Abstract
A polar conductor, where inversion symmetry is broken, may exhibit directional propagation of itinerant electrons, i.e., the rightward and leftward currents differ from each other, when timereversal symmetry is also broken. This potential rectification effect was shown to be very weak due to the fact that the kinetic energy is much higher than the energies associated with symmetry breaking, producing weak perturbations. Here we demonstrate the appearance of giant nonreciprocal charge transport in the conductive oxide interface, LaAlO_{3}/SrTiO_{3}, where the electrons are confined to twodimensions with low Fermi energy. In addition, the Rashba spin–orbit interaction correlated with the subband hierarchy of this system enables a strongly tunable nonreciprocal response by applying a gate voltage. The observed behavior of directional response in LaAlO_{3}/SrTiO_{3} is associated with comparable energy scales among kinetic energy, spin–orbit interaction, and magnetic field, which inspires a promising route to enhance nonreciprocal response and its functionalities in spin orbitronics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
A twodimensional electron gas (2DEG) confined at the oxide interface, LaAlO_{3}/SrTiO_{3} (LAO/STO), has shown various interesting condensed matter phases and rich spinorbitronic functionalities associated with broken inversion symmetry^{1,2}. This noncentrosymmetric 2D conductor exhibits exotic superconductivity with an unconventional order parameter^{3,4,5,6,7}. The Rashbatype spin–orbit interaction due to inherent structural asymmetry ties spin and momentum of electrons in the band structure leading to coupled spin and charge transport^{8,9}. The strength of the Rashba interaction highly relies on the location of Fermi level as it stiffly increases near the Lifshitz transition, where degenerate multiple d orbitals mix together^{10,11,12}. Thus, applying gate bias can significantly modulate the strength of the Rashba spin–orbit interaction^{13,14,15,16,17}. This tunable Rashba interaction provides versatile spinorbitronic functionalities. The coupling and conversion between spin and charge transport lead to the alternative generation and detection of spin currents, which have been evidenced in various experimental approaches^{17,18,19,20,21,22}. The observed high efficiency of the spincharge conversion in this system has been attributed to robust spin–orbit interaction and longlived electronic states^{23}.
The inherent structural asymmetry in the conductive oxide interface (Fig. 1a) can induce further intriguing transport properties. The directional charge transports have been observed in the systems with broken inversion symmetry, as exemplified by the semiconductor p–n junction diodes^{24,25,26}. However, noncentrosymmetric systems do not necessarily exhibit directional responses as the timereversal symmetry imposes degeneracy between right and leftmover with opposite spins in an electronic band structure. Applying a magnetic field that breaks timereversal symmetry lifts this degeneracy by tilting the energy dispersion (Fig. 1b). Then, the secondorder correction to the electrical current due to both symmetrybreaking energies results in the directional charge transport^{26}. Rikken et al.^{24} provided a phenomenological description for the directional transport in the noncentrosymmetric system by generalizing Onsagar’s theorem as follows
where, R_{0}, I, and B represent the resistance at zero magnetic field, the electric current, and magnetic field, respectively. β is a coefficient of the normal magnetoresistance (MR) and γ is a coefficient tensor representing the magnitude of the nonreciprocal resistance. For a polar system, γ exhibits maximum magnitude when the polarization P, magnetic field B, and the current I are orthogonal to each other. Then, the nonreciprocal resistance can be written as
Several noncentrosymmetric systems were found to exhibit this magnetochiral anisotropy, such as Bi helix^{24}, Si FET^{27}, molecular conductor^{28}, and BiTeBr^{26}. The measured coefficient γ is typically very small with an order of 10^{−1} to 10^{−4} T^{−1} A^{−1}. This is because the energy scale of the spin–orbit interaction and the applied magnetic field are generally much smaller than the kinetic energy. Recently, it was reported that this nonlinear effect could be strongly enhanced when the system enters a superconducting state where the electron pairing energy could be strongly disturbed by symmetrybreaking energies^{29,30,31}. The nonreciprocal charge transport could be an alternative probe to assess the strength of the Rashba spin–orbit interaction^{26} and could also be utilized for the determination of surface spin textures^{32,33}. The directional charge transports have also been observed in various heavymetal/ferromagnet (HM/FM) bilayer systems^{34,35,36,37}. In these cases, the spin accumulation via either the spin Hall or the Edelstein effect in combination with spindependent scatterings at the interface was attributed to the origin of the observed unidirectional MRs. The observed ratios of resistance changes (ΔR/R) in HM/FM systems were typically much <1%. The studies of directional charge transports have been focused on metallic systems, where relatively high Fermi energy limits the perturbation from spin–orbit interaction and Zeeman energy. Achieving high magnitude of the directional charge transport and its tunability will be an important foundation toward twoterminal spinorbitronic devices.
In this study, we report giant nonreciprocal responses in the LAO/STO interface, an archetype of conductive oxide interfaces. The directional responses are measured with both the static and dynamic electrical field, respectively, which show consistent results with each other. In particular, the Rashba spin–orbit interaction in the LAO/STO interface enables us to tune the strength of the nonreciprocal charge transport by applying a gate voltage. Upon increasing a gate voltage, the ratio of resistance change between the rightward and leftward currents is increased up to 2.7%. The coefficient γ representing the strength of the magnetochiral anisotropy is measured to be as high as ~10^{2} T^{−1} A^{−1}, which is about three orders of magnitude higher than those estimated for typical noncentrosymmetric conductors. Moreover, the magnitude of the directional response exhibits additional higherorder magnetic field dependence. The observed behavior of giant directional response in this system is due to the fact that energies associated with the broken inversion symmetry and the broken timereversal symmetry are comparable to the Fermi energy, which opens an effective route to enhance nonreciprocal responses in polar materials.
Results
Nonreciprocal responses upon applying DC currents
Figure 1c displays a scanning electron microscopy image of the studied Hall bar device, which has a dimension of 15 μm channel width. All results displayed in the main text were measured from two devices (device A and device B), which have the same geometry as shown in Fig. 1c. The devices were fabricated on 5 × 5 mm (001) STO substrates. The LAO/STO samples used for our devices have 10 unit cells (4 nm) of LAO layers grown by the pulsed laser deposition (PLD). Fabrication of a Hall bar and contacts to the conducting interface was done following the method used in our previous study of the nonlocal spin diffusion^{19}. Details of sample growth and device fabrication were described in the Methods and Supplementary Fig. 1. Before the electrical characterization of the studied devices, we first confirmed electrical contacts to the conductive interface underneath the LAO barrier through I–V curves as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2. The temperature dependence of the channel resistance is displayed in Supplementary Fig. 3, which follows general metallic behavior of the LAO/STO interface^{1}. The temperature dependence of the mobility and the carrier concentration obtained by the Hall effect measurement are also displayed in Supplementary Fig. 4. The measured sheet resistance (R_{sq}) was ~426 Ω at 2 K. The sheet carrier density (n_{s}) was ~1.56 × 10^{13} cm^{−2} at 2 K. Based on the 2DEG, the Fermi energy can be obtained by ε_{F} = \(\frac{{{\hbar}^2}} {{2m^{\ast}}}\)(2πn_{s})^{2} ~ 18.7 meV (where m* ≈ 2m_{e})^{38,39}. We note that this value is within one order of magnitude of the spin splitting energy in LAO/STO. The estimated momentum scattering time and characteristic mean free path are \(\tau = \frac{{m^ {\ast} {\sigma} _{\mathrm{s}}}}{{n_{\mathrm{s}}{\mathrm{e}}^2}}\) ~ 1.07 ps and λ_{e} = v_{F}τ ~ 61.2 nm, respectively. Figure 1d displays R_{xx} measured for I_{x} = + 30 μA and I_{x} = − 30 μA at 8 K upon varying applied magnetic field B_{y}. Measurements were done with a magnetic field sweeping rate of 10 mT s^{−1}. Large negative MR upon increasing B_{y} was observed. This negative inplane MR in LAO/STO was attributed to the anisotropic deformation of the Fermi surface upon increasing Zeeman energy, which results in suppressed interband scattering and reduced sheet resistance^{40}. In particular, a significant difference between R_{xx}(+I_{x}) and R_{xx}(−I_{x}) was clearly observed, indicating the existence of the nonreciprocal charge transport in the LAO/STO interface. The measured ratio of resistance change, \(\frac{{\Delta R_{xx}}}{{R_{xx}}} = \frac{{\left( {R_{xx}\left( { + I_x,B_y} \right) \,  \, R_{xx}\left( {  I_x,B_y} \right)} \right)}}{{1/2 \cdot \left( {R_{xx}\left( { + I_x,B_y} \right) \, + \, R_{xx}\left( {  I_x,B_y} \right)} \right)}}\) is very large compared with those measured for other noncentrosymmetric conductors^{24,26,27,28}.
As the Rashba spin–orbit interaction in the LAO/STO conductive interface is gatecontrollable, a further tuning of the nonreciprocal response can be achieved by applying a backgate voltage V_{g}, as shown in Fig. 2a, b. The measurements were done with an applied current I_{x} = ±30 μA at T = 8 K. Figure 2a displays MR, defined as MR = (R_{xx}(B) − R_{xx}(B = 0))/R_{xx}(B = 0), measured at various applied gate voltages. For each applied gate voltage, MR was measured for both direction of currents +I_{x} and −I_{x}, while sweeping the applied magnetic field B_{y}. The ratio of resistance change ΔR_{xx}/R_{xx} in between +I_{x} and −I_{x} estimated at B_{y} = 8 T is plotted as a function of gate voltage in Fig. 2b. The strong asymmetric V_{g} dependence of the nonreciprocal response can be observed. The increase of the Rashba spin–orbit interaction and electron accumulation by raising V_{g} in the LAO/STO interface were known in previous reports^{10,11,12,13}. As a result of the subband hierarchy of the 2DEG along (001) STO (see the inset of Fig. 2b), the electrostatic modulation of orbital occupancy by applying V_{g} is anticipated to lead a significant variation of the spin–orbit interaction. At V_{g} < 0 V, only d_{xy} orbitals are populated. In contrast, as V_{g} increases to the regime of accumulation, d_{xz/yz} bands start to be filled, leading to the Lifshitz transition. Then, the spin–orbit interaction starts to increase significantly due to the mixing of multiple d orbitals. According to the literature by Joshua et al.^{10}, typical quantitative values of the carrier density for the Lifshitz transition were 1.68 ± 0.18 × 10^{13} cm^{−2}. This value corresponds to the Fermi energy of ~20.1 meV within the 2D free electron model. In our studied sample, the obtained value of n_{s} at V_{g} = 0 and 8 K is ~1.61 × 10^{13} cm^{−2} (for device B, Supplementary Fig. 4). This value is slightly less than the Lifshitz point. Thus, the Lifshitz transition could occur with increasing V_{g} across zero voltage. The gatetunable spin–orbit interaction can be also inferred from the crossover between weak localization and weak antilocalization behaviors at low temperature^{13,15,41,42}. The LAO/STO samples in this study also display the crossover between weak localization and weak antilocalization, depending on the applied gate voltage (Supplementary Fig. 5). Further analyses of outofplane magnetoconductance curves within a Maekawa–Fukuyama theory were discussed in Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Fig. 6, 7, and 8. Results showed that the strong enhancement of the Rashba spin–orbit interaction across the Lifshitz point (Supplementary Fig. 7a) is consistent with previous reports^{13}.
Although the nonreciprocal charge transport significantly depends on the gatetunable Rashba spin–orbit interaction, it also highly relies on the carrier concentration. Ideue et al.^{26} derived \(n_{\mathrm{s}}^{  3}\) dependence of the nonreciprocal response in a singleband 2D Rashba system by using the Boltzmann equation. The carrier concentration of the studied LAO/STO system exhibits a gradual increase with increasing V_{g} but its variation is very weak (Supplementary Fig. 7d). In contrast, the estimated Rashba spin splitting energy is significantly enhanced with increasing V_{g} (Supplementary Fig. 7a). Therefore, gatetuned Rashba interaction mainly accounts for the observed V_{g} dependence of the nonreciprocal response in this system. As shown in Fig. 2b, the observed nonreciprocal response is nearly negligible for V_{g} < 0 V, whereas it stiffly increases upon applying a positive V_{g}, consistent with the Lifshitz transition across zero gate voltage. Interestingly, the negative inplane MR also increases significantly with applying a positive V_{g} and can be collapsed into a single curve by rescaling of the magnetic field B → B/B^{*} (B^{*} is a densitydependent value)^{40} (see Supplementary Fig. 9). Mechanisms of the nonreciprocal charge transport and negative inplane MR could be highly correlated, because both effects depend on the anisotropic deformation of a Fermi surface.
The LAO/STO system presents a gigantic nonreciprocal response displaying ΔR_{xx}/R_{xx} up to 2.7%. The corresponding value of γ, which characterizes the magnitude of the nonreciprocal response is estimated to be γ ~ 10^{2} A^{−1} T^{−1}. This value is much higher than those observed in other polar conductors. For examples, γ ~ 10^{−3} A^{−1} T^{−1} for a Bi helix^{24}, γ ~ 10^{−2} A^{−1} T^{−1} for a chiral organic conductor^{28}, γ ~ 10^{−1} A^{−1} T^{−1} for a 2DEG in Si FET^{27}, and γ ~ 1 A^{−1} T^{−1} for a BiTeBr^{26}. If we convert the coefficient γ for a current density, then the magnitude of the normalized γ’ = γA (A = L_{y}L_{z} is the crosssectional area of the sample) becomes as high as ~1.17 × 10^{−11} A^{−1} T^{−1} m^{2} (thickness was assumed to be ~7 nm)^{43}. This value is higher than that observed in BiTeBr^{26} by more than one order of magnitude.
Figure 2c displays the temperature dependence of the nonreciprocal response. Measurements were done with an applied current of I_{x} = 30 μA at B_{y} = 8 T. The estimated nonreciprocal resistance ΔR_{xx}/R_{xx} showed the maximum value at around 8 K and nearly disappeared over 100 K. The temperaturedependent MR curves were also displayed in Supplementary Figs. 10 and 11. In general, the conductivity of the LAO/STO interface decreases below 10 K due to other quantum corrections, i.e., Kondo effect^{44} and weak localization^{13}. The LAO/STO samples in our study also displayed such quantum corrections to the diffusive transport at low temperature (see Supplementary Fig. 3b). These effects could be detrimental to the nonreciprocal response at very low temperature below 10 K. Another possible explanation is the slight decrease of a carrier concentration when the temperature is lowered below 10 K (see the inset of Supplementary Fig. 4b). The decrease of a carrier concentration away from the Lifshitz transition reduces the spin–orbit interaction, so does the nonreciprocal response.
Nonreciprocal responses upon applying AC currents
The nonreciprocal charge transport can be further clearly observed upon applying AC input current (\(I = I_0 \sin {\omega}{\mathrm{t}}\)) with the lockin technique. In LAO/STO, the polarization points outofplane. If the magnetic field is rotated in the xy plane with an angle θ between +x axis and the magnetic field, the nonreciprocal voltage from Eqs. (1) and (2) can be written as follows^{26},
By measuring outofphase components of the second harmonic, we can directly probe the nonreciprocal resistance as follows^{26},
We have investigated the fieldangle dependence of the nonreciprocal resistance in response to the dynamic electric field with the device B. Figure 3a illustrates angledependent AC measurement with the definition of the coordinates and rotation planes. The zero angles are at +x, +z, and +z, and the directions of rotations are x to y, z to y, and z to x for xy, zy, and zx rotations, respectively. The applied magnetic field was rotated in each orthogonal plane, while the secondharmonic resistance R^{2ω} was recorded for AC input current of I_{ac} = 200 μA. Figure 3b displays R^{2ω} as a function of the xy angle measured for the reversed magnetic field of B = +8 T and B = −8 T, respectively. R^{2ω} exhibited maximum magnitude at θ = 90° and 270° with reversed sign for opposite magnetic field. The results showed the relation of \(R^{2\omega }\left( {I,B} \right) =  R^{2\omega }(I,  B)\), demonstrating a unidirectional characteristic of MR, i.e., odd to the polarity of the magnetic field. The observed R^{2ω} signal is not associated with thermoelectric artifacts arising from the vertical temperature gradient (see Supplementary Fig. 12). Figure 3c displays R^{2ω} in response to the applied magnetic field of 8 T rotated in three orthogonal plans (xy, zy, zx). The magnitude of R^{2ω} relied on the y component of the applied magnetic field and became nearly negligible when the applied magnetic field was rotated along the zx plane. Here we note that the fieldangle dependence of R^{2ω} in the zy plane is different from that in the xy plane, which will be discussed later in detail. The observed R^{2ω} at fixed magnetic field direction also showed the dependence on the y component of the applied magnetic field (Supplementary Fig. 13). The firstharmonic R^{ω} exhibited conventional anisotropic behavior, i.e., a sinusoidal angular dependence with a period of 180° (see Supplementary Fig. 14). Thus, R^{ω} is invariant under the reversal of the magnetic field.
