Abstract
Microresonator solitons are critical to miniaturize optical frequency combs to chip scale and have the potential to revolutionize spectroscopy, metrology and timing. With the reduction of resonator diameter, high repetition rates up to 1 THz become possible, and they are advantageous to wavelength multiplexing, coherent sampling, and selfreferencing. However, the detection of comb repetition rate, the precursor to all combbased applications, becomes challenging at these repetition rates due to the limited bandwidth of photodiodes and electronics. Here, we report a dualcomb Vernier frequency division method to vastly reduce the required electrical bandwidth. Freerunning 216 GHz “Vernier” solitons sample and divide the main soliton’s repetition frequency from 197 GHz to 995 MHz through electrical processing of a pair of low frequency dualcomb beat notes. Our demonstration relaxes the instrumentation requirement for microcomb repetition rate detection, and could be applied for optical clocks, optical frequency division, and microwave photonics.
Introduction
Optical frequency combs have revolutionized metrology, time keeping and spectroscopy^{1,2,3}, and the past decade has witnessed its miniaturization through optical microresonators^{4,5} and dissipated Kerr solitons^{6,7}. These solitary wave packets leverage Kerr nonlinearity to compensate cavity loss and to balance chromatic dispersion^{8,9,10}. They output a repetitive pulse stream at a rate set by the resonator roundtrip time, which can range from GHz to THz^{11,12,13}. The reduction of resonator mode volume increases the intracavity Kerr nonlinearity, lowers the operation pump power and extends the comb spectrum span. This has enabled demonstrations of batteryoperated soliton combs at 194 GHz repetition rate^{14}, and octavespanning soliton generation for selfreferencing in a resonator with 1 THz freespectralrange (FSR)^{15}. High repetition rates (reprates) are also desired in many combbased applications. For instance, the maximum acquisition speed in dualcomb spectroscopy^{16,17,18}, ranging^{19,20}, and imaging^{21,22}, all increase linearly with the comb repetition rate.
However, to detect the high repetition rate, a microresonatorbased frequency comb (microcomb) system has to include an auxiliary frequency comb whose repetition rate can be directly detected by a photodiode (PD). The detectable repetition frequency is then multiplied up optically through the equallyspaced comb lines to track the microcombs in action^{4,15}. This limits the miniaturization of microcomb system as the area occupied by the resonator scales inverse quadratically with the repetition rate. For the popular electrical Kband, the auxiliary resonator diameter has to exceed several millimeters^{23,24,25,26}. An approach to divide and detect microcomb repetition frequency beyond photodiode’s bandwidth will be critical to eliminate this restriction, and will advance the frequency comb technology in terms of miniaturization, power consumption and ease of integration.
In this article, we introduce a Vernier frequency division method to detect soliton microcomb repetition rate well above the electrical bandwidth in use. In contrast to the conventional approaches, the Vernier frequency division does not require lowrate frequency combs. Instead, the rate of the auxiliary combs, f_{r2}, can be higher than that of the main combs, f_{r1}, and it can be freerunning and stay unknown. The concept is illustrated in Fig. 1. The main and Vernier soliton comb lines create two freerunning graduation markings on the optical frequency domain, and similar to a Vernier caliper, these markings coarsely align periodically. Detectable frequency beat notes can be created when the frequency of the Nth higherrate comb line catches up with that of the (N + 1)th lowerrate comb line. These beat notes can be utilized to divide the soliton repetition frequency through an electrical frequency division followed by the subtraction of dualcomb repetition rate difference. Fig. 1 presents one conceptual example, where the main soliton repetition rate divided by N can be obtained from the sum of the first beat frequency Δ_{1}, and the Nth beat frequency Δ_{N} divided by N. Δ_{N} denotes the beat frequency between the Nth Vernier comb line and its nearest main soliton comb line.
Results
The Vernier division reduces the required electrical bandwidth for reprate detection from the soliton repetition rate to approximately the repetition rate difference between the main and Vernier solitons, which can be coarsely controlled in microfabrication. In our demonstration, the electrical bandwidth is reduced from 197 GHz to 20s GHz. The Vernier method directly applies to 100s GHz to THz rate soliton microcombs, which are common in many material systems, such as Si_{3}N_{4}^{27,28,29,30}, silicon^{31}, AlN^{32}, and LiNbO_{3}^{33,34,35}. For a fixed electrical bandwidth and reprate difference, a higher main soliton reprate will demand a broader comb span in the Vernier method. This is because the number of comb lines required for the comb line frequency of Vernier solitons to overtake that of the main solitons increases linearly with the main soliton repetition rate. At 1 THz repetition rate, 50 comb lines on one side of the pump are needed for 20 GHz reprate difference, and this comb span has been reported previously^{12,13}. The Vernier division demonstrated in this manuscript could serve as a universal solution for repetition rate detection in various microcomb systems and applications.
In this experiment, the main and Vernier solitons are generated in buswaveguide coupled Si_{3}N_{4} microresonators^{36}, which have FSRs of 197 GHz and 216 GHz, intrinsic quality factors of 1.5 × 10^{6} and 2.2 × 10^{6}, and loaded quality factors of 1.3 × 10^{6} and 1.8 × 10^{6}, respectively. To generate single soliton states, a rapid laser frequency sweeping method^{37} is implemented, in which the pump laser is derived from the first phase modulation sideband of a continuous wave (cw) laser, and the sideband frequency can be rapidly tuned by a voltage controlled oscillator (VCO). The pump laser is then split and amplified to generate solitons in both microresonators simultaneously. Thermoelectric coolers (TECs) are used for both the main and Vernier resonators to coarsely align their resonance frequencies at the modes that are being pumped. The complete experimental setup is shown in Fig. 2. Details of the soliton generation is included in the Methods section. Dualmicrocomb driven by one pump laser has been previously reported in two cascaded resonators^{38}, and in a single resonator by counterpropagating and copropagating pump lasers^{39,40,41}.
The optical spectra of single soliton states for main (red) and Vernier (blue) resonators are shown in Fig. 3a. A zoomedin panel shows the optical spectra where the frequency of the Nth Vernier soliton comb line coarsely aligns with that of the (N + 1)th main soliton comb line. An electrical spectrum of the beat frequencies between the two combs is shown in Fig. 3b. Within the 26 GHz cutoff frequency of our electrical spectrum analyzer (ESA), four beat frequencies are observed: Δ_{1} = 19.3639 GHz, Δ_{9} = 22.6815 GHz, Δ_{10} = 3.3157 GHz and Δ_{11} = 16.0449 GHz. The strong VCO_{1} beat note near 14 GHz is derived from the modulation of the cw laser, and can be removed by an optical or electrical filter.
Beat frequencies Δ_{9} and Δ_{11} are selected for the main soliton reprate division. Δ_{9}(Δ_{11}) is the beat frequency between the 9 (11)th Vernier soliton comb line and the 10 (12)th main soliton comb line, where Δ_{9} = 10f_{r1} − 9f_{r2}, and Δ_{11} = 11f_{r2} − 12f_{r1}. In the measurement, after combining the main and Vernier solitons with a fiber coupler, a bandpass filter is used to pass the comb lines associated with Δ_{9}, Δ_{10}, and Δ_{11} for optical amplification. Then a second fiber coupler splits the power into two optical paths, where in each path a bandpass filter is used to select the comb lines of Δ_{9} or Δ_{11}, and the corresponding beat note is created on a photodiode. To divide the main soliton reprate, Δ_{9} and Δ_{11} are divided by 36 and 44 in frequency, respectively, and sent to a RF mixer to produce their sum frequency, f_{v} = Δ_{9}/36 + Δ_{11}/44 = f_{r1}/198, which is the main soliton repetition rate divided by 198. The electrical spectra of Δ_{9}/36, Δ_{11}/44 and their sum f_{v} are shown in Fig. 3c–e. The complete experimental setup is shown in Fig. 2. More experimental details are included in Methods section. In principle, one can use the configuration in Fig. 1, where Δ_{1} is mixed with Δ_{N}/N to generate f_{r1}/N. However, limited by the selection of electrical mixers in our lab, we do not have the capability to mix Δ_{1} (~20 GHz) and Δ_{N}/N (~2 GHz for N = 9, 11), and thus we select Δ_{9} and Δ_{11} instead.
To validate the Vernier method, a conventional method by using electrooptics modulation (EOM) frequency comb is implemented as an outofloop verification. In the conventional EOM method, two adjacent comb lines from the main solitons are phase modulated at the frequency of a VCO to produce modulation sidebands. The strong modulation results in a pair of sidebands near the midpoint of the two comb lines, and they can be optically filtered and detected^{27,42} (see Fig. 2, and Methods section: electrooptics modulation (EOM) comb method). The detected EOM beat note (Fig. 3f) has frequency of f_{e} = f_{r1} − M × f_{VCO2}, where M is the number of modulation sidebands, and f_{VCO2} is the modulation frequency. M and f_{VCO2} are set to 11 and 17.897 GHz in this experiment, respectively. It is worth noting that the Vernier beat note f_{v} has much narrower linewidth than the EOM beat note f_{e}, which implies that the reprate of the main solitons is coherently divided down from 196.974 GHz to 994.82 MHz.
To show the coherent division in the Vernier dualcomb method, the phase noise of the Vernier beat note, f_{v}, and the outofloop EOM beat note, f_{e}, are measured with an ESA through direct detection technique (Fig. 3g). For coherent frequency division, the phase noise of f_{v} (red trace) should be 198^{2} lower than the phase noise of the undivided reprate, which is measured through the EOM method (blue trace). This is verified in our measurement, as the phase noise of f_{v} multiplied by 198^{2} (orange dash trace) agrees very well with the phase noise of f_{e} at offset frequency up to 30 kHz. Beyond 30 kHz offset frequency, the phase noise of f_{v} is comparable to the ESA sensitivity limit (black dash trace). At high offset frequency, our phase noise measurement might be affected by relative intensity noise (RIN). This is common for direct detection technique, as the RIN cannot be separated from the phase noise in the measurement.
The reprate of the main solitons can be derived by multiplying the Vernier beat note, f_{v}, by 198. A zerodeadtime frequency counter is used to record f_{v}. The main soliton reprate, f_{r1} = 198 × f_{v}, is shown in Fig. 3h (orange trace). The freerunning main solitons have repetition rate around 196.9740 GHz, and the rate is drifting due to temperature and pump laser frequency fluctuations. This reprate measurement is compared to the reprate measured with outofloop EOM method. The frequency of the EOM beat note f_{e} is recorded on a second zerodeadtime counter, and the reprate is derived as f_{r1} = f_{e} + M × f_{VCO2}. The EOMmeasured reprate is shown in Fig. 3h (blue trace), and it overlaps with the reprate measured by Vernier method perfectly. The frequency difference between the Verniermeasured reprate and EOMmeasured reprate is calculated and shown in Fig. 3i, and it has a mean value of (19 ± 37) Hz with a 95% confidence interval under normal distribution. Figure. 3j shows the Allan deviation of this frequency difference at various gate times, and it agrees with the counter resolution limit at the frequency of f_{v} (dash black trace) multiplied by 198 (green dash trace), which is the counter limit for f_{r1} = 198 × f_{v}. This indicates that no frequency difference between the Vernier method and the EOM method can be detected within the sensitivity of our instruments. In all frequency measurements, the counters and VCOs are synchronized to a rubidium clock.
The main soliton repetition rate can be stabilized by locking the Vernier beat note f_{v} to a radiofrequency reference. In this demonstration, f_{v} is locked to a rubidiumstabilized local oscillator through servo control of the pump power using an voltagecontrolled optical attenuator (VCOA) to vary the main soliton repetition rate (see Fig. 2). Reprate measurement with the EOM method is utilized to verify the locking and the result is shown in Fig. 4a. To eliminate the relative frequency drifts of the electronic components, f_{VCO1}, f_{VCO2}, counter 1 and counter 2 are all synchronized to the same rubidium clock. Therefore, the error in the rubidium clock has been corrected, and the absolute stability of the reference will not affect our frequency readouts. This allows us to evaluate the servo locking loop without using high performance atomic clock reference. The locking is turned on at the time near 50 s, and the soliton reprate immediately stops drifting and is stabilized to 196,962,681,959 Hz (see Fig. 4a). The Allan deviations of the freerunning (red) and stabilized (green) reprate are calculated from the EOMbased reprate measurements and are presented in Fig. 4b. Above 0.3 ms gate time, the Allan deviation of the locked reprate scales as 1/τ, where τ is the gate time. Below 0.3 ms gate time, the Allan deviation of the reprate follows that of the freerunning reprate. This behavior of the Allan deviation is expected for a phaselocked oscillator with ~ kHz locking bandwidth. Ultimately, the absolute stability of the reprate is limited by the atomic clock reference. It is worth noting that the repetition rate of the Vernier solitons is not stabilized in the entire measurement.
Discussion
In summary, we have demonstrated the Vernier frequency division method to detect and stabilize soliton repetition rate at 197 GHz with 20s GHz bandwidth photodiodes and electronics. The Vernier method shall be applicable for a wide range of repetition frequencies. It also applies to the case where the two frequency combs do not share the same pump frequency/center frequency. In this situation, one more pair of beat frequency should be detected. As this additional beat note and the two Vernier beat notes share the same offset frequency between the two pump lasers, the offset frequency can be eliminated by frequency subtraction. This will enable the Vernier method to be applied to other types of highrate combs, such as modelocked semiconductor lasers^{43}. The concept of Vernier dual combs could also be modified to assist carrierenvelope offset frequency (f_{CEO}) detection for selfreferencing an octavespanning microcomb. At 1 THz reprate, the f_{CEO} given by the f2f signal can range from 0 to 500 GHz, and it is challenging to keep this frequency in a detectable range as it is subject to small fabrication variations. However, if a Vernier comb is frequency doubled and beat against the main comb, a series of f2f beat frequencies can be created. Their spacing equals to the dualcomb reprate difference, and this can bring the f2f signal to a detectable frequency. Finally, the Vernier method has the potential to revolutionize optical and electrical frequency conversion by eliminating the need for a detectable repetition rate frequency comb, and it will have direct applications in optical clock^{44}, optical frequency division^{45}, and microwave frequency synthesis^{26}.
Methods
Experimental setup of soliton microcombs
The complete experimental setup is shown in Fig. 2. To overcome the thermal complexity in soliton generation process, the first phasemodulated sideband from a continous wave (CW) laser is used as a rapidtuning pump laser. The phase modulator is driven by a voltagecontrolled oscillator (VCO). The first sideband from the phase modulation is selected by an optical tunable bandpass filter (BPF). With the fast ramp voltage on the VCO, the pump laser scans at a speed of ~20 GHz/μs. A 50/50 splitter after the BPF splits the pump laser equally into two erbiumdoped fiber amplifiers (EDFAs). The polarization is carefully adjusted by a polarization controller after each EDFA. The pump laser is coupled into the bus waveguide by a lensed fiber. Single solitons are generated simultaneously in both microresonators by rapidly scanning the pump laser from the bluedetuned regime to the reddetuned regime. The single soliton existence detuning ranges of both microresonators are thermally tuned to overlap. Each microresonator has a temperature controller with 0.01°C resolution. The resonant frequencies are tuned ~2.5 GHz/°C. The main and Vernier solitons are then combined by a fiber coupler. An optical tunable bandpass filter is used to pass three pairs of comb lines, which correspond to Δ_{9}, Δ_{10}, and Δ_{11}. These comb lines are amplified by an EDFA and then split into two optical paths by a 50/50 fiber coupler. The comb lines corresponding to Δ_{9} and Δ_{11} are then selected by optical bandpass filters in each path and detected with photodiodes (PDs). The beat notes are amplified to the threshold power of electrical frequency divider for frequency division. Electrical bandpass filters are used to filter out harmonics from dividers, amplifiers, and mixers.
Vernier frequency division in our experiment
Vernier frequency division method can use two pairs of comb lines in the overtaking regime, where the frequency of the Nth higherrate comb line catches up with that of the (N + 1)th lowerrate comb line. Here, we use the Nth pair and the Mth pair of comb lines as an example, and Δf_{N,M} denotes the frequency difference between the N(M)th Vernier soliton comb line and its nearest main soliton comb line:
f_{r1} and f_{r2} are the reprates of the main solitons and Vernier solitons, respectively. Eq. (1)/N subtracted by Eq. (2)/M will yield
where the repetition rate of the main solitons, f_{r1}, is now expressed by two measurable quantities. In the experiment, photodetecting the corresponding pair of comb lines produces RF signals at the frequency of Δ_{M,N}, where Δ_{M,N} = ∣Δf_{M,N}∣. The “±” ambiguity in Δf_{M,N} = ±Δ_{M,N} can be resolved by measuring the optical spectra of the main and Vernier solitons.
In our measurement, we select N = 11 and M = 9 for the Vernier frequency division. Δ_{9} = 22.7 GHz and Δ_{11} = 16.1 GHz are obtained by photodetecting the corresponding pairs of comb lines. These two RF signals are then amplified to ~3 dBm to meet the minimum input power requirement of our frequency dividers. Both Δ_{9} and Δ_{11} are first divided by 4 so that their frequencies are within the frequency bandwidth of the by9 and by11 dividers. The output frequencies after division are Δ_{9}/4/9 = 629 MHz and Δ_{11}/4/11 = 366 MHz, respectively. These two frequencies are then amplified to ~7 dBm and are frequency mixed on an RF mixer. An electrical tunable bandpass filter is used to select the sum of Δ_{9}/36 and Δ_{11}/44 at the mixer output port. According to Eq. (3), this frequency is equal to (1/4/9 − 1/4/11)f_{r1} = f_{r1}/198.
Electrooptics modulation (EOM) comb method
In our experiment, part of the main soliton power is sent into the EOM setup for outofloop reprate verification. The EOM configuration is shown in the purple panel in Fig. 2. An optical bandpass filter is used to select two adjacent comb lines from the main soliton, which are then amplified by an EDFA. They are then sent into an electrooptic phase modulator which is driven by VCO 2 at a frequency of f_{VCO2}. Modulation sidebands are created for both comb lines, and when the modulation is strong enough, a pair of sidebands will meet in the midpoint of the two comb lines^{42}. This pair of sidebands is then optically filtered by a Bragggrating filter, and is detected on a photodiode. In our measurement, this EOM beatnote frequency, f_{e}, is ~100 MHz. Using this method, the repetition rate of the main soliton can be derived as f_{r1} = f_{e} + M × f_{VCO2}, where M is the number of modulation sidebands between the two adjacent comb lines. M and f_{VCO2} are set to 11 and 17.897 GHz in our experiment, respectively. The main soliton repetition rate shown in Fig. 4a is obtained with this method. Allan deviation can then be calculated based on this repetition rate measurement. Ultimately, the correction of the rubidium clock error is limited by the noise added to the EOM sidebands, e.g. residual noise of locking VCO 2 (model: Keysight PSG) to the rubidium reference. These additional noises are not characterized in this experiment.
Data availability
Source data for Figs. 3 and 4 can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12609401. Additional information is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
The codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Udem, T., Holzwarth, R. & Hänsch, T. W. Optical frequency metrology. Nature 416, 233–237 (2002).
Diddams, S., Bergquist, J., Jefferts, S. & Oates, C. Standards of time and frequency at the outset of the 21st century. Science 306, 1318–1324 (2004).
Newbury, N. R. Searching for applications with a finetooth comb. Nat. Photon. 5, 186–188 (2011).
Del’Haye, P. et al. Optical frequency comb generation from a monolithic microresonator. Nature 450, 1214–1217 (2007).
Kippenberg, T. J., Holzwarth, R. & Diddams, S. Microresonatorbased optical frequency combs. Science 332, 555–559 (2011).
Kippenberg, T. J., Gaeta, A. L., Lipson, M. & Gorodetsky, M. L. Dissipative kerr solitons in optical microresonators. Science 361, eaan8083 (2018).
Gaeta, A. L., Lipson, M. & Kippenberg, T. J. Photonicchipbased frequency combs. Nat. Photon. 13, 158–169 (2019).
Akhmediev, N. & Ankiewicz, A. Dissipative Solitons: From Optics to Biology and Medicine (Springer, 2008).
Leo, F. et al. Temporal cavity solitons in onedimensional kerr media as bits in an alloptical buffer. Nat. Photon. 4, 471–476 (2010).
Herr, T. et al. Temporal solitons in optical microresonators. Nat. Photon. 8, 145–152 (2014).
Suh, M.G. & Vahala, K. Gigahertzrepetitionrate soliton microcombs. Optica 5, 65–66 (2018).
Li, Q. et al. Stably accessing octavespanning microresonator frequency combs in the soliton regime. Optica 4, 193–203 (2017).
Pfeiffer, M. H. et al. Octavespanning dissipative Kerr soliton frequency combs in Si_{3}N_{4} microresonators. Optica 4, 684–691 (2017).
Stern, B., Ji, X., Okawachi, Y., Gaeta, A. L. & Lipson, M. Batteryoperated integrated frequency comb generator. Nature 562, 401–405 (2018).
Spencer, D. T. et al. An opticalfrequency synthesizer using integrated photonics. Nature 557, 81–85 (2018).
Suh, M.G., Yang, Q.F., Yang, K. Y., Yi, X. & Vahala, K. J. Microresonator soliton dualcomb spectroscopy. Science 354, 600–603 (2016).
Pavlov, N. et al. Soliton dual frequency combs in crystalline microresonators. Opt. Lett. 42, 514–517 (2017).
Dutt, A. et al. Onchip dualcomb source for spectroscopy. Sci. Adv. 4, e1701858 (2018).
Trocha, P. et al. Ultrafast optical ranging using microresonator soliton frequency combs. Science 359, 887–891 (2018).
Suh, M.G. & Vahala, K. J. Soliton microcomb range measurement. Science 359, 884–887 (2018).
Bao, C., Suh, M.G. & Vahala, K. Microresonator soliton dualcomb imaging. Optica 6, 1110–1116 (2019).
Yi, X., Yang, Q.F., Yang, K. Y. & Vahala, K. Imaging soliton dynamics in optical microcavities. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–8 (2018).
Lee, H. et al. Chemically etched ultrahighQ wedgeresonator on a silicon chip. Nat. Photon. 6, 369–373 (2012).
Yi, X., Yang, Q.F., Yang, K. Y., Suh, M.G. & Vahala, K. Soliton frequency comb at microwave rates in a highQ silica microresonator. Optica 2, 1078–1085 (2015).
Yang, K. Y. et al. Bridging ultrahighQ devices and photonic circuits. Nat. Photon. 12, 297–302 (2018).
Lucas, E. et al. Ultralownoise photonic microwave synthesis using a soliton microcombbased transfer oscillator. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–8 (2020).
Brasch, V. et al. Photonic chip–based optical frequency comb using soliton Cherenkov radiation. Science 351, 357–360 (2016).
Wang, P.H. et al. Intracavity characterization of microcomb generation in the singlesoliton regime. Opt. Express 24, 10890–10897 (2016).
Joshi, C. et al. Thermally controlled comb generation and soliton modelocking in microresonators. Opt. Lett. 41, 2565–2568 (2016).
Wildi, T., Brasch, V., Liu, J., Kippenberg, T. J. & Herr, T. Thermally stable access to microresonator solitons via slow pump modulation. Opt. Lett. 44, 4447–4450 (2019).
Yu, M., Okawachi, Y., Griffith, A. G., Lipson, M. & Gaeta, A. L. Modelocked midinfrared frequency combs in a silicon microresonator. Optica 3, 854–860 (2016).
Gong, Z. et al. Highfidelity cavity soliton generation in crystalline aln microring resonators. Opt. Lett. 43, 4366–4369 (2018).
Wang, C. et al. Monolithic lithium niobate photonic circuits for Kerr frequency comb generation and modulation. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–6 (2019).
He, Y. et al. Selfstarting bichromatic LiNbO_{3} soliton microcomb. Optica 6, 1138–1144 (2019).
Gong, Z. et al. Soliton microcomb generation at 2 μm in zcut lithium niobate microring resonators. Opt. Lett. 44, 3182–3185 (2019).
Pfeiffer, M. H. et al. Photonic damascene process for integrated highQ microresonator based nonlinear photonics. Optica 3, 20–25 (2016).
Stone, J. R. et al. Thermal and nonlinear dissipativesoliton dynamics in Kerrmicroresonator frequency combs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 063902 (2018).
Jang, J. K. et al. Synchronization of coupled optical microresonators. Nat. Photon. 12, 688–693 (2018).
Yang, Q.F., Yi, X., Yang, K. & Vahala, K. Counterpropagating solitons in microresonators. Nat. Photon. 11, 560–564 (2017).
Joshi, C. et al. Counterrotating cavity solitons in a silicon nitride microresonator. Opt. Lett. 43, 547–550 (2018).
Lucas, E. et al. Spatial multiplexing of soliton microcombs. Nat. Photon. 12, 699–705 (2018).
Li, J., Yi, X., Lee, H., Diddams, S. A. & Vahala, K. J. Electrooptical frequency division and stable microwave synthesis. Science 345, 309–313 (2014).
Rafailov, E. U., Cataluna, M. A. & Sibbett, W. Modelocked quantumdot lasers. Nat. Photon. 1, 395–401 (2007).
Newman, Z. L. et al. Architecture for the photonic integration of an optical atomic clock. Optica 6, 680–685 (2019).
Fortier, T. M. et al. Generation of ultrastable microwaves via optical frequency division. Nat. Photon. 5, 425 (2011).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Ligentec and VLC Photonics for resonator fabrication, A. Beling and S. Bowers at UVA for the access of signal generator and spectrum analyzer, K. Vahala and Q.F. Yang at Caltech for helpful comments during the preparation of this manuscript, and gratefully acknowledge National Science Foundation (award no. 1842641). X.Y. is also supported by Virginia Space Grant Consortium. X.B.Z is supported by China Scholarship Council.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
X.Y., B.W. and Z.Y. conceived the idea and designed the experiments. B.W. and Z.Y. performed the measurements with the help from X.Z. All authors analyzed the data, participated in preparing the manuscript and contributed to the discussions. X.Y. supervised the project.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Johann Riemensberger and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, B., Yang, Z., Zhang, X. et al. Vernier frequency division with dualmicroresonator solitons. Nat Commun 11, 3975 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467020178439
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467020178439
Further reading

Synthesized soliton crystals
Nature Communications (2021)

Optically referenced 300 GHz millimetrewave oscillator
Nature Photonics (2021)

Towards highpower, highcoherence, integrated photonic mmWave platform with microcavity solitons
Light: Science & Applications (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.