Infant gliomas have paradoxical clinical behavior compared to those in children and adults: low-grade tumors have a higher mortality rate, while high-grade tumors have a better outcome. However, we have little understanding of their biology and therefore cannot explain this behavior nor what constitutes optimal clinical management. Here we report a comprehensive genetic analysis of an international cohort of clinically annotated infant gliomas, revealing 3 clinical subgroups. Group 1 tumors arise in the cerebral hemispheres and harbor alterations in the receptor tyrosine kinases ALK, ROS1, NTRK and MET. These are typically single-events and confer an intermediate outcome. Groups 2 and 3 gliomas harbor RAS/MAPK pathway mutations and arise in the hemispheres and midline, respectively. Group 2 tumors have excellent long-term survival, while group 3 tumors progress rapidly and do not respond well to chemoradiation. We conclude that infant gliomas comprise 3 subgroups, justifying the need for specialized therapeutic strategies.
Gliomas are the most common primary central nervous system (CNS) neoplasm and result in the highest tumor-associated morbidity and mortality in children and adults1,2. Traditionally, gliomas are divided into low grade (LGG, WHO grades I–II) and high grade (HGG, WHO grades III–IV) based on their histological characteristics3. Molecularly, adult lower grade gliomas commonly harbor alterations in IDH1/2 in association with TP53 and ATRX mutations or TERT mutations and 1p/19q co-deletions4. In comparison, most childhood LGG are driven by RAS/MAPK activation—predominantly in the form of fusions or mutations involving the BRAF gene—and rarely undergo malignant transformation5,6,7. In contrast, adult LGG rarely contain RAS/MAPK alterations8 and invariably transform to HGG over time9. Pediatric HGG are usually not the result of transformation from LGG and, in contrast to adult HGG, most commonly harbor recurrent mutations in the genes encoding histone H3.3 and H3.110,11.
In contrast to the abundance of genetic and clinical information now available for pediatric glioma, far less is known about the infant demographic (under 1 year of age), despite the incidence of CNS tumors being highest in this group1. Although steady improvements in the overall outcome of childhood cancer have been observed globally, infants with brain tumors remain at high risk for early death after diagnosis, are less likely to be enrolled in clinical trials and are critically under-studied12. Further, the association between tumor grade and outcome is less predictable in infants; infant LGG (iLGG) show a more aggressive course13,14,15, while infant HGG (iHGG) have a better outcome16,17 when compared with older children and adolescents. As such, the classic treatment approaches for pediatric LGG (low dose chemotherapy) and HGG (surgery, radiation and alkylator-based chemotherapy) are often either ineffective or excessive, respectively. Therefore, clinicians caring for infants with gliomas are faced with the challenging task of treating an exceptionally vulnerable population of patients where the best treatment options remain ambiguous and data are scarce.
To address the lack of knowledge regarding the genetic underpinnings of infant gliomas, we assemble a multi-institutional, international collaborative taskforce to comprehensively characterize a large, clinically well-annotated cohort with follow-up data spanning three decades. We find that infant gliomas comprise three main subgroups: (1) hemispheric receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-driven tumors, including ALK, ROS1, NTRK, and MET fusions, which are enriched for HGG and have an intermediate clinical outcome, (2) hemispheric RAS/MAPK-driven tumors, which show excellent long-term survival with minimal clinical intervention post-surgery, and (3) midline RAS/MAPK-driven tumors, which are enriched for LGG with BRAF alterations and have a relatively poor outcome even after conventional chemotherapeutic approaches. Together the clinical and molecular features of each subgroup indicate age-specific mechanisms underlying tumor initiation. This suggests that updated clinical approaches are required to modernize treatment and improve the outcome of these infants.
Infantile gliomas have paradoxical survival profiles
We assembled a multi-institutional infant cohort consisting of 171 samples from 150 patients diagnosed between 1986 and 2017. Histological review confirmed the diagnosis in 142/150 (94.7%) patients, of which 104 (73.2%) and 33 (23.2%) were LGG or HGG, respectively. Five cases (3.5%) displayed intermixed LGG and HGG features (Supplementary Fig. 1a, Supplementary Table 1). Young children with LGG have a worse survival when compared with older children13,18,19 and to clarify whether this effect can be ascribed to the demographic <1 year of age, we compared the survival of our cohort with a cohort of older children (1–18 years, SickKids LGG cohort). iLGG had a significantly worse overall survival (OS) than pediatric LGG (pLGG) (10-year OS of 71.4% (60.8–83.3%) versus 91.6% (88.5–94.8) for iLGG vs pLGG, respectively; p < 0.001, log-rank test Supplementary Fig. 1b). In contrast, reports have suggested better survival of iHGG as compared with older children16. iHGG showed a significantly better overall survival as compared with children diagnosed between the ages of 1–18 years (SickKids HGG cohort, pHGG) with a 5-year OS of 54.5% (40.0–74.2%), vs 6.6% (2.4–18.5%), respectively (p < 0.001, log rank test, Supplementary Fig. 1c).
Molecular features of infantile glioma
For 118/142 (83.1%) patients, sufficient tumor tissue was available for molecular characterization. We utilized a tiered molecular profiling approach combining targeted single nucleotide variant (SNV) and fusion profiling, copy number arrays and transcriptome-wide discovery strategies suitable for archival samples (Fig. 1a). RAS/MAPK activating alterations were the most common events (56/118, 47.5%) and primarily consisted of KIAA1549-BRAF fusions (28/118, 23.7%) and BRAFV600E mutations (21/118, 17.8%) (Fig. 1b). Additional RAS/MAPK pathway alterations, such as FGFR1 fusions (FGFR1-TACC1, n = 3), FGFR1-tyrosine kinase duplications ((TKD), n = 2), RAF1 fusion (PML-RAF1, n = 1), and MYBL1 gain (n = 1) were also observed. Interestingly, RAS/MAPK activating events were exclusively seen in LGG and accounted for 73.6% (39/53) of alterations present in midline gliomas versus only 26.1% (17/65) of hemispheric gliomas (Fig. 1b, c). The second most common group of molecular events involved alterations in the RTK oncogenes ALK, ROS1, NTRK, or MET (30/118, 25.4%) (Fig. 1b). These events were almost exclusively observed in hemispheric tumors (29/30, 96.7%) and HGG (25/30, 83.3%) (Fig. 1b, c). ALK, ROS1, and NTRK1/2/3 alterations led to the fusion of different 5′ binding partners with the 3′ end of the truncated RTK containing the tyrosine kinase domain (Fig. 2a). Interestingly, PPP1CB-ALK fusions were detected in a region of chromothripsis on chromosome 2p (Fig. 2b) and the two most common RTK fusions—PPP1CB-ALK and CCDC88A-ALK—were found in both LGG and HGG (Fig. 2c, d; Supplementary Fig. 2). In contrast, NTRK1/2/3 and MET fusions were exclusively seen in HGG (Fig. 2e, f). No IDH1R132H, H3K27M or H3G34R mutations were detected in this cohort.
Activating ALK fusions are susceptible to targeted agents
Truncation of the extracellular ligand-binding domain with retention of the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain in the RTK-fusions identified suggests these are activating events (Fig. 2a). CCDC88A-ALK expressing immortalized normal human astrocytes (iNHA) (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b) showed increased proliferation in vitro (p = 0.002, student’s t-test, Fig. 3a) and ERK1/2 activation (Fig. 3b). Cell viability was reduced in a dose-dependent manner when treated with ALK-inhibitors currently in pediatric clinical trials (Fig. 3c). iNHAs overexpressing CCDC88A-ALK or PPP1CB-ALK were tumorigenic in vivo with 100% penetrance (Fig. 3d, e), forming glial tumors with a high MIB-1 proliferative index, pseudopalisading necrosis, focal GFAP expression, lack of synaptophysin expression and ALK overexpression (Supplementary Fig. 3c, d).
Infantile gliomas comprise three subgroups
Analysis of the clinical features associated with each class of molecular alterations suggested that infant gliomas represent three distinct clinical/molecular groups: (1) Hemispheric, RTK-driven, (2) Hemispheric, RAS/MAPK-driven, and (3) Midline, RAS/MAPK-driven (Table 1).
Group 1: hemispheric RTK-driven
Group 1 tumors harbor ALK/ROS1/NTRK/MET alterations (Figs. 1b, c; 2a), and are enriched for HGG (82.8%, 24/29, p < 0.0001, Fisher exact test, Fig. 4a), specifically glioblastomas (15/29), and younger infants (Table 1, median age at diagnosis 2.8 months, range 0–12 months) (examples of congenital tumors in Fig. 2c–e). All LGG within this group harbored ALK alterations (17.2%, 5/29) while all ROS1/NTRK/MET alterations appeared exclusively in HGG (Figs. 2c–e, 4a). The survival of ALK, ROS1, and NTRK driven tumors was heterogeneous (Fig. 4b, c). Five-year OS was 53.8, 25.0, and 42.9% for ALK, ROS1, and NTRK fused tumors respectively, although the numbers in each group were small (12, 8, 7, respectively). Interestingly, when compared with ALK-driven HGG, low-grade ALK gliomas tended to be diagnosed at an older age (median = 5.0 versus 1.6 months) and showed a better clinical outcome; all patients with ALK-fused LGG (n = 5) were alive at a median follow-up of 5 years (range, 1.4–7.2 years), whereas 42.9% (3/7) patients with ALK-fused HGG were deceased at a median follow-up of 3 years (range 0.01–8.55 years). Interestingly, in two patients with NTRK-fused HGG that underwent a second resection post-chemotherapy, tumor from the second resection had lower grade histology, suggesting that Group 1 tumors may comprise an LGG/HGG continuum and/or have the potential to differentiate and slow their growth over time (Fig. 4d).
Group 2: hemispheric RAS/MAPK-driven
Group 2 tumors are comprised solely of hemispheric LGG and represent 26.1% (17/65) of hemispheric gliomas in infants. Group 2 tumors more frequently had non-BRAF RAS/MAPK activating events when compared with Group 3 tumors (35.3% vs 2.6%, respectively) (Figs. 4a, 5b). Group 2 tumors have the best outcome of the three subgroups with 10-year OS of 93.3% (81.5–100%) (Fig. 4b), were more readily resected (52.9%, 9/17 gross-total resection (GTR)) versus midline (7.7%, 3/39), and were less likely to require a second line of treatment (0% and 23.5% received radiation or chemotherapy, respectively) (Table 1).
Group 3: midline RAS/MAPK-driven
Three quarters (39/53) of all midline infantile gliomas were RAS/MAPK driven, 97.4% of which (38/39) harbored canonical BRAF alterations. Group 3 infantile gliomas were histologically LGG, primarily consisting of pilocytic astrocytoma (69.2%, 27/39, Table 1). Survival of infant patients with Group 3 tumors was significantly worse with 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 23.4% (12.9–42.5%) compared with 55.6% (38.5–80.3%) for infants with other LGGs (non-midline) (p = 0.01030, log-rank test, Fig. 5a). Group 3 tumors consisted primarily of optic pathway hypothalamic glioma (OPHG) (31/39, 79.5%) and RAS/MAPK-activation was almost exclusively due to BRAF alterations (Fig. 5b). Importantly, despite half of all OPHGs in this study being driven by BRAFV600E, no non-OPHG group 3 tumors harbored this mutation (Fig. 5b). No difference in survival was observed between BRAF alterations in Group 3 tumors (Fig. 5c). When compared with OPHG in older patients, infants with OPHG had a poorer outcome with 10-year OS of 57.7% (42.8–77.9%) compared with 87.1% (76.8–98.7%) in infant vs SickKids OPHG 1–18 y cohort, respectively (p < 0.001, log-rank test, Fig. 5d). Age at diagnosis (infant vs. non-infant) was the only significant predictor of OS both on univariate (HR = 12.839, p = 0.001) and in a multivariate analysis that included sex, extent of resection, BRAF fusion and BRAFV600E status, chemotherapy and radiation (HR = 27.084, p = 0.001, Supplementary Table 2). The 5-year OS was 75.1% (56.6–99.7%) for infant BRAF-fused OPHG and 72.5% (49.5–100%) for infant BRAFV600E OPHG (Fig. 5e, f). This is in stark contrast to older children where long-term survival of patients with BRAF-fused OPHG is excellent (5-year OS 100%, p = 0.00114, log-rank test, Fig. 5e). A similar trend was seen in BRAFV600E OPHG compared between infants and older children, albeit not statistically significant (p = 0.1410, log-rank test, Fig. 5f). Interestingly, despite the striking differences in outcome, infant and pediatric gliomas clustered more according to location rather than molecular alteration or outcome on methylation analysis (Supplementary Fig. 4).
In this study we comprehensively characterize the landscape of genetic drivers and their clinical impact, revealing 3 subgroups of infant glioma (Fig. 6). Group 1 tumors are enriched for ALK/ROS1/NTRK/MET fusions, alterations analogous to those detected in adult carcinomas such as non-small cell lung cancer20,21 and colorectal cancer22. Despite similar conservation of the tyrosine kinase domain and region of breakpoints, for most cases the binding partners identified in infant gliomas differ from those in other malignancies. Interestingly, ETV6-NTRK3 can also be detected in other congenital tumors (congenital mesoblastic nephroma and congenital fibrosarcoma), suggesting a common age-specific mechanism. With the exception of NTRK fusions, which were previously shown to be enriched in non-brainstem infant HGG23, these alterations have been rarely reported in gliomas and this study provides a comprehensive explanation for the isolated case reports of ALK24,25 and ROS126 fusions in pediatric glial tumors. Indeed, these alterations are recurrent and define, together with NTRK, Group 1 hemispheric infant gliomas. Examination of the clinical data in these cases reveals several interesting facts: (1) their overall survival is good compared with that of older children with HGG and if they survive past two years, almost none progress further; (2) cases where a second surgery was done post-chemotherapy show differentiation and decreased proliferation of the tumor; and (3) cases with LGG histology tend to occur in older infants. Taken together, these observations suggest the capacity for differentiation over time in Group 1 tumors, perhaps, as in other pediatric gliomas, through oncogene induced senescence27,28,29,30. Alternatively, as seen in neuroblastoma, a common infant tumor that harbors ALK alterations, inherent maturation (also a part of normal development) may explain the morphological and clinical “maturation” of some iHGG into iLGG31,32,33. This has important implications for our therapeutic approach as it suggests that if we can use non-morbid treatment options, which may include targeted kinase inhibitors, to get them through the rapid growth phase of their tumor, their long-term outlook may be positive. Since infantile gliomas are mostly single-driver tumors, unlike adult lung and colorectal cancers, they are particularly suitable for precision-medicine treatment approaches. Several ALK inhibitors have either already shown efficacy or are in clinical trials for ALK-driven tumors in children, including Crizotinib34 and Ceritinib, and the newer generation inhibitors with enhanced blood-brain barrier penetration Lorlatinib and Ensartinib. The NTRK inhibitor Larotrectinib has also shown antitumor activity in pediatric patients with NRTK-fused tumors regardless of age or histology35,36,37. For example, in the NAVIGATE Phase 2 trial, Larotrectinib treatment resulted in a significant decrease in tumor volume in a 35-year-old woman with glioblastoma38. In the STARTRK1 trial, Drilon et al.39 report a pontine astrocytoma harboring an NTRK fusion that showed tumor volume reduction upon treatment with Entrectinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor known to target NTRK, ALK and ROS1. These encouraging results have led to a current phase I/Ib study being conducted in pediatrics to evaluate Entrectinib in primary CNS tumors (NCT02650401), which includes NTRK, ROS1, and ALK fused tumors. Results thus far are promising40.
Group 2 hemispheric RAS/MAPK tumors have an excellent long-term survival and often require only surgery, suggesting that a safe resection and a careful “watch and wait” postsurgical strategy is appropriate for these patients. Group 3 represents midline LGG enriched for RAS/MAPK alterations. The lack of HGG histology, such as that observed in the pons or thalami of older children, and the lack of histone mutations in this age group suggest distinct tumor- and/or host-related factors underlying tumor development. In older children, BRAF fused-tumors tend to have favorable outcome5,41,42 and a good response to conventional therapy. Strikingly, most Group 3 tumors, especially OPHG, progressed regardless of BRAF fusion or mutation status. The poor outcome of BRAF-fused midline tumors in infants is surprising and in stark contrast to the biological behavior of similar tumors in older children. This disparity may be related to age-specific genetic, tumor or microenvironment factors that are, at this point, poorly understood. As such, there is little or no room for “watch and wait” and a biopsy should be performed upfront to ascertain BRAF status and systemic therapy initiated readily thereafter. Given the multiple progressions typically observed with conventional chemotherapy and the encouraging results of targeted BRAF/MEK inhibitors in pLGG43,44, these patients should be prioritized for targeted therapies early after initial diagnosis.
Whereas future studies will certainly further characterize infant gliomas, our study broadens our understanding of cancers early in life and emphasizes the need for age-specific diagnostic and treatment guidelines. Our data have immediate therapeutic implications and provide a rationale for early molecular pathology consultation, prospective collection of clinical information and inclusion of infants in upfront clinical trials with targeted inhibitors.
Tumor specimens and clinical information were collected with informed or waived consent in accordance to protocols approved by the Research Ethics Board at the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, ON.) and each of the respective participating institutions. For patients diagnosed at the Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids) and older than 18 years at the time of clinical data collection, survival information was extracted from the Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario Network Information System (POGONIS)45. A central pathology review was completed to ascertain tumor content and confirm the diagnosis of the specimen where applicable. As only selected slides were available for central review from participating institutions, histological grading rendered at the original institution was used.
Nucleic acid extraction
DNA was extracted from 3–5 10 µm thick scrolls obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue either shaved from the original block or scraped from unstained slides. The extraction was completed with the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). If available, 10–20 mg of fresh frozen tissue rather than FFPE was used for extraction with the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). DNA was quantified with the Qubit Fluorometer V2.0 using the dsDNA Broad Range Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). All assay kits and quantification methods were used according to the manufacturer’s guidelines.
RNA was extracted from 3 to 5 10 µm thick scrolls obtained from FFPE either shaved from the original block or scraped from unstained slides. Extraction was completed using the ExpressArt FFPE Clear RNA extraction kit (Amsbio, Cambridge, MA). If available, 10–20 mg of fresh frozen tissue rather than FFPE was used for extraction using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RNA was quantified with the Qubit Fluorometer V2.0 using the RNA Broad Range Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). All assay kits and quantification methods were used according to the manufacturer’s guidelines.
Droplet digital PCR
Droplet digital PCR was conducted according to manufacturer guidelines. Samples consisted of 1X ddPCR Supermix for probes (no dUTP) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), 900 nM of HPLC-purified forward and reverse primers, 250 nM of target-specific mutant and wild type locked-nucleic acid (LNA) probes, and 10–20 ng of genomic DNA in 20 µl of total volume. Each reaction was mixed with 70 μl of Droplet Generation Oil (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and partitioned into a minimum of 10,000 droplets (range 10,000–15,000) on the QX200 droplet generator (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). 40 μl of the resultant droplets were transferred to a 96-well plate and sealed prior to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. PCRs were performed on a T1000 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and cycling conditions were as follows unless otherwise specified: 95 °C for 10 min, 39 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s and 55 °C for 60 s (with a 2 °C s−1 ramp rate), 98 °C for 10 min, and held at 4 °C. Following amplification, fluorescent intensity was measured with the QX200 Droplet Reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and data analysis performed with the QuantaSoft droplet reader software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Positive and negative droplet populations were detected on two-dimensional graphs and the absolute transcript levels were computed as a percent of the total gene copy. All samples were run in duplicate to ensure validity. Samples were considered positive if a minimum 1% mutant allele frequency was detected in both duplicate runs and a minimum threshold of 50 total droplets containing fluorescent signal were detected. The following assay IDs were used (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA):
PrimePCR ddPCR mutation assay BRAF WT/V600E for p.V600E, Human (unique assay ID: dHsaCP2000027/28).
PrimePCR ddPCR mutation assay H3F3A WT/K28M for p.K28M, Human (unique assay ID: dHsaCP2500510/11).
PrimePCR ddPCR mutation assay H3F3A WT/G35R for p.G35R, Human (unique assay ID: dHsaMDS720957813).
Prime PCR ddPCR copy number assay CDKN2A, Human unique assay ID: dHsaCP1000581) and reference prime PCR ddPCR copy number assay APB31 (unique assay ID: dHsaCP2500348). A known homozygous deleted cell line was used as a zero-copy control, whereas an Ontario Population Genomics Platform healthy control sample (ID: 85751) obtained from The Center of Applied Genomics at SickKids was used as a two-copy control. Samples that showed < 1.2 copy number value as calculated from the total target and reference event number were considered deleted.
FGFR1 TKD is a custom assay design46, primers and probes were designed by Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) as follows: FGFR1 Exon 8 Forward: 5′-TTCCCTTGCTCTGCGTCTCT-3′, FGFR1 Exon 8 Reverse: 5′-TCCATCTCTTTGTCGGTGGTATT-3′, FGFR1 Exon 8 HEX-probe: 5′ HEX-TTGCTTCCGTTGTCTCTTCTAGACTGCTGG-3′, FGFR1 Exon 16 Forward: 5′-CACTGCCCTGGGTAGAGGATT-3′, FGFR1 Exon 16 Reverse: 5′-ACAGGAGCACCCCGAAAGA-3′, and FGFR1 Exon 16 FAM-probe: 5′ FAM-CTCTAACACCCTGTGGCTCTCCGCC-3′. PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 10 min, 39 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s and 55 °C for 60 s (with a 2 °C s−1 ramp rate), 98 °C for 10 min, and a 15 °C hold. A ratio value of 1.125 for exon 16 relative to exon 8 were called duplicated.
Panel 1: Samples were tested for fusion gene expression with the NanoString nCounter (NanoString, Seattle, WA) Low Grade Glioma Panel 147. In all, 200–500 ng of RNA was mixed with panel specific CodeSet (Low Grade Glioma Panel 1) and allowed to hybridize overnight for 20 h. CodeSet/RNA complexes were then purified and immobilized onto the nCounter cartridge system (NanoString, Seattle, WA). The nCounter cartridge was then scanned at 555 fields of view on the nCounter Digital Analyzer (NanoString, Seattle, WA) to identify the unique fluorescent signatures (barcode) associated with each CodeSet probe. The barcodes are counted and background adjusted with a Poisson correction based on the negative control spikes included in each run. This was followed by a technical normalization using the four housekeeping transcripts included in each run (ABCF1, ALAS1, CLTC, and HPRT1). Data is viewed using a box plot and the extreme statistical outlier (3X the interquartile range (IQR)) method was used to detect the presence of an expressed fusion.
Panel 2: To account for an evolving knowledge of fusions described in gliomas, a second NanoString fusion panel was designed. The fusion targets included on this panel are listed in Supplementary Table 3. In addition to fusion targets, three reporter targeting systems were also included targeting ALK, ROS1, and NTRK2. These reporter systems work by adding multiple sequence tags prior to and after the exons of well-defined breakpoint hotspots. In the event of a breakpoint, the reads from the nCounter appear significantly different between adjacent sequence tags, allowing for the identification of a likely fusion event with an unknown partner. Samples were tested for fusion gene expression with the NanoString nCounter Low Grade Glioma Panel 2 as described above. CodeSet probe sequences for Panel 1 and 2 are proprietary, but available from NanoString Technologies (Seattle, WA) and the Hospital for Sick Children upon request.
Fluorescent in situ hybridization
Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was performed on formalin fixed paraffin embedded 4-μm tumor sections using a dual color breakapart probe for the ALK gene (Empire Genomics, Buffalo, NY). Slides were baked overnight to fix the section to the slide and were pretreated by using a paraffin pretreatment kit (Abbott, Chicago, IL). Sections were dehydrated before slide/probe co-denaturation on thermobrite (Intermedico, Markham, ON). Denaturation conditions used for paraffin-embedded slides/probes were as follows:
83 °C for 7 min
37 °C overnight
Slides were washed in 0.4x Saline-sodium citrate(SSC)/0.3% NP-40 at 65 °C for 30 s, followed by 2x SSC/0.1% NP-40 at room temperature for 30s. Slides were counterstained with DAPI. Nuclei were analyzed by using an Axioplan2 epifluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Images were captured by an Axiocam MRm Camera (Imaging Associates, Bicester, United Kingdom) and analyzed by using an imaging system with Isis Software (Version 5.1.110; MetaSystems, Boston, MA).
Copy number analysis
The OncoScan FFPE Assay Kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to assess copy number and loss of heterozygosity events in selected samples that remained uncharacterized by the targeted methods described above. Samples for this assay were sent to the Genome Quebec Innovation Centre for completion of the analysis. The OncoScan FFPE Assay Kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used according to manufacturer’s specifications and sample preparation, including digestion, labelling, quality checks, hybridization, and scanning was performed at the Genome Quebec Innovation Centre. Data was analyzed using the Chromosome Analysis Suite (ChAS) (ThermoFisher Scientific, CA, USA) and copy number calls based on normalized data.
Targeted RNA sequencing
TruSight Sequencing Panel: Samples with sufficient RNA for sequencing had their total RNA constructed into RNA-sequencing libraries using the Illumina TruSight RNA Pan-Cancer Panel Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA), following the manufacturer’s guidelines. cDNA generation was completed by random priming during first and second strand synthesis, followed by 3′ end adenylation. Sequencing adapters were then ligated to the fragments to allow for amplification of the cDNA followed by a validation step to ensure proper adapter ligation. Samples were then hybridized to specific target probes used to enrich for cancer-associated genes outlined in the manufacturer’s documentation. Paired-end RNA-sequencing was performed using the NextSeq 550 (Illumina, San Diego, CA), sequencing platform. Raw sequencing data was converted to fastq files and analyzed using the BaseSpace application (Illumina, San Diego, CA) with RNA-Seq Alignment V.1.0.0. Variant calling was completed in BaseSpace using the Isaac Variant Caller48 while structural rearrangements were identified using Manta49 and TopHat50.
Samples with sufficient RNA quality and quantity were sent for whole transcriptome sequencing at The Center for Applied Genomics (Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON). Library preparation was completed using the TruSeq RNA Library Prep Kit v2 (Illumina, San Diego, CA) using the rRNA depletion kit RiboZero Gold (Illumina, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Paired-end sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. STAR51 was used to align the raw sequencing data to genome reference “Homo sapiens UCSC hg19”. Fusion events were called using four fusion callers: defuse52, tophat50, ericscript53, and fusionmap54.
DNA methylation analysis
Methylation profiling was completed at the microarray centre at the Centre for Applied Genomics at the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Canada). Bisulphite conversion was completed using the EZ DNA Methylation kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturerʼs guidelines. Genome-wide DNA methylation patterns were analyzed using the HumanMethylation450 BeadChip platform according to manufacturer specifications (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Raw data underwent quality control and pre-processing using the R package “minifi”55 and normalized using the R package “noob”56. Probes with a SNP at or near the CpG, plus those on the X and Y chromosomes were removed. t-SNE plots were completed using the R package “t-SNE”57. Raw.idat files are available at at the GEO wesbite under the ascension code GSE135017.
Generation of preclinical models
In vitro: immortalized (TERT/E6/E7) normal human astrocytes (iNHA) were a gift from Dr. Pieper58 and maintained in culture in DMEM supplemented with 10% Fetal Calf Serum and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin. FLAG-tagged DNA sequences for the gene fusions CCDC88A-ALK and PPP1CB-ALK were cloned into pLVX-IRES-mcherry by GenScript USA. Stable lines were generated by lentiviral transduction and mcherry-positive cells selected by FACS sorting (Supplementary Fig. 3). Proper integration was confirmed via PCR analysis using the following primer sequences: CCDC88A-ALK forward: 5′-TTGGCTGGGAACTGGAACAG-3′, CCDC88A-ALK reverse: 5′-CAGCAAAGCAGTAGTTGGGG-3′, PPP1CB-ALK forward: 5′-GATTGTCACCAGACCTGCA-3′, PPP1CB-ALK reverse: 5′-CGGAGCTTGCTCAGCTTGTA-3′ mCherry forward: 5′-CGAGGAGGATAACATGGCCATC-3′, mCherry reverse: 5′-CATCACGCGCTCCCACTTGAAG-3′, RPPH1 forward 5′-TGTCACTAGGCGGGAACACC-3′, and RPPH1 reverse: 5′-CTCCGCCCTATGGGAAAAAG-3′. Cell lines are available upon request.
In vivo: all in vivo studies were reviewed and accepted by the Animal Care Committee at The Centre for Phenogenomics (Toronto, ON), an affiliate of the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, ON). For the intracranial orthotopic in vivo model, 200,000 iNHA mcherry EV, CCDC88A-ALK or PPP1CB-ALK cells were injected in the brain hemispheres of age (8–10 weeks) and sex-matched NOD/scid/gamma (NSG) mice randomly assigned to either a control or experimental group. Animals were independently monitored by a third party and euthanized at humane endpoints when physiological signs of a brain tumor (hunched posture, scruffy appearance, weight loss, etc.) were detected or at 6 months post injection for the control group. CNS samples were collected at endpoint and evaluated histologically for tumors by The Centre for Phenogenomics (Toronto, ON.) histology core.
In vitro proliferation assay
Cells were seeded at 10,000 cells/well in a 96-well plate and allowed to adhere for 48 h. 20 µl of Alamar Blue (Thermo Fisher, CA., USA) was added to each well and the plates incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 4 h. The fluorescence intensity was measured using a Spectramax Gemini plate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) using an excitation wavelength of 530 nm and an emission wavelength of 580 nm. Analysis was completed by normalizing intensity values against wells containing media alone. Data was represented as the mean of each condition. No detectable batch effect was observed.
In vitro drug dose assay
Ceritinib (LDK-378) and Crizotinib (PF-02341066) were purchased from Selleckchem.com and prepared according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Drugs were diluted in DMSO to the defined concentrations. Cells were seeded at 5,000 cells/well in a 96-well plate and allowed to adhere for 24 h. After 24 h, the appropriate drug concentration was added to each well and the plates incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 48 h. The fluorescence intensity was measured using a Spectramax Gemini plate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) using an excitation wavelength of 530 nm and an emission wavelength of 580 nm. Analysis was completed by normalizing intensity values against wells containing media alone. Data was represented as mean of each condition. No detectable batch effect was observed.
ALK and FLAG immunostaining was performed using 10 μm-thick sections of the tumor samples post de-parafinization. Antigen retrieval was performed in a citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 5 min prior to peroxidase quenching with 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in PBS for 10 min. The sections were then washed in water and pre-blocked with a normal goat or horse serum for 1 h. Next, the tissue sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C in primary antibody:
1:50 anti-ALK rabbit monoclonal primary antibody, Clone D5F3, Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA).
1:50 anti- FLAG (Monoclonal anti-FLAG M2 antibody, F1804, Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
MIB-1, Synaptophysin and GFAP immunohistochemistry was performed on a Benchmark Ventana Machine (Tucson, AZ) using the Optiview detection kit (Tucson, AZ). CC1 was used for heat retrieval for 40 min. Tissue sections were incubated with primary antibody for thirty-six minutes:
RTU anti-MIB-1 (mouse monoclonal primary antibody, GA626, ready-to-use, Dako Omnis, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
RTU anti-Synaptophysin (mouse monoclonal primary antibody, GC202, ready-to-use, Dako Omnis, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
RTU anti-GFAP (rabbit polyclonal primary antibody, GA524, ready-to-use, Dako Omnis, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
After washing the sections with PBS, they were incubated with secondary antibodies (1:100) for 1 h. The Mouse on Mouse Polymer IHC kit (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was used via the manufacturer guidelines prior to image acquisition to mitigate cross-reactivity and improve sensitivity for antibodies raised in mice. Finally, the sections were developed with diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride substrate for 10 min, and counterstained with hematoxylin. Pictures were obtained using a Nikon E600 microscope (Nikon, Canada).
Total cellular proteins were extracted with 2X SDS lysis buffer containing 1 M tris (pH 7.4), 0.5 M EDTA, 10% SDS, and glycerol. The proteins were separated on a sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel (Novex WedgeWell 4–20% Tris-Glycine Gel, Invitrogen) electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), which were then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The nitrocellulose membranes were incubated with the appropriate primary antibodies suspended in 5% albumin blocking solution, followed by the secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. Antibody binding was detected with Pierce enhanced chemiluminescence reagent western blotting substrate (Thermo Scientific Rockford, USA). Antibodies used were 1:5000 ALK (3633), 1:1000 p-ERK1/2 (9101), 1:5000 Total ERK 42/44 (9102), and 1:10,000 tubulin (2144) purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). 1:5000 Anti-Flag (F1804) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
iNHA cells plated on coverslips were fixed with 4% PFA for 10 min and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton-X for 15 min. Coverslips were blocked (1% BSA, 2.5% Donkey serum, 0.05% Tween-20) for 1 h and probed overnight for FLAG (Sigma, F1804, 1:100) and ALK (Cell Signaling Technology, 3633, 1:200). FLAG and ALK antibodies were subsequently labelled with FITC and TRITC labelled antibodies and mounted (Vector Laboratories, Vectashield, H-1200). Images were acquired using Di8 spinning disk confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems) (40x objective lens) and Volocity software (Quorum Technologies).
Statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.5.0 and R Commander Version 2.4–4 with the plugins “Survival” (version 1.2–0), “KMggplot2” (version 0.2–5) and “Plot by Group” (version 0.1-0). PFS was defined as the time between diagnosis and tumor progression requiring a change in clinical management. OS was defined as the time from diagnosis until death or last follow up for the patients still alive. Estimations of survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test, p values below 0.05 were considered significant. 5 and 10 year survival is reported as a percentage with 95% confidence intervals. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed using SPSS v25 (IBM Corporation). This was done using a univariate or multivariate Cox proportional hazards model and significance testing (α = 0.05) based on the Wald test.
Uncropped and unedited gels and blots are contained within Supplementary File Source Data. Raw clinical features used for survival plots and prognostic analysis are also included in this file.
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
The targeted and whole transcriptome sequencing data sets have been deposited in the European-Genome-phenome Archive under accession code EGAS00001003714. The methylation data is available from the GEO website under the accession code GSE135017. All the other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article, its supplementary information files and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. A reporting summary for this article is available as a Supplementary Information file.
Ostrom, Q. T. et al. Alex’s lemonade stand foundation infant and childhood primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007–2011. Neuro-Oncology 16, x1–x36 (2015).
Ostrom, Q. T. et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2009–2013. Neuro-Oncology 18, v1–v75 (2016).
Louis, D. N. et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 131, 803–820 (2016).
Eckel-Passow, J. E. et al. Glioma groups based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT promoter mutations in tumors. New Engl. J. Med. 372, 2499–2508 (2015).
Lassaletta, A. et al. Therapeutic and prognostic implications of BRAF V600E in pediatric low-grade gliomas. J. Clin. Oncol. 35, 2934–2941 (2017).
Mistry, M. et al. BRAF mutation and CDKN2A deletion define a clinically distinct subgroup of childhood secondary high-grade glioma. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 1015–1022 (2015).
Jones, D. T. et al. Tandem duplication producing a novel oncogenic BRAF fusion gene defines the majority of pilocytic astrocytomas. Cancer Res. 68, 8673–8677 (2008).
Jones, C. et al. Pediatric high-grade glioma: biologically and clinically in need of new thinking. Neuro-Oncology 19, 153–161 (2017).
Wessels, P. H. et al. Supratentorial grade II astrocytoma: biological features and clinical course. Lancet Neurol. 2, 395–403 (2003).
Schwartzentruber, J. et al. Driver mutations in histone H3.3 and chromatin remodelling genes in paediatric glioblastoma. Nature 482, 226–231 (2012).
Wu, G. et al. Somatic histone H3 alterations in pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas and non-brainstem glioblastomas. Nat. Genet. 44, 251–253 (2012).
Green, A. L., Furutani, E., Ribeiro, K. B. & Rodriguez Galindo, C. Death within 1 month of diagnosis in childhood cancer: an analysis of risk factors and scope of the problem. J. Clin. Oncol. 35, 1320–1327 (2017).
Ater, J. L. et al. Randomized study of two chemotherapy regimens for treatment of low-grade glioma in young children: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 2641–2647 (2012).
Mirow, C. et al. Children <1 year show an inferior outcome when treated according to the traditional LGG treatment strategy: a report from the German multicenter trial HIT-LGG 1996 for children with low grade glioma (LGG). Pediatr. Blood Cancer 61, 457–463 (2014).
Gnekow, A. K. et al. A European randomised controlled trial of the addition of etoposide to standard vincristine and carboplatin induction as part of an 18-month treatment programme for childhood (</=16 years) low grade glioma - a final report. Eur. J. Cancer 81, 206–225 (2017).
Mackay, A. et al. Integrated molecular meta-analysis of 1,000 pediatric high-grade and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Cancer Cell 32, 520–537, e525 (2017).
Duffner, P. K. et al. Treatment of infants with malignant gliomas: the Pediatric Oncology Group experience. J. Neuro-Oncol. 28, 245–256 (1996).
Krishnatry, R. et al. Clinical and treatment factors determining long-term outcomes for adult survivors of childhood low-grade glioma: a population-based study. Cancer 122, 1261–1269 (2016).
Bandopadhayay, P. et al. Long-term outcome of 4,040 children diagnosed with pediatric low-grade gliomas: an analysis of the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Pediatr. Blood Cancer https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.24958 (2014).
Takeuchi, K. et al. RET, ROS1 and ALK fusions in lung cancer. Nat. Med. 18, 378–381 (2012).
Vaishnavi, A. et al. Oncogenic and drug-sensitive NTRK1 rearrangements in lung cancer. Nat. Med. 19, 1469–1472 (2013).
Pietrantonio, F. et al. ALK, ROS1, and NTRK rearrangements in metastatic colorectal cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 109, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx089 (2017).
Wu, G. et al. The genomic landscape of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma and pediatric non-brainstem high-grade glioma. Nat. Genet. 46, 444–450 (2014).
Olsen, T. K. et al. Fusion genes with ALK as recurrent partner in ependymoma-like gliomas: a new brain tumor entity? Neuro-Oncology 17, 1365–1373 (2015).
Aghajan, Y., Levy, M. L., Malicki, D. M. & Crawford, J. R. Novel PPP1CB-ALK fusion protein in a high-grade glioma of infancy. BMJ Case Rep. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2016-217189 (2016).
Kiehna, E. N. et al. Novel GOPC(FIG)-ROS1 fusion in a pediatric high-grade glioma survivor. J. Neurosurg. Pediatr. 20, 51–55 (2017).
Courtois-Cox, S. et al. A negative feedback signaling network underlies oncogene-induced senescence. Cancer Cell 10, 459–472 (2006).
Dankort, D. et al. A new mouse model to explore the initiation, progression, and therapy of BRAFV600E-induced lung tumors. Genes Dev. 21, 379–384 (2007).
Michaloglou, C. et al. BRAFE600-associated senescence-like cell cycle arrest of human naevi. Nature 436, 720–724 (2005).
Sarkisian, C. J. et al. Dose-dependent oncogene-induced senescence in vivo and its evasion during mammary tumorigenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 493–505 (2007).
Cozzi, D. A. et al. Long-term follow-up of the “wait and see” approach to localized perinatal adrenal neuroblastoma. World J. Surg. 37, 459–465 (2013).
Tanaka, M. et al. A prospective study of a long-term follow-up of an observation program for neuroblastoma detected by mass screening. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 54, 573–578 (2010).
Ambros, I. M. et al. Role of ploidy, chromosome 1p, and Schwann cells in the maturation of neuroblastoma. New Engl. J. Med. 334, 1505–1511 (1996).
Mosse, Y. P. et al. Safety and activity of crizotinib for paediatric patients with refractory solid tumours or anaplastic large-cell lymphoma: a Children’s Oncology Group phase 1 consortium study. Lancet Oncol. 14, 472–480 (2013).
Laetsch, T. W. et al. Larotrectinib for paediatric solid tumours harbouring NTRK gene fusions: phase 1 results from a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 study. Lancet Oncol. 19, 705–714 (2018).
Drilon, A. et al. Efficacy of larotrectinib in TRK fusion-positive cancers in adults and children. New Engl. J. Med. 378, 731–739 (2018).
Ziegler, D. S. et al. Brief Report: Potent clinical and radiological response to larotrectinib in TRK fusion-driven high-grade glioma. Br. J. Cancer 119, 693–696 (2018).
Schram A. M. et al. AACR Annual Meeting 2017 Online Proceedings and 605 Itinerary Planner Home Section 34. 2017. LB-302/10 — potential role of 606 larotrectinib (LOXO-101), a selective pan-TRK inhibitor, in NTRK fusion-607 positive recurrent glioblastoma. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-LB-302.
Drilon, A. et al. Safety and antitumor activity of the multitargeted pan-TRK, ROS1, and ALK inhibitor entrectinib: combined results from two phase I trials (ALKA-372-001 and STARTRK-1). Cancer Discov. 7, 400–409 (2017).
Desai, A. V. et al. Phase 1 study of entrectinib (RXDX-101), a TRK, ROS1, 612 and ALK inhibitor, in children, adolescents, and young adults with recurrent or 613 refractory solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 36(suppl 15), 10536-614 10536 (2018).
Hawkins, C. et al. BRAF-KIAA1549 fusion predicts better clinical outcome in pediatric low-grade astrocytoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 4790–4798 (2011).
Horbinski, C., Nikiforova, M. N., Hagenkord, J. M., Hamilton, R. L. & Pollack, I. F. Interplay among BRAF, p16, p53, and MIB1 in pediatric low-grade gliomas. Neuro-Oncology 14, 777–789 (2012).
Lassaletta, A. et al. Profound clinical and radiological response to BRAF inhibition in a 2-month-old diencephalic child with hypothalamic/chiasmatic glioma. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 63, 2038–2041 (2016).
Banerjee, A. et al. A phase I trial of the MEK inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244) in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory low-grade glioma: a Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium (PBTC) study. Neuro-Oncology 19, 1135–1144 (2017).
Greenberg, M. L., Barr, R. D., DiMonte, B., McLaughlin, E. & Greenberg, C. Childhood cancer registries in Ontario, Canada: lessons learned from a comparison of two registries. Int. J. Cancer 105, 88–91 (2003).
Fina, F. et al. Droplet digital PCR is a powerful technique to demonstrate frequent FGFR1 duplication in dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors. Oncotarget 8, 2104–2113 (2017).
Ryall, S. et al. Multiplex detection of pediatric low-grade glioma signature fusion transcripts and duplications using the NanoString nCounter System. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 76, 562–570 (2017).
Raczy, C. et al. Isaac: ultra-fast whole-genome secondary analysis on Illumina sequencing platforms. Bioinformatics 29, 2041–2043 (2013).
Chen, X. et al. Manta: rapid detection of structural variants and indels for germline and cancer sequencing applications. Bioinformatics 32, 1220–1222 (2016).
Kim, D. & Salzberg, S. L. TopHat-Fusion: an algorithm for discovery of novel fusion transcripts. Genome Biol. 12, R72 (2011).
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
McPherson, A. et al. deFuse: an algorithm for gene fusion discovery in tumor RNA-Seq data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1001138 (2011).
Kumar, S., Vo, A. D., Qin, F. & Li, H. Comparative assessment of methods for the fusion transcripts detection from RNA-Seq data. Sci. Rep. 6, 21597 (2016).
Ge, H. et al. FusionMap: detecting fusion genes from next-generation sequencing data at base-pair resolution. Bioinformatics 27, 1922–1928 (2011).
Aryee, M. J. et al. Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics 30, 1363–1369 (2014).
Triche, T. J. Jr., Weisenberger, D. J., Van Den Berg, D., Laird, P. W. & Siegmund, K. D. Low-level processing of Illumina Infinium DNA Methylation BeadArrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e90 (2013).
Krijthe, J. H. Rtsne: T-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding using a Barnes-Hut Implementation https://github.com/jkrijthe/Rtsne. (2015).
Sonoda, Y. et al. Formation of intracranial tumors by genetically modified human astrocytes defines four pathways critical in the development of human anaplastic astrocytoma. Cancer Res. 61, 4956–4960 (2001).
A.S.G.S. was supported by a Garron Family Cancer Center fellowship, Worldwide Cancer Research and Gertrud-Hagmann-Stiftung. S.R. was supported by RESTRACOMP of the Hospital for Sick Children, the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) CGS-M scholarship, and an Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS). M.Z. was supported by a Garron Family Cancer Center fellowship and RESTRACOMP of The Hospital for Sick Children. This research is funded by the Canadian Cancer Society (Grant # 702296), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Grant #159805) and A Kids’ Brain Tumor Cure Foundation, aka The PLGA foundation. We would like to acknowledge the Canadian Centre for Computational Genomics (C3G), part of the Genome Innovation Network (GIN), funded by Genome Canada through Genome Quebec and Ontario Genomics. For excellent technical support, advice and expertise, we thank: Paula Marrano, Famida Spatare, Monte Borden (Department of Pathology, the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto); Cindy Zhang (Brain Tumor Research Center, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto); Dr. João Gonçalves (Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto); Kelly Pairan (Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Guerreiro Stucklin, A.S., Ryall, S., Fukuoka, K. et al. Alterations in ALK/ROS1/NTRK/MET drive a group of infantile hemispheric gliomas. Nat Commun 10, 4343 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12187-5
Current Opinion in Pediatrics (2021)
Genomic characterization of a PPP1CB-ALK fusion with fusion gene amplification in a congenital glioblastoma
Cancer Genetics (2021)
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology (2021)
Low‐grade BRAF V600E mutant oligodendroglioma‐like tumors of children may show EGFR and MET amplification
Brain Pathology (2021)