Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

IP3 receptor isoforms differently regulate ER-mitochondrial contacts and local calcium transfer

Abstract

Contact sites of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria locally convey calcium signals between the IP3 receptors (IP3R) and the mitochondrial calcium uniporter, and are central to cell survival. It remains unclear whether IP3Rs also have a structural role in contact formation and whether the different IP3R isoforms have redundant functions. Using an IP3R-deficient cell model rescued with each of the three IP3R isoforms and an array of super-resolution and ultrastructural approaches we demonstrate that IP3Rs are required for maintaining ER-mitochondrial contacts. This role is independent of calcium fluxes. We also show that, while each isoform can support contacts, type 2 IP3R is the most effective in delivering calcium to the mitochondria. Thus, these studies reveal a non-canonical, structural role for the IP3Rs and direct attention towards the type 2 IP3R that was previously neglected in the context of ER-mitochondrial calcium signaling.

Introduction

In the past decade, interorganellar signaling and its pathophysiologic connections to various human diseases have received growing attention. One of the most intensely pursued paradigms has been the local communication between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria at their close contacts, which are supported by direct physical links referred to as tethers1. ER-mitochondrial contacts are relevant for intracellular signaling through calcium, reactive oxygen species and Bcl-2 family proteins, biosynthetic pathways, membrane dynamics, and even for mitochondrial DNA replication (reviewed in ref. 2,3,4,5). The alteration of the physical contact between the ER and mitochondria and the malfunction of the interorganellar Ca2+ transfer was linked to various complex symptoms involved in human diseases, such as progressive cognitive and motor disorders, neurodegeneration, or cancer6,7,8,9. Thus, determining the structure of the interface between the ER and mitochondria, the molecules involved in the physical interaction and their regulation is expected to aid understanding of the pathogenesis of such diseases and identification of potential new drug targets. In the past decade more than 60 proteins have been localized at the contacts5,10,11, among them the IP3 receptors (IP3Rs), but their distinct roles in shaping the ER-mitochondrial contacts have never been directly addressed.

IP3Rs are large-conductance cation channels that mediate Ca2+ release from the ER, giving rise to a cytoplasmic [Ca2+] ([Ca2+]cyto) signal, which controls a variety of cytoplasmic targets and is also effectively delivered to the mitochondrial matrix to regulate oxidative metabolism and cell survival12,13. Because the global [Ca2+]cyto usually peaks at ≤ 1μM and the affinity of the mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake machinery is relatively low12, and because clamping the global [Ca2+]cyto with a slow Ca2+ buffer does not prevent calcium signal propagation to the mitochondria14,15, the IP3R-mitochondrial Ca2+ delivery has to involve a privileged local mechanism. Indeed, direct local [Ca2+] measurements showed the IP3R-mediated Ca2+ release can expose the adjacent mitochondrial surface to 10–30 times larger [Ca2+]cyto than the global [Ca2+]cyto increase16,17.

There are three isoforms of IP3Rs, encoded by three distinct genes, all regulated by IP3, Ca2+, ATP, and post-translational modifications (e.g., phosphorylation and redox state), but each isoform shows different activation and deactivation patterns18,19,20,21,22,23,24. The expression pattern and subcellular distribution of the three IP3R isoforms show heterogeneity in different tissues and cell types25,26,27. Overall, the three IP3R isoforms seem to have different functions and regulation, which are expected to result in heterogeneity in their communication with mitochondria. Among the three different IP3R isoforms, IP3R1 and IP3R3 have been described to co-IP with the voltage dependent anion channels (VDAC1) in the mitochondrial outer membrane (OMM) or to facilitate Ca2+ signal transmission from the ER to the mitochondria28,29,30. However, no systematic comparison of the three IP3R isoforms in the same cell type has been conducted.

The first vertebrate cellular model available to compare individual IP3R isoforms in the same cellular background was established in DT40 cells31. This model is also broadly relevant since several functional consequences of IP3R-mitochondrial communication have also been described in DT40 cells19,32,33. In the current study, we investigate a possible role of IP3Rs in shaping the interface between the ER and mitochondria and assess the role of each IP3R isoform in delivering Ca2+ signals to the mitochondria in IP3R-deficient (triple KO, TKO) DT40 cells stably and evenly rescued by biochemically tagged individual mammalian IP3R isoforms. To test the broad relevance of the findings made in DT40 cells, we also employ a very recently established IP3R-deficient (TKO) HeLa cell model34.

Results

Tight contacts between ER and mitochondria depend on IP3Rs

To test whether IP3Rs are needed for the physical coupling of ER and mitochondria we first used wild-type (WT) and IP3R-deficient (TKO) DT40 cells (Supplementary Fig. 1A). In TKO cells, the IP3-mediated Ca2+ signaling was completely absent (Fig. 1a). Localization of the ER relative to the mitochondria was first visualized by organelle-targeted fluorescent proteins (ER-GFP, mito-mCherry) using a confocal microscope with an Airyscan detector to improve the optical resolution (Fig. 1b). Our attempt at colocalization analysis of ER and mitochondria at ~150–200 nm resolution could not capture any IP3R-dependent difference in the TKO vs. WT and IP3R-rescued cells. However, looking at the relative abundance of the organelles among the different horizontal (Z) planes of the cell, we found that in WT cells, this Z-distribution of ER and mitochondria showed a similar pattern, whereas in TKO cells the two patterns were less aligned (Fig. 1c). The difference was most obvious in the region close to the adherent surface, therefore we examined the ER and mitochondria co-distribution in the basal (1 µm thick) region of the cells. Values close to zero for WT cells suggest that the ER and mitochondria follow the same distribution pattern, whereas in TKO cells, the relative presence of ER is higher than that of the mitochondria close to the adherent surface (Fig. 1c, inset). This phenomenon might be caused by a stronger physical interaction between the ER and mitochondria in the presence of IP3Rs, which keep the ER co-distributed with mitochondria when the cells are polarized by an adhesion surface (Cell-Tak coated coverglass), but Airyscan imaging does not have the resolution to directly visualize <100 nm wide contacts.

Fig. 1
figure1

Tight contacts between mitochondria and ER are more frequent in the presence of IP3Rs. a IP3-mobilizing agonist-induced [Ca2+]cyto signals in WT and TKO DT40 cells (representative traces, N = 23 and 35 cells, respectively, from three independent experiments). For reference, Ca2+ mobilization through SERCA inhibition (thapsigargin) is also shown. b Intracellular distribution of the mitochondria (mito, mito-mCherry) and ER (ER-GFP) visualized by confocal microscopy (Z-stacks). Sections at Z = 6 µm are shown (Z = 0 at the adherent surface), see scheme. Scale = 5 µm. c Relative abundance (distribution of the whole-cell fluorescence amongst 60 slices taken with 0.2 µm increments) of ER and mitochondria in WT (N = 45) and TKO (N = 49) cells plotted against the Z-axis (means ± SEM from four independent experiments). Inset co-distribution of ER and mitochondria (Log2 converted, dashed lines: mean, *p < 0.05 unpaired Student’s t-test). d Dynamics of the formation of tight interactions between ER and mitochondria as measured by FRET increase between CFP− (Donor, ER-targeted module) and YFP− (Acceptor, OMM-targeted module) tagged rapamycin-inducible linker pairs. FRET ratios (FRET/CFP) show different kinetics in WT and TKO cells (mean traces ± S.E.M., N = 122 and 71, respectively, from three independent experiments). inset Half-activation times (t1/2) (dashed lines: means) *p < 0.05, unpaired Student’s t-test. e, f Example electron micrographs of mitochondria forming close contact(s) with ER (red arrows) in WT and TKO DT40 (e) and HeLa (f) cells. Scale bar = 300 nm. Bar graphs Quantitation of the tight associations between mitochondria and ER. In TEM images of randomly selected WT and TKO cells, for all mitochondria with ER contact (<100 nm distance) the mitochondrial perimeter (OMM) and interfacing ER membrane segments were masked and measured, binning the interface distances and returning the length of the ER subsegment that participates in an interface of a given gap-width. Bars show relative frequencies (Mean ± S.E.M of three experiments) of minimum distances providing an interface <100 nm between the ER and mitochondrion in WT (gray) and TKO (black) cells. ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 with Chi-squared test (N = 591 WT and 531 TKO mitochondria in DT40 and 702 WT and 632 TKO mitochondria in HeLa cells from three independent experiments). Source data are provided for panels c, d, e, f as a Source Data file

To further examine the spatial relationship between ER and mitochondria in live cells, we used FRET measurements that are sensitive to distances within the 10 nm scale gap-width16. Outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) and ER targeting sequences coupled with the two components of the FKBP-FRB heterodimerization system and YFP and CFP, respectively, were overexpressed in WT and TKO cells. Addition of rapamycin causes trans heterodimerization between interfacing FKBP and FRB domains to rapidly connect the ER-and OMM-targeted anchors. Induction of the bridge formation is initially confined to the areas where the ER and OMM were naturally close. Addition of rapamycin (100 nM) led to rapid redistribution of the majority of the CFP fluorescence to the mitochondria and an increase in the FRET between CFP and YFP (Fig. 1d). The kinetics of the formation of the bond between the linker halves was measured by the change in the ratio of the FRET and CFP signal, which was significantly faster in WT cells than in the TKO (Fig. 1d, inset). This result further indicates the dependence of more close associations between ER and mitochondria on IP3R expression.

Associations between ER and mitochondria at the ultrastructural level were analyzed in electron micrographs of WT and TKO DT40 cells (Fig. 1e). The length of ER segments within 100 nm distance from the mitochondria (OMM) was measured with high spatial resolution. Quantitative interface profiles were established by binning the interface lengths in given distance ranges between the membranes. Comparing the occurrence of interactions within given gap widths between mitochondria and ER, we found significantly higher frequency of tighter interactions in WT cells (Fig. 1f). To test whether the IP3R dependence of the ER-mitochondrial interface is not a peculiarity of the DT40 cells, we also performed ultrastructure analysis in IP3R TKO HeLa cells that have just been created and validated34. Similar to that in the DT40 cells, the tight interactions were more frequent in the WT than in the TKO HeLa cells (Fig. 1f). These results, together with the FRET data, provide the first direct evidence for a role of IP3Rs in the formation of the ER-mitochondrial contacts.

Mammalian IP3R isoforms are functional in DT40 TKO cells

To verify the function of each IP3R isoform, we used DT40 TKO cells rescued with an individual FLAG-tagged mammalian IP3R isoform. Comparing the rescue levels to the endogenous IP3R isoform abundance is difficult because the anti-IP3R antibodies likely recognize avian (endogenous) and mammalian (rescue) IP3Rs with different affinities (Supplementary Fig. 1A). However, the clones selected for this study had comparable expression levels for the individual isoforms based on anti-FLAG immunoblotting (Supplementary Fig. 1B). We validated the IP3 sensitivity of each clone in permeabilized cells (Supplementary Fig. 1C, D). We measured the highest IP3 sensitivity for IP3R2 (EC50 = 146 nM, H = 2.37). The two IP3R1 clones (R1 A and R1 B) had similar sensitivities (EC50 = 213 nM, H = 1.18 for R1 A and 218 nM, H 1.46 for R1 B). IP3R3 has the lowest sensitivity (EC50 = 1664 nM, H = 1.08) (Supplementary Fig. 1B). The IP3-sensitive ER Ca2+ pool sizes (percentage of maximal IP3-induced release relative to the thapsigargin-induced Ca2+ release) of the cell lines were in the range of 50–80%. The IP3 sensitivity and pool sizes were then compared to what we recorded previously in double knockout (DKO cells) DT40 cells expressing each individual endogenous avian IP3R isoform19 (Table 1). The EC50 values show similar patterns in both systems, though we found slightly increased sensitivities in the stable rescue system. The IP3 sensitive pool size measured in the TKO rescue and DKO systems are also comparable with the exception of DKO cells expressing endogenous avian IP3R3, which had a relatively small IP3 sensitive pool. In conclusion, the different mammalian IP3R isoforms in the stable rescue cells provide a suitable model for studying their function in the same cellular background. Furthermore, having the FLAG tag on each rescue  allows studying their localization by the same antibody.

Table 1 Functional comparison of endogenous IP3R levels to those in stable-rescued cells

Each IP3R isoform can restore tight ER-mitochondria contacts

To test the effects of the three different IP3R isoforms on ER and mitochondrial distribution and contacts, we compared TKO cells with those stably rescued with a single, FLAG-tagged IP3R isoform. We used two clones of IP3R1 (A, B) and one clone each of IP3R2 and IP3R3. As a first approach, we examined the relative distribution of ER and mitochondria along the Z-axis of plated cells using the Airyscan detector (Fig. 2a). We found that each IP3R isoform increased the ER-mitochondria co-distribution close to the adherent surface (0–1 µm) (Fig. 2b) as compared to that in TKO cells (Fig. 1c), similarly to what we had seen in WT cells (see Fig. 1c). The competency of each IP3R isoform to rescue the co-distribution was established by calculation of the relative sum of square values for each cell by taking the sum of the square of the difference of the relative abundances of the two organelles within each Z plane (Fig. 2c). The higher values for TKO cells indicate a greater difference in the distribution pattern of the organelles. With ultrastructural analysis, the frequencies of the occurrence of close interfaces between the ER and mitochondria in the range of 0–10 nm and 10–20 nm were higher for each IP3R isoform expressing clone compared to TKO cells (Fig. 2d), demonstrating that each IP3R isoform enhances the physical connection between the ER and mitochondria. Together these results show isoform-independent effects of IP3Rs on the relative positioning of ER and mitochondria.

Fig. 2
figure2

Each IP3R isoform restores ER-mitochondria co-distribution and tight interactions. a Relative abundance of ER and mitochondria in R1 A (N = 38), R1 B (N = 50), R2 (N = 49), and R3 (N = 48) cells plotted against the Z-axis (mean ± SEM from four independent experiments). b Co-distribution of mitochondria and ER in the 0–1 µm Z sections of each clones (Log2 converted, mean, dashed line). c Residual sum of squares for mitochondria and ER. Cellular averages (dashed lines) are compared. Black lines in b, c indicate p < 0.05 with one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Holm method. d TEM evaluation of the close interfaces between ER and mitochondria in the different IP3R rescue clones (same color code as in a). Bar graphs show relative frequencies (Mean ± S.E.M of three experiments) of minimum distances at the interfaces of <100 nm between the ER and mitochondria in each cell line. Black lines represent p < 0.05 with Chi-squared test (N = 238 TKO, 312 R1 A, 322 R1 B, 310 R2 and 375 R3 mitochondria from three experiments). Source data are provided for each panel as a Source Data file

Each IP3R isoform forms clusters close to the mitochondria

We employed three techniques to visualize directly the relationship between IP3Rs and mitochondria in stable-rescued DT40 cells. First, the localization of FLAG-tagged IP3Rs and OMM was visualized by single-molecule localization super-resolution microscopy (Fig. 3a). A cluster-based analysis was used to measure 3D distances between IP3R clusters and the surfaces of mitochondria and compared against measurements on randomly generated clusters of similar dimensions (see Methods). Minimum distances between IP3R clusters and OMM were binned in 25 nm intervals (Fig. 3b). The fractions of minimum distance values in the range of 0–25 nm, relative to all clusters within 250 nm, were significantly higher for each IP3R isoform clusters than that of random clusters, suggesting that a fraction of each IP3R isoform is targeted to the close vicinity of the mitochondria.

Fig. 3
figure3

Each IP3R isoform forms clusters near mitochondria, but their subcellular distributions vary. a OMM (Tom20) and IP3Rs visualized by Vutara 352 STORM based super-resolution (single-molecule imaging) system. 2D projection of Z = 200 nm thickness is shown. Bars = 2 µm. b Shortest distances between IP3R and OMM clusters were measured in 3D. Relative frequencies of minimum distances are shown within 0–250 nM (median line, box: 25–75%, error bars 10–90% and individual outliers as dots N = 15, 18, 24 cells, respectively, from three independent experiments). For reference, the same measurements were performed using mock randomly generated clusters in place of the IP3R clusters (control) (N = 14, 13, 19, respectively). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, unpaired Student’s t-test. c Anti-FLAG immunofluorescence in IP3R-FLAG expressing cells in Z sections at 1, 4, and 7 µm. Scale bar = 5 µm. d Relative abundance of IP3Rs in R1 A (N = 38), R1 B (N = 50), R2 (N = 49), and R3 (N = 48) cells plotted against the Z-axis. e Cumulative abundance of IP3Rs in the 0–1 µm Z sections of each cells (mean, dashed lines from four independent experiments). Black lines indicate p < 0.05 with one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Dunn’s method. f Residual sum of squares for mitochondria and IP3Rs (Mt-IP3R). Cellular averages (dashed lines) are compared. Black lines represent p < 0.05 with one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Dunn’s method. Source data are provided for panels B, d, e, f as a Source Data file

Next, we sought to validate these findings using 3D stimulated emission depletion (STED), super-resolution microscopy. We were able to visualize FLAG-tagged IP3R2 and IP3R3 together with the OMM marker TOM20 and to localize areas where IP3R clusters overlapped with OMM signal (Supplementary Fig. 2A, B). While the IP3R2 seemed overall to have more contacts with the mitochondria, quantitative measurements were highly variable cell-to-cell, possible due to varying IP3R expression levels. Finally, we performed immuno-EM experiments, which provide very high spatial resolution, but are limited to 2D. We found that anti-FLAG gold particle density was higher within 0–25 nm from the surface of mitochondria than in the 25–100 nm range (Supplementary Fig. 2C, D, E) in agreement with the single-molecule localization fluorescence imaging. Consistent with the STED results, the IP3R2 isoform seemed to be most enriched within 0–25 nm from the OMM surface (Supplementary Fig. 2E third row).

Distributions of IP3R isoforms differ in plated cells

To examine the intracellular localization of IP3Rs at the whole-cell level, IP3Rs were visualized using the Airyscan detector (Fig. 3c). Plotting the intracellular distribution of the IP3Rs, we found that a large fraction of the pool of IP3R1 concentrates to the adherent surface whereas IP3R2 and IP3R3 are more uniformly distributed in the cells (Fig. 3d). To quantify this difference, we calculated the relative abundance of the IP3Rs within 0–1 µm distance from the adherent surface (Fig. 3e), which showed a significant increase for IP3R1 as opposed to IP3R2 and IP3R3. The residual sum of squares for the IP3Rs and ER shows significantly higher values, thus bigger differences in the distribution patterns for both R1 A and R1 B compared to R2 and R3 rescue clones (Fig. 3f). These results suggest that a fraction of each IP3R isoform is localized to the ER-mitochondrial contacts while IP3R1s have a primary concentration close to the adherent region of the plasma membrane.

IP3R2>IP3R3>IP3R1 at propagating Ca2+ signals to mitochondria

To test the ability of the IP3R isoforms to transfer Ca2+ from the ER to the mitochondria we measured cytoplasmic and mitochondrial matrix [Ca2+] ([Ca2+]cyto and [Ca2+]mito) levels, simultaneously in intact cells. To trigger IP3-dependent ER Ca2+ release we stimulated the cells with trypsin, which activates the IP3-linked protease-activated receptors (PAR). Addition of trypsin was followed by cytoplasmic and closely coupled mitochondrial Ca2+ signals in each IP3R isoform expressing cell line (Fig. 4a). Baseline [Ca2+]cyto levels were not different in the different IP3R rescue clones (Fig. 4b left). Cytoplasmic and mitochondrial Ca2+ signals for R1 A and R1 B clones showed slower rise and decay kinetics and lower peak values compared to those in the R2 and R3 clones (Fig. 4a–c). To measure and compare the time course of the ER-mitochondrial Ca2+ transfer for the different IP3R isoforms we determined the coupling time as the difference of the half-activation time of the [Ca2+]mito and [Ca2+]cyto signals measured in individual cells. We measured the fastest coupling in the R2 followed by R3 then R1 clones (Fig. 4d).

Fig. 4
figure4

IP3R2 is the most efficient coupler of agonist-induced Ca2+ signal. a To monitor Ca2+ transfer from ER to mitochondria [Ca2+]mito and [Ca2+]cyto were imaged simultaneously using a wide-field EMCCD imaging setup in intact cells transfected with mitochondrial matrix-targeted mtRCaMP and loaded with fura2. IP3 dependent Ca2+-release was stimulated with 500nM trypsin. Average traces of [Ca2+]cyto (black) and [Ca2+]mito (red) are shown. Individual traces (N = 24, 30, 19, and 21 cells, respectively, in five independent experiments) were synchronized to the half-activation time of the [Ca2+]cyto signal. b Baseline cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels (left panel) and peak values (right panel) followed by trypsin stimulation (mean, dashed lines). c Maximal [Ca2+]mito responses (mean, dashed lines). d Coupling times (mean, dashed lines): difference of the half-activation times of the [Ca2+]cyto and [Ca2+]mito signals for individual cells. bd Black lines indicate p < 0.05 with one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Dunn’s Method, N = 61, 49, 179, and 152 cells, respectively, from four independent experiments. Source data are provided for panels b, c, d as a Source Data file

To test whether fast ER-mitochondrial Ca2+ coupling also applies to the endogenous IP3R2 of the DT40 cells, we compared [Ca2+]cyto and [Ca2+]mito responses in permeabilized WT and the endogenous R2 expressing double (R1, R3) knockout (cR2 DKO) cells, and found higher maximal [Ca2+]mito levels in cR2 DKO cells following direct stimulation by IP3 (Supplementary Fig. 3A). We also compared the efficiency of the ER-mitochondrial Ca2+ transfer by comparing the percentage of cells with rapid [Ca2+]mito rises among WT, cR1, cR2, and cR3 clones, and cR2 cells also stood out in this comparison (Supplementary Fig. 3B). Thus, both the endogenous avian IP3R2 and the mammalian IP3R2 used for rescue are highly efficient in ER-mitochondrial Ca2+ transfer in DT40 cells.

To further investigate the role of the different IP3R isoforms in the Ca2+ transfer from ER to mitochondria we used photo-uncaging of IP3 (Fig. 5a). Because IP3R1 were localized at least in part, close to the plasma membrane we suspected that IP3R1 might recruit more effectively Ca2+ entry than the other IP3R isoforms. Thus, to assess the respective contributions of ER Ca2+ release and Ca2+ entry, IP3 uncaging was performed both in the presence and in the absence of Ca2+ in the extracellular medium. Because the wavelength of the (UV) uncaging light overlaps with the excitation wavelengths of fura2, [Ca2+]cyto was measured with a single wavelength probe, Fluo-8. When Ca2+ was present, the peak amplitudes of [Ca2+]cyto signals were similar for each IP3R isoforms (Fig. 5b left); however, compared to R2 and R3, the R1 clone displayed a sustained, slowly decaying [Ca2+]cyto rise, which showed faster kinetics in the absence of Ca2+. We measured similar peak [Ca2+]cyto values for each isoform in the absence of extracellular  Ca2+. Peak values appeared universally higher in the absence of Ca2+ when the response was normalized to the baseline (F/F0). To understand this phenomenon, we measured baseline [Ca2+]cyto levels in R1 cells with fura2, which, as opposed to Fluo-8, allows the precise calibration of the measured Ca2+ concentration (Supplementary Fig. 4). We measured lower baseline values in the absence of Ca2+, which explains why the baseline-normalized peaks were relatively high in this condition. In the presence of Ca2+, the [Ca2+]mito signal amplitudes were significantly higher for R1, compared to R2 and R3, with a sustained elevated phase, whereas in the absence of Ca2+ its peak amplitude was markedly decreased. (Fig. 5b middle). Coupling times measured in the presence of Ca2+ reflect a pattern similar to what we measured with agonist-induced stimulation (see Fig. 4), fastest coupling for R2 and the slowest for R1, however, in the absence of extracellular Ca2+, R1 coupling gets faster (Fig. 5b right). We then calculated the first derivatives of the [Ca2+]cyto and [Ca2+]mito time courses to compare the cytoplasmic and mitochondrial Ca2+ fluxes (Fig. 5c) and found a marked decrease in the mitochondrial Ca2+ flux in the absence of extracellular Ca2+ for R1 (Fig. 5c left). Such changes were minor for IP3R2 and IP3R3.

Fig. 5
figure5

IP3R2 couples mitochondria best to IP3-induced Ca2+ signal. a DT40 cells were transfected with mtRCaMP then loaded with caged IP3 and fluo8/AM. Calcium signals were evoked by photo-uncaging of IP3 (lightning bolts). [Ca2+]cyto and mitochondrial [Ca2+]mito signals were measured simultaneously in individual cells. Synchronized, mean Ca2+ signals in the presence (top row, N = 215, 91, and 131 cells, for R1A, R2, R3, respectively, from three independent experiments) and absence (bottom row, N = 77, 95, and 83 cells, respectively, for R1A, R2, R3) of Ca2+ in the extracellular medium. b Box plots show quantification of maximal [Ca2+]cyto, maximal [Ca2+]mito signals and coupling times compared in the presence and absence (dashed bars) of Ca2+ in the extracellular medium (median line, box: 25–75%, error bars 10–90% and individual outliers as dots). ***p < 0.001 with Mann–Whitney Rank Sum Test. c Mean Ca2+ fluxes calculated as Ft-Ft-0.5s for Ffluo8 and FmtRCaMP in the presence (solid lines) and absence (dashed lines) of Ca2+ in the extracellular medium. Source data are provided for panel b as a Source Data file

Store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) has been used to globally expose mitochondria to elevated [Ca2+]cyto in intact cells. We found that in store-depleted cells, the presence of any IP3Rs facilitates SOCE, especially IP3R1 (Supplementary Fig. 5A-C). However, the SOCE (non-IP3R) associated [Ca2+]mito rise shows no sign of IP3R-dependent sensitization (Supplementary Fig. 5D).

In summary, the simultaneous [Ca2+]cyto and [Ca2+]mito measurements suggest that IP3R2 and IP3R3 effectively engage rapid ER-mitochondrial Ca2+ transfer, whereas IP3R1 can support sustained Ca2+ delivery to the mitochondria mostly from enhanced Ca2+ entry in DT40 cells.

Tight contacts do not depend on Ca2+ flux through IP3Rs

We next set out to determine if the localization and the structural behavior of IP3Rs was dependent on the Ca2+ transfer between ER and mitochondria. We compared WT and TKO to cells stably expressing a functional (R1 A) and a non-conductive pore mutant clone of IP3R1 (R1 D2550A, pore-dead) that fails to mediate Ca2+ release35 (Fig. 6a). The co-distribution of ER and mitochondria in the 0–1 µm region of each IP3R expressing cell lines was significantly higher than that measured in the TKO cells (see Fig. 1 and 2) (Fig. 6b, c). Using an anti-IP3R1 antibody36 to examine the intracellular distribution of the receptors, the endogenous IP3R1 in WT cells, the mammalian R1 and the pore-dead R1 expressed in TKO cells were similarly concentrated towards the adherent surface (Fig. 6b, d, e). Ultrastructural measurements using TEM showed significantly higher frequency of the occurrence of 0–10 and 10–20 nm gap widths in all WT, R1 A and R1 D2550A, compared to TKO cells (Fig. 6f). To test whether our hypothesis can be extended to IP3R2s, we used a functional R2, a pore-dead R2 (R2 GS3) and a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3 (M3) expressing TKO clone, In both R2 GS3 and M3 clones IP3-dependent Ca2+ signaling was absent (Fig. 6g). In the ultrastructure study we found that the occurrence of 0–10 and 10–20 nm gap widths were similarly higher in R2 and also R2 GS3 cells than that in the TKO cells, whereas M3 cells, negative control, were not different from the TKO. These results indicate that neither in forming tight interactions between ER and mitochondria nor in regulating the organelles’ subcellular distributions do the IP3Rs’ roles depend on Ca2+ flux through the receptors.

Fig. 6
figure6

Ca2+ flux through the IP3R is dispensable for supporting the ER-mitochondrial contacts. a IP3 dependent Ca2+ signaling was tested as in Fig. 1a. in TKO cells rescued with WT rIP3R1 (R1 A) and with a pore-dead mutant IP3R1 (R1 D2550A). Representative cell traces are shown (N = 30 and 30 cells, respectively, from three independent experiments). b Relative abundance (Mean ± SEM from four independent experiments) of ER, mitochondria and IP3R1 in WT (N = 45), R1 A (N = 27) and R1 D2550A (N = 47) cells plotted against the Z-axis. c Co-distribution (mean, dashed lines) of ER and mitochondria calculated as in Fig. 1c. d Residual sum of squares for mitochondria and ER (mean, dashed lines). e Cumulative abundance of IP3Rs in the 0–1 µm Z sections of each cells (mean, dashed lines). Black lines indicate p < 0.05 with one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Holm’s Method. f Bar charts show the relative frequencies (Mean ± S.E.M of three experiments) of the occurrence of <100 nm interface gap widths between the ER and mitochondrion (N = 531, 591, 477, and 561 mitochondria for TKO, WT, R1 A, and R1 D2550A, respectively). Black lines represent p < 0.05 with Chi-squared test. g IP3 dependent Ca2+ signaling in TKO cells rescued with WT IP3R2, a pore-dead IP3R2 (R2 GS3) and muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3 (M3). Representative traces are shown (N = 164, 189, and 197 cells, respectively, from three independent experiments). h Relative frequencies (Mean ± S.E.M of three experiments) of the occurrence of interface gap widths providing an interface <100 nm between the ER and mitochondrion (N = 394 (TKO), 268 (R2), 522 (R2 GS3), and 390 (M3) mitochondria were analyzed from three independent experiments). Black lines represent p < 0.01 with Chi-squared test. Source data are provided for panels b, c, d, e, f, h as a Source Data file

Discussion

We have examined the properties of the three mammalian IP3Rs in the context of the structural organization and Ca2+ signal transmission between the ER and mitochondria. This is important because no previous study has tested the dependence of the ER-mitochondrial contact structure on the presence of any IP3Rs and no systematic assessment of the individual isoforms has been performed in terms of localization to the contacts or supporting local Ca2+ signaling. Separately, the different isoforms all have been implicated in mitochondria-ER communication in various tissues/cell types. IP3R1 was the first shown to be relevant to ER-mitochondrial Ca2+ coupling by forming a complex with VDAC1 and Grp7528. Both IP3R137,38 and IP3R239 have been localized to the mitochondria-associated membranes (MAM) in cardiomyocytes. Studies have reported that IP3R3 (1) is a marker of the ER-mitochondrial contacts, (2) is required for apoptotic mitochondrial Ca2+ signals29,30, (3) concentrates to the MAMs where it is stabilized by sigma-1 receptors40 or BAP16 and (4) similarly to IP3R1, co-IPs with VDAC129,41. However, in most cases IP3R3 has been put forward in contrast with IP3R1 but not IP3R2, or without validating the distribution/contribution of the other isoforms40,41.

The model system we chose was the chicken B cell (DT40) line that endogenously expresses all three IP3R isoforms and is available without any IP3Rs (TKO). This model has been widely used to evaluate the IP3R-dependence of various cellular functions31,32,42,43,44,45. Furthermore, DT40 cells expressing only one IP3R isoform are available (with deletion of any combinations of two IP3Rs, DKO), as well as TKO cells rescued with each mammalian IP3R isoforms, providing the possibility of side by side comparison of the individual IP3Rs in the same cellular environment19,46.

We demonstrated that the presence of IP3Rs affects the physical associations between the ER and mitochondria using techniques that go beyond the resolution limit of conventional optical microscopy. In live cells, FRET measurement of the tight ER-mitochondrial associations showed dependence on IP3Rs (Fig. 1d). In fixed cells, electron microscopy revealed IP3R-dependent differences in the ER-mitochondrial interfaces primarily of 0–20 nm gap-width range (Fig. 1e, f). This finding was also extended to HeLa cells (Fig. 1e, f). The shortage of tight contacts in the TKO cells was reversed by stable rescue by any single mammalian IP3R isoform (Fig. 2). Thus, IP3Rs assist in maintaining close contacts either as a tethering species or as a promoter of tether formation by other proteins. Further, enhanced resolution confocal microscopy (Fig 1b, c) revealed IP3R-dependent variances in the relative Z distributions of the ER and mitochondria, which we hypothesize may be related to the physical associations. Plating the cells on the glass coverslips creates an active adherent surface and the polarization of the cells is followed by the rearrangement of the organelles. During this process, owing to the lack of the IP3R-dependent structural support between the ER and mitochondria, a higher fraction of the ER would be available to concentrate close to the adherent surface in the TKO cells as compared to WT cells.

Recent reports suggest that in addition to VDAC128, other ER-mitochondrial linker species might have supporting role in the interaction of IP3Rs with the mitochondrial outer membrane (PTPIP51 for IP3R3;41 FUNDC1 for IP3R2 in the cardiac muscle39. Furthermore, the IP3R-dependent gap-width measurement provided structural evidence that IP3Rs are sufficiently close to the OMM that the IP3R-mediated Ca2+ release can create a high [Ca2+] nanodomain on the mitochondrial surface16,17. In addition, it revealed that each mammalian isoform can replace the endogenous avian IP3Rs in DT40 cells. One intriguing extension of this finding is that a pore-dead IP3R1 and IP3R2 could also rescue the close ER-mitochondrial contacts and the z-axis co-distribution of the organelles (Fig. 6), indicating that Ca2+ release is not necessary to supporting these IP3R-dependent structural reorganizations. We speculate that a scaffold5 or tether forming function28 of the IP3R is central for keeping mitochondria close to the ER. The competency of each IP3R isoform, including the Ca2+ release incompetent mutant to support close ER-mitochondrial contacts is illustrated in the scheme in Fig. 7.

Fig. 7
figure7

Scheme of the structural and functional properties of the individual IP3R isoforms in supporting the ER-mitochondrial interface and mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake

Previous studies suggested that the ER-mitochondrial Ca2+ transfer is mediated by IP3R1 or IP3R3 isoforms28,29,30. However, these studies did not consider IP3R2 and did not address the important question of how effectively each IP3R isoform would support the local communication in the same cellular paradigm. We tested simultaneously [Ca2+]cyto and [Ca2+]mito signals for each mammalian IP3R isoform in isolation in the same cell type during both agonist-treatment and direct IP3 mobilization (Figs. 4, 5). In our system, each IP3R isoform was able to mediate mitochondrial Ca2+ signaling, in an isoform specific manner (see purple arrows in Fig. 7). Strikingly, the IP3R-mediated Ca2+ release was most closely followed by a [Ca2+]mito rise for IP3R2, followed by IP3R3 and then IP3R1 (Figs. 4 and 5). Notably, the DT40 clones selected for this comparison expressed the different IP3R isoforms at comparable levels and so the above order didn’t result from differences in the expression levels. Furthermore, the Ca2+ release flux analysis showed similar peaks for IP3R2 and IP3R3 (Fig. 5). Lastly, the frequency of tight ER-mitochondrial contacts was also similar for the different rescue clones (Fig. 2). Thus, the most likely explanation for the superiority of the IP3R2 would be that on the nm scale, IP3R2s are enriched closest to the mitochondria. Nevertheless, IP3R2 has to be given more attention in the context of ER to mitochondria Ca2+ delivery.

Among the three IP3R isoforms, IP3R1 showed a unique mediation of the mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake, which was predominately dependent on Ca2+ entry. Since mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake activation by the SOCE itself did not seem to be affected by any of the IP3R isoforms (Supplementary Fig. 5D), it is likely that the dependence of IP3R1-linked Ca2+ delivery to the mitochondria on SOCE was indirect, e.g., due to more effective SOCE-mediated refilling of ER segments at the adherent surface where IP3R1 but not IP3R2/3 seemed to concentrate (see scheme in Fig. 7). Indeed, the role of plasma membrane-ER junction localized IP3R1 in mediating SOCE was reported47. Our results show that IP3R1 maintains sustained cytoplasmic calcium signal, which feeds more Ca2+ to the mitochondria as compared to IP3R2 and IP3R3. Complementing this result, in store-depleted cells every IP3R isoform facilitated the Ca2+ influx through the plasma membrane but IP3R1 was more effective in this regard than IP3R2 or IP3R3 (Supplementary Fig. 5). Thus, IP3R1 is less effective to direct Ca2+ released from the ER to the mitochondria than IP3R2 or IP3R3 as claimed recently29,30 but it is the IP3R isoform that most effectively promotes SOCE, which provides a sustained contribution to mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake. Thus, in contrast to previous reports, IP3R2 couples mitochondria best to pure ER Ca2+ release, but when ER store Ca2+ depletion engages Ca2+ entry, IP3R1s are most effective in promoting SOCE and thereby sustained mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake.

Methods

Reagents and chemicals were from Fisher Scientific or Sigma–Aldrich unless specified otherwise.

Cells

Wild-type (WT) and IP3R-deficient (TKO, cR1 DKO, cR2 DKO, and cR3 DKO) DT40 cells were provided by Prof. Tomohiro Kurosaki (RIKEN Research Center for Allergy and Immunology, Yokohama, Japan) and were cultured in suspension, in RPMI 1640 medium with glutamine (Gibco, Cat# 11875093) supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 10% FBS (all from GIBCO, Life Technology), 1% chicken serum (Gibco, Cat# 16110082) and 0.4% 2-mercaptoethanol in 5% CO2 and 95% air at 40 °C. DT40 cells stably expressing any IP3R or M3 construct were produced by David I. Yule, (University of Rochester, Rochester, NY) and were kept under the same conditions as above but in medium supplemented with 2 mg/ml G418 (Enzo Cat# ALX-380-013-G005).

Wild-type (WT) and IP3R-deficient (TKO) HeLa cells were provided by Katsuhiko Mikoshiba (RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama, Japan). Cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), with 4.5 g/l glucose (Gibco, Cat# 11965118) supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM glutamate, 100 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin (all from GIBCO, Life Technology),

Transfection

DT40 cells (7.5 × 106 cells in 350 μl medium) were electroporated (BTX ECM 830) with the following constructs: mitoRCaMP, mito-mCherry, ER-GFP, ER linker, OMM linker (15 μg cDNA each) using cuvettes with 4 mm gap-width with, 230 V in two, 25 ms pulses with 3 s interval then rapidly diluted in 10 ml medium and kept at 40 °C for 24 h.

Western blot

All reagents used for SDS-PAGE were obtained from Bio-Rad. Harvested cells were washed once with ice-cold PBS then solubilized in cell lysis buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM NaF, 20 mM Na4P2O7, 2 mM Na3VO4, 1% Triton X-100 (v/v), 0.5% sodium deoxycholate (w/v), and 10% glycerol with a mixture of protease inhibitors (Roche). After 30 min of incubation on ice lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C then transferred into fresh tubes. Protein concentrations were quantified with DC protein assay kit (Bio-Rad). Proteins were resolved on 5–7.5% SDS-PAGE gels then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (0.45 µm, Bio-Rad). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies recognizing IP3R1 (CT1) (1:5000) raised against the C-terminal 19 amino acid (aa) residues of rat IP3R1 and IP3R2 (NT2) (1:200) raised against N-terminal 320–338 aa residues in mouse IP3R2 (custom made, Pocono Rabbit Farms and Laboratories), mouse monoclonal antibody against 22–230 aa residues of human IP3R3 (1:1000, BD Transduction laboratories Cat# 610312), Calnexin rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:1000, Enzo Cat# ADI-SPA-860), and mouse monoclonal Flag antibody (1:5000, Sigma Cat# F1804-200UG) were used for immunoblotting. Corresponding mouse and rabbit HRP-linked secondary antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling (1:5000, Anti-mouse IgG, HRP-linked Antibody Cat#7076, Anti-rabbit IgG, HRP-linked Antibody Cat#7074). Proteins were detected with chemiluminescence using HRP substrate for CCD imaging (Azure Biosystems).

Transmission electron microscopy

DT40 cells were fixed and embedded using the following protocol: Cells were fixed using 2% glutaraldehyde, then with 1% OsO4 and stained with 0.5% uranyl acetate, pelleted in 2% agarose (Sigma–Aldrich, Type IX ultra low geling temperature), dehydrated in a dilution series of acetone/water, and embedded in Spurr’s resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences). The sections were examined with a JEOL JEM1010 TEM fitted with a side-mounted AMT XR-50 5Mpx CCD camera or an FEI Tecnai 12 TEM fitted with a bottom-mounted AMT XR-111 10.5 Mpx CCD camera. Whole-cell images were taken with ×6700–14,000 (JEOL) or ×4400–6500 (FEI) direct magnification. Mitochondria were imaged using ×40,000 (JEOL, 1.5 nm/px resolution) or ×15,000 (FEI, 1.3 nm/px resolution) magnification48. Interfaces between ER and mitochondria were analyzed using a custom Image J plugin/macro written by DW.

For immuno-EM experiments the following protocol was used: Plated DT40 cells were fixed with 5% paraformaldehyde followed by quenching, permeabilization, blocking, and labeling with primary antibody (dilution: 1:1000, Sigma Cat# F1804-200UG), followed by secondary blocking and incubating with secondary antibody anti-mouse IgG Nanogold (dilution: 1:50 Nanoprobes, Cat#2001–0.5ml). Silver enhancement (HQ Silver, Nanoprobes, Cat#2012–45 mL) was applied, followed by further fixation and contrasting with uranylacetate. Samples were dehydrated in grade of alcohol and embedded in Durcupan (Electron Microscopy Sciences). After polymerization, ultrathin sections (65–80 nm) were prepared using by ultramicrotome (Leica UTC, Diatome knife, Diatome) and studied with FEI Tecnai 12 electron microscope. Images were taken at ×3200–15,000 magnification.

Ca2+ imaging experiments

DT40 cells were plated on Cell-Tak (Corning, Cat# CB-40240) coated 25 mm coverslips then dye-loaded in a serum-free extracellular medium (ECM, 121 mM NaCl, 5 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM Na-HEPES, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 2 mM CaCl2, and 10 mM glucose, pH 7.4) containing 2% BSA (Roche). For measurements of [Ca2+]cyto, cells were loaded with 2 µM fura2/AM (Invitrogen) or 2 µM fluo8/AM (TEFLabs) in the presence of 0.003% Pluronic F-127 and 100 μM sulfinpyrazone for 10 min at 37 °C. Caged IP3 (D-23-O-Isopropylidene-6-O-(2-nitro-4.5-dimethoxy)benzyl-myo-Inositol 145-trisphosphate-Hexakis(propionoxymethyl) Ester, (SiChem, cag-iso-2-145-100) was loaded under the same conditions for 30 min Subsequently, the cells were washed with fresh ECM containing 0.25% BSA and transferred to the thermostated stage (37 °C) of the microscope.

Two imaging systems were used for Ca2+ measurements: (1) a ProEM1024 EMCCD camera (Princeton Instruments) fitted to a Leica DMI6000B inverted microscope with Lambda DG4 wavelength-switch xenon light source (Sutter Instruments) and operated by a custom software (Spectralyzer), and (2) an ImagEM EM-CCD camera (Hamamatsu) fitted to an Olympus IX81 microscope with Lambda DG4 light source and Mosaic targeted illumination module (Andor) operated by the Metamorph software (Molecular Devices). Uncaging light was provided by a mercury arc lamp (longpass UV filter, 400 nm cutoff) or a 365 nm LED source (Sutter Lambda TLED+). Both imaging setups used the UV-optimized Olympus UAPO/340 ×40/1.35N.A. oil immersion objective.

For simultaneous measurements of [Ca2+]cyto and [Ca2+]mito was measured fura2 fluorescence was recorded at 340 and 380 nm excitation while fluo8 at 485/15 nm excitation and the mitochondrial matrix-targeted RCaMP was either excited at 545/20 nm (w/fura2) or at 577/20 nm (w/fluo8), using dual-band dichroic and emission filters (Chroma, set 73100 or customized set 59022, respectively). Images were collected every 0.2 s or 2 s. [Ca2+]cyto measurements with fura2 were calibrated in vitro with adding 1 mM CaCl2, followed by 10 mM EGTA/Tris, pH 8.5. To determine [Ca2+], the following formula was used: [Ca2+] = Kd × (Sf2/Sb2) × (R − Rmin)/(Rmax − R), where Kd is the Ca2+-dissociation constant (0.224 µM), R is the ratio of the fluorescence intensities at 340/380 nm excitation, Rmin and Rmax are the fluorescence ratios in Ca2+-free and Ca2+-saturated conditions respectively, Sf2/Sb2 is the ratio of fluorescence intensities measured at 380 nm excitation in Ca2+-free (f)/Ca2+-saturated (Ca2+-bound, b) conditions49.

[Ca2+]cyto and [Ca2+]mito were recorded in permeabilized cells with Fura2FA added to the bulk buffer after permeabilization and rhod2AM accumulated by the mitochondria. One micromolar CaCl2 was added to optimize ER Ca2+ loading. IP3 receptors were stimulated with adding IP3 in a final concentration of 7.5 μM.

FRET measurements

DT40 cells were co-transfected with ER membrane (CFP-FRB-9×-ER) and OMM (AKAP1-18×-FKBP-YFP) targeted rapamycin-inducible linker pairs. After 24 h cells were plated on Cell-Tak coated coverslips. CFP (435 nm excitation/480 nm emmision), YFP (500/535 nm) and FRET (435/535 nm) fluorescence signals were measured in ECM containing 0.25% BSA with Leica DMI 6000B inverted microscope at 37 °C. Covalent linkage fromation between the FKBP and FRB domains was induced by adding 100 nM rapamycin.

Measurements of [Ca2+]cyto in permeabilized cells

DT40 cells in suspension were pre-incubated in Ca2+-free extracellular buffer (120 mM NaCl, 20 mM Na–HEPES, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM KH2PO4, 100 μM EGTA/Tris pH 7.4) for 1 h at 37 °C to drain Ca2+ from intracellular compartments and stored on ice. Cells were permeabilized with saponin (40 μg/ml) and incubated in an intracellular medium (ICM; 120 mm KCl, 10 mm NaCl, 1 mm KH2PO4, 20 mm Tris-HEPES, 2 mm Mg-ATP, and antipain, leupeptin, and pepstatin 1 μg/ml each at pH 7.2) and to measure [Ca2+]cyto, 1.5 μM fura2/FA was added. Fluorescence was monitored in a fluorometer (Delta-RAM, PTI) using 340 nm and 380 nm excitation and 500 nm emission for fura2. Calibration of the fura2 was carried out at the end of each measurement adding 1 mM CaCl2, followed by 10 mM EGTA/Tris, pH 8.5 and using the formula described aboved49.

Immunocytochemistry

DT40 Cells were transfected with ER-lumen targeted GFP and OMM-targeted mCherry (OMP25-mCherry) expression vectors. Transfected cells were incubated at 40 °C for 24 h then attached to Cell-Tak treated coverslips and further incubated for 4 h. Cells were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde/PBS and labelled with anti-FLAG (1:500 dilution, Sigma–Aldrich Cat# F1804) or anti-IP3R1 primary antibody (CT1)36 then AlexaFluor 647-conjugatedanti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:200 dilution, Thermo Fisher, Cat# A-21239 and A-21244). Immunofluorescence was imaged using a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal system equipped with Airyscan detector, using 488, 561, and 633-nm laser lines for green, red and far-red fluorescent probes, respectively. Images were taken through a ×63 oil objective (numerical aperture [NA] 1.40). Co-distribution of ER and mitochondria was calculated as the log2 ratio of the cumulative abundance of mitochondria and that of the ER in the 0–1 µm Z sections of each cells.

Superresolution localization microscopy

3D super-resolution microcopy was performed using a Vutara 352 nanoscope (Bruker). Briefly, two focal planes were projected onto the sensor of an ORCA Flash v.2 sCMOS camera (Hamamatsu) through an Olympus UPlanSApo ×60/1.2 N.A. water-immersion objective. The point spread functions for the wavelengths used were calibrated and aligned using 100 nm Tetraspeck microspheres (ThermoFisher Scientific). Laser illumination at 640 and 561 nm were used for stochastic imaging of AlexaFluor 647 and CF-568 (Biotium), respectively, and 405 nm light was used to recover portions on CF568 from their dark state. The two colors were recorded sequentially (AF647, then CF568) and several thousand frames were acquired for each fluorophore. Cells were plated, fixed and IP3Rs were labelled as described above, and TOM20 was labelled with anti TOM20 (dilution: 1:200, Santa Cruz Cat# sc-11415) primary then with CF568 Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (dilution: 1:200 Biotium Cat# 20103-1) secondary antibodies. Imaging was performed in freshly prepared buffer for oxygen-depleting and reducing conditions: 20 mM cysteamine, 1% 2-mercaptoethanol (v/v), 169 AU/ml glucose oxidase and 1400 AU/ml catalase in 50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM NaCl and 10% (w/v) glucose (pH 8.0). Calibration, alignment, acquisition and localization were all done in the Vutara SRX software.

Cluster-based minimum distance analysis was also performed in Vutara SRX. Empirically determined settings were used to generate IP3R clusters (minimum particles: 6, particle size: 70 nm, accumulation threshold: 0.04) and large clusters that represented the volumes of whole mitochondria (minimum particles: 100, particle size: 250 nm, accumulation threshold: 0.05), which were used for all measurements. Control data consisted of randomly generated clusters containing 20 particles each (30 and 75 nm FWHM lateral and axial, respectively) at a density of 12.5 clusters/µm3.

3D STED microscopy

3D STED microscopy was performed using an Abberior Instruments Expert Line STED microscope equipped with an Olympus UPLSAPO ×100/1.4NA oil immersion objective. Briefly, Tom20 was labelled with anti-TOM20 primary (dilution: 1:200, Proteintech, Cat#11802-1-AP) and Alexa Fluor 594 anti-rabbit IgG secondary (dilution: 1:150, Molecular Probes Cat#A-11037) antibodies. Flag-tagged IP3Rs were labelled with anti-FLAG primary (dilution: 1:500, Sigma–Aldrich Cat# F1804) and STAR RED, goat anti-mouse IgG (dilution: 1:150, Abberior, Cat#STRED-1001-500UG) secondary antibodies. Sequential confocal and STED images were obtained following excitation of Alexa Fluor 594 and STAR RED by 594 and 640 nm lasers, respectively. Both fluorophores were depleted in three dimensions with a 775 nm pulsed STED laser. Z-stacks were obtained by collecting images at 150 nm intervals using the 3D STED mode. RESCue STED was employed to minimize the light dosage. In this mode when the photon count returned in the confocal images was below 10, the STED laser was not engaged for that pixel. Blend mode depth projection images were generated and fluorophore volumes and interfaces between these volumes were analyzed using IMARIS 9.2.1 (Bitplane).

Statistical analysis

For the statistical tests Microsoft Excel or Systat SigmaPlot softwares were used. Significance was tested with two-tailed tests. Normality was tested with Systat SigmaPlot. Datasets of two independent groups were pairwise compared with unpaired Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney Rank Sum Test if normality test failed. Multiple samples were compared with one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Holm method (all vs. control) or post-hoc Dunn’s method (all pairwise). Difference between the expected frequencies and the observed were tested with Chi-squared test.

All graphs were created in SigmaPlot 12 and were combined with the images in PowerPoint.

Every element of each graph and image was created by the Authors. No previously created elements were used.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Custom image analysis software (Spectralyzer) and macros prepared for ImageJ are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The ImageJ plugin for analysis of ER-mitochondrial interfaces in TEM images is available from the update site: http://sites.imagej.net/MitoCare/

References

  1. 1.

    Csordas, G. et al. Structural and functional features and significance of the physical linkage between ER and mitochondria. J. Cell Biol. 174, 915–921 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lahiri, S., Toulmay, A. & Prinz, W. A. Membrane contact sites, gateways for lipid homeostasis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 33, 82–87 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Raffaello, A., Mammucari, C., Gherardi, G. & Rizzuto, R. Calcium at the center of cell signaling: interplay between endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and lysosomes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 41, 1035–1049 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lewis, S. C., Uchiyama, L. F. & Nunnari, J. ER-mitochondria contacts couple mtDNA synthesis with mitochondrial division in human cells. Science 353, aaf5549 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Csordas, G., Weaver, D. & Hajnoczky, G. Endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondrial contactology: structure and signaling functions. Trends Cell Biol. 28, 523–540 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bononi, A. et al. BAP1 regulates IP3R3-mediated Ca(2+) flux to mitochondria suppressing cell transformation. Nature 546, 549–553 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Schon, E. A. & Przedborski, S. Mitochondria: the next (neurode)generation. Neuron 70, 1033–1053 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Morciano, G. et al. Role of mitochondria-associated er membranes in calcium regulation in cancer-specific settings. Neoplasia 20, 510–523 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kerkhofs, M. et al. Emerging molecular mechanisms in chemotherapy: Ca(2+) signaling at the mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes. Cell death Dis. 9, 334 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Krols, M., Bultynck, G. & Janssens, S. ER-Mitochondria contact sites: a new regulator of cellular calcium flux comes into play. J. Cell Biol. 214, 367–370 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Giacomello, M. & Pellegrini, L. The coming of age of the mitochondria-ER contact: a matter of thickness. Cell death Differ. 23, 1417–1427 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rizzuto, R., De Stefani, D., Raffaello, A. & Mammucari, C. Mitochondria as sensors and regulators of calcium signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 566–578 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Duchen, M. R. Mitochondria, calcium-dependent neuronal death and neurodegenerative disease. Pflug. Arch.: Eur. J. Physiol. 464, 111–121 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Csordas, G., Thomas, A. P. & Hajnoczky, G. Quasi-synaptic calcium signal transmission between endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria. Embo J. 18, 96–108 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Rizzuto, R., Brini, M., Murgia, M. & Pozzan, T. Microdomains with high Ca2+ close to IP3-sensitive channels that are sensed by neighboring mitochondria. Science 262, 744–747 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Csordas, G. et al. Imaging interorganelle contacts and local calcium dynamics at the ER-mitochondrial interface. Mol. Cell 39, 121–132 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Giacomello, M. et al. Ca2+ hot spots on the mitochondrial surface are generated by Ca2+ mobilization from stores, but not by activation of store-operated Ca2+ channels. Mol. Cell 38, 280–290 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mak, D. O. & Foskett, J. K. Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors in the endoplasmic reticulum: a single-channel point of view. Cell calcium 58, 67–78 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bansaghi, S. et al. Isoform- and species-specific control of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) receptors by reactive oxygen species. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 8170–8181 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chandrasekhar, R., Alzayady, K. J. & Yule, D. I. Using concatenated subunits to investigate the functional consequences of heterotetrameric inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 43, 364–370 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Yule, D. I., Betzenhauser, M. J. & Joseph, S. K. Linking structure to function: recent lessons from inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor mutagenesis. Cell Calcium 47, 469–479 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Prole, D. L. & Taylor, C. W. Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors and their protein partners as signalling hubs. J. Physiol. 594, 2849–2866 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ivanova, H. et al. Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor-isoform diversity in cell death and survival. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1843, 2164–2183 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ramos-Franco, J., Fill, M. & Mignery, G. A. Isoform-specific function of single inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor channels. Biophys. J. 75, 834–839 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Monkawa, T. et al. Heterotetrameric complex formation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 14700–14704 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    De Smedt, H. et al. Determination of relative amounts of inositol trisphosphate receptor mRNA isoforms by ratio polymerase chain reaction. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21691–21698 (1994).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mignery, G. A., Newton, C. L., Archer, B. T. 3rd & Sudhof, T. C. Structure and expression of the rat inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 12679–12685 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Szabadkai, G. et al. Chaperone-mediated coupling of endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondrial Ca2+ channels. J. Cell Biol. 175, 901–911 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    De Stefani, D. et al. VDAC1 selectively transfers apoptotic Ca2+ signals to mitochondria. Cell Death Differ. 19, 267–273 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Mendes, C. C. et al. The type III inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor preferentially transmits apoptotic Ca2+ signals into mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 40892–40900 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Sugawara, H., Kurosaki, M., Takata, M. & Kurosaki, T. Genetic evidence for involvement of type 1, type 2 and type 3 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors in signal transduction through the B-cell antigen receptor. Embo J. 16, 3078–3088 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Cardenas, C. et al. Essential regulation of cell bioenergetics by constitutive InsP3 receptor Ca2+ transfer to mitochondria. Cell 142, 270–283 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Saleem, H., Tovey, S. C., Molinski, T. F. & Taylor, C. W. Interactions of antagonists with subtypes of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) receptor. Br. J. Pharmacol. 171, 3298–3312 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ando, H., Hirose, M. & Mikoshiba, K. Aberrant IP3 receptor activities revealed by comprehensive analysis of pathological mutations causing spinocerebellar ataxia 29. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 12259–12264 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Boehning, D. & Joseph, S. K. Functional properties of recombinant type I and type III inositol 1, 4,5-trisphosphate receptor isoforms expressed in COS-7 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 21492–21499 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Joseph, S. K. & Samanta, S. Detergent solubility of the inositol trisphosphate receptor in rat brain membranes. Evidence for association of the receptor with ankyrin. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 6477–6486 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Paillard, M. et al. Depressing mitochondria-reticulum interactions protects cardiomyocytes from lethal hypoxia-reoxygenation injury. Circulation 128, 1555–1565 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gomez, L. et al. The SR/ER-mitochondria calcium crosstalk is regulated by GSK3beta during reperfusion injury. Cell death Differ. 22, 1890 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wu, S. et al. Binding of FUN14 domain containing 1 with inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor in mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes maintains mitochondrial dynamics and function in hearts in vivo. Circulation 136, 2248–2266 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hayashi, T. & Su, T. P. Sigma-1 receptor chaperones at the ER-mitochondrion interface regulate Ca(2+) signaling and cell survival. Cell 131, 596–610 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Gomez-Suaga, P. et al. The ER-mitochondria tethering complex VAPB-PTPIP51 regulates autophagy. Curr. Biol. 27, 371–385 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Chandrasekhar, R., Alzayady, K. J., Wagner, L. E. 2nd & Yule, D. I. Unique regulatory properties of heterotetrameric inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors revealed by studying concatenated receptor constructs. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 4846–4860 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Miyamoto, A. et al. Apoptosis induction-related cytosolic calcium responses revealed by the dual FRET imaging of calcium signals and caspase-3 activation in a single cell. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 460, 82–87 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Peinelt, C., Beck, A., Monteilh-Zoller, M. K., Penner, R. & Fleig, A. IP(3) receptor subtype-dependent activation of store-operated calcium entry through I(CRAC). Cell calcium 45, 326–330 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Khan, M. T. & Joseph, S. K. Role of inositol trisphosphate receptors in autophagy in DT40 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 16912–16920 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Betzenhauser, M. J., Wagner, L. E. 2nd, Won, J. H. & Yule, D. I. Studying isoform-specific inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor function and regulation. Methods 46, 177–182 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Thillaiappan, N. B., Chavda, A. P., Tovey, S. C., Prole, D. L. & Taylor, C. W. Ca2+ signals initiate at immobile IP3 receptors adjacent to ER-plasma membrane junctions. Nat. Commun. 8, 1505 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Hajnoczky, G., Csordas, G., Madesh, M. & Pacher, P. Control of apoptosis by IP(3) and ryanodine receptor driven calcium signals. Cell Calcium 28, 349–363 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Csordas, G. & Hajnoczky, G. Sorting of calcium signals at the junctions of endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria. Cell Calcium 29, 249–262 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. T. Kurosaki for providing us with DT40 cells. Adam Bartok was supported by a Hungarian State Eotvos Fellowship from the Tempus Public Foundation (Hungary). This study was funded by NIH grants DK051526 and GM059419 (G.H.), ES025672 (G.H. and G.C.), DK103558 (S.K.J. and G.H.), and DE014756 (DIY). The Abberior STED microscope was partially funded by NIH S10ODO23440 (D.I.Y.).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: G.H., G.C., S.K.J., D.I.Y. and A.B.; Investigation: A.B., D.W., T.G., M.K., Z.N., S.B., V.K.T., K.A., H.A., K.M. and G.C.; Writing: G.H., A.B., D.W., G.C., S.K.J., D.I.Y. and; Funding Acquisition: G.H., G.C., S.K.J., D.I.Y. and A.B.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to György Csordás or György Hajnóczky.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bartok, A., Weaver, D., Golenár, T. et al. IP3 receptor isoforms differently regulate ER-mitochondrial contacts and local calcium transfer. Nat Commun 10, 3726 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11646-3

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing