Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Distinct magneto-Raman signatures of spin-flip phase transitions in CrI3


The discovery of 2-dimensional (2D) materials, such as CrI3, that retain magnetic ordering at monolayer thickness has resulted in a surge of both pure and applied research in 2D magnetism. Here, we report a magneto-Raman spectroscopy study on multilayered CrI3, focusing on two additional features in the spectra that appear below the magnetic ordering temperature and were previously assigned to high frequency magnons. Instead, we conclude these modes are actually zone-folded phonons. We observe a striking evolution of the Raman spectra with increasing magnetic field applied perpendicular to the atomic layers in which clear, sudden changes in intensities of the modes are attributed to the interlayer ordering changing from antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic at a critical magnetic field. Our work highlights the sensitivity of the Raman modes to weak interlayer spin ordering in CrI3.


Magnetic van der Waals-bonded materials represent a rapidly growing research field1,2,3,4,5,6, where these materials provide a solid-state platform to study a variety of exciting physics and potential applications of magnetism in two dimensions, including proximity effects, control using strain and gating, spin fluctuations, magnetic excitations, spintronics, and possible quantum spin liquids7. One material of particular interest is chromium tri-iodide (CrI3), a ferromagnet (FM) at bulk thicknesses below the Curie temperature (Tc) but with the remarkable property of layered antiferromagnetism (AFM) in thin multilayers2. Although each individual layer is FM, the layers themselves are AFM coupled, and this effect persists for samples tens of layers thick. Furthermore, the interlayer spin arrangement in CrI3 can be switched between AFM and FM by an electric field8,9,10, applied pressure11, and a magnetic field2,12,13,14,15, providing tunability in potential devices.

Raman spectroscopy is a powerful technique to study a variety of phenomena in 2D quantum materials, including effects of strain16, electron–phonon coupling17, phase transitions18, spin-phonon coupling19, and magnetic excitations20,21,22. In addition, the diffraction-limited spot size allows for the investigation of atomically thin samples and heterostructures using a non-contact probe. In this work, we collect temperature- and magnetic field (B)-dependent Raman spectra on a thin (~10 layers) CrI3 single crystal encapsulated in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN). Interestingly, at low temperature, increasing the magnetic field results in dramatic changes in the Raman spectra, indicating a magnetic field-induced phase transition when the interlayer spin arrangement changes from AFM to FM. By calculating the phonon dispersion of CrI3 in both the FM and AFM state, we conclude the two modes that only appear in the AFM state are zone-folded phonons. This work validates magneto-Raman spectroscopy as a sensitive technique to probe interlayer magnetic ordering in quantum materials.


Polarization-dependent Raman at zero magnetic field

A thin flake of CrI3 (≈7 nm from atomic force microscopy, or ≈10 layers) was encapsulated between two 20 nm and 30 nm flakes of hBN using the dry transfer technique22,23. In the ab plane, the Cr3+ atoms are arranged in a honeycomb lattice, where each chromium atom is bonded with six iodine atoms to form a distorted octahedron (see Fig. 1a). At room temperature, bulk CrI3 has a monoclinic structure (C2/m) but exhibits a crystallographic phase transition below ≈220 K to rhombohedral (R\(\bar 3\))24, where the main difference between the two structures is the stacking of the layers (see Supplementary Fig. 1). The bulk Tc is ≈61 K24, with the spins aligned perpendicular to the ab plane. Surprisingly, the magnetic behavior of thinner samples is very different; whereas the spins still align perpendicular to the ab plane, the interlayer magnetic stacking is AFM, as demonstrated through a variety of experimental techniques2,8,9,12,13,14,15,25,26. It has been theoretically27,28,29,30 and experimentally26,30 suggested that atomically thin CrI3 does not go through the crystallographic phase transition that the bulk does, but instead remains in the monoclinic structure at low temperatures, resulting in AFM interlayer stacking.

Fig. 1: Crystal structure and Raman spectra of CrI3.

a Top and side views of two layers of CrI3 with monoclinic structure and a schematic defining angles θ and φ with respect to the a- and b-crystal axes and the polarization vectors of the incoming εi and scattered εs light. The two CrI3 layers are color-coded differently. b Raman spectra for both xx (black) and xy (red) polarization configurations at T = 5 K and B = 0 T. Spectra in xx were divided by two for clarity. Peaks that appear below Tc are highlighted with blue asterisks. Inset shows intensity as a function of θ for P2 and \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) in a polar plot.

Raman spectra were collected with a triple grating spectrometer using an excitation laser wavelength of 632.8 nm and keeping the power below 150 μW (≈1 µm spot size) at the sample to avoid heating. The laser polarization of the incoming εi light makes an angle φ with respect to the b axis (Fig. 1a), and the scattered εs light angle θ is changed from θ = 0° (parallel, xx) to θ = 90° (perpendicular, xy). As the crystallographic a- and b axes are not known in our sample, the angle φ is an arbitrary, yet constant angle in our experiments. Figure 1b shows the Raman spectra at T = 5 K, in both the xx and xy polarization configurations. We confirm the monoclinic symmetry in our ≈10 layer flake by resolving two peaks at 108 cm−1 and 109 cm−1 between xx (black, scaled by 0.5) and xy (red), unlike the doubly degenerate peak seen in the rhombohedral structure31. Thus, we label the phonons using the irreducible representations of the 2/m point group, where only the Ag and Bg modes are Raman active32,33. The density functional theory (DFT) calculated atomic displacements associated with these modes are shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Two modes appear below Tc in the xy configuration at 77 cm−1 (9.5 meV) and 126 cm−1 (15.6 meV), labeled P1 and P2 in Fig. 1b, respectively. These modes were previously attributed to one-magnon excitations since they appear in the magnetically ordered state and have their largest intensity in xy (inset of Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 2), indicating Bg symmetry34. Instead, the bulk magnon dispersion35 at 5 K shows a low-energy magnon at Γ below 1 meV (8 cm−1), similar to what was measured by recent FM resonance experiments36, and magnons at the M point of the Brillouin zone at ≈9 meV  and 15 meV. Furthermore, a recent Raman study of magnon excitations in FePS3 showed it is possible for magnons to be present in both xx and xy in quasi-2D van der Waals magnets20. Thus, the Bg nature of P1 and P2 is not conclusive evidence that they are magnons.

Magneto-Raman measurements of 10 L CrI3 in Faraday geometry

We studied the effects of an applied magnetic field perpendicular to the ab plane (B ab, Faraday geometry) on P1 and P2, as detailed in Fig. 2. Two spectral ranges from 65 cm−1 to 90 cm−1 (P1, \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^1\)) and 120 cm−1 to 136 cm−1 (P2, \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\)) are shown on different intensity scales (≈a factor of 3:1, respectively) for clarity. At B = 0 T and in xy, P1 and P2 have strong intensities, whereas the two Ag modes at slightly higher frequencies have minimum intensities as they are forbidden in the xy configuration. Increasing the magnetic field results in drastic changes in the Raman spectra, where P1 and P2 behave in the same fashion. Above ≈1.6 T, the intensities of P1 and P2 abruptly start to vanish and \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^1\) and \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) begin to appear in xy. By B = 2 T, P1 and P2 are absent in all polarization configurations, whereas \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^1\) and \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) are no longer forbidden in xy. No further changes occur above 2 T, and no hysteresis was observed when the field was lowered back to 0 T. It should be noted that P1 and P2 do not show frequency shifting with magnetic field, suggesting they are not one-magnon processes with spins perpendicular to the ab plane.

Fig. 2: Magnetic field-dependent Raman spectra of CrI3.

Spectra are shown from 0 T to 3 T (B ab plane) at T = 9 K where P1 and P2 disappear above B = 2.0 T, whereas \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^1\) and \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) appear despite being forbidden in the xy polarization configuration. Yellow (green) shading highlights changes in P1, P2 (\({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^1\), \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\)) as the magnetic field is varied. A vertical offset was applied to spectra at different field values. xx spectrum at B = 0 T shown at top for comparison.

Raman spectra were collected as the magnetic field was increased in finer steps up to 2 T. This is shown as a false-color map (Fig. 3a) and spectra (Fig. 3b) for the frequencies near P2 and \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\), where six distinct magnetic field ranges are revealed. Upon close inspection, there is additional Raman scattering intensity, i.e., spectral weight, present between P2 and \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) ≈128 cm−1, although it cannot be discerned if the spectral weight is attributed to a single or multiple mode(s). No changes to P2, \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\), or the spectral weight were observed in Range 1 from 0 T and 0.6 T. In Range 2 between 0.7 T and 0.8 T, the spectral weight between P2 and \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) appears to shift in frequency and intensity. The spectra are again stable through Region 3 from 0.8 T to 1.4 T, after which striking changes are seen in Regions 4 and 5. In Region 4, P2 starts to decrease in intensity, the intensity of \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) stays relatively constant, and the spectral weight shifts in frequency and increases in intensity. In Region 5, P2 and the spectral weight both decrease in intensity until they disappear, whereas \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) grows in intensity until B > 1.95 T (Region 6), when the phase transition is finally complete. It should be noted that experimental uncertainty, including instrumental drift and corrections for Faraday rotation in magneto-cryostat objective lenses, can lead to small changes in peak intensities (generally less than 5%) when comparing consecutively taken Raman spectra. The intensity changes being tracked in the field ranges in Fig. 3b, however, are more significant than any changes seen in the Γ point phonons (see Supplementary Fig. 3) and are thus outside of experimental uncertainty. Moreover, frequency shifts, such as those observed in the spectral weight between P2 and \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) in Regions 2 and 4, are significantly more reliable than intensity changes, generally reproducible to within one CCD detector pixel (≈0.4 cm−1 with He–Ne excitation herein). For fitted peaks (e.g., well-defined phonons), changes in  the Raman shift frequency are even more precise (better than 0.1 cm−1).

Fig. 3: Distinct magnetic field ranges in CrI3.

a False-color contour map of the Raman intensity (logarithmic) vs. magnetic field and Raman shift frequency. b Raman spectra at T = 9 K, showing a detailed view of the 122 cm −1 to 134 cm−1 frequency range at different magnetic fields given by legend values (in Tesla). Six distinct field regions are identified below 2 T. A vertical offset was applied to spectra in the different field ranges for clarity.

Recent magneto-tunneling measurements of few-layered CrI3 observed large changes in the tunneling current at nearly the same magnetic field values where we observe marked changes in the Raman spectra, such as at 0.8 T and 2 T12,13,14,15,25. These changes were attributed to the spin-filtering effect when the magnetic field is strong enough to change the interlayer spin arrangement from AFM to FM, and the effect was observed even for 20 nm thick samples (our sample is ≈7 nm). The striking resemblance in the evolution with magnetic field observed with magneto-tunneling, including sharp changes between regions of stability, to those reported herein implies Raman spectroscopy is detecting the phase transition caused by layers flipping spins from AFM to FM stacking. The observation of the first jump at 0.8 T in a variety of thicknesses of CrI3 in magneto-tunneling12,13,14,15,25 suggests it is most likely a result of the surface layers (adjacent to the hBN) flipping while the second, final jump is the flipping of the internal layers at ≈2 T. This spin-flip phase transition is supported by the observation of the lower energy FM magnon for B > 6.5 T (Supplementary Fig. 4), which matches previous results on bulk, FM CrI335,36, and the lack of change in the Raman spectra between 2 T and 9 T (Supplementary Fig. 5). The 10 L sample remains monoclinic at high magnetic fields (Supplementary Fig. 6), demonstrating that a change in crystal structure is not the source of the evolution in the Raman spectra. In particular, the spectral weight present between P2 and \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) is extremely sensitive to the spin-flipping, displaying strong frequency shifts and intensity variations where the spin flips occur. The fact that the spectral weight does not shift in magnetic field in Regions 1 and 3, which are regions of stability, suggests its presence does not involve a one-magnon process. It is possible that the spectral weight results from the excitation laser wavelength (λ = 632.8 nm) being nearly resonant with the ligand-to-metal charge transfer transition37,38,39,40, but the weak Raman signal at off-resonance excitation laser wavelengths makes this difficult to verify.

The polar plots for \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\), which track the intensity of \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) as a function of angle θ, at various magnetic fields provide further evidence of the magnetic phase transition. As seen in Fig. 4a, the polar plot is rotated by ≈35° at B = 2 T when compared with B = 0 T. This can be understood if we write the Raman tensor for the Ag phonon with an induced magnetization m under applied magnetic field (B ab) as

$$R_{A_{g,{\mathbf{B}} \bot {\mathrm{ab}}}} = R_{A_g,m = 0} + m_z \cdot R_{A_g,m_z}$$

which separates the spin-independent and spin-dependent terms. The point group of CrI3 requires that the total Raman tensor \(R_{A_g}\) is symmetric under twofold rotation around the b axis (C2x). Thus, \(R_{A_g,m = 0}\) and \(m_z \cdot R_{A_g,m_z}\) must be symmetric under twofold rotation individually. As mz itself is antisymmetric under C2x, then the form of \(R_{A_g,m_z}\) is required to also be antisymmetric under C2x such that their product is symmetric:

$$R_{A_g,{\mathbf{B}} \bot {\mathrm{ab}}} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} \alpha & 0 \\ 0 & \beta \end{array}} \right) + m_z\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 0 & \gamma \\ \delta & 0 \end{array}} \right)$$

Thus, for the B = 0 T case (AFM state) where there is no induced magnetization, the Raman tensor would be purely symmetric, and we would not expect to detect the Ag phonon in xy polarization configurations. A magnetic field applied perpendicular to the ab plane that spin-polarizes the CrI3 to the FM state, however, introduces off-diagonal tensor elements and breaks this expectation, causing the polar plot to rotate as seen in Fig. 4a. Assuming there are minimal changes between the monoclinic (C2h), 10 L CrI3 and the hexagonal point group of the monolayer (D3d), then β ≈ α + Δ and δ ≈ −(γ + Δ′), where Δ and Δ′ are small corrections.

$$R_{A_{g}, + B_{z}} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} \alpha & {m_{z}\gamma} \\ { - m_{z}(\gamma + \Delta ^\prime )} & {\alpha + \Delta } \end{array}} \right),\\ R_{A_{g}, - B_{z}} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} \alpha & { - m_{z}{\gamma}} \\ {m_{z}(\gamma + \Delta ^\prime )} & {\alpha + \Delta } \end{array}} \right)$$

Writing the matrices as in Eq. (3) makes it clear that when the magnetic field direction is flipped from Bz to −Bz, thus flipping the direction of the induced magnetization, the signs of the off-diagonal elements switch, resulting in the opposite rotation of the polar plot, exactly as we observed in Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 7.

Fig. 4: Observable changes in the intensities and angular dependence of the Raman modes with applied magnetic field.

a Changes in the polar intensity of \({{\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^{6}}\) (maximum intensity normalized to one), as a function of θ for (a) B = 0 T (black), 1 T (blue), and 2 T (magenta) for B ab plane. b Comparing the polar intensity of \({{\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^{6}}\) at positive (magenta) and negative (green) applied magnetic fields. c Angle of maximum intensity in polar plot in a as a function of magnetic field, where field ranges from Fig. 3b are marked. d Intensity of P2 relative to the intensity of the combined mode \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^5{\mathrm{/B}}_{\mathrm{g}}^3\), labeled \(I\left( {{\mathrm{P}}_2} \right){\mathrm{/}}I\left( {{\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^5{\mathrm{/B}}_{\mathrm{g}}^3} \right)\), as a function of applied magnetic field (B ab plane) at various sample temperatures. e \(I\left( {{\mathrm{P}}_2} \right){\mathrm{/}}I\left( {{\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^5{\mathrm{/B}}_{\mathrm{g}}^3} \right)\) as a function of applied magnetic field (B ab plane). Insets of e show the magnetic stacking orders in the AFM and FM states for B ab plane. f Polar intensity of \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) for a magnetic field (7 T) applied parallel to the ab plane at two different crystal orientations (φ1 and φ1 + 90°). Sample temperature was 9 K (2 K) for B ab (B ab). Error bars represent standard errors from fitting function.

Figure 4c shows the angle of maximum intensity of the polar plot in 4a as the magnetic field is swept through the phase transition, where Regions 1–6 from Fig. 3 are marked with vertical dashed lines. Although Fig. 3 and magneto-tunneling results indicate that parts of the phase transition occur between Regions 2 and 4, there is no observable change in the maximum intensity of the polar plot in those field ranges. In Region 5, however, it increases to ≈10° for B = 1.7 T and 1.8 T, and then finally to ≈35° for 1.8 T and above. The lack of rotation of the polar plot between 0.7 T and 0.8 T reveals that not enough magnetization is induced in this field range to introduce the off-diagonal Raman tensors in Eq. (2).

The temperature dependence of the spin flips was investigated by tracking the intensity of P2 as a function of magnetic field for different temperatures between T = 9 K and 26 K, as detailed in Fig. 4d. The intensity of P2 is shown relative to the intensity of the combination peak \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^5{\mathrm{/B}}_{\mathrm{g}}^3\) at ≈115 cm−1 at B = 0 T for each temperature, as this peak appears to remain constant with temperature and magnetic field (in the probed range). The spin-flip transition field, or the amount of magnetic field necessary to cause P2 to disappear, decreases with increasing temperature. In addition, the distinct jumps from spin flips and flat plateaus observed in the intensity of P2 smooth out for higher T. Further temperature dependence is analyzed in Supplementary Fig. 8. This behavior is consistent with a phase transition where there is a strong correlation between the temperature and magnetic field, which suggests that the magnetic field takes the transition temperature to zero. Although this behavior is akin to a quantum phase transition, there is no evidence yet of any quantum critical behavior in this material, but it is a very interesting avenue for future investigation.

Magneto-Raman measurements of 10 L CrI3 in Voigt geometry

Finally, we investigated the directional dependence of the spin-flip phase transition by rotating the sample such that the applied magnetic field is parallel to the ab plane (B ab, Voigt geometry). Figure 4e shows \(I\left( {{\mathrm{P}}_2} \right){\mathrm{/}}I\left( {{\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^5{\mathrm{/B}}_{\mathrm{g}}^3} \right)\) for B ab and at T = 2 K. Unlike in the case for B ab, no jumps or plateaus are observed in the intensity of P2. Instead, the intensity of P2 continuously decreases with increasing applied magnetic field up to B = 6 T, after which the layers are stacked FM with the spins pointing in the ab plane. This observation matches nicely with measurements of the magneto-tunneling current when the field is in the ab plane12,13,14,15. Furthermore, no frequency shift of P2 is observed as a function of magnetic field (Supplementary Fig. 9). We perform the same tensor analysis that was done for Eqs. (1) and (2) above, but this time for the magnetic field applied in the ab plane.

$$R_{A_g,{\mathbf{B}}\parallel {\mathrm{ab}}} = R_{A_g,m = 0} + m_x \cdot R_{A_g,m_x} + m_y \cdot R_{A_g,m_y}$$

where x (y) corresponds to b axis (a axis). Requiring that the total Raman tensor be symmetric under C2x, then \(R_{A_g,{\mathbf{B}}\parallel {\mathrm{ab}}}\) is written as:

$$R_{A_g,{\mathbf{B}}\parallel {\mathrm{ab}}} = R_{A_g,m = 0} + m_x\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\alpha ^\prime } & 0 \\ 0 & {\beta ^\prime } \end{array}} \right) + m_y\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 0 & {\gamma ^\prime } \\ {\delta ^\prime } & 0 \end{array}} \right)$$

From Eq. (5), when the magnetic field is directed along the b axis and strong enough to align the spins and create a net magnetization mx, we expect the Raman tensor to be symmetric and the polar plot of the intensity of \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) as a function of θ not to rotate. However, when the magnetic field has a component pointed along the a axis that results in a net magnetization my, off-diagonal tensor elements are introduced, and some rotation of the polar plot would be expected. To test these predictions, we rotated the sample while the magnetic field was applied in the ab plane such that the magnetic field was pointed along two different crystal orientations φ1 and φ2 = φ1 + 90°. The polar plot of the intensity of \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) at B = 0 T and 7 T (in the spin-polarized state) are shown in Fig. 4f. Interestingly, for both orientations, in which either φ1 or φ2 must contain magnetic field components along the a axis, the polar plot of the intensity of \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) does not show the same rotation that was observed for spins pointing perpendicular to the ab plane in the spin-polarized state. This indicates that the off-diagonal elements γ′ and δ′ are negligible for magnetic fields pointing in the ab plane.


Our data shows that P1 and P2, which appear (disappear) in the AFM (FM) state and are absent in bulk samples (Supplementary Fig. 10), are not one-magnon excitations, as their frequencies do not shift with applied magnetic field. After considering other theoretical models (see Supplementary Notes 1 and 2, Supplementary Tables 25, Supplementary Fig. 11), we conclude that P1 and P2 are actually zone-folded phonons owing to a doubling of the AFM unit cell in the c direction. This is illustrated in Fig. 5a, where the opposite spins of consecutive layers in the AFM configuration lead to a unit cell that is twice as large in the c direction compared to the FM configuration.

Fig. 5: Unit cells, phonon dispersions, and normal modes for FM and AFM stacking.

a Comparing the unit cell for the FM and AFM stacked structures, where the AFM unit cell is doubled in the c direction. Chromium atoms are green, whereas iodine atoms are blue. b Calculated phonon dispersion showing the Raman-active modes in the FM (red, solid) and AFM (blue, dashed) stacking in bulk CrI3 in the monoclinic crystal structure. In the AFM case, the doubling of the unit cell along the c direction in real space results in the A(FM)-point folding into Γ, such that the number of modes is doubled compared with the FM case. The Γ–A distance in the AFM case is half that of the FM case. Modes that correspond to P1, \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^1\), P2, and \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) are highlighted and their atomic vibrations are shown in c and d.

Using DFT, we calculated the phonon dispersions for monoclinic, bulk CrI3 in both the FM and AFM stacking configurations. The full phonon dispersions, Brillouin zone, and table of frequencies are given in Supplementary Figs. 12 and 13 and Supplementary Table 6. Figure 5b shows only the Raman-active phonons in the FM state (red, solid) and AFM state (blue, dotted) for frequencies near P1 and P2. In general, Raman spectroscopy is only sensitive to modes at the Γ point in the phonon dispersion due to conservation of momentum. Thus, phonons at the A point (in direction of kz) in the FM state are not observed. However, the doubling of the unit cell in the AFM state leads to zone-folding, where the phonons at the A point in the Brillouin zone in the FM state fold back onto Γ in the AFM state and can be observed in Raman spectroscopy. Two pairs of modes with similar frequencies to P1/\({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^1\) and P2/\({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) have an easily resolvable frequency splitting at Γ (highlighted Fig. 5b), with the zone-folded phonon (P1 or P2) between 2 cm −1 and 4 cm−1 lower in frequency than the original phonon (\({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^1\) or \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\)). Illustrations of these vibrations are shown in Fig. 5c, d, where the two layers vibrate in-phase for \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^1\) and \({\mathrm{A}}_{\mathrm{g}}^6\) and out-of-phase for P1 and P2. In the bulk, P1 and P2 would have Bu symmetry and would thus be Raman silent but infrared active. However, the breaking of inversion symmetry for an even number of layers in the AFM configuration would allow P1 and P2 to be Raman active with B symmetry (only seen in xy configurations). These zone-folded phonons would not shift in magnetic field and would be Raman-active (forbidden) in the AFM (FM) state, aligning with the observed behaviors of P1 and P2.

Even though the doubling of the unit cell is purely magnetic in nature, the observation of very strong zone-folded phonons that have similar intensity as the observed Γ point phonons reveals the strong coupling between magnetism and the lattice in atomically thin CrI3. Of note, the origins of P1 and P2 as zone-folded phonons predict they would disappear for a monolayer sample (no zone-folding) or a sample with an odd number of layers because the AFM state preserves inversion symmetry with an odd number of layers. Recent work41,42 has shown P1 and P2 are not present in monolayers of CrI3, yet data by Jin et al.34 suggests the presence of P1 and P2 for odd layer thicknesses. One possibility is that the encapsulation of thin layers of CrI3 in hBN breaks inversion symmetry naturally, leading to the presence of P1 and P2 in all thicknesses. Further studies as a function of layer thickness and encapsulation parameters are needed to elucidate the symmetry response of P1 and P2 for even vs. odd numbers of layers.

In conclusion, we utilized temperature-dependent, magneto-Raman spectroscopy to elucidate a magnetic phase transition in CrI3 where the interlayer stacking changes from AFM to FM. Substantial changes in the Raman spectra are detected at specific magnetic field values due to spin flips of layers to a FM stacking state, indicating that Raman modes are extremely sensitive to this phase transition. Moreover, Raman scattering proves to be crucial to understanding the symmetry and frequency shifts of the modes. We deduce that the modes P1 and P2 are not high frequency magnons as previously concluded, but instead attribute the modes to zone-folded phonons using symmetry arguments, polarization-dependent Raman responses, and calculated phonon dispersions in the FM and AFM stacking configurations. This study paves the way for further use of magneto-Raman spectroscopy to investigate spin-flip phase transitions in 2D van der Waals magnets.


Sample preparation and encapsulation

Bulk CrI3 crystals were grown by a chemical vapor transport technique using stoichiometric mixtures of Cr and I in a sealed evacuated quartz tube, as mentioned in other references5,24. The phase of the obtained crystals were checked by X-ray diffraction. These crystals were then exfoliated onto Si/SiO2 substrates in an Ar-filled glovebox having O2 and H2O concentrations of <0.1 ppm. hBN/CrI3/hBN heterostructures were fabricated using a dry transfer technique detailed elsewhere23,43. Specifically, PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane) was used as the polymer stamp.

Raman spectroscopy

A triple grating Raman spectrometer (Horiba JY T64000, 1800 mm−1 grating) coupled to a liquid nitrogen cooled CCD detector was used to collect Raman spectra. The excitation wavelength was 632.8601 nm from a He–Ne laser and spectra were measured in the 180° backscattering configuration. Raman spectra as a function of temperature and magnetic field were collected using an attoDRY cryostat (Attocube Inc.), where the sample was zero-field cooled and studied with a magnetic field compatible objective (×50, N.A. 0.82). Ultra-broadband polarizers and achromatic half wave plates were used to select and control polarization, including correcting for Faraday rotation in the objective under applied magnetic field. The laser power was ≈150 µW to avoid local heating and integration times were ≈12 min.

DFT phonon calculations

We performed DFT calculations44,45 with the Quantum Espresso46 code, using the GBRV ultrasoft pseudopotential set47,48. We used the vdw-df-ob86 exchange correlation functional49,50, which includes long range van der Waals interactions, for our main results. We also tested the PBEsol51 functional, finding similar results. Phonon calculations were performed using a finite differences (frozen phonon) approach, using PHONONPY52 to perform symmetry analysis and the cluster_spring53 code to calculate phonon dispersions. A 6 × 6 × 4 k-point sampling was used for the ferromagnetic unit cell.

(Certain commercial equipment, instruments, or materials are identified in this manuscript in order to specify the experimental procedure adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the materials or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose).

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Gong, C. et al. Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals. Nature 546, 265–269 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Huang, B. et al. Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit. Nature 546, 270–273 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lee, J. U. et al. Ising-type magnetic ordering in atomically thin FePS3. Nano Lett. 16, 7433–7438 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wang, X. Z. et al. Raman spectroscopy of atomically thin two-dimensional magnetic iron phosphorus trisulfide (FePS3) crystals. 2D Mater. 3, 031009 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shcherbakov, D. et al. Raman spectroscopy, photocatalytic degradation, and stabilization of atomically thin Chromium tri-iodide. Nano Lett. 18, 4214–4219 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bonilla, M. et al. Strong room-temperature ferromagnetism in VSe2 monolayers on van der Waals substrates. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 289–293 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Burch, K. S., Mandrus, D. & Park, J. G. Magnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals materials. Nature 563, 47–52 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Huang, B. et al. Electrical control of 2D magnetism in bilayer CrI3. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 544–548 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Jiang, S. W., Li, L. Z., Wang, Z. F., Mak, K. F. & Shan, J. Controlling magnetism in 2D CrI3 by electrostatic doping. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 549–553 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jiang, S. W., Shan, J. & Mak, K. F. Electric-field switching of two-dimensional van der Waals magnets. Nat. Mater. 17, 406–410 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Li, T. et al. Pressure-controlled interlayer magnetism in atomically thin CrI3. Nat. Mater. 18, 1303–1308 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wang, Z. et al. Very large tunneling magnetoresistance in layered magnetic semiconductor CrI3. Nat. Commun. 9, 2516 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Song, T. C. et al. Giant tunneling magnetoresistance in spin-filter van der Waals heterostructures. Science 360, 1214–1218 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kim, H. H. et al. One million percent tunnel magnetoresistance in a magnetic van der Waals heterostructure. Nano Lett. 18, 4885–4890 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kim, H. H. et al. Evolution of interlayer and intralayer magnetism in three atomically thin chromium trihalides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 11131–11136 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Li, Y. Y. et al. Giant anisotropic Raman response of encapsulated ultrathin black phosphorus by uniaxial strain. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1600986 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    McCreary, A. et al. Intricate resonant Raman response in anisotropic ReS2. Nano Lett. 17, 5897–5907 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zhang, K. N. et al. Raman signatures of inversion symmetry breaking and structural phase transition in type-II Weyl semimetal MoTe2. Nat. Commun. 7, 13552 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Tian, Y., Gray, M. J., Ji, H. W., Cava, R. J. & Burch, K. S. Magneto-elastic coupling in a potential ferromagnetic 2D atomic crystal. 2D Mater 3, 025035 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    McCreary, A. et al. Quasi-two-dimensional magnon identification in antiferromagnetic FePS3 via magneto-Raman spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 101, 064416 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cenker, J. et al. Direct observation of 2D magnons in atomically thin CrI3. Preprint at (2020).

  22. 22.

    Li, S. et al. Magnetic field-induced quantum phase transitions in a van der Waals magnet. Phys. Rev. X 10, 011075 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Dean, C. R. et al. Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 722–726 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    McGuire, M. A., Dixit, H., Cooper, V. R. & Sales, B. C. Coupling of crystal structure and magnetism in the layered, ferromagnetic insulator CrI3. Chem. Mater. 27, 612–620 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Klein, D. R. et al. Probing magnetism in 2D van der Waals crystalline insulators via electron tunneling. Science 360, 1218–1222 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sun, Z. et al. Giant nonreciprocal second-harmonic generation from antiferromagnetic bilayer CrI3. Nature 572, 497–501 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sivadas, N., Okamoto, S., Xu, X. D., Fennie, C. J. & Xiao, D. Stacking-dependent magnetism in bilayer CrI3. Nano Lett. 18, 7658–7664 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jiang, P. H. et al. Stacking tunable interlayer magnetism in bilayer CrI3. Phys. Rev. B 99, 144401 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Soriano, D., Cardoso, C. & Fernandez-Rossier, J. Interplay between interlayer exchange and stacking in CrI3 bilayers. Solid State Commun. 299, 113662 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Jang, S. W., Jeong, M. Y., Yoon, H., Ryee, S. & Han, M. J. Microscopic understanding of magnetic interactions in bilayer CrI3. Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 031001(R) (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ubrig, N. et al. Low-temperature monoclinic layer stacking in atomically thin CrI3 crystals. 2D Mater. 7, 015007 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Larson, D. T. & Kaxiras, E. Raman spectrum of CrI3: an ab initio study. Phys. Rev. B 98, 085406 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Djurdjic-Mijin, S. et al. Lattice dynamics and phase transition in CrI3 single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 98, 104307 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Jin, W. C. et al. Raman fingerprint of two terahertz spin wave branches in a two-dimensional honeycomb Ising ferromagnet. Nat. Commun. 9, 5122 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Chen, L. B. et al. Topological spin excitations in honeycomb ferromagnet CrI3. Phys. Rev. X 8, 041028 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lee, I. et al. Fundamental spin interactions underlying the magnetic anisotropy in the Kitaev ferromagnet CrI3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 017201 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Seyler, K. et al. Ligand-field helical luminescence in a 2D ferromagnetic insulator. Nat. Phys 14, 277–281 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Chakraborty, B., Ramakrishna Matte, H. S. S., Sood, A. K. & Rao, C. N. R. Layer-dependent resonant Raman scattering of a few layer MoS2. J. Raman Spectr 44, 92–96 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Berkdemir, A. et al. Identification of individual and few layers of WS2 using Raman spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 3, 1755 (2013).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    del Corro, E. et al. Excited excitonic states in 1L, 2L, 3L, and bulk WSe2 observed by resonant Raman spectroscopy. ACS Nano 8, 9629–9635 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Magnetic order-induced polarization anomaly of Raman scattering in 2D magnet CrI3. Nano Lett. 20, 729–734 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Huang, B. et al. Tuning inelastic light scattering via symmetry control in the two-dimensional magnet CrI3. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 212–216 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ponomarenko, L. A. et al. Tunable metal-insulator transition in double-layer graphene heterostructures. Nat. Phys. 7, 958–961 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hohenberg, P. & Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. B 136, B864 (1964).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kohn, W. & Sham, L. J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev 140, A1133 (1965).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Giannozzi, P. et al. Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with QUANTUM ESPRESSO. J. Phys. Condens. Mater. 29, 465901 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Garrity, K. F., Bennett, J. W., Rabe, K. M. & Vanderbilt, D. Pseudopotentials for high-throughput DFT calculations. Comp. Mater. Sci. 81, 446–452 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Vanderbilt, D. Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism. Phys. Rev. B 41, 7892–7895 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Thonhauser, T. et al. Van der Waals density functional: self-consistent potential and the nature of the van der Waals bond. Phys. Rev. B 76, 125112 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Klimes, J., Bowler, D. R. & Michaelides, A. Chemical accuracy for the van der Waals density functional. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 022201 (2010).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Perdew, J. P. et al. Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Togo, A. & Tanaka, I. First principles phonon calculations in materials science. Scripta Mater. 108, 1–5 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Garrity, K. F. Combined cluster and atomic displacement expansion for solid solutions and magnetism. Phys. Rev. B 99, 174108 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


A.M., T.T.M., and A.R.H.W. would like to acknowledge the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)/National Research Council Postdoctoral Research Associateship Program and NIST-STRS (Scientific and Technical Research and Services) for funding. Work at The Ohio State University was supported by the Center for Emergent Materials, an NSF MRSEC under grant DMR-1420451. D.S. is supported by NSF/DMR 1807928. The single crystal growth efforts at Penn State are supported by the US Department of Energy under grant DE-SC0019068. D.W. gratefully acknowledges the financial support by the German Science Foundation DFG Research Fellowship (WE6480/1). Growth of hexagonal boron nitride crystals was supported by the Elemental Strategy Initiative conducted by the MEXT, Japan and the CREST(JPMJCR15F3), JST.

Author information




A.M., T.T.M, J.R.S., R.V.A, and A.R.H.W conceived the project. Bulk CrI3 crystals were grown by Y.Z, J.H., D.W, J.E.G, and Z.M. Hexagonal boron nitride crystals were supplied by K.W. and T.T. Heterostructures were fabricated by D.S. and C.N.L. Raman measurements and analysis were carried out by A.M., T.T.M., J.R.S., R.V.A., and A.R.H.W. Theoretical analysis, including modeling, and numerical calculations, were carried out by F.G.U. and X.F., N.T., and Y.-M.L. Phonon DFT calculations were carried out by K.F.G. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rolando Valdés Aguilar or Angela R. Hight Walker.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Anna Swan and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McCreary, A., Mai, T.T., Utermohlen, F.G. et al. Distinct magneto-Raman signatures of spin-flip phase transitions in CrI3. Nat Commun 11, 3879 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing