# Optical spin-orbit torque in heavy metal-ferromagnet heterostructures

## Abstract

Spin current generation through the spin-orbit interaction in non-magnetic materials lies at the heart of spintronics. When the generated spin current is injected to a ferromagnet, it produces spin-orbit torque and manipulates magnetization efficiently. Optically generated spin currents are expected to be superior to their electrical counterparts in terms of the manipulation speed. Here we report optical spin-orbit torques in heavy metal/ferromagnet heterostructures. The strong spin-orbit coupling of heavy metals induces photo-excited carriers to be spin-polarized, and their transport from heavy metals to ferromagnets induces a torque on magnetization. Our results demonstrate that heavy metals can generate spin-orbit torque not only electrically but also optically.

## Introduction

When a spin current polarized along the direction p is injected into a ferromagnet (FM) with magnetization M, it produces a spin torque1,2 along the direction M×(M × p), which is a powerful tool to manipulate the magnetization of FM. There are ongoing searches for ways to generate a more powerful spin torque. One option is to electrically generate a spin current from the spin–orbit coupling of a non-magnetic material3,4,5. Such a spin torque is called a spin–orbit torque, and the electrical generation of a spin–orbit torque through the spin Hall effect in heavy metals (HM) is intensively studied. For the fast magnetization dynamics, however, the optical generation of a spin–orbit torque is more promising than its electrical counterpart.

A prerequisite for the optical generation is the photo-spin conversion, which has been intensively studied for semiconductors such as GaAs6,7,8. A well-known mechanism of the conversion is the optical orientation; photo-excitation by a circularly polarized light with angular momentum along the direction σ can generate excited electrons that are spin-polarized along the direction σ. Such optically generated spins have been used to generate a spin torque in a ferromagnetic semiconductor MnGaAs9: Spin-polarized electrons in GaAs produced by optical orientation interact with magnetic moments of Mn to generate a spin torque along the direction M×(M × σ). An alternative method to optically generate a spin torque has been demonstrated for MnGaAs10. Its basic idea is to modify the magnetocrystalline anisotropy by light, thereby creating an anisotropy-induced torque. Although this torque is named optical spin–orbit torque10, it is independent of the angular momentum σ of light and does not involve photo-spin conversion. Thus it is not the exact optical counterpart of the electrical spin–orbit torque. All these works with ferromagnetic semiconductors are limited by the low Curie temperature of the materials. Still, another possible option is to optically generate a spin current in two-dimensional electron gas via circular photo-galvanic effect11 or spin-galvanic effect12 and inject it to a neighboring metallic FM with high Curie temperature. However, the resulting spin current flows within the electron gas and its injection into a FM is rather difficult.

The optical torque on magnetization has been demonstrated at room temperature for magnetic materials such as ferrimagnetic insulator, ferrimagnetic metal, and ferromagnetic metal13,14,15,16. The torque in these materials is qualitatively different, however, from the optical-orientation-induced torque illustrated for magnetic semiconductors9; the former torque points along the direction M× σ, which contrasts with the latter torque that points along the direction M× (M × σ). Thus the former torque has been attributed to a different mechanism called inverse Faraday effect17. We call the former and the latter torques field-like and damping-like torques, respectively, since they have similar structures as the field-like and damping-like components of electrically generated spin–orbit torque18. Interestingly some of us showed that even ferromagnetic metals such as Fe, Co, and Ni can exhibit a sizable damping-like torque in certain situations16: whereas light incident on those FMs produces mostly a field-like torque when the FMs are capped by a thin MgO or Au layer, a damping-like torque becomes comparable to a field-like torque in magnitude when the FMs are capped by Pt. Roles of Pt were not clarified, however.

In this work, we clarify the crucial role of Pt and show for a Pt/Co bilayer that a damping-like torque can even dominate over a field-like torque provided the Pt layer is sufficiently thick. Moreover, we demonstrate that not only Pt, but also various HM produce similar results in HM/Co bilayers. Our analysis indicates that the damping-like torque in HM/Co bilayers is caused by efficient optical spin orientation in HMs through their strong spin–orbit coupling. These results resemble, in many ways, the electrically generated spin–orbit torque that also utilizes the strong spin–orbit coupling of HMs18. We thus call the optically generated damping-like torque in HM/Co layers as optical spin–orbit torque (OSOT).

