Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Solvent-non-solvent rapid-injection for preparing nanostructured materials from micelles to hydrogels

## Abstract

Due to their distinctive molecular architecture, ABA triblock copolymers will undergo specific self-assembly processes into various nanostructures upon introduction into a B-block selective solvent. Although much of the focus in ABA triblock copolymer self-assembly has been on equilibrium nanostructures, little attention has been paid to the guiding principles of nanostructure formation during non-equilibrium processing conditions. Here we report a universal and quantitative method for fabricating and controlling ABA triblock copolymer hierarchical structures using solvent-non-solvent rapid-injection processing. Plasmonic nanocomposite hydrogels containing gold nanoparticles and hierarchically-ordered hydrogels exhibiting structural color can be assembled within one minute using this rapid-injection technique. Surprisingly, the rapid-injection hydrogels display superior mechanical properties compared with those of conventional ABA hydrogels. This work will allow for translation into technologically relevant areas such as drug delivery, tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and soft robotics, in which structure and mechanical property precision are essential.

## Introduction

Block polymers consist of two or more covalently attached incompatible polymer sequences, and as a result, will self-assemble into nanostructured materials with tunable morphologies and features on the 10–100 nm length scale1. The resulting nanoscale morphologies are a result of a balance between minimizing the different monomer contacts and maximizing the polymer block entropic degrees of freedom. Advances in synthetic strategies and chain architectural complexities have led to myriad applications for these materials ranging from uses in everyday products such as pressure-sensitive adhesives, coatings, nonwoven fabrics, and packaging2,3,4, to materials for highly engineered products such as medical devices5, organic electronics6,7, separation membranes8,9,10, and porous materials11. In addition to the progress in bulk nanostructural material fabrication using block polymers, similar studies of morphological control for solution-phase self-assembly have revolutionized areas of healthcare related to diagnostic detection and therapeutic administration12,13,14,15. Although the fundamental principles for equilibrium block polymer self-assembly in the melt and in solution are well-established, little attention has been paid on the guiding principles of nanostructure formation during nonequilibrium processing conditions, which arguably represents the most easily adaptable continuous manufacturing scenario for such materials.

In the immense block polymer architectural and compositional phase space16, linear ABA triblock copolymers have been broadly used to form physically crosslinked gels for applications in a number of technologies like thermoplastic elastomers (TPE)17,18, polymer electrolyte membranes6,7, tissue engineering19, and artificial muscles20. Gels, or hydrogels, are typically formed by means of polymer external stimuli21, coacervation22,23 or by simply submerging a neat ABA triblock copolymer into a B-selective solvent (e.g., water for hydrogels)24,25. The physical crosslinks in hydrogels created from ABA triblock copolymers form when the hydrophobic A-blocks segregate into separate micellar domains, while the mid B-block bridges the two domains (Fig. 1)26. As a result, the hydrophobic polymers will form interconnected domains supporting the hydrogel during swelling in aqueous environments. Additionally, because self-assembly is used to create the hydrogel, disassembly of the polymeric network by use of external stimuli like temperature, salt concentration, and pH is possible, allowing for further processing or recycling27. At low ABA triblock copolymer concentrations in a B-selective solvent, discrete isolated spherical micelles (i.e., flower-like micelles) (Fig. 1) form where the two hydrophobic A-blocks will reside in the same spherical domain, and the mid B-block will create a loop28. The transition from flower-like micelles to physically crosslinked gels as concentration increases is defined as the critical gelation concentration (CGC)25,26. This transition is predicted to be governed by an increase in polymer bridging as the polymer aggregation number (number of polymer chains per micelle) increases with increasing concentration26. Bridging is favored over looping because overcrowding of polymer chains within a single micelle is relieved when a single chain spans two micelles26.

Much of the existing literature regarding solution-phase self-assembly focuses on the thermodynamic equilibrium state of the system29,30,31,32. Despite the thermodynamic understanding of self-assembly, determining the guiding principles and establishing the essential parameters that dictate the final structure of ABA triblock copolymer solution-phase self-assembly under nonequilibrium conditions have yet to be fully addressed33. Traditionally, slow evaporation of the cosolvent34 or solvent switching during water addition35 to induce hydrogel formation, or swelling annealed structures in selective solvents24,36 has been utilized to create nanostructured gels. Quickly forming structures in water using a rapid-injection method to induce self-assembly is desirable, more convenient, and commercially applicable in the development and implementation of nanostructured materials. While the benefits of forming nanostructured ABA-type hydrogels under commercially relevant processing conditions are preferable37, the factors and experimental parameters that govern the gel formation under nonequilibrium conditions have yet to be fully investigated.

Here, we address the experimental parameters necessary for forming hydrogels using a rapid-injection method for a series of ABA triblock copolymers exhibiting hydrophobic−hydrophilic−hydrophobic chain sequences. We establish a quantitative route to obtain ABA triblock copolymer micelles, microgels, and hydrogels using a rapid-injection method. The final state of the ABA triblock copolymers (micelles, microgels, and hydrogels) depends on the initial polymer concentration, relative to the overlap concentration (c*), in a water miscible good solvent (e.g., tetrahydrofuran (THF)) before being rapidly injected into water (Fig. 1). At low concentrations in the dilute regime (c < c*), we produce micelles after injecting a polymer solution initially in THF into water. At concentrations near the overlap concentration (c ≈ c*), we form microgels, which are discrete micrometer sized physically crosslinked micellar aggregates. For concentrations approaching the entanglement regime (c ≥ ce), the ABA polymer forms a hydrogel in which bridged hydrophobic domains span the entire sample volume. By rapidly injecting a polymer solution containing an amphiphilic triblock copolymer into an unfavorable B-selective solvent, the polymers rapidly self-assemble and form nanostructured products within 1 min. The ability to rationally design a variety of nanostructures with various ABA triblock copolymers by simply calculating c* using the radius of gyration (Rg) of the polymer in the cosolvent emphasizes the versatility and universality of this self-assembly process. Interestingly, the amphiphilic triblock copolymer hydrogels created using the rapid-injection method exhibit hierarchical ordering in which spherical micelles form at the nanoscale, and a cellular network structure is composed of the physically crosslinked micelles at larger length scales. As a result of the well-defined hydrophobic domains (micelle cores) within the hydrophilic matrix, we are able to create printable structures, fibers, and coatings exhibiting fascinating properties that include the storage and retention of hydrophobic plasmonic gold nanoparticles and structural coloration. Furthermore, the hydrogel materials are easily recyclable by redissolution in the good solvent and exhibit the same mechanical and self-assembly properties as the original material after reprocessing. The work presented here will lead to broad implementation of ABA triblock copolymers in the creation of functional hydrogels with applications in drug delivery38, tissue engineering39, and personal care products40.

## Results

### Relating initial polymer solution to the final state

Four different amphiphilic triblock copolymers composed of poly(styrene)-poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(styrene) (SOS), poly(isoprene)-poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(isoprene) (IOI), and poly(butadiene)-poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(butadiene) (BOB) triblock copolymers) (Fig. 2a) with varying molecular weights and midblock O volume fractions (fO) (Table 1) were used to demonstrate the versatility of the solvent-induced nanostructure formation of ABA triblock copolymer using the rapid-injection method. By using this series of ABA triblock copolymers, it was possible to determine the necessary experimental parameters that govern the self-assembly behavior of ABA triblock copolymers under nonequilibrium conditions. The triblock copolymers were synthesized in two general steps: (1) using a combination of sequential living anionic polymerization to afford the diblock copolymers and (2) coupling the diblock copolymers using 1,4-bis(bromomethyl)benzene to afford the resulting triblock copolymers (Supplementary Figs. 12, Supplementary Table 1). We chose the midblock O as the hydrophilic block due to potential biomedical applications41, and uses in battery and transistor technologies6,7. For the hydrophobic blocks, low glass transition temperature (Tg) polymers I and B, and glassy S were selected to investigate the role Tg played in the self-assembly and the mechanical properties.

Aqueous colloidal or hydrogel structures are formed by first dissolving the desired ABA triblock copolymer in THF (good solvent, Supplementary Table 2) at specific concentrations, and then rapidly injecting the THF solution into water (1 mL of solution injected into 20 mL of water in 20 s). As seen in Fig. 2, the final structure of the SOS(8-65-8) triblock copolymer after rapidly injecting the polymer solution into water is easily tuned from micelles (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Table 3) to microgels (Fig. 2c) to hydrogels (Fig. 2d). When the polymer concentration in THF for SOS(8-65-8) was 0.02 wt%, the resulting structure after rapid-injection into water were isolated micelles (Fig. 2b). At a 1.0 wt% polymer solution concentration in THF, physically crosslinked micellar aggregates of colloidal size, or microgels formed after rapid-injection (Fig. 2c). To gain a better understanding of the transition from micelle to microgel, dynamic light scattering (DLS) was performed on samples using SOS(8-65-8) for a range concentrations near the overlap concentration. The DLS traces in Fig. 2e show that at the lowest concentration (0.05 wt% of polymer in THF) micelles form with an average hydrodynamic diameter of 100 nm. With increasing polymer concentration in the preinjection solution, two colloidal populations form: micelles and microgels. The DLS peak associated with the single micelles indicates that the micelle diameter stays relatively constant with increasing concentration. The single micelle size variations seen in DLS for 0.05 and 0.4 wt% samples are attributed to a fitting artifact of the intensity autocorrelation function when there is more than one population size, which is confirmed using TEM characterization (Supplementary Fig. 5). The average size of the microgel formed through physically crosslinked micelles increases from approximately 200 nm (0.4 wt%) to 1 μm (2.6 wt%). When the preinjection solution concentration reaches the entanglement regime, well-developed hydrogels form on rapid-injection.

The results shown in Fig. 2 are representative for the four different ABA triblock copolymers used for the rapid-injection method (Supplementary Figs. 3, 4). The major difference between the various polymer samples was the relationship between the initial polymer solution concentration in THF and the resulting polymer state in water. For example, the polymer sample with the lowest molecular weight, IOI(17-53-17), an initial polymer concentration of 1.5 wt% was needed to form microgels. Whereas for SOS(69-156-69), which is the polymer with the highest molecular weight, microgels formed when the initial polymer concentration in THF was 0.5 wt%. It is worth noting that when the IOI(17-53-17) polymer concentration was 0.5 wt%, only discrete micelles formed.

The concentration dependence of the final state of the self-assembled structures for a single ABA triblock copolymer, and the differences in the concentrations needed to form hydrogels for the various ABA triblock copolymers, suggests that the initial polymer solution properties in THF dictate the resulting structures after rapid-injection into water. To determine the role of the initial polymer solution properties in controlling the final structure, viscosity measurements were conducted at various concentrations for the four different polymers to experimentally determine the dilute, semi-dilute, and entangled regimes (Supplementary Fig. 6). When the specific viscosity (ηsp, where ηsp = ηsolution/ηsolvent – 1) is plotted versus polymer solution concentration (c), there are clear changes in the scaling exponents in the different polymer solution regimes42,43. In the dilute, semi-dilute, and entangled regimes, the scaling values are predicted to be 1, 1.3, and 3.9, respectively42. The fact that the experimentally determined scaling values for the four different ABA triblock copolymers follow the same trend as the theoretically predicted values indicate that there is no polymer association in the THF solution and the polymers are fully dissolved for all concentrations used44. When comparing the resulting structures with respect to initial concentration for SOS(8-65-8), we find that micelles, microgels, and hydrogels form when the polymer solutions are in the dilute, semi-dilute, and entangled regimes, respectively. When all of the ηsp values for the four polymers are compiled into a single master plot, where the polymer concentration is normalized to the experimentally determined overlap concentration (c/c*, where c* is ηsp = 1), the same three polymer solution regimes are established (Fig. 2f), and all four polymers are consistent with the trend that micelles, microgels, and hydrogels form when the initial polymer solution concentration in THF increases from dilute, to semi-dilute, and finally entangled regimes, respectively. It is worth noting that the transition between dilute and the semi-dilute regimes results in a mixture of discrete isolated micelles and microgels (Fig. 2e).

By establishing the relationship between the initial concentration of the polymer solution and the final state of the assembled polymer structure in water, it is now possible to design desired structures for any ABA triblock copolymer, where the A-blocks are hydrophobic, and the molecular weight is sufficiently large to exhibit the three polymer solution regimes. Furthermore, the predictive nature of using the polymer solution properties allows one to easily calculate c* by using the Rg of the ABA triblock copolymer in THF (Supplementary Note 1). The overlap concentration is a way to determine the concentration ranges for the different regimes (dilute regime: c < c*, semi-dilute regime: c* ≤ c < ce, and the entangled regime: c ≥ ce), and can be calculated using Eq. 1.

$$c^ \ast = \frac{{M_{\mathrm{n}}}}{{VN_{\mathrm{A}}}}.$$
(1)

In Eq. 1, Mn, V, and NA are the polymer number-average molecular weight, the pervaded volume, and Avogadro’s number. The utility of calculating c* using Eq. 1 is exemplified for the SOS(8-65-8) sample. When we use the experimentally measured Rg (Table 1) to calculate V ($$V = \frac{4}{3}\pi R_{\mathrm{g}}^3$$), we obtain c* = 1.0 wt% (Supplementary Table 4), which is close to the c* value determined from ηsp (Fig. 2f). In the case of the hydrogel formation, polymer solutions need to be in the c ≥ ce regime, which is approximately ten times c*43,45. For the four polymers studied here, the normalized ηsp plot (Fig. 2f) indicated that the crossover from the semi-dilute to the entangled regime occurs at ~10c*.

### Structure and mechanical properties of the hydrogels

Remarkably, for the ABA triblock copolymer hydrogels fabricated using the rapid-injection process described above, the internal structure of the material exhibits hierarchical ordering in which the hydrophobic domains self-assemble at the nanoscale while the polymer forms a cellular network structure. A combination of cryogenic scanning electron microscopy (cryo-SEM) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) were used to investigate the internal structure of the hydrogels. Cryo-SEM images reveal that all the hydrogel samples (SOS, BOB, IOI) formed using rapid-injection contain spherical micelles (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. 7). As expected, the diameter of the micelle core changes as the polymer molecular weight and composition changes (80 nm for SOS(69-156-69) compared with 58 nm for SOS(8-65-8), Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. 7a). The micelle core sizes determined from cryo-SEM are larger than the micelle cores measured from TEM, which is likely due to the sample characterization in the dry (TEM) and swollen (cryo-SEM) states, and the difficulty in distinguishing isolated micelles from microgel aggregates using cryo-SEM. Remarkably, the hydrogels exhibit a hierarchical structure in which nanostructured polymer layers form a cellular structure that surrounds water cavities. The cellular structure was discovered by comparing cryo-SEM images of the same SOS(69-156-69) hydrogel sample before and after vitrification (Supplementary Fig. 7a and Fig. 3b). The nanostructure for both IOI(17-53-17) and BOB(31-70-31) samples was confirmed using SAXS (Fig. 3c). SAXS patterns for the SOS samples were not analyzed due to low scattering contrast between the poly(styrene) micelle core and water/poly(ethylene oxide) midblock (Supplementary Table 6), which is exacerbated using the lab-source SAXS instrument. The SAXS patterns for both IOI(17-53-17) and BOB(31-70-31) were further interpreted by simulating the scattering pattern with a combination of a spherical form factor and a Percus–Yevick structure factor (Supplementary Note 2, Supplementary Eqs. 49)24,46. In both cases, the center-to-center distance of the micelles were assumed to be larger than the nanosphere radius of the micelle core (Supplementary Table 7). With this assumption, modeled SAXS profiles estimate that for the IOI(17-53-17) sample contains micelles with a micelle core radius of 12 nm and an inter-micellar center-to-center spacing of 47.6 nm. The hydrogels formed using BOB(31-70-31) exhibit a micelle core radius and an inter-micellar center-to-center spacing of 27.5 and 86 nm, respectively. The increase in micelle diameter and spacing for BOB over IOI is consistent with the reported molecular weight of both samples and TEM results (Table 1, Supplementary Table 3). Furthermore, the simulated SAXS patterns suggest that the micellar core volume fraction of the IOI hydrogel and BOB hydrogel samples are greater than 35%, which is significantly larger than the experimentally determined polymer volume fraction (5.9% for IOI and 7.0% for BOB determined using mass differences in the swollen and dried states). We posit that the discrepancy in micellar volume fraction is indicative of the hierarchical structure of the hydrogel seen in Fig. 3b. The q-range in which the SAXS characterization was performed would be probing the wall structure (nanometer), not the larger length scales associated with the cellular network (micrometer). It is worth noting that the SAXS patterns for microgels and hydrogels are similar (Supplementary Fig. 8), indicating that the nanostructures (micelle core diameter, inter-micellar spacing, and micelle core volume fractions) do not change as the network spans larger length scales. Morphologically, the microgels formed in the work presented here resemble the hydrogels at the nanometer scale. The difference between the two structures is the ratio between looping and bridging chains. The micron-sized micellar aggregates, or microgels, will have an increased number of looping chains, as compared to hydrogels formed at higher concentrations. As the concentration is increased, more bridging chains between different micelles form, which leads to more robust gels with higher water contents (Supplementary Table 5). Here, the microgel term is used to classify the transition between isolated micelles and fully developed hydrogels.

### Versatile processing methods for functional hydrogels

The rapid-injection method and the design rules for forming hydrogels described in this work are easily translatable to a variety of processing procedures that include printing, forming fibers, and coating complex architectures. For example, the well-defined internal nanostructure and the hierarchically ordered cellular network of the hydrogels allows one to create plasmonic nanocomposite hydrogels containing gold nanoparticles and hydrogels exhibiting structural color (Fig. 4). The procedure for printing hydrogels includes first printing a polymer/THF solution on a substrate (glass slide) and then submerging the glass slide into water. Interestingly, printed hydrogels created using transparent SOS(69-156-69) polymer solution (Fig. 4a) develop structural color after 90 s once submerged in water (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Fig. 13, Supplementary Movie 2). The structural coloration of the hydrogel is a result of the material to reflect or scatter specific wavelengths of light depending on the morphology and the differences in the refractive indices of the different domains59,60,61. The structural color was not expected because the same polymer does not exhibit structural color in the microgel form (Supplementary Fig. 3b, inset), which is expected to have similar micelle diameter, inter-micellar spacing, and micelle volume fractions as in the hydrogel (Supplementary Fig. 8). We hypothesize that the SOS(69-156-69) polymer exhibits structural color due to the hierarchical cellular network structure although the nanostructural ordering may play a role as well. The structural coloration, and as a result, the self-assembly and gelation process, are easily monitored after adding the glass slide to water (Supplementary Movie 2). Additional hydrogel functionality is possible by adding hydrophobic dyes or hydrophobic gold nanoparticles into the initial polymer/THF solution. The internal nanostructure of the hydrogels allows one to easily add hydrophobic components (oleylamine-capped gold nanoparticles or indigo blue) into the hydrophobic micellar domains (Fig. 4c, d). The hydrophobic domains serve as stable residing sites that prevent nanoparticle aggregation; gold nanoparticles inside the hydrogels were shown to display the same plasmonic UV−Vis spectrum as gold nanoparticles dispersed in THF (Fig. 4e, Supplementary Fig. 12). The plasmonic properties of the gold nanoparticles give rise to the red color seen in the hydrogel materials, which is a result of the collective oscillation of electrons in the nanoparticle62. By co-assembling gold nanoparticles and polymers using solution processing techniques, it is possible to create materials exhibiting physical properties that are dictated by the nanoparticle, which is one of the attractive features of colloidal nanoparticle/polymer materials63,64,65.

Additional hydrogel structures including fibers and coatings illustrate the versatility of the processing method (Fig. 4f–i). A complex hydrogel mesh was made by printing with two different types of polymer solution inks (SOS(69-156-69)/THF and SOS(8-65-8)/gold nanoparticle/THF solution) onto a stainless steel substrate and then immersing the substrate into water. The exceptional strength of the mesh junction points formed by different polymer solutions were further highlighted by the overall elasticity of the mesh that was removed from the substrate (Fig. 4g, Supplementary Movie 3). Furthermore, structural colored hydrogel fibers are easily formed by directly adding the polymer/THF solution into water (Fig. 4f, Supplementary Movie 1). The advantage of forming hydrogel materials using a direct injection into water is the possibility for scaling up material fabrication, which is analogous to solvent- or gel-spinning polymer fibers in which highly aligned polymer fibers are created by adding a homopolymer solution to a coagulating liquid66,67.

Another exciting application of hydrogels is film coating for applications in biocompatible interfaces for implants and devices in biological systems68. Similar to the printing process, hydrogel coating on an assortment of three-dimensional objects are created by dipping the objects into the polymer/THF solution and then submerging them into water (Fig. 4h, i, Supplementary Movie 4). Figure 4h, i shows how a faceted glass sphere is able to be coated with either a plasmonic or a structural colored hydrogel. In addition, it is possible to remove the coating in a single piece (Fig. 4h). The fundamental understanding of the solvent-induced self-assembly process and the ability to apply the method to create a variety of hydrogel structures has limitless possibilities for creating ABA triblock copolymer nanostructured materials. An exciting prospective is that traditional polymer processing methods like solvent- or gel-spinning are now viable possibilities for expanding the applicability of block polymers in large-scale processing applications.

## Discussion

The solvent-induced nanostructural transition work presented here takes advantage of creating hydrogel materials using a highly nonequilibrium process of rapidly injecting an ABA polymer solution into a B-selective solvent. The rapid-injection method is a robust technique for preparing ABA triblock copolymer self-assembled materials with outstanding mechanical properties. The rapid-injection process allows one to easily tune structures (micelles, microgels, and hydrogels) by simply changing the initial polymer concentration. Specifically, the final state of the system is related to the initial polymer concentration in THF relative to c*, which will allow one to utilize knowledge of c* to rationally design and tailor desired nanostructured hydrogel materials. Furthermore, the rapid-injection method is translatable for printing desired structures, forming fibers, and coating complex three-dimensional objects. The internal nanostructure and the hierarchically ordered cellular network structure of the hydrogels allows one to create plasmonic nanocomposite hydrogels containing gold nanoparticles and hydrogels exhibiting structural colors.

## Methods

### Synthesis and characterization of block copolymers

Monomers (Sigma-Aldrich) were purified with either n-butyllithium (Sigma-Aldrich) (isoprene, 1,3-butadiene, and ethylene oxide) or di-n-butylmagnesium (Sigma-Aldrich) (styrene). Organic solvents were used directly from a solvent drying system (JC Meyer Solvent Systems). The monomers isoprene, 1,3-butadiene, and styrene were initiated using sec-butyllithium (Sigma-Aldrich). Potassium naphthalenide solutions used for the poly(ethylene oxide) polymerizations were prepared 24 h before the initiation of the polymerization. The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments were performed on an Avance AV3HD 500 NMR spectrometer (Bruker) at room temperature. All the obtained spectra were calibrated according to the residual solvent peak. The size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) experiments were performed on an EcoSEC HLC-8320GPC (Tosoh Bioscience) equipped with a DAWN multi-angle static light scattering (SLS) detector (Wyatt Technology).

Mono-hydroxyl functionalized PEO, diblock copolymers SO, BO and IO were synthesized via standard anionic polymerization69. Triblock copolymers SOS, BOB and IOI were synthesized by terminating the corresponding diblock copolymers with the coupling agent α,αʹ-dibromo-p-xylene70. All the polymers were characterized with SEC and 1H NMR (see detailed data in supporting information).

### Micelle and microgel preparation and characterization

Block polymers were first dissolved in THF in the dilute or semi-dilute concentration regimes. To perform self-assembly, 1 mL of the polymer solution was rapidly injected to 20 mL of water in 20 s at room temperature. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) data were collected on an FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit BioTwin instrument operated at 120 kV. All the samples were prepared and negative stained with 0.75% aqueous uranyl formate solution. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was performed on a Malvern instrument equipped with a HE-Ne laser (633 nm, 4 mW) and an avalanche photodiode detector. For microgel samples, the supernatant of settled solution was used for the measurement. The samples were equilibrated at 25 °C before the measurement and signals at 90° angel were collected.

### Viscosity measurements

The viscosity values of different polymer solutions were measured on a Rheometric Scientific ARES RFS III strain-controlled rotational rheometer using concentric cylinder geometry with bob diameter of 16.5 mm. The temperature was controlled by a Julabo FS 18 recirculating water bath and evaporation was prevented by covering sample using a solvent trap with embedded felt. Polymer solutions (1.5 mL) were placed in the cylinder and a geometry gap of 3.5 mm was used to perform steady shear measurements. Steady shear measurements of solutions were conducted with shear rates of 10–100 s−1, with the motor rotating in both directions. Steady-state sensing with an equilibration time of 10 s and an averaging time of 30 s was applied to the procedure to avoid measuring viscosity overshoot during start-up shear.

### Hydrogel preparation

To prepare the hydrogels, ABA triblock copolymers were first dissolved in THF in the entangled regime. The solution was then injected into an excess amount of water (20 mL). For making bulk hydrogel samples and hydrogel printing, the polymer solution was first written on a substrate or cast in a petri dish, then an excess amount of water was added to the solution. For fabricating free-standing hydrogel fibers, the polymer solution was injected to water at a constant rate (5 mL min−1) with a nozzle with an inner diameter of 0.51 mm. For coating applications, the substrate was first immersed into polymer solution and then submerged into water for several minutes until the hydrogel formed.

### Cryogenic scanning electron microscopy (cryo-SEM)

The cryo-SEM experiments were performed on a Zeiss Sigma VP-FESEM. To perform the experiments, the hydrogel sample was placed together with cryo-matrix on the holder of the sample exchange rod. The sample holder was then submerged into a high-pressure freezing machine (slushy) filled with liquid nitrogen. After the sample was frozen, it was inserted into the SEM preparation chamber and a scalpel was used to cleave the sample and expose the inside of the hydrogel. Then the sample was sputter coated with gold for 120 s inside the chamber. Finally, the sample was inserted into the main chamber of the cryo-SEM maintained at −195 °C. The samples were measured under variable pressure mode at a low acceleration voltage of 5 keV to avoid excessive charging and radiation damage to the sample.

### Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS)

Transmission SAXS measurements were performed using a Cu K-α sourced (1.54 Å and 8.04 keV) Xeuss 2.0 (XENOCS) instrument installed with collimation optics and a 2D X-ray detector Pilatus 200 K (Dectris). The sample to detector distance was set to 2.5  and isotropic scattering intensity were azimuthally integrated to obtain I(q) 1D plots. The scattering wavevector, q, was calibrated by using a standard sample of powdered silver behenate. Microgel samples were measured in solution in quartz capillaries (1.5 mm outer diameter thickness, Charles Supper Company, Quartz 15-QZ). Hydrogel samples were measured after immediate removal from water to ensure a completely swollen network using an acquisition time of 5 min.

### Tensile test of ABA triblock copolymer hydrogels

Uniaxial tensile stress−strain tests were performed on an Instron 5866 load frame with a 10 N load cell at 25 °C. To measure the mechanical properties of ABA triblock copolymer hydrogels, fibers with an average diameter of 0.45 ± 0.13 mm were prepared via rapid-injection. The initial gauge length was 10 mm and uniaxial extension was applied to the specimen at a constant rate. The samples were stretched until fracture, and measurements were conducted in triplicate for each sample. The stress−strain curves of the hydrogel samples were background subtracted. For the cyclic loading and unloading experiment, stress−strain curves were recorded for different strain values ranging from 1 to 5 for the same sample.

## Data availability

The relevant data are available from the authors upon reasonable request. The raw data for Figs. 2e, 2f, 3c, 3d, 3e, 3f and 4e and Supplementary Figs. 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 13 are listed in a Source Data file.

## References

1. 1.

Bates, F. S. & Fredrickson, G. Block copolymers-designer soft materials. Phys. Today 52, 32–38 (1999).

2. 2.

Bates, C. M. & Bates, F. S. 50th anniversary perspective: block polymers pure potential. Macromolecules 50, 3–22 (2017).

3. 3.

Shin, J. et al. Pressure-sensitive adhesives from renewable triblock copolymers. Macromolecules 44, 87–94 (2011).

4. 4.

Flanigan, C. M., Crosby, A. J. & Shull, K. R. Structural development and adhesion of acrylic ABA triblock copolymer gels. Macromolecules 32, 7251–7262 (1999).

5. 5.

Middleton, J. C. & Tipton, A. J. Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices. Biomaterials 21, 2335–2346 (2000).

6. 6.

Bouchet, R. et al. Single-ion BAB triblock copolymers as highly efficient electrolytes for lithium-metal batteries. Nat. Mater. 12, 452–457 (2013).

7. 7.

Zhang, S., Lee, K. H., Sun, J., Frisbie, C. D. & Lodge, T. P. Viscoelastic properties, ionic conductivity, and materials design considerations for poly (styrene-b-ethylene oxide-b-styrene)-based ion gel electrolytes. Macromolecules 44, 8981–8989 (2011).

8. 8.

Peinemann, K.-V., Abetz, V. & Simon, P. F. Asymmetric superstructure formed in a block copolymer via phase separation. Nat. Mater. 6, 992–996 (2007).

9. 9.

Shen, Y.-x et al. Achieving high permeability and enhanced selectivity for Angstrom-scale separations using artificial water channel membranes. Nat. Commun. 9, 2294 (2018).

10. 10.

Lang, C. et al. Biomimetic separation of transport and matrix functions in lamellar block copolymer channel-based membranes. ACS Nano 13, 8292–8302 (2019).

11. 11.

Seo, M. & Hillmyer, M. A. Reticulated nanoporous polymers by controlled polymerization-induced microphase separation. Science 336, 1422–1425 (2012).

12. 12.

Jeong, B., Bae, Y. H., Lee, D. S. & Kim, S. W. Biodegradable block copolymers as injectable drug-delivery systems. Nature 388, 860–862 (1997).

13. 13.

Ghoroghchian, P. P. et al. Near-infrared-emissive polymersomes: self-assembled soft matter for in vivo optical imaging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2922–2927 (2005).

14. 14.

Geng, Y. et al. Shape effects of filaments versus spherical particles in flow and drug delivery. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 249–255 (2007).

15. 15.

Appel, E. A. et al. Self-assembled hydrogels utilizing polymer–nanoparticle interactions. Nat. Commun. 6, 6295 (2015).

16. 16.

Bates, F. S. et al. Multiblock polymers: panacea or Pandora’s box? Science 336, 434–440 (2012).

17. 17.

Koerner, H., Price, G., Pearce, N. A., Alexander, M. & Vaia, R. A. Remotely actuated polymer nanocomposites-stress-recovery of carbon-nanotube-filled thermoplastic elastomers. Nat. Mater. 3, 115–120 (2004).

18. 18.

Chen, Y., Kushner, A. M., Williams, G. A. & Guan, Z. Multiphase design of autonomic self-healing thermoplastic elastomers. Nat. Chem. 4, 467–472 (2012).

19. 19.

Lin, Z., Cao, S., Chen, X., Wu, W. & Li, J. Thermoresponsive hydrogels from phosphorylated ABA triblock copolymers: a potential scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 14, 2206–2214 (2013).

20. 20.

Li, M. H., Keller, P., Yang, J. & Albouy, P. A. An artificial muscle with lamellar structure based on a nematic triblock copolymer. Adv. Mater. 16, 1922–1925 (2004).

21. 21.

Li, C., Madsen, J., Armes, S. P. & Lewis, A. L. A new class of biochemically degradable, stimulus‐responsive triblock copolymer gelators. Angew. Chem. 118, 3590–3593 (2006).

22. 22.

Srivastava, S. et al. Gel phase formation in dilute triblock copolyelectrolyte complexes. Nat. Commun. 8, 14131 (2017).

23. 23.

Hunt, J. N. et al. Tunable, high modulus hydrogels driven by ionic coacervation. Adv. Mater. 23, 2327–2331 (2011).

24. 24.

Guo, C. & Bailey, T. S. Highly distensible nanostructured elastic hydrogels from AB diblock and ABA triblock copolymer melt blends. Soft Matter 6, 4807–4818 (2010).

25. 25.

Raspaud, E., Lairez, D., Adam, M. & Carton, J.-P. Triblock copolymers in a selective solvent. 2. Semidilute solutions. Macromolecules 29, 1269–1277 (1996).

26. 26.

Semenov, A., Joanny, J.-F. & Khokhlov, A. Associating polymers: equilibrium and linear viscoelasticity. Macromolecules 28, 1066–1075 (1995).

27. 27.

Garcia, J. M. & Robertson, M. L. The future of plastics recycling. Science 358, 870–872 (2017).

28. 28.

Balsara, N., Tirrell, M. & Lodge, T. Micelle formation of BAB triblock copolymers in solvents that preferentially dissolve the A block. Macromolecules 24, 1975–1986 (1991).

29. 29.

Zhang, L. & Eisenberg, A. Multiple morphologies and characteristics of “crew-cut” micelle-like aggregates of polystyrene-b-poly (acrylic acid) diblock copolymers in aqueous solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 3168–3181 (1996).

30. 30.

Zhang, L. & Eisenberg, A. Multiple morphologies of” crew-cut” aggregates of polystyrene-b-poly (acrylic acid) block copolymers. Science 268, 1728–1731 (1995).

31. 31.

Won, Y.-Y., Davis, H. T. & Bates, F. S. Giant wormlike rubber micelles. Science 283, 960–963 (1999).

32. 32.

Discher, B. M. et al. Polymersomes: tough vesicles made from diblock copolymers. Science 284, 1143–1146 (1999).

33. 33.

Hayward, R. C. & Pochan, D. J. Tailored assemblies of block copolymers in solution: it is all about the process. Macromolecules 43, 3577–3584 (2010).

34. 34.

Imaizumi, S., Kokubo, H. & Watanabe, M. Polymer actuators using ion-gel electrolytes prepared by self-assembly of ABA-triblock copolymers. Macromolecules 45, 401–409 (2012).

35. 35.

Guvendiren, M. & Shull, K. R. Self-assembly of acrylic triblock hydrogels by vapor-phase solvent exchange. Soft Matter 3, 619–626 (2007).

36. 36.

Kang, Y., Walish, J. J., Gorishnyy, T. & Thomas, E. L. Broad-wavelength-range chemically tunable block-copolymer photonic gels. Nat. Mater. 6, 957–960 (2007).

37. 37.

Tae, G., Kornfield, J. A. & Hubbell, J. A. Sustained release of human growth hormone from in situ forming hydrogels using self-assembly of fluoroalkyl-ended poly (ethylene glycol). Biomaterials 26, 5259–5266 (2005).

38. 38.

Li, J. & Mooney, D. J. Designing hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16071 (2016).

39. 39.

Slaughter, B. V., Khurshid, S. S., Fisher, O. Z., Khademhosseini, A. & Peppas, N. A. Hydrogels in regenerative medicine. Adv. Mater. 21, 3307–3329 (2009).

40. 40.

Kopecek, J. Hydrogels: From soft contact lenses and implants to self‐assembled nanomaterials. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 47, 5929–5946 (2009).

41. 41.

Harris, J. M. Poly (Ethylene Glycol) Chemistry: Biotechnical and Biomedical Applications (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2013).

42. 42.

Rubinstein, M. & Colby, R. H. Polymer Physics (Oxford University Press, New York, 2003).

43. 43.

Colby, R. H. Structure and linear viscoelasticity of flexible polymer solutions: comparison of polyelectrolyte and neutral polymer solutions. Rheol. Acta 49, 425–442 (2010).

44. 44.

Rubinstein, M. & Semenov, A. N. Dynamics of entangled solutions of associating polymers. Macromolecules 34, 1058–1068 (2001).

45. 45.

Graessley, W. W. Polymer chain dimensions and the dependence of viscoelastic properties on concentration, molecular weight and solvent power. Polymer 21, 258–262 (1980).

46. 46.

Taribagil, R. R., Hillmyer, M. A. & Lodge, T. P. Hydrogels from ABA and ABC triblock polymers. Macromolecules 43, 5396–5404 (2010).

47. 47.

Erk, K. A., Henderson, K. J. & Shull, K. R. Strain stiffening in synthetic and biopolymer networks. Biomacromolecules 11, 1358–1363 (2010).

48. 48.

Xu, D. & Craig, S. L. Strain hardening and strain softening of reversibly cross-linked supramolecular polymer networks. Macromolecules 44, 7478–7488 (2011).

49. 49.

Vatankhah-Varnosfaderani, M. et al. Chameleon-like elastomers with molecularly encoded strain-adaptive stiffening and coloration. Science 359, 1509–1513 (2018).

50. 50.

Vatankhah-Varnosfaderani, M. et al. Mimicking biological stress–strain behaviour with synthetic elastomers. Nature 549, 497–501 (2017).

51. 51.

Pellens, L., Corrales, R. G. & Mewis, J. General nonlinear rheological behavior of associative polymers. J. Rheol. 48, 379–393 (2004).

52. 52.

Bossard, F., Sfika, V. & Tsitsilianis, C. Rheological properties of physical gel formed by triblock polyampholyte in salt-free aqueous solutions. Macromolecules 37, 3899–3904 (2004).

53. 53.

Moerman, K. M., Holt, C. A., Evans, S. L. & Simms, C. K. Digital image correlation and finite element modelling as a method to determine mechanical properties of human soft tissue in vivo. J. Biomech. 42, 1150–1153 (2009).

54. 54.

Zhu, Y., Moldovan, N. & Espinosa, H. D. A microelectromechanical load sensor for in situ electron and x-ray microscopy tensile testing of nanostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 013506 (2005).

55. 55.

Zhang, Y. S. & Khademhosseini, A. Advances in engineering hydrogels. Science 356, eaaf3627 (2017).

56. 56.

Zhang, Y. N. et al. A highly elastic and rapidly crosslinkable elastin-like polypeptide-based hydrogel for biomedical applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 4814–4826 (2015).

57. 57.

Sun, J.-Y. et al. Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature 489, 133–136 (2012).

58. 58.

Imran, A. B. et al. Extremely stretchable thermosensitive hydrogels by introducing slide-ring polyrotaxane cross-linkers and ionic groups into the polymer network. Nat. Commun. 5, 5124 (2014).

59. 59.

Johnson, S. G., Mekis, A., Fan, S. & Joannopoulos, J. D. Molding the flow of light. Comput. Sci. Eng. 3, 38–47 (2001).

60. 60.

Yablonovitch, E. Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid-state physics and electronics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2059 (1987).

61. 61.

John, S. Strong localization of photons in certain disordered dielectric superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2486 (1987).

62. 62.

Link, S. & El-Sayed, M. A. Size and temperature dependence of the plasmon absorption of colloidal gold nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 4212–4217 (1999).

63. 63.

Hickey, R. J., Haynes, A. S., Kikkawa, J. M. & Park, S.-J. Controlling the self-assembly structure of magnetic nanoparticles and amphiphilic block-copolymers: from micelles to vesicles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 1517–1525 (2011).

64. 64.

Hickey, R. J. et al. Size-controlled self-assembly of superparamagnetic polymersomes. ACS Nano 8, 495–502 (2014).

65. 65.

Hickey, R. J., Meng, X., Zhang, P. & Park, S.-J. Low-dimensional nanoparticle clustering in polymer micelles and their transverse relaxivity rates. ACS Nano 7, 5824–5833 (2013).

66. 66.

Zhao, X. et al. Bioinspired ultra-stretchable and anti-freezing conductive hydrogel fibers with ordered and reversible polymer chain alignment. Nat. Commun. 9, 3579 (2018).

67. 67.

McIntyre, J. E. Synthetic Fibres: Nylon, Polyester, Acrylic, Polyolefin (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2005).

68. 68.

Moreau, D., Chauvet, C., Etienne, F., Rannou, F. P. & Corté, L. Hydrogel films and coatings by swelling-induced gelation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13295–13300 (2016).

69. 69.

Ndoni, S., Papadakis, C. M., Bates, F. S. & Almdal, K. Laboratory‐scale setup for anionic polymerization under inert atmosphere. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 1090–1095 (1995).

70. 70.

Lang, C. et al. Creating cross-linked lamellar block copolymer supporting layers for biomimetic membranes. Faraday Discuss. 209, 179–191 (2018).

## Acknowledgements

This work was supported using start-up funds and the Gladys Snyder Junior Faculty Grant from the Penn State University. Part of the work was also funded by National Science Foundation (NSF) grant CBET 1552571 and US Army CERL W9132T-16-2-12640004-P00003. All of the SAXS and TEM measurements were taken at the Materials Characterization Lab (MCL) in the Materials Research Institute (MRI) at the Penn State University. We are grateful to John Cantolina (Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences) for help with cryo-SEM imaging.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

C.L., M.K., and R.J.H. designed the project. C.L. carried out the synthesis of the polymers, and characterized the materials using TEM and tensile tests. J.A.L. conducted the SAXS experiments, and modeled the SAXS patterns. N.U. conducted the rheology experiments, and M.J.N. prepared all of the polymer solutions for the rheology experiments. Y.X. ran all the UV−Vis experiments for the plasmonic hydrogels. W.S. helped C.L. run experiments. M.A.H. helped with printing of the hydrogel materials. M.A.H., R.H.C., and M.K. added valuable insight into the full understanding of the hydrogel formation. C.L. and R.J.H. co-wrote the manuscript with significant input from M.K.

### Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Manish Kumar or Robert J. Hickey.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Lang, C., LaNasa, J.A., Utomo, N. et al. Solvent-non-solvent rapid-injection for preparing nanostructured materials from micelles to hydrogels. Nat Commun 10, 3855 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11804-7

• Accepted:

• Published: