Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The marine geological imprint of Antarctic ice shelves

Abstract

Reductions in the thickness and extent of Antarctic ice shelves are triggering increased discharge of marine-terminating glaciers. While the impacts of recent changes are well documented, their role in modulating past ice-sheet dynamics remains poorly constrained. This reflects two persistent issues; first, the effective discrimination of sediments and landforms solely attributable to sub-ice-shelf deposition, and second, challenges in dating these records. Recent progress in deciphering the geological imprint of Antarctic ice shelves is summarised, including advances in dating methods and proxies to reconstruct drivers of change. Finally, we identify several challenges to overcome to fully exploit the paleo record.

Introduction

The majority of grounded ice in Antarctica drains through the ice sheet’s peripheral ice shelves making them a critical component of its mass balance1,2. The rapid collapse of the Larsen B Ice Shelf in 2002 not only demonstrated the sensitivity of the Antarctic cryosphere to recent warming3, but also confirmed earlier theoretical work that ice shelves act to buttress inland ice4. The near-instantaneous acceleration of outlet glaciers following collapse resulted in greater land-ice discharge and contribution to sea-level rise5,6. Breakup of ice shelves along the Antarctic Peninsula has been linked to atmospheric warming since the late 1800s together with specific mechanisms, e.g., hydrofracture in water-filled crevasses7,8,9. Some Peninsula ice shelves, together with those along the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) Pacific margin (Fig. 1), have also thinned in response to enhanced submarine melting from intrusion of warm circumpolar deep water (CDW)1,10 onto the continental shelf which weakens buttressing, resulting in accelerated ice flow1. In the Amundsen Sea sector of WAIS, where mass loss due to ice shelf thinning has increased substantially over the past four decades11, numerical models suggest that runaway deglaciation of the ice sheet is possible and might already be underway12. Ocean-driven thinning is also detected for key ice shelves fringing the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS)13, suggesting that this region is also susceptible to rapid and large-scale ice loss14, and together with contributions from the Antarctic Peninsula and WAIS could drive significant future sea-level rise11,15.

Fig. 1
figure1

Rate of change of Antarctic ice-shelf and ice-sheet thickness1. Estimated average seafloor potential temperatures (in °C) from the World Ocean Circulation Experiment Southern Ocean Atlas145 (pink to blue) are overlaid on continental shelf bathymetry (in metres)146 (greyscale, landward of the continental-shelf break). APIS Antarctic Peninsula Ice Sheet, WAIS and EAIS West and East Antarctic Ice Sheets, PGC Prince Gustav Channel, LISA Larsen A, LISB Larsen B, LISC Larsen C, BB Barilari Bay, MT Marguerite Trough, GVI George VI Ice Shelf, PIG/PIB Pine Island Glacier/Bay, TH Thwaites, MacT Mackay Glacier Tongue, WDB Whales Deep Basin,T Totten, A Amery.

In addition to an improved understanding of the sensitivity of Antarctic ice shelves to ocean and atmospheric forcing, there is a growing awareness that some currently observed changes were instigated in the recent past16 and in some cases, ice shelves might have been pre-conditioned to collapse through many thousands of years of thinning17. This has highlighted the need for detailed reconstruction of ice-shelf history at a range of time scales so that the relative roles of contemporaneous ocean–atmosphere forced-change and/or a continuing response to an earlier perturbation in driving ice shelf loss can be fully assessed. Furthermore, the geological record can serve as an important analogue for recent and future changes and particularly dynamic thinning, where the impacts of ice-shelf removal on grounded ice further upstream can be fully explored and used to constrain model simulations. Such records will not only help decipher the drivers of change but are also important for initialising models which aim to predict future change15. The more important the long-term behaviour, the more likely the model will be required to run over longer time scales18.

In this review, we examine sediments, landforms and available proxy indicators associated with ice-shelf presence, absence and collapse, by utilising new information obtained from direct access10,16,19,20,21,22 and the considerable theoretical and observational advances that have been made by studying recently exposed and former sub-ice-shelf environments17,23. We consider how this information can constrain key boundary conditions relevant for modelling studies, such as ice shelf extent, thickness and cavity geometry, and review the methods currently available to assess the rates and drivers of past retreat. Finally, key gaps in our understanding of these systems are identified as areas for future research. Past or ‘paleo’ largely refers to changes since the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM; 19–23 kyr) because, unlike previous glaciations, the sediments and landforms are comparatively well-preserved and consequently easier to interpret and date accurately. The concepts and applications are also relevant to more ancient glaciations, which is particularly important as future climate conditions might differ from the LGM/Holocene.

Observations beneath contemporary ice shelves

The processes operating beneath modern ice shelves (Fig. 2) are critical to understanding the signatures left by past ice shelves yet they remain poorly characterised due to the logistical challenges associated with direct access to sub-ice shelf cavities. Observations made by a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) in the 1990s24 beneath Mackay Glacier Tongue, fed by an outlet glacier of the EAIS flowing into the Ross Sea (Fig. 1), remain the most comprehensive. At the grounding line (GL; Fig. 2), glacigenic debris up to 20-m-thick was observed in vertical faces of basal crevasses, consisting of discontinuous layers of diamicton or clast-rich mud interlayered with cleaner ice. Morainal banks were observed against the vertical face of such crevasses, formed as sediment was squeezed and pushed as the GL oscillated due to tidal flexure. Englacial debris was observed to be spatially patchy, with only a few layers cms to 1-m-thick present in calved icebergs and at the sides of the glacier tongue. Although basal melting was detected, no glacifluvial deposits or conduits indicative of extensive releases of meltwater were observed, suggesting a leaky drainage system through the till or between the till-glacier sole interface (cf. refs. 25,26). This contrasts with Arctic systems where meltwater-related processes are much more common27. Concentrations of suspended particulate matter increased near the GL, originating from either meltwater at the ice-bed interface or by re-suspension of seafloor sediments caused by increasing current velocities within a confined cavity. Up to 300 m away from the GL, a soft glacimarine drape consisting of clast-rich sandy-mud (shelfstone mud28) and diamicton with a poorly sorted texture similar to that of its basal debris source was imaged. The poor sorting indicated little subsequent sorting during rain-out from the ice shelf base. A key observation was that the drape is also locally patchy reflecting variations in rainout process and modification by ocean currents and/or by meltwater discharge.

Fig. 2
figure2

Simplified view of an Antarctic ice shelf influenced by warm water inflow (not to scale). Inflowing warm water drives enhanced melting at the ice-shelf base in the vicinity of the grounding line (GL) and results in outflowing meltwater that is cooler and fresher.

More recent autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) missions have prioritised the measurement and characterisation of ocean-water properties10,29. An exception to this are the AUV missions beneath Pine Island Glacier (PIG) ice shelf using Autosub, which not only revealed detailed information about the properties of the ocean and cavity geometry10 but also the morphology of the seafloor and ice base21,30. Inflowing CDW is warm and salty and contrasts with the melt-laden outflow that has been cooled and diluted by the addition of fresh water (Fig. 2). Under PIG, this outflow carries a signature of increased light attenuation arising from sediment-laden meltwater discharge or the melting of debris-rich basal ice immediately downstream of the GL. Sub-ice shelf sediment cores recovered at three locations along a prominent seafloor ridge beneath PIG—which is thought to have been the last stable pinning point as the PIG GL retreated landward—revealed the upper 4–6 cm consisted of finely laminated muds, consistent with a sediment-plume source16.

Access to ice shelf cavities via hot-water drilled boreholes are more numerous and allow direct measurements of critical boundary processes operating at the ice shelf base31 and seafloor. Measurements include sediment sampling16,19,20 and analyses of the biological communities living under the ice32,33,34, in the water column35, and on and within the seabed36,37. Early work on sub-ice shelf environments considered these regions unlikely to support living biota due to the absence of primary producers in settings devoid of light. Photographs from beneath the Ross Ice Shelf provided the first evidence for living biota beneath an Antarctic ice shelf hundreds of kilometres landward of ocean water, but also confirmed the low productivity of this environment with a relatively depauperate benthic assemblage comprised solely of mobile scavengers32,38. Fossilised benthic organisms in debris bands on the surface of the McMurdo Ice Shelf were used to infer the existence of a living benthic community beneath this ice shelf39,40, with a relatively impoverished community more recently imaged from the seaward part of this ice shelf41. In contrast, video footage collected 100 km from the calving front of the Amery Ice Shelf revealed a more diverse epifauna assemblage, including 29 distinct benthic taxa, mostly sedentary filter feeders, within an area of only 1–2 m2 (ref. 36) (Fig. 3a–d). Lower diversity communities, dominated by mobile scavengers, occurred 160 and 200 km upstream from the calving front of the Amery Ice Shelf42 (Fig. 3e, f). This work fundamentally changed our perception of sub-ice-shelf environments and specifically of the marine geological signature of ice shelf presence. Here the diverse benthic community could be mistaken for other low-light environments, such as coastal regions with perennial sea-ice cover43 and deep-water shelf regions below the photic zone44,45,46 if the context was not already known42.

Fig. 3
figure3

Seafloor biota imaged beneath the Amery Ice Shelf illustrating variations in ocean current circulation beneath the ice shelf. ad Diverse community dominated by sessile filter feeders at sites of inflowing bottom currents, 100 km from the calving front. e Deposit-feeders 200 km from the calving front associated with inflowing bottom currents. f Mobile scavengers imaged 160 km from the calving front in an area of weak bottom current circulation. For details of biota, see ref. 42. Images © Martin Riddle/Australian Antarctic Division.

The marine geological signature of ice shelf presence

A fundamental requirement for paleo-ice shelf studies is to reconstruct their geometry, including extent and thickness, together with temporal changes in these properties. In this section, we summarise the key sediment types, proxies and landforms used to determine ice shelf presence, absence and collapse (Fig. 2). Epishelf lakes as recorders of ice shelf history47,48 are not covered here (see instead ref. 49).

Sediment facies and proxies

Sub-ice-shelf sediments and proxies within them provide the most direct evidence of changing ice cover. With the exception of the area proximal to the GL (<10 km), sediments in sub-ice-shelf environments are characterised by low depositional rates (relative to other glacimarine environments) and low amounts of biogenic matter. Sedimentation is controlled by proximity to the sediment sources—the GL and calving line (Fig. 2)—but is also heavily influenced by marine currents, the spatial variability of debris entrainment in the ice as well as basal melting and freezing processes that can either enhance or retard debris release and rainout onto the sea floor23. Idealised models for sedimentation beneath Antarctic ice shelves25,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57 tend to consider a retreating GL and calving line, and typically comprise a basal diamicton (subglacial facies representing ice-advance; Fig. 4) overlain by a sequence of sub-ice shelf sediments consisting of stratified diamicton and/or pellet-rich diamicton (‘granulated facies’), massive to stratified, well-sorted glacimarine sands and muds which first fine upwards into a ‘null zone’ before coarsening upwards again. The latter coarsening indicates the approaching calving line and is usually characterised by higher concentrations of both biogenic matter and silty to sandy detritus advected under the ice shelf from the open ocean (Figs. 4 and 5). This is capped by an iceberg-rafted diamicton deposited at the ice-shelf front, which in turn is overlain by a dropstone-bearing biogenic mud deposited in a seasonally open marine setting.

Fig. 4
figure4

Idealised sedimentary sequence deposited under a retreating ice shelf (modified from refs. 53,147). This full succession is rarely preserved, although the general transition from coarse-grained grounding line (GL) proximal to finer-grained grounding line distal sediments is typical. A ‘collapse facies’ is summarised in the upper panel and can occur anywhere within the ‘sub-ice-shelf’ succession. Black numbered circles (right column) refer to the ‘sediment elements’ shown in Fig. 5. LISA, LISB Larsen A, B ice shelf, PGC Prince Gustav Channel Ice Shelf, BB Barilari Bay, PIG Pine Island Glacier, PB Prydz Bay. Sedimentation rates from refs. 16,23,118; number in parenthesis is distance from GL. Absolute diatom abundance (ADA; millions of valves/gram sediment)17,22,63,64,96. Percentage total organic carbon (TOC)/Nitrogen (N) and total carbon (TC)/N data16,63 together with unpublished data from George VI and Larsen C sub-ice-shelf cores. Berylium-10 (×109 atoms/g) data100,101,102. Diatom assemblage data61,73, foraminiferal assemblage and morphotype data are compiled from refs. 59,72,76,77,78,80,81.

Fig. 5
figure5

Conceptual model of the sediments and landforms associated with a ice shelf presence, b absence, c pre-collapse and d collapse (panel c, d modified from ref. 94). The characteristics of each sediment element is summarised in Fig. 4. Landform elements are summarised in Table 1. msl mean sea level.

While subsequent work has demonstrated the general applicability of these stratigraphic models, especially as a robust framework to infer GL proximal to distal sedimentation, it has also highlighted the variable and heterogeneous nature of sub-ice-shelf sediments25,58,59. Ultimately, any of the aforementioned sedimentary units may be muted, amplified or entirely absent, and the formation/preservation of a particular unit depends on the time scales over which the various depositional processes operate as well as the size of the ice shelf. Sediments associated with short-lived phases of ice shelf cover will differ from those deposited beneath a large ice shelf system that exists for many thousands of years. It is also worth noting the potential differences between glacier tongues vs. ice shelves. Although many of the processes, facies and landforms are likely to be similar, their lateral extent and overall footprint will differ, as will the biogenic signature within the sediments. For example, because ocean currents are more likely to circulate freely under a glacier tongue, sediments deposited away from the GL will be similar to outer parts of a larger ice shelf system.

Despite this heterogeneity, a consistent feature in most sub-ice-shelf sediments is the dominance of a coarse-grained GL-proximal facies (diamicton, gravel-rich and sand-rich sediments) and a lack or paucity of subaqueous outwash60. The latter reflects limited subglacial meltwater discharge (relative to Arctic ice shelves51) potentially allowing effective discrimination between polar ice-shelf and more temperate or sub-polar tidewater glacimarine regimes. However, coarse-grained facies occur directly above subglacial tills across much of the Antarctic shelf and do not necessarily reflect ice shelf cover. In this context, several authors ascribe ‘granulated facies’, consisting of muddy-gravel, rich in granules or ‘till pellets’ (pelletized-mud53) (Fig. 4), solely to sub-ice-shelf deposition54. Deposition of the granulated facies has been explained by a combination of regelation freezing near to the GL and re-melting of this basal debris in a sub-ice shelf setting53. Sub-ice shelf ocean currents and/or tidal pumping (Fig. 5) sort the finer-grained detritus released by melting from the ice shelf base, which can result in coarse lag deposits with a ‘granulated texture’. Micropaleontological studies indicate that diatoms or diatom fragments within the granulated facies tend to be enriched in heavily silicified taxa, with fewer larger or pennate taxa61, but this applies more generally to GL-proximal sediments. The genesis of till pellets is thought to reflect mechanical shearing of till into pellets or alternating thermal conditions which promote rotation of fine-grained till aggregates62. While both formation mechanisms can plausibly result in the rainout of the pellets in a sub-ice-shelf cavity, such pellets are also common in the upper part of the deforming subglacial layer meaning their presence in glacial sequences is not always diagnostic of a sub-ice-shelf cover.

The transition from coarse- to fine-grained sediments typically reflects increasing distance from the GL, and on a retrograde seabed, an enlarging sub-ice cavity16. The presence of cross-bedded sands directly above the coarse-grained facies has been interpreted to reflect strong traction currents in a widening, but relatively narrow ocean cavity (Figs. 4 and 5)20,24,54,63. With increasing distance from the GL, the gravel and sand rich sediments are eventually replaced by sometimes thick sequences of laminated to massive muds and sandy muds deposited by sediment-laden meltwater plumes16,25,26,64, observed to extend 250 km from the GL25. The overall thickness of this unit is primarily a function of time, but also the competing influence of sediment delivery, and strength and longevity of ocean currents (which can be tidally generated)16,23,64. On large ice shelves, where the GL and calving line can be separated by >100 km, the laminated muds grade into massive muds with progressive distance from the GL before eventually reaching a theoretical zone where sedimentation is almost zero (‘null zone’ in Figs. 2, 4 and 5). The calving line, and thus the seaward limit of the ice shelf, can be identifiable by a distinct maximum in ice-rafted debris (IRD)53,59,63 and elevated diatom/organic contents65 (Fig. 4). Trapping of sea-ice and icebergs at the calving line increases their residence time at the ice-shelf front, leading to accumulation of IRD on the seafloor over time. Debris can include aeolian components (Fig. 5), while biogenic material is delivered by landward advection beneath the ice shelf through inflowing currents53. The calving line, however, is not constant through time due to periodic iceberg calving, and this might be recognised by sandier or dropstone-rich layers with higher contents of biogenic detritus. Thicker sequences of dropstone-rich mud is expected if the calving line is stable over a longer period of time (102–103 years).

The absence of IRD within the largely terrigenous laminated to massive muds has traditionally been used as an important indicator for ice shelf cover based on the assumption that larger ice-stream fed ice shelves are devoid of coarse particle sizes beyond the GL50. However, several studies have described poorly sorted debris at the surface of and within large ice shelves66,67,68 which either remains on the ice shelf surface and is later deposited as IRD at the calving line67 or is entrained into the ice shelf by inflowing glaciers69 before melting out at its base. Coarse-grained debris can also freeze to the base of an ice shelf as it grounds on pinning points during phases of advance, ice shelf thickening or locally lowering sea-level56. This debris is subsequently redistributed as the ice shelf unpins and is exposed to basal melting24,56 or, in some unique cases, can migrate to the surface as a result of high rates of surface ablation40. An expected corollary of this is that the sediment flux and grain size will vary over time, depending on which ice layer is being melted at the base24. However, debris incorporated into the ice shelf englacially or from freeze-on is likely to be locally sourced, making it distinguishable from calving-line diamictons, where IRD can be sourced from icebergs originating from a wide area53.

Within this facies succession—excluding sediment deposited near the calving line (see63)—productivity indicators, e.g., total organic carbon (TOC), ratios of carbon and nitrogen (C/N), absolute diatom abundances (ADA) and biogenic silica, are assumed to be low, and widely employed to differentiate between ice shelf, tidewater and open-marine depositional settings (Fig. 4). Diatoms cannot survive beneath ice shelves, except under special circumstances (see refs. 19,70). In contrast, a tidewater calving front would allow both GL proximal and diatom sedimentation to occur contemporaneously, giving rise to higher ADA/biogenic content, if the related siliciclastic sedimentation rates are low. Consistently low TOC content and ADA throughout sediment cores recovered from the seafloor below the former Larsen B Ice Shelf were used to demonstrate its persistence during the Holocene17 (Fig. 4), while increases in ADA has been associated with past ice-shelf retreats71. An exception to this general pattern occurs where diatoms and foraminfera are advected beneath the ice shelf from the open ocean72,73,74. High ADA in seafloor surface sediments beneath the Amery Ice Shelf42 (Fig. 4) are consistent with its modelled cavity oceanographic circulation75, providing a proxy for inflowing and outflowing water masses42.

In contrast to siliceous microfossils, variations in foraminiferal assemblages have been directly associated with ice shelf cover. Additionally, because ice shelves restrict air–sea gas exchange, stable carbon isotope (δ13C) values in benthic and planktic foraminifera tend to be lower in shells calcifying in sub-ice shelf waters72 relative to open-marine settings. Recent work in the Amundsen Sea suggests that a switch from a benthic foraminifera assemblage dominated by Nonionella bradii and Globocassidulina species (Globocassidulina subglobosa, Globocassidulina biora) to one composed of various Angulogerina species, and specifically Angulogerina angulosa, reflects a change from sub-ice-shelf to open-marine deposition (Fig. 4)72. Assemblages dominated by G. subglobosa, G. biora, Trifarina earlandi, Astrononion echolsi and Nonionella sp. have also been associated with sub-ice-shelf environments in the Ross Sea and Marguerite Bay59,76,77 while Trifarina angulosa (as Angulogerina earlandi) is associated with an ice-shelf edge environment in the Larsen Ice Shelf area78. Sub-ice-shelf sediments in the Whales Deep Basin, eastern Ross Sea (Fig. 1) have revealed two different morphotypes of G. biora (pustulose and smooth) as well as spinose and costate morphotype of T. earlandi77. The pustulose morphotype of G. biora appears to be most prominent in GL-proximal sediments and particularly those associated with GZW foresets (Fig. 4). One suggestion is that the smooth morphotype is more characteristic of distal sub-ice-shelf conditions while the pustolose is indicative of GL-proximal sedimentation, perhaps associated with an ice cliff77. The two morphotypes of T. earlandi strongly dominate the ice-shelf breakup facies, which might record benthic foraminiferal colonisation after significant habitat disturbance. Within the sub-ice shelf foraminifera assemblage in Pine Island Bay, there was also a high proportion of the non-encrusted shell morphotype of Neogloboquadrina pachyderma sinistral (adolescent stage), which the authors related to advection beneath the ice shelf and subsequent mortality before reaching the terminal life stage72. Minzoni et al.74 also propose advection to explain increases in N. pachyderma sin. in glacier proximal sediments deposited beneath an expanded Cosgrove Ice Shelf. Arenaceous benthic foraminifera are also common in ice shelf covered areas although their taxonomy and ecology is poorly known compared to other groups79, and their relative abundance in some settings might relate to preservation potential77,80. Nevertheless, Miliammina arenacea and Portatrochammina sp. have been documented in sub-ice-shelf sediments in Marguerite Bay59, Whales Deep Basin77 and Lallemand Fjord81, while Portatrochammina pseudotriceramata and Cyclammina pusilla have specifically been linked to grounding line-proximal sub-ice-shelf sediments59 (Fig. 4).

Landforms

Supporting the sedimentary imprint of ice shelves, landforms, through an understanding of their geometry and geomorphic formation, provide additional records of ice shelf presence and absence. However, the landforms diagnostic of ice shelves are poorly characterised, reflecting both an under-appreciation of their potential but also technological limitations associated with sonar imaging systems that traditionally have been unable to resolve key features beneath the resolution of shipborne instruments (>20–30 m in Antarctic shelf depths). Landforms associated with ice shelf presence include grounding zone wedges (GZWs), various scours, corrugation ridges and moraines (Figs. 5 and 6; Table 1).

Fig. 6
figure6

Landforms associated with ice shelf presence and absence. a Large grounding zone wedges crossing the Mertz Trough (30 m grid cell size), indicative of grounding line positions constrained by the presence of an ice shelf148. The backslopes of the wedges (inset, top-right) are marked by sub-parallel furrows that may have formed during ice-sheet lift-off. Map inset (top-left) shows location of panels ad. −700 m (dark blue) and −500 m (light blue) bathymetric contours are shown to illustrate general continental shelf morphology. Colours and corresponding scales depict depth below sea level in metres in panels ad. b Melange scours (Filchner Trough, 25 m grid cell size91) indicative of ice-shelf presence, particularly their sub-parallel geometry. Inset highlights an along-track ‘kink’ in the scours which shows they are not subglacial bedforms. c Linear ice-shelf keel scours on the tops of grounding zone wedges in outer Pine Island Trough (30 m grid cell size) recording the transition from grounded ice-sheet to floating ice-shelf93. d Range of landforms associated with retreating ice shelves (Pine Island Trough, 20 m grid cell size93), including corrugation ridges, mega-furrows and ice-keel plough ridges. Inset shows one of the ice-pushed ridges in detail. Black arrow (inset) is direction of ice keel motion to generate ice-keel plough ridge.

Table 1 Summary of geomorphological features associated with ice shelf presence and absence30,83,84,91,93,112,149,150,151.

Ice shelf moraines—formed where debris is deposited or redistributed around the ice-shelf margins—provide constraints on ice shelf presence and thinning history82,83,84,85 yet are only preserved in a handful of ice free terrestrial settings. Push moraines with similar dimensions to those observed beneath Mackay Glacier (~2 m) have also been imaged on deglaciated parts of the western Ross Sea shelf (e.g., JOIDES Trough). Their formation has been associated with push and squeeze in basal crevasses as well as delivery and deposition from sub- or englacial material26,86 although no clear association between these features and the presence of an ice canopy was found86. As such it remains unclear, if such moraines are diagnostic of ice shelf presence or simply indicate a specific GL configuration and/or retreat pattern.

GZWs form when the GL remains near-stationary allowing the accumulation and forward progradation of sediment to build a wedge geometry (Figs. 5 and 6a)86,87,88. Their vertical restriction and asymmetry implies limited accommodation for sediments above the grounding zone, due to the low seaward slope of an extending, floating ice tongue88. In the absence of a restricting ice shelf, flux of subglacial sediments will more likely construct morainal banks or proglacial grounding-line fans, both of which are distinct in their morphology and internal facies from GZWs28.

Geophysical data indicate that the under-sides of modern ice shelves display an irregular topography characterised by crevassing, longitudinal channels, terracing and discrete keels of varying depth89,90. It is likely that ice shelf keels regularly interacted with the tops of GZWs, where GL migrations occurred. Such ‘keel’ expressions are perhaps the most prominent landform signature discerning past ice shelf extents and create both indirect and direct evidence for ice shelves in the form of melange scours and sub-ice shelf keel scours. Melange scours (Fig. 6a) are highly linear keel-forms created as part of a free-floating mass of icebergs held within an ice melange (Fig. 5)91. On the seafloor in the Filchner Trough, a glacially-incised trough extending below and seaward of the Filchner Ice Shelf91 (Fig. 1), the forward motion of the melange was interpreted to have been aided by an ice shelf that formed the seaward extension of a large paleo-ice stream. Ice shelf advance pushed the floating ice melange that in turn scoured the sea floor beyond the calving line (Fig. 6b).

Sub-ice shelf keel scours (Fig. 5) are similar to, but genetically distinct from, melange scours and consist of splayed and occasionally cross-cutting lineations with high linearity but low parallel conformity. They have been imaged on the surfaces of relict GZWs30 and interpreted as erosional keel-imprints formed by the lift off of marine terminating glaciers92 (Fig. 6c). They record the transition from a grounded to a sub-ice shelf environment and form an intermediary landform between curvilinear iceberg ploughmarks, characterised by restricted lengths without a preferred direction, and long elongate subglacial bedforms which are unidirectional and highly parallel (Table 1). Indeed, linear furrows on the backslopes of many GZW that have previously been classified as subglacial may be re-interpreted as sub-ice shelf keel scours formed during decoupling of the ice bed with the grounding zone feature (e.g. Fig. 6a). We hypothesise that such sub-ice shelf keel-scours form in newly opened ice shelf cavities where ice reaches flotation.

The only high-resolution (2-m grid cell size) bathymetry from beneath an extant ice shelf, where such a lift-off is known to have occurred, were obtained with Autosub from the top of Jenkins Ridge beneath PIG ice shelf. Graham et al.30 interpreted seafloor scours to result from keel ploughing beneath the ice shelf as it passed over the ridge. The scours also contain populations of ‘corrugation ridges’; the expression of tidal lifting and settling of the ice shelf during scour formation. Identical corrugation ridges were also mapped in the outer part of Pine Island Trough. By contrast, these were interpreted to have formed as the expression of tidal motion in free-floating icebergs entrained in an iceberg melange (a collapse scenario)93. Multiple lines of evidence indicate that, at least beneath PIG, corrugations record sub-ice shelf keel interaction with the seabed and not past iceberg grounding in open water (Table 1)30. Indeed, it is likely that all the cavity geomorphic features on Jenkins Ridge relate to sub-ice shelf processes during the last century—perhaps even the last decade21. Thus in this setting, ice-shelf keel scours and associated corrugations provide direct evidence for ice shelf presence (Fig. 5a) although it remains to be seen whether they can be used as landform indicators for past ice-shelf presence more widely.

Signature of ice shelf collapse

Sediment facies and proxies

The collapse of ice shelves in the Antarctic Peninsula during the 1990s and early 2000s not only allowed a detailed examination of sediments deposited beneath ice shelves but also the marine geological signature of ice-shelf collapse. A key finding was that sedimentation rates increased by two to four times during disintegration (Fig. 4)94 due to deposition of sediment from the ice shelf surface and increased rainout of englacial and basal debris from the ice-shelf base (Figs. 4 and 5c, d). The geological diversity of IRD also increased significantly during collapse95, primarily due to icebergs floating freely and being sourced from a larger catchment than pre-collapse. A distinctive feature of the Larsen B Ice Shelf collapse was that aeolian sediment was concentrated in melt ponds on the ice shelf surface prior to its breakup (Fig. 5c). These ponds are held responsible for weakening the ice shelf via hydrofracturing7, leading to catastrophic drainage and release of the aeolian sediment to the seabed (Fig. 5c). Repeated recharge and drainage of the ponds over several years prior to collapse was archived in the seafloor sediments as multiple layers of aeolian sand. Above the aeolian sands, gravel-rich sediments are attributed to iceberg-dumped material entrained from medial moraines (Fig. 5d). Gilbert and Domack94 cautioned that both the sand- and gravel-rich deposits are likely to occur in patches and lenses rather than as an ubiquitous drape and that local source geology was important in the observed signature, perhaps creating a bias in the sand-sized fraction. Nunataks local to the Larsen ice shelves comprise easily frost-weathered Cretaceous sandstones. Accordingly, such ice shelves are more likely to preserve an ‘aeolian’ signal of disintegration relative to others.

Collapse of Larsen B also resulted in significant increases in ADAs in post-collapse sediments (Fig. 4)17,96,97. Other parameters, such as contents of biogenic silica did not increase substantially following its retreat98 although this might simply reflect the regional signature of opal, which tends to be low even in the open ocean. Although overall contents did not increase, a clear partition in the source of biogenic silica was documented98 with contributions from sponge spicules being higher within sub-ice-shelf sediments compared to post-collapse sediments. This reflects the capability of certain sponges (Hexactinellidae and Demospongiae) to survive under the outer limits of an ice shelf34. Biogenic detritus reaching the seabed after collapse was dominated by diatoms, and concomittant increases of chlorophyll pigments65. Sub-ice-shelf sediments, on the other hand, contain older and more refractory organic matter thought to be related to advection65. In this context, geochemical analyses that can distinguish different organic carbon compounds may provide a more powerful discriminator in reconstructing ice shelf cover and absence in the geological record. There is also untapped potential in using sponge spicules to help distinguish phases of ice shelf presence/absence—and particularly collapse—as sponges rapidly colonise the seabed following ice shelf disintegration99. In addition, work from the eastern Ross Sea also noted an increased abundance of freshwater diatoms (Chrysophytes) in sediments associated with a post-LGM ice-shelf breakup73. This was interrupted as a biotic signature of freshwater melt ponds which existed on the ice-shelf surface prior to the ice-shelf disintegration. Fursenkoina fusiformis, which is an opportunistic (calcareous) benthic foraminfera often associated with organic-rich sediment and oxygen-depleted waters, has been documented in ice shelf collapse facies recovered from Marguerite Bay59. Majewski et al.77 also document a strong association between the two morphotypes of T. earlandi and the ice shelf breakup facies described from Whales Deep Basin (Fig. 4).

The insensitivity of certain biological proxies, e.g., biogenic silica and TOC, to ice shelf collapse reflects both the influence of strong advection from the open ocean under an ice shelf—which tends to blur differences between ice shelf presence and absence—as well as other environmental factors supressing productivity, such as perennial sea-ice cover following collapse. Several studies show that concentrations of beryllium isotopes (10Be) vary between subglacial, sub-ice shelf and open marine sediments (Fig. 4), leading to its use as a proxy for ice shelf cover100,101,102. Cosmogenic 10Be is produced at an essentially constant rate in the upper atmosphere by cosmic radiation, and is transferred to the surface ocean by precipitation, where it is quickly adsorbed to terrigenous clay and other particles, that rain out to the seafloor. One complicating factor is that radiogenic beryllium is adsorbed to diatom frustules103 and so its signature in sub-ice-shelf sediment can also relate to lateral transport from areas of open water directly in front of an ice shelf104. More recent work104 suggests that the HCl-extractable 10Be/9Be ratio might provide a more robust discrimination of sediment deposited in open marine and sub-ice shelf settings, as this can help distinguish between the various pathways of Be.

The potential of offshore sedimentary successions (continental slope, rise and deep-sea) for reconstructing ice shelf history is comparatively understudied, due to the complexity in interpreting ice-distal records. Accumulation rates105,106 and/or provenance107 of coarse-grained IRD can be a useful proxy for detecting ice mass loss in Late Cenozoic far-field records, with microtextures of these grains even allowing distinction between subglacial, englacial or supraglacial transport108. However, periods of ice shelf loss cannot be easily disentangled from normal calving and/or retreat of ice streams unless allied with accurate near-field sea-level data; ice shelf collapse is likely to have minimal impact on sea-level whilst ice sheet collapse will, although this is also dependent upon the impact of ice shelf removal on terrestrial ice. Ice shelf collapse might also leave an imprint on the global δ18O signal in benthic foraminifera, and has been used to explain rapid δ18O decreases following the LGM and the penultimate glaciation109. This argument has been used to support the idea of a pan-Arctic Ocean ice shelf during Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 6 ka110. Here, the amplitude of the glacial–interglacial δ18O shift in the deep-sea benthic foraminifera record predicts more ice volume than available sea-level records indicate, a discrepancy that can be explained if 16O is stored in a large ice shelf that, once melted, has only a minor effect on sea level111.

Landforms

A defining characteristic of landforms associated with retreating ice shelves is the interaction of ice keels with the seafloor (Fig. 5a, b). Some suites of iceberg ploughmarks almost certainly relate to past ice-shelf retreat phases112. However, these landforms are still being created in Antarctica today, making it difficult to discern “fossil” from modern ploughmark populations, particularly in shallower shelf regions, whose water depths overlap with keel depths of icebergs calved from modern ice shelves (<650 m113).

A more useful set of diagnostic landforms occurring in the shallow shelf areas have been termed ‘ice plough ridges’ (Fig. 6d). Ice plough ridges are formed by seafloor sediment pushing due to the multiple grounding of icebergs during an ice-shelf breakup114. These bedforms are generally restricted to sea beds that shoal gradually seaward from the ice front. Their relationship to ice-shelf retreat is linked to the idea that a distinct population of plough ridges form near synchronously during a single event, but the ridges are usually distal to the inferred calving front and only occur under circumstances in which the retreating ice shelf front is thick enough to calve icebergs with keels of suitable draft to ground at the sea floor. Therefore, ice plough ridges may not always be created, even during large ice-shelf collapse events.

Similar glacial features to linear melange scours described previously have been associated with episodes of past ice-shelf breakup on the middle continental shelf of Pine Island Trough93. Unlike other streamlined subglacial bedforms, these ‘mega-berg furrows’ have a pronounced relief (>20 m), and are characterised by clear downward incisions at irregular spacings, indicating they did not form subglacially. Jakobsson et al.93 interpreted these scours as having formed by an armada of grounded icebergs discharged during ice shelf breakup and retreat. Where found, these landforms may represent the proglacial signature of ice shelf collapse and may indicate ice-shelf extent and width, ice-shelf thickness during retreat, keel spacing and configuration, and even relative timing of the evolution of the collapse event in cases where they crosscut pre-existing morphological features. Corrugation ridges have also been used as diagnostic landforms of ice-shelf retreat and absence (Fig. 6d). In Pine Island Trough, corrugations form tracks of 1–2 m high ridges at the seabed, overprinting mega-berg furrows, with indicators for tidal modulation in their amplitudes and patterns suggesting that icebergs with deep drafts had been entrained in a large ice melange seaward of the ice shelf front (Fig. 6d). The assemblage of landforms in Pine Island Trough, including corrugations93, thus record the complete collapse of an ice shelf back to the grounding line. Therefore, corrugations can be useful diagnostic indicators of widespread ice-shelf collapse. If dated, they can reveal the pace at which icebergs are shed from the ice shelf, as well as the speed at which the ice melange carried the bergs forward (c. 50–150 m per day).

Part of the model for the formation of corrugation ridges, and of the signature of collapsing ice shelves, involves the scenario that icebergs can calve to full-depth near the GL (Fig. 5)93. Subsequently, this mechanism has been discussed and expanded upon in theoretical studies: where ice-shelf retreat leads to the exposure of thicker inland ice without a buttressing floating tongue, a positive feedback of structural failure of the ice cliff has been proposed (termed ‘marine ice cliff instability’; MICI). MICI has been incorporated into ice sheet models and constitutes a key physical process by which ice sheets rapidly disintegrate15. Wise et al.112 showed that this mechanism may have occurred during post-LGM retreat of collapsing ice shelves in the Amundsen Sea, with its signature preserved in the shapes of ploughmarks carved into the sea floor. Structural physics of ice shelves suggests that the landform signatures of MICI should only be present at discrete water depths112. However, the mechanism remains poorly studied and presents a challenge for geoscientists to discover, if MICI leaves additional landform signals at the sea floor.

Establishing past ice shelf and cavity geometry

Establishing the thickness and extent of former ice shelves is critical for ice sheet mass balance calculations because the flux of ice across the GL increases strongly as a function of its thickness. Ice shelf thickness at the GL is quantifiable (for a single point in time) using past sea-level estimates that are corrected for isostatic rebound115 coupled with depths of GZW crests at the sea floor. Relative elevations of GZW (e.g., Pine Island Trough) also indirectly indicate past ice-sheet surface profiles, which in turn can be used to infer paleo-ice-shelf surface profiles. At the Pine Island-Thwaites paleo-ice stream bed, the GL was elevated by only ~80 m during a retreat of more than 100 km, implying a very low-gradient ice stream. GZWs do not give a clear indication of the calving-line location of an ice shelf but this can be inferred by analysis of the sedimentary record if the density of sediment cores is sufficient to map the spatial distribution of ice shelf/calving line facies. However, with the exception of a few targeted areas, such datasets are rare on the Antarctic shelf. Establishing the extent of ice shelves using the sedimentary record also requires good-dating control to ensure that sediments were deposited contemporaneously, and this often represents the biggest challenge.

Constraints on past cavity geometry come from both seabed sediments and geomorphology, and by necessity require detailed bathymetric data which are currently unavailable for large areas of the Antarctic seabed, less so beneath extant ice shelves. Cavity geometry strongly influences the transfer of heat to the ice sheet10, and hence knowledge of its shape is important for understanding the processes that determine melt and thus ice-shelf sensitivity to external forcing. As an ice shelf base limits the height of a GZW, cavity size can be estimated if the bathymetry seaward of the GZW is known.

Indirect information about the evolution of the cavity can be inferred from the distribution of sedimentary facies seaward of a GZW. On a landward sloping bed, GL retreat results in a gradual enlargement of a sub-ice-shelf cavity. Although governed by several interacting variables, modern observations indicate that the majority of debris melts out from the ice shelf base within 1.5–10 km of the GL23,24, meaning that the transition from coarse-grained GL-proximal sediments to more distal finer-grained muds can be used as a crude yet meaningful estimate for former positions of the GL16, and by inference cavity geometry. Cross-bedded and/or laminated muds directly above the coarse-grained facies also indicates deposition in a shallow cavity. Because tidal pumping creates traction currents that influence particle sorting, changes in current strength(inferred from sortable silt) may be indirectly associated with the change in cavity shape and associated weakening of tidal-pumping processes20,63.

Finally, it is worth reiterating that there exists no single diagnostic tool for identifying ice shelf presence, rather a succession of sedimentary facies and proxies that are linked to the proximity of the GL and calving line and the interplay between inflowing and outflowing currents. Likewise, the landform record is often patchy and in some instances poly-genetic, whereby certain landforms (e.g., corrugation ridges) can form in more than one setting. This highlights the need to apply a multi-proxy approach and integrate the geomorphological context in order to reconstruct ice shelf presence, collapse or re-growth25,116. In instances where the sedimentary and/or landform record is sparse or inconclusive, modelling might offer additional support for former ice shelf cover117.

Constraining rates of change

Establishing the duration of past ice shelf cover, timing and rates of ice-shelf retreat requires accurate chronologies. Unfortunately, the variable but predominantly terrigenous nature of sediments deposited in a sub-ice-shelf setting combined with low concentrations of biogenic material (organic carbon and calcareous foraminifera) represent significant challenges for conventional dating methods. On short times scales (<200 years), measurements of the concentrations of short-lived radioisotopes, such as 210Pb, have helped constrain GL retreat, as well as recent sedimentation rates16,17,96,118. While fallout of atmospheric lead is typically preserved around Antarctica16,119, concentrations of other radioisotopes, such as 137Cs and 241Am, which are required to validate 210Pb decay profiles, are highly variable and often below analytical detection limits. 137Cs—injected into the atmosphere during nuclear bomb testing in the 1950s and 1960s—has a half-life of only 30 years, and in many Antarctic settings has already decayed below detectable levels. Furthermore, 137Cs is especially problematic in the Southern Hemisphere because fallout levels were approximately four times lower than in the Northern Hemisphere120. Smith et al.16 demonstrated the potential of using Pu-isotopes to validate 210Pb age models in sub-ice-shelf sediments. Plutonium isotopes, in contrast to other bomb-test products, have a much longer half-life and are expected to adsorb more readily than Cs to both coarse- and fine-grained detrital particles, with little chance of chemical re-mobilisation once the Pu is buried121.

On longer times scales (up to ~35,000 years) AMS 14C dating of calcareous microfossils provides the most reliable chronologies from marine sediments59,72,116 and can now be performed on very small sample sizes122. Unfortunately, the scarcity of such microfossils (even in low concentrations) in many sub-ice-shelf sediments has forced researchers to rely on dating other fractions123,124. Bulk organic matter or its acid-insoluble fraction (AIOM) can yield reliable and reproducible chronologies (see ref. 124), but it is often viewed as a last resort owing to the potential for large error caused by “contamination” with reworked fossil carbon125. Recent advances in Ramped Pyrolysis (RP) 14C dating minimises the effect of contamination by combusting sediments at gradually increasing temperatures to thermally break down the bulk organic matter64,126,127. The gradual temperature increase allows for the separation of the more thermochemically reactive younger constituents, which are preferably combusted under lower temperatures, from the reworked more stable older constituents, so that separate components can be dated independently127. Similarly, chemical compound-specific radiocarbon dating enables specific organic compounds (C14, C16 and C18 fatty acids) to be isolated, and thereby avoiding fossil carbon. Fatty acids in the surface waters of the Southern Ocean are primarily produced by diatoms and because their decomposition is relatively fast in both the sediment and water column128,129 they rarely stem from relict organic matter. Therefore, the majority of fatty acids extracted from sediments are formed just before deposition, rather than being derived from relict organic matter130.

Both RP and chemical compound-specific dating rely on a minimum concentration of organic carbon which is not always present in sub-ice-shelf sediments. In instances where sub-ice-shelf sediments are devoid of biogenic material or contamination with fossil organic carbon is high, relative paleomagnetic intensity dating offers an alternative for establishing reliable age models for Holocene sediments71,131. However, this method is susceptible to changes in magnetic mineralogy and magnetic grain size, and thus to sediment provenance and physical grain size, both of which can vary considerably in sub-ice shelf sediments. Nevertheless, Brachfeld et al.71 used this technique successfully to constrain the timing of Holocene retreat of the Larsen A Ice Shelf, demonstrating its potential for dating mainly fine-grained terrigenous sediments deposited beneath an ice shelf. Finally, in regions where aeolian sand and silt accumulates at the calving line and on the ice shelf surface until being released during collapse (Fig. 5a, d), multiple-grain optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating has shown some promise132, although this technique is unlikely to provide the resolution needed to constrain centennial to millennial-scale environmental changes.

Drivers of ice shelf retreat

Placing ice shelf histories in the context of climate drivers is needed to constrain the interplay between internal ice sheet dynamics and external forcing. Ice cores provide a valuable archive of environmental change from which it is possible to infer past atmospheric temperatures, precipitation and changes in atmospheric circulation, and previous ice-shelf retreats have been linked to periods of atmospheric warming. Similarly, clues to the behaviour of ocean currents and specifically the role of upwelling of warm CDW in driving ice shelf melting can be derived from a number of proxies, each with its own uncertainty and challenges. Benthic foraminiferal assemblages have been used to infer incursions of CDW, although results have often been contradictory133,134 and likely reflect an incomplete understanding of ecology and habitat preferences of key species. Traditionally Bulimina aculeata has been considered to be an index species for CDW81,135,136 and has been well documented in surface sediments in the Amundsen Sea that are currently bathed in this water mass137. Despite this association, B. aculeata is almost entirely absent in surface and Holocene down-core sediments recovered from Pine Island Bay, where CDW is present today and assumed to have been present in the past72.

Other attempts to reconstruct CDW intrusions have focussed on its geochemical fingerprint138, as well as stable carbon isotope composition of benthic foraminifera72,134 or indirectly using a multi-proxy approach139,140. Efforts to reconstruct ocean temperatures directly offer huge potential, yet are still in their infancy around Antarctica72,139,141, lacking both regional calibrations and well-dated records on which to apply temperature proxies. Without accurate paleocean temperatures the significance of current sub-ice-shelf melt rates remain difficult to validate, although information on past ice shelf melt rates can be derived from δ18O studies. Pike et al142 demonstrated that it is possible to infer glacier discharge (melt) using δ18O measurements in diatom silica, although problems remain with disentangling ice shelf melt from other sources of glacial/freshwater discharge or chemical processes. δ18O data from planktic foraminifera have been used to infer water column freshening due to the long-term thinning of the Larsen B Ice Shelf17. Needless to say the usefulness of this proxy—together with benthic foraminiferal assemblages and trace metal and stable isotope data from calcareous shells—is dependent on preservation of foraminifera, which is often poor in sub-ice-shelf environments.

Outlook and future research

The past decade has witnessed significant progress in our understanding of sub-ice-shelf environments, resulting in a comprehensive ‘toolbox’ with which to identify past ice shelf cover as well as passive retreat and/or breakup events. This not only reflects technological advances in remote access but also detailed analyses of sediments (Fig. 4) and landforms (Figs. 5 and 6) exposed following contemporary ice shelf collapse(s)58,65,94,95,96,97. Together with recent advances in dating64 and multi-proxy approaches72 this work holds the potential to usher in a new era of deciphering former ice shelf cover together with the rates and drivers of change. To enable this, there needs to be a concerted effort to link the often disparate strands of research, including constraints on ice shelf thickness and extent from the geomorphological record together with detailed sedimentology, proxy reconstructions and accurate dating. Furthermore, because Antarctic continental shelf sediments are often lacking biogenic material (diatoms, foraminifera), greater progress can be made by re-visiting areas where the sediments are known to be suitable for re-analysis using the latest proxies and dating methods and where the geomorphological footprint of former ice shelf cover is well-preserved (e.g., Pine Island Bay72, Marguerite Trough59, Whales Deep116 e.g., Box 1).

Despite this progress, sub-ice-shelf settings remain one of the least explored environments on Earth, and there is a clear need to access and sample the seafloor and ocean cavity beneath contemporary ice shelves. This will not only help answer debates about ice shelf and GL histories at a range of time scales16,20,143 but also reveal fundamental information about the processes occurring beneath ice shelves, particularly those close to the GL. In this context, much of our knowledge of sub-ice-shelf sedimentary processes, particularly those operating at or close to the GL, has been obtained from a limited number of studies in the Ross Sea, which is almost certainly not representative of all ice shelf systems. Future work, while ambitious in scope, should aim to combine transects of sub-ice-shelf sediment cores from the GL to calving line, with down-hole oceanography and dedicated ROV/AUV missions (e.g., through-ice vehicles such as IceFin and SCNII or ship-launched platforms such as Kongsberg’s Hugin AUV) that image the seafloor, ice base and processes operating near the GL. Only by investigating the ocean cavity and seafloor beneath ice shelves of different sizes, experiencing different rates of change, and forced by different oceanic and atmospheric drivers, will it be possible to capture the full-range of processes operating there. The areas requiring further focus should include, but not be limited to, the spatial distribution of sediment facies/facies geometries, sediment and meltwater fluxes, seafloor benthos, circulation patterns and advection of detrital and biogenic particles as well as processes which form enigmatic landforms (e.g., GZWs, corrugations ridges). With planned multi-national expeditions to the Eastern Ice Shelf of Thwaites Glacier as well as further work on the Amery and Ross ice shelves over the coming years, our knowledge of these processes is set to expand considerably.

Finally, an important aim of paleo reconstructions is to provide highly resolved records of past changes that can be used to constrain and/or initialise numerical models144. This includes information on key boundary conditions (e.g., bathymetry, cavity geometry) as well as accurate constraints on the rates and drivers of ice shelf and ice sheet changes. However, integration of data and models is often intended but not always realised, which calls for a concerted effort to provide relevant paleo data in a form that can be easily utilised by modellers144. By producing detailed information on known past ice sheet-ice shelf configurations—such as complete loss of buttressing due to ice shelf collapse or stabilisation of a grounding line due to sediment deposition (see Box 1)—the paleo record can serve as a critical test for assessing the abilities of models in predicting future changes as well as refining our understanding of the processes which limit or promote fast retreat of marine ice sheets.

References

  1. 1.

    Pritchard, H. D. et al. Antarctic ice-sheet loss driven by basal melting of ice shelves. Nature 484, 502–505 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Shepherd, A., Fricker, H. A. & Farrell, S. L. Trends and connections across the Antarctic cryosphere. Nature 558, 223–232 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Vaughan, D. G. et al. Recent rapid regional climate warming on the Antarctic Peninsula. Clim. Change 60, 243–274 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Weertman, J. Stability of the junction of an ice sheet and ice shelf. J. Glaciol. 13, 3–11 (1974).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rignot, E. et al. Accelerated ice discharge from the Antarctic Peninsula following the collapse of Larsen B ice shelf. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl020697 (2004).

  6. 6.

    Scambos, T. A., Bohlander, J. A., Shuman, C. A. & Skvarca, P. Glacier acceleration and thinning after ice shelf collapse in the Larsen B embayment, Antarctica. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, 1–4 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Scambos, T., Hulbe, C. & Fahnestock, M. in Antarctic Peninsula Climate Variability: Historical and Paleoenvironmental Perspectives, 79 Antarctic Research Series (eds. Domack, E. et al.) 79–92 (Amer Geophysical Union, 2003).

  8. 8.

    MacAyeal, D. R., Scambos, T. A., Hulbe, C. L. & Fahnestock, M. A. Catastrophic ice-shelf break-up by an ice-shelf-fragment-capsize mechanism. J. Glaciol. 49, 22–36 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Scambos, T. et al. Ice shelf disintegration by plate bending and hydro-fracture: satellite observations and model results of the 2008 Wilkins ice shelf break-ups. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 280, 51–60 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jenkins, A. et al. Observations beneath Pine Island Glacier in West Antarctica and implications for its retreat. Nat. Geosci. 3, 468–472 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Rignot, E. et al. Four decades of Antarctic Ice Sheet mass balance from 1979–2017. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1095 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Joughin, I., Smith, B. E. & Medley, B. Marine ice sheet collapse potentially under way for the Thwaites Glacier Basin, West Antarctica. Science 344, 735–738 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Greenbaum, J. S. et al. Ocean access to a cavity beneath Totten Glacier in East Antarctica. Nat. Geosci. 8, 294–298 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Aitken, A. R. A. et al. Repeated large-scale retreat and advance of Totten Glacier indicated by inland bed erosion. Nature 533, 385 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    DeConto, R. M. & Pollard, D. Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise. Nature 531, 591–597 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Smith, J. A. et al. Sub-ice-shelf sediments record history of twentieth-century retreat of Pine Island Glacier. Nature 541, 77 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Domack, E. et al. Stability of the Larsen B ice shelf on the Antarctic Peninsula during the Holocene epoch. Nature 436, 681–685 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bentley, M. J. The Antarctic palaeo record and its role in improving predictions of future Antarctic Ice Sheet change. J. Quat. Sci. 25, 5–18 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hemer, M. A. & Harris, P. T. Sediment core from beneath the Amery Ice Shelf, East Antarctica, suggests mid-Holocene ice-shelf retreat. Geology 31, 127–130 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    McKay, R. et al. Antarctic marine ice-sheet retreat in the Ross Sea during the early Holocene. Geology 44, 7–10 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Davies, D. et al. High-resolution sub-ice-shelf seafloor records of twentieth century ungrounding and retreat of Pine Island Glacier, West Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 122, 1698–1714 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hemer, M. A. et al. Sedimentological signatures of the sub-Amery Ice Shelf circulation. Antarctic Sci. 19, 497–506 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Domack, E. & Powell, R. in Past Glacial Environments (eds. Menzies, J. & Van der Meer, J.) Ch. 7, 858 (Elservier, 2018).

  24. 24.

    Powell, R. D., Dawber, M., McInnes, J. N. & Pyne, A. R. in Proc. International Symposium on Glacial Erosion and Sedimentation, Reykjavík, Iceland, Annals of Glaciology Vol. 22 (ed. Collins, D.) 217–223 (1996).

  25. 25.

    Prothro, L. O., Simkins, L. M., Majewski, W. & Anderson, J. B. Glacial retreat patterns and processes determined from integrated sedimentology and geomorphology records. Mar. Geol. 395, 104–119 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Simkins, L. M. et al. Anatomy of a meltwater drainage system beneath the ancestral East Antarctic ice sheet. Nat. Geosci. 10, 691 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Powell, R. D. & Molina, B. F. Glacimarine sedimentary processes, facies and morphology of the south-southeast Alaska shelf and fjords. Mar. Geol. 85, 359–390 (1989).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Powell, R. D. Glacimarine processes and inductive lithofacies modelling of ice shelf and tidewater glacier sediments based on Quaternary examples. Mar. Geol. 57, 1–52 (1984).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Dutrieux, P. et al. Strong sensitivity of Pine Island ice-shelf melting to climatic variability. Science 343, 174–178 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Graham, A. G. C. et al. Seabed corrugations beneath an Antarctic ice shelf revealed by autonomous underwater vehicle survey: origin and implications for the history of Pine Island Glacier. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 118, 1356–1366 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Nicholls, K. W., Makinson, K. & Venables, E. J. Ocean circulation beneath Larsen C Ice Shelf, Antarctica from in situ observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl053187 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lipps, J. H., Ronan, T. E. & Delaca, T. E. Life below the Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica. Science 203, 447–449 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    A. Knox, G., J. Waghorn, E. & Ensor, P. Summer plankton beneath the McMurdo Ice Shelf at White Island, McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Polar Biol. 16, 87–94 (1996).

  34. 34.

    Dawber, M. & Powell, R. D. Epifaunal Distributions at Marine-Ending Glaciers: Influences of Ice Dynamics and Sedimentation 875–884 (Terra Antartica, Siena, 1998).

  35. 35.

    Sugiyama, S., Sawagaki, T., Fukuda, T. & Aoki, S. Active water exchange and life near the grounding line of an Antarctic outlet glacier. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 399, 52–60 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Riddle, M. J., Craven, M., Goldsworthy, P. M. & Carsey, F. A diverse benthic assemblage 100 km from open water under the Amery Ice Shelf, Antarctica. Paleoceanography 22, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006pa001327 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Post, A. L., Hemer, M. A., O’Brien, P. E., Roberts, D. & Craven, M. History of benthic colonisation beneath the Amery Ice Shelf, East Antarctica. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 344, 29–37 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Bruchhausen, P. M. et al. Fish, crustaceans, and the sea floor under the Ross Ice Shelf. Science 203, 449–451 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kellogg, T., Stuiver, M., Kellogg, D. & Denton, G. Marine microfossils on the McMurdo Ice Shelf. Antarct. J. U. S. 12, 82–83 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hall, B. L., Henderson, G. M., Baroni, C. & Kellogg, T. B. Constant Holocene Southern-Ocean 14C reservoir ages and ice-shelf flow rates. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 296, 115–123 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Carter, L., Dunbar, G. & McKay, R. Sedimentation and oceanography beneath the McMurdo Ice Shelf at Windless Bight. 31 (Antarctic Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, 2007).

  42. 42.

    Post, A. L. et al. Modern sedimentation, circulation and life beneath the Amery Ice Shelf, East Antarctica. Cont. Shelf Res. 74, 77–87 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Dayton, P. K., Robilliard, G. A., Paine, R. T. & Dayton, L. B. Biological accommodation in the benthic community at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Ecol. Monogr. 44, 105–128 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Barthel, D. & Gutt, J. Sponge associations in the eastern Weddell Sea. Antarct. Sci. 4, 137–150 (1992).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Beaman, R. J. & Harris, P. T. Bioregionalization of the George V Shelf, East Antarctica. Cont. Shelf Res. 25, 1657–1691 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Gutt, J. & Starmans, A. Structure and biodiversity of megabenthos in the Weddell and Lazarev Seas (Antarctica): ecological role of physical parameters and biological interactions. Polar Biol. 20, 229–247 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Smith, J. A. et al. Oceanic and atmospheric forcing of early Holocene ice shelf retreat, George VI Ice Shelf, Antarctica Peninsula. Quat. Sci. Rev. 26, 500–516 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Smith, J. A. et al. Limnology of two antarctic epishelf lakes and their potential to record periods of ice shelf loss. J. Paleolimnol. 35, 373–394 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Antoniades, D. in Arctic Ice Shelves and Ice Islands (eds. Copland, L. & Mueller, D. R.) (Springer, 2017).

  50. 50.

    Alley, R. B., Blankenship, D. D., Rooney, S. T. & Bentley, C. R. Sedimentation beneath ice shelves—the view from ice stream B. Mar. Geol. 85, 101–120 (1989).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Powell, R. & Alley, R. in Geology and Seismic Stratigraphy of the Antarctic Margin, 2 Antarctic Research Series (eds. Barker, P. & Cooper, A. K.) (American Geophysical Union, 1997).

  52. 52.

    Domack, E. et al. Late Quaternary sediment facies in Prydz Bay, East Antarctica and their relationship to glacial advance onto the continental shelf. Antarct. Sci. 10, 236–246 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Domack, E. W. & Harris, P. T. A new depositional model for ice shelves, based upon sediment cores from the Ross Sea and the Mac. Robertson shelf, Antarctica. Ann. Glaciol. 27, 281–284 (1998).

  54. 54.

    Domack, E. W., Jacobson, E. A., Shipp, S. & Anderson, J. B. Late Pleistocene-Holocene retreat of the West Antarctic Ice- Sheet system in the Ross Sea: Part 2—sedimentologic and stratigraphic signature. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 111, 1517–1536 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Howat, I. M. & Domack, E. W. Reconstructions of western Ross Sea palaeo-ice-stream grounding zones from high-resolution acoustic stratigraphy. Boreas 32, 56–75 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Orheim, O. & Elverhøi, A. Model for submarine glacial deposition. Ann. Glaciol. 2, 123–128 (1981).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Hambrey, M. J., Ehrmann, W. & Larsen, B. Cenozoic glacial record of the Prydz Bay continental shelf, East Antarctica. In: Proc. ODP, Sci. Results, College Station, TX (eds Barron, J., Larsen, B., et al.) (Ocean Drilling Program, Texas A&M University), Vol. 119, 77–132 (1991).

  58. 58.

    Evans, J. & Pudsey, C. J. Sedimentation associated with Antarctic Peninsula ice shelves: implications for palaeoenvironmental reconstructions of glacimarine sediments. J. Geol. Soc. 159, 233–237 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kilfeather, A. A. et al. Ice-stream retreat and ice-shelf history in Marguerite Trough, Antarctic Peninsula: sedimentological and foraminiferal signatures. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 123, 997–1015 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Evans, J., Pudsey, C. J., Ocofaigh, C., Morris, P. & Domack, E. Late Quaternary glacial history, flow dynamics and sedimentation along the eastern margin of the Antarctic Peninsula Ice Sheet. Quat. Sci. Rev. 24, 741–774 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Sjunneskog, C. & Scherer, R. P. Mixed diatom assemblages in glacigenic sediment from the central Ross Sea, Antarctica. Paleogeogr. Paleoclimatol. Paleoecol. 218, 287–300 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Cowan, E. A., Christoffersen, P. & Powell, R. D. Sedimentological signature of a deformable bed preserved beneath an ice stream in a Late Pleistocene glacial sequence, Ross Sea, Antarctica. J. Sediment. Res. 82, 270–282 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Maas, S. Last Glacial Maximum-Holocene Glacial and Depositional History from Sediment Cores at Coulman High Beneath the Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica. MSc Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington (2012).

  64. 64.

    Subt, C. et al. Sub-ice shelf sediment geochronology utilizing novel radiocarbon methodology for highly detrital sediments. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 18, 1404–1418 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Sane, E. et al. Pigments in sediments beneath recently collapsed ice shelves: the case of Larsen A and B shelves, Antarctic Peninsula. J. Sea Res. 65, 94–102 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Hulbe, C. L., MacAyeal, D. R., Denton, G. H., Kleman, J. & Lowell, T. V. Catastrophic ice shelf breakup as the source of Heinrich event icebergs. Paleoceanography 19, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003pa000890 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Evans, J. & Cofaigh, C. O. Supraglacial debris along the front of the Larsen-A Ice Shelf, Antarctic Peninsula. Antarct. Sci. 15, 503–506 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Nicholls, K. W., Corr, H. F. J., Makinson, K. & Pudsey, C. J. Rock debris in an Antarctic ice shelf. Ann. Glaciol. 53, 235–240 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Engelhardt, H. Ice temperature and high geothermal flux at Siple Dome, West Antarctica, from borehole measurements. J. Glaciol. 50, 251–256 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Barrett, P. J. Seawater near the head of the Ross Ice Shelf. Nature 256, 390 (1975).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Brachfeld, S. et al. Holocene history of the Larsen—a Ice shelf constrained by geomagnetic paleointensity dating. Geology 31, 749–752 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Hillenbrand, C. D. et al. West Antarctic Ice Sheet retreat driven by Holocene warm water incursions. Nature 547, 43 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    McGlannan, A. J., Bart, P. J., Chow, J. M. & DeCesare, M. On the influence of post-LGM ice shelf loss and grounding zone sedimentation on West Antarctic ice sheet stability. Mar. Geol. 392, 151–169 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Minzoni, R. T. et al. Oceanographic influences on the stability of the Cosgrove Ice Shelf, Antarctica. Holocene 27, 1645–1658 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Galton-Fenzi, B. K., Hunter, J. R., Coleman, R., Marsland, S. J. & Warner, R. C. Modeling the basal melting and marine ice accretion of the Amery Ice Shelf. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 117, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jc008214 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Melis, R. & Salvi, G. Late Quaternary foraminiferal assemblages from western Ross Sea (Antarctica) in relation to the main glacial and marine lithofacies. Mar. Micropaleontol. 70, 39–53 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Majewski, W., Bart, P. J. & McGlannan, A. J. Foraminiferal assemblages from ice-proximal paleo-settings in the Whales Deep Basin, eastern Ross Sea, Antarctica. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 493, 64–81 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Ishman, S. & Szymcek, P. in Antarctic Peninsula Climate Variability: Historical and Paleoenvironmental Perspectives Antarctic Research Series (eds. Domack, E. et al.) (American Geophysical Union, 2003).

  79. 79.

    Murray, J. W. & Pudsey, C. J. Living (stained) and dead foraminifera from the newly ice-free Larsen Ice Shelf, Weddell Sea, Antarctica: ecology and taphonomy. Mar. Micropaleontol. 53, 67–81 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Pudsey, C. J., Murray, J. W., Appleby, P. & Evans, J. Ice shelf history from petrographic and foraminiferal evidence, Northeast Antarctic Peninsula. Quat. Sci. Rev. 25, 2357–2379 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Domack, E. W., Ishman, S. E., Stein, A. B., McClennen, C. E. & Jull, A. J. T. Late Holocene advance of the Muller Ice Shelf, Antarctic Peninsula—sedimentological, geochemical and paleontological evidence. Antarct. Sci. 7, 159–170 (1995).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Sugden, D. E. & Clapperton, C. M. An ice-shelf moraine, George VI Sound, Antarctica. Ann. Glaciol. 2, 135–141 (1981).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Hambrey, M. J. et al. Structure and sedimentology of George VI Ice Shelf, Antarctic Peninsula: implications for ice-sheet dynamics and landform development. J. Geol. Soc. 172, 599–613 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Glasser, N. F., Goodsell, B., Copland, L. & Lawson, W. Debris characteristics and ice-shelf dynamics in the ablation region of the McMurdo Ice Shelf, Antarctica. J. Glaciol. 52, 223–234 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Fitzsimons, S., Mager, S., Frew, R., Clifford, A. & Wilson, G. Formation of ice-shelf moraines by accretion of sea water and marine sediment at the southern margin of the McMurdo Ice Shelf, Antarctica. Ann. Glaciol. 53, 211–220 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Simkins, L. M., Greenwood, S. L. & Anderson, J. B. Diagnosing ice sheet grounding line stability from landform morphology. Cryosphere 12, 2707–2726 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Batchelor, C. L. & Dowdeswell, J. A. Ice-sheet grounding-zone wedges (GZWs) on high-latitude continental margins. Mar. Geol. 363, 65–92 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Dowdeswell, J. A. & Fugelli, E. M. G. The seismic architecture and geometry of grounding-zone wedges formed at the marine margins of past ice sheets. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 124, 1750–1761 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Vaughan, D. G. et al. Subglacial melt channels and fracture in the floating part of Pine Island Glacier, Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 117, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jf002360 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Jeofry, H. et al. A new bed elevation model for the Weddell Sea sector of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 711–725 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Larter, R. D., Graham, A. G. C., Hillenbrand, C.-D., Smith, J. A. & Gales, J. A. Late Quaternary grounded ice extent in the Filchner Trough, Weddell Sea, Antarctica: new marine geophysical evidence. Quat. Sci. Rev. 53, 111–122 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Rebesco, M. et al. Deglaciation of the western margin of the Barents Sea Ice Sheet—a swath bathymetric and sub-bottom seismic study from the Kveithola Trough. Mar. Geol. 279, 141–147 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Jakobsson, M. et al. Geological record of ice shelf break-up and grounding line retreat, Pine Island Bay, West Antarctica. Geology 39, 691–694 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Gilbert, R. & Domack, E. W. Sedimentary record of disintegrating ice shelves in a warming climate, Antarctic Peninsula. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 4, 1038 (2003).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Pudsey, C. J. & Evans, J. First survey of Antarctic sub-ice shelf sediments reveals mid-Holocene ice shelf retreat. Geology 29, 787–790 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Rebesco, M. et al. Boundary condition of grounding lines prior to collapse, Larsen-B Ice Shelf, Antarctica. Science 345, 1354–1358 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Sane, E. et al. Diatom valve distribution and sedimentary fatty acid composition in Larsen Bay, Eastern Antarctica Peninsula. Cont. Shelf Res. 31, 1161–1168 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Sane, E., Isla, E., Barcena, M. A. & DeMaster, D. J. A shift in the biogenic silica of sediment in the Larsen B Continental Shelf, off the Eastern Antarctic Peninsula, resulting from climate change. PLoS One 8, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052632 (2013).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Fillinger, L., Janussen, D., Lundälv, T. & Richter, C. Rapid glass sponge expansion after climate-induced antarctic ice shelf collapse. Curr. Biol. 23, 1330–1334 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Sjunneskog, C., Scherer, R., Aldahan, A. & Possnert, G. Be-10 in glacial marine sediment of the Ross Sea, Antarctica, a potential tracer of depositional environment and sediment chronology. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 259, 576–583 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Yokoyama, Y. et al. Widespread collapse of the Ross Ice Shelf during the late Holocene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2354–2359 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Jeong, A. et al. Late Quaternary deglacial history across the Larsen B embayment, Antarctica. Quat. Sci. Rev. 189, 134–148 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Yong, L. et al. Transport and burial rates of10Be and231Pa in the Pacific Ocean during the Holocene period. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 113, 173–189 (1992).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    White, D. A. et al. Beryllium isotope signatures of ice shelves and sub-ice shelf circulation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 505, 86–95 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Weber, M. E. et al. Millennial-scale variability in Antarctic ice-sheet discharge during the last deglaciation. Nature 510, 134 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Passchier, S. Linkages between East Antarctic Ice Sheet extent and Southern Ocean temperatures based on a Pliocene high-resolution record of ice-rafted debris off Prydz Bay, East Antarctica. Paleoceanography 26, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010pa002061 (2011).

  107. 107.

    Williams, T. et al. Evidence for iceberg armadas from East Antarctica in the Southern Ocean during the late Miocene and early Pliocene. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 290, 351–361 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Cowan, E., Hillenbrand, C.-D., E. Hassler, L. & T. Ake, M. Coarse-grained terrigenous sediment deposition on continental rise drifts: A record of Plio-Pleistocene glaciation on the Antarctic Peninsula. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 265, 275–291 (2008).

  109. 109.

    Johnson, R. G. & Andrews, J. T. Glacial terminations in the oxygen isotope record of deep sea cores: hypothesis of massive Antarctic ice-shelf destruction. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 53, 107–138 (1986).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Jakobsson, M. et al. Evidence for an ice shelf covering the central Arctic Ocean during the penultimate glaciation. Nat. Commun. 7, 10365 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Mix, A. in North America and Adjacent Oceans During the Last Deglaciation (eds. Ruddiman, W. F. & Wright, Jr, H. E.) 111–135 (The Geological Soceity of America, 1987).

  112. 112.

    Wise, M. G., Dowdeswell, J. A., Jakobsson, M. & Larter, R. D. Evidence of marine ice-cliff instability in Pine Island Bay from iceberg-keel plough marks. Nature 550, 506 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Dowdeswell, J. A. & Bamber, J. L. Keel depths of modem Antarctic icebergs and implications for sea-floor scouring in the geological record. Mar. Geol. 243, 120–131 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Mattingsdal, R. et al. A new 6 Myr stratigraphic framework for the Atlantic–Arctic Gateway. Quat. Sci. Rev. 92, 170–178 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Whitehouse, P. L., Gomez, N., King, M. A. & Wiens, D. A. Solid Earth change and the evolution of the Antarctic Ice Sheet. Nat. Commun. 10, 503 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Bart, P. J., DeCesare, M., Rosenheim, B. E., Majewski, W. & McGlannan, A. A centuries-long delay between a paleo-ice-shelf collapse and grounding-line retreat in the Whales Deep Basin, eastern Ross Sea, Antarctica. Sci. Rep. 8, 12392 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Gasson, E. G. W., DeConto, R. M., Pollard, D. & Clark, C. D. Numerical simulations of a kilometre-thick Arctic ice shelf consistent with ice grounding observations. Nat. Commun. 9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03707-w (2018).

  118. 118.

    Christ, A. J. et al. Late Holocene glacial advance and ice shelf growth in Barilari Bay, Graham Land, west Antarctic Peninsula. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 127, 297–315 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Appleby, P. G., Jones, V. J. & Ellisevans, J. C. Radiometric dating of lake-sediments from Signy Island (Maritime Antarctic)—evidence of recent climatic-change. J. Paleolimn 13, 179–191 (1995).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Beck, H. L. & Bennettt, B. G. Historical overview of atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and estimates of fallout in the continental United States. Health Phys. 82, 591–608 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Higgo, J. J. W. & Rees, L. V. C. Adsorption of actinides by marine sediments: effect of the sediment/seawater ratio on the measured distribution ratio. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20, 483–490 (1986).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Wacker, L. et al. MICADAS: Routine and High-Precision Radiocarbon Dating. Radiocarbon 52, 252–262 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    McKay, R. M. et al. Retreat history of the Ross Ice Sheet (Shelf) since the Last Glacial Maximum from deep-basin sediment cores around Ross Island. Paleogeogr. Paleoclimatol. Paleoecol. 260, 245–261 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Smith, J. A. et al. Deglacial history of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet in the western Amundsen Sea Embayment. Quat. Sci. Rev. 30, 488–505 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Andrews, J. T. et al. Problems and possible solutions concerning radiocarbon dating of surface marine sediments, Ross Sea, Antarctica. Quat. Res 52, 206–216 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Rosenheim, B. E. et al. Antarctic sediment chronology by programmed-temperature pyrolysis: methodology and data treatment. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 9, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gc001816 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Rosenheim, B. E., Santoro, J. A., Gunter, M. & Domack, E. W. Improving Antarctic sediment C-14 dating using ramped pyrolysis: an example from the Hugo Islands Trough. Radiocarbon 55, 115–126 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Canuel, E. A. & Martens, C. S. Reactivity of recently deposited organic matter: degradation of lipid compounds near the sediment-water interface. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 60, 1793–1806 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Ikehara, M. et al. Alkenone sea surface temperature in the Southern Ocean for the last two deglaciations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 679–682 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Ohkouchi, N., Eglinton, T. I. & Hayes, J. M. Radiocarbon dating of individual fatty acids as a tool for refining Antarctic margin sediment chronologies. Radiocarbon 45, 17–24 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Hillenbrand, C.-D. et al. Age assignment of a diatomaceous ooze deposited in the western Amundsen Sea Embayment after the Last Glacial Maximum. J. Quat. Sci. 25, 280–295 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Berger, G. W., Murray, A. S., Thomsen, K. J. & Domack, E. W. Dating ice shelf edge marine sediments: a new approach using single-grain quartz luminescence. J. Geophysical Res. Earth Surface 115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jf001415 (2010).

  133. 133.

    Ishman, S. E. & Sperling, M. R. Benthic foraminiferal record of Holocene deep-water evolution in the Palmer Deep, western Antarctic Peninsula. Geology 30, 435–438 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Shevenell, A. E. & Kennett, J. P. Antarctic Holocene climate change: a benthic foraminiferal stable isotope record from Palmer Deep. Paleoceanography 17, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000PA000596 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Ishman, S. E. & Domack, E. W. Oceanographic controls on benthic foraminifers from the Bellingshausen margin of the Antarctic Peninsula. Mar. Micropaleontol. 24, 119–155 (1994).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Igarashi, A., Numanami, H., Tsuchiya, Y. & Fukucki, M. Bathymetric distribution of fossil foraminifera within marine sediment cores from the eastern part of Lutzow-Holm Bay, East Antarctica, and its paleoceanographic implications. Mar. Micropaleontol. 42, 125–162 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Majewski, W. Benthic foraminifera from Pine Island and Ferrero bays, Amundsen Sea. Pol. Polar Res. 34, 169–200 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Carter, P., Vance, D., Hillenbrand, C. D., Smith, J. A. & Shoosmith, D. R. The neodymium isotopic composition of waters masses in the eastern Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 79, 41–59 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Etourneau, J. et al. Holocene climate variations in the western Antarctic Peninsula: evidence for sea ice extent predominantly controlled by changes in insolation and ENSO variability. Climate 9, 1431–1446 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Peck, V. L., Allen, C. S., Kender, S., McClymont, E. L. & Hodgson, D. A. Oceanographic variability on the West Antarctic Peninsula during the Holocene and the influence of upper circumpolar deep water. Quat. Sci. Rev. 119, 54–65 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Shevenell, A. E., Ingalls, A. E., Domack, E. W. & Kelly, C. Holocene Southern Ocean surface temperature variability west of the Antarctic Peninsula (vol 470, pg 250, 2011). Nature 472, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09931 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Pike, J., Swann, G. E. A., Leng, M. J. & Snelling, A. M. Glacial discharge along the west Antarctic Peninsula during the Holocene. Nat. Geosci. 6, 199–202 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Kingslake, J. et al. Extensive retreat and re-advance of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet during the Holocene. Nature 558, 430–434 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Colleoni, F. et al. Spatio-temporal variability of processes across Antarctic ice-bed–ocean interfaces. Nature. Nat. Commun. 9, 2289 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Locarnini, R. A. et al. in World Ocean Atlas 2009, Volume 1 NOAA Atlas NESDIS 68 184 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2010).

  146. 146.

    Timmermann, R. et al. A consistent data set of Antarctic ice sheet topography,cavity geometry, and global bathymetry. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2, 261–273 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Mayerle, M. A Conceptual Model of Ice Shelf Sedimentation. M.S. Thesis, Northern Illinois University (2014).

  148. 148.

    McMullen, K. et al. Glacial morphology and sediment formation in the Mertz Trough, East Antarctica. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 231, 169–180 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Graham, A. G. C. et al. Flow and retreat of the Late Quaternary Pine Island-Thwaites palaeo-ice stream, West Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jf001482 (2010).

  150. 150.

    Montelli, A., Dowdeswell, J. A., Ottesen, D. & Johansen, S. E. 3D seismic evidence of buried iceberg ploughmarks from the mid-Norwegian continental margin reveals largely persistent North Atlantic Current through the Quaternary. Mar. Geol. 399, 66–83 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Andreassen, K., Winsborrow, M. C. M., Bjarnadóttir, L. R. & Rüther, D. C. Ice stream retreat dynamics inferred from an assemblage of landforms in the northern Barents Sea. Quat. Sci. Rev. 92, 246–257 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by the British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), Polar Science for Planet Earth programme. J.A.S. and C.D.H. were additionally supported by NERC grant NE/M013081/1. A.L.P. publishes with the permission of the Chief Executive Officer, Geoscience Australia. P.J.B. was supported by NSF research grant # 1246357. Figure 2 is based on a schematic originally drafted by Becky Minzoni and we thank her for allowing use of it here. J.A.S. also wishes to acknowledge and thank Eugene Domack who was involved in early discussion about this paper but sadly passed away before a draft was complete.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.A.S. defined the structure of review and compiled the initial draft with input from all the authors. A.G.C.G. wrote the sections on sub-ice-shelf landforms and A.L.P. wrote the section on biota living beneath ice shelves and R.D.P., C.D.H. and P.J.B. provided expert input regarding modern observations, sediment facies and proxies. All authors commented on the final version of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A. Smith.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests. Reprints and permission information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Martin Jakobsson, Sandra Passchier and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, J.A., Graham, A.G.C., Post, A.L. et al. The marine geological imprint of Antarctic ice shelves. Nat Commun 10, 5635 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13496-5

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing