Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Introducing the crystalline phase of dicalcium phosphate monohydrate


Calcium orthophosphates (CaPs) are important in geology, biomineralization, animal metabolism and biomedicine, and constitute a structurally and chemically diverse class of minerals. In the case of dicalcium phosphates, ever since brushite (CaHPO4·2H2O, dicalcium phosphate dihydrate, DCPD) and monetite (CaHPO4, dicalcium phosphate, DCP) were first described in 19th century, the form with intermediary chemical formula CaHPO4·H2O (dicalcium phosphate monohydrate, DCPM) has remained elusive. Here, we report the synthesis and crystal structure determination of DCPM. This form of CaP is found to crystallize from amorphous calcium hydrogen phosphate (ACHP) in water-poor environments. The crystal structure of DCPM is determined to show a layered structure with a monoclinic symmetry. DCPM is metastable in water, but can be stabilized by organics, and has a higher alkalinity than DCP and DCPD. This study serves as an inspiration for the future exploration of DCPM’s potential role in biomineralization, or biomedical applications.


Calcium orthophosphates (CaPs) are common and important in geological and biological systems1, constituting a family of compounds with varying Ca/P atomic ratios and structural water contents. Important members are hydroxyapatite (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2)2, octacalcium phosphate (Ca8H2(PO4)6·5H2O)3, brushite (CaHPO4·2H2O)4, monetite (CaHPO4)5, and tricalcium phosphate (Ca3(PO4)2)6,7. Amorphous calcium phosphates (ACPs) have different chemical formulae, and can be the precursors of various crystalline CaPs8,9,10,11,12,13, including hydroxyapatite, in vivo14,15,16,17,18,19,20. However, the role of ACPs in biomineralization has been debated21,22,23,24,25. CaPs are involved in hard tissue formation and the metabolism of humans and animals, whereas they can also form pathologically13,26.

Due to their chemical composition being similar to that of hard tissues, high biocompatibility and bioactivity, synthetic CaPs have been extensively studied for uses in biomedicine, for example, as coatings of metallic implants and synthetic substitutes for bone repair27. Since X-ray crystallography was developed in the early 20th century28,29, the structures of all known CaPs were resolved in the course of that century, while some CaPs were discovered for the first time even earlier7. Despite their structural and chemical variability, however, no further crystalline form of CaP has been found lately. Until now, two different forms of crystalline CaPs with a Ca/P atomic ratio of 1:1 have been documented: CaHPO4·2H2O (brushite; dicalcium phosphate dihydrate, DCPD) and CaHPO4 (monetite; dicalcium phosphate, DCP), both playing important roles in geology4,5 and biology30,31. In DCPD, structural water molecules link layers composed of CaHPO4 via hydrogen bonds, whereas DCP is anhydrous and the structure is not layered32,33 (see below). These differences give rise to rather distinct chemical and physical properties for the two forms34,35. DCP and DCPD are both useful in biomedical applications, especially for the curing of calcium phosphate cements in clinical orthopedics. However, DCPD seems to provide generally better performance in real uses, as it exists in the majority of setting products36,37.

Metastable CaPs with structural water are thus promising for advancing biomedical applications. In this work, we introduce another crystalline form of CaP: dicalcium phosphate monohydrate (DCPM, CaHPO4·H2O). Due to its layered nature and structural water content, advantageous properties for applications within the biomedical field are anticipated. Also, it might play an important role as an intermediate in CaP biomineralization.


Preparation and characterization of DCPM

Amorphous calcium hydrogen phosphate (ACHP), with a Ca/P atomic ratio of 1.038, which is identical to that of DCPM, was used as a precursor for the crystallization of DCPM (see Methods section for details). The amorphous character of its precursor was confirmed by X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and electron diffraction (ED) (Supplementary Fig. 1). In water-poor environments, that is, mixtures of methanol and water, or in humid air, ACHP transforms into DCPM (see Methods section for details). Large crystals of DCPM, sufficient for single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD, see Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 2 for typical morphologies), could unfortunately not be obtained. However, ED provides a tool to overcome this issue, as the strong interactions between electrons and matter allow diffraction data to be obtained from crystals that are much smaller than in the case of X-rays. Indeed, recently, single-crystal electron diffraction (SCED) methods have proven to be invaluable for the structure determination of sub-micrometer-sized crystals for a wide range of compounds39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46. Three-dimensional SCED data were collected for DCPM by continuously rotating a crystal in the electron beam of a transmission electron microscope while collecting a series of selected-area electron-diffraction patterns, the so-called continuous Rotation Electron Diffraction technique (cRED), Fig. 1. This procedure was aided by sequential defocusing of the intermediate lens of the TEM in order to confirm the position of the crystal in the beam47. The reconstructed three-dimensional reciprocal lattice was successfully indexed using a monoclinic unit cell (space group P21/c, Fig. 1, Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4, and Supplementary Comment Section). Ab-initio structure determination revealed a layered structure with one unique calcium and one phosphate ion in the asymmetric unit constituting DCPM, while the location of the hydrogen atom on the phosphate could not be determined from this data alone. In addition, one water molecule per calcium and phosphate ion was found, consistent with its chemical formula, which was further confirmed by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) (Supplementary Fig. 5). Although the SCED data contained diffuse scattered lines, indicating layered disorder (see Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 6), least-squares refinement converged with a residual of 0.260 (see Supplementary Table 1 for details). So as to improve the confidence in the structural model of DCPM obtained by SCED further, and to show that it is representative for the bulk of our sample, Rietveld refinement of XRPD data converged with a Rwp of 6.67% (Supplementary Fig. 7, Supplementary Table 2). This yielded a monoclinic unit cell for DCPM with a = 8.0063(4) Å, b = 6.7954(5) Å, c = 7.7904(5) Å, α = γ = 90°, β = 91.548(4)°. Due to uncertainties in unit cell parameters as determined from ED data, all refinements were performed using the unit cell from XRPD data. The structure of DCPM refined against cRED and XRPD data shows only minor changes with an average difference in atomic positions of 0.16 Å and maximum difference of 0.25 Å. The coordination environment around Ca and P is the same for the structures after the two refinements, see Supplementary Figs. 8 and 9.

Fig. 1: Electron microscopy-based structure determination of DCPM.

a The reconstructed three-dimensional reciprocal lattice from continuous rotation electron diffraction data collected from (b) a crystal of DCPM can be indexed by a monoclinic unit cell. c Section through the reconstructed reciprocal lattice showing the 0kl family of reflections. Systematic extinctions can be observed for 0k0 and 00l families of reflections which is consistent with the space group P21/c. Further details on the symmetry deduction can be found in Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4. d Enlarged part of the 3D reconstructed reciprocal lattice shows some diffuse scattering running along the a*-axis, here, the a*, b*, and c*-axes are indicated by red, green and blue vectors, respectively. The 121 reflection with surrounding diffuse scattering and its symmetry related equivalents are marked in blue and the h02 line is marked in green. The diffuse circles in a, c, and d are due to diffraction from small ice crystals formed under liquid nitrogen cooling conditions. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

In order to further define the structural characteristics of DCPM, first principles quantum mechanical calculations were performed (see Methods section for full details). Hydrogen atoms were inserted into the structure for a variety of different initial positions for both the HPO42− ions and water, followed by geometry optimization and annealing via molecular dynamics. A consistent picture emerges in which two chains of hydrogen bonded HPO42− anions run parallel to the b axis, with the OH groups pointing in opposite directions in each chain. Attempts to transfer the proton along the chain (i.e., from OH…O to O…HO) led to spontaneous return of the hydrogen to its initial site, indicating a strong preference for the original order. Water coordinates to one calcium ion via oxygen and is simultaneously able to hydrogen bond to two different anions. All hydrogen positions are commensurate with the space group without the need for partial occupancy or disorder (see Supplementary Fig. 8).

The unit cell parameters of DCPM differ from those of DCPD (monoclinic; a = 5.812 Å, b = 15.180 Å, c = 6.239 Å, α = γ = 90°, β = 116.42°) and DCP (triclinic; a = 6.910 Å, b = 6.627 Å, c = 6.998 Å, α = 96.34°, β = 103.82°, γ = 88.33°). Consistently, also the atomic structures of CaHPO4·xH2O, with x = 0, 1, and 2 for DCP, DCPM, and DCPD, respectively, differ significantly (Fig. 2). Although both DCPM and DCPD contain water molecules located between the layers, the atomic arrangements within each layer of the two structures are different. The structural differences of the three CaPs were further confirmed by XRPD patterns and infrared (IR) spectra (Fig. 3). Regarding the vibrational modes of the HPO42− ion (Fig. 3b) in the three forms, the ν6, and ν6’ bands share similar wavenumbers (~1126 cm−1 and ~1060 cm−1, respectively), while those of ν2, ν3, and ν4 bands differ (DCPM: 1001 cm−1 for ν2; 901 and 887 cm−1 for ν3; 551 and 533 cm−1 for ν4); the split ν3 band in the spectrum of DCPM also contrasts DCPD and DCP. Lastly, the H1H4 bands, which can be assigned to two crystallographically distinct waters in DCPD, are not seen in the spectrum of DCPM. The pattern of the OH stretching modes is further supported by quantum mechanical calculations, which yield two groups of four IR-active modes each for DCPD in the ranges 3477–3429 and 3253–3146 cm−1, whereas DCPM only has a single group of four active modes between 3402 and 3364 cm−1 consistent with the experimental spectra (Fig. 3b). A structural comparison of DCPM with other CaPs is summarized in Supplementary Table 3.

Fig. 2: Structural comparison of DCPD, DCPM and DCP.

The crystal structures of DCPD (a), DCPM (b), and DCP (c) viewed along a, c, and c-axes, respectively. The layers in DCPD and DCPM are marked in (a) and (b) and are distinctly different in their structures, as seen in views perpendicular to each of the layers presented in d and e, respectively. f Shows the structure of DCP viewed along the b-axis. In the figures, magenta represents P; green: Ca; red: O of the HPO4 ion; blue: O of the water molecules (H atoms are not shown).

Fig. 3: Characterization of DCPD, DCPM, and DCP with XRPD and IR spectroscopy.

a Comparison of the XRPD pattern of DCPM with the standard diffractograms of DCPD (JCPDS 09-0077) and DCP (JCPDS 09-0080). b The IR spectra of DCPD, DCPM, and DCP. The assignment of vibration modes follows Bailey and Holt48. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

DCPM was previously neither observed during the dehydration of DCPD49,50 nor the hydration of DCP in H2O51,52. We also failed to obtain DCPM from other amorphous calcium phosphates (with Ca/P atomic ratios higher than 1.0). This indicates that ACHP is an essential precursor for the crystallization of DCPM. Although prepared by ACHP transforming in mixtures of methanol and water, DCPM is an intermediate phase between ACHP and DCP. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 10, DCPM can be formed as early as 2 min, and kept for 7 h. But after 24 h, while minor fractions of DCPM can still be detected by IR spectroscopy and XRPD, the majority phase became DCP.

Crystals of DCPM also formed via crystallization of ACHP in humid air (humidity 95%, 25 °C) during the transformation of ACHP to DCPD (as opposed to DCP that formed in mixed solvent as discussed above). Under these conditions, DCPM was the majority phase of the transformation of ACHP after 4 h (whereas two reflections were indicative of a DCPD impurity). ED of the as-obtained samples confirmed that the structure was identical to those prepared by the mixed water/methanol approach (Supplementary Fig. 11). This identity was evident by comparing the corresponding XRPD patterns and IR spectra of the DCPM from the distinct preparations (Supplementary Figs. 12 and 13). However, DCPM that crystallized from methanol/water mixtures exhibited a higher crystallinity as the broad feature of ACHP in the XRPD pattern was significantly reduced (Supplementary Fig. 12). After treating ACHP for 12 h in humid air, DCPD formed (alongside impurities of OCP, Fig. 4a). That the crystallization of ACHP in humid air progressed via DCPM to DCPD after 4 h and 12 h was corroborated by IR spectroscopy (Fig. 4b). TEM analysis (Fig. 4c) revealed corresponding morphological changes, where the spherical aggregates of the precursor ACHP yielded platelet-like DCPM without obvious elongations after 4 h, alongside some un-crystallized ACHP nanoparticles. After 12 h (Fig. 4c), typical elongated platelets of DCPD with well-defined edges had formed. H2O is required for the crystallization of DCPM from ACHP, as the amorphous precursor did indeed not crystallize in dry air (humidity < 5%, Methods section) for at least 1 month. The presence of too much water will lead to crystallization yielding other phases such as DCPD38.

Fig. 4: Formation of DCPM from ACHP in wet air.

XRPD patterns (a), IR spectra (b) and TEM micrographs (c) of ACHP in wet air (25 °C, 95% humidity) after different times as indicated. In the XRPD patterns (a), the symbols *, + and # mark the diffraction peaks of DCPD, DCPM; and OCP, respectively. The inset magnifies the diffractogram of the sample (12 h) in the range of 8–10° 2θ. In the IR spectra (b), “νi” represent different vibrational modes i of the phosphate ion; H1H4 indicate the ν(OH) modes of four different hydrogen bonds of structural H2O. The assignment of vibration modes follows Bailey et al.48. All scale bars: 500 nm. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Properties of DCPM

In water, DCPM was stable for at least 0.5 h, but transformed into poorly crystallized HAP within 1 h (Fig. 5a), which is the main biomineral component of human bones and teeth. In contrast, DCP and DCPD did not transform within 2 h (Supplementary Fig. 14), although they will ultimately yield more stable CaPs52. Organics, such as citrate salts, which are abundant in vivo and biocompatible53 can effectively stabilize DCPM for at least 2 h (Fig. 5a); polyelectrolytes such as sodium polyacrylate (NaPAA) can stabilize it for even longer times, i.e., at least 13 h (Fig. 5a). Notably, upon initial dissolution, the pH of the DCPM solution can reach a value of 8.2 before DCPM transforms (Fig. 5b), which is the highest of the three forms (DCP, DCPM, and DCPD). The comparably high pH in relation to the aqueous chemistry of the different protonation states of the phosphate anions upon HPO42− dissolution indicated that DCPM has the highest solubility among the three CaPs. Support for this comes from theoretical calculations (see Supplementary Table 4), which indicate that formation of DCPM from monetite is as endergonic as formation of brushite, though the latter has twice as much water. A brief comparison of DCPM with other CaPs in terms of chemical properties is compiled in Supplementary Table 5. It is also interesting that DCPM exhibited a significantly higher adsorption capacity for some organic molecules compared to DCP and DCPD, e.g., methyl blue, congo red, doxorubicin hydrochloride (anti-cancer drug), and ibuprofen (analgesic drug) (Supplementary Table S6). This higher adsorption capacity, in combination with the biocompatibility shown in Supplementary Fig. 15, points toward a significant potential use of DCPM for improving drug delivery carriers or pollution treatment materials. In their totality, in any case, these properties highlight that DCPM is a material that may significantly improve or extend current in vivo applications of CaPs.

Fig. 5: Transformation of DCPM in water.

XRPD patterns of particles (a) and corresponding pH change (b) retrieved after dispersing DCPM in water for different times. The sample obtained after 0.5 h shows the typical XRPD pattern of DCPM, indicating it did not transform during this time. Those obtained after 1 and 2 h show poorly crystallized HAP when compared to the HAP standard diffractogram shown at the bottom (JCPDS 09-0432). The pink and green curves in a were obtained from samples incubated in sodium citrate solution (pink) or NaPAA (green) for 2 h and 13 h, respectively, revealing the typical pattern of DCPM, indicating that citrate and NaPAA can significantly stabilize DCPM against transformation. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.


In conclusion, the CaP family has been expanded by DCPM, exhibiting a unique crystallographic structure. Considering the important biological role of CaPs and their wide use in biomedicine, it seems highly promising to study and explore the potential use of DCPM in biomedical applications. Last, but not least, it should be carefully investigated to confirm whether or not DCPM occurs (transiently) in geological or biological natural contexts, e.g., biomineralization.


DCPM was obtained either via transformation of ACHP in mixed solvents of methanol and deionized water or in humid air.


Na3PO4·12H2O and Na2HPO4 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich; methanol, ethanol, DCPD and CaCl2 were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co.; sodium polyacrylate (NaPAA, 50% solution, Mw 3000–5000) was purchased from Aladdin Reagent. All chemicals were used as received without further purification. All of the chemicals were of analytical grade. DCP was prepared by heating DCPD at 195 °C for 1 h and was confirmed by XRPD. Deionized water was used in all experiments.

Preparation of ACHP

At ambient temperature (ca. 25 °C), Na2HPO4 (0.95 mmol) and Na3PO4·12H2O (0.05 mmol) was dissolved in 3 mL deionized water, then quickly added into 2 mL CaCl2 (1.67 mmol) aqueous solution under vigorous stirring. Immediately, the white product of ACHP was formed in the solvent. After 3 s, 80 mL methanol was added to quench the reaction. Then, ACHP was separated from the solvent by centrifugation, washed with methanol 3 times, and dried in a vacuum desiccator. The ACHP obtained has a Ca/P atomic ratio of 1.02, formula CaHPO4·H2O, confirmed by inductively-coupled plasma optical emmission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) and TGA. Its amorphous character was confirmed by XRPD and ED (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Preparation of DCPM in a water-methanol mixed solvent

Typically, the ACHP obtained as described above was quenched in 32.5 mL methanol (not 80 mL), and kept in the solvent (that is, 32.5 mL methanol + 5.0 mL water) which was placed in an oscillating incubator (XZQ-X160, Suzhou Peiying) at constant temperature (90 rpm, 25 °C) for 20 min. Afterwards, the resulting product was centrifuged and washed with ethanol 3 times, and dried in a vacuum desiccator to obtain DCPM. To prevent its transformation, DCPM can be stored in dry (humidity < 5%) or cold (<−20 °C) environments.

Preparation of DCPM in humid air

Following the procedure for ACHP preparation, the dried ACHP was incubated for a specified period of time (as indicated below) at 25 °C and 95% humidity with air blowing in a temperature humidity chamber (HWS-080, Shanghai Jinghong). During the first 4 h, the ACHP was stirred with a glass stick for 10 s after every 20 min to ensure that the ACHP contacted the humid air more uniformly.

The stability of ACHP in dried air

Five gram CaCl2 powder was sealed in a beaker to create a dried air atmosphere (humidity < 5%), alongside a powder of ACHP (0.050 g) that was kept for 1 month. After the ACHP was again taken out, XRPD patterns showed no apparent reflections indicative of crystallization.

Transformation of DCPM in water

10.0 mg freshly prepared DCPM was placed in a centrifuge tube containing 20 mL deionized water (25 °C). Afterwards, it was kept in an oscillating incubator (XZQ-X160, Suzhou Peiying) for specified times at constant temperature (150 rpm, 25 °C). Then the samples were isolated by centrifugation, washed with ethanol 3 times, and dried in a vacuum desiccator.

In order to study the ability of citrate salts stabilizing DCPM, 15.0 mg trisodium citrate dihydrate was dissolved in water before adding DCPM, while the other conditions remained unchanged.

In order to study the ability of NaPAA towards stabilizing DCPM, 23 mg NaPAA was dissolved in water before adding DCPM (pH adjusted to 7.0 using 1:10 hydrochloric acid), while the other conditions described above remained unchanged.

So as to investigate the pH changes during DCPM transformation in water, 10.0 mg freshly prepared DCPM was dispersed in 20 mL deionized water. Under vigorous stirring and maintaining the temperature at 25 °C, a pH meter (A 600, Asone) was used for real-time monitoring of the pH development in the solution.

DCP and DCPD were used as the controls with the same experimental conditions as DCPM.

Adsorption capacity of DCPM for organics

Methyl blue, congo red, doxorubicin hydrochloride (anti-cancer drug) and ibuprofen (analgesic drug) were used to study the adsorption capacities of DCPM. Briefly, at 25 °C, 10.0 mg DCPM was dispersed in water, methanol or ethanol with 2.0 mg mL−1 organics (doxorubicin 1.0 mg mL−1), and then placed in an oscillating incubator at constant temperature (150 rpm, 25 °C). The incubation was performed for 30 min (aqueous solution) or 2 h (methanol or ethanol solution) so as to adsorb organics on DCPM without phase transformation. Afterwards, the samples were isolated by centrifugation. The concentration of the organic molecules in the supernatant was measured with a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV2300II, Techcomp). As the detection of ibuprofen in ethanol solution is problematic, 1 mL of the supernatant was dried in vacuum, then re-dissolved in the same volume of hexane for the UV-vis measurement. The wavelengths for the determination of the concentrations of methyl blue in water, methyl blue in methanol, congo red, doxorubicin hydrochloride and ibuprofen were 596 nm, 591 nm, 501 nm, 495 nm, and 220 nm, respectively. DCP and DCPD were used as the controls with the same experimental procedure.

Cell viability

Sprague-Dawley (SD) rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (rBMSCs) were kindly provided by Stem Cell Bank, Chinese Academy of Sciences, catalog number: SCSP-402. Samples of DCP, DCPM and DCPD dispersed in ethanol were added into 24-well plates. After drying and sterilizing by UV, rBMSCs in 1 mL culture medium was added for co-incubation (0.5 × 105 cells/well) at 37 °C. After a certain time, the culture medium was removed, and 1 mL fresh medium containing 10% Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo) solution was added to each well. After further incubating for 2 h, 100 µL solution from each well was transferred to a 96-well plate. The absorbance of the sample was measured with a microplate reader (BioRad 680, USA) at 450 nm to determine the cell viability. The cell incubated without samples was used as the control.

Electron microscopy

TEM micrographs were obtained on a Zeiss Libra 120 operated at 120 kV. Samples were dispersed in ethanol, then a drop of the dispersion was added onto a carbon-coated Cu grid. The TEM analyses were performed immediately after drying.

X-ray powder diffraction

The XRPD patterns were recorded using an X-ray diffractometer (Bruker D8 ADVANCE) in reflectance Bragg-Brentano geometry employing Ni filtered Cu Kα line focused radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å) at 3000 W (40 kV, 40 mA) power. Each sample was measured with a 2θ rate of 10°/min for normal characterization, and 1°/min for refinement. The Rietveld refinement was performed using the software Topas version 5. The refinement was performed using isotropic atomic displacement parameters, a pseudo-Voigt peak shape function, a fourth order spherical harmonic correction to take into account preferred orientation, and seven parameters to fit the background. No restraints on the geometry of the structure were used. Details of the structure after Rietveld refinement are available from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center with deposition code CCDC 1961467.

Infrared spectroscopy

Fourier transform IR spectroscopy was performed on a PerkinElmer spectrum 100 Spectrophotometer. Before measurements, thin KBr disks with a diameter of 1.0 cm were prepared by pressing KBr powder by applying a pressure of 10 MPa. The samples were dispersed in ethanol, then dropped on the KBr disks. After the ethanol was dried, the samples were adsorbed on individual KBr disks. The disks were then used for the measurements. In order to achieve a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio, 16 scans were accumulated for each spectrum.

Thermogravimetric analyses

TGA measurements were performed using a thermal analyzer instrument (NETZSCH STA 449 F3 Jupiter®) in a nitrogen atmosphere. The heating rate was 10 °C min−1. 10–15 mg of powdered samples were placed in a crucible for measurements, whereas an empty one served as reference.


The elemental composition of the ACPs was determined using an ICP-OES (Horiba, JY2000-2). The samples were dissolved in 1% HNO3 solution for measurements. 5 solutions, containing a different concentration of Ca and P in each one, were prepared for the setup calibration.

Continuous rotation electron diffraction

The sample was crushed in an agate mortar, dispersed in absolute ethanol and ultrasonicated for 5 s. Then, a droplet of the suspension was transferred onto a copper grid covered by a holey carbon film. The grid was mounted to a single-tilt cryo-transfer tomography holder, Gatan Type 914, operated at liquid nitrogen cooling at ~−176 °C. The data were collected using a JEOL JEM-2100 TEM operated at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The cRED data were collected by continuously tilting the goniometer with a tilt speed of 1.12°/s. During tilt the crystal was tracked by sequential defocusing of the intermediate lens using the software Instamatic47. The diffraction patterns were collected using the high-speed hybrid detection camera Timepix Quad (ASI). The datasets were processed using X-ray Detector Software (XDS) in order to extract intensities for structure solution and refinement. The reconstructed reciprocal lattice could be indexed by a monoclinic unit cell and systematic extinctions indicated that the space group was P21/c, see Supplementary Fig. 4. The structure of DCPM was solved using the software SHELXT54 and the subsequent least-squares refinement was performed in SHELXL-9755 using atomic scattering factors for electrons extracted from SIR201456. The structure solution directly identified 7 peaks identified as 1 Ca, 1 P, and 5 O. The least squares refinement converged without the use of any restraints and with reasonable isotropic atomic displacement parameters to an R1 residual of 0.260, using 29 refinement parameters. No restraints on the geometry of the structure were used during the refinement. Details regarding the cRED data collection, as well as the refinement, can be found in Supplementary Table S1. Details of the structure after refinement against cRED data are available from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center with deposition code CCDC 1961466. cRED data were also collected from the sample of DCPM prepared in humid air. Structure solution resulted in the same structure as for the sample prepared by mixed solvent and the refinement converged with an R1 residual of 0.256.

First principles calculations

All quantum mechanical calculations have been performed within the framework of Kohn-Sham density functional theory using one of two different methods:

  1. 1.

    Geometry optimizations and phonon calculations were conducted using the planewave pseudopotential method as implemented within the code CASTEP version 18.157. On-the-fly generated ultrasoft pseudopotentials were used with a small core for Ca and a planewave cutoff of 1000 eV for a high level of convergence (dEtot/dlog(Ecut) < 0.001 eV per atom). Reciprocal space was sampled with a Monkhorst-Pack mesh with a spacing of 0.02 Å−1. The PBE exchange-correlation functional58 was used with Grimme’s D2 dispersion corrections59. All geometries were optimized with a fully variable unit cell to an energy tolerance of 10−5 eV, a force tolerance of 0.02 eV/Å and a stress tolerance of 0.1 GPa. Phonon calculations were performed at the gamma point only using finite differences, from which the zero point energy and thermal corrections were estimated at 298.15 K. All phases were confirmed to have no imaginary modes at the zone center. Calculations on monetite, brushite and DCPM all used unit cells containing four formula units and so any systematic error due to the use of only the gamma point phonons will be largely canceled. In order to estimate the thermodynamics of water incorporation into the phases, calculations were also performed for a proton-ordered structure of ice-Ih at the same level of theory. Here the computed hypothetical free energy of ice at standard conditions was corrected using the experimental free energy of fusion under the same conditions to estimate the corresponding thermodynamics of liquid water.

  2. 2.

    Ab initio molecular dynamics was also performed for DCPM in order to explore the stability of the initial hydrogen position choices after geometry optimization. Here the Gaussian-augmented planewave method was used as implemented in the Quickstep60 module of CP2K61. In order to also verify that the computed behavior of DCPM was not especially sensitive to the choice of functional, these calculations were performed using BLYP62,63 with D3 dispersion corrections64. The Goedecker-Teter-Hutter pseudopotentials65 and basis sets of TZVP quality were used, except for Ca which used a DZVP basis. A planewave basis with a cutoff of 300 Ry was used for the electron density. Molecular dynamics was performed using a 2 × 2 × 2 supercell of DCPM containing 362 atoms in the NPT ensemble, again with a fully flexible unit cell. A slightly elevated temperature of 330 K was used to enhance the rate of exploration of configuration space, with the use of a canonical sampling velocity rescaling thermostat and barostat66, both with time constants of 50 fs, and a time step of 0.5 fs. Hydrogen was also assigned a mass of 2 amu (i.e., deuterated). A total of 34 ps of MD was run during which no proton transfer events or significant changes in the orientation of water molecules beyond libration were observed. Quenching of structures harvested from the dynamics resulted in the same structure as obtained initially by geometry optimization.

Force field calculations

As a further test of the validity of the DCPM structure, calculations were also performed using the GULP code67 and a recently fitted force field that was designed to reproduce the properties of aqueous calcium phosphate systems during crystallization68. Again the DCPM structure was optimized and a full phonon analysis performed across the Brillouin zone that revealed no instability within the initial space group.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Rietveld refinement and cRED data are available from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center with deposition code CCDC 1961467 and CCDC 1961466, respectively. The source data underlying Figs. 1b, 3a-b, 4a-c, 4c, 5a-b and Supplementary Figs. 1, 2, 4, 5a, b, 7, 10a, b, 12, 13, 14, 15, and Supplementary Table 6 are provided as a Source Data file. Data is also available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Dorozhkin, S. V. & Epple, M. Biological and medical significance of calcium phosphates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 3130–3146 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Mehmel, M. On the structure of apatite. Z. Kristallogr. 75, 323–331 (1930).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Brown, W. E., Lehr, J. R., Smith, J. P. & Frazier, A. W. Crystallography of octacalcium phosphate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79, 5318–5319 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Moore, G. E. On brushite, a new mineral occurring in phosphatic guano. Am. J. Sci. Ser. 2 39, 43–44 (1865).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shepard, C. U. On two new minerals, monetite and monite, with a notice of pyroclasite. Am. J. Sci. Ser. 3 23, 400–405 (1882).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Muhlenberg, W. F. Address in Hygiene, Transactions of the Medical Society of the State of Pennsylvania, at Its Thirty-third Annual Session, Held at Titusville, May 10, 11 and 12. Vol. XIV, 81–102 (Times printing house, Philadelphia, 1832).

  7. 7.

    Dorozhkin, S. V. A detailed history of calcium orthophosphates from 1770s till 1950. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 33, 3085–3110 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lotsari, A., Rajasekharan, A. K., Halvarsson, M. & Andersson, M. Transformation of amorphous calcium phosphate to bone-like apatite. Nat. Comm. 9, 4170 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zyman, Z. et al. Thermally induced crystallization and phase evolution in powders derived from amorphous calcium phosphate precipitates with a Ca/P ratio of 1:1. J. Cryst. Growth 450, 190–196 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tung, M. S. & Brown, W. E. An intermediate state in hydrolysis of amorphous calcium-phosphate. Calcif. Tissue Int. 35, 783–790 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Maciejewski, M., Brunner, T. J., Loher, S. F., Stark, W. J. & Baiker, A. Phase transitions in amorphous calcium phosphates with different Ca/P ratios. Thermochim. Acta 468, 75–80 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pan, H. H., Liu, X. Y., Tang, R. K. & Xu, H. Y. Mystery of the transformation from amorphous calcium phosphate to hydroxyapatite. Chem. Commun. 46, 7415–7420 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Combes, C. & Rey, C. Amorphous calcium phosphates: synthesis, properties and uses in biomaterials. Acta Biomater. 6, 3362–3378 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    La Fontaine, A. et al. Atomic-scale compositional mapping reveals Mg-rich amorphous calcium phosphate in human dental enamel. Sci. Adv. 2, e1601145 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Akiva, A. et al. Mineral formation in the larval Zebrafish tail bone occurs via an acidic disordered calcium phosphate phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 14481–14487 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tertuliano, O. A. & Greer, J. R. The nanocomposite nature of bone drives its strength and damage resistance. Nat. Mater. 15, 1195–1202 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lowenstam, H. A. & Weiner, S. Transformation of amorphous calcium-phosphate to crystalline dahllite in the radular teeth of chitons. Science 227, 51–53 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zhao, J., Liu, Y., Sun, W. B. & Yang, X. B. First detection, characterization, and application of amorphous calcium phosphate in dentistry. J. Dent. Sci. 7, 316–323 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mahamid, J. et al. Mapping amorphous calcium phosphate transformation into crystalline mineral from the cell to the bone in zebrafish fin rays. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 6316–6321 (2010).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gordon, L. M., Cohen, M. J., MacRenaris, K. W., Pasteris, J. D. & Seda, T. Amorphous intergranular phases control the properties of rodent tooth enamel. Science 347, 746–750 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Grynpas, M. D. & Omelon, S. Transient precursor strategy or very small biological apatite crystals? Bone 41, 162–164 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gower, L. B. Biomimetic model systems for investigating the amorphous precursor pathway and its role in biomineralization. Chem. Rev. 108, 4551–4627 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    De Yoreo, J. J. et al. Crystallization by particle attachment in synthetic, biogenic, and geologic environments. Science 349, aaa6760 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Olszta, M. J. et al. Bone structure and formation: a new perspective. Mater. Sci. Eng. R. Rep. 58, 77–116 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Glimcher, M. J., Bonar, L. C., Grynpas, M. D., Landis, W. J. & Roufosse, A. H. Recent studies of Bone-mineral-is the amorphous calcium-phosphate theory valid. J. Cryst. Growth 53, 100–119 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    LeGeros, R. Z. Calcium phosphate-based osteoinductive materials. Chem. Rev. 108, 4742–4753 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Habraken, W., Habibovic, P., Epple, M. & Bohner, M. Calcium phosphates in biomedical applications: materials for the future? Mater. Today 19, 69–87 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bragg, W. L. The structure of some crystals as indicated by their diffraction of x-rays. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 89, 248–277 (1913).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Friedrich, W., Knipping, P. & Laue, M. Interferenzerscheinungen bei Röntgenstrahlen. Ann. Phys. 346, 971–988 (1913).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kerr, A. & Laing, M. Mineralogical studies of human urinary calculi from natal. Environ. Geochem. Health 14, 19–25 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Mansfield, C. F. & Griffith, D. P. Descriptive human pathological mineralogy. Am. Mineral. 61, 1031–1034 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Schofield, P. F., Knight, K. S., van der Houwen, J. A. M. & Valsami-Jones, E. The role of hydrogen bonding in the thermal expansion and dehydration of brushite, di-calcium phosphate dihydrate. Phys. Chem. Miner. 31, 606–624 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Tortet, L., Gavarri, J. R., Nihoul, G. & Dianoux, A. J. Study of protonic mobility in CaHPO4·2H2O (brushite) and CaHPO4 (monetite) by infrared spectroscopy and neutron scattering. J. Solid State Chem. 132, 6–16 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wang, L. J. & Nancollas, G. H. Calcium orthophosphates: crystallization and dissolution. Chem. Rev. 108, 4628–4669 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Dorozhkin, S. V. Calcium orthophosphates in nature, biology and medicine. Materials 2, 399–498 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    O’Neill, R. et al. Critical review: injectability of calcium phosphate pastes and cements. Acta Biomater. 50, 1–19 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Tamimi, F., Sheikh, Z. & Barralet, J. Dicalcium phosphate cements: brushite and monetite. Acta Biomater. 8, 474–487 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lu, B. Q. et al. Short-range structure of amorphous calcium hydrogen phosphate. Cryst. Growth Des. 19, 3030–3038 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kolb, U., Gorelik, T., C.Kübel, C., Otten, M. T. & Hubert, D. Towards automated diffraction tomography: part I-data acquisition. Ultramicroscopy 107, 507–513 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Zhang, D. L., Oleynikov, P., Hovmöller, S. & Zou, X. D. Collecting 3D electron diffraction data by the rotation method. Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 225, 94–102 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Wan, W., Sun, J. L., Su, J., Hovmöller, S. & Zou, X. D. Three-dimensional rotation electron diffraction: software RED for automated data collection and data processing. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 46, 1863–1873 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Shi, D., Nannenga, B. L., Iadanza, M. G. & Gonen, T. Three-dimensional electron crystallography of protein microcrystals. Elife 2, e01345 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Nannenga, B. L., Shi, D., Leslie, A. G. W. & Gonen, T. High-resolution structure determination by continuous-rotation data collection in microED. Nat. Methods 11, 927–930 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Willhammar, T., Yun, Y. F. & Zou, X. D. Structural determination of ordered porous solids by electron crystallography. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 182–199 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Palatinus, L. et al. Hydrogen positions in single nanocrystals revealed by electron diffraction. Science 355, 166–169 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Xu, H. Y. et al. A rare lysozyme crystal form solved using highly redundant multiple electron diffraction datasets from micron-sized crystals. Structure 26, 667–675 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Cichocka, M. O., Ångström, J., Wang, B., Zou, X. D. & Smeets, S. High-throughput continuous rotation electron diffraction data acquisition via software automation. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 51, 1652–1661 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bailey, R. T. & Holt, C. in Calcified Tissue. In Chapter: Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and characterisation of biological calcium phosphates (Hukins, D. W. L. ed.) 93–120 (The Macmillan Press Ltd, 1989).

  49. 49.

    Dosen, A. & Giese, R. F. Thermal decomposition of brushite, CaHPO4·2H2O to monetite CaHPO4 and the formation of an amorphous phase. Am. Mineral. 96, 368–373 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Frost, R. L. & Palmer, S. J. Thermal stability of the ‘cave’ mineral brushite CaHPO4·2H2O-Mechanism of formation and decomposition. Thermochim. Acta 521, 14–17 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Lebugle, A., Sallek, B. & Tai, A. T. Surface modification of monetite in water at 37 degrees C: characterisation by XPS. J. Mater. Chem. 9, 2511–2515 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Duff, E. J. Orthophosphates. Part III. The hydrolysis of secondary calcium orthophosphates. J. Chem. Soc. A 917–921 (1971).

  53. 53.

    Hu, Y. Y., Rawal, A. & Schmidt-Rohr, K. Strongly bound citrate stabilizes the apatite nanocrystals in bone. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22425–22429 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Sheldrick, G. SHELXT-Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 71, 3–8 (2015).

    Article  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Sheldrick, G. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 64, 112–122 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Burla, M. C. et al. Crystal structure determination and refinement viaSIR2014. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 48, 306–309 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Clark, S. J. et al. First principles methods using CASTEP. Z. Für Krist. Cryst. Mater. 220, 567–570 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA‐type density functional constructed with a long‐range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 27, 1787–1799 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    VandeVondele, J. et al. Quickstep: fast and accurate density functional calculations using a mixed Gaussian and plane waves approach. Comput. Phys. Commun. 167, 103–128 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Hutter, J., Iannuzzi, M., Schiffmann, F. & VandeVondele, J. cp2k: atomistic simulations of condensed matter systems. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 4, 15–25 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Becke, A. D. Density-functional thermochemistry 1. The effect of the exchange-only gradient correction. J. Chem. Phys. 96, 2155–2160 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Lee, C. T., Yang, W. T. & Parr, R. G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron-density. Phys. Rev. B 37, 785–789 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Goedecker, S., Teter, M. & Hutter, J. Separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 54, 1703–1710 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Gale, J. D. & Rohl, A. L. The General Utility Lattice Program (GULP). Mol. Simul. 29, 291–341 (2003).

    Article  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Demichelis, R. et al. Simulation of calcium phosphate species in aqueous solution: force field derivation. J. Phys. Chem. B 122, 1471–1483 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


B.Q.L. acknowledges financial support by the CSC-DAAD postdoc program for a postdoctoral stay at the University of Konstanz, and characterization help from Shengtong Sun and Min Ju. D.G. was a Research Fellow of the Zukunftskolleg of the University of Konstanz, and partly supported by the DFG-funded SFB 1214 of the University of Konstanz during this work. T.W. acknowledges a grant from the Swedish research council (VR, 2014-06948). J.D.G. acknowledges the support of the Australian Research Council through grant FL180100087, as well as the provision of computing resources by the Pawsey Supercomputing Centre and National Computational Infrastructure. We also acknowledge financial support from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation through the project grant 3DEM-NATUR (no. 2012.0112).

Author information




All authors contributed to data analysis, and paper writing; B.Q.L. designed the study, synthesized the samples and performed the characterizations; T.W. conducted the TEM and ED measurements and determined the crystal structure of DCPM; B.B.S. conducted the cell experiments; N.H. performed additional characterizations; J.D.G. performed the theoretical calculations; D.G. designed and supervised the study, organized experiments, data analysis, paper writing and revisions.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bing-Qiang Lu or Denis Gebauer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, BQ., Willhammar, T., Sun, BB. et al. Introducing the crystalline phase of dicalcium phosphate monohydrate. Nat Commun 11, 1546 (2020).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing