Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Plasmonic monolithic lithium niobate directional coupler switches

Abstract

Lithium niobate (LN) has been the material of choice for electro-optic modulators owing to its excellent physical properties. While conventional LN electro-optic modulators continue to be the workhorse of the modern optoelectronics, they are becoming progressively too bulky, expensive, and power-hungry to fully serve the needs of this industry. Here, we demonstrate plasmonic electro-optic directional coupler switches consisting of two closely spaced nm-thin gold nanostripes on LN substrates that guide both coupled electromagnetic modes and electrical signals that control their coupling, thereby enabling ultra-compact switching and modulation functionalities. Extreme confinement and good spatial overlap of both slow-plasmon modes and electrostatic fields created by the nanostripes allow us to achieve a 90% modulation depth with 20-μm-long switches characterized by a broadband electro-optic modulation efficiency of 0.3 V cm. Our monolithic LN plasmonic platform enables a wide range of cost-effective optical communication applications that demand μm-scale footprints, ultrafast operation and high environmental stability.

Introduction

In the last decades, lithium niobate has become indispensable for integrated photonics as the material of choice for electro-optic modulation due to its excellent (linear and nonlinear) optical and material properties. Being advantageous over competing platforms, lithium niobate (LN) fulfills the eligibility material requirements for optical communication systems by exhibiting wide optical transparency (0.35–4.5 μm), large electro-optic coefficients (r33 = 30 pm V−1), which are preserved at elevated temperatures due to its high Curie temperature (~1200 °C), and excellent chemical and mechanical stability resulting in long-term material reliability1. Leading to considerable commercial significance, the early success of LN for optoelectronic applications was driven by heterogeneous integration of metal-diffused channel optical waveguides utilized for chip-scale electro-optic modulators2,3,4,5,6,7. However, the weak confinement of integrated metal-diffused optical waveguides is limiting the electro-optic interaction, resulting in low electro-optic modulation efficiencies and large device footprints. Recently, monolithic integration of thin-film lithium niobate modulators8,9,10,11,12,13,14 has attracted an increasing attention due to significantly higher optical confinement, leading to improvements in terms of compactness, bandwidth and energy efficiency, while still demanding relatively long, on the mm-scale, interaction lengths due to conceptual limitations in the electro-optic field overlap.

Leveraging metal nanostructures to transmit simultaneously both optical and electrical signals, with the additional attribute of extremely enhancing their accompanied local fields, promises plasmonics to become a versatile platform for exceptionally compact optoelectronic applications15,16. The first pioneering work17 utilizing surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) for electrically controlled modulation was based on thermo-optic effects induced by resistive heating in polymer materials. Though this approach facilitates only moderate switching times and relatively high power consumption, the large overlap between the electromagnetic field of the plasmonic mode and the electrically induced local change of the refractive index was opening the path to exceptionally efficient plasmonic electro-optic modulators. Following this approach, tremendous efforts have been directed towards exploring other electro-optic material platforms, which drastically improved the switching performance, including two-dimensional materials18,19,20,21, phase-change materials22,23,24, and electro-optic polymers25,26,27,28,29,30,31. These studies convincingly demonstrated the capability of plasmonics to be a potential complementary technology addressing bottleneck issues in future information technology. However, combining the attractive features of plasmonics with LN32, to date still the preferred material platform meeting all essential performance requirements, has remained largely unexplored.

Here, we introduce a monolithic plasmonic modulator/switch configuration based on two identical gold nanostripes on LN, where the metallic structure utilized for applying external electrostatic fields inherently supports the propagation of the SPP modes, resulting in an exceptionally simple device architecture. Our approach does not require patterning, etching or milling of the LN substrate, which is particularly challenging due to its mechanical hardness and chemical stability. The antisymmetric change of the refractive index of LN due to the Pockels electro-optic effect induced by an external electric field applied across two gold nanostripes affects the optical coupling between the plasmonic modes propagating along the two nanostripes. This allows high-density integration with extraordinary efficient and broadband switching of the optical power distribution (at telecom wavelengths) between the two output ports of plasmonic directional couplers.

