Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Charged particle guiding and beam splitting with auto-ponderomotive potentials on a chip

## Abstract

Electron and ion beams are indispensable tools in numerous fields of science and technology, ranging from radiation therapy to microscopy and lithography. Advanced beam control facilitates new functionalities. Here, we report the guiding and splitting of charged particle beams using ponderomotive forces created by the motion of charged particles through electrostatic optics printed on planar substrates. Shape and strength of the potential can be locally tailored by the lithographically produced electrodes’ layout and the applied voltages, enabling the control of charged particle beams within precisely engineered effective potentials. We demonstrate guiding of electrons and ions for a large range of energies (from 20 to 5000 eV) and masses (from 5 · 10−4 to 131 atomic mass units) as well as electron beam splitting for energies up to the keV regime as a proof-of-concept for more complex beam manipulation.

## Introduction

Since the postulation of the wave-like nature of matter1 and the formulation of the theory of quantum mechanics in subsequent years, experiments with free electrons showed fundamental concepts, such as like matter-wave (electron) interference2, the Aharanov–Bohm effect3,4, and antibunching through Hanbury Brown–Twiss experiment5. Furthermore, the invention of ion traps6, which allowed a previously unseen control over the external degrees of freedom of electrons, enabled high-precision measurements of the electrons mass7 and the magnetic moment8,9. For quantum information processing, planar chip-based ion traps have become a promising technology, as state-of-the art manufacturing techniques used in semiconductor and printed circuit board technology can be used to create miniaturized traps with many micro-structured electrodes10,11,12,13,14,15. Similarly, electromagnetic potentials customized in this way have been used in quantum manipulation experiments with neutral atoms in magnetic chip traps15. Even though guiding and splitting of an electron beam by the effective time-independent (ponderomotive) force created by the microwave field have been demonstrated to work for very low electron energies (<5 eV)16,17,18, quantum mechanical experiments like the coupling of a free electron wave packet into the ground state of the transverse quantum state of the ponderomotive potential or the coherence of the microwave-based beam splitting have yet to be shown. One reason is that, in order for the energy separation of the quantum states of the transverse potential to be large enough to ensure adiabaticity, the driving microwave signal needs to have a frequency in the tens of gigahertz and a power far beyond 100 W to get a trap frequency high enough. This is difficult to realize as heating, propagation of different modes, and impedance matching must be considered16,17.

In the following, we describe the electrostatic counterparts of planar electrodynamic microwave traps and beam splitters that dramatically expand the range of trapping parameters, while maintaining the same physical (but not technical) operation principle. These devices can simultaneously confine charged particles with vastly different masses in highly customizable potential landscapes. Further miniaturization can lead to the realization of an electron interferometer based on the ponderomotive guiding and splitting potential. Importantly, the applicable electron energies for these structures are high enough that they can be used in combination with a standard electron microscope, as demonstrated in the electron beam splitting experiment below.

Like in undulators in particle accelerators19 and similarly in charged particle optics20,21,22, a charged particle beam with well-defined forward velocity is created and injected into a structure consisting of segmented electrodes with spatially alternating direct current (DC) voltages, as illustrated in Fig. 1. The electrostatic potential is transformed into an alternating potential in the rest frame of the moving particles and, thus, the particles are subjected to the same restoring transverse force as they are in a conventional linear Paul trap with alternating current (AC) voltages on non-segmented electrodes. Since the driving frequency generating this ponderomotive force originates from the particles’ forward velocity, we call these devices here “auto-ponderomotive” to distinguish them from their electrodynamic counterparts. Like in a linear Paul trap6, the stability of the trajectories of the charged particles is described by the two well-known dimensionless stability parameters α and q. For nonrelativistic particles, these parameters depend only on the amplitude of the applied voltages, the particle acceleration voltage UA, and the guide’s geometry. Yet, in stark contrast to electrodynamic traps, the stability parameters are independent of the charge-to-mass ratio (see Supplementary Note 4). In the following, we present two auto-ponderomotive structures, one to show guiding over a curved path and another one for beam splitting, and discuss their potential applications in future quantum mechanical experiments based on their superior performance compared to the above mentioned planar microwave structures.

## Results and discussion

Figure 2 shows the design of a guiding structure and the simulation of the auto-ponderomotive potential Ψ. Eighty-four electrodes are printed on each of the two chips and define an S-curve with a radius of curvature of RK = 0.535 m, such that the output of the guide is laterally displaced by 5.8 mm with respect to its input. Static voltages +UDC (blue) and −UDC (red) are applied on the electrodes forming a system of quadrupole lenses with spatially periodic polarity (period length LP = 5.6 mm). This guide represents the electrostatic equivalent to the curved version of a conventional linear Paul trap with just an alternating potential applied (α = 0)16. The stability is therefore only determined by the parameter $$q = \frac{{\eta L_{\mathrm{P}}^2 U_{{\mathrm{DC}}}}}{{2{\uppi}^2 R^2 |U_{\mathrm{A}}|}}$$ (see Supplementary Note 4 and 5). The geometric factor η = 0.61 accounts for deviations from the ideal hyperbolic electrode geometry and from the perfectly sinusoidal form of the electric field23. R = 0.5 mm is the distance from the ponderomotive potential minimum to the chip surface.

To characterize the guiding stability, we measure the number of guided particles for a range of particle beam energies and electrode voltages. For this, a compact system consisting of a tungsten needle tip, extractor, four deflectors, and two grounded apertures was used as a source of charged particles (see Supplementary Note 1). This enables electron field emission24, as well as the generation of an ion beam from background gas25 depending on the polarity of the applied acceleration voltage UA. The charged particle beams are unguided when the electrodes are grounded, as shown in the detector images for electrons in Fig. 3a and for helium ions in Fig. 3b. When voltages are applied to the electrodes, guiding is observed for electrons (Fig. 3c), as well as helium ions (Fig. 3d), evidenced by a shifted detector signal at the expected guide exit position. In contrast to the unguided beams, the position of the guided beams on the detector remains unchanged even when magnets (~1 mT) are brought close to the vacuum chamber.

For each UA, the applied UDC was scanned from 0 to 1 kV. We observe guiding for a large energy range from 20 to 4000 eV for electrons (Fig. 3e, f) and from 800 to 5000 eV for helium ions (Fig. 3g). Even though there are five orders of magnitude difference in the masses, guiding is observed for the same ratios of the applied voltages $$U_{{\mathrm{DC}}}/\left| {U_{\mathrm{A}}} \right|$$, corresponding to q values between 0.4 and 0.9. The lower border in q is due to the curvature of the guide. Since the restoring force of this potential depends on q, a finite value of q ≥ 0.39 is needed to compensate the centrifugal force resulting from the curves (see the Supplementary Note 6), matching perfectly the experimentally observed minimum $$q \cong 0.4$$. The upper border corresponds similarly well to the maximum q value of 0.91 in the first stability region of linear Paul traps6. The measurement was repeated for other noble gas ions (neon, argon, krypton, and xenon) yielding similar results (displayed in the Supplementary Fig. 4). For comparison with radio frequency Paul traps, the corresponding driving frequencies and AC powers for an impedance of 50 Ω $$\left( {P_{{\mathrm{AC}}} = 0.5 U_{{\mathrm{DC}}}^2/50\;{\mathrm{{\Omega}}}} \right)$$ are given on the secondary axes in Fig. 3c, e. Using electrons, the auto-ponderomotive design easily generates an apparent alternating field with driving frequencies in the gigahertz range with tens of kilowatts of AC power, which is virtually impossible to feed or maintain on an electrodynamic chip for thermal load reasons16,17. As the stability parameters are independent of the geometrical size, a miniaturized version of the guide will work in the same way and can readily be fabricated on the micrometer scale by lithography. This will lead to higher driving and trap frequencies, for example, using an electron beam with an energy E of E = 1 keV, a period length LP of LP = 56 µm and UDC = 100 V results in a driving frequency of Ω = 2$$\pi \sqrt {2E/M_{\mathrm{e}}} /L_{\mathrm{P}}$$ = 2π × 0.33 THz and trap frequency of $$\omega$$ = $$q {\it{{\varOmega}}}/\sqrt 8$$ = 2π × 46 GHz (with Me the electron mass). As the quantum ground state of the transverse guiding potential is described by Heisenberg limited Gaussian profiles in position and momentum space16, a Gaussian electron beam in free space perfectly matching the ground state of the guided electrons in its focus will allow for perfect mode-matching (e.g., for electrons with a longitudinal energy of 1 keV, a beam with a width of Δx = $$\sqrt {\hbar /2M_{\mathrm{e}}\omega }$$ = 14 nm at the focus and an opening angle α = $$\sqrt {\hbar \omega /E}$$ of α = 0.4 mrad would be required, which is straightforward to achieve). However, realistic electron beams have an energy width ΔE and non-round (e.g., quadrupole) lenses are known to have negative lens aberrations26, which is why multipole fields can be used to correct the positive lens aberration of round lenses22,26. The energy spread ΔE will cause an energy dependent spread of electron trajectories (chromatic dispersion/aberration). As the trap frequency $$\omega$$ depends on the forward velocity, the profiles of quantum ground state in position and momentum space will vary as well, leading to a lower number of electron in their transverse ground state if the relative energy width ΔE/E is not sufficiently small. Alternatively, the curve of the guide can be utilized as an energy and mode filter, representing a quantum state-selective element by operating the guide at the minimum q value for the slowest electrons, and using the centrifugal force to filter out faster electrons and higher-lying states.

The next important goal will be to coherently split the ground state of the guided electrons similar to the Y junctions that have been envisioned for ions shuttled in surface-electrode ion traps11. Based on the microwave chip-based beam splitter for slow (<200 eV) electrons27, we now show the auto-ponderomotive version of an electron beam splitter, which works for electron energies up to 800 eV. The design is shown in Fig. 4a. Here, the electrode layout of each chip consists of 270 electrodes forming three rows. Electrostatic voltages +UDC (blue) and −UDC (red) are applied, forming a system of multipolar lenses with spatially periodic polarity with a period length LP = 2.4 mm. Moving along z, the width of the central electrodes widens. This splits the initial central minimum of the ponderomotive potential into two minima, separated by 2.3 mm (see Fig. 4b–d).

A charged particle beam fed into the single central minimum at the structure input splits transversely into two beams following smoothly the auto-ponderomotive potential. This is shown in Fig. 4f for an electron beam (Philips XL30 SEM) with an energy of 800 eV as two distinct beam spots (unguided beam displayed in Fig. 4e). For other electron energies, the voltage UDC has to be changed accordingly to maintain the same beam splitting and is only limited by sparking. (A more detailed investigation of the beam splitter will be subject to forthcoming work.) Based on prior quantum mechanical simulations18, such a beam splitter miniaturized to the micrometer scale should enable interferometry with guided electrons: by tailoring a smooth transition from a double-well potential to a single minimum back to a double-well potential, and by coupling electrons into the ground state of one arm of the beam splitter, the initial state evolves adiabatically in the ground state of the double-well potential and electrons leave the two output arms of the splitter as two Gaussian output beams separated by only a few µm. As shown recently28,29, the vicinity of the metal electrodes should not have any considerable detrimental effects on the coherence of the two output beams. Using the same optical elements like in conventional electron biprism experiments2 and a single-atom tip as a fully coherent electron source30, both output beams can be shifted longitudinally to restore potentially lost longitudinal coherence31, and be recombined, creating interference stripes, which can be made visible on a detector by magnification. Since the relative energy spread of the single-atom sources is very small32 at a beam energy E of E = 1 keV, the spread in the trap frequency is negligible ($${\mathrm{{\Delta}}}\omega /\omega$$ = $${\mathrm{{\Delta}}}E/2E$$) and most electrons can be efficiently injected into their ground state by the direct injection scheme explained above. It should be noted that this beam splitter would act as an amplitude beam splitter for electrons18, i.e., the electron-optical analog of a semitransparent mirror for photons, and could enable experiments like interaction-free measurement with electrons33. This measurement scheme could be important for electron microscopy, as it is proposed to be used to generate images of beam-sensitive specimens with substantially reduced damage34.

Therefore, the here presented devices are not just technically less demanding and more potent alternatives to previously shown planar microwave structures, whose miniaturized version are producible with existing lithographic techniques, they may also herald future experiments entering the frequency range bridging the gap between microwave and optical frequencies, for which ponderomotive forces have been utilized35,36,37,38, and by that open up an arena for quantum optics experiments and state-selective applications39 with free electrons.

## Data availability

The raw data, i.e., the recorded detector images, that support the findings of this study are available in Zenodo with the identifier “https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4160787”.

## Code availability

The code to reproduce the results is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

## References

1. 1.

de Broglie, L. Recherches sur la théorie des Quanta. Ann. Phys. 10, 22–128 (1925).

2. 2.

Hasselbach, F. Progress in electron-and ion-interferometry. Rep. Prog. Phys. 73, 016101 (2009).

3. 3.

Chambers, R. Shift of an electron interference pattern by enclosed magnetic flux. Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 3 (1960).

4. 4.

Tonomura, A. et al. Evidence for Aharonov-Bohm effect with magnetic field completely shielded from electron wave. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 792 (1986).

5. 5.

Kiesel, H., Renz, A. & Hasselbach, F. Observation of Hanbury Brown–Twiss anticorrelations for free electrons. Nature 418, 392–394 (2002).

6. 6.

Paul, W. Electromagnetic traps for charged and neutral particles. Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 531 (1990).

7. 7.

Farnham, D. L., Van Dyck Jr, R. S. & Schwinberg, P. B. Determination of the electron’s atomic mass and the proton/electron mass ratio via Penning trap mass spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3598 (1995).

8. 8.

Van Dyck Jr, R. S., Schwinberg, P. B. & Dehmelt, H. G. New high-precision comparison of electron and positron g factors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 26 (1987).

9. 9.

Hanneke, D., Fogwell, S. & Gabrielse, G. New measurement of the electron magnetic moment and the fine structure constant. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 120801 (2008).

10. 10.

Leibfried, D. et al. Creation of a six-atom ‘Schrödinger cat’ state. Nature 438, 639–642 (2005).

11. 11.

Amini, J. M. et al. Toward scalable ion traps for quantum information processing. N. J. Phys. 12, 033031 (2010).

12. 12.

Seidelin, S. et al. Microfabricated surface-electrode ion trap for scalable quantum information processing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 253003 (2006).

13. 13.

Brown, K. R. et al. Coupled quantized mechanical oscillators. Nature 471, 196–199 (2011).

14. 14.

Harlander, M., Lechner, R., Brownnutt, M., Blatt, R. & Hänsel, W. Trapped-ion antennae for the transmission of quantum information. Nature 471, 200–203 (2011).

15. 15.

Reichel, J. & Vuletic, V. Atom Chips (Wiley, Weinheim, 2011).

16. 16.

Hoffrogge, J., Fröhlich, R., Kasevich, M. A. & Hommelhoff, P. Microwave guiding of electrons on a chip. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 193001 (2011).

17. 17.

Hoffrogge, J. & Hommelhoff, P. Planar microwave structures for electron guiding. N. J. Phys. 13, 095012 (2011).

18. 18.

Hammer, J., Thomas, S., Weber, P. & Hommelhoff, P. Microwave chip-based beam splitter for low-energy guided electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 254801 (2015).

19. 19.

Courant, E. D., Livingston, M. S. & Snyder, H. S. The strong-focusing synchroton—a new high energy accelerator. Phys. Rev. 88, 1190 (1952).

20. 20.

Guan, S. & Marshall, A. G. Stacked-ring electrostatic ion guide. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 7, 101–106 (1996).

21. 21.

Allers, M., Schlottmann, F., Eckermann, M. & Zimmermann, S. Printed circuit board based segmented quadrupole ion guide. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 443, 32–40 (2019).

22. 22.

Maas, D. J., Henstra, S., Krijn, M. & Mentink, S. in Proc. Charged Particle Detection, Diagnostics, and Imaging Vol. 4510, 205–217 (International Society for Optics and Photonics, San Diego, CA, 2001).

23. 23.

Wesenberg, J. H. Electrostatics of surface-electrode ion traps. Phys. Rev. A 78, 063410 (2008).

24. 24.

Crewe, A., Eggenberger, D., Wall, J. & Welter, L. Electron gun using a field emission source. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 39, 576–583 (1968).

25. 25.

Müller, E. W. Field ionization and field ion microscopy. Adv. Electron. Electron Phys. 13, 83–179 (1960).

26. 26.

Scherzer, O. Über einige fehler von elektronenlinsen. Z. Phys. 101, 593–603 (1936).

27. 27.

Zimmermann, R., Weber, P., Seidling, M. & Hommelhoff, P. Beam splitting of low-energy guided electrons with a two-sided microwave chip. Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 104103 (2019).

28. 28.

Chen, Z. & Batelaan, H. Dephasing due to semi-conductor charging masks decoherence in electron-wall systems. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 129, 40004 (2020).

29. 29.

Kerker, N., Röpke, R., Steinert, L.-M., Pooch, A. & Stibor, A. Quantum decoherence by Coulomb interaction. N. J. Phys. 22, 063039 (2020).

30. 30.

Chang, C.-C., Kuo, H.-S., Hwang, S. & Tsong, T. T. A fully coherent electron beam from a noble-metal covered W (111) single-atom emitter. Nanotechnology 20, 115401 (2009).

31. 31.

Nicklaus, M. & Hasselbach, F. Wien filter: a wave-packet-shifting device for restoring longitudinal coherence in charged-matter-wave interferometers. Phys. Rev. A 48, 152 (1993).

32. 32.

Purcell, S., Binh, V. T. & Garcia, N. 64 meV measured energy dispersion from cold field emission nanotips. Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 436–438 (1995).

33. 33.

Putnam, W. P. & Yanik, M. F. Noninvasive electron microscopy with interaction-free quantum measurements. Phys. Rev. A 80, 040902 (2009).

34. 34.

Kruit, P. et al. Designs for a quantum electron microscope. Ultramicroscopy 164, 31–45 (2016).

35. 35.

Ashkin, A., Dziedzic, J. M., Bjorkholm, J. & Chu, S. Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles. Opt. Lett. 11, 288–290 (1986).

36. 36.

Bloch, I. Ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices. Nat. Phys. 1, 23–30 (2005).

37. 37.

L’Huillier, A. & Balcou, P. High-order harmonic generation in rare gases with a 1-ps 1053-nm laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 774 (1993).

38. 38.

Schwartz, O. et al. Laser phase plate for transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 16, 1016–1020 (2019).

39. 39.

Leibfried, D., Blatt, R., Monroe, C. & Wineland, D. Quantum state engineering with Josephson-junction devices. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 281–324 (2003).

## Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (Quantum Electron Microscope Project).

## Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

R.Z. and M.S. performed the experiments, R.Z. did the particle tracking simulations. All authors discussed the data and contributed to writing the manuscript. P.H. supervised the team.

### Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Robert Zimmermann, Michael Seidling or Peter Hommelhoff.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare that R.Z., M.S. and P.H. are named inventors on a patent application for the auto-ponderomotive design described in the manuscript for complex beam manipulation including the auto-ponderomotive beam splitting. This patent application has been submitted by Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg as a German patent to the German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DPMA) with the application number: DE 10 2020 111 820.1 and the title: “Auto-ponderomotorische Optiken”.

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Diederik Maas and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Zimmermann, R., Seidling, M. & Hommelhoff, P. Charged particle guiding and beam splitting with auto-ponderomotive potentials on a chip. Nat Commun 12, 390 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20592-4

• Accepted:

• Published:

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20592-4