Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Interfacial oxygen vacancies yielding long-lived holes in hematite mesocrystal-based photoanodes


Hematite (α-Fe2O3) is one of the most promising candidates as a photoanode materials for solar water splitting. Owing to the difficulty in suppressing the significant charge recombination, however, the photoelectrochemical (PEC) conversion efficiency of hematite is still far below the theoretical limit. Here we report thick hematite films (1500 nm) constructed by highly ordered and intimately attached hematite mesocrystals (MCs) for highly efficient PEC water oxidation. Due to the formation of abundant interfacial oxygen vacancies yielding a high carrier density of 1020 cm−3 and the resulting extremely large proportion of depletion regions with short depletion widths (<10 nm) in hierarchical structures, charge separation and collection efficiencies could be markedly improved. Moreover, it was found that long-lived charges are generated via excitation by shorter wavelength light (below 500 nm), thus enabling long-range hole transfer through the MC network to drive high efficiency of light-to-energy conversion under back illumination.


Solar water splitting (H2O + hv → 1/2 O2 + 2 H+), a promising way to turn solar light into clean energy, has inspired significant research but remains a great challenge in improving efficiency and reducing cost for practical applications1,2,3,4,5,6. With the superiority of higher efficiency and stability than molecular systems and lower cost than simple combination of photovoltaics and electrolysis, photoelectrochemical (PEC) water-splitting system is particularly desirable3,4. Owing to the advantages of abundance, long-term stability in alkaline solution, and a bandgap (~2.1 eV) suitable for absorption of visible light, hematite (α-Fe2O3) has been regarded as an ideal photoanode semiconductor for PEC water splitting7. However, the short lifetime (picosecond time scale) and diffusion length (2–4 nm) of photogenerated charges due to the significant charge recombination in the bulk or at the surface lower the PEC performance of hematite photoanodes8,9,10. Therefore, most of the efforts have been focused on the fabrication of nanostructured thin films11,12,13 and the passivation of surface defects7 to suppress the recombination. However, the conflict between charge separation and light harvesting (α−1 = 0.12 μm at 550 nm for hematite, where α is absorption coefficient) has significantly limited their application7,14. This is why state-of-the-art hematite photoanodes15,16,17,18 still showed poor efficiency as compared with the theoretical solar-to-hydrogen (STH) efficiency of ~15% (or photocurrent generation of ~13 mA cm−2 at 1.23 V vs. RHE under 1-sun illumination)7. In addition, the requirement of front illumination (irradiate the hematite film surface through electrolyte) to drive the water oxidation also largely limited the cell design due to light scattering or shadowing by evolved gas bubbles. However, thick hematite films enabling high efficiency of water oxidation via back illumination have not been reported so far.

A few examples of mesoporous hematite structures composed of aggregated nanostructures have been demonstrated to be effective for PEC water splitting16,19. However, owing to the disordered structures where nanoparticles collide and aggregate randomly, it is still hard to identify the champion nanostructures in a single electrode which may contribute most of the electrode’s photocurrent16. In addition, the crystal–crystal interfaces or grain boundaries may act as recombination sites due to the lattice mismatch in crystals with different orientation and thus limit charge transport20. Mesocrystals (MCs) are superstructures of nanoparticles with a specific preferable mutual orientation21,22. Tachikawa et al. demonstrated that MCs of metal oxides, such as TiO2 and SrTiO3, have superior efficiencies in charge separation and transport between primary nanocrystals compared with conventional nanocrystal systems owing to their highly ordered structures23,24,25,26,27. Besides, the interfacial atomic structures between facing nanocrystal subunits inside the MC might be partly adjusted to reduce the recombination sites, possibly resulting in the improvement of intergranular electronic conductivity. Therefore, the hieratical assembly of MCs with minimum disorders and appropriate adjustment of the interface may further improve the PEC performance.

Herein, we demonstrate impressive performance of hematite MC-based photoanodes with thickness of ~1500 nm constructed by ~15 layers of highly oriented and intimately attached Ti-modified hematite MCs (Ti–Fe2O3 MCs). The photocurrent density at 1.23 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) (Supplementary Note) reaches to 2.5 mA cm−2 with an onset potential of 0.8 V vs. RHE. Further analytical results illustrate that abundant interfacial oxygen vacancies (VO) formed during partial sintering at the interfaces between the well-oriented nanocrystals within the MC can largely increase the carrier density for efficient charge separation and transport. In addition, the unique mesoporous structures with extremely high proportion of thin depletion regions could greatly improve the charge-collection efficiency. Moreover, excitation with short-wavelength light generates long-lived charges, resulting in a considerable number of holes (~14%) diffused far from the excited region to the unexcited one along the intimately connected MCs. These characteristics of hematite MC-based photoanodes with rich interfacial VO enable high PEC performance and open a useful strategy to design the superstructure-based systems for efficient solar fuel production.


Synthesis and characterization of the hematite MCs

The highly stable Ti–Fe2O3 MCs were synthesized via an additive-free solvothermal self-assembling method using N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and methanol as the mixed solvent, and Fe(NO3)3·9H2O and TiF4 as metal precursors (Supplementary Fig. 1). The representative Ti–Fe2O3 MCs obtained with a TiF4/Fe(NO3)·9H2O molar ratio of 1:10 show a uniform discus-like structure as revealed by transmission microscopy (TEM) (Fig. 1a; Supplementary Fig. 2) and high-angle annular dark-field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM) images (Supplementary Fig. 3a). Ti–Fe2O3 MCs with diameters of ~300 nm and thickness of ~90 nm are composed of closely stacked nanocrystal subunits (~30 nm). The corresponding selective area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern captured over the whole region of MC exhibits a single-crystal-like spot pattern (Fig. 1a, inset), indicating that the nanocrystal subunits inside the MC are highly ordered and crystallographically aligned, which can be attributed to particle-to-particle interaction28. The SAED pattern displays well-defined diffraction spots of the (−210), (−120), and (110) planes along the [001] zone axis, which possess the central angles of 60o. The high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image obtained from the region comprised two adjacent nanocrystals with an interface clearly indicates parallel crystal lattices (Fig. 1b), further proving the structural characteristics of MC29. There are three sets of lattice fringes with lattice spacing (d) of 0.25 nm, which corresponds to the (110) plane of hematite, and with interfacial angle of 60o, which is consistent with the SAED result. The elemental mapping images of the typical Ti–Fe2O3 MC in Supplementary Fig. 3a visualize the similar spatial distributions of Fe, O, and Ti elements on the surface. The content of Ti determined from energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX) spectrum is ~8.5%, which is close to the concentration of the TiF4 precursor added (Supplementary Fig. 3b). The mesoporous structure and surface areas were confirmed by N2 sorption isotherms and the corresponding pore-size distribution curve (Supplementary Fig. 4). The TEM images and corresponding SAED pattern obtained from the whole MC particle in Fig. 1c indicate that Ti–Fe2O3 MCs maintain their size, morphology, and crystal structure even after high-temperature annealing at 700 °C (Fig. 1c; Supplementary Fig. 5a, b). Mesopores with diameters ranging from 8 to 40 nm formed inside the MC after the thermal treatment as seen from the HAADF-STEM image in Supplementary Fig. 6.

Fig. 1

Morphological characterization of Ti–Fe2O3 MC. a TEM and corresponding SAED (inset), and b HRTEM image of the as-synthesized Ti–Fe2O3 MC. c TEM and corresponding SAED (inset), d HAADF-STEM image and e corresponding EELS chemical composition maps of a typical Ti–Fe2O3 MC particle collected after annealing at 700 °C. f EEL spectra of the selected regions in panel d. g Top-view, and h cross-sectional SEM images of the optimized Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode. i XRD patterns of the Ti–Fe2O3 MC, Fe2O3 MC, and Fe2O3 SC photoanodes

HAADF-STEM with electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) measurements can give useful information about the local composition, structure, and chemical states of the samples30,31,32. Figure 1d shows the HAADF-STEM image of a typical Ti–Fe2O3 MC particle after being annealed at 700 °C in air. The corresponding EELS composition map is given in panel e. It is obvious that most of the Ti species are segregated to the outer surface and edges of the pores. To further analyze the distribution of the elements in the crystal, EEL spectra were acquired in different regions (Fig. 1d). As shown in Fig. 1f, only Ti-L2,3 and O-K signals were detected on the edge of the MC particle (Region 1 in Fig. 1d), suggesting the presence of TiO2 overlayer. The thicknesses of TiO2 layers are estimated from <1 to ~4 nm (Fig. 1e; Supplementary Fig. 7). It is noteworthy that TiO2 (most probably rutile phase) grew on the surface of hematite as suggested by the high-resolution HAADF-STEM images, the corresponding fast Fourier transform (FFT) patterns, inverse FFT images (Supplementary Fig. 7), and XRD peak attributed to rutile (110) (Supplementary Fig. 8). On the smooth surface (Region 2 in Fig. 1d), Ti-L2,3 signals are very weak, implying that a small portion of Ti4+ ions were doped into the crystal. A higher concentration of Ti4+ ions were observed near the edges of the pores (Region 3 in Fig. 1d), again indicating the formation of thin TiO2 layers. This conclusion was further confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and synchrotron-based X-ray total scattering measurements (Supplementary Figs. 911).

Fig. 2

Interfacial oxygen vacancies (VO) in MCs. a, b HAADF-STEM images of Fe2O3 MC and c corresponding EELS chemical composition maps of panel b. d EEL spectra of panel b and e corresponding EELS Fe-L2,3 spectra of the selected region in panel b. The rightmost one of panel c is merged image of components 1 (red), 2 (green), and 3 (blue). f EPR spectra of the samples. g Schematic illustration of the VO formation in MC, where (100) facets are tentatively assumed to form the interface

The morphology and thickness of the prepared photoanodes were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). As shown in Fig. 1g, Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode is constructed by highly oriented and intimately attached Ti–Fe2O3 MCs. The optimized film with thickness of ~1500 nm consists of ~15 layers of uniform Ti–Fe2O3 MCs according to the cross-sectional SEM image (Fig. 1h; Supplementary Fig. 12). For comparison, unmodified hematite MC (Fe2O3 MC) and Fe2O3 single-crystal (SC) photoanodes with a similar film thickness were prepared (Supplementary Figs. 13, 14). The crystal orientation of the particles on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glasses was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Fig. 1i). The observed diffraction peaks were identified according to the standard PDF card (PDF#33–0664), and no other crystal phases were detected by XRD under the typical conditions, except the cassiterite phase of SnO2 (PDF#41–1445) in the FTO substrate as marked by the asterisks. It should be noted that the higher ratios of (104)/(110) indicate the existence of predominantly (104) oriented hematite for all the photoanodes. The grain sizes in Ti–Fe2O3 and Fe2O3 MCs calculated using Scherrer equation are ~30 nm, which is close to the sizes of the nanocrystal subunits in as-synthesized MCs verified from TEM images (Supplementary Figs. 2, 13).

Abundant interfacial oxygen vacancies (VO) in MCs

The properties of semiconductors are closely related to intrinsic lattice defects, as well as their structure and composition. To analyze the defects in MCs, STEM-EELS analysis was carried out. Figure 2a, b is the HAADF-STEM images of a typical Fe2O3 MC. As demonstrated in Fig. 2c, d, three components (1, 2, and 3) are clearly separated by multivariate analysis33 of the spectrum image data obtained in the area of Fig. 2b. The components 1 and 2 can be assigned to oxides containing Fe3+ and Fe2+, respectively, form characteristic Fe-L2,3 spectra (Fig. 2e). These components are considered to be mostly located inside the MC from their high background intensity (Fig. 2d). Importantly, Fe2+ is distributed inside rather than the edge and pores without apparent spatial overlap with Fe3+ (Fig. 2c). These features reflect the grain boundaries in the depth direction, although the interfaces between nanoparticles inside the MC itself almost disappeared due to sintering. In other words, VO are likely to form in the regions where fusion of neighbored nanoparticles occurred during sintering. The component 3 probably originates from surface Fe3+ by taking into consideration its low background intensity and the L3 peak slightly shifted to the lower energy side compared with those of the standard Fe3+ (Fig. 2e). Qualitatively similar results are obtained for different MCs (Supplementary Fig. 15). The valence states of iron in Ti–Fe2O3 MC were also identified (Supplementary Figs. 16, 17).

To further confirm the presence of abundant VO in the MC samples, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements were carried out at 6 K (Fig. 2f). The two main signals of the Fe2O3 SC sample (g = 2.07 and 4.26) were assigned to Fe3+ ions coupled via exchange interactions and Fe3+ ions in rhombic and axial symmetry sites, respectively34,35. However, only single broad resonance lines centered at g = 3.12 and 2.76 were observed for the Fe2O3 MC and Ti–Fe2O3 MC samples, respectively. The change of the lineshape indicates a ferromagnetic resonance due to the interaction between Fe3+ and Fe2+ (i.e., VO)34,35. Thus, these results convincingly reveal that the MC samples possess more VO than the SC sample. For comparison, VO was not detected for Ti–Fe2O3 MCs and Fe2O3 MCs without high temperature annealing (Supplementary Fig. 18). The formation of VO was also suggested by the O 1 s XPS spectra, XPS depth profiles, and steady-state UV–visible diffuse reflectance spectra (Supplementary Figs. 19, 20, and 21, respectively). Based on the above results, we propose that the partial sintering of highly ordered interfaces between the nanocrystal subunits inside the MC at high temperature could leave small interior spaces with oxygen deficiency (i.e., oxygen-deficient interfaces), and thus oxygen atoms in the hematite lattice (Fe–O) easily escape to create VO (Fe–O + Fe–O → 2Fe–VO + O2) (Fig. 2g) owing to the lower formation energy of VO in metal oxides compared with cation interstitials36. In contrast, the Fe2O3 SC sample without such ordered interfaces between nanocrystals would hardly generate VO when being annealed under the same conditions.

PEC performance of MC photoanodes

The PEC performance of Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanodes fabricated with different Ti precursor concentrations is provided in Supplementary Fig. 22. The photocurrent density of the Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode reaches a maximum at a Fe:Ti molar ratio of 1:0.1, and higher Ti/Fe ratios lead to a decrease in the photocurrent density.

The PEC performance of the optimized Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode is displayed in Fig. 3 along with the results of reference Fe2O3 MC and SC photoanodes. Figure 3a shows the current density–voltage curves measured in the dark and under back illumination with simulated sunlight (AM 1.5 G, 100 mW cm−2) in 1.0 M NaOH (pH 13.6). The dark currents in the voltage range applied here are negligible for all samples. The photocurrent density obtained for the Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode at 1.23 V vs. RHE was 2.5 mA cm−2, which is twice and seven times the Fe2O3 MC (1.1 mA cm−2) and Fe2O3 SC (0.35 mA cm−2) photoanodes, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest value reported thus far for hematite photoanodes without heterojunction or additional surface treatment under back illumination (Supplementary Table 1). By depositing a Co–Pi co-catalyst on the surface, the current density can be further improved to 3.5 mA cm−2 (Fig. 3a; Supplementary Fig. 23). The Ti–Fe2O3 MC and Fe2O3 MC photoanodes realize a substantial increase in photocurrent and significant cathodic shift of the onset potential for water oxidation. The Ti–Fe2O3 MC and Fe2O3 MC photoanodes exhibit similar onset potentials of 0.76 V vs. RHE, which is more negative by 0.24 V than that of the Fe2O3 SC photoanode (1.0 V vs. RHE). The observed shift of the onset potential and largely enhanced solar light-responsive current density in MC-based photoanodes imply their superior charge separation and transport abilities37. After the deposition of the Co–Pi co-catalyst on the surface, the onset potential further decreases to 0.6 V vs. RHE, indicating that surface recombination is effectively suppressed38. To quantitatively investigate the PEC performance of the photoanodes, incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) (Supplementary Note) measurements were performed at 1.23 V vs. RHE in 1.0 M NaOH under back illumination (Fig. 3b). All the samples show photocurrent response to incident light in the wavelength region of 400–620 nm, which matches the bandgap of hematite (~2.1 eV). The Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode exhibits substantially enhanced quantum efficiency as compared with other photoanodes in the whole wavelength range. The IPCE of the Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode reaches ~31% at the excitation wavelength of 400 nm, which is twice and six times that of Fe2O3 MC (14%) and Fe2O3 SC (5%), respectively. As shown in Fig. 3c, gases were evolved from Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode and Pt counter electrode at 1.23 V vs. RHE with an irradiation area of 0.20 cm2. Both H2 and O2 were linearly produced over 3 h with the stoichiometric ratio (2:1). The Faradaic efficiencies (FEs) for both H2 and O2 are ~97%. The Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode exhibits no obvious current decrease over 24 h, indicating its excellent stability under the operation conditions (Fig. 3d). Figure 3e is the photograph of gas bubbles generated from the Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode and Pt counter electrode at 1.23 V vs. RHE under back illumination.

Fig. 3

PEC performance. a Current density–voltage curves of Ti–Fe2O3 MC/Co–Pi, Ti–Fe2O3 MC, Fe2O3 MC, and Fe2O3 SC photoanodes prepared by 50 cycles of spin-coatings measured under back illumination with AM 1.5 G simulated sunlight in 1.0 M NaOH. b IPCE curves measured at 1.23 V vs. RHE for the Ti–Fe2O3 MC, Fe2O3 MC, and Fe2O3 SC photoanodes. c Gas evolved from Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode and Pt counter electrode with an applied potential of 1.23 V vs. RHE under back illumination during 3 h and the corresponding Faradaic efficiencies (FEs). d Current density–time curve of the Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode measured at 1.23 V vs RHE under back illumination. e Photograph showing gas evolution from Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode and Pt counter electrode under an applied potential of 1.23 V vs. RHE

Charge transfer efficiencies

To gain insight into the enhancement of photocurrent in the MC photoanodes, electrochemical impedance measurements were performed at each potential with 10 kHz frequency in the dark. From the Mott–Schottky plots, which represent the changes in capacitance (C) against the applied potential, it can be seen that all the samples possess a positive slope (Fig. 4a), which is a characteristic of n-type semiconductors with electrons as majority carriers. The carrier density (Nd) can be calculated from the slopes of Mott–Schottky plots (Supplementary Note). The Nd value (Supplementary Table 2) for Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode (5.1 × 1020 cm−3) is 3.2 and 21 times higher than that of Fe2O3 MC photoanode (1.6 × 1020 cm−3) and Fe2O3 SC photoanode (2.4 × 1019 cm−3), respectively, suggesting that Ti species play a key role in improving the conductivity and thus efficiently suppress the charge recombination both in the bulk and depletion regions of hematite photoanode. Notably, the electron concentration of the Fe2O3 MC photoanode is ~6.7 times higher than that of the Fe2O3 SC photoanode. The higher Nd in Fe2O3 MCs compared with that of Fe2O3 SCs originates from additional electrons, which compensate for the charges induced by the formation of VO in the crystal, and thus endorse its conductivity36,39,40. Therefore, the abundant VO at the sintered interfaces (i.e., in the bulk) can actually increase the bulk carrier density and thus effectively improve the electrical conductivity.

Fig. 4

Charge transfer efficiencies. a Mott–Schottky plots of the samples. Capacitances (Cs) were determined from electrochemical impedance measurements at a frequency of 10 kHz in the dark. b Electrochemical impedance spectra measured for the Ti–Fe2O MC, Fe2O3 MC, and Fe2O3 SC photoanodes. The inset shows the equivalent circuit. c The energetic distribution of NSS as a function of the applied potentials. d The correlation between NSS, Nd, and current density at 1.23 V vs. RHE

The charge transport properties of the photoanodes were then investigated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) under back illumination at 1.23 V vs. RHE in 1.0 M NaOH (Fig. 4b). The fitting results according to the equivalent circuit model are summarized in Supplementary Table 2. The series resistance (Rs) at the interface between the FTO substrate and hematite layers represents a substantial reduction from ca. 100 Ω cm−2 for the unmodified sample to ca. 40 Ω cm−2 for the Ti–Fe2O3 MC sample. This result suggests the possibility that the formation of TiO2 layers on the surface of hematite MCs effectively improves the electron transfer from hematite to the FTO substrate41. The charge transfer resistance (Rct) increased in the order of Ti–Fe2O3 MC (367 Ω cm−2) < Fe2O3 MC (576 Ω cm−2) < Fe2O3 SC (2747 Ω cm−2), indicating the superior charge mobility in the Ti–Fe2O MC photoanode due to the increased carrier density by VO and Ti modification, as well as the highly ordered MC alignment. Rtrap reflects the charge transfer property at the semiconductor/electrolyte interfaces (SEI). The MC samples exhibited lower Rtrap values than that of the SC sample, indicating a higher charge transfer efficiency at SEI.

The surface states (SS) are known to strongly influence the charge transfer processes at the SEI42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50. To systematically examine the involvement of SS, photoelectrochemical impedance spectroscopy (PEIS) measurements were performed at potentials ranging from 0.7 to 1.6 V vs. RHE (Supplementary Fig. 24). The density of mid-gap surface states (NSS), which are considered to be related to OH and O-terminated surfaces51, was calculated from Ctrap (Supplementary Note) and shown in Fig. 4c. The peaks of the energetic distribution of NSS are observed near the formal potential for water oxidation (1.23 V vs. RHE), which decides an equilibration of trap-state energy and hole-accepting species at SEI44. The NSS values of MC photoanodes are both lower than that of the SC electrode; this suggests that SS are reduced via oriented attachment of primary nanocrystals, possibly leading to the reduced overpotential and enhanced photovoltage45,52,53. These results again support our idea that the hierarchical construction of highly ordered MCs with same crystal orientation effectively improves the PEC performance. In comparison with the Fe2O3 MC photoanode, the slightly increased NSS of Ti-Fe2O3 MC photoanode might be due to the formation of TiO2 overlayer on the surface. The correlation between NSS, Nd, and current density at 1.23 V vs. RHE is demonstrated in Fig. 4d. The higher Nd, which originates from the abundant interfacial VO and/or Ti incorporation, and lower NSS of MCs would effectively generate higher photocurrents.

Superior PEC performance under back illumination

The photocurrent generation of Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanodes was significantly influenced by the film thickness, as well as illumination mode. Figure 5a illustrates the penetration of excitation light into the hematite film with thickness of 1500 nm under different illumination modes. It is obvious that most of the solar light is absorbed by hematite near the FTO substrate (<300 nm) according to the Lambert–Beer law (Fig. 5a, dash lines)54,55. Since light transmission or scattering might effectively occur in a mesoporous film, the actual intensity ratio of transmitted light (Ix) to incident light (I0) (Fig. 5a, dot plot) was measured by the method displayed in Fig. 5b. The fitted results (solid lines in Fig. 5a) show that a much deeper region (up to ~900 nm from the FTO surface) can actually absorb solar light, indicating that more particles can be excited to produce the charge carriers. According to the fact that highest photocurrent density was obtained for the Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode with 1500-nm-film thicknesses under back illumination (Fig. 5c), it is presumed that a considerable number of photogenerated electrons diffuse away from the excited region and reach the FTO. Interestingly, the current densities measured under front illumination are much lower than those under back illumination (Fig. 5c).

Fig. 5

Superior back illumination current generation. a Lambert–Beer law-based simulation of light intensity in hematite film under different illumination modes (dash lines) and the measured light intensity in hematite with different thicknesses (dots) and the corresponding fitted line (solid lines). b The method used to measure the light intensity (Ix/I0). c The current density–voltage curves of Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode (with thickness of 1500 nm) measured under different illumination modes. d The current densities at 1.23 V vs. RHE of the Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanodes with different film thicknesses measured under different illumination modes

To understand the charge separation and transport dynamics, the current density of Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanodes with different film thicknesses are compared under different illumination modes (Fig. 5d; Supplementary Fig. 25). The Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanodes with different thicknesses all exhibited superior current generation under back illumination in the potential range (0.8 V to 1.6 V) (Supplementary Fig. 25, solid lines). As summarized in Fig. 5d, the current density increased with increasing film thickness from 200 to 900 nm under both illumination modes, which originate from the increase in the number of photons absorbed by the films with larger thicknesses in the region of <900 nm (Region 1). Beyond this region (Region 2, where the film thickness is >900 nm), the photocurrent would be influenced by charge collection efficiency54. The EIS results show that Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanodes with different film thicknesses have lower charge transfer resistances under back illumination than those under front illumination (Supplementary Fig. 26). In addition, the charge transfer resistance increases with increasing film thickness, and the lowest charge transfer resistance was observed for the sample with film thickness of 900 nm. On the basis of the above analyses, a plausible mechanism of charge transfer inside the Ti–Fe2O3 MC film under different illumination modes is proposed in Supplementary Fig. 27.

Charge carrier dynamics

To elucidate the charge carrier dynamics, time-resolved microspectroscopy measurements were performed. Figure 6a and b depicts the photoluminescence (PL) spectra and decay curves obtained for the particles on quartz cover glasses under 405-nm pulsed laser illumination in ambient air. All the samples exhibit a broad emission band (580–650 nm) centered at ~630 nm (PL band 1), which is close to their bandgaps (~1.9 eV). The broad emission peak centered at a longer wavelength (~720 nm) can be assigned to defect-mediated charge recombination on the surface (Supplementary Table 3). Intriguingly, Ti–Fe2O3 and Fe2O3 MCs display another emission band (510–580 nm) centered at ~560 nm (PL band 2). From the analysis of the PL decay curves, the intensity-weighted average lifetime (<τPL>) for Fe2O3 SCs was determined to be 0.4 ns (Supplementary Table 4), which is consistent with the reported short lifetime of the photogenerated charges (picosecond time scale). Meanwhile, Ti–Fe2O3 MCs (1.9 ns) and Fe2O3 MCs (4.1 ns) have much longer lifetimes, which are indicative of suppressed charge recombination. The PL decay curves measured with a longpass filter (>593 nm, Supplementary Fig. 28a) show that the PL of Ti–Fe2O3 and Fe2O3 MCs is both quickly quenched (Supplementary Table 4). Therefore, the observed longer lifetimes are likely attributed to PL band 2. This was further proved by the fact that the PL lifetimes measured for MC with a bandpass filter (440–570 nm, Supplementary Fig. 28b) exhibit considerably longer lifetimes (Supplementary Table 4). Furthermore, the shortened lifetime for Ti–Fe2O3 MCs in comparison with pure Fe2O3 MCs suggests that the charge separation becomes more facile by Ti modification owing to the increased conductivity, thus leading to the best performance.

Fig. 6

Time-resolved PL measurements and wavelength-dependent current generation. a Emission spectrum (Inset shows the corresponding optical transmission images) and b decay profiles collected from isolated small aggregates of Ti–Fe2O3 MCs, Fe2O3 MCs, and Fe2O3 SCs. c The proposed electronic transitions and charge recombination process in MC. d Current density at 1.23 V vs. RHE of the Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode under monochromatic light illumination (430 nm and 530 nm) from the back side. The normalized current density at 1.23 V vs. RHE of the Ti-Fe2O3 MC photoanodes with different film thicknesses under e 430-nm and f 530-nm monochromatic light illumination from the back side

Based on the above results, the electronic transitions as well as charge-recombination processes in hematite MCs are proposed in Fig. 6c. The MC samples exhibit a much higher content of PL band 2 than that of SCs (Fig. 6a), which corresponds to the higher VO concentration in MCs (Fig. 2f; Supplementary Fig. 19). The removal of oxygen atoms reduces the coordination number of the neighboring Fe ions, thus leading to strong modification of the local structure. Based on these findings and according to the literature56, the PL band 2 observed for MC samples might be attributable to radiative recombination of electron–hole pairs generated near VO via the ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) transition (O 2p → Fe 3d). It can also be noted that the VO species not only produce the liberated carriers but also prolong their lifetime. To fully understand the origin and mechanism of PL, however, more work is needed.

Such longer-lived holes would escape from the recombination with the photogenerated electrons, as seen in Ti–Fe2O3 MCs, and thus contribute to the PEC performance. Figure 6d shows the current density of the Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode with film thickness of 1500 nm at 1.23 V vs. RHE under back monochromatic light illumination (430 nm and 530 nm) with different light intensities ranging from 0 to 5.0 mW cm−2. The corresponding current density–potential curves are given in Supplementary Fig. 29. The current density was linearly enhanced with the increase of light intensity as reported57. As the incident light can be fully absorbed by the thick Ti–Fe2O3 MC film, the concentrations of photogenerated electron–hole pairs are almost the same when the sample is excited with same photon fluxes. Despite the fact that the 430-nm light is absorbed closer to the FTO side, i.e., further away from the hematite film/electrolyte interface, as compared with the 530-nm light55, the current density obtained by 430-nm excitation is even more than three times higher than that by 530-nm excitation. The higher current density measured by the short-wavelength excitation would be ascribed to the longer hole-diffusion length and higher hole-collection efficiency. To verify this hypothesis, dependences of current generation on the film thickness and light wavelength were further investigated. Supplementary Fig. 30 illustrates the thickness-dependent current generation under monochromatic light (430 nm and 530 nm) illumination with different light intensities. The normalized current densities of different film thicknesses are shown in Fig. 6e. It can be seen that the photocurrent density steadily increases with increasing film thickness from 200 to 900 nm when the sample was excited by 430-nm light in the same manner as simulated solar light illumination (Fig. 5d). In the case of 530-nm excitation, which corresponds to indirect Fe3+ d–d transition56, the result shows a clear increase in current only with the increase of film thickness from 200 to 600 nm (Fig. 6f). Considering the above experimental results, we suggest that the abundant VO in MC induces the generation of long-lived O holes via short-wavelength light excitation, which can largely improve the charge separation and transportation efficiencies between the inner nanocrystal subunits inside the MC.


The separation and collection of the photogenerated charges are driven by the band bending in the depletion layer at the SEI7. The width of depletion layer (W) can be calculated according the following equation: W= ((2ɛɛ0Vbi)/(qNd))1/2, where ɛ is the dielectric constant of hematite (80)7, ɛ0 is the permittivity of free space (8.854 × 10−12 F m−1), Vbi is the built-in potential which can be calculated by subtracting the flat-band potential from the applied potential, and q is the elementary charge. The W values are calculated to be 4.3, 7.6, and 19.7 nm for Ti–Fe2O3 MC, Fe2O3 MC, and Fe2O3 SC photoanodes, respectively. The W for Ti–Fe2O3 MC is much smaller than those of Fe2O3 MC and Fe2O3 SC, indicating a steeper band bending and a shorter hole drift distance for surface charge collection (Fig. 7a; Supplementary Fig. 31). Because of the excellent penetration of electrolyte into the pores of mesoporous films, the proportion of depletion regions to the entire film should be much higher than that for the SC film (Supplementary Fig. 31). Both the inner pore surface and the outer surface of MCs can contact electrolyte to serve as SE junction regions for charge separation and collection. The hematite films with thickness >1000 nm and aligned with less conductive [104] direction against the FTO substrate are rarely reported to have a good performance for PEC water oxidation when being irradiated from the back side. The present thick Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanodes, however, showed high quantum efficiencies. According to the results of thickness-dependent current generation experiments (Fig. 5d), we can estimate that ~86% of photocurrent was generated in the effective light absorption region (Region 1). Meanwhile, a considerable number of delocalized holes (~14%) generated far away from the film surface (>600 nm) efficiently migrate to Region 2 and drive the water oxidation. The roles of the interfacial VO and thin TiO2 overlayer in the PEC performance are specifically discussed in Supplementary Discussion with Supplementary Fig. 32.

Fig. 7

Proposed charge carrier dynamics in thick hematite MC film. a Illustration of the charge transfer at the SEI of Ti–Fe2O3 MC. b Illustration of the hole transport in the optimized Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode with film thickness of 1500 nm

Based on the above analysis and discussion, we again suggest that assembled MCs with rich interfacial VO and mesopores have unique properties such as efficient light absorption, superior charge mobility owing to the high carrier density, larger proportion of the depletion region to the entire film, and long-lived holes. These properties are beneficial for charge separation, transfer, and collection and finally enable considerable charges to traverse long distances. According to the PL characteristics and wavelength-dependent photocurrent generation, we can expect that longer-lived O holes with excellent mobility are generated with short-wavelength light excitation (Supplementary Discussion), thus enabling highly efficient charge separation and transfer along the intimately connected MCs over 1000 nm distance (Fig. 7b).

Despite the high-performance water splitting under back illumination that has been achieved by the present Ti–Fe2O3 MC photoanode, the bulk recombination still prevails in the film according to the EIS results. Possible routes for PEC performance improvement include the heterojunction and surface treatment. For instance, developing them into new nanocomposite MCs constructed by two different metal oxides23 (e.g., Fe2O3–MOx, M = Ti, Sn, Cr, Ce, etc.) to improve the charge separation and transfer. Considering that the present Ti–Fe2O3 MCs are aligned along the (104) orientation with relatively low conductivity, we can expect a further improvement of the performance by directly controlling the orientation of MCs in the film. However, the control of crystal orientation on substrate is still a great challenge, which is under investigation by our group.

In conclusion, novel thick hematite MC films (~1500 nm) have been developed for the highly efficient PEC water oxidation under back illumination. Due to the formation of abundant interfacial VO during partial fusion of interface between the highly ordered nanocrystals within the MC, the charge transfer properties were largely enhanced without significant recombination when compared with the SC film. In addition, the unique mesoporous structures with an extremely high proportion of depletion region and short depletion width would greatly improve the charge separation and collection efficiencies. Moreover, the excitation with shorter wavelength light generates long-lived charges, driving a considerable number of delocalized holes (~14%) to the distance far away from the excited regions along the intimately connected MCs. The present results provide new perspectives to the fields ranging from photocatalysis, electrocatalysis, optoelectronics, and sensing, to energy storage and conversion in terms of interfacial VO management through the construction of mesocrystal superstructures.


Synthesis of Ti–Fe2O3 MCs, Fe2O3 MCs, and Fe2O3 SCs

The synthesis of Ti–Fe2O3 MC, Fe2O3 MC, and Fe2O3 SC was based on a simple additive-free solvothermal method. Typically, 1.0 mmol of Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (Wako, 99.9%) and 0.1 mmol of TiF4 (Aldrich) were dissolved in a mixture solution containing 40 mL of N,N-dimethylformamide (Wako, 99.9%) and 10 mL of methanol by stirring for 20 min. Then the above solution was placed in a 100 mL Teflon-liner autoclave and hydrothermal at 180 °C for 24 h. After naturally cooling, the resulting brown powder was collected by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm, and washed by acetone, water, and methanol for twice, separately. The synthesis of Fe2O3 MCs was similar to the preparation of Ti–Fe2O3 MCs by only adding Fe(NO3)3·9H2O as a metal precursor in the same mixture solution. The pure Fe2O3 MC exhibit a bright red color. The Fe2O3 SC were also prepared as the reference sample only by changing the DMF/methanol volume from 40:10 to 48:2.

Fabrication of photoanodes by spin coating

The obtained fresh Ti–Fe2O3 MCs, Fe2O3 MCs, and Fe2O3 SCs were deposited on FTO-coated glasses by spin coating followed by a high-temperature annealing process. Typically, the photocatalyst powders were dispersed in methanol (10 mg mL−1) by sonication for 30 min. A piece of dry and cleaned FTO glass (washed by sonication in acetone, methanol, and water for 15 min, separately, and finally immersed in Milli-Q water for use) with a size of 2.2 × 1.7 cm2 was placed on a spin-coater. Then, 20 μL of the above suspension was deposited on the FTO glass under a spin-coating speed of 3000 rpm s−1 for 10 s. This spin-coating process was repeated for 50 cycles to obtain the optimized film. The thickness of the hematite films was controlled by varying the spin-coating cycles. Finally, the obtained films were annealed at 700 oC for 20 min with a heating speed of 20 oC min−1.

Depositing of Co–Pi co-catalyst on Ti–Fe2O3 MCs

Co–Pi co-catalysts were deposited on Ti–Fe2O3 MC via a photo-assisted electrodeposition method46. Typically, a three-electrode cell was utilized with Ti–Fe2O3 MC film as a working electrode, Pt wire as the counter electrode, and Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode. With simulated sunlight (1 sun, AM 1.5) illumination the Ti-Fe2O3 MC film, an external bias of 0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl was applied in a phosphate buffer solution (1.0 M, pH 7) containing 0.5 mM cobalt nitrate. After drying on air, the electrode was carefully washed by water. The amount of Co–Pi co-catalyst was controlled by varying the deposition time from 400 to 700 s.

Material characterizations

Powder XRD patterns were recorded on Rigaku Ultima IV with Cu Kα source. SEM images were taken on JEOL JSM-5500 operated at 20 kV. TEM images and EDX mapping images were obtained on a JEM-2100F (JEOL) microscope operated at 200 kV. High-resolution HAADF-STEM images combined with EELS analysis were obtained by a JEM-ARM200F Cold FEG (JEOL) microscope operated at 200 kV, equipped with a Gatan Image Filter Quantum ER. Steady-state UV–visible diffuse reflectance spectrum were collected by a UV–visible spectrophotometer (V-700, JASCO). XPS measurements were performed on a PHI X-tool (ULVAC-PHI). The XPS spectra showed here were calibrated by C1s at 284.8 eV. EPR measurements of the powder hematite samples were carried out by a Bruker EMX spectrometer with an Oxford ESR900 cryostat temperature control system. The microwave power was 6.325 mW, microwave frequency was 9.496 GHz, and temperature was 6 K. N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms at liquid nitrogen temperature (77 K) after degas under vacuum at 150 °C for 6 h were measured using a BELSORP-mini (MicrotracBEL). Synchrotron-based total X-ray total scattering measurements were performed with the incident X-ray energy of E = 61.4 keV at BL04B2 beamline in SPring-8, Japan, for studying the local structure from PDF analysis. The hybrid detectors of Ge and CdTe were employed for data collection. The reduced PDF G(r) was obtained by the conventional Fourier transform of the collected data58.

PEC measurements

The PEC data were obtained and analyzed on an electrochemical workstation (ALS, model 608E), and the light source was a compact xenon light source (Asahi Spectra, LAX-C100; 100 mW cm−2) equipped with an AM 1.5 filter and calibrated by a silicon photodiode detector (Asahi Spectra, CS-30). In a typical test cell, the fabricated hematite photoanode was applied as the working electrode, a Pt wire was served as the counter electrode, and an Ag/AgCl electrode was used as the reference electrode. The electrolyte solution was 1.0 M NaOH with a pH value of ~13.6. The working area of the hematite electrodes was fixed at 0.49 cm2. The scan rate of the potential was 50 mV s−1. All the applied voltage has been converted into the potential vs. RHE via the Nernst equation (Supplementary Note). The gas evolved from the PEC system was analyzed by a gas chromatograph (Shimadzu, GC-8A) equipped with an MS-5A column and a thermal conductivity detector. A xenon light source (Asahi Spectra, MAX-303) coupled with a monochromator (JASCO, CT-10) was used to measure the incident photon to current conversion efficiency (IPCE) data. The Mott–Schottky plots were collected in the dark at a frequency of 10 kHz. The photoelectrochemical impedance spectroscopy (PEIS) under light irradiation were measured in the same electrolyte over a frequency range from 0.05 to 105 Hz at different applied potentials.

Time-resolved PL spectroscopy measurements

The PL properties of individual aggregated particles were recorded using a home-built confocal microscope system based on a Nikon Ti-E inverted fluorescence microscope in ambient air at room temperature. The dry samples deposited on the cleaned quartz cover glass were excited through an objective lens (Nikon, CFI Plan Apo λ 100 × H; numerical aperture 1.45) by a 405 nm pulsed-diode laser (Advanced Laser Diode System, PiL040X) with a pulse width of ~45 ps. Emitted photons were passed through a 100-μm pinhole and directed onto a single-photon avalanche diode (Micro Photon Devices, SPD-050). The obtained signals from the detector were then analyzed by a time-correlated single-photon counting module (Becker & Hickl, SP-130EM).

Data availability

All the relevant data are available from the authors upon request.


  1. 1.

    Fujishima, A. & Honda, K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238, 37–38 (1972).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Grätzel, M. Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature 414, 338–344 (2001).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lewis, N. S. Toward cost-effective solar energy use. Science 315, 798–801 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Blankenship, R. E. et al. Comparing photosynthetic and photovoltaic efficiencies and recognizing the potential for improvement. Science 332, 805–809 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Walter, M. G. et al. Solar water splitting cells. Chem. Rev. 110, 6446–6473 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kudo, A. & Miseki, Y. Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 253–278 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sivula, K., Formal, F. L. & Grätzel, M. Solar water splitting: progress using hematite (α-Fe2O3) photoelectrodes. ChemSusChem 4, 432–449 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Shen, S., Lindley, S. A., Chen, X. & Zhang, J. Z. Hematite heterostructures for photoelectrochemical water splitting: rational materials design and charge carrier dynamics. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 2744–2775 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fitzmorris, B. C. et al. Ultrafast transient absorption studies of hematite nanoparticles: the effect of particle shape on excitation dynamics. ChemSusChem 6, 1907–1914 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Joly, A. G. et al. Carrier dynamics in α-Fe2O3 (0001) thin films and single crystals probed by femtosecond transient absorption and reflectivity. J. Appl. Phys. 99, 053521 (2006).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wheeler, D. A., Wang, G., Ling, Y., Li, Y. & Zhang, J. Z. Nanostructured hematite: synthesis, characterization, charge carrier dynamics, and photoelectrochemical properties. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 6682–6702 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ling, Y. et al. Sn-doped hematite nanostructures for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nano Lett. 11, 2119–2125 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kment, S. et al. Photoanodes based on TiO2 and α-Fe2O3 for solar water splitting—superior role of 1D nanoarchitectures and of combined heterostructures. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 3716–3769 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tilley, S. D., Cornuz, M., Sivula, K. & Grätzel, M. Light-induced water splitting with hematite: improved nanostructure and iridium oxide catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 6405–6408 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Dotan, H. et al. Resonant light trapping in ultrathin films for water splitting. Nat. Mater. 12, 158–164 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Warren, S. C. et al. Identifying champion nanostructures for solar water-splitting. Nat. Mater. 12, 842–849 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Guo, X., Wang, L. & Tan, Y. Hematite nanorods Co-doped with Ru cations with different valence states as high performance photoanodes for water splitting. Nano Energy 16, 320–328 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jeon, T. H., Moon, G., Park, H. & Choi, W. Ultra-efficient and durable photoelectrochemical water oxidation using elaborately designed hematite nanorod arrays. Nano Energy 39, 211–218 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gonçalves, R. H., Lima, B. H. R. & Leite, E. R. Magnetic colloidal nanocrystals: a facile pathway to prepare mesoporous hematite thin films for photoelectrochemical water splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 6012–6019 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wang, C. W. et al. Engineered hematite mesoporous single crystals drive drastic enhancement in solar water splitting. Nano Lett. 16, 427–433 (2016).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tachikawa, T. & Majima, T. Metal oxide mesocrystals with tailored structures and properties for energy conversion and storage applications. NPG Asia Mater. 6, e100 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zhang, P., Tachikawa, T., Fujitsuka, M. & Majima, T. The development of functional mesocrystals for energy harvesting, storage, and conversion. Chem. Eur. J. 24, 6295–6307 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bian, Z., Tachikawa, T., Zhang, P., Fujitsuka, M. & Majima, T. A nanocomposite superstructure of metal oxides with effective charge transfer interface. Nat. Commun. 5, 3038 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Tachikawa, T., Zhang, P., Bian, Z. & Majima, T. Efficient charge separation and photooxidation on cobalt phosphate-loaded TiO2 mesocrystal superstructures. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 3381–3388 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhang, P., Tachikawa, T., Fujitsuka, M. & Majima, T. Efficient charge separation on 3D architectures of TiO2 mesocrystals packed with chemically exfoliated MoS2 shell in synergetic hydrogen evolution. Chem. Commun. 51, 7187–7190 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bian, Z., Tachikawa, T., Zhang, P., Fujitsuka, M. & Majima, T. Au/TiO2 superstructure-based plasmonic photocatalysts exhibiting efficient charge separation and unprecedented activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 458–465 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zhang, P., Tachikawa, T., Fujitsuka, M. & Majima, T. In situ fluorine doping of TiO2 superstructures for efficient visible-light driven hydrogen generation. ChemSusChem 9, 617–623 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zhang, P. et al. Topotactic epitaxy of SrTiO3 mesocrystal superstructures with anisotropic construction for efficient overall water splitting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 5299–5303 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wang, H. et al. Photocatalytic properties dependent on the interface defects of intergrains within TiO2 mesocrystals. Chem. Eur. J. 24, 17105–17116 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tang, P.-Y. et al. Synergistic effects in 3D honeycomb-like hematite nanoflakes/branched polypyrrole nanoleaves heterostructures as high-performance negative electrodes for asymmetric supercapacitors. Nano Energy 22, 189–201 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Yuan, Y. et al. High-yield synthesis and optical properties of g-C3N4. Nanoscale 7, 12343–12350 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    de la Mata, M. et al. Polarity assignment in ZnTe, GaAs, ZnO, and GaN-AIN nanowires from direct dumbbell analysis. Nano Lett. 12, 2579–2586 (2012).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Muto, S. & Shiga, M. Application of machine learning techniques to electron microscopic/spectroscopic image data analysis. Microscopy 69 (2020) in press.

  34. 34.

    Jitianu, A. et al. Influence of the silica based matrix on the formation of iron oxide nanoparticles in the Fe2O3-SiO2 system. obtained by sol-gel method. J. Mater. Chem. 12, 1401–1407 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Can, M. M., Coşkun, M. & Firat, T. A comparative study of nanosize iron oxide particles; magnetic (Fe3O4), maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) and hematite (α-Fe2O3), using ferromagnetic resonance. J. Alloy. Comp. 542, 241–247 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhou, Z. et al. Control of charge carriers trapping and relaxation in hematite by oxygen vacancy charge: ab initio non-adiabatic molecular dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 6707–6717 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Cao, D. et al. Cathodic shift of onset potential for water oxidation on a Ti4+ doped Fe2O3 photoanode by suppressing the back reaction. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 752–759 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zhong, D. K. et al. Photo-assisted electrodeposition of cobalt–phosphate (Co–Pi) catalyst on hematite photoanodes for solar water oxidation. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 1759–1764 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wang, Z. et al. Understanding the roles of oxygen vacancy in hematite-based photoelectrochemical process. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 1030–1034 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ovcharenko, R., Voloshina, E. & Sauer, J. Water adsorption and O-defect formation on Fe2O3(0001) surfaces. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 25560–25568 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hisatomi, T. et al. Enhancement in the performance of ultrathin hematite photoanode for water splitting by an oxide underlayer. Adv. Mater. 24, 2699–2702 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Tang, P.-Y. et al. Enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting of hematite multilayer nanowire photoanodes by tuning the surface state via bottom-up interfacial engineering. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 2124–2136 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Monllor-Satoca, D. et al. What do you do, titanium? Insight into the role of titanium oxide as a water oxidation promoter in hematite-based photoanodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 3242–3254 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Klahr, B. et al. Water oxidation at hematite photoanodes: the role of surface states. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 4294–4302 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Zandi, O. & Hamann, T. W. Determination of photoelectrochemical water oxidation intermediates on haematite electrode surfaces using operando infrared spectroscopy. Nat. Chem. 8, 778–783 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Steier, L. et al. Understanding the role of underlayers and overlayers in thin film hematite photoanodes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 7681–7688 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Klahr, B. Electrochemical and photoelectrochemical investigation of water oxidation with hematite electrodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 7626–7636 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Klahr, B. & Hamann, T. Water oxidation on hematite photoelectrodes: insight into the nature of surface states through in situ spectroelectrochemistry. J. Phys. Chem. C. 118, 10393–10399 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Zandi, O. & Hamann, T. W. Enhanced water splitting efficiency through selective surface state removal. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 1522–1526 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Gimenez, S. & Bisquert, J. Photoelectrochemical Solar Fuel Production-from Basic Principles to Advanced Devices. (Springer, Berlin, 2016).

  51. 51.

    Iandolo, B. & Hellman, A. The role of surface state in the oxygen evolution reaction on hematite. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 13404–13408 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    le Formal, F., Sivula, K. & Grätzel, M. The transient photocurrent and photovoltage behavior of a hematite photoanode under working conditions and the influence of surface treatments. J. Phys. Chem. C. 116, 26707–26720 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    le Formal, F. et al. Passivating surface states on water splitting hematite photoanodes with alumina overlayers. Chem. Sci. 2, 737–743 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Xiao, S. et al. Origin of different photoelectrochemical performance of mesoporous BiVO4 photoanodes between the BiVO4 and the FTO side illumination. J. Phys. Chem. C. 119, 23350–23357 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kay, A. et al. Wavelength dependent photocurrent of hematite photoanodes: reassessing the hole collection length. J. Phys. Chem. C. 121, 28287–28292 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Su, Z. et al. Ultrafast element and oxidation-state mapping of hematite by 4D electron microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 4916–4922 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    le Formal, F. et al. Rate law analysis of water oxidation on a hematite surface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 6629–6637 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Ohara, K. et al. Time-resolved pair distribution function analysis of disordered materials on beamlines BL04B2 and BL08W at SPring-8, J. Synchrotron Rad. 25, 1627−1633 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Prof. Yasuhiro Kobori (Kobe University) is acknowledged for EPR measurements. KANEKA CORPORATION is acknowledged for financial support. The X-ray total scattering measurements were carried out at SPring-8 under the proposal 2019A2058. This work was partially supported by Nagoya University microstructural characterization platform as a program of “Nanotechnology Platform” of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan, JST PRESTO Grant Number JPMJPR1316, JST A-STEP Grant Number AS3011905T, JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP18H01944, JP18H04517, and others. Zhujun Zhang thanks to the support from Marubun Research Promotion Foundation.

Author information




Z.Z. and T.T. designed the study, carried out most of the experiments and data analyses, and wrote the paper with input from all authors. I.K. carried out the TEM measurements. H.N. carried out the EPR measurements. S.M. carried out STEM-EELS and multivariate analyses. K.O. and K.S. carried out the synchrotron-based X-ray total scattering and pair distribution function (PDF) analyses.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Tachikawa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Pengyi Tang and other, anonymous, reviewers for their contributions to the peer review of this work. Peer review reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Karimata, I., Nagashima, H. et al. Interfacial oxygen vacancies yielding long-lived holes in hematite mesocrystal-based photoanodes. Nat Commun 10, 4832 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing