Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Pillar-beam structures prevent layered cathode materials from destructive phase transitions



Energy storage with high energy density and low cost has been the subject of a decades-long pursuit. Sodium-ion batteries are well expected because they utilize abundant resources. However, the lack of competent cathodes with both large capacities and long cycle lives prevents the commercialization of sodium-ion batteries. Conventional cathodes with hexagonal-P2-type structures suffer from structural degradations when the sodium content falls below 33%, or when the integral anions participate in gas evolution reactions. Here, we show a “pillar-beam” structure for sodium-ion battery cathodes where a few inert potassium ions uphold the layer-structured framework, while the working sodium ions could diffuse freely. The thus-created unorthodox orthogonal-P2 K0.4[Ni0.2Mn0.8]O2 cathode delivers a capacity of 194 mAh/g at 0.1 C, a rate capacity of 84% at 1 C, and an 86% capacity retention after 500 cycles at 1 C. The addition of the potassium ions boosts simultaneously the energy density and the cycle life.


Lithium-ion batteries with high energy density and long cycle life have become the dominant energy storage technology in electronic devices and electric vehicles. However, owing to the limited lithium and cobalt resources and consequently their rising costs, relying solely on lithium-ion batteries to meet the rapidly increasing demand for energy storage presents a great risk1. Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) have been considered as a promising alternative to lithium-ion batteries owing to the abundance of sodium on the Earth and to the use of lower-cost transition metal elements in the electrodes. They could play a critical role in large-scale stationary renewable energy systems where lifetimes and availabilities are most desirable2,3,4,5,6,7.

A generally recognized challenge to the development of SIBs is to simultaneously improve the capacity and the cycle life of the sodium-ion cathode. Among the many potential cathode materials8,9,10,11,12,13, layered metal oxides have many advantages because their layered structures provide large capacity, high rate capabilities, and have a relatively lower manufacturing cost14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21. These layered transition metal oxides can be categorized into P2, P3, O2, and O3 types according to the oxygen alignment around the Na+ ions and the stacking of the transition metal oxide layers22. O3-type materials include the commonly used LiCoO2 and NMC (nickel–manganese–cobalt) oxides in current lithium-ion batteries23,24. Despite the success of these O3 materials in lithium-ion battery cathodes, when used in SIBs, NaCoO2 and their derivatives undergo complicated phase transitions during discharge O3 → O'3 → P3 → P'3 → P″3, and the materials fail rapidly if the content of sodium falls below 50–60%, resulting in a limited capacity of ~110 mAh/g25,26,27. P2-type structures have two possible symmetry groups, as shown in Fig. 1. One is the hexagonal P2 (H-P2) with symmetry group P63/mmc, which is the most conventional symmetry group of P2 materials. The other possibility is orthogonal P2 (O-P2) whose symmetry group is Cmcm; there is currently no direct use of O-P2 structures in the cathode materials for SIBs, to the best of our knowledge. H-P2-type structures have fewer phase transitions than those of O3, but the P2 → O2 transition at ~33% sodium content still leads to material failure and the capacity is severely capped by this high lower-bound of sodium. One exception to this lower-bound is where lithium is inserted in the transition metal layers of H-P2-type Na0.72[Li0.24Mn0.76]O2, whose first-cycle capacity can reach 210 mAh/g (full extraction of sodium ions). However, during cycling, the anions are involved in the charge transfer and hence oxygen evolution reactions occur, leading to poor stability28,29.

Fig. 1: Crystal structure of O-P2 phase and H-P2 phase.
figure 1

Schematic illustration of the orthorhombic P2 phase projected in (a) b–c plane, (b) a–b plane or along c-direction. And H-P2 phase in (c) a–b plane, and (d) b–c plane. Brown balls represent potassium, red balls oxygen, and blue balls transition metal atoms. Partially colored balls represent partial occupancy where the portion of white area represent the likelihood of the site's not having an atom.

Solutions have been previously proposed to improve either the stability or the capacity of the P2-type SIB cathode materials, but never both. High stability requires that the anions do not participate in the charge transfer; high capacity requires that the range of sodium content during the battery operation is as wide as possible. Therefore, on the one hand, one could try to increase the sodium content of the materials during synthesis so that the battery could operate in a wider range of sodium content (upper-bound elevated) without costly preprocessing; on the other hand, one could also try to suppress the phase transition at 33% of Na so that the lower-bound of operational sodium content is lowered, allowing for a wider range of sodium and consequently leading to a higher capacity. There is not much room for the improvement with the first approach because, when the sodium content in H-P2-type oxides is more than 80% or less than 60%, the material is not chemically stable in the air30. Preventing its reaction with the air would require a lot of extra work and greatly increase the manufacturing cost. Regarding the latter approach, surface coating and doping in the transition metal layer have been tried31,32,33. Neither of these methods could suppress a phase transition or prevent material failure caused by such transitions.

We envisage the fact that such phase transitions are inevitable for the moment and seek alternative approaches that might be more effective. We, therefore, did not aim to suppress the phase transition, but to postpone the phase transition to well below the “33%” threshold and to  maintain a stable structural framework during the transition. We tackled the problem not by doping the transition metal layer, but by doping the alkali ion layer. In this study, we present this “pillar-beam” structure with the formula K0.08Na[0-0.74][Ni0.2Mn0.8]O2 (K0.4[Ni0.2Mn0.8]O2 before cycling). In this material, a small percentage of potassium ions are “inert” during the cycling and stay in the alkali ion layer permanently, thus stabilizing the structure. Similar strategies have been applied to lithium-ion cathode materials in previous reports34,35,36, where dopants in the alkali ion layers are shown to help prevent the formation of spinel phase at the surfaces. Nevertheless, no single phase material was obtained in these lithium cathodes, but here we managed to synthesize an O-P2 phase powder for the Na cathode. In addition, the phase transition prevention is extended from the surface to the bulk in the current work. More importantly, the detailed underlying mechanism of the dopant ions is fully presented. We demonstrate that the doping potassium ions, which are larger than sodium, support the transition metal layers even while the sodium ions are completely extracted (hence the term “pillar-beam”). The P2 → O2 phase transition only occurs at nearly the end of sodium extraction, so that it no longer destroys the cathode materials and has little effect on the cyclability. By replacing around 8% of the sodium ions with potassium ions, we bypassed the 33% sodium content limit, thus benefiting from an extra 25% of sodium ions for the intercalation reaction. If a non-doped material works in the sodium content range of 33–80%, then we can increase the capacity by ~50% with the potassium “pillars”.

In this work, we report an orthogonal P2-type structured cathode material K0.4Ni0.2Mn0.8O2. It delivers a high capacity of 194 mAh/g at 0.1 C, a high rate capacity of 84% at 1 C, and an 86% capacity retention after 500 cycles at 1 C. In situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra, inductively coupled plasma (ICP) results, and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images demonstrate that the remaining potassium ions preserved the pillar-beam framework even when all the sodium ions are extracted. X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectra and differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS) also show that it is the transition metal ions, rather than the oxygen, that are involved in the charge transfer during the cycling period. The first-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculations provide insights into the diffusion properties of sodium and potassium ions, further supporting the hypothesized function of potassium ions in the material. The study of the detailed working mechanism of the potassium pillar ions in the alkali layer reveals their effect in boosting both the energy density and the cycle life.


Structure and sodium storage of Kx[Nix/2Mn1−x/2]O2

A series of compounds, specifically Kx[Nix/2Mn1−x/2]O2 with x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.67, were synthesized to study the effect of potassium content on the crystal structure. Although they were all layered, the Rietveld refinements of their XRD patterns showed that these compounds could be categorised into two symmetry groups, as shown in Fig. 2a. When x ≥ 0.4, they are O-P2 type. This O-P2 structure belongs to the orthorhombic crystal system with symmetry group Cmcm, where potassium ions occupy the 4c sites (see Supplementary Table 1 for the detailed atom locations). The potassium ions are contained in the triangular prisms sharing their base edges with those of the transition metal octahedral, and if viewed along the c-axis, the potassium ions are centered in triangles with transition metal atoms at the vertices. This is different from the conventional H-P2-type structure with symmetry group P63/mmc where, in addition to edge-sharing 2d sites, part of the alkali-metal ions occupied face-sharing 2b sites with transition metal atoms directly on top of them, as shown in Fig. 1. The O-P2 structure with x = 0.4 is plotted in Fig. 2c; its lattice parameters are a = 2.886(5) Å, b = 5.001(7) Å, c = 12.7908 Å, and V = 184.666 Å3. When x ≤ 0.3, however, these main phases become P3 which are monoclinic with symmetry group C2/m, where potassium ions partially occupy the 4i sites (Supplementary Table 1a, b). The exemplifying x = 0.3 case is plotted in Fig. 2d, e; its lattice parameters are a = 5.118(7) Å, b = 2.860(3) Å, c = 7.181(0) Å, and V = 105.012 Å3.

Fig. 2: Structure of KxNix/2Mn1−x/2O2.
figure 2

a XRD patterns of KxNix/2Mn1−x/2O2 compounds prepared by solid state reaction, arranged in order of increasing potassium content from top to bottom (λ = 1.789 Å). b The Rietveld refinement for the K0.4Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 XRD pattern. c Schematic illustration of the orthorhombic P2-K0.4Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 projected in b–c plane. d The Rietveld refinement for the K0.3Ni0.15Mn0.85O2 XRD pattern. e Schematic illustration of the Monoclinic K0.3Ni0.15Mn0.85O2 projected in ac plane.

The electrochemical results of Kx[Nix/2Mn1-x/2]O2 | Na cells (x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.67) are shown in Fig. 3a–h, where all the cells were first discharged to 1.5 V, then charged to 4.2 V, and finally discharged again. To summarize the results: (1) the x = 0.4 case had a maximum capacity for the second discharge; and (2) all the materials’ second discharge showed more capacity than their respective first discharges. The latter feature was readily understood as the result of the partial replacement of potassium ions by sodium ions. After the first discharge, sodium ions entered the structure via both ion-exchange and electrochemical intercalation; they could be extracted during the first charge, leaving more vacancies for the next discharge. But at least for the optimum case of x = 0.4, even potassium ions could get further extracted during the first charge, leaving even more available sites for sodium, and although all the cells reached equilibrium at an open-circuit voltage (OCV), the potassium equilibrium under the electrochemical conditions was reached only after the first cycle. We also discuss this below.

Fig. 3: Sodium storage performance of KxNix/2Mn1−x/2O2 electrodes.
figure 3

The 1st and 2nd discharge/charge curves at C/10 between 1.5 and 4.2 V versus Na+/Na for the material a K0.67Ni0.33Mn0.67O2, b K0.6Ni0.3Mn0.7O2, c K0.5Ni0.25Mn0.75O2, d K0.4Ni0.2Mn0.8O2, e K0.3Ni0.15Mn0.85O2, f K0.2Ni0.1Mn0.9O2, g K0.1Ni0.05Mn0.95O2. h Comparison of the 2nd discharge capacity of KxNix/2Mn1−x/2O2 versus x. Sodium storage performance of O-P2 K0.4Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 electrodes: i The 1st, 10th, 50th, and 100th discharge/charge curves at C/10 between 1.5 and 4.2 V versus Na+/Na. j Rate capability. The capacity versus cycle number at various current rates. k Long-term cycling performance. The capacity and Coulombic efficiency versus cycle number at 1 C. Note that the K content stabilized at 0.08 after first cycle, therefore, the working electrode was NaxK0.08Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 thereafter.

Since the x = 0.4 material K0.4Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 has the best electrochemical performance, further investigations were focused on this material only. Detailed cycling performances are shown in Fig. 3i–k. The first discharge exhibited a capacity of 115 mAh/g between 2.85 and 1.5 V versus Na/Na+. This capacity corresponds to a 0.441 sodium-ion intercalation per formula unit; at this moment, the total amount of alkali-metal ions becomes 0.841 per formula unit, which includes the initial 0.4 potassium (some of them being replaced by sodium due to the ion-exchange effect) and the 0.441 intercalated sodium. At the immediate next charging state, we see that the reversible capacity was 194 mAh/g between 1.5 and 4.2 V, corresponding to 0.748 alkali ion extraction. Hence, only 0.093 alkali ions were left in the cathode material at the end of the charge (before the second discharge). The ICP results suggest that at this stage there are 0.0991 K ions left in the material (see Table 1); therefore, we are certain that the 0.093 alkali ions that were left here are all K ions and that the 0.748 extracted alkali ions contained both K and Na. Note that ICP tests are destructive so different cells are used, and the derived values of 0.0991 and 0.093 K ions can be well considered to be consistent. The almost vacant alkali-metal ion layer led to high capacity in the following cycles. In the second cycle, this material appeared quite stable; the charge/discharge curves were barely changed. At a current density of C/10, excellent capacity retention of 95.6% was achieved at the 100th cycle. It is worth noting that, unlike conventional H-P2-type cathode materials, there was no plateau in the charge curve for sodium content below 33%. This observation suggests that no serious side reactions, such as gas evolution reactions, took place during the charging stage. After ion-exchange, the escaped K ions enter and stay in the electrolyte in the form of KPF6 even with metallic Na anodes (see supplement information for the details, shown in Supplementary Figs. 14). So the pre-treatment of ion-exchange does not trigger any safety issues in the cells. The rate capability of this O-P2-type K0.4[Ni0.2Mn0.8]O2 electrode was also tested. It can be seen in Fig. 3j that the reversible capacities were 194, 183, 174, 163, 147, and 135 mAh/g at current rates of C/10, C/5, C/2, 1 C, 2 C, and 4 C, respectively. The capacity retention at 1 C was 84% of the initial capacity. The capacity retention was 86% at 1 C after 500 cycles (shown in Fig. 3k). The Coulombic efficiency (CE) was nearly 100% for almost all cycles. Some fluctuations in the CE curve in Fig. 3k (upper curve) are observed. Many factors can contribute to cell fluctuations, including temperature, humidity, stress, electrolyte reactions, and SEI formations37,38. A few solutions have been proposed39, but fluctuations remain inevitable. Thus, with the help of the O-P2 pillar-beam structure of K0.4[Ni0.2Mn0.8]O2, a large capacity and high stability in this SIB cathode material were achieved simultaneously. In this x = 0.4 case, after first cycle, the content of K is stabilized at 0.08 and it is indeed NaxK0.08Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 at work in what follows.

Table 1 ICP results of cathode material at indicated states.

Charge transfer and structural changes

Several factors contributed to the excellent capacity and stability of K0.4[Ni0.2Mn0.8]O2 (which becomes NaxK0.08Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 after the first cycle). It was known that phase transitions and gas evolution were major reasons for the limited capacity and stability of conventional SIB cathode materials. In this section, we discuss how our material avoided these pitfalls. Detailed examinations of the atomic charge transfers and the microscopic structures were conducted to understand the electrochemical behavior of K0.4[Ni0.2Mn0.8]O2 (NaxK0.08Ni0.2Mn0.8O2). It was found that the anions in this K0.4[Ni0.2Mn0.8]O2 (NaxK0.08Ni0.2Mn0.8O2) did not participate in any chemical or electrochemical reactions and the conventionally destructive P2 → O2 phase transition occurred only towards the end of the sodium extraction.

The destructive gas (oxygen) evolution reaction, a threat to the stability of SIB cathode materials, typically comes from the oxidation of O2− anions in the structure. Detection of O2− was conducted by monitoring the valence changes of all elements by using X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy and operando differential electrochemical mass spectroscopy (DEMS) during battery cycling. XANES spectra revealed that the Mn edge was between those of Mn2O3 (Mn3+) and MnO2 (Mn4+), indicating that its average valence was between +3 and +4, and that the Ni edge was between NiO and NiOOH, indicating that its average valence was between +2 and +3 (Fig. 4a, b). Supplementary Table 2 shows the average Mn valences at each charge state, according to the linear regression between the absorption edge and the voltage of standards (Supplementary Fig. 5). During the first discharge, the voltage dropped from 2.7 to 1.5 V and the valence of Mn decreased from +3.65 to +3.10, which indicates that 0.44 Mn atoms changed from +4 to +3 per formula unit (as there are 0.8 Mn atoms in a formula unit); and compared to the number of sodium ions (0.441) that intercalated during this period, we see that it is the sodium intercalation in this voltage range that led to the corresponding Mn reduction. Upon charging the cell to 3.3 V, the Mn valence increased to +3.70, demonstrating good redox reversibility. Further charging the cell to 4.2 V led to an increase in Mn valence to +3.95; therefore, from 1.5 to 4.2 V, the charge transfer reflected by the Mn valence was determined to be 0.68 electrons per formula unit. Meanwhile, no significant changes in the Ni absorption edge were observed during the first discharge (from 2.7 to 1.5 V). However, during the charge from 1.5 to 4.2 V, the absorption edge has shifted 0.6 eV upwards. This upward shift of the edge is known to represent a valence change of +0.3 for Ni, according to the linear fitting with the absorption edge of NiO (8345.8 eV) and NiOOH (8347.8 eV). Given that there were 0.2 Ni atoms per formula unit, the overall charge was 0.06 electrons per formula unit. Oxygen valence did not change during the electrochemical reaction, as shown by the oxygen K-edge near-edge X-ray absorption fine structures (NEXAFS) results (see Supplementary Fig. 6). Therefore, the total charge transfer per formula during the charge from 1.5 to 4.2 V was 0.68 + 0.06 = 0.74 electrons, while the determined total number of the sodium ion extraction was 0.748; the difference between the two is 1.08%. The DEMS measurement for this process is shown in Supplementary Fig. 7. No signal of O2 gas has been detected during the whole charge–discharge process. This is consistent with the results from NEXAFS spectroscopy. Meanwhile, a small amount of CO2 gas was released. We believe it was generated by the decomposition of traces of Na2CO3 in the electrode and the side reactions involving the electrolyte at high voltage40,41,42. To conclude, based on these results that the charge transfer during the cell operation led to valence changes of the transition metal ions only, and oxygen ions did not participate in the electrochemical reaction, hence no gas evolution reactions occurred. This explains the observed high stability of K0.4[Ni0.2Mn0.8]O2/NaxK0.08Ni0.2Mn0.8O2. In addition, where Mn and Ni were both present within the lattice, it was determined that Mn underwent a valence change before Ni. Identical results to the first cycle were obtained in the second cycle, demonstrating the excellent reversibility and stability of this material.

Fig. 4: Charge transfer and STEM images of O-P2 K0.4Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 during cell operation.
figure 4

a Mn and b Ni K-edge ex situ XANES spectra collected at indicated states. Spectra of reference materials were presented for comparison. c Shell-by-shell fitting results for the Fourier-transformed EXAFS of Mn and d Ni in the same states. The most energetically favorable structures suggested by DFT calculations at the state of e Pristine, f OCV, g 4.2 V-1st charge, and h 1.5 V-2nd discharge. These results match well with the following STEM images: i ABF-STEM image of pristine K0.4Ni0.2Mn0.8O2, j OCV, and HAADF-STEM image of K0.4Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 (H-P2) at the state of k 4.2 V-1st charge and l 1.5 V-2nd discharge.

Having ruled out the possibility of gas evolution reactions, the structural changes accompanying the cycling process were investigated using multiple techniques. ICP was used to determine the quantity of the “pillar” potassium. XAFS spectra were used to investigate the local structure and an overall lattice evolution was probed via XRD. STEM images were then acquired to examine the microstructure of K0.4[Ni0.2Mn0.8]O2. Finally, first-principles DFT calculations were performed to further understand the energetics of the phases involved. All these techniques convinced us that our material was highly stable during the cycling; the P2 → O2 phase transition was postponed till nearly the end of the sodium extraction, and it did not interfere with the intercalation reaction or did not result in any structural damage.

The ICP results are shown in Table 1. The potassium content initially decreased due to ion-exchange and further decreased during the cycling period, as discussed earlier. However, after the first cycle, the K content remained constant, suggesting that equilibrium was reached. These “pillar” potassium ions occupied ~8% alkali metal sites, thus leaving an extra 25% of alkali metal sites available for sodium intercalation/de-intercalation. Consequently, the lower-bound of Na content is reduced from 33% in the conventional H-P2-type materials to ~8% in this O-P2-type material, which accomplished the high capacity.

Fourier-transformed extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) analyses were employed to examine the local structural changes during the electrochemical cycle. The shell-by-shell fitting results (Supplementary Table 3a, b and Fig. 4c, d) showed high stability of the material during the charge–discharge cycle from 1.5 to 3.4 V. The (averaged) Mn–O bonds have two different lengths of 1.86 and 1.99 Å due to the Jahn–Teller effect. Both bond-lengths remained unchanged. And so did the Mn–Mn/Ni distance of 2.88 Å. The Mn–O bond splitting in Jahn–Teller distorted MnO6 polyhedral is also confirmed in the first-principles DFT calculations (Supplementary Fig. 8). The coordination numbers of Mn to O and Mn/Ni elements had approximate values of 5.9 and 7.7, respectively. Substantial changes occurred during the charging process to 4.2 V, including the Mn–O bond length and Mn–Mn/Ni distance, which decreased to 1.83, 1.95, and 2.85 Å, respectively. This refers that there was a phase transition from P2 to O2 during this stage. The local structure around the Ni atoms did not exhibit significant changes.

The four states (pristine, OCV, 1st 4.2 V-charge, and 2nd 1.5 V-discharge) of the active materials were further analyzed at atomic resolution with annular bright field (ABF) and high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) STEM (shown in Fig. 4). Fig. 4e–h displays the most energetically favorable structures in each state, based on the DFT calculations. ABF-STEM images of pristine and OCV K0.4Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 are shown in Fig. 4i, j, respectively. They correspond to the orthogonal and hexagonal layered-structure phases with the inter-layer distances labeled. Fig. 4k, l exhibit the HAADF-STEM observation of the 4.2 V-1st charge and 1.5 V-2nd discharge state. The measured structures and inter-layer distance also aligned closely with our DFT calculations (see Supplementary Table 4).

In fact, before the electrochemical cycling, part of the O-P2 structure in the as-made cell has already converted to H-P2 via ion-exchange. The c-axis in the H-P2 phase (OCV state) was 11.417(7) Å as obtained from XRD pattern, which was close to the value observed from STEM (11.212 Å) (Fig. 4j). The crystal structure evolution during the cycling was studied via in situ XRD (Fig. 5). In the first cycle, O-P2 and H-P2 phases co-existed initially. When the discharge proceeded to ~2.1 V (K+ + Na+ = 0.76), the (002)H-P2 peak started to broaden and stayed till the end of the discharge period, along with an up-shift. The formation of an intermediate P’2 phase (orthorhombic, S.G.: Cm)43,44,45 was implied by the split of the (002) and (004) peaks and the emergence of another peak at 37° at the beginning of the charge, which was repeatedly observed in the following three cycles. This P′2 phase was formed by the collective gliding of transition metal layers with Na+ intercalation or with the distortions caused by the increasing amount of Mn3+44,45,46. While charged to ~4.0 V (0.162 Na+), the (002)O-P2 peak disappeared and a noticeable peak formed at ~16.6°, which was attributed to the (002) of O2 phase with a c-axis of 10.672 Å. This O2 phase was formed via the gliding of the transition metal layers and, as a result, the alkali metal sites changed from prismatic to octahedral. Further charging the cell to 4.2 V, the (002)H-P2 peak disappeared while the (002)O2 peak rapidly shifted to 17.8°, corresponding to the c-axis of 9.968 Å. This parameter was in agreement with the 9.718 Å that was captured in the STEM image (a 2.6% difference). The detailed information regarding the phase transformations during the first cycle is summarized in Fig. 5d. After the first cycle, the O-P2 phase disappeared completely with only the stable H-P2 phase left. This result could be due to the removal of potassium ions from 0.2 to 0.08 during the first charge, after which the potassium content kept constant. From the second cycle on, the spectrum development demonstrated excellent reversibility, with the H-P2 to O2 phase transformation at the end of charge. Some inflection points were observed on the charge/discharge curve. For example, at ~3.3 V (Na+ + K+ ~ 0.33), there was a small bump; further charging to ~3.5 V (Na+ + K+ ~ 0.5), there was a small drop. These subtle features on the electrochemical curves were due to Na+/vacancy ordering in the structure47,48, which had little effect on the main pillar-beam structure or the electrochemical performance.

Fig. 5: In situ XRD patterns of K0.4Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 electrode during electrochemical operation.
figure 5

a Selected XRD spectra collected during four cycles at C/15 between 1.5 and 4.2 V.; b XRD spectra focused on the 2nd cycle; c Variation of lattice parameters during the 2nd cycle; df Phase diagrams of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd cycles, respectively.

The evolution of the lattice parameters of H-P2 and O2 phases in the 1st and 2nd cycles is shown in Supplementary Fig. 9. The variations during the two cycles are similar despite the existence of O-P2 phase in the 1st cycle. Fig. 5c plots the lattice parameter changes in the 2nd cycle. During the discharge period from 3 to 1.5 V, cH-P2 decreased continuously and reached a minimum at 1.5 V, whereas aH-P2 displayed the opposite trend. During the charging period, cH-P2 increased until O2 phase was present. The lattice parameter changes were ΔcH-P2 = 5.29%, ΔaH-P2 = 2.74%, ΔVH-P2 = 2.99% for the H-P2 and ΔcO2 = 6.81%, ΔaO2 = 0.6%, ΔVO2 = 7.55% for the O2 phase. This phase transition introduced a total volumetric change of 12.8% which is smaller than those of the conventional SIB cathode materials (~23.1%)49. This phenomenon revealed the important role of the potassium pillars in reducing the strain to a tolerable level and thus stabilizing the structure. The importance of potassium pillar ions can be further evidenced by the excessive voltage in charge. In a destructive test, we charged the cell to 4.5 V at the rate of C/15, the cell showed fast degradation (see Supplementary Fig. 10a). Supplementary Fig. 10b shows the voltage curve started to be noisy after a short smooth slope above 4.2 V, which is likely related to the contact issue. This short slope started at the 4.2 V and ended at 4.35 V. The capacity provided by this slope matched exactly the remaining 8% K ions. The lattice parameter c of the O2 phase in the 1st cycle was calculated from the XRD pattern and plotted in Supplementary Fig. 10c, d. The c-axis of the O2 phase was 4.9794 Å at 4.2 V and reduced to 4.9730 Å by further charging the cell to 4.35 V. The decrease in c was caused by the removal of the 8% potassium ions from the structure. Although we can see from the XRD patterns that even under such conditions the layer structure could still be maintained, the material becomes highly irreversible regarding the intercalation reaction with Na ions and this proves the vital role of potassium ‘pillar’ ions in enhancing the performance of this material. In addition to propping the structure and reducing the strain during cycling, K ions also help to reduce the Na intercalation potential by stretching the transition metal layers so that they could not provide the optimum inter-layer distance for the intercalated Na (see Supplementary Fig. 11 and Discussion in Supplementary Information).

Insights from first-principles calculations

We also verified the condition of the P2 → O2 phase transition using first-principles DFT calculations. The energy difference between the P2 and O2 phases at different alkali metal contents are shown in Fig. 6a. The P2 phase is favored over O2 phase in the pristine K0.4Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 composition (marked “1” in black). After the ion-exchange, the resulting material K0.2Na0.2Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 (marked “2” in blue) was still energetically favored as the P2 phase. During the cycling period, the content of potassium changed to 0.1 (or 10%) and the content of sodium ranged from 0 to 0.7. All considered compositions of K0.1NaxNi0.2Mn0.8O2 (marked “3”, “4”, “5”, and “6” in red) favored the P2 phase except when the sodium content drops to 0 (marked “7” in red), where the O2 phase became much more energetically favored. Therefore, the P2 → O2 phase transition only occurred when the sodium content dropped below 0.1. We should note that, even where this phase transition did occur, there were still 0.1 potassium ions in the alkali metal layer propping the structure. Later cycles did not result in changes in the potassium content. We believe there were two reasons for this relatively constant potassium content. First, the equilibrium redox potential of K/K+ is 0.2 V lower than that of Na/Na+; therefore the potassium ions could remain in the electrolyte while the sodium was deposited on the anode, leaving the equilibrium between K+ in the electrolyte and K+ in the cathode material largely unaffected. Second, the calculated energy barrier of K+ vacancy migration in the alkali layer was higher than that of Na+ in P2-K0.2Na0.8Ni0.2Mn0.8O2, as shown in Fig. 6b.

Fig. 6: DFT calculations.
figure 6

a Energy difference between P2 and O2 phase of each composition found during the cell operation. b Na+ and K+ vacancy hopping energy barriers. c Trajectories of Na+/K+ ion diffusion in the alkali metal layer in P2- K0.1Na0.3Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 from AIMD simulations. d Radial distribution function (RDF) for the alkali ions. e Comparison between the RDF peak positions and the ab plane of the crystal lattice. f Distribution of K ions after structural relaxation. Inter-K distances are all larger than the inter-site distance even if they are put closer at the beginning of the structural relaxation.

The larger K migration barrier is mainly due to the localization of K-ions in the structure, which creates a higher energy cost of hopping to an adjacent site. To characterize the overall hopping behavior, we adopt the notion of kinetically resolved activation (KRA) energy barrier obtained by subtracting from the usual activation energy the difference between initial and final state total energies. In this way, an average difference of 0.18 eV in KRA energy barriers between K+ and Na+ at room temperature translates to a difference in hopping probability of orders of magnitude. Furthermore, ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulation was performed to investigate the diffusion of alkali-metal ions in the P2 phase. Fig. 6c shows the trajectories of alkali-metal ion in K0.1Na0.3Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 from the AIMD simulations. We find that sodium and potassium trajectories overlap, suggesting that potassium ions do not hinder sodium ions diffusion, since the latter can be where once occupied by the former. The radial distribution function (RDF) for the alkali ions are shown in Fig. 6d, and the RDF peaks are labeled corresponding to the labeled concentric circles in the lattice in Fig. 6e. The origin of the circles is chosen to be the center of an edge-sharing prism (marked with circled black star), as it is the lowest-energy alkali ion site in equilibrium. In Fig. 6d we see from K–K curve that K ions are more solid-like, with sharp RDF peaks, indicating they have much longer resident time on their respective sites than the time spent outside of site locations hopping. In Fig. 6e, sites forbidden to K ions around a central K ion are marked with black crosses. We see these are the nearest neighboring edge-sharing prism centers. This effect could be explained with the radius of potassium ions; large ions like potassium repel each other too strongly at this distance that such distribution is not possible. Sodium ions do not have as well defined peaks as the K-K case; they are more liquid-like. The time spent on residing on the sites is not significantly longer than the time hopping. This is another evidence showing Na ions are much more active than K ions. The full analysis of this AIMD data is presented in supplemental information. Here, we reach the conclusion that, when K and Na were both present, Na diffusion is not hindered by the presence of K ions, and Na ions diffuse much faster than K ions. We also verified it experimentally with galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) and found that with the presence of K ions, the Na ions have an average diffusion coefficient of 3 × 10−10 cm2 s−1, comparable to a few established results obtained without K ions (see Supplementary Fig. 12). The localization of the K+ ion resulted in a wide-spread distribution of “pillars”, found in the K-K RDF and in DFT structural optimization of K0.1Ni0.2Mn0.8O2, which created “homogenous” support for the transition metal layers as the sparse distribution of potassium ions made local depletion of these alkali-metal ions very unlikely (illustrated in Fig. 6f). This observation illustrates why 8% of the K+ ions were able to stabilize the layered structure even during the destructive P2-O2 phase transition. The detailed results of the density of states of the material, which verifies the charge transfer process, is put in the supplement information (as shown in Supplementary Fig. 13). It is worth noting that although we have suppressed the P2-O2 phase transition to achieve high capacity and long cycle life, the relatively low sodium content in the P2 cathode materials in general could still be a limiting factor for their commercial applications in sodium-ion batteries. Sodium supplementation through additives, pre-sodiated and metallic negative electrodes50,51 can be solutions to this issue.

To summarize, the pillar-beam structured O-P2-type K0.4[Ni0.2Mn0.8]O2 is successfully synthesized and used as a cathode material. It not only exhibits a high capacity of 194 mAh/g at 0.1 C, but also a high rate capacity of 84% at 1 C, and an 86% capacity retention after 500 cycles at 1 C within the voltage range from 1.5 to 4.2 V. Two essential characteristics of this material ensure its excellent electrochemical performance: (1) Only 8% of the pillar potassium ions are required to uphold the transition metal layers even with complete sodium extraction; (2) Only sodium ions participate in the intercalation reactions, which is realized by taking advantage of the differences in the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of K+ and Na+ ions. The findings obtained in this work inspire the search and design of improved positive electrode materials and the development of room temperature, long-lasting SIBs for use in large-scale energy storage systems.


Material synthesis

The series of materials of this work were prepared through a solid-state reaction method with the precursors K2CO3 (99%), Mn2O3, and NiO (99.5%). An excess of 5 mol% K2CO3 was used to compensate for the K loss during high-temperature synthesis. The starting materials were ground in an agate mortar and pressed into pellets under a pressure of 20 MPa. Then, the pellets were heated at 800 °C for 6 h, 900 °C for 6 h, 1000 °C for 10 h, and 1050 °C for 1 h in air. The heating rate was 5 °C/min. Afterwards, these pellets are cooled naturally. The color of the final products was black.

X-ray diffraction

The XRD patterns of the pristine powders were measured on a Smartlab diffractometer (Rigaku) with Co radiation (Kα: 1.788920 Å), 40 kV, 40 mA, 0.02°/step, scan speed 4 s/step, and a range of 10.0–120.0°.

The in situ XRD patterns were collected from a modified 2032 coin-cell with a 15-μm thick Al foil as an X-ray window as well as a current collector for the cathode. The in situ X-ray measurement was performed on a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer with 1 mm collimator and Cu-Kα radiation. The data were collected with scan-step size 0.025° and data collecting time of 3 s (2 h/scan). The corresponding electrochemical measurement was carried out using a Biologic SP300 potentiostat (BioLogic Science Instrument), controlled by EC-Lab (V10.19). The experimental coin cell was cycled between 1.5 and 4.2 V at a rate of C/15 for four cycles.

X-ray absorption spectroscopy

The Mn and Ni K-edge XAFS spectra of the standards and electrode slides were collected at the beamline BL14W1 of the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF) and beamline 17C1 and 44A1 of the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC). The typical energies of the storage rings were 3.5 GeV and 3.0 GeV, and the electron currents were ~220 mA and ~500 mA in the top-up mode, respectively. The white light was monochromatized by a Si (111) double-crystal monochromator and calibrated with Mn foil (K-edge at 6539 eV) and Ni foil (K-edge at 8333 eV). Samples were positioned at 90° to the incident beam in the sample-holder and the XAFS spectra were recorded in transmission mode.

The XAFS data were analyzed using the Demeter software package. The spectra were normalized with Athena first, and then shell-by-shell fittings were performed with Artemis. The χ(k) function was Fourier transformed (FT) using k3 weighting, and all fittings were done in R-space. The amplitude reduction factor (S02) was estimated to be 0.813 for Mn and 0.859 for Ni according to the fitting results of the manganese and nickel foil. The coordination parameters, including the coordination number, bond distance and Debye-Waller factor were allowed to vary and were obtained by fitting the experimental peaks with their theoretical amplitudes.

The oxygen K-edge near edge X-ray fine structure (NEXAFS) spectra of the electrode slides were collected at beamline BL10B in the National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (NSRL). The samples were kept in the total electron yield mode under an ultrahigh vacuum at 5 × 10−5 mbar during the experiment. The resolving power was E/ΔE = 1000 with the photon flux of 1 × 1010 photons s−1. Spectra were collected in 0.15 eV energy steps.

Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) imaging

A JEM-ARM200F STEM fitted with a double aberration-corrector for both probe-forming and imaging lenses was used to perform HAADF imaging, which was operated at 200 KV. The convergence angle was 25 mrad and the angular range of collected electrons for HAADF imaging was about 70–250 mrad. Atomic resolution STEM-EELS line scanning was performed vertically throughout the interfaces, providing an energy resolution of 0.4 eV.

Differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS)

The DEMS experiments were performed with a commercial quadrupole mass spectrometer (Hiden Analytical) and a house-made Swagelok-type cell with K0.4Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 as cathode, sodium as anode and 1 M NaPF6 in ethylene carbonate (EC)/diethyl carbonate (DEC) (4:6 in volume) as electrolyte. The electrochemical test for DEMS is performed on a LAND battery testing system at room temperature. The carrier gas is high purity Ar-gas with a flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1.


The working electrode was prepared by spreading a slurry of the active materials (75 wt.%), acetylene black (15 wt.%) and the polyvinylidene fluoride (10 wt.%) binder on Al foil. The working electrodes were dried at 120 °C in vacuum for 10 h. The electrolyte was 1 M NaPF6 in ethylene carbonate (EC)/diethyl carbonate (DEC) (4:6 in volume). The electrode mass loading is around ~5 mg/cm2. The coin-type (CR2032) cells were assembled with pure sodium foil as the counter electrode, and a glass fiber as the separator in an argon-filled glove box. The sodium storage performance in Kx[Nix/2Mn1−x/2]O2 | Na cells (x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.67) was tested, where sodium metal was used as the counter electrode and 1 M NaPF6 in 4:6 EC/DEC was used as the electrolyte. All assembled cells were left intact (OCV state) for 12 h before the first cycle in order to let the K+ and Na+ ion-exchange between electrolyte and Kx[Nix/2Mn1−x/2]O2 reach equilibrium. The charge and discharge measurements were carried out on a VMP-300 battery test system in the voltage range of 1.5–4.2 V at room temperature (1 C current rate corresponds to 120 mA/g).

DFT calculations

First-principles calculations were performed using density functional theory (DFT) as implemented in the plane-wave-basis-set Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP)52 with the projection augmented-wave scheme53. The Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) generalized gradient approximation (GGA) exchange-correlation functional with the rotationally invariant scheme of Hubbard-U correction54 was applied to calculate the total energies. The values of Ueff = 6.7 and 3.8 were employed for Ni and Mn, respectively, consistent with previous ab initio studies of their layered compounds55,56,57. The van der Waals interaction in structures at the charged state with a large amount of site vacancies was treated with nonlocal correlation functional vdW-DF-optB8658. Supercells containing 180–240 atoms were chosen depending on the composition of the alkali atoms. A cutoff energy of 520 eV was used for all calculations. The force exerted on each atom was ensured to be less than 0.01 eV/A for structural relaxation. The ionic diffusivity and conductivity were calculated using ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) as implemented in VASP. The simulations were performed on the canonical ensemble with a time step of 2 fs, and the temperature was initialized at 100 K and elevated to 400 K and 600 K with simulations over 40 ps for statistical analysis. The composition for AIMD is fixed to K0.1Na0.3Ni0.2Mn0.8O2. The radial distribution function analysis were processed with Python Materials Genomics package (pymatgen)59.

Structures with Ni/Mn and K/Na/vacancy orderings are pre-screened using Ewald electrostatic energy criterion in pymatgen59 followed by DFT geometry optimizations. Ni/Mn ordering are taken from the calculation of as-synthesized composition of K0.4Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 and kept fixed in the other calculations, assuming Ni/Mn cannot diffuse in the transition-metal layer when the cathode is charged or discharged. For KxNi0.2Mn0.8O2 (x = 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4), 40 lowest-energy structures are chosen for DFT optimization for each composition. For NaxK0.1Ni0.2Mn0.8O2 (x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5) and Na0.2K0.2Ni0.2Mn0.8O2, 20 structures in each composition are chosen for DFT optimization.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Armand, M. & Tarascon, J. M. Building better batteries. Nature 451, 652–657 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hwang, J.-Y., Myung, S.-T. & Sun, Y.-K. Sodium-ion batteries: present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 3529–3614 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pan, H. L., Hu, Y. S. & Chen, L. Q. Room-temperature stationary sodium-ion batteries for large-scale electric energy storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 2338–2360 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wang, Y. et al. A zero-strain layered metal oxide as the negative electrode for long-life sodium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 4, 2365 (2013).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yabuuchi, N. et al. P2-type NaxFe1/2Mn1/2O2 made from earth-abundant elements for rechargeable Na batteries. Nat. Mater. 11, 512–517 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Guignard, M. et al. P2-NaxVO2 system as electrodes for batteries and electron-correlated materials. Nat. Mater. 12, 74–80 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Delmas, C. Sodium and sodium-ion batteries: 50 years of research. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1703137 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jian, Z. et al. Carbon coated Na3V2(PO4)3 as novel electrode material for sodium ion batteries. Electrochem. Commun. 14, 86–89 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Oh, S.-M., Myung, S.-T., Hassoun, J., Scrosati, B. & Sun, Y.-K. Reversible NaFePO4 electrode for sodium secondary batteries. Electrochem. Commun. 22, 149–152 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wessells, C. D., Peddada, S. V., Huggins, R. A. & Cui, Y. Nickel hexacyanoferrate nanoparticle electrodes for aqueous sodium and potassium ion batteries. Nano Lett. 11, 5421–5425 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    You, Y., Wu, X.-L., Yin, Y.-X. & Guo, Y.-G. High-quality Prussian blue crystals as superior cathode materials for room-temperature sodium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1643–1647 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Saravanan, K., Mason, C. W., Rudola, A., Wong, K. H. & Balaya, P. The first report on excellent cycling stability and superior rate capability of Na3V2(PO4)3 for sodium ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 3, 444–450 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kim, J. et al. Unexpected discovery of low-cost maricite NaFePO4 as a high-performance electrode for Na-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 540–545 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Delmas, C., Braconnier, J.-J., Fouassier, C. & Hagenmuller, P. Electrochemical intercalation of sodium in NaxCoO2 bronzes. Solid State Ion. 3-4, 165–169 (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mendiboure, A., Delmas, C. & Hagenmuller, P. Electrochemical intercalation and deintercalation of NaxMnO2 bronzes. J. Solid State Chem. 57, 323–331 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Floros, N., Michel, C., Hervieu, M. & Raveau, B. Calcium insertion in the Na4Mn9O18 tunnel structure: Na1.1Ca1.8Mn9O18. J. Solid State Chem. 162, 34–41 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lu, Z. & Dahn, J. R. In situ X-ray diffraction study of P2 ­ Na2/3[Ni1/3Mn2/3]O2. J. Electrochem. Soc. 148, A1225–A1229 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Okada, S. et al. Layered transition metal oxides as cathodes for sodium secondary battery. Mater. Sci. MA2006-02, abstr. 201 (2006).

  19. 19.

    Billaud, J. et al. β-NaMnO2: a high-performance cathode for sodium-ion batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 17243–17248 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Li, X. et al. O3-type Na(Mn0.25Fe0.25Co0.25Ni0.25)O2: a quaternary layered cathode compound for rechargeable Na ion batteries. Electrochem. Commun. 49, 51–54 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Xu, S. et al. Fe-based tunnel-type Na0.61[Mn0.27Fe0.34Ti0.39]O2 designed by a new strategy as a cathode material for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1501156 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Delmas, C., Fouassier, C. & Hagenmuller, P. Structural classification and properties of the layered oxides. Phys. B & C 99, 81–85 (1980).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ozawa, K. Lithium-ion rechargeable batteries with LiCoO2 and carbon electrodes: the LiCoO2/C system. Solid State Ion 69, 212–221 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Petibon, R. et al. Studies of the capacity fade mechanisms of LiCoO2/Si-alloy: graphite cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, A1146–A1156 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mu, L. et al. Prototype sodium-ion batteries using an air-stable and Co/Ni-free O3-layered metal oxide cathode. Adv. Mater. 27, 6928–6933 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wang, P.-F. et al. Ti-substituted NaNi0.5Mn0.5-xTixO2 cathodes with reversible O3−P3 phase transition for high-performance sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 29, 1700210 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Guo, S. et al. A layered P2- and O3-type composite as a high-energy cathode for rechargeable sodium-ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 5894–5899 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Rong, X. et al. Anionic redox reaction-induced high-capacity and low-strain cathode with suppressed phase transition. Joule 3, 503–517 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    House, R. A. et al. Superstructure control of first-cycle voltage hysteresis in oxygen-redox cathodes. Nature 577, 502–508 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Han, M. H., Gonzalo, E., Singh, G. & Rojo, T. A comprehensive review of sodium layered oxides: powerful cathodes for Na-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 81–102 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jiang, K. et al. Suppressed the high-voltage phase transition of P2-type oxide cathode for high-performance sodium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 14848–14853 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Peng-Fei, W. et al. Suppressing the P2–O2 phase transition of Na0.67Mn0.67Ni0.33O2 by magnesium substitution for improved sodium-ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 7445–7449 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wang, K., Yan, P. & Sui, M. Phase transition induced cracking plaguing layered cathode for sodium-ion battery. Nano Energy 54, 148–155 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sallard, S., Sheptyakov, D. & Villevieille, C. Improved electrochemical performances of Li-rich nickel cobalt manganese oxide by partial substitution of Li+ by Mg2+. J. Power Sources 359, 27–36 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ates, M. N. et al. Mitigation of layered to spinel conversion of a Li-rich layered metal oxide cathode material for Li-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 161, A290–A301 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Li, Q. et al. K+-doped Li1.2Mn0.54Co0.13Ni0.13O2: a novel cathode material with an enhanced cycling stability for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 10330–10341 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zheng, Y., Wang, Y., Lu, Y., Hu, Y.-S. & Ju, L. A high-performance sodium-ion battery enhanced by macadamia shell derived hard carbon anode. Nano Energy 39, 489–498 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zheng, Y. et al. Superior electrochemical performance of sodium-ion full-cell using poplar wood derived hard carbon anode. Energy Storage Mater. 18, 269–279 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Li, K. et al. Evolution of the electrochemical interface in sodium ion batteries with ether electrolytes. Nat. Commun. 10, 725 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Luo, M. et al. Correction: identifying the anionic redox activity in cation-disordered Li1.25Nb0.25Fe0.50O2/C oxide cathodes for Li-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 13852–13852 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Luo, K. et al. Charge-compensation in 3d-transition-metal-oxide intercalation cathodes through the generation of localized electron holes on oxygen. Nat. Chem. 8, 684–691 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Maitra, U. et al. Oxygen redox chemistry without excess alkali-metal ions in Na2/3[Mg0.28Mn0.72]O2. Nat. Chem. 10, 288–295 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Han, M. H. et al. High-performance P2-phase Na2/3Mn0.8Fe0.1Ti0.1O2 cathode material for ambient-temperature sodium-ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 28, 106–116 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Mortemard de Boisse, B., Carlier, D., Guignard, M., Bourgeois, L. & Delmas, C. P2-NaxMn1/2Fe1/2O2 phase used as positive electrode in Na batteries: structural changes induced by the electrochemical (De)intercalation process. Inorg. Chem. 53, 11197–11205 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Talaie, E., Duffort, V., Smith, H. L., Fultz, B. & Nazar, L. F. Structure of the high voltage phase of layered P2-Na2/3−z[Mn1/2Fe1/2]O2 and the positive effect of Ni substitution on its stability. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 2512–2523 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Han, M. H. et al. Moisture exposed layered oxide electrodes as Na-ion battery cathodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 18963–18975 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Medarde, M. et al. 1D to 2D Na+ ion diffusion inherently linked to structural transitions in Na0.7CoO2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 266401 (2013).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Guignard, M. et al. P2-NaxVO2 system as electrodes for batteries and electron-correlated materials. Nat. Mater. 12, 74–80 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Yoshida, H. et al. P2-type Na2/3Ni1/3Mn2/3−xTixO2 as a new positive electrode for higher energy Na-ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 50, 3677–3680 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Niu, Y.-B. et al. High-efficiency cathode sodium compensation for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 32, 2001419 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Martinez De Ilarduya, J., Otaegui, L., López del Amo, J. M., Armand, M. & Singh, G. NaN3 addition, a strategy to overcome the problem of sodium deficiency in P2-Na0.67[Fe0.5Mn0.5]O2 cathode for sodium-ion battery. J. Power Sources 337, 197–203 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Dudarev, S. L., Botton, G. A., Savrasov, S. Y., Humphreys, C. J. & Sutton, A. P. Electron-energy loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA+U study. Phys. Rev.B 57, 1505–1509 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Zhou, F., Cococcioni, M., Marianetti, C. A., Morgan, D. & Ceder, G. First-principles prediction of redox potentials in transition-metal compounds with LDA +U. Phys. Rev.B 70, 235121 (2004).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Hoang, Khang Defect physics, delithiation mechanism, and electronic and ionic conduction in layered lithium manganese oxide cathode materials. Phys. Rev. Applied 3, 024013 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    McKendry, I. G. et al. Systematic doping of cobalt into layered manganese oxide sheets substantially enhances water oxidation catalysis. Inorg. Chem. 57, 557–564 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Klimeš, J., Bowler, D. R. & Michaelides, A. Chemical accuracy for the van der Waals density functional. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 022201 (2009).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Ong, S. P. et al. Python materials genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314–319 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Prof. Claude Delmas and Professor G. Ceder for the helpful and valuable discussions on the structure evolution during sodium insertion. This study of XAFS was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077145, 41701359). The authors acknowledge the staff of beamline BL14W1 of the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility, beamline 17C1 and 44A1 of the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center and beamline BL10B of the National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory for their support in hard and soft XAFS.

Author information




K. Z. and Y.-S. W. conceived and designed this work; Y.-S. W. performed all the experiments; M. G., G. L. and J. T. performed the synthesis and coatings. W. Z. performed in situ XRD measurements with Y.-S. W.; Y.-S. W. refined the XRD results; Z.-M. F. and Y. W. performed DFT calculations; P.X. C. performed ex situ hard and soft XAFS measurements with Y.-S. W; Y.G., Q-H, Z and L.G. performed STEM observation; C. Z. and Y. Y performed DEMS. Y.-S. W. and Y. G. analyzed the images; Y.W., P.X. C., Z.-M. F., W. Z., J. G. and Y.-S. W. wrote the paper; all the authors participated in analysis of the experimental data and discussions of the results as well as in the preparation of the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuesheng Wang, Lin Gu, Yan Wang or Karim Zaghib.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Elena Gonzalo and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Feng, Z., Cui, P. et al. Pillar-beam structures prevent layered cathode materials from destructive phase transitions. Nat Commun 12, 13 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing