Highly active ruthenium metathesis catalysts enabling ring-opening metathesis polymerization of cyclopentadiene at low temperatures

Article metrics

Abstract

Development of versatile ruthenium olefin-metathesis catalysts with high activity, stability, and selectivity is a continuous challenge. Here we report highly controllable ruthenium catalysts using readily accessible and versatile N-vinylsulfonamides as carbene precursors. Catalyst initiation rates were controlled in a straightforward manner, from latent to fast initiating, through the facile modulation of the N-vinylsulfonamide ligands. Trifluoromethanesulfonamide-based catalysts initiated ultrarapidly even at temperatures as low as −60 °C and continuously propagated rapidly, enabling the enthalpically and entropically less-favored ring-opening metathesis polymerizations of low-strained functionalized cyclopentene derivatives, some of which are not accessible with previous olefin-metathesis catalysts. To our surprise, the developed catalysts facilitated the polymerization of cyclopentadiene (CPD), a feedstock that is easily and commonly obtainable through the steam cracking of naphtha, which has, to the best of our knowledge, not been previously achieved due to its low ring strain and facile dimerization even at low temperatures (below 0 °C).

Introduction

Olefin metathesis is a key C–C double-bond forming reaction that is widely applied in the chemical synthesis1,2, pharmaceuticals3,4, agrochemicals5, and polymer industries5,6. Polymerization, especially ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP), has been studied for several decades, as it is a highly efficient way of obtaining a variety of functionalized linear and controlled polymers6. The basic driving force for ROMP is the release of the strain energies of constrained monomers, such as norbornene and its derivatives (>20 kcal/mol)6,7,8. Cyclopentenes, however, have significantly lower ring strains (4.5–6.8 kcal/mol) than those of norbornene derivatives; consequently, fewer examples of ROMP involving cyclopentenes have been reported9,10,11,12,13,14,15. Notably, the ROMP of cyclopentadiene (CPD), which is easily obtained by the cracking of naphtha and rapidly dimerized to dicyclopentadiene (DCPD) even below 0 °C, has, to the best of our knowledge, never been achieved. Polymers derived from cyclopentenes are attractive and potentially highly useful materials because of their natural rubber-like properties and their recyclability through the ring-closing metathesis (RCM) of the polypentenamer12,16. In addition, functionalized linear polymers obtained by the ROMP of functionalized cyclopentenes, such as hydroxyl17-, siloxy18-, or ester19,20-functionalized polypentenamers, are of great industrial significance due to their distinct mechanical and thermal properties. However, the low ring strains of cyclopentene derivatives are intrinsic obstacles to polymerization; hence, controlling the thermal equilibrium is the key to achieving polymerization. As polymerization is an entropically disfavored reaction, low-temperature conditions are preferred, as they thermodynamically drive the reaction toward polymerization9,12. Unfortunately, low-temperature conditions are kinetically unfavorable for precatalyst initiation, which usually requires ligand dissociation. Therefore, a rapidly initiating catalyst that can be activated at low temperatures would be ideal for facilitating the ROMP of challenging low-strained cyclopentene derivatives (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1
figure1

Development of N-vinylsulfonamide-based olefin-metathesis catalysts. a Representative Ru-based olefin-metathesis catalysts have limited initiation or propagation properties in ROMP at low temperatures. b The development of N-vinylsulfonamide-based metathesis catalysts. c Comparison of the initiation rates of Ru-based olefin-metathesis catalysts. The kinit values were determined by reacting a catalyst with 30 equiv. of butyl vinyl ether (BVE) at 10 °C in toluene (0.1 mM)

Ruthenium-based olefin-metathesis catalysts have widened the scope of olefin-metathesis reactions due to their ease of accessibility, functional group compatibilities, and stabilities21,22,23,24. One of the major issues in catalyst development is control of the precatalyst initiation rate25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36. Fast-initiating catalysts are especially useful for selective metathesis25,30, controlled living ROMP26,35, and ROMP of low-strained monomers9,34, whereas slow-initiating catalysts are beneficial for industrial molding process involving the ROMP of highly constrained monomers such as DCPD and orthogonal metathesis reactions31,32,33,36.

In 2002, Louie and Grubbs37 reported that electron-rich carbene-based Ru complexes can slowly initiate the catalysis of various metathesis reactions at relatively high temperatures. This study revealed that an N-vinylpyrrolidinone-based carbene can exist in a chelate complex through the dissociation of one phosphine ligand and the intramolecular coordination of its carbonyl group (Fig. 1b). However, the N-vinylpyrrolidinone-based Ru complex was not active in olefin-metathesis reactions under mild reaction conditions. Inspired by these reported complexes and the structural diversity of amides, we envisioned versatile, highly controllable metathesis catalysts based on a less-alkaline amide scaffold that can facilitate initiation. Sulfonamides, which are readily available and structurally diverse, were identified as the less-alkaline amides for realizing this hypothesis. The acidity (pKa) of the N‒H bond in an amide is in the 13–23 range, whereas that of a sulfonamide is 9–18, which indicates that electron density on the sulfonamide nitrogen atom is usually lower than that of an amide. Notably, the carbonyl oxygen is the preferred protonation position in an amide, whereas the nitrogen atom is generally protonated in a sulfonamide38,39. The pKa values of the conjugate acids of amides and sulfonamides are around −1 and −6, respectively (Fig. 1b). The data also indicate that the oxygen atoms of sulfonamides are much less basic than those of amides. Therefore, we envisaged that N-vinylsulfonamide-based ruthenium complexes are more reactive in olefin-metathesis reactions as a result of weaker oxygen chelation compared with N-vinylamide derivatives.

Herein, ruthenium olefin-metathesis catalysts that exhibit controllable initiation rates by the simple modification of readily accessible and structurally diverse N-vinylsulfonamide ligands are presented. Among the developed catalysts, trifluoromethanesulfonamide-based catalysts exhibited exceptional activities in metathesis reactions, especially for the polymerization of low-strained cyclopentene derivatives (Fig. 1c).

Results

Preparation of Ru complexes

A variety of N-vinylsulfonamide ligands were readily obtained by the simple vinylation of versatile and synthetically or commercially readily available sulfonamides (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). Electronically and structurally diverse N-vinylsulfonamides were prepared and the corresponding catalysts were synthesized by ligand exchange reactions with G-II in the presence of CuCl as the phosphine scavenger (Supplementary Fig. 3). The complexes were firmly characterized by 1H, 13C, and 19F NMR spectroscopies, elemental analysis, and X-ray crystallography (Fig. 2a). Bench-top stability of the representative precatalysts, Ru-1, Ru-5, and Ru-8, were checked. After 1 month as a solid form in air, the colors of three complexes became darker, but their 1H NMR spectra were intact without observation of any other peak. However, when the catalysts were solubilized in dichloromethane and the solutions were exposed to air, the carbene peaks disappeared in an hour. With the developed complexes in hand, the initiation rate of each complex was measured by adding excess butyl vinyl ether (30 equiv.) at 10 °C and following the decay of the λmax peak by UV/Vis spectroscopy at regular intervals (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Table 1)27.

Fig. 2
figure2

N-vinylsulfonamide-based metathesis catalysts and their catalytic activities. a Electronically and sterically diversified N-vinylsulfonamide-based metathesis catalysts. b Initiation rate constant for each complex determined by adding excess butyl vinyl ether to a solution of catalyst in toluene at 10 °C. c Standard RCM kinetics using electronically modified catalysts. The averages of three independent experiments are displayed

Examination of initiation rates

At first, the initiation rate of the 2,2,2-trifluoro-N-phenyl-N-vinylacetamide-based ruthenium complex (Ru-amide), bearing a highly electron-withdrawing trifluoromethyl group was examined; however, no initiation was observed at 10 °C, which demonstrates that the amide-based catalyst is difficult to activate at low temperature (Fig. 1b). Confirming our initial hypothesis, the sulfonamide-based catalysts exhibited much improved initiation rates compared with the amide-based catalyst (Fig. 2b). Within the set of prepared sulfonamide-based catalysts, mesyl-based catalysts (Ru-1 to 4) with electronically modified benzyl groups were synthesized, to examine the effect of the electronic nature of the nitrogen atom. Among the mesyl-based catalysts, Ru-2 bearing a methoxy group exhibited the lowest initiation rate constant (2.33 × 10−4 s−1, 10 °C), whereas Ru-4 bearing a bis(trifluoromethyl) group exhibited the highest initiation rate constant (14.8 × 10−4 s−1) (Fig. 2b, entries 2 and 4). To determine the effect of the electronic nature of the sulfur atom, arenesulfonamide-based catalysts bearing arene groups with different electronic properties were next investigated (Ru-5 to 7). Ru-7 with the p-nitro group exhibited a ten-times higher initiation rate constant (24.8 × 104 s−1) than that of the p-methoxy-substituted Ru-6 (2.48 × 10−4 s−1) (Fig. 2b, entries 6 and 7). As the initiation rate constants changed more distinctively by varying the electronics of the sulfur atom rather than the nitrogen atom, varying the electronics of the functional group attached to the sulfur atom was chosen as the strategy for controlling the initiation rate. To our delight, the trifluoromethanesulfonamide-based catalysts Ru-8 (136 × 10−4 s−1) and Ru-9 (113 × 10−4 s−1) initiated very fast, with rate constants that even exceeded that of Blechert’s catalyst (Ble) (85.8 × 10−4 s−1), which is one of the fastest chelating-type catalysts reported to date (Fig. 3b, entries 8, 9, 13)27,40. On the other hand, complex Ru-10 bearing the diethylamino group initiated slowly, with a 2000-times lower initiation rate constant (0.0685 × 10−4 s−1) compared with that of Ru-8 (Fig. 2b, entry 10). Increasing the steric hindrance on the sulfur atom was observed to decrease the rate of initiation (Ru-11, 1.93 × 10−4 s−1; Ru-12, 4.87 × 10−4 s−1) (Fig. 2b, entries 11 and 12).

Fig. 3
figure3

Effect of the external N-vinylsulfonamide ligand. a No difference in reactivity of Ru-8 was observed regardless of the presence of 15N-labeled external VS8*. b The catalyst with the electron-donating group on the sulfonyl moiety exhibited a diminished reaction rate in the presence of 15N-labeled external VS13*. The carbene’s proton peak of Ru-13 in 1H NMR spectra indicated the occurrence of ligand exchange (54:46 ratio of Ru-13 (13.11 ppm, singlet) to Ru-13* (doublet)) from the initial stage of the reaction

Ring-closing metathesis

The developed catalysts were further examined in the RCM of diethyl diallylmalonate (1a) under the standard conditions reported by Grubbs and colleagues41 (Fig. 2c); these catalysts exhibited dramatically improved reactivities compared with those previously reported for Fischer-type carbene-based ruthenium complexes (Supplementary Figs. 4, 5, and 6)37. Complexes Ru-8 and Ru-9 exhibited the fastest initiation rates among the developed catalysts and showed even higher activities compared with that of G-II. Ru-10 gave only 2% of the desired product at 30 °C after 2 h. When the temperature was elevated to 80 °C (C6D6), the RCM of 1a was completed by Ru-10 within 10 min (Supplementary Fig. 7). Other catalysts also exhibited predictable reactivities based on the electronic characteristics of their ligands.

A variety of standard olefin-metathesis reactions41 were compared and evaluated using complex Ru-9, which has similar RCM reactivity to that of Ru-8 but is expected to be more stable for challenging metathesis reactions (Supplementary Table 2). First, the RCM activity of complex Ru-9 was further investigated with a variety of dienes; it was faster in the chosen RCM reaction than G-II, which is the most popular catalyst for a variety of metathesis reactions. Even the sterically hindered trisubstituted olefin S1 reacted very fast to give a 95% conversion in 10 min and a 97% final yield after 1 h. Under the same conditions, G-III provided a conversion of <50% in 10 min and an 80% yield after 70 min (Supplementary Table 2, entry 1). Further RCM reactivity was monitored using G-III, to compare initial conversions with those obtained using Ru-9. Based on the results obtained, Ru-9 performed faster and more efficiently than G-III in the RCM of N,N-diallyl-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide S2 (>99% vs. >85%) (Supplementary Table 2, entry 2). In the case of G-III, the reaction was observed to gradually slow down due to the instability of the methylidene species in the presence of pyridine, consistent with previous reports42.

Mechanistic investigation

To evaluate the performance of Ru-9, the cross-metathesis (CM) of allylbenzene (S7) and 1,4-diacetoxy-2-butene (S8) was also examined. Ru-9 promoted a consistently faster initial conversion than G-II. The cis/trans-isomerization equilibrium of the CM product was quickly achieved, even within 1 min (E/Z = ~9) (Supplementary Table 3). Ru-9 produced the hetero-coupled product 4 (72%) more rapidly in the CM of 5-hexenyl acetate (2) with methyl acrylate (3), a standard chemoselective metathesis reaction used to check the catalytic performance with electron-deficient olefins, than G-II (66%) and H-II (66%) after 1 h (Supplementary Fig. 8)43.

We next investigated the mechanism of this reaction in detail, to determine whether or not the developed chelating catalysts operate through a boomerang mechanism. The release–return or boomerang mechanism is a long-standing issue in ruthenium-chelating metathesis catalysis44,45,46, which posits the reuptake of a released ligand by the active catalyst during the metathesis reactions to regenerate the precatalyst. The Hoveyda–Grubbs catalyst (H-II) with the chelating isopropoxystyrenyl ligand was reported by Grela and colleagues45 and by Fogg and colleagues44 to operate by the release–return mechanism. Based on the previous mechanistic studies, the CMs of 2 and 3 were catalyzed by the electronically modified sulfonamide-based catalysts Ru-8 and Ru-13 in the presence of additional 15N-labeled 1,1,1-trifluoro-N-phenyl-N-vinylmethanesulfonamide (VS8*) and N-phenyl-N-vinylmethanesulfonamide (VS13*), respectively (Fig. 3a, b). The reaction rate constant of Ru-8 was not affected when an equimolar amount of VS8* was added, indicating a lack of reuptake (Fig. 3a)47. Negligible ligand exchange between VS8 and VS8* was observed, and only a trace amount of carbene peak was observed in the 1H NMR spectrum. On the other hand, the reaction of Ru-13 was clearly retarded in the presence of VS13*. In addition, ligand exchange between VS13 and VS13* was detected by 1H NMR spectroscopy, which implies that the release–return mechanism operates in this case. Further background ligand exchanges in the absence of a substrate were negligible in both cases, which indicate that ligand-reuptake only occurs via the active methylidene species. These data indicate that the release–return mechanism is highly dependent on the electronic nature of the sulfonamide ligand.

Ring-opening metathesis polymerization

The application of the fastest-initiating Ru-8 for typical ROMPs of strained monomers was next examined. It is well known that fast precatalyst initiation is important for controlling the living polymerization of strained monomers26,35. For the ROMPs of endo-norbornene and exo-7-oxonorbornene derivatives, Ru-8 afforded products with similar narrow polydispersity indexes (PDIs) to those obtained with G-III, including exo-7-oxonorbornene derivative (5), which indicates that the initiation of Ru-8 is sufficiently fast for use in controlled living polymerizations (Fig. 4). In the ROMP of 5, both Ru-9 and Ble gave the desired polymer with broad PDIs, which is likely due to insufficient initiation, resulting in a much higher molecular weight than that of the polymer obtained using initiator Ru-8 or G-III. All the endo-norbornene derivatives also exhibited narrow PDIs.

Fig. 4
figure4

ROMPs of strained monomers. After quenching with ethyl vinyl ether, the polymer was isolated by precipitation in methanol. aDetermined by GPC in tetrahydrofuran (THF) relative to a polystyrene standard. bDetermined by GPC in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) relative to a polystyrene standard. cTheoretical Mn was calculated by assuming quantitative conversion. dBn = Benzyl; TBS = tert-Butyldimethylsilyl

For unique application of highly active Ru-8, we turned our attention to the polymerization of challenging low-strained monomers. To investigate whether or not Ru-8 is active at low temperatures, the ROMP of cyclopentene (10) was performed at various temperatures (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Table 9). The equilibrium conversion of monomer to polymer through ROMP of 10 has been reported to increase with decreasing temperature on the basis of thermodynamic considerations12. At 0 °C, both G-III and Ru-8 catalyzed only moderate yields (>80%) (Fig. 5a). However, only Ru-8 maintained its reactivity at −20 °C (>99% yield) and below, whereas the ROMP activity of G-III significantly decreased (17% yield) below −20 °C. Inspired by this observation, the deleterious effect of pyridine on the propagating species at low temperature was examined (Fig. 5b); when pyridine was used as an additive with Ru-8, a lower yield was obtained (25%). Stabilization of the propagating Ru carbene intermediates during ROMP by coordinating an additional ligand such as pyridine, phosphine, and an olefin has been reported with observation of the arrested intermediates48,49.

Fig. 5
figure5

ROMP of cyclopentene derivatives at low temperatures. a Comparing G-III and Ru-8 in the ROMP of cyclopentene at various temperatures. b Outlining pyridine interruption during propagation at low temperature. c ROMPs of functionalized cyclopentenes. After quenching with ethyl vinyl ether, the polymer was isolated by precipitation in methanol or hexane. aIn dichloromethane (2.0 M). *Ring strain (kcal/mol) calculated at the G3//RB3LYP/6–31 + + G(2df,2p) level of theory

Ru-8 was then applied to the ROMP of functionalized cyclopentenes, which have even lower strain energies than cyclopentene, some of which have never been used in ROMP (Supplementary Tables 1017). Recently, the Moore group reported the reversible polymerization of 4-substituted cyclopentenes for the interconversion of a polymer and a neat monomer through control of the reaction temperature50. Although the ROMPs of 4-substituted cyclopentenes have been reported with G-II and G-III, 3-substituted cyclopentenes, which have even lower ring strains than the 4-substituted derivatives, are still challenging with the previously reported catalysts9,17,20. Expectedly, the polymerizations of 4-substituted monomers 11 and 12 with G-III and Ru-8 exhibited similar moderate yields (36% and 46% for 11, and 50% and 52% for 12, respectively, Fig. 5c) at room temperature, and higher yields were not observed at low temperatures. This observation is probably due to physical limitations, such as initiator solubility or rapid gelation due to moderate conversions of the reaction mixtures, even at room temperature, resulting in entropic factors that further hinder these polymerization reactions.

We were clearly able to confirm the temperature effect during the ROMP of cyclopent-3-en-1-one (13). A dramatic increase in yield was observed when the temperature was decreased to 0 °C (from 33% at room temperature to 77% at 0 °C). However, lower yields were observed when the temperature was further decreased, which is probably due to the lower solubility of the produced polymer. In the case of the (cyclopen-2-en-1-yloxy)methylbenzene monomer (14), the obtained polymer produced under neat conditions formed a soft gel after a few minutes, with loss of solubility. Meanwhile, other than 14, which showed a slightly higher ring strain compared with the other monomers, the challenging 3-substituted monomers (1518) showed no conversion at room temperature with either G-III or Ru-8. When the temperature was decreased to 0 °C, similar but low yields were observed using both catalysts. The yield of the desired polymer formed by G-III was further reduced, as the temperature was further decreased to −20 °C. These data are in good agreement with the ROMP results of cyclopentene, namely the inhibiting effect of free 3-bromopyridine. To our delight, higher yields of polymer were obtained in all examples catalyzed by Ru-8 at the same temperature (−20 °C). G-III exhibited no activity when the reaction temperature was further decreased to −40 °C, whereas Ru-8 showed the highest yield in all examples (Fig. 5c). However, due to solubility limitations or the low freezing points of some monomers, the overall yields of the desired polymers at −60 °C were somewhat lower compared with those obtained at −40 °C. Among the obtained polymers, poly-18 has good regio-regularity as only two peaks were observed at 133.7 and 128.3 ppm in 13C NMR spectra. Further two-dimensional NMR experiments revealed that head-to-tail and head-to-head isomers were present at a ratio of 86:14, respectively, as dominant trans-configuration (Supplementary Fig. 10). It has been reported that ROMP of allylic-substituted cyclopentene monomers with high steric bulk can drive highly regular microstructure of major trans-olefins with head-to-tail insertion51. It is noteworthy that the challenging monomers with low ring strains successfully underwent ROMP with the very fast Ru-8 initiator. To the best of our knowledge, no ROMP example of monomers 1418 has been previously reported.

ROMP of cyclopentadiene

For further application of Ru-8, the ROMP of CPD (19) was investigated. CPD is a useful monomer and precursor for a variety of reactions, including anionic or thermal polymerizations, but is not a suitable monomer for ROMP due to its low ring strain (6.55 kcal/mol) and fast dimerization at ambient temperature (Fig. 6a). Even worse, DCPD from the dimerization of CPD has exceptionally high ring strain (26.1 kcal/mol), which results in the rapid formation of a cross-linked polymer network. Due to these characteristics, the ROMP of CPD has, to the best of our knowledge, not been demonstrated. To prevent the formation of DCPD, the reaction temperature needs to be sufficiently low, because the dimerization occurs slowly even at −20 °C52. Therefore, to obtain a linear polymer from CPD by ROMP, the reaction needs to be conducted at −40 °C (Fig. 6a). Among the reactions attempted, only Ru-8 demonstrated activity for the polymerization of CPD (up to 85% yield over 4 h) (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Table 18). The obtained polymer was carefully characterized by 1H and 1H-1H COSY NMR spectroscopy, which exhibited data that are well matched to those of the expected polymer structure (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Fig. 11). Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectroscopy of CPD oligomers, synthesized from a lowered equivalent of monomer ([CPD]:[Ru-8] = 5:1), also confirmed the structure with clear observation of the C5H6 repeating unit (66 Da, Supplementary Fig. 12). The crude reaction mixture was then dissolved in THF and directly hydrogenated (30 bar of H2 pressure) to afford polyethylene (81% over two steps), the linearity of which was determined by solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy (Fig. 6c)52,53. The NMR spectrum exhibited a single major peak at ~33 ppm (Fig. 6d and Supplementary Fig. 13), indicating the formation of highly linear polyethylene, which also verifies that DCPD was not majorly involved in the polymerization process54.

Fig. 6
figure6

ROMP of cyclopentadiene. a Dimerization of CPD at ambient temperature. b ROMP of CPD at −40 °C with Ru-8. Conversion was calculated from the 1H NMR spectrum. No reaction was observed with G-II or G-III under same conditions. c Post-treatment of poly-CPD. Without purification, the crude poly-CPD was directly dissolved in THF and hydrogenated in quantitative yields. d Comparing polyethylene samples by solid-state 13 C NMR spectroscopy; commercially available low-density polyethylene (left), polyethylene via hydrogenation of poly-CPD (right)

Discussion

N-vinylsulfonamide ligand-based ruthenium olefin-metathesis catalysts were developed. On the basis of this versatile scaffold, more than ten catalysts were prepared. These catalysts exhibited initiation rates that were easily controlled in a straightforward manner by simply modifying their steric and electronic characteristics. In particular, ultrafast-initiating catalysts were obtained by introducing the electron-withdrawing trifluoromethyl group on the sulfonyl moiety. The weakened Ru–O bond enables rapid initiation along with fast propagation, even at low temperatures, without the intervention of a bound-back ligand, such as pyridine. Using the trifluoromethanesulfonamide-based catalysts, the enthalpically challenging ROMP of low-strained monomers was successfully demonstrated by driving the thermodynamics toward the polymer by decreasing the reaction temperature and minimizing the effect of entropy. To our surprise, these catalysts enabled the ROMP of CPD, an easily obtainable common feedstock from the steam cracking of naphtha, which is challenging due to its low ring strain and fast dimerization to DCPD even at 0 °C. The synthesized polymer exhibited an extraordinary linear diene structure, which is difficult to produce using other monomers and polymerization techniques. The one-carbon intermediary diene structure can be further functionalized to generate advanced materials. The developed sulfonamide-based catalysts that operate with a wide range of initiation rates are expected to be applicable to a variety of industrial applications of involving olefin-metathesis reactions that require controlled initiation rates at a specific temperature.

Methods

Preparation of complex Ru-8

The Grubbs second-generation catalyst (G-II) (425 mg, 0.5 mmol), CuCl (99.0 mg, 1.0 mmol), the appropriate N-vinylsulfonamide ligand (1.0 mmol), and dichloromethane (5 mL) were added under Ar to a flame-dried 25 mL Schlenk flask equipped with a Teflon-coated magnetic stirrer bar. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min, during which time the color changed from dark red to dark orange. The volatiles were removed in vacuo to give a brown residue. The crude product was dissolved in excess diethyl ether (15 mL) to instantly afford CuCl∙PCy3 as a white precipitate. The suspension was filtered through a pad of cotton in a glass pipette to remove the CuCl∙PCy3 adduct. The filtrate was then diluted with pentane (15 mL) in a flame-dried 50 mL vial. The mixture was stored in a −20 °C fridge in a glovebox for 1 day. The desired orange crystalline solid was easily isolated by washing with excess pentane.

Data availability

Crystallographic data for the structures reported in this article (Supplementary Figs. 79–82) have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center, under deposition nos. CCDC 1526992 (Ru-5), CCDC 1526991 (Ru-6), CCDC 1526994 (Ru-7), and CCDC 1526990 (Ru-9). Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge from www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structure/. For calculation procedures for the ring strains of monomers 1119 and DCPD, see Supplementary Tables 4–8. For confirmation of regio-regularity of poly-17 and poly-18, see Supplementary Figs. 9 and 10. For NMR analysis of the compounds in this article, see Supplementary Figs. 14–78. All other relevant data of this study are available within the manuscript and its Supplementary Information, and/or from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Becker, M. R., Watson, R. B. & Schindler, C. S. Beyond olefins: new metathesis directions for synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 7867–7881 (2018).

  2. 2.

    Nicolaou, K. C., Bulger, P. G. & Sarlah, D. Metathesis reactions in total synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 4490–4527 (2005).

  3. 3.

    Higman, C. S., Lummiss, J. A. & Fogg, D. E. Olefin metathesis at the dawn of implementation in pharmaceutical and specialty-chemicals manufacturing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 3552–3565 (2016).

  4. 4.

    Hoveyda, A. H. & Zhugralin, A. R. The remarkable metal-catalysed olefin metathesis reaction. Nature 450, 243–251 (2007).

  5. 5.

    Ogba, O. M., Warner, N. C., O’Leary, D. J. & Grubbs, R. H. Recent advances in ruthenium-based olefin metathesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 4510–4544 (2018).

  6. 6.

    Sutthasupa, S., Shiotsuki, M. & Sanda, F. Recent advances in ring-opening metathesis polymerization and application to synthesis of functional materials. Polym. J. 42, 905–915 (2010).

  7. 7.

    Chen, Z. et al. Mechanochemical unzipping of insulating polyladderene to semiconducting polyacetylene. Science 357, 475–479 (2017).

  8. 8.

    Elling, B. R., Su, J. K. & Xia, Y. Ring-opening metathesis polymerization of 1,2-disubstituted cyclopropenes. Chem. Commun. 52, 9097–9100 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Hejl, A., Scherman, O. A. & Grubbs, R. H. Ring-opening metathesis polymerization of functionalized low-strain monomers with ruthenium-based catalysts. Macromolecules 38, 7214–7218 (2005).

  10. 10.

    Neary, W. J. & Kennemur, J. G. Variable temperature ROMP: Leveraging low ring strain thermodynamics to achieve well-defined polypentenamers. Macromolecules 50, 4935–4941 (2017).

  11. 11.

    Neary, W. J. & Kennemur, J. G. Polypentenamer renaissance: challenges and opportunities. ACS Macro Lett. 8, 46–56 (2018).

  12. 12.

    Tuba, R. & Grubbs, R. H. Ruthenium catalyzed equilibrium ring-opening metathesis polymerization of cyclopentene. Polym. Chem. 4, 3959–3962 (2013).

  13. 13.

    Sita, L. R. Main-chain chiral polymers from.beta.-citronellene via tandem diene metathesis cyclization/Ring-opening metathesis polymerization. Macromolecules 28, 656–657 (1995).

  14. 14.

    Mulhearn, W. D. & Register, R. A. Synthesis of narrow-distribution, high-molecular-weight ROMP polycyclopentene via suppression of acyclic metathesis side reactions. ACS Macro Lett. 6, 112–116 (2017).

  15. 15.

    Torre Iii, M., Mulhearn, W. D. & Register, R. A. Ring-opening metathesis copolymerization of cyclopentene above and below its equilibrium monomer concentration. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 219, 1800030 (2018).

  16. 16.

    Monfette, S. & Fogg, D. E. Equilibrium ring-closing metathesis. Chem. Rev. 109, 3783–3816 (2009).

  17. 17.

    Tuba, R., Al-Hashimi, M., Bazzi, H. S. & Grubbs, R. H. One-pot synthesis of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) copolymers via ruthenium catalyzed equilibrium ring-opening metathesis polymerization of hydroxyl functionalized cyclopentene. Macromolecules 47, 8190–8195 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Tuba, R. et al. Synthesis of recyclable tire additives via equilibrium ring-opening metathesis polymerization. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 4, 6090–6094 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Song, S., Fu, Z., Xu, J. & Fan, Z. Synthesis of functional polyolefins via ring-opening metathesis polymerization of ester-functionalized cyclopentene and its copolymerization with cyclic comonomers. Polym. Chem. 8, 5924–5933 (2017).

  20. 20.

    Song, S. et al. Functional polyethylene with regularly distributed ester pendants via ring-opening metathesis polymerization of ester functionalized cyclopentene: synthesis and characterization. Polymer (Guildf.). 129, 135–143 (2017).

  21. 21.

    Lozano-Vila, A. M., Monsaert, S., Bajek, A. & Verpoort, F. Ruthenium-based olefin metathesis catalysts derived from alkynes. Chem. Rev. 110, 4865–4909 (2010).

  22. 22.

    Grubbs, R. H., Wenzel, A. G., O’Leary, D. J. & Khosravi, E. Handbook of Metathesis Vol.1. (Wiley-VCH, 2015).

  23. 23.

    Samojlowicz, C., Bieniek, M. & Grela, K. Ruthenium-based olefin metathesis catalysts bearing N-heterocyclic carbene ligands. Chem. Rev. 109, 3708–3742 (2009).

  24. 24.

    Sanford, M. S., Love, J. A. & Grubbs, R. H. Mechanism and activity of ruthenium olefin metathesis catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 6543–6554 (2001).

  25. 25.

    Ahmed, T. S. & Grubbs, R. H. Fast-initiating, ruthenium-based catalysts for improved activity in highly E-selective cross metathesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 1532–1537 (2017).

  26. 26.

    Choi, T.-L. & Grubbs, R. H. Controlled living ring-opening-metathesis polymerization by a fast-initiating ruthenium catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 1743–1746 (2003).

  27. 27.

    Engle, K. M. et al. Origins of initiation rate differences in ruthenium olefin metathesis catalysts containing chelating benzylidenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 5782–5792 (2015).

  28. 28.

    Gułajski, Ł., Michrowska, A., Bujok, R. & Grela, K. New tunable catalysts for olefin metathesis: controlling the initiation through electronic factors. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 254, 118–123 (2006).

  29. 29.

    Luo, S. et al. An initiation kinetics prediction model enables rational design of ruthenium olefin metathesis catalysts bearing modified chelating benzylidenes. ACS Catal. 8, 4600–4611 (2018).

  30. 30.

    Montgomery, T. P., Ahmed, T. S. & Grubbs, R. H. Stereoretentive olefin metathesis: an avenue to kinetic selectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 11024–11036 (2017).

  31. 31.

    Ung, T., Hejl, A., Grubbs, R. H. & Schrodi, Y. Latent ruthenium olefin metathesis catalysts that contain an N-heterocyclic carbene ligand. Organometallics 23, 5399–5401 (2004).

  32. 32.

    Diesendruck, C. E., Iliashevsky, O., Ben-Asuly, A., Goldberg, I. & Lemcoff, N. G. Latent and switchable olefin metathesis catalysts. Macromol. Symp. 293, 33–38 (2010).

  33. 33.

    Levin, E., Mavila, S., Eivgi, O., Tzur, E. & Lemcoff, N. G. Regioselective chromatic orthogonality with light-activated metathesis catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 12384–12388 (2015).

  34. 34.

    Schrock, R. R. et al. Evaluation of cyclopentene-based chain-transfer agents for living ring-opening metathesis polymerization. Macromolecules 22, 3191–3200 (1989).

  35. 35.

    Shibuya, Y., Nguyen, H. V. T. & Johnson, J. A. Mikto-Brush-arm star polymers via cross-linking of dissimilar bottlebrushes: synthesis and solution morphologies. ACS Macro Lett. 6, 963–968 (2017).

  36. 36.

    Yao, Z., Zhou, L., Dai, B. & Cao, K. Ring-opening metathesis copolymerization of dicyclopentadiene and cyclopentene through reaction injection molding process. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 125, 2489–2493 (2012).

  37. 37.

    Louie, J. & Grubbs, R. H. Metathesis of electron-rich olefins: Structure and reactivity of electron-rich carbene complexes. Organometallics 21, 2153–2164 (2002).

  38. 38.

    Laughlin, R. G. The basicity of aliphatic sulfonamides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 89, 4268–4271 (1967).

  39. 39.

    Moreira, J. A., Rosa da Costa, A. M., García-Río, L. & Pessêgo, M. Equilibrium constants and protonation site for N-methylbenzenesulfonamides. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 7, 1732–1738 (2011).

  40. 40.

    Wakamatsu, H. & Blechert, S. A new highly efficient ruthenium metathesis catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 2403–2405 (2002).

  41. 41.

    Ritter, T., Hejl, A., Wenzel, A. G., Funk, T. W. & Grubbs, R. H. A standard system of characterization for olefin metathesis catalysts. Organometallics 25, 5740–5745 (2006).

  42. 42.

    Hong, S. H., Wenzel, A. G., Salguero, T. T., Day, M. W. & Grubbs, R. H. Decomposition of ruthenium olefin metathesis catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 7961–7968 (2007).

  43. 43.

    Santos, A. G., Bailey, G. A., dos Santos, E. N. & Fogg, D. E. Overcoming catalyst decomposition in acrylate metathesis: polyphenol resins as enabling agents for PCy3-stabilized metathesis catalysts. ACS Catal. 7, 3181–3189 (2017).

  44. 44.

    Bates, J. M., Lummiss, J. A. M., Bailey, G. A. & Fogg, D. E. Operation of the boomerang mechanism in olefin metathesis reactions promoted by the second-generation hoveyda catalyst. ACS Catal. 4, 2387–2394 (2014).

  45. 45.

    Bieniek, M., Michrowska, A., Usanov, D. L. & Grela, K. In an attempt to provide a user’s guide to the galaxy of benzylidene, alkoxybenzylidene, and indenylidene ruthenium olefin metathesis catalysts. Chem. Eur. J. 14, 806–818 (2008).

  46. 46.

    Vorfalt, T., Wannowius, K. J., Thiel, V. & Plenio, H. How important is the release–return mechanism in olefin metathesis? Chem. Eur. J. 16, 12312–12315 (2010).

  47. 47.

    Zaja, M. et al. Ruthenium olefin metathesis catalysts with modified styrene ethers: influence of steric and electronic effects. Tetrahedron 59, 6545–6558 (2003).

  48. 48.

    Song, J.-A., et al. Living polymerization caught in the act: direct observation of an arrested intermediate in metathesis polymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 10039–10047 (2019).

  49. 49.

    Kang, E.-H., Yu, S. Y., Lee, I. S., Park, S. E. & Choi, T.-L. Strategies to enhance cyclopolymerization using third-generation Grubbs catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 10508–10514 (2014).

  50. 50.

    Liu, H. et al. Dynamic remodeling of covalent networks via ring-opening metathesis polymerization. ACS Macro Lett. 7, 933–937 (2018).

  51. 51.

    Brits, S., Neary, W. J., Palui, G. & Kennemur, J. G. A new echelon of precision polypentenamers: highly isotactic branching on every five carbons. Polym. Chem. 9, 1719–1727 (2018).

  52. 52.

    Claus, M. et al. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (Wiley-VCH, 2000).

  53. 53.

    Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R. & Law, K. L. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700782 (2017).

  54. 54.

    Piche, L., Daigle, J. C. & Claverie, J. P. A ruthenium catalyst yielding crosslinked polyethylene. Chem. Commun. 47, 7836–7838 (2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. H. Yang of Professor T. L. Choi’s group, and J. Y. Kim and J. W. Kim of Professor K. T. Kim’s group for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2014R1A5A1011165, Center for New Direction in Organic Synthesis; NRF-2015M3D3A1A01065480; NRF-2015H1A2A1033766, Global PhD Fellowship Program).

Author information

K.S. and K.K. contributed equally to this work. K.S. and K.K. carried out the preparation and characterization of the catalysts, and investigated their activities. K.S. and D.H. performed the polymerization reactions of the low-strained monomers. J.K. contributed to calculating the ring strains of the low-strained monomers. C.E.H. and H.I.K. performed atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometric analysis of CPD-oligomers. S.H.H. designed and directed the project.

Correspondence to Soon Hyeok Hong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, K., Kim, K., Hong, D. et al. Highly active ruthenium metathesis catalysts enabling ring-opening metathesis polymerization of cyclopentadiene at low temperatures. Nat Commun 10, 3860 (2019) doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11806-5

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.