Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Autozygosity influences cardiometabolic disease-associated traits in the AWI-Gen sub-Saharan African study

## Abstract

The analysis of the effects of autozygosity, measured as the change of the mean value of a trait among offspring of genetic relatives, reveals the existence of directional dominance or overdominance. In this study we detect evidence of the effect of autozygosity in 4 out of 13 cardiometabolic disease-associated traits using data from more than 10,000 sub-Saharan African individuals recruited from Ghana, Burkina Faso, Kenya and South Africa. The effect of autozygosity on these phenotypes is found to be sex-related, with inbreeding having a significant decreasing effect in men but a significant increasing effect in women for several traits (body mass index, subcutaneous adipose tissue, low-density lipoproteins and total cholesterol levels). Overall, the effect of inbreeding depression is more intense in men. Differential effects of inbreeding depression are also observed between study sites with different night-light intensity used as proxy for urban development. These results suggest a directional dominant genetic component mediated by environmental interactions and sex-specific differences in genetic architecture for these traits in the Africa Wits-INDEPTH partnership for Genomic Studies (AWI-Gen) cohort.

## Introduction

Obesity and its associated cardiometabolic diseases (CMDs) have been rapidly increasing in sub-Saharan Africa. The continent is in the turmoil of an epidemiological transition characterized by complex patterns of change in health and diseases interacting with demographic, dietary, economic and social determinants1. However, this health and demographic transition is very heterogeneous across the African continent and varies dependant on the epidemiological transition at the site. The main purpose of the AWI-Gen (Africa Wits-INDEPTH partnership for Genomic studies) H3Africa Consortium study is to examine the prevalence of CMD-associated risk factors, regional burden, and to explore gene-gene and gene-environment interactions that contribute to disease risk1,2. To achieve its goals, AWI-Gen collected genotype and phenotype data on more than 10,000 individuals from rural and urban sites across four sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries (Fig. 1). Biomarkers of CMD included six anthropometric traits (height, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT and SCAT)), four classical lipid traits (total-cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) and triglycerides (TG)) and three circulatory traits (pulse rate, diastolic and systolic blood pressure). The objective of this study is to learn more about the genetic architecture of CMD-associated traits in SSA by analyzing the contribution of inbreeding depression (ID) to these traits.

Dissecting the genetic architecture of complex traits provides a deeper understanding of disease etiology and insights that could contribute to screening, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy3. ID, manifest by an effect of genomic homozygosity on phenotypic values, implies some degree of directional dominance or overdominance in the genetic architecture4. ID is influenced by two main factors: the amount of inbreeding and thus autozygosity; and the degree to which the dominance of causal loci is biased in one direction (which can be mainly caused by selection pressure5,6,7,8). For this study, the inbreeding coefficient is calculated from genomic data through the analysis of runs of homozygosity (ROH: genomic tracts where homozygous markers occur in an uninterrupted sequence)9. African genetic homozygosity is particularly understudied, e.g., 30,000 individuals of African ancestry were included within the largest (~1.4 M) published study, and of those, only 1000 were resident in SSA itself, all of whom were urban dwellers10. Eleven traits in total are shared by this analysis and the one performed by Clark et al. 2019, with our study replicating results for height, weight, total cholesterol, LDL, BMI, and triglycerides levels and presenting a statistically-powered ROH analysis of Africans.

## Results and discussion

### Inbreeding in the AWI-Gen cohort

The mean genomic inbreeding coefficient, FROH, for the entire AWI-Gen cohort is 0.0093, equivalent to their parents being on average about second cousins, once removed, but likely generated in many cases from the sum of multiple more distant relationships. No differences in the FROH were found between men and women or between urban and rural sites (FROH men = 0.0045, women = 0.0049) (FROH urban sites = 0.0051, rural sites = 0.0049).

### Traits affected by Inbreeding Depression

The substantial levels of genomic homozygosity exhibited by the AWI-Gen cohort allow us to explore their effect on 13 CMD-associated traits and their relationship to socio-economic status (Fig. 2a). We detected a negative association of inbreeding depression with socio-economic-status within each site; in general, having a higher FROH was associated with a lower socio-economic-status. When the entire cohort is considered, we detected significant negative ID for weight, BMI and SCAT. However, the intensity of the ID for these traits was not very strong and the offspring of the equivalent of a second cousin mating had on average, a reduction of 0.51 kg, 0.18 kg/m2, and 0.049 cm, respectively. In a previous study using ~1.4 M individuals worldwide, the average reduction in weight and BMI by ID was estimated as 0.85 kg and 0.25 kg/m2, respectively10. As a replication comparison, we can conclude that the effect of the inbreeding depression has the same direction for the 11 traits shared by Clark et al.10 and this study. Furthermore, among the African-descendant individuals analyzed by Clark et al.10 (Supplementary Data 18) inbreeding depression for height, weight, waist to hip ratio and BMI was found by both studies (Supplementary Table 1 and 2 in this study).

### Urbanization-specific effects of ID

In SSA, stratifying by night light intensity (luminosity) as a proxy for urban development (see Methods) revealed the effect of ID on the traits is more intense in less developed more rural study sites (Fig. 2b). The average reduction in trait value for offspring of the equivalent of a second cousin mating was greater for each of the significantly associated traits in areas with less luminosity (0.70 kg in weight, 0.26 kg/m2 in BMI and 0.081 cm in SCAT). Moreover, for TG levels that were not significant after multiple test correction in the overall analysis, there is a strongly significant ID effect in the study sites with less luminosity (0.024 mmol/L). As the sample size for the less developed sites is almost double that for more urban sites, we have more power to detect the effects of ID there. However, the effect sizes for ID on SCAT, LDL and TG in more urban sites were significantly different from less developed sites (P = 2.2 × 10−16, 2.2 × 10−5 and 3.2 × 10−9 respectively, using standard ANCOVA), interestingly showing that the effects in less developed sites were in the opposite direction for these traits (Fig. 2b). We suggest that environmental changes affecting lifestyle factors may be playing a role since food resources, comfort commodities and even primary healthcare are limiting factors in less developed sites. The results indicate that the differences in the effects of ID between more and less developed study sites are not due to unmeasured confounding variables, since we observed a negative effect of autozygosity on socio-economic-status (SES) in both groups (of similar strength), that is, increasing autozygosity was associated with decreased SES. Further, we accounted for the effect of SES by including it as a covariate in all ID analyses (see Methods). In order to ameliorate potential cultural bias in SES measurement and other differences among populations, we used the quintiles of the SES variable (SES.Q) calculated within each site independently (see Methods section Trait Definition).

### Sex-specific effects of ID

When the sexes were considered separately, we observed a sex-specific effect of inbreeding. For BMI, SCAT, LDL and TC, inbreeding had a decreasing effect in men but an increasing effect in women (Fig. 3). Overall, ID was significantly more intense in men, after normalizing the ID effect sizes for each trait (see Methods). The mean effect across all traits of a homozygous genome (βFROH) was −4.9 ± 5.9 TraitSD in men and only 1.1 ± 3.8 TraitSD in women (Mann-Whitney U test p = 0.0155). Men born from a second cousin marriage would be, on average, 2.26 kg lighter, have a reduction of 1.01 kg/m2 in BMI and 0.18 cm less SCAT. However, women would be, on average, 2.1 kg heavier, have an increase of 0.84 kg/m2 in BMI and 0.15 cm more SCAT (however, βROH in women were non-significant, Fig. 3). Also, women born from second cousin marriage would be 5.2 mm shorter, somewhat shorter than estimates found by other studies (average reductions of 2.9 mm10, 3.0 mm11 and 1.7 mm12 for second cousin offspring). Sex-specific ID effects for all the traits shared with Clark et al.10 (weight, BMI, total cholesterol, triglycerides and LDL) had the same directions, thus replicating their outcomes. Our results further suggest different autosomal genetic architectures, interactions or unmeasured biases for the CMD-associated traits considered in this study for men and women.

### ID is caused by rare recessive variants

We further explored whether inbreeding depression was caused by common or rare variants by comparing the effect of the FROH, genomic inbreeding coefficient using the genomic relationship matrix (FGRM) (see methods section) and FoutsideROH. We first fitted bivariate models with FROH and FGRM as explanatory variables and then we explored the effect of FoutsideROH, which is not an estimator of the inbreeding coefficient, but describes the homozygosity of common SNPs outside ROH. As can be seen in Supplementary Table 4, for all the traits that were significant in the overall univariate analysis (SES.Q, weight, BMI, SCAT and TG) we find that $$\hat \beta _{F_{ROH}|F_{GRM}}$$ is of a greater magnitude than $$\hat \beta _{F_{GRM}|F_{ROH}}$$ in the conditional analysis. Furthermore, for all of the traits but SCAT, $$\hat \beta _{F_{GRM}|F_{ROH}}$$ does not differ from zero, thus indicating that for these traits the variation of FGRM is not associated with any change in trait values. Like FGRM, FoutsideROH which captures common SNPs in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD), was not significant for any trait or any model (Supplementary Tables 13). These results suggest that autozygous rare recessive variants found in ROH, rather than homozygous common variants in strong LD, are causing the inbreeding depression and this is consistent with the dominance hypothesis4,13. The fact that the bivariate models show that FROH captures the signal better than FGRM and FoutsideROH also suggests that in this example inbreeding depression is caused by directional dominance. Overdominance—the positive selection on heterozygotes bringing alleles to intermediate frequency—would predict that more common homozygous SNPs outside ROH would also have an effect.

Two recent studies found evidence for the same conclusion. Clark et al.10, analyzing a large sample size of 1.4 M found that for all the traits affected by inbreeding depression $$\hat \beta _{F_{ROH}|F_{GRM}}$$ was of greater magnitude and in many cases $$\hat \beta _{F_{GRM}|F_{ROH}}$$ was also non-significant. Our results therefore confirm what Clark et al.10 and Johnson et al.14 found.

### Genomic regional FROH effects

We tested whether the genome-wide ID effects we observed came from a small number of major loci with large effects or resulted from the polygenic effect of many loci with small effects. We thus divided the genome into 1,000 non-overlapping 3 Mb-wide windows and assessed whether homozygosity of these regions was associated with the CMD-associated traits (see Methods). Only two traits were suggestively significantly influenced by individual regions: BMI in men (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Table 5) and VAT in women (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Table 6). For all other traits we have no evidence of major loci that may be exerting large effects, rather the ID appears to be polygenic in origin. For BMI in men, a significant window on chromosome 14 was detected, including 23 protein-coding genes (Supplementary Table 5). Published genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have reported associations with BMI in two of these genes (KCNH515 and FUT816), which are known to be pleiotropic. KCNH5 (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 5) has been found to be associated not just with BMI but also with SCAT17, intelligence18, and sleep duration19. FUT8 (fucosyltransferase 8) has also been associated with IgG glycosylation patterns20, age at menarche21, schizophrenia22, plasma N-glycans23, head circumference24, the plasma proteome25, multiple sclerosis26 and systolic blood pressure16. Thus, the strongest directionally dominant effects on BMI are shared with loci also imparting additive effects discovered by GWAS. Two windows on chromosomes 2 and 4 were found to be associated with VAT in women (Supplementary Table 6). No GWAS hits were previously found for this trait in these regions; however both regions include genes with multiple associations with other traits.

In this study we analysed the effect of inbreeding depression on 13 cardiometabolic disease-associated traits in the AWI-Gen cohort with the intention of better understanding the genetic architecture of these traits in sub-Saharan Africa. We found significant evidence for inbreeding depression for four phenotypes, which was strongly enhanced in less developed rural regions and also stronger in men. Our results suggest a complex genetic architecture for these traits with interactions by rurality. Larger studies of African populations will further illuminate the factors contributing to complex disease risk in sub-Saharan African populations.

## Methods

### Population genetics overview

Our objective was to explore the directionally dominant component of the genetic architecture of 13 cardiometabolic disease (CMD) associated traits measured in 10,776 sub-Saharan African (SSA) individuals recruited by the AWI-Gen study. In order to achieve this, we measured the effect of inbreeding depression on these risk factors. In classical population genetics inbreeding depression (ID) is defined as the reduction of the mean fitness in a population because of inbreeding27. Currently this definition has been generalized for any complex trait as the change in the mean phenotypic value in a population because of inbreeding. Considering the combined effect of all the loci that affect a character, as far as the genotypic value of the loci combined additively is concerned, the mean character value of a population with inbreeding coefficient (F) is given by:

$$M_F = M_0-2F{\sum} {d_i} \bar p_i\bar q_i.$$
(1)

where M0 is the population mean before inbreeding and p and q are allele frequencies. The change of the mean on inbreeding is therefore5

$$-2F{\sum} d \bar p\bar q$$
(2)

This shows that inbreeding will change the mean value of a character in a population when the sum of the genotypic value of the heterozygotes (d) is different from 0 (i.e., the character needs to exhibit directionally dominant (or overdominant) genetic architecture4). Further, when loci are combined additively, the change of the mean on inbreeding should be directly proportional to the coefficient of inbreeding4. This allows us to detect inbreeding depression in complex characteristics exhibiting directional dominance using regression analysis as long as the population under study practices some inbreeding. It is important to realize that the genetic architecture of a characteristic, including the effects of ID, is not necessarily constant among different populations. The intensity of the ID and the genetic architecture of a trait depend on the selection pressure, environmental factors and population structure inasmuch as genetic frequencies change between populations. The considerable burden of long ROH (>1.5 Mb) present in some sub-Saharan populations28 provides the opportunity to test whether CMD-associated traits gathered by the AWI-Gen initiative exhibit inbreeding depression.

### AWI-Gen Cohort

The Africa Wits-INDEPTH Partnership for Genomic Studies (AWI-Gen) is an NIH-funded Collaborative Centre of the Human Heredity and Health in Africa (H3Africa) Consortium2. It is a partnership between the University of the Witwatersrand and the International Network for Demographic Evaluation of Populations and Their Health (INDEPTH) that includes Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) Centres and the Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit (DPHRU), that have longitudinal cohorts in Navrongo, Ghana; Nanoro, Burkina Faso; Nairobi, Kenya; Agincourt, South Africa; Dikgale, South Africa and Soweto, South Africa. In total, over 12,500 participants were recruited between August 2013 and August 2016, of which 10,776 were aged 40–60 years1. Pregnant women, first-degree relatives, recent immigrants and individuals with physical impairments preventing the measurement of different characteristics were excluded. The objectives of the AWI-Gen study can be summarized as follows: (1) To build capability for genomic research in these centers and countries by providing opportunities to develop skills including biostatistics, genomics, and bioinformatics. (2) To understand population structure and genetic architecture among recruiting sites in order to inform analysis strategies and evaluate impact across different ethnicities. (3) To understand the prevalence and genetic basis of cardiometabolic diseases (CMD)2. The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) of the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) (protocol numbers M121029 and M170880), and each contributing Centre obtained additional local ethics approval as required. Data and samples were collected following community engagement and individual informed consent1.

Biomarkers of CMD gathered by the AWI-Gen study include anthropometric variables including height, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and fat distribution (visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT)); lipid composition variables including low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides (TG); circulatory traits including pulse rate and blood pressure (systolic and diastolic). Besides the above biomarkers a socio-economic-status variable was also calculated for each individual. This variable (SES) was obtained by adding the items a person has in their household from among a list defined items, determined as appropriate for their country. The SES quintiles for each study site were calculated and individuals assigned to a quintile. This was used in the analysis to remove a potential cultural component related to socio-economic-status as is shown in29. See Trait Definition section.

AWI-Gen individuals were genotyped using the H3Africa Custom Genotyping Array, which is a high-density genotyping array (2.267 million SNVs) designed by an H3Africa project team to maximize capturing common variation in African population. Manufactured by Illumina, the array has been used by several H3Africa projects. Details of the array and the SNVs captured can be found at https://www.h3abionet.org/h3africa-chip.

A total of 11,076 samples were genotyped. We removed duplicate and non-autosomal SNVs; SNVs with genotype missing rate > 0.01; minor allele frequency < 0.01 and SNVs that deviated from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test (p-value < 5.0 × 10−4). Similarly, at the sample level, individuals with genotype missing rate > 0.02, that failed the sex check and one of the individuals from each related pair (PIHAT > 0.8—potential duplicates) were removed. Also, 159 first degree relatives were removed from the Agincourt site. These QC steps were performed using the H3Africa GWAS pipeline30 and resulted in the final dataset containing 1,733,121 SNVs and 10,617 individuals.

### Trait definition

14 different traits and different control variables like age, sex, site of sampling, education and occupation were also considered in the analysis. All traits are defined below under headings in the format (short name –) full name—units. Further details can be found in Ali et al.1.

Socio-economic-demographic variables

age—years. Age at data collection (calculated using the self-declared date of birth and the date of the interview with the individual).

sex. Sex was self-reported and validated by genomic data.

site—Site of sampling. Recruitment site where the sample was collected: Nanoro (Burkina Faso), Navrongo (Ghana), Nairobi (Kenya), Agincourt (South Africa), Dikgale (South Africa), Soweto (South Africa).

night-light—Night-time luminosity. The average values of light pixels were obtained using night-light geo-tiffs from NOAA’s NGDC Earth Observation Group (EOG): https://ngdc.noaa.gov/eog/ and spatial boundaries are taken from the Global Administrative Boundaries Database: http://gadm.org/.

edu—Education. The highest level of education was self-reported according to four categories: (1) No formal education, (2) Primary, (3) Secondary, (4) Tertiary. Tertiary education includes qualifications such as certificates, diplomas, or degrees.

occu—Occupation. Self-declared employment according to five categories. (1) Self-employed. (2) Formal full-time employment by someone else. (3) Part-time employment by someone else. (4) Informal employment (dependent on the availability of work). (5) Unemployed.

SES.Q—Socio-economic-status quintiles. The socio-economic status of the individual was calculated using a list of household goods appropriate for each site (not all sites included all variables as some items were not relevant in specific settings): electricity, solar energy, power generator, alternative power source, television, radio, motor vehicle, bicycle, refrigerator, washing machine, sewing machine, telephone, mobile phone, microwave, DVD player, satellite TV or DSTV, computer or laptop, internet by computer, internet by mobile phone, electric iron, fan, electric or gas stove, kerosene stove, plate gas, electric plate, torch, gas lamp, kerosene lamp with a glass, toilet facilities, potable water, grinding mill, table, sofa set, wall clock, bed, mattress, blankets, cattle, other livestock, poultry, tractor, plough. In order to establish a meaningful comparison between individuals at different sites, the SES quintiles were calculated, and individuals assigned to a quintile. This approach was used to remove a potential cultural component related to socio-economic-status2.

Anthropometry variables

Height—meters. Standing height measured in meters.

Weight—kg. Weight measured in kilograms.

BMI—Body mass index—kg/m2. Weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

WHR– Waist: Hip ratio—no units. Calculated by dividing the individual waist circumference in centimeters by the hip circumference also in centimeters.

VAT—Visceral adiposity tissue—cm. Visceral (medial) fat measured using ultrasound.

SCAT—Subcutaneous adiposity tissue—cm. Subcutaneous (transverse) fat measured using ultrasound.

Lipid composition (in fasting serum)

LDL—Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol—mmol/L.

HDL—High-density lipoprotein cholesterol—mmol/L.

TC—Total cholesterol—mmol/L.

TG—Total triglycerides—mmol/L.

Circulatory

Systolic BP—Systolic blood pressure—mmHg. Three readings were taken during a single session, two minutes apart, the first was discarded and the second two readings were averaged.

Diastolic BP—Diastolic blood pressure—mmHg. Three readings taken during a single session, the first was discarded and the second two readings were averaged.

Pulse—Heart rate—beats per minute. Three readings taken during a single session, the first was discarded and the second two readings were averaged.

### Assessing site economic and urban development

As a proxy for the urban and economic development of the different AWI-Gen sites we used night-light intensity (luminosity). Luminosity has been widely used as a proxy in countries where GDP data are either not available or of poor quality31,32. It was found to be highly correlated with GDP per capita and other measures of prosperity, like electricity provision33, and can therefore be considered as a valid proxy34,35. More recently, using Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from 29 African countries, night-time light intensity has been found to correlate strongly with indicators of household wealth, education, and health. Also, the variation in night-time light explained a substantial share in the variation of these indicators36.

Night light data are made available by the National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the US, and originate from images taken by satellites of the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) of the U.S. Department of Defense between 1992 and 2013. Night light intensity data are available on pixel (grid cell) level, with each pixel corresponding to 30 × 30 arc s, i.e., one value represents the average night light intensity of an area of 0.86 square kilometers (on the equator). Night light intensity is measured by an integer ranging from 0 (unlit) to 63. We use the latest version (4.0) of the data.

### ROH calling

ROH longer than 300 Kb were called using PLINK software with the following parameters:

• homozyg-snp 30. Minimum number of SNPs that a ROH is required to have.

• homozyg-kb 300. Length in Kb of the sliding window.

• homozyg-density 30. Required minimum density to consider a ROH (1 SNP in 30 Kb).

• homozyg-window-snp 30. Number of SNPs that the sliding window must have.

• homozyg-gap 1000. Length in Kb between two SNPs in order to be considered in two different segments.

• homozyg-window-het 1. Number of heterozygous SNPs allowed in a window.

• homozyg-window-missing 5. Number of missing calls allowed in a window.

• homozyg-window-threshold 0.05. Proportion of overlapping window that must be called homozygous to define a given SNP as in a “homozygous” segment.

No linkage disequilibrium pruning was performed. These conditions were previously used and validated by different published studies and were shown to call ROH that correspond to autozygous segments in which all SNPs (including those not present on the array) are homozygous-by-descent9,28,37.

### Calculating genomic inbreeding coefficients

The inbreeding coefficient or FIT, is defined as the probability that an individual receives two alleles identical-by-descent38. Traditionally, FIT was measured using deep genealogies; currently, we can obtain an estimate of this parameter without having any genealogy by using genomic approaches. Different genomic inbreeding coefficients were calculated.

FROH measures the actual proportion of the autosomal genome that is autozygous over and above a specific minimum length ROH threshold39. When analyzing ROH > 1.5 Mb, FROH correlates most strongly (r = 0.86) with the inbreeding coefficient obtained from an accurate six-generation pedigree39. Using extended pedigrees of the royal European dynasties, with complex inbreeding loops, it has been found that above the 10th generation the change in the inbreeding coefficient is less than 1%40. Also, it has been found that individuals with no inbreeding loops in at least 5 generations (and probably 10) carried ROH up to 4 Mb in length but not longer39. FROH using a genomic approach, captures the total inbreeding coefficient (FIT) within the resolution of the data available and the size of ROH that can be called9.

$$F_{ROH} = \frac{{\mathop {\sum }\nolimits_{i = 1}^n ROH > 1.5Mb}}{{3\,Gb}}$$
(3)

FGRM. An alternative genomic inbreeding coefficient was obtained using PLINK’s parameter -ibc (Fhat3). This coefficient described by Yang et al. 2011 ($$\hat F^{{\mathrm{III}}}$$)41 is defined as:

$$F_{GRM} = \frac{1}{N}\mathop {\sum}\limits_i^n {\frac{{\left( {x_i^2 - \left( {1 + 2p_i} \right)x_i + 2p_i^2} \right)}}{{2p_i\left( {1 - p_i} \right)}}}$$
(4)

where N is the number of SNPs, pi is the reference allele frequency of the ith SNP and xi is the number of copies of the reference allele. The reference allele frequencies were site-specific and included only loci with MAF > 0.05.

Clark et al. 2020 showed that $$\hat \beta _{F_{GRM}}$$ is downwardly biased in real data and that this is proportional to the ratio $$var(F_{ROH})/var(F_{GRM})$$, as expected when the difference between FGRM and FROH can be considered as estimation error. In the same work, they compared the relative abilities of FROH and FGRM to capture inbreeding using the pedigree information of 47927 Icelanders with a 10 generation pedigree. The correlation was highest for FROH (r = 0.779) in comparison to FGRM (r = 0.682).

FoutsideROH An additional genomic inbreeding measure, FoutsideROH, was calculated as the genomic fraction of homozygous SNPs outside ROH.

$$F_{outsideROH} = \frac{{O\prime \left( {HOM} \right) - E\prime (HOM)}}{{N\prime - E\prime (HOM)}}$$
(5)

Where:

$$O\prime \left( {HOM} \right) = O\left( {HOM} \right) - N_{SNP\_ROH}$$
(6)
$$E\prime \left( {HOM} \right) = \left( {\frac{{N - N_{ROH}}}{N}} \right) \ast E(HOM)$$
(7)
$$N\prime = N - N_{ROH}$$
(8)

where O(HOM) is the observed number of homozygous SNPs, E(HOM) is the expected number of homozygous SNP according to H-W proportions, N is the total number of non-missing genotyped SNPs and NSNP_ROH is the number of homozygous SNPs found in ROH.

### Testing inbreeding depression

Inbreeding depression (ID) was modeled by a multiple regression: y = βFROH * FROH + Xb + ε (9). Where y is a vector of measured trait values, βFROH is the unknown scalar effect of FROH. FROH is a known vector of individual FROH as described above, b is a vector of unknown covariates effects including the mean (μ). X is a known design matrix for the fixed effects, and ε is an unknown vector of residuals. The traits used in this study have been the subject of genome-wide association meta-analysis (GWAMA), phenotype modeling, such that inclusion of covariates were chosen with reference to leading consortia: The Genetic Investigation of Anthropometric Traits (GIANT) for anthropometry, Global Lipids Genetics Consortium (GLGC) for lipids composition International Consortium for Blood Pressure (ICBP) for blood pressures.

SES.Q = sex + age + edu + occu + night_light + pc1 + … + pc15

Height = sex + age + age2 + SES.Q + night_light + pc1 + … + pc15

Weight = sex + age + age2 + SES.Q + night_light + pc1 + … + pc15

BMI = sex + age + age2 + SES.Q + night_light + pc1 + … + pc15

WHR = sex + age + age2 + height + SES.Q + night_light + pc1 + … + pc15

VAT = sex + age + age2 + height + SES.Q + night_light + pc1 + … + pc15

SCAT = sex + age + age2 + height + SES.Q + night_light + pc1 + … + pc15

HDL = sex + age + age2 + SES.Q + night_light + pc1 + … + pc15

LDL = sex + age + age2 + SES.Q + night_light + pc1 + … + pc15

TC = sex + age + age2 + SES.Q + night_light + pc1 + … + pc15

TG = sex + age + age2 + SES.Q + night_light + pc1 + … + pc15

Pulse = sex + age + age2 + SES.Q + BMI + night_light + pc1 + … + pc15

Systolic BP = sex + age + age2 + SES.Q + BMI + night_light + pc1 + … + pc15

Diastolic BP = sex + age + age2 + SES.Q + BMI + night_light + pc1 + … + pc15

In order to account for unmeasured confounding variables that may differ between rural and urban sites, we used three different lines of evidence. First, socio-economic-status was added as a confounding variable to every model we ran. This allows the model to account for differences in the relative socio-economic status within sites and across individuals in all sites. Second, the luminosity was added to prevent further confounding effects due to differential urban development. Third, when the overall dataset was stratified by luminosity we added “site” as a co-variable and we tested the effect of FROH on SES.Q for both luminosity groups. We expect that, if there are no confounding variables introducing bias, the effect of the FROH over SES.Q should be similar in both groups.

To analyze inbreeding depression, and for computational efficiency, it was decided to solve the multiple regression models in two steps. In the first step, the trait (y) was regressed on all fixed covariates to obtain the maximum likelihood (ML) of the model: y = Xb + u + ε’ (10), where u is an unknown vector of polygenetic effects with multivariate normal distribution of mean 0 and covariance matrix σg2A, where A is the genomic relationship matrix (GRM). GRM was obtained using PLINK v1.9 and GRM42, residuals (ε’) were estimated using GenABEL43. These residuals were used in subsequent analyses. To estimate βFROH for each trait, trait residuals were regressed on FROH to obtain the ML solution of the model: ε’ = μ + βFROH * FROH + βF_outsideROH * FoutsideROH + ε (11). Sex-specific estimates of βFROH and βF_outsideROH (shown in Tables S1S4) were obtained from this model applied to the relevant sex. Also, specific estimates of βFROH and βF_outsideROH were obtained for sites with more and less than 5 night-light units. When comparing between sites with more and less than 5 night-light units, night-light as a covariate was removed from the different models, but the site of sampling was added as a covariate in order to account for potential site confounding effects.

Finally, in order to be able to compare inbreeding effects among traits and sexes, βFROH were standardized using each trait’s standard deviation.

### Assessing whether inbreeding depression is caused by common or rare variants

FROH is an estimate of autozygosity which increases the homozygosity of all variants, both common and rare. In contrast, FGRM is calculated from common SNPs (>5%MAF) and correlates well with the homozygosity of common SNPs but less with rare SNP which may be in weak LD. Following previous studies10 and in order to assess if ID is caused by common or rare variants, we performed bivariate models of all traits (Trait ~ FROH + FGRM) to establish whether the observed inbreeding effects associate more strongly with FROH or FGRM.

By analyzing the excess homozygosities of SNPs, extracted from the UK Biobank, at seven minor allele frequencies, Clark et al.10 showed that homozygosity of common SNPs is better predicted by FGRM, but rare variant homozygosity is better predicted by FROH.

### Measuring genome-specific regional Inbreeding Depression

In order to learn more about the genetic architecture of each trait, the effect of ROH burden was tested in each of ~1000 3 Mb-wide windows along the genome. For each window, the fraction which is in ROH was calculated, and then the association between ROH in each 3 Mb window and the mean trait residual was tested. A Bonferroni correction for 1000 windows was applied, significance was considered when P < 5 × 10−5. Results are shown in a Manhattan-plot in Fig. 4. QQ plots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1.

### Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

## Data availability

AWI-Gen phenotype dataset is available at dataset accession id: EGA00001002482. AWI-Gen genotype dataset accession id: EGAD00010001996.

Night-time luminosity. The average values of light pixels were obtained using night-light geo-tiffs from NOAA’s NGDC Earth Observation Group (EOG): https://ngdc.noaa.gov/eog/ and spatial boundaries are taken from the Global Administrative Boundaries Database: http://gadm.org/. Data used correspond to the 2013 version, last accessed on February 10, 2020.

## References

1. 1.

Ali, S. A. et al. Genomic and environmental risk factors for cardiometabolic diseases in Africa: methods used for Phase 1 of the AWI-Gen population cross-sectional study. Gobal Health Action 11, 1507133 (2018).

2. 2.

Ramsay, M. et al. H3Africa AWI-Gen Collaborative Centre: a resource to study the interplay between genomic and environmental risk factors for cardiometabolic diseases in four sub-Saharan African countries. Glob. Health, Epidemiol. Genomics 1, e20 (2016).

3. 3.

Timpson, N. J., Greenwood, C. M. T., Soranzo, N., Lawson, D. J. & Richards, J. B. Genetic architecture: the shape of the genetic contribution to human traits and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 110–124 (2018).

4. 4.

Charlesworth, D. & Willis, J. H. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 783–796 (2009).

5. 5.

Falconer, D. S. & Mackay, T. F. C. Quantitative genetics (Pearson, 1996).

6. 6.

Crnokrak, P. & Roff, D. A. Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83, 260–270 (1999).

7. 7.

Bataillon, T. & Kirkpatrick, M. Inbreeding depression due to mildly deleterious mutations in finite populations: size does matter. Genetical Res. 75, 75–81 (2000).

8. 8.

Kirkpatrick, M. & Jarne, P. The effects of a Bottleneck on inbreeding depression and the genetic load. Am. Naturalist 155, 154–167 (2000).

9. 9.

Ceballos, F. C., Joshi, P. K., Clark, D. W., Ramsay, M. & Wilson, J. F. Runs of homozygosity: windows into population history and trait architecture. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 220–234 (2018).

10. 10.

Clark, D. W. et al. Associations of autozygosity with a broad range of human phenotypes. Nat. Commun. 10, 4957 (2019).

11. 11.

Joshi, P. K. et al. Directional dominance on stature and cognition in diverse human populations. Nature 523, 459–462 (2015).

12. 12.

McQuillan, R. et al. Evidence of inbreeding depression on human height. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002655 (2012).

13. 13.

Nakatsuka, N. et al. The promise of discovering population-specific disease-associated genes in South Asia. Nat. Genet. 49, 1403–1407 (2017).

14. 14.

Johnson, E. C., Evans, L. M. & Keller, M. C. Relationships between estimated autozygosity and complex traits in the UK Biobank. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007556 (2018).

15. 15.

Namjou, B. et al. EMR-linked GWAS study: investigation of variation landscape of loci for body mass index in children. Front. Genet. 4, 268 (2013).

16. 16.

Kichaev, G. et al. Leveraging Polygenic Functional Enrichment to Improve GWAS Power. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 104, 65–75 (2019).

17. 17.

Fox, C. S. et al. Genome-wide association for abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose reveals a novel locus for visceral fat in women. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002695 (2012).

18. 18.

Hill, W. D. et al. A combined analysis of genetically correlated traits identifies 187 loci and a role for neurogenesis and myelination in intelligence. Mol. Psychiatry 24, 169–181 (2019).

19. 19.

Doherty, A. et al. GWAS identifies 14 loci for device-measured physical activity and sleep duration. Nat. Commun. 9, 5257 (2018).

20. 20.

Wahl, A. et al. Genome-Wide Association Study on Immunoglobulin G Glycosylation Patterns. Front. Immunol. 9, 277 (2018).

21. 21.

Perry, J. R. et al. Parent-of-origin-specific allelic associations among 106 genomic loci for age at menarche. Nature 514, 92–97 (2014).

22. 22.

Goes, F. S. et al. Genome-wide association study of schizophrenia in Ashkenazi Jews. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part B: Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 168, 649–659 (2015).

23. 23.

Huffman, J. E. et al. Polymorphisms in B3GAT1, SLC9A9 and MGAT5 are associated with variation within the human plasma N-glycome of 3533 European adults. Hum. Mol. Genet. 20, 5000–5011 (2011).

24. 24.

Comuzzie, A. G. et al. Novel genetic loci identified for the pathophysiology of childhood obesity in the Hispanic population. PLoS One 7, e51954 (2012).

25. 25.

Sun, B. B. et al. Genomic atlas of the human plasma proteome. Nature 558, 73–79 (2018).

26. 26.

Baranzini, S. E. et al. Genetic variation influences glutamate concentrations in brains of patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain 133, 2603–2611 (2010).

27. 27.

Crow, J. F. & Kimura, A. An introduction to population genetics theory. (Harper & Row, New York, 1970).

28. 28.

Ceballos, F. C., Hazelhurst, S. & Ramsay, M. Runs of homozygosity in sub-Saharan African populations provide insights into complex demographic histories. Hum. Genet. 138, 1123–1142 (2019).

29. 29.

Kabudula, C. W. et al. Assessing changes In household socioeconomic status In rural South Africa, 2001–2013: a distributional analysis using household asset indicators. Soc. Indic. Res. 133, 1047–1073 (2017).

30. 30.

Baichoo, S. et al. Developing reproducible bioinformatics analysis workflows for heterogeneous computing environments to support African genomics. BMC Bioinforma. 19, 457 (2018).

31. 31.

Anthony, M. Night lights and regional income inequality in Africa. WIDER Working Paper Series 085 (2015).

32. 32.

Elliott, R. J. R., Strobl, E. & Sun, P. The local impact of typhoons on economic activity in China: a view from outer space. J. Urban Econ. 88, 50–66 (2015).

33. 33.

Baskaran, T., Min, B. & Uppal, Y. Election cycles and electricity provision: evidence from a quasi-experiment with Indian special elections. J. Public Econ. 126, 64–73 (2015).

34. 34.

Chen, X. & Nordhaus, W. D. Using luminosity data as a proxy for economic statistics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 8589–8594 (2011).

35. 35.

Henderson, J. V., Storeygard, A. & Weil, D. N. Measuring economic growth from outer space. Am. Economic Rev. 102, 994–1028 (2012).

36. 36.

Bruederle, A. & Hodler, R. Nighttime lights as a proxy for human development at the local level. PLoS ONE 13, e0202231 (2018).

37. 37.

Ceballos, F. C., Hazelhurst, S. & Ramsay, M. Assessing runs of Homozygosity: a comparison of SNP Array and whole genome sequence low coverage data. BMC Genomics 19, 106 (2018).

38. 38.

Templeton, A. R. & Read, B. Inbreeding, one word, several meanings, much confusion. Biol. Conserv. 75, 91–105 (1996).

39. 39.

McQuillan, R. et al. Runs of homozygosity in European populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 83, 359–372 (2008).

40. 40.

Alvarez, G., Ceballos, F. C. & Quinteiro, C. The role of inbreeding in the extinction of a European royal dynasty. PLoS ONE 4, e5174 (2009).

41. 41.

Yang, J., Lee, S. H., Goddard, M. E. & Visscher, P. M. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 76–82 (2011).

42. 42.

Amin, N., van Duijn, C. M. & Aulchenko, Y. S. A genomic background based method for association analysis in related individuals. PLoS ONE 2, e1274 (2007).

43. 43.

Karssen, L. C., van Duijn, C. M. & Aulchenko, Y. S. The GenABEL Project for statistical genomics. F1000Research 5, 914 (2016).

## Acknowledgments

F.C.C. received a postdoctoral fellowship from the South African National Research Foundation. The AWI-Gen Collaborative Centre is funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), Office of the Director (OD), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD), the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), the Office of AIDS research (OAR) and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award number U54HG006938 and its supplements, as part of the H3Africa Consortium. Additional funding came from the Department of Science and Technology, South Africa, award number DST/CON 0056/2014. M.R. is a South African Research Chair in Genomics and Bioinformatics of African populations hosted by the University of the Witwatersrand, funded by the Department of Science and Technology, and administered by the National Research Foundation. J.F.W. acknowledges support from the UK MRC Human Genetics Unit quinquennial programme grant (MC_UU_00007/10).

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

F.C.C.: research plan development, data analysis, figures, and manuscript preparation; S.H.: advisor on genomic analysis, data analysis, and manuscript preparation; D.C.: data analysis. GoAg, GeAs, P.B., X.G.O., F.M., and S.N.: AWI-Gen dataset collection and preparation; M.R.: principal advisor for research plan development, data analysis, and manuscript preparation; J.W.: advisor for research plan development, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michèle Ramsay.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Daniel Howrigan and other, anonymous, reviewers for their contributions to the peer review of this works. Peer review reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Ceballos, F.C., Hazelhurst, S., Clark, D.W. et al. Autozygosity influences cardiometabolic disease-associated traits in the AWI-Gen sub-Saharan African study. Nat Commun 11, 5754 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19595-y

• Accepted:

• Published: