Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

How Rh surface breaks CO2 molecules under ambient pressure

Abstract

Utilization of carbon dioxide (CO2) molecules leads to increased interest in the sustainable synthesis of methane (CH4) or methanol (CH3OH). The representative reaction intermediate consisting of a carbonyl or formate group determines yields of the fuel source during catalytic reactions. However, their selective initial surface reaction processes have been assumed without a fundamental understanding at the molecular level. Here, we report direct observations of spontaneous CO2 dissociation over the model rhodium (Rh) catalyst at 0.1 mbar CO2. The linear geometry of CO2 gas molecules turns into a chemically active bent-structure at the interface, which allows non-uniform charge transfers between chemisorbed CO2 and surface Rh atoms. By combining scanning tunneling microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy at near-ambient pressure, and computational calculations, we reveal strong evidence for chemical bond cleavage of O‒CO* with ordered intermediates structure formation of (2 × 2)-CO on an atomically flat Rh(111) surface at room temperature.

Introduction

Sharply rising carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in the air have escalated a climate crisis that affects the living conditions of humankind, leading to the most uncertain natural environment on our planet since the agricultural revolution1,2. Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is a widely accepted energy recycling strategy of lowering CO2 emissions to protect the environment in sustainable industries3. Accordingly, the utilization of CO2 for primary energy source production is becoming a central issue in relation to future technologies for renewable energy conversion. In particular, methanation (CO2 + 4H2 → CH4 + 2H2O) or methanol synthesis (CO2 + 3H2 → CH3OH + H2O) via CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) is an important catalytic conversion process for renewable utilization, in that economically useful energy sources could be produced from a primitive single molecule4,5. However, strongly binding carbon-to-oxygen intramolecular bonds (O = C = O) and their almost nonreactive linear geometry create a challenging drawback for utilization. According to the Gibbs−Helmholtz relationship, the associated enthalpy required to break the intramolecular bonding of CO2 into CO and O is ∆H0 = + 293.0 kJ/mol, which makes the CO2 molecule very stable6,7. Hence, driving several transient intermediates at gas−solid interface facilitates essential reaction steps by inducing the interaction of 2‒12 electrons to produce the energy source in heterogenous catalysis8,9.

One of the primary CO2RR processes in the industry is CO2 hydrogenation over zinc oxide-supported copper (Cu/ZnO) catalysts for methanol synthesis10. This reaction is actively facilitated by the formation of transient formate (HCOO) species from the chemisorbed CO2δ− in harsh conditions (e.g., 50−100 bar and 500−550 K), which demonstrates the critical role of intermediate formation in bypassing the out-of-range reaction routes of favorable thermodynamics11. In contrast, the similar feedstock of H2 and CO2 over silicon12 or aluminum13 oxide-supported rhodium (Rh) catalyst selectively yields a major product of methane via the conversion of CO2 to CO at an early step in the CO2RR process14. In this way, although various derivatives of the reactant CO2 molecules could affect multiple steps of transition states and thermodynamic equilibrium potentials, as predicted by theoretical calculations on the tailored surfaces15, previous studies have nonetheless assumed the adsorbate CO2 interactions with insufficient knowledge of underlying molecular behavior in operation conditions. For example, the calorimetry analysis results of CO2 over Rh surfaces suggested controversial conclusions16,17 about CO2 dissociation between 10−9 and 1 bar of pressure; they indicated that experimental detections of the dissociated carbon monoxide (CO*; an asterisk means as adsorbed species) and oxygen (O*) are impossible at lower pressures due to the probability of rare dissociative CO2 adsorption in the order of 10−15. In other words, the unreactive signature molecule only has a chance of catalytic activation at higher pressures, and the presence of the pressure gap issue18 should be mainly considered for investigating chemical reaction pathways on the surface. However, their specific characterizations have been comparatively limited because of technical difficulties related to the decrease of the electron mean-free path at elevated pressures19. Eventually, the progressive tools operable in realistic conditions20,21 are necessarily required to unravel the early steps of CO2RR at the molecular level. Recently published literature supports the strong evidence of CO2 activation beyond the pressure gap, for instance, the intramolecular bond-breakage phenomenon of CO2 molecules was reported on the Cu22,23 and Ni24,25 catalysts at the elevated pressures.

Here, we report direct observations of CO2 molecules’ dissociative adsorption structures at CO2−Rh(111) interface, employing advanced surface science techniques of scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) at near-ambient pressures (NAP). Unlike the physisorption process, the chemisorption of CO2 molecules induces changes of local charge density at the interface in order for the stimulated electronic interactions making a sufficient influence of bond cleavage for adsorbate O‒CO*, even at 300 K. Direct imaging results under 0.1 mbar of CO2(g) reveal that the dissociated O* and CO* occupy the hollow and atop site of each on the atomically flat Rh surface, which brings the spontaneous ordering formation of (2 × 2)-CO adsorption structures with a coverage (θCO) of 0.25 monolayer (ML) at equilibrium. Time-lapse NAP-XPS measurements also highlight the only significant increase of the dissociated CO* species at the atop site of the Rh surface in the chemical binding analysis of C 1s core-level spectra as well. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations elucidate a possible reaction route for the observed CO2 dissociation process with an activation energy barrier (Ea) of 0.58 eV on account of the nonuniform distribution of charge transfers between the bent (b)-CO2 molecule and Rh surface atoms.

Results

Molecular adsorption structure observations of CO and CO2

The well-defined {111}-facet model of the Rh single crystal was prepared in ultra-high vacuum (UHV) before direct observation under CO or CO2 environment. Figure 1a shows the freshly prepared step-terrace structures which have uniformly measured monatomic step heights of 2.2 Å along with dark and bright colors of separate local areas on the pretreated Rh(111) surface. This clean surface is consistent with a theoretical model of Rh surface structure and with literature values from real-space observations using STM26,27. Under the CO2 environment, as illustrated in Fig. 1b, linear (l)-CO2(g) molecules randomly collide with surface Rh atoms with kinetic energy (KE) at a given temperature in statistical velocity distribution; such fundamental molecular motions are correlated to a simplified function of chemical potential energy in the established ideal solution at equilibrium. With the right amount of CO2, the ground state of l-CO2(g) could have a greater chance for electronic transition throughout the excited state by exchanging hot carriers at the gas−solid interface28,29, and nonequilibrium molecular behaviors may result in the geometric transformation to b-CO2 (ads.) on the Rh surface30,31.

Fig. 1: Molecular adsorption structure of CO and CO2 on the Rh(111) surface.
figure1

a Freshly prepared wide-range STM image in UHV after cleaning cycles (Vt = 1.25 V; It = 0.17 nA). b Schematic illustration of the gaseous CO2/Rh(111) interface (side view). ce Representative atomic-resolution NAP-STM images of clean in UHV (Vt = 0.23 V; It = 0.25 nA) (c), 0.75 ML of (2 × 2)-3CO chemisorption structure at 0.1 mbar CO (Vt = 1.03 V; It = 0.16 nA) (d) and CO2 physisorption structure at 0.1 mbar CO2 (Vt = 0.54 V; It = 0.16 nA) (e) on the Rh(111) surfaces. fh Corresponding atomistic ball model illustrations of the observed NAP-STM images. Dark blue, black and red balls represent Rh, C and O atoms, respectively.

Representative atom-resolved resolution of NAP-STM images in Fig. 1c−e show the different chemisorption properties of CO and CO2 molecules on the Rh(111) surface. The observed hexagonal pattern of Rh atoms in UHV is periodically arrayed with a nearest-neighborhood distance of 2.7 Å in Fig. 1c, corresponding to |a| of the illustrated atomistic ball model in Fig. 1f. The clean Rh terraces are immediately covered by introduced CO molecules in a 0.1 mbar CO environment; the ordered bright spots and mismatched discrete lines appear simultaneously, as shown in Fig. 1d. A unit cell of the observed structural orderings by CO/Rh is indicated as a dotted parallelogram, which has long-range patterns attributed to (2 × 2)-3CO structures of 0.75 ML, as illustrated in Fig. 1g. The model construction of CO/Rh structure explains that each corner of a parallelogram is connected to an atop (t) site of CO* with a length of 2|a| on each side, which meets at an angle of 60° per unit cell. Also, two CO molecules occupy the hollow (h) sites inside the parallelogram, and the proposed CO/Rh structure at θCO of 0.75 ML consists of t-CO and h-CO with a ratio of 1:2 on the Rh(111) surface32,33. However, the displayed NAP-STM image under 0.1 mbar CO environment is not perfectly matched with the proposed model structure, due to changes of tunneling current probability in measurement condition. In principle, the local electron densities of t-CO and h-CO have different bond orders between adsorbate CO molecules and surface Rh atoms. So, the transferred charge distributions of directly bound t-CO at the atop site would have a higher probability of negative charge density than that of h-CO at the hollow site on the Rh(111) surface. This insignificant difference hinders characterizations of confined adsorption structures in direct observations27. Our observation results not only agree with previously reported dense CO/Rh(111) structures under a CO environment of approximately 1 bar, but also unravel a distinctive feature of the dominantly bright site-specific tunneling probability, depending on the perpendicular z-direction of distance between STM tip and Rh surface in measurement conditions (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Attempting the direct observation of molecular behaviors of CO2 at the interface is more challenging than working with CO/Rh, as displayed in Fig. 1e. This representative NAP-STM image under 0.1 mbar CO2 conditions was taken after being filled with CO2 gas for approximately 5 min, where the bright blobs, indicated by arrows, randomly diffused on the surface34. We note that our real-space probing of quickly moving CO2 molecules on the Rh surface was not able to take clear topographic images exploiting the same optimized measurement conditions of CO/Rh(111). So, we adopted the STM tip movement in fast-scanning mode with a few hundred milli-seconds for the local area of taken under CO2 environments at 300 K. Weakly bound CO2 molecules on the Rh(111) surface did not show any ordering of intermolecular interactions with each other during observations for 1 h; the randomly aligned l-CO2 molecules via the physisorption process are depicted as Fig. 1h (Supplementary Fig. 2). The trend of momentary diffusion of the physisorbed CO2 molecules could be distinguished in consecutively recorded NAP-STM images with a time interval of 2.8 s (Supplementary Fig. 3), and the characterized immobile chemisorption CO2 (ads.) molecules keep their ellipsoidal shape with a lateral size of 5.4 ± 0.4 Å and height of 0.3 ± 0.1 Å in real-space measurements. Moreover, the CO2 (ads.) species that appear are absolutely distinct from the impurity (lateral size: 12 Å ; height 1.0 Å) on the observed local area, which could be easily isolated of the visible difference along the z-axis in three-dimensional space according to a simplified Wentzel‒Kramers‒Brillouin (WKB) approximation35. In addition, the characterized CO2 (ads.) molecules are consistently observed at different tunneling conditions in NAP-STM measurements, showing that the recorded tunneling images of CO2−Rh interface analysis results are far from a tip-induced artifact in direct observations (Supplementary Fig. 4).

This exposes a characteristic of CO2 adsorption not found in CO molecules. In one aspect of molecular orbital configurations, the chemisorption of CO/Rh(111) is an exothermic process via π-backdonation in which electrons transfer from surface Rh atoms to CO molecules to relieve excess negative charge33. However, the ground state of CO2 is similar to the linear dimer molecule with1\(\mathop {\sum }\nolimits_g^ +\)symmetry6. This inactive electronic configuration of the CO2 leads exclusively to the physisorption process on the Rh surface, and the chemisorption of CO2 needs prerequisite energy to overcome the potential barrier36. Therefore, the intra-valency-shell orbitals of CO2 should be filled with induced-electrons at the moment of molecular collisions on the surface to proceed with the chemisorption process via modification as an active form of electronic configuration (Supplementary Fig. 5). The Walsh diagram37 explains this relationship between orbital energy constructions and CO2 molecular geometries of linear and bent structures; applicable predictions based on ab initio calculations imply the possibility of a metastable CO2δ− formation with a relatively long lifetime of 90 μs at molecular collisions38.

X-ray spectroscopy analysis of chemical binding energy

Topographic analysis results provide intuitive knowledge of adsorbate-driven chemisorption structures at the interface. Still, the acquired local density of states images have technical limitations on interpreting the chemical information of adsorbate species at the same moment during the observations. To investigate the observed chemisorption species in real-space, further chemical binding energy analysis was also performed under environmental conditions using synchrotron-based NAP-XPS. The incident X-ray photon energy for each taken core-level spectrum was selected to 400 eV (Rh 3d and C 1s) and 640 eV (O 1s) in order to collect escaping photoelectrons at a probing depth of 5‒10 Å from the topmost Rh layer39.

Figure 2a exhibits acquired Rh 3d core-level spectra under UHV, 0.1 mbar CO and 0.1 mbar CO2 environments. After repeated cycles of the flat Rh surface preparation (Supplementary Fig. 6), the obtained spectrum (labeled as clean) shows two distinctive peaks, attributed to a nonperturbate surface state and bulk Rh 3d5/2 metal atoms at 306.6 eV (yellow color) and 307.1 eV (green color), respectively40,41. In gaseous environments, the intense surface state peak completely disappears, regardless of the different kinds of gas molecules in Rh 3d core-level spectra since the surrounding adsorbates of s- and p-orbitals have strongly correlated hybridization interactions nearby surface Rh atoms of d-band electronic structure42. This indicates that the adsorbate molecules modify the electronic structure of surface regime including first- and second-layer Rh atoms, resulting in surface core-level shift (SCLS) phenomenon43. Their delicate spectral changes, depending on the different kinds of adsorbate gas molecules (i.e. CO or CO2) at NAP is analyzed in the comparison plots of Rh 3d core-level spectra taken in each different gaseous environment (Supplementary Fig. 7). The adsorption of gas molecules and their effective collision behaviors on the Rh(111) surface commonly make a noticeable broadening of the peak at 307.5 eV beside the characterized portion of Rh bulk species in the Rh 3d core-level spectra. In particular, we can find a small spectral shoulder at 307.9 eV, as displayed in the overlapping comparison plot of CO(g) and CO2(g) in Supplementary Fig. 7, which implies that the surface Rh 3d core-level shifts get involved in the adsorbate‒Rh atoms bonding formation properties by reactive molecule collisions and electronic charge redistribution on the Rh(111) surface44,45,46.

Fig. 2: Chemical binding energy analysis for adsorbed CO and CO2 molecules.
figure2

ac Synchrotron-radiation NAP-XPS measurements for Rh 3d ( = 400 eV) (a), C 1s ( = 400 eV) (b) and O 1s ( = 640 eV) (c) core-level spectra under UHV, 0.1 mbar CO and 0.1 mbar CO2 environments. The metallic Rh 3d5/2 core-level and non-perturbed surface state of Rh atoms deconvoluted with green and yellow peaks, respectively. Site-specific molecular CO bound properties of t-CO (blue) and h-CO (red) indicated in both of C 1s and O 1s core-level spectra. Chemical binding features of dissociative adsorption for CO2 at the interface also resolved individually with colors of blue, magenta and cyan, respectively.

Figure 2b, c exhibits spectroscopic discrepancies of adsorbate CO and CO2 on the Rh(111) surface. Under 0.1 mbar CO conditions, we detected two kinds of adsorbate species and one gaseous species at each different peak position in deconvoluted C 1s and O 1s core-level spectra. This metal carbonyl formation (M-CO) could be examined by individual metal element electron transfers binding the light organic molecule and the metal atom by the π-backdonation synergic process47. Spectral evolving features ascribe the chemical bonding of CO/Rh for hollow sites (h-CO; red color), atop sites (t-CO; blue color), and free molecules CO(g) (light gray color). Those assigned adsorbate CO species of peaks at 285.5 and 286.1 eV for C 1s core-level and at 530.8 and 532.2 eV for O 1s core-level spectra40,48 have a point of similarity in the greater signal intensity of h-CO rather than t-CO, where measured chemisorption properties are consistent with the literature for CO/Rh(111) study at a maximum θCO of 0.75 ML. Moreover, the relative C 1s signal intensity ratio (Supplementary Table 1) of t-CO/h-CO is 0.51, and this spectroscopic evidence supports the topographic observation result of (2 × 2)-3CO structure in Fig. 1d. However, the characterized ratio of t-CO/h-CO in the C 1s core-level spectrum is not matched with the calculated ratio in the O 1s core-level spectrum (0.80). Because the collected signal intensities would be influenced by the kinetic energy of irradiated photon beams during the capturing of photo-emitted electrons at the interface. It does not mean the qualitative change of characterized adsorbate species during the NAP-XPS measurements. The populated photoelectrons could be measured with different signal intensity ratios of t-CO/h-CO between C 1s and O 1s core-level spectra by the influence of adsorbate geometry and photoelectron diffraction effect as a function of photon energy, as reported previous literature40,48,49.

The well-characterized spectroscopic trends for CO−Rh interactions do not match the obtained C 1s and O 1s core-level spectra under 0.1 mbar CO2 environments. Interestingly, two peaks of the assigned CO2 (ads.) and CO (dis.) were identified at 285.5 and 286.1 eV. They are corresponding to chemisorbed CO2 and dissociated CO adsorbates in C 1s core-level spectrum, which have the same deconvolution profiles as at full width at half-maximum (FWHM) and peak center positions at the binding energy for the analysis results of CO/Rh(111). However, the effective collisions of CO2 free molecules on the Rh(111) surface would form weakly bound CO2 (ads.) species20,22, as observed in Fig. 1e, which differs remarkably from the measured NAP-XPS results in the CO(g) environment. This unique property is characterized at the early stage of gaseous CO2 exposure, the assigned peak of CO2δ− at 289.4 eV in C 1s core-level spectrum (Supplementary Fig. 8) suggests a clear evidence of molecular CO2 interactions with Rh atoms at NAP. The signal intensity ratio of t-CO/h-CO goes in the opposite direction from the spectral acquisition under CO(g) conditions. We note that the peak intensity ratio of gas phase/adsorbates is critically influenced by sample-to-aperture distance, which is irrelevant to the qualitative characterization of adsorbate species in NAP-XP spectra under CO(g) and CO2(g) environments. Furthermore, we could not obtain the unsuspected tendency in C 1s and O 1s core-level spectra until approximately 100 min of CO2 gas exposure, indicating that the chemical shifts of C 1s and O 1s start to be visible after long exposure to CO2.

At this point, an additional peak appears at 530.5 eV (O1) in O 1s core-level spectrum, besides the CO2 (ads.) species for hollow (O2) and atop (O3) sites of the Rh surface (Supplementary Fig. 9). A noticeable O1 peak could also be associated with the intramolecular chemical bonding of *COO−Rh, which makes a segmented dissociative adsorption neither t-CO nor h-CO of transient b-CO2 at the Rh interface. We can find a clear spectral broadening feature between initial (t0 + 14 min) and equilibrium (t0 + 132 min) O 1s core-level spectra in time-lapse NAP-XPS measurements, and the deconvoluted O1 peak is distinct from an adjacent O2 species with binding energy differences of 0.5−0.6 eV (Supplementary Fig. 10). Moreover, the evolved intermediate species cannot be classified as an atomic O* at the hollow site of Rh(111) surface in the literature50,51. Taken together, the unusual features under CO2(g) conditions imply that the partial chemical species of adsorbate molecules may occupy atop, bridge, and hollow sites on the Rh surface as intermediates. Consequently, the intramolecular bond of O‒CO* loosens by pulling both sides of the chemical bond with surface Rh atoms; in other words, electrophilic surface Rh atoms strongly attract the lone-pair electrons of O‒CO*, and the other side of molecular bonding for b-CO2 would consolidate a binding of CO* preferentially at the atop site on the Rh surface. At equilibrium, it is possible for dissociated O*, CO* and chemisorbed b-CO2 to exist together at the same Rh terrace; meanwhile, the resolved peaks of CO2 (ads.) species at a binding energy of 530.5 (cyan color) and 531.1 eV (magenta color) in O 1s core-level spectra have peak shifts of +0.3 and +0.1 eV as time lapsed in NAP-XPS measurements (Supplementary Table 2). Nonetheless, these specific observations only elucidate the influence of partial chemical binding of *O−Rh at the interface, because the direct molecular bonding information of *CO2−Rh could emerge from charge transfers for the intramolecular property of *CO−Rh species during the CO2 chemisorption process.

As a result, the measured peak intensity ratio (C2/C1) in C 1s core-level spectra under 0.1 mbar CO2 environment increases 172.9% between initiation and equilibrium (Supplementary Table 1), because the spectral portion of dissociated CO contributes to the change of relative signal intensity ratio. The corresponding relative peak intensity ratio of O3/O2 in O 1s core-level spectra of initial and equilibrium also increased 160.0%, indicating that the chemical species interpretation using a widely used peak deconvolution procedure for NAP-XP spectra are thereby reliable as supporting evidence of the CO2 dissociation process. We emphasize that the represented spectroscopic evidence of dissociated CO* from CO2 (ads.) was obtained in the strictly managed X-ray photoemission experimental setup to exclude the issue of photon-induced contaminations52. The high-flux X-ray photon beam was not continuously irradiated to the Rh(111) single crystal proportional to the exposure time of CO2 gas molecules in the analysis chamber. No significant evolution of carbon fragment or carbidic species was found in the C 1s core-level spectra at NAP conditions, which is also confirmed in the plotted comparison spectra of before and after pump down (Supplementary Fig. 11).

Direct observations of CO2 dissociation on the Rh surface

Both measurements of electron microscopy and X-ray spectroscopy techniques commonly experienced unexpectedly long CO2 gas exposure to reach equilibrium, in contrast with the immediately attained equilibrium conditions in a CO environment. We emphasize that these confusing results are neither contamination of CO impurity in CO2(g) nor partial thermolysis of CO2 molecules by glowing tungsten filaments from the analytical instruments; such a hypothesis for slowly conducting CO contamination on Rh surfaces cannot clearly explain the opposite trend of t-CO/h-CO ratio for C 1s core-level and the existence of O (ads.) species for O 1s core-level NAP-XPS spectra in a CO2 environment. To discover the detailed interactions at the CO2−Rh interface, time-lapse in situ observations were carried out during the CO2 dissociation over Rh(111) surface.

Figure 3a shows an NAP-STM image composed of bright and dark spots at CO2(g) equilibrium, where a marked parallelogram shape connects to each corner of the periodic bright spots, and the arrows indicate randomly distributed dark spots. The measured nearest-neighborhood distance of bright spots is approximately 5.4 Å, which is equivalent to double the atomic length of Rh−Rh on the surface27,53. Surprisingly, indicated bright and dark spots exactly occupy the atop and hollow for each site of the Rh surface at the measured local area; a substrate Rh atom-resolved narrow-scale image, as displayed in Fig. 3b, demonstrates that the indication of the parallelogram correlates with the dotted connections of each corner for a bright spot in Fig. 3a. Considering the NAP-STM images, we suggest the reasonable assignments of bright and dark spots corresponding to CO* at the atop site and O* at the hollow site of surface Rh atoms, which is critical evidence of spontaneous CO2 dissociation over the Rh surface at equilibrium. In fact, the ordering structure formation of (2 × 2)-CO in Fig. 3b matched remarkably with a visualized DFT-based STM simulation image for (2 × 2)-CO/Rh(111) in Fig. 3c; in addition, the dissociated O* was typically observed as dark spots, owing to the electron depression effect during the empty-state of surface observations using the tungsten STM tip54,55. On the other hand, the observed dark spots are irregularly scattered on the Rh(111) surface, which implies that some dissociated atomic oxygen species may be effectively removed rather than the ordered *CO−Rh by nearby adsorbates via the thermodynamically preferred desorption process of O2(g) or CO2(g). We note that these clearly distinguished CO* and O* species on Fig. 3a, b happen to be observed after the CO2 dissociation process on the Rh(111) surface. Once the catalytic reaction initiates, the CO2 (ads.) molecules have complex interactions with surface Rh atoms, represented by randomly tangled structures by chemisorbed, dissociated, and intermediate forms of CO2 (ads.) at the same time (Supplementary Fig. 12).

Fig. 3: Direct observations of dissociated CO and O adsorptions at the CO2/Rh interface.
figure3

ac Atom-resolved adsorption structure analysis during the CO2 dissociation over Rh(111) surface. A representative real-time observation result using NAP-STM at 0.1 mbar CO2 (Vt = 0.25 V; It = 0.17 nA) (a), their narrow-scale image (Vt = 0.21 V; It = 0.30 nA) (b) and the DFT-simulated STM image of (2 × 2)-CO adsorption structure on the Rh(111) surface (c). Indicated arrows and corners of the parallelogram on the images are corresponding to dissociated O* and CO*, respectively. d, e Time-lapsed spectroscopic measurement results of dissociated CO adsorptions on the Rh(111) surface using NAP-XPS ( = 400 eV). Recorded C 1s core-level spectra on the Rh(111) surface (d) and peak intensity ratio histogram analysis plots for the measured C 1s spectra (e) under 0.1 mbar CO2 environment. Each peak intensity of C2 was normalized to the of fixed C1 ratio in C 1s core-level spectrum. The assigned CO (dis.) and CO2 (ads.) peaks are labeled as C2 (blue) and C1 (magenta), respectively. All spectral interpretation procedures were identically carried out before and after normalization of C 1s core-level NAP-XP spectra (Supplementary Fig. 13).

As well as time-lapse NAP-XPS measurements for C 1s, core-level spectra in a CO2 environment (Fig. 3d) display the relative growth of intensity for CO (dis.) species (C2) compared to the other assigned peak for CO2 (ads.) (C1) in deconvolution areas. The sequentially recorded spectra in order of time show that the only CO(dis.) peak increases proportionally to the elapsed time in spectra. The plot of the peak intensity ratio of C2/C1 (black color) and histogram analysis (blue color) of the normalized CO(dis.) coverage (the plot of unnormalized C 1s core-level spectra is provided in Supplementary Fig. 13) exhibits the number of relative variations between dissociated CO* and CO2 (ads.) on the Rh surface at 300 K under 0.1 mbar CO2(g) as displayed in Fig. 3e. Given the plot, the measured coverage of dissociated CO* from CO2 (ads.) is approximately 0.1 ML after introducing gaseous CO2 molecules into the analysis chamber 85 min later. In consequence, the catalytic CO2 dissociation does not reach equilibrium until 108 min in our direct observation results of 0.25 ML at maximum CO coverage. This unexpected phenomenon is feasible for the molecular CO2 conversion occurring over the Rh catalyst, but the addressed detectable measurements strongly support the exothermic bond-breaking process for the CO2 dissociation after all.

In principle, reaching CO (dis.) coverage of 0.1 ML would require a few million years17 because of the low probability of dissociative adsorption at the CO2(g) pressure in the 10−6 mbar range (Supplementary Fig. 14). On the other hand, the reaction requisition time, which varies between a few hundreds of micro-seconds and one month, could be dramatically reduced, depending on the reaction temperature at 1 bar of CO2(g). Discrepancies between fundamental theory and empirical calculations can occur as a result of underestimating experimental kinetic data. Nevertheless, an enormous turnover time gap during the direct observations of CO2 (ads.) at 0.1 mbar CO2 would be engaged in increased effective molecular collisions at CO2−Rh interface14,16. The turnover frequency of chemisorbed CO2 molecules is determined by the combined equations of a Maxwell−Boltzmann function at a certain temperature and probabilities for dissociative adsorption of CO2; as a result, the increased chemical potential at the elevated pressure facilitates the dissociative chemisorption state beyond the potential energy barrier19,56. Therefore, in industrial chemical reactors for CO2 conversion typically operating at high pressure, dissociated CO* molecules are effectively involved in the catalytic reaction process at the early stage of CO2RR at the Rh catalyst interface, whereas the intermediate product of formate is selectively hindered at the projected reaction pathway.

Electronic charge analysis and proposed mechanism

The experimental results of atom-resolved microscopy and X-ray spectroscopy indicate that chemisorbed b-CO2 molecules spontaneously break up at the CO2−Rh interface, which would lead to selective yields of intermediate species developing further complicated catalytic reaction processes. DFT calculations were performed to elucidate the details of electronic charge distribution between the b-CO2 molecule and surface Rh atoms by the Bader charge analysis method based on a theory of atoms in molecules (AIM)57, and to predict a catalytic reaction route of CO2 dissociation on the Rh(111) surface. The calculated molecular geometry for CO2 in the gas phase has a bond angle (O = C = O) of 178−180° and an intramolecular distance (dO−C) of 1.172−1.181 Å, whereas the activated CO2δ− molecules at the interface could have transformed structures, as reported in the literature20,58,59.

In Fig. 4a, b, the optimized molecular geometry at local minimum (∆Eads = −0.39 eV) has a bond angle of 133.3° and coupled distances of dRh−C and dRh−O corresponding to 2.059 and 2.145 Å, respectively. The surface Rh atoms bind with adjacent intramolecular C and O atoms of b-CO2. Meanwhile, the projected nonuniform charge distributions would induce separately to the gradient points of positively charged (Rh1−C and Rh2−O) or negatively charged (O−CO) atoms. Finally, a net charge of −0.51 e is transferred from the Rh atoms to the b-CO2 molecule. The electron density iso-surface at a density of 0.004 e/Å3 confirms the chemical interaction formed between b-CO2 and the Rh surface, which initiates the subsequent spontaneous CO2 dissociation process by O−CO bond cleavage at the interface. Figure 4c presents the energetics of overall catalytic CO2 dissociation over the Rh(111) surface, which is exothermic (ΔEdiss. = −0.82 eV) with an activation energy barrier, ΔETS of +0.58 eV. As a result, the dissociated CO* and O* remain on the Rh surface (Supplementary Fig. 15). The calculated final dissociated state exhibits 7−11% shorter Rh−C (1.834 Å) and Rh−O (1.987 Å) bond distances while the moderate level of ΔETS indicates the occurrence of complicated atomic rearrangements at the transition state. That is, a partial *CO intramolecular bonding of Rh−COO* at atop Rh2 site would be rearranged to the bridge Rh2 site. Eventually, the dissociated O* is relocated to the most thermodynamically preferred hollow site by the bond cleavage of *O−CO. This proposed chemical reaction route confirms that the strongly correlated electronic interactions between chemisorbed CO2 molecules and Rh(111) surface possibly lead to the thermodynamic driving force of CO2 dissociation at the Rh interface in realistic reaction conditions. The DFT-calculated average binding energy of four CO2 molecules adsorbed on Rh(111) was decreased to −0.19 eV/CO2 (Supplementary Fig. 16). The multiple CO2 binding configuration with the weaker binding energy would have a limited survival under the higher CO2 partial pressure, providing the increased CO2 surface coverage. We note that the DFT-estimated ΔETS values of CO2 dissociation on Rh(111) with conventional generalized gradient approximation level exchange-correlation functionals are usually underestimated from the experimental value (Supplementary Table 3)59,60,61,62. However, such underestimation does not significantly interfere with the theoretical analysis of the CO2 dissociation mechanism.

Fig. 4: Electronic interaction analysis and proposed mechanism for CO2 dissociation.
figure4

a Electron iso-surface (ρ = 0.004 e/Å3) presenting the distribution and morphology of the orbitals participating in the chemical interaction between b-CO2 (ads.) and Rh atoms, which visualizes that each positively charged adjacent surface Rh atom is binding with C (Rh1−C; +0.03 e) or O (Rh2−O; +0.17 e) atom of the b-CO2 (ads.). Integrated electron charge density difference defined as Δρ = ρtotal – ρsurf – ρadsorbate in Bader volume, where ρtotal, ρsurf, and ρadsorbate are charge density for b-CO2/Rh, Rh surface, and b-CO2 molecule, respectively. Charge accumulated or depleted areas in the iso-surface are presented as red or blue. b A Bader charge analysis result of b-CO2/Rh. A net charge (q) of −0.51 e was transferred to b-CO2 (ads.) from adjacent Rh surface atoms. c DFT-calculated pathway and energetics of CO2 dissociation on the Rh(111) surface. (Rh, emerald; C, gray; O, red). A single imaginary frequency of 434i cm−1 was calculated for the TS.

Discussion

We have revealed a chemical bond cleavage of *O−CO at CO2−Rh(111) interface in reaction environments using NAP-STM and NAP-XPS techniques. Those direct observations of CO2 dissociation, an essential step in primary energy source production processes, indicate that the active charge transfers between CO2 molecules and metal surface at elevated pressures significantly affect yields of intermediate products at the early stage of catalytic reactions. Our combined experimental results clearly show ordered (2 × 2)-CO structure formation by spontaneous CO2 dissociation at the Rh interface. Similarly, probed time-lapse evolutions of the dissociated CO* chemical binding at atop sites of the Rh surface support evidence of the observed catalytic reaction extensively along the same lines. For the constructed model of b-CO2/Rh, which may be facilitated by the increased chemical potential of the Rh interface under realistic reaction conditions, the DFT calculations explain a possible chemical reaction route by activated charge transfer at the nonequilibrium state of b-CO2 molecules on the Rh surface. Furthermore, the proposed CO2 dissociation pathway not only suggests a thermodynamic preference of Rh−carbonyl formation toward methane synthesis, but also describes a distinct reaction direction against yields of intermediate formate carrying on a route for methanol synthesis using Cu catalysts. Our combined investigations provide fundamental insights in determining the selectivity of energy source production at the molecular level and therein contributes to the rational design of catalytic factors for improving CO2 utilization in broad applications of cutting-edge science in heterogeneous catalysis.

Methods

Sample preparation

A commercially available single crystal Rh(111) sample (99.99%) was purchased from Mateck GmbH. The one-side polished (roughness < 10 nm) metal crystal was prepared by a floating zone method with a high cut-orientation accuracy < 0.1°. The prepared sample was cleaned by repeated cycles of Ar+ ion-bombardment sputtering (PAr = 1 × 10−5 mbar at 1.0 keV) and annealing to 1000−1050 K for 5 min in UHV. Freshly prepared contaminant-free surface characterization was confirmed using STM, low-electron energy diffraction (LEED), and XPS.

NAP-STM experiments

Topographic NAP-STM images were recorded in a small volume (15 mL) reaction cell-integrated STM scanner (Aarhus STM 150 NAP, SPECS GmbH), where the enclosed volume could be physically separated with a UHV chamber (base pressure: 1 × 10−10 mbar) by two locking screws63. The cleaned sample was transferred to the pressure and temperature variable reaction cell, taking direct observation results under gaseous environments. High-purity (99.999%) CO or CO2 gas molecules were further purified to remove infinitesimal amounts of Ni or Fe-carbonyl and water using gas purification filters (PALL Corp.) in the multi-gas delivery manifold system, which was introduced to the reaction cell by a precision leakage valve. A chemically etched tungsten tip was employed to record tunneling current between the sample and the STM tip. Sharpening and cleaning processes of the tip were treated with the positively charged in situ noble gas ion sputtering method before STM measurements under the gas environment. The positive bias voltage was applied to the sample to prevent gas molecule-induced tip crash during the measurements at 300 K in constant current mode. Each empty-state topographic image of tunneling conditions was denoted as Vt (applied voltage) and It (tunneling current), respectively.

Synchrotron-based NAP-XPS experiments

All X-ray photoemission spectra were taken at the endstation of the BL-13B soft X-ray undulator beamline facility of the Photon Factory (PF) at the High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) in Japan41. Clean Rh surface preparation and photoemission core-level spectrum measurements were performed in each separate preparation (base pressure: 2 × 10−10 mbar) and analysis (base pressure: 2 × 10−9 mbar) chamber, respectively. Sample cleanliness and long-range ordering of Rh atoms on the surface were confirmed by a LEED instrument in UHV after the repeated cycles of Ar+ ion-bombardment sputtering and high-temperature annealing. In the same manner, no contaminants such as C, O, B, Ni and Si were detectable on the freshly cleaned Rh(111) surface by XPS. High-purity CO (99.999%) and CO2 (99.999%) gas cylinders were connected to a compact–sized gas manifold. All gas lines had a bake out procedure at 383 K with a high-speed pump out for at least 12 h before the cleaned gas feed in experiments. CO or CO2 gas molecules were backfilled with the analysis chamber using a precision leakage valve, which introduced reactive gas molecules that were monitored with a quadrupole mass spectrometer (HAL-201, HIDEN) in the chamber of the first differential-pumping stage. A modified hemispherical electron energy analyzer (EA125HP, Omicron) was used for the NAP-XPS measurements. The selected incident photon energies used for NAP-XPS analysis were 400 eV (C 1s; Rh 3d) and 640 eV (O 1s), to take almost the same surface sensitivity of each core-level spectrum at KE of approximately 100 eV (probed depth from the topmost layer ≤10 Å). The high-flux photon beam was irradiated to the Rh(111) model catalyst within 3 min at a shot of the selected core-level analysis, then the beam shutter was closed immediately after the acquisition of each spectrum. X-ray beam-induced sample damage and influence of photoionization effect were not detected during the NAP-XPS measurements. The acquired spectra of binding energy were calibrated by the Fermi-edge of the sample substrate at the incident photon energy. For detailed analysis of acquired core-level XP spectra, each spectrum was subtracted by a Shirley-type background that measured peaks fitting a widely accepted mixed ratio (70%:30%) of Gaussian−Lorentzian function using the CasaXPS package.

DFT calculations

All spin-polarized DFT calculations for the CO or CO2/Rh systems were performed using the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP), and the interaction between the valence electrons and the ionic core was described by the projector augmented wave (PAW) method64,65. The exchange-correlation energy of the Kohn–Sham equation was functionalized with the revised Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (RPBE) functional66. A 6 × 6 × 4 supercell was used to describe the Rh(111) surface (Supplementary Fig. 17). The calculated lattice parameter of Rh was 3.85 Å (refer to Supplementary Table 4 for more discussions). The bottom two Rh layers were fixed upon geometry optimization. A 4 × 4 × 4 Γ-centered k-point grid was used to sample the first Brillouin zone. The mechanism of the CO2 dissociation process over an Rh surface was studied using a model structure of single CO2 molecule/Rh(111). Appropriate multiple molecular binding configurations were also estimated to reproduce the NAP-STM images. Valence electron functions were extended with the plane-wave basis to an energy cutoff of 400 eV, and a 15 Å vacuum space along the z-direction was applied to avoid interactions between the repeating slabs. The convergence criteria for the electronic structure and the geometry were set to 10−3 eV and 0.05 eV/Å, respectively. The van der Waals (vdW)-corrected DFT-D3 method with the Becke−Johnson damping model was applied for all calculations67. Gaussian smearing function with a finite temperature width of 0.02 eV was used. The location and energy of transition state (TS) were calculated with the climbing-image nudged elastic band method68,69. Subsequent normal mode analysis was performed to confirm the TS. Simulated STM images were acquired by integrating the occupied states at and below the Fermi-level (down to EF – E ≤ 0.5 eV). The calculated adsorption energy (Eads) is defined as Eads = Etotal – Esurf – Eadsorbate, where Etotal is the total energy for the model system with adsorbate species; Esurf is the total energy for the optimized bare surface; and Eadsorbate is the total energy for the adsorbate species.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Shakun, J. D. et al. Global warming preceded by increasing carbon dioxide concentrations during the last deglaciation. Nature 484, 49–54 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sperry, J. S. et al. The impact of rising CO2 and acclimation on the response of US forests to global warming. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 25734–25744 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chu, S. & Majumdar, A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature 488, 294–303 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Rostrupnielsen, J. R. & Hansen, J. H. B. CO2-reforming of methane over transition metals. J. Catal. 144, 38–49 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Olah, G. A. Towards oil independence through renewable methanol chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 104–107 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Freund, H. J. & Roberts, M. W. Surface chemistry of carbon dioxide. Surf. Sci. Rep. 25, 225–273 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bradford, M. C. J. & Vannice, M. A. CO2 reforming of CH4. Catal. Rev. 41, 1–42 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kuhl, K. P., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N. & Jaramillo, T. F. New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 7050–7059 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Voiry, D., Shin, H. S., Loh, K. P. & Chhowalla, M. Low-dimensional catalysts for hydrogen evolution and CO2 reduction. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2, 0105 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Behrens, M. et al. The active site of methanol synthesis over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 industrial catalysts. Science 336, 893–897 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kattel, S., Ramírez, P. J., Chen, J. G., Rodriguez, J. A. & Liu, P. Active sites for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol on Cu/ZnO catalysts. Science 355, 1296–1299 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kim, C. et al. Energy-efficient CO2 hydrogenation with fast response using photoexcitation of CO2 adsorbed on metal catalysts. Nat. Commun. 9, 3027 (2018).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Beuls, A. et al. Methanation of CO2: further insight into the mechanism over Rh/γ-Al2O3 catalyst. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 113–114, 2–10 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Solymosi, F., Erdöhelyi, A. & Bánsági, T. Methanation of CO2 on supported rhodium catalyst. J. Catal. 68, 371–382 (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Xu, S. & Carter, E. A. Theoretical insights into heterogeneous (photo)electrochemical CO2 reduction. Chem. Rev. 119, 6631–6669 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sexton, B. A. & Somorjai, G. A. The hydrogenation of CO and CO2 over polycrystalline rhodium: correlation of surface composition, kinetics and product distributions. J. Catal. 46, 167–189 (1977).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Weinberg, W. H. Why CO2 does not dissociate on Rh at low temperature. Surf. Sci. Lett. 128, L224–L230 (1983).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Somorjai, G. A. & Park, J. Y. Molecular surface chemistry by metal single crystals and nanoparticles from vacuum to high pressure. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 2155–2162 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Salmeron, M. & Schlögl, R. Ambient pressure photoelectron spectroscopy: a new tool for surface science and nanotechnology. Surf. Sci. Rep. 63, 169–199 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Favaro, M. et al. Subsurface oxide plays a critical role in CO2 activation by Cu(111) surfaces to form chemisorbed CO2, the first step in reduction of CO2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6706–6711 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Skafte, T. L. et al. Selective high-temperature CO2 electrolysis enabled by oxidized carbon intermediates. Nat. Energy 4, 846–855 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Eren, B., Weatherup, R. S., Liakakos, N., Somorjai, G. A. & Salmeron, M. Dissociative carbon dioxide adsorption and morphological changes on Cu(100) and Cu(111) at ambient pressures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 8207–8211 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kim, Y., Trung, T. S. B., Yang, S., Kim, S. & Lee, H. Mechanism of the surface hydrogen induced conversion of CO2 to methanol at Cu(111) step sites. ACS Catal. 6, 1037–1044 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Roiaz, M. et al. Reverse water–gas shift or Sabatier methanation on Ni(110)? Stable surface species at near-ambient pressure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 4146–4154 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Heine, C., Lechner, B. A. J., Bluhm, H. & Salmeron, M. Recycling of CO2: probing the chemical state of the Ni(111) surface during the methanation reaction with ambient-pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 13246–13252 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Stempel, S., Bäumer, M. & Freund, H. J. STM studies of rhodium deposits on an ordered alumina film-resolution and tip effects. Surf. Sci. 402−404, 424–427 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Cernota, P., Rider, K., Yoon, H. A., Salmeron, M. & Somorjai, G. Dense structures formed by CO on Rh(111) studied by scanning tunneling microscopy. Surf. Sci. 445, 249–255 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hertel, T., Knoesel, E., Wolf, M. & Ertl, G. Ultrafast electron dynamics at Cu(111): response of an electron gas to optical excitation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 535–538 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Park, J. Y., Baker, L. R. & Somorjai, G. A. Role of hot electrons and metal–oxide interfaces in surface chemistry and catalytic reactions. Chem. Rev. 115, 2781–2817 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Pacansky, J., Wahlgren, U. & Bagus, P. S. SCF ab‐initio ground state energy surfaces for CO2 and CO2. J. Chem. Phys. 62, 2740–2744 (1975).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    McDiarmid, R. & Doering, J. P. Electronic excited states of CO2: an electron impact investigation. J. Chem. Phys. 80, 648–656 (1984).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Thiel, P. A., Williams, E. D., Yates, J. T. Jr & Weinberg, W. H. The chemisorption of CO on Rh(111). Surf. Sci. 84, 54–64 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Van Hove, M. A., Koestner, R. J., Frost, J. C. & Somorjai, G. A. The structure of Rh(111)(2 × 2)-3CO from LEED intensities: Simultaneous bridge and near-top adsorption in a distorted compact hexagonal CO overlayer. Surf. Sci. 129, 482–506 (1983).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Feng, X., Cerdá, J. I. & Salmeron, M. Orientation-dependent interaction between CO2 molecules adsorbed on Ru(0001). J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 1780–1784 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Binnig, G., Garcia, N. & Rohrer, H. Conductivity sensitivity of inelastic scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 32, 1336–1338 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hagman, B. et al. Steps control the dissociation of CO2 on Cu(100). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 12974–12979 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Walsh, A. D. 466. The electronic orbitals, shapes, and spectra of polyatomic molecules. Part I. AH2 molecules. J. Chem. Soc. 2260−2266 (1953).

  38. 38.

    Compton, R. N., Reinhardt, P. W. & Cooper, C. D. Collisional ionization of Na, K, and Cs by CO2, COS, and CS2: molecular electron affinities. J. Chem. Phys. 63, 3821–3827 (1975).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Powell, C. J. et al. NIST data resources for surface analysis by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Auger electron spectroscopy. J. Electron. Spectros. Relat. Phenom. 114-116, 1097–1102 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Beutler, A. et al. On the adsorption sites for CO on the Rh(111) single crystal surface. Surf. Sci. 371, 381–389 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ueda, K., Isegawa, K., Amemiya, K., Mase, K. & Kondoh, H. Operando NAP-XPS observation and kinetics analysis of NO reduction over Rh(111) surface: characterization of active surface and reactive species. ACS Catal. 8, 11663–11670 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Baraldi, A. et al. Spectroscopic link between adsorption site occupation and local surface chemical reactivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 046101 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Baraldi, A., Lizzit, S., Novello, A., Comelli, G. & Rosei, R. Second-layer surface core-level shift on Rh(111). Phys. Rev. B 67, 205404 (2003).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bianchettin, L. et al. Experimental and theoretical surface core level shift study of the S-Rh(100) local environment. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 4003–4013 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Bianchettin, L. et al. Surface core level shift: high sensitive probe to oxygen-induced reconstruction of Rh(100). J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 13192–13198 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Amann, P. et al. A high-pressure x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy instrument for studies of industrially relevant catalytic reactions at pressures of several bars. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 103102 (2019).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Blyholder, G. Molecular orbital view of chemisorbed carbon monoxide. J. Phys. Chem. 68, 2772–2777 (1964).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    DeLouise, L. A., White, E. J. & Winograd, N. Characterization of CO binding sites on Rh{111} and Rh{331} surfaces by XPS and LEED: comparison to EELS results. Surf. Sci. 147, 252–262 (1984).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wiklund, M., Beutler, A., Nyholm, R. & Andersen, J. N. Vibrational analysis of the C 1s photoemission spectra from pure ethylidyne and ethylidyne coadsorbed with carbon monoxide on Rh(111). Surf. Sci. 461, 107–117 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Köhler, L. et al. High-coverage oxygen structures on Rh(111): adsorbate repulsion and site preference is not enough. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 266103 (2004).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Toyoshima, R. et al. High-pressure NO-induced mixed phase on Rh(111): chemically driven replacement. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 3033–3039 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Koitaya, T. et al. Real-time observation of reaction processes of CO2 on Cu(997) by ambient-pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Top. Catal. 59, 526–531 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Tang, D. C., Hwang, K. S., Salmeron, M. & Somorjai, G. A. High pressure scanning tunneling microscopy study of CO poisoning of ethylene hydrogenation on Pt(111) and Rh(111) single crystals. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 13300–13306 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Brune, H., Wintterlin, J., Behm, R. J. & Ertl, G. Surface migration of "hot" adatoms in the course of dissociative chemisorption of oxygen on Al(111). Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 624–626 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Wintterlin, J., Schuster, R. & Ertl, G. Existence of a "hot" atom mechanism for the dissociation of O2 on Pt(111). Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 123–126 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Ceyer, S. T. New mechanisms for chemistry at surfaces. Science 249, 133–139 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Sanville, E., Kenny, S. D., Smith, R. & Henkelman, G. Improved grid-based algorithm for Bader charge allocation. J. Comput. Chem. 28, 899–908 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Peng, G., Sibener, S. J., Schatz, G. C., Ceyer, S. T. & Mavrikakis, M. CO2 hydrogenation to formic acid on Ni(111). J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 3001–3006 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Ko, J., Kim, B.-K. & Han, J. W. Density functional theory study for catalytic activation and dissociation of CO2 on bimetallic alloy surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 3438–3447 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Goodman, D. W., Peebles, D. E. & White, J. M. CO2 dissociation on rhodium: measurement of the specific rates on Rh(111). Surf. Sci. 140, L239–L243 (1984).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Abbott, H. L. & Harrison, I. Activated dissociation of CO2 on Rh(111) and CO oxidation dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 13137–13148 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Liu, X., Sun, L. & Deng, W.-Q. Theoretical investigation of CO2 adsorption and dissociation on low index surfaces of transition metals. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 8306–8314 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kim, J. et al. Adsorbate-driven reactive interfacial Pt-NiO1−x nanostructure formation on the Pt3Ni(111) alloy surface. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat3151 (2018).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. 6, 15–50 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Hammer, B., Hansen, L. B. & Nørskov, J. K. Improved adsorption energetics within density-functional theory using revised Perdew−Burke−Ernzerhof functionals. Phys. Rev. B 59, 7413–7421 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Klimeš, J. & Michaelides, A. Perspective: Advances and challenges in treating van der Waals dispersion forces in density functional theory. J. Chem. Phys. 137, 120901 (2012).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901–9904 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Henkelman, G. & Jónsson, H. Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9978–9985 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Institute for Basic Science (IBS) [IBS-R004]. H.H., H.Y.K., and B.S.M. are thankful for financial support from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2019R1A2C1089256, NRF-2019R1A2C2008052, NRF-2015R1A5A1009962). B.S.M. would like to thank the GRI project of GIST 2020 for their support. This research used resources from the Center for Functional Nanomaterials (CFN), which is a U.S. DOE Office of Science Facility, and the Scientific Data and Computing Center, a component of the Computational Science Initiative, at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) under Contract No. DE-SC0012704. The synchrotron-based NAP-XPS experiments were performed under the approval of the Photon Factory Program Advisory Committee (PF PAC No. 2018S2-005).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.K. and J.Y.P. conceived and designed experiments. J.K. performed NAP-STM measurements. W.H.D. and K.U. performed LEED and NAP-XPS measurements. K.M., H.K. and B.S.M. supervised the NAP-XPS measurements at the synchrotron beamline facility. H.H. and H.Y.K. performed theoretical calculations. J.Y.P., H.Y.K., and B.S.M. supervised the project. J.K., H.H., and W.H.D. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the experimental and theoretical calculation results for manuscript preparation.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bongjin Simon Mun, Hyun You Kim or Jeong Young Park.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Joachim Paier, David Grinter and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J., Ha, H., Doh, W.H. et al. How Rh surface breaks CO2 molecules under ambient pressure. Nat Commun 11, 5649 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19398-1

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing