Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Group 2i Isochrysidales produce characteristic alkenones reflecting sea ice distribution

Abstract

Alkenones are biomarkers produced solely by algae in the order Isochrysidales that have been used to reconstruct sea surface temperature (SST) since the 1980s. However, alkenone-based SST reconstructions in the northern high latitude oceans show significant bias towards warmer temperatures in core-tops, diverge from other SST proxies in down core records, and are often accompanied by anomalously high relative abundance of the C37 tetra-unsaturated methyl alkenone (%C37:4). Elevated %C37:4 is widely interpreted as an indicator of low sea surface salinity from polar water masses, but its biological source has thus far remained elusive. Here we identify a lineage of Isochrysidales that is responsible for elevated C37:4 methyl alkenone in the northern high latitude oceans through next-generation sequencing and lab-culture experiments. This Isochrysidales lineage co-occurs widely with sea ice in marine environments and is distinct from other known marine alkenone-producers, namely Emiliania huxleyi and Gephyrocapsa oceanica. More importantly, the %C37:4 in seawater filtered particulate organic matter and surface sediments is significantly correlated with annual mean sea ice concentrations. In sediment cores from the Svalbard region, the %C37:4 concentration aligns with the Greenland temperature record and other qualitative regional sea ice records spanning the past 14 kyrs, reflecting sea ice concentrations quantitatively. Our findings imply that %C37:4 is a powerful proxy for reconstructing sea ice conditions in the high latitude oceans on thousand- and, potentially, on million-year timescales.

Introduction

Alkenones are among the best proxies for paleo sea surface temperature (SST) reconstructions, and their exceptional diagenetic stability has enabled the generation of palaeotemperature records spanning tens of millions of years of Earth’s history1,2,3. They are a class of C35–42 methyl and ethyl ketones with two to four double bonds produced exclusively by the algae in the order Isochrysidales1,4,5,6,7,8: in ocean settings Emiliania huxleyi and the closely related Gephyrocapsa oceanica have been considered as the exclusive producers of di-unsaturated (C37:2) and tri-unsaturated (C37:3) methyl alkenones1,4,5. The unsaturation index of alkenones (\(U_{37}^{K{\prime}}\)), defined as C37:2/(C37:2 + C37:3), is positively correlated with temperature, as validated both by algal culture experiments and global core-top calibrations9,10,11,12,13.

However, application of \(U_{37}^{K\prime }\)-SST calibrations in the northern high latitude oceans has encountered major difficulties. Variable warm bias in \(U_{37}^{K{\prime}}\)-based SST reconstructions is often accompanied by the occurrence of tetra-unsaturated alkenone (C37:4), which is usually absent in mid-to-low latitude oceans and E. huxleyi cultures even under exceedingly low growth temperature8. This pattern is reported in surface sediment and seawater filtered particulate organic matter (POM) samples from the Nordic Seas and the Bering Sea14,15,16, and downcore sediment records in Okhotsk Sea during glacial periods17,18,19. As a result, Rosell-Melé14 concluded that \(U_{37}^{K{\prime}}\) was unreliable when the percentage of C37:4 among the total C37 methyl alkenones (%C37:4) is >5%. Yet, %C37:4 greater than 5% is widely reported in sediment records in the northern high latitude oceans, thereby complicating SST reconstructions from these regions (Supplementary Fig. 1).

On the other hand, negative correlations between %C37:4 and sea surface salinity (SSS) on a regional scale were observed14,15,20, with elevated %C37:4 often associated with fresher and colder water mass21,22. The mechanisms for these observations, however, are poorly defined, with previous studies suggesting unknown oceanographic parameters14 and/or alkenone producers22 as the possible explanations. The occurrence of miscellaneous compounds that co-elute with C37:4 alkenone in sediment samples extracts adds an additional level of complication when interpreting %C37:4 data23. Regardless of these problems, elevated %C37:4 is widely applied as an indicator of fresher and colder polar water mass or decreased SSS (Supplementary Table 1). More recently, it has been applied as an indicator of sea ice margin based on co-occurrence with benthic foraminifera signal suggesting sea ice breakup24. The interpretation of %C37:4 as a proxy for SSS stands in direct contrast to results from culture experiments, which show positive or no correlation between salinity and %C37:4 in marine and brackish Isochrysidales species25,26,27. Such conflict suggests that elevated %C37:4 is not a physiological response to decreased SSS, but rather that unidentified producers of C37:4 occur in high latitude marine environments14,22.

In this study, we used next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify Isochrysidales in water column, sea ice, and sediment samples in northern high latitude marine environments. We show that Isochrysidales communities in subarctic regions are composed of a lineage that is distinct from E. huxleyi and any other described species. Culture of this lineage isolated from sea ice demonstrates that they are prolific producers of C37:4. %C37:4 in POM and surface sediments in northern high latitude oceans show strong correlation with annual mean sea ice concentrations, which is further corroborated by downcore sediment records from the Svalbard region spanning the past 14 kyr. Our results suggest that %C37:4 has great potential as a paleo sea ice proxy, which may provide crucial information about sea ice distributions prior to satellite observations.

Results and discussion

Identifying widespread ice-related alkenone producers

We sequenced the V4 region of the 18S rRNA gene from three surface sediment samples containing high %C37:4 (59–68%; Supplementary Fig. 2, Supplementary Data 1) that were collected from Victoria Strait in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago where the sea ice regime is mainly governed by first-year ice. Four Isochrysidales amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were recovered from those surface sediments (Supplementary Table 2). We also extracted 18S-V4 sequences of Isochrysidales available from NGS datasets from high latitude oceans (20 datasets, 1216 samples; Supplementary Data 2). We used a phylogenetic framework to compare these data with published Isochrysidales 18S-V4 data from environmental and culture studies28 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1: Phylogenetic position of the novel Group 2 ice lineage (Group 2i) Isochrysidales.
figure 1

Maximum-likelihood tree based on 18S rRNA gene from 99 sequences spanning three groups of Isochrysidales and 6 from the Coccolithales outgroup. The numbers shown on branches represent bootstrap support for the node (only those >50% are shown). Numbers in the parentheses represent numbers of sequences included in the collapsed groups, and the expanded version of this tree can be found in Supplementary Fig. 4. The scale bar represents substitution/site. Sequences generated from Canadian Arctic Archipelago surface sediments in this study are highlighted in red, and sea ice isolated strain RCC5486 cultured in this study is highlighted in blue. Sequences from reanalyzed NGS datasets are highlighted in brown, and other sequences were obtained from NCBI GenBank. The branches of the ice lineage are marked in red.

We followed the Isochrysidales classification of Theroux et al.29 based on habitat salinity ranges and phylogenetic divergence: Group 1 (freshwater species, uncultured), Group 2 (brackish species, e.g., Isochrysis galbana, Ruttnera lamellosa), and Group 3 (marine species, E. huxleyi and G. oceanica). Our phylogenetic analysis revealed close relationships between the majority of Isochrysidales sequences recovered from marine sites with perennial or extended seasonal sea ice and those of published sequences from lakes with seasonal or perennial ice cover (Figs. 1 and 2a). The sequences formed a monophyletic group with 80% bootstrap support, and placement of these sequences within Group 2 Isochrysidales is supported by 100% bootstrap support. We refer to this monophyletic clade as the Group 2 ice lineage Isochrysidales (Group 2i). Group 2i is distinct from any named Isochrysidales species, and potentially represents one or more new species. The sequences falling within Group 2i were detected in environments with a wide range of salinity, from freshwater to saline brine channels within sea ice, and in samples from sea ice cores, under ice seawater, and sediments from regions governed by multi- and first-year ice. These distributions suggest that Group 2i is euryhaline and well-adapted to variable Arctic marine environments. E. huxleyi was abundant in seawater samples that were collected during the summer after ice-melt in the Chukchi Sea and Barents Sea, and was not identified in any of the sea ice samples except one sample from the central Arctic. Particularly, seawater samples collected in the Fram Strait during sea ice melting season (June 2014)30 where the western part of the Fram Strait was ice-covered and eastern part was ice-free showed E. huxleyi was present in both ice-covered and ice-free sites. However, Group 2i was only detected in seawater samples collected under ice cover. The DNA data suggest that the presence of Group 2i is tightly associated with sea ice.

Fig. 2: Distribution of the Group 2i Isochrysidales, %C37:4 values, and \(U_{37}^{K{\prime}}\)-sea surface temperature bias.
figure 2

a Distribution of Group 2i in northern high latitude marine environment from DNA sequencing in this study, reanalyzed NGS datasets, and NCBI GenBank based on phylogeny. Orange color represents samples with Group 2i detected, yellow color represents samples with both Group 2i and other Isochrysidales detected, and green color represents samples with occurrence of other Isochrysidales and absence of Group 2i (details of samples can be found in Supplementary Data 2). Blue arrow indicates surface sediment samples where both DNA sequencing and alkenone analyses were conducted in this study. Yellow arrow denotes the location where strain RCC5486 cultured in this study was isolated from. b %C37:4 values of water filter POM compiled from Harada et al.15 and Bendle and Rosell-Melé16 are shown in circles. %C37:4 values of surface sediment samples from this study are shown in triangles. c Differences between \(U_{37}^{K{\prime}}\) reconstructed SST in surface sediment and 1981–2010 mean annual SST (WOA)83. The contour shows annual mean sea ice concentration during 1980–2010 from National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) Climate Data Record of Passive Microwave Sea Ice Concentration, Version 3, with a spatial resolution of 25 km × 25 km84 (https://doi.org/10.7265/N59P2ZTG). The blue and magenta lines show 1980–2010 median sea ice extent during March and September, respectively, (NSIDC).

Culture experiments show Group 2i produce predominant C37:4

To confirm that Group 2i produces high %C37:4, we cultured the unclassified Isochrysidales strain RCC5486 at 3 and 6 °C in f/2 medium under salinity of 15, 21, 26, 31, and 38 ppt. The RCC5486 strain falls within the Group 2i in our phylogeny and it is the most phylogenetically similar strain to the Isochrysidales found in Canadian Arctic Archipelago surface sediments that is available in pure culture (Fig. 1). Live cells of RCC5486 were isolated during the algal pre bloom and bloom-development phase in sea ice samples from Baffin Bay31 (67.47°N, 63.78°W; May–July 2016). The alkenones produced by RCC5486 showed exceptionally high %C37:4 (~80%) at both 3 and 6 °C (Supplementary Fig. 2), and salinity does not have any significant influence on %C37:4 (Supplementary Fig. 3). This further validates that physiological response to decreased salinity would not result in increased C37:4 production. Published DNA sequences that fall into Group 2i in our phylogenetic analyses were also observed in water and sediment samples from lakes in China29,32, Canada33, the USA,29 and Antarctica34, where C37:4 was the predominant alkenone. High %C37:4 alkenone production is thus likely a shared characteristic across Group 2i Isochrysidales. Culture of RCC5486 also showed an absence of C38 methyl alkenones (C38Me), matching alkenone production by other Group 2 Isochrysidales and differing from E. huxleyi8. However, C38Me was present in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago surface sediments, even though Group 2i was the only Isochrysidales detected through NGS. The C38Me detected in Canadian Arctic Archipelago is likely produced by E. huxleyi even though their DNA was not detected. The discrepancy between DNA and alkenone preservation could result from differences in the life cycles of Group 2i compared to E. huxleyi: the former potentially forms cysts and enters a resting stage in surface sediment,35,36 while the latter does not form resting spores during winter37, after the bloom they die and disaggregate during downward transportation into sea floor38.

Implications for sea ice, SSS, and SST reconstructions

The identification of the novel and widespread Group 2i Isochrysidales gives rise to the possibility of using %C37:4 as a reliable sea ice proxy. Elevated %C37:4 from surface sediment and seawater POM15,22 is located at regions with seasonal sea ice in the Northern Hemisphere (Fig. 2b). %C37:4 in both POM and surface sediment were positively and significantly correlated with sea ice concentrations (Fig. 3a, c). Differences in the calibration could be results of stronger seasonality of POM, uncertainty in the age of the surface sediment, and advection influencing the linkage between sediment and overlying surface water12. The positive correlation between sea ice concentration and %C37:4 most likely reflect increasing alkenone contribution from Group 2i Isochrysidales with increasing sea ice. %C37:4 showed negative and significant correlations with SSS in POM and surface sediments (Fig. 3b, d), consistent with prior research14,15. However, this relationship is a byproduct of the negative correlation between SSS and sea ice concentrations in the above sample sites, which reflects the temporal influence of melting sea ice on near-surface salinity (Supplementary Fig. 5). Thus variations in %C37:4 cannot be attributed to SSS changes, and regional relationship between %C37:4 and SSS should not be extrapolated for global-scale SSS reconstruction. So far there is no mechanistic explanation that supports a direct response of %C37:4 to changes in SSS, except in low salinity (0–6 ppt) or estuarine environments where Group 1 Isochrysidales are present and contribute to elevated %C37:429,39,40. Group 1 Isochrysidales are typically found in freshwater to oligosaline environments and predominantly produce C37:441. Alkenone contribution from Group 1 can be identified through the presence of C37:3b isomer, which is not produced by Groups 2 and 341. Our results show that both Group 1 and the Group 2i are present in brackish water underlying sea ice in the northwest of Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea42 (Supplementary Fig. 6). However, Group 1 Isochrysidales are very sparse within sea ice in the Baltic Sea and are absent in other sea ice samples examined in this study (Fig. 2). Thus, we conclude that the majority of C37:4 production in the northern high latitude oceans distal from coast can be attributed to the presence of sea ice and Group 2i Isochrysidales.

Fig. 3: %C37:4 showing significant positive correlation with annual mean sea ice concentration and negative correlation with sea surface salinity.
figure 3

a Linear regression between water filter POM %C37:4 compiled from previous studies15,16 and mean sea ice concentration 12 months prior to sample collection (n = 40 independent samples). b Linear regression between water filter POM %C37:4 and measured SSS during collection15,16 (n = 40 independent samples). c Linear regression between surface sediment %C37:4 and 1980–2010 annual mean sea ice concentration (n = 42 independent samples). d Linear regression between surface sediment %C37:4 and 1980–2010 annual mean SSS85 (n = 42 independent samples). Surface sediment samples from Baltic Sea are not included in the regressions in c and d. Sea ice concentrations were obtained from NOAA/NSIDC Climate Data Record of Passive Microwave Sea Ice Concentration, Version 3, with a spatial resolution of 25 km × 25 km84 (https://doi.org/10.7265/N59P2ZTG). The dashed lines denote 95% confidence interval for the regression.

Alkenones produced by the Group 2i are also a potential source of bias in \(U_{37}^{K{\prime}}\)–SST reconstructions. Surface sediment samples from regions covered by winter sea ice in the North Atlantic experience significant warm bias in \(U_{37}^{K{\prime}}\)–SST13,43. A similar warm bias is also observed in calculated SSTs from surface sediments examined in this study, including the Canadian Arctic Archipelago samples where Group 2i was detected (Fig. 2c); however, the exact mechanism leading to the warm bias is still a question. Group 2i may produce alkenones within multiyear sea ice, but there is no prior report of alkenones detected from the surface sediments in the central Arctic. Bloom of Group 2i has been observed upon ice-melt in Lake George, USA, followed by a bloom of non-ice lineage Isochrysidales44. Group 2i and other Group 2 Isochrysidales are able to form cysts in sediments and potentially re-emerge to surface water during water-overturning under increased insolation35,36, which could occur in blooms during ice-melt. Prolonged seasonal sea ice and the Group 2i Isochrysidales within sea ice could potentially shift the phenology of E. huxleyi from colder to warmer seasons. They are also likely to have a \(U_{37}^{K{\prime}}\)-SST calibration different from E. huxleyi. The bias in \(U_{37}^{K{\prime}}\)–SST introduced by Group 2i could thus be more prominent during periods with extended seasonal sea ice coverage in downcore records. More experimental and field studies are needed to fully understand the causes for the warm SST bias inferred by \(U_{37}^{K{\prime}}\) in high latitude oceans.

Validation of %C37:4 as paleo sea ice proxy in downcore sediments

Elevated %C37:4 has long been observed in concordance with other sea ice proxies, such as IRD45,46,47,48,49, diatoms48,50, foraminifera assemblages,24,51 and IP2552 in sediment records spanning the Late Pliocene to the Holocene. However, the interpretations of %C37:4 were essentially derived from long-term SSS change instead of the occurrence of sea ice in previous studies (Supplementary Table 1).

To further evaluate %C37:4 as a sea ice proxy within a paleoceanographic context, we compared %C37:4 records with the widely applied sea ice proxy IP25 and coarse fraction contents (% of grain size > 63 μm) in the Svalbard area during the past ca. 14.5 kyr (Figs. 4 and 5). IP25 is a C25 isoprenoid lipid synthesized by certain Arctic sea ice diatoms and is deposited in underlying sediments following ice-melt in spring53,54,55. Coarse sediment fraction at this site is largely composed of lithic grains and foraminifera, reflecting sea ice formation off the western Barents shelf56. The Fram Strait is the major gateway between the North Atlantic and the Arctic Ocean, and sea ice distribution in our study area is highly sensitive to surface temperature variability in modern time57. Over longer timeframes, such as the Holocene, variations in sea ice extent in the Fram strait, the Greenland Sea, and the northern Barents Sea co-occurred with changes in Northern Hemisphere solar insolation and changes in Greenland air temperature58,59,60,61,62. Marine sediment core M23258-256,63 (74.99°N, 13.97°E) is located close to the modern maximum winter sea ice extent in the northeastern Norwegian Sea where temporal variations of sea ice conditions have been identified64. Alkenones were not detected prior to 14.1 kyr BP in M23258-2, likely due to seasonally extended sea ice cover limiting productivity. The general trend of %C37:4 from M23258-263 is in direct agreement with inferred-temperature trends from the δ18O values of Renland ice core located in east Greenland65, with increasing %C37:4 corresponding to decreasing temperature, and is positively correlated with IP25 concentration and coarse fraction content in M23258-2 (Supplementary Fig. 7). The high values of %C37:4 in both M23258-2 and JM09-020-GC52 (76.31°N, 19.70°E) located in the glacial trough of Storfjordrenna during the Bølling–Allerød (13.95–12.8 kyr BP) may represent partial sea ice cover and a retreating ice edge; high coarse fraction content during this time in M23258-2 suggests rapid breakup of the Svalbard–Barents Sea ice sheet. The highest peak in %C37:4 in M23258-2 occurs at the beginning of the Younger Dryas (YD, ~12.8 kyr BP), indicating an expansion of sea ice. This is in agreement with increases in the coarse grain-size fraction and IP25 from M23258-2 and increases in IP25 at nearby site JM09-KA11-GC66 (74.87°N, 16.48°E). The gradual decrease in %C37:4 observed in M23258-2 and JM09-020-GC after the termination of YD (~11.7 kyr BP) is coincident with increasing Northern Hemisphere summer insolation and temperature. Low %C37:4 in M23258-2 and the closely adjacent core SV0467 (74.957°N, 13.899°E) suggests that sea ice extent retreated and was present in low concentrations at these sites between 10.8 and 4 kyr BP during the Holocene Thermal Maximum, while the fluctuating %C37:4 in JM09-020-GC suggests a variable ice-edge condition at Storfjordrenna during this period. %C37:4 in M23258-2 increased after ca. 4 kyr BP indicating a slight expansion of the sea ice margin during the neoglacial cooling period in the Northern Hemisphere, as the coarse fraction contents in this core also increased, reflecting sediment injections caused by cascades of dense brine water down the Barents shelf induced by seasonal sea ice56. IP25 in M23258-2 is, however, absent (or below detection limit) during this time period. The return to partial seasonal sea ice cover during neoglaciation is also evident in the rapid IP25 increase in the Fram Strait60 (MSM5/5-723-2; 79.16°N, 5.33°E) and northern Barents Sea records68 (NP05-11-70GC; 78.40°N, 32.42°E), as well as the re-emergence of IP25 in JM09-KA11-GC.

Fig. 4: Map of the Svalbard region.
figure 4

Red star56,63 (this study) and red dots52,60,64,65,66,67,68 are the locations of core sites cited in this paper. The bathymetry is adapted from IBCAO Version 386.

Fig. 5: Sea ice reconstructions at the Svalbard region during the past ca. 14.5 kyr.
figure 5

a δ18O from Renland ice core65. b Mid-July 65°N insolation87. c %C37:4 from M23258-263. d %C37:4 from SV0467. e C37 methyl alkenone concentration from M23258-263. f %C37:4 from JM09-020-GC52. g C37 methyl alkenone concentration from JM09-020-GC52. h Coarse fraction from M23258-256. il IP25 concentration from M23258-2 (this study), JM09-KA11-GC64,66, MSM5/5-723-2,60 and NP05-11-70GC68. Black triangles represent age control points in M23258-256.

In this study, we demonstrate that %C37:4 is a reliable and sensitive indicator for paleo sea ice, and has the potential for quantitative sea ice reconstructions based on surface sediment calibrations. As alkenones are solely produced by Isochrysidales, %C37:4 directly reflects proportion of Group 2i Isochrysidales within Isochrysidales community induced by sea ice, and is not affected by variations in total productivity or sedimentation rates as IP25. %C37:4 is also less likely to be affected by diagenetic factors due to the strong diagenetic stability of alkenones, and does not suffer from dissolution like microfossil sea ice proxies such as diatoms, ostracods, and foraminifers. As an example of the durability of the %C37:4 proxy, a gradual increase of %C37:4 from 0 to 10% was observed in Bering Sea after the onset of MIS M2 glaciation (~3.3 Ma) in concordance with an increase in sea ice-related diatoms50. In addition, %C37:4 provides site-specific sea ice information which is different from proxies such as methanesulfonic acid and sea salt in ice from glaciers and ice sheets that records the averaged sea ice condition at a variable (e.g., depending on wind direction and speed) sector of ocean. Future work combining molecular biology and organic geochemistry analyses in culture experiments and large-scale analyses of seawater, sea ice, and sediment samples will improve the %C37:4-sea ice calibration and shed light on other sea ice properties such as seasonality.

Methods

Sample collection

Surface sediment samples for both DNA sequencing and alkenone analyses were collected from Canadian Arctic Archipelago during Amundsen 2018. The samples were stored at −20 °C before DNA extraction. Other surface sediment samples for alkenone analyses were collected during several cruises including M86/1 (R/V Meteor; 2011), P435 (R/V Poseidon; 2012), EMB046 (R/V Elisabeth Mann Borgese; 2013), JR51 (James Clark Ross; 2000), JR106 (James Clark Ross; 2004), KN158-4 (Knorr; 1998), POS175 (Poseidon; 1990), HLY0601 (USCGC Healy; 2006), HLY0702 (USCGC Healy; 2007), M13/2 (Meteor; 1990), and M 21/2 (Meteor; 1992). The locations of the surface sediment samples are shown in Supplementary Data 1.

NGS of Canadian Arctic Archipelago surface sediment samples

Sequencing of the surface sediment samples was performed by Jonah Ventrues, Boulder, CO, USA, (https://jonahventures.com/). Genomic DNA was extracted from the samples using the DNeasy PowerSoil HTP 96, then a two-step PCR protocol was performed. First, a portion of 18S rRNA was amplified by an adapted version of primer pair 528Flong and PRYM01+7 (F: GCGGTAATTCCAGCTCCAA, R: GATCAGTGAAAACATCCCTGG, Egge et al.69). The first PCR step following the program described in Egge et al.69 was performed in 25-μl reactions containing Phusion GC Buffer, 0.4 mM of each primer, 0.2 mM dNTP, DMSO 3%, 0.5 U Phusion polymerase (Thermo Scientific), and 2 µl of DNA template. After cleanup of the amplicons, a second round of PCR was performed to give each sample a unique 12-nucleotide index sequence. The final indexed amplicons were then cleaned and normalized using SequalPrep Normalization Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and proceeded to sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq using V2 600-Cycle Kit (San Diego, CA). Sequencing success and read quality was verified using FastQC v0.11.8. The forward and reverse primers were removed from the sequences, and sequences with length below 100 bp were discarded. The ASVs were compiled for each sample after denoising by UNOISE3 algorithm with an alpha value of 5 to remove sequencing error70. Taxonomy of the ASVs was assigned using the SILVA reference database (including 506 Isochrysidales sequences) and assign_taxonomy.py as implemented in QIIME/1.9.171.

Reanalyses of environmental sequences and phylogeny

We searched for short-read studies including the term “sea ice” on the European Nucleotide Archive, and runs from studies targeting subfragments of 18S rRNA that included sea ice or seawater samples were downloaded. Primers were removed from the downloaded raw reads using cutadapt72, except from Roche 454 sequenced reads where forward primers were removed after quality trimming. ASVs were compiled after the reads were quality trimmed using DADA273, except for studies with available quality trimmed ASVs42,74. The DADA2 parameters were adjusted based on the quality profiles of the sequencing runs. Taxonomic affiliations of the ASVs were identified using the assignTaxonomy command in DADA2 and, as reference sequences, the Protist Ribosomal Reference database75 (including 159 expert-curated Isochrysidales sequences from each taxonomic groups). Sequences classified to the order Isochrysidales were selected to proceed to further analysis. Close relatives of the environmental sequences were identified through BLAST search against NCBI GenBank and compiled as reference sequences for phylogeny. All sequences were then aligned against a curated alignment from Gran-Stadniczeñko et al.76 using PyNAST77. In total, the alignment contains 105 sequences, including 6 Coccolithales, 16 Groups 2 and 3 Isochrysidales cultures, 46 published environmental sequences from GenBank, and 37 recovered or reanalyzed environmental sequences from this study. A maximum-likelihood phylogeny was inferred using the RAxML78 program with substitution model GTRCAT with 1000 bootstraps through CIPRES79.

Culture experiments

We obtained the RCC5486 strain (GenBank accession: MH764930) from the Roscoff Culture from the National Institute for Environmental Studies. The strain was acclimatized to 3 and 6 °C for 10 days before the start of corresponding culture experiments. The f/2 medium was prepared from filtered and sterilized seawater collected from Vineyard Sound, Woods Hole, MA, USA, adjusted to 15, 21, 26, 31, and 38 ppt. Cultures were grown under a light:dark cycle set at 16:8 h. The light intensity was 140 μE · m−2 · s−1. Culture experiments under each salinity and temperature condition were triplicated.

Cultures were harvested at early stationary phase (monitored using hemocytometer counts (Hausser Scientific, PA, USA)) by filtering onto 0.7 μm glass fiber filters (Merck Millipore, MA, USA). All filters were wrapped with aluminum foils and immediately frozen at −20 °C before further extraction and analysis. For alkenones analyses, all of the filters were freeze-dried overnight and then dissolved in dichloromethane (DCM) and sonicated (3 × 30 min, 40 ml each time). The total extracts were separated and analyzed for alkenones as described in the section “Alkenones analyses.”

Alkenones analyses

Surface sediment samples were analyzed for lipids by extracting around 10 g of freeze-dried sediment using a DionexTM accelerated solvent extraction system with DCM:methanol mixture (9:1, v/v) to obtain a total lipid extract (TLE). The TLE was then separated into alkane, ketone, and polar fractions through silica gel columns by eluents with increasing polarity: hexane, DCM, and methanol. The ketone fraction containing alkenones was analyzed by gas chromatography–flame ionization detection Agilent 7890N Series instrument equipped with mid-polarity column RTX-200 (105 m × 250 μm × 0.25 μm) with the oven program described in Zheng et al.80. This method is able to fully eliminate the co-elution between alkenones and alkenoates, as well as co-elution between C38 methyl and ethyl alkenones80. Alkenone peaks were identified and quantified based on retention time compared with standard Group 1 alkenone samples extracted from BrayaSø Lake (Greenland) through Agilent ChemStation B.03.02. A gas chromatography–mass spectrometer (GC–MS, Agilent 7890B interfaced to 5977 inert plus MSD) equipped with RTX-200 columns (105 m × 250 μm × 0.25 μm) was used to examine co-elution. Samples with compounds co-eluting with alkenones were purified using silver thiolate silica gel columns with hexane: DCM (1:1, v/v), DCM, and acetone23. Regressions of alkenone indices and environmental parameters were performed via MATLAB (R2018b).

IP25 analyses

Analysis of IP25 in core M23258-2 was carried out as described by Belt et al.81 with minor modification. An internal standard (9-octylhexadec-8-ene; 9-OHD; 0.1 µg) was added to dried sediment material (ca. 2 g), which was extracted using DCM/methanol (MeOH) (2:1 v/v; 3 × 6 ml) and ultrasonication. Following evaporation of the total organic extract (TOE) to dryness (N2 stream; room temperature), elemental S was removed according to Cabedo-Sanz and Belt82. Thus, the TOE was dissolved in hexane (1 ml) followed by addition of tetrabutylammonium sulfite (1 ml) and propan-2-ol (2 ml). After brief shaking by hand (1 min), ultrahigh purity water (3 ml) was added, reagitated (1 min), and centrifuged (2 min; 2500 rpm). The hexane layer was transferred to a clean vial and the procedure repeated twice more. Combined hexane extracts were dried using N2. Partially purified TOEs were resuspended in hexane and purified using column chromatography (SiO2; ca. 0.5 g in a glass pipette), with fractions containing IP25 collected using hexane (6 ml). Final purification was achieved using Ag-ion chromatography (Supelco Discovery® Ag-Ion; 0.1 g). After elution of saturated hydrocarbons (hexane; 1 ml), unsaturated hydrocarbons including IP25 were collected in acetone (2 ml).

Identification and quantification of IP25 in purified sediment extracts was carried out via GC–MS using established methods81 with an Agilent 7890 gas chromatograph equipped with a HP5MS fused-silica column (30 m; 0.25 µm film thickness; 0.25 mm internal diameter) coupled to an Agilent 5975 series mass spectrometric detector. IP25 was identified by its characteristic retention index (RIHP5-MS = 2081) and mass spectrum. Quantification was carried out in single-ion monitoring mode. The resulting peak areas for IP25 were normalized to internal standard responses, instrumental response factors, and sediment mass.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Raw sequence data generated in this study were archived in NCBI GenBank with accession number PRJNA650544, and assembled Isochrysidales sequences were archived in NCBI GenBank with accession number MT647637-MT647640. Reanalyzed NGS data can be found through European Nucleotide Archive with accession codes provided in Supplementary Data 2. Reference database SILVA is available at https://www.arb-silva.de/, and PR2 is available at https://github.com/pr2database/pr2database.

References

  1. 1.

    Brassell, S. C., Eglinton, G., Marlowe, I. T., Pflaumann, U. & Sarnthein, M. Molecular stratigraphy: a new tool for climatic assessment. Nature 320, 129–133 (1986).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Liu, Z. et al. Global cooling during the Eocene-Oligocene climate transition. Science 323, 1187–1190 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Herbert, T. D. et al. Late Miocene global cooling and the rise of modern ecosystems. Nat. Geosci. 9, 843–847 (2016).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Volkman, J. K., Eglinton, G., Corner, E. D. S. & Forsberg, T. E. V. Long-chain alkenes and alkenones in the marine coccolithophorid Emiliania huxleyi. Phytochemistry 19, 2619–2622 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Conte, M. H., Thompson, A., Eglinton, G. & Green, J. C. Lipid biomarker diversity in the coccolithophorid Emiliania huxleyi (prymnesiophyceae) and the related species gephyrocapsa oceanica1. J. Phycol. 31, 272–282 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Xu, L. et al. Identification of a novel alkenone in Black Sea sediments. Org. Geochem. 32, 633–645 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zhao, J. et al. Occurrence of extended chain length C41 and C42 alkenones in hypersaline lakes. Org. Geochem. 75, 48–53 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zheng, Y., Heng, P., Conte, M. H., Vachula, R. S. & Huang, Y. Systematic chemotaxonomic profiling and novel paleotemperature indices based on alkenones and alkenoates: Potential for disentangling mixed species input. Org. Geochem. 128, 26–41 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Prahl, F. G. & Wakeham, S. G. Calibration of unsaturation patterns in long-chain ketone compositions for palaeotemperature assessment. Nature 330, 367–369 (1987).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Prahl, F. G., Muehlhausen, L. A. & Zahnle, D. L. Further evaluation of long-chain alkenones as indicators of paleoceanographic conditions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 52, 2303–2310 (1988).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Müller, P. J., Kirst, G., Ruhland, G., von Storch, I. & Rosell-Melé, A. Calibration of the alkenone paleotemperature index UK37′ based on core-tops from the eastern South Atlantic and the global ocean (60°N-60°S). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 62, 1757–1772 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Conte, M. H. et al. Global temperature calibration of the alkenone unsaturation index (UK37’) in surface waters and comparison with surface sediments. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems 7, Q02005 (2006).

  13. 13.

    Tierney, J. E. & Tingley, M. P. BAYSPLINE: a new calibration for the alkenone paleothermometer. Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol. 33, 281–301 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rosell-Melé, A. Interhemispheric appraisal of the value of alkenone indices as temperature and salinity proxies in high-latitude locations. Paleoceanography 13, 694–703 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Harada, N., Shin, K. H., Murata, A., Uchida, M. & Nakatani, T. Characteristics of alkenones synthesized by a bloom of Emiliania huxleyi in the Bering Sea. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67, 1507–1519 (2003).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bendle, J. & Rosell-Melé, A. Distributions of UK37 and UK37’ in the surface waters and sediments of the Nordic Seas: implications for paleoceanography. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems 5, Q11013 (2004).

  17. 17.

    Seki, O., Kawamura, K., Ikehara, M., Nakatsuka, T. & Oba, T. Variation of alkenone sea surface temperature in the Sea of Okhotsk over the last 85 kyrs. Org. Geochem. 35, 347–354 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Harada, N., Sato, M. & Sakamoto, T. Freshwater impacts recorded in tetraunsaturated alkenones and alkenone sea surface temperatures from the Okhotsk Sea across millennial-scale cycles. Paleoceanography 23, PA3201 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hernández-Almeida, I., Boltovskoy, D., Kruglikova, S. B. & Cortese, G. A new radiolarian transfer function for the Pacific Ocean and application to fossil records: Assessing potential and limitations for the last glacial-interglacial cycle. Glob. Planet. Change 190, 103186 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sicre, M.-A., Bard, E., Ezat, U. & Rostek, F. Alkenone distributions in the North Atlantic and Nordic sea surface waters. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems 3, 1–13 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rosell-Melé, A. Appraisal of a molecular approach to infer variations in surface ocean freshwater inputs into the North Atlantic during the last glacial. Glob. Planet. Change 34, 143–152 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bendle, J., Rosell-Melé, A. & Ziveri, P. Variability of unusual distributions of alkenones in the surface waters of the Nordic seas. Paleoceanography 20, PA2001 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wang, L. et al. An efficient approach to eliminate steryl ethers and miscellaneous esters/ketones for gas chromatographic analysis of alkenones and alkenoates. J. Chromatogr. A 1596, 175–182 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lochte, A. A. et al. Holocene water mass changes in the Labrador Current. Holocene 29, 676–690 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ono, M., Sawada, K., Kubota, M. & Shiraiwa, Y. Change of the unsaturation degree of alkenone and alkenoate during acclimation to salinity change in Emiliania huxleyi and Gephyrocapsa oceanica with reference to palaeosalinity indicator. Res. Org. Geochem. 25, 53–60 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ono, M., Sawada, K., Shiraiwa, Y. & Kubota, M. Changes in alkenone and alkenoate distributions during acclimatization to salinity change in Isochrysis galbana: implication for alkenone-based paleosalinity and paleothermometry. Geochem. J. 46, 235–247 (2012).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Chivall, D. et al. Impact of salinity and growth phase on alkenone distributions in coastal haptophytes. Org. Geochem. 67, 31–34 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Edvardsen, B., Egge, E. S. & Vaulot, D. Diversity and distribution of haptophytes revealed by environmental sequencing and metabarcoding—a review. Perspect. Phycol. 3, 77–91 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Theroux, S., D’Andrea, W. J., Toney, J., Amaral-Zettler, L. & Huang, Y. Phylogenetic diversity and evolutionary relatedness of alkenone-producing haptophyte algae in lakes: Implications for continental paleotemperature reconstructions. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 300, 311–320 (2010).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Fadeev, E. et al. Microbial communities in the East and West Fram Strait during sea ice melting season. Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 429 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ribeiro, C. G. et al. Culturable diversity of Arctic phytoplankton during pack ice melting. https://doi.org/10.1101/642264 (2019).

  32. 32.

    Yao, Y. et al. New insights into environmental controls on the occurrence and abundance of Group I alkenones and their paleoclimate applications: evidence from volcanic lakes of northeastern China. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 527, 115792 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Plancq, J., Couto, J. M., Ijaz, U. Z., Leavitt, P. R. & Toney, J. L. Next generation sequencing to identify lacustrine haptophytes in the Canadian Prairies: significance for temperature proxy applications. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 124, 2144–2158 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Coolen, M. Combined DNA and lipid analyses of sediments reveal changes in Holocene haptophyte and diatom populations in an Antarctic lake. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 223, 225–239 (2004).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Toney, J. L. et al. Culturing of the first 37:4 predominant lacustrine haptophyte: Geochemical, biochemical, and genetic implications. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 78, 51–64 (2012).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ellegaard, M., Moestrup, Ø., Joest Andersen, T. & Lundholm, N. Long-term survival of haptophyte and prasinophyte resting stages in marine sediment. Eur. J. Phycol. 51, 328–337 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Hegseth, E. N. & Sundfjord, A. Intrusion and blooming of Atlantic phytoplankton species in the high Arctic. J. Mar. Syst. 74, 108–119 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Rosell-Melé, A. & Comes, P. Alkenone fluxes and anomalous UK37’ values during 1989–1990 in the Northeast Atlantic (48 ˚N 21 ˚W). Mar. Chem. 71, 251–264 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Longo, W. M. et al. Temperature calibration and phylogenetically distinct distributions for freshwater alkenones: evidence from northern Alaskan lakes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 180, 177–196 (2016).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kaiser, J. et al. Changes in long chain alkenone distributions and Isochrysidales groups along the Baltic Sea salinity gradient. Org. Geochem. 127, 92–103 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Longo, W. M. et al. Widespread occurrence of distinct alkenones from Group I haptophytes in freshwater lakes: implications for paleotemperature and paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 492, 239–250 (2018).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Enberg, S., Majaneva, M., Autio, R., Blomster, J. & Rintala, J. Phases of microalgal succession in sea ice and the water column in the Baltic Sea from autumn to spring. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 599, 19–34 (2018).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Filippova, A., Kienast, M., Frank, M. & Schneider, R. R. Alkenone paleothermometry in the North Atlantic: a review and synthesis of surface sediment data and calibrations. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems 17, 1370–1382 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Theroux, S. et al. Successional blooms of alkenone‐producing haptophytes in Lake George, North Dakota: implications for continental paleoclimate reconstructions. Limnol. Oceanogr. 65, 413–425 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Seki, O. et al. Decreased surface salinity in the Sea of Okhotsk during the last glacial period estimated from alkenones. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L08710 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Risebrobakken, B., Moros, M., Ivanova, E. V., Chistyakova, N. & Rosenberg, R. Climate and oceanographic variability in the SW Barents Sea during the Holocene. Holocene 20, 609–621 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Bachem, P. E., Risebrobakken, B., De Schepper, S. & McClymont, E. L. Highly variable Pliocene sea surface conditions in the Norwegian Sea. Clim. Past 13, 1153–1168 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Stein, R., Blackman, D., Inagaki, F. & Larsen, H. C. Earth and Life Processes Discovered from Subseafloor Environments—a Decade of Science Achieved by the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP), Vol. 7 (Elsevier, 2014).

  49. 49.

    Sánchez-Montes, M. L. et al. Late Pliocene Cordilleran ice sheet development with warm northeast Pacific sea surface temperatures. Clim. Past 16, 299–313 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Horikawa, K. et al. Pliocene cooling enhanced by flow of low-salinity Bering Sea water to the Arctic Ocean. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–9 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    McClymont, E. L., Rosell-Melé, A., Haug, G. H. & Lloyd, J. M. Expansion of subarctic water masses in the North Atlantic and Pacific oceans and implications for mid-Pleistocene ice sheet growth. Paleoceanography 23, PA4214 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Łącka, M. et al. Postglacial paleoceanography of the western Barents Sea: implications for alkenone-based sea surface temperatures and primary productivity. Quat. Sci. Rev. 224, 105973 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Belt, S. T. et al. A novel chemical fossil of palaeo sea ice: IP25. Org. Geochem. 38, 16–27 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Brown, T. A., Belt, S. T., Tatarek, A. & Mundy, C. J. Source identification of the Arctic sea ice proxy IP25. Nat. Commun. 5, 1–7 (2014).

  55. 55.

    Belt, S. T. Source-specific biomarkers as proxies for Arctic and Antarctic sea ice. Org. Geochem. 125, 277–298 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sarnthein, M. et al. Centennial-to-millennial-scale periodicities of Holocene climate and sediment injections off the western Barents shelf, 75°N. Boreas 32, 447–461 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Comiso, J. C., Parkinson, C. L., Gersten, R. & Stock, L. Accelerated decline in the Arctic sea ice cover. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L01703 (2008).

  58. 58.

    Müller, J., Massé, G., Stein, R. & Belt, S. T. Variability of sea-ice conditions in the Fram Strait over the past 30,000 years. Nat. Geosci. 2, 772–776 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Müller, J. et al. Holocene cooling culminates in sea ice oscillations in Fram Strait. Quat. Sci. Rev. 47, 1–14 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Werner, K. et al. Holocene sea subsurface and surface water masses in the Fram Strait—comparisons of temperature and sea-ice reconstructions. Quat. Sci. Rev. 147, 194–209 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Berben, S. M. P., Husum, K., Navarro-Rodriguez, A., Belt, S. T. & Aagaard-Sørensen, S. Semi-quantitative reconstruction of early to late Holocene spring and summer sea ice conditions in the northern Barents Sea. J. Quat. Sci. 32, 587–603 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Syring, N. et al. Holocene changes in sea-ice cover and polynya formation along the eastern North Greenland shelf: new insights from biomarker records. Quat. Sci. Rev. 231, 106173 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Martrat, B., Grimalt, J. O., Villanueva, J., van Kreveld, S. & Sarnthein, M. Climatic dependence of the organic matter contributions in the north eastern Norwegian Sea over the last 15,000 years. Org. Geochem. 34, 1057–1070 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Belt, S. T. et al. Identification of paleo Arctic winter sea ice limits and the marginal ice zone: optimised biomarker-based reconstructions of late Quaternary Arctic sea ice. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 431, 127–139 (2015).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Johnsen, S. J. et al. Oxygen isotope and palaeotemperature records from six Greenland ice-core stations: Camp Century, Dye-3, GRIP, GISP2, Renland and NorthGRIP. J. Quat. Sci. 16, 299–307 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Berben, S. M. P., Husum, K., Cabedo-Sanz, P. & Belt, S. T. Holocene sub-centennial evolution of Atlantic water inflow and sea ice distribution in the western Barents Sea. Clim. Past 10, 181–198 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Rigual-Hernández, A. S. et al. Svalbard ice-sheet decay after the Last Glacial Maximum: new insights from micropalaeontological and organic biomarker paleoceanographical reconstructions. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 465, 225–236 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Köseoğlu, D., Belt, S. T., Husum, K. & Knies, J. An assessment of biomarker-based multivariate classification methods versus the PIP25 index for paleo Arctic sea ice reconstruction. Org. Geochem. 125, 82–94 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Egge, E. et al. 454 pyrosequencing to describe microbial eukaryotic community composition, diversity and relative abundance: a test for marine haptophytes. PLoS ONE 8, e74371 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Edgar, R. C. UNOISE2: improved error-correction for Illumina 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing. https://doi.org/10.1101/081257 (2016).

  71. 71.

    Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10–12 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Majaneva, M., Enberg, S., Autio, R., Blomster, J. & Rintala, J. Mamiellophyceae shift in seasonal predominance in the Baltic Sea. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 83, 181–187 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Guillou, L. et al. The Protist Ribosomal Reference database (PR2): a catalog of unicellular eukaryote small sub-unit rRNA sequences with curated taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D597–D604 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Gran-Stadniczeñko, S., Šupraha, L., Egge, E. D. & Edvardsen, B. Haptophyte diversity and vertical distribution explored by 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA gene metabarcoding and scanning electron microscopy. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 64, 514–532 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Caporaso, J. G. et al. PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics 26, 266–267 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) 1–8 (IEEE, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129.

  80. 80.

    Zheng, Y., Tarozo, R. & Huang, Y. Optimizing chromatographic resolution for simultaneous quantification of long chain alkenones, alkenoates and their double bond positional isomers. Org. Geochem. 111, 136–143 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Belt, S. T. et al. A reproducible method for the extraction, identification and quantification of the Arctic sea ice proxy IP25 from marine sediments. Anal. Methods 4, 705 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Cabedo-Sanz, P. & Belt, S. T. Identification and characterisation of a novel mono-unsaturated highly branched isoprenoid (HBI) alkene in ancient Arctic sediments. Org. Geochem. 81, 34–39 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Locarnini, R. A. et al. World Ocean Atlas 2018, Vol. 1: Temperature. NOAA Atlas NESDIS 81, 52 (2018).

  84. 84.

    Peng, G., Meier, W. N., Scott, D. J. & Savoie, M. H. A long-term and reproducible passive microwave sea ice concentration data record for climate studies and monitoring. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 5, 311–318 (2013).

  85. 85.

    Zweng, M. et al. World Ocean Atlas 2018, Vol. 2: Salinity. NOAA Atlas NESDIS 82, 50 (2018).

  86. 86.

    Jakobsson, M. et al. The International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean (IBCAO) Version 3.0: IBCAO Version 3.0. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L12609 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Laskar, J. et al. A long-term numerical solution for the insolation quantities of the Earth. Astron. Astrophys. 428, 261–285 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the United States National Science Foundation (NSF) under grant EAR-1762431 and an IBES seed grant to Y.H., IBES Graduate Research, Training & Travel Award to K.J.W., and NSF DEB-1930820 to T.R.K. We would like to thank Dr. Beth Caissie for surface sediment samples from Bering Sea, and Dr. Daniel Sigman, Dr. Cara Manning, Dr. Anissa Merzouk, Dr. Alexandre Forest, Dr. Camille Wilhelmy, Dr. Philippe-Olivier Dumais, Dr. Diana Saltymakova, Dr. Katarzyna Polcwiartek, and Dr. Cindy Grant for surface sediment samples from Amundsen cruise. We would like to thank GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, BOSCORF repository, and Lamont-Doherty Core Repository, Columbia University, for other surface sediment samples. We would also like to thank Dr. Robert Spielhagen for sediment samples from core M23258-2.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.H. initiated the research idea. K.J.W. and Y.H. codesigned the study after discussions with T.R.K., T.D.H., and S.T.B. Authors K.J.W., M.M., T.R.K., and N.R. analyzed the DNA and the phylogenetic data. S.L. conducted the culture experiment. J.N., S.L., K.J.W., Y.H., and T.D.H. conducted the alkenone analyses. S.T.B. and P.C.-S. conducted the IP25 analyses. K.J.W. and Y.H. cowrote the manuscript with contributions from coauthors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Karen Jiaxi Wang or Yongsong Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Marco Coolen and other, anonymous, reviewers for their contributions to the peer review of this work. Peer review reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, K.J., Huang, Y., Majaneva, M. et al. Group 2i Isochrysidales produce characteristic alkenones reflecting sea ice distribution. Nat Commun 12, 15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20187-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20187-z

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing