Demonstration of a quantized acoustic octupole topological insulator

Abstract

Recently introduced quantized multipole topological insulators (QMTIs) reveal new types of gapped boundary states, which themselves represent lower-dimensional topological phases and host symmetry protected zero-dimensional corner states. Inspired by these predictions, tremendous efforts have been devoted to the experimental observation of quantized quadrupole topological phase. However, due to stringent requirements of anti-commuting reflection symmetries, it is challenging to achieve higher-order quantized multipole moments, such as octupole moments, in a three-dimensional structure. Here, we overcome this challenge, and experimentally realize the acoustic analogue of a quantized octupole topological insulator using negatively coupled resonators. We confirm by first-principle studies that our design possesses a quantized octupole topological phase, and experimentally demonstrate spectroscopic evidence of a hierarchy of boundary modes, observing 3rd order topological corner states. Furthermore, we reveal topological phase transitions from higher- to lower-order multipole moments. Our work offers a pathway to explore higher-order topological states in 3D classical platforms.

Introduction

Since the discovery of the quantum Hall effect,1 topological phases of matter have attracted a significant attention due to their unique physical properties. While most interest in past years has been driven by research in condensed matter physics2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, classical systems have proven as powerful and versatile platforms to realize a wide variety of topological phases14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39. The inherent advantage in realizing topological phases in classical systems stems from the possibility of implementing a wide range of artificial potentials and gauge fields acting on engineered synthetic degrees of freedom. Thus, classical systems not only offer the possibility of emulating known quantum topological phenomena, but also allow to test new topological phases that may be hard or even impossible to find in naturally occurring materials. This is especially important in the context of recent predictions of a variety of novel topological phases of matter, which can be immediately tested using designer acoustic or photonic materials. One such recently predicted topological phases, which is of significant theoretical and practical interest, and is at the core of this paper, is the class of quantized multipole topological insulators (QMTIs)40,41.

Recently extended from the theory of electric polarization42,43,44,45, QMTIs40,41 describe higher-order multipole moments, lying in nested Wilson loops, which are quantized by lattice symmetries. The concept of electric dipole moment is essential to understanding the behavior of foundational topological phenomena such as polarization-induced boundary charge in polyacetylene chains46 and edge currents in quantum Hall systems2,47,48. In contrast to previously studied topological systems, whose topological phase arises from bulk energy bands and the associated first-order Wannier band, the topology of QMTIs emerges from a hierarchy of gapped bulk, surface, and hinge bands, and associated nested (higher-order) Wannier bands. The unique property of such multipole topological insulators (TIs) is manifested in higher-order topological states (HOTSs) localized not only at the surface, but also at edges and corners of the system. In fact, the emergence of quantized charge corner states represents a hallmark of multipole TIs.

While corner, edge and surface states can also be found in systems with topological bulk polarization49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58, as well as the second-order modes protected by crystalline symmetries were predicted theoretically in the pioneering work59 and first experimentally observed in ref. 60 (and more recently studies in nonlinear regimes61), it is only in QMTIs that higher multipole moments are enforced by the lattice symmetries to be quantized to 0 or 1/2. This property has been experimentally confirmed in 2D microwave, mechanical and circuit-based systems62,63,64,65,66. However, the extension to 3D quantized octupole TIs is not straightforward for multiple reasons: first, because of the requirement that octupole TIs must provide a synthetic magnetic flux of π through every plaquette of a 3D crystal, second, because they must possess dimerized inter-cell and intra-cell hopping in all three dimensions, and third, because, at the same time, they must preserve reflection symmetries to protect the topological phase.

Here, using a versatile additive manufacturing platform, we successfully tackle all the technical obstacles and experimentally implement these requirements in a 3D acoustic metamaterial, demonstrating for the first time an acoustic TI with quantized octupole moment supporting a hierarchy of topological states, including third-order corner states. Besides experimentally demonstrating the spectral evidence of nontrivial octupole moment, we also show through first-principle simulation the rich topological classes that can be supported by the proposed design.

Results

Theoretical design of acoustic octupole TI

A 3D acoustic octupole TI proposed here emulates the tight-binding model (TBM) shown in Fig. 1a, which was originally introduced in refs. 40,41. The model is emulated using unit cells consisting of eight coupled acoustic resonators of cylindrical shape, as schematically shown in Fig. 1b. We choose to work with the lowest-order axial acoustic mode, whose pressure oscillates along the cylinder (see Fig. 1d as an example profile). To form the lattice, the resonators are coupled through narrow cylindrical channels, whose position on the resonator is carefully chosen to respect the crystalline symmetries. A π synthetic magnetic flux through each plaquette is achieved by bending the channels connecting the resonators based on the protocol shown in Fig. 1b. Assuming the simplest case, the bent channels (blue-colored connectors in Fig. 1b) provide a zero phase shift in the coupling, while the straight channels (red-colored connectors in Fig. 1b) connect the bottom of one cylinder with the top of the other cylinder in the xy-plane, providing an additional π phase shift in the hopping due to the odd symmetry of the modes of interest. More general scenarios are examined in Supplementary Fig. 1, which shows that the protocol implemented here always ensures a synthetic magnetic flux of π through each plaquette. In addition, the channel lengths are chosen to be identical in all directions, in order to guarantee no dynamic phase difference in the coupling channels due to propagation. At the same time, the dimerization of intra-cell coupling \(\gamma _i\) and inter-cell coupling \(\lambda _i\) in all directions is achieved by varying the diameter of the coupling channels, such that \(|\gamma _i| < |\lambda _i|\). Since the acoustic modes are strongly bound to the resonators and the design of the structure only allows nearest neighbor coupling, the TBM in Fig. 1a is nicely reproduced in our acoustic crystal. The only distinction from the original model in refs. 40,41 is the tetragonal geometry of our lattice, as opposed to the cubic one, which is due to the bending taking place in the xy-plane and different intra-cell coupling in the directions parallel and perpendicular to the xy-plane. This design-imposed alterations have no consequences on the topological phase of the system, as the essential inversion and reflection symmetries are preserved41, leading to the vanishing of bulk dipole and quadrupole moments and the quantization of octupole moment (see Supplementary Note 1). Detailed symmetry analysis of the Hamiltonian constraint in the context of this higher-order topology is presented in Supplementary Notes 2–5. COMSOL Multiphysics (Acoustic Module) has been used to verify our results with full-wave finite element method (FEM) simulations, and the bulk acoustic band structure along high-symmetry directions of the tetragonal Brillouin zone (BZ) of the proposed octupole TI is shown in Fig. 1c, revealing two sets of fourfold degenerate bands split around the frequency of a single isolated resonator (“zero energy” of our system), spectrally separated from other modes. The symmetry of the band structure with respect to the frequency of a single resonator, and the degeneracy of the bulk bands, further confirm the presence of essential reflection, inversion, and sublattice (chiral) symmetries41. The bulk field profile shown in Fig. 1d clearly reveals the effect of chosen coupling protocol on the phase distribution of coupling between dipolar modes.

Fig. 1: Acoustic octupole topological insulator.
figure1

a Geometry for minimal tight-binding model of octupole topological insulator, \(\gamma _ \bot\) and \(\lambda _ \bot\) are the intra-cell and inter-cell couplings in the plane perpendicular to \(z\) axis, and \(\gamma _z\) and \(\lambda _z\) are the intra-cell and inter-cell couplings in the \(z\) direction. b Unit cell design of acoustic tetragonal crystal that guarantees the negative coupling at each plaquette of the lattice, geometry parameters are provided in the Methods. c Band structures of the acoustic unit cell in (b), shaded gray region indicates the frequency bandwidth of interested bands (orange colored), inset figures show fourfold degenerate band structures of interest (slight deviation due to meshing in numerical calculation) and high-symmetry lines and points in the tetragonal Brillouin zone, respectively. d Acoustic pressure profile of the acoustic coupled dipolar modes taken at the high-symmetry point A.

To prove that the proposed acoustic structure indeed possesses quantized octupole topological phase, we carried out calculations of the higher-order Wannier bands based on first-principle FEM simulations. As shown in Fig. 2a–c, the structure supports gapped twofold degenerate first-order Wannier bands (vz), gapped second-order Wannier bands (\(\nu _x^{ - z}\)), and importantly, a third-order Wannier band \((\nu _y^{ - x, - z})\) quantized as 1/2. The same conclusions are obtained for Wannier bands with arbitrary order in x, y, z. Thus, the octupole topological phase (Wannier-sector polarization) of the acoustic tetragonal crystal is

$$\left( {p_x^{ - z, - y},p_y^{ - x, - z},p_z^{ - y, - x}} \right) = \left( {\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}} \right).$$
(1)
Fig. 2: Higher-order topology and corresponding boundary states of the acoustic tetragonal crystal.
figure2

ac nth-order Wannier bands obtained based on the first-principle FEM simulation. a First-order Wannier bands vz of the selective energy bands below the bandgap shown in Fig. 1c. b Second-order Wannier bands \(\nu _x^{ - z}\) of the Wannier-sector −vz. c Third-order Wannier bands \(\nu _y^{ - x, - z}\) of the Wannier sector \(- \nu _x^{ - z}\). df Energy bands show hierarchy topological states in which (d), energy bands of the supercell lattice (110) supporting the surface states (yellow-colored bands). e Energy bands of the supercell lattice (010) supporting the hinge states (blue-colored bands). f Energy diagram of a finite lattice composed of 3 × 3 × 3 unit cells supporting mid-gap edge polarization-induced corner states. gi Surface, hinge and corner field distributions over the finite lattice integrated from the respective boundary eigenstates inside the bulk bandgap in (f). Surface and hinge states in the vertical boundaries are mixed and represented by gray-colored bands in (f).

Further explanations on the appearance of gapped Wannier bands induced by noncommuting reflection symmetries are presented in Supplementary Notes 3, 4. Since the Wannier bands are adiabatically connected to the energy spectrum of corresponding boundary states67,68, surface states and hinge states are expected to be gapped, while the corner states that arise from quantized bulk octupole moment are anticipated to be in the mid-gap of the energy spectrum due to the chiral symmetry (see Supplementary Note 2 for details). We emphasize that it is only the corner states are pinned to “zero energy” and protected by the chiral symmetry, and the vanishing dipole moment and quadrupole moment enforced by inversion symmetries in our system make hinge and surface states trivial. All these predictions are indeed confirmed by first-principle simulations of our structure in Fig. 2d–f, which clearly reveal gapped spectra with nested surface (yellow bands), hinge (blue bands), and corner states (red bands). The associated field profiles for (i) the top surfaces of the crystal (Fig. 2g), (ii) the corresponding edges of top surfaces (Fig. 2h), and (iii) the corners of top surfaces (Fig. 2i) verify the boundary nature of these states. Note that, due to the anisotropy of the crystal, the surface and hinge states of vertical boundaries support a wider bandgap (Fig. 2f, gray-colored bands). In addition, the frequency splitting of corner states (~10 Hz) in Fig. 2f is due to finite size of the system and hybridization of the corner modes localized at different corners.

Experimental results

The experimental sample implementing our octupole TI was fabricated with the use of a high-resolution stereolithographic (STL) 3D printer (see Methods). The unit cells were printed and snapped together using interlocking features deliberately introduced in the design, thus allowing for the assembly of a rigid and stable large-scale crystal. The assembled structure consists of 27 unit cells (216 resonators in total), as shown in Fig. 3a. The modes of the fabricated structure were probed with a local excitation in each resonator by placing an air transducer at the side-hole, intentionally introduced into every resonator. The strength of the local response was measured using a microphone attached to the second side-hole. The holes are small enough not to introduce excessive loss, but sufficiently large to probe the acoustic pressure field. The resultant frequency-response spectra for selected groups of resonators (Fig. 3b inset), internal bulk, and external surface, hinge, and corner resonators, are shown in Fig. 3b by color-coded bands, and clearly reveal four distinct types of states (see Methods for detailed measurement and data analysis). The average quality factor of the modes of resonators is about 90 due to loss in the resin and leakage through probe holes giving the mean resonant bandwidth of about 120 Hz. Compared to the gaps of bulk (~1500 Hz), surface and hinge states (~400 Hz), these resonant peaks are narrow enough to clearly distinguish the corner states in the spectra. As predicted by our theoretical calculations, the corner states appear to be nested within gapped hinge, surface, and bulk spectra. The field profiles at the specific frequencies corresponding to bulk, surface, hinge, and corner states are shown in Fig. 3c–f, and confirm the localization of these states to the corresponding boundary resonators. Frequency-response spectra for eight corners are shown in Supplementary Fig. 2, providing further evidence of octupole topological phase in our structure, and Supplementary Fig. 3 confirms localization of the corner mode and emphasizes the role of chiral symmetry as the field predominantly localizes on a particular sublattice. We point out the resonant peaks of corners fluctuate around the mid-gap frequency since 3D printing used in fabricating the sample has resolution of ~70 μm, which is the main mechanism of the chiral symmetry reduction due to fluctuations of the resonant frequency of the cylinders. Together with other mechanisms, such as nonuniform focusing of light in stereolithographic 3D printer, leads to the resonant frequency variations excededing100 Hz. However, we minimize the role of such chiral symmetry reduction by individually testing the resonators to ensure approximately the same resonant frequency, such that the frequency splitting of corner modes stays within 100 Hz, which is sufficiently small even with respect to the narrowest (hinge states) bandgap (~400 Hz), as indicated by the dashed lines in Supplementary Fig. 2.

Fig. 3: Experimental demonstration of acoustic octupole TI.
figure3

a Photograph of the assembled structure consisting of 3 × 3 × 3 unit cells. Location of probe holes is shown by red squares. b Normalized acoustic frequency-response spectra for the selective bulk (orange), surface (yellow), edge (blue) and corner sites (red) of a finite structure. Gray-colored spectra represent surface and hinge states in the vertical boundaries perpendicular to the yellow-colored surface. Inset is the schematic of selective groups of resonators, in which their respective topologies are shown, like bulk has octupole moment oxyz, top surface has octupole moment \(q_{xy}\), and top edges have dipole moment \(p_x\) and \(p_y\). cf The field profiles of c bulk states, d surface states, e hinge states and f corner states extracted from the frequency responses of all resonators and chosen at selected frequencies indicated by dashed lines in (b).

Extended topological phases

The insulator with noncommuting reflection symmetries possesses rich topological classes, as illustrated by our first-principle FEM studies summarized in Fig. 4a, where the dimerization between \(\lambda _i\) and \(\gamma _i\) are changed along the selected direction i. When the ratio \(\left| {\frac{{\lambda _i}}{{\gamma _i}}} \right|\) crosses one, the corresponding second-order Wannier bandgap \(\nu _j^{ \pm k}\) closes and reopens, implying a topological transition, therefore inferring that the Wannier-sector polarization \(p_i^{ \pm j, \pm k}\) switches between 1/2 and 0. For example, the quantized octupole moment \(o_{xyz} = 1/2\) lies in the topological class represented by the red block of Fig. 4a. If the dimerization of couplings in the y direction changes to \(\left| {\frac{{\lambda _y}}{{\gamma _y}}} \right| \,<\, 1\), the insulator enters into the topological class of blue block in Fig. 4a, corresponding to the scenario of crystal with nontrivial quadrupole phases in the zx-plane\(( {p_x^{ - z, - y},p_y^{ - x, - z},p_z^{ - y, - x}} ) = (\frac{1}{2},0,\frac{1}{2})\), which supports surface and hinge states induced by such quadrupole moment nested in the bulk bandgap in Fig. 4b. However, the combined quadrupole moment vanishes, and therefore, these states are not protected and are spectrally gapped. Since the octupole moment becomes trivial in this class, no mid-gap topological corner states are observed. The reversal of dimerization along y, x and then z-direction one by one leads to a sequence of topological transitions, accompanied by a sequence of closing and reopening of second-order Wannier bands, corresponding to the disappearance of corner, hinge, and the surface states accordingly, as shown in Fig. 4b–d.

Fig. 4: Topological classes of the second-order Wannier bands.
figure4

a Diagram of the topological classes for the second-order Wannier bands as a function of \(\left| {\frac{{\lambda _i}}{{\gamma _i}}} \right|,i = x,y,z\). bd Energy spectra of a finite lattice obtained from first-principle FEM studies with a topological phase in \(( {p_x^{ - z, - y},p_y^{ - x, - z},p_z^{ - y, - x}} ) = ( {\frac{1}{2},0,\frac{1}{2}} )\), c in \(( {p_x^{ - z, - y},p_y^{ - x, - z},p_z^{ - y, - x}} ) = ( {0,0,\frac{1}{2}} )\), and d in \(( {p_x^{ - z, - y},p_y^{ - x, - z},p_z^{ - y, - x}} ) = (0,0,0)\).

Discussion

To conclude, in this article we reported the design, fabrication and experimental verification of a 3D octupole topological insulator using a classical acoustic platform. We confirmed that the octupole topological moment leads to the emergence of a hierarchy of higher-order boundary states, topological third-order states confined to corners, second-order states localized at the edges, and first-order states localized at the surface of the crystal. The corner modes appear in the gap of all lower-order states, making them good candidates for precise control of energy localization in the lattice. The versatile engineering of synthetic magnetic flux and acoustic potentials in 3D enabled by the complex geometries of the 3D printed metamolecules implemented in this work further facilitates design and control of sound based on topological properties. Our results open a direction in exploring topological physics in metamaterials and offers approaches to localizing, guiding, and controlling sound and other classical waves in complex systems.

Methods

Structure design and 3D printing

The geometries of the unit cell in Fig. 1b are as follows: the lattice constants of the tetragonal crystal in xy-plane and along z-axis are \(a_ \bot = 67.50\,{\mathrm{{mm}}}\) and \(a_z = 81.48\,{\mathrm{mm}}\), respectively. The height and diameter of the cylinder are chosen as \(h_0 = 16.20\,{\mathrm{mm}}\) and \(d_0 = 13.50\,{\mathrm{mm}}\), such that the frequencies of the desired modes are in the probing range of the microphone, and also far away from the undesired (transverse) modes. The cylinders are coupled through either bended or straight cylindrical channels; they have the same acoustic length (the dynamic phase is the same) in all directions. The coupling strength of the modes is adjusted by changing the diameter of channels. In order to make the intra-cell and inter-cell coupling of the structure inequivalent, in the octupole TI case, the diameters of the intra-cell channels are set to \(d_{\lambda \bot } = 3.78\,{\mathrm{mm}}\), \(d_{\lambda z} = 9.07\,{\mathrm{mm}}\), while the diameters of the inter-cell channels are set to \(d_{\gamma \bot } = d_{\gamma \bot } = 1.89\,{\mathrm{mm}}\). In the cases of other topological classes, geometrical sizes are the same as above except the diameters of intra-cell and inter-cell channels are exchanged in the selected directions.

The unit cells were fabricated using the B9Creator v1.2 3D printer. All cells were made with acrylic-based light-activated resin, a type of plastic that hardens when exposed to UV light. Hard wall boundary conditions are ensured by a sufficient thickness of the printed structure. Narrow probe holes with the diameter D0 = 2.00 mm were intentionally introduced on opposite sides of each of the cylinders to excite and measure local pressure field at each resonator.

Numerical methods

Finite element solver COMSOL Multiphysics 5.2a (the Acoustic module) was used to perform full-wave simulation. In the acoustic propagation wave equation, the speed of sound was set as 343.2 ms−1, and density of air as \(1.225\,{\mathrm{kg}}\,{\mathrm{m}}^{ - 3}\). For bulk (surface, hinge) band structure calculations, the Floquet periodic boundary conditions were imposed along the edges of the unit cell (supercell). Large-scale simulations were performed with hard wall boundary conditions applied on the boundaries. To calculate the higher-order Wannier bands from simulation results, the eigenstates are constructed by the complex values of acoustic pressure field extracted at the center of top surface of each cylinder for the modes of interest (fourfold degenerate bulk modes below the bandgap).

The on-site frequency (the single resonator frequency, which also plays the role of “zero energy”), intra-cell and inter-cell couplings are fitted by the TBM with \(\omega _0 \cong 10,590\,{\mathrm{Hz}}\), \(|\lambda _ \bot | \cong 197\,{\mathrm{Hz}}\), \(\left| {\lambda _z} \right| \cong 767\,{\mathrm{Hz}}\), \(\left| {\gamma _ \bot } \right| \cong 30\,{\mathrm{Hz}}\) and \(\left| {\gamma _z} \right| \cong 42\,{\mathrm{Hz}}\). The value of “zero energy” is extracted from the resonant frequency of an individual resonator (decoupled from the lattice) via both first-principle FEM numerical simulations and experimental measurements, which agree well. Similarly, the hopping κ between the two resonators connected by a channel in any direction is extracted by fitting the separation between the resonances of the system \(\omega _2 - \omega _1 = 2\kappa\). The negative sign of coupling can be also immediately confirmed from FEM studies by inspecting the acoustic field distribution. Subsequently, we verify that the extracted parameters give agreeable results between first-principle FEM model and the TBM.

Measurement and signal analysis

For all measurements, a frequency generator and FFT spectrum analyzer scripted in LabVIEW were used. The speaker was placed at one of the side-holes of the cylinder, and the microphone at the other side-hole of the same cylinder. A tiny gap was left between the speaker and the port to allow for the presence of reflection channels while the microphone was closely touched with the port to achieve the maximum absorption. The frequency generator was used to run a sweep from 9300 to 11,800 Hz in 20 Hz intervals and with the dwell time of 1 s while the FFT spectrum analyzer obtained the amplitude responses \(\varphi (f)\) at each frequency f. Field distributions \(\varphi (i,f)\) are obtained by repeating this process for each site i. Since it is hard to guarantee the tiny gap is exactly the same for every site, and the amplitude response is highly sensitive to this tiny gap, we normalized the data for each site based on the total squared signal summed over frequencies, \({\mathrm{\Phi }}\left( {i,f} \right) = \left| {\varphi \left( {i,\,f} \right)} \right|^2/\mathop {\sum }\nolimits_f |\varphi (i,\,f)|^2\). After that, we averaged the energy spectrum for a group of chosen sites (inset of Fig. 3b) \(P_{\mathrm{a}}(f) = \mathop {\sum }\nolimits_i {\mathrm{\Phi }}\left( {i,\,f} \right)/N_{\mathrm{o}}\) to get the normalized spectra for groups of bulk, surface, hinge and corner sites with No = 64, 16, 8, and 1, respectively.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Vonklitzing, K., Dorda, G. & Pepper, M. New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure constant based on quantized Hall resistance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494–497 (1980).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Thouless, D. J., Kohmoto, M., Nightingale, M. P. & Dennijs, M. Quantized Hall conductance in a two-dimensional periodic potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405–408 (1982).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Haldane, F. D. M. Model for a quantum Hall-effect without Landau-levels—condensed-matter realization of the parity anomaly. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015–2018 (1988).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Qi, X. L. & Zhang, S. C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057–1110 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bernevig, B. A. & Hughes, T. L. Topological Insulators and Topological Superconductors (Princeton University Press, 2013).

  7. 7.

    Armitage, N. P., Mele, E. J. & Vishwanath, A. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kane, C. L. & Mele, E. J. Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kane, C. L. & Mele, E. J. Z(2) topological order and the quantum spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bernevig, B. A., Hughes, T. L. & Zhang, S. C. Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in HgTe quantum wells. Science 314, 1757–1761 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Fu, L. & Kane, C. L. Topological insulators with inversion symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 76, 045302 (2007).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fu, L., Kane, C. L. & Mele, E. J. Topological insulators in three dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106803 (2007).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chen, Y. L. et al. Experimental realization of a three-dimensional topological insulator, Bi2Te3. Science 325, 178–181 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lu, L., Joannopoulos, J. D. & Soljaclc, M. Topological photonics. Nat. Photon. 8, 821–829 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Khanikaev, A. B. & Shvets, G. Two-dimensional topological photonics. Nat. Photon. 11, 763–773 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ozawa, T. et al. Topological photonics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zhang, X. J., Xiao, M., Cheng, Y., Lu, M. H. & Christensen, J. Topological sound. Commun. Phys. 1, 97 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Huber, S. D. Topological mechanics. Nat. Phys. 12, 621–623 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Haldane, F. D. M. & Raghu, S. Possible realization of directional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with broken time-reversal symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 013904 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wang, Z., Chong, Y. D., Joannopoulos, J. D. & Soljacic, M. Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states. Nature 461, 772–775 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hafezi, M., Demler, E. A., Lukin, M. D. & Taylor, J. M. Robust optical delay lines with topological protection. Nat. Phys. 7, 907–912 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Poo, Y., Wu, R. X., Lin, Z. F., Yang, Y. & Chan, C. T. Experimental realization of self-guiding unidirectional electromagnetic edge states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 093903 (2011).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Fang, K. J., Yu, Z. F. & Fan, S. H. Realizing effective magnetic field for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation. Nat. Photon. 6, 782–787 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Khanikaev, A. B. et al. Photonic topological insulators. Nat. Mater. 12, 233–239 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rechtsman, M. C. et al. Photonic Floquet topological insulators. Nature 496, 196–200 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hafezi, M., Mittal, S., Fan, J., Migdall, A. & Taylor, J. M. Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics. Nat. Photon. 7, 1001–1005 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Chen, W. J. et al. Experimental realization of photonic topological insulator in a uniaxial metacrystal waveguide. Nat. Commun. 5, 5782 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Wu, L. H. & Hu, X. Scheme for achieving a topological photonic crystal by using dielectric material. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 223901 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lu, L. et al. Experimental observation of Weyl points. Science 349, 622–624 (2015).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Cheng, X. J. et al. Robust reconfigurable electromagnetic pathways within a photonic topological insulator. Nat. Mater. 15, 542–548 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kane, C. L. & Lubensky, T. C. Topological boundary modes in isostatic lattices. Nat. Phys. 10, 39–45 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Khanikaev, A. B., Fleury, R., Mousavi, S. H. & Alu, A. Topologically robust sound propagation in an angular-momentum-biased graphene-like resonator lattice. Nat. Commun. 6, 8260 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Mousavi, S. H., Khanikaev, A. B. & Wang, Z. Topologically protected elastic waves in phononic metamaterials. Nat. Commun. 6, 8682 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Nash, L. M. et al. Topological mechanics of gyroscopic metamaterials. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14495–14500 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Susstrunk, R. & Huber, S. D. Observation of phononic helical edge states in a mechanical topological insulator. Science 349, 47–50 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Xiao, M., Chen, W. J., He, W. Y. & Chan, C. T. Synthetic gauge flux and Weyl points in acoustic systems. Nat. Phys. 11, 920–924 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Yang, Z. J. et al. Topological acoustics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 114301 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Fleury, R., Khanikaev, A. B. & Alu, A. Floquet topological insulators for sound. Nat. Commun. 7, 11744 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    He, C. et al. Acoustic topological insulator and robust one-way sound transport. Nat. Phys. 12, 1124–1129 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Benalcazar, W. A., Bernevig, B. A. & Hughes, T. L. Quantized electric multipole insulators. Science 357, 61–66 (2017).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Benalcazar, W. A., Bernevig, B. A. & Hughes, T. L. Electric multipole moments, topological multipole moment pumping, and chiral hinge states in crystalline insulators. Phys. Rev. B 96, 245115 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zak, J. Berrys phase for energy-bands in solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2747–2750 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Resta, R. Theory of the electric polarization in crystals. Ferroelectrics 136, 51–55 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kingsmith, R. D. & Vanderbilt, D. Theory of polarization of crystalline solids. Phys. Rev. B 47, 1651–1654 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Vanderbilt, D. & Kingsmith, R. D. Electric polarization as a bulk quantity and its relation to surface-charge. Phys. Rev. B 48, 4442–4455 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Su, W. P., Schrieffer, J. R. & Heeger, A. J. Solitons in polyacetylene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698–1701 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hatsugai, Y. Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall-effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3697–3700 (1993).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kellendonk, J., Richter, T. & Schulz-Baldes, H. Edge current channels and Chern numbers in the integer quantum Hall effect. Rev. Math. Phys. 14, 87–119 (2002).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Ni, X., Gorlach, M. A., Alu, A. & Khanikaev, A. B. Topological edge states in acoustic Kagome lattices. New J. Phys. 19, 055002 (2017).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Ezawa, M. Higher-order topological insulators and semimetals on the breathing Kagome and Pyrochlore lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 026801 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Xie, B. Y. et al. Second-order photonic topological insulator with corner states. Phys. Rev. B 98, 205147 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Ni, X., Weiner, M., Alu, A. & Khanikaev, A. B. Observation of higher-order topological acoustic states protected by generalized chiral symmetry. Nat. Mater. 18, 113–120 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Xue, H. R., Yang, Y. H., Gao, F., Chong, Y. D. & Zhang, B. L. Acoustic higher-order topological insulator on a kagome lattice. Nat. Mater. 18, 108–112 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Weiner, M., Ni, X., Li, M., Alu, A. & Khanikaev, A. B. Demonstration of a third-order hierarchy of topological states in a three-dimensional acoustic metamaterial. Science Advances. 6, eaay4166 (2020).

  55. 55.

    Benalcazar, W. A., Li, T. & Hughes, T. L. Quantization of fractional corner charge in Cn-symmetric topological crystalline insulators. Phys. Rev. B 99, 245151 (2019).

  56. 56.

    Xue, H. R. et al. Realization of an acoustic third-order topological insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 244301 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Zhang, X. et al. Dimensional hierarchy of higher-order topology in three-dimensional sonic crystals. Nat. Commun. 10, 5331 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    El Hassan, A. et al. Corner states of light in photonic waveguides. Nat. Photon. 13, 697–700 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Benalcazar, W. A., Teo, J. C. Y. & Hughes, T. L. Classification of two-dimensional topological crystalline superconductors and Majorana bound states at disclinations. Phys. Rev. B 89, 224503 (2014).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Noh, J. et al. Topological protection of photonic mid-gap defect modes. Nat. Photon. 12, 408–415 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Zangeneh-Nejad, F. & Fleury, R. Nonlinear second-order topological insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 053902 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Peterson, C. W., Benalcazar, W. A., Hughes, T. L. & Bahl, G. A quantized microwave quadrupole insulator with topologically protected corner states. Nature 555, 346–350 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Imhof, S. et al. Topolectrical-circuit realization of topological corner modes. Nat. Phys. 14, 925–929 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Serra-Garcia, M. et al. Observation of a phononic quadrupole topological insulator. Nature 555, 342–345 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Serra-Garcia, M., Susstrunk, R. & Huber, S. D. Observation of quadrupole transitions and edge mode topology in an LC circuit network. Phys. Rev. B 99, 020304 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Mittal, S. et al. Photonic quadrupole topological phases. Nat. Photon. 13, 692–696 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Fidkowski, L., Jackson, T. S. & Klich, I. Model characterization of gapless edge modes of topological insulators using intermediate Brillouin-zone functions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 036601 (2011).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Khalaf, E., Benalcazar, W. A., Hughes, T. L. & Queiroz, R. Boundary-obstructed topological phases. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.00011 (2019).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Science Foundation with grants no. DMR-1809915, EFRI-1641069, and by the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency. X.N. thanks the support of Mina Rees Dissertation Fellowship at Graduate Center of CUNY.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed extensively to the work presented in this paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Andrea Alù or Alexander B. Khanikaev.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Wladimir Benalcazar, Valerio Peri and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ni, X., Li, M., Weiner, M. et al. Demonstration of a quantized acoustic octupole topological insulator. Nat Commun 11, 2108 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15705-y

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.