IL-22-dependent dysbiosis and mononuclear phagocyte depletion contribute to steroid-resistant gut graft-versus-host disease in mice

Efforts to improve the prognosis of steroid-resistant gut acute graft-versus-host-disease (SR-Gut-aGVHD) have suffered from poor understanding of its pathogenesis. Here we show that the pathogenesis of SR-Gut-aGVHD is associated with reduction of IFN-γ+ Th/Tc1 cells and preferential expansion of IL-17−IL-22+ Th/Tc22 cells. The IL-22 from Th/Tc22 cells causes dysbiosis in a Reg3γ-dependent manner. Transplantation of IFN-γ-deficient donor CD8+ T cells in the absence of CD4+ T cells produces a phenocopy of SR-Gut-aGVHD. IFN-γ deficiency in donor CD8+ T cells also leads to a PD-1-dependent depletion of intestinal protective CX3CR1hi mononuclear phagocytes (MNP), which also augments expansion of Tc22 cells. Supporting the dual regulation, simultaneous dysbiosis induction and depletion of CX3CR1hi MNP results in full-blown Gut-aGVHD. Our results thus provide insights into SR-Gut-aGVHD pathogenesis and suggest the potential efficacy of IL-22 antagonists and IFN-γ agonists in SR-Gut-aGVHD therapy.


Statistics
For all statistical analyses, confirm that the following items are present in the figure legend, table legend, main text, or Methods section.

n/a Confirmed
The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as a discrete number and unit of measurement A statement on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one-or two-sided Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.
A description of all covariates tested A description of any assumptions or corrections, such as tests of normality and adjustment for multiple comparisons A full description of the statistical parameters including central tendency (e.g. means) or other basic estimates (e.g. regression coefficient) AND variation (e.g. standard deviation) or associated estimates of uncertainty (e.g. confidence intervals) For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g. F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of freedom and P value noted Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.

For Bayesian analysis, information on the choice of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings
For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of outcomes Estimates of effect sizes (e.g. Cohen's d, Pearson's r), indicating how they were calculated Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.

Software and code
Policy information about availability of computer code Data collection

Data analysis
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or software that are central to the research but not yet described in published literature, software must be made available to editors/reviewers. We strongly encourage code deposition in a community repository (e.g. GitHub). See the Nature Research guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.

Data
Policy information about availability of data All manuscripts must include a data availability statement. This statement should provide the following information, where applicable: -Accession codes, unique identifiers, or web links for publicly available datasets -A list of figures that have associated raw data -A description of any restrictions on data availability Field-specific reporting Please select the one below that is the best fit for your research. If you are not sure, read the appropriate sections before making your selection.

Life sciences Behavioural & social sciences Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences
For a reference copy of the document with all sections, see nature.com/documents/nr-reporting-summary-flat.pdf

Life sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative. We do not exclude data after protocol is established and optimized. On principle, data were only excluded for the technically failed experiments during exploring stage.
Experiments were repeated. Our data represent at least two to three independent experiments with similar results.
For animal study, all the animals were randomly divided into different group for experiments. For human PBMC samples, samples were randomly collected.
Investigators were blinded for disease scoring. The investigators were not blinded for cell harvest or processing due to the risk of confusion in handling. The investigator was blinded during acquisition and analysis of flow cytometry, and the same gating were applied to all samples in the given experiment, although the whole process was completed by the same person.