## Results

### Experiment

We study samples of the film structures of sap/Pt(dPt)/Co(3)/MgO(3), sap/Pt(5)/Cu(dCu)/Co(3)/MgO(3), and sap/Co(dCo)/Pt(2), where the sap is the sapphire substrate with (0001) texture, and dX is the thickness of the layer X in nanometers. On top of the MgO capping, we deposit an additional Ta 1 nm to secure the passivation of MgO. We also study samples with other HM of Ta, W, or Pd instead of Pt. All layers are deposited by magnetron sputtering with a base pressure of <5 × 10−8 Torr without breaking the vacuum. To generate and detect the OSOT, we use a time-resolved pump-probe technique (see Methods). To generate the OSOT, a circularly polarized pump light with the photon energy of 1.58 eV and pulse width of 1.1 ps is incident on the sapphire substrate side of the samples: for sap/Pt/Co or sap/Pt/Cu/Co samples, the pump passes the substrate layer and then the Pt layer; for sap/Co/Pt samples, the pump passes the substrate and Co layer and then the Pt layer. Since photons with right circular polarization (RCP) and left circular polarization (LCP) carry the angular momentum of +ħ and –ħ, respectively (For the light helicity, we adopt the handedness convention from the point of view of the source.), circularly polarized photons can serve as an angular momentum source for the OSOT. To detect the OSOT, a linearly polarized probe light is incident on the surface side of the samples to detect the dynamics of the z or y-component of magnetization by the polar or longitudinal magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) (see Methods). The magnetization of Co is initially saturated to the x-direction by an external magnetic field, and the pump light propagates along the z-direction (Fig. 1). All experiments are performed at room temperature and incident pump fluence of 10 J m−2. The measured signals are linearly proportional to the fluence (Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1).

### Optical spin–orbit torque

We first show the OSOT in the structure of sap/Pt(5)/Co(3)/MgO(3). Figure 2a shows the resultant polar MOKE signal oscillation of this structure right after the pump pulse is shot at time zero. With a polar MOKE, the Kerr rotation measures Mz dynamics of Co (Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 2). The oscillation changes its sign for an opposite circular polarization of the pump and disappears for a linear polarization of the pump. (We align the in-plane crystal axis of Co along the applied magnetic field so that a torque due to a sudden change of magnetic anisotropy is suppressed.) The pump polarization dependence evidences a critical role of the pump light’s angular momentum in the OSOT. The oscillation period is about two orders of magnitude longer than the pump pulse width. Thus after the initial tilting of M by the pump, the subsequent magnetization dynamics is governed by the magnetic anisotropy of the structure. The oscillation frequency of 7 GHz agrees with the structure’s ferromagnetic resonance frequency determined by the anisotropy. We also measure My dynamics with a longitudinal MOKE (Supplementary Note 3 and Supplementary Figs. 3, 4). While Mz dynamics exhibit a cosine-like oscillation, My dynamics show a sine-like oscillation (Fig. 2b). Therefore, magnetization dynamics begins from the initial tilting towards the ±z-direction, which agrees with the direction of the damping-like torque M× (M×σ). The initial tilting towards the ±z-direction demonstrates that the damping-like torque is dominant over the field-like torque M × σ that causes the initial tilting towards the ±y-direction.

Discussion on the mechanism of the damping-like torque is in order. If the photo-spin conversion originates from a ferromagnetic order of FM or induced ferromagnetism at the HM/FM interface19, the direction of the spin polarization should be determined by the direction of the magnetization rather than the polarization of the light. We rule out this possibility because the direction of the initial tilting of magnetization is the same for the initial magnetization directions of ±x at polar MOKE geometry (Supplementary Note 3). If the inverse Faraday effect is dominant, the magnetization must initially tilt towards the y-direction since the circularly polarized pump pulse generates an effective magnetic field along the z-direction13,14,15,16. We also find that the phase of the oscillation is unaffected by inverting the layer stacking order from sap/Pt/Co to sap/Co/Pt (Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Fig. 5). This result rules out mechanisms based on the stacking sequence, such as temperature gradient.

An important clue for the mechanism is obtained from the dependence on the Co thickness dCo. We measure the magnitude of the OSOT as a function of dCo from 3 nm to 30 nm, while fixing the Pt thickness to 2 nm in the sap/Co/Pt structure (Fig. 3). The variation of dCo modifies the relative weight of the pump light absorptions in Co and Pt. We calculate the light absorption in each layer using refractive indexes of each layer (Supplementary Note 5 and Supplementary Table I). We find that the pump absorption in Pt exhibits the exactly same dCo dependence as ΔM·dCo, which is a measure of $$\mathop {\smallint } J_{\mathrm{s}}{\mathrm{d}}t$$, where Js is the spin (magnetic moment) current per area to Co. Js produces a torque on the magnetization of Co. In our experiment, Js appears as a short pulse, and the magnitude of magnetization dynamics is determined by $$\mathop {\smallint } J_{\mathrm{s}}dt$$. The ΔM is determined experimentally from the relation $${\mathrm{\Delta }}M = \frac{{{\mathrm{\Delta }}M}}{M} \times M_{\mathrm{s}} = \frac{{{\mathrm{\Delta }}\theta _{{\mathrm{R}} - {\mathrm{L}}}}}{{2\theta _{\mathrm{K}}}} \times M_{\mathrm{s}}$$, where ΔθR-L is the Kerr rotation difference between RCP and LCP, θK is the Kerr rotation for the saturation magnetization (Supplementary Note 6 and Supplementary Fig. 6), and Ms is the saturation magnetization of Co of 1.4 × 106 A−1.

### Theoretical calculation

Based on this experimental result, we propose the following mechanism: [Step 1: optical orientation] the pump light induces the optical dipole transition in Pt and generates electron-like and hole-like excitations above and below the Fermi energy, respectively (simply referred to as electrons and holes from now on), that are spin-polarized along ±z-direction; [Step 2: spin current injection] the excited spins flow from Pt into Co to generate the OSOT. Since the injection of a spin current (polarized along ±z-direction) into a FM produces a damping-like torque ±M× (M × z)18, this mechanism is consistent with all experimental data presented above. Note that in this mechanism, the pump light interacts with Pt, and there is no direct interaction between the light and FM. If the direct interaction were important, it would generate an effective magnetic field along ±z-direction, which results in a field-like torque ±M × z16. This demonstrates the importance of the Pt layer for the generation of the OSOT.

The optical orientation in [Step 1] demands further discussion. Although the optical orientation is well known in semiconductors such as GaAs, its applicability to HMs such as Pt may not be evident since these two classes of materials have very different band structures. In GaAs, p orbitals in the valence bands make optical transitions to s orbitals in the conduction bands, satisfying the electric dipole selection rule of Δl = ±1. As the total angular momentum J is a good quantum number near the conduction band bottom and the valence band top, the resulting correlation between spin and orbital angular momenta allows polarized spins to be generated by the optical transition6,7,8. On the other hand, in the case of HMs such as Pt, the situation is more complicated since there are many energy bands near the Fermi level εF. However, there are similarities with GaAs, as well. For Pt, for instance, many energy bands below εF have strong d character, and there are energy bands above εF that have mainly p character. Thus, optical transitions between those bands satisfy the electric dipole selection rule Δl = ±1. Moreover, many energy eigenstates near εF have well-defined correlations between spin and orbital angular momenta, although the total angular momentum J is not a good quantum number. This escalates the similarity with GaAs further. As a passing remark, we mention that not only Pt but also many 4d and 5d transition metals share similar properties, and the spin–orbit correlation in those HMs is responsible for the Hund’s rule type behavior of the intrinsic spin Hall effect in HMs20.

To check whether the optical orientation is indeed possible in Pt, we calculate the evolution of spin density generated by light of the experimental condition (see Methods). In Fig. 4, we show the optical spin generation rate $$ds_{\mathrm{z}}/dt$$ (positive value with red and negative value with blue in the center panel) in the k space when a right-circularly polarized light is illuminated [(a) Pt and (b) GaAs]. For the photon energy of 1.58 eV, optical transitions occur at many k points (Fig. 4a) in Pt, which is natural considering that there are many energy bands near εF. This feature of Pt is in clear contrast to the case of semiconductors, where the contribution near the Γ point dominates in general21, which is consistent with our calculation for GaAs (Fig. 4b). Thus the situation is more complicated in Pt than in GaAs: $${\mathrm{d}}s_{\mathrm{z}}/{\mathrm{d}}t$$ varies in magnitude and even in sign as a function of k. However, we emphasize that the k space region with positive $${\mathrm{d}}s_{\mathrm{z}}/{\mathrm{d}}t$$ is much wider than the k space region with negative $${\mathrm{d}}s_{\mathrm{z}}/{\mathrm{d}}t$$. This implies that despite the complication in Pt, there exists a clear preference towards one particular sign of $${\mathrm{d}}s_{\mathrm{z}}/{\mathrm{d}}t$$, confirming the optical orientation. By analyzing the eigenstates involved in the optical transition, we find that p and d orbitals of a Pt atom are important for those optical transitions. The summation over all k points determines the net spin-polarized carriers, which is non-zero. The ratio of the net spin sz generation rate of whole excitations (electrons and holes) to the photon absorption rate is calculated to be 0.11. Although a definite distinction of the spin polarization between electrons and holes is not possible due to the hybridization of p and d orbital, the sign of the spin polarization is the same for electrons and holes. On the contrary, GaAs has an opposite sign of the spin polarization for electrons and holes: the ratio of the spin generation rate to the photon absorption rate is −0.436 for electrons and 0.434 for holes at the photon energy of 1.58 eV. When the helicity of the light polarization is switched, the sign of the net spin-polarized carriers is reversed. This calculation supports the helicity-dependent spin generation in Pt (optical generation).

The spin current injection in [Step 2] also demands further discussion. The excited spins in HM can move to FM either by diffusive or drift transport. Due to the unbalance in the spin density, the optically generated spin excitations in Pt will diffuse to Co, generating a spin current (Fig. 5a). The efficiency of the spin diffusion depends on the spin diffusion length, which may be different for electrons and holes. Another possible mechanism for spin transport is the electric field (E-field) at the interface (Fig. 5b). The E-field induces a directional motion of the spin excitations, thus creating a drift spin current. Although the internal E-field at interfaces is studied mostly for semiconductor junctions, we expect it occurs also at metallic interfaces between metals with different work functions as a chemical equilibrium has to be achieved by transferring electrons at interfaces with a narrow width ≈1 nm (screening length)22,23. Such an E-field is the key requirement for the Rashba spin splitting at metallic surfaces24,25,26. The direction of the drift current is determined by the work function difference and group velocity. In contrast to the semiconductor case, where electrons and holes have the group velocities in the opposite directions, electrons and holes in Pt do not have such anti-correlation in the group velocities. Depending on k-vectors, electrons and holes have the same or opposite sign of the group velocity (Fig. 4a). The average (integration over all k-vectors) direction tends to be the same for electrons and holes. Further study is necessary to figure out which of these mechanisms are more important.

### Quantum efficiency

Next, we experimentally determine the quantum efficiency η of the OSOT, which denotes the ratio between the number of spins transferred to Co and the number of photo-excited electrons generated in Pt. The number of spins transferred to Co is determined by ΔM∙dCo/μB, where μB is the Bohr magneton. The number of photo-excited electrons in Pt is determined by Fin∙APt/ħω, where Fin is the incident pump fluence per pulse of 10 J m−2, APt is the light absorption probability in Pt, and ħω is the photon energy. Then the quantum efficiency, η, for the OSOT is defined as,

$$\eta = \frac{{{\mathrm{\Delta }}M \cdot d_{{\mathrm{Co}}}}}{{\mu _{\mathrm{B}}}} \div \frac{{F_{{\mathrm{in}}} \cdot A_{{\mathrm{Pt}}}}}{{\hbar \omega }}$$
(1)

We find that the η does not depend on Co thickness but does on Pt thickness dPt (Fig. 6a), evidencing the critical role of Pt in the spin generation. The η shows a maximum of ≈0.08 at dPt = 2 nm in the sap/Pt(dPt)/Co(3)/MgO(3) structure, and it is somewhat smaller in the sap/Co(3)/Pt(dPt) structure probably because the different morphology at the Pt/Co interface affects the spin transport efficiency from Pt to Co. The η decreases gradually with increasing dPt, which is reasonable considering that as dPt increases, spins should transfer longer distance before they get injected to Co. From the dPt dependence of η, we obtain (see Methods) the spin diffusion length ls of Pt of 6 nm with the sap/Pt/Co/MgO structure and 9 nm with the sap/Co/Pt structure, which are within the range of 1–10 nm of the previous report27. Since the OSOT is generated in two steps, we also attempt to assess the efficiency of each individual step: η = PsPc, where the spin polarization Ps quantifies the efficiency of the optical orientation in Pt [Step 1], and the collection probability Pc quantifies the efficiency of the spin transport from Pt to Co [Step 2]. For the sap/Pt(2)/Co(3)/MgO(3) structure, where η is maximized, our spin diffusion calculation with ls of Pt of 6 nm (see Methods) results in Pc ≈ 0.7. The relation η = PsPc then sets Ps ≈ 0.1, which well matches the calculated ratio of the spin generation rate to the photon absorption rate of 0.11.

We also examine the bilayer structure variation. The OSOT persists even with the insertion of Cu between Pt and Co (Fig. 6b). This result indicates that direct contact between Pt and Co is not necessary for the OSOT. It also excludes the possibility that the magnetic proximity effect in Pt19 is the source of the OSOT. The magnitude of the OSOT decreases with Cu thickness. From the spin diffusion simulation (see Method), we obtain the ls of Cu of ≈25 nm, which is much shorter than the reported ls of Cu, ≈400 nm28. One possible reason for the difference is that Jedema et al.28. probes the spin relaxation near the Fermi energy, whereas the spin excitations in our experiment can have considerably larger excitation energies of ≈1 eV. For such excitation energy, the spin–orbit coupling effect becomes strong even in Cu (in particular for holes), which can result in fast spin relaxation29. The spin Hall conductivity, which is a measure of the spin–orbit coupling strength, becomes sizable even for Cu at the excitation energy of a few eV30 and comparable to that of the strong spin–orbit coupling material, Pt. Another possible reason is the coupling to charge transport. When there is an E-field at the Pt/Cu interface, a photo-excitation at certain k-vectors with a different sign of the group velocity between electrons and holes can induce a charge current. In this situation, the spin transport property could be different from that without charge current (Supplementary Note 7 and Supplementary Fig. 7). However, this estimation is based on the assumption that the E-field at the interface is strong enough to induce photocurrent, which has not been verified experimentally.

We find that the OSOT exists even when Pt is replaced by other HMs such as Ta, W, or Pd (Fig. 7), which implies that the OSOT is a common phenomenon in many HM/FM bilayers and HM/NM/FM trilayers, where NM is the non-magnetic metal of Cu. Although the magnitude of η varies with HM, the sign of η is the same for all HMs that we have examined, which is in contrast to the electrical spin–orbit torque whose sign varies with HM choices5,31. In addition, the magnitude of η is relatively high for Pd and Pt, which have higher work functions than Co32, and relatively small for Ta and W, which have lower work functions than Co32. We expect that the E-field at the HM/FM interface, driven by the work function difference, can affect the spin transport efficiency of electrons and holes at the HM/FM interface. Further experimental and theoretical efforts, especially for the magnitude and sign of the optical orientation in various HMs and effect of the work function difference on the spin transport, are needed to clarify the [Step 1] and [Step 2] of the OSOT mechanism.

Finally, we remark that we observe the OSOT not only at the photon energy of 1.58 eV as presented above but also at other photon energies such as 1.38 and 1.72 eV (Fig. 6a). For the Pt(6)/Co(3)/MgO(3) sample, the value of η at 1.72 eV is close to that at 1.58 eV, but the value of η at 1.38 eV is about two times smaller than that at 1.58 eV.

In summary, we report the OSOT in the HM/FM heterostructures. Our experimental and theoretical results suggest that the OSOT is driven by the spin excitation via optical orientation in HM followed by the spin transport from HM to FM. It is also demonstrated that the OSOT is a common phenomenon in HM/FM bilayers and HM/NM/FM trilayers with various HMs. Further works are needed to clarify the detailed process of the OSOT generation, such as the sign of the optical orientation in HM and the mechanism of the spin transport from HM to FM. As a final remark, we expect that the OSOT could be closely related to all-optical helicity-dependent switching observed in similar metallic heterostructures that contain HMs33.

## Methods

### Pump-probe measurement

For a light source, we use a Ti-sapphire oscillator (Coherent, Vision S), which produces a pulsed laser of a tunable wavelength of 690–1050 nm at a repetition rate of 80 MHz. The initial pulse width of 0.1 ps is broadened after passing through an electro-optic modulator (Conoptics, 350–160). The full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) at the sample is 1.1 ps and 0.2 ps for pump and probe pulses, respectively. The pump and probe are focused on the sample by a focusing lens with a diameter of the spot size of 11 μm. The pump is always incident normal to the film surface (incident angle of 0o). The incident angle of the probe is 0o for a polar MOKE and 20o for a longitudinal MOKE. The pump and probe are modulated at 10 MHz and 200 Hz, respectively, using an electro-optic modulator and a chopper. A balanced detector detects the probe reflected off the sample and converts the polarization change of the probe to the voltage signal. A lock-in amplifier detects the voltage signal that has the modulation frequency.

### Theoretical calculation of optical orientation

With Bloch basis, the Heisenberg equation of motion for the density matrix ρjl is given by21,34

$$\frac{{\partial \rho _{jl}(t)}}{{\partial t}} = \frac{1}{{i\hbar }}\left[ {{\it{\epsilon }}_j - {\it{\epsilon }}_l} \right]\rho _{jl} + \frac{1}{{i\hbar }}\left[ {{\cal{H}}^{\mathrm{p}}\rho - \rho {\cal{H}}^{\mathrm{p}}} \right]_{jl} - \frac{{\rho _{jl} - \rho _{jl}^0}}{{T_1\delta _{jl} + T_2(1 - \delta _{jl})}}$$

where $${\it{\epsilon }}_j$$ is the jth eigenstates, $${\cal{H}}^{\mathrm{p}}$$ is a perturbing potential due to the light pulse, and T1 and T2 are phenomenological parameters for dissipative dynamics35. We solve this equation within a rotating wave approximation. To be specific, we consider 6-layers-thick film of fcc-Pt piled up along the [111]-direction, and apply a circular-polarized light pulse propagating in the [111]-direction (i.e., the z-direction). We apply a continuous light with $$\hbar \omega$$ = 1.58 eV and field strength = 0.005 V Å−1 comparable to the experimental values).

### Spin diffusion simulation

We calculate the diffusive transport of spins from Pt to Co in the Pt/Co and Pt/Cu/Co structure. The diffusion constants (D) of 220, 9500, and 250 nm2 ps−1 for Pt, Cu, and Co, respectively, are determined by $$\frac{\sigma }{{e^2N_{\mathrm{F}}}}$$, where σ is the electrical conductivity, e is the elementary charge, and NF is the electronic density of states at the Fermi level. The σ of 6.6 × 106, 3.7 × 107, and 6.7 × 106 Ω−1 m−1 for Pt, Cu, and Co, respectively, are obtained from the four-probe measurements. The NF of 1.15 × 1048, 1.6 × 1047, and 1.06 × 1048 states J−1 m−3 for Pt, Cu, and Co, respectively, are determined by $$\frac{{3\gamma }}{{\pi ^2k_{\mathrm{B}}^2}}$$, where γ is the coefficient of the electronic heat capacitance36. The spin chemical potentials of Pt, Cu, and Co are connected at the interface with relevant spin conductances. For the Pt/Co structure, we use Re$$[ {G_{ \uparrow \downarrow }} ]$$ of 0.6 × 1015 Ω−1 m−1 at the Pt/Co interface18. For the Pt/Cu/Co structure, we use $$\frac{{G_ \uparrow + G_ \downarrow }}{2}$$ of 0.7 × 1015 Ω−1 m−1 at the Pt/Cu interface37 and Re$$[ {G_{ \uparrow \downarrow }} ]$$ of 0.6 × 1015 Ω−1 m−1 at the Cu/Co interface38. With a uniform spin generation in the Pt bulk, we calculate the spin current to Co by setting the spin chemical potential of Co to be zero. Given a spin generation rate on Pt, the spin relaxation time (τs), which is related to the spin diffusion length (ls) by $$l_{\mathrm{s}} = \sqrt {D\tau _{\mathrm{s}}}$$, of Pt and Cu determines the amount of spin current to Co.

## Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

## References

1. 1.

Slonczewski, J. C. Current-driven excitation of magnetic multilayers. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 159, L1–L7 (1996).

2. 2.

Berger, L. Emission of spin waves by a magnetic multilayer traversed by a current. Phys. Rev. B 54, 9353–9358 (1996).

3. 3.

Miron, I. M. et al. Current-driven spin torque induced by the Rashba effect in a ferromagnetic metal layer. Nat. Mater. 9, 230–234 (2010).

4. 4.

Miron, I. M. et al. Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection. Nature 476, 189–193 (2011).

5. 5.

Liu, L. et al. Spin-torque switching with the giant spin hall effect of tantalum. Science 336, 555–558 (2012).

6. 6.

Lampel, G. Nuclear dynamic polarization by optical electronic saturation and optical pumping in semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 491–493 (1968).

7. 7.

Pierce, D. P. & Meier, F. Photoemission of spin-polarized electrons from GaAs. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5484–5500 (1976).

8. 8.

Meier, F. & Zakharchnya, B. P., Optical Orientation (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984).

9. 9.

Némec, P. et al. Experimental observation of the optical spin transfer torque. Nat. Phys. 8, 411–415 (2012).

10. 10.

Tesařová, N. et al. Experimental observation of the optical spin-orbit torque. Nat. Photon. 7, 492–498 (2013).

11. 11.

Ganichev, S. D. et al. Conversion of spin into directed electric current in quantum wells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4358–4361 (2001).

12. 12.

Ganichev, S. D. et al. Spin-galvanic effect. Nature 417, 153–156 (2002).

13. 13.

Kimel, A. V., Kirilyuk, A., Usachev, P. A., Pisarev, R. V., Balbashov, A. M. & Rasing, Th., Ultrafast non-thermal control of magnetization by instantaneous photomagnetic pulses. Nature 435, 655–657 (2005).

14. 14.

Hansteen, F., Kimel, A., Kirilyuk, A. & Rasing, Th., Femtosecond photomagnetic switching of spins in ferrimagnetic garnet films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 047402 (2005).

15. 15.

Stanciu, C. D. et al. Ultrafast interaction of the angular momentum of photons with spins in the metallic amorphous alloy GdFeCo. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 207401 (2007).

16. 16.

Choi, G.-M., Schleife, A. & Cahill, D. G. Optical-helicity-driven magnetization dynamics in metallic ferromagnets. Nat. Commun. 8, 15085 (2017).

17. 17.

van der Ziel, J. P., Pershan, P. S. & Malmstrom, L. D. Optically-induced magnetization resulting from the inverse Faraday effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 190–193 (1965).

18. 18.

Haney, P. M., Lee, H.-W., Lee, K.-J., Manchon, A. & Stiles, M. D. Current induced torques and interfacial spin-orbit coupling: semiclassical modeling. Phys. Rev. B 87, 174411 (2013).

19. 19.

Ellsworth, D. et al. Photo-spin-voltaic effect. Nat. Phys. 12, 861–866 (2016).

20. 20.

Kontani, H., Tanaka, T., Hirashima, D. S., Yamada, K. & Inoue, J. Giant Orbital Hall effect in transition metals: origin of large spin and anomalous Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 016601 (2009).

21. 21.

Nastos, F., Rioux, J., Strimas-Mackey, M., Mendoza, B. S. & Sipe, J. E. Full band structure LDA and k·p calculations of optical spin-injection. Phys. Rev. B 76, 205113 (2007).

22. 22.

Kasap, S. O., Principle of Electronic Materials and Devices, p. 320 (McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2005).

23. 23.

Ramírez-Caballero, G., Martínez de la Hoz, J. M. & Balbuena, P. B. p-n junction at the interface between metallic system. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3, 818–825 (2012).

24. 24.

LaShell, S., McDougall, B. A. & Jensen, E. Spin splitting of an Au(111) surface state band observed with angle resolved photoelectron spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3419–3422 (1996).

25. 25.

Ishida, H. Rashba spin splitting of Shockley surface states on semi-infinite crystals. Phys. Rev. B 90, 235422 (2014).

26. 26.

Grytsyuk, S. et al. k-asymmetric spin splitting at the interface between transition metal ferromagnets and heavy metals. Phys. Rev. B 93, 174421 (2016).

27. 27.

Sagasta, E. et al. Tuning the spin Hall effect of Pt from the moderately dirty to the superclean regime. Phys. Rev. B 94, 060412(R) (2016).

28. 28.

Jedema, F. J., Filip, A. T. & van Wees, B. J. Electrical spin injection and accumulation at room temperature in an all-metal mesoscopic spin valve. Nature 410, 345–348 (2001).

29. 29.

Zhukov, V. P., Chulkov, E. V. & Echenique, P. M. First-principle approach to the study of spin relaxation times of excited electrons in metals. Phys. Stat. Solidi. (A) 205, 1296–1301 (2008).

30. 30.

Jo, D., Go, D. & Lee, H.-W. Gigantic intrinsic spin Hall effects in weakly spin-orbit coupled metals. Phys. Rev. B 98, 214405 (2018).

31. 31.

Tanaka, T. et al. Intrinsic spin Hall effect and orbital Hall effect in 4d and 5d transition metals. Phys. Rev. B 77, 165117 (2008).

32. 32.

Hölzl, J. & Schulte, F. K. Solid Surface Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979).

33. 33.

Lambert, C.-H. et al. All-optical control of ferromagnetic thin films and nanostructures. Science 345, 1337–1340 (2014).

34. 34.

Tscherbul, T. V. & Brumer, P. Long-lived quasistationary coherences in a V-type system driven by incoherent light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 113601 (2014).

35. 35.

Haug, H. & Koch, S. W. Quantum Theory Of The Optical And Electronic Properties Of Semiconductors (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).

36. 36.

Tari, A. The Specific Heat of Matter at Low Temperatures. (Imperial College Press, London, 2003).

37. 37.

Kurt, H., Loloee, R., Eid, K., Pratt, W. P. Jr. & Bass, J. Spin-memory loss at 4.2 K in sputtered Pd, Pt, and at Pd/Cu and Pt/Cu interfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 4787–4789 (2002).

38. 38.

Zwierzycki, M., Tserkovnyak, Y., Kelly, P. J., Brataas, A. & Bauer, G. E. W. First-principles study of magnetization relaxation enhancement and spin transfer in thin magnetic films. Phys. Rev. B 71, 064420 (2005).

## Acknowledgements

G.M.C acknowledges the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (NRF-2019R1C1C1009199). K.J.L. acknowledges the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (NRF-2015M3D1A1070465) and the KIST Institutional Program (project no. 2V05750). H.W.L. acknowledges the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (NRF 2018R1A5A6075964). K.W.K. acknowledges the financial support from IBS (Project Code No. IBS-R024-D1). B.C.M. acknowledges the National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (CAP-16-01-KIST) and the KIST institutional program.

## Author information

G.M.C. performed the optical experiment and transport simulation. J.H.O., D.K.L., S.W.L., K.J.L., K.W.K., M.L., and H.W.L. performed the theoretical investigation. G.M.C. and B.C.M. prepared samples. All authors discussed the results and wrote the manuscript.

Correspondence to Gyung-Min Choi or Kyung-Jin Lee or Hyun-Woo Lee.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Petr Nemec the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Choi, G., Oh, J.H., Lee, D. et al. Optical spin-orbit torque in heavy metal-ferromagnet heterostructures. Nat Commun 11, 1482 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15247-3