Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Robust and efficient hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds catalysed by mixed donor Mn(I) pincer complexes

Abstract

Any catalyst should be efficient and stable to be implemented in practice. This requirement is particularly valid for manganese hydrogenation catalysts. While representing a more sustainable alternative to conventional noble metal-based systems, manganese hydrogenation catalysts are prone to degrade under catalytic conditions once operation temperatures are high. Herein, we report a highly efficient Mn(I)-CNP pre-catalyst which gives rise to the excellent productivity (TOF° up to 41 000 h−1) and stability (TON up to 200 000) in hydrogenation catalysis. This system enables near-quantitative hydrogenation of ketones, imines, aldehydes and formate esters at the catalyst loadings as low as 5–200 p.p.m. Our analysis points to the crucial role of the catalyst activation step for the catalytic performance and stability of the system. While conventional activation employing alkoxide bases can ultimately provide catalytically competent species under hydrogen atmosphere, activation of Mn(I) pre-catalyst with hydride donor promoters, e.g. KHBEt3, dramatically improves catalytic performance of the system and eliminates induction times associated with slow catalyst activation.

Introduction

Catalytic hydrogenation of carbonyl derivatives with molecular hydrogen is an essential technique for the production of bulk and fine chemicals1. The state of the art in hydrogenation catalysis to this date is laid down by well-defined noble metal complexes based on ruthenium, iridium, and rhodium2,3. However, the requirements for more sustainable hydrogenation processes recently initiated a search for earth-abundant, inexpensive 3d metals that can replace their noble counterparts4,5,6,7. In this search, the catalysts based on highly biocompatible and abundant Mn metal became particularly prominent8,9,10,11,12,13.

Manganese-based hydrogenation catalysis has become a subject of intense research since 2016, largely set off by the pioneering work of Beller and coworkers14. An Mn pincer complex A (Fig. 1) promoted hydrogenation of ketones, aldehydes and nitriles operating at 1–3 mol% loading at 60–120 °C and 10–50 bar H2 pressure. Following the initial reports, the field of hydrogenation with Mn was extended to several prominent ligand platforms9,10,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27.

Fig. 1: Mn complexes.
figure1

Selected examples of Mn hydrogenation catalysts and the complex used in this work.

Specifically, in addition to aminopincer ligands, the diamino triazine-based pincers B and lutidine-derived PNN pincer C ligands were introduced to Mn-catalyzed hydrogenations by the groups of Kempe28 and Milstein29, and saw further improvement in recent years30. In addition to pincer ligands, several bidentate ligands have been employed in Mn catalysis. These include PN aminophosphines developed by our group (D, Fig. 1)31, diphosphines E reported by the groups of Kirchner32 and García33. The most recent addition to this set was reported by Sortais and coworkers who described catalyst F (Fig. 1) based on a bidentate ligand containing phosphine and N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) donors. Together with catalyst B, complex F is one of the most potent Mn ketone hydrogenation catalysts requiring ca. 0.1 mol% catalyst loading for operation34.

The activity of Mn catalysts is generally lower than that of noble metal catalysts with majority of Mn-catalyzed hydrogenations requiring relatively high catalyst loadings of 0.1–5 mol%—a feature that strongly limits their practical utility. We recently demonstrated that reliance on such high metal loadings in Mn catalysis might stem from the limited stability of Mn pre-catalysts, most noticeable when Mn loadings are low35. Namely, we noted that Mn(I)–NHC complexes featuring aminocarbene “CN” bidentate ligands were highly competent hydride transfer catalysts at low reaction temperatures and high metal loadings, but a rapid catalyst degradation took place upon even marginal increase of reaction temperatures or reduction of catalyst loading <100 p.p.m. with respect to reduction substrate35. Addressing the catalyst stability in this work, we developed an active and highly stable Mn(I) catalyst that can promote hydrogenation reactions at catalyst loadings as low as 5 parts per million. Responsible for such performance is the tridentate CNP ligand platform (Fig. 1) that exhibits highly unusual phosphine hemilability, and enables catalyst activation pathways unavailable for known Mn catalysts.

Results

Synthesis and hydrogenation activity of 3

Our initial synthetic effort was targeted at addressing the stability of manganese catalysts utilizing bidentate “CN” ligands (1, Fig. 2) by extending the ligand with additional phosphine donor arm. This extension of CN ligand 1 was done via a straightforward reductive amination producing the air-stable L1 in 81% yield (Fig. 2). The L1 can undergo complexation to form 3 by a one-pot reaction involving pre-coordination to Mn(CO)5Br followed by the base-assisted formation of the NHC complex (Fig. 2). Analytically pure MnCNP complex 3 was isolated in 51% yield with its identity confirmed by NMR and IR spectroscopy, and elemental analysis (see Supplementary Information).

Fig. 2: Synthesis of Mn(I) complex 3.
figure2

a Conditions: 1 (8 mmol), 2 (1 eq.), NaBH(OAc)3 (2.5 eq.), DCE (20 mL), rt, 12 h. b Conditions: (i) L1 (0.5 mmol), MnBr(CO)5 (1 eq.), THF (5 mL), 50 °C rt, 12 h; (ii) KHMDS (1.1 eq.), rt, 3 h.

The IR spectrum of 3 features three strong bands at 2021, 1943, and 1919 cm−1 consistent with the presence of three carbonyl ligands in a facial arrangement within the cationic complex15. The characteristic 31P resonances in NMR spectrum of 3 appear at δ = 37.5 (s), −144.4 (hep, 1JFP 712.8 Hz) p.p.m. confirming the coordination of the phosphine donor arm and the presence of the hexafluorophosphate anion in 3. Finally, the 13C NMR revealed resonances at 217.7, 215.5, 213.9, and 187.0 p.p.m. confirming the presence of three inequivalent carbonyl ligands and an Mn-bound NHC ligand.

Complex 3 is a potent and stable precatalyst for ketone hydrogenation. We screened its performance in hydrogenation of acetophenone benchmark substrate in various solvents at different H2 pressures (see Supplementary Tables 1 and 2), and found the H2 pressure of 50 bar and dioxane solvent to be optimal for performance. This combination was further used to evaluate the impact of reaction temperature and catalyst loadings on the hydrogenation yield. The results listed in Table 1 indicate that the quantitative hydrogenation of acetophenone to the corresponding alcohol can be obtained with catalyst loadings as low as 50 p.p.m. at 60 °C (Table 1, entries 1–3). Importantly, catalyst 3 tolerates elevated reaction temperatures of 80 and 100 °C, that marks a significant improvement of thermal stability over the parent CN bidentate that rapidly degraded as the temperatures were elevated over 70 °C (ref. 35). Even at 100 °C hydrogenations with 3 led to quantitative yields requiring only 50 p.p.m. catalyst loading (entries 5 and 6). At low catalyst loading conditions, the activity of 3 compares favorably with a related MnPNP system A (ref. 14; entries 4 and 5). The hydrogenation with 3 at 200 p.p.m. loading at 80 °C is complete within 3 h, whereas catalyst A (Fig. 1) provides 67% conversion in 24 h under identical conditions.

Table 1 Manganese-catalyzed hydrogenation of acetophenonea.

The analysis of reaction progress using the H2 uptake measurements (see Supplementary Information) reveals that catalyst deactivation at elevated temperatures is only pronounced at very low catalyst loadings. Namely, for the reaction at 100 °C (entries 6–9, Table 1), full ketone conversion can be reached with 50 p.p.m. of 3, whereas at 25 p.p.m. the reaction does not proceed beyond 87% conversion level regardless of the reaction times employed (see Supplementary Fig. 38). Having observed that the introduction of a protective phosphine arm in complex 3 has markedly increased the catalyst thermal stability, we sought to improve the performance of 3 further. Apart from stability per se, we aimed at improving catalyst activation protocol that is an integral parameter to any catalytic system.

Mechanistic analysis

Catalyst activation, at large, is the reactivity pattern resulting in the generation of the active catalyst species. Similar to most bifunctional hydrogenation catalysts4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, our initial approach to catalyst activation involved the reaction of 3 with excess strong KOtBu alkoxide base followed by H2 to form the catalytically active Mn–H moiety (Fig. 3a). Tracking this transformation with the IR spectroscopy we observed a rapid and clean conversion of 3 upon reaction with KOtBu (Fig. 3b) into the amido complex 4. Notably, all three CO ligands were retained within 4 as follows from the presence of new bands at 1989, 1901, and 1885 cm−1. The resonance of phosphine donor in 4 was slightly shifted upfield to δ = 33.6 p.p.m. in 31P NMR compared to the initial cationic complex 3 (δ = 37.7 p.p.m.). At the same time complex 4, as well as its parent complex 3 exhibited restricted mesityl group rotation dynamics evidenced by the loss of equivalency between ortho-methyl substituents of the mesityl group on the NMR timescales—a typical feature of Mn(I)–NHC complexes35.

Fig. 3: Activation and reactivity of complex 3.
figure3

a Generation of complex 5 upon reaction with H2 (3 bar). b IR spectra of complex 3 (black) and in situ generated complex 4 (red) recorded in THF at 25 °C. c Molecular structure of complex 4 in the crystal with thermal ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability. d Hydride region of 1H NMR (THF-d8) spectra of in situ generated isomers of complex 5 (see Supplementary Fig. 19 for full spectra and analysis of isomers of 5, conversion of 45 estimated at 24% by 1H NMR).

Complex 4 was stable in THF for up to 24 h and could be isolated as microcrystalline solid in 70% yield. The analysis of solid-state crystal structure of 4 confirmed the facial configuration of the tridentate CNP ligand implied by the NMR and IR spectral data (Fig. 3c). Remarkably, the single-crystal X-ray diffraction results revealed a highly unusual P-donor binding geometry in 4 with N–Mn–P angle of mere 67.4°. For comparison, the corresponding valent angles in related MnPNP pincer complexes are >80° (refs. 28,29,30), indicating a significant coordination strain in complex 4 featuring the fac-bound CNP ligand.

Complex 4 reacts with H2 gas upon heating, resulting in a loss of one of the CO ligands and the formation of isomers of a manganese hydride pincer complex 5 (Fig. 3). However, this reaction is particularly slow and proceeds to ca. 24% conversion of the starting complex 4 at 50 °C over 12 h under 3 bar H2 pressure. The reaction gives rise to two new doublet resonances in 1H NMR spectrum at −3.46 and −3.49 p.p.m. with 2JPH = 60.0 and 68.0 Hz, respectively (Fig. 3d), corresponding to two isomers of dicarbonyl Mn–H species 5 with phosphine arm bound to Mn center. DFT analysis suggests that the main feature distinguishing these isomers is the respective positions of the axial carbonyl and hydride ligands relative to the meridionally bound CNP pincer (see Supplementary Figs. 40 and 41 for all analyzed structures), and allows ruling out the generation of fac isomers of the same composition.

From catalysis standpoint, the formation of Mn hydride species is generally accepted as a prerequisite for entering the hydrogenation cycle8,9,10,11,12,13,16,17,18,19,29,30,33. Our data, on the other hand, indicated that the Mn–H formation from 4 is slow and requires the irreversible loss of one CO ligand. Seeking for an alternative to the sluggish direct H2 activation, we found that the reaction of precatalyst 3 with 2.5 equiv. of the KBHEt3 hydride donor can also generate a Mn–H species in an instant manner. In THF-d8 at room temperature the reaction of 3 with KBHEt3 readily yields a reaction mixture containing 69% of the amido complex 4 with remainder comprised of new manganese hydride species 6 (Fig. 4a) that exist as a mixture of isomers. Unlike Mn hydride complex 5 observed in alkoxide-based activation protocol, species 6 features a free phosphine arm. The latter is evidenced by the appearance of the singlet resonances at δ = −16.2 and −16.6 p.p.m. in 31P NMR. As in the case of 5, complex 6 exists as two isomers distinguished by 31P resonances and those of hydride ligands appearing as singlets at δ = −3.92 and −4.40 p.p.m. in 1H NMR spectrum. Similar to the case of 5, DFT analysis suggests that complex 6 exists with meridionally bound CNP ligand and hydride ligands occupying axial position within the complex (see Supplementary Fig. 41). Species 6, being stable in solution for several hours, slowly convert to 5 as confirmed by in situ solution IR studies and NMR data depicted in Fig. 4a (see Supplementary Figs. 2225 and 28 for full spectra).

Fig. 4: Catalyst activation with KBHEt3 and corresponding catalytic performance.
figure4

a 1H NMR spectra of the hydride region for KHBEt3 activated complex 3. Left panel shows slow conversion of 6 to complex 5 and subsequent reactivity with acetophenone; right panel shows reactivity of species 6 with acetophenone and regeneration of reactive hydride species in H2 atmosphere (see Supplementary Figs. 3235 for details); relative content of hydride species indicated in percent units of total Mn. b Kinetic traces for the hydrogenation of acetophenone with complexes 3 and 4 in the presence of 1 mol% KOtBu or 1 mol% KHBEt3 promoters at 60 °C, 50 bar H2, and 50 p.p.m. Mn loading. c Kinetic traces of acetophenone hydrogenation with 3 at different catalyst loading. Conditions: 50 bar H2, 120 °C, 12.5 mmol substrate, 1 mol% of KHBEt3, catalyst loading indicated on the graph. d Double logarithmic plot for reaction order analysis with respect to catalyst concentration for the data plotted in c.

An unusual feature of the CNP ligand, responsible for the formation of complex 6 is the apparent hemilabile nature of phosphine donor arm in MnCNP precatalyst. The phenomenon of ligand hemilability is often employed to rationalize reactivity of organometallic compounds36,37,38,39,40,41, especially in the context of hybrid and multidentate ligands42,43,44. Invoked mainly for labile donor groups, e.g., oxygen or nitrogen43, hemilability is scarce for phosphine donors in general45,46,47 and for manganese phosphines in particular48,49. In case on MnCNP complexes, generation of hydride complex 6 presents an attractive activation protocol for 3. Unlike the sluggish base-assisted activation with molecular H2, the reaction with KBHEt3 proceeds instantly at room temperature and does not require CO ligand dissociation steps. The hydride species produces in such manner are catalytically competent and readily react with ketone substrates. Our stoichiometric studies indicate the higher reactivity of 6 toward ketones, compared to 5. The stepwise introduction of a stoichiometric amount of acetophenone to the mixture containing 5 and 6 leads to a rapid disappearance of the resonances of 6, highlighting it as a more competent hydride donor (see Supplementary Fig. 29).

We found that the improved activation protocol has a profound effect on the hydrogenation kinetics. Monitoring the hydrogenation kinetics, we could confirm that the use of KHBEt3 promoter at 60 °C and 50 bar H2 pressure significantly reduces the hydrogenation onset time compared to the KOtBu-promoted catalysis (Fig. 4b). While the activation of the MnCNP precatalyst with the alkoxide base resulted in ca. 15 min induction period, the KHBEt3 treatment eliminated this lag time. Furthermore, the more selective precatalyst activation with the borohydride promotor resulted in a nearly threefold increase of the hydrogenation rate. We suggest this improvement to stem from an efficient catalyst activation protocol that allows for facile generation of competent hydride species 5 and 6, thus ensuring the ability of Mn precatalyst to enter the catalytic cycle immediately. As our data depicted in Fig. 4a suggested that both 5 and 6 are exhibiting the hydride transfer reactivity upon the contact with acetophenone, we further attempted to observe the outcome of the catalytic turnover on the relative composition of the reaction mixture using NMR spectroscopy. Results of this experiment are presented in Fig. 4a. We observed that hydrogenation of acetophenone substrate with reaction mixtures containing predominantly hydride species 6 results in the accumulation of the dicarbonyl complex 5. While suggesting that the catalytic turnover involving solely species 6 and associated ligand hemilability is possible, gradual accumulation of 5 in the course of several catalytic turnovers suggests that the hydrogenation can likely proceed over the complex 5 at low catalyst loadings.

The use of the improved activation method allowed carrying out the hydrogenations at lower catalyst loadings and higher reaction temperatures (Table 2). The borohydride activation allowed for a sevenfold reduction of reaction time compared to the best example of alkoxide-promoted hydrogenation described above (Table 2, entry 1 vs. Table 1, entry 8). Furthermore, we could use 3 at 120 °C with the catalyst loading reduced from 50 to 5 p.p.m. without the loss of catalytic performance (Table 2, entries 2–5). Even at 5 p.p.m. loading acetophenone hydrogenation was brought to completion within 9 h at 120 °C. The homogeneous nature of Mn catalysis in this reaction was confirmed by control experiments (Table 2, entries 6 and 7). Our kinetic data collected for hydrogenations at 12.5 mmol scale indicated the first order in precatalyst 3 (Fig. 4d) with exceptional TOF° values of >40,000 h–1 (Fig. 4c) under these reaction conditions.

Table 2 Manganese-catalyzed hydrogenation of acetophenone with KBHEt3 promotora.

Substrate scope

Finally, complex 3 proved to be a versatile hydrogenation catalyst (Fig. 5). With mere 50 p.p.m. Mn loading at 120 °C, aromatic ketones 8a8i were reduced in high to quantitative yield with the exception of sterically demanding tert-butyl phenyl ketone 8b that was converted with 81% yield. Milder conditions (80 °C) were used for activated ketones with heterocycles and functional groups (8j8l), affording corresponding alcohols with 85–99% isolated yields. Cyclic and linear aliphatic ketones 8m8q were also hydrogenated with quantitative yields. A noteworthy exception to this set was conjugated α,β-unsaturated ketone 8q that was not converted by our catalytic system at appreciable level. In addition to ketones, functionalized aldehydes (8r8u) and imines (8v8x) were converted using 50–100 p.p.m. catalyst loading. Finally, the activity of 3 was sufficient to convert formate esters (8y8aa) to the corresponding alcohols at 200 p.p.m. catalyst loading.

Fig. 5: Results of catalytic hydrogenation with 3.
figure5

[a] Typical conditions: 5 mmol substrate, complex 3 (50 p.p.m.), KBHEt3 (1 mol%) in 1,4-dioxane (3 mL), 120 °C, P = 25 bar H2, 24 h. Yields determined by GC-FID with dodecane internal standard. [b] Isolated yields. [c] Reactions carried out in isopropanol (3 mL) at 80 °C instead. [d] The product was corresponding isopropyl ester identified by NMR. [e] 100 p.p.m. of 3 used in isopropanol (3 mL), 120 °C. [f] 200 p.p.m. of 3 used.

In summary, our findings highlight a Mn(I)–CNP complex 3 as a truly robust and versatile hydrogenation catalyst. A large part of its performance stems from the unusual coordination behavior of the tridentate ligand in complex 3 that opens up the catalyst activation pathways that are unavailable for conventional Mn pincers. As an outcome, one obtains a highly stable catalyst tolerating high reaction temperatures, while operating at p.p.m.-level loadings. Apart from ketones, the catalytic system allows for the efficient reduction of various unsaturated functional groups, including aldehydes, imines, and formic acid esters in quantitative yields. With the mechanistic analysis of the catalytic action of 3 underway, its performance highlights the high potential of manganese for hydrogenation catalysis. With the introduction of robust mixed donor ligand systems, we anticipate developments in this dynamic field.

Methods

General procedure for catalytic hydrogenation

Stock solutions of 3 (0.01 M) were prepared in dioxane solvent. In a typical run, substrate (5 mmol), dioxane (3 mL), dodecane internal standard (56.8 μL, 0.25 mmol), base promoter (0.05 mmol), and complex 3 were combined in a 4 mL glass vials and transferred into a stainless steel autoclave in the glovebox. The system was purged with N2 (3 × 8 bar) and H2 (1 × 30 bar), pressurized with H2 to specified pressure, and heated to specified temperature. The yields of products were determined by GC or GC–MS.

Kinetic study of acetophenone hydrogenation with Mn catalyst 3 on a large scale

Inside the glovebox, a stock solution of 3 (0.0125 M) was prepared in 0.875 mL dioxane, treated with 0.125 mL of 1 M KBHEt3 solution in THF and stirred for 0.5 h. A 1 mL syringe was loaded with complex 3 (500, 250, 100, and 50 μL) and KBHEt3 (62.5, 93.8, 112.5, and 118.8 μL) in dioxane (total volume 0.7 mL), and a 20 mL syringe was loaded with acetophenone (1.460 mL, 12.5 mmol) and dodecane (113.6 μL, 0.625 mmol) in 10 mL dioxane. Under N2 flow, the substrate syringe was first injected into high pressure stainless steel reactor, in which a glass liner was inserted in advance. The dissolved catalyst was then placed in an injection port and the system was purged with H2 (3 × 10 bar). The reactor was brought to at 120 °C at 50 bar H2 pressure with stirring at 500 r.p.m. and reaction was initiated by injecting the catalyst solution. The samples were withdrawn at given time intervals using an autosampler apparatus and analyzed with GC. Data plotted in Fig. 4 of the manuscript.

Data availability

Data relating to the synthetic procedures, materials and characterization, optimization studies, DFT calculations, H2 consumption traces, and spectral data are available in the Supplementary Information. CCDC-1994375 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif. All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this article and its Supporting Information, and also available from the authors upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Rylander, P. N. Catalytic Hydrogenation in Organic Syntheses: Paul Rylander (Academic, New York, 1979).

  2. 2.

    Vries, J. G. d. The Handbook of Homogeneous Hydrogenation (Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2007).

  3. 3.

    Arai, N. & Ohkuma, T. Design of molecular catalysts for achievement of high turnover number in homogeneous hydrogenation. Chem. Rec. 12, 284–289 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Filonenko, G. A., van Putten, R., Hensen, E. J. & Pidko, E. A. Catalytic (de) hydrogenation promoted by non-precious metals–Co, Fe and Mn: recent advances in an emerging field. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 1459–1483 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Werkmeister, S., Neumann, J., Junge, K. & Beller, M. Pincer‐type complexes for catalytic (De) hydrogenation and transfer (De) hydrogenation reactions: recent progress. Chem. Eur. J. 21, 12226–12250 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zell, T. & Milstein, D. Hydrogenation and Dehydrogenation iron pincer catalysts capable of metal–ligand cooperation by aromatization/dearomatization. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 1979–1994 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Clarke, M. L. & Widegren, M. B. in Homogeneous Hydrogenation with Non‐Precious Catalysts (ed. Teichert, J. F.). 111–140 (Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2020).

  8. 8.

    Chandra, P., Ghosh, T., Choudhary, N., Mohammad, A. & Mobin, S. M. Recent advancement in oxidation or acceptorless dehydrogenation of alcohols to valorised products using manganese based catalysts. Coord. Chem. Rev. 411, 213–241 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kallmeier, F. & Kempe, R. Manganese complexes for (De) hydrogenation catalysis: a comparison to cobalt and iron catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 46–60 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Maji, B. & Barman, M. K. Recent developments of manganese complexes for catalytic hydrogenation and dehydrogenation reactions. Synthesis 49, 3377–3393 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Valyaev, D. A., Lavigne, G. & Lugan, N. Manganese organometallic compounds in homogeneous catalysis: past, present, and prospects. Coord. Chem. Rev. 308, 191–235 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Carney, J. R., Dillon, B. R. & Thomas, S. P. Recent advances of manganese catalysis for organic synthesis. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 3912–3929 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Snider, B. B. Manganese (III)-based oxidative free-radical cyclizations. Chem. Rev. 96, 339–364 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Elangovan, S. et al. Selective catalytic hydrogenations of nitriles, ketones, and aldehydes by well-defined manganese pincer complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 8809–8814 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Elangovan, S. et al. Hydrogenation of esters to alcohols catalyzed by defined manganese pincer complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 15364–15368 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Freitag, F., Irrgang, T. & Kempe, R. Mechanistic studies of hydride transfer to imines from a highly active and chemoselective manganate catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 11677–11685 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Glatz, M., Stöger, B., Himmelbauer, D., Veiros, L. F. & Kirchner, K. Chemoselective hydrogenation of aldehydes under mild, base-free conditions: manganese outperforms rhenium. ACS Catal. 8, 4009–4016 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kaithal, A., Hölscher, M. & Leitner, W. Catalytic hydrogenation of cyclic carbonates using manganese complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 13449–13453 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kumar, A., Janes, T., Espinosa‐Jalapa, N. A. & Milstein, D. Manganese catalyzed hydrogenation of organic carbonates to methanol and alcohols. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 12076–12080 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Li, H. et al. Rhenium and manganese complexes bearing amino-bis(phosphinite) ligands: synthesis, characterization, and catalytic activity in hydrogenation of ketones. Organomet 37, 1271–1279 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Papa, V. et al. Efficient and selective hydrogenation of amides to alcohols and amines using a well-defined manganese–PNN pincer complex. Chem. Sci. 8, 3576–3585 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Weber, S., Stöger, B., Veiros, L. F. & Kirchner, K. Rethinking basic concepts: hydrogenation of alkenes catalyzed by bench-stable alkyl Mn (I) complexes. ACS Catal. 9, 9715–9720 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wei, D. et al. Hydrogenation of carbonyl derivatives catalysed by manganese complexes bearing bidentate pyridinyl‐phosphine ligands. Adv. Synth. Catal. 360, 676–681 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zou, Y.-Q. et al. Highly selective, efficient deoxygenative hydrogenation of amides catalyzed by a manganese pincer complex via metal–ligand cooperation. ACS Catal. 8, 8014–8019 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Fertig, R. et al. Manganese-catalyzed and base-switchable synthesis of amines or imines via borrowing hydrogen or dehydrogenative condensation. ACS Catal. 8, 8525–8530 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhang, L. et al. Lutidine‐based chiral pincer manganese catalysts for enantioselective hydrogenation of ketones. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 4973–4977 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ling, F. et al. Highly enantioselective synthesis of chiral benzhydrols via manganese catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation of unsymmetrical benzophenones using an imidazole-based chiral PNN tridentate ligand. Org. Lett. 21, 3937–3941 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kallmeier, F., Irrgang, T., Dietel, T. & Kempe, R. Highly active and selective manganese C=O bond hydrogenation catalysts: the importance of the multidentate ligand, the ancillary ligands, and the oxidation state. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 11806–11809 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Espinosa‐Jalapa, N. A. et al. Manganese‐catalyzed hydrogenation of esters to alcohols. Chem. Eur. J. 23, 5934–5938 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Zhang, L. et al. Lutidine‐based chiral pincer manganese catalysts for enantioselective hydrogenation of ketones. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 4973–4977 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Putten, R. V. et al. Non‐pincer‐type manganese complexes as efficient catalysts for the hydrogenation of esters. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 56, 7531–7534 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Weber, S., Stöger, B. & Kirchner, K. Hydrogenation of nitriles and ketones catalyzed by an air-stable bisphosphine Mn (I) complex. Org. Lett. 20, 7212–7215 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Garduño, J. A. & García, J. J. Non-pincer Mn (I) organometallics for the selective catalytic hydrogenation of nitriles to primary amines. ACS Catal. 9, 392–401 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Buhaibeh, R. et al. Phosphine‐NHC manganese hydrogenation catalyst exhibiting a non‐classical metal‐ligand cooperative H2 activation mode. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 6727–6731 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Putten, R. et al. Efficient and practical transfer hydrogenation of ketones catalyzed by a simple bidentate Mn−NHC complex. ChemCatChem 11, 1–5 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Becker, E. et al. Novel [2+2+1] cyclotrimerization of alkynes mediated by bidentate cyclopentadienyl-phosphine ruthenium complexes. Organometallics 22, 3164–3170 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Eliasson, S. H. H. & Jensen, V. R. Benefit of a hemilabile ligand in deoxygenation of fatty acids to 1-alkenes. Faraday Discuss. 220, 231–248 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Foerstner, J., Kakoschke, A., Wartchow, R. & Butenschön, H. Reactions of cyclopropenone derivatives with a cyclopentadienylcobalt (I) chelate: formation of a cobaltacyclobutenone and a transformation of 2, 2-dimethoxycyclopropenone to methyl acrylate at cobalt. Organometallics 19, 2108–2113 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Müller, C., Lachicotte, R. J. & Jones, W. D. Catalytic C−C bond activation in biphenylene and cyclotrimerization of alkynes: increased reactivity of P, N-versus P, P-substituted nickel complexes. Organometallics 21, 1975–1981 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Müller, C., Lachicotte, R. J. & Jones, W. D. Chelating P, N versus P, P ligands: differing reactivity of donor-stabilized Pt (η2-PhC CPh) complexes toward diphenylacetylene. Organometallics 21, 1118–1123 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Wei, C. et al. Aluminum complexes bearing bidentate amido–phosphine ligands for ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone: steric effect on coordination chemistry and reactivity. Organometallics 38, 3816–3823 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Braunstein, P. & Naud, F. Hemilability of hybrid ligands and the coordination chemistry of oxazoline‐based systems. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40, 680–699 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Grützmacher, H. Cooperating ligands in catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 1814–1818 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Müller, C., Vos, D. & Jutzi, P. Results and perspectives in the chemistry of side-chain-functionalized cyclopentadienyl compounds. J. Organomet. Chem. 600, 127–143 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Krut’ko, D. P., Borzov, M. V., Veksler, E. N., Churakov, A. V. & Mach, K. Crystal structures and solution dynamics of monocyclopentadienyl titanium (IV) complexes bearing pendant ether and phosphanyl type functionalities. Polyhedron 22, 2885–2894 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Yong, L., Hofer, E., Wartchow, R. & Butenschön, H. Oxidative addition of hydrosilanes, hydrogermane, and hydrostannane to cyclopentadienylcobalt (I) bearing a pendant phosphane ligand: cyclopentadienylhydridocobalt (III) chelate complexes with silyl, germyl, and stannyl ligands. Organometallics 22, 5463–5467 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Yu, X.-J. et al. Hemilabile N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC)-nitrogen-phosphine mediated Ru (II)-catalyzed N-alkylation of aromatic amine with alcohol efficiently. Catal. Commun. 95, 54–57 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Chakraborty, S. et al. Manganese‐catalyzed N‐formylation of amines by methanol liberating H2: a catalytic and mechanistic study. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 4229–4233 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Kumar, A. et al. Direct synthesis of amides by dehydrogenative coupling of amines with either alcohols or esters: manganese pincer complex as catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 14992–14996 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement no. 725686). G.A.F. acknowledges NWO for an individual Veni grant. All authors acknowledge SURFsara for computational resources and BT Mass Spectrometry Facility at TU Delft for HRMS measurement.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

W.Y., G.A.F., and E.A.P. wrote the manuscript; W.Y. designed, conducted the experiments, and analyzed the data; I.Y.C. performed the DFT calculation; R.K.A.S. conducted part of kinetics studies; M.W. and C.M. performed crystal structure determination and analysis; G.A.F. and E.A.P. supervised the research.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Georgy A. Filonenko or Evgeny A. Pidko.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Rhett Kempe and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, W., Chernyshov, I.Y., van Schendel, R.K.A. et al. Robust and efficient hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds catalysed by mixed donor Mn(I) pincer complexes. Nat Commun 12, 12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20168-2

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing