Author Correction: Land-use change interacts with climate to determine elevational species redistribution

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

"Coefficient averages of the five most important predictors with 95% confidence intervals. Models constructed using the full dataset (n = 1464). For details of the 30 competing models refer to Supplementary Table 3. All variables are scaled to allow direct comparison both in direction and in magnitude, ranked by importance (threshold = 0.6). Sdist: distance to mountain summit, T: baseline temperature, CCR: climate change rate, Cover: forest cover percentage." AUTHOR CORRECTION NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17319-w Which replaces the previous incorrect version: "Coefficient averages of the four most important predictors with 95% confidence intervals. Models constructed using full dataset (n = 2798). For details of the 13 competing models refer to Supplementary Table 3. All variables are scaled to allow direct comparison both in direction and in magnitude, ranked by importance (threshold = 0.7). Sdist: distance to mountain summit, T: baseline temperature, Cover: forest cover percentage, Ref: reference point (margin or center)." In the "Disaggregated analysis" subsection, number of candidate models has been changed from 13 to 30.
The main results of the disaggregated analysis using the updated and corrected species-level dataset are similar to the original ones, but there are some changes affecting the text. The original fourth through sixth sentences of the "Disaggregated analysis" subsection read: "Our findings at the species level suggest increasing shift rates for species with denser baseline forest cover, for higher baseline temperature conditions, and for greater elevational distance to the highest mountain summit within the study area. Although the data suggest that the magnitude of the elevational shift rate might be higher at the margins than at the core of the distribution, this effect was not significant (see the large 95% confidence interval crossing the zero line for "Ref_Margin" in Fig. 4). Interestingly, when restricting data to forest systems only (forest cover >25%, n = 2419), we found significant synergistic effects between baseline temperature and forest cover, as well as between climate change rate and forest loss percentage on elevational shift rate at the species level ( Supplementary Fig. 2)." This incorrect text has now been replaced with: "Our findings at the species level suggest increasing shift rates for species with higher baseline temperature conditions, and for greater elevational distance to the highest mountain summit within the study area. Although the data suggest that the magnitude of the elevational shift rate might be higher under denser baseline forest cover conditions, this effect was not significant (see the 95% confidence intervals crossing the zero line for "Cover" in Fig. 4). The data also suggest that the magnitude of the elevational shift rate might be affected by synergistic effects between climate change rate and baseline temperature, but these effects were also not significant (see the 95% confidence intervals crossing the zero line for "CCR" and "CCR * T" in Fig. 4). Interestingly, when restricting data to forest systems only (forest cover > 25%, n = 1120), we found significant synergistic effects between climate change rate and forest loss percentage on the elevational shift rate at the species level ( Supplementary Fig. 2)." Corrections in the "Discussion" section Several minor changes have been made throughout the "Discussion" section.
In the first sentence of the first paragraph, the phrase "confounding impacts of habitat features (i.e., forest cover)" has been changed to "confounding impacts of habitat features (e.g., forest cover, forest loss)".
In the first sentence of the second paragraph, the phrase "the generally positive effects of forest cover" has been changed to "the generally positive effects of forest cover (although not significant at the species level)." The fourth sentence of the second paragraph, "In addition, when restricting the disaggregated analysis to forest systems only, the synergistic effect between forest cover and temperature further confirmed the importance of habitat connectivity in enhancing species movement16" has been deleted, because there is no longer a synergistic effect between forest cover and temperature after updating the dataset at the species level.
In the third sentence of the fourth paragraph, the phrase "unexplained variance in our models at the species level (cf. 76.4% on average, with ±0.65% SD)" has been changed to "unexplained variance in our models at the species level (cf. 87.4% on average, with ±0.97% SD)."

Corrections in the Supplementary Information file
The original, incorrect, version of the Supplementary Information is attached to this Correction. The new, correct, Supplementary Information file contains updated versions of Supplementary Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 7, Supplementary Table 3, and Supplementary  Table 5.