Genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies ELP5 as a determinant of gemcitabine sensitivity in gallbladder cancer

Gemcitabine is the first-line treatment for locally advanced and metastatic gallbladder cancer (GBC), but poor gemcitabine response is universal. Here, we utilize a genome-wide CRISPR screen to identify that loss of ELP5 reduces the gemcitabine-induced apoptosis in GBC cells in a P53-dependent manner through the Elongator complex and other uridine 34 (U34) tRNA-modifying enzymes. Mechanistically, loss of ELP5 impairs the integrity and stability of the Elongator complex to abrogate wobble U34 tRNA modification, and directly impedes the wobble U34 modification-dependent translation of hnRNPQ mRNA, a validated P53 internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) trans-acting factor. Downregulated hnRNPQ is unable to drive P53 IRES-dependent translation, but rescuing a U34 modification-independent hnRNPQ mutant could restore P53 translation and gemcitabine sensitivity in ELP5-depleted GBC cells. GBC patients with lower ELP5, hnRNPQ, or P53 expression have poor survival outcomes after gemcitabine chemotherapy. These results indicate that the Elongator/hnRNPQ/P53 axis controls gemcitabine sensitivity in GBC cells.


Statistics
For all statistical analyses, confirm that the following items are present in the figure legend, table legend, main text, or Methods section.
n/a Confirmed The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as a discrete number and unit of measurement A statement on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one-or two-sided Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.
A description of all covariates tested A description of any assumptions or corrections, such as tests of normality and adjustment for multiple comparisons A full description of the statistical parameters including central tendency (e.g. means) or other basic estimates (e.g. regression coefficient) AND variation (e.g. standard deviation) or associated estimates of uncertainty (e.g. confidence intervals) For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g. F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of freedom and P value noted Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.

For Bayesian analysis, information on the choice of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings
For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of outcomes Estimates of effect sizes (e.g. Cohen's d, Pearson's r), indicating how they were calculated Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.

Software and code
Policy information about availability of computer code Data collection

Data analysis
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or software that are central to the research but not yet described in published literature, software must be made available to editors/reviewers. We strongly encourage code deposition in a community repository (e.g. GitHub). See the Nature Research guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.

Data
Policy information about availability of data All manuscripts must include a data availability statement. This statement should provide the following information, where applicable: -Accession codes, unique identifiers, or web links for publicly available datasets -A list of figures that have associated raw data -A description of any restrictions on data availability The accession number for the transcriptional profiles is GSE139682. Unprocessed gel bot of Fig. 1b, d, 2a, d, 3a, c"g, i, k, 5a, c, e, h, 6b, d, g, h, j and m, Supplementary Fig. 2b, d, 4a, c, e"g, i, k, 6a, b, d, 7a, c, e"g, h, 8a, f and i are provided in Source Data file. The source data underlying Fig.1c, g, 2b, c, e, f, h, i, k, 3b, h, j, l, 5b, c, g, i, 6c, e, g, h, k and l, Supplementary Fig. 1a, 2a The sample size of GBC Cohort 1 and GBC Cohort 2 was determined by the number of tumor samples and clinic information availabled in our database. Sample size and number of independent experiments are always clearly stated in the figure legend or in the Methods section. In CRISPR screen, two independent results were analyzed. In other experiments, three or more independent results were used to perform statistical analyses. All raw data required for statistical tests are indicated in Source Data file 2.
No data were excluded from analysis.
Experiments in the article are reliably produced, replication were described in the figure legends.
Animals with similar age and weight were randomly allocated to experimental groups. Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.

Human research participants
Policy information about studies involving human research participants Population characteristics