Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Benthic fauna declined on a whitening Antarctic continental shelf

An Author Correction to this article was published on 07 July 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Ice retreat in West Antarctica and Antarctic Peninsula has led to important changes in seafloor communities and gains in benthic blue carbon. In most of the Antarctic, however, sea ice increased between the 1970s and 2014, but its effects on the benthos remain largely unexplored. Here, we provide a 1988–2014 record of macro- and megafauna from the north-eastern Weddell Sea shelf, where benthic biomass decreased by two thirds and composition shifted from suspension feeders to deposit feeders. Concomitant increases in sea-ice cover suggest a reduced flux of primary production to the benthos. As benthic communities are major repositories for Antarctic biodiversity and play an important role in biogeochemical cycling, the observed changes have far-reaching consequences for the Antarctic ecosystem and its feedback to the climate system. The findings underscore the importance of long-term ecological monitoring in a region vulnerable to warming and ice-shelf collapse.

Introduction

Antarctica harbours a unique benthic fauna displaying unusually high levels of biodiversity, endemism and biomass1,2,3,4,5. Antarctic benthos evolved in cold isolation, leading to life-forms characterized by low temperature adaptation, stenothermia, long generation time, late maturity age and brooding as prevalent reproductive strategy1,6,7,8,9. Extreme seasonal and interannual variations in food availability have favoured the capacity to maintain metabolic activity during periods of food scarcity10,11. Icebergs scouring the seafloor are a notorious source of disturbance creating large variations in abundance, biomass and species numbers on small spatial scales12,13.

The extreme patchiness, slow growth of most organisms1,14, spatio-temporal heterogeneities in sampling effort, inconsistencies in sampling equipment and methods and scarcity of repeated measurements make it difficult to detect temporal changes in Antarctic benthic communities. As a result, only few studies conducted around the Southern Ocean have shown climate-related changes in benthic communities and key benthic groups. Most studies on the Antarctic benthos in a changing climate are in response to glacier, sea ice, anchor ice retreat, increased iceberg scouring and ice-shelf collapse15,16,17,18,19, establishing a link between pelagic productivity and carbon stored by benthos (blue carbon)18,20,21. As opposed to the Arctic, where sea-ice has been plummeting over the last decades22, two thirds of the Antarctic including the Weddell Sea, the East Antarctic shelf and the Ross Sea have seen increasing trends of sea-ice cover over the satellite instrumental period from 1979 up to a maximum in 201423,24, but the response of the benthos to this larger whitening region of the Antarctic is so far unexplored. Long-term studies from the shallow part of McMurdo Sound in the Ross Sea, showed decadal changes in the benthic community25 and in the growth and recruitment of sponges26,27, likely in response to changes in local productivity due to grounded icebergs. The only available data for the eastern Weddell Sea continental shelf shows a positive relationship between bryozoan growth and open water extent (and hence productivity) in an area of increasing sea-ice cover18. Given the absence of systematic repeated samplings with standardized methods, quantitative community scale time series data on the benthos from the Antarctica’s whitening deep continental shelves are so far lacking.

Here, we present a 26-year record of macrobenthic biomass and abundance off Kapp Norvegia/Auståsen (KNA) in the north-eastern Weddell Sea, and its associated changes with increasing summer sea-ice cover during the last decades28,29,30. KNA is considered a gate of entry for icebergs into the Weddell Sea31 and a hotspot of iceberg grounding20. As sea-ice cover is inversely related to productivity32 and organic material reaching the seafloor33, while icebergs act antagonistically reducing benthos by scouring12,16,34 and consolidating sea-ice between grounded icebergs25, our data set provides an opportunity to assess benthic biological responses to a whitening Antarctica.

KNA represents the intersection of eight ship-based expeditions between 1988 and 2014 (Fig. 1). Here, 59 multibox corer deployments were carried out, processed and analysed by the same protocol and staff. Additionally, we analyse 98 imagery transects (see Methods), to assess the megafauna, which is not quantitatively represented in the box cores, and whose complexity varies in response to iceberg disturbance. To represent productivity and iceberg influence, we consider data on sea-ice cover and iceberg area available from several data bases (see Methods). We relate these data to benthic variations and the main southern hemisphere climatic pattern, the Southern Annular Mode (SAM)28,30,35,36. Here we show temporal changes in benthic macrofauna abundance and biomass, megabenthic 3D complexity, and benthic community composition. Additionally, we relate the faunal changes to concomitant changes in sea-ice related productivity, and variation of iceberg area during our study period.

Fig. 1: Map of the Weddell Sea.
figure1

The map includes position of giant icebergs (pink dots), tracks of R/V Polarstern cruises to the Weddell Sea providing material for this study (black lines), and areas were sea-ice cover has increased (white) and decreased (blue). The yellow polygon, drawn as a polygon shapefile using the ArcGIS 10.x software, represents the study area off Kapp Norvegia/Auståsen.

Results

Loss of benthic abundance and biomass (blue carbon)

Macrobenthic abundance and biomass dropped by half and two thirds of the late 80s values, respectively, in the second half of the time series (Fig. 2a, b; Table 1). The southern annular mode (SAM) switched from a more negative to a slightly more positive phase (Fig. 2c) during this period, along with large increases in sea-ice cover (Fig. 2d), no trend in iceberg area (Fig. 2e), and a pronounced drop in productivity (Fig. 2f) were observed. The largest abundance and biomass changes, occurred at the turn of the millennium, coinciding with the overall SAM maximum. Abundance and biomass of feeding guilds followed the pattern for the total community (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2).

Fig. 2: Temporal changes in macrobenthic and environmental characteristcs between 1988–2014.
figure2

Changes are given for macrobenthos abundance (a), macrobenthos biomass (b), summer Southern Annular Mode index (SAM, c), sea-ice cover (d), iceberg area (e) and productivity (f) for the time period 1988–2014. Values are given as deviations from the long-term average. For SAM, sea-ice cover, iceberg area and productivity n = 1 for all years. Dashed lines represent significant Pearson linear regressions (p < 0.05, permutations = 9999). Dots represent independent multibox corer deployments for 1988 (n = 5), 1989 (n = 2), 1996 (n = 24), 1998 (n = 9), 2000 (n = 3), 2004 (n = 8), 2011 (n = 6) and 2014 (n = 2); note that only n ≤ 10 are displayed. Bars represent mean values, black whiskers represent standard errors. For abundance and biomass the shading denotes n (stronger colours represent larger n). Underlying data are provided as a Source data file.

Table 1 Benthic mean abundance and biomass for Kapp Norvegia/Auståsen.

While total macrofauna abundance decreased during our study period (Fig. 2a), the relative contribution of feeding guilds to total macrofauna abundance remained fairly constant (Fig. 3a). This suggests similar responses by different functional groups of the macrofauna inhabiting KNA and, thus, a high interconnectivity between individuals of the community. Contrastingly, the decrease in total macrofauna biomass (Fig. 2b) was accompanied by a shift from a suspension feeder dominated community in the 80s and 90s to one dominated by deposit feeders in the new millennium (Fig. 3b). As benthic suspension feeders depend directly on the vertical flux of organic matter, their decline provides additional evidence for a reduced productivity in response to increased sea-ice cover.

Fig. 3: Temporal changes of macrobenthic composition between 1988–2014.
figure3

Temporal changes are given for the contribution of each feeding guild to macrobenthic abundance (a) and biomass (b). Each coloured bar represents the average abundance and biomass proportion of each feeding guild. Averages were calculated based on data from independent multibox corer deployments for 1988 (n = 5), 1989 (n = 2), 1996 (n = 24), 1998 (n = 9), 2000 (n = 3), 2004 (n = 8), 2011 (n = 6) and 2014 (n = 2). Underlying data are provided as a Source data file.

The megafauna showed a similar decline over the study period, with a decreasing proportion of fully mature apex communities (see Methods) and an increase in the proportion of young successional community stages (Fig. 4). Large Antarctic glass sponges are the main component of benthic communities in the Weddell Sea1,2,3,5. These organisms enhance biodiversity and provide refuge for other organisms which, in turn, increases the local benthic biomass. Thus, the decrease of total macrobenthic biomass (Fig. 2b) in addition to the loss of 3D complexity can be associated to biomass losses of large foundation species (e.g. sponges), which are the largest suspension feeders.

Fig. 4: Temporal changes in the frequency of megafaunal stage of recolonization following putative iceberg disturbance.
figure4

Categories ranging from flat (no megafauna) to fully three-dimensional apex communities (see Methods) were applied to independent imagery transects obtained during 1988 (n = 12), 1996 (n = 27), 1998 (n = 33), 2000 (n = 9), 2004 (n = 11), 2011 (n = 3) and 2014 (n = 3). Shading denotes n (stronger colours represent larger n; see Supplementary Table 3). Underlying data are provided as a Source data file.

Environmental factors and benthos: trends and relations

A positive phase of the SAM is associated with higher summer sea-ice concentrations in the eastern Weddell Sea28, a lower areal extent and duration of productive polynya areas and a lower vernal supply of pelagic food to the benthos32. Model-based studies suggest a delayed response of sea-ice cover to SAM variation37,38. Based on regression analyses, we were able to confirm SAM variations to significantly affect sea-ice cover changes with a delay of one year (Pearson r2 = 0.404; p-value = 0.0165; Permutations = 9999). The negative correspondence between SAM and productivity suggests that ice-free days and ice-free area dominate over other factors governing pelagic productivity in Antarctica (e.g. nutrients, photo-synthetically available radiation, sea surface temperature, continental shelf width, basal melt rate)32.

Correlation analyses showed positive relationships between benthic abundance and biomass and pelagic productivity, both for the total community as well as for the major feeding guilds, (p < 0.05, permutations = 9999; green areas in Fig. 5). Biomass of suspension feeders showed an immediate response to increases in productivity (year t0; p < 0.05, permutations = 9999), commensurate with their direct dependence on fresh organic matter. The instantaneous response of the benthos supports earlier findings of rapid sponge growth17,26 overturning the long-held paradigm of slow growth in polar waters9. The observed coupling of macrobenthic biomass and productivity also supports the hypothesis that Antarctic benthos is food limited39. Deposit feeders and higher trophic levels (scavengers and predators), by contrast, showed a delayed biomass response (years t1 and t2, Fig. 5). The lack of immediate response suggests a decoupling from primary production at the temporal scales investigated. A plausible explanation is that the energy for these feeding guilds becomes available only after it settles on the seabed (deposit feeders) or passes through other organisms (scavengers and predators)11,33. Abundances showed a 2-years phase-shift for all groups (Fig. 5), which would be consistent with the rather long time it takes for gonad development, reproduction and recruitment40,41.

Fig. 5: Influence of productivity and iceberg area on total benthic abundance and biomass, and abundance and biomass of major feeding guilds.
figure5

Spearman correlations were calculated considering all independent multibox corer deployments (n = 59), and 9999 permutations. Significant correlations (p < 0.05) are represented by coloured boxes. p-values shown with + represent a statistical trend69, the colours represent positive (green) and negative (red) correlation statistic values, respectively. Underlying data are provided as a Source data file.

We found inverse correlations between total benthic abundance and iceberg area, as well as abundance of all feeding guilds (p < 0.05, permutations = 9999; Fig. 5). Biomass appeared to be independent of iceberg area (Fig. 5). As opposed to shallow coastal areas, where increased frequency and mobility of icebergs resulted in increased scouring on the shelf16,42, the changes in icebergs in our study were not associated with inverse changes in either biomass or megabenthic 3D complexity.

Discussion

Our study, spanning more than a quarter of a century, is the first, to the best of our knowledge, showing quantitative benthic community changes over the full depth of the continental shelf. It is also, to our knowledge, the first to examine benthic changes in a region of the Antarctic that has been whitening until very recently, thus providing an important test of the proposed links between sea-ice cover and iceberg area and benthic abundance and biomass43. Because most of the Antarctic continental shelf has seen a positive trend in sea-ice extent over 40 years of satellite observations until 201428,44, an overall decrease in blue carbon can be expected. If corroborated by geochemical evidence, the extrapolation of our findings to the total Antarctic continental whitening shelf would imply an overall decrease in Antarctic zoobenthic blue carbon storage of 18.9 × 106 t during that period, contrasting the situation described for the West Antarctic and Antarctic Peninsula regions where blue carbon has been increasing in response to climate change17,18,20,21.

The end of our study marks the possible end of three decades of increasing Antarctic sea-ice extent with a record high in 2014 followed by a precipitous decline to a record low only three years later23. It is not clear to date, how the trends will develop. There are indications for a turning point24, and a model for the eastern Weddell Sea predicts a decrease of sea-ice cover in the coming decades44. A decrease in sea-ice would lead to an increase in productivity, flux of organic matter to the benthos and, ultimately, in benthic abundance and biomass. A change from a whitening to a blueing Weddell and Ross Seas would roughly double the carbon sink initiated in the Bellingshausen/Amundsen continental shelf area, providing an important negative feedback to climate change18,20,21. However, carbon supply is only one of many factors limiting life on the Antarctic seafloor. Most of the few Antarctic benthic species to be investigated are stenothermal with narrow thermal windows7,8,38 showing only very limited potential to cope with the 1–2 °C temperature rises7,8,41,45, which at least for the Weddell Sea, already occur in the form of warm water intrusions46. Further temperature increases are predicted for the Weddell Sea in the coming decades47. The biological responses to the physico-chemical environment under different climate scenarios are complex48 and require an integrated and sustained effort to continue observations over time in this part of the planet that is critically vulnerable to climate change49.

Methods

Study area, benthic abundance, biomass and 3d configuration

Research was carried out in the Kapp Norvegia/Auståsen (KNA) region (Fig. 1), as delimited by previous studies conducted there50,51. To calculate the approximate area of KNA we constructed a polygon in the GIS environment with an approximate area of 9180 km2.

Benthic total abundance and biomass, and abundance and biomass data of 35 benthic taxa correspond to stations of the R/V Polarstern52 cruises ANT-VI/3. VII/4, XIII/3, XV/3, XVII/3, XXI/2, XXVII and PS82 (see https://www.pangaea.de/expeditions/cr.php/Polarstern for cruise reports), which represent the years 1988, 1989, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2004, 2011 and 2014, respectively. Only shelf stations were selected, i.e. all those stations located within 100–700 m depth, based on the definition of Antarctic shelves1,33. We excluded stations that were artificially disturbed in the long-term “BEnthic Disturbance EXperiment” (BENDEX)53, leaving a total of 59 multibox corer54 stations with a total 307 cores for the present study (Supplementary Table 1; note that for ANT-XXI/2 only the pooled values for the stations were available). The multibox corer was equipped with 9 cores, from which 1 to 8 were analysed for each station. Each core was 20 × 12 × 45 cm (L × W × D), providing an approximate total of 150 kg of sediment sample per station54. Sample size was adequate for the epi- and endobenthic macrofauna, but too small for the large megafauna (e.g. hexactinellid sponges)55, which was excluded from the analyses and categorized separately (see below). Sediments were sieved through 0.5 mm mesh and the organisms retained on the sieve were fixed in 5% borax-buffered formaline and stored until microscopic enumeration and biomass analysis, generally within a few months after collection2. The taxonomic units as defined by Pineda-Metz et al.43 were used to calculate abundance and biomass of four major feeding guilds: deposit feeders, suspension feeders, scavengers and predators. Separation of feeding guilds was done following the classification scheme shown in Supplementary Table 2. For colonial species (e.g. bryozoans and hydrozoans) abundance data were available only as presence/absence data.

To assess changes in the structural complexity of a benthic community from a flat (early successional stage) to a three-dimensional mature apex community dominated by megafauna (glass sponges, gorgonians), we analysed video- and photo-transects (i.e. imagery transects) from all expeditions, with the exception of 1989 for which no image data are available. Transects representing the years 1988, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2004 and one transect for 2014 (Supplementary Table 3), were extracted from the PANGAEA data repository.

Megafauna was described on a categorical basis using an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 5. Category 0 represented a putative scour mark in its earliest stage of recolonization, characterized by a lack of megafauna and an abrupt change in benthic cover and size along the transect (equivalent to stage R0 in Gutt & Starmans34). Categories 1–5 represent later stages of colonization by Antarctic shelf megafaunal assemblages sensu Gili et al.56, of increasing three-dimensionality (see Fig. 1, in Gili et al.56). The frequency of all 3D configurations was assessed for all imagery transects, and was represented by five categories (from 0 to 4) to facilitate analysis. Each category represents the following proportions: 0 = absent/rare, 1 = uncommon, 2 = common, 3 = mainly, 4 = dominant. This first analysis gave a transect × 3D category table which was used with the prep.fuzzy function of the ade4 package for R57 to transform categorical values to percentage. These calculated percentages were used to estimate the average proportion of each 3D configuration category at each year.

Environmental data and treatment

Environmental data were obtained from the National Sea Ice Data Center data repository58 (sea-ice cover), the OceanColor web data repository59,60,61,62 (Chl a and particulate organic carbon), Solar Geometry Calculator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration63 (NOAA), ALTIBERG Iceberg data base64,65 (average area of small icebergs), and the “The Climate Data Guide: Marshall Southern Annular Mode (SAM) Index (Station-based)66.

Monthly data of the Southern Annular Mode (SAM) index were obtained66 for all summers of the years 1986–2014. We considered as summer the period November to March, which represents the months when the local polynya is open67. Based on this, we calculated the summer SAM index as the average value considering the period November to March.

Daily sea-ice cover from the Sea ice Index provided by the National Snow and Ice Data Center was extracted for the summer months of the period 1986–201458. The daily sea-ice cover data were used to calculate ice-free days in summer for each cell within the KNA polygon. Additionally, data from the Solar Geometry Calculator of the NOAA63 were used to calculate the proportion of a summer day with sun light during summers of the period 1986–2014.

Sea-ice and solar data were used to calculate a summer productivity index, referred in the main text as productivity. Arrigo et al.32 found polynya productivity to be directly related to mean daily photo-synthetically usable radiation, number of ice-free days, ice-free area, sea surface temperature, continental shelf width, and basal melt rate. Based on this, we calculated the productivity for the 1979–2014 period as the product of ice-free days and proportion of a summer day with sun light for all cells located in the KNA polygon (for a detailed description see Supplementary Method Productivity Raster Calculation).

To test if the calculated productivity works as a proxy for Chl a and particulate organic carbon concentration, we correlated productivity with summer Chl a and particulate organic carbon data obtained from the NASA Ocean Color web59,60,61,62 for our study area, and Chl a data for the whole Weddell Sea67. As all correlations were significant (p < 0.005; Supplementary Fig. 3) and had coefficients >0.7, we considered our calculated productivity to sufficiently represent Chl a and particulate organic carbon variations; however, without representing an actual measurement of Chl a or particulate organic carbon. Productivity values were then extracted for the respective 25 km2 pixel of each multibox corer station.

NetCDF files containing monthly means of volume, average area, and probability of finding small icebergs was downloaded from the ALTIBERG v2.1 database64,65. We used the raster package for R57 to extract data on average area of small icebergs in ha.

Summer SAM index, sea-ice cover, productivity and iceberg area data for the KNA area were used to calculate average values for each factor for, whenever possible, the 1986–2014 period. Based on these averages, we calculated summer SAM index, sea-ice cover, productivity, and iceberg area anomalies for each year.

Statistical analysis

Abundance, biomass and complexity data were averaged for the 1988 to 2014 period. Abundance and biomass averages for each expedition were used to calculate the anomalies for the whole community and for each feeding guild. Based on the gains/losses of total benthic biomass (sum of anomalies) we extrapolated losses recorded in KNA to other Antarctic whitening shelves. We estimated the area of Antarctic whitening shelves to be 1.85 × 106 km2. This area was calculated with the measure tool of ArcGIS 10.x and using the IBCSO chart68 as spatial reference.

Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated with 9999 permutations to test the association between productivity and iceberg area with benthic total abundance and biomass, for the total community and the feeding guilds. The same approach was used for 3D complexity. Negative coefficients imply a reduction (reduced), positive coefficients an increase of benthic abundance and biomass (increased) in response to the respective environmental driver investigated.

Statistical tests and figures were done using the R57 and ArcGIS 10.x (ESRI) softwares. R packages included for treatment and analysis of data, as well as to design figures were: raster, car, rcompanion, ggplot2, corrplot, grid, dplyr, ade4, wPerm and extrafont.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The abundance and biomass data, as well as imagery transects that supports the findings of this study are made available in PANGAEA (see Supplementary Tables 1 and 3 and citations therein). Source data for Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2 are provided as Source data.

Change history

  • 07 July 2020

    An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Arntz, W. E., Brey, T. & Gallardo, V. A. Antarctic zoobenthos. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. 32, 241–304 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gerdes, D. et al. Quantitative investigations on macrobenthos communities of the southeastern Weddell Sea shelf based on multibox corer samples. Polar Biol. 12, 291–301 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gutt, J. & Starmans, A. Structure and biodiversity of megabenthos in the Weddell and Lazarev Seas (Antarctica): ecological role of physical parameters and biological interactions. Polar Biol. 20, 229–247 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gutt, J., Sirenko, B. I., Smirnov, I. S. & Arntz, W. E. How many macrozoobenthic species might inhabit the Antarctic shelf? Antarct. Sci. 16, 11–16 (2004).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gutt, J., Griffiths, H. J. & Jones, C. D. Circumpolar overview and spatial heterogeneity of Antarctic macrobenthic communities. Mar. Biodiv. 43, 481–487 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Clarke, A. Seasonality in the Antarctic marine environment. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 90, 461–473 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Peck, L. Prospects for survival in the Southern Ocean: vulnerability of benthic species to temperature change. Antarct. Sci. 17, 497–507 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pörtner, H. O., Peck, L. & Somero, G. Thermal limits and adaptation in marine Antarctic ectotherms: an integrative view. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 362, 2233–2258 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Barnes, D. K. A. & Clarke, A. Antarctic marine biology. Curr. Biol. 21, R451–R457 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Barnes, D. K. A. & Clarke, A. Feeding activity in Antarctic suspension feeders. Polar Biol. 15, 335–340 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sumida, P. Y. G., Smith, C. R., Bernardino, A. F., Polito, P. S. & Vieira, D. R. Seasonal dynamics of megafauna on the deep West Antarctic Peninsula shelf in response to variable phytodetrital influx. R. Soc. Open. Sci. 1, 140294 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gutt, J. On the direct impact of ice on marine benthic communities, a review. Polar Biol. 24, 553–564 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gutt, J. & Piepenburg, D. Scale-dependent impact on diversity of Antarctic benthos caused by grounding of icebergs. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 253, 77–83 (2003).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Peck, L. in Oceanography And Marine Biology: An Annual Review, Vol. 56 (eds Hawkins, S. J., Evans, A. J., Dale, A. C., Firth L. B. & Smith, I. P.) 105–236 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018).

  15. 15.

    Dayton, P. K. Interdecadal variation in an Antarctic sponge and its predators from oceanographic climate shifts. Science 245, 1484–1486 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Barnes, D. K. A. & Souster, T. Reduced survival of Antarctic benthos linked to climate-induced iceberg scouring. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 365–368 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Fillinger, L., Janussen, D., Lundälv, T. & Richter, C. Rapid glass sponge expansion after climate-induced Antarctic ice shelf collapse. Curr. Biol. 23, 1330–1334 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Barnes, D. K. A. Antarctic sea ice losses drive gains in benthic carbon drawdown. Curr. Biol. 25, R775–R792 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sahade, R. et al. Climate change and glacier retreat drive shifts in an Antarctic benthic ecosystem. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500050 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Barnes, D. K. A., Fleming, A., Sands, C. J., Quartino, M. L. & Deregibus, D. Icebergs, sea ice, blue carbon and Antarctic climate feedbacks. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A. 376, 2017176 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Peck, L. S., Barnes, D. K. A., Cook, A. J., Fleming, A. H. & Clarke, A. Negative feedback in the cold: ice retreat produces new carbon sinks in Antarctica. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 2614–2623 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Maksym, T. Arctic and Antarctic Sea ice change: contrasts, commonalities, and causes. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 11, 187–213 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Parkinson, C. L. A 40-y record reveals gradual Antarctic sea ice increases followed by decreases at rates far exceeding the rates seen in the Arctic. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14414–14423 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ludescher, J., Yuan, N. & Bunde, A. Detecting the statistical significance of the trends in the Antarctic sea ice extent: an indication for a turning point. Clim. Dyn. 53, 237–344. (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dayton, P. K. et al. Benthic responses to an Antarctic regime shift: food particle size and recruitment biology. Ecol. Appl. 29, e01823 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Dayton, P. K. et al. Recruitment, growth and mortality of an Antarctic hexactinellid sponge, Anaxycalyx joubini. Plos ONE 8, e56939 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Dayton, P. K. et al. Surprising episodic recruitment and growth of Antarctic sponges: implications for ecological resilience. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 482, 38–55 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Turner, J., Hosking, J. S., Marsahll, G. J., Phillips, T. & Bracegirdle, T. J. Antarctic sea ice increase consistent with intrinsic variability of the Amundsen Sea Low. Clim. Dyn. 46, 2391–2402 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Comiso, J. C. et al. Positive trend in the Antarctic sea-ice cover and associated changes in surface tempreature. J. Clim. 30, 2251–2267 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Vernet, M. et al. The Weddell Gyre, Southern Ocean: Present knowledge and future challenges. Rev. Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000604 (2019).

  31. 31.

    Ranckow, T. et al. A simulation of small to giant Antarctic iceberg evolution: differential impact on climatology estimates. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 122, 3170–3190 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Arrigo, K. R., van Dijken, G. L. & Strong, A. L. Environmental controls of marine productivity hot spots around Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 120, 5545–5565 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Smith, C. R., Minks, S. & DeMaster, D. J. A synthesis of bentho-pelagic coupling on the Antarctic shelf: food banks, ecosystem inertia and global climate change. Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II 53, 875–894 (2006).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Gutt, J. & Starmans, A. Quantification of iceberg impact and benthic recolonization patterns in the Weddell Sea (Antarctica). Polar Biol. 24, 615–619 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Liu, J., Curry, J. A. & Martinson, D. G. Interpretation of recent Antarctic sea ice variability. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L02205 (2004).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Abram, N. J. et al. Evolution of the Southern Annular Mode during the past millennium. Nat. Clim. Change. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2235 (2014).

  37. 37.

    Ferreira, D., Marshall, J., Bitz, C. M., Solomon, S. & Plumb, A. Antarctic Ocean and sea ice response to ozone depletion: a two-time-scale problem. J. Clim. 28, 1206–1226 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Doddridge, E. W. & Marshall, J. Modulation of the seasonal cycle of Antarctic sea ice extent related to the southern Annular Mode. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 7961–9786 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Brey, T. & Clarke, A. Population dynamics of marine benthic invertebrates in Antarctic and subantarctic environments: are there unique adaptations? Antarct. Sci. 5, 253–266 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Pearse, J. S., McClintock, J. B. & Bosch, I. Reproduction of Antarctic benthic marine invertebrates: tempos, modes, and timing. Am. Zool. 31, 65–80 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Peck, L. Ecophysiology of Antarctic marine ectotherms: limits to life. Polar Biol. 25, 31–40 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Barnes, D. K. A. Iceberg killing fields limit huge potential for benthic blue carbon in Antarctic shallows. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 2649–2659 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Pineda-Metz, S. E. A., Gerdes, D. & Isla, E. Benthic communities of the Filchner Region (Weddell Sea). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 628, 37–54 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Timmermann, R. & Hellmer, H. H. Southern Ocean warming and increased ice shelf basal melting in the twenty-first and twenty-second centuries based on coupled ice-ocean finite-element modelling. Ocean Dynam. 6363, 1011–1026 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Sandersfeld, T., Davison, W., Lamare, M. D., Rainer, K. & Richter, C. Elevated temperature causes metabolic trade-offs at the whole-organism level in the Antarctic fish Trematomus bernacchii. J. Exp. Biol. 218, 2373–2381 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Isla, E. & Gerdes, D. Ongoing ocean warming threatens the rich and diverse microbenthic communities of the Antarctic continental shelf. Prog. Oceanogr. 178, 102180 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hellmer, H. H., Kauker, F., Timmermann, R. & Hattermann, T. The fate of the southern Weddell Sea continental shelf in a warming climate. J. Clim. 30, 4337–4350 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Rintoul, S. R. et al. Choosing the future of Antarctica. Nature 588, 233–241 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Hellmer, H. H., Kauker, F., Timmermann, R., Determan, J. & Rae, J. Twenty-first-century warming of a large Antarctic ice-shelf cavity by a redirected coastal current. Nature 485, 225–228 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Gerdes, D., Hilbig, B. & Montiel, A. Impact of iceberg scouring on macrobenthic communities in the high-Antarctic Weddell Sea. Polar. Biol. 26, 295–301 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Isla, E. et al. Downward particle fluxes, wind and a phytoplankton bloom over a polar continental shelf: a stormy impulse for the biological pump. Mar. Geol. 259, 59–72 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (AWI). Polar Research and Supply Vessel POLARSTERN operated by the Alfred Wegener Institute. J. Large-scale Res. Facil. 3, A119 (2017).

  53. 53.

    Gerdes, D., Isla, E., Knust, R., Mintenbeck, K. & Rossi, S. Response of Antarctic benthic communities to disturbance: first results from the artificial Benthic Disturbance Experiment on the eastern Weddell Sea Shelf, Antarctica. Polar Biol. 31, 1469–1480 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Gerdes, D. Antarctic trials of the multi-box corer, a new device for benthos sampling. Polar Rec. 26, 35–38 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Pineda-Metz, S. E. A. & Gerdes, D. Seabed images versus corer sampling: a comparison of two quantitative approaches for the analysis of marine benthic communities in the southern Weddell Sea (Southern Ocean). Polar Biol. 41, 515–526 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Gili, J. M., Coma, R., Orejas, C., López-González, J. & Zabala, M. Are Antarctic suspension-feeding communities different from those elsewhere in the world? Polar Biol. 24, 473–485 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).

  58. 58.

    Fetterer, F., Knowles, K., Meier, W., Savoie, M. & Windnagel, A. K. Sea Ice Index v3 (National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2017). 

  59. 59.

    NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Ocean Ecology Laboratory & Ocean Biology Processing Group. Sea-Viewing Wide Field-of-View Sensor (SeaWiFS) Chlorophyll Data (NASA OB.DAAC, Greenbelt, 2018).

  60. 60.

    NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Ocean Ecology Laboratory & Ocean Biology Processing Group. Sea-Viewing Wide Field-of-View Sensor (SeaWiFS) Particulate Organic Carbon Data (NASA OB.DAAC, Greenbelt, 2018).

  61. 61.

    NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Ocean Ecology Laboratory & Ocean Biology Processing Group. Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Aqua Chlorophyll Data (NASA OB.DAAC, Greenbelt, 2018).

  62. 62.

    NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Ocean Ecology Laboratory & Ocean Biology Processing Group. Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Aqua Particulate Organic Carbon Data (NASA OB.DAAC, Greenbelt, 2018).

  63. 63.

    National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Solar Geometry Calculatorhttps://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/grad/antuv/SolarCalc.jsp?mu=on&sza=on&el=on&az=on (2018).

  64. 64.

    Tournadre, J., Bouhier, N., Girard-Ardhuin, F. & Rémy, F. Antarctic icebergs distributions 1992-2014. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 121, 327–349 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Tournadre, J., Accensi, M. & Girard-Ardhuin F. The ALTIBERG iceberg data base version-2.1 (Ifremer, 2019).

  66. 66.

    Marshall, G. & National Center for Atmospheric Research Staff. The Climate Data Guide: Marshall Southern Annular Mode (SAM) Index (Station-based)https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/marshall-southern-annular-mode-sam-index-station-based (2018).

  67. 67.

    Arrigo, K. R., van Dijken, G. L. & Bushinsky, S. Primary production in the Southern Ocean, 1997–2006. J. Geophys. Res. 113, C08004 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Arndt, J. E. et al. The international Bathymetric Chart of the Southern Ocean (IBCSO) Version 1.0 – a new bathymetric compilation covering circum-Antarctic water. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3111–3117 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Hasley, L. G. The reign of the p-value is over: what alternative analyses could we employ to fill the power vacuum? Biol. Lett. 15, 2019–0174 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the captain, crew and colleagues on board of R/V Polarstern for their help during the eight cruises from 1988 to 2014. We thank Chester Sands and Heike Link for helpful comments in the first draft of the manuscript. Research was supported by the Alfred Wegener Institute (PACES II-T1WP6) and a fellowship to SEAPM given by H. Costa. We acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Funds of the Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforchung.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The paper was conceived by all three authors. D.G. carried out the sampling activities with the multibox corer and directed the analyses of the samples. S.E.A.P.-M. carried out the analyses of the data, carried out the statistical analyses, generated the figures and tables and contributed to the sampling activities (PS82, PS96. S.E.A.P.-M. and C.R. wrote the paper with contributions of D.G. C.R. contributed imagery data for PS77.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Santiago E. A. Pineda-Metz or Claudio Richter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks David Barnes and Paul Dayton for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pineda-Metz, S.E.A., Gerdes, D. & Richter, C. Benthic fauna declined on a whitening Antarctic continental shelf. Nat Commun 11, 2226 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16093-z

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links