Results

Device principles

The proposed optical switch configuration represents a plasmonic directional coupler that comprises two lithographically fabricated gold nanostripe waveguides placed on z-cut LN, which have identical dimensions of w × h = 350 × 50 nm2 and are separated by the distance of 350 nm (Fig. 1). Numerical optimization of the waveguide dimensions is given in Supplementary Note 5.

Fig. 1: Plasmonic monolithic lithium niobate directional coupler switch.
figure1

a Conceptual image of power modulation in the plasmonic nanostripes by applying a bias voltage, which induces a refractive index change due to the electro-optic effect in the substrate. The inset shows the cross-section of the two identical parallel waveguides of width w = 350 nm, separated by a gap of g = 350 nm and placed on z-cut lithium niobate (LiNbO3, LN). b False-colored scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the investigated plasmonic directional coupler switch. The scale bar represents 5 µm. The optimal length L of interaction is chosen to be 15.5 µm.

The transmission line, composed of two optically coupled plasmonic strip waveguides, supports two quasi-TEM modes, i.e., the odd and even modes, which define the geometrically dependent coupling length \(L_{\mathrm{C}} = {\uppi}/ {\left| {\beta _{{\mathrm{odd}}} - \beta _{{\mathrm{even}}}} \right|} = \lambda _0/\left( {2 \cdot \left| {n_{{\mathrm{odd}}} - n_{{\mathrm{even}}}} \right|} \right)\) of the passive system with the mode effective indices nodd and neven, respectively. An optical near-field study is conducted to verify and quantify coupling between the two SPP modes supported by the considered configuration (Supplementary Note 9 and Supplementary Movie 1). In the modulator device, light with the free-space wavelength λ0 is fed symmetrically into the two plasmonic waveguides by positioning a diffraction-limited beam on a metallic grating coupler. A 90° bend of the individual waveguides in opposite directions is employed to separate the coupling channels and accordingly limiting the interaction length L between the SPP modes supported by the nanostripe waveguides. Furthermore, the linearly polarized emission from the terminating gratings is rotated by the bend to be orthogonal to the polarization of the incident beam, thus allowing cross-polarized far-field imaging with suppression of back-reflections from the incident beam. In order to introduce an external electrostatic field in the electro-optically active substrate supporting the plasmonic coupler, the individual waveguide ends are electrically connected to signal (Vm) and ground (GND), respectively. The change of the refractive index induced by the Pockels effect in z-cut LN depends on the direction of the applied electric field relative to the direction of the optic axis of the crystal. To investigate the optical response on the externally applied field, the electrostatic field distribution with the field contour lines are simulated for the two-wire configuration while one wire is grounded and the other is biased with 25 V (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2: Electrostatic field simulation of the two-wire configuration.
figure2

a Color-coded electric field and its contours upon applying a bias of 25 V. The electrostatic field extends stronger along the depth-direction (z-axis), as compared to the isotropic case, due to the anisotropy in the relative permittivity of z-cut lithium niobate (LiNbO3, LN). b In-plane (Ex) and out-of-plane electric-field component (Ez) in the LN substrate 100 nm below the surface (along the dashed red line shown in Fig. 2a). The yellow bars indicate the position of the Au wires. The in-plane field component Ex shows highest amplitude in between the two electrodes, while the out-of-plane component Ez exhibits highest amplitude underneath the wires with opposite sign. c, d Due to the linear electro-optic (Pockels) effect in the LN substrate, the extraordinary (ne) and ordinary (no) refractive index underneath the left wire is decreased, while being increased by an equal amount in the right guide. Consequently, the waveguides lose their optical identity, which influences the power transfer in the directional coupler.

The field extends further along the depth-direction as compared to the isotropic case due to the anisotropic relative permittivity of LN. The amplitude of the electric field components along the x- and z- direction 100 nm below the LN/air interface (Fig. 2b) reveals an alternating electric field along the LN optical axis below the individual nanostripes.

Therefore, an opposite refractive index modification is introduced in the two waveguides, consequently eliminating the device symmetry of the directional coupler (Fig. 2c, d). Strong overlap between the plasmonic field and the modulating electrostatic field results in a significant phase change with opposite polarities in the two waveguides, thus providing efficient push-pull operation of the directional coupler modulator. An expression for the intensity modulation and switching characteristics of the device can be derived from the coupled-mode formalism33. Under assumption of negligible coupling in the output bends and by neglecting absorption losses, the normalized power in the weakly coupled waveguide system is given by (see Supplementary Note 1):

$$P_{1,2} = \frac{1}{2}\left[ {1\, \pm\, \frac{2}{{{\mathrm{\Delta }}\beta _{\mathrm{n}} + {\mathrm{\Delta }}\beta _{\mathrm{n}}^{ - 1}}}\sin ^2\left( {\frac{{\uppi }}{2}\frac{L}{{L_{\mathrm{C}}}}\sqrt {1 + {\mathrm{\Delta }}\beta _{\mathrm{n}}^2} } \right)} \right],$$
(1)

where \({\mathrm{\Delta}}\beta _{\mathrm{n}} \, {=} \, [ \beta _1(V_{\mathrm{m}}) - \beta _2(V_{\mathrm{m}}) ]/[ \beta _{{\mathrm{odd}}}(V_{\mathrm{m}} = 0) - \beta _{{\mathrm{even}}} (V_{\mathrm{m}} = 0)]\) is the normalized electrically induced difference in the propagation constants β1 and β2 of each individual waveguide mode, and L is the interaction length. From Eq. (1) it follows that the unbiased device is inherently set to the linear section of the modulation transfer curve (quadrature point), offering high degree of linearity and collapse of even-order nonlinear distortions in the modulation spectrum. It is clear that complete switching of the optical power can be reached when the device length is \(L = L_{\mathrm{C}}/\sqrt 2\) and when Δβn = 1 (i.e., the required voltage should cause the difference in propagation constants of each wire to be as high as the difference between mode propagation constants of the even and odd modes in the passive device). Deviations from this interaction length result in reduced maximum modulation depth and sensitivity (see Supplementary Note 1 and 2 for details). It was found that for the considered cross-section geometry of the directional coupler, this condition is fulfilled at the interaction length of L = 15.5 µm and thus taken as the optimum design for efficient switching in our study. Interestingly, the above conditions for the complete switching demonstrate the well-known trade-off between required voltage and device length: with less coupled waveguides, the required full-switch voltage will be smaller, but the optimal interaction length will be larger. Due to the established material platform and the simple device geometry, the fabrication procedure of the monolithic modulator device is exceedingly simple, involving only a standard electron-beam lithography step followed by thermal gold evaporation and subsequent metal lift-off (see Methods for more details). Furthermore, the switch conceptionally exhibits relaxed tolerances to geometrical variations and wavelength instabilities compared to ring resonators or Mach-Zehnder interferometers (see Supplementary Note 3–5 for details).

Performance of the device

Switching and modulation of the scattering signal emitted from the output gratings of the two waveguide channels in the characterized device is illustrated with far-field images shown in Fig. 3 for two different bias voltages with opposite polarity.

Fig. 3: Visualization of switching and modulation behavior.
figure3

Experimental optical far-field images captured by an infrared camera at different modulation voltages. A diffraction-limited beam (λ0 = 1550 nm) is positioned on the input grating to symmetrically feed the coupling system. The structure design is superimposed as a guide to the eye. The scattering images are superimposed with the structure design. a The unbiased device (Vm = 0 V) exhibits equal power distribution of the scattered signal emitted from the output ports, due to the symmetry of the directional coupler. b When a negative bias voltage (Vm = −25 V) is applied, an enhancement of the optical output signal of the biased waveguide arm is observed, while the optical signal at the opposite output port is decreased in intensity. c By changing the polarity of the applied voltage, the intensity in the two output terminals is switched.

At zero bias, the symmetry of the device configuration results in an equal phase condition in the coupler arms and consequently equal power distribution in the waveguides, revealed by balanced output signals. When a bias signal is applied, an enhancement of the output signal at one port is observed, while the signal at the opposite output port is decreased. By changing the polarity of the applied voltage, the intensity in the two output terminals is switched, revealing a reversed refractive index change as expected from the linear modulation characteristics of the Pockels effect. The dynamic optical switching, induced by an alternating voltage of VAC = 25 V at slow switching speeds, is captured by the infrared camera (Supplementary Movie 2).

For obtaining the transfer curve in Fig. 4a, the applied bias is varied and the output power modulation of the two channels is measured independently at the image plane by spatial filtering with subsequent detection by a photodiode (see the “Methods” section for more details). The experimentally measured modulation curve agrees well with the analytical predictions from the coupled mode theory (CMT), assisted by finite element method (FEM) simulations (see the “Methods” section for details). A modulation depth of 90% is achieved at sufficiently high voltages (V ≈ ± 50 V), without permanent breakdown of the device. This corresponds to a dual-channel intensity extinction ratio (ER) of 10 dB. Given that the full modulation depth is reached at the electrically induced phase mismatch of \(\sqrt 2 {\uppi}\), our device exhibits a drive voltage-length product of 0.3 V cm (half-wave voltage-length product of \(V_{\uppi}L = 0.21\,{\mathrm{V}} \cdot {\mathrm{cm}}\)), which is approximately an order of magnitude smaller than that obtained with the state-of-the-art photonic LN modulators. In fact, lower levels of the voltage-length product have only been observed with electro-optic polymers, whose very low phase-transition temperatures impede their practical deployment (see Supplementary Table 2 for a detailed comparison). The insertion loss due to the propagation loss of α = 0.35 dB µm−1 in the phase shifter section is 5.5 dB, resulting in a half-wave voltage-length-loss product of Vπ = 735 VdB. Due to non-resonant modulation characteristics and the wide optical transparency window, spectrally broadband operation of our directional coupler switch is expected. The relative modulation efficiency at the driving voltage of 15 V is measured within the wavelength range of 1280–1590 nm (Fig. 4b), normalized by that measured at the design wavelength of 1550 nm. Although the performance of the device fluctuates with the operation wavelength, a high wavelength tolerance is observed, exhibiting <2 dB modulation depth variation within all wavelength telecommunication bands.

Fig. 4: Directional coupler switch characteristics.
figure4

a Measured (symbols) and simulated (solid lines) electro-optical transfer function, showing the power exchange as a function of the applied bias voltage. Error bars represent standard deviations and are deduced from repeated measurements. For AC signals smaller than 15 V (with a frequency of 200 kHz), error bars are smaller than the symbols. b Wavelength dependence of the modulation efficiency (at the driving voltage of 15 V) normalized by that measured at the design wavelength of 1550 nm. Less than 2 dB modulation deterioration over all optical communication wavelength bands is observed. Error bars indicate the estimated standard deviation of the mean. c Measured frequency response as a function of the applied RF signal frequency, normalized with respect to the lowest applied frequency. The continuous shaded error region represents the standard deviation in the measured frequency response with a smoothed average between data points. The response in the measured frequency range is only restricted by the bandwidth limitations of the RF probe and the electrical feedline (red line).

The electro-optic frequency response of the directional coupler switch is characterized from 10 kHz to 10 GHz (Fig. 4c). The device exhibits a flat frequency response up to 2 GHz in our measurement. The observed 3-dB bandwidth of (9 ± 2) GHz is caused by a limited response bandwidth of the electrical feedline on the chip and the RF probes (see Supplementary Note 8 for details). Owing to the extremely short response time (~ fs) of the Pockels effect and the small device capacitance of only 3.6 fF, the calculated modulation cutoff frequency exceeds 800 GHz at 50 Ω resistive load (f = 1/[2πRC]), indicating potential operation at much higher modulation speeds than shown in our measurements and suggesting the energy consumption reaching levels below 1 pJ/bit (see Supplementary Note 6 for details).

Discussion

In summary, we demonstrated a broadband directional coupler switch featuring a drive voltage-length product of 0.3 V cm at telecom wavelengths, to date the lowest value for a device based on lithium niobate electro-optic modulation. Owing to the excellent material properties such as electro-optic reliability and temperature stability, this material platform is still considered as the material-of-choice that can fulfill the demands of future optical data links, by exploring new device configurations which are significantly smaller, faster, and more efficient than current LN electro-optic modulators. The proposed directional coupler switch configuration addresses this challenge with exceptional structural simplicity by providing multiport, broadband, and effective modulation at a compact footprint and a high-speed operation. The presented proof-of-concept study of utilizing integrated plasmonic circuits in LN platforms demonstrates its enormous potential, which can pave the way towards feasible communication links, promising high-speed, broadband, and robust operation. The full-switching voltage in our configuration can be reduced by utilizing plasmonic waveguides with higher optical confinement or longer interaction length, which can eventually be interfaced with low-loss photonic waveguides or multicore fibers26 for practical integration into long-haul on-chip optical communication systems.

Methods

Device fabrication

Devices are fabricated on commercially available z-cut lithium niobate substrates. The directional coupler modulators are written by electron beam lithography (using a scanning electron microscope JOEL JSM-6490LV with an acceleration voltage of 30 keV) in spin-coated 200-nm-thick PMMA positive resist and 20-nm-thick Al layer, which serves as a metallic charge dissipation layer during the writing (electron doses varying between 200 and 250 µC cm−2). After resist development, the directional couplers are formed by depositing a 4 nm titanium adhesion layer and a 50 nm gold layer by thermal evaporation and subsequent 12 h lift-off in acetone. To reduce electron beam writing time, macroscopic bonding pads and connecting wires are patterned beforehand on the LN chip by optical lithography, metal deposition (5 nm Ti/150 nm Au), and lift-off. Lithographic overlay is ensured by the mix-and-match approach.

Experimental electro-optical characterization

A collimated and linearly polarized laser beam from a tunable IR laser is focused by a high numerical aperture objective (Olympus MPlan100xIR, NA = 0.95). The focused beam is positioned symmetrically on the grating coupler for symmetric feeding of the two arms of the directional coupler. The output optical signal is collected by the same objective. The cross-polarized configuration is used to suppress the back-reflection and scattering from the incident beam. This provides an improved signal-to-noise ratio for the optical signal scattered from the output gratings, which is subsequently detected by the IR camera or a high-speed photodiode. The integration time of the camera is adjusted to give a reasonable contrast for the output signal, leading to an oversaturation and increased size of the incident back-reflected beam spot. By applying electrical probes on the electrode pads, one directional coupler arm is grounded while the other is biased with an AC/DC signal. For measuring the modulation transfer curve, the wavelength dependence and the frequency response of the device, the scattering signal coming from one port of the directional coupler is spatially filtered and detected by a high-speed photodetector. The frequency response measurements are calibrated by the response reference of the signal generator and the photoreceiver. A detailed description of the experimental set-up can be found in Supplementary Note 7 and 8.

Numerical modeling

FEM simulations are performed using a commercially available software (Comsol Multiphysics 5.2a). For the electrostatic simulations, the device cross-section is modeled with the unclamped static relative permittivity tensor of LN taken from Jazbinsek et al.34 (εxx = εyy = 27.8, εzz = 84.5), while the relative permittivity of air is set to be εair = 1 and the boundaries of the two gold nanostripes are set to ground and Vbias potential, respectively. The calculated electric-field distribution is utilized to determine the modification of the refractive index in the LN substrate by using the electro-optic Pockels coefficients from Jazbinsek et.al.34 (restricting to the largest diagonal terms, i.e., Δnii = −0.5riiznii3Ez, with rxxz = ryyz = 10.12 pm/V and rzzz = 31.45 pm V−1), which are considered to be non-dispersive over the investigated wavelength range35. For the optical simulation, the modified distribution of the refractive index of LN is fed into the mode solver, while the unmodified refractive indices from Au and LN were taken from Johnson and Christy36 and Zelmon et al.37 (nxx = nyy = no = 2.211, nzz = ne = 2.138 at λ0 = 1550 nm). Scattering-boundary conditions in combination with a perfectly matched layer are applied to calculate the modification β1 − β2 in the propagation constants of each individual waveguide as a function of the applied voltage, which is used for describing the intensity modulation using the coupled-mode formalism (see Supplementary Note 1 for details). The optical simulation of two parallel waveguides and unmodified LN refractive index was used to calculate the propagation constants of even and odd modes (βeven and βodd) and, eventually, the coupling length LC.

Data availability

All data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Weis, R. & Gaylord, T. Lithium niobate: summary of physical properties and crystal structure. Appl. Phys. A 37, 191–203 (1985).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Alferness, R. Polarization-independent optical directional coupler switch using weighted coupling. Appl. Phys. Lett. 35, 748–750 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bozhevolnyi, S. I., Buritskii, K. S., Zolotov, E. M., Prokhorov, A. M. & Chernykh, V. A. A study of an electrooptic modulator utilizing coupled channel diffused waveguides in LiNbO3. Kvantovaya Elektro. 9, 1808–1816 (1982).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Schmidt, R. & Kaminow, I. Metal-diffused optical waveguides in LiNbO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 25, 458–460 (1974).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wooten, E. L. et al. A review of lithium niobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systems. IEEE. J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 6, 69–82 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tavlykaev, R. F. & Ramaswamy, R. V. Highly linear Y-fed directional coupler modulator with low intermodulation distortion. J. Lightwave Technol. 17, 282–291 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Anwar, N. et al. The effect of fabrication parameters on a Ridge Mach–Zehnder interferometric (MZI) modulator. J. Lightwave Technol. 20, 854–861 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ren, T. et al. An integrated low-voltage broadband lithium niobate phase modulator. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 31, 889–892 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wang, C., Zhang, M., Stern, B., Lipson, M. & Lončar, M. Nanophotonic lithium niobate electro-optic modulators. Opt. Express 26, 1547–1555 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    He, M. et al. High-performance hybrid silicon and lithium niobate Mach–Zehnder modulators for 100 Gbit s−1 and beyond. Nat. Photonics 13, 359–364 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wang, C. et al. Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages. Nature 562, 101–104 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Boes, A., Corcoran, B., Chang, L., Bowers, J. & Mitchell, A. Status and potential of lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) for photonic integrated circuits. Laser Photonics Rev. 12, 1700256 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Rao, A. & Fathpour, S. Compact lithium niobate electrooptic modulators. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 24, 1–14 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mahmoud, M., Cai, L., Bottenfield, C. & Piazza, G. Lithium niobate electro-optic racetrack modulator etched in Y-Cut LNOI platform. IEEE Photonics J. 10, 1–10 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ebbesen, T. W., Genet, C. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Surface-plasmon circuitry. Phys. Today 61, 44–50 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Thomaschewski, M., Yang, Y., Wolff, C., Roberts, A. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. On-chip detection of optical spin-orbit interactions in plasmonic nanocircuits. Nano Lett. 19, 1166–1171 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Nikolajsen, T., Leosson, K. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Surface plasmon polariton based modulators and switches operating at telecom wavelengths. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 5833–5835 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Maier, M., Nemilentsau, A., Low, T. & Luskin, M. Ultracompact amplitude modulator by coupling hyperbolic polaritons over a graphene-covered gap. ACS Photonics 5, 544–551 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ding, Y. et al. Efficient electro-optic modulation in low-loss graphene-plasmonic slot waveguides. Nanoscale 9, 15576–15581 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ansell, D. et al. Hybrid graphene plasmonic waveguide modulators. Nat. Commun. 6, 8846 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Thomas, P. et al. Nanomechanical electro-optical modulator based on atomic heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 7, 13590 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Joushaghani, A. et al. Sub-volt broadband hybrid plasmonic-vanadium dioxide switches. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 061101 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Markov, P. et al. Optically monitored electrical switching in VO2. ACS Photonics 2, 1175–1182 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rudé, M., Simpson, R. E., Quidant, R., Pruneri, V. & Renger, J. Active control of surface plasmon waveguides with a phase change material. ACS Photonics 2, 669–674 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Haffner, C. et al. Low-loss plasmon-assisted electro-optic modulator. Nature 556, 483–486 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ayata, M. et al. High-speed plasmonic modulator in a single metal layer. Science 358, 630–632 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kieninger, C. et al. Ultra-high electro-optic activity demonstrated in a silicon-organic hybrid modulator. Optica 5, 739–748 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Abel, S. et al. Large Pockels effect in micro- and nanostructured barium titanate integrated on silicon. Nat. Materials 18, 42–47 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Haffner, C. et al. All-plasmonic Mach–Zehnder modulator enabling optical high-speed communication at the microscale. Nat. Photonics 9, 525–528 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Heni, W. et al. Plasmonic IQ modulators with attojoule per bit electrical energy consumption. Nat. Commun. 10, 1694 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Alloatti, L. et al. 100 GHz silicon–organic hybrid modulator. Light Sci. Appl. 3, e173 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Berini, P., Charbonneau, R., Jett́-Charbonneau, S., Lahoud, N. & Mattiussi, G. Long-range surface plasmon-polariton waveguides and devices in lithium niobate. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 113114 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yariv, A. Coupled-mode theory for guided-wave optics. IEEE J. Quantum Elect. 9, 919–933 (1973).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Jazbinšek, M. & Zgonik, M. Material tensor parameters of LiNbO3 relevant for electro- and elasto-optics. Appl. Phys. B 74, 407–414 (2002).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Yonekura, K., Jin, L. & Takizawa, K. Measurement of dispersion of effective electro-optic coefficients \(r_{13}^E\) and \(r_{13}^E\) of non-doped congruent LiNbO3 crystal. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 47, 7R (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Johnson, P. & Christy, R. Optical constants of the noble metals. Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370–4379 (1972).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zelmon, D. E., Small, D. L. & Jundt, D. Infrared corrected Sellmeier coefficients for congruently grown lithium niobate and 5 mol% magnesium oxide–doped lithium niobate. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14, 3319–3322 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge funding support from the European Research Council (PLAQNAP, Grant 341054), the University of Southern Denmark (SDU2020 funding) and the VILLUM FONDEN (Grant 16498). C.W. acknowledges funding from a MULTIPLY fellowship under the MarieSkłodowska-Curie COFUND Action (grant agreement No. 713694). We also thank Martin Houmann Thygesen, Jesper Nielsen and Morten Nymand from SDU Electrical Engineering for providing equipment for the high-speed measurements. We acknowledge Marcus Fred Hufe for supporting the near-field measurements and Joel Cox for constructive feedback on the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.I.B. and M.T. conceived the experiment and geometry of the modulators. M.T. set up the experiment, performed the device fabrication, experimental characterization and simulations of the device. V.Z. and C.W. contributed in the device characterization and simulations. M.T. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all other authors. S.I.B. supervised the project.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Martin Thomaschewski or Sergey I. Bozhevolnyi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Young-Ik Sohn, Luke Sweatlock and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomaschewski, M., Zenin, V.A., Wolff, C. et al. Plasmonic monolithic lithium niobate directional coupler switches. Nat Commun 11, 748 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14539-y

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing