SKP2 attenuates autophagy through Beclin1-ubiquitination and its inhibition reduces MERS-Coronavirus infection


Autophagy is an essential cellular process affecting virus infections and other diseases and Beclin1 (BECN1) is one of its key regulators. Here, we identified S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 (SKP2) as E3 ligase that executes lysine-48-linked poly-ubiquitination of BECN1, thus promoting its proteasomal degradation. SKP2 activity is regulated by phosphorylation in a hetero-complex involving FKBP51, PHLPP, AKT1, and BECN1. Genetic or pharmacological inhibition of SKP2 decreases BECN1 ubiquitination, decreases BECN1 degradation and enhances autophagic flux. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) multiplication results in reduced BECN1 levels and blocks the fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes. Inhibitors of SKP2 not only enhance autophagy but also reduce the replication of MERS-CoV up to 28,000-fold. The SKP2-BECN1 link constitutes a promising target for host-directed antiviral drugs and possibly other autophagy-sensitive conditions.


Macroautophagy (subsequently referred to as autophagy) is a conserved cytosolic degradation process in eukaryotes that maintains macromolecule, energy and organelle homeostasis1. It requires a fine-tuned sequence of molecular actions largely executed by autophagy-related genes (ATGs). In the initial steps, a phagophore consisting of a double-membrane sheet is nucleated, amplified and finally closed to form a vesicular structure called an autophagosome that engulfs cellular material for degradation1. Degradation is accomplished after the fusion of autophagosomes (AP) with lysosomes to form autolysosomes (AL).

A more recently emerged regulator of autophagy is the HSP90 cochaperone FK506 binding protein (FKBP)512. In general, FKBP51 is a stress-regulated protein involved in numerous pathways, likely through scaffolding regulatory protein interactions3. FKBP51-induced autophagy is accompanied by elevated levels of Beclin1 (BECN1) through a yet unknown mechanism. This multifunctional protein is crucial in autophagy and membrane trafficking processes4. In mammals, BECN1 is an essential component of two phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) complexes through its interaction with either Barkor (BECN1-associated autophagy-related key regulator)/ATG14 or UVRAG (UV radiation resistance-associated gene)5. The ATG14-complex is important for the initial nucleation steps of autophagy, whereas the UVRAG containing complex functions in endocytic trafficking and autophagosomal maturation. ATG14 is also found on mature autophagosomes where it enhances tethering and fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes6.

The regulation of BECN1 through post-translational modification is well documented, and in particular involves phosphorylation and ubiquitination4. The oncogenic kinase AKT1 phosphorylates BECN1 at positions S234, S295, which leads to sequestration of this peripheral membrane binding protein7 to the cytoskeleton with the result of inhibition of autophagy8. Several other autophagy-regulating kinases (both stimulatory and inhibitory) also target BECN14. Furthermore, distinct E3 ligases of different types modify BECN1 with K11-, K48- or K63-linked poly-ubiquitins9, complemented by ubiquitin-specific peptidases (USPs)10,11. Depending on the site and type of linkage of BECN1 ubiquitination, autophagy is inhibited or enhanced; the underlying mechanisms involve degradation of BECN1 and modulation of its protein interactions9,12.

Studies investigating the interplay between autophagy and viruses revealed that some viruses use parts of the autophagy machinery for their own replication but also have evolved strategies to escape autophagic degradation. Congruently, autophagy-inducing agents can have antiviral effects13. In case of coronaviruses (CoV), the formation of replication complexes at double membrane vesicles (DMV) and, most likely, of infectious particles depend on ER-derived membranes, as does autophagy14,15,16. Thus, current knowledge suggests that CoV interact differentially with components of the autophagic pathway with the potential for both the utilization of autophagy components for virus replication and for the attenuation of autophagy17. Substances inhibiting the generation of DMVs have been shown to be broadly reactive against CoV replication in vitro18. Importantly, this included CoV of different genera including the emerging Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV, a paradigmatic emerging virus that entails considerable pandemic risks due to its prevalence in dromedary populations in Africa and the Arabian Pensinsula and its transmission via the respiratory tract causing a severe form of pneumonia in humans18,19,20,21. Since its discovery in 2012, the WHO has reported 2468 human MERS-CoV infections in 27 countries, of which at least 851 were fatal (

Currently, there is no clinically-approved treatment for MERS-CoV infection. While holding promise as a broad-range host-directed antiviral target, in general13, the role of autophagy in the MERS-CoV life cycle, if any, is unknown. Nevertheless, a kinome analysis of MERS-CoV-infected cells detected phosphorylation changes of several regulatory kinases including AKT1 and mTOR that have been linked to autophagy in other studies22,23. Although pharmacological interventions of broadly active AKT1- and mTOR-pathway inhibitors showed promise for antiviral therapy against several viruses including MERS-CoV22, the identification of downstream molecules may facilitate a more targeted therapeutic approach with putative reduced side effects in patients.

A role of autophagy is suggested for another CoV, the mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), by the observation that multiplication of, and immune evasion by the virus is highly dependent on the formation of convoluted membranes and DMVs that are reminiscent of autophagosomes24. However, the link of MHV replication to these DMVs did not appear to involve autophagy as the deletion of the pivotal autophagy genes ATG7 or ATG5 did not affect MHV replication25,26. Of note, also the induction of autophagy by starvation did not significantly change MHV replication26. On the other hand, results of an earlier study employing ATG5 knockout cells suggested that autophagy is required for the formation of DMV-bound MHV replication complexes thereby significantly enhancing the efficiency of viral replication16. Furthermore, pharmacological or genetic manipulation of autophagy showed that replication of another CoV, the Transmissible Gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), is negatively regulated by autophagy27. In contrast, another study reported enhancement of TGEV replication by autophagy28. Thus, no general role of autophagy in CoV replication could be established yet.

Here, we aim to elucidate the mechanisms controlling BECN1 protein levels. We find that S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 (SKP2) executes lysine-48-linked poly-ubiquitination of BECN1; its activity is regulated through phosphorylation under the control of FKBP51 involving AKT1 and PHLPP. Small molecule inhibitors of SKP2 enhance autophagy and reduce replication of MERS-CoV, pointing to the prospect of their therapeutic usefulness.


FKBP51 increases BECN1 stability

In search for a mechanism of the previously reported increase of the pivotal autophagy regulator BECN1 driven by FKBP512 we considered effects on mRNA and protein level. In direct comparison to the highly homologous FKBP52, a known counter-player of FKBP5129, only FKBP51 increased BECN1 levels upon ectopic expression3 (Fig. 1a). Regulation of BECN1 protein stability through the ubiquitin-proteasome system was indicated by using the proteasome inhibitor MG132, which increased the levels of BECN1 and the extent of its ubiquitination (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 1a). The use of ammonium chloride to inhibit lysosome-mediated proteolysis confirmed proteasomal degradation of BECN1 (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Ectopic expression of FKBP51 was similarly efficient in stabilising BECN1 as proteasome inhibition by MG132 (Fig. 1c, d). A protein degradation assay based on a pulse-chase using Halo-tagged BECN130 confirmed that FKBP51 stabilises BECN1 (Fig. 1e, f). These results also revealed a high turn-over rate of BECN1 (t1/2 < 1 h).

Fig. 1: FKBP51 increases BECN1 stability.

a FKBP51 increases BECN1 protein levels. HEK293 cells were transfected with either Flag-tagged FKBP51 or FKBP52 expressing plasmid or control vector. BECN1 mRNA and protein were determined after 72 h. b BECN1 is subject to proteasomal degradation. HEK293 cells were transfected with Ubiquitin-HA expressing plasmid and treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (10 µM, 2 h) as indicated. BECN1 was immunoprecipitated from whole cell extracts and probed for ubiquitination by western blotting (quantification Supplementary Fig. 1a). cf FKBP51 delays degradation of BECN1. HEK293 cells were transfected with vector control (Co) or FKBP51 expressing plasmid for 72 h and treated with the translation inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX, 30 µg mL−1) as indicated in c, d. In e, f, HEK293 cells were transfected with Halo-tagged BECN1 expressing plasmid together with FKBP51-Flag expressing plasmid or vector, cultivated with halogenated dye (100 nM, R110Direct, pulse) overnight, switched to medium without dye (chase) and treated with MG132 or vehicle for the indicated times. In all panels, error bars denote the standard error of the mean, derived from n = 3 biologically independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA in a, two-way ANOVA in d, f details in Supplementary Table 1). Source data and blot collections are provided as a Source Data file.

FKBP51 associates with SKP2 regulating BECN1 stability

FKBP51 recently emerged as a scaffolder protein organising various regulatory protein complexes2,31,32,33. We thus considered an FKBP51-controlled association of BECN1 with E3 ubiquitin ligases or USPs. Based on the results of an FKBP51 mammalian-2-hybrid interaction screen34, we first verified the association of FKBP51 with the USPs 18 and 36, and with the E3 ligase SKP2 by immunoprecipitation in HEK293 cells (Fig. 2a). TRAF6 that is known as an E3 ligase of BECN135 and interactor of FKBP5136 served as a control. Of these FKBP51 interactors, SKP2, USP18 and USP36 have the potential to influence K48-linked poly-ubiquitination of BECN1. Co-immunoprecipitations of BECN1 in HEK293 cells revealed association with SKP2 only (Fig. 2b), which has not been described as an E3 ligase of BECN1 before. However, inhibition of SKP2 has been previously linked to induction of autophagy37,38.

Fig. 2: FKBP51 associates with SKP2 that regulates BECN1 stability.

a HEK293 cells were transfected with plasmids expressing the indicated E3 ligases and USPs; after 72 h, cells were either harvested for immunoprecipitation of FKBP51. b BECN1 associates with SKP2, but not with USP18 or USP36. HEK293 cells were transfected with vectors expressing tagged SKP2, USP18 and USP36; after 72 h, cells were harvested for immune-precipitation with either control IgG or anti BECN1 antibody. c, d SKP2 affects BECN1 stability. HEK293 cells were transfected with plasmids expressing SKP2 or TRAF6 and exposed to MG132 (10 µM, 2 h) where indicated and to cycloheximide (CHX, 30 µg mL−1) after 72 h for the durations indicated to monitor the decay of BECN1. e, f The conditions of c,d were also used in the pulse-chase assay, performed as in Fig. 1e, f, to determine BECN1 stability. g, h Cellular SKP2 levels determine BECN1 levels. SKP2 was either down-regulated by using siRNA (g) or up-regulated by transient transfection (h) and the levels of the indicated proteins were measured by western blotting (P27 served as control). Quantifications for g and h are provided in Supplementary Fig. 1c, d. i Knock-down of SKP2 by siRNA decreases BECN1 ubiquitination (assay as in Fig. 1b). jm Stability assays were performed like in cf to determine the effect of SKP2-targeting siRNA on BECN1 stability. WCE = whole cell extract. In all panels, error bars denote the standard error of the mean, derived from n = 3 biologically independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (two-way ANOVAs, details in Supplementary Table 1). Source data and blot collections are provided as a Source Data file.

Since we aimed at understanding the mechanism of FKBP51-directed increase in BECN1, we focussed in the following on proteins we found associated with both FKBP51 and BECN1. To assess the effect of SKP2 on BECN1 stability, we monitored the protein levels of BECN1 after the addition of the translation inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX) in the presence of over-expressed SKP2 or TRAF6 (again used as control), respectively. SKP2 affected BECN1 stability, leading to faster proteasomal degradation, while the K63-E3 ligase TRAF6 had no effect (Fig. 2c, d). Similar results were obtained in a pulse-chase experiment showing that SKP2 reduced BECN1 by about 20% compared to the vector control already at 30 min (Fig. 2e, f).

Further corroborating the function of SKP2 on BECN1, siRNA directed against Skp2 produced increased levels of BECN1 and the SKP2 target P27 along with enhanced lipidation of LC3B (typically detected as the ratio LC3B-II/I) (Fig. 2g, Supplementary Fig. 1c). Ectopic expression of SKP2 exerted the opposite effect (Fig. 2h, Supplementary Fig. 1d). Decreasing SKP2 by siRNA prevented BECN1 ubiquitination (Fig. 2i). In addition, stability assays using either CHX or the Halo-tagged BECN1 further established that reducing SKP2 levels with siRNA increases BECN1 stability leading to almost 3-fold higher levels at 90 min (Fig. 2j–m).

Phosphorylation-controlled ubiquitination of BECN1 by SKP2

Next, we examined whether SKP2 ubiquitinates BECN1. Ubiquitination frequently forms chains linking several ubiquitin units to distinct lysine (K) residues. The type of lysine linkage determines protein fate and function39. Using a set of ubiquitin mutants, we found that SKP2 leads to K48-linked poly-ubiquitination (Fig. 3a), which marks proteins for proteasomal degradation39. Using a freely available mass-spectrometry database that proposes ubiquitination sites in mammalian proteins40, we mutated various lysines in BECN1 and identified K402 in BECN1′s ECD (evolutionary conserved domain) as the attachment site of SKP2-directed ubiquitination (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Fig. 1e). The potential recruitment of SKP2 by FKBP51 raises the question how this may lead to reduced rather than increased ubiquitination of BECN1. Since FKBP51 inactivates the kinase AKT1 through complex formation with the phosphatase PHLPP2,31, and AKT1 regulates SKP2 through phosphorylation at S7241, we used ectopic expression of FKBP51-Flag and co-immunoprecipitation to probe for protein interactions and the phosphorylation status of SKP2. The association between FKBP51 and BECN1, AKT1, PHLPP, and SKP2 was accompanied by a decreased phosphorylation of AKT1 at position S473 and of SKP2 at position S72 (Fig. 3c–e).

Fig. 3: SKP2 executes K48-linked poly-ubiquitination at K402 of BECN1.

a, b SKP2 attaches K48-linked poly-ubiquitin at K402 of BECN1. HEK293 cells were transfected with plasmids expressing either WT HA-tagged ubiquitin or mutant forms featuring only one lysine together with an SKP2 expressing plasmid or vector control (a). In b, cells were transfected with plasmids expressing BECN1, either WT or the indicated mutants, myc-SKP2 and HA-ubiquitin. Ubiquitination of BECN1 was determined after immunoprecipitation. ce Association of FKBP51 and BECN1 with regulatory kinases. HEK293 cells were transfected with FKBP51-Flag expressing plasmid (c, e) and protein extracts were used for western blot analysis after 72 h of cultivation (e) or immunoprecipitation of FKBP51 (c). In d, endogenous BECN1 was precipitated from cell extracts. Blot collections are provided as a Source Data file.

These results suggest a mechanism where FKBP51 enacts a cascade of activity changes in AKT1 and SKP2 by the recruitment of PHLPP (Fig. 4a). We followed several approaches to substantiate the functionality of this cascade, first by employing SKP2 mutants that either mimic phosphorylation (S72D/S75D) or cannot be phosphorylated (S72A)41. The phosphomimetic mutant still decreased BECN1 stability, but the S72A mutant showed no effect (Fig. 4b, c), consistent with the proposed cascade (Fig. 4a). We further made use of a well-established PHLPP inhibitor42 that led to enhanced phosphorylation of AKT1 and SKP2 (Fig. 4d, Supplementary Fig. 1f). A pulse-chase assay showed that the stability of BECN1 decreased by using the PHLPP inhibitor (Fig. 4e, f). This inhibitor had no effect on the stability of the ubiquitination-protected K402R mutant of BECN1, further corroborating the proposed cascade (Fig. 4g, h). In addition, pharmacological inhibition of AKT1 enhanced BECN1 stability in both assays, leaving about twice the amount of BECN1 at 90 min compared to control (Fig. 4i–l). In order to verify that reduced SKP2 activity drives autophagy in our cellular set-up, we used siRNA and determined the degradation of long-lived proteins43. Targeting SKP2 increased proteolysis, but not in the presence of the autophagy inhibitor 3-methyladenine (3-MA, Fig. 4m). Furthermore, we observed decreased levels of P62 (Supplementary Fig. 1g), which typically goes along with enhanced autophagy43. All these data are consistent with an inhibitory effect of SKP2 on autophagy regulated by a phosphorylation cascade involving FKBP51, PHLPP and AKT1.

Fig. 4: SKP2 is controlled by AKT-PHLPP mediated phosphorylation involving FKBP51.

a Model of FKBP51`s kinase associations that regulate SKP2 phosphorylation and activity. The recruitment of PHLPP by FKBP51 leads to lower phosphorylation (S473) and activity of AKT1, which causes decreased phosphorylation and activity of SKP2, thereby stabilizing BECN1. b, c BECN1 stability was assessed by the cycloheximide assay (as in Fig. 1c, d) comparing wt SKP2 with the phosphor-null mutant S72A and the phosphomimetic mutant S72D/S75D. df PHLPP inhibition destabilizes BECN1. HEK293 cells were treated with PHLPPi (NSC117079, 50 µM) for 1 h and cell extracts were probed for the indicated proteins by western blot analysis (d). The pulse-chase assay as in Fig. 1e, f was used in e, f. gj The cycloheximide protein stability assay was performed (as in Fig. 1c, d) to evaluate the effect of PHLPPi on K402-BECN1 in comparison to wt BECN1 (g, h) and to test the effects of AKT1 inhibitors (AktiX and MK2206) on wt BECN1 (i, j). k, l The effect of the AKT1 inhibitors on BECN1 was also tested in the pulse chase assay. m Reduction of SKP2 by siRNA enhances the half-life of long-lived proteins. HEK293 cells were metabolically labelled with [14C]-valine overnight, chased with fresh media with excess valine overnight and then incubated for 4 h with complete media. The autophagy inhibitor 3-MA (10 mM) was used as control. In all panels, error bars denote the standard error of the mean, derived from n = 3 biologically independent experiments. WCE = whole cell extract. *p < 0.05, **,$$p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (two-way ANOVAs, details in Supplementary Table 1. In m, **labels the effect of 3-MA in the si-Skp2 RNA condition, $$labels the effect of the si-Skp2 RNA in the vehicle control. Source data and blot collections are provided as a Source Data file.

Small molecule inhibitors of SKP2 increase BECN1 stability

Next, we compared known small molecule inhibitors of SKP244,45,46 and found increased stability of BECN1 after a 90 min exposure to SMER3 (leaving about twice as much BECN1 at 60 and at 90 min compared to vehicle control, p < 0.001), and SMIP004 in particular (virtually no degradation vs. 78% decrease at 90 min, p < 0.001), while compound C1 had no effect (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Fig. 2a). The pulse-chase assay confirmed SMIP004 as the most efficient compound in stabilising BECN1 leaving threefold more BECN1 protein after 90 min (Fig. 5b). Furthermore, SMIP004 reduced ubiquitination of BECN1 most efficiently (Fig. 5c, last lane). The long-lived protein assay revealed that SMER3 and SMIP004 enhanced protein half-life, while C1 showed no effect (Fig. 5d). Starvation by cultivating the cells in HBSS, which we confirmed to induce autophagy (Supplementary Fig. 2b-d), did not elicit a greater effect than SMIP004 in the long-lived protein assay (Fig. 5d). Furthermore, SMIP004 most profoundly affected not only BECN1, but also LC3B-II/I and P62 (example blot in Fig. 5e, quantifications in Supplementary Fig. 2e-g) that are established markers of autophagy. To analyse autophagy more thoroughly, it is mandatory to include assays that address autophagic protein turn-over, commonly referred to as autophagic flux43. Thus, we subjected SMIP004 to a flux assay with the specific inhibitor of vacuolar H + -ATPases bafilomycin A1 (BafA1), which interferes with lysosome acidification and thus degradation of autophagosome cargo43. We revealed a stimulatory effect of SMIP004 on the autophagic flux (Fig. 5f, Supplementary Fig. 2b, c). In addition, it has been shown that ATG14 oligomerizes to dimers and tetramers, which is essential for autophagy by promoting STX17 binding and autophagosome-lysosome fusion6. Using capillary-based electrophoresis allowing for better resolution at high molecular weight we observed ATG14 oligomerization to 7–8mers, which was enhanced by SMIP004 (Supplementary Fig. 2h, i). Thus, SMIP004 was used as SKP2-inhibitor (SKP2i) in all subsequent experiments.

Fig. 5: SKP2 inhibitors enhance BECN1 protein stability and autophagy.

a, b Evaluation of small compounds inhibiting SKP2. HEK293 cells were exposed to known SKP2 inhibitors for 24 h, followed by additional exposure to cycloheximide (CHX, 30 µg mL−1) for the times as indicated or vehicle (a). b HEK293 cells were transfected with Halo-tagged BECN1 expressing plasmid and exposed to known SKP2 inhibitors and halogenated dye (100 nM, R110Direct) overnight. Cells were transferred to medium without dye and harvested after the indicated times. Labelled BECN1 was determined and quantified. c HEK293 cells were transfected with control vector (−) or plasmids expressing BECN1-Flag, HA-ubiquitin and myc-SKP2. Cells were exposed to known SKP2 inhibitors (C1, 3 µM; SMER3, 5 µM; SMIP004, 10 µM) for 24 h, BECN1 was precipitated from cell extracts and its ubiquitination and levels were determined by western blotting. d SKP2 inhibitors impact long-lived proteins. HEK293 cells were metabolically labelled with [14C]-valine overnight, exposed to the indicated drugs or starvation (HBSS = Hank’s balanced salt solution) and the degradation of proteins was determined 4 h after withdrawal of [14C]-valine completed media. The autophagy inhibitor 3-MA (10 mM) was used as control. e, f Assessment of autophagy markers upon exposure to SKP2 inhibitors. VeroB4 cells were exposed to the indicated drugs or vehicle and the levels of P62 and LC3B-II/I were determined by western blotting (e). The most efficient drug, SMIP004, was analyzed in the flux assay with bafilomycin A1 (BafA1; f). In all panels, error bars denote the standard error of the mean, derived from n = 3 biologically independent experiments. WCE = whole cell extract. *,$p < 0.05, **,$$p < 0.01, ***,$$$p < 0.001 (two-way ANOVAs, details in Supplementary Table 1). In d, *labels refer to the effects of 3-MA, $labels to the drug effects in comparison to vehicle. Source data and blot collections are provided as a Source Data file.

MERS-CoV decreases autophagy

Results up to this point suggested that activity of BECN1 and thereby autophagy is limited by SKP2, which in turn is activated by AKT1 (41 and Figs. 3, 4). Since MERS-CoV has been shown to enhance phosphorylation of AKT122, it might reduce autophagy. Infection of VeroB4 cells with MERS-CoV facilitated increased phosphorylation of SKP2 at S72 (Fig. 6a, Supplementary Fig. 3a), with a concomitant decrease of cellular levels of BECN1 (Fig. 6a, Supplementary Fig. 3b) and enhanced K48-polyubiquitinylation of BECN1 (Fig. 6b). Infection with MERS-CoV further led to an increase of the total number of phagocytic vesicles (sum of AL + AP) per cell (Fig. 6c, d). However, the number of successfully formed AL was reduced significantly indicating that AP can form but not fuse with lysosomes when cells are infected. A fusion block was also evidenced by the significantly reduced ATG14 oligomerization, essential for AP-lysosome fusion6, in infected cells (Fig. 6e, f) and by the increase of the autophagy target P62 (Supplementary Fig. 3c). The block of vesicle fusion was further tested by the use of BafA1: as expected, LC3B-II/I levels were not further enhanced upon treatment with BafA1 (Fig. 6g). The fusion between AP and lysosome membranes is facilitated by the interaction between tSNARE proteins STX17 (AP-bound) and VAMP8 (lysosome-bound). This interaction is mediated by SNAP2947 (Supplementary Fig. 3d). Co-immunoprecipitation revealed that MERS-CoV infection leads to a reduced interaction of STX17 with SNAP29 and VAMP8 (Fig. 6h). This further supports the conclusion that MERS-CoV infection causes a block of AP-lysosome fusion.

Fig. 6: MERS-CoV blocks autophagic flux.

a MERS-CoV decreases BECN1 and increases pSKP2. VeroB4 cells were infected with MERS-CoV (MOI = 0.001) or mock-infected and harvested 48 h later. Representative western blots are shown, quantification in Supplementary Fig. 3a, b. b MERS-CoV increases K48-linked poly-ubiquitination of BECN1. BECN1 was immune-precipitated from cell extracts 48 h p.i. and its ubiquitination determined by a ubiquitin K48 linkage specific antibody. c, d MERS-CoV blocks fusion of AP with lysosomes. VeroB4 cells were transfected with tandem fluorescent-tagged LC3B (mRFP and EGFP) and infected with MERS-CoV (MOI = 0.001). Twenty-four hours later, cells were fixed and analyzed for fluorescence. Vesicles with both green and red fluorescence (autophagosomes, AP) and with red fluorescence only (autolysosomes, AL) were counted. d, representative images, scale bar 25 µm. e, f MERS-CoV decreases ATG14 oligomerization. VeroB4 cells were infected with MERS-CoV (MOI = 0.001), cross-linked with disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS, 75 µM) 48 h p.i. for 30 min and harvested. ATG14 homo-oligomerization was examined after western blotting (ProteinSimple). g MERS-CoV decreases autophagic flux. VeroB4 cells were infected with MERS-CoV (MOI = 0.001) and incubated with bafilomycin A1 (BafA1, 0.1 µM) for 2 h before samples were taken at 48 h p.i.. The ratios of LC3B-II/I were determined by western blotting. h MERS-CoV affects SNARE protein interactions. VeroB4 cells were infected with MERS-CoV (MOI = 0.001), cross-linked with disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS, 75 µM) 48 h p.i. for 30 min and harvested. The SNARE complex protein STX17 was immunoprecipitated and the eluate was probed for interacting VAMP8 and SNAP29 by western blotting (the quantification represents the bands detected at the combined molecular weights of the cross-linked proteins, i.e. STX17 + VAMP8 and STX17 + SNAP29). In all panels, error bars denote the standard error of the mean. derived from n = 3 biologically independent experiments for b, f, g, h, and n = 13 (control) or n = 12 (CoV) different cells for c. WCE = whole cell extract of vehicle exposed cells, i.e. no cross-linking. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (t-test in b, c, f, h, two-way ANOVA in g, details in Supplementary Tables 1, 2). Source data and blot collections are provided as a Source Data file.

Since the results so far raised the possibility that MERS-CoV may benefit from reducing autophagy, we generated VeroB4 cells with a knockout of the pivotal autophagy gene ATG5. Compared to WT cells, infection of VeroB4 Atg5-KO cells led to the formation of 52-fold more infectious viral particles (Fig. 7a) while genomic viral RNA copies only increased by 6-fold (Fig. 7b). The efficient formation of DMVs is required for CoV replication and might exploit autophagy or its components25. CoV-induced DMV formation is known to depend on viral nonstructural proteins (NSP) 4 and 618,48,49. Ectopic expression of MERS-CoV NSP4 and 6 indeed led to an accumulation of LC3B-II/I and of P62 in the case of NSP6, while NSP4 only had a very minor effect on LC3B-II/I (Fig. 7c). This suggested a block of the autophagic flux by NSP6, which was confirmed by using BafA1 (Fig. 7d), altogether suggesting the MERS-CoV-induced inhibition of autophagic flux to be mediated mainly by NSP6.

Fig. 7: Mutual influence of MERS-CoV and autophagy.

a, b Deletion of ATG5 in VeroB4 cells facilitates MERS-CoV replication. VeroB4 wt or Atg5 knockout cells were infected with MERS-CoV (MOI = 0.001). Plaque forming units (PFU, a) and genome equivalents (GE, b) per ml were determined by plaque assay or quantitative real time RT-PCR, at 24 and 48 h p.i.. Fold difference and absolute numbers per ml are displayed. In all panels, error bars denote the standard error of the mean, derived from n = 3 biologically independent experiments. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (t-tests, details in Supplementary Table 2). cf MERS-CoV NSP4, NSP6 (c, d) p3, p4a, p4b, and p5 (e, f, all proteins were Flag-tagged at the N-terminus) were transiently expressed in VeroB4 cells and the indicated proteins were determined by western blotting after 72 h. BafA1 (0.1 µM) was added 2 h before harvesting to assess the autophagic flux (d, f). Western blots are representative of three independent experiments. Source data and blot collections are provided as a Source Data file.

CoV have group-specific accessory proteins that can modulate viral replication and immune evasion50,51. To assess potential autophagy-related functions, we overexpressed all MERS-CoV accessory genes 3, 4a, 4b, and 5. Protein 4b and 5, but not 3 and 4a, caused accumulation of P62 and enhanced the level of LC3B-II/I similar to Baf1A, which produced an additional effect in the presence of p3 or p4a, but not p4b or p5 (Fig. 7e, f). Because p4b and p5 are accessory proteins that can be deleted without lethal effects on virus replication, we constructed recombinant MERS-CoVs lacking the respective orfs (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b) to evaluate their effect on autophagy in the context of full virus replication. In comparison to the recombinant MERS-CoV the p4b- and p5-deletion variants showed a decreased accumulation of P62 and LC3B-II/I, suggesting that both proteins contribute to the inhibition of the autophagic flux (Supplementary Fig. 4c, d). The p4b- and p5-deleted viruses as well as the WT control virus grew to higher levels in Atg5 knockout Vero cells compared to WT cells (Supplementary Fig. 4e, f). However, the p4b and p5-deleted viruses showed overall an up to 10-fold decreased replication in both WT and Atg5 knockout cells compared to WT virus suggesting a p4b- and p5-dependent attenuation of virus replication that is independent of ATG5-directed autophagy.

SKP2 inhibition reduces MERS-CoV replication

The influence of MERS-CoV infection on SKP2 phosphorylation, BECN1 degradation and its inhibition of the autophagic flux encouraged us to test if SKP2 inhibitors (such as SKP2i) may limit MERS-CoV amplification in infected cells. Indeed, SKP2i caused significant reduction of viral replication (by about 250-fold, Fig. 8a, Supplementary Fig. 5a). To explore the relevance of SKP2 inhibition on viral infection in more general terms, we also tested SKP2i in Sindbis virus (SINV) replication. It is known that SINV induces autophagy but that its replication levels are unaffected by it52. We observed that treatment with SKP2i caused a moderate decrease of SINV replication (Supplementary Fig. 5b, c). SKP2i may thus be exploitable as a broader therapeutic antiviral principle.

Fig. 8: SKP2 inhibition reduces replication of MERS-CoV and its effects on autophagy.

a The SKP2 inhibitor (SKP2i) efficiently inhibits MERS-CoV replication. VeroB4 cells were infected with MERS-CoV (MOI = 0.001) and treated with SKP2i (10 µM) or DMSO (Co = control). MERS-CoV GE were determined by real-time RT-PCR at 24 and 48 h p.i., data are presented as fold difference (black bars, SKP2i condition) in comparison to control (gray bars, Co = DMSO condition). Raw data presenting GE ml^-1 is shown in Fig. S5A. b, c The SKP2-inhibitor (SKP2i) restores autophagic flux in MERS-CoV-infected cells. VeroB4 cells were transfected with mRFP-EGFP-tagged LC3B, infected with MERS-CoV (MOI = 0.001) and treated with SKP2i (10 µM) or vehicle for 24 h. b Representative images (scale bar 25 µm). c The numbers of vesicles with both green and red fluorescence (autophagosomes, AP) and with red fluorescence only (autolysosomes, AL) were counted 24 h p.i.. df SKP2i enhances protein interactions indicative of autolysosome formation in MERS-CoV-infected cells. VeroB4 cells were infected with MERS-CoV (MOI = 0.001), treated with SKP2i for 48 h, cross-linked with disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS, 75 µM) 48 h p.i. for 30 min and harvested. ATG14 homo-oligomerization was assessed after western blotting (d) and quantified (e). f The SNARE complex protein STX17 was immunoprecipitated and the eluate was probed for interacting VAMP8 and SNAP29 by western blotting and quantified as in Fig. 6h. In all panels, error bars denote the standard error of the mean, derived from n = 3 (a, e) or n = 4 (f) biologically independent experiments, and n = 13 (c, vehicle, non-infected) or n = 12 (all other conditions in c) different cells. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***,###p < 0.001 (c, *,***refer to the statistical difference between the numbers autolysosomes, ###to the difference between the total numbers of fluorescing vesicles). Two-way ANOVA was performed in c, t-tests in a, e, f, details in Supplementary Tables 1, 2. Source data and blot collections are provided as a Source Data file.

As high concentrations of SKP2i inhibit the cell cycle44, it was mandatory to control for potential cell cycle effects in VeroB4 cells that may partly account for the observed inhibition of MERS-CoV replication. FACS-based analysis of VeroB4 cells revealed effects on cell proliferation occur only at concentrations of SKP2i beyond 10 µM (Supplementary Fig. 6). Accordingly, while SKP2i enhanced the levels of BECN1 already at 1 µM, no significant increase in the cell cycle promoter P27 was observable up to 100 µM (Supplementary Fig. 7a).

Our data strongly suggest that of the potential mechanisms of SKP2i, it is the increase of BECN1-directed autophagy that reduces MERS-CoV multiplication. If this is correct, other ways of enhancing BECN1′s effect on autophagy should elicit similar effects. Therefore, we used two recently introduced tools to enhance BECN1 function in autophagy: the BH3 mimetic ABT-737 and a BECN1-derived peptide53,54. These compounds, in contrast to SKP2i, do not change the levels of BECN1, but increase autophagy by redirecting BECN1 function towards the autophagy pathway, which we confirmed in VeroB4 cells (Supplementary Fig. 7b–d, g). Enhanced autophagy was indicated by the increase of LC3B-II/I (Supplementary Fig. 7e, g) and the reduction of P62 (Supplementary Fig. 7f, g). This was paralleled by inhibition of MERS-CoV replication by up to 60-fold in the case of the BECN1-peptide (TAT-B) (Figure Supplementary Fig. 7h) and up to 10-fold in the case of ABT-737 at 48h p.i. (Supplementary Fig. 7i). These results are in accordance with the notion that increasing BECN1 acts through enhancing autophagy as the relevant mechanism for the antiviral effects of SKP2 in vitro.

To determine whether SKP2i relieves the antagonistic effects of MERS-CoV infection on autophagy, we performed flux assays using either BafA1 or the tandem-labelled LC3B. While BafA1 did not change LC3B lipidation in infected cells as evidenced by constant levels of LC3B-II/I in the absence of SKP2i (as before, Fig. 6g gray bars), it increased LC3B-II/I in the presence of SKP2i (Supplementary Fig. 7j). The fluorescence-based assay revealed that SKP2i enhanced the number of AP while decreasing the number of AL (Fig. 8b, c). Furthermore, SKP2i enhanced ATG14 oligomerization (Fig. 8d, e) and the interaction of autophagic SNARE complex proteins (STX17 with VAMP8 or SNAP29), in MERS-CoV infected cells (Fig. 8f), thereby counteracting the effect of MERS-CoV (see above, Fig. 6h). Thus, SKP2i inhibits MERS-CoV production, most likely by enhancing BECN1 levels, which might also account for its effect on late steps of autophagy55. Since very little interaction between BECN1 and STX17 was detected using immunoprecipitation, this effect of BECN1 may require interaction with ATG146.

These results encouraged us to test other potential inhibitors of SKP2. Autophagy-inducing, FDA-approved drugs and drugs from clinical trials were of particular interest as these could become more readily available for treatment in humans. Of note, valinomycin (VAL), which has been shown to target SARS-CoV in vitro45,56, is also known to act as an SKP2 inhibitor44.

Of the chosen drugs (Table S3), niclosamide (NIC) and VAL were efficient in enhancing BECN1, LC3B-II/I and autophagic flux (Fig. 9a, Supplementary Fig. 8a, b, Supplementary Table 3) and comparable to SKP2i (see Fig. 5e, f, Supplementary Fig. 2e, f). NIC and VAL reduced MERS-CoV multiplication by up to 1000-fold at 48 h p.i. (Fig. 9b, Supplementary Fig. 9a–c). Thus, NIC and VAL were characterized further. Both drugs enhanced ATG14 oligomerization about twofold (Supplementary Fig. 9d, e) and increased the number of autolysosomes more than twofold (Supplementary Fig. 9f, g). NIC also affected the autophagic flux in the infected cells similar to SKP2i (Supplementary Fig. 9h, i). Therefore, these three compounds were tested for their dose-effect relationship in a MERS-CoV infection experiment. All compounds showed high efficacy, (ImaxSKP2i = 28,000 fold, ImaxNIC = 23,000 fold and ImaxVAL = 93,000 fold; Fig. 9c, Supplementary Fig. 10) and moderate to high potency (IC50SKP2i = 9 µM, IC50NIC = 0.32 µM and IC50VAL = 84 nM).

Fig. 9: Some potential SKP2 inhibitors affect autophagy and viral replication.

a VeroB4 cells were treated with various FDA-approved drugs (for abbreviations and concentrations see Supplementary Table 3) and cotreatment with Bafilomycin A1 (0.1 μM) was performed to evaluate the autophagic flux. The graph provides the means + SEM of three independent experiments, representative western blots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 8b. b VeroB4 cells were infected with MERS-CoV (MOI = 0.001), treated with the indicated drugs, and MERS-CoV genome copies were determined by RT-PCR 24 h and 48 h p.i.; data are presented as (log10) fold difference in relation to the DMSO control. Unprocessed data and PFU results are presented in Supplementary Fig. 9a–c. c Concentration-dependent inhibition of MERS-CoV replication by the SKP2-inhibitor (SKP2i), valinomycin (VAL) und niclosamide (NIC). VeroB4 cells were infected with MERS-CoV (MOI = 0.001) and treated with drug. MERS-CoV genome copies were determined by real-time RT-PCR at 48 h p.i., data present the percentage of remaining MERS-CoV genomes in comparison to vehicle treatment. In all panels, error bars denote the standard error of the mean, derived from n = 3 or n = 6 (c, no drug condition) biologically independent experiments. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (two-way ANOVA in a, one-way ANOVA in b, details in Supplementary Table 1). d Summary scheme: SKP2 leads to K48-linked poly-ubiquitination and thus degradation of BECN1. The effect of SKP2 can be diminished in two ways, either by chemical inhibition or by FKBP51, which scaffolds protein interactions ultimately leading to SKP2 inactivation through inhibiting its phosphorylation. Both scenarios enhance autophagy, which involves ATG14 oligomerization (probably 7–8mers) as recently described essential step in functional autophagy6. MERS-CoV reduces autophagy through distinct viral proteins leading to blockade of autophagosome-lysosome fusion and ATG14 oligomerization. Compounds inhibiting SKP2 reinstate autophagy and efficiently reduce viral production. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.


The present work reveals BECN1 as a target of the E3 ligase SKP237,38,46. SKP2 executes K48-linked ubiquitination at K402 of BECN1, resulting in proteasomal degradation. This action of SKP2 is counteracted by FKBP51 that regulates SKP2 phosphorylation through forming regulatory complexes with AKT1 and PHLPP. Inhibition of SKP2 increases BECN1 levels, enhances the assembly of lysosomal SNARE proteins and autophagy, and efficiently reduces the replication of MERS-CoV (Fig. 9d).

FKBP51 is a pivotal element of molecular feedback loops of the cellular and physiological stress reaction. It increasingly emerges as a scaffolder that chaperones various regulatory protein interactions3. Here, FKBP51 appears to recruit SKP2 in its inactive form to BECN1, probably by virtue of its interaction with the kinase AKT1 and the phosphatase PHLPP. Similarly, FKBP51-directed protein interactions increase BECN1 phosphorylation2, decrease phosphorylation and activity of AKT131. Thus, FKBP51 impacts BECN1 at least via two mechanisms, phosphorylation of BECN1 itself2 and of its regulatory E3 ligase SKP2. Both mechanisms involve AKT1, which exhibits yet another way of influencing BECN1 by phosphorylating USP14, which removes K63-linked ubiquitins from BECN157.

