The BCL-2 antagonist venetoclax is highly effective in multiple myeloma (MM) patients exhibiting the 11;14 translocation, the mechanistic basis of which is unknown. In evaluating cellular energetics and metabolism of t(11;14) and non-t(11;14) MM, we determine that venetoclax-sensitive myeloma has reduced mitochondrial respiration. Consistent with this, low electron transport chain (ETC) Complex I and Complex II activities correlate with venetoclax sensitivity. Inhibition of Complex I, using IACS-010759, an orally bioavailable Complex I inhibitor in clinical trials, as well as succinate ubiquinone reductase (SQR) activity of Complex II, using thenoyltrifluoroacetone (TTFA) or introduction of SDHC R72C mutant, independently sensitize resistant MM to venetoclax. We demonstrate that ETC inhibition increases BCL-2 dependence and the ‘primed’ state via the ATF4-BIM/NOXA axis. Further, SQR activity correlates with venetoclax sensitivity in patient samples irrespective of t(11;14) status. Use of SQR activity in a functional-biomarker informed manner may better select for MM patients responsive to venetoclax therapy.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy. MM accounted for approximately 12,590 deaths and 30,280 new diagnoses in the US, in 20171,2. Despite the administration of next-generation proteasome inhibitors, autologous transplant and immunomodulatory compounds in steroid-supplemented combinatorial strategies, most patients succumb to disease2. Myeloma comprises a genetically complex multiclonal cancer. Relapse and the development of refractory disease occur primarily due to the emergence of subclonal resistant populations of cells and the inability to induce cell death in the residual population. Identifying ways to engage common distal effectors of apoptosis can circumvent the proximal resistance promoting mechanisms that develop.
The BCL-2 family of proteins is central to regulating the intrinsic pathway of programmed cell death, and novel approaches to targeting these proteins continue to demonstrate therapeutic promise. The BCL-2 proteins are divided into four groups based on structure and function. The antiapoptotic BCL-2, BCL-xL, MCL-1, BCL-w and BFL-1 proteins prevent death by sequestering proapoptotic BH3-only activator proteins BIM, PUMA and BID. The proapoptotic BH3-only sensitizer proteins, NOXA, BAD, BMF and BIK, release activator proapoptotics by binding antiapoptotic proteins. These released proapoptotics activate effector proteins BAX and/or BAK, which oligomerize and permeabilize the outer mitochondrial membrane releasing cytochrome c to activate subsequent steps of apoptosis3,4. The “dependency” on a particular antiapoptotic protein refers to the antiapoptotic that is most pertinent for maintaining a cell’s survival, which is in turn dictated by the sufficiency of proapoptotics bound to that antiapoptotic which upon release would commit a cell to apoptosis5. The BH3 activator, BIM, is highly expressed in cells of hematopoietic origin6 and evaluation of BH3 activators bound to antiapoptotics in MM demonstrated that BIM is the most relevant BH3 activator bound to BCL-27. Despite heavy reliance of MM on MCL-18,9 and correlation of MCL-1 levels with poor prognoses10, targeting BIM−BCL-2 interactions has been shown to induce apoptosis even in MCL-1-dependent MM7.
BH3 mimetics are a class of small molecules that block the interaction of specific proapoptotics with cognate antiapoptotics, releasing bound proapoptotic activators4. Venetoclax is one such selective, potent BCL-2 antagonist11. It is highly effective in BCL-2-dependent malignancies and FDA-approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)12 and with hypomethylating agents azacitidine or decitabine (NCT02203773)13 or low dose cytarabine (NCT02287233) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Intriguingly, a small fraction (approximately 7%) of MM patients (about 40% of the 15–20% of patients exhibiting the 11;14 translocation) respond to single-agent venetoclax14,15,16. Given the plethora of new myeloma therapies, there is need for precision therapy informed by biomarkers or molecular traits. Understanding the basis for single-agent efficacy of venetoclax in t(11;14) myeloma can be highly informative for identifying patients who will benefit from single-agent venetoclax therapy as well as identify targets for developing rational venetoclax containing combinations to expand use of venetoclax beyond the small cohort of patients currently sensitive to venetoclax monotherapy.
Metabolites regulate the primed state, i.e. proximity to the apoptotic threshold, by regulating the expression and binding properties of pro- and antiapoptotic BCL-2 family members17,18,19,20,21. Metabolites such as glucose, glutamine and (R)-2HG22 have previously been shown to regulate BCL-2, MCL-1, BCL-xL, PUMA, NOXA and BIM expression and/or their interactions. Therefore, it is not surprising that perturbing metabolism can alter dependence and sensitivity to specific BH3 mimetics. We previously reported that glutamine deprivation increases BIM binding to BCL-2 thereby sensitizing MM to venetoclax while supplementation with α-ketoglutarate reversed this sensitivity23, affirming metabolic regulation of BCL-2 dependence. We therefore explore the presence of a metabolic basis for t(11;14) myeloma sensitivity to single-agent venetoclax that could aid in identifying (1) venetoclax-sensitive MM in the broader MM population, and (2) metabolic targets that could be inhibited to sensitize resistant MM to venetoclax. Our studies reveal Complex I and the succinate ubiquinone reductase (SQR) activity of Complex II of the ETC as targets for venetoclax sensitization and SQR activity as an assessable predictor of patient response.
Venetoclax-sensitive MM exhibits reduced cellular energetics in contrast to venetoclax-resistant MM
We first assessed differential venetoclax sensitivity in a panel of MM lines. As previously reported14, venetoclax elicited significant cytotoxicity primarily in t(11;14) lines (Fig. 1a). The pattern of increased sensitivity of these cell lines was selective for venetoclax and not detected with other standard myeloma therapeutics i.e. bortezomib and melphalan (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b) or sensitivity to the MCL-1 inhibitor S63845 as reported for the KMS12BM, KMS12PE, KMS11, MM.1S, JJN3, RPMI-8226 and L363 lines24.
To investigate differential energy metabolism in venetoclax-sensitive and -resistant cells, we performed glucose and glutamine carbon isotope tracing using labeled U13C-glucose or U13C-glutamine in resistant non-t(11;14) KMS11 and t(11;14) U266, as well as sensitive t(11;14) KMS12PE and non-t(11;14) OCI-MY5 cell lines (Supplementary Fig. 2). We detected lower TCA cycle metabolite levels in the sensitive compared to venetoclax-resistant lines (Supplementary Fig. 2c, f). Glucose-derived carbon contribution to the TCA cycle intermediates was reduced in venetoclax-sensitive cells, reflected in the diminished pool of citrate, succinate, fumarate and malate along with decrease in 13C enrichment of citrate, α-ketoglutarate, succinate, fumarate and malate in cells supplemented with U-13C-glucose (Supplementary Fig. 2a, d). In contrast, we detected comparable glutamine-derived carbon utilization (Supplementary Fig. 2b, e). The results cannot be explained by reduced nutrient uptake or reduced mitochondrial content in the venetoclax-sensitive lines as these cells do not exhibit a uniformly reduced pattern of glucose or glutamine consumption or proliferation rate (Supplementary Fig. 3a−c), and mitochondrial mass (Supplementary Fig. 4) as assessed by cardiolipin staining25.
Next, we evaluated oxygen consumption rates (OCR) in the MM cell lines. Basal, maximal, coupled OCR and spare respiratory capacity (SRC) were found to be significantly lower in all of the sensitive MM lines (Fig. 1b−e). Interestingly, insensitive t(11;14) lines such as U266 and KMS21BM displayed high basal, maximal and coupled respiration while the sensitive line, OCI-MY5, which does not have a 11;14 translocation, exhibited lower respiratory parameters, suggesting that oxygen consumption and potentially electron transport chain (ETC) activity could segregate venetoclax-sensitive and -resistant MM cells. Importantly, SRC, which is the difference in basal and maximal respiration and reflects the potential to elevate cellular bioenergetics and ATP synthesis during oxidative stress or upon partial Complex I inhibition26, is also reduced in the sensitive cells. In sum, these results suggest that the ETC activities may be suppressed in venetoclax-sensitive cells.
To discern the basis for differential OCR, we next queried the CoMMpass MM trial (NCT0145429, IA11) RNAseq data, to examine ETC gene expression. Since we do not know the response of these patients to venetoclax, we used t(11;14) as proxy for venetoclax sensitivity. Interestingly, this analysis demonstrated marked suppression of ETC-related genes in patients with t(11;14) MM (Fig. 1f) which is in line with our OCR assessment of t(11;14) and venetoclax-sensitive cell lines (Fig. 1).
Venetoclax-sensitive MM exhibits reduced Complex I and Complex II activity
Given reduced OCR in sensitive cells, we examined the activities of mitochondrial Complex I and II. Mitochondrial Complex I and II receive electrons from the electron donors NADH or FADH2 respectively, that are transferred to the terminal electron acceptor (O2) via a series of redox reactions. Complex I or NADH:Coenzyme Q:oxidoreductase is the largest multimeric respiratory complex of ETC comprised of over 40 subunits with its catalytic subunit containing the NADH binding site. Electrons from NADH are transferred to FMN and then to FeS clusters and finally to ubiquinone where ubiquinone is reduced to ubiquinol27. Complex II is the only enzyme that has a direct role both in the TCA cycle and ETC. Complex II/Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) consists of four subunits: SDHA, SDHB, SDHC and SDHD that contain distinct dehydrogenase and oxidoreductase enzymatic activities28. SDHA exposed to the mitochondrial matrix contains the catalytic dicarboxylate binding site for succinate. SDHA is responsible for the SDH activity of Complex II and oxidizes succinate to fumarate in addition to reducing FAD to FADH2. Electrons from FADH2 are then transferred sequentially to Fe-S clusters in SDHB and then to ubiquinone at the Qp site formed by SDHC and D, embedded in the mitochondrial inner membrane29. The reduction of ubiquinone bound in the Qp site to ubiquinol is referred to as the succinate ubiquinone reductase (SQR) activity of Complex II.
We measured Complex I activity using an assay that relies on immunocapture of Complex I from freshly prepared cellular protein extracts. The NADH dehydrogenase activity of immunocaptured Complex I was determined by the oxidation of NADH and simultaneous reduction of the provided dye resulting in increase in absorbance. SDH and SQR activities were measured in live permeabilized cells, containing intact mitochondria pretreated with inhibitors of Complex I (rotenone), Complex III (antimycin) and Complex IV (sodium azide), allowing for selective measurement of SQR or SDH activity. In the assay, SDH activity correlates with electron transfer from succinate to the Fe-S clusters to the water-soluble dye 5-methyl-phenazinium methyl sulfate (PMS) to the final acceptor 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT). On the other hand, SQR activity correlates with electron transfer from succinate to the Fe-S clusters to decylubiquinone bound at the Qp site and then final transfer to the redox sensitive dye, 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol (DCPIP)30. The assay is validated by detection of SDH activity only upon addition of the electron donor i.e. succinate and inhibition of activity upon addition of malonate (dicarboxylate binding site competitor) or selective SQR inhibition with thenoyltrifluoroacetone (TTFA) as demonstrated in Supplementary Fig. 5.
We determined that venetoclax-sensitive cells exhibit significantly lower Complex I activity (p value = 0.008) and SQR and SDH activities (p values = 0.0007) than resistant lines including t(11;14) U266 and KMS21BM (Fig. 2a−c), correlating with venetoclax sensitivity. The activity of citrate synthase (a TCA cycle enzyme) was similar in sensitive and resistant lines (p value = 0.2824) (Fig. 2d) suggesting the presence of an equivalently functional TCA cycle enzyme activity in contrast to the ETC activities. Interestingly, Complex I subunit (NDUFS2) and SDH subunit protein expression levels (Supplementary Fig. 6a, b) did not correlate with Complex I, SDH or SQR activity (Fig. 2a−c), underscoring the importance of assessing enzymatic activity over subunit gene expression to explain their functional contribution.
We also investigated whether other cancers demonstrate a correlation between low SQR activity and venetoclax sensitivity. We evaluated DLBCL lines ((SUDHL-4, SUDHL-6, U2932, OCI-LY19, OCI-LY10, HBL-1) for both SQR activity and venetoclax sensitivity. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 7, we did not detect a correlation between low SQR activity and venetoclax sensitivity suggesting that the relationship between low SQR activity and BCL-2 dependence may be plasma cell context specific (further elaborated upon in Discussion).
Inhibition of SQR with Qp site inhibitor TTFA sensitizes resistant MM to venetoclax
Given the under studied and unique role of Complex II in directly connecting the TCA cycle to the ETC, we tested the impact of selectively inhibiting either the SDH or SQR activities of Complex II on venetoclax sensitivity. We tested the venetoclax sensitization effects of TTFA (SQR inhibitor) or 3NPA (SDH inhibitor) on eight venetoclax-resistant MM lines (Fig. 3a−h). 3NPA is a structural analog of succinate, which binds irreversibly with SDH inhibiting FAD reduction and fumarate production while TTFA is a direct Qp site inhibitor28. Inhibition of SQR in resistant MM lines, with the Qp site inhibitor TTFA, increased sensitivity to venetoclax in six of the eight lines tested (Fig. 3a−h). 3NPA on the other hand was less effective compared to TTFA in eliciting sensitivity to venetoclax. We also tested the efficacy of the TTFA−venetoclax cotreatment strategy in a colony-forming unit assay. MM lines (L363 and KMS11) were cultured in an agar matrix with single agents or the combination. Similar to results obtained in suspension culture, TTFA treatment sensitized MM lines to a lower dose of venetoclax (0.1 μM) reducing cellular viability (Supplementary Fig. 8). These results highlight the sufficiency of targeting the Qp site/quinone reductase activity of Complex II to induce BCL-2 dependence and sensitization to venetoclax. To demonstrate the selectivity of TTFA inhibiting SQR activity, we evaluated SQR, SDH, and CS activities in TTFA-treated KMS11 cells. We found significant reduction in SQR activity upon TTFA treatment (Fig. 3i), while SDH (Fig. 3j) and CS (Fig. 3k) activities remained unaffected. SRC was also concordantly reduced in the TTFA-treated KMS11 cells but not in unsensitized U266 and KMS21BM cells (Supplementary Fig. 9).
SQR inhibition via Qp site SDHC-mutant introduction is sufficient to sensitize MM to venetoclax
To further interrogate the sufficiency of SQR inhibition in inducing venetoclax sensitivity, we generated a Qp site variant of SDHC by mutating arginine to cysteine at position 72 which shows less binding affinity with ubiquinone31. We generated an SDHC guide RNA targeting an intronic region prior to the first SDHC exon so that we would not target the exogenously introduced SDHC-R72C mutant enzyme. We expressed the mutant in SDHC knockout (KO) L363 and KMS11 cell lines. This strategy was adapted as the SDHC KO cells did not survive in culture. As anticipated, cells expressing the SDHC-R72C mutant exhibited selective reduction of SQR activity (Fig. 4a) while maintaining SDH (Fig. 4b) and CS (Fig. 4c) activity as compared to SDHC-WT cells. We also confirmed that Complex I activity was maintained in SDHC-R72C mutant-expressing KMS11 cells (Supplementary Fig. 10). The SDHC-R72C mutant sensitized KMS11- and L363-resistant MM cells to venetoclax (Fig. 4d), demonstrating that the Qp site and SQR inhibition is sufficient for inducing venetoclax sensitivity, despite maintenance of SDH, CS and Complex I activities. Since venetoclax-sensitive cells exhibited reduced mitochondrial respiratory parameters, we evaluated basal, maximal and coupled respiration in parental and SDHC-R72C mutant cells. Both KMS11 and L363 SDHC-R72C mutant cells exhibited a reduction in SRC (Fig. 4e), concordant with the loss of SQR activity. In summary, these results demonstrate that selective Complex II SQR inhibition increases BCL-2 dependence and venetoclax sensitivity.
ATF4, BIM and NOXA regulate TTFA-induced venetoclax sensitivity in MM
To identify the mechanistic basis for SQR inhibition-related venetoclax sensitivity, we evaluated the expression of ATF4, a transcription factor typically upregulated in response to cellular stresses such as ER stress, hypoxia and amino acid deprivation32,33. We also evaluated expression levels and binding properties of BCL-2 family members in SDHC-R72C mutants and resistant MM cells treated with and without TTFA. We detected increased expression of ATF4, NOXA, and a variable increase in BIM and/or BCL-2 protein expression in TTFA-treated MM cells (Fig. 5a). In addition, SDHC-R72C expressing mutants (Fig. 5b) exhibited a similar pattern of ATF4, BIM and BCL-2 induction. To interrogate the significance of ATF4 induction in venetoclax sensitization, we suppressed ATF4 expression in KMS11 and JJN3 cells using an ATF4 siRNA pool (KD efficiency demonstrated in (Fig. 5e) and the individual siRNAs (shown in Supplementary Fig. 11). Control and ATF4 siRNA-transfected cells were treated with or without TTFA and assessed for sensitivity to venetoclax. ATF4 KD significantly reversed venetoclax sensitivity, rescuing cell viability in venetoclax and TTFA cotreated cells (Fig. 5c, d and Supplementary Fig. 11) suggesting its role in elevating BCL-2 dependence. Importantly, TTFA-induced NOXA expression was reversed with ATF4 KD (Fig. 5e), while the induction of BIM and BCL-2 was variable. BIM induction was reduced in TTFA-treated KMS11 cells with ATF4 KD but maintained in TTFA-treated JJN3 cells (Fig. 5e). Knockdown of ATF4 also reduced the induction of BCL-2 and BAK in TTFA-treated JJN3 cells, identifying cell-context-specific contributory roles of other BCL-2 family proteins in elevating BCL-2 dependence in SQR-inhibited cells. The reduction in NOXA induction detected in the ATF4 KD cells (KMS11 and JJN3) treated with TTFA (Fig. 5e) suggests a role for NOXA in TTFA-induced venetoclax sensitivity. NOXA can displace BIM bound to MCL-1 to promote BIM binding to BCL-2 thereby increasing BCL-2 dependence in MM7.
To evaluate the role of BIM in TTFA-induced BCL-2 dependency, we generated a CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of BIM in KMS11 and L363 cells. BIM KO reversed the cytotoxic effect of cotreatment with TTFA and venetoclax in both KMS11 and L363 cells (Fig. 5f, g). This effect was observed despite the maintenance of ATF4 expression (Fig. 5h, i), suggesting it to be a downstream effector. These results confirm BIM as the major proapoptotic protein in TTFA/SQR inhibition-induced venetoclax sensitivity. We similarly tested the requirement for NOXA induction in TTFA-induced venetoclax sensitivity. Using NOXA KO lines (RPMI-8226 and KMS18), we demonstrate a lack of induction of NOXA in TTFA-treated NOXA KO as anticipated (Fig. 5l, n), and, importantly, a loss of TTFA-induced sensitivity to venetoclax (Fig. 5m, o). NOXA KO efficiency and expression levels of ATF4, BIM and BCL-2 were evaluated and are shown in (Fig. 5l, n).
Next, we investigated the regulation of ATF4, BIM and NOXA in MM cells that were not sensitized by TTFA treatment. We evaluated whole-cell lysates for total protein expression and performed coimmunoprecipitations to examine binding of BIM with antiapoptotic BCL-2 in KMS11 and the TTFA insensitive-t(11;14) KMS21BM cells. We excluded U266 from this study as it does not express NOXA34. We observed induction of BIM and NOXA upon TTFA treatment (Fig. 5j) only in KMS11 not in the TTFA insensitive-t(11;14) KMS21BM cells. Coimmunoprecipation of BCL-2 from control or TTFA-treated cells also demonstrated elevated BIM binding to BCL-2 in TTFA-treated KMS11 cells in contrast to the resistant KMS21BM cells (Fig. 5k). Cumulatively, these results identify NOXA and BIM to facilitate TTFA-ATF4-induced venetoclax MM sensitization.
SQR activity inversely correlates with venetoclax sensitivity in MM patient samples
In order to clinically validate our observations, we utilized MM patient samples to (1) evaluate the impact of TTFA treatment on inducing sensitivity to venetoclax and (2) evaluate SQR activity in purified MM cells and its correlation with venetoclax cytotoxicity ex vivo and the response of patients being administered venetoclax (Trial NCT01794520: a Phase I Study Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of venetoclax in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma). Complex I comprising of over 40 subunits is difficult to assay35. A direct evaluation of the NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase activity of Complex I requires release of Complex I from whole cells or manipulation of purified mitochondria as mitochondria are impermeable to NADH. On the other hand, SQR activity can be assessed in a fast and direct activity measurement assay using permeabilized cells. Due to the caveats associated with Complex I activity measurement and the simplicity of the SQR activity measurement assay, we further assessed SQR activity in purified CD138+ MM cells from patient samples.
Bone marrow aspirate samples from 50 MM patients (characteristics reported in Supplementary Table 1) were treated with three doses of venetoclax (0.01, 0.1 and 0.5 μM) or TTFA (100 μM), or the combination for 24 h and cell death was assessed by AnnexinV staining. These results show that the combination of TTFA plus 0.1 μM venetoclax resulted in significantly more cell death in 50 primary myeloma cells (Fig. 6a). A venetoclax IC50 <0.1 μM is characterized as a sensitive sample based on previous studies in MM that evaluated venetoclax IC50 in relation to sensitivity36,37. By this criteria 15 of 50 (30%) samples were sensitized by TTFA treatment (Supplementary Table 1). However, comparison of the IC50 of venetoclax plus TTFA vs. venetoclax alone showed that 46 of 50 (92%) had increased venetoclax sensitivity with 31 (62%) showing more than a 50% decrease in IC50 (Fig. 6b). Of the 31 samples where TTFA did reduce their IC50 by at least 50%, 11 exhibited the t(11;14) translocation (Supplementary Table 1). TTFA sensitized MM cells to venetoclax, increasing cell death in CD38+ CD45− gated MM cells (Fig. 6c, d) with no to minimal impact on viability of the non-MM cells contained within the aspirate (Supplementary Fig. 12), suggestive of the selective synthetic lethality of this combination in MM cells.
We were also able to assess SQR activity in purified CD138+ MM cells from 14 samples (SQR activity, venetoclax IC50 and patient sample characteristics presented in Fig. 6e). There was a positive correlation between SQR activity and venetoclax insensitivity/resistance ex vivo (Spearman’s rank correlation, ρ = 0.824, p < 0.001), validating our observations in cell lines where low SQR activity correlates with venetoclax sensitivity (Fig. 6f). We found low SQR activity (i.e. <0.25 nmol min−1 mL−1) in four patient samples, including two non-t(11;14) (PS10001591 and PS10001750), to correspond with ex vivo venetoclax sensitivity i.e. venetoclax IC50 < 0.1 μM. In addition, three patients PS10001245-2 and PS10001620 which were t(11;14) and PS10001591, a non-t(11;14), either on the M15-538 trial (NCT02899052) or off trial were found to have low SQR activity and a clinical response (as described in Supplementary Table 1).
On the other hand, among the ten resistant samples (based on ex vivo sensitivity), all having high SQR activity, five exhibited the t(11;14) translocation, highlighting the ability of SQR activity to identify venetoclax-resistant MM among t(11;14) MM. One of these patients (PS10001551-2) was a post-venetoclax treatment refractory sample, the other (PS10001658) failed to achieve an objective response and the third (PS10001570) was responsive, as reported in Supplementary Table 1. While all ten resistant samples showed increased sensitivity to venetoclax upon TTFA treatment, seven samples showed greater than 50% reduction in IC50 values. Importantly, PS10001551-2 that showed more than tenfold reduction in IC50 was the t(11;14) patient who relapsed on venetoclax and was additionally refractory to other therapies. This patient’s MM cells exhibited high SQR activity highlighting (1) SQR activity correlates with a refractory patient response (Supplementary Table 1) and the ability of SQR inhibition to induce venetoclax sensitization. While our sample size for correlation with patient response is small, we believe the correlation of SQR activity with patient response warrants further investigation.
Inhibition of Complex I and distal ETC Complexes sensitize MM to venetoclax
To further inquire whether Complex I inhibition could also sensitize MM cells to venetoclax, we tested a Complex I inhibitor (IACS-01075938, currently in phase I clinical trials for relapse refractory AML (NCT02882321) and relapse refractory lymphoma and solid tumors (NCT03291938)). Treatment of three representative resistant lines (KMS11, L363 both non-t(11;14); and KMS21BM a t(11;14) line) with increasing doses of IACS-010759 sensitized cells to 0.5 μM venetoclax after a 24 h treatment (Fig. 7a). Further, Complex I inhibitor piericidin also sensitized resistant MM cell lines to venetoclax (Supplementary Fig. 13a, b). Western blot analysis of cells treated with 25 nM IACS-010759 for 24 h revealed induction of ATF4 and NOXA suggesting that, similar to TTFA, IACS-010759 also sensitizes MM cells to venetoclax through regulation of ATF4 and NOXA (Fig. 7b). The dose of IACS-010759 was selected based on proximity to the IC50 of IACS-010759 in combination with 0.5 μM venetoclax and minimal impact of single-agent IACS-010759 on viability after a 24 h treatment (Fig. 7a). Cotreatment with 25 nM IACS-010759 significantly reduced the IC50 of venetoclax in the tested cell lines (Fig. 7c). We next tested if inhibition of Complex III, IV and V could also sensitize resistant MM to venetoclax. As seen with Complex I and SQR inhibition, inhibition of Complex III, IV and V by Complex III inhibitor (antimycin), Complex IV inhibitor (sodium azide) and Complex V inhibitor (oligomycin) at doses which reduced ATP levels by about 50% after 24 h (Supplementary Fig. 13c, d) sensitized L363, KMS11 and KMS21BM to venetoclax (Supplementary Fig. 13e−g).
Lastly, we tested the efficacy of IACS-010759 in sensitizing MM patient samples to venetoclax. Details of the patient samples and IC50 values are summarized in Supplementary Table 2. We found that eight out of nine samples showed increased sensitivity with IACS and there was >50% reduction in the IC50 of venetoclax in five of the samples (Supplementary Table 2). Interestingly, out of the two t(11;14) patient samples (PS10001582 and PS10001832), PS10001832 was resistant to venetoclax alone and was significantly sensitized on treatment with IACS-010759 (IC50 of Ven + IACS = 0.01732 µM). This suggests that IACS-010759 can be used to sensitize non-t(11;14) MM and venetoclax-resistant t(11;14) patients, only 40% of which are responsive to single-agent venetoclax. These results are summarized in Fig. 7d. Additionally, similar to TTFA, combined treatment of IACS-010759 with venetoclax had minimal impact on the viability of non-MM cells contained within the aspirate (Supplementary Fig. 14). In sum, IACS-010759 reduced the IC50 for venetoclax and sensitized MM patient samples to single-agent venetoclax providing translational impetus for testing this combination in MM.
To summarize our findings, a model for the mechanistic basis for induction of BCL-2 dependence with IACS-010759 and TTFA is presented in Fig. 7e.
MM cells expressing the t(11;14) translocation afford a unique opportunity to investigate the intrinsic mechanisms responsible for BCL-2 dependence and identify biology that can be harnessed to increase venetoclax sensitivity in the broader resistant MM population. We were specifically interested in determining whether metabolism and cellular energetics played a role in the increased BCL-2 dependence and sensitivity of t(11;14) MM to venetoclax.
The primary translocations in myeloma occur early in the evolution of the disease and the t(11;14) translocation juxtaposes the cyclin D1 gene to the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) gene enhancer resulting in dysregulated cyclin D1 expression39. Cyclin D1-dependent activation of CDK4/6 promotes G1-S phase cell cycle transition. Cyclin D1 also exhibits a number of CDK-independent functions by regulating more than 35 transcription factors to block cellular differentiation, proliferation, mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation40. While our CoMMpass data analysis does not have matching venetoclax sensitivity data making it impossible to identify a venetoclax-sensitive gene signature, the observation of reduced ETC gene expression in t(11;14) vs. non-t(11;14) suggests that ETC activity may be a biomarker of venetoclax sensitivity. We have used t(11;14) as a proxy as ~40% of t(11;14) patients are venetoclax-sensitive whereas <6% of non-t(11;14) are venetoclax-sensitive37,41. This is supported by our functional studies in cell lines that demonstrated reduced ETC activity to be critical to venetoclax sensitivity. Our study has illuminated that low SQR activity is a reliable read-out of venetoclax sensitivity in all MM cells, irrespective of t(11;14) status. Importantly, SQR activity can be evaluated in intact permeabilized whole cells in a fast and direct activity measurement assay. Direct assessment of the ubiquinone reductase activity of Complex I is technically challenging as it requires isolation of mitochondria followed by permeabilization while maintaining the structure and activity of Complex I35. SQR activity on the other hand can be determined in semi-permeabilized whole cells supplemented with exogenous succinate.
We also sought to understand whether an elevation in OXPHOS promotes resistance to venetoclax. We have previously demonstrated that glutamine deprivation (that suppresses OXPHOS) sensitizes resistant MM cell lines and patient samples to venetoclax23. Importantly, this sensitization to venetoclax was reversed upon supplementation of the glutamine-deprived cells with cell permeant α-ketoglutarate, suggesting that restoration of OXPHOS promotes resistance to venetoclax23. Interestingly, recent studies in venetoclax-relapsed CLL also demonstrate changes in cellular metabolism and an elevation in OXPHOS to promote venetoclax resistance42, supporting our observations of elevated OXPHOS correlating with reduced BCL-2 dependence.
The dependence of B cells on specific prosurvival BCL-2 members is activation, development and differentiation stage specific. The activation/differentiation of normal murine B cells is associated with increased ABT-737 (a Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-w antagonist) sensitivity due to a decline in BCL-2 and increase in BCL-xL expression upon differentiation to a plasma cell43. Additionally, prior studies testing the effects of ABT-737 on the murine immune system showed ABT-737 to inhibit the establishment of newly arising bone marrow plasma cells and memory B cells with no effect on pre-existing plasma cells, or germinal center B cells44. These results suggest that in B cells, BCL-2 dependence is regulated in an activation and/or differentiation-stage-specific manner. With respect to metabolism, B-cell activation and differentiation to a plasma cell are associated with an increased dependency on the TCA and OXPHOS45,46. t(11;14) MM are differentiated antibody-producing plasma cells. However, early studies examining expression profiles of CD138+ MM in the CD2 subgroup of CCND1/CCND2-amplified MM cells identified elevated expression of B-cell lineage markers like MS4A1/CD20, VPREB and PAX547. Thus, a multiple myeloma plasma cell malignancy which should be exhibiting elevated OXPHOS may get locked into metabolically compromised suppressed ETC state upon expressing/maintaining B-cell-like features. This suppression of the ETC activity is thus also associated with the sensitivity to venetoclax (Fig. 1a), allowing for a potent strategy of synthetic lethality with venetoclax. Interestingly, the non-t(11;14) OCI-MY5 line that exhibits low SQR activity and venetoclax sensitivity is also likely to be more B-cell-like or undifferentiated based on its high expression of CD20 (VA Gupta and LH Boise, unpublished observations). SQR activity in the limited number of DLBCL lines we assessed was low and we were unable to detect a correlation between low SQR activity and venetoclax sensitivity, again supportive of a differentiation-specific component to ETC activity and BCL-2 dependence.
Our studies have allowed us to also unravel the ETC as a target for venetoclax sensitization. Our initial studies focused on Complex II. SDH is unique in that it is the only ETC complex with all four subunits being solely nuclear encoded and exclusively positioned to function in both the TCA and ETC. The four SDH subunits have distinct roles with mutations in SDHA (albeit rare) linked to impaired oxidative phosphorylation and severe metabolic disorders48 while mutations in SDH B, C and D are linked to tumorigenesis when present with Complex I deficiency49. Disruption of SQR activity with the introduction of the SDHC R72C mutant31 or with TTFA treatment that disrupts the SQR activity of the enzyme without impacting SDH activity or Complex I activity sensitizes MM cells to venetoclax, underscoring the sufficiency of targeting SQR to induce BCL-2 dependence. Previous work has shown that death-resistant cells have increased SRC50 and Complex II plays a role in maintaining SRC and resistance to death51. Here we show that venetoclax-resistant MM exhibit significantly higher SRC than venetoclax-sensitive MM and inhibition of SQR by TTFA or the R72 SDHC mutant lowers the SRC of venetoclax-resistant MM and sensitizes them to venetoclax. Our observations thus warrant the development of selective potent SQR inhibitors for creating a heightened dependence on BCL-2 and venetoclax sensitivity. Studies in AML have shown that targeting Complex II with azacitidine induced venetoclax sensitivity52. Previous studies have demonstrated that the oncometabolite (R)-2-HG expressed in IDH 1/2 mutant-expressing AML induces BCL-2 dependence by suppressing cytochrome c oxidase (Complex IV)53 While we subsequently show that targeting the other ETC complexes can also sensitize to venetoclax, the unique aspect of Complex II in not contributing to proton transport but being a conduit of electrons from succinate to labile ubiquinone, whose inhibition can generate signals that can elevate BCL-2 dependence, are worthy of further exploration.
Complex II is linked to the generation of ROS, accumulation of succinate and the induction of HIF1-α54 that can lead to induction of ATF455. ATF4 is post-translationally induced as part of the integrated stress response to anoxia, hypoxia, proteasome inhibition or nutrient deprivation, upregulating genes that sustain amino acid metabolism and anti-oxidant responses56. ATF4 has both prosurvival effects through the activation of autophagy33 and proapoptotic effects through the induction of C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) which in turn induces BIM57, NOXA58 and PUMA59. NOXA has previously been implicated in inducing BCL-2 dependence and sensitivity to venetoclax36, implicated in bortezomib cytotoxicity in MM60 and in panobinostat sensitivity of DLBCL61. ATF4 in specific cellular contexts can induce NOXA62,63 which, in binding MCL-1, can increase the quantity of BIM bound to BCL-2, potentially explaining TTFA-induced BCL-2 dependency. We must note that U266 cells do not express basal NOXA34 and NOXA was not induced with TTFA treatment in U266 which could contribute to its reduced sensitivity to BCL-2 antagonists. However, interestingly, while both ATF4 and NOXA are induced in KMS21BM upon treatment with TTFA and IACS-010759, 100 μM TTFA does not sensitize these cells to venetoclax. This can be explained by the difference in the levels of induction of ATF4 and NOXA proteins upon Complex I and Complex II inhibition. Concordantly, the higher level of ATF4 and NOXA induction upon IACS-010759 treatment is enough to sensitize KMS21BM to venetoclax. On the other hand, the low level of NOXA induction in case of TTFA treatment of KMS21BM is not sufficient to increase BIM binding on BCL-2 (Fig. 5k) and sensitize the cells to venetoclax treatment.
Studies from the Letai group have clearly established that refractory cancers, including MM and other cancers subject to prior chemotherapy, exhibit reduced “priming” i.e. exhibit suboptimal quantities of BH3 activators bound to antiapoptotics, increasing the threshold required to induce apoptosis64,65,66,67. Hence, approaches that can increase the “primed” state of the cell will not only increase sensitivity to existing chemotherapy but also enhance sensitivity to BH3 mimetics. Normal cells, on the other hand, being further removed from the apoptotic threshold are not sensitized by ETC inhibition and venetoclax cotreatment, further supported by our observations on the insensitivity of non-MM cells to the venetoclax IACS-010759/TTFA + venetoclax treatment. Several strategies (dexamethasone36,37 with or without a proteasome inhibitor (NCT02755597) for MM, hypomethylating agents in AML13,52,68) are being tested to increase BCL-2 dependence and sensitivity to venetoclax. It is the presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) that is well connected to the emergence of refractory disease. There continues to be an unmet need in achieving deeper responses in t(11;14) patients to remove MRD and reduce toxicity. Therefore, we believe that identification of novel targets to achieve sensitization even in t(11;14) patient samples is important. The isolated myeloma patient samples, in contrast to cell lines, are not proliferating ex vivo. It is possible that proliferating cells (more characteristic of poor prognosis MM47) are more dependent upon OXPHOS due to energetic and biosynthetic requirements of cell division and thus could make them more sensitive to targeting ETC activity. Given the genetic heterogeneity of MM, targeting the ETC has the potential to maximize the clinical application of the highly potent BCL-2 antagonist, venetoclax, and provide a more unifying approach to tackle refractory resistant MM.
Chemicals and reagents
Standard chemicals, 2-thenoyltrifluoroacetone (TTFA; #T27006), rotenone (#R8875), sodium azide BioXtra (#S8032), antimycin A (#A8674), dimethyl malonate (#04011), d-α tocopherol succinate (#T3126), 2,6-dichloroindophenol sodium salt hydrate (DCPIP; #D1878), phenazine methosulphate (PMS; #P9625), MTT (#M5655), acetyl CoA (#A2181), 5,5′-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB; #D218200), bovine serum albumin (#A6003), doxycycline hyclate (#D9891), 3-Nitropropionic acid (#N5636) and oxaloacetic acid (#O4126) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Carbonyl cyanide p-trifluoro-methoxyphenyl hydrazone (FCCP; #BML-CM120-0010) was purchased from Enzo Life Sciences. Venetoclax (#2253-1) and IACS-010759 (#B2231-1) were purchased from Biovision Inc. Potassium phosphate monobasic (KH2PO4; #BP362-500) and ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA; #BP118-500) were purchased from Fisher Scientific. Decylubiquinone was purchased from Abcam (#ab145233). Oligomycin was purchased from Merck Millipore (#495455). Triton X-100 (0694) was purchased from Amresco. Polybrene (#TR-1003-G) was purchased from Millipore. Puromycin (#631306) was purchased from Clontech.
MM cell lines were obtained from the following sources: KMS18 (Dr. L Bergsagel, Mayo Clinic, AZ), RPMI-8226 (ATCC), U266, L363, KMS11, JJN3 (Dr. M. Kuehl, NCI, MD), MM.1S (Dr. S. Rosen, City of Hope, CA), KMS18, KMS21BM, KMS12BM, KMS12PE and KMS27 from JCRB Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources and KARPAS-620, OCI-MY5 and H1112 from Jonathan Keats, TGEN, City of Hope affiliate. DLBCL cell lines were obtained from the following sources: OCI-LY-19, OCI-LY-10 and HBL-1 from Dr. C. Henry; SUDHL-4, SUDHL-6 and U2932 from Dr. L. Mizrachi-Bernal, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. HEK 293T cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection.
MM cell lines were routinely cultured in complete RPMI-1640 (Corning #10-040-CV) with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS, DLBCL lines in 20% FBS), HEK293T cells in Dulbeccoʼs Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Sigma #D5030) with 10% FBS and 100 U per mL penicillin, 100 µg per mL streptomycin and maintained in a 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2.
Cells were harvested and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and whole cell lysates were prepared with RIPA buffer supplemented with phosphatase and protease inhibitors and 1% phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) for 30 min on ice. Debris was removed by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min. Total protein concentration was determined using Bio-Rad Protein Assay Dye Reagent Concentrate (#5000006). Samples were normalized to a total protein concentration of 20−30 µg and resolved using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (Bio-Rad #4568096, #4568093) after being boiled at 95 °C for 5 min. Proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore # IPVH00010). Antibodies to: BCL-xL (#2764), BIM (#2933), PUMA (#4976), BAX (#2772), BID (#2002), and BCL-2 (#4223) were obtained from Cell Signaling; MCL-1 (#sc-819), SDHA (F-2) (sc-390381), SDHB (G-10) (#sc-271548), SDHC (C-2) (#sc-515102) and NDUFS2 (B-3) (#sc-390596) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; ATF4 (#ab23760) from Abcam; beta-actin (#A5441), BAK (#06-536) and NOXA (#OP180) from Sigma-Aldrich. Antibody to BCL-2 (Hamster) used in co-IP was purchased from BD-Pharmingen (#51-1513GR). PVDF membranes were incubated in blocking solution (5% milk in tris-buffered saline with tween TBST) for 1 h followed by washing and incubation with primary antibodies (1:1000 dilution made in BLOK™ Casein in TBS (G-Biosciences, #786-196)) overnight. Secondary antibodies were used at a dilution of 3:10,000 in blocking solution for 1 h.
Cells were washed once with PBS and lysed in 3-((3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio)-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors and PMSF for 30 min on ice. Debris was removed by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min. Total protein concentration was determined using Bio-Rad Protein Assay Dye Reagent Concentrate (#5000006). 340 µL lysates containing 113 µg protein were precleared by incubating for 1 h at 4 °C with 50 µL of Protein G Agarose (Millipore#16-266), prewashed with PBS and CHAPS buffer. Precleared lysates were collected by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 2 min at 4 °C and incubated with rotation overnight at 4 °C with 50 µL of Protein G Agarose, preincubated with 7 µL of BCL-2 (CST #4223S) antibody overnight. Pelleted matrix was washed twice with 500 μL ice-cold PBS, and proteins were eluted after boiling at 95 °C for 5 min in 30 µL of 2× electrophoresis sample buffer containing β-mercaptoethanol.
Cell viability assays
For cell viability assays, 0.125 × 106 cells per mL were treated with the indicated concentration of drug and evaluated for viability by AnnexinV/DAPI flow cytometric analysis. Cells were harvested and washed twice with PBS and stained with Annexin V–fluorescein isothiocyanate (BD-Pharminogen# 556419) and DAPI according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were acquired on an FACSCanto II RUO Special Order System flow cytometer from BD (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) and analyzed with the De Novo Software FCS Express Version 4.
Isolation and purification of primary myeloma cells
Bone marrow aspirates or peripheral blood samples from consenting myeloma patients were diluted to 25 mL with PBS and over laid on lymphocyte separation media (Corning). Following centrifugation, the collected buffy coat was washed with PBS and resuspended in culture medium. Cells subject to various treatments were stained with anti-CD38-phyocerythrin and anti-CD45-allophycocyanin-Cy7 (BD Biosciences) to identify MM cells69. All samples were collected following an Emory University Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved protocol in compliance with all relevant ethical regulations. The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent to participate in the study (IRB00057236). CD138+ cells were purified using MACS Miltenyi Biotec CD138+ human microbeads as per instructions (#130-051-301). IC50s of venetoclax alone or in combination with TTFA/IACS-010759 in myeloma samples were calculated using nonlinear regression (curve-fit) analysis under agonist vs. normalized response with variable slope using GraphPad Prism 5.
Enzyme activity assays
Succinate ubiquinone reductase (SQR) and succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) activity assays were performed by absorbance-based assays using different electron acceptors. 0.3 × 106 cells were harvested per sample, washed with PBS and resuspended in buffer containing 10 mM KH2PO4 (pH 7.4), 2 mM EDTA and 1 mg per mL BSA, 10 mM sodium azide, 5 μM rotenone, and 2 μM antimycin (assay buffer). Control, 50 µM TTFA and 5 mM malonate treated samples were supplemented with 20 mM succinate. Sample without succinate was used as a negative control for the assay. For SQR assay, reaction was initiated by adding reaction buffer containing 80 µM decylubiquinone and 80 µM DCPIP (molar extinction coefficient = 19.1 mM−1cm−1). Reduction in the absorbance of DCPIP was monitored at 600 nm every min for 10 min using a BioTek SYNERGY H1 microplate reader. For SDH assay, reaction was initiated by adding reaction buffer containing 400 µM phenazine methosulphate (PMS) as an exogenous electron carrier and 150 µM MTT (molar extinction coefficient = 13 mM−1 cm−1). Change in the absorbance of MTT was monitored at 570 nm for 10 min at 1 min intervals. Citrate synthase activity assay was measured in 0.3 × 106 cells harvested per sample and washed with PBS. Cells were resuspended in 10 mM Tris (pH 8.5) and 0.1% Triton X-100 assay buffer, containing 300 µM acetyl CoA and 100 µM 5,5′-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB = molar extinction coefficient 13.6 mM−1 cm−1). Reaction was started by the addition of 0.5 mM oxaloacetic acid and change in absorbance recorded at 412 nm wavelength every min for 10 min70. SQR, SDH and CS activity measurements were performed with 100 µL sample containing 0.3 × 106 permeabilized cells. Complex I activity assay was performed using Abcam (ab109721) Complex I Enzyme Activity Microplate Assay Kit (Colorimetric), per instructions. Complex I specific antibodies are precoated in the microplate wells where target was immobilized. Complex I activity was determined by following the oxidation of NADH to NAD+ and the simultaneous reduction of the provided dye (ε = 25.9 mM−1 well−1) which leads to increased absorbance at OD 450 nm. Complex I activity measurements were perfomed with 250 µg total protein per sample resuspended in 200 µL assay buffer. Enzyme activities were calculated from the change in absorbance using the extinction coefficients of the respective dyes.
Oxygen consumption rate
Basal, maximal and coupled respiration were determined by measuring OCR using Seahorse bioscience extracellular flux (XFe96) analyzer71,72. Myeloma cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium treated or untreated with TTFA for 24 h in a six-well plate. Harvested cells were washed with PBS and plated at 80,000 cells per well in 5−8 replicates in Cell-Tak (Becton Dickinson)-precoated 96-well plates custom designed for XFe96 analysis following the manufacturer’s recommendations. OCR was evaluated over time after injection of oligomycin (final concentration 2.5 µM), carbonyl cyanide p-trifluoro-methoxyphenyl hydrazone (FCCP; final concentration 0.5 µM), and antimycin and rotenone (final concentration 2 µM each). The results from the mitochondrial respiration assay were analyzed by the XFe wave software (Seahorse Bioscience Inc., MA), and displayed as OCR (pmol min−1 per 80,000 cells).
Generation of CRISPR KO cells and siRNA knockdown
Crispr/Cas9 BIM and SDHC knockout (KO) cell lines were generated by designing sgRNAs using the http://crispr.mit.edu/ and http://www.broadinstitute.org/rnai/public/analysis-tools/sgrna-design-v1 web tools. sgRNA for SDHC was designed targeting the intron region just before the Exon 1 of sdhc. “CACCG” was added towards the 5′ end of 20-nt guide sequence. “AAAC” was added at the 5′ end and an extra “C” towards the 3′ end of the opposite pair of sgRNA. sgRNA pairs were annealed and cloned in LentiCRISPRv2 vector at the BsmbI site according to GecKO-Zhang’s lab Lentiviral CRISPR Tool box. The following primers were used for inserting SDHC guides into LentiCRISPRv2 vector: CACCGGTCCAGACCGGAACCCAAGA (forward) and AAACTCTTGGGTTCCGGTCTGGACC (reverse). The following primers were used for inserting BIM guides into LentiCRISPRv2 vector: CACCGGTAGACAATTGCAGCCTG (forward) and AAACCAGGCTGCAATTGTCTACC (reverse). Vector was digested with NEB BsmBI restriction enzyme, dephosphorylated with CIP (alkaline phosphatase) and purified using QIAGEN Gel extraction kit as per the manufacturer’s protocol73,74,75. After ligation in LentiCRISPRv2, clones were transformed in Escherichia coli Stbl3 competent cells (Invitrogen# C737303). Plasmids were purified from ampicillin-resistant colonies and sequence confirmed by Sanger sequencing using U6F primer probe. LentiCRISPRv2-sgRNA plasmids were cotransformed with psPAX2 (packaging plasmid) and pMD2.G (VSV-G expressing plasmid, envelope plasmid) in HEK293T cells using jet-PRIME Polyplus transfection reagent to generate virus. Lentiviral particles were transduced in MM cell lines using a standard transduction protocol. Briefly, 1.5 × 106 cells were plated per well in a six-well plate in UltraCulture serum-free medium (Lonza #12-725F) containing 2.5 µg per mL Polybrene Infection/Transfection Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich #TR-1003-G). Spinfection was performed by adding 500 µL of virus solution per well followed by centrifugation at 2500 rpm at room temperature for 1.5 h. The plate was then placed in a 37 °C CO2 incubator for 2 h. Cells were harvested and washed with PBS and resuspended in regular RPMI growth medium and allowed to grow for 72 h. Single-cell clones were generated from cells sorted in 96-well plates. ATF4 siRNA knockdowns were generated using Dharmacon ON-TARGETplus Human ATF4 siRNA pool (L-005125-00-0005) and individual siRNAs from the deconvoluted pool by transfection using V-reagent as per the manufacturer’s protocol.
To generate NOXA KO lines, inducible Cas9 expressing cells were generated using the pCW-Cas9 plasmid through lentiviral infection. Virus was produced by transfecting HEK293T cells with pCW-Cas9 (gift from Eric Lander and David Sabatini: Addgene plasmid # 50661) and packaging plasmids DR8 and VSVg using lipofectamine 2000. Viral supernatant was collected at 48 h, filtered, and supplemented with 4 µg per mL polybrene. Myeloma cells were resuspended in viral supernatant and centrifuged at 1000 × g and 37 °C for 90 min. Infected cells were selected with puromycin for 1−2 weeks before single-cell cloning by limiting dilution. Clones were screened for inducible Cas9 by adding doxycycline at 1 µg per mL for 24 h followed by lysis, SDS-PAGE, and western blot with anti-FLAG antibodies. NOXA CRISPR knockout was achieved by cloning a published sgRNA sequence76 into pLX-sgRNA (gift from Eric Lander and David Sabatini: Addgene plasmid # 50662) using the following primers: GTCGAGTGTGCTACTCAACTCGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAA (forward) and GAGTTGAGTAGCACACTCGACGGTGTTTCGTCCTTTCC (reverse). Virus generation and cell infection were as described above. Twenty-four hours after infection, infected cells were selected with blasticidin. Simultaneously, Cas9 was induced with doxycycline. Cells were maintained in blasticidin and doxycycline for 7−14 days before assessing for knockout by western blot.
Overexpression of SDHC-R72C
SDHCKO was generated as described in previous section. Bacterial stock of cDNA clone of SDHC (BC033626) was purchased from transomic technologies. SDHC-R72C mutation was made using site-directed mutagenesis kit from Invitrogen following the manufacturer’s protocol and constructs containing wild-type and mutated SDHC genes were recloned in PLVX mammalian expression vector using the following primers: CATCTGCCACTGTGGCACTGG (forward) and GACATCGCCATGGGAAGAG (reverse). Lentivirus particles containing these constructs were transduced in SDHCKO myeloma cell lines KMS11 and L363.
10-Nonyl acridine orange (NAO) staining
0.125 × 106 cells were harvested. Cells were washed with PBS and incubated with NAO at a final concentration of 1 µM for 30 min at 37 °C following which they were subject to Annexin-APC/DAPI staining. MFI of stain was evaluated on live cells by flow cytometry.
Colony-forming unit (CFU) assay
CFU assays were performed using the CytoSelect 96-Well In Vitro Tumor Sensitivity Assay (Soft Agar Colony Formation) from Cell Bio Labs, Inc. with modifications for quantitation. Cells were harvested and plated at 0.03 × 106 cells per well according to the manufacturer’s instructions and incubated for 8 days. For quantification of viable cells, Nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) (Sigma) was added on day 7 at a concentration of 1 mg per mL to each well and incubated for 24 h at 37°C prior to reading the plate. The plates were read using a BioTek Lionheart plate reader under Texas Red autofluorescence. Images taken for one well were stitched together using the Gen5 Image+ 3.04 software in the red channel with a linear blend fusion method. Six focal planes were condensed into minimum Z projections and subsequently analyzed using Gen5 Cellular Analysis.
10,000 cells per 100 µL were plated in triplicates in a 96-well white flat bottom plate (Greiner CELLSTAR # 655083) with inhibitors (25 nM IACS-010759, 100 µM TTFA, 5 nM antimycin, 0.1 mM azide and 2.5 nM oligomycin) for 24 h. ATP levels were assessed 10 min after adding 100 µL of CellTiter-Glo Assay Reagent (Promega # G9248) to each well using a BioTek SYNERGY H1 microplate reader following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Differential expression was estimated between patients with and without t(11;14) translocation, identified from SeqFISH data from the same database. R package, DESeq2 was used to calculate differential gene expression and perform statistical analysis. Multiple hypothesis testing was performed using independent hypothesis weighting using the IHW R Package. Data are presented as log2 of fold-change in patients with t(11;14) vs. all other patients. All relevant clinical and genetics data were obtained from the MMRF CoMMpass study version 11a. Statistical significance (adjusted p value < 0.01) is highlighted for gene names in bold-italic font.
Statistical analyses and reproducibility
Results are expressed as ±SEM of at least three independent experiments unless indicated otherwise. p values are indicated as follows: p < 0.0001 as **** and p > 0.05 as ns. Representative western blot images from one of three independent experiments are presented unless indicated otherwise.
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
The CoMMpass MM trial (NCT0145429, IA11) data referenced during the study are available in a public repository from the MMRF (https://research.themmrf.org/) website. The source data underlying Figs. 1–7 and Supplementary Figs. 1−14 are provided as a Source Data file. All the other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J. Clin. 67, 7–30 (2017).
Barlogie, B. et al. Curing myeloma at last: defining criteria and providing the evidence. Blood 124, 3043–3051 (2014).
Danial, N. N. & Korsmeyer, S. J. Cell death: critical control points. Cell 116, 205–219 (2004).
Cheng, E. H. et al. BCL-2, BCL-X(L) sequester BH3 domain-only molecules preventing BAX- and BAK-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis. Mol. Cell 8, 705–711 (2001).
Ni Chonghaile, T. & Letai, A. Mimicking the BH3 domain to kill cancer cells. Oncogene 27(Suppl 1), S149–S157 (2008).
O’Reilly, L. A. et al. The proapoptotic BH3-only protein bim is expressed in hematopoietic, epithelial, neuronal, and germ cells. Am. J. Pathol. 157, 449–461 (2000).
Morales, A. A. et al. Distribution of Bim determines Mcl-1 dependence or codependence with Bcl-xL/Bcl-2 in Mcl-1-expressing myeloma cells. Blood 118, 1329–1339 (2011).
Zhang, B., Gojo, I. & Fenton, R. G. Myeloid cell factor-1 is a critical survival factor for multiple myeloma. Blood 99, 1885–1893 (2002).
Derenne, S. et al. Antisense strategy shows that Mcl-1 rather than Bcl-2 or Bcl-x(L) is an essential survival protein of human myeloma cells. Blood 100, 194–199 (2002).
Wuilleme-Toumi, S. et al. Mcl-1 is overexpressed in multiple myeloma and associated with relapse and shorter survival. Leukemia 19, 1248–1252 (2005).
Souers, A. J. et al. ABT-199, a potent and selective BCL-2 inhibitor, achieves antitumor activity while sparing platelets. Nat. Med. 19, 202–208 (2013).
Roberts, A. W., Stilgenbauer, S., Seymour, J. F. & Huang, D. C. Venetoclax in patients with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 4527–4533 (2017).
DiNardo, C. D. et al. Safety and preliminary efficacy of venetoclax with decitabine or azacitidine in elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukaemia: a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1b study. Lancet Oncol. 19, 216–228 (2018).
Touzeau, C. et al. The Bcl-2 specific BH3 mimetic ABT-199: a promising targeted therapy for t(11;14) multiple myeloma. Leukemia 28, 210–212 (2014).
Kumar, S. K. et al. Safety and efficacy of venetoclax (ABT-199/GDC-0199) monotherapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: phase 1 preliminary results. Blood 126, 4219–4219 (2015).
Kumar, S. K. New treatment options for the management of multiple myeloma. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 15, 709–712 (2017).
Coloff, J. L. et al. Akt requires glucose metabolism to suppress puma expression and prevent apoptosis of leukemic T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 5921–5933 (2011).
Zhao, Y. et al. Glycogen synthase kinase 3alpha and 3beta mediate a glucose-sensitive antiapoptotic signaling pathway to stabilize Mcl-1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 4328–4339 (2007).
Danial, N. N. et al. BAD and glucokinase reside in a mitochondrial complex that integrates glycolysis and apoptosis. Nature 424, 952–956 (2003).
Rathmell, J. C. et al. Akt-directed glucose metabolism can prevent Bax conformation change and promote growth factor-independent survival. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 7315–7328 (2003).
McBrayer, S. K. et al. Multiple myeloma exhibits novel dependence on GLUT4, GLUT8, and GLUT11: implications for glucose transporter-directed therapy. Blood 119, 4686–4697 (2012).
Medeiros, B. C. et al. Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations in myeloid malignancies. Leukemia 31, 272–281 (2017).
Bajpai, R. et al. Targeting glutamine metabolism in multiple myeloma enhances BIM binding to BCL-2 eliciting synthetic lethality to venetoclax. Oncogene 35, 3955–3964 (2016).
Kotschy, A. et al. The MCL1 inhibitor S63845 is tolerable and effective in diverse cancer models. Nature 538, 477–482 (2016).
Widlansky, M. E. et al. Altered mitochondrial membrane potential, mass, and morphology in the mononuclear cells of humans with type 2 diabetes. Transl. Res. 156, 15–25 (2010).
Yadava, N. & Nicholls, D. G. Spare respiratory capacity rather than oxidative stress regulates glutamate excitotoxicity after partial respiratory inhibition of mitochondrial complex I with rotenone. J. Neurosci. 27, 7310–7317 (2007).
Vinothkumar, K. R., Zhu, J. & Hirst, J. Architecture of mammalian respiratory complex I. Nature 515, 80–84 (2014).
Sun, F. et al. Crystal structure of mitochondrial respiratory membrane protein complex II. Cell 121, 1043–1057 (2005).
Rutter, J., Winge, D. R. & Schiffman, J. D. Succinate dehydrogenase—assembly, regulation and role in human disease. Mitochondrion 10, 393–401 (2010).
Guo, L. et al. Inhibition of mitochondrial complex II by the anticancer agent lonidamine. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 42–57 (2016).
Kluckova, K. et al. Ubiquinone-binding site mutagenesis reveals the role of mitochondrial complex II in cell death initiation. Cell Death Dis. 6, e1749 (2015).
Qing, G. et al. ATF4 regulates MYC-mediated neuroblastoma cell death upon glutamine deprivation. Cancer Cell 22, 631–644 (2012).
Ye, J. et al. The GCN2-ATF4 pathway is critical for tumour cell survival and proliferation in response to nutrient deprivation. EMBO J. 29, 2082–2096 (2010).
Descamps, G. et al. The cap-translation inhibitor 4EGI-1 induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma through Noxa induction. Br. J. Cancer 106, 1660–1667 (2012).
Grivennikova, V. G., Kapustin, A. N. & Vinogradov, A. D. Catalytic activity of NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I) in intact mitochondria. evidence for the slow active/inactive transition. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 9038–9044 (2001).
Matulis, S. M. et al. Dexamethasone treatment promotes Bcl-2 dependence in multiple myeloma resulting in sensitivity to venetoclax. Leukemia 30, 1086–1093 (2016).
Matulis, S. M. et al. Functional profiling of venetoclax sensitivity can predict clinical response in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 33, 1291–1296 (2019).
Molina, J. R. et al. An inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation exploits cancer vulnerability. Nat. Med. 24, 1036–1046 (2018).
Kuehl, W. M. & Bergsagel, P. L. Multiple myeloma: evolving genetic events and host interactions. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2, 175 (2002).
Pestell, R. G. New roles of cyclin D1. Am. J. Pathol. 183, 3–9 (2013).
Kumar, S. et al. Efficacy of venetoclax as targeted therapy for relapsed/refractory t(11;14) multiple myeloma. Blood 130, 2401–2409 (2017).
Guieze, R. et al. Mitochondrial reprogramming underlies resistance to BCL-2 inhibition in lymphoid malignancies. Cancer Cell 36, 369–384.e13 (2019).
Gaudette, B. T., Iwakoshi, N. N. & Boise, L. H. Bcl-xL protein protects from C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP)-dependent apoptosis during plasma cell differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 23629–23640 (2014).
Carrington, E. M. et al. BH3 mimetics antagonizing restricted prosurvival Bcl-2 proteins represent another class of selective immune modulatory drugs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10967–10971 (2010).
Waters, L. R., Ahsan, F. M., Wolf, D. M., Shirihai, O. & Teitell, M. A. Initial B cell activation induces metabolic reprogramming and mitochondrial remodeling. iScience 5, 99–109 (2018).
Price, M. J., Patterson, D. G., Scharer, C. D. & Boss, J. M. Progressive upregulation of oxidative metabolism facilitates plasmablast differentiation to a T-independent antigen. Cell Rep. 23, 3152–3159 (2018).
Zhan, F. et al. The molecular classification of multiple myeloma. Blood 108, 2020–2028 (2006).
Bardella, C., Pollard, P. J. & Tomlinson, I. SDH mutations in cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1807, 1432–1443 (2011).
Lorendeau, D. et al. Dual loss of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) and complex I activity is necessary to recapitulate the metabolic phenotype of SDH mutant tumors. Metab. Eng. 43, 187–197 (2017).
Nickens, K. P., Wikstrom, J. D., Shirihai, O. S., Patierno, S. R. & Ceryak, S. A bioenergetic profile of non-transformed fibroblasts uncovers a link between death-resistance and enhanced spare respiratory capacity. Mitochondrion 13, 662–667 (2013).
Pfleger, J., He, M. & Abdellatif, M. Mitochondrial complex II is a source of the reserve respiratory capacity that is regulated by metabolic sensors and promotes cell survival. Cell Death Dis. 6, e1835 (2015).
Pollyea, D. A. et al. Venetoclax with azacitidine disrupts energy metabolism and targets leukemia stem cells in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Nat. Med. 24, 1859–1866 (2018).
Chan, S. M. et al. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations induce BCL-2 dependence in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat. Med. 21, 178–184 (2015).
Guzy, R. D., Sharma, B., Bell, E., Chandel, N. S. & Schumacker, P. T. Loss of the SdhB, but Not the SdhA, subunit of complex II triggers reactive oxygen species-dependent hypoxia-inducible factor activation and tumorigenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 718–731 (2008).
Lange, P. S. et al. ATF4 is an oxidative stress-inducible, prodeath transcription factor in neurons in vitro and in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 205, 1227–1242 (2008).
Harding, H. P. et al. An integrated stress response regulates amino acid metabolism and resistance to oxidative stress. Mol. Cell 11, 619–633 (2003).
Puthalakath, H. et al. ER stress triggers apoptosis by activating BH3-only protein Bim. Cell 129, 1337–1349 (2007).
Wang, Q. et al. ERAD inhibitors integrate ER stress with an epigenetic mechanism to activate BH3-only protein NOXA in cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2200–2205 (2009).
Cazanave, S. C. et al. CHOP and AP-1 cooperatively mediate PUMA expression during lipoapoptosis. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 299, G236–G243 (2010).
Punnoose, E. A. et al. Expression profile of BCL-2, BCL-XL, and MCL-1 predicts pharmacological response to the BCL-2 selective antagonist Venetoclax in multiple myeloma models. Mol. Cancer Ther. 15, 1132–1144 (2016).
Liu, Y. et al. NOXA genetic amplification or pharmacologic induction primes lymphoma cells to BCL2 inhibitor-induced cell death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 12034–12039 (2018).
Armstrong, J. L., Flockhart, R., Veal, G. J., Lovat, P. E. & Redfern, C. P. Regulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced cell death by ATF4 in neuroectodermal tumor cells. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 6091–6100 (2010).
Sharma, K. et al. p53-independent Noxa induction by cisplatin is regulated by ATF3/ATF4 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Mol. Oncol. 12, 788–798 (2018).
Deng, J. et al. BH3 profiling identifies three distinct classes of apoptotic blocks to predict response to ABT-737 and conventional chemotherapeutic agents. Cancer Cell 12, 171–185 (2007).
Ni Chonghaile, T. et al. Pretreatment mitochondrial priming correlates with clinical response to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Science 334, 1129–1133 (2011).
Montero, J. et al. Drug-induced death signaling strategy rapidly predicts cancer response to chemotherapy. Cell 160, 977–989 (2015).
Pan, R. et al. Selective BCL-2 inhibition by ABT-199 causes on-target cell death in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Discov. 4, 362–375 (2014).
Jones, C. L. et al. Inhibition of amino acid metabolism selectively targets human leukemia stem cells. Cancer Cell 34, 724–740.e724 (2018).
Mishra, R. K. et al. In silico modeling-based identification of glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4)-selective inhibitors for cancer therapy. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 14441–14453 (2015).
Spinazzi, M., Casarin, A., Pertegato, V., Salviati, L. & Angelini, C. Assessment of mitochondrial respiratory chain enzymatic activities on tissues and cultured cells. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1235–1246 (2012).
Wei, C., Heitmeier, M., Hruz, P. W. & Shanmugam, M. Evaluating the efficacy of GLUT inhibitors using a seahorse extracellular flux analyzer. Methods Mol. Biol. 1713, 69–75 (2018).
Dalva-Aydemir, S. et al. Targeting the metabolic plasticity of multiple myeloma with FDA-approved ritonavir and metformin. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 1161–1171 (2015).
Ran, F. A. et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2281–2308 (2013).
Sanjana, N. E., Shalem, O. & Zhang, F. Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening. Nat. Methods 11, 783–784 (2014).
Shalem, O. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science 343, 84–87 (2014).
O’Neill, K. L., Huang, K., Zhang, J., Chen, Y. & Luo, X. Inactivation of prosurvival Bcl-2 proteins activates Bax/Bak through the outer mitochondrial membrane. Genes Dev. 30, 973–988 (2016).
We would like to thank Anthea Hammond, Ph.D., Emory University for editorial assistance. This study was supported in part by NIH/NCI R01 CA208328 to M.S. and Leukemia Lymphoma Society TRP Award #6573-19 to M.S. Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource of Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University and NIH/NCI under award number P30CA138292 and the Integrated Cellular Imaging Microscopy Core of the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University and NIH/NCI under award number, 2P30CA138292-04. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
S.K.M. is a consultant for Agios Pharmaceuticals; L.H.B. is a consultant for Abbvie, consultant for Genentech and has research funding and is a consultant for Astra Zeneca; A.K.N. is consultant with honoraria from Janssen, GSK, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, Spectrum, BMS, Adaptive and research funding from Janssen, GSK, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, BMS; S.L. is a consultant and receives honoraria for Millennium, Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, BMS, Janssen, and Celgene and received honorarium from Celgene, Takeda, BMS, GSK, Novartis, Amgen, Merck, and Janssen. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Navdeep Chandel and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Bajpai, R., Sharma, A., Achreja, A. et al. Electron transport chain activity is a predictor and target for venetoclax sensitivity in multiple myeloma. Nat Commun 11, 1228 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15051-z
Journal of Hematology & Oncology (2020)
Cell Death & Disease (2020)
Cell Death & Disease (2020)
Biochemical phenotyping of multiple myeloma patients at diagnosis reveals a disorder of mitochondrial complexes I and II and a Hartnup-like disturbance as underlying conditions, also influencing different stages of the disease
Scientific Reports (2020)