Lgr5+ telocytes are a signaling source at the intestinal villus tip.

The intestinal epithelium is a structured organ composed of crypts harboring Lgr5+ stem cells, and villi harboring differentiated cells. Spatial transcriptomics have demonstrated profound zonation of epithelial gene expression along the villus axis, but the mechanisms shaping this spatial variability are unknown. Here, we combine laser capture micro-dissection and single cell RNA sequencing to uncover spatially zonated populations of mesenchymal cells along the crypt-villus axis. These include villus tip telocytes (VTTs) that express Lgr5, a gene previously considered a specific crypt epithelial stem cell marker. VTTs are elongated cells that line the villus tip epithelium and signal through Bmp morphogens and the non-canonical Wnt5a ligand. Their ablation is associated with perturbed zonation of enterocyte genes induced at the villus tip. Our study provides a spatially-resolved cell atlas of the small intestinal stroma and exposes Lgr5+ villus tip telocytes as regulators of the epithelial spatial expression programs along the villus axis.


Statistics
For all statistical analyses, confirm that the following items are present in the figure legend, table legend, main text, or Methods section.

n/a Confirmed
The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as a discrete number and unit of measurement A statement on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one-or two-sided Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.
A description of all covariates tested A description of any assumptions or corrections, such as tests of normality and adjustment for multiple comparisons A full description of the statistical parameters including central tendency (e.g. means) or other basic estimates (e.g. regression coefficient) AND variation (e.g. standard deviation) or associated estimates of uncertainty (e.g. confidence intervals) For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g. F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of freedom and P value noted Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.

For Bayesian analysis, information on the choice of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings
For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of outcomes Estimates of effect sizes (e.g. Cohen's d, Pearson's r), indicating how they were calculated Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.

Software and code
Policy information about availability of computer code Data collection

Data analysis
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or software that are central to the research but not yet described in published literature, software must be made available to editors/reviewers. We strongly encourage code deposition in a community repository (e.g. GitHub). See the Nature Research guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.

Data
Policy information about availability of data All manuscripts must include a data availability statement. This statement should provide the following information, where applicable: -Accession codes, unique identifiers, or web links for publicly available datasets -A list of figures that have associated raw data -A description of any restrictions on data availability Field-specific reporting Please select the one below that is the best fit for your research. If you are not sure, read the appropriate sections before making your selection. The sample sizes (number of mice and total number of sequenced cells) where chosen as to be sufficient to obtain sufficient power to discern gene expression differences.
single cell data was excluded on the basis of mitochondrial percentage, and minimum UMI and gene counts per cell in order to include only high quality live cells.
Each experiment was replicated n times (and n is given in each figure for each experiment). Although the exact quantitative results differ between replicates, the qualitative results were the same, so that it is reasonable to state that the "All attempts at replication were successful" For each experiment cage mates were taken on the same date. The mice were allocated randomly in this study The data collection was not blinded. Blinding was not possible as the investigators were also conducting the experiments and had to be aware of controls and treated groups. Epcam (PE 118205, clone G8.8, Biolegend). for validation from website: "In this experiment we were looking at type II alveolar epithelial cells in the lung of WT and KO mice", "This antibody works well for detecting EpCAM in the lung" PDGFRa immunofluorescence staining, goat anti mouse PDGFRa was used as first antibody (AF1062 polyclonal, R&D systems) for validation from website: " PDGF R alpha was detected in immersion fixed frozen sections of mouse embryo using 15 µg/mL Goat Anti-Mouse PDGF R alpha Antigen Affinity-purified Polyclonal Antibody (Catalog # AF1062) overnight at 4°C. "