N6-methyladenosine regulates glycolysis of cancer cells through PDK4

Li, Zihan; Peng, Yanxi; Li, Jiexin; Chen, Zhuojia; Chen, Feng; Tu, Jian; Lin, Shuibin; Wang, Hongsheng

doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16306-5

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 22 May 2020

N⁶-methyladenosine regulates glycolysis of cancer cells through PDK4

Zihan Li^1,2^na1,
Yanxi Peng^1,3^na1,
Jiexin Li¹^na1,
Zhuojia Chen⁴,
Feng Chen¹,
Jian Tu²,
Shuibin Lin ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7065-614X⁵ &
…
Hongsheng Wang ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0054-4820¹

Nature Communications volume 11, Article number: 2578 (2020) Cite this article

12k Accesses
153 Citations
11 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Studies on biological functions of N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) modification in mRNA have sprung up in recent years. We find m⁶A can positively regulate the glycolysis of cancer cells. Specifically, m⁶A-sequencing and functional studies confirm that pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (PDK4) is involved in m⁶A regulated glycolysis and ATP generation. The m⁶A modified 5′UTR of PDK4 positively regulates its translation elongation and mRNA stability via binding with YTHDF1/eEF-2 complex and IGF2BP3, respectively. Targeted specific demethylation of PDK4 m⁶A by dm⁶ACRISPR system can significantly decrease the expression of PDK4 and glycolysis of cancer cells. Further, TATA-binding protein (TBP) can transcriptionally increase the expression of Mettl3 in cervical cancer cells via binding to its promoter. In vivo and clinical data confirm the positive roles of m⁶A/PDK4 in tumor growth and progression of cervical and liver cancer. Our study reveals that m⁶A regulates glycolysis of cancer cells through PDK4.

m6A reader IGF2BP2-stabilized CASC9 accelerates glioblastoma aerobic glycolysis by enhancing HK2 mRNA stability

Article Open access 13 October 2021

Hongjiang Liu, Shan Qin, … Xiaofeng Sun

N6-methyladenosine METTL3 promotes cervical cancer tumorigenesis and Warburg effect through YTHDF1/HK2 modification

Article Open access 24 October 2020

Qianqing Wang, Xiangcui Guo, … Juan Liu

m6A-modified circFOXK2 targets GLUT1 to accelerate oral squamous cell carcinoma aerobic glycolysis

Article 20 September 2022

Yameng Cui, Jingwen Liu, … Wei Zhao

Introduction

N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) is the prominent dynamic mRNA modification which has been identified since the 1970s¹. m⁶A is governed by methyltransferase complex (“writers”), demethylases (“erasers”), and RNA-binding proteins (“readers”)². Methyltransferase-like 3 (Mettl3), Methyltransferase-like 14 (Mettl14), and Wilms’ tumor 1-associating protein (WTAP) form the core methyltransferase complex^3,4. Two demethylases are fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) and AlkB homologue 5 (ALKBH5)^5,6. m⁶A can regulate the splicing, translation, and decay rates of mRNA to affect protein production and various biological processes such as cell differentiation, embryonic development, and stress responses⁷.

Dysregulation of m⁶A methylated mRNA can regulate cancer development. FTO has been suggested to play oncogenic role in acute myeloid leukemia^8,9, while inhibition of FTO exerts a broad anti-leukemic activity in vitro and in vivo¹⁰. ALKBH5 can maintain tumorigenicity of glioblastoma stem-like cells via sustaining FOXM1 expression¹¹. Our recent study showed that deletion of Mettl3 can suppress the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) of cancer cells by inhibiting translation of Snail¹². Mettl3 can directly interact with eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit h (eIF3h) to promote tumorigenicity¹³. Although relationship between m⁶A modification and tumorigenesis has been raised in recent years, the precise mechanisms have not been sufficiently described.

Recently, cancer metabolism is gaining increasing attention in cancer research. As a hallmark of cancer cells, Warburg effect means cancer cells heavily rely on glycolysis to obtain energy regardless of the presence of oxygen¹⁴. There is a strong link between epigenetic factors and the Warburg effect. For example, cancer cells can adopt the metabolic diversion through chromatin remodeling and histone acetylation (H3K27ac)¹⁵. Studies uncover that there might be clues between RNA modification and cellular metabolism. Transcriptome-wide m⁶A profiling revealed that genes relevant to regulation of metabolic processes were modified by m⁶A during liver development¹⁶. Knockdown of Mettl3 can reduce lipid accumulation and cell viability¹⁷. However, the roles of m⁶A modification in regulating mRNA processing of metabolic-related genes and affecting metabolism of cancer cells remain unknown.

Our present study reveals that m⁶A can positively regulate the glycolysis of cancer cells via regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (PDK4), one of the most important factors which can direct carbon flux into glycolysis from oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). The methylation of 5′UTR of PDK4 can regulate the mRNA stability and translation of PDK4 via recruitment of different reader proteins.

Results

m⁶A regulates glycolysis and ATP generation of cancer cells

To investigate the role of m⁶A modification in cell metabolism, we used Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells generated in the previous study¹⁸ by using CRISPR/Cas9 editing system and Mettl3 stable knockdown (KD) Huh7, HepG2, and MDA-MB-231 cells¹² by using sh-RNA (Supplementary Fig. 1A and B). Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa and sh-Mettl3 Huh7 cells exhibited significantly lower glucose consumption (Fig. 1a), lactate production rate (Fig. 1b), and the ATP levels (Fig. 1c) than that of control cells. Knockdown of Mettl3 can inhibit the ATP generation of both HepG2 and MDA-MB-231 cells (Supplementary Fig. 1C). Further, Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells displayed decreased extracellular acidification rate (ECAR), which reflects overall glycolytic flux, and increased oxygen consumption rate (OCR), an indicator of mitochondrial oxidative respiration (Fig. 1d, e). Consistently, increased OCR while decreased ECAR were observed in sh-Mettl3 Huh7 cells as compared with that in control cells (Fig. 1f, g).

To confirm the role of m⁶A in cell metabolism, we generated catalytically inactive Mettl3 mutant DA (D395A)¹⁹ and observed that cells expressing wild-type (WT) Mettl3, rather than Mettl3 DA mutant (Supplementary Fig. 1D), displayed an increased glucose consumption (Supplementary Fig. 1E), lactate production (Supplementary Fig. 1F), and ATP productions (Supplementary Fig. 1G). Over expression of m⁶A demethylase ALKBH5 can also decrease the glucose consumption, lactate production rate, and ATP levels of Huh7 cells (Fig. 1h). Consistently, ALKBH5 can increase OCR while decrease ECAR in HeLa cells (Supplementary Fig. 1H and I). Together, our findings reveal that m⁶A positively regulated glycolysis and ATP generation of cervical and liver cancer cells.

PDK4 mediates m⁶A regulated glycolysis and ATP generation

We checked whether m⁶A regulated metabolic reprogramming is related to the mitochondrial mass of cancer cell. The results suggested that deletion of Mettl3 had no significant effect on mitochondrial DNA content (Supplementary Fig. 2A). As Mettl3 is an m⁶A “writer” of RNA methylation, we next investigated potential targets involved in m⁶A-regulated metabolic shift by use of m⁶A sequencing (m⁶A-seq)¹² and mRNA-seq. Gene ontology (GO) analysis of these downregulated genes showed enrichment in several key ontology terms reflecting cellular metabolic processes (Fig. 2a). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) found that the glycolysis (Fig. 2b) and glycan degradation (Supplementary Fig. 2B) were inhibited in Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells. Among the 83 glucose metabolism related genes (Supplementary Table 1), we identified the only candidate, pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (PDK4, Supplementary Table 2), that overlapping among mRNA-seq (greater than 2.0-fold variation (p < 0.05) between wild type and Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells, Supplementary Data 1) and m⁶A-seq (modification is more than 3 times greater than that in the input, p < 0.05, Supplementary Data 2) (Fig. 2c).

PDK4 has been suggested as one of the most important factors controlling cell metabolism via directing carbon flux into glycolysis from OXPHOS²⁰. Our data confirmed that PDK4 mRNA can be m⁶A methylated and showed significant enrichment of m⁶A in its 5′UTR and 3′UTR regions (Fig. 2d), which is consistent with published reports using human HEK293T²¹, A549²², and GM12878²³ cells. m⁶A-RIP-qPCR confirmed that a 6-fold m⁶A antibody enriched PDK4 mRNA in HeLa cells, while this enrichment significantly decreased in Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells (Fig. 2e). Consistently, knockdown of Mettl3 significantly attenuated m⁶A antibody enriched PDK4 mRNA in Huh7 cells (Fig. 2f). However, neither m⁶A pull down enrichment nor m⁶A downregulation in Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells was observed for the negative candidate gene PDK1 (Supplementary Fig. 2C).

Our data showed that expression of PDK4 was decreased in Mettl3 knocked down HeLa and Huh7 cells (Fig. 2g). Consistently, knockdown of Mettl3 can decrease the expression of PDK4 in SiHa cells (Supplementary Fig. 2D). While over expression of Mettl3 increased the protein expression of PDK4 in both HeLa and MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 2h). Further, qRT-PCR confirmed that the mRNA of PDK4 was also decreased in Mettl3 knockdown cells (Fig. 2i). However, the mRNA expression of PDK1/2/3 was not variated in Mettl3^Mut/- cells (Supplementary Fig. 2E). Over expression of ALKBH5 can suppress the expression of PDK4 in both HeLa and Huh7 cells (Fig. 2g). These data indicated that m⁶A can positively regulate the expression of PDK4 in cancer cells.

Although the promotion roles of PDK4 in cell metabolism have been well illustrated^24,25, we further investigated its roles in m⁶A regulated glycolysis of cancer cells. Results showed that over expression of PDK4 (Supplementary Fig. 2F) to a comparable level of endogenous PDK4 can predominantly reverse the glucose consumption, lactate production rate, and ATP levels in Mettl3^Mut/- cells (Fig. 2j). Consistently, over expression of PDK4 constructs to a comparable level of endogenous PDK4 (Supplementary Fig. 2F) can also attenuate the metabolic phenotypes in Mettl3 knocked down SiHa cells (Supplementary Fig. 2G). It confirmed that PDK4 was involved in Mettl3 regulated glycolysis of cervical and liver cancer cells.

m⁶A regulates mRNA stability and translation of PDK4

We further investigated the potential mechanisms involved in m⁶A regulated expression of PDK4. Our data showed that there was no significant difference of promoter activities of PDK4 between wild type and Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells, or between sh-control and sh-Mettl3 Huh7 cells (Fig. 3a), suggesting that m⁶A did not affect the transcription of PDK4. After fractionation assay (Supplementary Fig. 3A), results showed that there was no difference of subcellular localization of PDK4 mRNA between wild type and Mettl3^Mut/- cells, or between sh-control and sh-Mettl3 Huh7 cells (Fig. 3b). We treated wild type and Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells with Act-D to block transcription. Deletion of Mettl3 had no significant effect on the stability of precursor mRNA of PDK4 in HeLa cells, suggesting that m⁶A had no effect on splicing of PDK4 precursor mRNA (Fig. 3c). However, mRNA stability of mature PDK4 in Mettl3 deletion HeLa (Fig. 3d) or SiHa (Supplementary Fig. 3B) cells were significantly less than that in their corresponding control cells. Consistently, over expression of ALKBH5 can also decrease the mature mRNA stability of PDK4 in HeLa cells (Supplementary Fig. 3C). It indicated that m⁶A modification may delay the degradation of mature mRNA of PDK4 in cancer cells.

**Fig. 3: m⁶A regulates the mRNA stability and translation of PDK4 in cancer cells.**

We further investigated whether m⁶A can regulate the expression of PDK4 beside mRNA stability. Both wild-type HeLa cells transfected with vector or Mettl3 construct were further treated with MG132 to inhibit proteasome activity or cycloheximide (CHX) to block protein translation. The data showed that in the presence of CHX, but not MG-132, attenuated Metttl3-induced PDK4 expression in HeLa cells (Fig. 3e), suggesting that Mettl3 might regulate the protein translation rather than protein stability/post-translation modification of PDK4. This was confirmed by the results that half-life of PDK4 protein had no significant difference between wide type and Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells (Fig. 3f).

To confirm that m⁶A may regulate the translation of PDK4, we constructed the pmirGLO-PDK4 luciferase reporter that contained PDK4 cDNA in multiple cloning site (MCS) region. Results of dual-luciferase assay showed that translation efficiency of PDK4 in HeLa cells was significantly greater than in Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells (Fig. 3g). Consistently, the translation efficiency of PDK4 was also reduced in cells co-transfected with ALKBH5 constructs (Supplementary Fig. 3D). It suggested that m⁶A-induced PDK4 expression might be due to regulation of translation. Next, we isolated different RNA fractions from wild type and Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells by ribosome profiling: non-translating fraction (<40S), translation initiation fraction (including 40S ribosomes, 60S ribosomes, 80S monosomes, <80S) and translation active polysomes (>80S) (Supplementary Fig. 3E). Results showed that PDK4 mRNA in translation active polysomes (>80S), rather than that in monosome (<40S, 40S, 60S, and 80S), of Mettl3^Mut/− cells were significantly lower than that in wild type cells (Fig. 3h). All these data suggested that m⁶A regulated the mRNA stability and translation elongation of PDK4 in cervical and liver cancer cells.

Methylation sites involved in m⁶A-regulated PDK4

m⁶A-RIP-seq data showed that one m⁶A peak in 5′UTR region and three peaks in 3′UTR region of PDK4 mRNA (Fig. 2d and Fig. 4a). To characterize m⁶A methylation in PDK4 mRNA, fragmented RNA isolated from HeLa cells was immunoprecipitated with m⁶A antibody¹². m⁶A-RIP-PCR showed that the m⁶A enrichment of PDK4 5′UTR, rather than 3′UTR, was significantly downregulated in Mettl3^Mut/- cells (Fig. 4b), suggesting that m⁶A methylation in 5′UTR region might be more dynamic than those in 3′UTR.

**Fig. 4: Methylation sites of PDK4 involved in m⁶A regulated expression of PDK4.**

To explore the potential roles of m⁶A methylation on PDK4 expression, firstly, we constructed 3′UTR reporters containing wild type PDK4 3′UTR, or mutant 1/2/3 3′UTR (GGAC to GGCC, Fig. 4c) after the firefly luciferase reporter gene. The luciferase assay showed that the mRNA expression, protein expression, and translation efficiency of pmirGLO-PDK4-3′UTR in Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells had no significant difference with that in HeLa cells (Fig. 4d). The PDK4 3′UTR-reporter luciferase assay showed that reporter genes from WT-3′UTR, mut1-3′UTR, mut2-3′UTR, and mut3-3′UTR, had no translational difference between wild type and Mettl3^Mut/- cells (Fig. 4e). It suggested that m⁶A methylation on 3′UTR was independent to the m⁶A -regulated PDK4 expression.

To investigate the potential roles of m⁶A in 5′UTR, we generated luciferase reporters by inserting 5′UTR of PDK4 in the front of firefly luciferase (Fig. 4f). The dual-luciferase assay showed that the mRNA expression, protein expression, and translation efficiency of pGL3-PDK4-5′UTR in Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells were significantly less than that in wild type HeLa cells (Fig. 4g). The mutant of m⁶A motif (5′UTR-Mut1) while not control site (5′UTR-Mut2) in 5′UTR resulted in a downregulation of mRNA expression, protein expression, and translation efficiency of F-Luc but partially abolished the difference between wild type and Mettl3^Mut/- cells (Fig. 4g). Wild type or Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells were transfected with pcDNA-PDK4-5′UTR-WT or pcDNA-PDK4-5′UTR-Mut1/Mut2, respectively. Western blot results showed that deletion of Mettl3-suppressed PDK4 expression was attenuated using pcDNA-PDK4-5′UTR-Mut1, compared to that of pcDNA-PDK4-5′UTR-WT or pcDNA-PDK4-5′UTR-Mut2 (Fig. 4h). This was further confirmed by the results that the mRNA stability of pcDNA-PDK4-5′UTR-WT in wild type cells were greater than that in Mettl3^Mut/- cells (Fig. 4i), while pcDNA-PDK4-5′UTR-Mut1 can abolish the difference of mRNA half-lives between wild type and Mettl3^Mut/- cells (Fig. 4j). Together, our data suggested that m⁶A in PDK4 5′UTR is responsible for the mRNA stability and translation, which might be due to that the m⁶A modified GGAC is important for the secondary structure of PDK4 5′UTR (Supplementary Fig. 4).

Factors involved in m⁶A regulated expression of PDK4

Mechanisms responsible for m⁶A regulated mRNA stability and translation elongation were further investigated. It has been revealed that m⁶A modification may regulate the mRNA stability via readers including YTHDF2, YTHDF3, and IGF2BP1~3^26,27. Results showed that IGF2BP3, while not YTHDF2, YTHDF3, or IGF2BP1/2, can significant bind with PDK4 mRNA in HeLa cells (Fig. 5a). Further, the binding between IGF2BP3 and PDK4 was significantly decreased in Mettl3^Mut/- cells as compared with that in HeLa cells (Fig. 5b). We therefore knocked down the expression of IGF2BP3 by siRNA (Fig. 5c). Results showed that si-IGF2BP3 can suppress the expression of PDK4 and attenuate deletion of Mettl3-suppressed expression of PDK4 in HeLa cells (Fig. 5c). Further, si-IGF2BP3 can significantly decrease the mRNA stability of pcDNA-PDK4-5′UTR-WT (Fig. 5d), while this effect was attenuated for pcDNA-PDK4-5′UTR-Mut1 (Fig. 5i). The data suggested that IGF2BP3 was involved in m⁶A regulated mRNA stability.

YTHDF1 can recognize m⁶A methylated mRNA and promote the translation of its targets²⁸. RIP-qPCR was used to verify whether YTHDF1 participates in m⁶A methylation of PDK4 mRNA. Results showed that YTHDF1 interacted with PDK4 mRNA remarkably, while this interaction was significantly suppressed in Mettl3^Mut/- cells (Fig. 5f). It further revealed that YTHDF1 preferred to interact with the 5′UTR region of PDK4 mRNA rather than 3′UTR region (Fig. 5g). In Mettl3^Mut/- cells, interaction between YTHDF1 and 5′UTR, but not 3′UTR, of PDK4 mRNA, was significantly suppressed in comparison to that in HeLa cells (Fig. 5g). To confirm the roles of YTHDF1 in m⁶A-regulated PDK4 expression, we over expressed YTHDF1 in HeLa cells (Fig. 5h). Our data showed that YTHDF1, which had limited effect on the mRNA expression of PDK4 (Supplementary Fig. 5A), can increase the expression of PDK4 and attenuate deletion of Mettl3-suppressed expression of PDK4 in HeLa cells (Fig. 5h). Further, over expression of YTHDF1 can increase the protein expression of pcDNA-PDK4-5′UTR-WT, while this effect was attenuated for pcDNA-PDK4-5′UTR-Mut1 (Fig. 5i).

To further investigate whether m⁶A regulated translation of PDK4 was cap-independent/dependent translation initiation, both Mettl3^Mut/- and wide type cells were treated with rapamycin, which inhibits cap-dependent translation²⁹. However, no obvious difference of PDK4 was observed between wild type and Mettl3^Mut/- cells (Supplementary Fig. 5B). Maintenance of PDK4 expression in the presence of rapamycin was not due to an increase of PDK4 protein stability, as co-treatment of wild type cells with protein synthesis inhibitor CHX resulted in a rapid disappearance of PDK4 (Supplementary Fig. 5B), suggesting that PDK4 expression was regulated through cap-independent translation³⁰.

We then further evaluated the roles of translation elongation in m⁶A regulated PDK4 according the results of ribosome profiling-qPCR. eEF-1 and eEF-2 are elongation factors that responsible to the eukaryotic translation elongation³¹. RIP-qPCR was performed to investigate the variation of eEF-1 and eEF-2 binding PDK4 mRNA. Our data revealed that the interaction between PDK4 mRNA and eEF-2, but not eEF-1, in Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells was significantly inhibited than that in HeLa cells (Fig. 5j). Combining our previous data that the YTHDF1 and eEF-2 interaction, but not eEF-1, significantly suppressed in Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells than that in control cells¹², the data hinted that both YTHDF1 and eEF-2 are likely associated to regulate the m⁶A induced translation elongation of PDK4 mRNA in cancer cells.

Targeting m⁶A of PDK4 by dm⁶ACRISPR to regulate glycolysis

We then specifically demethylated the m⁶A of PDK4 by fusing the catalytically dead Type VI-B Cas13 enzyme with the m⁶A demethylase ALKBH5, which is developed in our lab and named as dm⁶ACRISPR³². Three gRNAs at distinct positions around the m⁶A site were designed to target the mRNA of PDK4 (Fig. 6a). Firstly, the m⁶A site in 5′UTR of PDK4 was verified by SELECT method³³ in HeLa and Huh7 cells (Fig. 6b). Next, wild type Cas13b, which cleaves targeted mRNA, was used to test the efficiency of gRNAs. Our data showed that wild type Cas13b co-transfected with three gRNAs respectively can significantly decrease the mRNA levels of PDK4 (Supplementary Fig. 6A), suggesting that all three gRNAs worked efficiently in vivo. While mRNA levels of PDK4 in cells transfected with gRNAs alone (Supplementary Fig. 6B) or gRNAs combined with dCas13b (Supplementary Fig. 6C) had no significant change.

**Fig. 6: Targeting m⁶A of PDK4 by dm⁶ACRISPR re-programs metabolic of cancer cells.**

The demethylation effect of dm⁶ACRISPR on PDK4 mRNA was verified by SELECT-qPCR. Results showed that the m⁶A levels of targeted site on PDK4 mRNA significantly decreased after transfecting cells with gRNAs and dCas13b-ALKBH5 (Fig. 6c). The strongest demethylation effect on PDK4 5′UTR was observed with gRNA1, which targets a ~90 nt downstream region from the m⁶A site and resulted in 80.2 ± 3.6% demethylation (2-ΔCt method). The dm⁶ACRISPR induced demethylation of PDK4 was further confirmed by m⁶A-RIP-qPCR (Supplementary Fig. 6D).

Results showed that dm⁶ACRISPR targeting PDK4 led to a significant downregulation of PDK4 mRNA (Fig. 6d) and protein (Fig. 6e). This might be due to that dm⁶ACRISPR with gRNA for PDK4 can significantly decrease the binding of PDK4 mRNA with YTHDF1 and IGF2BP3 (Fig. 6f). To investigate whether m⁶A mediated mRNA stability of PDK4 was related to the dm⁶ACRISPR induced upregulation of PDK4, we compared the effects of dCas13b-ALKBH5 with control gRNA or gRNA1 on PDK4 mRNA half-life. Results showed that targeted demethylation of PDK4 can significantly destabilize its mRNA (Fig. 6g), indicating that dm⁶ACRISPR decreased the mRNA stability via demethylation of m⁶A at 5′UTR in the case of PDK4.

To further investigate that dm⁶ACRISPR targeting PDK4 can modulate cell metabolism, we generated catalytically inactive dCas13b-ALKBH5 mutant (H204A)⁶. Our data showed that gRNA1 combined with dCas13b-ALKBH5 can significantly decrease the glucose consumption (Fig. 6h), lactate production (Fig. 6i), and ATP productions (Fig. 6j) as compared with that of non-targeted gRNA combined with dCas13b-ALKBH5. However, gRNA1 for PDK4 combined with dCas13b-ALKBH5 mutant had no significant effect on glycolysis and ATP generation (Fig. 6h–j). These data suggested that targeting m⁶A of PDK4 by dm⁶ACRISPR can regulate the glycolysis and ATP generation of cancer cells.

TBP transcriptionally regulates expression of Mettl3

We evaluated the potential mechanisms responsible for the expression of Mettl3 in cancer cells. The expression of Mettl3 in ECT1/E6E7, a human normal cervical epithelium cell line, and cervical cancer HeLa and SiHa cells were checked. Our data showed that the protein (Fig. 7a) and mRNA (Fig. 7b) expression of Mettl3 increased in cervical cancer HeLa and SiHa cells as compared with that in ECT1/E6E7 cells. In addition, the precursor mRNA of Mettl3 in cervical cancer cells was also greater than that in ECT1/E6E7 cells (Fig. 7c). Further, we generated the promoter reporter of Mettl3 via inserting 1 Kb upstream of the transcription start site (TSS) of Mettl3 to pGL3 plasmid. The luciferase assay showed that the promoter activities of Mettl3 in cervical cancer cells were significantly greater than that in ECT1/E6E7 cells (Fig. 7d). It indicated that the transcription of Mettl3 was activated in cervical cancer cells.

**Fig. 7: TBP is responsible for the upregulation of Mettl3 in cervical cancer cells.**

We then evaluated the potential transcription factors (TFs) responsible for the regulation of Mettl3 in cancer cells. To identify TFs that directly regulate Mettl3 expression, we analyzed the ENCODE chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) data in ChIPBase³⁴ and PROMO with 5% maximum matrix dissimilarity rate³⁵. Among the 47 factors identified by ChIPBase and 32 factors identified by PROMO, eight factors including ETS1, FOXA1, NRF1, PAX5, STAT4, TBP, TP53, and YY1 were overlapping between the two databases (Fig. 7e). We further compared the expression of these factors among ECT1/E6E7 and cervical cancer cells. Our data showed that only mRNA of NRF1 and TBP were upregulated in both HeLa and SiHa cells as compared with that in ECT1/E6E7 cells (Fig. 7f). Western blot analysis showed that the expression of TBP, rather than NRF1, in cervical cancer cells was significantly greater than that in ECT1/E6E7 cells (Fig. 7g). We then knocked down the expression of TBP in HeLa and SiHa cells by use of its specific siRNA (Supplementary Fig. 7A). Our data showed that knockdown of TBP can suppress the mRNA (Fig. 7h) and protein (Fig. 7i and Supplementary Fig. 7A) expression of Mettl3 in both HeLa and SiHa cells.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-qPCR assays demonstrated that TBP had a significant enrichment of Mettl3 promoter over normal immunoglobulin G (IgG) control in both HeLa and SiHa cells (Fig. 7j, indicating a direct binding between TBP and Mettl3 promoter. ChIPBase data (Supplementary Fig. 7B)³⁶ and JASPAR (Supplementary Fig. 7C) showed that there were two TBP potential binding sites in the promoter within 1 Kb upstream of Mettl3. ChIP-qPCR showed that binding of TBP to the potential binding site 2 was much greater than to the site 1 in HeLa cells (Fig. 7k). We then mutated the two TBP potential binding sites of promoter reporter of Mettl3 to generate the pGL-M3-Mut1 or pGL-M3-Mut2 (Supplementary Fig. 7D and Fig. 7l). Our data showed that si-TBP can significantly decrease luciferase levels of pGL-M3-WT and pGL-M3-Mut1, while the inhibition effect of si-TBP was attenuated for pGL-M3-Mut2 (Fig. 7m). Consistently, the relative values of F-Luc/R-luc of pGL-M3-WT and pGL-M3-Mut1 in HeLa cells were greater than that in ETC1/E6E7 cells, while this effect was attenuated for pGL-M3-Mut2 (Supplementary Fig. 7E). Further, the expression of TBP was significantly and positively correlated with the expression of Mettl3 in clinical cervical cancer patients from ChIPBase³⁴ (Fig. 7n), GEPIA (Supplementary Fig. 7F), or TCGA database (Supplementary Fig. 7G). All these data suggested that TBP might be responsible for the upregulation of Mettl3 in cervical cancer cells via binding to its promoter-proximal site to increase the transcription.

PDK4 is involved in m⁶A regulated cancer progression

Glycolysis and ATP generation are critical for cancer progression including growth, metastasis and chemoresistance^37,38. We further over expressed PDK4 in Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa, sh-Mettl3 Huh7, or si-Mettl3 SiHa cells (Supplementary Fig. 8A, B, C). Over expression of PDK4 can reverse the suppressed growth rate of Mettl3-deleted HeLa (Fig. 8a) and SiHa (Supplementary Fig. 8D) cells as compared to that of their corresponding control cells. Consistently, PDK4 also attenuated sh-Mettl3 suppressed proliferation of Huh7 cells (Fig. 8b). Further, our data suggested that deletion of Mettl3 increased sensitivity of HeLa cells to the treatment of doxorubicin (Dox), however, over expression of PDK4 can attenuate this effect and reduce the Dox sensitivity (Fig. 8c). It suggested that PDK4 was involved in Mettl3 regulated growth and chemosensitivity of cervical and liver cancer cells.

HeLa wide type, Mettl3^Mut/-, HeLa^PDK4, and Mettl3^Mut/-PDK4 stable cells were used to establish xenografts. Consistently, xenograft model confirmed that over expression of PDK4 can attenuate the suppression effect of Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells on in vivo tumor growth (Fig. 8d). IHC showed that Mettl3 depletion led to a lower level of PDK4 in xenograft tumor tissues (Fig. 8e), which suggested that deletion of Mettl3 can regulate the expression of PDK4 in vivo.

At this point, we explored the possibility of a link between m⁶A methylation, PDK4 and cervical cancer development. The expression of Mettl3 was positively correlated with the PDK4 mRNA in cervical cancer patients (Fig. 8f). Further, Mettl3 expression in cervical cancer tissues was significantly (p < 0.01) greater than that in normal tissues, according to Zhai Cervix, Biewenga Cervix, and Pyeon Muti-Cancer data from the Oncomine database (Fig. 8g). Consistently, IGF2BP3 (Fig. 8h) and YTHDF1 (Fig. 8i), the readers of PDK4 mRNA, significantly increased in cervical cancer tissues as compared with that in the normal control samples. Using the online bioinformatics tools including GEPIA and Kaplan‐Meier plotter, we found that cervical cancer patients with increased expression of Mettl3 (Fig. 8j) and TBP (Fig. 8k) showed reduced disease-free survival (DFS). Consistently, cervical cancer patients with increased expression of PDK4 showed reduced disease-free survival (DFS, Fig. 8l) and overall survival (OS, Fig. 8m). Together, these data suggested that PDK4 was involved in m⁶A regulated glycolysis and progression of cervical cancer.

Discussion

The metabolic alterations are generally thought to promote cancer progression³⁹. Our data showed that m⁶A can direct carbon flux into glycolysis from OXPHOS. A few studies suggested that potential clues between RNA methylation and lipid metabolism^17,40,41. For example, m⁶A negatively mediated UCP2 protein expression and positively mediated PNPLA2 protein expression to regulate obesity development⁴¹. Knockdown of Mettl3 increases PPaRα mRNA lifetime and expression, which resulted in the reducing lipid accumulation and cell viability¹⁷. Our data found that deletion of Mettl3 or over expression of ALKBH5 can suppress glucose consumption, lactate production, ATP generation, and ECAR. Further, GO and GSEA analysis revealed that deletion of Mettl3 downregulated genes enriched in several key ontology terms reflecting cellular metabolic processes such as glycolysis and glycan degradation. Our results described the potential roles of m⁶A in cancer metabolism, and also created the possibility to develop therapeutic strategies against cancer progression by targeting m⁶A modification.

The conventional Warburg effect is generally associated with upregulation of PDK1/2/3⁴², whereas the expression of these enzymes is not variated in m⁶A regulated Warburg-effect-like metabolic changes; instead, PDK4, which directs carbon flux into glycolysis from OXPHOS²⁰, acts as the key upstream regulator. PDK4 is the most widely distributed PDK isoform which plays oncogenic roles in human colon²⁵ and bladder⁴³ cancer. Our data showed significant enrichment of m⁶A in its 5′UTR and 3′UTR regions of PDK4 in HeLa cells. Deletion of Mettl3 decreased the expression of PDK4, while over expression of PDK4 can attenuate Mettl3 regulated glycolysis of cancer cells. It confirmed the essential roles of PDK4 in m⁶A regulated glycolysis and ATP generation.

The m⁶A modification can regulate nearly all stages in the life cycle of RNA, such as RNA processing, nuclear export and translation modulation^2,44. Our data showed that m⁶A in 5′UTR, rather than 3′UTR, positively regulated the mRNA stability and translation of PDK4. YTHDF1-eEF-2 interaction is likely involved in the m⁶A regulated translation elongation of PDK4 mRNA in cancer cells, while IGF2BP3 was involved in m⁶A regulated mRNA stability. Consistently, our recent study indicated that methylation of CDS of Snail, which recruited the YTHDF1 and eEF-2, can trigger its translation elongation and cancer metastasis¹². IGF2BPs can bind the GG(m⁶A)C sequence of mRNA to promote the stability and storage of their target mRNAs²⁶. The oncogenic roles of IGF2BP3 have been observed in various cancers⁴⁵. Our data provided a new insight into the function of IGF2BP3 and YTHDF1 in glycolysis via regulating the mRNA stability and translation of PDK4, respectively.

We further specifically demethylated the m⁶A of PDK4 mRNA by use of dm⁶ACRISPR system³². The system resulted in about 80% of demethylation and significantly decreased the expression of PDK4 and glycolysis of cancer cells. dm⁶ACRISPR is a newly developed method that targeting demethylation of specific mRNA in transcriptome to artificially manipulate cell metabolism. Further, both in vitro and in vivo data suggested that PDK4 was involved in Mettl3 regulated growth and chemosensitivity of cancer cells. Clinical analysis confirmed the positive correlation between Mettl3 and PDK4 in cervical cancer tissues. Both high expression of PDK4 and Mettl3 reduced the survival rate of cancer patients. Mettl3 has been reported to maintain myeloid leukemia⁴⁶, promote liver cancer progression⁴⁷, and is essential for GSC maintenance and radioresistance⁴⁸. Considering that metabolic control by PDK4 is critical for cancer development, the roles of PDK4 in m⁶A related oncogenic functions in other cancers need further investigation.

Finally, we found that TBP can regulate the transcription of Mettl3 to increase its expression in cervical cancer cells. Nowadays, TFs which can regulate the expression of RNA methyltransferases are not well illustrated. It has been reported that the expression of Mettl14 is negatively regulated by SPI1 in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells⁴⁹. As to Mettl3, hepatitis B X-interacting protein (HBXIP) can increase its expression in breast cancer cells via inhibiting miRNA let-7g, which downregulated the expression of Mettl3 by targeting its 3′UTR⁵⁰. MiR-33a can decrease the expression of Mettl3 in lung cancer cells to suppress cell proliferation⁵¹. In gastric cancer cells, H3K27ac can activate Mettl3 transcription to increase its expression⁵². Our data provided a novel mechanism which was responsible for the upregulation of Mettl3 in cancer cells.

In summary, we provided compelling in vitro and in vivo evidences demonstrating that m⁶A can regulate the glycolysis of cancer cells via regulation of PDK4. The methylation of 5′UTR is critical for m⁶A mediated mRNA stability and translation. Since a great number of genes are involved in cell metabolism, we cannot exclude the possibility that m⁶A modification regulates metabolic process by indirectly targeting other genes. Our study suggested that m⁶A regulates glycolysis of cervical and liver cancer cells through induction of PDK4, which expanded our understanding of such interplays that are essential for therapeutic application.

Methods

Metabolic assay

The glucose and lactate concentration in cultured media were measured using commercial kits (BioVision) following the manufacturer’s instructions. ATP was quantified using Cell Titer-Glo® luminescence assay (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All samples were tested in triplicate.

ECAR and OCR

Extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) and oxygen consumption rate (OCR) were analyzed using the Seahorse XF96 instruments (Seahorse Bioscience, USA). For OCR test, cell medium was replaced by assay medium (Seahorse Bioscience) supplemented with 1 mM pyruvate, 10 mM glucose, and 2 mM glutamine for 1.5 h at 37 °C, then measured by the XF Cell Mito Stress Kit (Seahorse Bioscience). The concentrations of oligomycin and FCCP were 1.0 μM and 0.5 μM, respectively. For ECAR test, cells were incubated in the assay medium (Seahorse Bioscience) with 2 mM glutamine for 1.5 h at 37 °C, then measured by the Glycolytic Stress Test Kit (Seahorse Bioscience). The OCR and ECAR results were adjusted to the Seahorse XF96 Wave software.

RNA-seq and bioinformatics

Total RNAs from wild type and Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells were purified using RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Then the cDNA was generated by use of a NuGEN Ovation RNA-Seq Systemv2 (NuGEN, San Carlos, CA). As to mRNA-seq, total mRNA preparation and sequencing were performed by the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China). Sequencing reads were mapped to reference human genome sequence (NCBI 36.1 [hg19] assembly by TopHat (Version 2.0.6). The read counts were expressed as FPKM. The differential expression between conditions was statistically assessed by R/Bioconductor package edgeR (version 3.0.8). Genes with FDR of <0.05 and >200 bp were called as differentially expressed.

For GESA, standard procedure (http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsea/doc/GSEAUserGuideFrame.html) as described by GSEA user guide was performed. The curated gene set C2 of the Molecular Signature Database version 4.0 was used to compute overlaps between gene sets in Molecular Signature Database and our gene set.

Cell line and cell culture

Human cancer HeLa, SiHa, Huh7, HepG2, and MDA-MB-231 cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM, GIBCO, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1 % penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen). The ECT1/E6E7, a human normal cervical epithelium cell line, was kindly provided by Prof Tianfeng Chen at Jinan University. The ECT1/E6E7 cells were grown in keratinocyte-serum free medium (GIBCO) containing 0.1 ng/ml human recombinant EGF, 0.05 mg/ml bovine pituitary extract, and additional calcium chloride 44.1 mg/L.

Plasmid, siRNA, shRNA and generation of stable cell lines

The CDS of Mettl3, ALKBH5 and PDK4 were cloned into pcDNA3.1 to generate over expression plasmid. pcDNA3.1 was used as the vector control for analysis. Mettl3 mutant DA (D395A) and ALKBH5 mutant (H204A) plasmids were generated in our previous study⁵³. For IGF2BP3, Mettl3, and TBP knockdown, three synthesized duplex RNAi oligos targeting human mRNA sequences from Sigma were used. A scrambled duplex RNA oligo (5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGU) was used as RNA control. Twenty-four hours before transfection, the medium was replaced with fresh medium and transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen) with vector control, plasmid construct, siRNA negative control (si-NC), or siRNAs according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The working concentration of siRNA was 50 nM.

The Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells were generated by CRISPR-cas9 editing system in the previous study⁵⁴. The sh-control and sh-Mettl3 Huh7 cells were kindly provided by Prof Jun Cui at Sun Yat-sen University. To generate PDK4 stable over expression cells, the wide type and Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells were transfected with pcDNA/PDK4 or vector control via liposome-mediated transfection. G418 (700 μg/ml) was used to select the transfected cells. After two week selection, the survived cells were seeded individually into 96-well plate for further expansion. The expression of PDK4 and Mettl3 was checked by western blot analysis. For over expression of target genes, cells were transfected with plasmids by lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturers’ instructions.

To generate dCas13b-ALKBH5 fusion protein, the original PspCas13b plasmid (Addgene plasmid #103866), gRNA plasmid (Addgene plasmid #103854) and non-targeting gRNA plasmid (Addgene plasmid #103868) were obtained from Addgene. PspCas13b-Alkbh5 and gRNA-containing plasmids were constructed by Synbio Technologies Company (Suzhou, China). Inactive Cas13b was constructed containing double mutations at A133H and A1058H of PspCas13b.

Luciferase reporter assay

To evaluate the effect of 3′UTR on PDK4 expression, the wild type or mutant-1/-2/-3 of 3′UTR of PDK4 was inserted behind the F-luc coding region. Both the pmirGLO-PDK4-3′UTR-WT and pmirGLO-PDK4-3′UTR-Mut-1/-2/-3 were transfected into wild type or Mettl3^Mut/- cells for 24 h, the firefly luciferase (F-luc) and renilla luciferase (R-luc) were assayed by Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay system (Promega).

To evaluate the potential roles of 5′UTR in PDK4 expression, the wild type or mutant 5′UTR ligated with promoter of PDK4 was inserted in the front of F-luc coding region of pGL3-basic plasmid to generate pGL-3-PDK4-5′UTR-WT, pGL-3-PDK4-5′UTR-Mut1, and pGL-3-PDK4-5′UTR-Mut2, respectively. Both these plasmids were co-transfected with pRL-TK into wild type or Mettl3^Mut/- cells for 24 h. The firefly luciferase (F-luc) and renilla luciferase (R-luc) were assayed by Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay system (Promega). Renilla Luciferase (R-luc) was used to normalize firefly luciferase (F-luc) activity. The translation outcome was determined as a relative signal of F-luc divided by R-luc, the mRNA abundance was determined by qRT-PCR of F-luc and R-luc, and the translation efficiency of PDK4 is defined as the quotient of reporter protein production (F-luc/R-luc) divided by mRNA abundance²⁸.

Promoter activity of Mettl3 and PDK4 in cells was measured by luciferase assay according to our previously described protocol⁵⁵. Briefly, cells were transfected with pGL3-Mettl3-WT-Luc, pGL3-Mettl3-Mut1-Luc, or pGL3-Mettl3-Mut2-Luc containing the −1000/+1 sequence of the Mettl3 promoter, or pGL3-Basic-PDK4-luc containing sequence −1000/+1 of PDK4 promoter.

Transfection efficiency was normalized by co-transfection with pRL-TK. After 24 h incubation, luciferase activity was measured using the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Renilla Luciferase (R-luc) was used to normalize firefly luciferase (F-luc) activity to evaluate the reporter transcription. Experiments were performed three times with similar results.

mRNA stability

Stability of RNA in wild type and Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells was achieved by incubating cells with actinomycin D (Act-D, Catalog #A9415, Sigma, U.S.A) at 5 μg/ml. Cells were then collected at the indicated times and RNA was isolated for Real-time PCR. Half-life (t_1/2) of PDK4 mRNA was calculated using ln2/ slope and GAPDH was used for normalization.

Polysome profiling

The fraction of ribosome was separated by centrifugation in a sucrose gradient. Cells pretreated with 100 μg/ml cycloheximide were lysed in 1 ml lysis buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 100 μg ml^–1 CHX, 0.5% Triton-X-100, freshly add 1:100 protease inhibitor, 40 U ml^–1 SUPERasin). After centrifugation at 15,000 g for 15 min, the supernatant was separated by 5/50% w/v sucrose gradient at 4 °C for 4 h at 140, 000 g (Beckman, rotor SW28). The sample was then fractioned and analyzed by Gradient Station (BioCamp) equipped with ECONO UV monitor (BioRad) and fraction collector (FC203B, Gilson). The fractions resulting from sucrose gradient were used for RNA extraction and qRT-PCR.

Design of the guide RNAs

mRNA sequences of all isoforms of target genes were subjected to alignment analysis to identify the common regions, which were acted as targeting candidates for gRNA design. gRNAs targeting CDS region of PDK4 were designed, all designed gRNAs were subject to MEGABLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) to avoid mismatching to unexpected mRNA in human genome. The sequences of gRNAs were: gRNA1, 5′-AGA ATG TTG GCG AGT CTC AC-3′; gRNA2, 5′-GGA TCA ATG CTT CCA ATG TGG CTT GGG TTT CC-3′; gRNA3, 5′-CAG TTA GGA TCA ATG CTT CCA ATG TGG CTT GG-3′.

SELECT qPCR

SELECT qPCR method was following Xiao’s protocol³³ with slight modifications. Qubit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with Qubit™ RNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to quantified total RNAs. Then, 1500 ng of total RNA was mixed with 40 nM up and down primers and 5 μM dNTP in 17 μl 1 x CutSmart buffer (NEB). The mixture was incubated with the follow program: 90 °C for 1 min, 80 °C for 1 min, 70 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 1 min, 50 °C for 1 min and 40 °C for 6 min. The sample was further mixed with 0.5 U SplintR ligase, 10 nM ATP and 3 μl of 0.01 U Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase and incubated at 40 °C for 20 min and denatured at 80 °C for 20 min. Afterwards, 20 μl qPCR reaction containing 2 μl of final reaction mixture, 2 x SYBR Green Master Mix (TaKaRa), and 200 nM SELECT primers (listed in Supplementary Table 3) was performed. The qPCR program was 95 °C, 5 min; (95 °C, 10 s; 60 °C, 35 s) × 40 cycles; 95 °C, 15 s; 60 °C, 1 min; 95 °C, 15 s; 4 °C, hold. Results were calculated by normalized the C_t values of samples to their corresponding C_t values of control. All assays were performed with three independent experiments.

Xenograft models

Female BALB/c nude mice (four weeks old) were purchased from Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China) Animal Center and raised under pathogen-free conditions. The animal experiments were complied with Zhongshan School of Medicine Policy on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. As to the subcutaneous transplanted model, WT^Vec, Mettl3^Mut/-+vec, WT^PDK4, Mettl3^Mut/-+PDK4 cells (2 × 10⁶ per mouse, n = 10 for each group) were diluted in 200 μL normal medium + 200 μL Matrigel (BD Biosciences) and subcutaneously injected into immunodeficient mice to investigate tumor growth. Tumor growth was monitored every three days. The tumor volume was calculated using the formula V = 1/2× larger diameter × (smaller diameter)².

Database (DB) analysis

Kaplan-Meier plotter (http://kmplot.com/analysis/)⁵⁶ was used to assess the prognostic value of Mettl3 and PDK4 expression in patients with cervical cancers. Expression levels of PDK4 in cancer tissues and normal tissues of cervical cancers were obtained from TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) database. The correlation between Mettl3 and PDK4 was evaluated by use of LinkedOmics (http://www.linkedomics.org), which is a publicly available portal that includes multi-omics data from all 32 cancer types from TCGA⁵⁷. PDK4 expression in cervical cancer from Oncomine database (Zhai Cervix, Biewenga Cervical, and Pyeon Mutiple Cancer) was analyzed. TF binding data and gene co-expression analysis were derived from ChIPBase 2.0³⁴.

Western blot analysis

Western blot analysis was performed as our previous study⁵⁸. Briefly, cells were lysed by use of lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1%NP-40, 0.5%Na-deoxycholate, 5 mg/ml aprotinin, 5 mg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride for 30 minutes after treatment as indicated in figure legends. About 20 μg total proteins were separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes, blocked with 5% non-fat milk at room temperature for 2 h, and incubated with primary antibodies. After washed three times, membrane was incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (1: 5,000 dilution) for 2 h at room temperature. The blot was visualized by using Western Blotting Plus Chemiluminescence Reagent (Life Science). The bands resulting from gel imaging were quantified by ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The antibodies used in the present study were: PDK4 (Abcam, ab89295, 1:500), Mettl3 (Abcam, ab195352, 1:500), ALKBH5 (Abcam, ab69325, 1:500), H2A.X (Abcam, ab26350, 1:500), IGF2BP3 (Santa Cruz, sc-365641, 1:500), YTHDF1(Abcam, ab99080, 1:500), NRF1 (Abcam, ab34682, 1:500), TBP (Abcam, ab818, 1:500) and GAPDH (BOSTER, BM3876, 1:1000). The bands resulting from gel imaging were quantified by ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

RNA extraction and real-time PCR for gene expression

Total RNA was isolated from target cells using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. Then 500 ng of mRNA were used to synthesize the cDNA by using Prime Script RT Master Kit (Takara, Dalian, China). The qRT-PCR was performed on CFX96 Touch real time System (Biorad, USA) with 2 x SYBR Green Master Mix (TaKaRa). Primers of targeted genes were listed in Supplementary Table 3. The cycle number at threshold was used to quantify the transcript levels of genes of interest. Transcripts of the housekeeping gene GAPDH in the same incubations were used for normalization, while nuclear MALAT1 RNA was selected as endogenous control for the nuclear RNA. The relative expression levels were calculated by the 2-ΔCt methods.

m⁶A-RIP qPCR

1 μg m⁶A or IgG antibody were incubated with Protein G Magnetic beads in 1x Reaction buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.1% NP-40 in nuclease free H₂O) at 4 °C for 3 h, followed by incubation with 200 μg extracted RNA at 4 °C for 3 h. Incubation of RNA-antibody-conjugated beads with 100 µl Elution Buffer (75 nM NaCl, 50 nM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 6.25 nM EDTA, 1% (w/v) SDS, 20 mg/ml Proteinase K) for 30 min at room temperature was used to elute the bound RNAs. The eluted RNA was extracted by phenol: chloroform method followed by ethanol precipitation. Isolated m⁶A-RIP RNA was reverse transcribed and quantification by qPCR. IP enrichment ratio of a transcript was calculated as the ratio of its amount in IP to that in the input yielded from same amounts of cells.

m⁶A sequencing (m⁶A-seq) and data analysis

Total polyadenylated RNA was isolated from HeLa cells by use of TRIZOL reagent followed by isolation through FastTrack MAGMaxi mRNA isolation kit (Invitrogen). RNA fragmentation, m⁶A-seq, and library preparation were conducted according to manufacturer’s instructions and previously published protocol²⁸. The library was prepared by use of NEBNext Ultra Directional RNA Library Prep Kit (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA). Each experiment was conducted with two biological replicates. m⁶A-seq data was analyzed according to protocols described before²⁸. Significant peaks with FDR < 0.05 were annotated to RefSeq database (hg19). Homer was used to identify the sequence motifs. Cufflinks using sequencing reads from input samples was used to calculate gene expression. Cuffdiff was used to find DE genes.

Mitochondrial DNA assay

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number was determined by a standard by real-time PCR using nuclear DNA (nDNA, GAPDH primer set) content as an internal control for normalization. Extract genomic DNA (including mtDNA) from target cells were isolated using the Qiagen Genomic DNA kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells relative content of mtDNA (mtDNA primer set) was checked by qRT-PCR and normalized to that of nuclear DNA (GAPDH primer set). The primers were as follow: mtDNA, forward 5′-ACG CCA TAA AAC TCT TCA CCA AAG-3′, reverse 5′-GGG TTC ATA GTA GAA GAG CGA TGG-3′; GAPDH, forward 5′-ACA ACT TTG GTA TCG TGG AAG G-3′, reverse 5′-GCC ATC ACG CCA CAG TTT C-3′.

LC-MS/MS assay for m⁶A quantification

After purified using oligo dT magnetic beads, mRNA was digested with nuclease P1 (0.5 U, Sigma) in 25 μl reaction system containing 10 mM NH₄OAc (pH = 5.3) at 42 °C for 1 h. Then mixtures were further incubated with NH₄HCO₃ (1 M, 3 μL) and alkaline phosphatase (1 μL, 1 U/μL; Sigma) at 37 °C for 2 h. After neutralization and filter, samples were separated by a C18 column (Agilent) and analyzed by an Agilent 6410 QQQ triple-quadrupole LC mass spectrometer using positive electrospray ionization mode. Ratio of m⁶A to A was calculated based on calibration curves.

Cell proliferation assay

Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 1×10⁴ cells per well in 10% FBS-supplemented medium. After treatment as indicated conditions, cell proliferation was evaluated using CCK-8 cell viability assay system according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A microplate reader was used to measure the absorbance at 450 nm.

Protein stability

Protein stability of targets in wild type and Mettl3^Mut/- HeLa cells were achieved by incubation of cycloheximide (CHX, final concentration 100 μg/ml) during indicated times. The expression of PDK4 was measured through western blot analysis.

Subcellular fraction

The nucleus and cytoplasm were separated by NE-PER nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction reagents (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). The fractions were pooled to isolate total RNA by TRIzol reagent for qRT-PCR. GAPDH were used as endogenous control for cytoplasmic RNA, while MALAT1 RNA was selected as endogenous control for nuclear RNA.

RIP-RT-PCR

Before sample collection, cells were irradiated twice with 400 mJ/cm² at 254 nm by Stratalinker on ice. Cells were then lysed in high salt lysis buffer (300 mM NaCl, 0.2% NP-40, 20 mM Tris-HCl PH 7.6, 0.5 mM DTT, protease inhibitor cocktail (1 tablet/50 ml), and RNase inhibitor (1:200)) at 4 °C for 30 min. After treatment with or without 1 U RNase T1 for 15 min at 24 °C, 10% supernatant was collected as input. YTHDF1/2/3, IGF2BP1/2/3, or eEF-1/2 antibody, or IgG-conjugated Protein A/G Magnetic Beads were used to incubate the remaining supernatant in 1x IP buffer supplemented with RNase inhibitors at 4 °C overnight. 100 µl Elution Buffer (5 mM Tris-HCL pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 0.05% SDS, 20 mg/ml Proteinase K) was used to elute the immunoprecipitated RNAs for 2 h at 50 °C. RNA was further isolated by phenol: chloroform method followed by ethanol precipitation. IP enrichment ratio of a transcript was calculated as ratio of its amount in IP to that in the input, yielded from same amounts of cells.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

All of slides were placed in a 60 °C incubator for 20 min, de-paraffinized in xylene and rehydrated in gradient ethanol. The slides were incubated with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min, followed by antigen retrieving using 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 30 min. After blocking with 5% BSA, slides were incubated overnight at 4 °C with relevant primary antibody. After that, the secondary biotin-conjugated antibody was applied for 1 h in room temperature. The IHC staining was visualized using diaminobenzidine reaction, counterstained with hematoxylin.

Statistical analyses

Data were reported as mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. For statistical analysis, two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test between two groups and by one-way or two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test for multiple comparison were performed. All statistical tests were two-sided. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS 16.0 for Windows. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; NS, no significant.

URLs and data resources

Gene Ontology Analysis (GO), http://pantherdb.org/; Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/; NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/.

Consent

The authors confirmed that we have obtained written consent from the patient to publish the manuscript.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The accession number for the high-throughput of m⁶A-seq data reported in this paper is GEO: GSE112795 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE112795). The data underlying Figs. 7n, and 8f–n referenced during the study are available in a public repository from the TCGA website. The source data underlying all experimental results (Figs. 2g, h; 3e, f left panel; 4h left panel; 5c, h, i left panel; 6e left panel; 7g left panel, i and Supplementary Figs. 1a left panel, d; 2d, f; 3a; 5b left panel; 7a; 8a-c) are provided as a Source Data file. All the other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. A reporting summary for this article is available as a Supplementary Information file.

References

Perry, J. K. & Kelley, D. E. Existence of methylated messenger RNA in mouse L cells. Cell 1, 37–42 (1974).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Roundtree, I. A., Evans, M. E., Pan, T. & He, C. Dynamic RNA modifications in gene expression regulation. Cell 169, 1187–1200 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, J. et al. A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 93–95 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ping, X. L. et al. Mammalian WTAP is a regulatory subunit of the RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase. Cell Res. 24, 177–189 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jia, G. F. et al. N6-Methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 885–887 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zheng, G. et al. ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse fertility. Mol. Cell 49, 18–29 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yue, Y., Liu, J. & He, C. RNA N6-methyladenosine methylation in post-transcriptional gene expression regulation. Genes Dev. 29, 1343–1355 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, Z. et al. FTO plays an oncogenic role in acute myeloid leukemia as a N6-methyladenosine RNA demethylase. Cancer Cell 31, 127–141 (2017).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Huang, Y. et al. Small-molecule targeting of oncogenic FTO demethylase in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell 35, 677–691 e610 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Su, R. et al. R-2HG exhibits anti-tumor activity by targeting FTO/m(6)A/MYC/CEBPA signaling. Cell 172, 90–105 e123 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, S. et al. m6A demethylase ALKBH5 maintains tumorigenicity of glioblastoma stem-like cells by sustaining FOXM1 expression and cell proliferation program. Cancer Cell 31, 591–606.e596 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lin, X. et al. RNA m(6)A methylation regulates the epithelial mesenchymal transition of cancer cells and translation of Snail. Nat. Commun. 10, 2065 (2019).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Choe, J. et al. mRNA circularization by METTL3-eIF3h enhances translation and promotes oncogenesis. Nature 561, 556–560 (2018).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Warburg, O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science 123, 309–314 (1956).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Reid, M. A., Dai, Z. & Locasale, J. W. The impact of cellular metabolism on chromatin dynamics and epigenetics. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 1298–1306 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
He, S. et al. mRNA N6-methyladenosine methylation of postnatal liver development in pig. PloS ONE 12, e0173421 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Zhong, X. et al. Circadian clock regulation of hepatic lipid metabolism by modulation of m(6)A mRNA methylation. Cell Rep. 25, 1816–1828 e1814 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yue, Y. et al. VIRMA mediates preferential m(6)A mRNA methylation in 3′UTR and near stop codon and associates with alternative polyadenylation. Cell Disco. 4, 10 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wang, P., Doxtader, K. A. & Nam, Y. Structural basis for cooperative function of Mettl3 and Mettl14 methyltransferases. Mol. Cell 63, 306–317 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Stacpoole, P. W. Therapeutic targeting of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex/pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDC/PDK) axis in cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 109, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx071 (2017).
Schwartz, S. et al. Perturbation of m6A writers reveals two distinct classes of mRNA methylation at internal and 5′ sites. Cell Rep. 8, 284–296 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lin, S. B., Choe, J., Du, P., Triboulet, R. & Gregory, R. I. The m(6)A methyltransferase METTL3 promotes translation in human cancer cells. Mol. Cell 62, 335–345 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Molinie, B. et al. m(6)A-LAIC-seq reveals the census and complexity of the m(6)A epitranscriptome. Nat. Methods 13, 692–698 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Takubo, K. et al. Regulation of glycolysis by Pdk functions as a metabolic checkpoint for cell cycle quiescence in hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 12, 49–61 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Leclerc, D. et al. Oncogenic role of PDK4 in human colon cancer cells. Br. J. Cancer 116, 930–936 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Huang, H. et al. Recognition of RNA N(6)-methyladenosine by IGF2BP proteins enhances mRNA stability and translation. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 285–295 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. N6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability. Nature 505, 117–120 (2014).
Article ADS PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. N(6)-methyladenosine modulates messenger RNA translation efficiency. Cell 161, 1388–1399 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Beretta, L., Gingras, A. C., Svitkin, Y. V., Hall, M. N. & Sonenberg, N. Rapamycin blocks the phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 and inhibits cap-dependent initiation of translation. EMBO J. 15, 658–664 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Evdokimova, V. et al. Translational activation of snail1 and other developmentally regulated transcription factors by YB-1 promotes an epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Cell 15, 402–415 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kapur, M., Monaghan, C. E. & Ackerman, S. L. Regulation of mRNA translation in neurons—a matter of life and death. Neuron 96, 616–637 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li J. X. et al. Targeted mRNA demethylation using an engineered dCas13b-ALKBH5 fusion protein. Nucleic Acids Res. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1269 (2020).
Xiao, Y. et al. An elongation- and ligation-based qPCR amplification method for the radiolabeling-free detection of locus-specific N(6) -methyladenosine modification. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl. 57, 15995–16000 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhou, K. R. et al. ChIPBase v2.0: decoding transcriptional regulatory networks of non-coding RNAs and protein-coding genes from ChIP-seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D43–D50 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Messeguer, X. et al. PROMO: detection of known transcription regulatory elements using species-tailored searches. Bioinformatics 18, 333–334 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576–589 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vander Heiden, M. G., Cantley, L. C. & Thompson, C. B. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324, 1029–1033 (2009).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Ganapathy-Kanniappan, S. & Geschwind, J. F. Tumor glycolysis as a target for cancer therapy: progress and prospects. Mol. Cancer 12, 152–163 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ma, J. Z. et al. METTL14 suppresses the metastatic potential of hepatocellular carcinoma by modulating N(6) -methyladenosine-dependent primary MicroRNA processing. Hepatology 65, 529–543 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. mRNA m(6)A plays opposite role in regulating UCP2 and PNPLA2 protein expression in adipocytes. Int J. Obes. (Lond.) 42, 1912–1924 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gordan, J. D., Thompson, C. B. & Simon, M. C. HIF and c-Myc: sibling rivals for control of cancer cell metabolism and proliferation. Cancer Cell 12, 108–113 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Woolbright, B. L. et al. The role of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase-4 (PDK4) in bladder cancer and chemoresistance. Mol. Cancer Ther. 17, 2004–2012 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhao, B. S., Roundtree, I. A. & He, C. Post-transcriptional gene regulation by mRNA modifications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 31–42 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lederer, M., Bley, N., Schleifer, C. & Huttelmaier, S. The role of the oncofetal IGF2 mRNA-binding protein 3 (IGF2BP3) in cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 29, 3–12 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Barbieri, I. et al. Promoter-bound METTL3 maintains myeloid leukaemia by m(6)A-dependent translation control. Nature 552, 126–131 (2017).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen, M. et al. RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase METTL3 promotes liver cancer progression through YTHDF2 dependent post-transcriptional silencing of SOCS2. Hepatology 67, 2254–2270 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Visvanathan, A. et al. Essential role of METTL3-mediated m(6)A modification in glioma stem-like cells maintenance and radioresistance. Oncogene 37, 522–533 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Weng, H. et al. METTL14 inhibits hematopoietic stem/progenitor differentiation and promotes leukemogenesis via mRNA m(6)A modification. Cell Stem Cell 22, 191–205 e199 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cai, X. et al. HBXIP-elevated methyltransferase METTL3 promotes the progression of breast cancer via inhibiting tumor suppressor let-7g. Cancer Lett. 415, 11–19 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Du, M. et al. MiR-33a suppresses proliferation of NSCLC cells via targeting METTL3 mRNA. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 482, 582–589 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang Q., et al. METTL3-mediated m(6)A modification of HDGF mRNA promotes gastric cancer progression and has prognostic significance. Gut, https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319639 (2019).
Chen, Z. et al. Transfer RNA demethylase ALKBH3 promotes cancer progression via induction of tRNA-derived small RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 2533–2545 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shen, B. et al. Generation of gene-modified mice via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting. Cell Res. 23, 720–723 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lu, L. et al. Inhibition of BRD4 suppresses the malignancy of breast cancer cells via regulation of Snail. Cell Death Differ. 27, 255–268 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gyorffy, B., Surowiak, P., Budczies, J. & Lanczky, A. Online survival analysis software to assess the prognostic value of biomarkers using transcriptomic data in non-small-cell lung cancer. PloS ONE 8, e82241 (2013).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Vasaikar, S. V., Straub, P., Wang, J. & Zhang, B. LinkedOmics: analyzing multi-omics data within and across 32 cancer types. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D956–D963 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. et al. Targeting CDK7 increases the stability of snail to promote the dissemination of colorectal cancer. Cell Death Differ. 26, 1442–1452 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr Feng Liu and Prof Junjiu Huang at School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University for technical support. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81973343, 81673454, 81672608, and 31801197), the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chiral Molecule and Drug Discovery (2019B030301005), the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Construction Foundation (No. 2017B030314030), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Sun Yat-sen University) (Nos.19ykpy130 and 19ykzd24), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China (No. 2020A1515010291), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2018M643354).

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Zihan Li, Yanxi Peng, Jiexin Li.

Authors and Affiliations

Guangdong Key Laboratory of Chiral Molecule and Drug Discovery, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China
Zihan Li, Yanxi Peng, Jiexin Li, Feng Chen & Hongsheng Wang
Institute of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, 421001, China
Zihan Li & Jian Tu
Department of Basic Medicine, Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, Hunan, 423000, China
Yanxi Peng
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, China
Zhuojia Chen
Center for Translational Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Shuibin Lin

Authors

Zihan Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yanxi Peng
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jiexin Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhuojia Chen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Feng Chen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jian Tu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Shuibin Lin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hongsheng Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and design: Hongsheng Wang, Zhuojia Chen; Acquisition of data: Zihan Li, Yanxi Peng, Jiexin Li, Zhuojia Chen, Feng Chen; Analysis and interpretation of data: Hongsheng Wang, Zihan Li, Yanxi Peng, Feng Chen, Jian Tu; Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: Hongsheng Wang, Zhuojia Chen, Shuibin Lin.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongsheng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Tao Wu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Z., Peng, Y., Li, J. et al. N⁶-methyladenosine regulates glycolysis of cancer cells through PDK4. Nat Commun 11, 2578 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16306-5

Download citation

Received: 22 February 2019
Accepted: 17 April 2020
Published: 22 May 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16306-5

This article is cited by

New horizons for the role of RNA N6-methyladenosine modification in hepatocellular carcinoma
- Yu-jia Li
- Yang-ling Qiu
- Shi-zhong Zheng
Acta Pharmacologica Sinica (2024)
RNA modification-mediated mRNA translation regulation in liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical perspectives
- Shuibin Lin
- Ming Kuang
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology (2024)
Protein translation: biological processes and therapeutic strategies for human diseases
- Xuechao Jia
- Xinyu He
- Kangdong Liu
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2024)
The RNA m6A reader IGF2BP3 regulates NFAT1/IRF1 axis-mediated anti-tumor activity in gastric cancer
- Lichen Ge
- Yalan Rui
- Junjun Wang
Cell Death & Disease (2024)
METTL3 promotes cellular senescence of colorectal cancer via modulation of CDKN2B transcription and mRNA stability
- Zhuojia Chen
- Jiawang Zhou
- Hongsheng Wang
Oncogene (2024)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.