The gatedependent nonreciprocal response can also be observed by measuring R^{2ω}. Figure 4a displays R^{2ω} as a function of the xy angle measured with various applied gate voltages. This result is summarized in Fig. 4b, where the magnitude of the maximum R^{2ω} (at θ = 90°) is plotted as a function of V_{g}. Results display a strong asymmetric V_{g} dependence of ΔR^{2ω}, consistent with DC measurements shown in Fig. 2b. As the nonreciprocal response R^{2ω} is directly associated with the strength of the Rashba spin–orbit interaction, the sudden increase of R^{2ω} could be regarded as the signature of the Lifshitz transition in this LAO/STO system.
Ideue et al.^{26} derived the secondorder current \(\left( {J_x^{2{\mathrm{nd}}}} \right)\) responsible to the nonreciprocal charge transport using the Boltzmann equation, as follows
where E_{x} is the applied electric field and λ is the magnitude of the spin–orbit interaction. Both parameters a and b, which determine the strength of the nonreciprocal response, are functions of \({\cal{F}}\left(\frac{1}{{\varepsilon _{\mathrm{F}}  m\lambda ^{2}}}\right)\) (ε_{F} is Fermi energy and mλ^{2} is the Rashba splitting energy)^{26}. Thus, the relative strength of the Rashba spin–orbit interaction in comparison with the Fermi energy is a governing factor to produce the nonreciprocal charge transport. This is conceivable, as the nonreciprocal charge transport is in principle a perturbation effect by the spin–orbit interaction. The secondorder current in Eq. (5) is odd to the applied B_{y}, i.e., \(J_x^{2{\mathrm{nd}}}( {  B_y} ) =  J_x^{2{\mathrm{nd}}}(B_y)\). The electrical conductivity from the secondorder current also depends on the direction of the electric field and thus describes the nonreciprocal electric transport as σ^{2nd}(+I_{x}) = −σ^{2nd}(−I_{x}), which is linear to the applied E_{x}. Figure 4c shows R^{2ω} as a function of the xy angle measured with various applied currents. An excellent linear relationship between the maximum R^{2ω} and an applied current can be observed as shown in Fig. 4d. The ratio of resistance change ΔR_{xx}/R_{xx} in response to a DC current also displays a linear behavior as shown in Supplementary Fig. 15.
Figure 4e displays the angle dependence of R^{2ω} measured with varying applied magnetic field. The observed maximum R^{2ω} is plotted as a function of the applied magnetic field in Fig. 4f. The maximum R^{2ω} shows not only a linear dependence on B_{y} but also a significant higherorder dependence on B_{y} when the applied field was increased over several Tesla. The appearance of higherorder terms would be associated with a relative strength between B_{y} and λ. Following Eq. (5), higherorder dependence terms are negligible when B_{y} ≪ λ. In LAO/STO, the estimated mλ^{2} values were typically around ~3 meV in both theoretical^{45} and experimental^{13,17} studies. The corresponding Zeeman energy μ_{B}B_{y} is ~51.8 T (assuming g = 2). Thus, the nonreciprocal charge transport in LAO/STO may exhibit a higherorder dependence for applied magnetic fields over several Tesla. Applying a gate voltage, which tunes the Rashba spin–orbit interaction, significantly modifies the magnetic field dependence of R^{2ω} as shown in Supplementary Fig. 16. This nonlinear variation of the nonreciprocal resistance can also be observed in ΔR_{xx}/R_{xx} measured with a DC current (Supplementary Fig. 17). The higherorder dependence on the applied magnetic field also reflects on the different behavior of R^{2ω} in between xy and zyplane rotations (shown in Fig. 3c). When the magnetic field is rotated in the xy plane, the direction of the field is always orthogonal to the direction of the polarization. As \(\Delta R \propto I \cdot \left( {P \times B} \right)\), R^{2ω} displays sinusoidal behavior for the rotation of the magnetic field in the xy plane. On the other hand, when the field is rotated in the zy plane, the orthogonal component of the field to the direction of the polarization is not constant and varies as \(B \cdot \sin \theta\). As the ΔR has additional higherorder dependences on B at a high magnetic field regime, the variation of R^{2ω} becomes more significant at high fields, making a sharp increase of R^{2ω} near 90° and 270° in the zy plane (Fig. 3c). At a relatively low magnetic field, where ΔR is linear to B, R^{2ω} displays sinusoidal behavior for the rotation of the magnetic field in the zy plane (see Supplementary Fig. 18).
Discussion
We showed robust nonreciprocal charge transport in the inversion symmetrybroken LAO/STO conductive interface. The observed nonreciprocal response is highly tunable by applying gate voltages, as the Rashba spin–orbit interaction in the LAO/STO system varies according to the location of Fermi level. The observed value of γ was as high as ~10^{2} T^{−1} A^{−1}, which is the largest value reported for noncentrosymmetric conductors. The large magnitude of the nonreciprocal response is due to the fact that the Fermi energy in LAO/STO is relatively low (~18.7 meV, estimated value from the device B). Thus, the spin splitting energy (~3 meV) arising from broken inversion symmetry is comparable to the kinetic energy producing strong perturbations to the charge transport. We note that the reported nonreciprocal charge transport in strong Rashba interaction systems, such as BiTeBr (mλ^{2} ~ 75 meV), is much weaker than that observed in LAO/STO^{26}. Thus, the important factor that produces the large magnitude nonreciprocal charge transport is not just a strong Rashba spin–orbit interaction but the relative strength of the Rashba spin splitting energy to the Fermi energy. The reported strong spincharge conversion in LAO/STO^{17,18,19,20,21,22} could be also partly due to this aspect. In addition, the observed directional response in LAO/STO exhibits additional higherorder dependence on the applied magnetic field when the Zeeman energy is not ignorable compared with the Rashba spin splitting energy. In short, the overall behavior of the nonreciprocal charge transport in the LAO/STO interface can be attributed to the comparable energy scales among kinetic energy, spin splitting energy due to broken inversion symmetry, and Zeeman energy due to timereversal symmetry breaking. The observed behavior of the giant directional response in our study inspires a promising channel to enhanced nonreciprocal charge transport and confirms conductive oxide interfaces as outstanding 2DEG platforms for functional twoterminal devices in spin orbitronics.
Methods
Sample growth
The (001) STO singlecrystal substrates (5 × 5 mm) were etched by using buffered hydrofluoric acid and then were annealed at 1000 °C under an oxygen atmosphere to create the TiO_{2}terminated surface with the clean stepterrace structure. Epitaxial LAO films on TiO_{2}terminated STO surface were deposited by using a PLD with a KrF excimer laser (λ = 248 nm) under 1 mTorr O_{2} pressure. A KrF excimer laser beam was used for a PLD deposition with an energy density of 1.5 J cm^{−2} and a frequency of 2 Hz.
Device fabrication
The studied devices were fabricated by using both electron beam lithography and photolithography. Each device fabrication step is illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 1. Negative electron beam lithography was first used to create contact patterns. A thermally deposited Al layer (100 nm) was used as a buffer layer for reactive ion (RI) etching of the contact patterns. Then, Ti (10 nm)/Au (20 nm) layers were deposited to fill the openings of the contact patterns left by the etching, followed by the removal of the Al buffer layer. Positive photolithography was then used to pattern the eightcontact Hall bar geometry of the device. An Al buffer layer (100 nm) was used again for the second RI etching. Then, oxygen annealing was performed at 300 °C to anneal out oxygen vacancies created in the STO surface during the etching process. After removing the Al buffer layer, contact electrodes (Ti (5 nm)/Au (60 nm)) were deposited on top of the contact patterns using a shadow mask. The dimension of the studied Hall bar pattern has a width of w = 15 μm and a length of l = 40 μm (a distance between the two Hall probes).
Measurement
All electrical measurements were performed in a Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System with a horizontal sample rotator. Electrical contacts to Au pads and a backgate of the device were made with Ag paste using copper wires. The fourterminal ΔR_{xx} was measured using a Keithley 2636 sourcemeter and a Keithley 2182 nanovoltmeter. For AC measurements, the AC current of 10 Hz was supplied by a Keithley 6221 current source and both the first and secondharmonic signals of the AC voltage were measured by a SR830 DSP of Stanford Research Systems. The backgate voltage was applied by using the Keithley 2636. For V^{ω}, inphase components were recorded, whereas outofphase (−π/2) components were recorded for V^{2ω}. All R^{2ω} (or R^{ω}) signals shown in the main text and Supplementary Information are outofphase (or inphase) components of the lockin measurement.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Ohtomo, A. & Hwang, H. Y. A highmobility electron gas at the LaAlO_{3}/SrTiO_{3} heterointerface. Nature 427, 423–426 (2004).
Thiel, S., Hammerl, G., Schmehl, A., Schneider, C. W. & Mannhart, J. Tunable quasitwodimensional electron gases in oxide heterostructures. Science 313, 1942–1945 (2006).
Gor’kov, L. P. & Rashba, E. I. Superconducting 2D system with lifted spin degeneracy: mixed singletriplet state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037004 (2001).
Reyren, N. et al. Superconducting interfaces between insulating oxides. Science 317, 1196–1199 (2007).
Caviglia, A. D. et al. Electric field control of the LaAlO_{3}/SrTiO_{3} interface ground state. Nature 456, 624–627 (2008).
Li, L., Richter, C., Mannhart, J. & Ashoori, R. C. Coexistence of magnetic order and twodimensional superconductivity at LaAlO_{3}/SrTiO_{3} interfaces. Nat. Phys. 7, 762–766 (2011).
Bert, J. A. et al. Direct imaging of the coexistence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity at the LaAlO_{3}/SrTiO_{3} interface. Nat. Phys. 7, 767–771 (2011).
Bychkov, Y. A. & Rashba, E. I. Properties of a 2D electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy. JETP Lett. 39, 66–69 (1984).
Hwang, H. Y. et al. Emergent phenomena at oxide interfaces. Nat. Mater. 11, 103–113 (2012).
Joshua, A., Pecker, S., Ruhman, J., Altman, E. & Ilani, S. A universal critical density underlying the physics of electrons at the LaAlO_{3}/SrTiO_{3} interface. Nat. Commun. 3, 1129 (2012).
King, P. D. et al. Quasiparticle dynamics and spinorbital texture of the SrTiO_{3} twodimensional electron gas. Nat. Commun. 5, 3414 (2014).
Zhong, Z. C., Toth, A. & Held, K. Theory of spinorbit coupling at LaAlO_{3}/SrTiO_{3} interfaces and SrTiO_{3} surfaces. Phys. Rev. B 87(R), 161102 (2013).
Caviglia, A. D. et al. Tunable Rashba spinorbit interaction at oxide interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 126803 (2010).
Ben Shalom, M., Sachs, M., Rakhmilevitch, D., Palevski, A. & Dagan, Y. Tuning spinorbit coupling and superconductivity at the SrTiO_{3}/LaAlO_{3} interface: a magnetotransport study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 126802 (2010).
Fete, A., Gariglio, S., Caviglia, A. D., Triscone, J. M. & Gabay, M. Rashba induced magnetoconductance oscillations in the LaAlO_{3}SrTiO_{3} heterostructure. Phys. Rev. B 86(R), 201105 (2012).
Liang, H. X. et al. Nonmonotonically tunable Rashba spinorbit coupling by multipleband filling control in SrTiO_{3}based interfacial delectron gases. Phys. Rev. B 92, 075309 (2015).
Lesne, E. et al. Highly efficient and tunable spintocharge conversion through Rashba coupling at oxide interfaces. Nat. Mater. 15, 1261–1266 (2016).
Chauleau, J. Y. et al. Efficient spintocharge conversion in the 2D electron liquid at the LAO/STO interface. Europhys. Lett. 116, 17006 (2016).
Jin, M. J. et al. Nonlocal spin diffusion driven by giant spin Hall effect at oxide heterointerfaces. Nano Lett. 17, 36–43 (2017).
Ohshima, R. et al. Strong evidence for delectron spin transport at room temperature at a LaAlO_{3}/SrTiO_{3} interface. Nat. Mater. 16, 609–614 (2017).
Song, Q. et al. Observation of inverse Edelstein effect in Rashbasplit 2DEG between SrTiO_{3} and LaAlO_{3} at room temperature. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602312 (2017).
Wang, Y. et al. Roomtemperature giant chargetospin conversion at the SrTiO_{3}LaAlO_{3} oxide interface. Nano Lett. 17, 7659–7664 (2017).
Varignon, J., Vila, L., Barthelemy, A. & Bibes, M. A new spin for oxide interfaces. Nat. Phys. 14, 322–325 (2018).
Rikken, G. L. J. A., Strohm, C. & Wyder, P. Observation of magnetoelectric directional anisotropy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 133005 (2002).
Tokura, Y. & Nagaosa, N. Nonreciprocal responses from noncentrosymmetric quantum materials. Nat. Commun. 9, 3740 (2018).
Ideue, T. et al. Bulk rectification effect in a polar semiconductor. Nat. Phys. 13, 578–583 (2017).
Rikken, G. L. J. A. & Wyder, P. Magnetoelectric anisotropy in diffusive transport. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 016601 (2005).
Pop, F., AubanSenzier, P., Canadell, E., Rikken, G. L. J. A. & Avarvari, N. Electrical magnetochiral anisotropy in a bulk chiral molecular conductor. Nat. Commun. 5, 3757 (2014).
Wakatsuki, R. et al. Nonreciprocal charge transport in noncentrosymmetric superconductors. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602390 (2017).
Qin, F. et al. Superconductivity in a chiral nanotube. Nat. Commun. 8, 14465 (2017).
Lustikova, J. et al. Vortex rectenna powered by environmental fluctuations. Nat. Commun. 9, 4922 (2018).
He, P. et al. Bilinear magnetoelectric resistance as a probe of threedimensional spin texture in topological surface states. Nat. Phys. 14, 495–499 (2018).
He, P. et al. Observation of outofplane spin texture in a SrTiO_{3} (111) twodimensional electron gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 266802 (2018).
Avci, C. O. et al. Unidirectional spin Hall magnetoresistance in ferromagnet/normal metal bilayers. Nat. Phys. 11, 570–575 (2015).
Lv, Y. et al. Unidirectional spinHall and RashbaEdelstein magnetoresistance in topological insulatorferromagnet layer heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 9, 111 (2018).
Yasuda, K. et al. Large Unidirectional magnetoresistance in a magnetic topological insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 127202 (2016).
Olejnik, K., Novak, V., Wunderlich, J. & Jungwirth, T. Electrical detection of magnetization reversal without auxiliary magnets. Phys. Rev. B 91(R), 180402 (2015).
Ben Shalom, M., Ron, A., Palevski, A. & Dagan, Y. Shubnikovde Haas oscillations in SrTiO_{3}/LaAlO_{3} interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 206401 (2010).
Pai, Y. Y., TylanTyler, A., Irvin, P. & Levy, J. Physics of SrTiO_{3}based heterostructures and nanostructures: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 036503 (2018).
Diez, M. et al. Giant negative magnetoresistance driven by spinorbit coupling at the LaAlO_{3}/SrTiO_{3} interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 016803 (2015).
Stornaiuolo, D. et al. Weak localization and spinorbit interaction in sidegate field effect devices at theLaAlO_{3}/SrTiO_{3} interface. Phys. Rev. B 90, 235426 (2014).
Hurand, S. et al. Fieldeffect control of superconductivity and Rashba spinorbit coupling in topgated LaAlO_{3}/SrTiO_{3} devices. Sci. Rep. 5, 12751 (2015).
Basletic, M. et al. Mapping the spatial distribution of charge carriers in LaAlO_{3}/SrTiO_{3} heterostructures. Nat. Mater. 7, 621–625 (2008).
Brinkman, A. et al. Magnetic effects at the interface between nonmagnetic oxides. Nat. Mater. 6, 493–496 (2007).
Shanavas, K. V., Popovic, Z. S. & Satpathy, S. Theoretical model for Rashba spinorbit interaction in d electrons. Phys. Rev. B 90, 165108 (2014).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (2017R1A2B4008286, 2017M3A7B4049172, 2017R1A6A3A01012106, 2016R1D1A1B03933255, and 2018R1A5A6075964). This research was also supported by the Korea Institute of Science and Technology (2E28210 and 2E28190).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.C., M.J.J., and J.W.Y. designed the research. D.C. and M.J.J. worked on device fabrication, characterization, and analysis. J.J., I.O., and J.P. assisted device fabrication and characterization. S.I.K., H.J.C., and S.H.B. prepared LAO/STO samples. D.C., M.J.J., and J.W.Y. wrote the manuscript. H.W.L., S.M.H., H.J., H.C.K., B.C.M., and S.H.B. discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Toshiya Ideue and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Choe, D., Jin, MJ., Kim, SI. et al. Gatetunable giant nonreciprocal charge transport in noncentrosymmetric oxide interfaces. Nat Commun 10, 4510 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467019124661
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467019124661
This article is cited by

Lightinduced giant enhancement of nonreciprocal transport at KTaO3based interfaces
Nature Communications (2024)

Observation of giant nonreciprocal charge transport from quantum Hall states in a topological insulator
Nature Materials (2024)

Controlled large nonreciprocal charge transport in an intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4
Nature Communications (2022)

Defectgradientinduced Rashba effect in van der Waals PtSe2 layers
Nature Communications (2022)

Nonreciprocal charge transport up to room temperature in bulk Rashba semiconductor αGeTe
Nature Communications (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.