Abstract
Sensitive photodetection is crucial for modern optoelectronic technology. Two-dimensional molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) with unique crystal structure, and extraordinary electrical and optical properties is a promising candidate for ultrasensitive photodetection. Previously reported methods to improve the performance of MoS2 photodetectors have focused on complex hybrid systems in which leakage paths and dark currents inevitably increase, thereby reducing the photodetectivity. Here, we report an ultrasensitive negative capacitance (NC) MoS2 phototransistor with a layer of ferroelectric hafnium zirconium oxide film in the gate dielectric stack. The prototype photodetectors demonstrate a hysteresis-free ultra-steep subthreshold slope of 17.64 mV/dec and ultrahigh photodetectivity of 4.75 × 1014 cm Hz1/2 W−1 at room temperature. The enhanced performance benefits from the combined action of the strong photogating effect induced by ferroelectric local electrostatic field and the voltage amplification based on ferroelectric NC effect. These results address the key challenges for MoS2 photodetectors and offer inspiration for the development of other optoelectronic devices.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Sensitive, fast, and accurate detection of light is the foundation for the future optical communication, memory, sensing, imaging, and other optoelectronic applications. Photodetectors based on two-dimensional (2D) materials, such as graphene1,2 and transition metal dichalcogenides3,4,5, have emerged and drawn tremendous attention owing to their unique crystal structures, extraordinary electrical and optical properties, as well as the potential applications in ultrathin, transparent, and flexible optoelectronic devices6,7. The nature of a 2D optoelectronic material has largely determined the type and the working mechanism of its photodetectors8,9,10. Taking graphene as an example, as its gapless Dirac cone band structure results in ultrafast carrier recombination, graphene–metal junction and graphene p–n junction photodiodes are mainly exploited for separating photogenerated electrons and holes by the built-in electric field1,11,12,13. Graphene-based photodiodes with the characteristics of fast photoresponse but low photocurrent gain are hardly suitable for the room-temperature few-photon photodetection. On the contrary, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) phototransistors are promising for visible to near-infrared highly sensitive photodetection, due to its thickness-dependent band gap, high photoconductive gain, and high carrier mobility14,15,16,17,18,19,20. Back in 2013, the monolayer MoS2 phototransistor was reported with responsivity (R) as high as 880 A W−1 at incident wavelength (λ) of 561 nm and power of 150 pW21. However, since its high responsivity is mainly attributed to trap states either in MoS2 or at the interface between MoS2 and SiO2 substrate, the uncontrollability of trap states caused by material and interface defects, low detectivity, and slow photoresponse on the timescale of seconds seriously limit its practical applications.
Nowadays, nearly all researches on improving the performance of MoS2 phototransistors focus on the hybrid systems combined with other material platforms such as graphene, quantum dots (QDs), perovskites, organic dye molecules, and surface plasmonic nanostructures22. For instance, the hybrid MoS2-PbS QDs photodetector was reported with an ultrahigh responsivity of 6 × 105 A W−1, yet large dark current of 0.26 μA, low detectivity, and high operating voltage23. Even though hybrid photodetectors using HgTe QDs demonstrate compelling sensitivity, the quality control of QDs and complicated preparation technology remain as the key challenges24. Besides, by incorporating organic dye molecules25 or perovskites26, MoS2 photodetectors demonstrate enhanced optical absorption and responsivity, whereas it is inevitable to change the characteristic absorption spectrum and form leakage paths, resulting in large dark current and low detectivity. Furthermore, using high-mobility graphene as an expressway for carrier transport of phototransistors can only improve the performance of MoS2 phototransistors to some extent, yet introducing undesirable complex interface and fabrication issues27.
Here, an alternative approach is developing gate dielectric engineering in MoS2 phototransistors. Ferroelectrics behave nonlinearly, which implies that phototransistors with a ferroelectric layer in the gate stack may have the ability to amplify the electrical response to optical signals. Ferroelectric hafnium zirconium oxide (HZO, Hf1−xZrxO2 with x = 0.5) thin film, with thickness scalability, complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology compatibility, and environmental friendliness, is thought as a kind of superior nonlinear gate dielectric layer to regulate optoelectronic characteristics of MoS2 phototransistors. Recent researches have demonstrated the photogating effect in MoS2 phototransistors, where trapped holes enable photogenerated electrons to circulate through an external circuit more than once leading to large photocurrent20,28. Besides, photogating effect can not only achieve the photoconductive gain but also lead to the threshold shift of phototransistors. Although the uncompensated dangling bonds or water molecules at the MoS2/oxide interface contribute to trap states to a certain extent, the ferroelectric HZO gate dielectric layer dominates and enhances the photogating effect by trapping more holes in the ferroelectric local electrostatic field, yielding high photoconductive gain and large threshold shifts. Moreover, ferroelectric negative capacitance (NC) effect, that the capacitance of ferroelectrics is negative during the process of ferroelectric polarization switching, possesses the ability to accomplish voltage amplification and ultra-steep subthreshold slope (SS) in the phototransistor with a ferroelectric layer in its gate stack29,30,31,32,33,34. Therefore, MoS2 phototransistors based on ferroelectric HZO films can efficiently amplify the change of the channel energy barrier induced by threshold shifts, resulting in that more electrons can go across the channel energy barrier and form large photocurrent. On the whole, ferroelectric HZO film is supposed to improve the performance of MoS2 phototransistors through strengthening the photogating effect by trapping more holes in the ferroelectric local electrostatic field and amplifying the energy barrier drop caused by threshold shifts based on ferroelectric NC effect.
In this paper, we report an ultrasensitive NC MoS2 phototransistor based on ferroelectric HZO thin film. In contrast to previously reported optimization strategies of MoS2 photodetectors, ferroelectric HZO thin films in the gate dielectric stack can significantly enhance the photogating effect, suppress the dark current and improve the light to dark current ratio by ferroelectric local electrostatic field and ferroelectric NC effect, thereby yielding an ultrahigh photodetectivity while maintaining high responsivity and fast response. Experimentally, by the gate structure engineering and the semiconductor thickness scaling35, MoS2 phototransistors accomplish a hysteresis-free ultra-steep SS (SSavg = 45 mV/dec, SSmin = 17.64 mV/dec). When illuminated, transfer characteristic curves shift to the left because of the strong photogating effect induced by ferroelectric local electrostatic field, yielding a change in phototransistor threshold voltage VT (in the dark) to VT − ΔVT (under illumination). As a result of threshold shift, the drain current (Ids) changes from Idark to Ilight = Idark + Iph and follows Iph = Ilight − Idark = ∫(dIds/dVg)dVT, where Iph is photocurrent, Idark and Ilight are the drain currents in the dark or under illumination. More specially, as dIds/dVg is fully dependent on SS in the subthreshold region, ultra-steep SS induced by ferroelectric NC effect can efficiently increase photocurrent and improve detectivity20. Therefore, based on the combined action of the threshold shift and the ultra-steep SS, we demonstrate the prototype devices with ultrahigh detectivity of 4.7 × 1014 cm Hz1/2 W−1 and high responsivity of 96.8 A W−1 under low operating voltages of Vds = 0.5 V and Vg = −1.6 V at room temperature. These results address the key challenges for ultrasensitive MoS2 photodetectors and are promising for the development of other photodetectors based on the photogating effect.
Results
Device structure and microscopic representation
Figure 1a, b is the structure schematic and the optical microscope photograph of the NC MoS2 phototransistor, respectively. A metal-ferroelectric-insulator-semiconductor field effect transistor (MFISFET) was fabricated on a p-type silicon substrate, with TiN as the gate metal, HZO/Al2O3 as ferroelectric/insulator gate layers, multilayer MoS2 as the channel semiconductor, and Cr/Au as the source and drain electrodes. The TiN layer is not only used as the back gate electrode but also as the substrate for growing high-quality ferroelectric HZO thin film by atomic layer deposition (ALD) process. The growth process of the ferroelectric HZO thin film is provided in “Methods” section, and the grazing-incident X-ray diffraction (GI-XRD) pattern of the ferroelectric HZO film is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. Compared with conventional ferroelectrics, ferroelectric HZO thin film with thickness scalability, CMOS compatibility, and environmental friendliness is more applicable in future nanoscale electronic and optoelectronic devices. Besides, the amorphous Al2O3 layer plays an essential role in improving the quality of HZO/MoS2 interface36, including suppressing gate leakage current, achieving capacitance matching, and enhancing device stability31,32. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 2, metal-ferroelectric-semiconductor field effect transistors (MFSFETs) without the Al2O3 layer present inferior electrical properties. The inset in Fig. 1b is the atomic force microscope (AFM) imaging of a multilayer MoS2 flake, and the thickness of MoS2 is measured as 6.3 nm (nine layers) with the Raman spectrum of nine-layer MoS2 shown in Supplementary Fig. 337. Figure 1c, d is the cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging and the detailed energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) elemental mapping of the channel and gate of the device. According to the TEM imaging, the thicknesses of MoS2/Al2O3/HZO/TiN layers are 6.3/6/10/40 nm, and the interfaces of all layers are clear, flat, and free of impurities. Besides, the layered structure of the MoS2 layer is discerned in Supplementary Fig. 4. Furthermore, the EDS analysis of Mo, S, Al, Hf, Zr, and Ti elements demonstrates that all elements are uniformly distributed and without inter-diffused.
Electrical properties of NC MoS2 phototransistors
The ferroelectric properties of the HZO thin film, such as the hysteresis loop and the NC effect, play decisive roles in electrical and optoelectronic characteristics of NC phototransistors. Firstly, the solid blue line in Fig. 2a presents the hysteresis loop of the 10 nm-thick ferroelectric HZO thin film tested by a capacitor composed of Au/HZO/TiN layers (the maximum swept voltage of the P-E measurement is ±2.8 V, the frequency used is 1000 Hz, and the preset delay is 1000 ms). The hysteresis loop confirms the basic ferroelectric characteristics of HZO films with coercive field (Ec) of 1.5 MV cm−1 and remnant polarization (Pr) of 10 μC cm−2, and the dashed red line fitted by the Landau–Khalatnikov (LK) equation E = 2αP + 4βP3 + 6γP5 shows the negative dP/dE29,32. Furthermore, the ferroelectric capacitance (CFe) is defined as the reciprocal of the second derivation of the potential energy (U) with respect to the charge (Q), written as CFe = (d2U/dQ2)−1. The principle of the ferroelectric NC effect can be understood through device working mechanism schematics and ferroelectric double well energy landscapes34 shown in Fig. 2b. At the beginning, the gate voltage of the device is negative and less than the threshold voltage, yielding the ferroelectric layer polarized downwards, the channel electrons depleted, and the device turned off. Then changing the gate voltage to the opposite, the ferroelectric layer is polarized upwards, the channel electrons are accumulated, and the device is turned on. In the process of mutual conversion of the above two ferroelectric polarization states, the ferroelectric is supposed to go across an energy barrier from one energy valley to another. According to the definition of the ferroelectric capacitance, this energy barrier is the ferroelectric NC region.
To get insight into the fundamental electrical characteristics of the NC MoS2 phototransistors, Fig. 2c exhibits its equivalent capacitance schematic, where CS, Cox, and CFe represent the capacitance of MoS2, Al2O3, and HZO layers, respectively. Notably, CS also includes the stray capacitances of the source and drain shown in Supplementary Fig. 5. Cox38 and CFe can be calculated by the expression C = εSd−1, where ε, S, and d stand for the permittivity, area and thickness of dielectric layers, and the permittivity of the ferroelectric HZO thin film (εFe) presented in Supplementary Fig. 6 is measured by the capacitor shown in Fig. 2a. Through a simple calculation, the relationship between SS and capacitances is obtained as SS = [1 + CS(CFe−1 + Cox−1)] × 60 mV/dec = [1 − CS(|CFe|−1 − Cox−1)] × 60 mV/dec. According to this expression, it is beyond doubt that capacitance matching is crucial to achieve sub-60 mV/dec ultra-steep SS. Based on an optimized 10 nm-thick HZO ferroelectric layer and an appropriate 6 nm-thick Al2O3 layer (according to the expression of SS, |CFe|−1 − Cox−1 > 0 is a necessary condition for the sub-60 mV/dec ultra-steep SS), a series of thicknesses of MoS2 are measured experimentally and the measurement results are shown in Supplementary Fig. 7. As the thickness of MoS2 increases, that is the permittivity and capacitance of MoS2 increase35, the SS becomes steeper in accordance with the expression SS = [1 − CS(|CFe|−1 − Cox−1)] × 60 mV/dec. Meanwhile, when the thickness of the MoS2 is increased to 9.8 nm, a hysteresis about 0.16 V between forward and reverse Vg–Ids curves is observed, which can be explained by the structural defects of MoS2 or the stability condition of NCFETs. For one thing, the total number of structural defects increases with the thickness of MoS239,40. When Vg sweeps forward, charge traps in the MoS2 layer inhibit the ferroelectric polarization switching by screening the electric field. After the traps have been neutralized, the ferroelectric polarization switches, leading to a large hysteresis and an abrupt jump in the reverse. For another, the stability condition of MFISFETs requires that the total gate-channel capacitance Cgc = (CS−1 + Cox−1 + CFe−1)−1 = (CS−1 + Cox−1 − |CFe|−1)−1 has to be positive29,31. Increasing the thickness (capacitance) of MoS2 may break the stability condition of the device, resulting in a large hysteresis in Ids–Vg curves.
Through optimizing the thickness of MoS2 in MFISFETs to 6.3 nm (nine layers), the MoS2 phototransistor accomplishes hysteresis-free ultra-steep SS. The output characteristic (Vds–Ids) curves shown in Fig. 2d exhibit ohmic characteristics for all gate voltages. The output characteristic curves under larger drain voltages are presented in Supplementary Fig. 8. In Fig. 2e, the forward and reverse transfer characteristic (Vg–Ids) curves (the swept voltage of Vg–Ids measurements is ramped and the swept rate is 14.14 Hz corresponding to the number of data points per second) are plotted in red and blue, respectively, and the hysteresis between them is almost negligible (the gate leakage measurement is shown in Supplementary Fig. 9). For a linear scale (right axis), electron mobility (μn) is calculated as 54.2 cm2 V−1 s−1 using the expression μn = (L/W)(S/Cins)Vds−1(dIds/dVg), where Cins stands for the total capacitance of gate insulators. For a logarithmic scale (left axis), SS calculated by the definition SS = dVg/d(lgIds) are presented in Fig. 2f, where the average value, the minimum value in forward and reverse (SSavg, SSmin-for, and SSmin-rev) are 45, 17.64, and 25.55 mV/dec, respectively. The optimization of electrical characteristics paves the way for ultrasensitive photodetection of MoS2 phototransistors working in the subthreshold region.
Mechanism of optical detection in NC MoS2 phototransistors
For typical photodetection operation, the laser is incident perpendicularly to the device surface, and the spot covers the entire channel uniformly shown in Fig. 3a. The transfer characteristics of the phototransistors in the dark and under the illumination of various optical powers are presented in Fig. 3b. The changes in threshold voltage VT,dark (in the dark) to VT,light = VT − ΔVT (under illumination) are observed in Vg–Ids curves, and the threshold shift (ΔVT) increases with the incident optical powers. As a result of the threshold shift, the channel current increases from Idark to Ilight = Idark + Iph, that is the photocurrent Iph = Ilight − Idark = ∫(dIds/dVg)dVT, where dIds/dVg is fully dependent on SS in the subthreshold region. According to the definition of SS, with simple algebra the quantitative relationship among ΔVT, Iph and SS is obtained as lg(Ilight/Idark) = lgIlight − lgIdark = ∫SS−1dVT, indicating that the large threshold shift and the ultra-steep SS work together to contribute to the ultrahigh light to dark current ratio and achieve ultrasensitive photodetection. Dependence of threshold shifts on incident optical powers and dependence of photocurrent on threshold shifts are extracted from Vg–Ids curves and presented in Fig. 3c. Since the ability of the ferroelectric local electrostatic field to trap holes is gradually weakened as holes accumulated more and more in the gate stack, P–ΔVT and ΔVT–Iph curves rise steeply for the incident optical power up to 0.2 nW and the threshold shift up to 0.21 V, respectively, and then gradually saturates.
To explore the mechanism of ultrasensitive photodetection, we focus on the working principles of optical absorption, photogating effect and voltage amplification in the device. Throughout the entire photodetection process, the operating voltages Vds and Vg are set as constant, and the gate voltage equals to the threshold voltage of the device in the dark. For the dark state, the ferroelectric layer is polarized by the gate voltage, and the channel electrons are depleted by the ferroelectric electrostatic local field, therefore the phototransistor is turned off, and the dark current is suppressed to an extremely low level. Under light illumination, the enhanced light absorption can be achieved in multilayer MoS2, generating electron-hole pairs efficiently by a strong light-matter interaction shown in Fig. 3d. Crucially, photoexcited electrons are pulled toward the external circuits, while photoexcited holes are trapped in the gate stack due to the ferroelectric electrostatic local field (Eferro), leading to a strong photogating effect on the MoS2 phototransistors. Furthermore, as presented in Fig. 3e, the photogating effect gives rise to a change of threshold voltage (ΔVT) as well as a reduction of the energy barrier (qΔV) in the channel, so that more electrons can get over the energy barrier and form photocurrent. As shown in Fig. 3f, the channel energy barrier drop qΔV = qΔVT(1 + CSCins−1)−1 is generally less than qΔVT, since the total capacitance of gate insulators is usually positive. However, MoS2 NC phototransistors can break through this limitation and achieve a larger qΔV = qΔVT[1 − CS(|CFe|−1 − Cox−1)]−1 > qΔVT based on the ferroelectric NC effect and capacitance matching conditions. It means that ultrasensitive photodetection of NC MoS2 phototransistors is fundamentally based on the combined action of the ferroelectric electrostatic local field and the ferroelectric NC effect.
Optoelectronic properties of NC MoS2 phototransistors
To confirm the above mechanism, we next turn our attention to the photoresponse of the NC MoS2 phototransistors. The optoelectronic measurements are performed under the illumination of a monochromatic light source with wavelength of 637 nm in a dark room at room temperature. Figure 4a presents the Vds–Ids curves in the dark and under various incident optical powers. To further evaluate the performance of the phototransistors, we extract the power dependence of photocurrent, light to dark current ratio, responsivity, external quantum efficiency (EQE) and detectivity from the Vds–Ids curves at Vds = 0.5 V and Vg = −1.6 V. With the logarithmic scale, the photocurrent dotted in red and the light to dark current ratio dotted in blue increase with the incident optical powers and achieve maximum values as high as Iph = 5.22 μA and Ilight/Idark = 5.8 × 107 at Peff = 1116 nW as shown in Fig. 4b. It is worth mentioning that Peff is calculated by Peff = APπ−1r−2, where A is the area of the sample, P is the actual laser output and r is the radius of the laser spot size. The responsivity R = IphPeff−1 indicates how much photocurrent can be produced by unit incident power on the photodetector, while the EQE defined as EQE = hcRλ−1e−1, is the ratio of the number of photoexcited carriers to the number of incident photons, where h is Planck constant, c is the speed of light and e is the electron charge. The responsivity and the EQE respectively plotted in Fig. 4c, d show the same changing tendency with the incident powers, reaching the largest values of R = 96.8 A W−1 and EQE = 1.88 × 104 % at the lowest incident power of Peff = 2.7 nW. The detectivity given by D* = RA1/2(2eIdark)−1/2 is one of the most important parameters for photodetectors. The ultrahigh detectivity of D* = 4.75 × 1014 cm Hz1/2 W−1 is achieved at Peff = 2.7 nW in Fig. 4e owing to the ultrahigh light to dark current ratio. Moreover, rise (τr) and decay (τf) times of photocurrent are measured as 400 μs and 200 ms, respectively, and both the rise and decay curves (in black) are fitted well using exponential functions (in red) shown in Fig. 4f.
We have also reviewed methods to improve the performance of MoS2 phototransistors based on previously reported researches and this work. As one kind of the most investigated 2D material-based photodetectors, optimization strategies and detailed performance parameters of MoS2 phototransistors are listed in Supplementary Table 1 to provide ideas for further exploration of other 2D optoelectronic semiconductors and their photodetectors41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62. There are four kinds of strategies regarding methods, including surface plasmon enhancement, charge-transfer assistance, impurity/energy band engineering of MoS2, and gate engineering. Among these methods, charge-transfer-assisted hybrid systems combined with other material platforms such as graphene, QDs, perovskites and organic molecules are the most extensively studied strategy recently. The hybrid phototransistors present enhanced optical absorption and responsivity, whereas it is usually inevitable to introduce leakage paths, increase dark current, and slower response speed. As presented in Fig. 5, NC MoS2 phototransistors based on gate dielectric engineering can circumvent these issues and demonstrate compelling performance with ultrahigh light to dark current ratio and detectivity, high responsivity and fast response, are promising for low-power and high-performance optoelectronic applications.
Discussion
In summary, based on the strategy of gate dielectric engineering, NC MoS2 phototransistors with HZO ferroelectric thin films in the gate dielectric stack are proposed and fabricated. The prototype photodetectors demonstrate ultra-steep subthreshold slope of 17.64 mV/dec and ultrahigh detectivity of 4.75 × 1014 cm Hz1/2 W−1 under λ = 637 nm and Peff = 2.7 nW at room temperature, owing to the strong photogating effect of ferroelectric local electrostatic field and the ultra-steep SS induced by ferroelectric NC effect during the process of ferroelectric polarization switching. This high-performance MoS2 photodetector should be a promising candidate for future optoelectronic applications and offer inspiration for the development of other optoelectronic devices. Furthermore, the gain mechanism relying on the combined action of the photogating and NC effects can be further exploited for the ultrasensitive few-photon detection technique and generally applicable to a large amount of low-dimensional semiconductors.
Methods
Fabrication of the multilayer MoS2 phototransistor
A 40 nm-thick TiN layer was deposited by ion beam sputtering on 300 nm-thick SiO2 grown on p-doped silicon substrates. The 10 nm-thick HZO thin film was grown on the TiN gate electrode by ALD process at 280 °C substrate temperature, and crystalized with a 60 s anneal at 500 °C in a nitrogen atmosphere. Hf[N(C2H5)CH3]4, Zr[N(C2H5)CH3]4 and H2O were used as Hf precursor, Zr precursor and oxygen source, respectively. The Hf/Zr ratio was controlled by alternate deposition of one cycle HfO2 and one cycle ZrO2, which was confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Then a 6 nm-thick Al2O3 layer was deposited on the HZO film by electron beam evaporation. Multilayer MoS2 nano-sheets were mechanically exfoliated from bulk MoS2 crystals and mounted on the Al2O3 layer. Finally, the source (S) and drain (D) metal electrodes were fabricated using electron-beam lithography, thermal evaporation of Cr/Au films (15 nm / 45 nm) and lift-off.
Polarization of the ferroelectric HZO Film
In MoS2 NC phototransistors, the source electrode is connected to ground, and the polarization state of the ferroelectric HZO film in the gate stake is controlled by the gate voltage Vg, specific as follows. For the electrical measurement, taking Fig. 2e as an example, during the Ids–Vg measurement (Ig–Vg is measured simultaneously and the results are shown in Supplementary Fig. 9), the source electrode is connected to ground, the drain voltage is constant (Vds = 0.1 V), and the gate voltage sweeps forward (Vg is from –1.9 to 1.9 V) and then reverse (from 1.9 to −1.9 V). As Vg sweeps forward, the ferroelectric polarization switches from downward to upward, the channel electrons are gradually accumulated and the device is turned on. As Vg sweeps reverse, the ferroelectric polarization switches from upward to downward, the channel electrons are gradually depleted and the device is turned off. For the optoelectronic measurement, taking Fig. 4a as an example, the source electrode is connected to ground, the operating voltages Vds and Vg are set as constant, and specially the gate voltage equals to the threshold voltage of the dark state (Vg = VT,dark = −1.6 V), yielding that the ferroelectric layer is polarized downwards and the dark current is suppressed to an extremely low level.
Measurement of electrical and optoelectronic properties
The electrical and optoelectronic measurement were carried out with a Lake Shore probe station and a Keysight B1500A semiconductor device analyzer under ambient conditions at room temperature. The photoresponse was tested under illumination of 520 nm/637 nm monochromatic light sources in a dark room. The light source was generated, switched, and transmitted by a Thorlabs ITC4001 laser diode/temperature controller and a LM9LP fiber-pigtailed laser diode. The spot diameter of the light source on the device surface was 1 mm, and the multilayer MoS2 nano-sheet of the device was positioned at the center of the spot. A high-speed Tektronix MDO3014 mixed domain oscilloscope was used to measure the time-resolved photoresponse.
Data availability
The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The source data underlying Figs. 2a, d–f, 3b, c, 4a–f, 5a, b and Supplementary Figs. 1, 2b–d, 3, 6, 7b, c, e, f, 8 and 9 are provided as a Source Data file.
References
Mak, K. F., Ju, L., Wang, F. & Heinz, T. F. Optical spectroscopy of graphene: from the far infrared to the ultraviolet. Solid State Commun. 152, 1341–1349 (2012).
Bonaccorso, F., Sun, Z., Hasan, T. & Ferrari, A. C. Graphene photonics and optoelectronics. Nat. Photonics 4, 611 (2010).
Mak, K. F. & Shan, J. Photonics and optoelectronics of 2D semiconductor transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Photonics 10, 216 (2016).
Chhowalla, M. et al. The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Nat. Chem. 5, 263 (2013).
Wong, J. et al. High photovoltaic quantum efficiency in ultrathin van der Waals heterostructures. ACS Nano 11, 7230–7240 (2017).
Xie, C. & Yan, F. Flexible photodetectors based on novel functional materials. Small 13, 1701822 (2017).
Long, M., Wang, P., Fang, H. & Hu, W. Progress, challenges, and opportunities for 2D material based photodetectors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1803807 (2019).
Brar, V. W., Sherrott, M. C. & Jariwala, D. Emerging photonic architectures in two-dimensional opto-electronics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 6824–6844 (2018).
Buscema, M. et al. Photocurrent generation with two-dimensional van der Waals semiconductors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 3691–3718 (2015).
Liu, Y. et al. Van der Waals heterostructures and devices. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16042 (2016).
Xia, F., Mueller, T., Lin, Y. M., Valdes-Garcia, A. & Avouris, P. Ultrafast graphene photodetector. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 839 (2009).
Mueller, T., Xia, F. & Avouris, P. Graphene photodetectors for high-speed optical communications. Nat. Photonics 4, 297 (2010).
Gabor, N. M. et al. Hot carrier-assisted intrinsic photoresponse in graphene. Science 334, 648–652 (2011).
Choi, W. et al. High-detectivity multilayer MoS2 phototransistors with spectral response from ultraviolet to infrared. Adv. Mater. 24, 5832–5836 (2012).
Yoon, Y., Ganapathi, K. & Salahuddin, S. How good can monolayer MoS2 transistors be? Nano Lett. 11, 3768–3773 (2011).
Lee, H. S. et al. MoS2 nanosheet phototransistors with thickness-modulated optical energy gap. Nano Lett. 12, 3695–3700 (2012).
Conley, H. J. et al. Bandgap engineering of strained monolayer and bilayer MoS2. Nano Lett. 13, 3626–3630 (2013).
Yin, Z. et al. Single-layer MoS2 phototransistors. ACS Nano 6, 74–80 (2011).
Radisavljevic, B., Radenovic, A., Brivio, J., Giacometti, V. & Kis, A. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 147 (2011).
Furchi, M. M., Polyushkin, D. K., Pospischil, A. & Mueller, T. Mechanisms of photoconductivity in atomically thin MoS2. Nano Lett. 14, 6165–6170 (2014).
Lopez-Sanchez, O., Lembke, D., Kayci, M., Radenovic, A. & Kis, A. Ultrasensitive photodetectors based on monolayer MoS2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 497 (2013).
Wu, C. C. et al. Elucidating the photoresponse of ultrathin MoS2 field-effect transistors by scanning photocurrent microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 2508–2513 (2013).
Kufer, D. et al. Hybrid 2D-0D MoS2-PbS quantum dot photodetectors. Adv. Mater. 27, 176–180 (2015).
Huo, N., Gupta, S. & Konstantatos, G. MoS2-HgTe quantum dot hybrid photodetectors beyond 2 µm. Adv. Mater. 29, 1606576 (2017).
Yu, S. H. et al. Dye-sensitized MoS2 photodetector with enhanced spectral photoresponse. ACS Nano 8, 8285–8291 (2014).
Kang, D. H. et al. An ultrahigh-performance photodetector based on a perovskite-transition-metal-dichalcogenide hybrid structure. Adv. Mater. 28, 7799–7806 (2016).
Xu, H. et al. High responsivity and gate tunable graphene-MoS2 hybrid phototransistor. Small 10, 2300–2306 (2014).
Fang, H. & Hu, W. Photogating in low dimensional photodetectors. Adv. Sci. 4, 1700323 (2017).
Salahuddin, S. & Datta, S. Use of negative capacitance to provide voltage amplification for low power nanoscale devices. Nano Lett. 8, 405–410 (2008).
McGuire, F. A. et al. Sustained sub-60 mV/decade switching via the negative capacitance effect in MoS2 transistors. Nano Lett. 17, 4801–4806 (2017).
Nourbakhsh, A. et al. Subthreshold swing improvement in MoS2 transistors by the negative-capacitance effect in a ferroelectric Al-doped-HfO2/HfO2 gate dielectric stack. Nanoscale 9, 6122–6127 (2017).
Si, M. et al. Steep-slope hysteresis-free negative capacitance MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 24 (2018).
Catalan, G., Jiménez, D. & Gruverman, A. Ferroelectrics: Negative capacitance detected. Nat. Mater. 14, 137 (2015).
Khan, A. I. et al. Negative capacitance in a ferroelectric capacitor. Nat. Mater. 14, 182 (2015).
Cheiwchanchamnangij, T. & Lambrecht, W. R. Quasiparticle band structure calculation of monolayer, bilayer, and bulk MoS2. Phys. Rev. B 85, 205302 (2012).
Zou, X. et al. Interface engineering for high-performance top-gated MoS2 field-effect transistors. Adv. Mater. 26, 6255–6261 (2014).
Li, H. et al. From bulk to monolayer MoS2: evolution of Raman scattering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 1385–1390 (2012).
Birey, H. Thickness dependence of the dielectric constant and resistance of Al2O3 films. J. Appl. Phys. 48, 5209–5212 (1977).
Lu, C. P. et al. Bandgap, mid-gap states, and gating effects in MoS2. Nano Lett. 14, 4628–4633 (2014).
Zhou, W. et al. Intrinsic structural defects in monolayer molybdenum disulfide. Nano Lett. 13, 2615–2622 (2013).
Zhang, W. et al. High-gain phototransistors based on a CVD MoS2 monolayer. Adv. Mater. 25, 3456–3461 (2013).
Tsai, D. S. et al. Few-layer MoS2 with high broadband photogain and fast optical switching for use in harsh environments. ACS Nano 7, 3905–3911 (2013).
Perea-López, N. et al. CVD-grown monolayered MoS2 as an effective photosensor operating at low-voltage. 2D Mater. 1, 011004 (2014).
Lu, J. et al. Improved photoelectrical properties of MoS2 films after laser micromachining. ACS Nano 8, 6334–6343 (2014).
Ling, Z. P. et al. Large-scale two-dimensional MoS2 photodetectors by magnetron sputtering. Opt. Express 23, 13580–13586 (2015).
Lee, Y. et al. Trap-induced photoresponse of solution-synthesized MoS2. Nanoscale 8, 9193–9200 (2016).
Miao, J. et al. Surface plasmon-enhanced photodetection in few layer MoS2 phototransistors with Au nanostructure arrays. Small 11, 2392–2398 (2015).
Lee, S., Park, J., Yun, Y., Lee, J. & Heo, J. Enhanced photoresponsivity of multilayer MoS2 phototransistor using localized Au schottky junction formed by spherical-lens photolithography. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 6, 1900053 (2019).
Schornbaum, J. et al. Epitaxial Growth of PbSe Quantum Dots on MoS2 Nanosheets and their Near-Infrared Photoresponse. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 5798–5806 (2014).
Chen, C. et al. Highly responsive MoS2 photodetectors enhanced by graphene quantum dots. Sci. Rep. 5, 11830 (2015).
Huang, Y. et al. Van der Waals coupled organic molecules with monolayer MoS2 for fast response photodetectors with gate-tunable responsivity. ACS Nano 12, 4062–4073 (2018).
Wang, Y. et al. Solution-processed MoS2/organolead trihalide perovskite photodetectors. Adv. Mater. 29, 1603995 (2017).
Roy, K. et al. Graphene-MoS2 hybrid structures for multifunctional photoresponsive memory devices. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 826 (2013).
Zhang, W. et al. Ultrahigh-gain photodetectors based on atomically thin graphene-MoS2 heterostructures. Sci. Rep. 4, 3826 (2014).
Li, X. et al. A self-powered graphene-MoS2 hybrid phototransistor with fast response rate and high on-off ratio. Carbon 92, 126–132 (2015).
Kang, D. H. et al. High-performance transition metal dichalcogenide photodetectors enhanced by self-assembled monolayer doping. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 4219–4227 (2015).
Li, S. et al. Enhanced performance of a CVD MoS2 photodetector by chemical in situ n-type doping. ACS Appl. Mater. interfaces 11, 11636–11644 (2019).
Xie, Y. et al. Ultrabroadband MoS2 photodetector with spectral response from 445 to 2717 nm. Adv. Mater. 29, 1605972 (2017).
Kwon, J. et al. Giant photoamplification in indirect-bandgap multilayer MoS2 phototransistors with local bottom-gate structures. Adv. Mater. 27, 2224–2230 (2015).
Kufer, D. & Konstantatos, G. Highly sensitive, encapsulated MoS2 photodetector with gate controllable gain and speed. Nano Lett. 15, 7307–7313 (2015).
Wang, X. et al. Ultrasensitive and broadband MoS2 photodetector driven by ferroelectrics. Adv. Mater. 27, 6575–6581 (2015).
Pak, Y. et al. Enhanced Performance of MoS2 Photodetectors by Inserting an ALD-Processed TiO2 Interlayer. Small 14, 1703176 (2018).
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDPB12). Major State Basic Research Development Program (Grant No. 2016YFA0203900), and Key Research Project of Frontier Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDB-SSW-JSC016, QYZDY-SSW-JSC042). Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61574151, 61574152, 61722408, 61725505, 11734016, 61674158 and 61835012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.L.W. conceived and supervised the project. L.Q.T. and J.L.W. fabricated the devices and performed the electrical measurements. R.R.C. and Q.L. prepared the HZO film and performed the P-E measurements. L.Q.T., W.D.H. and Z.W. performed photoresponse characterizations. L.Q.T., J.L.W., X.D.W., Y.C., S.Q.W., F.W. and Z.W. performed the data analysis. H.S., T.L., P.Z., X.J.M., M.L. and J.H.C. assisted with data analysis and interpretation. L.Q.T., J.L.W. R.R.C., Q.L. and W.D.H. co-wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tu, L., Cao, R., Wang, X. et al. Ultrasensitive negative capacitance phototransistors. Nat Commun 11, 101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13769-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13769-z
This article is cited by
-
DFT-based Atomic Calculation of Si-doped HfO2 and Effect of its Negative Capacitance on Analog/RF, and VTC Parameters of MOSFET
Silicon (2024)
-
Enhanced gain and detectivity of unipolar barrier solar blind avalanche photodetector via lattice and band engineering
Nature Communications (2023)
-
High-performance ultraviolet-visible photodetector with high sensitivity and fast response speed based on MoS2-on-ZnO photogating heterojunction
Tungsten (2023)
-
Emerging MoS2 Wafer-Scale Technique for Integrated Circuits
Nano-Micro Letters (2023)
-
All-van der Waals stacking ferroelectric field-effect transistor based on In2Se3 for high-density memory
Science China Information Sciences (2023)