Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17035-5, published online 26 June 2020.

 In the original version of this article, some text was missing from the legends of Figure 5 and Figure 6.

The legend of Figure 5 originally read:

“CO2 interaction energy distribution shown as horizontal violin plots for the first, second, and third active-learning steps. The height of the shape shows the frequency of occurrences..”

The correct version states:

“CO2 interaction energy distribution shown as horizontal violin plots for the first, second, and third active-learning steps. a CM, b BoB, c SOAP, and d PI. The height of the shape shows the frequency of occurrences…”

This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML version of the article.

The legend of Figure 6 originally read:

“Predicted CO2 and N2 interaction energies (in kcal mol−1) for all molecules in the GDB-9 database using four molecular representation models. Only the model that utilized the PI molecular representation …”

The correct version states:

“Predicted CO2 and N2 interaction energies (in kcal mol−1) for all molecules in the GDB-9 database using four molecular representation models. a CM, b BoB, c SOAP, and d PI. Only the model that utilized the PI molecular representation.”

This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML version of the article.