Table 1 Characteristics of the different data sets of the ENIGMA ASD working group

From: Altered structural brain asymmetry in autism spectrum disorder in a study of 54 datasets

Sample name N total N cases (M/F) N controls (M/F) Median age in years (range) Scanner type Field strength
ABIDE_CALTECH 31 13/1 13/4 23.4 (17.5, 56.2) Siemens Trio 3 T
ABIDE_KKI 21 7/0 11/3 10.6 (8.4, 12.8) Philips Achieva 3 T
ABIDE_LEUVEN_1 29 14/0 15/0 22 (18, 32) Philips Interna 3 T
ABIDE_LEUVEN_2 35 12/3 15/5 14.2 (12.1, 16.9) Philips Interna 3 T
ABIDE_MAX_MUN 57 21/3 29/4 26 (7, 58) Siemens Verio 3 T
ABIDE_NYU 186 68/11 81/26 13.6 (6.5, 39.1) Siemens Allegra 3 T
ABIDE_OHSU 18 7/0 11/0 10 (8.2, 12.7) Siemens Trio 3 T
ABIDE_OLIN 36 17/3 14/2 17 (10, 24) Siemens Allegra 3 T
ABIDE_PITT 58 26/5 23/4 17 (9.3, 35.2) Siemens Allegra 3 T
ABIDE_SBL 30 15/0 15/0 33.5 (20, 64) Philips Interna 3 T
ABIDE_SDSU 37 14/1 16/6 14.8 (8.7, 37.7) GE MR750 3 T
ABIDE_STANFORD 40 16/4 16/4 9.4 (7.5, 12.9) GR Signa 3 T
ABIDE_TCD 55 24/1 30/0 15.9 (9.3, 25.9) Philips Achieva 3 T
ABIDE_UM_1 130 50/14 43/23 12.3 (8.1, 20.9) GE Signa 3 T
ABIDE_UM_2 31 14/1 15/1 14.8 (11.1, 26.8) GE Signa 3 T
ABIDE_USM 101 59/0 42/0 19.6 (8.2, 50.2) Siemens Trio 3 T
ABIDE_YALE 55 20/8 19/8 12.8 (7, 17.8) Siemens Magnetom 3 T
ABIDEII-BNI 58 29/0 29/0 43 (18, 64) Philips Ingenia 3 T
ABIDEII-EMC 54 22/5 22/5 8.2 (6.2, 10.7) GE MR750 3 T
ABIDEII-ETH 37 13/0 24/0 22.3 (13.8, 30.7) Philips Achieva 3 T
ABIDEII-GU 106 43/8 28/27 10.6 (8.1, 13.9) Siemens TriTim 3 T
ABIDEII-IP 56 14/8 12/22 18.4 (6.1, 46.6) Siemens TriTim 1.5 T
ABIDEII-IU 40 16/4 15/5 22 (17, 54) Philips Achieva 3 T
ABIDEII-KKI 211 41/15 99/56 10.3 (8, 13) Philips Achieva 3 T
ABIDEII-KUL* 28 28/0 24 (18, 35) Philips Achieva 3 T
ABIDEII-NYU_1 78 43/5 28/2 8.4 (5.2, 34.8) Siemens Allegra 3 T
ABIDEII-NYU_2* 27 24/3 7 (5.1, 8.8) Siemens Allegra 3 T
ABIDEII-OHSU 93 30/7 27/29 11 (7, 15) Siemens Skyra 3 T
ABIDEII-OILH 59 20/4 20/15 23 (18, 31) Siemens TriTim 3 T
ABIDEII-SDSU 57 26/7 22/2 13 (7.4, 18) GE MR750 3 T
ABIDEII-TCD 43 21/0 22/0 14.8 (10, 20) Philips Achieva 3 T
ABIDEII-UCD 32 14/4 10/4 14.6 (12, 17.8) Siemens TriTim 3 T
ABIDEII-UCLA 32 15/1 11/5 9.6 (7.8, 15) Siemens TriTim 3 T
ABIDEII-USM 33 15/2 13/3 19.7 (9.1, 38.9) Siemens TriTim 3 T
Barcelona 76 39/4 32/1 12.3 (7.2, 17.1) Siemens Trio 3 T
BRC 52 19/0 33/0 15 (10, 18) GE Signa HDx 3 T
CMU 27 11/3 10/3 27 (19, 40) Siemens Magnetom 3 T
Dresden 45 18/3 20/4 31.2 (21.1, 56.8) Siemens Trio 3 T
FAIR 85 36/7 27/15 11.6 (7.2, 15.9) Siemens Magnetom 3 T
FRANKFURT 27 10/2 13/2 18 (18, 18) Siemens Sonata 1.5 T
FSM 80 20/20 20/20 4.1 (1.8, 6) GE Signa 1.5 T
MRC 148 74/0 74/0 25 (18, 45) GE Signa HDx 3 T
MYAD 73 59/0 14/0 4.5 (1.5, 9) Siemens symphony 1.5 T
NIJMEGEN1_1 33 14/3 14/2 15.1 (12.3, 18) Siemens Trio 3 T
NIJMEGEN1_2* 9 8/1 17.5 (13.4, 18.5) Siemens Trio 3 T
NIJMEGEN2 72 29/19 16/8 26 (18, 40) Siemens Avanto 1.5 T
NIJMEGEN3 95 37/4 45/9 9.7 (6.1, 12.3) Siemens Avanto 1.5 T
ParelladaHGGM 66 33/2 30/1 13 (7, 18) Philips Intera 1.5 T
PITT_1 56 11/3 34/8 15 (8, 36) Siemens Allegra 3 T
PITT_2 90 39/6 39/6 15 (8, 36) Siemens Allegra 3 T
SAOPAULO 35 15/0 20/0 11 (6, 19) Philps 3 T
TCD_1 50 28/0 22/0 14.9 (10, 21.8) Philips Achieva 3 T
TCD_2 39 17/0 22/0 15.9 (12, 25.9) Philips Achieva 3 T
TORONTO_1 219 82/23 57/57 11.9 (3.3, 20.8) Siemens Trio 3 T
TORONTO_2 203 107/43 29/24 11 (2.5, 21.7) Siemens Trio 3 T
UMCU_1 88 41/7 37/3 12.1 (7.1, 24.7) Philips 1.5 T
UMCU_2 9 6/0 2/1 11.8 (10, 12.6) Philips 1.5 T
Total 3671 1833 1838    
  1. *Excluded, as diagnosis would be completely confounded with random variable ‘data set’ in the analysis model. For the calculation of the totals (in bold) these data sets were also excluded