Wrapping glia regulates neuronal signaling speed and precision in the peripheral nervous system of Drosophila

Abstract

The functionality of the nervous system requires transmission of information along axons with high speed and precision. Conductance velocity depends on axonal diameter whereas signaling precision requires a block of electrical crosstalk between axons, known as ephaptic coupling. Here, we use the peripheral nervous system of Drosophila larvae to determine how glia regulates axonal properties. We show that wrapping glial differentiation depends on gap junctions and FGF-signaling. Abnormal glial differentiation affects axonal diameter and conductance velocity and causes mild behavioral phenotypes that can be rescued by a sphingosine-rich diet. Ablation of wrapping glia does not further impair axonal diameter and conductance velocity but causes a prominent locomotion phenotype that cannot be rescued by sphingosine. Moreover, optogenetically evoked locomotor patterns do not depend on conductance speed but require the presence of wrapping glial processes. In conclusion, our data indicate that wrapping glia modulates both speed and precision of neuronal signaling.

Introduction

Any complex nervous system is built by neurons and glia. Neurons collect, compute and transmit information in form of action potentials. The restoration of ion homeostasis as well as the energetically expensive neuron to neuron communication require an enormous amount of energy, which is mostly provided by glia1,2,3,4. Glial cells are not only indispensable for energy delivery, but perform a large spectrum of additional functions, including physical insulation of the axon to promote faster signal propagation5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12.

In vertebrates, axonal insulation depends on the axonal caliber. In the peripheral nervous system (PNS), large caliber axons are wrapped by myelin forming Schwann cells which allowed the evolution of saltatory conduction with a 20-fold increase in conduction speed13,14. Myelination can be activity dependent and thus conduction velocity can be further regulated according to neuronal activity15,16,17. In contrast, small caliber axons are wrapped in groups by non-myelinating Schwann cells that form Remak fibers18,19,20. Myelinating and non-myelinating Schwann cells share a common lineage and can redifferentiate in the other cell type depending on neuron–glia interaction21,22. Interestingly, non-myelinating Schwann cells appear morphologically similar to the wrapping glia found in the Drosophila PNS21,23,24.

Given the generally small size of invertebrates, no evolutionary pressure is expected to promote the development of very fast axonal conductance velocity and thus myelin-like structures. Surprisingly, however, such myelin-like structures can be found in several invertebrates, including shrimps, and copepods which due to their very small size of 200 µm length do not appear to require very fast nerve conduction25,26,27,28,29,30,31. Indeed, swimming speed in copepods does not correlate with myelination32. This suggests that wrapping glial cells perform additional tasks than just the acceleration of axon potential propagation speed33.

To identify such functions, the larval Drosophila PNS provides a powerful model. Peripheral sensory neurons send their axons through the segmental nerves to the ventral nerve cord. At the same time motor neurons project their axons through the segmental nerves to the musculature34. The segmental nerves are accompanied by a small set of individually identifiable glial cells which can be placed into three classes according to their morphological and functional characteristics35,36,37,38,39,40.

The perineurial and subperineurial glial cells establish the blood-brain barrier3,23,41,42. Inside the nerve, peripheral axons are enwrapped by the wrapping glia. Only three to four wrapping glial cells per nerve are specified during embryogenesis38,39. They accompany the axons and start to differentiate during the first larval stage. During subsequent larval stages the wrapping glial cells grow and axons are progressively wrapped23,24. The differentiation of wrapping glial cells is controlled by a set of transcriptional regulators43 and receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. The wrapping glial cells of the optic nerve require fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-receptor signaling to wrap around photoreceptor axons44,45 and wrapping glial cells along the abdominal nerves require EGF-receptor activity and the activating ligand Vein, a Drosophila Neuregulin24. This process appears evolutionarily conserved since differentiation of myelinating Schwann cells is controlled by the mammalian EGF-receptor and the activating ligand Neuregulin46,47,48.

At the end of larval development of Drosophila the wrapping glial cell has formed simple glial wraps around axons or small axon bundles24. The wrapping glial cells that cover the abdominal nerves can reach up to 2 mm in length, highlighting the need for their efficient metabolic supply. Given the enormous size of the wrapping glia, membrane synthesis is of high relevance. Vesicles required for membrane expansion of wrapping glia are routed via the exocyst pathway to the plasma membrane and respective mutants interfere with wrapping glial differentiation49. Moreover, lack of ceramide synthesis in wrapping glia leads to poor differentiation and a concomitant reduction in conduction velocity50. Lack of mactosylceramide, which is generated by the mannosyltransferase Egghead, causes aberrant activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) in peripheral glial cells and might also affect FGF-receptor signaling in wrapping glia51. Once differentiated, wrapping glial cells likely participate in metabolic homeostasis3 and ion homeostasis52,53,54.

Here, we address how insulation of axons affects nerve signaling properties. Previously, no specific means to manipulate the peripheral wrapping glia were available. All Gal4 lines known to be expressed in the wrapping glia are also expressed in central glia. We thus establish a Gal4/Gal80 combination which allows to specifically target only the wrapping glial cells. Abnormal wrapping glial differentiation or genetic ablation of wrapping glia cause a reduction in axon caliber and a decrease in conduction velocity. Interestingly, ablation of wrapping glia causes prominent larval locomotor phenotypes, while animals with poorly differentiated wrapping glia show only very mild locomotor phenotypes. To quantify this, we use the coiling phenotype, which increases in animals expressing a dominant negative FGF-receptor and is even higher upon wrapping glia ablation. Interestingly, the coiling phenotype of animals with impaired FGF-receptor activity is rescued to control levels by feeding the larvae with sphingosine, a primary part of sphingolipids found in the plasma membrane. In line with these observations, we find that glial ablation but not poor differentiation of wrapping glia blocks specific behavioral changes evoked by optogenetic means. In summary, our data indicate that the wrapping glial cells guarantee neuronal signaling precision and ensure growth of axons to promote action potential conduction speed.

Results

Generation of a wrapping glial driver

A promoter fragment of the nrv2 gene is commonly used to target wrapping glia23,55,56. We generated a nrv2-stgGFP transgene which shows a broad range of activity including many cells in the central nervous system (CNS) (Fig. 1a). This pattern is identical to the pattern directed by the nrv2-Gal4 driver as seen in the MultiColor FlpOut 2 (MCFO-2) approach57 (Fig. 1b). Unfortunately, we failed to identify a PNS–glia specific element in the nrv2 enhancer fragment58,59. We therefore screened the Gal4 driver collection generated at Janelia Research Campus, the inSITE collection and many publically available stocks60,61,62, but again failed to identify a wrapping glia specific enhancer element.

Fig. 1: Generation of a wrapping glia driver.
figure1

Confocal projection of larval filet preparations of the genotypes indicated. Representative images are shown taken from >10 animals analyzed for each genotype. a Third instar larva with the genotype [nrv2-stGFP]. Broad GFP expression is detected in the CNS. Note the restricted expression in the peripheral nervous system which corresponds to the wrapping glia (arrowheads). b Third instar larva of the genotype [hs-Flp; nrv2-Gal4/MCFO-2]. flp expression of the multicolor FlpOut construct was induced by 1 h 37 °C heat shock during first instar stage. Larvae were stained for HA (green), V5 (red), and FLAG (blue). c Same animal as in (a). Expression of stRed is observed only in the CNS and no expression is found in the wrapping glia. df Overlay of nrv2-GFP (green) and 90C03 > dsRed (red) expression. Note the complete overlap of dsRed (e) and GFP expression in the CNS (f). g Young third instar larva with the genotype [hs-Flp; nrv2-Gal4/MCFO-2; 90C03-Gal80]. flp expression was induced by 1 h 37 °C heat shock during first instar stage. Larvae were stained for HA (green), V5 (red), and FLAG (blue). h Living third instar larva of the genotype [nrv2-Gal4, UAS-CD8GFP; 90C03-Gal80/90C03-Gal80]. Note strong expression at the anterior tip of the larva. Scale bars are 250 µm (ac, g, h) and 100 µm (df).

We next searched for enhancer elements that direct an expression pattern in the CNS as it is observed for nrv2-Gal4 - but lack the peripheral glia expression domain. This work identified 90C03-Gal4 generated by the FlyLight project62 which showed no expression in the PNS (Fig. 1c). In the CNS, however, 90C03 and nrv2 activities are overlapping (Fig. 1d–f). Subsequently, we used the 90C03 enhancer element and established a corresponding Gal80 line by inserting a 90C03-Gal80 transgene into the attP2 landing site. We then generated a fly strain harboring the combination nrv2-Gal4, 90C03-Gal80 which resulted in robust expression in wrapping glia with only very little expression outside the nervous system around the pharynx (Fig. 1g, h).

FGF-receptor activity controls glial wrapping

To study the impact of wrapping glia on neuronal signaling we then used the above generated tool to specifically manipulate gene activity in these cells. We have previously shown that wrapping glial cells in the developing eye require the activity of the FGF-receptor Heartless (Htl)44. To test whether FGF-receptor signaling is also needed during glial differentiation in the peripheral nerve, we expressed a dominant negative Htl construct (htlDN) in wrapping glia. This resulted in larvae with poorly differentiated wrapping glial cells (Fig. 2a, b). In confocal microscopic views the wrapping glia appeared sometimes thinner, and formed a single line within the axon bundle (Fig. 2a, b; arrows). However, in other nerves or other sections of the same nerve, the wrapping glia appeared to cover a larger region of the nerve bundle (Fig. 2b; arrowheads). Following electron microscopic analysis, the disrupted differentiation of the wrapping glial cell can be clearly seen (Fig. 2c, d). The wrapping glia fails to properly wrap around axons but is still able to extend processes through the nerve (Fig. 2d). The failure to individually wrap axons can be described using the wrapping index (wi) (see “Methods”)24. In control larvae, the wi is 18.5 (n = 26 nerves, Supplementary Table 1). Upon expression of htlDN in wrapping glial cells, the wi is about 7.5 (Fig. 2c, d, Fig. 3c; n = 22 nerves, p = 3.5E−11; Supplementary Table 1).

Fig. 2: FGF-receptor Heartless controls differentiation of the wrapping glia.
figure2

a, b Filet preparations of a third instar larvae with a genotypes as indicated stained for Repo expression (red), GFP (green), and HRP (blue). Representative images are shown taken from >10 animals analyzed for each genotype. b Note that upon expression of htlDN, the wrapping glia appears thinner (arrows). Scale bar is 200 µm. c, d Electron microscopic images of segmental nerves taken at about 160 µm distance to the tip of the ventral nerve cord of wandering third instar larvae. Five or more specimens were fixed and embedded in a filleted form. Representative images are shown for each genotype. Scale bar is 2 µm. c Cross-section of a control nerve (white1118). The nerve is surrounded by a neural lamella (nl). The perineurial glia (pg) and the subperineurial glia (spg) form the blood–brain barrier. The wrapping glia (wg) engulfs all axons (ax). The wrapping glia is highlighted by purple staining. d Cross-section of a nerve from an animal of the genotype [nrv2-Gal4; UAS-htlDN]. Note that differentiation of the wrapping glia (purple shading) is compromised. A similar phenotype is seen in larvae of the genotype [nrv2-Gal4/UAS-htlDN; 90C03-Gal80/90C03-Gal80], see Supplementary Fig. 2).

Fig. 3: Wrapping glia affects neuronal differentiation and behavior.
figure3

a Distribution of axonal size in 40 nm2 bins of control larvae ([nrv2-Gal4, UAS-GFP; 90C03-Gal80/90C03-Gal80], 2046 axons of 26 nerves) and of larvae expressing htlDN in wrapping glia ([nrv2-Gal4/UAS-htlDN; 90C03-Gal80/90C03-Gal80]; 2555 axons of 22 nerves). The number of axons in the indicated size intervals is plotted for control (green) and htlDN nerves (blue). b Same dataset as in (a). Relative changes in the number of axons in different axon size classes upon expression of htlDN compared to control animals. Note the increase in the number of small diameter axons and the reduction of larger caliber axons. c The wrapping index of control larvae [white1118] and larvae expressing htlDN in the wrapping glia [nrv2-Gal4; UAS-htlDN]. The wrapping index in control nerves is 18.5 (n = 27 nerves). The wrapping index is 7.5 upon heartless suppression (n = 22 nerves, p = 3.5E−11, t test). d The accumulated distance per minute is not changed by expression of htlDN (genotypes as indicated). n = 68 control larvae and n = 71 larvae expressing htlDN, p = 0.85, Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Box plots in (c, d) show median (horizontal line), boxes represent the first and third quartile, whiskers show standard deviation, individual points show outliers. e Bending angle distribution of control larvae and larvae expressing htlDN in wrapping glia (genotypes as in (a)). A slight difference in the bending behavior can be detected (p = 8.4E–32, t test). f Quantification of the coiling phenotype. The relative distribution of 300 frames long movement clips (n = 263 30-s long video clips with 300 frames each) with 0, 1–30, or 31–60 frames showing coiling is shown. Green denotes control, blue denotes larvae expressing htlDN in wrapping glia, genotypes as in (a).

Glial FGF-receptor signaling affects axonal diameter

Concomitantly with the reduced wrapping index we noted that many axons appear smaller in diameter than in wild type nerves of third instar larvae. To quantify the phenotype, we determined the morphology of abdominal nerves about 160 µm distal to the ventral nerve cord as reported previously24. We measured the surface area to minimize fixation artifacts and then calculated the axonal radius. The size of 2046 axons in 27 control nerves of 5 larvae was evaluated and we found an average axon radius of 0.194 µm with a characteristic area distribution (Fig. 3a). Upon expression of htlDN in wrapping glia, the axonal diameter is on average reduced by 15% (r = 0.159 µm, 2555 axons in 22 nerves from five larvae, p = 7.6E−26). When we compared the distribution of axonal sizes between control larvae and larvae with reduced FGF-receptor activity in wrapping glia we found a strong increase in the number of small diameter axons and a decrease in the number of large diameter axons (Fig. 3a, b).

Behavioral consequences of glial FGF-receptor activity

In locomotion assays, larvae expressing htlDN in wrapping glia [nrv2-Gal4/UAS-htlDN; 90C03-Gal80/90C03-Gal80] as well as control animals [nrv2-Gal4/UAS-GFP; 90C03-Gal80/90C03-Gal80] were tracked for 3 min (10 frames per second, ~15 animals per movie, in total ~80 larvae per genotype originating from three independent crosses). The resulting video data were subjected to FIMtrack analysis as described63,64,65. Interestingly, third instar larvae showing such poorly differentiated wrapping glia behaved rather normally. For example, accumulated distance is as in control animals (Fig. 3d). We only observed a difference in bending distribution (Fig. 3e; p = 8.4E−32) and a small increase in coiling frequency, a rare behavioral pattern during stop phases, where the bending strength is increased such that the larva turns its head so strong that it touches the tail tip resulting in a coil structure. Whereas in control larvae coiling behavior can be detected in 0.097% of the frames (197,100 frames from 9 movies with 15–20 animals each analyzed), animals expressing htlDN specifically in wrapping glial cells show coiling in 0.774% of all frames (78,900 frames analyzed, p = 3E−13). To further quantify this behavior, we analyzed tracks of 300 frames each and plotted the distribution of the coiling frequency. In both conditions, most of the tracks contain 0 frames with a coiled animal. In control animals, only 2% of all tracks contain 1–30 frames showing a coiling pattern. In contrast, 18% of all tracks of larvae with impaired FGF-receptor signaling in wrapping glia show 1–30 frames with coiling in a given 30 s long track. 1.5% of the tracks even show 31–60 frames with coiling, which is never seen in control animals (Fig. 3f). In conclusion, a block of FGF-receptor signaling impairs differentiation of the wrapping glial cells but the residual glial cell processes still allow almost normal neuronal function although axons become considerably smaller.

Wrapping glial differentiation requires gap junctions

The observed reduction in axonal diameter suggests that wrapping glial cells metabolically support axons to allow their growth. Metabolic interactions can be either mediated by specific metabolite transporters or by direct coupling of cells through gap junctions66. Here, we addressed whether gap junctional coupling is required for wrapping glial growth. Drosophila gap junctions are generated by innexins. innexin1 (ogre) and innexin2 are both expressed by CNS glial cells and are required for viability67. To determine the expression of these two innexin genes in wrapping glia we utilized Innexin2 specific antibodies and V5 knockins into the endogenous ogre and innexin2 genes68. In peripheral nerves a broad expression of both genes can be detected and both expression patterns show a complete overlap (Fig. 4a). To test whether this is due to neuronal or glial expression we silenced innexin2 gene activity using RNA interference in the background of a V5 knockin into the innexin2 gene either in all neurons using nsyb-Gal4 or in all glial cells using repo-Gal4. Upon glial knockdown, no Innexin2V5 expression can be seen in abdominal nerves but expression in epidermal cells or tracheae still remains (Fig. 4b). No change in Innexin2V5 expression was noted upon pan-neuronal silencing. We then silenced innexin2V5 expression in subsets of peripheral glial cells. However, in this paradigm neither nrv2-Gal4 which directs expression in wrapping glia nor moody-Gal4 which directs expression in the subperineurial glia was able to remove innexin2V5 expression completely (Fig. 4c, d). This suggests that innexin2V5 is expressed in all glial cell layers of the segmental nerve, which is in agreement with providing a channel function between the different glial cells.

Fig. 4: Wrapping glial cells require innexins for their growth.
figure4

Third instar larval filet preparations expressing endogenously V5-tagged Ogre (a green), or endogenously V5-tagged Innexin2 (bd green), or carrying a nrv2-GFP fusion (eg, green). HRP (blue) labels neuronal membranes, (a, eg) Innexin2 antibody staining is shown in red. More than ten animals were analyzed for each genotype. Representative images are shown. Scale bars are 200 µm. a In a control larva, Innexin1 (Ogre, green) and Innexin2 (Inx2, red) show overlapping localization. The boxed area is shown in higher magnification. b Upon panglial, RNAi mediated suppression of innexin2 expression no Inx2 can be detected in nerves. c Upon suppression of innexin2 expression only in the subperineurial glial cells some reduction in Inx2 can be observed. d Similar expression patterns are observed upon innexin2 suppression in wrapping glia. e Note that wrapping glial cells cover the entire width of the nerve. f Upon knockdown of ogre in wrapping glia, the differentiation of wrapping glia is affected (arrowheads). Mainly thin wrapping glial processes can be detected. Inx2 is seen in the peripheral nerves (arrows). g A similar phenotype is noted when innexin2 is suppressed in the wrapping glia (arrowheads). h Bending distribution of control [nrv2-Gal4; 90C03-Gal80/UAS-GFPdsRNA] and ogre knockdown third instar larvae [nrv2-Gal4; 90C03-Gal80/UAS-ogredsRNA]. ogre knockdown larvae show increased bending (p = 1.36E−25, t test). i The accumulated distance per minute is slightly reduced in ogre knockdown animals (p = 1.6E−19, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n = 88 control larvae and n = 69 larvae expressing ogredsRNA). Box plot shows median (red line), boxes represent the first and third quartile, whiskers show standard deviation, red points show outliers. j Same dataset as in (i). Quantification of the coiling phenotype. The relative distribution of 300 frames long movement clips (n = 259 30 s long video clips with 300 frames each) with 0, 1–30, or 31–60 frames showing coiling. Green denotes control, red denotes larvae expressing ogredsRNA in wrapping glia. Genotypes as in (h).

To further test the functional role of innexin2 and ogre in wrapping glia we analyzed the morphology of the wrapping glia in knockdown experiments. Upon suppression of either innexin gene in the wrapping glia, glial growth is impaired (Fig. 4e–g). Similarly as noted for upon expression of htlDN, knockdown of ogre (Fig. 4f) or knockdown of innexin2 (Fig. 4g) results in poorly differentiated wrapping glial cells. Only thin processes form that fail to grow around the entire nerve bundle. ogre knockdown causes mild locomotion defects in third instar larvae. The bending rate was slightly increased and in consequence the accumulated distance per minute was reduced, as animals spent more time in bending compared to control animals (Fig. 4h, i). In addition, ogre knockdown in wrapping glia also causes a coiling phenotype. Similar to what we observed for larvae with wrapping glia specific expression of a dominant negative FGF-receptor Heartless, we noted coiling in 0.726% of 77,700 frames analyzed (significantly different when compared to a GFP expressing control: p = 1.9E−14). Also, the distribution of locomotion tracks with increased coiling frequency is comparable to htlDN expression: in 17% of the tracks a coiling is seen in 1–30 frames and in 0.8% of the tracks more than 31 frames showing coiling can be detected in the tracks (Fig. 4j). In conclusion, the suppression of gap junctional coupling causes more pronounced neuronal phenotypes than expressing a dominant negative Heartless FGF-receptor. This supports the notion that wrapping glial differentiation is indeed needed to ensure normal neuronal function.

Ablation of peripheral wrapping glial cells

To obtain the strongest possible wrapping glia phenotype, we decided to ablate the wrapping glial cells and induced apoptosis via expression of the gene head involution defective (hid), a key regulator of developmentally controlled cell death in Drosophila69,70. To increase the specificity, we included a second 90C03-Gal80 transgene. Expression of Hid in all wrapping glial cells [nrv2-Gal4/UAS-hid; 90C03-Gal80, UAS-CD8Cherry/90C03-Gal80] will be referred to as wrapping glia ablation in the following. The expression of hid results in an almost complete loss of CD8Cherry expression. No CD8Cherry expression is detected in the PNS during third or second larval stages, indicating death of all wrapping glial cells (Fig. 5a–d). Third instar larvae of this genotype are slightly smaller than control larvae (on average 14% smaller, n = 10 larvae, Fig. 6c) and die at the end of pupal development. To determine the branching pattern of the peripheral axons we used the monoclonal antibody 22C10 which labels the Drosophila microtubule associated protein 1B, Futsch71,72. The expression of Futsch does not differ much between control and wrapping glia ablated animals and the neuronal branching pattern as well as the formation of neuromuscular junctions appears normal (Fig. 5e, f).

Fig. 5: Ablation of wrapping glia in abdominal nerves.
figure5

a Confocal projection of a control third instar larval filet preparation [nrv2-Gal4 / UAS-GFP; 90C03-Gal80, UAS-CD8Cherry/90C03-Gal80]. Expression of CD8Cherry is observed in wrapping glia along abdominal nerves, in a structure close to the mouth hooks (arrowhead) and in few glial cells in the brain (see c). Representative images are taken from >10 animals analyzed for each genotype. b Wrapping glia ablated third instar larva [nrv2-Gal4/UAS-hid; 90C03-Gal80, UAS-CD8Cherry/90C03-Gal80]. Note the absence of CD8Cherry expression (see d). Scale bars are 500 µm. c Some brain glial cells express CD8Cherry in control larvae. d No CD8Cherry expression can be detected following hid expression. e, f Futsch expression as indicated, genotypes as in (a, b). Note the elaborated branching morphology of peripheral nerves. Upon wrapping glial ablation (f) Futsch expression remains unchanged compared to (e). g, h Electron microscopic images of segmental nerves at about 160 µm distance to the ventral nerve cord of wandering third instar larvae. The specimens were fixed and embedded in a filleted form. The size of the different axons was calculated using Fiji (yellow lines). Neural lamella (nl), perineurial glia (pg), subperineurial glia (spg), wrapping glia (wg), axon (ax). Scale bar is 2 µm. Genotypes as in (a, b). g Cross-section of a control nerve. h Upon ablation of the wrapping glial cells, only possible remnants of the wrapping glia can be recognized (asterisk). Note that large caliber axons are usually found close to the glial cells of the blood-brain barrier (arrowheads). i The number of axons in the indicated size intervals is plotted for control (green) and wrapping glia ablated (black) nerves (n = 1901 control axons and 1915 axons in glia ablated nerves, genotypes as in (a, b). j Relative changes in the number of axons in different axon size classes upon ablation of the wrapping glia compared to control animals. Note the increase in the number of small diameter axons and the reduction of larger caliber axons.

Fig. 6: Larval locomotion impairment upon wrapping glial ablation.
figure6

a, b Representative FIM images. a Tracks of 15 control third instar larvae [nrv2-Gal4/UAS-GFP; 90C03-Gal80, UAS-CD8Cherry/90C03-Gal80]. b Third instar larvae with ablated wrapping glial cells [nrv2-Gal4/UAS-hid; 90C03-Gal80, UAS-CD8Cherry/90C03-Gal80]. Larvae were imaged for 3 min at 10 frames/s. Upon ablation of wrapping glia larvae cover only a small part of the 20 cm × 20 cm arena and perform many turns. c Peristaltic body contractions over time. upper panel: control larva, lower panel: wrapping glia ablated larva, genotypes as in (a, b). Note the reduction in body size, and reduced and irregular peristaltic waves upon ablation of wrapping glia. d The peristalsis frequency is reduced upon wrapping glia ablation (p = 9.8E−17). ei Box plots showing quantifications of the larval locomotion parameters. n = 91 control larvae, and n = 79 wrapping glia ablated larvae. All box plots show median (red line), boxes represent the first and third quartile, whiskers show standard deviation, red points show outliers. e Accumulated distance [cm/min], p = 9.1E−7. f Distance to origin [cm/min], p = 1.5E−25. g Number of turns/min, p = 2.3E−4. h Number of stops/min, p = 1.6E−35. i Number of head bends/10 s p = 8.3E−21. dg Statistical analyses: Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Ablation of wrapping glia causes a reduced axon diameter

To test how wrapping glia ablation affects axonal morphology, we performed an extensive electron microscopic analysis as described above. We measured the size of 2046 axons in 27 control nerves and the size of 1915 axons in 28 wrapping glia ablated nerves (5 filets were analyzed in every case, size of wrapping glia ablated animals matched control animals). The radius of the axons ranges from about 50 nm to 1 µm (Fig. 5g). In control animals, the average axon radius is 0.194 µm, whereas upon ablation of wrapping glial cells the axonal radius is reduced by 18% to an average axon radius of 0.159 µm (p = 9.1E−10). The few larger axons that are detected in wrapping glia ablated nerves are usually found next to the subperineurial glia which engulfs the entire nerve (Fig. 5h, arrowheads). The reduction in average axonal radius is caused by a strong increase in the number of very small axons and a decrease in the number of larger axons (Fig. 5i, j).

When comparing changes in axonal caliber evoked by wrapping glia ablation to those evoked by expression of htlDN, only minor differences became apparent (compare Fig. 3a, b to Fig. 5i, j). The proportion of small axons increases and the number of large caliber axons decreases. We thus conclude that glial cells nurture the axons to allow their growth and possibly differentiation. In this respect, it should be noted that during embryonic stages all axons have a rather similar caliber and therefore appear to grow differentially during larval stages23.

Ablation of wrapping glial cells affects larval locomotion

To test possible neuronal deficits, we studied larval locomotion as described above. For larval locomotion assays, 79 wrapping glia ablated larvae originating from three independent crosses [nrv2-Gal4/UAS-hid; 90C03-Gal80, UAS-CD8-mCherry/90C03-Gal80] and 91 control animals [nrv2-Gal4/UAS-GFP; 90C03-Gal80, UAS-CD8-mCherry/90C03-Gal80] were analyzed. In stark contrast to larvae with wrapping glia specific expression of htlDN, or larvae where we silenced ogre, we noted pronounced behavioral phenotypes in crawling third instar larvae. Upon wrapping glia ablation, larvae do not explore the agar plate as control larvae do (Fig. 6a, b; Supplementary Movies 1 and 2).

Larval locomotion is characterized by a highly stereotypic contraction pattern sweeping across the entire length of the animal from posterior to anterior73,74,75,76,77. Upon ablation of wrapping glia, the peristaltic contraction shows a highly aberrant pattern (Fig. 6c). While control larvae show regular contraction patterns with a frequency of about 1.2 peristaltic cycles per second, wrapping glia ablated animals have 0.5 peristaltic cycles per second (n = 12 larvae with 10 times 10 s continuous imaging each, p = 9.8E−17, Fig. 6d). Moreover, in wrapping glia ablated animals the shape of the peristaltic curves is generally irregular with many small peaks, indicating that the regular contraction wave is abnormal (Fig. 6c). Further high-resolution analyses showed that in crawling larvae movements of abdominal segments A6–A8, which are most distant to the CNS seem to be more affected by wrapping glia ablation than segments closer to the CNS (Supplementary Movies 13).

Quantification of larval tracks revealed that wrapping glia ablated animals show a decrease in both accumulated distance (Fig. 6e; p = 9.1E−7) and distance to origin (Fig. 6f; p = 1.5E−25). Interestingly, the distance to origin is much more reduced than the accumulated distance. Further quantification showed a four-fold increase in the number of stops, which are defined as no movements for five frames. In addition, a similar increase in the number of head bends is noted in animals with ablated wrapping glia. Head bends are defined changes in body posture with a larva showing a bending angle of more than 20° over five frames. The increased stop and head bending rates also result in an increase in the number of turns. Here, larvae change direction after head bending (Fig. 6g–i; p = 2.3E−4; 1.6E−35; and 8.3E−21, respectively).

Ablation of wrapping glial cells causes a coiling behavior

Not only the bending rate, but also the bending strength is increased upon wrapping glia ablation. The overall bending distribution was dramatically altered in these animals (Fig. 7a, p = 1.8E−244; Fig. 7b, p = 6.8E−37, >79 larvae with >230,000 frames analyzed). In contrast to control larvae that move mostly oriented in a straight line, corresponding to a bending angle of 180°, wrapping glia ablated animals show three bending angle peaks. One at 180° corresponding to straight movement and two representing a 25° deviation indicating turning to the left or right. In addition, wrapping glia ablated larvae show an intensive coiling behavior where the head reaches the tail tip (Fig. 7c). Whereas control larvae show a coiling phenotype in only 0.097% of the frames (see above), an almost 16-fold increase in coiling frequency can be noted in wrapping glia ablated larvae. 1.507% of the frames of videos from wrapping glia ablated animals showed coiling behavior (167,100 frames from 8 movies with 15–20 animals each, with 2518 frames showing coiling, p = 1.2E−12). This is stronger than what we observed following expression of htlDN specifically in the wrapping glia (0.774% of all frames show coiling see above, Fig. 7d). Only in animals lacking wrapping glial cells we detected 30 s long larval locomotion tracts where more than 60 frames showed coiling (Fig. 7d). In conclusion, these data show that ablation of wrapping glia has a more dramatic consequence than impairing with glial differentiation. This might be due to differential effects on neuronal signaling speed or due to protective effects of glial membranes.

Fig. 7: Coiling behavior upon wrapping glia ablation.
figure7

a Graph showing all bending angles of control [nrv2-Gal4/UAS-GFP; 90C03-Gal80, UAS-CD8Cherry/90C03-Gal80] and wrapping glia ablated larvae [nrv2-Gal4/UAS-hid; 90C03-Gal80, UAS-CD8Cherry/90C03-Gal80] (p = 1.8E−244, t test). A bending angle of 180° corresponds to a non-bended larva. b Box plot shows bending strength [°] during stop phases. Control animals show a median bending angle of around 3°, while Hid expressing animals show a median bending angle of around 47° (p = 6.8E−37, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Genotypes as in (a). n = 91 control larvae, and n = 79 wrapping glia ablated larvae. Box plot shows median (red line), boxes represent the first and third quartile, whiskers show standard deviation, red points show outliers. c Five frames of a movie showing coiling of a larva with ablated wrapping glia (genotype as in a). Representative example out of 150 coiling events analyzed. Scale bar is 1 mm. d Relative changes in coiling behavior. The following genotypes were analyzed: Control (green), wrapping glia ablation (black), genotypes as in (a), and larvae expressing htlDN in wrapping glia (blue) [nrv2-Gal4, UAS-htlDN; 90C03-Gal80/90C03-Gal80]. The proportion of 30 s long video clips (300 frames) showing no coiling, 1–30 frames, 30–60 frames, or more than 60 frames with coiling are plotted. Filled bars indicate animals that were fed with sphingosine. In control larvae coiling is observed in 0.097% of all frames (n = 657 video clips of 300 frames each). Upon feeding with sphingosine, coiling frequency increases in control animals to 0.356%, (n = 203, p = 0,0474). Upon wrapping glia ablation, coiling is noted in 1.507% of all frames (n = 557). Upon feeding with sphingosine coiling frequency does not change significantly to 2.166%, (n = 269, p = 0,2653). Larvae expressing htlDN in wrapping glia show coiling in 0.774% of all frames (n = 263). Upon feeding with sphingosine, coiling frequency decreases significantly to 0.106% (n = 223, p = 0.0001) which is not distinguishable from the coiling frequency of control animals (0.097%, p = 0.4209). Statistical analyses: Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Wrapping glia controls action potential propagation speed

To determine the consequence of the different genetic manipulations of the wrapping glia for neuronal conductance velocity we performed electrophysiological measurements. To separate the conductance velocities of sensory and motor axons we established two experimental paradigms.

For motor axons, we utilized an open book preparation of third instar larvae. In such preparations, larval filets show fictive crawling due to a spontaneous activation of the motor program. During fictive crawling, motor neurons driven by the central pattern generator send characteristic trains of action potentials to the muscle which can be recognized in the extracellular recording78,79 (Supplementary Fig. 1). An electrode was placed at the nerve innervating the seventh or eighth abdominal segment close to the ventral nerve cord to determine the membrane potentials exiting the CNS. A second electrode was placed just anterior to the affected segment (Fig. 8a–c). During a fictive crawling phase, the time interval between individual depolarization events was determined. To calculate the conduction speed, the time interval between two identifiable depolarization phases was put into relation to the distance between the two electrodes (Fig. 8a, ∆d). The conduction speed of the motor unit is significantly affected by ablation of wrapping glial cells (Fig. 8b, c; vcont mot = 0.196 m/s [a total of 222 spikes in 16 recordings was analyzed], vabl mot = 0.133 m/s, [231 spikes/14 recordings]; reduction by 32%, p = 0.0000125).

Fig. 8: Ablation of wrapping glial cells reduces action potential conduction speed.
figure8

ac Conduction speed in motor axons. a Schematic representation of the experimental setup. One electrode (extra1) was placed at the seventh or eighth abdominal nerve close to the ventral nerve cord. The membrane potentials exiting the CNS during fictive crawling were recorded by a second electrode (extra2) placed anterior to the affected segment. The time interval (∆t) between identifiable depolarization phases was put in relation to the distance between the two electrodes (∆d) to calculate the conduction speed. b Exemplary recording traces of the motor unit. Genotypes are as in Fig. 7. c The mean conduction speed in control motor axons is 0.196 m/s (n = 16 larvae). Upon wrapping glia ablation, the mean conduction speed is 0.133 m/s (n = 14 larvae, p = 0.0000125). A similar conduction velocity (0.131 m/s, n = 10 larvae, p = 0.00000374) is observed in motor axons of larvae expressing htlDN in the wrapping glia. df Conduction speed in sensory axons. d To determine the conduction speed in sensory axons, membrane potentials were recorded following mechanical stimulation of the innervated segment (extra1, extra2). The conduction speed was calculated by determining the temporal delay of identifiable sensory spikes between the recording sites and the distance between the recording sites. e Exemplary recording traces of the sensory unit. Genotypes are as above. f Sensory axons show a 34% reduced conduction speed compared to motor axons (c). The mean conduction speed in control sensory axons is 0.129 m/s (n = 16 larvae). Upon ablation of the wrapping glia, the mean conduction speed is 0.079 m/s (n = 14 larvae, p = 0.00000587) corresponding to decrease in conduction speed by 38.5%. In sensory axons of larvae expressing htlDN in the wrapping glia a slightly reduced conduction velocity of 0.110 m/s (n = 10 larvae, p = 0.0229) is observed. Both plots (c, f) show the mean and standard deviation. Statistical analyses: Wilcoxon rank-sum test and t test.

When we analyzed the conductance speed in motor axons following expression of htlDN in wrapping glia we determined a comparable reduction in conduction speed as found in wrapping glia ablated animals (Fig. 8b, c; vhltDN mot = 0.130 m/s, [178 spikes/10 recordings], p = 0.00000374). A reduction of axonal conductance speed is expected since the classical work of Hodgkin and Huxley established that axonal conductance velocity depends on the square root of the axonal radius80.

To determine the conductance speed in sensory axons, we again selected one of the long nerves innervating the seventh or eighth abdominal segment and severed it close to the ventral nerve cord (Fig. 8d–f). Upon mechanical stimulation of the innervated segment, mechanosensory neurons fire action potentials which propagate along the nerve towards the ventral nerve cord. We calculated the speed by determining the delay of identifiable sensory spikes between the recording sites, knowing the distance between the recording sites. Sensory axons show a 34% reduced conduction speed compared to motor axons (Fig. 8c, f; vcont mot = 0.196 m/s, vcont sens = 0.129 m/s, [224 spikes/16 recordings]). Upon wrapping glia ablation, the conduction speed of the sensory unit decreases by over 39% (Fig. 8f; vcont sens = 0.129 m/s, vabl sens = 0.079 m/s, [179 spikes/14 recordings], p = 0.00000587). The reduction in conduction velocity in sensory nerves of larvae expressing htlDN is significantly less pronounced as induced by wrapping glia ablation (Fig. 8e, f; vhltDN sens = 0.110 m/s [229 spikes/10 recordings], p(ablation vs. htlDN) = 0.009; p(control vs. htlDN) = 0.0229). Thus, residual glial processes that persist upon expression of htlDN are able to partially sustain axonal conductance speed in sensory axons but are insufficient to maintain conductance speed in motor axons.

Wrapping glia membrane controls the coiling phenotype

The coiling phenotype shown by moving third instar larvae appears to be indicative for defects in wrapping glial cell differentiation. Impairment of wrapping glial differentiation results in a medium coiling frequency, whereas wrapping glia ablation causes a strong coiling phenotype. To test whether the locomotor phenotype depends on the presence of wrapping glia membranes, we performed rescue experiments by supplementing the food with sphingosine, a primary part of sphingolipids found in the plasma membrane. Previously, such a food supplementation was shown to promote membrane growth50. When we added sphingosine to the food of control larvae, the coiling frequency increased from 0.097 to 0.356% (Fig. 7d, p = 0.0474). When we supplemented the food for larvae lacking wrapping glial cells, the coiling frequency increased slightly from 1.507 to 2.166%, (p = 0.265, not significant). In contrast, when larvae expressing htlDN in wrapping glia were grown on sphingosine supplemented food, we noted a decrease of the coiling frequency from 0.774 to 0.106% (p = 0.0001), which is not distinguishable from the coiling frequency of control animals (0,097%, p = 0.4209, not significant). This is also reflected by the lack of tracks with 31–60 frames showing a coiling phenotype (Fig. 7d). Moreover, the addition of sphingosine also rescued the axonal diameter as well as the wrapping index (see Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 2). Thus, we conclude that the presence of glial membrane between axons is needed to block coiling.

Peripheral wrapping glia controls signaling precision

The above data suggest that wrapping glial cells provide metabolic support to axons enabling their growth and thus, in direct consequence, provide the means for a fast conductance velocity of action potentials. At the same time wrapping glial cells provide insulation to prevent electrical cross talk between axons. To further test this in a behaving animal, we used the rolling response that is governed by the Goro circuit81. Here sensory input of peripheral sensory neurons (mdIV-neurons) is used to trigger the rolling escape reaction involving three layers of interneurons in the ventral nerve cord and five layers of interneurons in the CNS81 (Fig. 9). Larval rolling is initiated by the activity of the Goro command neuron. Due to the efforts of the FlyLight consortium enhancer elements are available for all involved neurons62,81.

Fig. 9: Schematic representation of the Goro circuit.
figure9

a Control situation. The rolling response is triggered when a noxious signal is perceived by the mdIV neurons and transmitted via the abdominal nerves to the ventral nerve cord. Here, the mdIV neuron synapses onto the Basin-4 neurons (1) which project to the A05q neurons (2) which innervate the Goro neurons (3) that act as the command neurons orchestrating the activity of motor neurons (4). Additional pathways exist which involve neurons located in the brain hemispheres. b Upon ablation of wrapping glial cells, mdIV neuron activation results in ephaptic crosstalk and uncontrolled activation of motor axons. Likewise, upon ablation of wrapping glial cells, Goro neuron activation results in ephaptic crosstalk (flash) and activation of a sensory input affecting the rolling response.

When mdIV neurons are activated by optogenetic or thermogenetic means, the animal initiates a rolling response. We expressed the red light sensitive csChrimson in mdIV neurons using the pickpocket enhancer (ppk-LexA), and recorded the evoked behavioral responses of intact larvae with 100 frames per second. Thereby we were able to obtain a 10 msec time resolution. In control larvae, activation of mdIV neurons by red light triggered a rolling response after 210 msec (median value; n = 38 larvae; Fig. 10a, Supplementary Movie 4). When we performed the same optogenetic activation of mdIV neurons in wrapping glia ablated larvae we failed to elicit a rolling response. Instead the larvae showed an uncoordinated seizure phenotype and contracted their musculature without showing a rolling behavior. Importantly, such a reaction was initiated significantly faster and only 80 ms after csChrimson was activated larvae initiated muscle contractions (median value, n = 28 larvae; p = 7E−10, Fig. 10a, Supplementary Movie 5). When we performed the same experiments using animals expressing htlDN in the wrapping glia, larvae were reacting slightly slower than control animals and importantly were able to initiate rolling (n = 32 larvae; p = 1.9E−5, Fig. 10a).

Fig. 10: Modulation of the Goro circuit.
figure10

a Upon optogenetic activation of the mdIV neurons in third instar control larvae [ppk-LexA, nrv2-Gal4/UAS-GFP; LexAop-csChrimson, nrv2-Gal4/90C03-Gal80] rolling is induced after 210 ms (n = 38 larvae). Upon ablation of the wrapping glia in third instar larvae [ppk-LexA, nrv2-Gal4/UAS-hid; LexAop-csChrimson, nrv2-Gal4/90C03-Gal80] no rolling response is induced but larvae cramp after 80 ms (n = 28 larvae; p = 7E−10). Upon expression of htlDN [ppk-LexA, nrv2-Gal4/UAS-htlDN; LexAop-csChrimson, nrv2-Gal4/90C03-Gal80] a rolling response is initiated as in control but with a delay of 120 ms (n = 32 larvae, p = 1.9E−5). b In control larvae optogenetic activation of the Goro neurons [Goro-LexA/UAS-GFP; LexAop-csChrimson, nrv2-Gal4/90C03-Gal80] induces rolling after 475 ms (n = 27 larvae). Upon ablation of wrapping glia [Goro-LexA/UAS-hid; LexAop-csChrimson, nrv2-Gal4/90C03-Gal80] the rolling response is induced at about the same time (n = 43 larvae, p = 0.212). A slightly significant delay in the rolling response can be observed when comparing to larvae expressing htlDN [Goro-LexA, nrv2-Gal4/UAS-htlDN; LexAop-csChrimson, nrv2-Gal4/90C03-Gal80] (n = 26 larvae, p = 0.013). c Control larvae show 5 rolls (n = 23 larvae, median value). Upon ablation of wrapping glia 9 rolls are induced (median value, n = 33 larvae, p = 0.000074). Larvae expressing htlDN in wrapping glia show 6 rolls which is not significantly different from the control (n = 20 larvae, p = 0.48). Genotypes as in (b). d The orientation of rolling upon Goro activation changes when wrapping glia are ablated but not when wrapping glia differentiation is impaired. Control larvae (n = 27) and larvae expressing htlDN (n = 20) do not change orientation of rolling reaction (p = 0.43). In contrast upon wrapping glia ablation larvae change orientation during every other roll (n = 39 larvae, p = 0.005). Genotypes as in (b). Box plots: median (horizontal line), boxes represent first and third quartile, whiskers show standard deviation, individual points show outliers. All statistical analyses: t test.

In summary, only wrapping glia ablated animals fail to show a coordinated rolling behavior and importantly show fast unspecific contraction responses instead. This indicates that the lack of axonal insulation by glial cell processes results in aberrant activation of motor axons which causes an uncoordinated muscle contraction.

In a next step, we more directly activated the motor neurons by stimulating Goro command neurons via csChrimson expression and red light illumination. As reported81, this triggers a robust rolling response in control animals after 520 ms (median value, n = 27 larvae, Fig. 10b). Interestingly, when we activated csChrimson in Goro neurons of wrapping glia ablated animals, we noted a similarly fast induction of the rolling behavior after 475 ms (median value, n = 43 larvae, Fig. 10b). However, when looking at the duration and the coordination of the rolling response we noted highly significant differences between control and wrapping glia ablated larvae. Control larvae showed 5 complete body turns (median value, n = 23 larvae). In stark contrast, wrapping glia ablated animals showed a prolonged response to light induced Goro activation and showed 9 full body turns (median value, n = 33 larvae, p = 0.000074, Fig. 10c, Supplementary Movies 6 and 7).

The rolling response can be either clockwise or counterclockwise. In control larvae, the rolling orientation does not change after rolling initiation (median = 0 changes in rolling orientation during 5 completed body turns, n = 27 larvae). After wrapping glia ablation, the direction of the rolling response frequently changes (median = 4 changes in rolling orientation during 9 completed body turns, n = 39 larvae; p = 0.005, Fig. 10d). Thus, the rolling direction appears almost randomized for every single turn. When we activated the Goro neurons in the background of an animal expressing a dominant negative FGF-receptor in the wrapping glia, larvae were reacting slightly slower (Fig. 10b, n = 26 larvae, p = 0.1203, not significant), showed a similar number of rolls as control larvae (Fig. 10c, n = 20 larvae, p = 0.4839, not significant) and did not change rolling orientation (Fig. 10d, n = 20 larvae, p = 0.43, not significant).

In conclusion, in wrapping glia ablated animals, evoked peripheral sensory input into the Goro circuit triggers a fast and rather unspecific activation of motor axons that results in uncoordinated muscle contractions preventing the rolling response. Activation of the Goro command neurons triggers rolling in control and wrapping glia ablated animals. However, upon wrapping glia ablation, activation of motor neurons appears to provide an ectopic activation of neighboring sensory axons resulting in a constant positive feedback which prolongs the rolling response by providing a stimulus for restarting the turning reaction (either clockwise or counter-clockwise).

Discussion

In Drosophila, abdominal peripheral axons are engulfed by only few wrapping glial cells found in each nerve. Using a specific Gal4/Gal80 driver system we found that wrapping glia depend on FGF-signaling and gap junctional coupling. We show that wrapping glial cells are required for radial growth of peripheral axons, suggesting a metabolic support function. Indeed, the lack of nutritive support can be rescued by adding sphingosine to the diet of animals with poorly differentiated wrapping glia. Interestingly, different behavioral consequences are observed in animals with poorly differentiated wrapping glia and those lacking wrapping glia, although both animals show similarly reduced nerve conductance velocities. Locomotor deficits can be restored by a sphingosine enriched diet only in those animals that have poorly differentiated wrapping glia. Further experiments using optogenetically evoked behavior show that wrapping glial cells not only nurture axons but also appear to prevent ephaptic coupling to ensure precise neuronal signaling. Thus, wrapping glia control speed and precision of information transfer in the PNS of Drosophila.

In Drosophila, all axons start with an almost identical small diameter and during larval stages only few, in particular motor axons, appear to grow to significantly larger sizes24. Likewise, axons that are selected for myelination in the mammalian nervous system initially all have very similar sizes and only later, the diameter of myelinated axons is significantly larger than of unmyelinated axon82,83. In lampreys, a jawless vertebrate (agnatha), no myelin forms, but still during maturation of the animal axonal calibers increase correlating with axonal ensheathment84. This might indicate that the initial recognition of axons to be myelinated does not depend on size but that rather those axons could be selected that show most robust neuronal activity (e.g., motor axons). In fact, activity-dependent myelin plasticity is documented10,85. Therefore, one might conclude that of initially similarly sized axons, the more active ones are selected by the glia and subsequent wrapping then promotes axonal growth. The finding that the reduced axonal diameter associated with poorly differentiated wrapping glia in the Drosophila larva can be rescued by the addition of extra sphingosine to the food supports the notion that glial cells nurture axons to allow their growth.

In the mammalian PNS differential axonal caliber has long been recognized as an important denominator of myelination82,83. Whereas large caliber axons are associated with myelinating Schwann cells, small caliber axons are associated with non-myelinating Schwann cells that form Remak fibers18,19,20. Many of the axons in Remak bundles are sensory C-fibers which transmit pain information21,86. Differentiation of the non-myelinating Schwann cells is in part regulated by GABA-B-receptor signaling87. Schwann cell specific knock-out mouse mutants show an increase in the number of small unmyelinated fibers. Interestingly, such mice show an increased sensitivity to pain (hyperalgesia) and, as also seen upon deletion of the LDL receptor-related protein-1, show pain reactions to stimuli that normally do not elicit pain (allodynia)87,88. Neuropathic pain due to poorly differentiated non-myelinating Schwann cells might be indicative for ephaptic coupling of closely contacting axons similar to what we reported here.

Non-myelinating Schwann cells, which share a common lineage with myelinating Schwann cells22,89,90, are morphologically similar to the wrapping glia that engulfs peripheral axons in Drosophila21,23,24. Moreover, similar molecular processes appear to operate in flies and mammals. In mice, deletion of FGF-receptor signaling specifically in non-myelinating Schwann cells leads to abnormally and smaller appearing axons91. Likewise, differentiation of non-myelinating Schwann cells in mice requires neuropathy target esterase while glial loss of the Drosophila homolog swiss cheese causes incomplete glial wrapping as well as locomotion defects92,93.

Axonal ensheathment by glial cells establishes a metabolic barrier and thus calls for intensive metabolic neuron-glia coupling which has been found both in invertebrates and in vertebrates3,7,8,9,10. Possibly, the more metabolic support is provided, the more glial membranes insulate an axon, and at the same time the growth of the axon is fostered. This is supported by our finding that the addition of sphingosine to the food rescued glial complexity and axonal growth in larvae with impaired wrapping glial differentiation but not in those that lacked the wrapping glia. The coiling phenotype that is rarely seen in control larvae, is increased in animals with impaired wrapping glia morphology (either caused by expression of htlDN or by silencing of ogre) and even more in animals lacking wrapping glia. Again, the addition of sphingosine to the diet is able to rescue behavioral deficits only in those larvae with impaired wrapping glial differentiation but not in those that lacked wrapping glia, suggesting that the increase of glial complexity ensures neuronal signaling precision.

It is long known that the increase of axonal diameter directly leads to an increase in nerve conduction velocity28,80,94. Glial cells nurturing the axon to allow growth to a larger diameter thus participate in the regulation of conduction speed. Interestingly, disruption of wrapping glia differentiation as well as ablation of the wrapping glia both resulted in significantly reduced conduction velocity along motor axons. In contrast, conductance velocity in sensory axons is more strongly affected by wrapping glia ablation than by mal-differentiated wrapping glia. Thus, we speculate that wrapping glia may affect conductance velocity not only by controlling the axonal diameter but also by regulating the functioning of voltage gated ion channels.

Interestingly, larvae with mal-differentiated wrapping glia show a relatively normal locomotion pattern, whereas larvae lacking wrapping glia show pronounced locomotion phenotypes. In addition, only the lack of wrapping glia has an effect on the optogenetically evoked rolling response. Thus, the question remains how the mere presence of wrapping glial cells influences locomotor behavior. One known function of wrapping glia is to control water and ion homeostasis, which in turn influences neuronal activity. Disruption of the salt-inducible kinase 3 (SIK2), which regulates ion transporter expression in wrapping glia or the Serine/Threonine kinase Fray (the orthologue of the mammalian PASK), which regulates the Na+-K+-Cl cotransporter Ncc69, or the K+-Cl cotransporter Kcc, all result in increased interstitial K+ concentration resulting in hyperexcitability52,53,95,96,97. In addition, the elevated K+ levels also cause water influx and edema in the affected nerves52,53,95,96,97. However, since we never observed such edema following wrapping glia ablation, alternative mechanisms are likely to explain how the lack of wrapping glia accounts for the observed behavioral phenotypes.

Possibly, the observed locomotion phenotypes indicate a role of wrapping glia in suppressing unwanted electrical crosstalk between individual axons in peripheral nerves, known as ephaptic coupling. Ephaptic coupling generates noise in neuronal information transmission and thus must be blocked between most axons to avoid unwanted neuronal stimulation. However, ephaptic coupling is beneficial during synchronous neuronal activity98,99,100. Unfortunately, the small size of the axons in the abdominal nerves and the lack of knowledge on which axons are neighboring each other precludes direct electrophysiological studies to demonstrate ephaptic coupling. We therefore evoked the activity of defined neurons and determined the physiological output. Upon optogenetic activation of the mdIV neurons, control larvae exhibit a prominent rolling behavior81. Only when wrapping glial cells are ablated, no rolling response is initiated but instead a fast seizure like reaction can be observed (Figs. 9 and 10).

In a control 2 mm long peripheral nerve it takes 15.5 ms to deliver a sensory stimulus to the CNS and 10.2 ms to deliver the information from the CNS to the neuromuscular junction along the motor axon. In a wrapping glia ablated nerve, it takes 25.3 ms to deliver the signal to the CNS and 15 ms to send the motor information. Moreover, each synaptic transmission event in the CNS would account for an additional 10 ms which would add 10–50 ms depending on the number of synaptic contacts. Given the unknown kinetics of action potential formation in the mdIV neurons, ephaptic coupling between sensory and motor axons therefore appears to be a likely underlying mechanism explaining the fast reaction time of 80 ms. Residual glial cell processes, as we find them in larvae expressing a dominant negative FGF-receptor specifically in the wrapping glia, are sufficient to block ephaptic coupling, allowing a relatively normal rolling response in contrast to what we observed following ablation of these glial cells.

Interestingly, when we triggered the activation of the Goro command neuron, a rolling response is activated in both control and wrapping glia ablated animals, but wrapping glia ablated animals show almost twice as many rolls and, moreover, change the rolling direction almost every single turn (Figs. 9 and 10). This demonstrates that wrapping glia ablated animals are in principle able to perform the rolling response. When a rolling command is given and motor axons are active, sensory neurons are likely activated by ephaptic processes which on the one hand provides a feedback stimulus that prolongs the rolling response and on the other hand resets the rolling direction with every turn.

Therefore, we suggest the following model underlying neuron-glia interaction in the Drosophila PNS. Motor neurons are active from beginning onwards as the larva needs to crawl as soon it leaves the egg case. Possibly high neuronal activity helps to attract glial processes which subsequently start to ensheath these axons. The axon–glia contact also triggers an increased metabolic rate in the wrapping glia which subsequently metabolically support the axons, resulting in axonal growth. Concomitantly, the glia provides signals for proper axonal differentiation and separates axons from neighboring ones. This separation then results in a reduction of ephaptic coupling and thus electric noise during neuronal signal transmission. This might represent a further evolutionary advantage towards the development of myelin33.

Methods

Drosophila genetics

All Drosophila work was conducted according to standard procedures. The following fly strains were used in this study: 90C03-Gal4, MCFO-257,62, repo-Gal4, nrv2-Gal4, UAS-CD8Cherry, UAS-GFP, UAS-hid, R27H06-LexA (=ppk-LexA), 16E11-LexA (=Goro-LexA), and LexAop-csChrimson (Bloomington), moody-Gal423. UAS-heartlessdsRNA, innexin2dsRNA (VDRC Vienna, KK102194), ogredsRNA (BL44048), UAS-heartlessDN101. 90C03-Gal80 was generated by inserting a 90C03 enhancer fragment61 (primer 1: GAGTTATGAGCTAGATCCGGTCGTA; primer 2: CTCGCTCGGAGGAAACTGTTGACTG) upstream of the Gal80 sequence. All crosses were performed at 25 °C. Induction of hs-flp expression for multicolor labeling was done by placing first instar larvae at 37 °C for one hour as described57. Supplementation of sphingosine (Sigma S7049) to the food was performed as described50. Larvae were kept on sphingosine food from embryonic stages onwards.

FIM imaging

Larval locomotion was analyzed using the frustrated total internal reflection-based imaging method FIM102,103. Recordings of about 15 larvae each were performed at room temperature. Larvae were recorded for 3 min with 10 frames per second. Tracking data were obtained using FIMTrack (http://fim.uni-muenster.de64) and analyzed using FIManalytics v0.1.1.2 and Excel. Statistical analyses were performed with MatLab (MathWorks, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests). Accumulated distance describes the total length of larval trajectories per minute. Distance to origin describes the distance the larvae moved away from the spot they were placed normalized per minute. A stop is defined as no movement for at least five frames. The number of stops per minute and animal is given. A head bend is defined when a larva shows a bending angle of at least 20° for at least 5 frames. The number of head bends per 10 s is given. In bending distribution plots all deviations from an 180° body axis are show. Totally, 180° indicates no turn and straight appearance. Turns are defined as a stop lasting at least 4 frames followed by a body bending of at least 20° and subsequent forward locomotion towards the new direction for at least 20 frames. Peristalsis frequency gives the number of body contractions as defined by rhythmic alterations in body size per 10 s. Peristalsis efficacy defines the distance a larva crawls per peristaltic wave.

Immunohistochemistry

For confocal analyses, we dissected at least six to ten animals. For fixation larvae were opened at the dorsal midline and stretched out with four needles, fixed in PBS 4% PFA for 20 min at room temperature and then washed with three quick buffer exchanges and three 20 min long washing steps. Tissues were blocked for immunohistochemistry with 10% goat serum for 1 h as described43. The following antibodies were used: Anti-V5 (1:500, Invitrogen, R96025); anti-Flag (1:1000; Novus biologicals, NBP1-06712); anti-HA (1:1000; Covance, MMS-101P 901503); anti-HRP-DyLightTM649 (1:500; Dianova, 123-165-021); anti-GFP (1:1000; Invitrogen, A6455); anti dsRed (1:1000, Clontech Labs 3P 632496), anti-Innexin2 (1:10067) anti-Futsch (1:5, mAb 22C1071,72), conjugated secondary antibodies (all 1:1000, anti-mouse 488, A10680; anti-mouse 568, A11031; anti-rabbit 488, A11008; anti-rabbit 568, A11011; anti guinea pig 647, 1903515; anti-rat 647, A21247; all Invitrogen). All specimens were analyzed using a Zeiss 710 or 880 LSM; orthogonal sections were taken using the Zeiss LSM imaging software.

Electron microscopic analysis

For electron microscopy analyses larvae were dissected and fixed as filets in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and 0.5% glutaraldehyde at 4 °C overnight. Fixation and embedding of larval filets was done as described before24,104. Ultra-thin sections of segmental nerves about 160 µm distant from the tip of the ventral nerve cord were obtained using a Leica Ultramicrotome UC7 and were stained with 2% uranyl acetate for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. Ultrathin sections were directly imaged with a Zeiss EM900 using a SIS Morada digital camera.

Electrophysiology

For recordings, third instar larvae (98 h ± 2h) were washed and dissected as described65. To measure the conduction velocity of neuronal units, double extracellular recordings of the seventh or eight abdominal nerve were performed. Neural activity was measured by differential extracellular recordings with a preamplifier (Model MA103, electronics lab University of Cologne) connected to a four-channel amplifier signal conditioner (Model MA102, electronics lab University of Cologne). All recorded signals were amplified (amplification factor: 5,000) and filtered (bandpass: 0.1–3 kHz). The recordings were sampled at 20 kHz. Recording electrodes were made of silver wire (diameter: 50 µm, Goodfellow). Data were acquired with a Power 1401mk2 A/D board (Cambridge Electronic Design) and Spike2 (version 7) software (Cambridge Electronic Design).

Experimental design and statistical analyses

To determine the conduction velocity of neuronal units in the seventh or eighth abdominal nerve, we used the distance between the two different electrodes of the double recording. After each double recording an image of the recording sites was taken and the distance was measured by using the software Fiji (ImageJ version 1.52b). The delay of a specific neuronal unit in the double recording was determined by the usage of a custom-made analysis-script in Spike2 (https://github.com/Pankratz-Lab/Spike2-Scripts). The specificity of the analyzed neuronal units over the series of recordings was ensured by spike sorting, an internal analysis tool in Spike2. The conduction velocity was calculated as distance/delay-quotient. For each double recording the mean conduction velocity for a motor and sensory unit was determined. Outliers were determined using Grubb’s test and removed from the analysis. The statistical analysis of the data were done using SigmaPlot (version 12). Normal distribution was tested using the Shapiro Wilk test. The significance was tested by using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test (nonparametrical) and t test (parametrical). In control larvae 222 spikes were analyzed for motor axons and 224 spikes were analyzed for sensory axons. In wrapping glia ablated larvae 231 spikes were analyzed for the motor component and 179 spike were analyzed for the sensory system. For larvae with impaired FGF-receptor signaling we analyzed 179 spikes for motor axons and 229 spikes for the sensory axons. p Values are given as two-tailed p values.

For statistical analyses of FIM and EM data the standard nonparametrical Wilcoxon rank-sum test and the standard parametrical t test were performed using MatLab as described64,65. Normal distribution of data was tested using the Shapiro Wilk test and the statistical test was chosen accordingly. To calculate the wrapping index the number of individual wrapped axons or axon fascicles is put into relation to the number of all axons. A wrapping index of 100 implies, that every single axon of the nerve is individually wrapped. All nerves that contained less than 76 or more than 82 axons were not included in the statistical analysis. Significance was determined using the Student’s t test.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

All fly stocks generated for this article are available from the corresponding author (C.K.) upon request. The Spike2 analysis script is available through github (https://github.com/Pankratz-Lab/Spike2-Scripts).

References

  1. 1.

    Attwell, D. & Gibb, A. Neuroenergetics and the kinetic design of excitatory synapses. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 841–849 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Magistretti, P. J. & Allaman, I. A cellular perspective on brain energy metabolism and functional imaging. Neuron 86, 883–901 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Volkenhoff, A. et al. Glial glycolysis is essential for neuronal survival in Drosophila. Cell Metab. 22, 437–447 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Nortley, R. & Attwell, D. Control of brain energy supply by astrocytes. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 47, 80–85 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nave, K.-A. & Trapp, B. D. Axon-glial signaling and the glial support of axon function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 31, 535–561 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hirrlinger, J. & Nave, K.-A. Adapting brain metabolism to myelination and long-range signal transduction. Glia 62, 1749–1761 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fünfschilling, U. et al. Glycolytic oligodendrocytes maintain myelin and long-term axonal integrity. Nature 485, 517–521 (2012).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lee, Y. et al. Oligodendroglia metabolically support axons and contribute to neurodegeneration. Nature 487, 443–448 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Beirowski, B. et al. Metabolic regulator LKB1 is crucial for Schwann cell-mediated axon maintenance. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1351–1361 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Saab, A. S. et al. Oligodendroglial NMDA receptors regulate glucose import and axonal energy metabolism. Neuron 91, 119–132 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Simons, M. & Nave, K.-A. Oligodendrocytes: myelination and axonal support. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8, a020479 (2016).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Micu, I., Plemel, J. R., Caprariello, A. V., Nave, K.-A. & Stys, P. K. Axo-myelinic neurotransmission: a novel mode of cell signalling in the central nervous system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 49–58 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sherman, D. L. & Brophy, P. J. Mechanisms of axon ensheathment and myelin growth. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 683–690 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zalc, B. The acquisition of myelin: an evolutionary perspective. Brain Res. 1641, 4–10 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gibson, E. M. et al. Neuronal activity promotes oligodendrogenesis and adaptive myelination in the mammalian brain. Science 344, 1252304–1252304 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hines, J. H., Ravanelli, A. M., Schwindt, R., Scott, E. K. & Appel, B. Neuronal activity biases axon selection for myelination in vivo. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 683–689 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hughes, E. G., Orthmann-Murphy, J. L., Langseth, A. J. & Bergles, D. E. Myelin remodeling through experience-dependent oligodendrogenesis in the adult somatosensory cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 696–706 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jessen, K. R. & Mirsky, R. The origin and development of glial cells in peripheral nerves. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 671–682 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Napoli, I. et al. A central role for the ERK-signaling pathway in controlling schwann cell plasticity and peripheral nerve regeneration in vivo. Neuron 73, 729–742 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Fledrich, R., Kungl, T., Nave, K.-A. & Stassart, R. M. Axo-glial interdependence in peripheral nerve development. Development 146, dev151704 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Harty, B. L. & Monk, K. R. Unwrapping the unappreciated: recent progress in Remak Schwann cell biology. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 47, 131–137 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Stierli, S. et al. The regulation of the homeostasis and regeneration of peripheral nerve is distinct from the CNS and independent of a stem cell population. Development 145, dev170316 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Stork, T. et al. Organization and function of the blood-brain barrier in Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 28, 587–597 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Matzat, T. et al. Axonal wrapping in the Drosophila PNS is controlled by glia-derived neuregulin homolog vein. Development 142, 1336–1345 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Heuser, J. E. & Doggenweiler, C. F. The fine structural organization of nerve fibers, sheaths, and glial cells in the prawn, Palaemonetes vulgaris. J. Cell Biol. 30, 381–403 (1966).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Roots, B. I. & Lane, N. J. Myelinating glia of earthworm giant axons: thermally induced intramembranous changes. Tissue Cell 15, 695–709 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Xu, K. & Terakawa, S. Fenestration nodes and the wide submyelinic space form the basis for the unusually fast impulse conduction of shrimp myelinated axons. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 1979–1989 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hartline, D. K. & Colman, D. R. Rapid conduction and the evolution of giant axons and myelinated fibers. Curr. Biol. 17, R29–R35 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wilson, C. H. & Hartline, D. K. Novel organization and development of copepod myelin. II. Nonglial origin. J. Comp. Neurol. 519, 3281–3305 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hartline, D. K. The evolutionary origins of glia. Glia 59, 1215–1236 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wilson, C. H. & Hartline, D. K. The novel organization and development of copepod myelin. I. Ontogeny. J. Comp. Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.22695 (2011).

  32. 32.

    Buskey, E. J., Strickler, J. R., Bradley, C. J., Hartline, D. K. & Lenz, P. H. Escapes in copepods: comparison between myelinate and amyelinate species. J. Exp. Biol. 220, 754–758 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Rey, S., Zalc, B. & Klämbt, C. Evolution of glial wrapping: a new hypothesis. Dev. Neurobiol. 34, 5089–11 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Landgraf, M., Sánchez-Soriano, N., Technau, G. M., Urban, J. & Prokop, A. Charting the Drosophila neuropile: a strategy for the standardised characterisation of genetically amenable neurites. Dev. Biol. 260, 207–225 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Klämbt, C. & Goodman, C. S. The diversity and pattern of glia during axon pathway formation in the Drosophila embryo. Glia 4, 205–213 (1991).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sepp, K. J. & Auld, V. J. Reciprocal interactions between neurons and glia are required for Drosophila peripheral nervous system development. J. Neurosci. 23, 8221–8230 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Edenfeld, G. et al. Notch and Numb are required for normal migration of peripheral glia in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 301, 27–37 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hilchen von, C. M., Beckervordersandforth, R. M., Rickert, C., Technau, G. M. & Altenhein, B. Identity, origin, and migration of peripheral glial cells in the Drosophila embryo. Mech. Dev. 125, 337–352 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Hilchen von, C. M., Bustos, Á. E., Giangrande, A., Technau, G. M. & Altenhein, B. Predetermined embryonic glial cells form the distinct glial sheaths of the Drosophila peripheral nervous system. Development 140, 3657–3668 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Yildirim, K., Petri, J., Kottmeier, R. & Klämbt, C. Drosophila glia: few cell types and many conserved functions. Glia 21, 276 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Schwabe, T., Bainton, R. J., Fetter, R. D., Heberlein, U. & Gaul, U. GPCR signaling is required for blood-brain barrier formation in Drosophila. Cell 123, 133–144 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Schwabe, T., Li, X. & Gaul, U. Dynamic analysis of the mesenchymal-epithelial transition of blood-brain barrier forming glia in Drosophila. Biol. Open 6, 232–243 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bauke, A.-C., Sasse, S., Matzat, T. & Klämbt, C. A transcriptional network controlling glial development in the Drosophila visual system. Development 142, 2184–2193 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Franzdóttir, S. R. et al. Switch in FGF signalling initiates glial differentiation in the Drosophila eye. Nature 460, 758–761 (2009).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Sieglitz, F. et al. Antagonistic feedback loops involving rau and sprouty in the Drosophila eye control neuronal and glial differentiation. Sci. Signal 6, ra96 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Brinkmann, B. G. et al. Neuregulin-1/ErbB signaling serves distinct functions in myelination of the peripheral and central nervous system. Neuron 59, 581–595 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Michailov, G. V. et al. Axonal neuregulin-1 regulates myelin sheath thickness. Science 304, 700–703 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Taveggia, C. et al. Neuregulin-1 type III determines the ensheathment fate of axons. Neuron 47, 681–694 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Silva-Rodrigues, J. F. et al. Peripheral axonal ensheathment is regulated by RalA GTPase and the exocyst complex. Development 147, dev174540 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Ghosh, A. et al. A global in vivo Drosophila RNAi screen identifies a key role of ceramide phosphoethanolamine for glial ensheathment of axons. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003980 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gerdøe-Kristensen, S., Lund, V. K., Wandall, H. H. & Kjaerulff, O. Mactosylceramide prevents glial cell overgrowth by inhibiting insulin and fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling. J. Cell Physiol. 232, 3112–3127 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Leiserson, W. M., Harkins, E. W. & Keshishian, H. Fray, a Drosophila serine/threonine kinase homologous to mammalian PASK, is required for axonal ensheathment. Neuron 28, 793–806 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Li, H., Russo, A. & Diantonio, A. SIK3 suppresses neuronal hyperexcitability by regulating the glial capacity to buffer K+ and water. J. Cell Biol. 218, 4017–4029 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Weiss, S., Melom, J. E., Ormerod, K. G., Zhang, Y. V. & Littleton, J. T. Glial Ca2+ signaling links endocytosis to K+ buffering around neuronal somas to regulate excitability. eLife Sci. 8, e44186 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Hilchen von, C. M., Hein, I., Technau, G. M. & Altenhein, B. Netrins guide migration of distinct glial cells in the Drosophila embryo. Development 137, 1251–1262 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Xie, X. & Auld, V. J. Integrins are necessary for the development and maintenance of the glial layers in the Drosophila peripheral nerve. Development 138, 3813–3822 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Nern, A., Pfeiffer, B. D. & Rubin, G. M. Optimized tools for multicolor stochastic labeling reveal diverse stereotyped cell arrangements in the fly visual system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E2967–E2976 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sun, B., Xu, P. & Salvaterra, P. M. Dynamic visualization of nervous system in live Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 10438–10443 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Sun, B. & Salvaterra, P. M. Characterization of Nervana, a Drosophila melanogaster neuron-specific glycoprotein antigen recognized by anti-horseradish peroxidase antibodies. J. Neurochem. 65, 434–443 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Gohl, D. M. et al. A versatile in vivo system for directed dissection of gene expression patterns. Nat. Methods 8, 231–237 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Jenett, A. et al. A GAL4-driver line resource for Drosophila neurobiology. Cell Rep. 2, 991–1001 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Li, H.-H. et al. A GAL4 driver resource for developmental and behavioral studies on the larval CNS of Drosophila. Cell Rep. 8, 897–908 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Otto, N. et al. Interactions among Drosophila larvae before and during collision. Sci. Rep. 6, 31564 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Risse, B., Berh, D., Otto, N., Klämbt, C. & Jiang, X. FIMTrack: an open source tracking and locomotion analysis software for small animals. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005530 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Otto, N. et al. The sulfite oxidase Shopper controls neuronal activity by regulating glutamate homeostasis in Drosophila ensheathing glia. Nat. Commun. 9, 3514 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Schirmeier, S., Matzat, T. & Klämbt, C. Axon ensheathment and metabolic supply by glial cells in Drosophila. Brain Res. 1641, 122–129 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Holcroft, C. E. et al. Innexins Ogre and Inx2 are required in glial cells for normal postembryonic development of the Drosophila central nervous system. J. Cell Sci. 126, 3823–3834 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Volkenhoff, A., Hirrlinger, J., Kappel, J. M., Klämbt, C. & Schirmeier, S. Live imaging using a FRET glucose sensor reveals glucose delivery to all cell types in the Drosophila brain. J. Insect Physiol. 106, 55–64 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Steller, H. Regulation of apoptosis in Drosophila. Cell Death Differ. 15, 1132–1138 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Bilak, A. & Su, T. T. Regulation of Drosophila melanogaster pro-apoptotic gene hid. Apoptosis 14, 943–949 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Zipursky, S. L., Venkatesh, T. R., Teplow, D. B. & Benzer, S. Neuronal development in the Drosophila retina: monoclonal antibodies as molecular probes. Cell 36, 15–26 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Hummel, T., Krukkert, K., Roos, J., Davis, G. & Klämbt, C. Drosophila Futsch/22C10 is a MAP1B-like protein required for dendritic and axonal development. Neuron 26, 357–370 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Lahiri, S. et al. Two alternating motor programs drive navigation in Drosophila larva. PLoS ONE 6, e23180 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Heckscher, E. S., Lockery, S. R. & Doe, C. Q. Characterization of Drosophila larval crawling at the level of organism, segment, and somatic body wall musculature. J. Neurosci. 32, 12460–12471 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Kohsaka, H., Takasu, E., Morimoto, T. & Nose, A. A group of segmental premotor interneurons regulates the speed of axial locomotion in Drosophila larvae. Curr. Biol. 24, 2632–2642 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Fushiki, A. et al. A circuit mechanism for the propagation of waves of muscle contraction in Drosophila. eLife Sci. 5, e13253 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Clark, M. Q., Zarin, A. A., Carreira-Rosario, A. & Doe, C. Q. Neural circuits driving larval locomotion in Drosophila. Neural Dev. 13, 6 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Cattaert, D. & Birman, S. Blockade of the central generator of locomotor rhythm by noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists in Drosophila larvae. J. Neurobiol. 48, 58–73 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Barclay, J. W., Atwood, H. L. & Robertson, R. M. Impairment of central pattern generation in Drosophila cysteine string protein mutants. J. Comp. Physiol. A 188, 71–78 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Hodgkin, A. L. & Huxley, A. F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. 117, 500–544 (1952).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Ohyama, T. et al. A multilevel multimodal circuit enhances action selection in Drosophila. Nature 520, 633–639 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Matthews, M. A. An electron microscopic study of the relationship between axon diameter and the initiation of myelin production in the peripheral nervous system. Anat. Rec. 161, 337–351 (1968).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Peters, A., Palay, S. & Webster, H. The Fine Structure of the Nervous System. 212–272 (Oxford University Press, 1991).

  84. 84.

    Weil, M.-T. et al. Axonal ensheathment in the nervous system of lamprey: implications for the evolution of myelinating glia. J. Neurosci. 38, 6586–6596 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Fields, R. D. A new mechanism of nervous system plasticity: activity-dependent myelination. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 756–767 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Maarbjerg, S., Di Stefano, G., Bendtsen, L. & Cruccu, G. Trigeminal neuralgia—diagnosis and treatment. Cephalalgia 37, 648–657 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Faroni, A. et al. Deletion of GABA-B receptor in Schwann cells regulates remak bundles and small nociceptive C-fibers. Glia 62, 548–565 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Orita, S. et al. Schwann cell LRP1 regulates remak bundle ultrastructure and axonal interactions to prevent neuropathic pain. J. Neurosci. 33, 5590–5602 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Hurley, P. A., Crook, J. M. & Shepherd, R. K. Schwann cells revert to non-myelinating phenotypes in the deafened rat cochlea. Eur. J. Neurosci. 26, 1813–1821 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Ma, D. et al. A Subpopulation of Foxj1-expressing, nonmyelinating schwann cells of the peripheral nervous system contribute to schwann cell remyelination in the central nervous system. J. Neurosci. 38, 9228–9239 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Furusho, M., Dupree, J. L., Bryant, M. & Bansal, R. Disruption of fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling in nonmyelinating Schwann cells causes sensory axonal neuropathy and impairment of thermal pain sensitivity. J. Neurosci. 29, 1608–1614 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Dutta, S., Rieche, F., Eckl, N., Duch, C. & Kretzschmar, D. Glial expression of Swiss cheese (SWS), the Drosophila orthologue of neuropathy target esterase (NTE), is required for neuronal ensheathment and function. Dis. Models Mech. 9, 283–294 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    McFerrin, J., Patton, B. L., Sunderhaus, E. R. & Kretzschmar, D. NTE/PNPLA6 is expressed in mature Schwann cells and is required for glial ensheathment of Remak fibers. Glia 65, 804–816 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Rushton, W. A. H. A theory of the effects of fibre size in medullated nerve. J. Physiol. 115, 101–122 (1951).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Leiserson, W. M., Forbush, B. & Keshishian, H. Drosophila glia use a conserved cotransporter mechanism to regulate extracellular volume. Glia 59, 320–332 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Leiserson, W. M. & Keshishian, H. Maintenance and regulation of extracellular volume and the ion environment in Drosophila larval nerves. Glia 59, 1312–1321 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Rusan, Z. M., Kingsford, O. A. & Tanouye, M. A. Modeling glial contributions to seizures and epileptogenesis: cation-chloride cotransporters in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 9, e101117 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Anastassiou, C. A., Perin, R., Markram, H. & Koch, C. Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 217–223 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Anastassiou, C. A. & Koch, C. Ephaptic coupling to endogenous electric field activity: why bother? Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 31, 95–103 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Han, K.-S. et al. Ephaptic coupling promotes synchronous firing of cerebellar purkinje cells. Neuron 100, 564–578.e3 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Beiman, M., Shilo, B. Z. & Volk, T. Heartless, a Drosophila FGF receptor homolog, is essential for cell migration and establishment of several mesodermal lineages. Genes Dev. 10, 2993–3002 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Risse, B. et al. FIM, a novel FTIR-based imaging method for high throughput locomotion analysis. PLoS ONE 8, e53963 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Risse, B., Otto, N., Berh, D., Jiang, X. & Klämbt, C. FIM imaging and FIMtrack: two new tools allowing high-throughput and cost effective locomotion analysis. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/52207 (2014).

  104. 104.

    Petri, J., Syed, M. H., Rey, S. & Klämbt, C. Non-cell-autonomous function of the GPI-anchored protein undicht during septate junction assembly. Cell Rep. 26, 1641–1653.e4 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to P. Plelan for sending anti-Innexin2 antibodies, H. Kranenburg for advice throughout the project, A. Volkenhoff for help during the innexin analysis, F. Sieglitz and S. Thomas who were involved in the early steps of this project, S. Luschnig, S. Rumpf, S. Schirmeier, and B. Zalc and all lab members for fruitful discussions. We are indebted to E. Naffin for help with the fly work. This work was supported through grants of the DFG (SFB 1348 B5; Kl588/27-1).

Funding

Open Access funding provided by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.K., J.B., and C.K. designed the experiments. A.S. and M.P. performed the electrophysiological experiments, F.S. and T.M. performed the TEM analysis. R.K. and J.B. performed all other experiments. The paper was written by C.K. and commented by all the authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Klämbt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Yannick Poitelonand the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kottmeier, R., Bittern, J., Schoofs, A. et al. Wrapping glia regulates neuronal signaling speed and precision in the peripheral nervous system of Drosophila. Nat Commun 11, 4491 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18291-1

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing