Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

An amphipathic peptide with antibiotic activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria

ABSTRACT

Peptide antibiotics are an abundant and synthetically tractable source of molecular diversity, but they are often cationic and can be cytotoxic, nephrotoxic and/or ototoxic, which has limited their clinical development. Here we report structure-guided optimization of an amphipathic peptide, arenicin-3, originally isolated from the marine lugworm Arenicola marina. The peptide induces bacterial membrane permeability and ATP release, with serial passaging resulting in a mutation in mlaC, a phospholipid transport gene. Structure-based design led to AA139, an antibiotic with broad-spectrum in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant bacteria, including ESBL, carbapenem- and colistin-resistant clinical isolates. The antibiotic induces a 3–4 log reduction in bacterial burden in mouse models of peritonitis, pneumonia and urinary tract infection. Cytotoxicity and haemolysis of the progenitor peptide is ameliorated with AA139, and the ‘no observable adverse effect level’ (NOAEL) dose in mice is ~10-fold greater than the dose generally required for efficacy in the infection models.

Introduction

The prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria is of grave concern1,2. Gram-negative bacteria possess efflux pumps, porins, and antibiotic-impermeable membranes, which together reduce drug concentrations in the cytoplasm, where most tractable targets are present. They have now evolved extensive resistance elements that cover all classical pathways targeted by current antibiotics: cell wall, folic acid, protein, RNA, and DNA synthesis. Although directly targeting and disrupting the bacterial membrane can potentially circumvent many of these resistance mechanisms, today only one class of such membrane-targeting antibiotics has been approved for treatment of drug-resistant Gram-negative infections: the structurally related lipopeptides colistin (polymyxin E) and polymyxin B. Unfortunately, these have a very narrow therapeutic index, with nephrotoxicity and other adverse off-target effects seen in humans even at the minimum doses needed to achieve efficacy3,4. Resistance to these ‘last resort’ antibiotics is increasingly common, with one mechanism recently found to be disseminated by a plasmid-mediated mcr-1 gene now found in multiple bacterial species over multiple geographies5,6. Antimicrobial peptides that also exert immunomodulatory effects are, in theory, an alternative to traditional antibiotics. For example, the defensins cathelicidin LL-37 and its murine ortholog mCRAMP weakly inhibit bacterial growth and viability in vitro, but modulate and coordinate innate immune responses with a much greater impact on bacterial burden and survival seen in vivo7,8. These and other peptides that affect immunomodulation to clear bacterial infections are extensively discussed in a recent review of alternatives to traditional antibiotics9.

‘Rules’ that define the physicochemical properties of small molecules that favor penetration and retention within the cytoplasm of Gram-negative bacteria were well summarized over a decade ago10. Cell penetrant Gram-negative antibiotics tend to be small (< 600 Da) and polar (low cLogD7.4)10. More recently, this analysis was extended to include compound globularity, positive charge, and structural rigidity11. We questioned whether similar guidelines could be developed for peptide antibiotics, for which there is a wealth of published in vitro activity, but little translation to pre-clinical models, toxicology, and clinical development12,13,14,15.

The antibiotic arenicin-3 was used as an exemplar to enhance for Gram-negative activity and in vivo efficacy with concomitant minimization of toxicity. Arenicins are small antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) isolated from the coelomocytes of marine polychaeta lugworm Arenicola marina16. Arenicin-3 is a more recently identified member of the arenicin family that contains two disulfide bonds forming a 21-residue amphipathic β-hairpin17. It exhibits potent and rapid antimicrobial activity in vitro against various MDR and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] of 1 μg mL−1 against Escherichia coli), but it is also cytotoxic and induces hemolysis of human erythrocytes. A close analog, NZ17074, has been reported to induce cell death through membrane interruption in Candida albicans18, and cause disruption of cell wall synthesis, and DNA/RNA damage, in both E. coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis19,20.

We show herein that structure-based design can be applied to antimicrobial peptides to minimize basicity while retaining membrane translocation properties, successfully generating a broad-spectrum antibiotic with efficacy in murine models of Gram-negative bacterial infection, accompanied by ameliorated toxicity and hemolysis compared to the progenitor.

Results

Structure-guided optimization of antibiotic specificity

We first determined the NMR solution structure of arenicin-3 (Fig. 1a, b; PDB5v0y; BMRB30259, Table 1). The peptide structure is stabilized by two rigid disulfide bridges Cys3-Cys20 and Cys7-Cys16, which link the two β-strands (Cys3-Asn10 and Arg13-Cys20) forming an anti-parallel β-sheet, connected by a type I′ β-turn (Asn11/Gly12). The pattern of nuclear Overhauser effect (nOE) interactions, variation from random coil values of the secondary chemical shift of carbon and hydrogen atoms (Fig. 1c), and the chemical shift indices (Supplementary Table 1) suggested the peptide adopted a slightly twisted β-hairpin configuration, with 4 hydrogen bonds evenly spaced (every second residue) further stabilizing the β-sheet pinned by the disulfide bonds (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 2). The distortion created by the right-handed twist of the two-stranded β-sheet allowed the molecule to adopt an amphipathic conformation15, where the hydrophobic side of the β-sheet was shielded from contact with a polar solvent, similar to other β-hairpin AMP structures such as tachyplesin-1 (PDB1wo0) and polyphemusin-1 (PDB 1rkk21).

Fig. 1: 3-Dimensional NMR solution structure of arenicin-3.
figure1

a Structure displayed in cartoon form showing the classic β-hairpin assembly created by anti-parallel β-sheets and two stabilizing disulfide bonds (yellow) across the sheet, key residues and the N and C terminus labeled for orientation. b Overlay of 20-lowest energy structures, aligned by backbone. c Secondary Hα shifts (variation from random coil). Structure deposited as PDB 5V0Y and BMRB 30259 and images created using PyMol. Structural refinement statistics are displayed in Table 1.

Table 1 NMR and refinement statistics for arenicin-3 solution structure.

With this structural data in hand, we then designed, synthesized, and characterized a series of arenicin-3 analogs and evaluated their activity, toxicity, and membrane selectivity. Firstly, we produced an alanine scan series by replacing individual residues independently with alanine. Secondly, we removed and/or mutated 1–4 residues at varying positions (Supplementary Data 1). In each case, no cysteine residues were mutated, in order to maintain the integrity of the peptide backbone and the secondary structure that is required for antimicrobial activity20. Finally, as peptides that interface with membranes can possess different tertiary and even secondary structures at the membrane interface compared to those in free solution, we also prepared an isotopically labeled peptide and solved the high-resolution structure on lipid bilayer membrane nanodiscs using NMR spectroscopy22. The membrane structure binding pose posited a lipophilic and hydrophilic face orientation with the long axis almost parallel to the membrane bilayer plane, and with C and N termini making stronger interactions with the membrane compared to the turn residues. This result helped to refine our amphiphilicity model, which suggested that changes in the β-turn region and the C and N termini proximal to the second disulfide bridge were the most likely to affect activity and cytotoxicity of the peptide.

Broad-spectrum antibiotic activity

The activity of the progenitor arenicin-3 and newly designed derivatives was initially assessed by broth microdilution (BMD) assays determining MICs against a panel of reference strains of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, and yeasts (Supplementary Data 2). A subset of active peptides showed 2- to 16-fold increased potency compared to arenicin-3 against the E. coli reference strain ATCC 25922 and the New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase-1 (NDM-1) producing strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae BAA-2146 (Table 2). Those derivatives were further tested against additional MDR and XDR Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, and yeasts (Supplementary Data 2 provides MICs, Supplementary Data 3 provides strain information). Although broad-spectrum potency was limited against both Gram-positive bacteria (AA139 MIC against Staphylococcus aureus of 32–64 μg mL−1 and MIC of 2 μg mL−1 against Bacillus subtilis and Listeria monocytogenes), and yeasts (AA139 MIC of 64 μg mL−1 against C. albicans and MIC of 1–4 μg mL−1 against Cryptococcus neoformans), AA139 possessed widespread Gram-negative activity with potency against MDR and XDR isolates, including those resistant to the last-resort antibiotics (MIC 2 μg mL−1 against a polymyxin-resistant (PmxR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolate, 0.5 μg mL−1 against an XDR/PmxR Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolate, 0.5–0.125 μg mL−1, against two mcr-1-positive E. coli clinical isolates). AA139 was more active than polymyxin B and colistin against a single PmxR K. pneumoniae isolate from Greece, but did display elevated MICs compared to its potent activity seen against the other PmxR species (i.e. colistin MIC of >64 μg mL−1, polymyxin B MIC of 32 μg mL−1, and AA139 MIC of 16 μg mL−1). The elevation in AA139 activity observed with this strain, but not other PmxR isolates, may be due to different mechanisms of resistance leading to PmxR across the tested species. AA139 and selected antibiotic comparators were then profiled against two large panels of clinical isolates (a US panel of 331 isolates from 2010 to 2012 and a worldwide panel of 445 isolates from 2011 to 2013) containing a wide selection of non-MDR, MDR, and XDR clinical isolates with multiple drug resistance mechanisms, such as ESBL (extended spectrum β-lactamase producing), IPM (imipenem)-resistant, and Carb (carbapenem)-resistant, Supplementary Table 3. In these population inhibitory studies MIC90 values for AA139 were 1.0 μg mL−1 (E. coli), 4.0 μg mL−1 (K. pneumoniae), 8.0 μg mL−1 (P. aeruginosa), and 2.0 μg mL−1 (A. baumannii) (Table 3). The results show that AA139 in vitro antimicrobial activity is independent of resistance phenotype (Table 3). MICs were also determined in agarose plates against the E. coli reference strain ATCC 25922, which were consistent with the BMD MICs. Among the peptides tested, AA139 (V8A, Y9R, V13A) showed broad potent activity against all tested Gram-negative strains, including MDR and XDR strains. The in vitro antibacterial activity of the arenicin-3 variants was further tested in the presence of human serum and lung surfactant against E. coli ATCC 25922 (Supplementary Table 4) and against a panel of clinical isolates (Supplementary Table 5), to evaluate the potential free-drug concentration expected in in vivo models. Across the series of arenicin-3 analogs an 8- to 16-fold loss of activity was seen in serum-induced reversal against E. coli (human serum 50% v/v), yet only 2- to 8-fold loss of activity was seen in the presence of lung surfactant (5% SURVANTA® v/v), with the exception of NZ17125 that displayed 64-fold reduced activity in both serum and lung surfactant. Mild cytotoxicity (CC50 ~110–300 μg mL−1) against HepG2 (hepatocellular carcinoma liver), HEK-293 (embryonic kidney), and HK-2 (kidney proximal tubule) human cell lines was observed for only 3 out of 10 compounds analyzed (Table 2). Of these, only NZ17125 (Y5R, V8A, Y9S, V13L) was found to show toxic effects against all three cell lines. The same peptide, along with arenicin-3, and NZ17126, also displayed mild hemolysis, with HC10 values (concentration at which 10% hemolysis is induced) in the range of 181–232 μg mL−1 (Table 2). Notably, AA139 was neither cytotoxic nor hemolytic at concentrations 250- to 300-fold higher than the MIC against NDM-1 K. pneumoniae and 2000- to 2400-fold higher than the MIC against E. coli ATCC 25922. To further evaluate the in vitro toxicity of AA139, it was tested against human primary hepatocytes (Source Data). The assay showed AA139 to have an IC50 of 130 μM (330 μg mL−1) following 24 h incubation, confirming the specificity of Gram-negative antibacterial activity over general cell toxicity, with 300-fold and 2400-fold higher IC50 over antibacterial activity against K. pneumoniae and E. coli, respectively.

Table 2 Arenicin-3 and its analogs assessed for in vitro antimicrobial activity and toxicity.
Table 3 AA139 assessed for antimicrobial activity against two clinical isolate panels.

Membrane binding and permeation

A previous report by Yang et al.20 showed specific binding of NZ17074 to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and molecular modeling suggested specific binding to the monophosphate group of lipid A via hydrogen bond formation. However, our data show that, unlike other membrane permeable antibiotics (such as polymyxins), the binding of arenicin-3 to the membrane was not dependent on lipid A. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) experiments were used to compare arenicin-3 and analogs for their binding affinities to 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC) lipids alone and DMPC combined with E. coli lipid A at a molar ratio of 9:1 (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 2). There was no significant difference between the propensity for arenicin-3 variants to bind to DMPC with lipid A over DMPC alone, in stark contrast to colistin and polymyxin B.

Fig. 2: Binding of arenicin-3 variants to lipids as monitored by SPR.
figure2

Comparison of the propensity of arenicin-3, AA139, NZ17143, NZ17211, and other membrane binding antimicrobials, colistin and polymyxin B, to bind to various model membrane lipid systems. DMPC (gray) is compared to DMPC with 10% E. coli lipid A (white) at 1 µM a and 10 µM b. Mean data of n = 3 per test group is plotted with error bars shown as SEM. Significant difference in binding affinities can be seen for colistin and polymyxin B between the two lipid systems; however, not for arenicin-3 variants. Statistical comparison performed with Prism 8 using Student’s t-test, all differences between means with p < 0.01 are indicated; ***p ≤ 0.001. RU response unit, MW molecular weight. Source data are provided as a source data file.

Permeabilization activity against membranes of E. coli was investigated using NPN (1-n-phenylnapthylamine) and DiSC3(5) uptake assays, which report bacterial outer membrane (OM) permeabilization23 and cytoplasmic membrane depolarization24, respectively. The fluorescence intensity of NPN markedly increased after adding arenicin-3 variants, like the positive control membrane permeating peptides melittin and polymyxin B (Supplementary Fig. 3a). In the DiSC3(5) assay, all arenicin-3 variants showed relatively weak ability to depolarize the cytoplasmic bacterial membrane (Supplementary Fig. 3b), as compared to melittin and polymyxin B, which were again used as positive controls. Finally, to determine whether the arenicin-3 variants permeabilize the cytoplasmic membrane, they were tested in combination with the SYTOXTM Green fluorescent probe. E. coli cells incubated with arenicin-3 variants and SYTOXTM Green were monitored by flow cytometry, showing cell permeabilization and ultimately cell death after 60 min of incubation (Supplementary Fig. 3c).

We further investigated bacterial membrane disruption using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Clear membrane disruption and cytoplasmic leakage was seen in P. aeruginosa after treatment with arenicin-3 variants, an effect also seen, albeit to a lesser extent, in E. coli (Supplementary Fig. 4). Mid-log phase E. coli and P. aeruginosa cultures were incubated with 32 µg mL−1 (>16-fold MIC) of arenicin-3 or NZ17143 for 40 min. Most E. coli cells were intact after arenicin-3 treatment; however, membrane debris was observed surrounding the cells (Supplementary Fig. 4b, c). Furthermore, mild membrane disruption and cytoplasmic leakage was observed following treatment of E. coli with NZ17143 (Supplementary Fig. 4d, e). More significant membrane disruption and cytoplasmic leakage was observed in P. aeruginosa (Supplementary Fig. 4g–j). These results suggest that membrane disruption may have a role in the antibacterial mode of action for arenicin-3 variants.

Arenicin-3 exposure affects ATP release from cells

ATP-efflux as measured by a luminescent microbial cell viability assay indicated rapid leakage of ATP after addition of arenicin-3 and AA139 to mid-phase cultures of E. coli K12 MG1655 as compared to piperacillin and colistin sulfate (Supplementary Fig. 5). Piperacillin and colistin induced approximately a third less ATP release in the first 10 min compared to arenicin-3 and AA139. By 30 min, arenicin-3 and AA139 displayed 4-fold more ATP release than piperacillin, and 2-fold more than colistin. At 60 min of incubation at the top three concentrations of 8-fold, 16-fold and 32-fold MIC, arenicin-3 showed ~93% and AA139 showed ~90% ATP release, colistin showed ~80% release of ATP, and piperacillin showed ~20% release of ATP. In addition, at 60 min arenicin-3 and AA139 only reached their maximum ATP release at 4-fold and 8-fold MIC, respectively, whereas at the same time point colistin reached its maximum ATP release at its MIC.

Low spontaneous and induced resistance in vitro

The propensity for AA139 treatment to induce spontaneous resistant mutants was evaluated by in vitro agar dilution. The spontaneous mutation frequencies in two strains each of K. pneumoniae (#3010 & ST258), P. aeruginosa (UNT138-1 & ATCC 27853), and E. coli (AID#172 & ATCC 25922) were determined under selection of 4× and 8× MIC of AA139 compared to the antibiotic colistin. The frequency of spontaneous mutants was ≤1.6 × 109 for AA139 against the six strains at 4-fold MIC, and ≤6.7 × 10−10 at 8-fold MIC. Subsequent testing of putative mutants showed that the MIC values for all selected organisms were within one 2-fold dilution of the parent strain (unexposed to AA139). In contrast, the colistin-treated groups resulted in a frequency of spontaneous mutants up to 75-fold higher in K. pneumoniae and E. coli (from 1.2 × 107 to 3.9 × 10−7 at 4-fold MIC), though rates of resistance in P. aeruginosa were similar (Supplementary Table 6).

Arenicin-3 and AA139 were then challenged over a 20 day serial passage BMD assay to determine the rate of potential resistance induction (Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 7). Two isolates, one drug susceptible and one MDR, of each of four species, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, and P. aeruginosa were treated over 20 serial passages in broth with either arenicin-3 or AA139. Following the 20 days of passages, a further 3 drug-free passages were conducted to assess stability of any induced resistance. Both arenicin-3 and AA139 showed the least induction of resistance against E. coli compared to the other species, with a non-stable increase in MIC of 16-fold and 8-fold for arenicin-3 and AA139 against E. coli ATCC 25922 on day 20, respectively. For E. coli, MDR/ESBL both peptides induced an 8-fold increase in MIC over 20 days, which reverted to 4-fold following the drug-free passage resulting in a final MIC of 1 μg mL−1. The most affected organism was K. pneumoniae with a stable increase in resistance following 20 passages plus 3 drug-free passages of 16- to 64-fold in the presence of the two peptides.

Fig. 3: Serial passage resistance induction of AA139 against susceptible and MDR Gram-negative bacteria.
figure3

MIC values for AA139 before and after each of 20 passages (1 passage per 24 h, n = 1) treated with 0.5× MIC μg mL−1 (of previous passage). Bacteria that grew at the highest concentration of AA139 on the final passage were passaged a further 3 times on drug-free agar plates before determining the final MIC by BMD (“Post”, gray shading). Tabulated MIC values for AA139 and arenicin-3 are presented in Supplementary Table 7. Strains used in this study are detailed by (#) in Supplementary Data 3.

Finally, AA139 was challenged against a highly diverse Gram-negative panel of over 330 isolates with varying susceptibility and resistance mechanism profiles (Supplementary Table 3) in BMD in vitro assays. No cross-resistance was identified between AA139 and the last-resort antibiotic colistin (Supplementary Fig. 6). In particular, against the colistin-resistant isolates the MIC of AA139 did not surpass 0.5 μg mL−1 for E. coli with a colistin MIC of 4 to 16 μg mL−1, 2 μg mL−1 for A. baumannii with a colistin MIC of 8–≥32 μg mL−1, 8 μg mL−1 for P. aeruginosa with a colistin MIC of >32 μg mL−1, and 4 μg mL−1 for all but two K. pneumoniae isolates with a colistin MIC of 8–≥32 μg mL−1.

Targeting phospholipid transportation

To investigate the genetics underlying adaptation of bacteria to arenicin exposure, we performed transposon directed insertion sequencing (TraDIS) analysis on a uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) strain. A random Tn5 mutant library of ST131 UPEC strain NCTC 13441, containing ~380,000 unique insertions25, was grown in duplicate overnight with, and without, a sub-inhibitory concentration of arenicin-3 (0.25× MIC). TraDIS analysis of the relative mutant abundance of the UPEC treated with arenicin-3, compared to the untreated control, revealed that the mlaA-F operon had the most significantly increased mutant population compared to any other genes (increased insertions of log2fold change of 4.95-5.3), indicating increased mla mutant fitness in the presence of arenicin-3 (Fig. 4, Supplementary Data 4). The mla operon regulates the expression of phospholipid transport system mlaABCDEF, which stabilizes and restores the integrity of the membrane26,27. This suggests that arenicin-3 may cause pressure on the mla operon and therefore dysregulates the UPEC phospholipid transport pathways. We speculate that this pressure is either evidence of the bacteria attempting to overcome the lipid asymmetry caused by arenicin-3 disruption or possibly that the mla genes are a direct target of arenicin-3 in UPEC, and by removing mla-encoded gene products, cell fitness in the presence of arenicin-3 could increase. Genes involved in adaptation to arenicin-3 selection (with decreased insertions in the treated sample) from the TraDIS analysis included outer membrane proteins slyB and yfgB (Fig. 4), which are involved in maintaining membrane integrity and symmetry (supporting the posited primary mode of action on the membrane), as well as more general first line antibiotic resistance genes, such as efflux pump genes macAB and tolC that displayed decreased insertions. In support of the TraDIS data suggesting the mla operon is a target during arenicin-3 treatment, we performed whole-genome sequencing of the previously mentioned 20 day serial passage of the E. coli ATCC 25922 isolate in the presence of arenicin-3, and found a single point mutation in the mlaC gene (T33G; L11R, Supplementary Fig. 7).

Fig. 4: TraDIS reads representing transposon insertions across the mla operon (B-F), slyB and yfgB in UPEC.
figure4

The arenicin-3-treated library is represented by the bottom two rows and the controls with LB only, the top two rows. Insertion positions of Tn5 mutations at each bp are represented by vertical lines, the depth represented by the height of the line and the direction of insertion, the color (forward and reverse are red and blue, respectively) across the entire mla operon. Note, mlaA is not shown here as it is located separately but also displayed the same pattern of insertions.

In vivo profile of AA139

The in vitro activity spectrum of action, low cytotoxicity, and retention of some activity in the presence of serum and surfactant suggested that the optimized peptide AA139 could be a lead candidate suitable for testing in models of MDR Gram-negative infections. We therefore evaluated the in vivo efficacy of AA139 against E. coli AID#172 MDR clinical isolate (AA139 MIC = 0.25 μg mL−1, resistant to ampicillin, ceftazidime, aztreonam, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin), using a single intravenous (i.v.) dose (0.06–7.5 mg kg−1) in a neutropenic murine peritonitis model (Supplementary Fig. 8a, b). Neutropenic mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with ~106 CFU of E. coli, with compound administered 1 h post infection, and colony counts in peritoneal fluid and blood determined after killing 5 h later. The ED50 was 1.85 mg kg−1 in peritoneal fluid and 1.55 mg kg−1 in blood at 5 h post treatment. Significant reduction in bacterial load (colony-forming units, CFU) was seen with a single dose at 3.75 mg kg−1, leading to a ~3-log reduction in peritoneal fluid and ~4-log reduction in blood, when compared to the vehicle treatment group (Fig. 5a). In the same model, meropenem treatment (40 mg kg−1, meropenem MIC = 0.125 μg mL−1) resulted in a slight reduction of the CFU levels both in peritoneal fluid and blood compared to vehicle treatment, but this reduction was not statistically significant. The ED50 was also determined for the same isolate in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model (Supplementary Fig. 8c), with two intravenous doses of AA139 administered 6 h apart (0.6–15 mg kg−1), with 5 mg kg−1 polymyxin B as a positive control. Neutropenic mice were inoculated in the thigh with 0.05 mL of ~1–5 × 107 CFU mL−1 of E. coli, with compound administered 1 and 7 h post infection, and colony counts in thighs determined after killing 24 h post first treatment. The ED50 was 3-fold higher 4.8 mg kg−1. AA139 at 10 mg kg−1 (3.61 log reduction compared to saline control) was equivalent to polymyxin B at 5 mg kg−1 (3.13 log reduction) and a 5 mg kg−1 dose of AA139 was not statistically different (1.94 log reduction), despite a 4-fold higher MIC (AA139 = 0.125 μg mL−1, polymyxin B = 0.03 μg mL−1).

Fig. 5: In vivo peritonitis, pneumonia and UTI murine models for AA139.
figure5

a Peritonitis model dosed at 3.75 mg kg−1 against MDR E. coli AID#172 (inoculated in the lateral lower quadrant of the abdomen by single I.V dose) with CFU mL−1 measured in the peritoneal fluid (PF) and the blood after 5 h post infection (n = 4 for start of treatment groups and n = 3 for other groups). b P. aeruginosa pneumonia model treated with aerosolized AA139 for 10, 20, or 30 min duration in an aerosol exposure chamber at 2, 12, and 24 h post infection. The bacterial load (CFU g−1 lung tissue) was measured at 34 h post infection (n = 4 for start of treatment group, n = 7 for AA139 30 min treatment group and n = 8 for other groups). c Bacterial load (CFU mL−1) in the urine of UTI murine model infected with ESBL producing E. coli DSA 443 before treatment (day 1), and bacterial load (CFU mL−1) in the urine, bladder, and kidney after last treatment (day 3). Animals were treated twice-daily with AA139 at 5 mg kg−1 or meropenem at 40 mg kg−1 i.v. (n = 12). Horizontal bar indicates geometric mean burden of each treatment. Statistical comparison performed with Prism 8 using one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, and all differences between means with p ≤ 0.05 are indicated: ***p ≤ 0.001; ****p ≤ 0.0001. Source data are provided as a source data file.

The efficacy of aerosolized AA139 was tested against P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) in a pneumonia model. Infected mice were treated with aerosolized AA139 (MIC = 1.0 μg mL−1) or tobramycin (MIC = 0.5–2.0 μg mL−1) in an aerosol exposure chamber for different durations at 2, 12, and 24 h post infection. Exposure to nebulized AA139 at 30 mg mL−1 for 30 min resulted in a substantial reduction of P. aeruginosa burden in the lung (6.6-log CFU per gram) when compared with vehicle-treated mice. In addition, in this group 6 of the 7 animals cleared the infection to below the limit of detection (<374 CFU per gram, see methods) of the assay (Fig. 5b). Mice were treated with 7.5 and 15 mg mL−1 of AA139 for 10-min exposure, and 30 mg mL−1 of AA139 for 10, 20, and 30 min. A statistically significant reduction in P. aeruginosa burden was observed in the lungs of all groups treated except the lowest dose, and an increased clearance of bacterial burden was observed as the exposure time was lengthened in the mice exposed to 30 mg mL−1 of AA139 (Fig. 5b). A limitation of the experimental setup was that the exact delivered dose could not be determined; however, the results show that AA139 remains active and effective after nebulization and inhalation.

AA139 was also tested against an ESBL producing E. coli DSA 443 strain (AA139 MIC = 0.5 μg mL−1), in a urinary tract infection (UTI) model. Following infection of the bladder, mice were dosed twice-daily i.v. for 2 days with AA139 at 5 mg kg−1 or meropenem at 40 mg kg−1, assessing the bacterial burden on day 3 in the urine, bladder and kidneys (Fig. 5c). A significant decrease in infection was observed in the AA139-treated group, with reduction in CFU equivalent to that caused by an 8-fold higher dosage of meropenem (MIC = 0.032 μg mL−1). Arenicin-3 and analogs NZ17143 (MIC = 0.5 μg mL−1) and NZ17211 (MIC = 2.0 μg mL−1) were also tested for efficacy in the UTI model and showed similar promising efficacy at 0.8–12.5 mg kg−1. NZ17211 was the most efficacious of the three tested compounds at the lowest dose of 0.8 mg kg−1, showing the greatest bacterial burden reductions in urine and bladder (Supplementary Fig. 9).

We then investigated the i.v. pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of AA139 in mice, cynomolgus monkeys, and minipigs. AA139 showed rapid and widespread distribution beyond the central compartment, bi-exponential elimination with a half-life of ~2 to 4 h, and moderate clearance consistent with ~20% the rate of liver blood flow, or similar to the glomerular filtration rate, suggesting primarily renal clearance (Supplementary Table 8). Following a 2 h constant i.v. infusion of 10 mg kg−1 to the mouse, cynomolgus monkey or minipig, the extent of plasma AA139 exposure varied between species, yet the shape of the plasma concentration versus time curve remained consistent across species (Fig. 6). In contrast, the PK profile of inhaled AA139 exhibited high concentrations of AA139 in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and lung tissue of mice, whereas systemic absorption following inhalation administration appeared to be minimal, resulting in very low concentrations in the plasma (Supplementary Table 9) when compared to ELF or lung tissue. Systemic exposure to inhaled AA139 increased in a greater than dose-proportional manner between target doses 5 and 20 mg kg−1 per day on both days 1 and 7. Following 7 days of once-daily aerosol administration to mice, AA139 concentrations in ELF were persistent for up to 24 h post-dose, suggesting the potential for once-daily administration in a clinical setting.

Fig. 6: The pharmacokinetic profile across species of systemically administered AA139.
figure6

Plasma or serum AA139 concentration in mouse, monkey and minipig over time after the initiation of a 10 mg kg−1 dose (i.v. continuous infusion over 2 h, or i.v. single bolus injection). Mean values with error bars shown as SEM (mouse i.v. infusion n = 6, mouse i.v. bolus n = 3, monkey n = 2, minipig n = 2; male and female combined for all species) are plotted using Prism 8. Source data are provided as a source data file.

AA139 toxicity was evaluated following i.v. administration in single and repeated dose studies in mice, cynomolgus monkeys and minipigs, as well as inhalation administration in mice. In general, the dose-limiting toxicity of systemically administered AA139 appeared related to excessive pharmacological dose, presenting with clinical signs of lethargy, decreased locomotion, swelling at extremities, tremors, and twitching (Supplementary Data 5). Target organ toxicity at high exposure appeared to be limited to the kidney with tubular nephropathy present in the minipig at 20, 25, or 30 mg kg−1 per day of AA139 by 2 h i.v. infusion for 7 days, with a dose-related increase in severity. Other tissues were macroscopically and microscopically unremarkable. Both clinical signs and histopathological changes were generally dose-related. In 7-day or 14-day repeated administration of a 2 h i.v. infusion once or twice daily, the no observable adverse effect level (NOAEL) in mice was 20 mg kg−1 per day (ca. 10-fold the dose generally required for efficacy in murine infection models), whereas in monkeys the NOAEL was 15 mg kg−1 per day when given i.v. over 2 h QD or BID. When given via aerosol inhalation over 7 days, the NOAEL in mice was 20 mg kg−1 per day.

Discussion

We have shown that improved peptide antibiotic analogs can be developed by following a rational design approach accounting for lipophilicity, charge and amphipathicity12,28,29,30. Detailed structure–activity and structure–toxicity relationship analysis of the progenitor antibiotic arenicin-3 suggested that: (i) lipophilicity is a key contributor to the cytotoxicity of the peptide; (ii) swapping Tyr5, Val6 Val13, and Val15 with more lipophilic residues, and swapping Val8, Tyr9, and Tyr17 with more hydrophilic residues reduced cytotoxicity, while retaining antibacterial activity; (iii) replacing or deleting Arg18 and Arg19 significantly reduced antibacterial activity; (iv) substituting aromatic residues (Phe2, Trp4, Tyr5, Tyr9, and Tyr17), and to a lesser extent aliphatic residues (Val6, Val8, Val13, and Val15) with Ala was beneficial for antibacterial activity, and finally; (v) substituting Tyr17 with His decreased cytotoxicity. This analysis, combined with the membrane models and NMR solution structures, led to peptide AA139 (H-GFCWYVCARRNGARVCYRRCN-OH; changes vs. arenicin-3 in bold; V8A, Y9R, V13A) as a promising lead.

The new variants retained potent activity against a range of MDR and XDR clinical isolates, including those resistant to the last-resort polymyxin antibiotics, and were effective against the high priority pathogens E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa (full list of strains in Supplementary Data 3). In particular, AA139 displayed promising efficacy in several pathogenic Gram-negative infection in vivo models and decreased mammalian toxicity compared to the native arenicin-3. Mode of action investigations showed that arenicin activity was consistent with bacterial membrane binding and disruption of membrane integrity. TraDIS analysis and genetic analysis of forced induction of resistance isolates suggested the mla operon, which maintains outer membrane asymmetry via retrograde phospholipid transport, could be associated with arenicin’s mechanism of action in E. coli. TraDIS showed that mlaA-F mutants were fitter than wild-type E. coli during arenicin-3 selection, suggesting that by removing any part of this phospholipid transport system, arenicin-3 cannot act as efficiently. Resistance induction experiments resulted in a SNP in mlaC, supporting the hypothesis that arenicin-3 places pressure on this phospholipid transport gene. The mla operon has been recently proposed to traffic phospholipids from the inner to outer membrane31, which is also consistent with our hypothesis that arenicin-3 directly interacts with phospholipids in the outer membrane as the first step of its mechanism of action and interferes with membrane homeostasis.

Eukaryotic membranes are less negatively charged than prokaryotic membranes due to a more neutral lipid composition and internalization of the electrostatic membrane potential within cytosolic mitochondria. The orthogonal hydrophobic and hydrophilic barrier membranes of Gram-negative bacteria necessitate consideration of subtle differences in phospholipid head group regions in order to effect membrane perturbation and translocation in prokaryotes, but not human cells. We show that a structure-selectivity model based on amphipathicity and overall charge can be used to derive a bacteria-selective peptide antibiotic that is active against recalcitrant MDR and XDR Gram-negative bacteria, with reasonable pharmacokinetic properties and efficacy in vivo. However, derivation of new peptide drugs with appropriate safety margins in animals required for progression to clinical trials is still a challenge.

Methods

Peptide synthesis

Arenicin-3 and peptide analogs were manufactured using solid phase peptide synthesis by PolyPeptide Group (Strasbourg, France, and Limhamn, Sweden), on behalf of Adenium Biotech ApS. The physiochemical properties of the peptides were calculated using the ExPASy ProtParam tool32.

NMR solution structure

Arenicin-3 was analyzed at 3.5 mM in 20 mM pH 3.3 phosphate buffer containing 10% D2O. All NMR experiments were performed on a Bruker Avance III spectrometer equipped with a cryogenically cooled triple resonance probe operating at a nominal 1H frequency of 700 MHz. An excitation sculpting sequence was used to suppress the solvent (H2O) resonance. Two-dimensional TOCSY [tm (MLEV17 spin-lock mixing pulses) = 80 ms], NOESY [tm (mixing time) = 300 ms], 15N-HSQC, and 13C-HSQC were recorded at 25 °C. Chemical shifts were directly or indirectly referenced to the 2,2-dimethylsilapentane-5-sulfonic acid (DSS) signal at 0 ppm. The assignment of proton resonances was carried out using TOCSY and NOESY data using the CCPNMR software33. The torsion angles constraints were obtained using Talos program34. Structure calculations were performed using CYANA 3.035. Additional upper/lower restraints were applied to form disulfide bonds between Cys3-Cys20 and Cys7-Cys16. All NMR spectra for the hydrogen-deuterium exchange studies were recorded on the spectrometer described above at 25 °C. Spectra were referenced to DSS at 0 ppm. The peptide was re-lyophilized and dissolved in 100% D2O and immediately placed in the spectrometer for measurement. 1D 1H and 2D TOCSY spectra were recorded at specific time points over a 24 h period. Hydrogen-deuterium exchange rates were measured by integrating each exchangeable amide resonance separately. The temperature dependence of amide proton resonances was derived from 1D and TOCSY spectra recorded on a Bruker ARX 500 MHz spectrometer. Spectra were measured between 15 and 35 °C, in 5 °C increments, and referenced to DSS at 0 ppm. Assignment of the spectra was performed using the program CCPNMR. The NMR solution structure of arenicin-3 is deposited with the Protein Data Bank under accession number PDB5V0Y and with the Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank as accession number BMRB30259.

Determination of antimicrobial activity

Antimicrobial activity of arenicin-3 and its analogs was tested against a panel of bacterial and yeast strains by in vitro broth microdilution (BMD) assay with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination. Strains were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) or obtained from clinical collaborators (full strain profiles provided in Supplementary Data 3). All peptides were prepared in Ringer’s acetate solution, and subsequently diluted fresh in water for each independent assay.

MICs were determined using in vitro BMD assays in 96-well non-binding surface polystyrene plates (NBS; Corning Cat # 3641), with the MIC being recorded as the lowest concentration of peptide in the assay wells that showed no visible bacterial growth. Assays were performed in Mueller Hinton broth (MHB; BD, Cat. No. 211443) for bacteria, and yeast extract-peptone dextrose (YPD; Sigma-Aldrich, Y1500) for yeast. The concentrations of the peptides and comparator antibiotics/antifungals in the assay wells ranged from either 128 or 64 μg mL−1, to 0.06 or 0.03 μg mL−1 as a 12-point dose response plated as a 2-fold dilution series across the wells of the plate in duplicate for each independent biological replicate, using a final cell density of 5 × 105 CFU mL−1 and 2.5 × 103 CFU mL−1 for bacteria and yeast respectively. Final assay volumes were 100 μL per well with MICs determined visually following 18-20 h incubation at 37 °C for bacteria, 24 h incubation at 35 °C for Candida albicans, and 24 h incubation at 35 °C with resazurin addition (0.006%; Sigma-Aldrich, Cat # R7017) for a further 3 h for Cryptococcus neoformans, without shaking. Additional bacterial and yeast susceptibility assays were performed in Cation-Adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (CAMHB; BD, Cat No. 212322) and Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 culture medium (Life Technologies Australia, Cat No. 21870092), respectively, as recommended by CLSI guidelines (M07 11th ed36 and M27 4th ed37). CAMHB bacterial MICs did not significantly differ to those conducted in MHB, and Yeast MICs in RPMI did not differ to those conducted in YPD (maximum of 4-fold variation, which is acceptable within the error of the assay, data presented in Supplementary Data 2). However, for yeast it was determined that the YPD media was more reliable and robust between repeats and therefore MICs in this media are reported. Human serum and lung surfactant effects were determined using MIC BMD as described above against bacteria with either the addition of 50% (v/v) human serum (human male AB plasma, Sigma-Aldrich Cat # H4522) or 5% (v/v) lung surfactant (SURVANTA®, Abbvie Pty Ltd, Cat # 1039.008) into the growth media38. Agarose MICs were determined in MHB with 1% agarose (Bioline molecular grade; Cat no: BIO-41025; high purity, high gel strength). All experiments were performed a minimum of six replicates (n ≥ 6).

In vitro activity profiling and cross-resistance assessment

The in vitro activity of AA139 and comparator antimicrobials was determined in two panels of clinical isolates of E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii (Supplementary Table 3), and MIC90 presented. The US panel consisted of 331 clinical isolates from 2010 to 2012. It was tested by BMD in accordance with the CLSI guidelines (M07-A9, 2012)39. The comparator drugs were ceftazidime, tigecycline, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, colistin (ThermoFisher Scientific), and gentamicin (Sigma-Aldrich). AA139 was diluted in 0.01% acetic acid/0.1% bovine serum albumin. Sterile polypropylene culture cluster round-bottom 96-well plates (Costar # 3879) were used for testing. The worldwide panel consisted of 445 clinical isolates from 2011 to 2013, geographically divided into Asia, Europe, North America, and Rest of World (Middle East, Latin America, Africa, and South Pacific) with each region representing ~25% of the isolates. It was tested by broth microdilution in accordance with the CLSI guidelines (M07-A9, 2012)39. The comparator antimicrobials were polymyxin B sulfate, meropenem, gentamicin, ceftazidime (USP), and levofloxacin (Sigma-Aldrich). The test media was CAMHB (Becton Dickinson). AA139 and polymyxin B were tested in media supplemented with 0.002% Tween 80 (Calbiochem). MIC90 values were calculated for all or subsets of the isolates. MIC correlation between AA139 and colistin was analyzed with data from the US panel.

Cytotoxicity and hemolysis assays

HEK-293 human embryonic kidney cells (ATCC CRL-1573), HepG2 liver hepatocellular carcinoma cells (ATCC HB-8065), and HK-2 human kidney proximal tubule cells (ATCC CRL-2190) cell lines were purchased from ATCC. Cytotoxicity of arenicin-3 variants was determined using the Alamar Blue (resazurin; Sigma-Aldrich, Cat # R7017), with 1% FBS for HK-2 and 10% FBS for HEK-293, and HepG240. Cells were seeded as 2000 cells per well in black wall clear bottom 384-well plates (Corning®, Costar®, Cat # 3712). The cells were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Then peptides were added into each cell containing well. After 24 h incubation, 5 μM resazurin were added per well and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Then the fluorescence intensity (FI) was read using a Polarstar® Omega plate reader with excitation/emission 560/590 and CC50 values were determined using Prism 8 following curve fitting and applying the following equation:

$${\mathrm{Percentage}}\,{\mathrm{viability = (FI}}_{{\mathrm{TEST}}}{\mathrm{ - FI}}_{{\mathrm{Negative}}}{\mathrm{/FI}}_{{\mathrm{UNTREATED}}}{\mathrm{ - FI}}_{{\mathrm{Negative}}}{\mathrm{)}} \times {\mathrm{100}}{\mathrm{.}}$$

Hemolytic activity was measured against isolated human erythrocytes from anonymously donated fresh human blood15. Isolated erythrocytes were adjusted to 1 × 109 blood cells mL−1 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4), added to the wells of NUNC polypropylene round-bottom 96-well plates (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat # P6866) then up to 300 μg mL−1 of compound was added per well and incubated for 3 h at 37 °C. Following incubation, samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 20 min, and the supernatants, 100 μL, were carefully collected for measurement. The degree of hemolysis in the samples was determined by measurement of the absorption of the supernatants at 540 nm using the Polarstar-Omega plate reader. 1% Triton-X100 was used as positive control for inducing 100% hemolysis. HC10 and HC50 values were determined using Prism 8 following curve fitting. The use of human blood (sourced from the Australian Red Cross Blood Service) for hemolysis assays was approved by the University of Queensland Institutional Human Research Ethics Committee, Approval Number 2014000031. All in vitro toxicity assays were performed for two independent biological replicates as an 8-point dose response of 3-fold dilution series in triplicate with the highest test concentration of 300 μg mL−1.

ADME-Tox; in vitro toxicity

Cell viability of human primary hepatocytes against AA139 was assessed by fluorometric readout of Alamar Blue following 24 h incubation at 37 °C of human plateable cryopreserved hepatocytes and AA139 as an 8-point dose response, 0.1–300 μM, as described by Nociari et al.41. Cell viability was calculated as a percentage of the control cells and plotted versus concentration using Prism 8 Software. The IC50 value was determined by non-linear regression analysis of the concentration–response curve using the Hill equation. Assay was performed by Eurofins Pharma Discovery Services (Panlabs), St Charles, MO, USA, study number 100049990. Source data are provided as a source data file.

Surface plasmon resonance

SPR experiments were performed on a Biacore T200 using an L1 sensor chip as previously described42. Small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) were prepared in PBS by sonication and extrusion. Lipids were dissolved in ethanol-free chloroform in 25 mL round-bottom flasks. 10% (mol/mol) of E. coli lipid A, diphosphoryl (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat # L5399) was added into 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC) (Auspep, Cat # 850345P) solution to make lipid A–DMPC mixtures, which were then deposited as a thin film by removal of the solvent (chloroform) under reduced pressure on a rotary evaporator and dried under high vacuum for at least 2 h. PBS was then added into each flask to give a 1 mM (DMPC) suspension, which was sonicated 5 min for five times. The suspension was passed 17 times through a 50 nm polycarbonate filter in an Avestin Lipofast Basic extrusion apparatus to give a translucent solution of vesicles, which should possess a mean diameter of 50 nm. The SUVs were then injected into the flow cells of the L1 sensor chip for 2000 s at a low flow rate of 2 μL min−1 to form a bilayer membrane model on the chip surface. Then, a series of peptide solutions (30–0.33 μM in 3-fold dilution), was injected across the flow cells at a flow rate of 30 μL min−1, having an injection phase of 180 s, and a dissociation phase of 300 s. The binding responses (RU) were normalized by molecular weight (MW) of each peptide. The equation 100 × RU/MW was used for normalization. The relative affinities were compared by selecting a reporting time point toward the end of the peptide-to-lipid association phase (t = 180 s).

Membrane perturbation assays

For the investigation of outer membrane permeability, 1-N-phenylnaphthylamine (NPN) uptake assay was performed43,44. NPN is an uncharged, hydrophobic fluorescent probe that has very weak fluorescence in an aqueous environment. However, it shows strong fluorescence in a hydrophobic interior of a membrane. Upon outer membrane disruption, NPN is able to reach the hydrophobic environment of the membrane, emitting bright fluorescence. NPN was added to 2 × 106 E. coli ATCC 25922 cells mL−1 (final NPN concentration of 20 μM) and incubated for 15 min with varying concentrations (64–0.015 μg mL−1) of lipopeptides with the fluorescence emission intensity recorded (λexc = 340 nm, λem = 405 nm) using a Polarstar-Omega (BMG) spectrophotometer to evaluate NPN uptake by the bacterial cells.

The 3,3′-dipropylthiadicarbocyanine iodide (DiSC3(5)) assay45 was employed to investigate cytoplasmic membrane depolarization. DiSC3(5) accumulates in cells on hyperpolarized membranes, and its fluorescence is self–quenched. When the membranes lose potential, the dye is released and emits fluorescence. Mid-log phase (OD ~ 0.6) E. coli ATCC 25922 cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 5 mM HEPES, 20 mM glucose, pH 7.4. The uptake and self-quench of DiSC3(5) dye into bacterial cells was monitored for 30 min. Then compounds in a concentration series were added and the fluorescence intensity (λexc = 620 nm, λem = 670 nm) was measured using a Polarstar-Omega (BMG) spectrophotometer.

Inner membrane permeability was measured using SYTOXTM Green (Invitrogen/Life Technologies, S7020) uptake assay46. SYTOXTM Green is a DNA binding dye that is fluorescent when bound to nucleic acids and only enters cells with compromised plasma membranes. Firstly, suspensions of 1 × 107 E. coli ATCC 25922 cells mL−1 were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with compounds at varying concentrations. Then SYTOXTM Green was added at 2 μM to the compound-treated E. coli cells for 5 min at room temperature. Cells were compared for their fluorescence emission profiles by flow cytometry performed with a BD FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences; λexc = 488 nm, λem = 530 nm) with 30 nm bandpass.

Electron microscopy

Mid-log phase bacteria (E. coli ATCC 25922 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853) grown in LB broth were adjusted to a density of 5 × 108 CFU mL−1. Arenicin-3 variants were added to bacterial suspension at a final concentration of 32 μg mL−1 and incubated for 40 min at 37 °C under constant shaking. Bacteria were then centrifuged and frozen using a Leica EM PACT2 high pressure freezer. Frozen samples were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde using a Leica EM AFS2 freeze substitution processor. Subsequently, the samples were embedded in EPON epoxy-resin and polymerized at 60 °C overnight. Ultrathin-sectioning (80–100 nm) was performed with a diamond knife, using a Leica ultra-cut microtome. The slices were placed on a copper grid (400 squares). Pictures were taken with a JEOL 1011 TEM.

Measure of ATP release

E. coli K12 MG1655 (ATCC 700926) cells (5 × 105 CFU mL−1 mid-log phase in CAMHB) were exposed to various MIC-folds (MIC and 1/4×, 1/2×, 2×, 4×, 8×, 16×, 32× MIC) of arenicin-3 (MIC 0.25 μg mL−1), AA139 (MIC 0.125 μg mL−1), piperacillin sodium salt (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat # P8396; MIC 2 μg mL−1), and colistin sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat # C4461; MIC 0.03 μg mL−1). ATP was measured using the BacTiter-GloTM Microbial Cell Viability Assay (Promega) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The assay was performed for three biological replicates at 37 °C, with luminescence recorded using a Tecan Infinite M1000 Pro plate reader. The fold reduction of ATP was calculated as: Fold reduction ATP = 1 − (Ltreat − Lmedia/Lcontrol − Lmedia); where Ltreat is the luminescence of treated cells, Lmedia is the luminescence of CAMHB without cells, and Lcontrol is the luminescence of untreated cells. Resultant graphs show mean (n = 7) and std error for each data point, prepared in Prism 8. DMSO was included as a control as piperacillin was solubilized in DMSO, with final assay concentration of 2.5%.

Spontaneous frequency of resistance

The spontaneous mutation frequencies in two strains each of K. pneumoniae (#3010 & ST258), P. aeruginosa (UNT138-1 & ATCC 27853) and E. coli (AID#172 & ATCC 25922) were determined under selection of 4× and 8× MIC of AA139 and colistin sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich). The test media was cation-adjusted MHB (CAMHB, Becton Dickinson) supplemented with 2% Noble Agar (Becton Dickinson) and additionally for AA139 with 0.1% BSA. The agar dilution MIC values were determined as recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)47. Bacterial strains were tested against AA139 and colistin at 4× and 8× MIC as determined by agar dilution testing. The inoculum for the spontaneous mutation plates targeted 109 to 1010 colony-forming units (CFU) per plate. The viable count of each suspension was determined by plating serial ten-fold dilutions onto MHB/NA in duplicate. In addition, agar plates without drug were inoculated as positive controls. Plates were inspected for growth at both 24 and 48 h. Colony counts were determined manually. Using the counts at 48 h, the spontaneous mutation frequency was calculated using the following equation: (average number of colonies from duplicate selection plates)/(total number of cells inoculated onto each plate). If there were no colonies on the antibiotic selection plates, the spontaneous mutation frequency was reported as less than the frequency observed with one colony to indicate that the spontaneous mutation frequency was less than the limit of detection (one CFU).

Serial passage resistance induction studies

Assay performed by Eurofins Inc., Virginia USA. Serial passage MICs were performed in microtiter panels prepared by Eurofins according to SOP 1-P-PR-PRO-9002355. From inoculated microtiter panels, an aliquot of the well with the highest concentration permitting growth was taken and back diluted in fresh media to a turbidity of a 0.5 McFarland standard. This suspension was then further diluted and used to inoculate a fresh MIC panel resulting in a final concentration of 1.5 × 106 CFU mL−1. Panels were incubated according to CLSI guidelines (M07-A9)36, MICs were recorded and the next inoculum was prepared from the well containing the highest concentration of drug that allowed growth in identical fashion as described above. Twenty repeat passages were performed. Subsequently, stability studies were performed by taking bacteria that grew at the highest concentration of drug on the final passage, passing them three (3) times on drug-free agar plates, and then evaluating the broth microdilution MIC by CLSI methods as described above. With each daily panel inoculation, purity blood agar plates were also inoculated and read to check for contamination and appropriate concentration of inoculum. All experiments were performed as outlined in Eurofins SOP 1-P-PR-PRO-9002386. MICs of evaluated agents were within CLSI QC range48 for evaluated ATCC organisms as applicable (at baseline).

Genetic analysis of serial passage isolates

E. coli strains (ATCC 25922 parent strain, 20 day serial passage isolate, 20 day +3 day drug-free passage) were incubated in MHB overnight at 37 °C. Genomic DNA was purified from 3 mL of pelleted cells using the Powersoil DNA isolation kit (MO BIO, Carlsbad, CA). Indexed whole-genome sequencing libraries were prepared with the Nextera XT DNA sample preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Pooled libraries were submitted to the Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics (University of Queensland, QLD, Australia) for sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Raw data was de novo assembled using SPAdes v3.10.149 and annotated via the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST)50. RAST enabled the extraction of the protein sequence for MlaC (ABC transporter substrate-binding protein) and identified the L11R amino acid change (nucleotide change: T32G) in day 20 and 20 + 3 isolates. This sequence was further queried on the UniProt database51, which revealed this modification in the signal peptide domain is unique to these isolates. Sequences were submitted to NCBI as Bioproject PRJNA511334.

TraDIS libraries, sequencing, and analysis

Bacterial cells were transformed with a Tn5 transposon flanking a chloramphenicol selectable marker52. A random Tn5 mutant library of ST131 UPEC strain NCTC 13441, containing ~380,000 unique insertions25, was grown in duplicate overnight with, and without a sub-inhibitory concentration of arenicin-3 (0.25× MIC). Sequencing was performed on a HiSeq 2500 Illumina platform and ~2 million single-end reads per sample were generated, and deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under study PRJEB3226. These were then mapped and analyzed for differences in mutant abundance using the Bio-Tradis pipeline53 with default settings using minimum read count of 20 and 10% of 3′ sequence trimmed, against ENA reference sequence ERS530440.

In vivo pharmacology models

Peritonitis and UTI murine models were performed at the Department of Microbiology & Infection Control, Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark, under approval by the National Committee of Animal Ethics, Denmark, and adhered to the standards of EU Directive 2010/63/EU. The mouse pneumonia model was performed by Evotec Ltd, United Kingdom, under UK Home Office Licenses and with local ethical committee clearance. All animal studies were contracted by Adenium Biotech ApS. Mice were housed in polysulfone cages with an acclimatization period of 7 days prior to experiments with air temperature maintained at 22 °C with 55% humidity and light–dark cycles of 12 h light.

Peptides were prepared in Ringer’s acetate pH 6.0 (vehicle) at 34 mg mL−1. Comparator antibiotics included meropenem (Meronem®, AstraZeneca), polymyxin B sulfate (Sigma) and tobramycin (Novartis).

The E. coli peritonitis in vivo model was conducted using an E. coli AID#172 strain in female NMRI mice (Harlan) that were rendered neutropenic by injecting 0.5 mL cyclophosphamide solution (Apodan®) intraperitoneally for 4 days (~200 mg kg−1) and 1 day (~100 mg kg−1) prior to inoculation of infection. At time −1 h, mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 0.5 mL of 2 × 106 CFU mL−1 E. coli AID#172 suspension in the lateral lower quadrant of the abdomen. Mice were then treated i.v. with 10 mL kg−1 of a single dose of AA139 (BMD MIC 0.125 μg mL−1), doses ranging from 0.06 to 7.5 mg kg−1, meropenem (BMD MIC 0.125 μg mL−1, 40 mg kg−1) or vehicle at time 1 h (n = 3 mice per group). CFU counts were determined from blood and peritoneal fluid at 0 and 5 h after treatment. The mice were anesthetized with Zoletil® and blood was collected by axillary cut down. The mice were killed by cervical dislocation, a total of 2 mL sterile saline was injected i.p. and the abdomen gently massaged before it was opened, fluid sampled with a pipette, and collected for CFU counts on agar.

The E. coli thigh infection in vivo model was conducted using an E. coli AID#172 strain in female NMRI mice (Taconic) that were rendered neutropenic as above. At time −1 h, mice were inoculated intramuscularly in the quadriceps femoral muscle close to the femur of the left hind leg with 0.05 mL of a suspension of ~1–5 × 107 CFU mL−1 of E. coli (fresh overnight colonies from 5% Horse Blood Agar plate suspended in sterile saline to ~108 CFU mL−1, then diluted) with compound administered intravenously 1 and 12 h post infection (injection over 30 s with 10 mL kg−1 of 0.6–15 mg kg−1 AA139 or 5 mg kg−1 polymyxin B). Colony counts were determined in thighs at 0 and 24 h post infection. The mice were killed by cervical dislocation, the skin was removed and the left hind leg from the hip joint to the hock was collected, cut into at least three parts and frozen at −80 °C. After thawing, the thighs were homogenized in 5 mL saline using a Dispomix® Drive. Each sample was then 10-fold diluted in saline and 20 μL spots were applied on 5% blood agar plates. All agar plates were incubated 18–24 h at 35 °C in ambient air.

The E. coli UTI in vivo model was prepared using an E. coli DSA 443 ESBL strain, in neutropenic outbred OF-1 female mice (Charles River, France). Starting 4 days before inoculation mice were given drinking water with 5% glucose. On day 0 mice were anaesthetized and inoculated with 50 μL bacterial suspension (1 × 109 CFU mL−1) of E. coli DSA 443 ESBL, via a catheter in the urethra into the bladder. On days 1 and 2, mice were treated i.v. with vehicle (n = 18) or with twice-daily administrations of 5 mg kg−1 AA139 (n = 12) or 40 mg kg−1 meropenem (n = 12). Urine samples were taken on days 1–3 and on day 3 mice were killed and urine, kidneys, and bladder were collected for CFU counts on agar.

P. aeruginosa pneumonia in vivo model was prepared as follows: male CD1 mice were immunosuppressed with cyclophosphamide 200 mg kg−1 on day −4 and 150 mg kg−1 on day −1. On day 0, mice were infected by intranasal administration with 40 μL of 2.5 × 106 CFU mL−1 P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 suspension. Mice were then placed in an acrylic aerosol exposure chamber (0.11 m3) and treated at 2, 12, and 24 h post infectious challenge with aerosolized AA139 (n = 8 per group), tobramycin (n = 8) or vehicle (Ringer’s acetate, n = 8) using a nebulizer (Hudson RCI Micro-mist) with compressed air at 0.5–1 bar. Three strengths of AA139 formulation (in Ringer’s acetate) were nebulized for different treatment durations: 30 mg mL−1 (30, 20, 10 min); 15 mg mL−1 (10 min); and 7.5 mg mL−1 (10 min). Tobramycin was nebulized at 4.2 mg mL−1 for 20 min. Pre-treatment and untreated control groups were also included (n = 4 per group). Mouse weights were recorded once-daily following infection to ensure animals remained within ethical limits and to monitor efficacy of treatment. All mice remaining in the study at 34 h post infection were euthanized and the burden of P. aeruginosa in the lungs was determined. Briefly, the lungs were removed and weighed and then homogenized in 2 mL ice cold sterile phosphate-buffered saline using a bead-beater. The lung homogenates were diluted appropriately then quantitatively cultured on to Pseudomonas-selective agar and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h before the number of colonies was counted. The limit of detection for the CFU assay was <374 CFU g−1, based on 0.1 mL plating neat sample and tissue weight of 0.308 g. All resultant data were analyzed and displayed using GraphPad Prism. The data from the culture burdens were analyzed with an appropriate non-parametric statistical model (Kruskal–Wallis) using StatsDirect statistical software v 2.7.8 and compared to vehicle control.

Pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic studies

The studies were performed at Fidelta Ltd, Croatia (mice), under review by the institutional ethics committee (CARE-Zg), and Covance Laboratories UK and Muenster Germany (cynomolgus monkey and minipig) in accordance with the requirements of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1989 and a maintained local ethical review. All studies were contracted by Adenium Biotech ApS. Mice were housed in polysulfone cages with an acclimatization period of 7 days prior to experiments with air temperature maintained at 22 °C with 55% humidity and light–dark cycles of 12 h light. Cynomolgus monkeys of age range 4–7 years were selected, tested for health, acclimatized for 2 weeks, and housed in single-animal climate controlled stainless-steel cages with a minimum of 8 air changes per hour with air temperature at 19–25 °C and relative humidity 40–70%, and light–dark cycles of 12 h light. Minipigs of age range 4–6 months were selected, tested for health, acclimatized for 2 weeks, and housed in single-animal pens with 15–20 air changes per hour with air temperature at 22–26 °C with light–dark cycles of 12 h light.

Mouse i.v. injection: A formulation of AA139 in Ringer’s acetate pH 6.0 (1 mg mL−1) was administered to male CD1 mice (Charles River, Italy) at 10 mg kg−1 as a 400 μL slow injection into the lateral tail vein. Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein at eight timepoints (n = 3 mice): 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h. AA139 was quantified in plasma using solid phase extraction (SPE) followed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection (LC–MS/MS). Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using Phoenix WinNonlin 6.2. (Pharsight Corporation) software using individual animal data, non-compartmental sparse analysis, and the actual dose as determined from formulation analysis by UPLC.

Mouse, monkey, and minipig i.v. 2-h infusion: AA139 formulated in Ringer’s acetate was administered intravenously to CD1 mice, cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) and Göttingen A/S minipigs (Ellegaard Göttingen, Denmark) by continuous infusion over 2 h (minipig under anesthesia). Individual dose volumes were based on individual body weight. Blood samples were collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 10, and 12 h after the start of the infusion (n = 6 mice, male and female combined; n = 2 monkeys, one male and one female; n = 2 minipigs, one male and one female). Bioanalytical analysis was performed by SPE followed by LC–MS/MS. The method was validated for an AA139 concentration range of 43.4–21,700 ng mL−1. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis (NCA) using Phoenix WinNonlin version 6.2. The studies were conducted in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) regulations.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

NMR solution structure of arenicin-3 is deposited with the Protein Data Bank under accession number PDB5V0Y and with the Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank as accession number BMRB30259. TraDIS data are deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under study PRJEB3226. Genome sequences of serial passage isolates are deposited to National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) as Bioproject PRJNA511334. The source data underlying Figs. 2, 5a–c and 6, Tables 2 and 3, Supplementary Figs. 3, 5, 6, 8, and 9, and Supplementary Tables 4 and 5 are provided as a Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. 1.

    McKenna, M. Antibiotic resistance: the last resort. Nature 499, 394–396 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    US CDC. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/ (CDC, 2013).

  3. 3.

    Nation, R. L., Rigatto, M. H. P., Falci, D. R. & Zavascki, A. P. Polymyxin acute kidney injury: dosing and other strategies to reduce toxicity. Antibiotics 8, 24 (2019).

  4. 4.

    Cisneros, J. M. et al. Colistin versus meropenem in the empirical treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (Magic Bullet study): an investigator-driven, open-label, randomized, noninferiority controlled trial. Crit. Care 23, 383 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Liu, Y. Y. et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 16, 161–168 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wang, R. et al. The global distribution and spread of the mobilized colistin resistance gene mcr-1. Nat. Commun. 9, 1179 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ganz, T. Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 710–720 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tjabringa, G. S., Ninaber, D. K., Drijfhout, J. W., Rabe, K. F. & Hiemstra, P. S. Human cathelicidin LL-37 is a chemoattractant for eosinophils and neutrophils that acts via formyl-peptide receptors. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 140, 103–112 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Czaplewski, L. et al. Alternatives to antibiotics—a pipeline portfolio review. Lancet Infect. Dis. 16, 239–251 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    O’Shea, R. & Moser, H. E. Physicochemical properties of antibacterial compounds: implications for drug discovery. J. Med. Chem. 51, 2871–2878 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Richter, M. F. et al. Predictive compound accumulation rules yield a broad-spectrum antibiotic. Nature 545, 299–304 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chen, Y. et al. Role of peptide hydrophobicity in the mechanism of action of alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51, 1398–1406 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Steinberg, D. A. et al. Protegrin-1: a broad-spectrum, rapidly microbicidal peptide with in vivo activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41, 1738–1742 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    da Cunha, N. B. et al. The next generation of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as molecular therapeutic tools for the treatment of diseases with social and economic impacts. Drug Discov. Today 22, 234–248 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Edwards, I. A. et al. Contribution of amphipathicity and hydrophobihity to the antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity of β-hairpin peptides. ACS Infect. Dis. 2, 442–450 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Spodsberg, N. Polypeptides having antimicrobial activity and polynucleotides encoding same. WO 2007/023163 A1 (2007).

  17. 17.

    Ravn, B. T. et al. Arenicin-3 for use in the treatment of urinary tract infections. WO 2011/070032 A1 (2011).

  18. 18.

    Wang, X. J. et al. Recombinant production of the antimicrobial peptide NZ17074 in Pichia pastoris using SUMO3 as a fusion partner. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 59, 71–78 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang, X. et al. Combined systems approaches reveal a multistage mode of action of a marine antimicrobial peptide against pathogenic Escherichia coli and its protective effect against bacterial peritonitis and endotoxemia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61, e01056–01016 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yang, N. et al. Antibacterial and detoxifying activity of NZ17074 analogues with multi-layers of selective antimicrobial actions against Escherichia coli and Salmonella enteritidis. Sci. Rep. 7, 3392 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Powers, J. P., Rozek, A. & Hancock, R. E. Structure-activity relationships for the beta-hairpin cationic antimicrobial peptide polyphemusin I. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1698, 239–250 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zhang, A. H. et al. Elucidating the lipid binding properties of membrane-active peptides using cyclised nanodiscs. Front. Chem. 7, 238 (2019).

  23. 23.

    Loh, B., Grant, C. & Hancock, R. E. W. Use of the fluorescent-probe 1-n-phenylnaphthylamine to study the interactions of aminoglycoside antibiotics with the outer-membrane of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 26, 546–551 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sims, P. J., Waggoner, A. S., Wang, C. H. & Hoffman, J. F. Mechanism by which cyanine dyes measure membrane potential in red blood-cells and phosphatidylcholine vesicles. Biochemistry 13, 3315–3330 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sharp, C. et al. O-antigen dependent colisin insensitivity of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 201, e00545–00518 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Malinverni, J. C. & Silhavy, T. J. An ABC transport system that maintains lipid asymmetry in the Gram-negative outer membrane. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8009–8014 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ekiert, D. C. et al. Architectures of lipid transport systems for the bacterial outer membrane. Cell 169, 273–285.e217 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jiang, Z., Vasil, A. I., Gera, L., Vasil, M. L. & Hodges, R. S. Rational design of alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides to target Gram-negative pathogens, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: utilization of charge, ‘specificity determinants,’ total hydrophobicity, hydrophobe type and location as design parameters to improve the therapeutic ratio. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 77, 225–240 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Frecer, V., Ho, B. & Ding, J. L. De novo design of potent antimicrobial peptides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48, 3349–3357 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Yin, L. M., Edwards, M. A., Li, J., Yip, C. M. & Deber, C. M. Roles of hydrophobicity and charge distribution of cationic antimicrobial peptides in peptide-membrane interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 7738–7745 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hughes, G. W. et al. Evidence for phospholipid export from the bacterial inner membrane by the Mla ABC transport system. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1692–1705 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Artimo, P. et al. ExPASy: SIB bioinformatics resource portal. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, W597–W603 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Skinner, S. P. et al. Structure calculation, refinement and validation using CcpNmr analysis. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 71, 154–161 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Shen, Y., Delaglio, F., Cornilescu, G. & Bax, A. TALOS+: a hybrid method for predicting protein backbone torsion angles from NMR chemical shifts. J. Biomol. NMR 44, 213–223 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Guntert, P. Automated NMR structure calculation with CYANA. Methods Mol. Biol. 278, 353–378 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    CLSI. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically 11th edn. CLSI standard M07 (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA, 2018).

  37. 37.

    CLSI. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts 4th edn. CLSI standard M27 (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA, 2017).

  38. 38.

    Blaskovich, M. A. T. et al. Protein-inspired antibiotics active against vancomycin- and daptomycin-resistant bacteria. Nat. Commun. 9, 22 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    CLSI. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for bacteria that Grow Aerobically 8th edn. CLSI standard M07-A9 (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA, 2012).

  40. 40.

    McMillian, M. K. et al. An improved resazurin-based cytotoxicity assay for hepatic cells. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 18, 157–173 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Nociari, M. M., Shalev, A., Benias, P. & Russo, C. A novel one-step, highly sensitive fluorometric assay to evaluate cell-mediated cytotoxicity. J. Immunol. Methods 213, 157–167 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Huang, J. X. et al. Molecular characterization of lipopolysaccharide binding to human alpha-1-acid glycoprotein. J. Lipids 2012, 475153 (2012).

  43. 43.

    Helander, I. M. & Mattila-Sandholm, T. Fluorometric assessment of Gram-negative bacterial permeabilization. J. Appl. Microbiol. 88, 213–219 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Velkov, T. et al. Structure, function, and biosynthetic origin of octapeptin antibiotics active against extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Cell Chem. Biol. 25, 380–391.e385 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Anderson, R. C., Hancock, R. E. & Yu, P. L. Antimicrobial activity and bacterial-membrane interaction of ovine-derived cathelicidins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48, 673–676 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Roth, B. L., Poot, M., Yue, S. T. & Millard, P. J. Bacterial viability and antibiotic susceptibility testing with SYTOX Green nucleic acid stain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 2421–2431 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    CLSI. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically. Approved standard 10th edn. CLSI document M07-A10 (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA, 2015).

  48. 48.

    CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing 22nd informational supplement. CLSI standard M100-S22 (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA, 2012).

  49. 49.

    Bankevich, A. et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477 (2012).

    MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Aziz, R. K. et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9, 75 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    UniProt Consortium. UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D204–D212 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Langridge, G. C. et al. Simultaneous assay of every Salmonella typhi gene using one million transposon mutants. Genome Res. 19, 2308–2316 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Barquist, L. et al. The TraDIS toolkit: sequencing and analysis for dense transposon mutant libraries. Bioinformatics 32, 1109–1111 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was funded in part by Adenium Biotech ApS and by NHMRC Project Grant APP1106590. M.A.C. is a NHMRC professorial research fellow (APP1059354). A.G.E., J.X.H., J.Z., and M.A.T.B. were supported in part by Wellcome Trust Strategic Grant WT104797/Z/14/Z. I.A.E. was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award (APA) PhD scholarship. The sequencing work was supported by the Wellcome Trust, Grant Number WT098051. A.K.C. and C.J.B. were supported by the Medical Research Council, grant number G1100100/1. We thank S. Ramu, A. M. Kavanagh, G. J. Lowe, A. Hinton, and M. Amado for technical assistance, and M. E. Pitt for genomic analysis. Clinical isolates were kindly provided by Ilias Karaiskos and Helen Giamarellou (6th Dept. of Internal Medicine, Hygeia General Hospital, Athens, Greece), Roger L. Nation (Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Australia), and all reference strains were sourced from ATCC. We thank the Australian Red Cross Blood Service for the supply of blood for hemolysis assays. We acknowledge the facilities, and the scientific and technical assistance, of the Microscopy Australia Facility at the Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, The University of Queensland. M.A.C. currently holds a fractional Professorial Research Fellow appointment at the University of Queensland with his remaining time as CEO of Inflazome Ltd., a company headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. S.N. is currently Director of pharmacology at Orphazyme ApS, and S.L. is currently CSO of BioVersys AG.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.N., S.L., J.Z., M.A.T.B., and M.A.C. conceived the study. A.G.E., J.X.H., J.Z., and M.A.C. designed and/or performed activity and mode of action studies. S.N. and C.V.L. designed and performed in vivo pharmacology studies. M.S. and K.M.P. designed, analyzed, and/or monitored PK and toxicology studies. J.S. performed genetic sequencing analysis of serial passage isolates. M.S.B., S.N., I.A.E., and M.M. characterized the peptides by MS and NMR. A.K.C., C.J.B., and L.E.B. designed and performed the TraDIS experiments and analysis. A.G.E., J.X.H., and M.A.C. wrote the manuscript with input from some authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew A. Cooper.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Matthew Cooper was Chair of the Scientific Advisory Board of Adenium Biotech from 2013 to 2019. He has no shareholding, current income, or any other interest in the company. Magnus Strandh was an employee of Adenium Biotech from 2017 to Jan 2020. Kaela Porter is an independent consultant operating as the Director, Preclinical Development of Adenium Biotech until Nov 2020. She has no current shareholding, income, or any other interest in the company. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Derry Mercer and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elliott, A.G., Huang, J.X., Neve, S. et al. An amphipathic peptide with antibiotic activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Nat Commun 11, 3184 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16950-x

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing