Abstract
Knowledge of magnetic symmetry is vital for exploiting nontrivial surface states of magnetic topological materials. EuIn_{2}As_{2} is an excellent example, as it is predicted to have collinear antiferromagnetic order where the magnetic moment direction determines either a topologicalcrystallineinsulator phase supporting axion electrodynamics or a higherordertopologicalinsulator phase with chiral hinge states. Here, we use neutron diffraction, symmetry analysis, and density functional theory results to demonstrate that EuIn_{2}As_{2} actually exhibits lowsymmetry helical antiferromagnetic order which makes it a stoichiometric magnetic topologicalcrystalline axion insulator protected by the combination of a 180^{∘} rotation and timereversal symmetries: \({C}_{2}\times {\mathcal{T}}={2}^{\prime}\). Surfaces protected by \({2}^{\prime}\) are expected to have an exotic gapless Dirac cone which is unpinned to specific crystal momenta. All other surfaces have gapped Dirac cones and exhibit halfinteger quantum anomalous Hall conductivity. We predict that the direction of a modest applied magnetic field of μ_{0}H ≈ 1 to 2 T can tune between gapless and gapped surface states.
Introduction
Electrons attaining a nontrivial Berry phase due to symmetryprotected features in the electronicband structure^{1,2,3,4} and/or the presence of noncoplanar magnetic order^{5,6,7} can lead to astonishing topological physical properties such as dissipationless chiralcharge transport, quantum anomalous Hall (QAH) effect, and axion electrodynamics^{4,8}. Whereas topologicalcrystalline insulators (TCIs) are broadly defined as insulators with nontrivial topological properties protected by crystalline symmetry, magnetic TCIs offer the possibility of tuning topological properties via manipulating the magnetic order^{4}. Indeed, much theoretical effort is focused on predicting magnetic crystalline materials with nontrivial topological states by considering symmetries associated with the magnetic space groups (MSGs) describing their magnetic order^{9,10,11}. A database with predictions for nontrivial topological band structures based on MSG symmetries provides important guidance towards finding new magnetic topological materials using highthroughput ab initio studies^{11}. However, an often limiting bottleneck is detailed knowledge of a candidate’s intrinsic magnetic order, which is difficult to predict theoretically. Determining such order can be a subtle task requiring significant experimental effort.
QAH and axion insulators (AXIs) are particularly attractive topological states as the former manifests quantized Hall conductivity in the absence of an applied magnetic field, and the latter shares similarities with the axion particle in quantum chromodynamics^{12}. AXIs exhibit the topological magnetoelectric effect for which an applied electric field E induces a parallel magnetization M or a magnetic field H induces a parallel electric polarization^{4}. An AXI requires that the axion angle θ in the action of axion electrodynamics \({{S}_{\theta }}=\theta \frac{{e}^{2}}{4{\pi }^{2}}\int \,{\rm{d}}t\,{\rm{d}}^{3}r{\bf{E}}\cdot {\bf{B}}\) is θ = π, which leads to the presence of halfinteger QAHtype conductivity on insulating surfaces^{10,13}. Here, B = μ_{0}(H + M) is the magnetic induction, μ_{0} is the permeability of free space, and e is the electron charge. θ is quantized to zero or π in the presence of either timereversal \({\mathcal{T}}\) or inversion \({\mathcal{I}}\) symmetry, but also any other symmetry operation that reverses an odd number of space–time coordinates ^{14}.
Hexagonal EuIn_{2}As_{2} [space group P6_{3}/mmc (No. 194) with lattice parameters a = 4.178(3) Å and c = 17.75(2) Å] is a magnetic TCI built of alternating Eu and In_{2}As_{2} layers stacked along c as shown in Fig. 1c^{15,16}. The magnetic Eu^{2+} (spin \(S=\frac{7}{2}\)) layers undergo antiferromagnetic (AF) ordering at a Néel temperature of T_{N} ≈ 18 K^{17} which density functional theory (DFT) calculations predict to be Atype^{18}. Atype order is collinear, with the ordered Eu magnetic moments μ ferromagnetically aligning in each layer and the layers stacking AF along c. Theory predicts that depending on the orientation of μ, the Atype order leads to an AXI that is either a TCI with some gapless surfaces or a higherorder topological insulator with chiralhinge states^{17,18}. Attractively, the ordered Eu moments may influence topological fermions in In_{2}As_{2} layers, providing a path for in situ control of band topology.
Below we detail our discovery of lowsymmetry brokenhelix magnetic order in EuIn_{2}As_{2} using singlecrystal neutron diffraction. We find that the brokenhelix order has \({2}^{\prime}\) symmetry elements along specific crystalline axes that lead to the emergence of an AXI in the absence of \({\mathcal{I}}\) and \({\mathcal{T}}\), both of which are broken by the magnetic ordering. The \({2}^{\prime}\) symmetry element denotes the product of a twofold rotation (C_{2}) and the \({\mathcal{T}}\) operation: \({2}^{\prime}={C}_{2}\times {\mathcal{T}}\). C_{2} rotates the lattice and the spins around the axis by π and \({\mathcal{T}}\) then reverses the direction of the spins. As shown in detail in Supplementary Figs. 16 and 17, the \({2}^{\prime}\) transformations leave the brokenhelix order invariant and protect gapless surface Dirac cones that are not pinned to timereversalinvariant momenta (TRIM). Surfaces not associated with a \({2}^{\prime}\) axis have gapped Dirac cones and exhibit halfinteger QAHtype conductivity. Our symmetry analyses and magnetization data predict that the surface states are highly tunable by a modest field of μ_{0}H ≈ 1 to 2 T which is strong enough to polarize the magnetic moments along its direction. This induces a gap and, depending on the field’s direction, creates new unpinned gapless states on previously gapped surfaces.
Results
Neutron diffraction determination of the AF order
Figure 1a shows neutron diffraction data for the (h0l) reciprocallattice plane taken below T_{N} ≈ 18 K at T = 6 K, and Fig. 1b shows data along the (00l) direction taken above and below T_{N} at 30 and 6 K. Nuclear Bragg peaks occur in Fig. 1b at l = 2n positions for both temperatures whereas magnetic Bragg peaks only appear in the 6 K data. Two AF propagation vectors define the locations of the magnetic Bragg peaks: (1) peaks at l = 2n ± τ_{1z} positions correspond to τ_{1} = (0, 0, τ_{1z}) with τ_{1z} = 0.303(1); (2) nuclearforbidden peaks at l = 2n + 1 positions in Fig. 1b correspond to τ_{2} = (0, 0, 1). [τ_{2} = (0, 0, 1) is equivalent to τ_{2} = (0, 0, 0) for P6_{3}/mmc. We use τ_{2} = (0, 0, 1) to facilitate presentation of the diffraction data.] Within the (h0l) reciprocallattice plane, magnetic Bragg peaks matching τ_{2} overlap with nuclear Bragg peaks with odd values of l when the conditions h = 3n + 1 or h = 3n + 2 (n = integer) are satisfied. The predicted Atype order would be consistent with magnetic Bragg peaks appearing only at positions corresponding to τ_{2}. However, the existence of additional magnetic Bragg peaks at τ_{1} reveals the presence of more complex helical or spindensitywave type (itinerant) AF order. Our measurements cannot distinguish between these two types of order, but our DFT calculations reveal that the Eu 4f bands are located well below the Fermi level which is more supportive of localmoment helical order.
Using magnetic symmetry analysis and singlecrystal refinements to our data from the TRIAX tripleaxis spectrometer and the CORELLI timeofflight spectrometer, we discover that EuIn_{2}As_{2} has the complex brokenhelix AF order illustrated in Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 5. It consists of ferromagnetically aligned layers with μ⊥c that are helically stacked along c. We find that the orthorhombic MSG \(C{2}^{\prime}{2}^{\prime}{2}_{1}\) (No. 20.33) describes the symmetry, but for continuity we refer to directions with respect to the hexagonal chemical unit cell. We find μ = 6.0(3)μ_{B}/Eu at T = 6 K, which is smaller than the expected value of 7.0μ_{B}/Eu and the saturation moment of μ_{sat} = 7.00(6)μ_{B} shown below and in Supplementary Fig. 11. We note that neutron diffraction studies of other Eu containing compounds report less than 7.0μ_{B}/Eu^{19,20}, and, as shown below, the ordered moment is still increasing with decreasing temperature below 6 K. Details of the corrections performed to account for the strong thermal neutron absorption of Eu are given in the “Methods” section and Supplementary Note 1.
To analyze the brokenhelix order, we assume a tripling of the chemical unit cell since \({\tau }_{z}=0.303(1)\approx \frac{1}{3}\) and the relatively small incommensurability results in maximum disagreement only at the 33rd Eu layer. Referring to Fig. 1d, we designate the two Eu crystallographic sites in \(C{2}^{\prime}{2}^{\prime}{2}_{1}\) as red and blue. This in turn indicates red and blue ferromagnetically aligned layers, and allows for defining the helix turn angles ϕ_{rr} and ϕ_{rb} between successive red–red and red–blue layers, respectively. The MSG symmetry dictates that ϕ_{rr} + 2ϕ_{rb} = 180^{∘} and constrains magnetic moments in the blue layers to lie along \([\bar{1}10]\). Our refinements find that ϕ_{rb} = 127(3)^{∘} at T = 6 K, and more details of the refinements are given in Supplementary Figs. 1–9 and Supplementary Tables 1–3.
We simulate in Fig. 2a the integrated intensities for representative magnetic Bragg peaks for different values of ϕ_{rb} using the determined MSG and μ⊥c. Magnetic Bragg peaks corresponding to τ_{2} disappear as ϕ_{rb} → 60^{∘} (pure 60^{∘}helix order), whereas magnetic Bragg peaks matching τ_{1} disappear as ϕ_{rb} → 180^{∘} (Atype order). We find that the pure 60^{∘}helix order can be described by the highersymmetry MSG \(P{6}_{1}{2}^{\prime}{2}^{\prime}\) (No. 178.159) and that the Atype order can be described by MSG \(C{m}^{\prime}{c}^{\prime}m\) (No. 63.462). The darker shaded area in Fig. 2a indicates the experimental value of ϕ_{rb} at T = 6 K.
Figure 2b, c reveals the temperature evolution of the AF order. Figure 2b displays the measured integrated intensities of the (2, 0, 2) ± τ_{1} and (2, 0, 1) magnetic Bragg peaks scaled to 1 at T = 6 K. The curves suggest that μ continues to increase with decreasing temperature below 6 K. Two transitions are evident: the incommensurate magnetic Bragg peaks corresponding to τ_{1} with \({\tau }_{1z}\approx \frac{1}{3}\) emerge at T_{N1} = 17.6(2) K and commensurate magnetic Bragg peaks corresponding to τ_{2} appear at T_{N2} = 16.2(1) K. These transitions also appear in the magnetic susceptibility, resistance, and ^{151}Eu Mössbauer data shown in Supplementary Fig. 10. Figure 2c displays the temperature dependence of τ_{1} which indicates that pure 60^{∘}helix order first emerges at T_{N1}, and τ_{1z} decreases upon cooling until T_{N2} where brokenhelix order emerges. This sequence follows the rightmost path in the groupsubgroup chart in Supplementary Fig. 18 which traces secondorder magnetic transitions from the paramagnetic state to pure 60^{∘}helix order to brokenhelix order.
The inset to Fig. 2b shows the evolution of the helix turn angle ϕ below T_{N1}. ϕ ≈ 60^{∘} at T_{N1} and slightly decreases upon cooling for T_{N2} < T < T_{N1}. The small change from 60^{∘} reflects the change in τ_{1z}. For T < T_{N2}, the brokenhelix order emerges and the inset to Fig. 2b plots ϕ = ϕ_{rb}, which is calculated from data shown in Supplementary Fig. 9. ϕ_{rb} rapidly increases immediately below T_{N2} and approaches ϕ_{rb} = 130^{∘} as T → 0 K. The temperature evolution of ϕ_{rb} below T_{N2}, while maintaining τ_{1z} = 0.303(1), agrees with the calculations in Fig. 2a showing that brokenhelix order persists over a range of ϕ_{rb}.
Density functional theory calculations and symmetry analyses
Having established and described the emergence of complex helical order, we now discuss and compare the impacts of brokenhelix, pure 60^{∘}helix, and Atype order on the electronicband structure and topology. First, similar to previous reports^{18}, our DFT calculations and symmetry analyses find that Atype order creates an AXI state with inverted bulk bands near Γ and an electronicband gap of ≈100 meV. Looking at the phase diagram in Fig. 2a, we realize that by adiabatic continuation the magnetic symmetry can be lowered away from the pure 60^{∘}helix or Atype ordered states by varying ϕ_{rb} while maintaining the constraints that ϕ_{rr} + 2ϕ_{rb} = 180^{∘} and ordered moments in the blue layers lie along \([\bar{1}10]\). For example, starting from Atype order, reducing ϕ_{rb} from 180^{∘} immediately breaks the mirror and \({\mathcal{I}}\) symmetries present in MSG \(C{m}^{\prime}{c}^{\prime}m\).
Using this adiabatic continuation approach, we find via DFT calculations that a full band gap persists for any value of ϕ_{rb}. Figure 3a shows a diagram of the Brillouin zone and Fig. 3b shows the calculated electronic bands for ϕ_{rb} = 130^{∘}. Figure 3c focuses on the gap region near Γ where band inversion is highlighted by green bars denoting As 4p_{z} orbital character, and Fig. 3d demonstrates that the inverted gap remains for pure 60^{∘}helix order. Supplementary Figure 15 shows that this result holds for other values of ϕ_{rb} spanning 180^{∘} ≤ ϕ_{rb} ≤ 60^{∘}. Thus, the inverted gap remains across all three magnetic orders connected by the internal parameter ϕ_{rb} and indicates that the topological phase is robust to changes to ϕ_{rb}. In contrast, we find that bands cross the Fermi level for the case of ferromagnetic order as shown in Supplementary Fig. 15. This opens the possibility of controlling the band structure by applying a magnetic field strong enough to align μ along a single direction. This point is discussed further below.
Discussion
With these results in hand, we now address why EuIn_{2}As_{2} is an AXI in its magneticallyordered phases despite the absence of \({\mathcal{I}}\). We determine θ = π in S_{θ} for the brokenhelix order by finding that θ = π in the presence of \({\mathcal{I}}\) for ϕ_{rb} = 180^{∘} (Atype order) via calculating the paritybased symmetry indicator \({{\mathbb{Z}}}_{4}=\frac{1}{2}{\sum }_{k\in \text{TRIMs}}({n}_{k}^{+}{n}_{k}^{})\ \,\text{mod}\,\ 4=2\)^{10,11,18,21}. Here, \({n}_{k}^{\pm }\ge 0\) denotes the total number of filled bands with parity eigenvalue ± 1 at TRIM k. Since the band gap remains for 60^{∘} ≤ ϕ_{rb} ≤ 180^{∘}, adiabatic continuity ensures that θ = π for all three magnetic structures, and, remarkably, the entire family of Atype, broken, and pure 60^{∘}helix states are AXIs as long as the Fermi energy resides in the band gap. It is the \({2}^{\prime}\) symmetry operator along [110] and \([\bar{1}10]\) for the brokenhelix order and along [110] and [100] for the pure 60^{∘}helix order that permits an AXI in the absence of \({\mathcal{I}}\)^{14}.
The presence of \({2}^{\prime}\) symmetry axes for the brokenhelix order enforces an odd number of gapless unpinned surface Dirac cones on the \((\bar{1}10)\) and (110) surfaces. More specifically, the unpinned gapless Dirac cones occur on surfaces perpendicular to the \({2}^{\prime}\) axes. These exotic topological surface states appear in the presence of \({2}^{\prime}\) because it reverses an odd number of space–time coordinates^{14}. Figure 3e, f shows the surface band structure for (110) wherein a gapless Dirac cone is seen which is offset from \(\bar{{{\Gamma }}}\) along \(\bar{{{\Gamma }}}\)–\(\bar{{\rm{X}}}\). This result contrasts with the gapped Dirac cone at \(\bar{{{\Gamma }}}\) on the (001) surface shown in Fig. 3g. For the case of no magnetic order, Fig. 3h shows a gapless Dirac cone on the (001) surface pinned to \(\bar{{{\Gamma }}}\). These calculations did not include the Eu 4f orbitals. We find that \({{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}=1\), which signals a strong topological insulator, rather than an AXI phase, for the nonmagnetic state.
The AXI state protected by \({2}^{\prime}\) symmetry is different from the AXI phase protected by a combination of \({\mathcal{T}}\) and a translation recently proposed for MnBi_{2}Te_{4} (ref. ^{22}). In MnBi_{2}Te_{4}, this symmetry is only unbroken on surfaces that contain the translation vector, where it leads to gapless Dirac cones that are pinned to TRIM. The Dirac cones are gapped on all other surfaces. In contrast, in EuIn_{2}As_{2} the AXI state is protected by \({2}^{\prime}\) symmetry, leading to unpinned Dirac surface states whenever the \({2}^{\prime}\) axis is normal to the surface and gapped surface states appear on all other surfaces.
The different topological surface states resulting from the presence or absence of \({2}^{\prime}\) symmetry leads to differing physical properties. To facilitate this discussion, Fig. 4a shows the relationships between realspace and reciprocallattice directions, and the direction(s) of the \({2}^{\prime}\) axis/axes are listed in Fig. 4c for various magnetic states. For the brokenhelix order, (001) and other gapped surfaces without a \({2}^{\prime}\) axis exhibit halfinteger QAHtype conductivity^{4}. On the other hand, similar to a 3D topological insulator, the gapless surface Dirac cones on (110) and \((\bar{1}10)\) support dissipationless charge transport where sweeping E_{F} through the Dirac point switches the handedness of the chirality associated with the itinerant charge. Similar analyses of the surface states can be performed for the pure 60^{∘}helix and Atype order phases. In particular, Fig. 4c shows that the pure 60^{∘}helix phase supports multiple surfaces with an unpinned gapless Dirac cone. The consequences of the gapless Dirac cones being exotically unpinned from TRIM, which require abscence of Kramer’s degeneracy, however, lacks investigation.
Figure 4c also illustrates that the surface states are highly tunable by an external magnetic field, and Fig. 4b shows that modest field strengths of μ_{0}H ≈ 1–2 T are sufficient to polarize the Eu magnetic moments along any direction at T = 5 K. For example, the row in Fig. 4c corresponding to brokenhelix order indicates that a gapless completely unpinned Dirac cone exists only on the \((\bar{1}10)\) and (110) surfaces, and, therefore, all of the other surfaces have a gapped Dirac cone. For a fieldpolarized state with μ∥[100], Fig. 4c indicates that only the (010) surface has a gapless surface Dirac cone and its node is constrained to lie along \(\bar{{{\Gamma }}}\)\(\bar{{\rm{Z}}}\). Thus, a field provides an effective means for switching by inducing a gap in previously gapless surface states while eliminating the gap in previously gapped surface states. Further, the position of the node of the gapless Dirac cone can change from being completely unpinned to being constrained to a line. Figure 4c also highlights the direct correlation between the existence of a \({2}^{\prime}\) axis and gapless surface states. More details of our symmetry analyses are given in Supplementary Table 4 and in the associated discussion in Supplementary Note 5.
Finally, a true AXI state only occurs for insulating compounds, but resistance and angleresolvedelectronphotoemission data for EuIn_{2}As_{2} are consistent with it being a slightly holedoped compensated semimetal^{17,23}, see Supplementary Fig. 10c. Thus, E_{F} needs to be shifted into the bulk gap for an AXI to be observed. Fortunately, the robust quantization of θ = π with respect to changes of ϕ_{rb} suggests that small perturbations to the magnetic order potentially caused via tuning E_{F} will not destroy the symmetry leading to an AXI state. Further, the fact that τ_{1} is not exactly \(\frac{1}{3}\) does not invalidate our analysis, because the slight incommensurability should enter into the calculation of θ as only a small perturbation. Investigations into growing thin films may permit gating or strain to shift the chemical potential, and growth of films on magnetic substrates may allow for simultaneous gating while facilitating magneticfield control of the topological surface states.
To conclude, we have established that complex helical magnetic order emerges in EuIn_{2}As_{2} upon cooling below T_{N1} = 17.6(2) K (pure 60^{∘}helix order) and T_{N2} = 16.2(1) K (brokenhelix order). Both of these helical orders create \({2}^{\prime}\) symmetry axes that protect an AXI state in the absence of \({\mathcal{I}}\). Our DFT calculations and symmetry analyses show that the band topology is robust to changes of the helical turn angles, such that the magnetic order can change from Atype, to brokenhelix, to pure 60^{∘}helix order while maintaining the same topological phase. We further find that the existence of \({2}^{\prime}\) symmetry axes protects gapless Dirac cones on specific surfaces which are unpinned from TRIM and that the other surfaces possess gapped Dirac cones and exhibit QAHtype conductivity. Our magnetization results show that only a moderate magnetic field of μ_{0}H ≈ 1–2 T is necessary for tuning the direction of the magnetic moment, which our symmetry analyses show can choose the surfaces supporting gapless unpinned Dirac cones. This opens up the possibility for novel device development as well as further research into the physical properties associated with unpinned surface Dirac cones. For example, experiments exploring if these exotic surface states can be moved in the surfaceBrillouin zone via pressure or strain may yield insight into basic material interactions and reveal unexpected properties. The intrinsic lowsymmetry brokenhelix magnetic order of EuIn_{2}As_{2} offers an excellent opportunity to study and tune exotic surface states in a magnetic TCI.
Methods
Sample synthesis
Single crystals of EuIn_{2}As_{2} were grown using a flux method similar to ref. ^{15} and found to be single phase via powder Xray diffraction. An initial composition of Eu:In:As = 3:36:9 was weighed out and packed in fritted alumina crucibles^{24}, followed by sealing in a fused silica tube. The prepared ampoule was first heated up to 300 ^{∘}C over 2 h and held there for an hour, then heated up to 580 ^{∘}C over 3 h and held there for 2 h, and finally heated up to 900 ^{∘}C over 10 h followed by a 2h dwell. The intermediate dwells were to ensure maximum dissolving and incorporation of the volatile elements into the melt. The final dwell was followed by a 48h cool down to 770 ^{∘}C, at which point excess flux was decanted using a centrifuge. This process yielded platelike crystals of EuIn_{2}As_{2} with masses of a few milligrams.
Magnetization experiments
Magnetization measurements were made on singlecrystal samples down to T = 2 K under applied magnetic fields up to μ_{0}H = 5 T using a Quantum Design, Inc. Superconducting Quantum Interference Device.
Neutron diffraction experiments
Neutron diffraction measurements were made on the TRIAX tripleaxis spectrometer at the University of Missouri Research Reactor, and on the timeofflight (TOF) CORELLI spectrometer at the Spallation Neutron Source at Oak Ridge National laboratory^{25}. Singlecrystal samples with masses of 4.5 and 11.6 mg were used on TRIAX and CORELLI, respectively. The samples were attached to Al sample mounts and cooled down to T = 6 K using closedcycle He refrigerators. The integrated intensities of recorded Bragg peaks were corrected for the effects of neutron absorption using the MAG2POL^{26} software according to the procedure described in ref. ^{27}. The samples were flat rectangular plates with thicknesses of 0.1 mm along [001]. The TRIAX sample has an approximate width of 3 mm along [100] and approximate length of 2 mm along [010]. The CORELLI sample has an approximate width of 3 mm along [110] and approximate length of 3 mm along \([1\bar{1}0]\).
The TRIAX experiments were performed in elastic mode with incident and final neutron energies of E_{i,f} = 14.7 and 30.5 meV. Söller slit collimators with divergences of \(6{0}^{\prime}\)\(6{0}^{\prime}\)\(8{0}^{\prime}\)\(8{0}^{\prime}\) were inserted before the pyrolytic graphite (PG) (002) monochromator, between the monochromator and sample, between the sample and PG (002) analyzer, and between the analyzer and detector, respectively. PG filters were inserted before and after the sample to eliminate higherorder beam harmonics. The sample’s (h0l) reciprocallattice plane was aligned within the horizontal scattering plane. In order to collect data for purely nuclear and magnetic Bragg peaks, a series of (h0l) reflections were recorded at T = 30 and 6 K, i.e. significantly above T_{N1} and below T_{N2}, respectively. Each Bragg peak was fitted with a Gaussian lineshape in order to determine its integrated intensity (area), center, and fullwidth at halfmaximum. The magnetic signals of the lowtemperature τ_{2} Bragg peaks were then extracted by subtracting the integrated intensity of the 30 K nuclear contribution when appropriate. A Lorentz factor (\(L=\frac{1}{\sin 2\theta }\)) was also applied. Refinements were made with FULLPROF^{28}. Throughout this work, error bars represent one standard deviation.
CORELLI experiments were performed at several temperatures above and below T_{N1} and T_{N2} with the (h0l) plane set horizontal. However, the spectrometer employs 2D positionsensitive detectors which allow for recording some Bragg peaks above and below this plane. The TOF measurement technique employs a white neutron beam, and the sample was rotated around its vertical axis at discrete intervals in order to cover a large swath of reciprocal space. Individual Bragg peaks were obtained by performing cuts through the 2D maps recorded by the instrument, returning intensity versus Q profiles of the peaks. Integrated intensities were in turn calculated by adding up all of the data points located in the peak profile that were above background. To account for the pulsed beam’s nonlinear distribution of wavelengths, a normalization to vanadium scattering was applied. CORELLI data used for the structural and magnetic refinements presented in Supplementary Note 1 are restricted to a bandwidth of incoming neutron energies of 45–55 meV in order to accurately correct for neutron absorption.
Electronicband structure calculations
Band structures using DFT with spin–orbit coupling were calculated with the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof exchangecorrelation functional, a planewave basis set, and the projectedaugmentedwave method as implemented in VASP^{29,30}. To account for the halffilled stronglylocalized Eu 4f orbitals, a Hubbardlike^{31}U value of 5.0 eV is used. For different helical magnetic structure with τ ≈ (0, 0, 1/3), i.e. the hexagonal unit cell is tripled along the caxis with atoms fixed in their bulk positions. A MonkhorstPack 12 × 12 × 1 kpoint mesh with a Gaussian smearing of 0.05 eV including the Γ point and a kineticenergy cutoff of 250 eV have been used. To search for possible band gap closing points in the full Brillouin Zone, a tightbinding model based on maximally localized Wannier functions^{32} was constructed to reproduce closely the bulk band structure including spin–orbit coupling in the range of E_{F} ± 1 eV with Eu sdf, In sp, and As p orbitals as implemented in WannierTools^{33}.
Data availability
The neutron scattering data that support our analysis of the ground state magnetic order in the EuIn_{2}As_{2} are displayed in the Supplementary Note 1 and/or available in the MDF Open data repository with the identifiers https://doi.org/10.18126/u3j8aplr and https://doi.org/10.18126/u3j8aplr.
References
Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010).
Yan, B. & Felser, C. Topological materials: Weyl semimetals. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 8, 337–354 (2017).
Armitage, N. P., Mele, E. J. & Vishwanath, A. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in threedimensional solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018).
Vanderbilt, D. Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2018).
Ye, J. et al. Berry phase theory of the anomalous Hall effect: application to colossal magnetoresistance manganites. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3737–3740 (1999).
Taguchi, Y., Oohara, Y., Yoshizawa, H., Nagaosa, N. & Tokura, Y. Spin chirality, berry phase, and anomalous Hall effect in a frustrated ferromagnets. Science 291, 2573–2576 (2001).
Ueland, B. G. et al. Controllable chiralityinduced geometrical Hall effect in a frustrated highly correlated metal. Nat. Commun. 3, 1067 (2012).
Rui, Y. et al. Quantized anomalous Hall effect in magnetic topological insulators. Science 329, 61–64 (2010).
Wan, X., Turner, A. M., Vishwanath, A. & Savrasov, S. Y. Topological semimetal and Fermiarc surface states in the electronic structure of pyrochlore iridates. Phys. Rev. B 83, 205101 (2011).
Turner, A. M., Zhang, Y., Mong, R. S. K. & Vishwanath, A. Quantized response and topology of magnetic insulators with inversion symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 85, 165120 (2012).
Watanabe, H., Po, H. C. & Vishwanath, A. Structure and topology of band structures in the 1651 magnetic space groups. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat8685 (2018).
Wilczek, F. Two applications of axion electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1799–1802 (1987).
Qi, X.L., Hughes, T. L. & Zhang, S.C. Topological field theory of timereversal invariant insulators. Phys. Rev. B 78, 195424 (2008).
Fang, C. & Fu, L. New classes of threedimensional topological crystalline insulators: nonsymmorphic and magnetic. Phys. Rev. B 91, 161105 (2015).
Goforth, A. M., Klavins, P., Fettinger, J. C. & Kauzlarich, S. M. Magnetic properties and negative colossal magnetoresistance of the rare earth zintl phase EuIn_{2}As_{2}. Inorg. Chem. 47, 11048–11056 (2008).
Rosa, P. F. S. et al. Electron spin resonance of the intermetallic antiferromagnet EuIn_{2}As_{2}. Phys. Rev. B 86, 094408 (2012).
Zhang, Y. et al. Inplane antiferromagnetic moments and magnetic polaron in the axion topological insulator candidate EuIn_{2}As_{2}. Phys. Rev. B 101, 205126 (2020).
Xu, Y., Song, Z., Wang, Z., Weng, H. & Dai, X. Higherorder topology of the axion insulator EuIn_{2}As_{2}. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 256402 (2019).
Gong, D. et al. Canted Eu magnetic structure in EuMnSb_{2}. Phys. Rev. B 101, 224422 (2020).
Chattopadhyay, T., Schnering, H. G. & Brown, P. J. Neutron diffraction study of the magnetic ordering in EuAs_{3}. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 28, 247–249 (1982).
Khalaf, E., Po, H. C., Vishwanath, A. & Watanabe, H. Symmetry indicators and anomalous surface states of topological crystalline insulators. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031070 (2018).
Zhang, D. et al. Topological axion states in the magnetic insulator MnBi_{2}Te_{4} with the quantized magnetoelectric effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 206401 (2019).
Regmi, S. et al. Temperaturedependent electronic structure in a higherorder topological insulator candidate EuIn_{2}As_{2}. Phys. Rev. B 102, 165153 (2020).
Canfield, P. C., Kong, T., Kaluarachchi, U. S. & Jo, N. H. Use of fritdisc crucibles for routine and exploratory solution growth of single crystalline samples. Philos. Mag. 96, 84–92 (2016).
Ye, F., Liu, Y., Whitfield, R., Osborn, R. & Rosenkranz, S. Implementation of cross correlation for energy discrimination on the timeofflight spectrometer CORELLI. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 51, 315–322 (2018).
Qureshi, N. Mag2Pol: A program for the analysis of spherical neutron polarimetry, flipping ratio and integrated intensity data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 52, 175–185 (2019).
Busing, W. R. & Levy, H. A. Highspeed computation of the absorption correction for singlecrystal diffraction measurements. Acta Crystallogr. 10, 180–182 (1957).
RodríguezCarvajal, J. Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction. Phys. B Condens. Matter 192, 55–69 (1993).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for abinitio totalenergy calculations using a planewave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of abinitio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a planewave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).
Dudarev, S. L., Botton, G. A., Savrasov, S. Y., Humphreys, C. J. & Sutton, A. P. Electronenergyloss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA.U study. Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505–1509 (1998).
Marzari, N., Mostofi, A. A., Yates, J. R., Souza, I. & Vanderbilt, D. Maximally localized Wannier functions: theory and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1419–1475 (2012).
Wu, Q., Zhang, S., Song, H.F., Troyer, M. & Soluyanov, A. A. WannierTools: an opensource software package for novel topological materials. Comput. Phys. Commun. 224, 405–416 (2018).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Center for Advancement of Topological Semimetals, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, through the Ames Laboratory under Contract No. DEAC0207CH11358. D.C.J., S.L.B., and A.K. were supported by U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Field Work Proposals at the Ames Laboratory operated under the same contract number. This research used resources at the Spallation Neutron Source, a DOE Office of Science User Facility operated by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. This research used resources at the Missouri University Research Reactor. Financial support for this work was provided by Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies. Much of this work was carried out while D.H.R. was on sabbatical at Iowa State University and Ames Laboratory, and their generous support under the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences Contract No. DEAC0207CH11358 during this visit is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.X.M.R., B.G.U., R.J.M., T.W.H., and F.Y. conducted neutron scattering experiments. S.X.M.R. refined the neutron diffraction data and determined the magnetic structure with input from A.K., B.G.U., D.C.J., and R.J.M. B.K., S.L.B., and P.C.C. synthesized crystals and performed magnetization and resistance measurements. D.H.R. performed Mössbauer measurements. T.V.T., P.P.O., L.L.W., and A.V. performed symmetry analyses concerning the topologically protected properties. L.L.W. performed electronicbandstructure calculations.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Riberolles, S.X.M., Trevisan, T.V., Kuthanazhi, B. et al. Magnetic crystallinesymmetryprotected axion electrodynamics and fieldtunable unpinned Dirac cones in EuIn_{2}As_{2}. Nat Commun 12, 999 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s4146702121154y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s4146702121154y
This article is cited by

Canted antiferromagnetic order in EuZn2As2 single crystals
Scientific Reports (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.