Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Direct structural evidence of Indian continental subduction beneath Myanmar


Indian continental subduction can explain Cenozoic crustal deformation, magmatic activity and uplift of the Tibetan Plateau following the India-Asia collision. In the western Himalayan syntaxis and central Himalaya, subduction or underthrusting of the Indian Plate beneath the Eurasian Plate is well known from seismological studies. However, because information on the deep structure of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis is lacking, the nature of the Indian subduction slab beneath Myanmar and the related tectonic regime remain unclear. Here, we use receiver function common conversion point imaging from a densely spaced seismic array to detect direct structural evidence of present-day Indian continental subduction beneath Asia. The entire subducting Indian crust has an average crustal thickness of ~30 km, dips at an angle of ~19°, and extends to a depth of 100 km under central Myanmar. These results reveal a unique continental subduction regime as a result of Indian-Eurasian continental collision and lateral extrusion.


The fate of the Indian Plate during continental collision with Asian terranes is one of the core issues for understanding continental subduction following continent–continent collision and resultant effects. Diverse and complex tectonic activity has taken place along the India–Asia collision zone since the Eocene. In the central Himalaya, the underthrusting of the Indian Plate beneath the Tibetan Plateau has been well revealed by seismic imaging1,2. Through tectonic reconstructions, the high-velocity anomalies in the upper mantle identified by seismic tomography have been interpreted as evidence of Indian continental lithosphere subduction3,4. In the western Himalayan syntaxis (WHS), two converging continental subduction zones have been reported to extend to a depth of ~400 km, with a south-dipping 10–15 km-thick low-velocity zone proposed as the subducting Eurasian continental lower crust beneath the Pamir and a north-dipping Indian slab beneath the Hindu Kush5,6,7,8. Myanmar, situated along the obliquely colliding eastern margin of the Indian Plate (Fig. 1A), connects the ongoing India–Asia collision along the Himalayas in the north to the newly formed oceanic crust in the Andaman Sea in the south9. The seismicity outlines a Wadati-Benioff zone beneath Myanmar10,11,12 that approximately coincides with a broad high-velocity structure revealed by regional and global tomographic studies, hinting at ongoing subduction4,13,14. However, given the lack of detailed geometry and structures, the nature of the ongoing subduction and the related tectonic regime remain unclear.

Fig. 1: Topographic map of the study region showing simplified tectonic divisions, distribution of seismic stations, and cross-sections of P receiver functions.

a Map of the convergent system of the Indian and Asian plates in the Myanmar region. Each seismic station used in this study is shown with a blue triangle. The yellow areas mark the outcrops of Late Cretaceous to Miocene volcanic rocks, and the purple areas mark ophiolites in the IBR. The topographic data are derived from the ETOPO1 database40. The inset shows the location of the study region in the India–Asia collision system. b Cross-sections (from west to east) of stacked P receiver functions from data (Obs) and synthetic (Syn) images. Traces are plotted in a time window between −1 and 15 s with time-zero aligning with the onset of the P-wave. The amplitudes of the traces are normalized by the maximum amplitude of all traces. Station numbers are labeled at the top of the plots for ease of reference. Dashed lines indicate the converted phases from the Moho (blue), the top interface (red), and the bottom interface (black) of a dipping structure recognized by waveform inversion. EHS eastern Himalayan syntaxis, WHS western Himalayan syntaxis, KBF Kabaw fault, MV Monywa volcanoes, SGF Sagaing fault, RRF Red River fault.

Following the events in the Late Cretaceous-Paleogene, the Myanmar region can be divided into three physiographic units (Fig. 1A). In the east, the Shan Plateau comprises Cambrian-Jurassic sequences, a slate belt, and the Mogok metamorphic belt intruded by Late Cretaceous-Miocene granites, which appear to correlate with the rifting of the Sibumasu terrane from Gondwana and subsequent docking with the Indochina terrane during the Mesozoic15.

In the middle, the Central Lowland comprises Mesozoic and Cenozoic volcanic arcs and related forearc and back-arc basin deposits. Mitchell16 infers a latest Early Cretaceous age for the initiation of Burma volcanic arc magmatism related to Tethyan ocean subduction. Geochemical data indicate that late Cenozoic volcanic rocks from the Monywa and Popa areas erupted in two distinct stages, i.e., mid-Miocene and Quaternary17. Most mid-Miocene volcanic rocks have intermediate compositions with high-K calc-alkaline affinity, whereas the Quaternary volcanic rocks exhibit mafic compositions with high-K calc-alkaline and shoshonitic affinities17, implying a subduction setting.

In the west, the Indo-Burma Range (IBR) is a fold-and-thrust belt composed of ultramafic rocks, schists, pillow lavas, and Triassic-Eocene sedimentary rocks18. The Western Ophiolitic Belt in Myanmar follows the eastern margin of the IBR and the outer Andaman island arc. The ophiolites of Middle Jurassic-Early Cretaceous age appear to be related to the suture zone created by the closure of the Neo-Tethys Ocean18,19. During the Neogene, the IBR is considered to have formed as an accretionary wedge linked to the eastward subduction of the continental crust beneath the Bengal Basin18. The joint study of multichannel seismic reflection, gravity, magnetic, and bathymetric data in the Bay of Bengal south of 18°N implies that the oceanic crust of the Indian Plate is steeply subducting beneath the Burma microplate20. The shear wave velocity structure beneath the Bay of Bengal estimated from the surface wave data indicate that the crustal thickness increases from south to north and that the crustal velocity decreases from a higher oceanic crust-like value at the southern end to a lower continental crust-like value at the northern end21.

To gain insights into the previously unknown deep processes of subduction evolution beneath Myanmar and their relations to the India–Tibet subduction system, the detailed geometry and the nature of the subducting plate constrained by structural imaging are crucial. We implemented the China–Myanmar Geophysical Survey in the Myanmar Orogen (CMGSMO) project to deploy the first portable seismic array in north-central Myanmar in cooperation with the Myanmar Geosciences Society (MGS). Here, we present a receiver function common conversion point (CCP) image22 beneath the main-line profile of the CMGSMO crossing Myanmar in the E–W direction. The revealed continental subduction structures have an average crustal thickness of ~30 km, dip at an angle of ~19°, and extend to a depth of 100 km under central Myanmar, largely different from those in the WHS. Incorporating our results with the sideways extrusion tectonics of the Asian lithosphere, we propose a scenario of a geodynamic regime in a continental subduction system following continental collision with lateral extrusion.


Seismic data and section features of receiver functions

Seismic data obtained from a dense seismic array (the Central Myanmar Seismic Profile, CMSP) comprising 38 temporary stations were used to image the structures of the crust and upper mantle in Myanmar. From June 2016 to January 2018, the CMSP was temporarily deployed over a distance of ~450 km in an E–W direction along latitude ~22° N with station spacing of 10–20 km across the IBR (stations M00-M08), the Central Lowland (stations M09–M29), the Sagaing fault, and the Shan Plateau (stations M30–M46) (Fig. 1A). We employ receiver function imaging to infer the velocity structure beneath the CMSP. The records of teleseismic events with magnitudes larger than 5.8 and epicentral distances in the range of 30°–90° are converted to P receiver functions. The back azimuths of events range over the whole space, with most falling within the range of 30°–140° (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). The piercing points for P-to-S converted phases at 100 km depth are distributed north and south of the CMSP >50 km apart. The back-azimuth distribution on the northern side is significantly better than that on the southern side. For the western section of the CMSP (stations M00–M19), receiver functions coming from the north (in the back-azimuth ranges of 0°–92° and 270°–360°) are used to determine the structure with depths of 0–120 km by CCP imaging. The data in the back-azimuth range of 0°–92° are stacked and used in waveform inversion. For the eastern section (stations M20–M46), the imaging object is normal crust with a thickness <40 km, and the receiver functions of full back azimuths are used to image the crustal structure (Supplementary Table 1). The stacked receiver functions at each station are ranked along the imaged profile from west to east (Fig. 1B). The first-order feature of the receiver function cross-sections is the distinct difference in waveforms between the western and eastern parts. The Ps phases converted from the Moho and the following PpPs phases emerge in the eastern part. In the western part, in addition to the Ps phases from the Moho, we find two eastward-dipping running phases with a negative phase above and a positive phase below emerging at ~5–13 s, corresponding to depths of ~40–100 km.

Common conversion point stacking and structural imaging

Taking advantage of the energy concentration from the P-S converted phases, the migration and stack imaging of receiver functions in the depth domain is a robust method to directly identify velocity discontinuities in the crust and upper mantle. We apply the CCP stacking of radial receiver functions to investigate the structure of the crust and upper mantle. First, we obtain the CCP image using a prior model as a migration model. The prior model is a modified preliminary reference Earth model (PREM), in which the crustal part is replaced by an average one-dimensional model for Yunnan (eastern adjacent region). From the initial CCP image along the CMSP (Fig. 2), we can roughly identify the dominant sedimentary cover beneath stations M21–M30 and the Moho interface in the depth range of 30–40 km. Notable features are two parallel east-dipping phases (negative phase above and positive phase below) appearing in the upper mantle beneath stations M00–M19.

Fig. 2: Initial common conversion point (CCP) image along the Central Myanmar Seismic Profile.

The CCP image is generated using a prior one-dimensional model as the migration model. Red colors denote positive receiver function amplitudes as indicated by the color bar, and blue colors denote negative amplitudes.

However, the multiple PpPs and PsPs+PpSs waves generated by shallow structures seriously interfere with identifying the real velocity discontinuities. Determining the properties of these interfaces, in addition to the Moho interface, is difficult. Here, we apply a synthetic test of CCP imaging to distinguish reliable intracrustal and upper mantle interfaces. Based on the velocity models resulting from stepwise waveform inversion from shallow to deep, we generate a set of synthetic CCP images from synthetic receiver functions and compare them with the observed CCP image from the observed receive functions.

We first estimate the velocity structure of the sedimentary cover by waveform inversion with constraints on the thickness of sedimentary strata revealed by the observed CCP profile. We then calculate synthetic CCP image Syn-1 (Fig. 3A) based on the synthetic receiver functions generated by the velocity models of a PREM underlying the sedimentary cover models. Large-amplitude positive and negative signals from the surface to a depth of >15 km are observed (Fig. 3A), even though the sedimentary cover is <7.5 km thick (indicated by the white dashed line in Fig. 3). The signals below the sedimentary cover in Fig. 3A, which are generated by multiples, clearly cannot be identified as velocity discontinuities. At the same time, the signals in the upper part of the crust that appear in the observed CCP image (Fig. 4A) but not in the Syn-1 image should be considered intracrustal interfaces.

Fig. 3: Synthetic test of the common conversion point (CCP) imaging.

a Syn-1 is calculated based on the model with a homogeneous medium underlying the sedimentary cover resulting from the waveform inversion. b Syn-2 is calculated based on the model with a homogeneous mantle medium underlying the crustal models above ~35 km resulting from the waveform inversion. c Syn-3 is the synthetic CCP image calculated based on the model with a dipping structure in the upper mantle. To show the structural features of the imaged crust and mantle wedge more clearly, a lighter color bar is used in the unstudied part of the mantle. Dashed lines in the CCP image mark the locations of velocity discontinuities, including the basement (white), Moho (blue), top interface (red) and bottom interface (black) of the dipping structure from the observed CCP image (Fig. 4A).

Fig. 4: Resulting common conversion point (CCP) image and reliability analysis.

a Resulting CCP image along the seismic profile CMSP. Dashed lines in the CCP image mark the locations of velocity discontinuities, including the basement (white), Moho (blue), top interface (red), and bottom interface (black) of the gently dipping structure. KBF: Kabaw fault; MV: Monywa volcanoes; SGF: Sagaing fault; SSF: Shan Scarp fault. b Comparison of the interface depths identified from CCP images with different migration models. Various colors mark the interface of the Moho and the top and bottom interfaces of the gently dipping structure obtained from different models. Dashed lines mark the interfaces from the resulting CCP imaging.

The strong positive phase at a depth of ~30 km in the observed CCP image is the converted phase from the Moho. To distinguish the multiples from intracrustal interfaces and real interfaces in the upper mantle, we iteratively run the above process. The Syn-2 image (Fig. 3B) is calculated based on the synthetic receiver functions generated by the velocity models of a homogeneous mantle medium underlying the crustal models resulting from the waveform inversion. As shown in Fig. 3B, despite the well-constructed crustal structure, no dipping structure with two parallel phases (negative phase above and positive phase below) appears in the upper mantle beneath stations M00–M19, which is different from the observed CCP image. This result indicates that the two parallel phases represent velocity discontinuities in the upper mantle, rather than multiples generated by intracrustal interfaces. Syn-3 (Fig. 3C) is the synthetic CCP image obtained from the model with a dipping structure in the upper mantle.

After the synthetic test of CCP imaging, the resulting best-fit velocity models derived from waveform inversion of receiver functions at each station (Supplementary Fig. 3) are merged as a quasi-two-dimensional migration model to replace the prior model in the CCP imaging. As the cross-sections of the receiver functions (Fig. 1B) hint at a dipping structure, a dipping converter at the dipping layered structures7,23 is also utilized in the migration. Finally, we obtain the refined CCP image along the CMSP (Fig. 4A). Three strong running phases, including a positive phase at a depth of ~30–35 km and two eastward-dipping phases (a negative phase above and a positive phase below) in the depth range of ~40–100 km in the western part are identified in the CCP image and are real velocity discontinuities, not the signals of multiple waves from shallow structures.

The crustal image revealed by CCP stacking (Fig. 4A) effectively divides the crust into three parts with different features roughly corresponding to the surface tectonic units. The Shan Plateau in the eastern part of the section (stations M30–M46) features a relatively gentle Moho topography at a depth of ~30 km and then deepens westward to 34–36 km. The Moho is uplifted ~2 km and is weakened beneath the Sagaing fault (stations 28–29), indicating that this fault may extend through the crust. Beneath the Central Lowland (stations M09–M29), the Moho topography is rugged, and the crust–mantle transition is sharp in the center and diffuse on both sides. Under the IBR, a strong positive velocity discontinuity appears at a depth range of 50 km (beneath station M00) −70 km (beneath station M06). This discontinuity may indicate the Moho interface of the subducting Indian Plate underlying a 20–30 km-thick accretionary wedge.

A prominent eastward-dipping structure is imaged beneath the western CMSP. Two parallel interfaces tilt down 19° with a thickness of 23–39 km (average thickness of 30 km). The top interface of the dipping structure is identified by the negative running phase in the CCP image, and the bottom interface is identified by the positive running phase between depths of ~70 and 100 km.

Reliability analysis of CCP imaging of the gently dipping structure

In our study, a gently dipping structure (~19°) is observed in the CCP image. Previous research has indicated that CCP stacking with a flat-layer migration model would be valid if the object to be reconstructed is horizontal or slightly inclined (<30°)7. Here, a dipping converter with an inclined structure7 is also utilized in migration for more accurate recovery of interfaces than that obtained by using a horizontal converter. We estimate the reliability of the resulting CCP imaging by synthetic tests. We compare the Moho depths of the overlying plate and the top and bottom interface depths, thicknesses, and dip angles of the gently dipping structure obtained from the resulting CCP images with those from the CCP images based on different migration models (Fig. 4B, Supplementary Table 2). The geometry of the interface is defined by the depth of the local maximum amplitude in the CCP images. The dip angle of the dipping structure is measured based on the linear regression line of the top interface. The results from the resulting CCP imaging are also shown in Fig. 4B. The test models include the migration models with different dipping layered structures, a modified PREM without a dipping structure in the upper mantle, and the best-fit velocity model as the migration model but a horizontal converter applied in the migration. The comparison of the interface depths and thicknesses between the tested and the resulting CCP images is used to estimate the reliability of the seismic imaging. The standard deviations of interface depths from models with dip angles <20° are <2 km at the top interface of the dipping structure and <1 km at the bottom interface of the dipping structure. Imaging based on migration using horizontal converters produces standard deviations similar to those of the models with low dip angles. The imaged dip angle from migration models with dip angles larger than 30° is 21°–22° and that from other migration models is 19°–20°. This analysis indicates that the dipping structure with a dip angle of ~19°–20° is a reliable result. The standard deviation of the Moho depth from PREM is 2.6 km, and the standard deviation of the interfaces of the dipping structure is 5.9 km. The standard deviations of the top interface with dip angles larger than 30° are ~3 km, and those of the bottom interface are 3–5 km. These results indicate the impact of setting a proper migration model in CCP imaging. Despite the large standard deviations obtained from PREM and the models with dip angles larger than 30°, prominent eastward-dipping structures are imaged in all of the tests. The reliability test of CCP imaging demonstrates that the gently dipping structure beneath the CMSP is not an artifact.


We show the shear wave velocity structure of the CMSP (Fig. 5A), which is compiled from the velocity models resulting from the waveform inversion beneath each station (Supplementary Fig. 3), to further understand the structural characteristics related to subduction (Fig. 5B). In the IBR, the accretionary wedge is 20–30 km thick overlying the subducting Indian Plate and is characterized by high- and low-velocity interlayers. In the Central Lowland, a continental crustal structure consisting of the upper crust and the lower crust has shear wave velocities (Vs) of 3.5–3.6 km/s and 3.7–3.9 km/s, respectively, and is covered by a sedimentary sequence with a maximum thickness of 7 km. Beneath the Shan Plateau, the intracrustal interfaces are gently elongated, and the low-velocity zones are located near the crust–mantle boundary.

Fig. 5: Shear wave velocity structure and related schematic model.

a Shear wave velocity structures of the crust and uppermost mantle compiled from the velocity models resulting from waveform inversion beneath each station along the CMSP. The values of shear velocity are indicated by the color bar at the bottom of the map. The white dashed line represents the basement interface, and the blue dashed line indicates the depth of the Moho along the profile. The dipping crustal segment in the mantle is bounded by the magenta and black dashed lines. White dots denote the newly located shallow and intermediate-depth earthquakes, and only the earthquakes located within 0.25° of the profile are shown here. b Schematic model of Indian continental subduction tectonics beneath Myanmar. White dots denote the newly located shallow and intermediate-depth earthquakes, which are the same as those in a. KBF: Kabaw fault; MV: Monywa volcanoes; SGF: Sagaing fault; SSF: Shan Scarp fault.

In particular, our imaging results also show that a low-velocity structure with a dip angle of ~19° extends to a depth of 100 km beneath the IBR and the western Central Lowland. The large thickness of the eastward-dipping low-velocity structure located beneath the Myanmar crust, which is >30 km thick, implies that this layer is not oceanic crust. The upper part of the dipping layer has shear wave velocities of 3.5–3.8 km/s, and the lower part has shear wave velocities of 3.7–4.0 km/s, indicating an intermediate mineral composition. We thus identify the dipping layer as the Indian continental crust.

Shallow and intermediate-depth earthquakes occurring during June 2016–January 2018 in Myanmar between latitudes 21.75° and 22.25° N are also shown in Fig. 5. We pick these local earthquakes from seismic data for the entire CMGSMO network (Supplementary Fig. 1) and relocate the epicenters by the double-difference method24. The location errors in longitude, latitude and depth are 2.9, 3.3, and 5.4 km, respectively. We find that shallow earthquakes are located beneath the Central Lowland and the Sagaing fault. The intermediate-depth earthquakes are mainly concentrated along the lower part of the subducting crust at depths of 70–120 km. The deep front end of the intermediate-depth earthquake cluster extends slightly beyond the lower boundary of the imaged subducting crust. Eclogitization of a metastable subducting Indian continental lower crust in the presence of water may dominate the occurrence and distribution of intermediate-depth earthquakes shallower than 100 km25. The deep earthquakes beyond the subducting crust may hint at other embrittlement mechanisms in the lithospheric mantle under ductile conditions. We suspect that the shear instability induced by breakoff of the subducted slab and thermal runaway might be a likely mechanism26,27, analogous to those in the Hindu Kush8,28. Further geological and geophysical investigations on the eclogitization of the subducting Indian continental crust are necessary in the future.

Along the CMSP, for the first time, the detailed velocity structures of subducting continental crust and overlying mantle wedge are imaged. Informed by petrological research in Dabie29, we interpret the low shear wave velocity zones in a depth range of 40–60 km in the mantle wedge (Fig. 5A, beneath stations M13–M19) as ponding mantle magmas (Fig. 5B). Studies of oceanic plate subduction indicate that arc magmas are formed by the partial melting of the mantle wedge, which is metasomatized by fluids or melts released from the underlying subducted oceanic slab. A similar process for continental subduction was suggested by a detailed petrological study of Maowu garnet orthopyroxenites29 in Dabie, a continental subduction-collision zone. Crustal rocks were subducted into the deeper part of the cold mantle wedge zone in a depth range of ~70–150 km, dehydration reactions occurred, and a large amount of fluid was released from the lower margin of the cold mantle wedge. The released fluid might also have migrated into the overlying, hotter part of the mantle wedge in a depth range of ~40–100 km, resulting in a high degree of partial melting and the formation of arc magmas. The ponding mantle magmas beneath the CMSP may have played a role in the generation of late Cenozoic igneous activity.

The present geometry of the Indochina block has been suggested to be a consequence of collision-driven extrusion10,30,31. Based on global tomographic images, Replumaz et al.4 interpreted the high-speed anomaly to a depth of 400 km beneath Myanmar as a slab of Indian lithosphere pushed away from the frontal collision by the extrusion of Indochina. A well-defined continental slab revealed by our new seismic imaging indicates ongoing subduction of Indian continental crust beneath Myanmar to a depth of ~100 km. We infer that the slab is part of the Indian continent. This part of the Indian continent was most likely located initially on the northeast margin of India and is presently subducting under Myanmar following the clockwise rotation of Indochina around the eastern Himalayan syntaxis (EHS).

The differences in the WHS and EHS subduction structures provide us with important information to understand continental subduction after continental collision. At the WHS, seismological studies of the Hindu Kush-Pamir orogenic system provide a structural image of continental collision linked to two opposing intracontinental subduction zones: northward subduction of Indian lithosphere beneath the Hindu Kush and southward subduction of Asian lithosphere beneath the Pamir6,7,8. The subduction zones in the WHS and EHS are dramatically different in terms of slab steepness and subduction depth. The subducting Indian continental crust underneath the Hindu Kush reaches ~180 km with dip angles of ~65–80°8,28, and the subducting Eurasian continental crust beneath the Pamir extends to >150 km with dip angles increasing to subvertical6,7. Both are steeper and deeper than the subducting slab underneath Myanmar (~19° and ~100 km). Another striking difference between the slab structures is lower crust subduction beneath the Pamir, mid-to-lower crust subduction beneath the Hindu Kush in the WHS7,28 and entire crust subduction beneath Myanmar in the EHS. The subducting crustal thickness of 23–39 km observed beneath Myanmar indicates that upper crustal material has not been mechanically decoupled from the lower crust during continental subduction. In the regime of continental collision, geodynamic modeling32 has shown that the subduction of the entire crust is possible only if the upper crust and lower crust are fully coupled.

We propose that the discrepancies in continental subduction between the WHS and EHS can be primarily attributed to the sideways extrusion of Asian lithosphere. The asymmetry of collisional deformation suggests that the continental lithosphere in western Eurasia offers more resistance to lateral motions than the subduction zone along the Pacific and Indonesian margins and Asian lithospheric materials are extruded along the eastern margin of the Indian Plate30,31. Accordingly, asymmetric continental subduction tectonics in the India–Asia collision zone is expected. The subduction occurring in a compressional regime in the WHS is represented by two converging subduction zones with the lower and possibly middle crust subducted7,28. The continental collision is weakened by shearing-derived extrusion in the EHS, which decreases the resistance to subduction and leads to subduction of the entire continental crust. The difference in the depths of continental subduction beneath the WHS and EHS may be partly caused by the difference in integrity of the subducting continental crust33.

In this study, the subducting continental crust is explicitly explored by seismic observation and imaging. We delineate a continental subduction regime resulting from continental collision with lateral extrusion. The continental collision is weakened by the lateral extrusion of the Tibetan lithosphere, and the decreased resistance to subduction enables subduction of the entire continental crust. This tectonic pattern defines a unique geodynamic regime of a subduction system following continental collision with lateral extrusion. As a result, the primary characteristics of crust–mantle interactions and the formation of arc magmatism in continental subduction zones have been preserved. Our study of continental subduction beneath Myanmar is based on evidence from crustal and upper mantle structures, and exploration for petrologic and geochemical evidence of continental subduction is necessary in the future.


Receiver function imaging

We apply the CCP stacking of receiver functions to investigate the velocity structure of the crust and upper mantle. Some efforts have been made to improve the capability of structural imaging34,35. The velocity models derived from waveform inversion of receiver functions at each station are used as the migration model in the CCP imaging. A dipping converter with an inclined layered structure is utilized in migration. The synthetic modeling of CCP images is used to determine the structural constituents of the crust and upper mantle and to distinguish the real interfaces from multiple phases.

Receiver function imaging was carried out in five steps. First, we produced the observed CCP images using a regional average velocity model obtained from a previous study as the migration model. Second, we inferred the 1-D velocity models via waveform inversion of the stacked receiver functions for each station using constraints on the interface depths from the observed CCP image (Supplementary Fig. 3). Third, we calculated the synthetic CCP images (Syn, for example, in Fig. 3). The synthetic receiver functions were computed using the same ray paths as the observations and the 1-D velocity models resulting from the waveform inversion. Fourth, by comparing the observed and synthetic CCP images (Figs. 3 and 4A), we distinguished real discontinuities from multiple phases, systematically adjusted the inversion spaces of the velocity models at each station, and then executed steps 2, 3, and 4 repeatedly. The velocity discontinuities identified via the previous synthetic CCP modeling were used to constrain the subsequent waveform inversion. We also produced an improved observed CCP image with the resulting velocity models as migration models. Fifth, the final confirmations of the velocity structures were obtained based on an optimal match between the synthetic and observed CCP images. Dual constraints on the CCP image and seismic waveform significantly enhanced the reliability of the receiver function imaging.

Three principal technique components

Receiver function offsetting and stacking in the depth domain, synthetic receiver function computation, and waveform inversion are three principal technique components. Receiver functions were constructed using a time-domain maximum entropy deconvolution method36. The data were band-pass filtered with corner frequencies of 0.05 Hz and 4 Hz. Waveforms were windowed from 20 s before to 100 s after the onset of the P-wave. A Gaussian parameter of 5.0 and a water level of 0.0001 were adopted in the deconvolution. The data selection process yielded >100 receiver functions from most stations (Supplementary Table 1). The CCP stacking method22 was used to calculate the depth domain stacking image. A dipping converter with dipping layered structure23 was also utilized in migration, in which the ray paths were computed to satisfy Snell’s law at a converter with a defined inclination angle. Synthetic receiver functions were calculated by the reflection matrix method following Kennett (1983)37.

The inversion was performed using an adapted hybrid global inversion method38,39 based on structural constraints from the CCP images to construct the velocity model. In our receiver function inversion, the best fit between the synthetic receiver function and the observed one is searched by minimizing the objective function, which measures the degree of coincidence of both waveforms and amplitudes between observations and synthetics. Supplementary Fig. 3 shows the waveform comparison between the stacked receiver functions from the data and the synthetic receiver functions and the best-fit shear wave velocity model at each station. The waveforms of the synthetic receiver functions fit closely with the observed waveforms with respect to both arrival times and relative amplitudes beneath most of the stations. Major structural characteristics can be coherently detected.

Reliability analysis

We measured the differences of interface depth Yj(xi)−Y0(xi) between the CCP images of different test models (Yj) and the resulting CCP image (Y0) for each pixel along the x axis, where Y represents the value of Moho depth, top interface depth, bottom interface depth, and thickness of the dipping structure along the section, x is the surface location of the section with a sampling interval of 1 km. Here j = 0 for the best-fit model, and j = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 for test models. The standard deviation and maximum deviation within 90% confidence intervals are listed in Supplementary Table 2. The estimation of deviations reflects the depth resolution of velocity interfaces.

Data availability

Seismic data from the CMGSMO project are managed and deposited in the Seismic Array Laboratory, IGGCAS (, The seismic receiver functions for this study can be downloaded via

Code availability

The CCP code is available at The hypoDD code used to relocate earthquakes is available at The GMT code used to create the figures is available at The other codes mentioned in this paper are available to interested researchers upon request.


  1. 1.

    Zhao, W. J. & Nelson, K. D. Deep seismic reflection evidence for continental underthrusting beneath southern Tibet. Nature 366, 557–559 (1993).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Nelson, K. D. et al. Partially molten middle crust beneath Southern Tibet: synthesis of Project INDEPTH results. Science 274, 1684–1688 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    van der Voo, R., Spakman, W. & Bijwaard, H. Tethyan subducted slabs under India. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 171, 7–20 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Replumaz, A., Negredo, A. M., Guillot, S. & Villaseñor, A. Multiple episodes of continental subduction during India/Asia convergence: Insight from seismic tomography and tectonic reconstruction. Tectonophysics 483, 125–134 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Negredo, A. M., Replumaz, A., Villaseñor, A. & Guillot, S. Modeling the evolution of continental subduction processes in the Pamir–Hindu Kush region. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 259, 212–225 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mechie, J. et al. Crustal and uppermost mantle velocity structure along a profile across the Pamir and southern Tien Shan as derived from project TIPAGE wide-angle seismic data. Geophys. J. Int. 188, 385–407 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Schneider, F. M. et al. Seismic imaging of subducting continental lower crust beneath the Pamir. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 375, 101–112 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kufner, S. K., Schurr, B., Sippl, C., Yuan, X., Ratschbacher, L., Ischuk, A., Murodkulov, S., Schneider, F., Mechie, J. & Tilmann, F. Deep India meets deep Asia: lithospheric indentation, delamination and break-off under Pamir and Hindu Kush (Central Asia). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 435, 171–184 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sloan, R. A., Elliott, J. R., Searle, M. P. & Morley, C. K., Active tectonics of Myanmar and the Andaman Sea. In Myanmar: Geology, Resources and Tectonics. (eds. Barber, A. J., Khin Z. & Crow, M. J.) 19–52 (Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 48, 2017).

  10. 10.

    Ni, J. F., Speziale, M. G., Bevis, M., Holt, W. E., Wallace, T. C. & Seager, W. R. Accretionary tectonics of Burma and the three-dimension geometry of the Burma subducyion zone. Geology 17, 68–71 (1989).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Stork, A. L., Selby, N. D., Heyburn, R. & Searle, M. P. Accurate relative earthquake hypocenters reveal structure of the Burma subduction zone. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98, 2815–2827 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kundu, B. & Gahaldut, V. K. Earthquake occurrence processes in the Indo-Burmese wedge and Sagaing fault region. Tectonophy 524–525, 135–146 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Li, C., van der Hilst, R. D., Meltzer, A. S. & Engdah, E. R. Subduction of the Indian lithosphere beneath the Tibetan Plateau and Burma. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 274, 157–168 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Raoof, J., Mukhopadhyay, S., Koulakov, I. & Kayal, J. R. 3-D seismic tomography of the lithosphere and its geodynamic implications beneath the northeast India region. Tectonics 36, 962–980 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Barber, A.J., Zaw K. & Crow, M.J. The pre-Cenozoic tectonic evolution of Myanmar. In Myanmar: Geology, Resources and Tectonics. (eds. Barber, A. J., Khin Z., & Crow, M.J.) 687–701 (Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 48, 2017).

  16. 16.

    Mitchell, A. Popa-Loimye Magmatic Arc. In Geological Belts, Plate Boundaries, and Mineral Deposits in Myanmar, 277–321 (Elsevier Inc., 2018).

  17. 17.

    Lee, H. Y., Chung, S. L. & Yang, H. M. Late Cenozoic volcanism in central Myanmar: geochemical characteristics and geodynamic significance. Lithos 245, 174–190 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Khin, K., Zaw, K. & Aung, L. T. Geological and tectonic evolution of the Indo-Myanmar Ranges. In Myanmar: Geology, Resources and Tectonics. (eds Barber, A. J., Khin Zaw, & Crow, M. J.) 65–79 (Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 48, 2017).

  19. 19.

    Liu, C. Z., Chung, S. L., Wu, F. Y., Zhang, C., Xu, Y., Wang, J. G., Chen, Y. & Guo, S. Tethyan suturing in Southeast Asia: Zircon U-Pb and Hf-O isotopic constraints from Myanmar ophiolites. Geology 44, 311–314 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gopala Rao, D., Krishna, K. S. & Sar, D. Crustal evolution and sedimentation history of the Bay of Bengal since the Cretaceous. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 747–17,768 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kumar, A., Mukhopadhyay, S., Kumar, N. & Baidya, P. R. Lateral variation in crustal and mantle structure in Bay of Bengal based on surface wave data. J. Geodynamics 113, 32–42 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zhu, L. Crustal structure across the San Andreas Fault, Southern California from teleseismic converted waves. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 179, 183–190 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Langston, C. A. The effect of planar dipping structure on source and receiver responses for constant ray paramenter. Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 67, 1029–1050 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Waldhauser, F. & Ellsworth, W. L. A double-difference earthquake location algorithm: method and application to the northern Hayward Fault, California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, 1353–1368 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Incell, S. et al. Reaction-induced embrittlement of the lower continental crust. Geology 47, 235–238 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kelemen, P. B. & Hirth, G. A periodic shear-heating mechanism for intermediate-depth earthquakes in the mantle. Nature 446, 787–790 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    John, T., Medvedev, S., Rüpke, L. H., Andersen, T. B., Podladchikov, Y. Y. & Austrheim, H. Generation of intermediate-depth earthquakes by self-localizing thermal runaway. Nat. Geosci. 2, 137–140 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kufner, S. K., Schurr, B., Haberland, C., Zhang, Y., Saul, J., Ischuk, A. & Oimahmadov, I. Zooming into the Hindu Kush slab break-off: a rare glimpse on the terminal stage of subduction. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 461, 127–240 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chen, Y., Ye, K., Wu, Y. W., Guo, S., Su, B. & Liu, J. B. Hydration and dehydration in the lower margin of a cold mantle wedge: implications for crust–mantle interactions and petrogeneses of arc magmas. Int. Geol. Rev. 55, 1506–1522 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Le Dain, A. Y., Tapponnier, P. & Molnar, P. Active faults and tectonics of Burma and surrounding regions. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 453–472 (1984).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Tapponnier, P., Peltzer, G., Le Dain, A. Y., Armijo, R. & Cobbold, P. Propagating extrusion tectonics in Asia: new insights from simple experiments with plasticine. Geology 10, 611–616 (1982).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Liao, J. et al. 3D geodynamic models for the development of opposing continental subduction zones: the Hindu Kush–Pamir example. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 480, 133–146 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Capitanio, F. A., Morra, G., Goes, S., Weinberg, R. F. & Moresi, L. India-Asia convergence driven by the subduction of the Greater Indian continent. Nat. Geosci. 3, 136–139 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zheng, T.Y., Yang, J.H., He, Y.M. & Zhao, L. Seismological constraints on the crustal structures generated by continental rejuvenation in northeastern China. Sci. Rep. 5, 14995 (2015).

  35. 35.

    He, Y. M., Zheng, T. Y., Ai, Y. S., Hou, G. B. & Chen, Q. F. Growth of the lower continental crust via the relamination of arc magma. Tectonophysics 724–725, 42–50 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wu, Q. & Zeng, R. The crustal structure of Qinghai–Xizang plateau inferred from broadband teleseismic waveform. Chin. J. Geophys. 41, 669–679 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kennett, B.L.N. Seismic Wave Propagation in Stratified Media. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983).

  38. 38.

    Liu, P., Hartzell, S. & Stephenson, W. Non-linear multiparameter inversion using a hybrid global search algorithm, applications in reflection seismology. Geophys. J. Int 122, 991–1000 (1995).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ai, Y., Liu, P. & Zheng, T. Adaptive hybrid global inversion algorithm. Sci. China Ser. D-Earth Sci. 41, 137–143 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Amante, C. and B.W. Eakins. ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis. NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24. National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA. (2009).

  41. 41.

    Wessel, P. & Smith, W. H. F. New, improved version of generic mapping tools released. Eos, 79, 579–579 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 41490612), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant XDA20070300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 91755214), the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (Grant 2019QZKK0000), and the National Key Research and Development Project of China (Grant 2016YFC0600303). Figures are made with the Generic Mapping tools (GMT)41. We thank Fuyuan Wu and Jien Zhang for valuable discussions and Xiaohui Yuan for providing the code for dipping converter processing. We gratefully acknowledge the researchers at the Seismic Array Laboratory, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for their efforts in collecting the data.

Author information




Y.H., T.Z., and L.D. conceived this study, and Y.H., L.D., and K.S. managed the project. Y.H., M.J., Y.A., G.H., M.T., and C.T.M. supervised data acquisition and data processing. T.Z. performed the seismic imaging. T.Z., L.D., and Y.H. wrote the first draft of the paper, following discussion with and contributions from all authors. T.Z. and L.D. designed and drafted the figures.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yumei He.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Prantik Mandal, Anne Replumaz and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, T., He, Y., Ding, L. et al. Direct structural evidence of Indian continental subduction beneath Myanmar. Nat Commun 11, 1944 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing