Shotgun ion mobility mass spectrometry sequencing of heparan sulfate saccharides

Miller, Rebecca L.; Guimond, Scott E.; Schwörer, Ralf; Zubkova, Olga V.; Tyler, Peter C.; Xu, Yongmei; Liu, Jian; Chopra, Pradeep; Boons, Geert-Jan; Grabarics, Márkó; Manz, Christian; Hofmann, Johanna; Karlsson, Niclas G.; Turnbull, Jeremy E.; Struwe, Weston B.; Pagel, Kevin

doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15284-y

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 20 March 2020

Shotgun ion mobility mass spectrometry sequencing of heparan sulfate saccharides

Nature Communications volume 11, Article number: 1481 (2020) Cite this article

6102 Accesses
37 Citations
63 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Despite evident regulatory roles of heparan sulfate (HS) saccharides in numerous biological processes, definitive information on the bioactive sequences of these polymers is lacking, with only a handful of natural structures sequenced to date. Here, we develop a “Shotgun” Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry Sequencing (SIMMS²) method in which intact HS saccharides are dissociated in an ion mobility mass spectrometer and collision cross section values of fragments measured. Matching of data for intact and fragment ions against known values for 36 fully defined HS saccharide structures (from di- to decasaccharides) permits unambiguous sequence determination of validated standards and unknown natural saccharides, notably including variants with 3O-sulfate groups. SIMMS² analysis of two fibroblast growth factor-inhibiting hexasaccharides identified from a HS oligosaccharide library screen demonstrates that the approach allows elucidation of structure-activity relationships. SIMMS² thus overcomes the bottleneck for decoding the informational content of functional HS motifs which is crucial for their future biomedical exploitation.

Proteome-scale discovery of protein degradation and stabilization effectors

Article 20 March 2024

Juline Poirson, Hanna Cho, … Mikko Taipale

A host–microbiota interactome reveals extensive transkingdom connectivity

Article 20 March 2024

Nicole D. Sonnert, Connor E. Rosen, … Noah W. Palm

Tandem mass spectrum prediction for small molecules using graph transformers

Article 05 April 2024

Adamo Young, Hannes Röst & Bo Wang

Introduction

Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are linear sulfated polysaccharides which constitute some of the most negatively charged biopolymers in nature. The heparan sulfate (HS) family of GAGs are linear polysaccharides found on the cell surface and in the extracellular matrix. GAGs are attached to core proteins in the form of proteoglycans (PGs), and exhibit great diversity in chain length and degree of sulfation patterns, creating enormous diversity for informational cues. HS chains are essential for life and orchestrate numerous biological processes including; cell migration, inflammation, anticoagulation, angiogenesis, and tumor metastasis¹. It is generally believed that distinct structural motifs along the linear sequence of these polysaccharides serve as specific recognition sites for regulation of biological interactions. Yet only a few defined sequence motifs are known², perhaps the best example being the ATIII-binding pentasaccharide responsible for the anticoagulant activity of pharmaceutical heparin. This is in part due to technical limitations in the structural analysis of the large heterogenous HS chains, which is generally limited to compositional analysis of disaccharide components obtained after exhaustive enzymatic digestions³. Disaccharide analysis provides important “building block” analysis of sulfation and acetylation of the disaccharide units within a HS chain. However, this analysis does not provide insight into larger bioactive motifs, typically consisting of 4–10 monosaccharide units. Partial digestion and isolation of larger bioactive oligosaccharide structures (<dp10) is possible with considerable effort, but heterogeneity often prevents complete characterization^4,5. A handful of tetrasaccharides (out of around 5000 theoretical structures) have been confidently characterized since the number of isomeric structures is limited at this size^6,7,8,9. The heterogeneity of larger oligosaccharide structures (>dp4) impose significant challenges in complete sequencing of isomers, and even with NMR¹⁰, chemical modification^11,12,13, and enzymatic deconvolution¹⁴ <20 structures have been fully sequenced. Separation of isomeric structures is the main limitation for sequencing larger oligosaccharide fragments. Ion mobility mass spectrometry (IMMS) of glycans has demonstrated the ability to characterise isomeric arrangements of glycan building blocks (mannose, galactose, etc.), but also connectivity (glycosidic bond linkage, sialic acids) and configuration (α and β anomers)^15,16,17,18. GAGs possess a linear sequence with no branching, and connectivity is singular to the GAG family. However, GAGs pose different challenges for IMMS analysis. GAG chain complexity is a result of heterogeneity from sulfation and epimerisation, and extended linear units. Preliminary results from our lab and others have shown that IMMS is a promising strategy for the gas phase separation of isomeric GAG oligosaccharide structures^{18,19,20,21,22,23,24}.

Here we present a method coined Shotgun Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry Sequencing (SIMMS²) that relies on distinct IMMS features of smaller fragments (dp4-10) obtained by limited digestion and with reconstruction of overlapping fragments to characterize larger sequences (Fig. 1). We take advantage of a library of defined standards to build unique IMMS features that enable us to obtain unambiguous sequence information on both validated standards and unknown natural HS saccharides, and also reveal structure-activity information on FGF-inhibitory HS hexasaccharides. The SIMMS² sequencing method thus opens up detailed studies of bioactive motifs, aimed at deepening understanding of HS structure-function relationships and potentially permitting strategies to discover HS-based therapeutics.

**Fig. 1: Graphic depiction of the SIMMS² strategy for de novo sequencing of HS saccharides.**

Results

Assembling a library of HS standards

HS is composed of a repeating uronic acid and glucosamine disaccharide unit, the uronic acid exists as either β-D-glucuronic acid (GlcA) or its epimer α-L-iduronic acid (IdoA) and can be modified with a sulfate at the C2 position, the glucosamine contains a N-sulfate (NS) or N-acetyl group (NAc) and can be modified with a sulfate on the C6 and rarely the C3 position. These modifications create acetylated, transition (both acetylated and sulfated) and sulfated domains (Fig. 1a). A library of standards representing features found in heparin and HS (including NS/NAc, 2O-/6O/3O-sulfation (2S/6S/3S) and IdoA/GlcA) was collected. This library encompasses a set of disaccharides isolated from heparinase-digested HS, complemented by more extended oligosaccharide structures produced by both chemoenzymatic^25,26,27,28 and chemical synthesis^29,30,31. The final library included nine disaccharides, ten tetrasaccharides, six hexasaccharides, six octasaccharides, two nonasaccharides and two decasaccharides, in total providing 35 standards (#1–35), and a further standard (#36) described later (See Supplementary Table 1). Whilst containing a number of structural permutations (including NS/NAc, 2S/6S/3S, and IdoA/GlcA), this initial library was designed to be sufficiently complex to test our hypothesis that a library of defined standards can be used to develop a sequencing strategy for larger HS oligosaccharides by IMMS (Fig. 1b–d).

IMMS separated standards display distinct characteristics

Since we and others have shown that IMMS can resolve HS saccharide isomers as large as octasaccharides^19,20,22,23, we reasoned that it would have significant utility for HS sequencing in concert with the library of standard oligosaccharides. In IMMS molecular ions are transported through a gas-filled cell aided by a weak electric field, where they are separated according to their mass, charge, size and shape, which enables the differentiation of isomers. From the resulting arrival time distributions (ATDs), drift times can be extracted for individual components. When measured under controlled conditions, drift times can be used to calculate the collision cross section (CCS) values, a structural property related to the rotationally averaged area of a given ion. CCSs are generally given in units of ångström squared (Å²) and serve as molecular descriptors that can be stored in databases and used for the identification of analytes³². Depending on the utilized IMMS technique, CCSs can be directly calculated from the applied instrumental parameters as performed here (for details see Methods) or obtained from calibration³³. The resulting CCS values derived from the 36 HS standards (#1–#36) and their fragments (See Supplementary Tables 1 and 2) demonstrated the ability of IMMS to distinguish between intact structures, different sized fragment ions, charge states and isomeric structures (See Supplementary Table 2).

Disaccharides—The disaccharide ΔUA-GlcNAc (#1) displayed the smallest CCS of 112Å², compared to disaccharide ΔUA2S-GlcNS3S6S (#29) displaying the largest CCS value of 150Å². Isomeric structures ΔUA-GlcNAc6S (#2) and ΔUA2S-GlcNAc (#7) displayed different CCS values of 121 Å² and 124 Å² respectively (Fig. 2a), with ΔUA-GlcNS6S (#4) and ΔUA2S-GlcNS (#5) at CCS values of 123Å² and 124Å², respectively (See Supplementary Tables 1 and 2).

**Fig. 2: Drift tube ion mobility separation (DTIMS) of isomeric HS standards.**

Tetrasaccharides—Among the ten defined tetrasaccharides (#9–#15, and #30–#32) in the library; four are homogenous or heterogenous tetrasaccharides containing GlcA-GlcNAc6S and IdoA-GlcNAc6S, two are heterogenous tetrasaccharides containing GlcA/IdoA-GlcNS6S, and the seventh tetrasaccharide is GlcA-GlcNS6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-R₁. The last three tetrasaccharides contain 3O-sulfation correlating to the ATIII binding sites in porcine and bovine heparin, including ΔUA-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNS3S (#30), ΔUA-GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S (#31), and ΔUA-GlcNAc6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S (#32). GlcA and IdoA are isomeric structures that cannot be distinguished using MS/MS alone. The homogenous structures GlcA-GlcNAc6S-GlcA-GlcNAc6S-R₁ (#9) and IdoA-GlcNAc-IdoA-GlcNAc6S-R₁ (#10) can be distinguished by IMMS (Fig. 2b) with the homogenous GlcA tetrasaccharide (#9) displaying a CCS value of 214 Å² and IdoA tetrasaccharide (#10) displaying a CCS value of 242 Å² (See Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). The heterogenous mixtures GlcA-GlcNAc6S-IdoA-GlcNAc6S-R₁ (#11) and IdoA-GlcNAc6S-GlcA-GlcNAc6S-R₁ (#13) displayed CCS values of 232 Å² and 245 Å², respectively (See Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). Thus, the non-reducing end GlcA from the heterogenous tetrasaccharide structure (#11) displayed a more compact CCS, similar to the CCS observation in the homogenous GlcA tetrasaccharide (#9). The non-reducing IdoA from the heterogenous tetrasaccharide (#13) displayed a more extended structure closer in CCS to the homogenous IdoA tetrasaccharide (#10) structure than the homogenous GlcA tetrasaccharide. Crucially, all four isomeric structures (#9, #10, #11 and #13) had distinct CCSs. The heterogenous GlcA-GlcNS6S-IdoA-GlcNS6S-R₁ (#12) and IdoA-GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS6S-R₁ (#14) tetrasaccharides were also distinguished, with CCS values of 236 Å² and 234 Å², respectively (See Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). As observed for the disaccharides, the N-sulfate group generates a more compact structure compared to saccharides with the N-acetyl groups, likely due to the formation of a hydrogen bond between the N-sulfate oxygens and the neighboring uronic acid^34,35. The 2O-sulfate containing tetrasaccharide GlcA-GlcNS6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-R₁ (#15) displayed a CCS value of 239 Å², which was 3 Å² larger than the same structure without the 2O-sulfate (#12), confirming that the N-sulfate is a dominating feature for the three-dimensional structure (See Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). The 3O-sulfated tetrasaccharides corresponding to the ATIII sites in porcine ΔUA-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNS3S (#30) and ΔUA-GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S (#31) displayed CCS values of 228 Å² and 229 Å² respectively. Whilst the tetrasaccharide corresponding to the ATIII site in bovine heparin ΔUA-GlcNAc6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S (#32) displayed a CCS value of 234 Å².

Hexasaccharides to decasaccharides—Six hexasaccharides were tested. The structure GlcA-GlcNS6S-IdoA-GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS6S-R₁ (#16) is a disaccharide extension of one of the tested tetrasaccharides (#14) and displayed a CCS value of 259 Å². The two homogenous isomeric hexasaccharide structures GlcNAc6S-[GlcA-GlcNAc6S]₂-GlcA-R₂ (#17) and GlcNAc6S-[IdoA-GlcNAc6S]₂-IdoA-R₂ (#18) displayed distinctly different CCS values of 297 Å² and 292 Å², respectively (See Supplementary Table 2). Structures G-GlcNS6S-G-GlcNS6S-I2S-GlcNS6S-R₁ (#33) and G-GlcNS6S-G-GlcNS3S-I2S-GlcNS6S-R₁ (#34) are isomeric displaying CCS values of 280 Å² and 282 Å² respectively. Structure G-GlcNS6S-G-GlcNS3S6S-I2S-GlcNS6S-R₁ (#35) displayed a CCS value of 328 Å².

Furthermore, we tested six octasaccharide structures GlcNAc6S-[UA-GlcNAc6S]₃-UA-R₂ (#19– #24) that were either homogenous with GlcA or IdoA residues, or heterogenous with two GlcA and two IdoA residues. All these isomeric octasaccharides are also distinguishable based on their distinct CCS values (Fig. 2c and See Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). Whether a GlcA or IdoA was next to the methoxyphenyl glycoside tag appeared to affect the octasaccharide structure, with the GlcA-R on the reducing end displaying a more extended structure than the IdoA-R on the reducing end.

Two decasaccharides with homogenous disaccharide structures GlcNAc6S-[IdoA-GlcNAc6S]₄-IdoA-R₂ (#27) and GlcNAc6S-[GlcA-GlcNAc6S]₄-GlcA-R₂ (#28) were also distinguished with CCS values of 536 Å² and 524 Å², respectively (Fig. 2d and See Supplementary Table 2). Finally, we also found that two nonasaccharides GlcA-GlcNS-GlcA-GlcNS-IdoA-GlcNS-GlcA-GlcNS-GlcA-R₃ (#25) and GlcA-GlcNS-GlcA-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNS-GlcA-GlcNS-GlcA-R₃ (#26) differing only in 2O-sulfate on the iduronic acids can be distinguished based on their CCS values of 437 Å² and 441 Å², respectively.

Fragmentation of defined standards

The tetra- to decasaccharides standards were subjected to fragmentation in the trap cell of the mass spectrometer prior to separation in the IMMS cell (See Supplementary Tables 3–51). This process resulted in unique CCS values for each fragment ion where homogenous IdoA B fragment ions (as defined by Domon and Costello nomenclature³⁶) resulted in more extended structures, compared to homogenous GlcA B fragment ions (See Supplementary Tables 3–51). In contrast, the hexa- to decasaccharides with a nitrophenyl tag next to the IdoA/GlcA affected the structural conformation, with IdoA Y product ions resulting in a more compact structures compared to that of GlcA. A comparison of B ions with GlcNAc6S or GlcNS6S showed that the NS group resulted in a more compact structure (See Supplementary Tables 3–18). Importantly, data obtained on internal fragments from standards demonstrates the utility of single larger standards to provide an extended set of CCS data values.

Development of a HS sequencing method—SIMMS²

While MS and MS/MS alone do not enable unambiguous sequencing of HS chains, our IMMS studies on the library of HS standards demonstrated that IMMS could, firstly, distinguish HS structures with different lengths up to decasaccharides, secondly, determine disaccharide composition and order, and thirdly, distinguish many isomeric structures. These collective abilities provide the necessary data for complete structural identification of a large number of important structures. We therefore hypothesized that with sufficient information on fragmentation patterns and CCS values from relevant standards, it would be possible to unambiguously sequence unknown HS structures using data from overlapping standards in a shotgun IMMS strategy—designated SIMMS².

To test this hypothesis, we used SIMMS² to sequence the hexasaccharide GlcA-GlcNS6S-IdoA-GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS6S-R₁ (#16) (Fig. 3). This approach exploits data from two tetrasaccharides GlcA-GlcNS6S-IdoA-GlcNS6S-R₁ (#12) and IdoA-GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS6S-R₁ (#14) that represent all the possible monosaccharides contained in this hexasaccharide. Tetrasaccharide #12 generated CCS of B₂ 135 Å² and B₃ 160 Å² matching the CCS data B₂ 135 Å² and B₃ 160 Å² from the hexasaccharide (#16), confirming that the reducing ends were identical. Tetrasaccharide #14 generated CCS of Y₂ 156 Å² and Y₃ 213 Å², matching with Y₂ 156 Å² and Y₃ 213 Å² from the hexasaccharide #16 confirming that the non-reducing ends are identical (Fig. 3, and See Supplementary Tables 4 and 6 display the full set of B, Y, C, and Z ions). In addition, with the aid of CCS values of fragments ions created by loss of a sulfate group from the two tetrasaccharides #12 and #14, we were able to sequence the hexasaccharide structure #16 (See Supplementary Fig. 1 and See Supplementary Tables 28, 29 and 31).

**Fig. 3: Using the SIMMS² method for sequencing a hexasaccharide.**

In another example the structures of a nonamer (#25) and the nonamer with a single 2O-sulfate (#26) were compared by SIMMS² (Fig. 4a and See Supplementary Tables 15–16) demonstrating that this strategy could determine the position of the single 2O-sulfate on the IdoA residue in nonasaccharide #26. This supports the hypothesis that SIMMS² has the potential to serve as a method for sequencing extended glycosaminoglycan structures.

**Fig. 4: MS² sequencing of two 9mer saccharides.**

Applying SIMMS² to define ATIII and FGF-regulatory epitopes

It is generally observed that the majority of biological interactions of HS chains are conferred by motifs within the range of 4–10 monosaccharide residues. The classic high affinity antithrombin III binding site responsible for the anticoagulant activity in pharmaceutical heparin is an important example;^37,38 therefore CCS values were determined for the enzymatically depolymerized natural structures (#29–#32) and synthesized structures (#33–35) that correlated with the porcine and bovine ATIII binding sites (See Supplementary Tables 19 to 25). SIMMS² was used to sequence isomeric structures #33 and #34 (See Supplementary Table 1) that differed only in the presence of either a 6O-sulfate or a 3O-sulfate on a single glucosamine residue (See Supplementary Fig. 2). B fragment ions from #33 and #34 were distinguishable: the B₄ fragment ion of the 6O-sulfated isomer (#33) has a CCS value of 225 Å², whereas the B₄ fragment of the isomer carrying 3O-sulfation (#34) has a CCS value of 220 Å² (See Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Tables 23 and 24). This data clearly demonstrates the ability of SIMMS² to determine structures containing 3O-sulfate groups.

In addition, we used FGF1 and FGF2 regulation as a relevant model to demonstrate sequencing capabilities for natural isolated HS structures. We used BaF3 cell assays³⁹ to evaluate activation and inhibition of FGFs by HS compounds. First, we validated the assay with heparin and the nonamer compounds #25/26, which interestingly showed that the single 2O-sulfate group introduced in #26 provides weak partial FGF2 activation, while neither structure showed inhibitory activity (Fig. 4b).This is noteworthy since previous results demonstrated that NS and 2OS are required for FGF2 binding, while 6OS is required for optimal promotion of FGF2 cellular signaling^40,41. The nonasaccharide #26 lacks 6OS and yet partially promotes FGF2 signaling, demonstrating the utility of complete characterization of sequences by SIMMS² in deciphering cues for FGF bioactivities. We then obtained HS by-products from pharmaceutical heparin production⁴², and used limited heparinase III digestion to produce a range of oligosaccharide size fractions, which were initially separated by size exclusion chromatography (SEC). The dp8 and dp6 fractions were further separated through strong anion exchange (SAX)-HPLC and selected fractions were tested for bioactivity in the BaF3 assay (See Supplementary Fig. 3a–b). Only the late eluting dp8 subfractions (more highly sulfated) induced FGF1 and FGF2 activation (See Supplementary Fig. 3a–b); however, we were unable to separate these fractions further into single entities due to low abundance and high heterogeneity of these fractions. In contrast, the dp6 fractions separated nicely into single oligosaccharides, and two of these (b¹ and b³) showed substantial FGF2 inhibitory activity (See Supplementary Fig. 3b). The two inhibitory dp6 fractions were separated further by cetyltrimethylammonium-SAX (CTA-SAX)⁴³, and the purity assessed by MS and disaccharide analysis, confirming that each represented a single hexasaccharide structure designated #HS1 (b¹) and #HS2 (b³) (See Supplementary Fig. 4a–c).

Employing the SIMMS² method and taking disaccharide analysis into account, the potential hexasaccharide structures were limited and sequences for #HS1 and #HS2 could be provisionally assigned as ΔUA-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNS-UA-GlcNAc and ΔUA-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-UA-GlcNAc6S, respectively (See Supplementary Tables 52–69). Both proposed hexasaccharides display the same non-reducing end (ΔUA-GlcNS-IdoA2S), and our IMMS data confirmed that the first three non-reducing monosaccharides indeed had the same CCS values (Fig. 5 and See Supplementary Tables 59 and 68). The current standard library we employed is necessarily limited to a subset of HS structures. To expand the library of standards to include saccharides containing a 2O-sulfate and a carbon-carbon double bond, we performed enzymatic digestion of the nonamer standard #26 (with one 2O-sulfate group), which provided the 7mer standard #36 (See Supplementary Table 1) with a single 2O-sulfate. The SIMMS² method was applied to the ATIII tetrasaccharide #30, septsaccharide #36 and the hexasaccharides #HS1 and #HS2 with a set of MS, MS/MS and CCS values for each ΔUA-GlcNS-IdoA2S containing structure (See Supplementary Tables 20, 26, 59, and 68). The CCS fragment ion values from standard #36 were compared to the HS purified hexasaccharide #HS1 (Fig. 5a and See Supplementary Tables 26 and 59), and the CCS data for B₁, B₂, and B₃, B₄ were the same in both structures (71, 110, 162 and 201Å², respectively; Fig. 5a and See Supplementary Tables 26 and 59). This resulted in unambiguous sequencing of hexasaccharide #HS1 and assignment of the sequence as ΔUA-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNS-GlcA-GlcNAc. A comparison of #36, and #HS1 with #HS2 revealed that the B₄ exhibited different CCS values demonstrating the position of the predicted 6O-sulfate groups and thus assigning the hexasaccharide structure of #HS2 as ΔUA-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNAc6S (Fig. 5a, See Supplementary Fig. 4c, and Tables 26, 59, and 68). A comparison of tetrasaccharide #30 (from the ATIII binding site) to #HS2 confirmed B₁, B₂, and B₃ fragment ions. The B₄ ion of #30 and #HS2 are isomers, with the former containing a 3O-sulfate and a CCS value of 218 Å² and the latter a 6O-sulfate with a CCS of 225 Å² (Fig. 5 and See Supplementary Tables 20 and 68). We retested the homogenous #HS1 and #HS2 hexasaccharides in the BaF3 cell assay and found that they inhibit FGF2-dependent cell proliferation with similar IC50 values of 638 and 566 nM, respectively (Fig. 5b). The #HS1 and #HS2 hexasaccharides differ in only 6O-sulfation. Previous studies have shown that 2O-sulfate is required for FGF2 binding, 6O-sulfate is additionally required for receptor activation, although the detailed structural requirements for binding versus activation is poorly understood^39,41. However, as discussed above we found that the 9mer standard #25 was unable to activate FGF2, whereas in contrast the modified 9mer standard #26 with only a single 2O-sulfate group sequenced by SIMMS² displayed partial but significant activation of FGF2 (Fig. 4b). A decasaccharide containing two 6O-sulfate groups was previously shown to have FGF2 inhibitory activity³⁹, and our results demonstrate two smaller hexasaccharides with none or two 6O-sulfate groups that exhibit similar inhibitory activity. It is thus clear that the mere presence of 2O-sulfate and 6O-sulfate is not enough to drive regulation of FGF2 activity, and further studies are now justified to pursue the detailed features of FGF-regulatory HS motifs, and will clearly be facilitated by SIMMS² methodology.

**Fig. 5: Applying the SIMMS² method for sequencing HS motifs displaying FGF bioactivity.**

Discussion

The SIMMS² method presented here relies on the resolving power of IM to define IMMS features of smaller fragments (dp4-10), and the reconstruction of overlapping fragments to characterize larger sequences. It was identified that both odd and even fragments are informative for SIMMS² sequencing. This method provides a substantial step forward in enabling direct sequencing of HS saccharides. A key objective for the development of the SIMMS² strategy was to demonstrate sequencing of bioactive HS motifs, since this has been a major bottleneck for advancement of the field. We were able to demonstrate identification of hexasaccharide inhibitors with both 2O-sulfate and 6O-sulfate groups which were notably selective for FGF2 versus FGF1, suggesting the possibility of developing FGF-specific regulatory compounds. We also exploited SIMMS² to sequence an enzymically modified 9mer and showed that the addition of a single 2OS group conferred partial activation of FGF2 (but not FGF1), despite lacking any 6O-sulfation. This illustrates the utility of SIMMS² for defining structure-activity relationships for GAG saccharides and emphasize its potential for the discovery of bioactive motifs with pharmacological potential^44,45,46.

SIMMS² is a methodology relying on access to accurate CCS values from standards, and while we demonstrated proof-of-concept for sequencing HS through synthetic standards, further development of SIMMS² for complete analysis of all HS structures will require access to a larger library of standards, generation of a comprehensive CCS dataset, and improved strategies to isolate and obtain homogeneous and heterogenous oligosaccharides. Separation of isomeric glycans in some cases is possible, whereas some isomeric glycans display similar CCS values⁴⁷. In the present study, the same phenomenon was observed, and is a recognized limitation of IM/MS methodology in its current form. Thus, to ensure correct oligosaccharide sequence identification, a comparison of multiple CCS fragment values should be performed, and the interpretation should include information from MS/MS and disaccharide analysis. We anticipate further extension to other simpler GAGs will also be possible using a similar strategy as suitable defined standards become available. Recent advances in chemical^30,31 and chemoenzymatic^25,26,27,28 synthesis of GAG saccharides are providing expanding resources of structures to support building such standards and CCS datasets. Purification of GAG oligosaccharides from tissues with current chromatography methods is notoriously challenging due to the complex mixtures obtained from such heterogenous sources. However, an emerging source for standards may be cell lines with engineered capacities for producing limited subsets of GAG features^3,48, which should simplify separation and isolation of homogeneous and heterogenous oligosaccharides. In particular, the GAGOme method employing the robust Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line to engineer and produce specifically restricted repertoires of GAGs with distinct features can help reduce complexities. These CHO cells can also be used to produce distinct GAGs on secreted proteins or by metabolic priming on glycosides, which may offer unique access to defined standards required for developing the SIMMS² method.

A further aspect for expanding utility of the SIMMS² method is interpretation and analysis of spectra for HS and potentially other GAG saccharides. Proteomics software packages perform poorly with GAG spectra, since they commonly use averaging algorithms of monoisotopic peaks and charge states. However, solutions are beginning to emerge^49,50. For example, Hogan et al.⁴⁹ uses a library of every possible theoretical fragment of a GAG saccharide for each charge state and compares the theoretical isotopic distribution with observed spectral patterns. Data sharing provides the resources for the development of improved algorithms for GAG analysis, and our dataset from 36 oligosaccharides are publicly available in UniCarbDR⁵¹ under MIRAGE guidelines⁵². These resources will require continuous updating and expansion, and they should be allied with effective software development. Generation of sequence data on expanding numbers of HS saccharides, and links to relevant protein targets, will also provide important information to support molecular modelling⁵³ and interaction studies⁵⁴ which will aid in defining their mechanisms of action in biological regulation.

The principles of SIMMS² sequencing rely on the generation of accurate CCS values and the resolving power of IMMS instruments. The linear drift tube (DT)IMS employed here is the only IMMS technique that enables the direct determination of accurate CCSs without a need for a calibration procedure. Oligosaccharide CCS values in this study were determined using a single DTIMS instrument. Reproducibility, uncertainty and instrument variability has been addressed previously in an interlaboratory study⁵⁵. For fatty acids and metabolites an average error of 0.27 ± 0.18% and 0.44 ± 0.28% was observed. Peptides and proteins showed the largest error with the stepped field method, 0.53 ± 0.44% and 0.68 ± 0.36%, respectively. Our CCS data from 36 defined oligosaccharide structures can now be applied as calibrants to determine CCS values on other IMMS instruments, potentially including traveling wave (TW)IMS, trapped (T)IMS and cyclic (c)IMS. Moreover, the utility to distinguish isomers relies on the IMMS resolving power, which can be expected to continue to improve with advances in instrumentation, and this could help alleviate this current limitation of the methodology. For example, if the CCS of two isomeric ions differ by 2%, a resolving power of 64 (corresponding to a plate number of 22 500) is required to separate them by DTIMS with a peak-to-peak resolution of 0.75. SIMMS² as a concept is entirely compatible with other MS labs, as state-of-the-art commercial and custom-built DTIMS instruments can achieve the required resolving power. Furthermore, current developments in cIMS devices working with traveling waves enable capabilities of achieving much higher levels of resolving power, heralding immense potential for advances in IMMS-based de novo sequencing strategies for HS and other GAGs.

Whilst sequencing bioactive HS motifs is the most pressing need, and is now enabled by the use of the SIMMS² strategy, intact HS chains are large, heterogenous, and composed of multiple bioactive motifs. Defining more details of sequences of intact HS chains remains a future challenge in which SIMMS² may make a contribution. Only one example of intact GAG chain sequencing has been reported⁵⁶, where a short CS chain on the proteoglycan bikunin with only 4O-sulfation was sequenced. A second attempt was applied on the short DS chains on decorin⁵⁷; significant heterogeneity was observed and isomeric structures were unresolved, but partial information on chain length and level of sulfation was acquired. Nevertheless, we envision that limited digestion of HS or GAG chains with multiple site-specific enzymes will generate unique sets of partially overlapping fragments that can be separated and then sequenced by SIMMS²; overlaps of such fragments may enable assembly in a similar manner to the shotgun sequencing approaches used in genomics and proteomics. This could ultimately lead to insights into domain structures and higher order arrangements of intact HS and other GAG chains.

In summary, SIMMS² is a shotgun method which enables direct and unambiguous sequencing of HS oligosaccharides through assembly of overlapping fragments. The method alleviates previous limitations imposed by the isomeric nature of many HS saccharides, and we envision SIMMS² being further developed and expanded to enable sequencing of all types of GAG oligosaccharides. Its application should accelerate decoding the informational codes that underpin their functional versatility and promise significant advances in their biomedical exploitation.

Methods

Materials and reagents

All chemicals were of analytical or HPLC grade purity from Sigma (Gillingham, UK) or VWR (Lutterworth, UK) unless otherwise stated. Disaccharide standards 1–8 were from Iduron (Manchester, UK), HS from IntelliHep (Liverpool, UK) and heparinases from IBEX (Montreal, Canada). Chemically synthesized structures were produced as described³¹. Structure (#36) was produced chemoenzymatically as described²⁵. HS-2-O-sulfotransferase was expressed in Origami B(DE3) cells (Novagen) and purified by chromatography as described⁵⁸.

Chemical synthesis of standards

For the synthesis of standards desired building blocks were prepared following reported procedures and assembled employing modular approach^31,59. The levulinoyl (Lev) esters of the sequences were removed by treatment with hydrazine acetate, and subjected to O-sulfation using sulfur trioxide/pyridine complex in DMF, followed by Fmoc removal with triethylamine/dichloromethane (1/4, v/v). The methyl esters and acetates were saponified with H₂O₂ and LiOH in THF. Next, the azide groups of the compounds were reduced under Staudinger conditions using PMe₃/THF (1.0 M), and the resulting amines were N-sulfated, employing a sulfur trioxide/pyridine complex in MeOH in the presence of Et₃N and NaOH. The target structures were obtained by hydrogenation, over Pd/C in a mixture of tBuOH/H₂O (1/1, v/v) to cleave the protecting group of the linker followed by further hydrogenation over Pd(OH)₂/C to remove the benzyl ethers, and finally purified by SEC over a P-2 column. All final structures were characterized by NMR spectroscopy and high resolution MS.

Preparation of 3O-sulfated di- and tetrasaccharide standards

The 3-O-sulfated disaccharide and 3-O-sulfated tetrasaccharide standards were prepared from corresponding oligosaccharides after heparin lyases digestion as described previously⁶⁰. Four 3-O-sulfated standards were used in this study, including ΔUA2S-GlcNS3S6S, ΔUA-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNS3S, ΔUA-GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S, and ΔUA-GlcNAc6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S. To prepare ΔUA2S-GlcNS3S6S disaccharide standard, a synthetic octasaccharide with a structure of GlcNAc6S-GlcA-GlcNS6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-GlcA-pNP (pNP represents p-nitrophenyl group) was incubated with a mixture of heparin lyase I, II, and III in 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0 at 37 ^oC overnight. The ΔUA2S-GlcNS3S6S disaccharide was purified by a Q-Sepharose column. The structure of ΔUA2S-GlcNS3S6S disaccharide standard was confirmed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and by NMR as described⁶⁰. To prepare ΔUA-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNS3S, ΔUA-GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S, and ΔUA-GlcNAc6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S, three different octasaccharide substrates with the structures of GlcNAc-GlcA-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNS3S-IdoA2S-GlcNS-GlcA-pNP, GlcNAc-GlcA-GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-GlcA-pNP, and GlcNAc-GlcA-GlcNAc6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-GlcA-pNP, respectively, were subjected to heparin lyases digestion. Each tetrasaccharide was purified by Q-Sepharose, and the structure was confirmed by ESI-MS and NMR⁶⁰.

CCS measurements

Drift tube (DT)IMS and a helium buffer gas (HE) was used to directly calculate ^DTCCS_He, designated as CCS (drift velocity of ions across the cell is proportional to mobility). CCS of standards was performed on a Synapt HDMS instrument modified with a linear drift tube IM cell as described^61,62, allowing determination of CCS values without calibration. Mass Lynx V4.1 software (Waters) is used to operate the instrument and save data files. Samples were measured at 0.05 µM in water/acetonitrile (50/50 v/v). Oligosaccharides were ionized using nano-electrospray ionization (nESI) and Pd/Pt or gold-coated borosilicate capillaries fabricated in-house. Mass spectra were acquired in negative ion mode with a capillary voltage at 0.70 kV. Standard #10 was analyzed under soft and harsh source conditions, and demonstrated that the determined CCS value was unchanged (See Supplementary Fig. 5). To obtain product ion mobility data and produce comparable CID data for each isomer, MS/MS was performed on selected ions in the trap cell of the instrument at 3, 8, and 18 V (with argon as collision gas). CCS values were determined using the stepped-field method, i.e., by plotting the arrival times (centroid of the best-fit Gaussian) as a function of reciprocal drift voltages. Correlation coefficient (R²) of the linear fits were typically ≥0.9999. ATDs were recorded at eight different voltages ranging from 50 to 120 V. Each given CCS value is the average of two to four independent measurements with deviations generally around 0.5%. Drift times were extracted and CCSs calculated using software developed in-house or manually using origin. Drift times were extracted manually where peak broadening, split peaks or peak shoulders were evident. The algorithm for processing ion-mobility data (Aprid) was written in-house and used for CCS calculation in an automated fashion. Details about the code can be found in the code availability section.

Expression of 2O-sulfotransferase

The maltose binding protein (MBP)-2O-sulfotransferase is a fusion protein was created using a pMAL-c2x vector (New England Biolabs). The MBP was truncated at the Asn-367 residues and the 2OST contained a mutation at E359A. The linker region encodes three alanine residues (A368–A370) and contained a NotI site for cloning. The catalytic domain of chicken 2OST (D69–N356) was cloned into the vector by using the NotI and BamHI sites. The MBP-2OST was expressed in Origami B(DE3) cells (Novagen). The cells were grown in LB medium and induced using isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (ITGP). Cells were left to grow on a shaker at 37 ^oC or overnight at 18 ^oC. Cells were pelleted and resuspended in 25 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 500 mM NaCl, and 1 mM DTT. Sonication was used to lyse the cells. The MBP-2OST expressed fusion protein was purified through an amylose resin (New England Biolabs) and eluted from the beads using maltose⁵⁸.

Generation of a 9-mer HS standard with 2O-sulfation

The 9mer standard #25 (500 µg) (See Supplementary Table 1) was incubated with 5 mU 2O-sulfotransferase in 100 mM PAPS, 50 mM MES, pH 7 at 30^oC overnight. After heat inactivation (98 ^oC, 4 min) products were separated by SAX-HPLC on a ProPac PA1 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 µm bead size, Dionex) using a NaCl gradient (0–1.4 M NaCl in HPLC grade water). Product with addition of a single 2O-sulfate was observed at 30% yield; this 9mer + 2O-sulfate (#26) was digested further with heparinase II at 1 mU/mg to generate standard #36.

Pure bioactive hexasaccharide structures isolated from HS

HS (500 mg) was dissolved in 900 µL of lyase buffer (100 mM sodium acetate, 10 mM calcium acetate) and incubated with Heparinase I (0.5 mU/mg) at 37 ^oC, with aliquots (300 µL) taken at 2, 4, and 8 h and heat inactivated. The aliquots were pooled and separated by SEC using preparation grade Superdex 30 beads (15 mm × 170 cm, bead size 34 µm – GE Healthcare) on an Akta FPLC system with isocratic elution in 0.5 M NH₄HCO₃ (0.5 mL/min; 232 nm). Fractions containing HS of similar dp were pooled and repeatedly freeze-dried using HPLC grade water to remove NH₄HCO₃. Dp8 and dp6 SEC fractions were selected and separated by SAX-HPLC (ProPac PA1) as described above using a 0–1.4 M NaCl gradient. The two main fractions were desalted and separated by VSCTA-SAX on a cetyltrimethylammonium derivatized C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 µm bead size – Sigma) using a gradient of 0–1.5 M NH₄HCO₃, as described⁴³. Each fraction was dried on a speed vac (Thermo Scientific) and subjected to DTIMS and compositional analysis.

Compositional analysis

HS fractions digested with 0.1 mU each of heparinases I, II, and III were incubated at 30 ^oC for 24 h, followed by HPLC on a Propac PA1 column with a NaCl gradient (0–1 M, 60 min) monitoring at 232 nm; peaks were evaluated by comparison with authentic standards.

BaF3 FGF signaling assays

The activity of HS oligosaccharides with FGF1 and FGF2 was determined using BaF3 cells transfected with FGFR1c (from David Ornitz, Washington University, St. Louis)^39,42. BaF3 cells (1 × 10⁴ cells/well) were plated into 96 well plates with recombinant FGF-1 or FGF-2 (1 ng/mL; R&D Systems) and either heparin or oligosaccharides (3 µg/mL). After 72 h 5 μL/well of 5 mg/mL MTT was added and incubated for 4 h. Formazan product was solubilized with 10% SDS/0.01 N HCl and quantified at 570 nm. For inhibition assays suboptimal heparin was added at 0.1 µg/mL, with oligosaccharides tested at 3 µg/mL Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, n = 3–9.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Materials are available on request to the authors. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and/or associated Supplementary Information Tables 1–69 and uploaded to UniCarbDR. The source data underlying Figs. 4b and 5d and Supplementary Fig. 3b are provided as a Source Data file.

Code availability

The algorithm for processing ion-mobility data (Aprid) was written in-house and used for CCS calculation in an automated fashion. It is implemented using Python 2.7 and can be operated by the user through a graphic interface devised in PyQtDesigner. The main goal of the script is to determine collision cross-sections (CCSs) for specific mass-to-charge (m/z) ratios. For that purpose, the script follows the mathematical approach of solving the Mason-Schamp equation. Details about the code and modules can be found online via github: https://github.com/waschbaerlauch/CCS-Calculation.

References

Soares da Costa, D., Reis, R. L. & Pashkuleva, I. Sulfation of glycosaminoglycans and its implications in human health and disorders. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 19, 1–26 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kjellen, L. & Lindahl, U. Specificity of glycosaminoglycan-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 50, 101–108 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, Y. H. et al. The GAGOme: a cell-based library of displayed glycosaminoglycans. Nat. Methods 15, 881–888 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Miller, R. L., Guimond, S. E., Prescott, M., Turnbull, J. E. & Karlsson, N. Versatile separation and analysis of heparan sulfate oligosaccharides using graphitized carbon liquid chromatography and electrospray mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 89, 8942–8950 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, Z. et al. Sequencing the oligosaccharide pool in the low molecular weight heparin dalteparin with offline HPLC and ESI-MS/MS. Carbohydr. Polym. 183, 81–90 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wolff, J. J., Chi, L., Linhardt, R. J. & Amster, I. J. Distinguishing glucuronic from iduronic acid in glycosaminoglycan tetrasaccharides by using electron detachment dissociation. Anal. Chem. 79, 2015–2022 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wolff, J. J. et al. Negative electron transfer dissociation of glycosaminoglycans. Anal. Chem. 82, 3460–3466 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Leach, F. E. 3rd et al. Electron detachment dissociation of synthetic heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycan tetrasaccharides varying in degree of sulfation and hexuronic acid stereochemistry. Int J. Mass Spectrom. 330-332, 152–159 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Agyekum, I., Zong, C., Boons, G. J. & Amster, I. J. Single stage tandem mass spectrometry assignment of the C-5 uronic acid stereochemistry in heparan sulfate tetrasaccharides using electron detachment dissociation. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 28, 1741–1750 (2017).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shriver, Z. et al. Sequencing of 3-O sulfate containing heparin decasaccharides with a partial antithrombin III binding site. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 10359–10364 (2000).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Huang, R. et al. De novo sequencing of complex mixtures of heparan sulfate oligosaccharides. Anal. Chem. 88, 5299–5307 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Huang, R., Liu, J. & Sharp, J. S. An approach for separation and complete structural sequencing of heparin/heparan sulfate-like oligosaccharides. Anal. Chem. 85, 5787–5795 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liang, Q., Chopra, P., Boons, G. J. & Sharp, J. S. Improved de novo sequencing of heparin/heparan sulfate oligosaccharides by propionylation of sites of sulfation. Carbohydr. Res 465, 16–21 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Turnbull, J. E., Hopwood, J. J. & Gallagher, J. T. A strategy for rapid sequencing of heparan sulfate and heparin saccharides. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 2698–2703 (1999).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gray, C. J. et al. Advancing solutions to the carbohydrate sequencing challenge. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 14463–14479 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gray, C. J. et al. Bottom-up elucidation of glycosidic bond stereochemistry. Anal. Chem. 89, 4540–4549 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hinneburg, H. et al. Distinguishing N-acetylneuraminic acid linkage isomers on glycopeptides by ion mobility-mass spectrometry. Chem. Commun. 52, 4381–4384 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Both, P. et al. Discrimination of epimeric glycans and glycopeptides using IM-MS and its potential for carbohydrate sequencing. Nat. Chem. 6, 65–74 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wei, J. et al. Characterization and quantification of highly sulfated glycosaminoglycan isomers by gated-trapped ion mobility spectrometry negative electron transfer dissociation MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 91, 2994–3001 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Leary, J. A. et al. Composition, sequencing and ion mobility mass spectrometry of heparan sulfate-like octasaccharide isomers differing in glucuronic and iduronic acid content. Eur. J. Mass Spectrom. 21, 245–254 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Miller, R. L. et al. Enrichment of two isomeric heparin oligosaccharides exhibiting different affinities toward monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Anal. Chem. 88, 11551–11558 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kailemia, M. J. et al. High-field asymmetric-waveform ion mobility spectrometry and electron detachment dissociation of isobaric mixtures of glycosaminoglycans. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 25, 258–268 (2014).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jin, L., Barran, P. E., Deakin, J. A., Lyon, M. & Uhrin, D. Conformation of glycosaminoglycans by ion mobility mass spectrometry and molecular modelling. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 3464–3471 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hofmann, J., Hahm, H. S., Seeberger, P. H. & Pagel, K. Identification of carbohydrate anomers using ion mobility-mass spectrometry. Nature 526, 241 (2015).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. Chemoenzymatic synthesis of heparan sulfate and heparin oligosaccharides and NMR analysis: paving the way to a diverse library for glycobiologists. Chem. Sci. 8, 7932–7940 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xu, Y. M. et al. Synthetic oligosaccharides can replace animal-sourced low-molecular weight heparins. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaan5954 (2017).
Lu, W. G. et al. Controlled chemoenzymatic synthesis of heparan sulfate oligosaccharides. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. 57, 5340–5344 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Liu, J. & Linhardt, R. J. Chemoenzymatic synthesis of heparan sulfate and heparin. Nat. Prod. Rep. 31, 1676–1685 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
de Paz, L. L. et al. Profiling heparin-chemokine interactions using synthetic tools. Acs Chem. Biol. 2, 735–744 (2007).
Zong, C. et al. Heparan sulfate microarray reveals that heparan sulfate-protein binding exhibits different ligand requirements. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 9534–9543 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schworer, R., Zubkova, O. V., Turnbull, J. E. & Tyler, P. C. Synthesis of a targeted library of heparan sulfate hexa- to dodecasaccharides as inhibitors of beta-secretase: potential therapeutics for Alzheimer’s disease. Chemistry 19, 6817–6823 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Struwe, W. B., Pagel, K., Benesch, J. L. P., Harvey, D. J. & Campbell, M. P. GlycoMob: an ion mobility-mass spectrometry collision cross section database for glycomics. Glycoconj. J. 33, 399–404 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gabelica, V. et al. Recommendations for reporting ion mobility mass spectrometry measurements. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 38, 291–320 (2019).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mulloy, B. & Forster, M. J. Conformation and dynamics of heparin and heparan sulfate. Glycobiology 10, 1147–1156 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yates, E. A. et al. 1H and 13C NMR spectral assignments of the major sequences of twelve systematically modified heparin derivatives. Carbohydr. Res. 294, 15–27 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Domon, B. & Costello, C. E. A systematic nomenclature for carbohydrate fragmentations in Fab-Ms Ms spectra of glycoconjugates. Glycoconj. J. 5, 397–409 (1988).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Olson, S. T. et al. Role of the antithrombin-binding pentasaccharide in heparin acceleration of antithrombin-proteinase reactions. Resolution of the antithrombin conformational change contribution to heparin rate enhancement. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 12528–12538 (1992).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ersdal-Badju, E., Lu, A., Zuo, Y., Picard, V. & Bock, S. C. Identification of the antithrombin III heparin binding site. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 19393–19400 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Guimond, S. E. & Turnbull, J. E. Fibroblast growth factor receptor signalling is dictated by specific heparan sulphate saccharides. Curr. Biol. 9, 1343–1346 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Guimond, S., Maccarana, M., Olwin, B. B., Lindahl, U. & Rapraeger, A. C. Activating and inhibitory heparin sequences for Fgf-2 (Basic Fgf) - distinct requirements for Fgf-1, Fgf-2, and Fgf-4. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 23906–23914 (1993).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pye, D. A., Vives, R. R., Turnbull, J. E., Hyde, P. & Gallagher, J. T. Heparan sulfate oligosaccharides require 6-O-sulfation for promotion of basic fibroblast growth factor mitogenic activity. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22936–22942 (1998).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Taylor, S. L., Hogwood, J., Guo, W., Yates, E. A. & Turnbull, J. E. By-products of heparin production provide a diverse source of heparin-like and heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans. Sci. Rep. 9, 2679 (2019).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Miller, R. L. et al. Heparin isomeric oligosaccharide separation using volatile salt strong anion exchange chromatography. Anal. Chem. 88, 11542–11550 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gustafsen, C. et al. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans present PCSK9 to the LDL receptor. Nat. Commun. 8, 503 (2017).
Hippensteel, J. A. et al. Circulating heparan sulfate fragments mediate septic cognitive dysfunction. J. Clin. Invest. 129, 1779–1784 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Morla, S. Glycosaminoglycans and glycosaminoglycan mimetics in cancer and inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 1963 (2019).
Gray, C. J. et al. Applications of ion mobility mass spectrometry for high throughput, high resolution glycan analysis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1860, 1688–1709 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Qiu, H. et al. A mutant-cell library for systematic analysis of heparan sulfate structure-function relationships. Nat. Methods 15, 889 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hogan, J. D. et al. Software for peak finding and elemental composition assignment for glycosaminoglycan tandem mass spectra. Mol. Cell Proteom. 17, 1448–1456 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Chiu, Y., Huang, R., Orlando, R. & Sharp, J. S. GAG-ID: heparan sulfate (HS) and heparin glycosaminoglycan high-throughput identification software. Mol. Cell Proteom. 14, 1720–1730 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Campbell, M. P. et al. Validation of the curation pipeline of UniCarb-DB: building a global glycan reference MS/MS repository. Bba-Proteins Proteom. 1844, 108–116 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Rojas-Macias, M. A. et al. Towards a standardized bioinformatics infrastructure for N- and O-glycomics. Nat. Commun. 10, 3275 (2019).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Singh, A. et al. Extension and validation of the GLYCAM force field parameters for modeling glycosaminoglycans. Can. J. Chem. 94, 927–935 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. et al. Gas-phase analysis of the complex of fibroblast growthfactor 1 with heparan sulfate: a traveling wave ion mobility spectrometry (TWIMS) and molecular modeling study. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 28, 96–109 (2017).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stow, S. M. et al. An interlaboratory evaluation of drift tube ion mobility-mass spectrometry collision cross section measurements. Anal. Chem. 89, 9048–9055 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ly, M. et al. The proteoglycan bikunin has a defined sequence. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 827–833 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yu, Y. et al. Sequencing the dermatan sulfate chain of decorin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 16986–16995 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bethea, H. N., Xu, D., Liu, J. & Pedersen, L. C. Redirecting the substrate specificity of heparan sulfate 2-O-sulfotransferase by structurally guided mutagenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18724–18729 (2008).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Arungundram, S. et al. Modular synthesis of heparan sulfate oligosaccharides for structure-activity relationship studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 17394–17405 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dhurandhare, V. M., Pagadala, V., Ferreira, A., Muynck, L. & Liu, J. Synthesis of 3-O-sulfated disaccharide and tetrasaccharide standards for compositional analysis of heparan sulfate. Biochemistry https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00838 (2019).
Hofmann, J. et al. Estimating collision cross sections of negatively charged N-glycans using traveling wave ion mobility-mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 86, 10789–10795 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pagel, K. & Harvey, D. J. Ion mobility-mass spectrometry of complex carbohydrates: collision cross sections of sodiated N-linked glycans. Anal. Chem. 85, 5138–5145 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by an Oxford CRUK development fund grant (CRUK0317 to R.L.M. and W.B.S.); a Senior Research Fellowship from the Medical Research Council (G117/423), Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council project grants (BB/I004343/1; BB/K02128/1; BB/MO27791), a PhD studentship from MRC/Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (to J.E.T.); the National Institutes of Health (HL094463-09 and HL144970 to J.L.); The National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS; P41GM103390) from US National Institute of Health (G-J.B); a Center for Research Resource grant of the National Institutes of Health (2 P41 RR005351 to G-J.B.); a Human Frontier Science Program grant (RGP0062 to G-J.B. and J.E.T.); Marsden Fund New Zealand grant (to P.C.T. and J.E.T.); the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) (Project number 372486779 – SFB 1340 to K.P.); and the Danish National Research Foundation (DNFR107).

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Jeremy E. Turnbull, Weston B. Struwe, Kevin Pagel.

Authors and Affiliations

Copenhagen Center for Glycomics, Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, N 2200, Denmark
Rebecca L. Miller & Jeremy E. Turnbull
Centre for Glycobiology, Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK
Rebecca L. Miller, Scott E. Guimond & Jeremy E. Turnbull
Laboratory of Cancer Biology, Department of Oncology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
Rebecca L. Miller
Institute for Science and Technology in Medicine, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
Scott E. Guimond
Ferrier Research Institute, Victoria University of Wellington, 69 Gracefield Road, Gracefield, Lower Hutt, 5010, New Zealand
Ralf Schwörer, Olga V. Zubkova & Peter C. Tyler
Division of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
Yongmei Xu & Jian Liu
Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, 315 Riverbend Road, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
Pradeep Chopra & Geert-Jan Boons
Department of Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Science, and Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Geert-Jan Boons
Freie Universitaet Berlin, Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Takustrasse 3, 14195, Berlin, Germany
Márkó Grabarics, Christian Manz, Johanna Hofmann & Kevin Pagel
Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society, Faradayweg 4-6, 14195, Berlin, Germany
Márkó Grabarics, Christian Manz, Johanna Hofmann & Kevin Pagel
Department of Medical Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Niclas G. Karlsson
Department of Chemistry, Chemistry Research Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QZ, UK
Weston B. Struwe

Authors

Rebecca L. Miller
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Scott E. Guimond
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ralf Schwörer
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Olga V. Zubkova
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Peter C. Tyler
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yongmei Xu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jian Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Pradeep Chopra
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Geert-Jan Boons
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Márkó Grabarics
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Christian Manz
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Johanna Hofmann
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Niclas G. Karlsson
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jeremy E. Turnbull
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Weston B. Struwe
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Kevin Pagel
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.L.M. performed all MS analyses and interpretations. S.E.G. performed the FGF bioassay experiments and enzymatic modification of the 9mer saccharide. J.H., M.G., K.P., and W.B.S. assisted with the IMMS instrument and CCS data analysis. C.M. provided Python created software to calculate CCS values. R.S., O.V.Z., P.C.T., P.C., and G.J.B generated the chemically synthesized standards. J. L. and Y.X. generated the chemoenzymatic synthesized standards. N.G.K. contributed to upload and database storage in UniCarbDR. R.L.M., J.E.T., K.P., and W.B.S. conceived and designed the study. R.L.M. wrote the manuscript and all authors contributed to manuscript revisions and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca L. Miller.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks John Whitelock and the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Reporting Summary

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, R.L., Guimond, S.E., Schwörer, R. et al. Shotgun ion mobility mass spectrometry sequencing of heparan sulfate saccharides. Nat Commun 11, 1481 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15284-y

Download citation

Received: 02 September 2019
Accepted: 27 February 2020
Published: 20 March 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15284-y

This article is cited by

Genome-wide screens uncover KDM2B as a modifier of protein binding to heparan sulfate
- Ryan J. Weiss
- Philipp N. Spahn
- Jeffrey D. Esko
Nature Chemical Biology (2021)
Discovery of exolytic heparinases and their catalytic mechanism and potential application
- Qingdong Zhang
- Hai-Yan Cao
- Fuchuan Li
Nature Communications (2021)
Multiplexed imaging mass spectrometry of the extracellular matrix using serial enzyme digests from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections
- Cassandra L. Clift
- Richard R. Drake
- Peggi M. Angel
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (2021)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.