Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Precise control of the interlayer twist angle in large scale MoS2 homostructures

## Abstract

Twist angle between adjacent layers of two-dimensional (2D) layered materials provides an exotic degree of freedom to enable various fascinating phenomena, which opens a research direction—twistronics. To realize the practical applications of twistronics, it is of the utmost importance to control the interlayer twist angle on large scales. In this work, we report the precise control of interlayer twist angle in centimeter-scale stacked multilayer MoS2 homostructures via the combination of wafer-scale highly-oriented monolayer MoS2 growth techniques and a water-assisted transfer method. We confirm that the twist angle can continuously change the indirect bandgap of centimeter-scale stacked multilayer MoS2 homostructures, which is indicated by the photoluminescence peak shift. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the stack structure can affect the electrical properties of MoS2 homostructures, where 30° twist angle yields higher electron mobility. Our work provides a firm basis for the development of twistronics.

## Introduction

Recently, two-dimensional (2D) materials and their hetero-structures have attracted a lot of attention due to their unique electrical, optical, and mechanical properties1. Since the weak van der Waals (vdW) interactions dominate the interlayer coupling, vdW homo- and hetero-structures can possess a degree of freedom: interlayer twist angle. Twist angle governs the crystal symmetry and can lead to a variety of interesting physical behaviors, such as Hofstadter’s spectra2,3, unconventional superconductivity4,5, moiré excitons6,7,8, tunneling conductance9,10, nonlinear optics11,12, and structural super-lubricity13,14. These initiate the age of twistronics for various electronic and photonic applications. Therefore, precise controlling the interlayer twist angle of 2D materials-based structures over a large scale is highly desired and would set a foundation for the applications of twistronics. Indeed, it is possible to fabricate the required twist angle by transfer method4,9,15,16,17,18 or atomic force microscope (AFM) tip manipulation techniques10,13,19,20. However, the sample size in the previously demonstrated results is usually in the order of ten-microns, strongly impeding the applications of twistronics. Wafer-scale few-layer films were also realized21,22,23, but their interlayer twist angle is random and limited by the grain size and orientation as well. To realize large-scale 2D vdW homo- /hetero-structures with accurately controlled interlayer twist angle, an approach is required, in particular for the applications of twistronics.

In this work, we report the precise control of interlayer twist angle in large-scale stacked multilayer MoS2 homostructures by the combination of as-fabricated epitaxially grown oriented MoS2 monolayer and water-assisted transfer technique. The interfaces of our fabricated MoS2 homostructures are relatively clean since no polymer is needed to be dissolved during the transfer process. We confirm that the Raman fingerprints (low-frequency interlayer modes and Moiré phonons), interlayer coupling, band structure, and electrical properties are strongly twist angle dependent. Considering that twisted bilayer MoS2 shows a variety of fantastic physical properties, such as ultra-flatbands, shear solitons, time-reversal-invariant topological insulators, Moiré quantum well states and correlated Hubbard model physics24,25,26,27, our work is of great significance in guiding the applications of twistronics based on large-scale 2D materials.

## Results

### Fabrication of large-scale twisted multilayer MoS2 films

In this study, wafer-scale highly oriented MoS2 monolayer is fabricated by epitaxial growth technique28 (see Methods for more details). Figure 1a illustrates a typical monolayer MoS2 film on a 2-inch sapphire wafer, the optical microscope images in Supplementary Fig. 1 shows that the film is highly uniform with 100% coverage. The inset of Fig.1a is a typical low-energy electron diffraction (LEED) pattern in a random position of as-fabricated wafer-scale MoS2 monolayer. Only one set of hexagonal spots with the same direction is observed, indicating that the MoS2 monolayer films exhibit only 0° or 60° twin alignments with sapphire substrates28. Figure 1b shows the AFM image of an as-grown MoS2/sapphire wafer after we scrape off the MoS2 film by a tweezer. It shows that the surface of the MoS2 film is clean. The thickness of the MoS2 monolayer is ~0.53 nm, in good harmony with pervious results29. Raman and photoluminescence (PL) spectra in Fig. 1c provide further evidence that the as-fabricated monolayer MoS2 film is of high quality. The line scan Raman and PL spectra of a whole wafer in Supplementary Fig. 2 also show the high uniformity of the MoS2 film. For more information, please see Supplementary Notes 1.

The transfer process is illustrated in Fig. 1d. First, we use a linear guided wafer scriber to cut the whole wafer into rectangular slides (6 × 7 mm for example). As the whole MoS2 film is oriented, we can use the edges of the slides to determinate the orientation of MoS2 films. Second, we use polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) as a transfer medium and deionized water to fully peel off the MoS2 films from the sapphire substrates with our home-made transfer machine. Third, we use the long or short edges to align and stamp MoS2 films to target substrates layer by layer (e.g., silicon wafers with 300 nm SiO2). Fourth, we directly peel off the PDMS transfer medium and the MoS2 films stay intact at the target substrates. More details about the transfer process can be found in the Methods section, Supplementary Notes 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3. Figure 1e shows a series of transferred bilayer and typical trilayer MoS2 homostructures with precise-controlled twist angles on the order of centimeter. The mark of stacked multilayer MoS2 is based on the relative angle between adjacent transferred layers. For example, (0°,30°) trilayer indicates that the relative angle between the first and second (second and third) transferred layers is 0° (30°).

Figure 2a shows optical microscope images of three typical samples with different twist angles. The optical images indicate that the surfaces of all transferred films are clean and uniform. Moreover, the edges of each layer are very straight and sharp, ensuring the high accuracy of the twist angle. AFM images in Fig. 2b shows that the surface of the transferred monolayer MoS2 film is clean and flat. For the bilayer sample, although there are some bubbles, they are less than 10% of the area, indicating the good quality of our samples. Supplementary Fig. 4a–d indicate that all the surfaces involved in the transfer process are clean and flat, no contamination was observed. Figure 2c shows the scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of the stacked bilayer MoS2 with a twist angle of 30°. The Moiré pattern is close to quasicrystal bilayer graphene30, also indicating that the interface of our MoS2 film is clean. For more information, please see Supplementary Notes 3.

The electron diffraction pattern (inset of Fig. 2c) suggests that the twist angle is around 29.88°, which is very close to the designed twist angle of 30°. Notice that, due to the threefold rotation symmetry of monolayer MoS2 lattice and the existence of twin lattice alignments in these films, the bilayer samples with transfer stack angles θ should have both θ and 60° – θ lattice twist angles regions, which have the same electron diffraction patterns. According to previous studies, both the interlayer coupling and interlayer distance of these two structures are almost indentical31; the optical and electrical properties between these two structures are also similar (For example, WSe2/WS2 moiré superlattice with twist angle 0° and 60° show nearly the same triangular lattice Hubbard physics32). Thus, the properties of the transferred multilayer MoS2 films can be controlled by the stacking angle of as-grown monolayers with twin alignments. In this paper, we directly marked all the measured twist angle within 30° for simplicity.

We also fabricated eight 30°-stacked samples and transferred them on TEM grids for further analysis. For each sample, we randomly select 10–20 positions to measure the twist angle through the electron diffraction. The statistics of the measured twist angle is shown as green bars of Fig. 2d (blue bars are mirror copy of green bars for Gaussian fitting). Based on the statistics, the distribution of twist angle is relatively narrow, and the Standard Deviation of the twist angle of our samples is σ = 0.327°. It is worth noting that, the formation of flatbands in transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) homo- and hetero- twist structures is not so sensitive to twist angle (spanning over 1°)33,34. As a consequence, the accuracy of our method is enough to study TMD homo- and hetero-structures-based twistronics. For more detail discussion of the twist angle distribution, please refer to Supplementary Notes 4.

Figure 2e illustrates a typical PL spectrum of the 30° stacked MoS2 bilayer, which clearly shows the peaks of B, A, and the indirect bandgap excitons. The uniformity of indirect bandgap exciton mapping on a 100 × 100 μm2 area (right inset of Fig. 2e) shows that our fabrication process provides high-quality twisted MoS2 homostructures, which is further supported via the laser scanning confocal fluorescence microscopy image (left inset in Fig. 2e). 0° bilayer samples show the same uniformity (Supplementary Fig. 7). In Supplementary Fig. 8, the PL spectra of top and bottom monolayer are identical, indicating that our transfer method would not damage MoS2 films. For more information, please see Supplementary Notes 5 and 6.

### Twist angle-dependent spectral properties of twisted multilayer MoS2 films

Since a series of MoS2 films with accurately controlled twist angles are available, we thus performed Raman and PL to characterize these large-area samples. Figure 3a is PL spectra of twisted bilayer MoS2 films. To highlight the exciton of indirect bandgap, signal intensities between 706 nm to 950 nm are multiplied by 7. Both the intensity and position of A and B excitons peaks barely change with twist angles. The energies of A (B) exciton is around 1.86 eV (2.01 eV), indicating the spin-orbit coupling is 0.15 eV, which is in a good agreement with previous theoretical and experimental results35,36. In contrast, the position of indirect bandgap exciton peaks shows a clear blue shift and the intensity of these peaks increases with the twist angle, confirming the previous study31. The energy of indirect exciton exponentially increases from 1.44 to 1.63 eV as the twist angle increases from 0° to 30° (Fig. 3b). Such twist angle-dependent energies of indirect exciton stem from that the interlayer coupling decrease with increasing the twist angle, which leads to the energy of critical points Q (Γ) upshift (downshift)31,36,37,38. We also applied PL characterizations of our twisted trilayer MoS2 films. Consider the complexity of the trilayer structure, we have prepared only five samples with representative stacked configuration, as shown in Fig. 1e. PL spectra (Fig. 3c) and excitons’ energy (Fig. 3d) of twisted trilayer MoS2 films also indicate that the energies of indirect exciton can be tuned by precise control of the twist angle of each layer. Besides, compared to natural bilayer and trilayer MoS2 in Supplementary Fig. 9, our artificial bilayers and trilayer show similar spectral properties. In other words, we can realize specific electronic bands by twisted layers of multilayer MoS2 films.

Raman spectra of twisted multilayer MoS2 films are shown in Fig. 4. Figure 4a shows the Raman spectra of twisted bilayer MoS2 films. Two prominent peaks around 384 and 407 cm−1 can be seen, originating from the in-plane E2g and out-of-plane A1g modes at Brillouin-zone center of the monolayer constituent, respectively39. The position of E2g peaks is not sensitive to twist angles, while the A1g peaks shift with the twist angles (Fig. 4b), being consistent with the previous results31. This distinct angle-dependence is due to that E2g and A1g modes are mainly determined by long-range Coulombic interlayer interactions and interlayer vdW interactions, respectively40,41. The softening of A1g phonon with increasing twist angle indicates that the interlayer coupling is strongest for the 0° twist angle31. Apart from these two modes, we can observe a mode at about 411 cm-1 when the twist angle is larger than 8° (Fig. 4a). This Raman mode can be assigned as Moiré phonon related with the A1g phonon branch (here we denote it as FA1g), which stems from the off-center phonons of monolayer linked with the lattice vectors of Moiré reciprocal space42. FA1g peaks exhibit a sine-like behavior with twist angle (Fig. 4b). Since the Moiré phonons FA1g at different twist angles are derived from distinct different wave vectors of the phonon dispersion, it provides an effective way to map the phonon dispersions42. In addition to the phonon energies, the intensities of Raman peaks are also dependent on the twist angle, as shown in Fig. 4c. The intensities of E2g and A1g peaks linearly decrease from 0° to 30° with a larger slope for A1g mode. This can be understood as that A1g mode possesses a stronger electron-phonon coupling than the E2g mode43. In contrast, the intensities of FA1g exponentially increase from 8° to 30°, resulting from the sharply increasing density of Moiré phonon.

To further confirm the good interfacial coupling of our samples, we performed the Raman spectra in the ultralow-frequency region, which provides a fingerprint for benchmarking the quality of interfacial coupling15,44. The shear (S) and layer-breathing (LB) modes of twisted bilayer MoS2 homostructures are shown in Fig. 4d, together with the data from monolayer MoS2. For 0° twisted bilayer sample, both the S and LB modes are observed and located around 22 and 38 cm−1, respectively, in agreement with the signatures of exfoliated45 or CVD-grown bilayer samples46. This demonstrates that the interlayer coupling of our samples is quite strong. For other twist angles, the S modes are missing and LB modes redshift, indicating the weakening of interlayer coupling15,42. Figure 4e presents the Raman spectra of five twisted trilayer MoS2 samples. Being akin to the results of the bilayer, we can observe not only the in-plane E2g and out-of-plane A1g modes, but also the Moiré phonons FA1g. Strikingly, the effect of Moiré phonons in trilayer twisted MoS2 with structure (0°, 30°) and (30°, 0°) is stronger than that of bilayer samples, due to the larger density of moiré phonon in trilayer MoS2 films.

### Device characterization of twisted multilayer MoS2 films

Finally, we investigated the electrical properties of twisted multilayer MoS2 films. We used a standard ultraviolet (UV) lithography method and deposited Ti/Au as electrodes. Inset of Fig. 5a shows the optical image of our device array made from 30° bilayer sample. Devices exhibit high quality and integrity. Standard I/Vg curves are shown in Fig. 5a. Figure 5b is I/V curves of our device, which are linear under different back gate voltages, showing good contact between MoS2 and metal electrodes. Figure 5c is the on/off ratio statistics of 0° and 30° stacked bilayer MoS2 devices, on/off ratio of our 30°/0° stacked bilayer MoS2 devices device is ~108/107. 30° stacked bilayer MoS2 devices have higher on/off than 0° is due to 30° stacked bilayer MoS2 devices have higher on-current (Supplementary Fig. 10). Figure 5d is the electron mobility of device arrays made from MoS2 films with different stacking sequences and interlayer twist angles. We can see that 30° twisted structure have higher mobility than 0° twisted structure, as electron mobilities of 30°/(30°,0°) twisted samples are higher than that of 0°/(0°, 0°) and (0°, 30°). We attribute the electron mobility of 30° bilayer higher than that of (30°,0°) and (0°, 30°) trilayer to the screen of the electric field by the bottom MoS2 layers and the enhanced scattering effect of by trapped interlayer bubbles in trilayer samples. The higher mobility of 30° twist angle may be due to the interlayer decoupling by incommensurate structure or smaller interlayer resistance47. For more information, please refer to Supplementary Notes 7.

## Discussion

In conclusion, we successfully obtained large-scale MoS2 homostructures with precise-controlled layer number and interlayer twist angle by using an advanced epitaxial growth method and water assisted transfer method. Our results show that the interlayer twist angle of MoS2 films has a strong influence on both the spectroscopic properties and electronic mobility. Our work promises a cost-effective and scalable process to prepare large-scale vdW homo- and hetero-structures with precise controlling the twist angle, which would open a pathway to industrial applications of twistable electronics and photonics.

## Methods

### Epitaxial CVD growth of Wafer-Scale MoS2

The MoS2 growth28 was performed in our home-made three-temperature-zone chemical vapor deposition (CVD) system. S (Alfa Aesar, 99.9%, 4 g) and MoO3 (Alfa Aesar, 99.999%, 50 mg) powders, loaded in two separate inner tubes, were used as sources and placed at Zone-I and zone-II, respectively, and 2 inches. Sapphire wafers were loaded in zone-III as the substrates. During the growth, Ar (gas flow rate 100 sccm) and Ar/O2 (gas flow rate 75/3 sccm) were used as carrying gases. The temperatures for the S source, MoO3 source, and wafer substrate are 115, 530, and 930 °C, respectively. The growth duration is 40-min, and the pressure in the growth chamber is 1 Torr.

### Sample characterizations

AFM imaging was performed by Veeco Multimode III and Asylum Research Cypher S. Raman and PL characterizations were carried out on a Horiba Jobin Yvon Lab RAM HR-Evolution Raman confocal microscope with an excitation laser wavelength of 532 nm, a laser power of 100 μW. LEED measurement was performed in UHV chambers at a base pressure of <1.0  × 10−10 mbar. Samples were annealed in the UHV chamber at 200 °C for 2 h. For LEED, the electron beam energy ranges from 100 to 200 eV. SAED was performed in a TEM (Philips CM200) operating at 200 kV. Atomic-resolution HAADF-STEM images were acquired by an aberration-corrected Nion U-HERMES200 system operated at 60 kV.

### Transfer methods

PDMS films used in the transfer process were prepared using SYLGARD 184 (Dow Corning Corporation), a two-part kit consisting of prepolymer (base) and cross-linker (curing agent). We mixed the prepolymer and cross-linker at a 10:1 weight ratio and cured the cast PDMS films on silicon wafers at 100 °C for 4 h. During the transfer process, the PDMS/MoS2 films were clamped by a manipulator equipped on home-made step-motor linear guides for assisting both their peeling-off from sapphire substrates and stamping onto receiving substrates, same with our previous work28. After transfer, all samples were annealed at 400 °C for 8 h, under the protection of 20 sccm H2/150 sccm Ar gas, ~1 Torr. Diagram of the transfer process, please see Supplementary Fig. 3.

### FET device fabrication and measurements

The transferred twisted multilayer MoS2 films were firstly patterned with RIE (Plasma Lab 80 Plus, Oxford Instruments Company) by oxygen plasma, and then the standard UV-lithography (MA6, Karl Suss) process was used to pattern source/drain contacts with AR-5350 as the photoresist, which was spin coated on sample surface at 4000 rpm and baked at 100 °C for 4 min. The developer is AR 300-47. 2/30 nm Ti/Au contacts were deposited by home-made e-beam evaporation system. The electrical measurements were carried out in a Janis vacuum four-probe station with Agilent semiconductor parameter analyzers (1456C and B1500) under a base pressure of 3 × 10−6 mbar.

## Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files. The source data underlying Figs. 1b, c, 2b–d, 3a–e, 4a–d and 5a–d, and Supplementary Figs. 2b–e, 4a–d, 6f, 7b–d, 8, 9b, c and 10 are provided as a Source Data file.

## References

1. Novoselov, K. S., Mishchenko, A., Carvalho, A. & Neto, A. H. C. 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures. Science 353, aac9439 (2016).

2. Dean, C. et al. Hofstadter’s butterfly and the fractal quantum Hall effect in moire superlattices. Nature 497, 598–602 (2013).

3. Hunt, B. et al. Massive Dirac fermions and Hofstadter butterfly in a van der Waals heterostructure. Science 340, 1427–1430 (2013).

4. Cao, Y. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43 (2018).

5. Yankowitz, M. et al. Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Science 363, 1059–1064 (2019).

6. Seyler, K. L. et al. Signatures of moiré-trapped valley excitons in MoSe2/WSe2 heterobilayers. Nature 567, 66 (2019).

7. Tran, K. et al. Evidence for moiré excitons in van der Waals heterostructures. Nature 567, 71–75 (2019).

8. Jin, C. et al. Observation of moiré excitons in WSe2/WS2 heterostructure superlattices. Nature 567, 76–80 (2019).

9. Mishchenko, A. et al. Twist-controlled resonant tunnelling in graphene/boron nitride/graphene heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 808 (2014).

10. Liao, M. et al. Twist angle-dependent conductivities across MoS2/graphene heterojunctions. Nat. Commun. 9, 4068 (2018).

11. Autere, A. et al. Nonlinear optics with 2D layered materials. Adv. Mater. 30, 1705963 (2018).

12. Hsu, W. -T. et al. Second harmonic generation from artificially stacked transition metal dichalcogenide twisted bilayers. ACS Nano 8, 2951–2958 (2014).

13. Ribeiro-Palau, R. et al. Twistable electronics with dynamically rotatable heterostructures. Science 361, 690–693 (2018).

14. Song, Y. et al. Robust microscale superlubricity in graphite/hexagonal boron nitride layered heterojunctions. Nat. Mater. 17, 894–899 (2018).

15. Huang, S. et al. Low-frequency interlayer Raman modes to probe interface of twisted bilayer MoS2. Nano Lett. 16, 1435–1444 (2016).

16. Huang, S. et al. Probing the interlayer coupling of twisted bilayer MoS2 using photoluminescence spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 14, 5500–5508 (2014).

17. Kim, K. et al. Tunable moiré bands and strong correlations in small-twist-angle bilayer graphene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 114, 3364–3369 (2017).

18. Kim, K. et al. van der Waals heterostructures with high accuracy rotational alignment. Nano Lett. 16, 1989–1995 (2016).

19. Du, L. et al. Modulating PL and electronic structures of MoS2/graphene heterostructures via interlayer twisting angle. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 263106 (2017).

20. Wang, D. et al. Thermally induced graphene rotation on hexagonal boron nitride. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 126101 (2016).

21. Gurarslan, A. et al. Surface-energy-assisted perfect transfer of centimeter-scale monolayer and few-layer MoS2 films onto arbitrary substrates. ACS Nano 8, 11522–11528 (2014).

22. Ma, D. et al. A universal etching-free transfer of MoS2 films for applications in photodetectors. Nano Res. 8, 3662–3672 (2015).

23. Phan, H. D. et al. Ultraclean and direct transfer of a Wafer-Scale MoS2 thin film onto a plastic substrate. Adv. Mater. 29, 1603928 (2017).

24. Naik, M. H. & Jain, M. Ultraflatbands and shear solitons in Moiré patterns of twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 266401 (2018).

25. Wu, F., Lovorn, T., Tutuc, E., Martin, I. & MacDonald, A. Topological insulators in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide homobilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 086402 (2019).

26. Fleischmann, M., Gupta R., Sharma S. & Shallcross, S. Moiré quantum well states in tiny angle two dimensional semi-conductors. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.04679.pdf (2019).

27. Wu, F., Lovorn, T., Tutuc, E. & MacDonald, A. H. Hubbard model physics in transition metal dichalcogenide Moiré bands. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026402 (2018).

28. Yu, H. et al. Wafer-scale growth and transfer of highly-oriented monolayer MoS2 continuous films. ACS Nano 11, 12001–12007 (2017).

29. Radisavljevic, B., Radenovic, A., Brivio, J., Giacometti, V. & Kis, A. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 147 (2011).

30. Ahn, S. J. et al. Dirac electrons in a dodecagonal graphene quasicrystal. Science 361, 782–786 (2018).

31. Liu, K. et al. Evolution of interlayer coupling in twisted molybdenum disulfide bilayers. Nat. Commun. 5, 4966 (2014).

32. Tang, Y. et al. Simulation of Hubbard model physics in WSe2/WS2 moire superlattices. Nature 579, 353–358 (2020)

33. Zhang, Z. et al. Flat bands in small angle twisted bilayer WSe2. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1910/1910.13068.pdf (2019).

34. Wang, L. et al. Magic continuum in twisted bilayer WSe2. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.12147.pdf (2019).

35. Zhu, Z., Cheng, Y. & Schwingenschlögl, U. Giant spin-orbit-induced spin splitting in two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenide semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 84, 153402 (2011).

36. Du, L. et al. Temperature-driven evolution of critical points, interlayer coupling, and layer polarization in bilayer MoS2. Phys. Rev. B 97, 165410 (2018).

37. Liu, G. -B., Xiao, D., Yao, Y., Xu, X. & Yao, W. Electronic structures and theoretical modelling of two-dimensional group-VIB transition metal dichalcogenides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2643–2663 (2015).

38. Yeh, P. -C. et al. Direct measurement of the tunable electronic structure of bilayer MoS2 by interlayer twist. Nano Lett. 16, 953–959 (2016).

39. Lee, C. et al. Anomalous lattice vibrations of single-and few-layer MoS2. ACS Nano 4, 2695–2700 (2010).

40. Molina-Sanchez, A. & Wirtz, L. Phonons in single-layer and few-layer MoS2 and WS2. Phys. Rev. B 84, 155413 (2011).

41. Du, L. et al. Strongly enhanced exciton-phonon coupling in two-dimensional WS2. Phys. Rev. B 97, 235145 (2018).

42. Lin, M. -L. et al. Moiré phonons in twisted bilayer MoS2. Acs Nano 12, 8770–8780 (2018).

43. Chakraborty, B. et al. Symmetry-dependent phonon renormalization in monolayer MoS2 transistor. Phys. Rev. B 85, 161403 (2012).

44. Li, H. et al. Interfacial interactions in van der Waals heterostructures of MoS2 and graphene. ACS Nano 11, 11714–11723 (2017).

45. Zhang, X. et al. Raman spectroscopy of shear and layer breathing modes in multilayer MoS2. Phys. Rev. B 87, 115413 (2013).

46. Yan, J. et al. Stacking-dependent interlayer coupling in trilayer MoS2 with broken inversion symmetry. Nano Lett. 15, 8155–8161 (2015).

47. Zhou, K. et al. Interlayer resistance of misoriented MoS2. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 10406–10412 (2017).

## Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Grant Nos. 61734001, 11834017, 11574361, and 51572289), the Strategic Priority Research Program (B) of CAS (Grant No. XDB30000000), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of CAS (Grant No. QYZDB-SSW-SLH004), the National Key R&D program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0300904), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (No. 2018013). T.P. acknowledges support from the project CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000464. S.Z. acknowledges support from the project Academy of Finland (Grant Nos. 295777, 312297, and 314810), Academy of Finland Flagship Program (Grant No. 320167, PREIN), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant No. 820423, S2QUIP), and ERC (Grant No. 834742)

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

G.Z. and Y.R. supervised the research; M.L. design the experiment, preformed sample preparing & characterization; Z.W. performed the growth of MoS2 and electrical characterization. L.D. helped analysis spectra data. Q.Q. and Y.H. performed the growth of MoS2; F.W. and J.Z. helped sample preparation. X.X. and K.L. performed LEED; J.T., B.H., and P.G. performed TEM; T.P., Z.S., and G.Z. revised manuscript; M.L., L.D., and Y.R. wrote the article. All authors commented on the manuscript.

### Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rong Yang or Guangyu Zhang.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Xiuju Song, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Liao, M., Wei, Z., Du, L. et al. Precise control of the interlayer twist angle in large scale MoS2 homostructures. Nat Commun 11, 2153 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16056-4

• Accepted:

• Published:

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16056-4

• ### Excitonic devices with van der Waals heterostructures: valleytronics meets twistronics

• Alberto Ciarrocchi
• Fedele Tagarelli
• Andras Kis

Nature Reviews Materials (2022)

• ### MoS2 and Fe3O4 modified spongy wood with micro-reaction cellulose channels and natural water transfer to enhance tetracycline removal

• Wei Zhang
• Xiangyu Wang
• Lincheng Zhou

Cellulose (2022)

• ### Flexible electronics and optoelectronics of 2D van der Waals materials

• Huihui Yu
• Zhihong Cao
• Yue Zhang

International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials (2022)

• ### The optical response of artificially twisted MoS$$_2$$ bilayers

• M. Grzeszczyk
• J. Szpakowski
• M. R. Molas

Scientific Reports (2021)

• ### Engineering symmetry breaking in 2D layered materials

• Luojun Du
• Tawfique Hasan
• Zhipei Sun

Nature Reviews Physics (2021)