Synergistic cancer immunotherapy combines MVA-CD40L induced innate and adaptive immunity with tumor targeting antibodies

Virus-based vaccines and appropriate costimulation potently enhance antigen-specific T cell immunity against cancer. Here we report the use of recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (rMVA) encoding costimulatory CD40L against solid tumors. Therapeutic treatment with rMVA-CD40L-expressing tumor-associated antigens results in the control of established tumors. The expansion of tumor-specific cytotoxic CD8+ T cells is essential for the therapeutic antitumor effects. Strikingly, rMVA-CD40L also induces strong natural killer (NK) cell activation and expansion. Moreover, the combination of rMVA-CD40L and tumor-targeting antibodies results in increased therapeutic antitumor efficacy relying on the presence of Fc receptor and NK cells. We describe a translationally relevant therapeutic synergy between systemic viral vaccination and CD40L costimulation. We show strengthened antitumor immune responses when both rMVA-CD40L-induced innate and adaptive immune mechanisms are exploited by combination with tumor-targeting antibodies. This immunotherapeutic approach could translate into clinical cancer therapies where tumor-targeting antibodies are employed.


Statistics
For all statistical analyses, confirm that the following items are present in the figure legend, table legend, main text, or Methods section.
n/a Confirmed The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as a discrete number and unit of measurement A statement on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one-or two-sided Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.
A description of all covariates tested A description of any assumptions or corrections, such as tests of normality and adjustment for multiple comparisons A full description of the statistical parameters including central tendency (e.g. means) or other basic estimates (e.g. regression coefficient) AND variation (e.g. standard deviation) or associated estimates of uncertainty (e.g. confidence intervals) For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g. F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of freedom and P value noted Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.

For Bayesian analysis, information on the choice of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings
For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of outcomes Estimates of effect sizes (e.g. Cohen's d, Pearson's r), indicating how they were calculated Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.

Software and code
Policy information about availability of computer code Data collection

Data analysis
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or software that are central to the research but not yet described in published literature, software must be made available to editors/reviewers. We strongly encourage code deposition in a community repository (e.g. GitHub). See the Nature Research guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.

Data
Policy information about availability of data All manuscripts must include a data availability statement. This statement should provide the following information, where applicable: -Accession codes, unique identifiers, or web links for publicly available datasets -A list of figures that have associated raw data -A description of any restrictions on data availability Field-specific reporting Please select the one below that is the best fit for your research. If you are not sure, read the appropriate sections before making your selection. Sample size used for in vivo experiments is n=5 mice per experimental group, determined by experience with the tumor models used and confirmed useful for the limited availability of knockout mice. When naive mice were used, sample sizes varies between PBS (n=2 mice) and treated mice (n=3 to 5 mice when indicated).
No data were excluded from the analysis.
In vivo results were repeated at least twice for reproducibility. All attempts of replication were successful. When results were not repeated, it is clearly stated in the manuscript.
For in vivo experiments, mice were randomized by the investigators according to the measured tumor mean diameter and ultimately by the tumor mean volume. So, the intrinsic variability of tumor cell growth in vivo is equally spread among the groups.
Experiments were not blinded. Technical research personnel preparing the treatment groups and performing the experiments were aware of which group receives a particular treatment. In addition, the local authorities require that, for in vivo experiments, the substances used are written onto the cage cards. Finally, all samples processed and assayed by the technical research personnel are handled the same way. In vivo treatment rat anti mouse in vivo antibody depletion observed in our lab (information can be provided) Anti CD20 SA271G2 Biolegend In vivo treatment rat anti mouse in vivo antibody depletion observed in our lab (information can be provided) CT26 murine colon carcinoma cell line expressing human HER2 (CT26.HER2) was licensed from the Regents of the University of California. The B16.OVA melanoma cell line was a kind gift of Roman Spörri (University of Zürich. B16.F10 (ATCC® CRL-6475™), EG7-OVA (ATCC® CRL-2113™) and CT26.WT (ATCC® CRL-2638™) cell lines were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). MC38.WT colon carcinoma cells were property of and used at Charles River Discovery Services.
The cell lines used were not authenticated.
All cell lines were tested negative for Mycoplasma contamination. Mycoplasma tests are ran routinely in the lab. The method of detecion used is the Lonza MycoAlert PLUS Mycoplasma Detection kit according to Standard Operating Procedures at Bavarian Nordic GmbH.

N/A
Provide provenance information for specimens and describe permits that were obtained for the work (including the name of the issuing authority, the date of issue, and any identifying information). Confirm that both raw and final processed data have been deposited in a public database such as GEO.

nature research | reporting summary
Confirm that you have deposited or provided access to graph files (e.g. BED files) for the called peaks.

Data access links
May remain private before publication.

Files in database submission
Indicate where the specimens have been deposited to permit free access by other researchers.
If new dates are provided, describe how they were obtained (e.g. collection, storage, sample pretreatment and measurement), where they were obtained (i.e. lab name), the calibration program and the protocol for quality assurance OR state that no new dates are provided.
Provide details on animals observed in or captured in the field; report species, sex and age where possible. Describe how animals were caught and transported and what happened to captive animals after the study (if killed, explain why and describe method; if released, say where and when) OR state that the study did not involve wild animals.
For laboratory work with field-collected samples, describe all relevant parameters such as housing, maintenance, temperature, photoperiod and end-of-experiment protocol OR state that the study did not involve samples collected from the field.
All animal experiments were approved by the animal ethics committee of the government of Upper Bavaria (Regierung von Oberbayern, Sachgebiet 54, Tierschutz) and were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines for animal experiments at Bavarian Nordic GmbH. When indicated, an experiment was conducted at Charles River Discovery Services (Morrisville, NC, USA) in compliance with the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC).
Describe the covariate-relevant population characteristics of the human research participants (e.g. age, gender, genotypic information, past and current diagnosis and treatment categories). If you filled out the behavioural & social sciences study design questions and have nothing to add here, write "See above." Describe how participants were recruited. Outline any potential self-selection bias or other biases that may be present and how these are likely to impact results.
Identify the organization(s) that approved the study protocol.
Provide the trial registration number from ClinicalTrials.gov or an equivalent agency.
Note where the full trial protocol can be accessed OR if not available, explain why.
Describe the settings and locales of data collection, noting the time periods of recruitment and data collection.
Describe how you pre-defined primary and secondary outcome measures and how you assessed these measures.
For "Initial submission" or "Revised version" documents, provide reviewer access links. For your "Final submission" document, provide a link to the deposited data.
Provide a list of all files available in the database submission.

Magnetic resonance imaging
Experimental design Design type Provide a link to an anonymized genome browser session for "Initial submission" and "Revised version" documents only, to enable peer review. Write "no longer applicable" for "Final submission" documents.
Describe the experimental replicates, specifying number, type and replicate agreement.
Describe the sequencing depth for each experiment, providing the total number of reads, uniquely mapped reads, length of reads and whether they were paired-or single-end.
Describe the antibodies used for the ChIP-seq experiments; as applicable, provide supplier name, catalog number, clone name, and lot number.
Specify the command line program and parameters used for read mapping and peak calling, including the ChIP, control and index files used.
Describe the methods used to ensure data quality in full detail, including how many peaks are at FDR 5% and above 5-fold enrichment.
Describe the software used to collect and analyze the ChIP-seq data. For custom code that has been deposited into a community repository, provide accession details.
When indicated, spleen, liver, lung and tumor were harvested from mice and incubated with 0.1 mg collagenase/DNase (Roche) for 30 minutes at 37°C. Single-cell suspensions were prepared by mechanically disrupting the organs through a 70-µm cell strainer (Falcon). Tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells, liver cells and lung cells were isolated by centrifugation with 44% Percoll (GE Healthcare). Cells were then subjected to red blood cell lysis (Sigma-Aldrich). Blood was collected in PBS containing 2% FCS, 0.1% sodium azide and 2.5 U/ml heparin. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were prepared by lysing erythrocytes with red blood cell lysis buffer. Mononuclear cells from the abovementioned organs were washed, resuspended in RPMI+2% FCS (Gibco), counted and kept on ice until further analysis. Indicate task or resting state; event-related or block design.