Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Acid ceramidase of macrophages traps herpes simplex virus in multivesicular bodies and protects from severe disease

Abstract

Macrophages have important protective functions during infection with herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). However, molecular mechanisms that restrict viral propagation and protect from severe disease are unclear. Here we show that macrophages take up HSV-1 via endocytosis and transport the virions into multivesicular bodies (MVBs). In MVBs, acid ceramidase (aCDase) converts ceramide into sphingosine and increases the formation of sphingosine-rich intraluminal vesicles (ILVs). Once HSV-1 particles reach MVBs, sphingosine-rich ILVs bind to HSV-1 particles, which restricts fusion with the limiting endosomal membrane and prevents cellular infection. Lack of aCDase in macrophage cultures or in Asah1−/− mice results in replication of HSV-1 and Asah1−/− mice die soon after systemic or intravaginal inoculation. The treatment of macrophages with sphingosine enhancing compounds blocks HSV-1 propagation, suggesting a therapeutic potential of this pathway. In conclusion, aCDase loads ILVs with sphingosine, which prevents HSV-1 capsids from penetrating into the cytosol.

Introduction

Macrophages are one of the most important components of the innate immune system. With their strong phagocytic capacity they engulf pathogens early after their invasion and inactivate them by proteolysis1. Especially during virus infection, macrophages are the key effector cells of innate immunity. Mice lacking macrophages are highly susceptible for instance to mouse hepatitis virus, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus and vesicular stomatitis virus and show overwhelming viral propagation2,3,4. The contribution of macrophages to control of systemic infection was linked to their capacity to internalize infectious particles and limit their propagation in a type I interferon (IFN-I) dependent manner, which leads to upregulation of the antiviral genes Mx, OAS, RNase L and Protein kinase R4. While these antiviral mechanisms require hours after infection to become active, macrophages also exhibit robust antiviral suppression already minutes after virus inoculation4,5,6, suggesting the presence of preexisting IFN-I-independent antiviral mechanisms. However, these mechanisms are poorly defined.

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is an enveloped DNA virus, which can replicate in several different cell types7. After binding to a target cell, HSV-1 either fuses directly with the plasma membrane or is taken up into endosomes of the cell8,9. Within these endosomes fusion of the outer limiting membrane with HSV-1 membrane leads to infection of the cells in a pH dependent manner10. Upon penetration, the HSV-1 capsid traffics on microtubules to the nucleus11,12, uncoats its DNA genome at the nuclear pore complex13,14, and delivers the genome to the nucleus for replication and assembly of capsids15,16. Newly formed capsids bud through the nuclear envelope17 and exit the infected cell through the secretory pathway or by cell lysis18,19. In an HSV-1 infection model, macrophages play an essential role20. This is linked to the high IFN-I sensitivity of HSV-1, which limits the replication of HSV-1 DNA and the production of newly formed capsids21,22. Interestingly even in the absence of IFN-I replication of HSV-1 is restricted in macrophages, a phenomenon that could be explained by limited uptake of HSV-1 into macrophages or an aggravated or limited infection of the macrophage after HSV-1 has entered the endosome. Whether indeed macrophage-specific mechanisms regulate HSV-1 infection remains unknown.

Mulitvesicular bodies (MVBs) are complex membrane rich organelles of the cytoplasm, which contain high numbers of vesicles. These so called intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) are formed by invagination and budding from the outer limiting membranes (OLMs) into the MVB lumen and play a crucial role in sorting, degrading, and recycling of proteins23. Sphingolipids are enriched in MVBs and are involved in the MVB biogenesis and the regulation of their functions24. Thereby sphingolipids modulate diverse cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, signal transduction, and membrane trafficking25,26,27. Modulation of biophysical membrane properties such as fluidity, polarity, vesicle formation, and deformation is one major factor of the regulatory capacity of sphingolipids28. A key enzyme in sphingolipid metabolism in MVBs is the acid ceramidase (aCDase)29,30,31. It catalyzes the degradation of ceramide into sphingosine and free fatty acid, which modulates the shape and the charge of membranes. Whether this process can modulate HSV-1 entry remains unknown.

Here we analyze whether the aCDase dependent modulation of membrane properties can affect HSV-1 entry after uptake into macrophages. In a model of HSV-1 infection in bone marrow derived murine macrophages (BMDMs) we found that strong activity of aCDase blocks the fusion of the HSV-1 membrane with the outer limiting membrane of MVBs. Antiviral activity of aCDase is independent of IFN-I, but aCDase expression is dependent on IRF8 during macrophage development. In vivo, expression of aCDase in macrophages limits early steps of HSV-1 propagation and protects mice from severe outcome of infection.

Results

Macrophages control HSV-1 infection

To prove the importance of macrophages during herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) control in vivo, we infected C57BL/6 mice intravenously with HSV-1 and then analyzed the distribution of virus in the liver by histology. Naïve mice and HSV-1 infected macrophage-depleted mice served as controls. 1 h after infection most of the virus inoculum co-localized with F4/80+ macrophages within the liver (Fig. 1a), suggesting that macrophages are equipped to take up HSV-1 quickly after systemic administration. Naïve mice did not show HSV-1 staining (Fig. 1a) and macrophage-depleted mice showed no F4/80+ cells in spleen and liver and no co-localization (Supplementary Fig. 1)4. To obtain insights on the functional role of macrophages we treated C57BL/6 mice with clodronate-liposomes to deplete macrophages. Control mice were treated with control-liposomes and all mice were infected with HSV-1. In the presence of macrophages, HSV-1 replication was nearly undetectable 24 h after infection (Fig. 1b, c). In strong contrast, HSV-1 showed overwhelming replication in the absence of macrophages (Fig. 1b, c). Enhanced replication of HSV-1 correlated with production of infectious HSV-1 in liver and spleen of macrophage deficient mice (Fig. 1d). In line with overwhelming virus propagation, macrophage deficient mice developed liver cell damage and died quickly after infection (Fig. 1e, f). To analyze the importance of macrophages during a natural infection route, we infected mice intravaginal with HSV-1 and analyzed local replication of HSV-1 and outcome of the infection. Local HSV-1 replication and production of infectious particles was comparable between control and macrophage-depleted mice (Fig. 1g, h). However, macrophage-depleted mice died after intravaginal infection while control mice were protected (Fig. 1i). This suggests that macrophages in the vagina do not limit early local HSV-1 replication, while, macrophages are critical for the systemic control of HSV-1. In conclusion, we found that macrophages do play an essential role to protect from systemic HSV-1 propagation.

Fig. 1: Macrophages control HSV-1 infection.
figure1

a Immunofluorescence of livers from wild-type (WT) mice that were not or were infected with 8 × 107 tissue culture infection dose 50 (TCID50) HSV-1 and analyzed after 1 h (n = 3, blue represents Hoechst staining, scale bar 100 µm). bd Immunofluorescence of livers (b, n = 8, scale bar 200 µm), real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of lymph nodes (LN), spleens and livers (c, n = 12–14, two-tailed student’s t-test) and TCID50 of spleens and livers (d, n = 8, two-tailed student’s t-test) from WT mice that were pretreated with control-liposomes and WT mice that were pretreated with clodronate-liposomes (day −3), infected with 6 × 106 TCID50 HSV-1 and analyzed after 24 h. e, f Alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) activity (e; n = 10, one-way ANOVA [Tukey’s multiple comparison]) and survival of mice (f) that were treated with clodronate-liposomes or control liposomes (n = 10; day -3) and then infected with 6 × 105 TCID50 HSV-1 or left uninfected (n = 5; p = 0.0006, Log-rank [Mantel-Cox] test). g, h RT-PCR of vagina (g) and TCID50 of vagina and vaginal fluid (h) of mice that were treated with clodronate-liposomes or control-liposomes (day −3) and then infected with 2 × 107 TCID50 HSV-1 intravaginally, analyzed after 24 h (n = 6, two-tailed student’s t-test). i Survival of mice that were treated with clodronate-liposomes or control-liposomes (day −3) and then infected with 2 × 107 TCID50 HSV-1 intravaginally (n = 9), or left uninfected (n = 5; p = 0.0372, Log-rank [Mantel-Cox] test). All data are shown as mean ± SEM. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, #p ≤ 0.001, ##p ≤ 0.0001.

aCDase in multivesicular bodies traps HSV-1

As elucidated in Fig. 1, macrophages are of high importance to limit HSV-1 propagation during systemic infection. Following this, we aimed to investigate antiviral mechanisms that are specific to macrophages. To get insights into the macrophage-specific antiviral mechanism we generated bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) and compared their antiviral activity to isolated alveolar fibroblasts. HSV-1 propagated strongly in fibroblasts and infectious HSV-1 was released into the supernatant (Fig. 2a, b). In contrast to fibroblasts, HSV-1 showed limited propagation in macrophages and infectious particles were hardly measurable in the supernatants (Fig. 2a, b). Even higher infection doses up to MOI 1 did not result in productive infection in cultured macrophages (Fig. 2b). Treatment with interferon-α4 (IFN-α4) reduced the infectious particles (Fig. 2b), however the striking difference in virus production between fibroblasts and macrophages remained. These results suggest that administration of type I interferon (IFN-I) cannot induce the strong antiviral capacities of macrophages in fibroblasts. While there are multiple differences between macrophages and fibroblasts, we hypothesized that macrophages have specific antiviral protection mechanisms independent of the presence of IFN-I.

Fig. 2: aCDase in multivesicular bodies traps HSV-1.
figure2

a, b Immunofluorescence (a) and tissue culture infection dose 50 (TCID50) from supernatants (b) of fibroblasts or bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) that were infected with herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 and stained after 6 h (an = 4; scale bar 50 µm) or MOI 0.01 or MOI 1 and supernatant was collected after 24 h (bn = 8; one-way ANOVA [Tukey’s multiple comparison]). c Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of microarrays showing gene sets enriched in macrophages (red) vs. gene sets enriched in fibroblasts (blue). See Supplementary Table 1a, b for gene sets, ranking and grouping. NES: normalized enrichment score. ER: endoplasmic reticulum. d, e Representative electron microscopic images (d) and quantification (e) of wild-type (WT) BMDMs and/or fibroblasts infected with HSV-1 (MOI 250) analyzed after 30 min (BMDMs: n = 77 images from three independent experiments, scale bar 5 µm; Fibroblasts: n = 106 images from three independent experiments, scale bar 5 µm, one-way ANOVA [Tukey’s multiple comparison]). Overview of one macrophage and one fibroblast is shown. Details show specific compartments containing HSV-1. MVB: multivesicular bodies. f: Expression of membrane-modulating proteins analyzed from microarrays of fibroblasts and macrophages with or without 50 U/ml interferon-α4 (IFN-α4) treatment. g Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for Asah1 mRNA expression of fibroblasts and macrophages from WT mice (n = 6, two-tailed student’s t-test). h Western Blot for aCDase protein expression of fibroblasts and macrophages from WT mice (1 of 2 is shown). All data are shown as mean ± SEM. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, #p ≤ 0.001, ##p ≤ 0.0001.

To explore potential antiviral mechanisms we performed microarray analysis to compare cellular pathways between macrophages and fibroblasts. The strongest difference between fibroblasts and macrophages was the high expression of endosomal, lysosomal and vesicular transport pathways in macrophages (Fig. 2c). From these data, we considered it likely that in macrophages the vesicular trafficking of HSV-1 might be extraordinary, and therefore restricts a productive infection. To directly visualize HSV-1 entry in macrophages and fibroblasts, we performed electron microscopy of macrophages and fibroblasts, which were infected with HSV-1 (MOI 250) for 30 min. We chose 30 min, as this is the time that HSV-1 requires to enter cells and first incoming capsids to reach the nuclear envelope of fibroblasts or epithelial cells11,32,33,34. Indeed, 30 min after infection we detected first viral capsids at the nuclear envelope of fibroblasts, but no newly produced viral capsids (Supplementary Fig. 2). Therefore we concluded that 30 min is an ideal time point to analyze the early internalization and intracellular distribution of HSV-1 within the cell. As expected, we found in macrophage and fibroblast cell cultures HSV-1 virions close to the plasma membrane (Fig. 2d). In macrophages, about 30% of all particles were found in endosomes and significantly more particles, about 50% of all particles, were found in multivesicular bodies (Fig. 2d, e). We could hardly detect viral capsids in the cytosol of macrophages (Fig. 2d, e). In fibroblasts, HSV-1 was detectable in vesicular compartments like early endosomes, late endosomes, MVBs and/or lysosomes (Fig. 2d). In addition electron microscopy revealed cytosolic capsids after 30 min of infection (Fig. 2d), indicating fusion of the viral envelopes with host membrane and successful capsid delivery into the cytosol. From these results we concluded that after HSV-1 is internalized by macrophages, it passes early and late endosomes and accumulates in MVBs but cannot deliver its capsid through the outer limiting membrane to the cytosol. This phenomenon might be responsible for limited productive infection in macrophages.

To determine why HSV-1 fails to release its capsid through the outer limiting MVB membrane in macrophages, we analyzed our microarray data for differences in membrane-modulating proteins. Strikingly we found overexpression of phospholipase C subtypes, neutral sphingomyelinase (Nsm, Smpd3) and acid ceramidase (aCDase, Asah1) in macrophages (Fig. 2f) in comparison to fibroblasts. Differential expression of these proteins was independent of IFN-I (Fig. 2f). Using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blot analysis we confirmed the high expression of Asah1 mRNA and cleaved, i.e., activated, aCDase protein in macrophages compared to fibroblasts (Fig. 2g, h, Supplementary Fig. 7). From these experiments we concluded that macrophages accumulate HSV-1 in MVBs without being productively infected. This strong antiviral activity of macrophages correlated with aCDase expression.

aCDase limits HSV-1 infection and prevents disease

Since we identified that aCDase is a membrane modulating molecule that is highly expressed in macrophages, we next analyzed the antiviral activity of aCDase. WT macrophages showed limited propagation of HSV-1 (Fig. 3a, b). In strong contrast macrophages that lack aCDase (Asah1−/−) showed strong propagation of HSV-1 (Fig. 3a, b). Next we tested the role of aCDase in vivo. We infected WT and Asah1−/− mice with HSV-1. In Asah1−/− mice, HSV-1 showed overwhelming propagation after 12 h to 3 days (Fig. 3c, d) and infectious particles were produced in spleen and liver of Asah1−/−, but not control mice (Fig. 3e). Next we aimed to determine the importance of Asah1 in relation to the known anti-HSV-1 effectors type I interferon (IFN-I)35 and SAMHD136. Therefore we infected mice, which show limited production of IFN-I (MyD88−/− x Trif−/− x Cardif−/− mice), limited response to IFN-I (Ifnar−/− mice) and mice, which lack SAMHD1 (Samhd1−/− mice), with HSV-1. Similarly to Asah1−/− mice, Ifnar−/− mice and MyD88−/− x Trif−/− x Cardif−/− mice showed highly elevated HSV-1 DNA in lymph node, spleen and liver, when compared to control mice (Supplementary Fig. 3). In Samhd1−/− mice HSV-1 DNA levels were elevated in the liver (Supplementary Fig. 3). In Ifnar−/− mice and MyD88−/− x Trif−/− x Cardif−/− mice, but not in Samhd1−/− mice, we detected infectious HSV-1 particles in liver and spleen after HSV-1 infection, which was comparable to HSV-1 production in Asah1−/− mice (Fig. 3f). From these data we considered aCDase to be an important antiviral effector mechanism.

Fig. 3: aCDase limits HSV-1 infection and prevents disease.
figure3

a, b Representative images (a) and quantification (b) of immunofluorescence from wild-type (WT) and Asah1−/− bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) infected with HSV-1 for 6 h (multiplicity of infection [MOI] 10, n = 5, scale bar 50 µm, two-tailed student’s t-test). N.D.: not done. c Immunofluorescence of livers from WT and Asah1−/− mice that were infected with 7 × 107 plaque forming units (PFU) HSV-1 and analyzed after 12 h (n = 6–9, scale bar 100 µm). d, e Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of lymph nodes (LN), spleens and livers (d, n = 7–10, 2-way ANOVA [Sidak’s multiple comparison]) and tissue culture infection dose 50 (TCID50, e, n = 4–6, two-tailed student’s t-test) of spleens and livers from WT mice and Asah1−/− mice that were infected with 2 × 106 TCID50 HSV-1 and analyzed on day 3. f TCID50 of spleens and livers from WT (n = 9), Samhd1−/− (n = 4), Ifnar−/− (n = 4), and MyD88−/− x Trif−/− x Cardif−/− (n = 3, 2-way ANOVA [Tukey’s multiple comparison]) mice that were infected with 2 × 106 TCID50 HSV-1 and analyzed on day 3. g RT-PCR of spleens and livers from bone marrow chimera mice receiving Cre Asah1fl/fl or Cre+ Asah1fl/fl bone marrow that were tamoxifen-treated, infected with 6 × 106 TCID50 HSV-1 and analyzed on day 3 (n = 4–5, two-tailed student’s t-test). h Survival of tamoxifen-treated Cre Asah1fl/fl and Cre+ Asah1fl/fl mice which were infected intravaginally with 2 × 107 TCID50 HSV-1 (n = 11–12, p = 0.0004, Log-rank [Mantel-Cox] test). i Survival of tamoxifen-treated Cre Asah1fl/fl and Cre+ Asah1fl/fl mice which were infected intravenously with 5 × 105 TCID50 HSV-1 (n = 11–13, p = 0.0004, Log-rank [Mantel-Cox] test) or left uninfected (Cre+ Asah1fl/fl, naïve; n = 5). All data are shown as mean ± SEM. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, #p ≤ 0.001, ##p ≤ 0.0001.

To determine the macrophage-specific role of aCDase we generated bone marrow chimeras, in which Asah1−/− bone marrow was transplanted into macrophage-depleted WT mice. In these mice macrophages repopulate from Asah1−/− bone marrow. Chimeric mice with aCDase-deficient macrophages showed enhanced HSV-1 copies when compared to control mice (Fig. 3g), suggesting that indeed aCDase in macrophages contributed to control of HSV-1. To determine the overall importance of aCDase during systemic and local infection we infected Tamoxifen treated Cre-ER Asah1fl/fl (inducible aCDase-deficient mice) with HSV-1. aCDase deficient Cre-ER Asah1fl/fl mice died quickly after systemic and local intravaginal infection (Fig. 3h, i). Therefore we conclude that aCDase is an important effector mechanism against HSV-1, which acts in macrophages.

Sphingosine protects against HSV-1 infection

After analyzing aCDase deficiency, we investigated effects of increasing sphingolipid content during HSV-1 infection. From literature it is known that aCDase is usually active in lysosomes and MVBs29,30,31,37. To test whether aCDase directly interacts with HSV-1, we infected macrophages with HSV-1 and stained for aCDase and HSV-1 after 30 min. HSV-1 and aCDase were in close approximation, however we did not see a direct co-localization of aCDase with HSV-1 (Fig. 4a). This suggests that aCDase is not directly modulating HSV-1, but might modulate cellular components such as MVBs, which affect HSV-1 infection. Functionally, aCDase converts ceramide into sphingosine (Fig. 4b) and we considered that enhancement of sphingosine in MVBs was the reason for viral protection in WT macrophages against HSV-1. Indeed, addition of CDase 30 min before infection limits HSV-1 propagation, which suggests that the enzymatic function is most relevant for the antiviral activity (Fig. 4c, d).To reveal the role of sphingosine in HSV-1 infection, we treated macrophages with sphingosine (Sph), sphingomyelinase (SMase), and sphingosine kinase inhibitor (SKI-II), which are all involved in sphingolipid pathway and could enhance sphingosine levels38. Sphingosine treatment, which strongly elevated total sphingosine levels of primary macrophages and the Raw264.7 macrophage cell line (Supplementary Fig. 4), suppressed propagation of HSV-1 (Fig. 4c–e). Treatment with ceramidase, sphingomyelinase, and sphingosine kinase inhibitor resulted in smaller increases of cellular sphingosine levels and a corresponding suppression of HSV-1 propagation (Fig. 4c–e, Supplementary Fig. 4). From these data we concluded that enhanced amount of sphingosine was most likely the reason for antiviral activity in the presence of aCDase. To determine whether sphingosine acted cell type specific, we tested the antiviral activity of sphingosine in different cell types including human monocytes (THP-1), human cervix carcinoma cells (HeLa) and monkey kidney cells (Vero). To note, HSV-1 infects Vero cells via fusion at the plasma membrane while HeLa cells are infected after HSV-1 is endocytosed10,11,39,40. We found that sphingosine and/or SKI-II acted antiviral in undifferentiated THP-1 and HeLa cells (Fig. 4f, g). However we found limited antiviral activity of sphingosine in Vero cells (Fig. 4h), suggesting that the cell type and/or the route of infection might limit the antiviral activity of sphingosine. Taken together we concluded, that sphingosine, which is produced by aCDase in MVBs is antivirally active in macrophages.

Fig. 4: Sphingosine protects against HSV-1 infection.
figure4

a Immunofluorescence of wild-type (WT) macrophages, which were infected with HSV-1 (multiplicity of infection [MOI] 10) and stained for acid ceramidase (aCDase) and HSV-1 (n = 5, blue represents Hoechst staining, scale bar 10 µm) after 30 min. b Schematic representation showing the metabolism of sphingomyelin (SM) to sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P). c, d Representative image (c) and quantification (d) of immunofluorescence from bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) that have been incubated for 30 min with β-D-galactosyl ceramide (Cer; 100 µM), D-erythro-sphingosine (Sph; 100 µM), sphingosine kinase inhibitor (SKI-II; 100 µM), ceramidase (CDase; 250 U/L) or sphingomyelinase (SMase; 6.5 U/ml) and subsequently infected with HSV-1 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 100 (n = 5, scale bar 50 µm, one-way ANOVA [Dunnett’s multiple comparison]), fixed and stained after 6 h. N.D.: not done. e Tissue culture infection dose 50 (TCID50) of BMDMs that have been incubated for 30 min with D-erythro-sphingosine (Sph; 40 µM), sphingosine kinase inhibitor (SKI-II; 200 µM), or sphingomyelinase (SMase; 6.5 U/ml), subsequently infected with HSV-1 at a MOI of 1 and analyzed after 24 h (n = 3–4, one-tailed student’s t-test). f TCID50 of THP-1 cells that have been incubated for 30 min with D-erythro-sphingosine (Sph; 400 µM) and subsequently infected with HSV-1 at a MOI of 0.01, analyzed after 6 h (n = 3, two-tailed student’s t-test). g TCID50 of HeLa cells that have been incubated for 30 min with D-erythro-sphingosine (Sph; 100 µM), and sphingosine kinase inhibitor (SKI-II; 100 µM), and subsequently infected with HSV-1 at a MOI of 0.001 analyzed after 24 h (n = 3, one-way ANOVA [Dunnett’s multiple comparison]). h TCID50 of Vero cells that have been incubated for 30 min with D-erythro-sphingosine (Sph; 100 µM), and sphingosine kinase inhibitor (SKI-II; 100 µM), and subsequently infected with HSV-1 at a MOI of 0.01 analyzed after 24 h (n = 3, two-tailed student’s t-test). All data are shown as mean ± SEM. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, #p ≤ 0.001, ##p ≤ 0.0001.

Sphingosine-rich intraluminal vesicles trap HSV-1

Next we aimed to determine the mechanism, how aCDase and sphingosine limit HSV-1 infection in macrophages. To this end, we incubated cells for 30 min with an HSV-1 carrying a fluorescently labeled tegument (HSV-1-VP16-GFP), and stained with an antibody for viral capsids (VP541), which recognizes the uncoated capsid after virus membrane fusion. In this experimental setup capsid is only visible after dissociation of the tegument11. We mainly observed HSV-1-VP16-GFP puncta, in WT macrophages (Fig. 5a, b), indicating that the HSV-1 capsids were not released from the envelope. In strong contrast, in aCDase lacking (Asah1−/−) macrophages we detected almost exclusively exposed capsids without tegument (Fig. 5a, b), suggesting that the capsids were released from the envelope and the tegument due to virus infection. To get more insights into the reason for limited infection in WT macrophages, we performed electron microscopy experiments in WT and Asah1−/− macrophages. WT and Asah1−/− macrophages showed similar amounts of HSV-1 particles attached to the plasma membrane (Fig. 5c, d). In line, similar amounts of HSV-1 particles were detected in WT and Asah1−/− macrophages in endosomes and MVB (Fig. 5c, d). In WT macrophages HSV-1 particles were located in close proximity to the ILVs, and in some cases appeared to fuse with ILVs (Fig. 5c, d). This correlated with trapping of HSV-1 in ILVs (Fig. 5c, d). In contrast, in Asah1−/− macrophages, the HSV-1 envelopes were more frequently associated with the outer limiting membranes (OLMs) of the MVBs (Fig. 5c, d), so that membrane fusion here led to a productive release of capsids into the cytosol and infection of the cell. Therefore, we concluded that aCDase-derived sphingosine mediates binding of HSV-1 envelope to ILVs membrane, which results in trapping of the virus.

Fig. 5: Sphingosine-rich intraluminal vesicles trap HSV-1.
figure5

a, b Representative images (a) and quantification (b) of immunofluorescence from wild-type (WT) and Asah1−/− bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) incubated with HSV-1-VP16-GFP (multiplicity of infection [MOI] 30) for 30 min. Intact viral particles are visible through GFP-tagged tegument protein VP16 (green). Exposed capsids were stained with anti-VP5 (red, n = 17 images, one of two experiments is shown, scale bar 10 µm). c, d Representative electron microscopy images (c) and quantification (d) of WT and Asah1−/− BMDMs infected with HSV-1 (MOI 250) analyzed after 30 min (n = 68 WT images and n = 63 Asah1−/− images from three independent experiments; upper scale bar 400 nm, lower scale bar 200 nm, Mann-Whitney test). e Immunofluorescence of WT BMDMs, which were loaded with clickable ω-azido-sphingosine for 3 h, infected with HSV-1 (MOI 10) for 30 min and then stained for sphingosine, the intraluminal vesicle (ILV) marker CD9, HSV-1 anti-capsid and Hoechst (blue, n = 5, scale bar 20 µm). f, g Representative dot plots (f) and quantification (g) of control liposomes, ceramide-loaded liposomes and sphingosine-loaded liposomes that were incubated with fluorescently labeled HSV-1 for 10 min and then analyzed for HSV-1 binding in flow cytometry (n = 6, 2-way ANOVA [Tukey’s multiple comparison]). All data are shown as mean ± SEM. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, #p ≤ 0.001, ##p ≤ 0.0001.

To prove that indeed sphingosine on ILVs interacted with HSV-1 we loaded WT macrophages with ω-azido-sphingosine, which can be visualized by a click reaction42. 3 h after sphingosine loading, we infected cells with HSV-1 and co-stained cells with the ILV marker CD9. Indeed, sphingosine accumulated in ILVs (Fig. 5e). As expected HSV-1 co-stained with these sphingosine-rich ILVs (Fig. 5e). To determine that indeed sphingosine is responsible for interaction between HSV-1 and ILVs, we generated liposomes and loaded them either with ceramide or sphingosine. Liposomes were then incubated with HSV-1 and binding of virions was analyzed after 10 min by flow cytometry. Control and ceramide-liposomes did not bind HSV-1 (Fig. 5f, g). In contrast, sphingosine-liposomes bound HSV-1 (Fig. 5f, g). Concluding, we found that the antiviral effects of aCDase are mediated via fusion of viral envelop to sphingosine containing ILVs of MVBs.

IRF8, but not IFN-I signaling, induces aCDase expression

Our data show that the Asah1 gene encoding aCDase is a crucial factor involved in antiviral protection against HSV-1. Next, we aimed to define, how aCDase expression is induced. We aimed to analyze whether Asah1 is also induced by IFN-I. The results show that Asah1 expression was hardly influenced by IFN-I, nor did Asah1 influence the induction of IFN-I or interferon induced genes (Fig. 6a, b). Therefore we concluded that Asah1 is not specifically upregulated during infection, but shows already basal activity in macrophages before infection. To get insights how Asah1 expression is upregulated in macrophages we considered that interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) might play a role in this process. IRF8 is a factor, which induces natural resistance in macrophages during their development43,44. Furthermore, it was shown that IRF8 regulates the expression of aCDase during the induction of apoptosis in cancer cells45. RT-PCR analysis of myeloid pre-cursor cells in the bone marrow revealed IRF8-dependent upregulation of Asah1 (Supplementary Fig. 5). To determine the role of IRF8 in regulating Asah1 in mature macrophages, we analyzed Asah1 expression in the spleen, an organ showing high numbers of macrophages. RT-PCR and Western blot analysis revealed limited levels of Asah1 mRNA and aCDase precursor protein in spleens of Irf8−/− mice when compared to WT spleens (Fig. 6c, d, Supplementary Fig. 8). In line, Irf8−/− mice showed elevated levels of HSV-1 DNA as well as increased production of viral particles after infection with HSV-1 (Fig. 6e, f). It has previously been reported, that IRF8 expression in human blood monocytes decreases with age, which correlates with decreased expression of interferon stimulated genes and might be a reason for impaired antiviral resistance to influenza A virus (IAV)46. Whether this reduced IRF8 expression influences also aCDase dependent virus control remains to be studied. We concluded that Asah1 is not induced during infection or by IFN-I, however IRF8 regulates Asah1 expression during development of macrophages.

Fig. 6: IRF8, but not IFN-I signaling, induces aCDase expression.
figure6

a Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of wild-type (WT) and Asah1−/− bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) that were left untreated, infected with herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 for 24 h or infected and treated with 100 units interferon-α4 (IFN-α4; n = 10, one-way ANOVA [Dunnett’s multiple comparison]). b RT-PCR of WT and Asah1−/− BMDMs that were left untreated or infected with HSV-1 at an MOI of 1 for 24 h (n = 10, two-tailed student’s t-test). c, d RT-PCR for Asah1 (c, n = 5, two-tailed student’s t-test) and Western blot for aCDase (d, n = 3) of spleen tissues from WT and interferon regulatory factor 8 deficient (Irf8−/−) mice that were left untreated. e, f RT-PCR (e) of lymph nodes (LN), spleens and livers and tissue culture infection dose 50 (TCID50, f) of spleens and livers from WT and Irf8−/− mice that were infected with 2 × 106 TCID50 HSV-1 and analyzed on day 3 (n = 5-6, two-tailed student’s t-test). All data are shown as mean ± SEM. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, #p ≤ 0.001, ##p ≤ 0.0001.

Discussion

Macrophages are one of the most important effector cells of the innate immune system5,47. During infection with viruses such as vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), adenovirus or mouse hepatitis virus, macrophages play a major protective role in limiting infection and preventing severe disease2,3,4,48,49,50. In particular, tissue resident macrophages such as Kupffer cells in the liver clear a range of systemic virus infections4,48. Molecular mechanisms explaining this strong antiviral activity are presently unknown. Here we found that macrophages are essential for the control of HSV-1. With our in vitro data, we linked the strong antiviral activity of macrophages to the expression of aCDase. aCDase produced sphingosine-rich ILVs in MVBs. Once HSV-1 is taken up into MVBs, sphingosine-rich ILVs bind to HSV-1 particles and thereby trap them in MVBs and prevent infection of the cell. Expression of aCDase was not regulated by IFN-I, but was induced in macrophages in response to IRF8 signaling. While we focused in our manuscript on the role of aCDase in macrophages, our in vivo data suggest that aCDase exerts antiviral activity probably also in other myeloid or even none-myeloid cell types.

It remains to be explored whether the restriction mechanism of sphingosine-rich ILVs is specific for HSV-1 or whether also other viruses are sensitive to sphingosine-rich ILVs. Interestingly, VSV, the flaviviruses Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) and yellow fever virus (YFV) fuse with ILVs in MVBs51,52. Le Blanc et al.51 and Nour et al.52 considered the release of viral capsids into ILVs a relevant step in virus life cycle, and suggested that back-fusion of ILVs, harboring capsids, with the OLMs of MVBs leads to productive infection. Our data show that although back-fusion might occur in macrophages, fusion of viral membrane with ILV membrane is rather a cellular mechanism to limit infection of the cell. Further experiments are required to determine whether other enveloped viruses and non-enveloped viruses are also restricted by sphingosine in MVBs.

Viruses frequently have an acidic isoelectric point at low pH53, implying that these viruses are negatively charged at physiological pH. The isoelectric point of HSV-1 is around 4.954. In contrast, sphingosine is net positively charged at neutral or acidic pH, as occurring in MVBs. We suggest that sphingosine gives ILVs a positive charge, which facilitates the interaction with negatively charged HSV-1. Indeed it was shown that sphingosine containing vesicles interact with negatively charged membranes at the plasma membrane or in late endosomes and accelerates fusion of these membranes55,56. More biophysical work is required to better understand the interaction of HSV-1 with sphingosine.

We compared the in vivo phenotype of Asah1−/− mice during HSV-1 infection to several other mouse strains, which show limited production of IFN-I (MyD88−/− x Trif−/− x Cardif−/− mice), limited response to IFN-I (Ifnar−/− mice) or lack SAMHD1 (Samhd1−/− mice). SAMHD1 was previously reported to be of importance for HSV-1 control in myeloid cells36,57 and anti-viral effects can be evaded by some herpesviruses58. Viral replication in Asah1−/− was comparable to MyD88−/− x Trif−/− x Cardif−/− mice and Ifnar−/− mice and even enhanced to that in Samhd1−/− mice. These findings indicate that Asah1 is an important and major innate effector mechanism. We observed increased HSV-1 DNA in livers of Samhd1−/− mice. This is in line with other groups which determined an important role of SAMHD1 on HSV-1 control in vitro36,57,58. How this lack of HSV-1 control influences disease onset after HSV-1 infection needs to be determined in the future. While SAMHD1 and IFN signaling counteract mainly viral replication and production of infectious particles, we think that aCDase protects macrophages from infection with HSV-1 immediately after the virus is taken up.

Our electron microscopy studies indicate that HSV-1 fuses with ILVs. We consider that trapped viral particles are unable to leave MVBs and are targeted to lysosomes for degradation. This pathway of degradation might also facilitate antigen-presentation and immune activation, as high numbers of tetraspanins and MHC-II molecules are contained within ILVs23,59. More studies are required to identify the relationship of aCDase, sphingosine and antigen-presentation on MHC-II. In our study we focused mainly on the role of sphingosine and aCDase in macrophages. In addition, aCDase is expressed in several other tissues, especially in lung, colon and stomach as well as spleen60 (Supplementary Fig. 6). Cells in these organs are involved in building a barrier, which protects against invading viruses. We consider it likely that in addition to macrophages, potentially also other cell types express aCDase in MVBs and are thereby protected against invading viruses.

From our data we suggest enhanced virus infections in patients with Farber disease, which are deficient in activity of aCDase61. While such associations were not determined yet, patients with Farber disease have a limited life span and die early after birth61. Akin to other innate or adaptive deficiencies, a limited lifespan of the patients may obscure a link between innate or adaptive deficiencies to infectious agents62. Whether other mutations, which affect the activity of aCDase, are widespread in the population and whether such mutations influence the susceptibility to viral infections will be subject to future studies.

In conclusion, we found that macrophages are essential to survive an infection with HSV-1. Mechanistically, macrophages took up HSV-1 and accumulated it in MVBs. aCDase in macrophages enriched ILVs with sphingosine. Once HSV-1 entered MVBs sphingosine-rich ILVs trapped HSV-1 and prevented productive infection of the cells.

Methods

Mice

For acid ceramidase 1 (Asah1) deficient heterozygous mice, the exon-intron organization of the gene was established on the basis of the Asah1 cDNA sequence. A targeting vector was constructed, including Asah1 genomic sequences on the C57BL/6 genetic background, a long homology region of 5.8 kb and a short homology region of 1.7 kb. It also included two loxP sites flanking Asah1 exon 1, a neomycin gene flanked by flipase recognition target sites for positive selection of homologous recombination, and a diphtheria toxin, a negative-selection marker to detect insertions and nonhomologous recombinant embryonic stem cell clones. This targeting vector was inserted into C57BL/6 embryonic stem cells by homologous recombination. Offspring were crossed with CreER mice (Gt[ROSA]26Sortm9[cre/ESR1]Arte; Taconic Artemis Pharmaceuticals [Köln, Germany]). In some experiments we used mice in which acid ceramidase deficiency could be induced (Cre × Asah1fl/fl). CreER x Asah1fl/fl offspring express a Cre recombinase under the tamoxifen promoter and the Asah1 gene with two LoxP sites flanking exon 1. Administering tamoxifen thus led to the expression of Cre recombinase and loss of function mutation by deletion of exon 1 in the Asah1 gene. In this model, knock out of Asah1 occurs right before infection. Potential developmental defects due to long term knock out of Asah1 are excluded in this model.

Asah1fl/fl x EIIa-Cre mice carry a Cre transgene under the control of the adenovirus EIIa promoter that targets expression of Cre recombinase to the early mouse embryo, and are used for germ line deletion of Asah1 gene, referred to as Asah1−/− mice. Asah1−/− mice were on C57BL/6J background. Sibling animals with the genotype Asah1+/+ were used as control animals. We bred Irf8−/−Ifnar−/−MyD88−/− x Trif−/− x Cardif−/− and Samhd1−/− mice on C57BL/6J background. Samhd1−/− mice were originally developed by Prof. Jan Rehwinkel (MRC Human Immunology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, England)63.

All animals were housed in single ventilated cages. Animal experiments were authorized by the Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz (LANUV) Nordrhein-Westfalen and in accordance with the German law for animal protection and/or according to institutional guidelines at the Ontario Cancer Institute of the University Health Network.

Cell lines, bone marrow macrophages

Raw264.7 cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA, #: ATCC: TIB-71). THP-1 cells were purchased from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany, #: DSMZ: ACC 16). Vero cells were provided by the Ontario Cancer Institute (Toronto, ON, Canada). HeLa cells were provided in house (University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany). For the generation of macrophages, bone marrow was isolated from mice and cultured for 9 days with macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF). Cells were plated on new cell culture plates and the experiment was started the next day. For generation of primary fibroblasts, lungs were isolated from mice and digested using DNase/Liberase. Fibroblasts were harvested after 6 days of culture and experiment was started the subsequent day.

Viruses

We used HSV-1(17+)Lox and HSV-1(17+)Lox-CheVP26 in which monomeric Cherry has been fused to the N-terminus of the small capsid protein VP2664, HSV-1F (kindly provided by Prof. Hartmut Hengel, Institute of Virology, Freiburg, Germany) and HSV-VP16-GFP65 (kindly provided by Dr. Yohei Yamauchi, University of Bristol, United Kingdom).

Reagents

D-erythro-sphingosine (C18, 860490) and D-Galactosyl-β1-1’-N-Nervonoyl-D-erythro-sphingosine (C24:1, β-D-Galactosyl Ceramide, 110759), were obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL, USA). Glycoceramidase (E9030-100MUN), sphingomyelinase (S8633-25UN), Cy3-linked DBCO (777366-1 mg) and DAPI (D9542) were purchased from Millipore Sigma (Darmstadt, Germany). Recombinant mouse Asah2 (3558-AH) was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). The sphingosine kinase inhibitor SKI-II (CAS # 312636-16-1; Cat # 2097) was obtained from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, United Kingdom) and tamoxifen (CAS # 10540-29-1, Cat # T5648-5G) and cornoil (CAS # 8001-30-7, Cat # C8267-500ML) from Millipore Sigma. Clodronate and control liposomes were purchased from Liposoma (CP-005-005, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Clickable ω-azido-sphingosine ((2S,3R,E)-2-amino-18-azidooctadec-4-ene-1,3-diol) for click chemistry42 staining was synthesized in-house by Julian Fink.

Tamoxifen treatment

Tamoxifen was dissolved in corn oil. Eight, six, and four days before an experiment, Cre- × Asah1fl/fl control animals and Cre+ × Asah1fl/fl animals were treated with 4 mg tamoxifen (in 100 μL corn oil) intraperitoneally.

Depletion of macrophages

For macrophage-depleted mouse experiments, mice were treated intravenously with 50 mg/kg clodronate to deplete tissue resident macrophages. After 3 days, mice were ready to be used in experiments.

Survival experiments

To analyze the effect of macrophage/ sphingosine deficiency on the course of infection, we performed survival experiments. For this purpose, animals were infected with a dose that was sublethal for WT animals. Animals were checked daily, killed with corresponding termination criteria, and counted as dead. Termination criteria were body weight, general condition, spontaneous behavior and clinical findings.

Bone marrow chimera mice

For bone marrow chimera experiments, 10–12 weeks old female C57BL/6J mice were irradiated with 9.5 Gy. On the following day, bone marrow from donor mice was isolated under sterile conditions and i.v. administered. On day 10 after irradiation, mice were treated with clodronate liposomes to deplete tissue resident macrophages. After 50 days of reconstitution mice were ready to be used in experiments.

Infection of cells and animals

For in vitro infection, the virus was added to the cell cultures. After incubation for 1 h, the supernatant was washed away and new medium was added. The supernatant was collected at various times after infection. For intravenous infection, 100 µL of the virus was injected into the tail vein. For intravaginal infection, 20 µL of the virus was pipetted into the vagina of anesthetized mice. The vagina was briefly closed with skin glue to reduce variability of inoculation time and volume.

Immunofluorescence microscopy

Immunofluorescence was used to detect viruses in cells and organs. For in vitro experiments, cells were seeded in 24-well plates, each containing a coverslip. After 24 h, the cells were correspondingly infected, fixed after incubation, and labeled with antibodies. Organs of infected animals were snap-frozen, and 8 μm thick sections were recovered on a microscope slide. The sections were fixed, and virus was visualized with virus-specific antibodies. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-HSV-1 capsid (SY456334, anti-capsid, 1:100), anti-HSV-1 glycoprotein (hu2c66, anti-glycoprotein gB, 1:200) or anti-HSV-1 VP5 (NC-141, anti-capsid, 1:500). Alternatively, virus was directly labeled with a dye (e.g., Cy3; carboxylfluorescein succinimidyl ester [CFSE]) was used. Zeiss ELYRA PS.1 SIM/PAL-M/STORM/TIRF and LSM710 (ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany), was used to acquire images.

Immunofluorescence microscopy of sphingosine

Immunofluorescence was used to detect sphingosine in cells. Cells were seeded in 24-well plates, each containing a coverslip. After 24 h, the cells were correspondingly treated, fixed after incubation, and labeled with antibodies. As primary antibody monoclonal anti-sphingosine antibody (clone NHSPH, ALF-274042010, Alfresa Pharma Corporation, Osaka, Japan, 1:1000) and as secondary antibody Cy3-coupled anti-IgM F(ab)2 fragments (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Ely, United Kingdom, 1:500) were used. Samples were examined with a Leica TCS-SP5 confocal microscope equipped with a 100× lens, and images were analyzed with Leica LCS software version 2.61 (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany). Fluorescence intensity was determined in 100 randomly selected cells/sample (total of 300 cells). We determined the fluorescence of the cell periphery.

Detection of HSV in cell supernatant/organs by TCID50 assay

For tissue culture infection dose 50 (TCID50) Vero cells were seeded onto a 96-well plate and let grow to confluence overnight. To determine the viral titer, cell culture supernatant or organ suspension was titrated and transferred to the 96-well plate. After 7 days of incubation, the plaque positive wells were counted, and the number of infectious particles per ml of supernatant or organ was determined.

Detection of HSV in organs by qRT-PCR

For quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) DNA was isolated from organs using the innuPREP Virus DNA Kit (Order #: 845-KS-4600050, Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany). RealStar HSV PCR Kit 1.0 CE (Order #: 061013, Altona Diagnostics, Hamburg, Germany) was used to quantify the amount of HSV-1 genomes per organ. A LightCycler 480 Instrument (Roche Life Science, Basel, Switzerland) was used for detection.

Capsid uncoating assay of herpes simplex virus

Cells were incubated with HSV-1 expressing GFP at the tegument protein VP16 (HSV-1-VP16-GFP65). After 30 min of incubation, cells were fixed and stained for HSV capsid with anti-VP5 (NC-141, 1:500) and DAPI. Images were acquired on Leica SP8 microscope (Wetzlar, Germany) and analyzed using CellProfiler by segmentation and counting of single VP16-GFP or VP5 puncta.

Sphingosine-containing liposomes for FACS analysis

Liposomes were prepared by sonication as previously described67. Phosphatidylcholine (PC), cholesterol (Ch), sphingomyelin (SM), ceramide (Cer) and D-sphingosine (Sph) were from Millipore Sigma. The lipid composition of the liposomes was as follows: control-liposomes (PC: Ch: SM 33.3:33.3:33.3 mol/%), ceramide-rich liposomes (PC: Ch: SM: Cer 33:33:24:10 mol/%) and sphingosine-rich liposomes (PC: Ch: SM: Sph 33:33:24:10 mol/%).

Isolation of total RNA, reverse transcription and qRT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from cells using Trizol. Complementary DNA synthesis was performed with the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

For quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) either Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany) or TaqMan Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific) was used on the 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). For analysis, the expression levels of all target genes were normalized against glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh; ΔCt). Relative gene expression values were calculated with the ΔΔCt method. Following primers were used: Gapdh (Mm99999915_g1, ThermoFisher Scientific), Gapdh (QT01658692, Qiagen), Asah1 (Mm00480021_m1, ThermoFisher Scientific) IRF7 (Mm00516788_m1, ThermoFisher Scientific), Isg15 (QT00322749, Qiagen), RnaseL (QT01066086, Qiagen), Tetherin/Bst2 (QT01066184,Qiagen), IFNα4 (QT01774353, Qiagen), IFNα5 (QT00327656, Qiagen), IFNβ1 (QT00249662, Qiagen), Mx-1 (QT01064231, Qiagen), Oas1 (QT01056048, Qiagen) and PKR (QT00162715, Qiagen).

Click chemistry

Clickable ω-azido-sphingosine ((2S,3R,E)-2-amino-18-azidooctadec-4-ene-1,3-diol) was used for click chemistry reaction as described previously42,68. Briefly, cells were seeded and grown to confluence. ω-azido-sphingosine was added to cell culture medium (100 μmol/L) for 3 h. Cells were washed with PBS and then Cy3-linked DBCO (8 μg/ml diluted in PBS) was added for 7 min at room temperature. Samples were washed 3x with PBS and medium was added. Cell were further analyzed as described.

For detailed synthesis and analysis of ω-azido-sphingosine see methodical information “chemical synthesis of ω-azido-sphingosine” in Supplementary Information and Supplementary Figs. 920.

Microarray

Total RNA preparations were checked for RNA integrity with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. All samples in this study exhibited high-quality RNA Integrity Numbers (RIN 9.8-10). Synthesis of cDNA and subsequent fluorescence labeling of cRNA were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocols (One-Color Microarray-Based Gene Expression Analysis/Low Input Quick Amp Labeling; Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). Briefly, 100 ng of total RNA was converted to cDNA, followed by in vitro transcription and incorporation of Cy3-CTP into nascent cRNA. After fragmentation, labeled cRNA was hybridized to AgilentSurePrint G3 Mouse GE 8×60k microarrays for 17 h at 65 °C and scanned as described in the manufacturer’s protocol. Signal intensities on 20-bit TIFF images were calculated by Feature Extraction software (FE, Vers. 10.7.1.1; Agilent Technologies). Data analyses were conducted with GeneSpring GX software (Vers. 10.5; Agilent Technologies). Probe signal intensities were quantile-normalized across all samples for reduction of inter-array variability. Input data preprocessing was concluded by baseline transformation to the median of all samples.

To ensure innate immune activation macrophages and fibroblasts were infected with LCMV and treated with IFN-α4. To analyze the microarray data a gene set enrichment analysis with GSEA (Broad Institute, v3.069) using the Gene Ontology Cellular Components (CC) gene set database (c5.cc.v6.270, accessed on 15.07.19) was performed using default settings. Results were further subjected to network analysis using the Enrichment Map plugin v3.2.0 in Cytoscape v3.7.1 with the following settings: FDR q-value cutoff 0.05, p-value cutoff 1, Metric: Jaccard+Overlap Combined (50/50) with cutoff 0.375. Clusters were identified by the AutoAnnotate plugin v1.3 and labeled manually for visualization. For visualization gene sets upregulated in LCMV-infected and interferon-treated macrophages or fibroblasts were sorted to the left or right side of the diagram respectively. Several membrane modulating proteins from the families of sphingolipids (including gangliosides), cholesterol and phosphatidylcholine were considered for simplified comparison of macrophages and fibroblasts (see Supplementary Table 2).

Virus binding to liposomes

Liposomes were incubated with fluorescently labeled virus. Samples were diluted and further analyzed in flow cytometry (LSR Fortessa). Liposomes were detected by size and granularity. Frequency of liposomes, which bound the virus was determined by fluorescence according to the gating shown in Fig. 5f. Data was analyzed using the software FlowJo (FlowJo LLC).

FACS Sorting

Bone marrow was isolated from tibia and femur of mice and erythrocytes were lysed. To sort pre-progenitor cells staining for linage markers anti-CD3e (Cat # 45-0031-80, eBioscience, 1:50), anti-GR1 (Cat # 108428, BioLegend, 1:400), anti-Mac-1 (Cat # 101228, BioLegend, 1:400), anti-CD4 (Cat # 101228, BioLegend, 1:200), anti-CD8a (Cat # 100734, BioLegend, 1:100), anti-TCRb (Cat # 109228, BioLegend, 1:100), anti-NK1.1 (Cat # 45-5941-82, eBioscience, 1:100), anti-B220 (Cat # 103236, BioLegend, 1:100) and anti-CD19 (Cat # 115534, BioLegend, 1:200) was performed. Additionally anti-CD16/32 (Cat # 101305, BioLegend, 1:200), anti-CD41 (Cat # 133906, BioLegend, 1:100), anti-Sca-1 (Cat # 108114, BioLegend, 1:200), anti-c-kit (Cat # 47-1171-82, Invitrogen, 1:50), anti-CD105 (Cat # 120412, BioLegend, 1:50) and anti-CD150 (Cat # 115910, BioLegend, 1:400) were stained to further classify cells. To sort immature granulocytes, mature granulocytes and monocytes anti-Ly6G/Ly6C (Cat # 17-5931-82, Invitrogen, 1:100), anti-CD11b (Cat # 25-0112-82, eBioscience, 1:100) and anti-CD115 (Cat # 11-1031-85, eBioscience, 1:100) were used. Gating strategy was performed as shown in Supplementary Fig 5.

Western blot for aCDase protein expression

Frozen mouse spleen or cultured primary mouse cells were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation buffer containing 1x HALT Protease Inhibitor Cocktail and 50 mM EDTA (Thermo Fisher, Cat. no. 78430) using 100 µl lysis buffer per 10 mg organ or 30 µl lysis buffer per 106 cells respectively. Spleens were homogenized using a homogenizer (Qiagen Tissue Lyser II, Cat. no. 85300) for 2 min at 20 Hz. Lysates were then centrifuged for 20 min at 20,000 x g at 4 °C, keeping the supernatants. Protein concentration was measured using detergent compatible (DC) Protein Assay (Bio-Rad, Cat. no. 5000112), standardized to 4 µg/µl and prepared for SDS-PAGE by addition of 4x Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad, Cat. no. 1610747), incubation at 95 °C for 5 min followed by cool-down on ice. 30 µg per organ or 10 µg per cell lysate was loaded per lane into a precast TGX AnyKD Stain-free gel (Bio-Rad, Cat. no. 4568126), using Bio-Rad AllBlue protein standard (Cat. no. 1610373) and ran for 45 min at 140 V in Tris/glycine/SDS running buffer (Bio-Rad, Cat. no. 1610732). Transfer was performed using the Trans-Blot Turbo system (Bio-Rad, Cat. no. 1704150) with Mini PVDF Transfer Packs (Bio-Rad, Cat. no. 1704156). Membranes were blocked in Pierce StartingBlock (TBS) Blocking Buffer (Thermo Fisher, Cat. no. 37542) for 2 h and primary antibody was incubated shaking at 4 °C for 2 days: 1:500 for anti-aCDase rabbit polyclonal (Proteintech, Cat. no. 11274-1-AP) for spleens, or 1:500 anti-aCDase rabbit polyclonal (ProSci, Cat. no. 4741) for cell lysates, and 1:1000 for anti-GAPDH mouse (Meridian Life Science, Cat. no. H86504M) diluted in blocking buffer. Membranes were washed three times with Tris-buffered saline-0.1 % Tween 20 (TBS-T) and incubated with secondary antibody at 1:5000 (from GE Life Sciences, anti-Rabbit IgG, HRP-linked, Cat. no. NA934 or anti-mouse IgG, HRP linked, Cat no. NA931) diluted in 25 % blocking buffer in TBS-T shaking at room temperature for 2 h. After washing twice in TBS-T and twice in TBS membranes were incubated with Pierce ECL (Thermo Fisher, Cat. no. 32106) for 5 min and imaged on a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP (Cat. no. 1708280) with ImageLab version 6.0.1 (Bio-Rad).

Histology

Histological analysis of snap-frozen liver and spleen tissues or cell cultures was performed with monoclonal fluorescence labeled antibodies against HSV-1-capsid (SY4563, 1:100) anti-HSV-1 (hu2c66, anti-gB, 1:200), anti-F4/80 (12-4801-82, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA, 1:100), anti-Asah1 (4741, ProSci, San Diego, CA, USA, 1:200), anti-CD9 (124809, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA, 1:100) and anti-sphingosine (clone NHSPH, ALF-274042010, Alfresa Pharma Corporation, Osaka, Japan, 1:1000). Nuclei were stained using Hoechst 33342 (Cat # B2261-100MG, Sigma, 1:5000). Zeiss ELYRA PS.1 SIM/PAL-M/STORM/TIRF and LSM710, Leica SP8 gSTED and FLIM, Leica TCS-SP5, or Keyence BZ-9000 (Keyence, Osaka, Japan) were used to acquire images. Quantification of histology was done using standard procedures in Fiji software version 1.52e (Image J, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) or Cell Profiler71. In Fiji we used the raw images, applied a mean filter of two/ten to exclude noise. We took the total signal area and the intensity per area after an empirically fixed threshold for further evaluation.

Mass spectrometry analysis

106 cells were subjected to lipid extraction with 1.5 mL methanol/chloroform (2:1, v:v)72. The extraction solvent contained d7-sphingosine (d7-Sph), C17-ceramide, and C16-d31-sphingomyelin (all from Avanti Polar Lipids) as internal standards. Sample analysis was carried out by liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using either a TQ 6490 mass spectrometer (for Sph) or a QTOF 6530 mass spectrometer (for ceramides and sphingomyelins) (both from Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) operating in the positive electrospray ionization mode (ESI+). The following selected reaction monitoring (SRM) transitions were used for quantification: m/z 300.3 → 282.3 for Sph and m/z 307.3 → 289.3 for d7-Sph. The precursor ions of ceramide or sphingomyelin species (differing in the lengths of their fatty acid chains) were cleaved into the fragment ions m/z 264.270 (for ceramide) or m/z 184.074 (for sphingomyelin), respectively73. Quantification was performed with Mass Hunter Software (Agilent Technologies).

Electron microscopy

The samples were fixed with glutaraldehyde (2.5% in 100 mM phosphate buffer). Cells were then contrasted with 1% osmium tetroxide, 1% thiocarbohydrazide, 1.5% potassium ferrocyanide, and 1% uranyl acetate in water and were then dehydrated in an ascending ethanol row (50%, 70%, 96%, and 3 × 100%, 10 min each) and stepwise (EPON/EtOH 1:1 and 2:1 each for 2 h, EPON overnight) flat-embedded in EPON resin. Subsequently, EPON-embedded samples were polymerized for 24 h at 60 °C. After removal of the glass slide with 40% aqueous hydrofluoric acid, the EPON disk, containing the cells of interest, was removed from the dish, mounted on EPON resin blocks, and processed for ultramicrotomy. Serial sections were cut with a Leica EM UC7 ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems) set to a thickness of 55 nm. A final post staining of the ultrathin sections was perfomed for 6 min on a drop of 1% uranylacetate followed by 1% lead citrate for 3 min in aqueous solution.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was conducted on a Jeol 1400FPlus (Tokyo, Japan) instrument at 120 kV with magnifications as indicated. Digital images were acquired with a 4096×4096-pixel complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera (TemCam-F416, TVIPS; Gauting, Germany). Postprocessing of the resulting 16-bit TIFF image files was performed with Fiji software version 1.52e (Image J). Pixel noise was averaged by a gaussian blur algorithm. A background resulting from inhomogeneous illumination was removed by implementing the “rolling ball” procedure, and the contrast was adjusted with histogram normalization.

Statistical analysis

If not mentioned otherwise, data are expressed as arithmetic mean ± SEM and n represents the number of mice. Student’s t-test (two-tailed, if not indicated otherwise) in case of normal distribution or in case of multiple comparisons ANOVA, were used to detect statistically significant differences. p-Values of 0.05 or less were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses and graphical presentations were computed with Graph Pad Prism software (Graph Pad, La Jolla, USA).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The authors declare that data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Microarray data are deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under the accession code GSE142175.

References

  1. 1.

    Murray, P. J. & Wynn, T. A. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 11, 723–737 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Honke, N. et al. Enforced viral replication activates adaptive immunity and is essential for the control of a cytopathic virus. Nat. Immunol. 13, 51–57 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cervantes-Barragan, L. et al. Type I IFN-mediated protection of macrophages and dendritic cells secures control of murine coronavirus infection. J. Immunol. 182, 1099–1106 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lang, P. A. et al. Tissue macrophages suppress viral replication and prevent severe immunopathology in an interferon-I-dependent manner in mice. Hepatology 52, 25–32 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jenne, C. N. & Kubes, P. Immune surveillance by the liver. Nat. Immunol. 14, 996–1006 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wardle, E. N. Kupffer cells and their function. Liver 7, 63–75 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Karasneh, G. A. & Shukla, D. Herpes simplex virus infects most cell types in vitro: clues to its success. Virol. J. 8, 481 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nicola, A. V. Herpesvirus entry into host cells mediated by endosomal low pH. Traffic 17, 965–975 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Agelidis, A. M. & Shukla, D. Cell entry mechanisms of HSV: what we have learned in recent years. Future Virol. 10, 1145–1154 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Weed, D. J. & Nicola, A. V. Herpes simplex virus membrane fusion. Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell Biol. 223, 29–47 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sodeik, B., Ebersold, M. W. & Helenius, A. Microtubule-mediated transport of incoming herpes simplex virus 1 capsids to the nucleus. J. Cell Biol. 136, 1007–1021 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mabit, H. et al. Intact microtubules support adenovirus and herpes simplex virus infections. J. Virol. 76, 9962–9971 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ojala, P. M., Sodeik, B., Ebersold, M. W., Kutay, U. & Helenius, A. Herpes simplex virus type 1 entry into host cells: reconstitution of capsid binding and uncoating at the nuclear pore complex in vitro. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 4922–4931 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Flatt, J. W. & Greber, U. F. Viral mechanisms for docking and delivering at nuclear pore complexes. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 68, 59–71 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yamauchi, Y. & Greber, U. F. Principles of virus uncoating: cues and the snooker ball. Traffic 17, 569–592 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Virgin, H. W. The virome in mammalian physiology and disease. Cell 157, 142–150 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bigalke, J. M. & Heldwein, E. E. Nuclear exodus: herpesviruses lead the way. Annu. Rev. Virol. 3, 387–409 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mettenleiter, T. C. Herpesvirus assembly and egress. J. Virol. 76, 1537–1547 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yamauchi, Y., Kiriyama, K., Kimura, H. & Nishiyama, Y. Herpes simplex virus induces extensive modification and dynamic relocalisation of the nuclear mitotic apparatus (NuMA) protein in interphase cells. J. Cell Sci. 121, 2087–2096 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lee, D. H. & Ghiasi, H. Roles of M1 and M2 macrophages in herpes simplex virus 1 infectivity. J. Virol. 91, e00578–17 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rasmussen, S. B. et al. Type I interferon production during herpes simplex virus infection is controlled by cell-type-specific viral recognition through Toll-like receptor 9, the mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein pathway, and novel recognition systems. J. Virol. 81, 13315–13324 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Leib, D. A. et al. Interferons regulate the phenotype of wild-type and mutant herpes simplex viruses in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 189, 663–672 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Piper, R. C. & Katzmann, D. J. Biogenesis and function of multivesicular bodies. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 23, 519–547 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Trajkovic, K. et al. Ceramide triggers budding of exosome vesicles into multivesicular endosomes. Science 319, 1244–1247 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ohanian, J. & Ohanian, V. Sphingolipids in mammalian cell signalling. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 58, 2053–2068 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Spiegel, S. & Merrill, A. H. Jr. Sphingolipid metabolism and cell growth regulation. FASEB J. 10, 1388–1397 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Tirodkar, T. S. & Voelkel-Johnson, C. Sphingolipids in apoptosis. Exp. Oncol. 34, 231–242 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Utermohlen, O., Herz, J., Schramm, M. & Kronke, M. Fusogenicity of membranes: the impact of acid sphingomyelinase on innate immune responses. Immunobiology 213, 307–314 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Jimenez-Rojo, N., Garcia-Arribas, A. B., Sot, J., Alonso, A. & Goni, F. M. Lipid bilayers containing sphingomyelins and ceramides of varying N-acyl lengths: a glimpse into sphingolipid complexity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1838, 456–464 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Li, C. M. et al. The human acid ceramidase gene (ASAH): structure, chromosomal location, mutation analysis, and expression. Genomics 62, 223–231 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zupancic, E., Carreira, A. C., de Almeida, R. F. & Silva, L. C. Biophysical implications of sphingosine accumulation in membrane properties at neutral and acidic pH. J. Phys. Chem. B 118, 4858–4866 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Crameri, M. et al. MxB is an interferon-induced restriction factor of human herpesviruses. Nat. Commun. 9, 1980 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Nicola, A. V. & Straus, S. E. Cellular and viral requirements for rapid endocytic entry of herpes simplex virus. J. Virol. 78, 7508–7517 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Dohner, K. et al. Importin alpha1 is required for nuclear import of herpes simplex virus proteins and capsid assembly in fibroblasts and neurons. PLoS Pathog. 14, e1006823 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mikloska, Z. & Cunningham, A. L. Alpha and gamma interferons inhibit herpes simplex virus type 1 infection and spread in epidermal cells after axonal transmission. J. Virol. 75, 11821–11826 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kim, E. T., White, T. E., Brandariz-Nunez, A., Diaz-Griffero, F. & Weitzman, M. D. SAMHD1 restricts herpes simplex virus 1 in macrophages by limiting DNA replication. J. Virol. 87, 12949–12956 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Gebai, A., Gorelik, A., Li, Z., Illes, K. & Nagar, B. Structural basis for the activation of acid ceramidase. Nat. Commun. 9, 1621 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Goni, F. M. & Alonso, A. Biophysics of sphingolipids I. Membrane properties of sphingosine, ceramides and other simple sphingolipids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1758, 1902–1921 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Nicola, A. V., McEvoy, A. M. & Straus, S. E. Roles for endocytosis and low pH in herpes simplex virus entry into HeLa and Chinese hamster ovary cells. J. Virol. 77, 5324–5332 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Devadas, D. et al. Herpes simplex virus internalization into epithelial cells requires Na+/H+ exchangers and p21-activated kinases but neither clathrin- nor caveolin-mediated endocytosis. J. Virol. 88, 13378–13395 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Cohen, G. H. et al. Structural analysis of the capsid polypeptides of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2. J. Virol. 34, 521–531 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Fink, J. & Seibel, J. Click reactions with functional sphingolipids. Biol. Chem. 399, 1157–1168 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Langlais, D., Barreiro, L. B. & Gros, P. The macrophage IRF8/IRF1 regulome is required for protection against infections and is associated with chronic inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 213, 585–603 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Qi, C. F. et al. Differential expression of IRF8 in subsets of macrophages and dendritic cells and effects of IRF8 deficiency on splenic B cell and macrophage compartments. Immunol. Res. 45, 62–74 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Hu, X. et al. IRF8 regulates acid ceramidase expression to mediate apoptosis and suppresses myelogeneous leukemia. Cancer Res. 71, 2882–2891 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Molony, R. D. et al. Aging impairs both primary and secondary RIG-I signaling for interferon induction in human monocytes. Sci. Signal 10, eaan2392 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Stohlman, S. A., Woodward, J. G. & Frelinger, J. A. Macrophage antiviral activity: extrinsic versus intrinsic activity. Infect. Immun. 36, 672–677 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Xu, Z., Tian, J., Smith, J. S. & Byrnes, A. P. Clearance of adenovirus by Kupffer cells is mediated by scavenger receptors, natural antibodies, and complement. J. Virol. 82, 11705–11713 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Maler, M. D. et al. Key role of the scavenger receptor MARCO in mediating adenovirus infection and subsequent innate responses of macrophages. MBio 8, e00670–17 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Stichling, N. et al. Lung macrophage scavenger receptor SR-A6 (MARCO) is an adenovirus type-specific virus entry receptor. PLoS Pathog. 14, e1006914 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Le Blanc, I. et al. Endosome-to-cytosol transport of viral nucleocapsids. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 653–664 (2005).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Nour, A. M., Li, Y., Wolenski, J. & Modis, Y. Viral membrane fusion and nucleocapsid delivery into the cytoplasm are distinct events in some flaviviruses. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003585 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Michen, B. & Graule, T. Isoelectric points of viruses. J. Appl. Microbiol. 109, 388–397 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Olofsson, S. Isoelectric focusing of herpes simplex virus. Arch. Virol. 49, 93–98 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Jimenez-Rojo, N. et al. Membrane permeabilization induced by sphingosine: effect of negatively charged lipids. Biophys. J. 106, 2577–2584 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Hafez, I. M., Ansell, S. & Cullis, P. R. Tunable pH-sensitive liposomes composed of mixtures of cationic and anionic lipids. Biophys. J. 79, 1438–1446 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Hollenbaugh, J. A. et al. Host factor SAMHD1 restricts DNA viruses in non-dividing myeloid cells. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003481 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Zhang, K., Lv, D. W. & Li, R. Conserved herpesvirus protein kinases target SAMHD1 to facilitate virus replication. Cell Rep. 28, 449–459 e445 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Chow, A. Y. & Mellman, I. Old lysosomes, new tricks: MHC II dynamics in DCs. Trends Immunol. 26, 72–78 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Geiger, T. et al. Initial quantitative proteomic map of 28 mouse tissues using the SILAC mouse. Mol. Cell Proteom. 12, 1709–1722 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Ehlert, K. et al. Farber disease: clinical presentation, pathogenesis and a new approach to treatment. Pediatr. Rheumatol. Online J. 5, 15 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Dropulic, L. K. & Cohen, J. I. Severe viral infections and primary immunodeficiencies. Clin. Infect. Dis. 53, 897–909 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Rehwinkel, J. et al. SAMHD1-dependent retroviral control and escape in mice. EMBO J. 32, 2454–2462 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Sandbaumhuter, M. et al. Cytosolic herpes simplex virus capsids not only require binding inner tegument protein pUL36 but also pUL37 for active transport prior to secondary envelopment. Cell Microbiol. 15, 248–269 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Yamauchi, Y. et al. The UL14 tegument protein of herpes simplex virus type 1 is required for efficient nuclear transport of the alpha transinducing factor VP16 and viral capsids. J. Virol. 82, 1094–1106 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Krawczyk, A. et al. Overcoming drug-resistant herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection by a humanized antibody. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6760–6765 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Henry, B. D. et al. Engineered liposomes sequester bacterial exotoxins and protect from severe invasive infections in mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 81–88 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Walter, T. et al. Incorporation studies of clickable ceramides in Jurkat cell plasma membranes. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 53, 6836–6839 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Carpenter, A. E. et al. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol. 7, R100 (2006).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Gulbins, A. et al. Antidepressants act by inducing autophagy controlled by sphingomyelin-ceramide. Mol. Psychiatry 23, 2324–2346 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Kachler, K. et al. Enhanced acid sphingomyelinase activity drives immune evasion and tumor growth in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Res. 77, 5963–5976 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Alexandra Brenzel and Sylvia Voortmann from the Imaging Center Essen (IMCES) for their technical support. We further thank Daniel Herrmann for technical assistance with the mass spectrometric analyses and Michael Möllmann for help with cell sorting. Images shown in this publication were acquired on IMCES instruments. This study was funded by the German Research Council (DFG - Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; GRK2098, GRK2581, SFB974, GRK1949, GU 335/35-1, LA1419/7-1, LA1419/10-1, HU1824/7-1, SE1410/6-2 and SFB1292/TP13), the Fresenius Stiftung (2015_A232, MH), GIF (I-1474-414,13/2918, MH) and the EU 7th framework, Marie-Curie Actions ITN-EDGE (https://ec.europa.eu/research/mariecurieactions/about/innovative-training-networks to BS). Justa Friebus-Kardash was supported by the “Programm zur internen Forschungsförderung Essen” (IFORES) Research fellowship program of the University of Duisburg-Essen Medical School. We acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Duisburg-Essen.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L., E.G., K.S.L.; Investigation J.L., A.R.N., V.D., S.K.F., H.B., F.C., P.B., J.F., M.B., D.O., K.A.B., J.F.K., E.G., K.S.L.; Formal analysis J.L., E.G., K.S.L.; Investigation and formal analysis electron microscopy, J.L., H.J., B.W.; Investigation and formal analysis mass spectrometry F.S., B.K.; Investigation and formal analysis click chemistry J.L., J.F., J.S.; Investigation and formal analysis microarray J.L., P.B., K.K.; Writing – original draft J.L., K.S.L.; Writing – review & editing J.L., M.J.E., P.A.L., E.G., B.S., H.J., J.S., U.F.G., K.S.L., C.H., A.K., E.B.B., J.R.G., B.K., F.S.; Resources K.S.L., P.A.L., E.G., E.B.B., U.F.G., B.S., J.F., A.K., B.K., M.H., A.B., H.C.P.; Supervision K.S.L., E.G., U.F.G., B.S.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl S. Lang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.L., M.J.E., E.G., and K.S.L. declare that they have applied for a patent related to the treatment of viral infections with sphingosine. Patent applicant: Harbins Ruhr Bioscience; name of inventors: Erich Gulbins, Karl Lang, Judith Lang; application number: DE 102018217334.6 (German), 57HARB10052WO 16/588,361 (USA); status of application: pending; specific aspect of manuscript covered in patent application: claims on the basis of data shown in Fig. 3c, h, i. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks JIllian Carr and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lang, J., Bohn, P., Bhat, H. et al. Acid ceramidase of macrophages traps herpes simplex virus in multivesicular bodies and protects from severe disease. Nat Commun 11, 1338 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15072-8

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing