Acetylation regulates ribonucleotide reductase activity and cancer cell growth

Ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) catalyzes the de novo synthesis of deoxyribonucleoside diphosphates (dNDPs) to provide dNTP precursors for DNA synthesis. Here, we report that acetylation and deacetylation of the RRM2 subunit of RNR acts as a molecular switch that impacts RNR activity, dNTP synthesis, and DNA replication fork progression. Acetylation of RRM2 at K95 abrogates RNR activity by disrupting its homodimer assembly. RRM2 is directly acetylated by KAT7, and deacetylated by Sirt2, respectively. Sirt2, which level peak in S phase, sustains RNR activity at or above a threshold level required for dNTPs synthesis. We also find that radiation or camptothecin-induced DNA damage promotes RRM2 deacetylation by enhancing Sirt2–RRM2 interaction. Acetylation of RRM2 at K95 results in the reduction of the dNTP pool, DNA replication fork stalling, and the suppression of tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo. This study therefore identifies acetylation as a regulatory mechanism governing RNR activity.

A full description of the statistical parameters including central tendency (e.g. means) or other basic estimates (e.g. regression coefficient) AND variation (e.g. standard deviation) or associated estimates of uncertainty (e.g. confidence intervals) For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g. F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of freedom and P value noted Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.

For Bayesian analysis, information on the choice of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings
For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of outcomes Estimates of effect sizes (e.g. Cohen's d, Pearson's r), indicating how they were calculated Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.

Software and code
Policy information about availability of computer code

Data collection
No software was used

Data analysis
No software was used For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or software that are central to the research but not yet described in published literature, software must be made available to editors/reviewers. We strongly encourage code deposition in a community repository (e.g. GitHub). See the Nature Research guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.

Data
Policy information about availability of data All manuscripts must include a data availability statement. This statement should provide the following information, where applicable: -Accession codes, unique identifiers, or web links for publicly available datasets -A list of figures that have associated raw data -A description of any restrictions on data availability Data availability: The data that support the findings of this study, its supplementary information and source data file are included in the paper, and are available from the corresponding author (X. Deng) upon reasonable request. The mass spectrometry proteomics source data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD014105.

nature research | reporting summary
October 2018 Field-specific reporting Please select the one below that is the best fit for your research. If you are not sure, read the appropriate sections before making your selection.

Life sciences Behavioural & social sciences Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences
For a reference copy of the document with all sections, see nature.com/documents/nr-reporting-summary-flat.pdf

Life sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.

Sample size
Sample sizes were chosen to detect a minimum effect size of 1.5 with at least 80% power and a type I error of 0.05 for each comparison.
Data exclusions No samples or animals have been excluded from the analysis.

Replication
The measures taken for experiments were repeated at least three times, and data are presented as mean plus/minus standard deviation (s.d) of three separate experiments. All attempts at replication were successful. All findings can be replicated.
Randomization Forty mice were randomly divided into 8 groups without any selective criteria.

Blinding
Blinding was not relevant to the study because methods for group allocation, data collection and all related analyses were designed in advance.

Validation
According to company source of each antibody name and catalog number as above, and we found the data sheet on the manufacturer's website and validated relevant citations and antibody profiles, and clearly indicated in the manuscript. Tick this box to confirm that a figure exemplifying the gating strategy is provided in the Supplementary (See Eklund et al. 2016) No magnetic resonance imaging was used in this study

Correction
No magnetic resonance imaging was used in this study