Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Photoswitching mechanism of a fluorescent protein revealed by time-resolved crystallography and transient absorption spectroscopy


Reversibly switchable fluorescent proteins (RSFPs) serve as markers in advanced fluorescence imaging. Photoswitching from a non-fluorescent off-state to a fluorescent on-state involves trans-to-cis chromophore isomerization and proton transfer. Whereas excited-state events on the ps timescale have been structurally characterized, conformational changes on slower timescales remain elusive. Here we describe the off-to-on photoswitching mechanism in the RSFP rsEGFP2 by using a combination of time-resolved serial crystallography at an X-ray free-electron laser and ns-resolved pump–probe UV-visible spectroscopy. Ten ns after photoexcitation, the crystal structure features a chromophore that isomerized from trans to cis but the surrounding pocket features conformational differences compared to the final on-state. Spectroscopy identifies the chromophore in this ground-state photo-intermediate as being protonated. Deprotonation then occurs on the μs timescale and correlates with a conformational change of the conserved neighbouring histidine. Together with a previous excited-state study, our data allow establishing a detailed mechanism of off-to-on photoswitching in rsEGFP2.


Phototransformable fluorescent proteins (PTFPs) are invaluable tools for advanced fluorescence microscopy, serving as genetically encoded markers that change emission color or intensity when irradiated with visible light at specific wavelengths1,2. A subgroup of PTFPs, the so-called reversibly switchable fluorescent proteins (RSFPs), are used in ensemble-based nanoscopy approaches such as RESOLFT (reversible saturable optical fluorescence transition3) or NL-SIM (nonlinear structured illumination microscopy4), where they are repeatedly toggled back and forth between a fluorescent on- and a non-fluorescent off-state by irradiation with light at two different wavelengths5. Depending on whether irradiation at the excitation peak turns the fluorescent state off or on, RSFP are coined negative or positive switchers, respectively. It is widely accepted that the molecular basis of photoswitching in RSFPs (with the exception of some engineered variants such as Dreiklang6) is a combination of isomerization and change in protonation state of the chromophore phenol moiety, as evidenced by X-ray crystallography7 and absorption and fluorescence spectroscopies8. In all negative RSFP, the fluorescent on-state chromophore is an anionic cis isomer (cis-phenolate) whereas the non-fluorescent off-state is a neutral trans isomer (trans-phenol). The chronological order of isomerization and protonation-changes is being controversially discussed, as well as corresponding timescales on which they occur.

Over the past decade, several spectroscopic investigations focused on Dronpa, a negative RSFP from Anthozoa (e.g. corals)9. Due to the thousand-fold higher switching quantum yield (QY) in the off-to-on (0.37) direction as compared to on-to-off (3.2 × 10−4)9, mostly off-to-on photoswitching has been studied experimentally. The first investigation of Dronpa by ultrafast optical spectroscopy suggested that the deprotonation of the trans-phenol occurs in the excited state on the ps timescale via an excited-state proton transfer (ESPT) mechanism10. Later, however, picosecond time-resolved infrared (TR-IR) spectroscopy on Dronpa11 and its fast-switching M159T mutant12 indicated that isomerization occurs during picosecond excited-state decay. This has also been suggested by femtosecond UV–visible transient anisotropy absorption spectroscopy, which attributed the first photoproduct to a cis-protonated chromophore13. The same study also showed that chromophore deprotonation occurs in the ground state on the microsecond timescale. However, another TR-IR study on the Dronpa-M159T mutant advocated that both isomerization and deprotonation are ground-state processes, attributing the ps spectroscopic changes in the excited state to protein conformational changes priming the chromophore for switching14. This view was corroborated by a follow-up TR-IR study on Dronpa-M159T involving isotope labeling15. In that study, evidence has been provided for chromophore distortion and excited-state decay on the picosecond timescale, followed by formation of the cis protonated chromophore with a 91 ns time constant before the final deprotonation step. Importantly, the structure of the cis-protonated switching intermediate in Dronpa has remained elusive.

RSFPs from Hydrozoa (e.g. jellyfish), such as rsEGFP216, are less well studied than those from Anthozoa because fewer examples have been identified or generated so far17. Whereas both hydrozoan and anthozoan RSFPs have the same overall protein fold and chromophore (4-(p-hydroxybenzylidene)−5-imidazolinone (p-HBI)), structural features in their chromophore pockets differ. For example, the p-hydroxyphenyl ring of the on-state chromophore is stabilized in rsEGFP2 by three hydrogen bonds18 and in Dronpa by π-stacking with the side chain of a histidine residue and by two hydrogen bonds7. Therefore, it is not clear yet if the photoswitching mechanisms in hydrozoan and anthozoan RSFPs differ in details or not. Moreover, structures of ground-state intermediates remain to be determined for both hydrozoan and anthozoan RSFPs. Here, we studied off-to-on photoswitching in rsEGFP2 by a combination of time-resolved crystallography and transient absorption spectroscopy.

rsEGFP2 is a bright, photostable, monomeric and photoswitchable variant of the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP). This fast RSFP is extensively used for tagging proteins in mammalian cells for live-cell RESOLFT nanoscopy16. Its p-HBI chromophore, formed autocatalytically from the three residues Ala-Tyr-Gly, is carried by an α-helix entrapped within an 11-stranded β-barrel18 (Fig. 1a). rsEGFP2 remains photoactive in the crystalline state, so that first insights into the structure of its on- and off-state chromophores could be obtained by conventional crystallography18. Optical spectroscopy measurements and crystal structures established that in rsEGFP2, as in other RSFPs such as Dronpa7, asFP59519, mTFP0.720, or IrisFP21, the resting on-state is characterized by a cis-phenolate chromophore, which absorbs at 479 nm and emits at 503 nm (fluorescence QY of 0.35), whereas the off-state features a trans-phenol chromophore, which absorbs at 403 nm. Like Dronpa, rsEGFP2 is a negative RSFP, meaning that on-to-off photoswitching competes with fluorescence18 and is triggered by illumination of the anionic species at 479 nm with a switching QYon-to-off of 1.65 × 10−2. Back-switching to the on-state is triggered by illumination at 405 nm, and characterized by a QYoff-to-on of 0.3318 (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1: Structure and photoswitching scheme of rsEGFP2.
figure 1

a Three-dimensional structure showing an 11-stranded β-barrel embedding a chromophore held by a central α-helix. b The chromophore of rsEGFP2 in its fluorescent on-state (bottom) absorbs at 479 nm (laser 488 nm) and emits at 503 nm. Isomerization competes with fluorescence and leads the chromophore to its non-fluorescent off-state, which absorbs at 403 nm (laser 400 nm) and ultimately isomerizes back to the initial on-state. Flashes and arrows represent the color of each actinic wavelength. The width of arrows is representative of the efficiency of each isomerization.

Chromophore states that accumulate at room temperature and physiological pH can be characterized by conventional X-ray crystallography. In order to characterize the room-temperature structure of photoswitching intermediate states that only exist transiently, another method is needed that allows collecting structural data on a timescale from a few ps to ms. Such a method is time-resolved serial femtosecond (fs) crystallography (TR-SFX) using X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs)22,23, which has already provided intermediate-state structures of several photosensitive proteins24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37. Recently, we combined ultrafast optical spectroscopy and TR-SFX to study excited-state intermediates of rsEGFP2 on the ps timescale during off-to-on switching27. Optical spectroscopy showed that the excited state decays with a time constant of a few ps. TR-SFX revealed that 1 ps after photoexcitation at 400 nm, the chromophore adopts a twisted conformation halfway between the trans and cis isomers, while at 3 ps, the cis chromophore of a presumed ground-state intermediate starts to become populated. The quality of the latter data, however, did not allow building a structural model reliably. Consequently, the structure of the first photoproduct during rsEGFP2 off-to-on photoswitching has remained elusive. Such a structure would provide insight into conformational changes in the chromophore pocket occurring after decay of the excited-state and clarify the order of photoswitching events in RSFPs from Hydrozoa.

Here, we describe TR-SFX experiments that capture an off-to-on switching intermediate, formed 10 ns after photoexcitation of rsEGFP2. The structure of the intermediate reveals that the initially trans-protonated chromophore has transitioned to the cis isomer and evidences conformational changes in the main and side chains of residues in the chromophore pocket. Structural features revealed by the 10 ns structure are compatible with a cis protonated chromophore. Indeed, pump–probe UV–visible spectroscopy indicates that at this time, the chromophore is still protonated, as deprotonation only occurs on the µs to ms timescale in solution. Thus, our data, together with our ps study published earlier27, establish that off-to-on photoswitching in rsEGFP2 involves excited-state isomerization on the ps timescale followed by µs conformational changes in the ground state that trigger proton transfer on the ms timescale. This allows proposing a detailed switching mechanism.


Time-resolved UV–visible transient absorption spectroscopy

Time-resolved UV–visible transient absorption spectra were recorded from 40-ps to 10-ms after excitation of rsEGFP2 in its off-state in solution (50 mM HEPES pH 8, 50 mM NaCl; Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 1). On the examined timescale, the excited state had decayed27 so that the photodynamics of rsEGFP2 in the ground state was monitored. From 40 ps to 2 ns (Supplementary Fig. 1a), transient spectra show a negative and a positive band at 420 and 460 nm, respectively, evolving with a characteristic time constant of 87 ps ± 8 ps (Supplementary Fig. 1c). A negative band at 500 nm originates from stimulated emission from residual 10% of rsEGFP2 that had remained in the cis anionic on-state (Supplementary Fig. 1b) and vanished after 2 ns (Supplementary Fig. 1d). Between 10 and 100 ns, there is no significant spectral evolution (Supplementary Fig. 2). Figure 2 shows spectral changes from 100 ns to 9 ms. The transient difference absorbance spectrum at 100 ns shows a broad positive band with a maximum at 400 nm (dark blue in Fig. 2a). This band evolves within 4.9 μs to a spectrum (light blue) with two positive maxima at 390 nm and 460 nm. Then within 90.6 µs, the first peak (390 nm) vanishes, while a negative band appears at 410 nm. The second peak (460 nm) increases and shifts to 480 nm (Fig. 2b). Subsequently, and on a timescale from 100 µs to 9 ms, the maximum of the negative band shifts from 420 to 400 nm while the positive band at 480 nm further increases in amplitude. The 480 nm band is characteristic of the cis anionic form16.

Fig. 2: Transient UV–Visible spectroscopy in H2O solution.
figure 2

Time-resolved difference absorption spectra of rsEGFP2 in H2O solution (50 mM HEPES pH 8, 50 mM NaCl) recorded after a 410 nm nanosecond excitation of the trans-protonated off-state in the time windows from 100 ns to 9 ms (ac). The spectrum without laser excitation was subtracted to calculate the difference spectra. The colored arrows (red in (a), cyan in (b) and light green in (c)) correspond to the three time constants (5.57, 36.1 and 825 µs, respectively) identified by a global fit analysis of kinetic traces for all wavelengths. d Decay associated spectra obtained by fitting the kinetic traces in panels (ac) for all wavelengths with a weighted sum of three exponential functions.

Three distinct time windows are observed for the evolution of transient spectra (Fig. 2a–c) with the existence of two isosbestic points (Fig. 2a, c). A model based on the weighted sum of three exponential decays was chosen to fit the kinetic traces for all wavelengths between 100 ns to 10 ms. The estimated time constants are 5.57 ± 0.02 µs, 36.1 ± 0.1 µs and 824.8 ± 0.3 µs, respectively. The residuals show no structure, thus validating the given confidence intervals (Supplementary Fig. 3). However, it is known that standard deviations of the parameter values are optimistic estimates of the confidence on these parameters (since it assumes that the estimated parameters are the true ones)38. Therefore, we performed a bootstrap estimate of the standard deviation of the set of parameters. By bootstrapping, different sets of parameters are reported for each replicated fit. Mean value and confidence can then be estimated from their respective distribution. Results obtained for 1000 replicates are reported in Supplementary Fig. 4 (see details in the Methods section) and confirm the validity of the time constants reported above. Similar experiments were carried out in D2O solution (50 mM HEPES pD 8, 50 mM NaCl; Supplementary Fig. 5), and the same model was applied, yielding time constants of 5.16 ± 0.02 µs, 88.4 ± 0.2 µs and 2041.1 ± 0.7 µs. Thus, the first time constant is similar in H2O and D2O, but a significant isotope effect is observed for the two others (kH/kD = 2.45 and 2.47, respectively) which can be assigned to proton transfer steps. Decay associated spectra (Fig. 2d) show that the 5.57 µs time constant in H2O solution is mainly characterized by a growth of the positive band at 460 nm and a decay at 390 nm. The 36.1 µs time constant has some positive and negative contributions characteristic of the band shift observed, while the 825 µs time constant is mainly characterized by the respective decay and growth of the 390-nm and 480-nm bands.

Nanosecond transient absorption data were also recorded from a suspension of rsEGFP2 microcrystals (in 100 mM HEPES pH 8, 2.5 M ammonium sulfate), using a modified flash-photolysis setup (see Methods). Transient difference spectra similar to those measured in solution were obtained, with positive bands first growing at 460 nm and then at 480 nm (Supplementary Fig. 6). A global fit analysis of kinetic traces for all wavelengths yield time constants of 4.75 ± 0.13 µs, 42.9 ± 0.8 µs and 295 ± 2 µs, i.e. significantly smaller than of rsEGFP2 in H2O solution (50 mM HEPES pH 8, 50 mM NaCl). To test whether these results are due to the differences in buffer composition or in protein state, measurements were made with a solution of rsEGFP2 in buffer containing ammonium sulfate at a concentration too low to produce crystals or cause protein precipitation. In this buffer (50 mM HEPES, 50 mM NaCl, pH 8, 1.25 M ammonium sulfate), time constants of 4.23 ± 0.02 µs, 40.4 ± 0.2 µs and 245.2 ± 0.2 µs were found (Supplementary Fig. 7), which are similar to those for microcrystals. This suggests that ammonium sulfate accelerates proton transfer in rsEGFP2.

rsEGFP2 structure solved by TR-SFX 10 ns after photoexcitation

In order to structurally characterize intermediates along the off-to-on photoswitching reaction coordinate of rsEGFP2, TR-SFX was carried out at the Spring-8 Angstrom Compact Laser (SACLA39) XFEL, according to an optical pump–X-ray probe scheme (Experiment No. 2015A8031, July 2015). A pump–probe delay of 10 ns was specifically chosen in order to increase chances to characterize a ground-state intermediate featuring a cis-protonated chromophore. Indeed, the 10-ns delay is much shorter than the µs–ms timescale on which time-resolved UV–visible transient absorption spectroscopy identified chromophore deprotonation to occur (see above), while much longer than the ps timescale on which a twisted-chromophore isomerization intermediate has been characterized in the excited state27. Prior to injection, rsEGFP2 microcrystals were photoswitched from their (resting) on-state to their off-state (half-life of 100 min40) by illumination with 488-nm light, using a dedicated pre-illumination device40. Two interleaved datasets were collected, with (laser_on_∆10 ns) and without (laser_off) activation by the 400-nm pump laser (peak power density 1.25 GW/cm2). From the laser_off dataset, a laser_off structure was determined at 1.60 Å resolution. The initial model consisted of 90% off-state and 10% on-state (see Method section for details), with the chromophore being in the trans and the cis conformation, respectively (Fig. 3a). The reason for including the on-state model was because of absorption spectroscopy that indicated a residual amount of ~10% of the molecules remained in the on-state after pre-illumination40. Moreover, in the resulting mFobslaser_off–DFcalclaser_off map, negative peaks on the trans chromophore and on the side chains of Tyr146 and His149 were observed, suggesting that the off-state is even less than 90% occupied (Fig. 3a). Additionally, a positive peak at 4.2 σ was observed halfway between the trans and cis conformers of the chromophore, suggesting the presence of a third, hitherto unobserved conformation (Fig. 3a). An ensemble refinement against the laser_off dataset was carried out starting from the trans chromophore of the off-state and also suggested the presence of a third chromophore conformation (oval contour in Fig. 3b). Ensemble refinement identified this conformation as a trans isomer (called trans2 hereafter). Thus, the chromophore was modeled in a triple conformation, i.e. trans1, trans2, and cis and refined against the laser_off dataset, yielding occupancies of 65, 25 and 10%, respectively (Fig. 3c). Ensemble refinement also suggested a third conformation of the His149 side chain (His149-supp, cf. circle in Fig. 3b), in addition to the ones characteristic of the on- (His149-on) and the off- (His149-off) states (Fig. 3b, c), respectively. Likewise, three conformations of His149 (His149-off, His149-supp, His149-on) were included in the laser_off model at 65, 25, and 10% occupancy, respectively. Inclusion of these new chromophore and His149 conformers cleared all major peaks in the Fobslaser_off–Fcalclaser_off map (Fig. 3d). Three alternate conformations were also included for residues at positions 146-148 and 150-152 of β-strand-7, which is known to adopt slightly different conformations in the on- and the off-states at room-temperature27, residues at the N- and C-terminus of the chromophore (residues 65 and 69), and for Thr204 and Glu223 (see details in the Methods section).

Fig. 3: Off-state structure.
figure 3

Chromophore (HBI) and its neighboring residues in the rsEGFP2 laser_off structure determined by SFX without pump-laser activation are shown. a The initial laser-off model consists of a mixture of the off-state conformer (light gray carbon trace) and the residual on-state conformer (yellow carbon trace) with occupancies of 90% and 10%, respectively. 2Fobslaser_off–Fcalclaser_off (blue) and Fobslaser_off–Fcalclaser_off (green/red) maps at 1.6 Å resolution are displayed at 1σ and ±3σ, respectively. A positive Fobslaser_off –Fcalclaser_off peak between the trans (gray) and the cis (yellow) chromophores suggests the presence of an additional conformer. b Result of ensemble refinements against the laser_off dataset starting for the off-state model (chromophore 100% trans1). A third chromophore conformation and a third rotamer of His149 are revealed. (c) The final laser-off model features triple conformations of His149 and of the chromophore, i.e. His149-off and trans1 (light gray), His149-on and cis (yellow) and the additional His149-supp and trans2 (dark gray) conformations, at 65%, 10% and 25% occupancy, respectively. 2Fobslaser_off–Fcalclaser_off (blue) and Fobslaser_off–Fcalclaser_off (green/red) maps calculated from the laser-off dataset at 1.6 Å resolution are displayed at 1σ and ±3σ, respectively.

Following pump-laser irradiation, some protein molecules in the crystal are excited and change structure whereas others are not and thus remain in the laser_off structure. The structural features that occur within 10 ns after photoexcitation can be disentangled from the resting laser_off structure in a q-weighted41 difference Fourier map. Such a map was calculated at 1.85 Å resolution, using observed structure factor amplitudes of the laser_on_∆10 ns and laser_off datasets (Fobslaser_on_∆10ns–Fobslaser_off) and phases calculated from the laser_off model (Fig. 4a). The strongest features are located at the chromophore and its direct environment. Negative (down to −5.7 σ) and positive (up to 4.5 σ) peaks are observed at the positions of the trans1 and the cis chromophore, respectively, in particular on their phenol group and methylene bridge. We do not observe a negative peak on the trans2 chromophore. Such a negative peak might have vanished by overlay of a nearby positive peak on the cis chromophore (Fig. 4a). Additionally, negative peaks are present on the off-state conformers of Tyr146 (−4.2 σ) and His149 (−4.8 σ on His149-off), and a positive one on the on-state conformers of Tyr146 (3.5 σ). The off-state has thus been depleted and an intermediate-state built up with a chromophore conformation similar to the one observed in the on-state.

Fig. 4: 10-ns intermediate-state structure.
figure 4

a Q-weighted difference electron density map (Fobslaser_on_∆10ns–Fobslaser_off), determined from SFX data with and without pump-laser activation, is contoured at +3σ (green) and −3σ (red) and overlaid onto the model determined from the laser_off dataset. b Model of the laser_on_∆10 ns intermediate structure (cyan) determined by difference refinement at 1.85 Å resolution. 2Fextrapolatedlaser_on_∆10ns–Fcalc (blue, 1σ) and Fextrapolatedlaser_on_∆10ns–Fcalc maps (green/red, ±3σ, respectively) are shown.

A structural model of the rsEGFP2 intermediate structure 10 ns after photoexcitation (laser_on_∆10 ns intermediate structure) was determined by difference refinement42,43 using extrapolated structure factor amplitudes (Fextrapolatedlaser_on_∆10ns, see eq. 1 in Methods section)44. An occupancy of ~50% was estimated for the intermediate state in the laser_on_∆10 ns dataset (Supplementary Fig. 8, see details in the Methods section). The 2Fextrapolatedlaser_on_∆10ns–Fcalc map (Fig. 4b) features continuous and well-defined electron density in the intermediate state for the entire chromophore and for all neighboring residues, including His149. At 10 ns, the chromophore has transitioned to a cis isomer. The main differences between the off-state and the laser_on_∆10 ns intermediate structures, besides chromophore isomerisation, are structural changes in the side chains of Tyr146 and His149 (Fig. 5). The former is found in its on-state conformation, whereas the latter remains in an off-like conformation. Figure 6 displays an overlay of the laser_on_∆10 ns intermediate structure and the on-state structure (PDB entry code 5O8927) and shows that the main difference between these are the conformations of His149 and Glu223. In the on-state, the δ nitrogen atom (ND1) of His149 H-bonds to the deprotonated chromophore phenol oxygen (Fig. 6c), whereas in the laser-on-∆10 ns intermediate structure (Fig. 6b) it is the ε (NE2) nitrogen atom of His149 that H-bonds to the phenol oxygen of the chromophore (distance 2.4 Å). Assuming that His149 is singly protonated and that its protonation state does not change between the laser_on_∆10 ns intermediate and the on-state structures, i.e. that His149NE2 is unprotonated and His149ND1 protonated, the chromophore phenol would be an obligate donor for the H-bond to His149NE2 in the laser-on-∆10 ns intermediate structure. Thus, the His149 conformer observed 10 ns after excitation by the pump laser are compatible with a protonated cis isomer of the chromophore. As to Glu223, one of its carboxyl oxygens is in H-bonding distance to N2 of the chromophore (3.1 Å) in the laser_on_∆10 ns intermediate (Fig. 6e) but not in the on-state structure (Fig. 6f), and is in H-bonding distance to Ser206OG in the on-state structure (Fig. 6f) but not in the laser_on_∆10 ns intermediate structure (Fig. 6e).

Fig. 5: Overlay of 10-ns intermediate-state and off-state structures.
figure 5

The chromophore regions in the 10-ns intermediate structure (cyan) and the laser-off model (gray) are shown. For the sake of clarity, only the major conformer (65% occupancy) of the laser-off model is shown. Note that His149 is hydrogen bonded to Tyr146 in the laser-off model and to the chromophore in the 10-ns intermediate structure.

Fig. 6: Overlay of 10-ns intermediate-state and on-state structures.
figure 6

Overlay (a, d) of the chromophore region in the 10-ns intermediate structure (cyan, b, e) and the on-state structure (yellow, c, f) determined from SFX at room temperature (PDB entry code 5O8927). The focus is on the phenol moiety of the chromophore, His149 and water W356 (ac) and on the entire chromophore, Ser206 and Glu223 (df). Key distances are indicated.


The mechanism of off-to-on photoswitching in rsEGFP2 involves trans-to-cis isomerization and deprotonation of the chromophore, and it was here investigated by time-resolved pump–probe UV–visible spectroscopy and TR-SFX. Spectroscopy in solution provides evidence for the existence of four intermediate states decaying with time constants of 87 ps, 5.57, 36.1 and 825 µs, respectively. The latter two time constants are markedly affected when experiments are carried out in D2O instead of H2O solution, changes compatible with a proton transfer step. The data thus show that chromophore deprotonation takes place after excited-state decay in the ground state, with time constants of 36.1 and 825 µs. The crystal structure obtained 10 ns after phototriggering features a cis chromophore that is still in the protonated state, as inferred from the spectroscopic data and from analysis of the hydrogen-bonding network at the chromophore phenol group. In our earlier TR-SFX study27, chromophore twisting was observed in the excited state 1 ps after photoexciting the off-state. Also, a low-occupancy population of a cis isomer was found 3 ps after photoexcitation that indicated chromophore isomerisation occurs in the excited state. Due to insufficient data quality, however, no structural model could be built of the 3-ps intermediate state27. The present spectroscopic and structural data unequivocally shows that the excited-state chromophore isomerisation in rsEGFP227 is followed by proton transfer in the ground state.

The TR-SFX structure determined from data collected 10 ns after triggering differs from the structure of the starting off-state (Fig. 5) and of the stable cis anionic on-state (Fig. 6), respectively, and corresponds to that of an intermediate state (laser_on_∆10 ns). Spectroscopy (see above) provides evidence that the chromophore is still protonated at 10 ns (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Fig. 2) so that the 10-ns intermediate corresponds to a cis protonated photoproduct. In the 10-ns intermediate structure, the side chain of His149 remains in an off-like conformation while the chromophore has isomerized (Figs. 4b and 6b). His149 might be more disordered in the intermediate than in the off-state structure, since there is a negative but no positive peak on that residue in the Fobslaser_on_∆10ns-Fobslaser_off map. The transition to the final on-state conformation of His149 is thus completed on a timescale longer than 10 ns. Notably, the water molecule which is being hydrogen bonded to the chromophore phenolate in the on-state (W356 in Fig. 6a), and absent in the off-state (Fig. 5), is present at 10 ns (Fig. 6b). Interestingly, Thr204 adopts the same rotamer in the 10-ns intermediate and the on-state structure (Fig. 6a), whereas it is in different rotamers in 1-ps intermediate and in the off-state structure27. In the 10-ns intermediate, the chromophore phenol group engages in three H-bonds, i.e. His149NE2, W356 and Thr204OG1 (Fig. 6b).

The 50% occupancy of the laser_on_∆10 ns intermediate exceeds the primary quantum yield of the off-to-on photoswitching reaction (0.3318). Indeed, the pump-laser parameters chosen resulted in nominally 17 absorbed photons per chromophore (cf. Methods) so that those molecules that after excitation return to a hot trans ground state within a few ps27 and then further evolve to the cold initial trans ground state can be excited again during the 100-ps pump pulse. Additionally, intermediates formed within 100 ps can also absorb and either drive the reaction forward or generate off-pathway intermediates. The time-resolved difference absorption spectra recorded at 40 and 100 ps display values close to zero at 400 nm (Supplementary Fig. 1a), indicating that the signals from ground-state depletion and an arising intermediate state absorbing at 400 nm compensate. Therefore, we cannot exclude that the laser_on_∆10 ns intermediate has partially evolved from an intermediate absorbing at 400 nm during the 100 ps pump pulse.

During the transition from the laser_on_∆10 ns intermediate to the stable cis anionic on-state His149 moves from the off-like conformation (Fig. 7b) to its on conformation (Fig. 7d). This move could correspond to the process with a 5.57 µs time constant determined by spectroscopy. Alternatively, the 5.57 µs process could correspond to structural rearrangements elsewhere in the protein and His149 would move to the on position concomitantly with chromophore deprotonation. A TR-SFX experiment with a pump–probe delay of 20 µs would provide the unknown structure (Fig. 7c) prior to chromophore deprotonation, therefore allowing to decide between the two alternative scenarios. Changes in the H-bonding network around the chromophore phenol group between the laser_on_∆10 ns intermediate and the cis anionic on-state structure (Fig. 6) are strikingly similar to the ones between the protonated A form and the anionic B form of wild-type GFP45. An exception is the H-bond between the chromophore phenol and Thr204OG1 present in the laser_on_∆10 ns intermediate structure but absent in the protonated A form of wild-type GFP (Fig. 2a in45). The laser_on_∆10 ns intermediate structure allows proposing three different pathways taken by the proton upon chromophore deprotonation. On the first pathway, the proton is transferred from the chromophore via Thr204OG1 and His149O to the solvent outside the protein as suggested for GFP46. A proton pathway between the solvent and the chromophore has also been suggested to exist in the positive RSFP Padron47,48. A second pathway proceeds via His149 and a chain of three water molecules (W377, W158, W144; only W377 is seen in Fig. 6a) connected to His149ND1 to the solvent. A third pathway guides the proton via a Grotthuss mechanism involving W356 and W361 (Fig. 6a, b) to the solvent.

Fig. 7: Model for the rsEGFP2 off-to-on photoswitching process.
figure 7

The bold purple bar represents the laser_on_∆10 ns intermediate structure determined by TR-SFX. Time constants correspond to those determined by femtosecond (87 ps) and nanosecond-resolved pump–probe UV–visible absorption spectroscopy (5.57, 36.1 and 825 µs) in H2O solution (50 mM HEPES pH 8, 50 mM NaCl). All three cis protonated states (purple bars) are ground-state intermediates, interconversion of which involves rearrangements of the protein matrix (orange arrows). Corresponding structural models for the chromophore and His149 as determined by X-ray crystallography are shown in panels a, b (this work) and d27. Trans1 and His149-off (light gray) and trans2 and His149-supp (dark gray) of the trans-protonated off-state (a, Fig. 3c) transited to cis and His149-off-like at 10 ns (b, Fig. 4b, Fig. 6b, e). His149-off-like has moved to His149-on in the cis anionic on state (d, Fig. 6c, f). The structure whose intermediate forms in 5.57 µs remains elusive (c).

The laser_off structure, determined from SFX data without pump-laser excitation, features the chromophore in two trans conformations, one of which (trans2, 25% occupancy) was not previously observed in the off-state of rsEGFP2. The third His149 conformation (His149-supp), included in the laser_off structure in addition to the ones in the on (His149-on) and the off (His149-off) states (Fig. 3c) might correspond to the trans2 conformation of the chromophore to which it would be H-bonded (distance of 2.7 Å between phenol oxygen and ND1). Ensemble refinements against published off-state datasets collected by room-temperature SFX27 and cryo-crystallography at a synchrotron18 show no indication of trans2 and His149-supp conformations (Supplementary Fig. 9). We do not yet have an explanation for this structural off-state heterogeneity. Evidence for the existence of a trans2 chromophore also comes from cryo-crystallographic synchrotron experiments, in which illumination at 488 nm of an rsEGFP2 variant with a substituted phenolate ring yielded trans2 when crystals with a contracted unit cell were examined, whereas the trans1 conformation is populated when crystals with a larger unit cell were used49. The authors suggest the tighter packing of proteins in the contracted crystal reduces the flexibility of the chromophore pocket, thereby limiting the volume available for the isomerizing chromophore and favoring the volume-conserving cis  - to - trans2 transition, rather than the volume-consuming cis - to - trans1 transition. Coincidentally, different illumination conditions were used for the two datasets. We note that a chromophore conformation similar to trans2 has been observed in rsFolder18, a reversibly switchable fluorescent protein designed for efficient expression in oxidizing cellular environments.

Based on the new results described here, we can now propose a model for the rsEGFP2 off-to-on photoswitching process (Fig. 7). Excitation at 400 nm of the trans-protonated chromophore in the off-state triggers excited-state isomerization to a cis chromophore within a few picoseconds27. After excited-state decay, there is an evolution in the ground-state with a 87 ps time constant that we assign to a protein reorganization to accommodate the cis chromophore. The resulting intermediate state with a cis protonated chromophore remains stable up to 100 ns (Supplementary Fig. 2) and was characterized by TR-SFX at 10 ns (purple bold bar in Fig. 7). Transient absorption spectroscopy in H2O solution evidences a further ground-state process with a time constant of about 5.57 µs (no isotope effect) that might correspond to a protein rearrangement during which the off-like conformation of His149 transitions to the on conformation (Fig. 7). Alternatively, the conformational change in His149 could accompany chromophore deprotonation that occurs with characteristic time constants of 36.1 and 825 µs (isotope effect) to yield the final cis anionic on-state.

Together, the present and the preceding ultrafast studies27 clarify the order of off-to-on photoswitching events in rsEGFP2 (hydrozoan origin) and provide evidence for chromophore isomerization and deprotonation being excited-state and ground-state processes, respectively. If the photoswitching mechanism of RSFPs from Anthozoa is identical to the one from Hydrozoa, our study would disagree with the proposed ground-state isomerization in Dronpa14,15 and provide unambiguous support to the proposed excited-state isomerisation and ground-state deprotonation11,12,13. TR-SFX on Dronpa and TR-IR spectroscopy on rsEGFP2 would shed light on differences and similarities in the photoswitching mechanisms of RSFPs from Anthozoa and Hydrozoa.


Protein expression, purification, and crystallization

rsEGFP216 fused to an N-terminal polyhistidine tag was expressed in E. coli BL21 cells and purified by Ni-NTA affinity and size exclusion chromatographies18. For TR-SFX, rsEGFP2 microcrystals (3 × 3 × 3 µm3) were generated by seeding a solution with final protein, precipitant, salt and buffer concentrations of ~20 mg/ml, ~2 M ammonium sulfate, 20 mM NaCl, 120 mM HEPES pH 8, respectively. Sedimented microcrystals were resuspended in 100 mM HEPES pH 8, 2.5 M ammonium sulfate prior to injection into the XFEL beam. A suspension containing 2–8% (v/v) microcrystals was filtered through a 20-µm stainless steel filter using a sample loop and a manually driven syringe.

H2O/D2O exchange of rsEGFP2 in solution

H2O/D2O exchange for nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy was performed by several cycles of dilution/concentration. 450 µl of 50 mM HEPES pD 8, 50 mM NaCl were added to a tube containing 50 µl of rsEGFP2 at 20 mg/ml in 50 mM HEPES pH 8, 50 mM NaCl. Then the protein solution was concentrated to a final volume of 100 µl using 10 kDa concentrators (Amicon 1 ml Centrifugal Filters 10 kDa Millipore). The dilution/concentration cycle was repeated four times, so that the total dilution factor was at least 1000.

Time-resolved UV–visible absorption spectroscopy

Femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy from 40 ps to 2 ns was carried out on rsEGFP2 (12.5 mg/ml) in a H2O solution containing 50 mM HEPES pH 8, 50 mM NaCl according to the protocol reported earlier27 (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy experiments were carried out from 10 ns to 10 ms (Fig. 2, Supplementary Figs. 2, 5, 7) using a conventional flash-photolysis setup (90° geometry between pump and probe beams, Supplementary Fig. 10)50 on three rsEGFP2 solutions (46 µM): (i) 50 mM HEPES pH 8, 50 mM NaCl in H2O, (ii) 50 mM HEPES pD 8, 50 mM NaCl in D2O, (iii) 50 mM HEPES pH 8, 50 mM NaCl, 1.25 M (NH4)2SO4 in H2O. Initially, the solutions (2 ml) were illuminated for 3 min at 488 nm (Cobolt 06-MLD 488; 200 mW, 2 mm 1/e2 waist diameter) to photoswitch 90% of the proteins to the trans-protonated off-state (absorbance of about 1 at 410 nm for a 1 cm thickness). Pump beam (410 nm, 8 ns, 1.6 mJ, beam size approximately 1 mm × 10 mm) was focused using a cylindrical lens onto a spectroscopic cell (Hellma, chamber thicknesses 1 mm) containing the protein solution (Supplementary Fig. 10a). The time traces of the variation in absorbance were recorded from 350 to 520 nm in 10-nm steps (3.5 nm spectrometer bandpass) to reconstruct the transient difference absorption spectra at different time delays after the pump-pulse excitation. The recorded time traces were obtained by averaging a sequence of eight pump–probe experiments (laser energy fluctuation is below 0.1 mJ pulse-to-pulse and is not corrected). There was a time lapse of 30 s between two consecutive pump-pulse excitations. To photoswitch the proteins in the stationary solution back to the off-state after each 410 nm pump pulse the spectroscopic cell containing the stationary protein solution was illuminated continuously by 490-nm light (collimated Thorlabs LED M490L4, 200 mW, beam diameter 9 mm; Supplementary Fig. 10a). Time traces of the variation in absorbance can be analyzed only at and above 10 ns, given the 8-ns pump pulse length. A transient difference absorption spectrum at one time delay (t) is obtained by averaging 10 time delay points (from t−5 points to t + 5 points) of the time traces. Three time delay windows were explored from 10 ns to 5 µs (500 ps/point), from 5 µs to 100 µs (10 ns/point) and from 100 µs to 10 ms (1 µs/point).

For spectroscopy experiments on microcrystal suspensions (Supplementary Fig. 6), rsEGFP2 microcrystals (3 × 3 × 3 µm3) were suspended in 100 mM HEPES pH 8, 2.5 M ammonium sulfate. Suspensions were initially irradiated for 30 min at 488 nm (Cobolt 06-MLD 488; 200 mW, 2 mm 1/e2 waist diameter) to achieve off-switching. For the subsequent ns–ms transient absorption experiment, the microcrystal suspension was placed in a spectroscopic cell (Hellma, chamber thickness 1 mm, Supplementary Fig. 10b). The conventional flash-photolysis setup was modified (15° between pump and probe beams, Supplementary Fig. 10b) to minimize light scattering. The pump laser (410 nm, 8 ns, 5 mJ, beam diameter approximately 2 mm) was focused using a spherical lens onto the cell containing the microcrystal suspension. The probe light-source was not modified from conventional experiments. The diameter of both pump and probe beams was 2 mm through the spectroscopic cell. Following single-shot excitation, the time traces of the variation in absorbance were recorded from 350 to 520 nm in 10-nm steps (9.4 nm spectrometer bandpass) to reconstruct the transient difference absorption spectra at different time delays after the pump-pulse excitation. Between each single-shot excitation the cell was moved manually to probe a fresh area. Time traces of the variation in absorbance start to be meaningful at 500 ns. Time windows explored were from 500 ns to 100 µs (10 ns/point) and from 100 µs to 2 ms (200 ns/point).

For the analysis of transient absorption spectra, a model based on a weighted sum of three exponential decays was chosen to fit the kinetic traces for all wavelengths (global fit analysis). This was done with Igor Pro and a custom-made analysis routine in python 3 using lmfit package51. The quality of the fit was checked by analyzing the residuals (no structure, Supplementary Fig. 3) and the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm was used to minimize least-squares error surface (χ2 < 10−5). The reported values of the standard deviations of the parameters correspond to the diagonal elements of the covariance matrix, which is the inverse of the so-called curvature matrix taken at the minimum of the error. By contrast to linear fitting, this matrix is not constant but a function of the fitting parameters for nonlinear modeling. Still, information on standard deviations can be derived but should, however, be interpreted with caution, keeping in mind the assumption that the set of parameters estimated is true. A more reliable estimation of the uncertainty would require replicated estimations of the nonlinear parameters on different datasets. These replicated datasets can be generated with bootstrap. Fitting these datasets provides different sets of parameters, whose means and standard deviations can be estimated from their distributions. The model was here fitted on 1000 replicated datasets constructed using the best parameters of the fit and adding replicates of noise (Supplementary Fig. 4). These replicates were obtained from the residuals (difference between the original and reconstructed data) randomly shuffling 25% of the values. Figures were made using Igor Pro and Searborn and matplotlib python 3 package.

SFX data collection

A suspension of rsEGFP2 microcrystals (2–8% (v/v) was transferred into a stainless steel syringe that was mounted on an anti-settling device52 and whose temperature was maintained at 20 °C with an adjustable Peltier element. The microcrystal suspension was injected with a gas dynamic virtual nozzle (GDVN53) injector into the helium-filled Diverse Application Platform for hard X-ray Diffraction in SACLA (DAPHNIS54) chamber on beamline BL3-EH4c at SACLA39 (hutch temperature ca. 27 °C). The GDVN carried a sample capillary of 100 µm inner diameter and operated at flow rates of 30–40 µl/min. Both parameters, as well as the low microcrystal concentration, were critical to avoid microcrystal aggregation and thus nozzle-clogging that occurred at lower flow rates and smaller nozzle diameters. The resulting jet had a diameter of 3–5 µm at a focusing helium pressure of 15 psi.

On their way from the sample syringe to the injector, rsEGFP2 microcrystals were photoswitched from their on-state (the resting state) to the off-state (see Fig. 1) by irradiation with continuous 488-nm laser-light (cw, 200 mW) within a pre-illumination device40. The analysis of absorption spectra (Fig. 6 in40) obtained from microcrystals collected at the exit of the device with (200 mW) and without pre-illumination indicated that approximately 90% of microcrystalline rsEGFP2 were switched off. The transit time from the pre-illumination device to the interaction zone was less than, or equal to, 1 min. This time interval is short compared to the off-to-on thermal recovery of microcrystalline rsEGFP2 (100 min40) so that 90% of the proteins were in their off-state when reaching the interaction zone.

SFX data were collected at 30 Hz using an X-ray beam (nominal photon energy 10 keV, pulse length ≤ 10 fs, 300 µJ per pulse at the sample position, 2 × 1011 photons/pulse) focused to 1.4 µm (horizontal) × 1.6 µm (vertical) (FWHM). Diffraction data were recorded using an octal-MPCCD detector with eight sensor modules55 positioned 52 mm away from the sample. Online monitoring of diffraction data, such as determination of hit-rate and estimation of the fraction of multiple hits, was done with CASS56.

TR-SFX data were collected using an optical pump–X-ray probe scheme with a pump–probe delay of 10 ns. The off-to-on transition was triggered by a pump-laser pulse (400 nm, 100 ps pulse length, 180 µm × 180 µm focal spot (FWHM), 46 µJ per pulse, leading to a peak power density of 1.25 GW/cm2 and corresponding nominally to 17 absorbed photons per chromophore) generated by a Ti:sapphire laser, aligned perpendicularly to both the liquid jet and the X-ray beam. A sequence of interleaved laser_off and laser_on diffraction images was collected at 30 Hz.

SFX data processing

A total of about 609,000 frames were collected for the laser_on_∆10 ns and the laser_off datasets, respectively. NanoPeakCell57 was used to perform offline hit-finding and sort frames with and without prior pump-laser excitation into laser_on_∆10 ns (13300 hits) and laser_off (12487 hits) datasets, respectively. CrystFEL 0.6.2 was used for further data processing (i.e. indexing and integration), resulting in 9781 and 9997 indexed frames for the laser_on_∆10 ns and laser_off datasets, respectively. The “ring-nocen” method was used for intensity integration. The sample-detector distance was refined until the distribution of unit-cell parameters was Gaussian58. Merging with the partialator module of CrystFEL 0.6.2 was optimal when combining scaling and partiality refinement with the push-res option set to zero, as judged by Rsplit, CC* and the Wilson plot. Data collection statistics are given in Supplementary Table 1.

Structure solution and refinement

The structure corresponding to the laser_off dataset was phased by molecular replacement using Phaser59 with the structure of rsEGFP2 in it off-state determined by synchrotron cryo-crystallography (PDB entry 5DTY18) as a starting model. Refinement with the Phenix suite60 included positional and isotropic individual B factor refinement in reciprocal space. Model building was carried out using Coot61 and occupancies were set manually. Given that the pre-illumination efficiency was approximately 90%40, an alternate chromophore conformation corresponding to the cis isomer in the on-state was included at 10% occupancy. Accordingly, those residues adopting different conformations in the on- and the off-states, i.e. part of β-strand 7 (residues 146 to 152), residues at the N- and C-terminus of the chromophore (residues 65 and 69), and Thr204, were also first modeled in double conformations, (90% off and 10% on). When the remaining 90% were attributed to the trans isomer of the off-state, a negative peak in the Fobslaser_off–Fcalclaser_off map indicated that the relative occupancy must be lower than 90% and a positive Fobslaser_off–Fcalclaser_off peak halfway between the cis and the trans (called trans1 hereafter) isomers indicated the presence of a third chromophore conformer (called trans2 hereafter) occupied at 25% or less (Fig. 3a). Ensemble refinement against the laser_off dataset was carried out with the Phenix suite starting from the off-state model (trans1 chromophore; Fig. 3b). The values of pTLS, tbath and tx were varied, where pTLS is the fraction of the molecules included in the TLS fitting procedure, tbath is a parameter that controls the X-ray weight and that is coupled to the thermostat temperature and tx is the relaxation time used during the simulation. The tested values were 0.6, 0.8, 0.9 and 1.0 for pTLS, 2.5, 5 and 10 K for tbath, and 0.35, 0.7 and 1.4 ps for tx. Rfree was plotted as a function of the different sets of parameter values using a custom-made python script. The lowest Rfree was chosen as a criterion to determine the most appropriate set of values of these three parameters. Ensemble refinement indicated the presence of a third chromophore conformation (trans2) and a third rotamer of His149 (His149-supp). Consequently, the chromophore and His149 were modeled with three alternate conformations, i.e. trans1, cis, trans2, and His149-off, His149-on, His149-supp, whose occupancies were jointly refined to 65% (alternate conformers A), 10% (alternate conformers B) and 25% (alternate conformers C), respectively (Fig. 3c). Thr204 and residues in β-strand 7 (positions 146-148 and 150-152) and at the N- and C-termini of the chromophore were also modeled in three alternate conformations and included in the occupancy refinement. As a control, ensemble refinement was carried out against the off-state data collected by cryo-crystallography at a synchrotron18 starting from the corresponding off-state model (chromophore 100% trans1, PDB code 5DTY18) and against the off-state data collected by room temperature SFX27 starting for the corresponding off-state model (PDB code 5O8A) from which the cis alternate conformation was omitted so that the chromophore was fully in the trans1 conformation27. The same procedure was applied and the set of parameters yielding the lowest Rfree values were ptls = 0.8, bath = 5, tx = 2.0 for 5DTY and ptls = 0.8, bath = 5, tx = 2.0 for 5O8A. Neither trans2 and nor His149-supp, conformations were occupied (Supplementary Fig. 9).

Structural changes 10 ns after pump-laser excitation were qualitatively identified in a q-weighted41 (qW) difference Fourier electron density map (Fobslaser_on_∆10ns–Fobslaser_off), calculated with the laser_off structure as a phase model using CNS62 (Fig. 4a). For further analysis, extrapolated structure factors (Fext) were calculated based on the q-weighted structure factor amplitude differences according to the following formula: Fextlaser_on_∆10ns = α * q/ < q > * (Fobslaser_on_∆10ns–Fobslaser_off) + Fobslaser_off (eq. 1), where α is the inverse of the estimated occupancy of the fraction of molecules that changed conformation upon photoexcitation and q is the Bayesian weight retrieved through the q-weighting procedure41. To determine α, a procedure reported earlier27 was applied, i.e. Fextrapolatedlaser_on_∆10ns were calculated and the ratio of integrated peaks in the Fextrapolatedlaser_on_∆10ns–Fcalclaser_off map and of integrated peaks in the qW Fobslaser_on_∆10ns–Fobslaser-off map was plotted as a function of α (Supplementary Fig. 8). Only peaks in the vicinity of the chromophore, Tyr146, His149, Val151, and Thr204 were integrated. The most appropriate value of α is the one at a maximum is reached, i.e. 2 in the present case (Supplementary Fig. 8). An α of 2 corresponds to an occupancy of 50% of the laser_on_∆10 ns intermediate structure.

The laser_on_∆10 ns intermediate structure was refined using the difference refinement procedure, and 2Fextrapolatedlaser-on-∆10ns–Fcalc and Fextrapolatedlaser-on-∆10ns–Fcalc electron density maps were used to build the model. The same procedure as for the laser-off model was followed. Refinement statistics are given in Supplementary Table 1. Figures were prepared using PyMOL63.

Data availability

Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession codes 6T39, 6T3A. The source data underlying Supplementary Fig 8 are provided as a Source Data file. Other data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.


  1. Nienhaus, K. & Nienhaus, G. U. Fluorescent proteins for live-cell imaging with super-resolution. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 1088–1106 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Adam, V., Berardozzi, R., Byrdin, M. & Bourgeois, D. Phototransformable fluorescent proteins: Future challenges. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 20C, 92–102 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hofmann, M., Eggeling, C., Jakobs, S. & Hell, S. W. Breaking the diffraction barrier in fluorescence microscopy at low light intensities by using reversibly photoswitchable proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 17565–17569 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gustafsson, M. G. L. Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy: wide-field fluorescence imaging with theoretically unlimited resolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13081–13086 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nienhaus, K. & Nienhaus, G. U. Photoswitchable fluorescent proteins: do not always look on the bright side. ACS Nano 10, 9104–9108 (2016).

  6. Brakemann, T. et al. A reversibly photoswitchable GFP-like protein with fluorescence excitation decoupled from switching. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 942 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Andresen, M. et al. Structural basis for reversible photoswitching in Dronpa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13005–13009 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Habuchi, S. et al. Reversible single-molecule photoswitching in the GFP-like fluorescent protein Dronpa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9511–9516 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ando, R., Mizuno, H. & Miyawaki, A. Regulated fast nucleocytoplasmic shuttling observed by reversible protein highlighting. Science 306, 1370–1373 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fron, E. et al. Ultrafast excited-state dynamics of the photoswitchable protein Dronpa. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 4870–4871 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Warren, M. M. et al. Ground-state proton transfer in the photoswitching reactions of the fluorescent protein Dronpa. Nat. Commun. 4, 1461 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaucikas, M., Tros, M. & van Thor, J. J. Photoisomerization and proton transfer in the forward and reverse photoswitching of the fast-switching M159T mutant of the Dronpa fluorescent protein. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 2350–2362 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yadav, D. et al. Real-time monitoring of chromophore isomerization and deprotonation during the photoactivation of the fluorescent protein Dronpa. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 2404–2414 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lukacs, A. et al. Protein photochromism observed by ultrafast vibrational spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 11954–11959 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Laptenok, S. P. et al. Infrared spectroscopy reveals multi-step multi-timescale photoactivation in the photoconvertible protein archetype dronpa. Nat. Chem. 10, 845–852 (2018).

  16. Grotjohann, T. et al. rsEGFP2 enables fast RESOLFT nanoscopy of living cells. Elife 1, e00248 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bourgeois, D. & Adam, V. Reversible photoswitching in fluorescent proteins: a mechanistic view. IUBMB Life 64, 482–491 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. El Khatib, M., Martins, A., Bourgeois, D., Colletier, J. P. & Adam, V. Rational design of ultrastable and reversibly photoswitchable fluorescent proteins for super-resolution imaging of the bacterial periplasm. Sci. Rep. 6, 18459 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Andresen, M. et al. Structure and mechanism of the reversible photoswitch of a fluorescent protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13070–13074 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Henderson, J. N., Ai, H.-w, Campbell, R. E. & Remington, S. J. Structural basis for reversible photobleaching of a green fluorescent protein homologue. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 104, 6672 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Adam, V. et al. Structural characterization of IrisFP, an optical highlighter undergoing multiple photo-induced transformations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18343–18348 (2008).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Aquila, A. et al. Time-resolved protein nanocrystallography using an X-ray free-electron laser. Opt. Express 20, 2706–2716 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Colletier, J.-P., Schirò, G. & Weik, M. in X-ray Free Electron Lasers: A Revolution in Structural Biology (eds Boutet, S., Fromme, P. & Hunter, M. S.) 331–356 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018).

  24. Barends, T. R. et al. Direct observation of ultrafast collective motions in CO myoglobin upon ligand dissociation. Science 350, 445–450 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pande, K. et al. Femtosecond structural dynamics drives the trans/cis isomerization in photoactive yellow protein. Science 352, 725–729 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tenboer, J. et al. Time-resolved serial crystallography captures high-resolution intermediates of photoactive yellow protein. Science 346, 1242–1246 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Coquelle, N. et al. Chromophore twisting in the excited state of a photoswitchable fluorescent protein captured by time-resolved serial femtosecond crystallography. Nat. Chem. 10, 31–37 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nango, E. et al. A three-dimensional movie of structural changes in bacteriorhodopsin. Science 354, 1552–1557 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shimada, A. et al. A nanosecond time-resolved XFEL analysis of structural changes associated with CO release from cytochrome c oxidase. Sci. Adv. 3, e1603042 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Suga, M. et al. Light-induced structural changes and the site of O=O bond formation in PSII caught by XFEL. Nature 543, 131–135 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nogly, P. et al. Lipidic cubic phase injector is a viable crystal delivery system for time-resolved serial crystallography. Nat. Commun. 7, 12314 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Tosha, T. et al. Capturing an initial intermediate during the P450nor enzymatic reaction using time-resolved XFEL crystallography and caged-substrate. Nat. Commun. 8, 1585 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kern, J. et al. Simultaneous femtosecond X-ray spectroscopy and diffraction of photosystem II at room temperature. Science 340, 491–495 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Young, I. D. et al. Structure of photosystem II and substrate binding at room temperature. Nature 540, 453–457 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Nogly, P. et al. Retinal isomerization in bacteriorhodopsin captured by a femtosecond x-ray laser. Science 361, eaat0094 (2018).

  36. Kern, J. et al. Structures of the intermediates of Kok’s photosynthetic water oxidation clock. Nature 563, 421–425 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Nass Kovacs, G. et al. Three-dimensional view of ultrafast dynamics in photoexcited bacteriorhodopsin. Nat. Commun. 10, 3177 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. De Groen, P. & De Moor, B. The fit of a sum of exponentials to noisy data. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20, 175–187 (1987).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Yabashi, M., Tanaka, H. & Ishikawa, T. Overview of the SACLA facility. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 22, 477–484 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Schiro, G., Woodhouse, J., Weik, M., Schlichting, I. & Shoeman, R. L. Simple and efficient system for photoconverting light-sensitive proteins in serial crystallography experiments. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 50, 932–939 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ursby, T. & Bourgeois, D. Improved estimation of structure-factor difference amplitudesfrom poorly accurate data. Acta Crystallogr. A 53, 564–575 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Terwilliger, T. C. & Berendzen, J. Difference refinement: obtaining differences between two related structures. Acta Crystallogr. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 51, 609–618 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Colletier, J.-P. et al. Use of a ‘caged’ analogue to study the traffic of choline within acetylcholinesterase by kinetic crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 63, 1115–1128 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Genick, U. Structure-factor extrapolation using the scalar approximation: theory, applications and limitations. Acta Crystallogr. D 63, 1029–1041 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Brejc, K. et al. Structural basis for dual excitation and photoisomerization of the Aequorea victoria green fluorescent protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 2306–2311 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Agmon, N. Proton pathways in green fluorescence protein. Biophys. J. 88, 2452–2461 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Regis Faro, A. et al. Low-temperature chromophore isomerization reveals the photoswitching mechanism of the fluorescent protein padron. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 16362–16365 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Brakemann, T. et al. Molecular basis of the light-driven switching of the photochromic fluorescent protein Padron. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 14603–14609 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Chang, J., Romei, M. G. & Boxer, S. G. Structural evidence of photoisomerization pathways in fluorescent proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 15504–15508 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Stoll, T. et al. [Rh(III)(dmbpy)2Cl2]+ as a highly efficient catalyst for visible-light-driven hydrogen production in pure water: comparison with other rhodium catalysts. Chemistry 19, 782–792 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Newville, M., Stensitzki, T., Allen, D. & Ingargiola, A. LMFIT: non-linear least-square minimization and curve-fitting for python. (2014).

  52. Lomb, L. et al. An anti-settling sample delivery instrument for serial femtosecond crystallography. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 45, 674–678 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Weierstall, U., Spence, J. C. & Doak, R. B. Injector for scattering measurements on fully solvated biospecies. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 035108 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Tono, K. et al. Diverse application platform for hard X-ray diffraction in SACLA (DAPHNIS): application to serial protein crystallography using an X-ray free-electron laser. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 22, 532–537 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Kameshima, T. et al. Development of an X-ray pixel detector with multi-port charge-coupled device for X-ray free-electron laser experiments. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 033110 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Foucar, L. et al. CASS-CFEL-ASG software suite. Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2207–2213 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Coquelle, N. et al. Raster-scanning serial protein crystallography using micro- and nano-focused synchrotron beams. Acta Crystallogr. D 71, 1184–1196 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Nass, K. et al. Protein structure determination by single-wavelength anomalous diffraction phasing of X-ray free-electron laser data. IUCrJ 3, 180–191 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Brunger, A. T. Version 1.2 of the crystallography and NMR system. Nat. Protoc. 2, 2728–2733 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. edn (Schrödinger, LLC).

Download references


The authors are grateful to So Iwata and Rie Tanaka for valuable comments and technical assistance related to the experiments at SACLA and to Hugues Nury for help with sample preparation at SACLA. The XFEL experiments were carried out at BL3-EH4c of SACLA with the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI; Proposal No. 2015A8031). We warmly thank the SACLA staff for assistance. M.S.l. is grateful to Raffaele Vitale for discussion on bootstrap analysis and Jean-Julien Dubois for technical support in time-resolved spectroscopy experiments and M.W. to Marco Kloos and James Remington for discussions and to Eva Pebay-Peyroula, Jacques Neyton, Gilles Bloch and Renaud Blaise for support. The study was supported by a travel grant from the CEA to J.W., N.C., V.A., E.d.l.M., P.M., J.P.C. and M.W., a grant from the CNRS (PEPS SASLELX) to M.W., an ANR grant to M.W., M.C., M.S.l. (BioXFEL) and a PhD fellowship from Lille University to LMU. We acknowledge support from the Max Planck Society. This work used the Multistep Protein Purification Platform (MP3) of the Grenoble Instruct center (ISBG; UMS 3518 CNRS-CEA-UJF-EMBL) with support from FRISBI (ANR-10-INSB-05-02) and GRAL (ANR-10-LABX-49-01) within the Grenoble Partnership for Structural Biology (PSB). The IBS acknowledges integration into the Interdisciplinary Research Institute of Grenoble (IRIG, CEA) and financial support by the CEA, the CNRS and the UGA. The Chevreul Institute (FR 2638), the Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, the Région Nord-Pas de Calais and FEDER are acknowledged for financial support. G.N.K. acknowledges support from the E.U. under the program FP7-PEOPLE-2011-ITN NanoMem (project number 317079). J.W. acknowledges support from the CEA through the IRTELIS PhD program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



M.W., M.S., D.B., J.P.C. and I.S. designed research. S.J. provided rsEGFP2 plasmid. J.W., V.A., V.G., M.T. and F.F. expressed and purified WT protein. J.W., V.G. and I.S. carried out microcrystallization. G.S. and M.B. spectroscopically characterized microcrystals. M.Fe. and M.Fi. carried out simulations. L.U., M.S. and C.R. carried out time-resolved absorption spectroscopy. J.W., G.N.-K., N.C, V.A., T.R.M.B., E.DlM, R.B.D., Y.J., P.M., K.M., K.N., S.O., C.M.R., G.S., R.L.S., T.T., K.T., M.C., L.F., M.S., J.P.C., I.S. and M.W. carried out SFX experiments. R.L.S, R.B.D., G.N.-K. and K.N. performed sample injection. T.T., S.O., and M.C. aligned and controlled the pump laser. Y.J., K.M., K.T., M.Y., L.F. discussed software aspects of experiment, K.M. and L.F. prepared and implemented DAQ and online processing. C.M.R., K.M., L.F., N.C., T.R.M.B. and J.P.C. carried out online SFX data processing. J.W., N.C. and J.P.C. carried out offline SFX data processing. J.W. and J.P.C. carried out structure refinement and analysis, with input from V.A., T.R.M.B., D.B., N.C. I.S. and M.W. J.W. and M.W. wrote the manuscript with contributions and input from D.B., M.S., J.P.C. and I.S. and all authors approved it.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Michel Sliwa, Ilme Schlichting or Martin Weik.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woodhouse, J., Nass Kovacs, G., Coquelle, N. et al. Photoswitching mechanism of a fluorescent protein revealed by time-resolved crystallography and transient absorption spectroscopy. Nat Commun 11, 741 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing