Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Anapole mediated giant photothermal nonlinearity in nanostructured silicon

## Abstract

Featured with a plethora of electric and magnetic Mie resonances, high index dielectric nanostructures offer a versatile platform to concentrate light-matter interactions at the nanoscale. By integrating unique features of far-field scattering control and near-field concentration from radiationless anapole states, here, we demonstrate a giant photothermal nonlinearity in single subwavelength-sized silicon nanodisks. The nanoscale energy concentration and consequent near-field enhancements mediated by the anapole mode yield a reversible nonlinear scattering with a large modulation depth and a broad dynamic range, unveiling a record-high nonlinear index change up to 0.5 at mild incident light intensities on the order of MW/cm2. The observed photothermal nonlinearity showcases three orders of magnitude enhancement compared with that of unstructured bulk silicon, as well as nearly one order of magnitude higher than that through the radiative electric dipolar mode. Such nonlinear scattering can empower distinctive point spread functions in confocal reflectance imaging, offering the potential for far-field localization of nanostructured Si with an accuracy approaching 40 nm. Our findings shed new light on active silicon photonics based on optical anapoles.

## Introduction

All-dielectric, high refractive index nanostructures offer unique ability to efficiently confine and manipulate light at the nanoscale based on their potentials to control both optically induced electric and magnetic Mie resonances1,2,3,4. During recent years, the interplays of a wealth of Mie-type resonant modes have unveiled many novel physical phenomena, such as unidirectional scattering5,6,7,8, magnetic Fano resonances9, bound states in the continuum10,11, and nonradiating optical anapoles12,13. Among these observations, which originate from multimodal interference in dielectric nanostructures, optical anapole holds distinct features characterized by vanishing far-field scattering accompanied with strong near-field absorptions. The former is a result of far-field destructive interference between a toroidal dipole (TD) and an out-of-phase oscillating electric dipole (ED)14, and the latter is due to the induced displacement currents inside the nanostructures, which produce tightly confined near-fields to resonantly enhance the local density of photonic states.

The discovery of the general existence of optical anapoles in dielectric nanostructures immediately spurred extensive investigations on diverse applications. Engineered anapole states have been used to tailor light scattering in the far-field for inducing optical transparency15,16 or rendering pure magnetic dipole source17. Functional anapole metamaterials and metasurfaces featuring high-quality factors have revealed potentials in optical modulation and sensing18,19. More importantly, energy concentration in the subwavelength volume associated with anapole-mediated hotspots facilitates boosting near-field light–matter interactions including nonlinear harmonic generation20,21,22, nanoscale lasing23, broadband absorption24, strong coupling with plasmon25 or molecular excitons26,27, and enhanced Raman spectroscopy28,29. To further advance nanophotonic devices, the full potential amalgamating the benefits in both far-field and near-field features from optical anapoles remains tantalizing.

In this report, we discover a giant photothermal nonlinearity mediated by anapole states within a subwavelength-sized silicon (Si) nanodisk and demonstrate dynamic scattering modulations. Leveraging their nontrivial electromagnetic near-fields, anapole modes boost photothermal nonlinearity by three orders of magnitude higher than that of bulk Si, or nearly one-order-of-magnitude outperforming the radiative ED-driven enhancement for similar sized Si nanostructures. A record-high photothermal refractive index change Δn up to 0.5 can be achieved upon a mild laser radiance intensity of 1.25 MW/cm2 through optically pumping a Si nanodisk at a wavelength close to the anapole mode. The giant photothermal nonlinearity thus offers an active mechanism for dynamic tuning of far-field radiation from multipolar modes. The scattering cross section that is normalized to 1 for linear scattering can be reversibly suppressed down to 0.1 and then rapidly enhanced up to 1.1, demonstrating a large modulation depth and a broad dynamic range, due to the progressive transition of dominant modes from the bright state to the low-radiating dark state and further moving towards the bright state again. Consequently, we found distinctive point spread functions (PSFs) in confocal reflection imaging induced by the nonlinear scattering modulation of single Si nanodisks. These PSFs can be employed for optical localization of Si nanostructures in dense arrays with an accuracy approaching 40 nm. Compared to existing techniques, anapole-mediated photothermal nonlinearity offers noninvasive all-optical modulation of scattering, shedding new light on active photonics harnessing dielectric nanostructures for on-demand tunability.

## Results

### Nonlinear scattering of Si nanodisks

The principle is schematically illustrated in Fig. 1a. A Si nanodisk illuminated by a continuous-wave (CW) laser beam converts incident light into heat, which raises the disk temperature substantially. Photothermal mechanism induces the refractive index variation, resulting in continuous red-shifting of Mie resonances under light excitation, and thus allows for tunable optical responses of the silicon nanodisk. With rationally designed dimensions of the Si nanodisk, the associated anapole mode can be actively engineered and tuned in the vicinity of the excitation wavelength. Hence, the illumination irradiance required for the large refractive index modification of the Si nanodisk can be efficiently reduced via anapole-assisted absorption enhancement. As the laser intensity increases, the dominant mode at the excitation wavelength transits from the initial bright mode towards the anapole mode (will be discussed in detail below), which induces saturation scattering (SS)30 and significant reduction of the scattering intensity (Fig. 1b, c). Further temperature rise leads to the progressive transition from the nonradiating anapole to the ED mode, inducing a sharp increase of the scattering intensity, which we denote as reverse saturation scattering (RSS). We will show in the following paragraphs that anapole-driven nonlinear scattering herein can be actively controlled in a reversible manner without the need to physically alter the dimensions of the nanostructure or change the environment.

The anapole state is an engineered destructive interference between toroidal and electric dipoles presenting in well-designed dielectric nanostructures. Pioneering works have uncovered that disk geometry, with its structural simplicity, supports the fundamental and higher-order anapole modes14,31. To generate anapole mode at the vicinity of the excitation wavelength of 532 nm, Si nanodisks with diameter D of 200 nm and height h of 50 nm were used in the present study. Well-dispersed silicon nanodisks on a glass substrate were fabricated by colloidal-mask lithography32,33 with step-by-step fabrication sketched in Fig. 2a (see Methods). The as-prepared Si nanodisks were laser annealed before the nonlinear scattering study (Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (Fig. 2b) show high-quality Si nanodisks with an average spacing of micrometers to avoid the coupling effect. Scattering images of individual Si nanodisks under the 532 nm CW laser illumination are measured with a reflectance confocal laser scanning microscope (Fig. 2c, see Methods).

We examine the photothermal nonlinearity through analyzing the scattering PSFs of single nanodisks30,34,35,36,37. Figure 2d, e depicts the evolution of the PSFs from isolated Si nanodisks by increasing excitation intensities. When the laser intensity is low, the PSF fits well to a Gaussian function with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 230 nm. The shape of the PSF changes dramatically when SS occurs. At deep saturation, a doughnut-shaped PSF appears with a low intensity in the center (Fig. 2d (d-3)), representing the radiationless anapole state. By further increasing the excitation intensity, a sharp peak emerges from the doughnut center, indicating the onset of RSS (shown in Fig. 2d (d-4)). The strong central peak starts to dominate the PSF as the irradiance intensity continues to increase (Fig. 2d (d-5)).

The evolution of PSF profiles can be numerically reproduced through modelling confocal reflectance imaging of a subwavelength object displaying intensity-dependent nonlinear scattering (Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 2). Such nonlinear behavior is quantified by taking the ratio of scattering over excitation intensity extracted from experimental results in Fig. 1b. As shown in Fig. 2f, the normalized scattering cross section stays constant (normalized to 1) at the initial linear region, then decreases to 0.1 for the largest SS, and again drastically rises to 1.1 for RSS, demonstrating a large dynamic range spanning from scattering suppression to enhancement. Throughout the nonlinear scattering measurements, the full recovery of both scattering intensities and corresponding PSFs confirms its reversibility (Fig. 2g). The reversibility is also checked by the reversible evolution of normalized scattering cross sections with excitation intensities varied between low and high (Supplementary Fig. 3). This ensures the scattering behavior of a single Si nanodisk can be actively and reversibly engineered.

### Anapole-mediated photothermal nonlinearity

The anapole mode supported by the Si nanodisk is verified by both simulation and experimental measurements (Supplementary Fig. 4). The anapole state is featured by a significant dip in the total far-field scattering spectrum, accompanied by unique near-field distributions as shown in Fig. 3a, b. Notably, the boosted near-field energy directly contributes to the absorption peak at the anapole wavelength, leading to a substantial temperature rise within the Si nanodisk. To corroborate the local temperature rise, we perform Raman spectroscopy measurements at different irradiance intensities at the wavelength of 532 nm. By taking the intensity ratio of anti-Stokes to Stokes Raman spectra38, temperature increment within the Si nanodisks under various incident intensities can be extracted (see Methods and Supplementary Fig. 5). Experimental results from Raman thermometry reveal that the Si nanodisks experience a huge temperature rise, more than 900 °C above room temperature (RT) during the nonlinear scattering processes (Fig. 3c). Such substantial temperature rises of Si nanostructures, particularly in the thermally sensitive visible wavelength region39,40, induces large modifications of refractive indices in both real and imaginary parts, also known as thermo-optic effect41,42 (Supplementary Fig. 6). In the temperature range from RT to 950 °C, the change of the refractive index in real part Δn is extrapolated to be 0.5 at a moderate laser intensity of 1.25 × 106 W/cm2. This equivalently gives the effective nonlinear refractive index as $$n_{2,@532\;{\mathrm{nm}}} = \Delta n/I = 0.4$$ cm2/MW. Compared with the measured temperature rise in bulk Si, i.e., less than 10 °C under much higher laser intensities, optical anapole significantly enhances photothermal nonlinearity by three orders of magnitude (Supplementary Fig. 7). Since the absorption of the nanodisk depends on the contribution from all multipole modes, it keeps increasing with temperature (Fig. 3d). In contrast, the scattering can be desirably manipulated in response to optical heating of the anapole mode, thus yielding unconventional nonlinear scattering responses.

The simulated backward scattering cross-section CscaB is plotted in Fig. 3e to show the spectral response and the tuning range of Mie resonances with temperature increments. The pronounced scattering maxima and minima (marked by the dashed lines for eye guidance) undergo continuous redshifts with elevated temperatures. The corresponding photothermally-induced Mie resonance shifts are estimated to be $$\Delta \lambda \approx \lambda \Delta n/n \approx 50\;{\mathrm{nm}}$$, or $$\Delta \lambda /\lambda \sim$$10%, which is indeed observed in Fig. 3e. The large resonance tuning represents a significant improvement compared with previous studies using liquid crystals or thermo-optic effects43,44,45,46.We also remark here that free-carrier contributions are ruled out by the fact that they lead to a negative Δn, which causes the blue shift of the resonance47.

The irradiance-induced temperature rise from RT to 500–600 °C allows for suppressing the backward scattering cross section from 2.3 × 10−14 m2 to 0.6 × 10−14 m2 (Fig. 3e–g), corresponding to 74% modulation. This agrees qualitatively with the experimental observation of 90% suppression of normalized cross section from linear to SS in Fig. 2f. The large modulation depth is attributed to the fact that the excitation laser delicately operates in the vicinity of the anapole mode. The sharp slope in the far-field scattering spectrum near the anapole mode enables pronounced changes of backward scattering cross sections via a small spectral tuning (Fig. 3f). The bottom panels in Fig. 3f further depict the near-field distributions excited at the wavelength of 532 nm, providing a clear progressive transition that the illumination laser initially excites the lower-energy-side of the anapole mode, and then gradually approaches resonant with the anapole mode and finally excites the ED mode. To establish the relationship between scattering Isca and the incident intensity Iexc for single Si nanodisks, the intensity-dependent nonlinear scattering can be derived as $$I_{{\mathrm{sca}}} \propto C_{{\mathrm{sca}}}\cdot I_{{\mathrm{exc}}}$$, which is depicted in Fig. 3h. It shows a similar trend with the experimental results in Fig. 1b. Although we recorded only the backward scattering in experiments, the temperature dependences of simulated total scattering and forward scattering reveal a similar trend (Supplementary Fig. 8), thus excluding the scattering modulation originating from energy redistributions between forward and backward radiation43.

To illustrate the important role played by anapole modes, we performed calculations for another two representative sizes of Si nanodisks (Supplementary Note 9). For a smaller-sized nanodisk (D = 170 nm), the overall photothermal tuning occurs near its ED mode. We show that ED-mediated process presents much weaker photothermal nonlinearity by a moderate temperature rise less than 200 °C at a similar laser intensity of 1.25 × 106 W/cm2. The corresponding nonlinear refractive index n2 = 0.08 cm2/MW, which is five times lower than anapole-assisted process. In addition, its scattering cross sections keep almost unchanged within the excitation intensity range, resulting in negligible SS. On the contrary, for a larger-sized nanodisk (D = 230 nm), its original anapole mode coincides with the excitation wavelength at RT. Elevated temperatures induce redshifts of the anapole mode away from the excitation wavelength, leading to a monotonical increase of scattering cross sections. Thus, a sharp RSS is achieved. Similar nonlinear scattering has been reported by optically heating the magnetic quadrupole48.

### Potential for far-field optical localization of Si nanostructures

Leveraging the photothermal nonlinear scattering, we demonstrate the potential for far-field optical localization of Si nanostructures. In analogy to differential excitation methods49,50,51, the difference between the two scattering images obtained at RSS and SS stages yields a narrow spot with a sub-diffractive FWHM as shown in Fig. 4a. The outer contour of the RSS image can be subtracted over the SS image with r to be the subtractive factor, leaving a clear and sub-diffraction spot in the image. The 41-nm FWHM represents a localization capability that is far smaller than the size of the nanodisk itself. To demonstrate that the localization accuracy works for not only isolated nanostructures, but also densely packed ones, we fabricated periodic Si nanodisk arrays with diameter of 200 nm, height of 50 nm, and pitch size of 300 nm, as shown in Fig. 4b (Supplementary Fig. 10 for AFM characterization). The confocal image at low excitation intensities for such nanodisk array is blurry without any surprise. When gradually increasing the laser power, the evolution of PSFs unveils characteristic nonlinear scattering behaviors from SS to RSS (see Supplementary Note 11, and video for more results). By applying the differential technique, densely packed Si nanodisk arrays, whose density is beyond the diffraction limit can be distinctly localized (Fig. 4b). Combination of SEM and optical images unambiguously correlates the nonlinear scattering images with individual nanodisk morphology. Figure 4c quantifies the localization accuracy of, respectively, subtracting RSS-1 and RSS-2 to SS, showing FWHMs below the diffraction limit in our experimental setup.

The localization accuracy of Si nanodisks acquired at different stages is plotted in Fig. 4d. The best localization accuracy corresponds to the very beginning of RSS while the signal to noise ratio is barely satisfactory. Strong RSS can induce better contrast while sacrificing a bit of precision. Noteworthily, during the whole photothermal nonlinearity modulation processes, the irradiance range is far from thermal deformation of Si nanodisks and the localization imaging is highly reproducible (Supplementary Fig. 12). We envision that the demonstrated photothermal nonlinearity assisted label-free imaging modality could be potentially useful for contactless inspection and metrology of silicon ICs or failure analysis of microelectronic circuitry52. It is noted that the proposed technique is also applicable for other shapes and sizes of silicon nanostructures supporting anapole modes, not limited to nanodisks (Supplementary Fig. 13). In analogy to gold nanoparticles35,37, the applicability of such Si nanostructures as fluorescence-free labeling contrasts in photothermal nonlinearity assisted cellular imaging might be feasible combining their biodegradable features.

## Discussion

In summary, we have demonstrated giant photothermal nonlinearity and active scattering modulation by fully exploiting the near- and far-field properties of anapole states in a single Si nanodisk. Taking advantages of the resonantly enhanced near-field absorption at the anapole’s excitation, we observed pronounced temperature rises along with record-high refractive index changes under mild laser irradiances. Utilizing low-radiating feature of anapole modes, far-field scattering was dynamically controlled by photothermally tuning anapole spectral positions, allowing for active scattering engineering with all-optical stimuli. The anapole-driven photothermal nonlinear scattering results in dramatically changed PSFs in confocal reflectance images, offering the potential for localization of Si nanostructures with accuracy below the diffraction limit. As a proof-of-principle demonstration, densely packed Si nanodisk arrays are resolved with 40–60 nm FWHM, corresponding to $$\lambda /10$$ precision. Considering the compatibility with the existing semiconductor fabrication infrastructure, our work provides new perspectives for Si photonics with giant optical nonlinearity and the long-sought active control capability.

## Methods

### Preparation of silicon nanodisks

Amorphous Si was deposited onto the glass substrate by magnetron sputtering. Then, polystyrene (PS) spheres were firstly spin-coated on to the layer film consisting of sputtered silicon onto the glass. The size of the PS mask was reduced by the RIE process using oxygen gas. And then such PS spheres serve as the mask for the subsequent fluorine-based inductively coupled plasma reactive ion etching (ICP-RIE) using CHF3 gas. Finally, the PS mask was removed with sonication in acetone. The sizes of the resulting silicon disks can be precisely tuned by changing the size of the PS mask with accurate control of the etching time. When fabricating large array of periodic Si nanodisks, self-organized PS spheres assembling in a hexagonally close-packing manner were prepared as the monolayer mask. The as-prepared Si samples are pre-annealed to switch into crystalline phase, before performing all the nonlinear scattering measurements (Supplementary Note 1).

### Thermal calculations

The temperature growth inside the Si nanodisk is related to the absorbed power $$Q = \sigma _{{\mathrm{abs}}}I$$ according to53,54

$$\Delta T = \frac{{\sigma _{{\mathrm{abs}}}I}}{{4\pi R_{{\mathrm{eq}}}\kappa \beta }}$$
(1)

where $$\kappa$$ is the thermal conductivity of the surrounding medium. In the present case for Si nanodisks on the glass substrate and immersed in the oil environment, $$\kappa$$ was taken to be 0.38. $$\beta$$ is a dimensionless geometrical correction factor for a geometry with axial symmetry. For Si nanodisks with D/h = 4, it is expressed as $$\beta = {\mathrm{exp}}\left\{ {0.04 - 0.0124\ln 4 + 0.0677{\mathrm{ln}}^24 - 0.00457{\mathrm{ln}}^34} \right\} = 1.15$$. Req is the corresponding equivalent radius, calculated as the radius of a sphere with the same volume as the nanodisk. The temperature rising from initial RT (25 °C) to the final temperature was divided into several intermediate steps and for each iteration, temperature-dependent optical absorption was firstly determined (Fig. 3d) and substituted into the formula Eq. (1). The derived temperature rise by photothermal effects shows a nice agreement with the results from Raman measurement. The linear trend shown in the red dashed line in Fig. 3c represents temperature rises linearly with irradiance intensities, providing an underestimation of the actual temperature without taking into account photothermal refractive index change.

### Complex refractive index of Si at elevated temperatures

The present work focuses on the visible region, at which Si is generally more absorbing at photon energies close to the band gap. One has to consider both real and imaginary parts of the refractive index. Values of n and k used for simulations were taken from the model given by Jellison39 (see Supplementary Note 6). The real part n was reported to vary linearly with temperature rise while the imaginary part k varied exponentially with temperature39,55. Measurements of temperature dependence of n and k were performed up to 400 °C by ellipsometric techniques, which show good congruence with the model adopted from literature39,40. And then, an extrapolation was made to determine the complex refractive index at high temperatures.

### Microscope system

The nonlinear scattering measurements were performed based on Abberior 775 STED confocal microscope (Abberior Instruments GmbH, Göttingen). We coupled continuous-wave laser line (532 nm) into the system for CW illumination35,37. The excitation beam was first spatially filtered and then focused onto the sample. Linear polarization excitation was controlled by imposing a half-wave plate on the laser beam. The backward scattering signal was collected using the same objective lens (×100, NA = 1.4, Olympus), reflected by a beam splitter and detected by a photomultiplier tube (PMT) after a confocal pinhole. The laser beam at the wavelength of 532 nm is focused by an objective (NA = 1.4) down to a diffraction-limited spot (the full width at half maximum 230 nm). Given a power of 2.11 mW reaching the sample, it yields an average intensity of 1.25 MW/cm2. Under such circumstance, the disk raises its temperature to cause the refractive index change of 0.5. The corresponding absorbed power per disk is estimated to be 0.2–0.4 mW, and the estimated absorption efficiency is 9.5–19%. The microscope images were obtained by synchronizing the PMT and the galvo mirror scanner and were recorded by beam scanning through the sample with a step size of 7 nm and a dwell time of 10 µs.

### Multipole decomposition

The Cartesian electric and magnetic dipole, quadrupole moments and the toroidal dipole moments of a nanodisk were calculated using the standard expansion formulas10:

Electric dipole moment:

$${\mathbf{P}}_{{\mathrm{car}}} = \frac{1}{{i\omega }} \int {\mathbf{J}}d^3{\mathbf{r}}$$
(2)

Magnetic dipole moment:

$${\mathbf{M}}_{{\mathrm{car}}} = \frac{1}{{2c}}{\int} {\left( {{\mathbf{r}} \times {\mathbf{J}}} \right)d^3{\mathbf{r}}}$$
(3)

$${\mathbf{Q}}_{\alpha ,\beta }^{\mathbf{E}} = \frac{1}{{i2 \omega }}{\int} {[r_{\alpha} J_{\beta} + r_{\beta }J_{\alpha} - \frac{2}{3}{\updelta }_{\alpha ,\beta }({\mathbf{r}} \cdot {\mathbf{J}})]d^{3}{\mathbf{r}}}$$
(4)

$${\mathbf{Q}}_{\alpha ,\beta }^{\mathbf{M}} = \frac{1}{{3c}}{\int} {[\left( {{\mathbf{r}} \times {\mathbf{J}}} \right)_\alpha r_\beta + \left( {{\mathbf{r}} \times {\mathbf{J}}} \right)_\beta r_\alpha ]d^3{\mathbf{r}}}$$
(5)

Toroidal dipole moment:

$${\mathbf{T}}_{{\mathrm{car}}} = \frac{1}{{10c}}{\int} {\left[ {\left( {{\mathbf{r}} \cdot {\mathbf{J}}} \right){\mathbf{r}} - 2r^2{\mathbf{J}}} \right]d^3{\mathbf{r}}}$$
(6)

where $${\mathbf{J}} = i\omega \varepsilon _0(\varepsilon _r - 1){\mathbf{E}}$$ is the induced current in the structure, $${\mathbf{r}}$$ is the position vector with the origin at the center of the nanodisk, and $$\alpha ,\beta = x,y,z$$.

### Raman spectroscopy

Raman spectra were taken under a microspectroscopic system based on an inverted optical microscope (NTEGRA Spectra, NT-MDT)56. Briefly, Si nanodisks were excited using linearly polarized 532-nm laser beams using an oil immersion objective (1.4 NA, ×60, Olympus). The resulting Raman signal with both Stokes and anti-Stokes lines was collected using the same objective, passed through a notch filter, and focused into the spectrometer with a cooled CCD (iDdus, Andor). Raman spectra were recorded with an acquisition time of 1 s.

## Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

## References

1. 1.

Jahani, S. & Jacob, Z. All-dielectric metamaterials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 23–36 (2016).

2. 2.

Kuznetsov, A. I., Miroshnichenko, A. E., Brongersma, M. L., Kivshar, Y. S. & Luk’yanchuk, B. Optically resonant dielectric nanostructures. Science 354, aag2472 (2016).

3. 3.

Yang, Z.-J. et al. Dielectric nanoresonators for light manipulation. Phys. Rep. 701, 1–50 (2017).

4. 4.

Kruk, S. & Kivshar, Y. Functional meta-optics and nanophotonics governed by Mie resonances. ACS Photonics 4, 2638–2649 (2017).

5. 5.

Fu, Y. H., Kuznetsov, A. I., Miroshnichenko, A. E., Yu, Y. F. & Luk’yanchuk, B. Directional visible light scattering by silicon nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 4, 1527 (2013).

6. 6.

Staude, I. et al. Tailoring directional scattering through magnetic and electric resonances in subwavelength silicon nanodisks. ACS Nano 7, 7824–7832 (2013).

7. 7.

Cihan, A. F., Curto, A. G., Raza, S., Kik, P. G. & Brongersma, M. L. Silicon Mie resonators for highly directional light emission from monolayer MoS2. Nat. Photonics 12, 284–291 (2018).

8. 8.

Shi, T. et al. All-dielectric kissing-dimer metagratings for asymmetric high diffraction. Adv. Opt. Mater. 7, 1901389 (2019).

9. 9.

Miroshnichenko, A. E. & Kivshar, Y. S. Fano resonances in all-dielectric oligomers. Nano Lett. 12, 6459–6463 (2012).

10. 10.

He, Y., Guo, G., Feng, T., Xu, Y. & Miroshnichenko, A. E. Toroidal dipole bound states in the continuum. Phys. Rev. B 98, 161112 (2018).

11. 11.

Liu, Z. et al. High-Q quasibound states in the continuum for nonlinear metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 253901 (2019).

12. 12.

Baryshnikova, K. V., Smirnova, D. A., Luk’yanchuk, B. S. & Kivshar, Y. S. Optical anapoles: concepts and applications. Adv. Opt. Mater. 7, 1801350 (2019).

13. 13.

Yang, Y. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Nonradiating anapole states in nanophotonics: from fundamentals to applications. Nanotechnology 30, 204001 (2019).

14. 14.

Miroshnichenko, A. E. et al. Nonradiating anapole modes in dielectric nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 6, 8069 (2015).

15. 15.

Liu, W., Zhang, J. F. & Miroshnichenko, A. E. Toroidal dipole-induced transparency in core-shell nanoparticles. Laser Photon Rev. 9, 564–570 (2015).

16. 16.

Ospanova, A. K., Labate, G., Matekovits, L. & Basharin, A. A. Multipolar passive cloaking by nonradiating anapole excitation. Sci. Rep. 8, 12514 (2018).

17. 17.

Feng, T., Xu, Y., Zhang, W. & Miroshnichenko, A. E. Ideal magnetic dipole scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 173901 (2017).

18. 18.

Ospanova, A. K., Stenishchev, I. V. & Basharin, A. A. Anapole mode sustaining silicon metamaterials in visible spectral range. Laser Photon Rev. 12, 1800005 (2018).

19. 19.

Wu, P. C. et al. Optical anapole metamaterial. ACS Nano 12, 1920–1927 (2018).

20. 20.

Grinblat, G., Li, Y., Nielsen, M. P., Oulton, R. F. & Maier, S. A. Enhanced third harmonic generation in single germanium nanodisks excited at the anapole mode. Nano Lett. 16, 4635–4640 (2016).

21. 21.

Xu, L. et al. Boosting third-harmonic generation by a mirror-enhanced anapole resonator. Light Sci. Appl. 7, 44 (2018).

22. 22.

Grinblat, G., Li, Y., Nielsen, M. P., Oulton, R. F. & Maier, S. A. Efficient third harmonic generation and nonlinear subwavelength imaging at a higher-order anapole mode in a single germanium nanodisk. ACS Nano 11, 953–960 (2017).

23. 23.

Totero Gongora, J. S., Miroshnichenko, A. E., Kivshar, Y. S. & Fratalocchi, A. Anapole nanolasers for mode-locking and ultrafast pulse generation. Nat. Commun. 8, 15535 (2017).

24. 24.

Wang, R. & Dal Negro, L. Engineering non-radiative anapole modes for broadband absorption enhancement of light. Opt. Express 24, 19048–19062 (2016).

25. 25.

Du, K. et al. Strong coupling between dark plasmon and anapole modes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 4699–4705 (2019).

26. 26.

Liu, S.-D., Fan, J.-L., Wang, W.-J., Chen, J.-D. & Chen, Z.-H. Resonance coupling between molecular excitons and nonradiating anapole modes in silicon nanodisk-J-aggregate heterostructures. ACS Photonics 5, 1628–1639 (2018).

27. 27.

Verre, R. et al. Transition metal dichalcogenide nanodisks as high-index dielectric Mie nanoresonators. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 679–683 (2019).

28. 28.

Baranov, D. G., Verre, R., Karpinski, P. & Käll, M. Anapole-enhanced intrinsic Raman scattering from silicon nanodisks. ACS Photonics 5, 2730–2736 (2018).

29. 29.

Yang, Y., Zenin, V. A. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Anapole-assisted strong field enhancement in individual all-dIELECTRIC NANOSTRUCtures. ACS Photonics 5, 1960–1966 (2018).

30. 30.

Chu, S.-W. et al. Saturation and reverse saturation of scattering in a single plasmonic nanoparticle. ACS Photonics 1, 32–37 (2014).

31. 31.

Zenin, V. A. et al. Direct amplitude-phase near-field observation of higher-order anapole states. Nano Lett. 17, 7152–7159 (2017).

32. 32.

Dao, T. D., Chen, K. & Nagao, T. Dual-band in situ molecular spectroscopy using single-sized Al-disk perfect absorbers. Nanoscale 11, 9508–9517 (2019).

33. 33.

Dao, T. D. et al. Infrared perfect absorbers fabricated by colloidal mask etching of Al–Al2O3–Al trilayers. ACS Photonics 2, 964–970 (2015).

34. 34.

Chu, S.-W. et al. Measurement of a saturated emission of optical radiation from gold nanoparticles: application to an ultrahigh resolution microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 017402 (2014).

35. 35.

Xu, J. et al. Plasmonic nanoprobes for multiplexed fluorescence-free super-resolution imaging. Adv. Opt. Mater. 6, 1800432 (2018).

36. 36.

Chen, Y.-T. et al. Study of nonlinear plasmonic scattering in metallic nanoparticles. ACS Photonics 3, 1432–1439 (2016).

37. 37.

Ouyang., X. et al. Invited Article: saturation scattering competition for non-fluorescence single-wavelength super-resolution imaging. APL Photonics 3, 110801 (2018).

38. 38.

Bhusari, D. M., Kumbhar, A. S. & Kshirsagar, S. T. Temperature-dependent Raman studies of hydrogenated-amorphous-silicon films. Phys. Rev. B 47, 6460–6464 (1993).

39. 39.

Jellison, G. E. & Modine, F. A. Optical functions of silicon at elevated temperatures. J. Appl. Phys. 76, 3758–3761 (1994).

40. 40.

Šik, J., Hora, J. & Humlı́ček, J. Optical functions of silicon at high temperatures. J. Appl. Phys. 84, 6291–6298 (1998).

41. 41.

Lewi, T., Butakov, N. A. & Schuller, J. A. Thermal tuning capabilities of semiconductor metasurface resonators. Nanophotonics 8, 331–338 (2019).

42. 42.

Reed, G. T., Mashanovich, G., Gardes, F. Y. & Thomson, D. J. Silicon optical modulators. Nat. Photonics 4, 518–526 (2010).

43. 43.

Rahmani, M. et al. Reversible thermal tuning of all-dielectric metasurfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1700580 (2017).

44. 44.

Zangeneh Kamali, K. et al. Reversible image contrast manipulation with thermally tunable dielectric metasurfaces. Small 15, 1805142 (2019).

45. 45.

Sautter, J. et al. Active tuning of all-dielectric metasurfaces. ACS Nano 9, 4308–4315 (2015).

46. 46.

Shcherbakov, M. R. et al. Ultrafast all-optical switching with magnetic resonances in nonlinear dielectric nanostructures. Nano Lett. 15, 6985–6990 (2015).

47. 47.

Xiang, J. et al. Modifying Mie resonances and carrier dynamics of silicon nanoparticles by dense electron-hole plasmas. Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 014003 (2020).

48. 48.

Duh, Y-S. et al. Giant photothermal nonlinearity in single silicon nanostructure: ultrasmall alloptical switch and super-resolution imaging, Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08421.

49. 49.

Zhao, G., Kuang, C., Ding, Z. & Liu, X. Resolution enhancement of saturated fluorescence emission difference microscopy. Opt. Express 24, 23596–23609 (2016).

50. 50.

Chen, C. et al. Multi-photon near-infrared emission saturation nanoscopy using upconversion nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 9, 3290 (2018).

51. 51.

Nawa, Y. et al. Saturated excitation microscopy using differential excitation for efficient detection of nonlinear fluorescence signals. APL Photonics 3, 080805 (2018).

52. 52.

Pinhas, H. et al. Plasma dispersion effect based super-resolved imaging in silicon. Opt. Express 26, 25370–25380 (2018).

53. 53.

Baffou, G., Quidant, R. & García de Abajo, F. J. Nanoscale control of optical heating in complex plasmonic systems. ACS Nano 4, 709–716 (2010).

54. 54.

Zograf, G. P. et al. Resonant nonplasmonic nanoparticles for efficient temperature-feedback optical heating. Nano Lett. 17, 2945–2952 (2017).

55. 55.

Bergmann, J., Heusinger, M., Andrä, G. & Falk, F. Temperature dependent optical properties of amorphous silicon for diode laser crystallization. Opt. Express 20, A856–A863 (2012).

56. 56.

Zhang, T. et al. Photoluminescence of a single complex plasmonic nanoparticle. Sci. Rep. 4, 3867 (2014).

## Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFB1107200), National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (61805107, 61905097, 61975067), Guangdong Provincial Innovation and Entrepreneurship Project (Grant 2016ZT06D081), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2017A030313006). S-W.C is funded by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (105-2628-M-002 -010 -MY4 and 108-2321-B-002 -058 -MY2). S-W.C acknowledges the support by MOST and Ministry of Education, Taiwan (MOE) under The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

X.L. and S.-W.C. conceived the idea and supervised the project. T.Z. and Y.C. performed the experiments. K.C. prepared the sample. T.Z. and Y.X. performed the electromagnetic multipolar expansion. J.X and J.H assisted dark-field experiments. T.W., G.L., B.W., and X.X contributed to Raman measurements. Y.S.D. and Y.L.T. assisted ellipsometric spectroscopy measurements. X.L. and Y.Y.C. contributed to analysis of point spread functions of scattering images. T.Z., Y.C., S.-W.C., and X.L. analyzed data and prepared the manuscript. T.Z., Y.C., B.G., S.-W.C., and X.L. participated in the discussion and manuscript writing.

### Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shi-Wei Chu or Xiangping Li.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Maxim Shcherbakov and Vladimir Zenin for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Zhang, T., Che, Y., Chen, K. et al. Anapole mediated giant photothermal nonlinearity in nanostructured silicon. Nat Commun 11, 3027 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16845-x

• Accepted:

• Published:

• ### Integrating lattice and gap plasmonic modes to construct dual-mode metasurfaces for enhancing light–matter interaction

• Limin Lin
• , Jiancai Xue
• , Haofei Xu
• , Qian Zhao
• , Wenbo Zhang
• , Yaqin Zheng
• , Lin Wu
•  & Zhang-Kai Zhou

Science China Materials (2021)