In addition to K48-linked poly-ubiquitination by SKP2, BECN1 undergoes ubiquitination also by other E3 ligases, at different sites, and with different types of poly-ubiquitination linkage12,58,59. NEDD4 produces both K63- and K11-linkages at yet to be determined sites of BECN19. Decoration of BECN1 with the non-canonical K11-linked ubiquitins by NEDD4 leads to its proteasomal degradation60. K63-linked ubiquitination of the BH3 domain of BECN1 at K117 by TRAF6 enhances autophagy, possibly by reducing the interaction of BECN1 with BCL235. AMBRA1 is another positive regulator of autophagy61. As a substrate receptor for the DDB1-cullin4 E3 ligase complex62, it forms K63-linked ubiquitin chains at K437 of BECN1, enhances the association between BECN1 and Vps34/PI3K3C, and thus stimulates the activity of this autophagy promoting lipid kinase63. In sum, BECN1 activity is regulated by ubiquitination in multiple ways, both stimulatory and inhibitory.

Very recently, the polyQ domain protein ataxin 3 has been shown to interact with BECN1 and to remove K48-linked polyubiquitin, an activity that is competitively inhibited by longer polyQ mutation in a disease protein64. Together with the here-presented discovery of SKP2 as K48-linking E3 ligase of BECN1, this points to the intriguing possibility that inhibiting SKP2 using small molecule inhibitors might counteract deleterious effects of soluble proteins with polyQ expansions that are held responsible for causing neurodegenerative diseases such as Huntington's disease and ataxin 3 in spinocerebellar ataxia64.

Due to the tremendous variability of viral proteins, there is huge interest in host cell-encoded pathways that could be exploited for fighting viral infection. The present study as well as earlier work suggest autophagy as a pivotal component of virus-host interaction and potential broad-range antiviral target13,52. For MERS-CoV replication, it remains to be elucidated whether blocking basal autophagy is mandatory or only auxiliary; nevertheless, the virus encodes at least three proteins that limit autophagy when expressed ectopically, NSP6, p4b and p5. Although the detailed molecular mechanisms are yet to be analysed, MERS-CoV NSP6 may also play a role in inhibiting the expansion of autophagosomes as shown for other betacoronaviruses48. MERS-CoV p4b has phosphodiesterase function inhibiting the activation of RNAse L, which itself can activate autophagy65. MERS-CoV p5 is located in the endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi intermediate compartment51 and was shown to inhibit IFN-beta induction66, which may constitute another link to autophagy67.

Deletion of p4b or p5 resulted in reduced MERS-CoV growth. These results differ from previous observations, which may be related to different cell lines and cDNA clone construction strategies68,69. In addition, we used a very low MOI and a type I IFN-deficient cell line (VeroB4), which allows to determine minor growth differences. The absence of p4b and p5 during MERS-CoV replication may also result in lower LC3B levels compared to MERS-CoV wildtype-infected but also to the mock-infected control cells. This points to a more complex interaction between virus replication and autophagy; p4b and p5 may counteract a response of the host to viral infection, but the functional relevance of their link to autophagy requires further investigation. Apparently, several CoV proteins collaborate to reprogram the membrane traffic in the cell for DMV formation serving as compartments of viral genome replication and transcription18,24. Since autophagy is tightly linked to intracellular membrane traffic and turnover, it appears possible that MERS-CoV blocks autophagy not only to evade degradation but also to improve membrane availability.

It appears that most of the potential treatments arising from other observations of reduction of viral replication upon autophagy stimulation are not easily applicable in vivo because of side effects and inefficient peptide delivery70. Examples are rapamycin and vitamin D which restricted the replication of HIV in primary human macrophages71, and the autophagy-inducing BECN1-derived peptide which limited the replication of a number of viruses in vitro53. From the present results, therapeutic induction of autophagy by inhibition of SKP2 emerges as a promising approach. We should note that all the substances tested here have or may have additional targets. While we cannot exclude the possibility that for each of the compounds it is this additional target that is responsible for the antiviral effect, we consider this scenario as less likely; this assessment is also based on the observation of the antiviral effects of compounds targeting BECN1, which we establish here as client of SKP2. Nevertheless, future experiments should assess the effect of these drugs in autophagy-defective cells such as the Atg5 knockout cells.

It further remains to be investigated whether inhibiting SKP2 will affect all autophagy-sensitive viruses. SINV, which was not overtly influenced by Atg5 knockout despite indications of degradation of viral components through autophagy72, reacted modestly to SKP2i. The reason for this is unknown; it may relate to the involvement of other immune pathways influencing SINV, for example the JAK/STAT pathway73 or stress granule formation74, or to autophagy functioning in the absence of Atg575. FDA-approved drugs known to act as SKP2 inhibitors are available44. We show that some of these drugs are effective in reducing MERS-CoV replication in vitro, for example niclosamide and pyrvinium pamoate. Even though there are reports of low absorption of these drugs76, others found considerable absorption and serum levels of niclosamide reached 1-20 µM77, concentrations we show here to efficiently limit MERS-CoV replication. In addition, inhalable formulations of niclosamide have been developed78. SKP2-targeting compounds also may have potential against other infections and other clinical conditions that are influenced by autophagy induction79,80.



The following chemicals were used for treatment of cells: BafA1 (Alfa Aeser, J61835), 17-AAG (Sigma-Aldrich, A8476), 6-AN (Sigma-Aldrich, A68203), AMI (Sigma-Aldrich, 1019701), BRO (Sigma-Aldrich, 1076501), CEL (Sigma-Aldrich, PZ0008), CLO (Sigma-Aldrich, C7291), ETO (Sigma-Aldrich, E1383), (MET (Sigma-Aldrich, M0605000), PAR (Sigma-Aldrich, P9623), RAP (Tocris, 1292), SMER3 (Tocris, 4375), ABT-737 (Selleckchem, S10002), Tat-B (Anaspec, AS65467), Tat-scr. (Anaspec, AS65468), GOS (Sigma-Aldrich, G8761), HAL (Tocris, 0931), MIN (Sigma-Aldrich, M9511), NIC (Sigma-Aldrich, N3510), PIM (Sigma-Aldrich, P1793), PRT (Tocris, 0610), PER (Sigma-Aldrich, SML0120), PEP (Sigma-Aldrich, P6402), PYR (Sigma-Aldrich, 1592001), RAS (Sigma-Aldrich, SML0124), SEC (Sigma-Aldrich, SML0055), SAL (Sigma-Aldrich, S4526), TAM (Sigma-Aldrich, T5648), TOP (Tocris, 4562), VAL (Sigma-Aldrich, V0627), PHLPPi NSC117079 (GlixxLabs, GLXC-03994), C14-Valine (Perkin Elmer, NEC291EU050UC), Akti X (Cayman Chemical, 14863) MK-2206 HCl (Cayman Chemical, 11593).

Co-Immunoprecipitation (CoIP) with crosslinker

CoIP of endogenous STX17 or BECN1 were performed in VeroB4 cells. The PBS-washed cell pellet was incubated with 75 µM DSS (disuccinimidyl subernate, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 21655) or corresponding vehicle (DMSO) in PBS. Crosslinking was performed for 30 min at room temperature followed by 2 h at 4 °C while rotating. After washing with PBS, crosslinking was quenched in tris-buffered saline (pH 7.0) for 20 min at 4 °C. Cells were lysed in CoIP-buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% IGEPAL CA-630 complemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, P2714). This was followed by incubation on an overhead shaker for 20 min at 4 °C. 1.2 mg of lysate was incubated with 2.5 µg STX17 or BECN1 antibody overnight at 4 °C. 20 µl of BSA-blocked Protein G Dynabeads (Invitrogen, 100–03D) were added to the lysate–antibody mix followed by 3 h incubation at 4 °C. The beads were washed three times with PBS and protein-antibody complexes were eluted by boiling for 5 min at 95 °C in Laemmli loading buffer. Fifteen microgram of the cell lysates or 5 µl of the immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE.

Toxicity assays

LDH assay. To assess membrane disruption and cell death the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) into the growth medium of HEK293 or VeroB4 cells was measured. The assay (LDH cytotoxicity detection system) was carried out according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). As positive control 0.02% Triton X-100 was added to the medium 1–2 h prior performing the assay; empty wells were used with medium only, as negative control.

MTT assay. HEK293 or VeroB4 cells were incubated in the presence of 0.5 mg mL−1 tetrazole 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl-)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) for 4 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Read-out of MTT assay was carried out as described previously81.

Western blot analysis

Protein extracts were obtained by lysing cells in RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% IGEPAL CA-630, 0.5% Sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS 50 mM Tris (pH8.0)) freshly supplemented with protease inhibitor (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), benzonase (Merck Millipore), 5 mM DTT (Sigma Aldrich, Munich, Germany), and phosphatase inhibitor (Roche, Penzberg, Germany) inhibitor cocktail. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and electro-transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Blots were placed in Tris-buffered saline, supplemented with 0.05% Tween (Sigma Aldrich) and 5% non-fat milk for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated with primary antibody (diluted in TBS/0.05% Tween) overnight at 4 °C. The following primary antibodies were used: Actin (1:5000, Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, sc-1616), Beclin-1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, #3738), K48-linkage Specific Polyubiquitin (D9D5) Rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling #8081, 1:500), PI3K3C (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, #4263), LC3-B (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, #3868), SQSTM1/p62 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, #5114), VAMP8 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, #13060), Atg14 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, #5504), STX17 (1:1000, Sigma Aldrich, SAB001204), SNAP29 (1:1000, Sigma Aldrich, SAB2107406), PHLPP1 (1:1000, Millipore, 07–141). The antibody recognizing pSKP2 (S72) was a kind gift from Cell Signaling Technology®.

Subsequently, blots were washed and probed with the respective horseradish peroxidase- or fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. The immuno-reactive bands were visualized either using ECL detection reagent (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) or directly by excitation of the respective fluorophore. Determination of the band intensities were performed with BioRad, ChemiDoc MP.

In the case of ATG14 oligomerization, lysates were analyzed by capillary electrophoresis on Wes™ (ProteinSimple) using the 60–440 kDa cartridges.

In general, protein quantification was performed by normalization to the intensity of Actin, which was determined on the same membrane. For quantification of lipidated LC3B, the intensity of LC3B-II was always referred to the signal intensity of the corresponding LC3B-I, following the guidelines for the determination of autophagy43.

RIPA lysis of MERS-CoV infected VeroB4 cells

Whole cell lysates were prepared with RIPA lysis buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 1% IGEPAL CA-630, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS and 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0). 1% proteinase inhibitor cocktail III [Calbiochem], 0.1% benzonase [Novagen], 0.5% dithiothreitol [0.1 mM] and 1% phosphataseinhibitor [PhosphoSTOP, Roche] were freshly added. For cell lysis, supernatant was discarded and cells were carefully rinsed 3x with pre-cooled 1x PBS. 500 µl of pre-cooled 1x PBS was added and cells were scraped off and transferred to a microcentrifuge tube. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 4 °C and 300 × g for 5 min The supernatant was removed carefully and cells were resuspended in 100 µl RIPA lysis buffer and incubated for 20 min at 4 °C for efficient lysis. Then, SDS loading buffer (4x NuPAGE LDS, ThermoFisher Scientific) was added and samples were boiled at 95 °C for 10 min Samples were stored at −20 °C and processed as indicated in the respective sections.


VeroB4 (DSMZ [German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures] number-ACC33) were cultivated in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagles Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% non-essential amino acids, 1% L-glutamine and 1% sodium pyruvate at 37 °C and 5% CO2. HEK293 cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA CRL-1573) were cultivated in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 1% sodium pyruvate at 37 °C and 5% CO2. For transfection HEK293 and VeroB4 were detached and resuspended in 100 µL (50 mM HEPES pH 7.3, 90 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 0.15 mM CaCl2) transfected using the Nucleofector II system (program # T020).

Generation of Atg5 KO VeroB4

Vero B4 were plated in 6-well plates at a cell density of 5 × 105/well in VeroB4 medium and transfected with lipofectamine 3000 according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For the Atg5 knock-out, the pSpCas9 BB-2A-Puro (PX459) V2.0 plasmid containing Atg5-targeting gRNA (sequence: 5′-TATCCCCTTTAGAATATATC-3′) purchased from GenScript was used. Forty-eight after transfection, 10 μg mL−1 puromycin (InVivoGen, ant-pr-1) was added to the medium. After 48 h, the medium was changed to puromycin-free VeroB4 medium and, another 48 h later, cells were sorted into a 96-well plate at a density of one cell per well using the BD FACSMelody cell sorter (BD Biosciences). Cells were maintained in conditioned medium for 1 week until a colony was formed from a single cell. All the colonies were then trypsinized and expanded individually. Atg5 knockout was examined for each clone by western blot analysis using anti-Atg5 purchased from Santa Cruz (sc-133158).

Virus infection

For virus infection, cells were seeded in a concentration of 3.5 × 105 cells mL−1. After 24 h, virus stocks were diluted in serum-free medium according to the desired MOI. For virus adsorption, 1 ml (six-well) virus master mix was added to the cells and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. When comparing to non-infected cells, heat-inactivated (95 °C, 10 min) virus was used (mock control). After 1 h, the virus dilutions were removed and the wells were washed twice with 1x PBS and refilled with DMEM (supplemented as described above). Samples were taken at the indicated time points. All virus infection experiments were conducted under biosafety level 3 conditions with enhanced respiratory personal protection equipment.

For all SINV infection experiments strain LEIV-Ast03 was used. SINV infections were done using VeroB4 cells applying an MOI = 0.0001 for 16 and 24 h. The SKP2-inhibitor SMIP004 (SKP2i) was applied at a concentration of 10 µM.

Real-time RT-PCR assay

Genome equivalents were determined by real-time RT-PCR. Therefore, 75 µl of cell supernatant was lysed in RAV1 lysis buffer (Macherey & Nagel) and heated to 70 °C for 10 min for virus inactivation. Then, viral RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time RT-PCR assays were performed as before82. More specifically, the upE assay was applied for the detection of MERS-CoV genome equivalents, the ORF1b assay was used for the detection of MERS-del4b and MERS-del5 genome equivalents. Primers were upE-Fwd (5′-GCAACGCGCGATTCAGTT-3′), upE-Rev (5′-GCCTCTACACGGGACCCA TA-3′) and 200 nM of probe upE-Prb (6-carboxyfluorescein [FAM])-CTCTTCACATAA TCGCCCCGAGCTCG-6-carboxy-N,N,N,N´-tetramethylrhodamine [TAMRA]) as well as ORF1b-Fwd (5′-TTCGATGTTGAGGGTGCTCAT-3′), ORF1b-Rev (TCACACCAGTTGA AAATCCTAATTG) and probe ORF1b-Prb (6-carboxyfluorescein [FAM])-CCCGTAAT G CATGTGGCACCAATGT-6-carboxy-N,N,N,N´-tetramethylrhodamine [TAMRA]). For quantification of BECN1-mRNA, primers (forward 5′-CAAGATCCTGGA-3′, reverse 5′-CCGTGTCA-3′) were used as described in83.

Plaque assay

SINV infectious particles were quantified by plaque titration on VeroB4 cells as previously described84 with minor modifications. Briefly, VeroB4 monolayers were seeded in 24-well plates, incubated with SINV-containing cell culture supernatants and overlaid with 1.2% Avicel in MEM containing 2% FCS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. After 16 h, 24 h or 72 h, plaques were fixated and visualized by staining with crystal violet and counted.

Plasmids and construction of MERS-CoV cDNA clones

For heterologous expression, nsp4 and nsp6 were PCR amplified from MERS-CoV cDNA and cloned into the eukaryotic expression plasmid pCAGGS along with a C-terminal FLAG tag (MERS-nsp4-F: 5′-AGAGAATTCGCCACCATGGCTCCTACATGGTTTAATGC-3′, MERS-nsp4-R: 5′-TCTGCGGCCGCCTATCACTTGTCATCGTCGTCCTTGTAGTCGCC GGCTTGCAACACGCCAGAGGTTATGC-3′, MERS-nsp6-F: 5′-AGAGAATTCGCCACC ATGAGTGGTGTGAGAAAAGTTACATATGG-3′, MERS-nsp6-R: 5′-TCTGCGGCCGCC TATCACTTGTCATCGTCGTCCTTGTAGTCGCCGGCCTGCATAGCAGCAACCTTTAA CAAGG-3′). Construction of the plasmids expressing the accessory open reading frames (ORFs) 3, 4a, 4b, and 5 was previously described51.

Construction of a MERS-CoV cDNA clone lacking accessory ORFs: The accessory ORFs (ORF4b or ORF5) were deleted using a two-step markerless Red Recombination system as extensively described85,86. Briefly, in a first step a kanamycin resistance gene was amplified by an overhang extension PCR from the pEP-KanS vector (kindly provided by K. Tischer and K. Osterrieder) with primers containing homologous MERS-CoV recombination sites, the desired mutation and an I-SceI restriction site (MERS-delta4b-ABC-Kana-F: 5′-ATT CGCGCAAAGCGAGGAAGAGGAGCCATTCTCAACTAATGATGTTGTCTCCATACGG TCTTTAGGGATAACAGGGTAATCGATTT-3′ and MERS-delta4b-BCD-Kana-R: 5′-TT GTTTATTACCCTGATTGGAAGACCGTATGGAGACAACATCATTAGTTGGAGAATG GCTCCTGCCAGTGTTACAACCAATTAACC-3′; MERS-delORF5_Kana-F: 5′-TTCTTA TCCCATTTTACATCATCCAGGATTTTAACGAACTGCAGCTCTGCGCTACTATGGTA GGGATAACAGGGTAATCGATTT-3′ and MERS-delORF5_Kana-R: 5′-GATTAGCCTC TACACGGGACCCATAGTAGCGCAGAGCTGCAGTTCGTTAAAATCCTGGATGCCAG TGTTACAACCAATTAACC-3′). We would like to point out that this design preserves the regulatory sites of ORF5, in contrast to a previous approach69. Our rationale was to preserve an equal number of subgenomic mRNAs. E. coli GS1783 cells (kindly provided by K. Tischer and K. Osterrieder) containing the MERS-CoV cDNA clone were transfected with the PCR product in order to induce the recombination of the transfer construct into the MERS-CoV backbone. In a second step, the kanamycin selection marker was excised by an inducible in vivo I-SceI cleavage and the second Red recombination event. Rescue and stock production of the recombinant viruses were performed as described elsewhere85.

The following expression constructs were used for experiments performed in cultured cells: pRK5-FKBP51-Flag, pRK5-FKBP52-Flag2,87, pRK5-HA-Ubiquitin-WT (, #17608), pRK5-HA-Ubiquitin-KO (, #17603), pRK5-HA-Ubiquitin-K11 (, #22901), pRK5-HA-Ubiquitin-K29R (, #17602), pRK5-HA-Ubiquitin-K48 (, #17605), pRK5-HA-Ubiquitin-K63 (, #17606), Beclin1-HT (Promega, FHC08488), FLAG-HA-USP18 (, #22572), FLAG-HA-USP36 (, #22579), pcDNA3-myc-SKP2 (, #19947), FLAG-TRAF6-wt (, #21624), pcDNA4-Beclin1-HA (FL) (, #24388). The phosphomimetic and phospho-null mutants S72D/S75D and S72A of SKP2 were kind gifts from the authors of41. Transfection of the constructs FLAG-HA-USP18 and and FLAG-HA-USP36 each led to the appearance of another band at higher molecular weight in western blots. Irrespective of the exact nature of these bands, specific co-precipitation with FKBP51 was only observable for the bands at the predicted molecular weight (Fig. 1a); these were absent in coprecipitations of BECN1 (Fig. 1b). Figure 1a, b display the bands at the predicted molecular weight.

Skp2 knockdown

HEK293 cells were electroporated as described above with skp2-siRNA (sense 5′-GUCGGUGCUAUGAUAAUTT-3′; anti-sense 5′-AUUAUAUCAUCGCACCGACTT-3′) or control siRNA (sense 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′; anti-sense 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3′) and harvested after 48 h. Primers were purchased from Biomol (Hamburg, Germany).

Autophagic flux

To determine the effect of drug treatment or MERS-CoV infection on autophagic flux, either BafA1 (Alfa Aeser, J61835), a specific inhibitor of vacuolar H+-ATPases interfering with lysosome acidification and thereby degradation of autophagosome cargo, was used or transfection with a plasmid (ptfLC3,, #21074) that expresses LC3 tagged with both GFP (inactivated in autolysosomes) and mRFP (resists inactivation in autolysosomes)88, following the recently updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy43. Transfection in Vero4B cells was performed using Fugene transfection reagent (Promega), followed by MERS-CoV infection (MOI = 1) and drug treatment the next day. Cells were fixed (1% PFA for 1 h) 1 day later and analyzed by laser scanning microscopy (Leica Confocal Sp8). Vesicles were counted by an experimenter blind to the conditions.

Long-Lived protein degradation assay

Experiments were performed as described by Klionsky et al.43. Cells were incubated with valine[14C] overnight, chased in fresh media with excess valine overnight, and then incubated 4 h with complete medium or starvation media (HBSS/EBSS + 10 mM HEPES, Starv). To check that protein degradation measured was due to autophagic processes, experiments were also performed in the presence of 3-MA (10 mM, which is typically used for the inhibition of autophagy89). LLP degradation with SKP2-KD was monitored 48 h after transfection.

Inhibition of translation by cycloheximide (CHX)

HEK293 cells were incubated with 20 µg mL−1 CHX. MG132 (10 µM), 3.5 µg expression construct for FKBP51-Flag, empty vector pRK5 SV40 MCS2, TRAF6-Flag (, #21624), SKP2-MYC (, #19947) was used for stimulation or transfection of HEK293 cells.

Pulse-Chase-Assay using Halo®-tagged BECN1

HEK293 cell were transfected with 5 µg BECN1-HT expression construct. The pulse-chase assay was performed according to manufacturer’s manual using R110Direct as halogenated fluorophore (100 nM, R110Direct, #G3221, Promega) over-night (pulse), followed by switching the cells to medium without dye (chase).

Determination of IC50

To estimate the maximal viral inhibition (Imax) and the drug concentration achieving viral inhibition halfway between baseline and maximum (IC50), we first normalized the dose-response curves for each drug by dividing by cell viability, and we then fitted the normalized viral inhibition curves to a sigmoid curve using the Sigmoid and Nonlinear Least Squares functions in R version 3.1.0 ( as previously described ( Based on the sigmoid-fitted curves, we then determined numerically the Imax and IC50.

Flow cytometry

Cells were washed in PBS and fixed with cold ethanol (70%) for 30 min at 4 °C. After washing with PBS cells were treated with ribonuclease A (100 µg mL−1; Sigma Aldrich) and stained with Vybrant DyeCycle Orange (Invitrogen, V35005) as described by the manufacturer’s manual. Cells were analyzed with the FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences). Acquired data were analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star).

Statistical analysis

When two groups were compared, the student’s t-test was applied. For three or more group comparisons, one or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, as appropriate, followed by Tukey’s or Bonferroni’s post hoc test, as appropriate. All t-test t and p-values and ANOVA F and p-values are reported in the legends to the Supplementary Figures; significant results of the contrast tests are further indicated by asterisks in the graphs. All statistical tests were two-tailed and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For the complete set of raw data, see the data source file.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Candidate ubiquitination sites on BECN1 were taken from the mUbiSiDa data base (originally at, now part of omicX at The source data underlying Figs. 1, 2, 49, and Supplementary Figs. 110 are provided as a Source Data file. All other data is available from the authors upon request.


  1. 1.

    Bento, C. F. et al. Mammalian autophagy: how does it work? Annu. Rev. Biochem. 85, 685–713 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gassen, N. C. et al. Association of FKBP51 with priming of autophagy pathways and mediation of antidepressant treatment response: evidence in cells, mice, and humans. PLoS. Med. 11, e1001755 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rein, T. FK506 binding protein 51 integrates pathways of adaptation: FKBP51 shapes the reactivity to environmental change. Bioessays 38, 894–902 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Levine, B., Liu, R., Dong, X. & Zhong, Q. Beclin orthologs: integrative hubs of cell signaling, membrane trafficking, and physiology. Trends Cell Biol. 25, 533–544 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Itakura, E., Kishi, C., Inoue, K. & Mizushima, N. Beclin 1 forms two distinct phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complexes with mammalian Atg14 and UVRAG. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 5360–5372 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Diao, J. et al. ATG14 promotes membrane tethering and fusion of autophagosomes to endolysosomes. Nature 520, 563–566 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Huang, W. et al. Crystal structure and biochemical analyses reveal Beclin 1 as a novel membrane binding protein. Cell Res 22, 473–489 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wang, R. C. et al. Akt-mediated regulation of autophagy and tumorigenesis through Beclin 1 phosphorylation. Science 338, 956–959 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Reidick, C., El, M. F., Meyer, H. E., Stenmark, H. & Platta, H. W. Regulation of the tumor-suppressor function of the class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complex by ubiquitin and SUMO. Cancers (Basel) 7, 1–29 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jin, S. et al. USP19 modulates autophagy and antiviral immune responses by deubiquitinating Beclin-1. EMBO J. 35, 866–880 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Liu, J. et al. Beclin1 controls the levels of p53 by regulating the deubiquitination activity of USP10 and USP13. Cell 147, 223–234 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Boutouja, F., Brinkmeier, R., Mastalski, T., El, M. F. & Platta, H. W. Regulation of the tumor-suppressor BECLIN 1 by distinct ubiquitination cascades. Int J. Mol. Sci. 18, E2541 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dong, X. & Levine, B. Autophagy and viruses: adversaries or allies? J. Innate. Immun. 5, 480–493 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Knoops, K. et al. SARS-coronavirus replication is supported by a reticulovesicular network of modified endoplasmic reticulum. PLoS. Biol. 6, e226 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cottam, E. M. et al. Coronavirus nsp6 proteins generate autophagosomes from the endoplasmic reticulum via an omegasome intermediate. Autophagy 7, 1335–1347 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Prentice, E., Jerome, W. G., Yoshimori, T., Mizushima, N. & Denison, M. R. Coronavirus replication complex formation utilizes components of cellular autophagy. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 10136–10141 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Cong, Y., Verlhac, P. & Reggiori, F. The interaction between nidovirales and autophagy components. Viruses 9, E182 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lundin, A. et al. Targeting membrane-bound viral RNA synthesis reveals potent inhibition of diverse coronaviruses including the middle East respiratory syndrome virus. PLoS. Pathog. 10, e1004166 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Corman, V. M. et al. Viral shedding and antibody response in 37 patients with middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 62, 477–483 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Reusken, C. B. et al. Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus neutralising serum antibodies in dromedary camels: a comparative serological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 13, 859–866 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Müller, M. A. et al. MERS coronavirus neutralizing antibodies in camels, Eastern Africa, 1983–1997. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20, 2093–2095 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kindrachuk, J. et al. Antiviral potential of ERK/MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling modulation for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection as identified by temporal kinome analysis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 1088–1099 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kim, Y. C. & Guan, K. L. mTOR: a pharmacologic target for autophagy regulation. J. Clin. Invest 125, 25–32 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gosert, R., Kanjanahaluethai, A., Egger, D., Bienz, K. & Baker, S. C. RNA replication of mouse hepatitis virus takes place at double-membrane vesicles. J. Virol. 76, 3697–3708 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Reggiori, F. et al. Coronaviruses Hijack the LC3-I-positive EDEMosomes, ER-derived vesicles exporting short-lived ERAD regulators, for replication. Cell Host. Microbe 7, 500–508 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhao, Z. et al. Coronavirus replication does not require the autophagy gene ATG5. Autophagy 3, 581–585 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Guo, L. et al. Autophagy negatively regulates transmissible gastroenteritis virus replication. Sci. Rep. 6, 23864 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zhu, L., Mou, C., Yang, X., Lin, J. & Yang, Q. Mitophagy in TGEV infection counteracts oxidative stress and apoptosis. Oncotarget 7, 27122–27141 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Storer, C. L., Dickey, C. A., Galigniana, M. D., Rein, T. & Cox, M. B. FKBP51 and FKBP52 in signaling and disease. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 22, 481–490 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Los, G. V. & Wood, K. The HaloTag: a novel technology for cell imaging and protein analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 356, 195–208 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Pei, H. et al. FKBP51 affects cancer cell response to chemotherapy by negatively regulating Akt. Cancer Cell 16, 259–266 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gassen, N. C. et al. FKBP51 inhibits GSK3beta and augments the effects of distinct psychotropic medications. Mol. Psychiatry 21, 277–289 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gassen, N. C. et al. Chaperoning epigenetics: FKBP51 decreases the activity of DNMT1 and mediates epigenetic effects of the antidepressant paroxetine. Sci. Signal. 8, ra119 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Taipale, M. et al. A quantitative chaperone interaction network reveals the architecture of cellular protein homeostasis pathways. Cell 158, 434–448 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Shi, C. S. & Kehrl, J. H. TRAF6 and A20 regulate lysine 63-linked ubiquitination of Beclin-1 to control TLR4-induced autophagy. Sci. Signal. 3, ra42 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Akiyama, T. et al. Mitochondria-nucleus shuttling FK506-binding protein 51 interacts with TRAF proteins and facilitates the RIG-I-like receptor-mediated expression of type I IFN. PLoS. ONE 9, e95992 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chen, Q. et al. Targeting the p27 E3 ligase SCF(Skp2) results in p27- and Skp2-mediated cell-cycle arrest and activation of autophagy. Blood 111, 4690–4699 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Shin, H. J. et al. AMPK-SKP2-CARM1 signalling cascade in transcriptional regulation of autophagy. Nature 534, 553–557 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ikeda, F. & Dikic, I. Atypical ubiquitin chains: new molecular signals. ‘Protein Modifications: Beyond the Usual Suspects' review series. EMBO Rep. 9, 536–542 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Chen, T. et al. mUbiSiDa: a comprehensive database for protein ubiquitination sites in mammals. PLoS. ONE 9, e85744 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Gao, D. et al. Phosphorylation by Akt1 promotes cytoplasmic localization of Skp2 and impairs APCCdh1-mediated Skp2 destruction. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 397–408 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Sierecki, E., Sinko, W., McCammon, J. A. & Newton, A. C. Discovery of small molecule inhibitors of the PH domain leucine-rich repeat protein phosphatase (PHLPP) by chemical and virtual screening. J. Med. Chem. 53, 6899–6911 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Klionsky, D. J. et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition). Autophagy 12, 1–222 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Rico-Bautista, E., Yang, C. C., Lu, L., Roth, G. P. & Wolf, D. A. Chemical genetics approach to restoring p27Kip1 reveals novel compounds with antiproliferative activity in prostate cancer cells. Bmc. Biol. 8, 153 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Wu, L. et al. Specific small molecule inhibitors of Skp2-mediated p27 degradation. Chem. Biol. 19, 1515–1524 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Aghajanyy, M. et al. Chemical genetics screen for enhancers of rapamycin identifies a specific inhibitor of an SCF family E3 ubiquitin ligase. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 738–742 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Itakura, E., Kishi-Itakura, C. & Mizushima, N. The hairpin-type tail-anchored SNARE syntaxin 17 targets to autophagosomes for fusion with endosomes/lysosomes. Cell 151, 1256–1269 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Cottam, E. M., Whelband, M. C. & Wileman, T. Coronavirus NSP6 restricts autophagosome expansion. Autophagy 10, 1426–1441 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Oudshoorn, D. et al. Expression and cleavage of middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirusnsp3–4 polyprotein induce the formation of double-membrane vesicles that mimic those associated with coronaviral RNA replication. MBio 8, e01658–17 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Muth, D. et al. Attenuation of replication by a 29 nucleotide deletion in SARS-coronavirus acquired during the early stages of human-to-human transmission. Sci. Rep. 8, 15177 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Niemeyer, D. et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus accessory protein 4a is a type I interferon antagonist. J. Virol. 87, 12489–12495 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Orvedahl, A. et al. Autophagy protects against Sindbis virus infection of the central nervous system. Cell Host. Microbe 7, 115–127 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Shoji-Kawata, S. et al. Identification of a candidate therapeutic autophagy-inducing peptide. Nature 494, 201–206 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Malik, S. A. et al. BH3 mimetics activate multiple pro-autophagic pathways. Oncogene 30, 3918–3929 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Matsunaga, K. et al. Two Beclin 1-binding proteins, Atg14L and Rubicon, reciprocally regulate autophagy at different stages. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 385–396 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Wu, C. Y. et al. Small molecules targeting severe acute respiratory syndrome human coronavirus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10012–10017 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Xu, D. et al. USP14 regulates autophagy by suppressing K63 ubiquitination of Beclin 1. Genes Dev. 30, 1718–1730 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Xu, C. et al. Regulation of autophagy by E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF216 through BECN1 ubiquitination. Autophagy 10, 2239–2250 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Liu, C. C. et al. Cul3-KLHL20 ubiquitin ligase governs the turnover of ULK1 and VPS34 complexes to control autophagy termination. Mol. Cell 61, 84–97 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Platta, H. W., Abrahamsen, H., Thoresen, S. B. & Stenmark, H. Nedd4-dependent lysine-11-linked polyubiquitination of the tumour suppressor Beclin 1. Biochem. J. 441, 399–406 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Fimia, G. M. et al. Ambra1 regulates autophagy and development of the nervous system. Nature 447, 1121–1125 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Jin, J., Arias, E. E., Chen, J., Harper, J. W. & Walter, J. C. A family of diverse Cul4-Ddb1-interacting proteins includes Cdt2, which is required for S phase destruction of the replication factor Cdt1. Mol. Cell 23, 709–721 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Xia, P. et al. WASH inhibits autophagy through suppression of Beclin 1 ubiquitination. EMBO J. 32, 2685–2696 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Ashkenazi, A. et al. Polyglutamine tracts regulate beclin 1-dependent autophagy. Nature 545, 108–111 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Gusho, E., Baskar, D., & Banerjee, S. New advances in our understanding of the “unique” RNase L in host pathogen interaction and immune signaling. Cytokine pii: S1043–4666(16)30456–2. (2016).

  66. 66.

    Yang, Y. et al. The structural and accessory proteins M, ORF 4a, ORF 4b, and ORF 5 of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) are potent interferon antagonists. Protein Cell 4, 951–961 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Ambjorn, M. et al. IFNB1/interferon-beta-induced autophagy in MCF-7 breast cancer cells counteracts its proapoptotic function. Autophagy 9, 287–302 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Scobey, T. et al. Reverse genetics with a full-length infectious cDNA of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16157–16162 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Almazán, F. et al. Engineering a replication-competent, propagation-defective Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus as a vaccine candidate. MBio 4, e00650–13 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Skotland, T., Iversen, T. G., Torgersen, M. L. & Sandvig, K. Cell-penetrating peptides: possibilities and challenges for drug delivery in vitro and in vivo. Molecules 20, 13313–13323 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Campbell, G. R. & Spector, S. A. Vitamin D inhibits human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in macrophages through the induction of autophagy. PLoS. Pathog. 8, e1002689 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Orvedahl, A. et al. HSV-1 ICP34.5 confers neurovirulence by targeting the Beclin 1 autophagy protein. Cell Host. Microbe 1, 23–35 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Akhrymuk, I., Kulemzin, S. V. & Frolova, E. I. Evasion of the innate immune response: the Old World alphavirus nsP2 protein induces rapid degradation of Rpb1, a catalytic subunit of RNA polymerase II. J. Virol. 86, 7180–7191 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Kim, D. Y. et al. New world and old world alphaviruses have evolved to exploit different components of stress granules, FXR and G3BP proteins, for assembly of viral replication complexes. PLoS. Pathog. 12, e1005810 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Galluzzi, L. et al. Molecular definitions of autophagy and related processes. EMBO J. 36, 1811–1836 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Smith, T. C., Kinkel, A. W., Gryczko, C. M. & Goulet, J. R. Absorption of pyrvinium pamoate. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 19, 802–806 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Andrews, P., Thyssen, J. & Lorke, D. The biology and toxicology of molluscicides, Bayluscide. Pharmacol. Ther. 19, 245–295 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Costabile, G. et al. Toward repositioning niclosamide for antivirulence therapy of pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections: development of inhalable formulations through nanosuspension technology. Mol. Pharm. 12, 2604–2617 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Rubinsztein, D. C., Codogno, P. & Levine, B. Autophagy modulation as a potential therapeutic target for diverse diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 11, 709–730 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Rubinsztein, D. C., Bento, C. F. & Deretic, V. Therapeutic targeting of autophagy in neurodegenerative and infectious diseases. J. Exp. Med. 212, 979–990 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Zschocke, J. et al. Antidepressant drugs diversely affect autophagy pathways in astrocytes and neurons–dissociation from cholesterol homeostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology 36, 1754–1768 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Corman, V. M. et al. Detection of a novel human coronavirus by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Eur. Surveill. 17, 20285 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Miracco, C. et al. Protein and mRNA expression of autophagy gene Beclin 1 in human brain tumours. Int J. Oncol. 30, 429–436 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Byrnes, A. P. & Griffin, D. E. Binding of Sindbis virus to cell surface heparan sulfate. J. Virol. 72, 7349–7356 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Muth, D. et al. Transgene expression in the genome of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus based on a novel reverse genetics system utilizing Red-mediated recombination cloning. J. Gen. Virol. 98, 2461–2469 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Tischer, B. K., Smith, G. A. & Osterrieder, N. En passant mutagenesis: a two step markerless red recombination system. Methods Mol. Biol. 634, 421–430 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Wochnik, G. M. et al. FK506-binding proteins 51 and 52 differentially regulate dynein interaction and nuclear translocation of the glucocorticoid receptor in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 4609–4616 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Kimura, S., Noda, T. & Yoshimori, T. Dissection of the autophagosome maturation process by a novel reporter protein, tandem fluorescent-tagged LC3. Autophagy 3, 452–460 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Mizushima, N., Yoshimori, T. & Levine, B. Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell 140, 313–326 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are indebted to Mikko Taipale and Susan Lindquist for sharing the results of their FKBP51 interaction screen before publication. We thank Nicolas Heinemann, Anja Richter (both Charité), Artem Siemens, Maximilian Tschischka (both University of Bonn Medical Center) for excellent technical assistance. This work was partially funded by a NARSAD Young Investigator Award by Brain and Behavior Research Foundation, honoured by P&S Fund (to NCG, Grant ID 25348). NCG was further supported by a European Research Council starting grant (# 281338, GxE molmech, awarded to Elisabeth Binder) within the FP7 framework. CD was supported by the German Research Council (DFG) grant DFG SPP1596 (DR 772/10–2) and SFB-TR84 (TRR 84/3, A07), the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) grant RAPID (#01KI1723A) and the EU Horizon 2020 grants COMPARE (# 643476) and EVAg (#653316). MAM was supported by the VW Foundation (#93345).” The SKP2 mutant plasmids were a kind gift from Wenyi Wei.

Author information




N.C.G., V.M.C., C.D., M.A.M., T.R. designed and conceived the work. N.C.G., D.N., D.M., V.M.C., S.M., A.G., K.H., J.P., K.M., A.Z., A.S.Z., A.H., F.H., R.B.-W., M.B., B.M.-M., carried out experiments. N.C.G., D.N., D.M., V.M.C., S.M., A.G., K.H., J.P., K.M., A.Z., A.S.Z., A.H., F.H., R.B.-W., M.B., B.M.-M., C.D., M.A.M., T.R. analysed data. N.C.G., C.D., M.A.M., T.R. wrote the main paper text. N.C.G., prepared all figures. All authors reviewed the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nils C. Gassen or Theo Rein.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gassen, N.C., Niemeyer, D., Muth, D. et al. SKP2 attenuates autophagy through Beclin1-ubiquitination and its inhibition reduces MERS-Coronavirus infection. Nat Commun 10, 5770 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.