Microstructural control suppresses thermal activation of electron transport at room temperature in polymer transistors

Abstract

Recent demonstrations of inverted thermal activation of charge mobility in polymer field-effect transistors have excited the interest in transport regimes not limited by thermal barriers. However, rationalization of the limiting factors to access such regimes is still lacking. An improved understanding in this area is critical for development of new materials, establishing processing guidelines, and broadening of the range of applications. Here we show that precise processing of a diketopyrrolopyrrole-tetrafluorobenzene-based electron transporting copolymer results in single crystal-like and voltage-independent mobility with vanishing activation energy above 280 K. Key factors are uniaxial chain alignment and thermal annealing at temperatures within the melting endotherm of films. Experimental and computational evidences converge toward a picture of electrons being delocalized within crystalline domains of increased size. Residual energy barriers introduced by disordered regions are bypassed in the direction of molecular alignment by a more efficient interconnection of the ordered domains following the annealing process.

Introduction

Semiconducting polymers with ideal, band-like transport are strongly desired to meet the requirements for a vast range of applications in the field of flexible, large-area electronics1,2, including wearable, portable and distributed sensing, monitoring and actuating devices3,4,5. This need derives from a fundamental limit to the maximum charge mobility in temperature activated transport regimes, which is generally assumed to be <1 cm2/Vs for hopping6,7. Such performance cannot meet the increasingly stringent requirements for emerging thin film technologies such as high resolution backplanes, full color displays and sensors networks, among others.

A vast library of high performance donor-acceptor copolymers has been developed in recent years, making solution processed conjugated polymers yet more appealing for large-area and flexible electronic applications4,8,9,10,11,12,13. Among them, materials with field-effect electron mobilities exceeding 1 cm2/Vs are no longer isolated examples13, demonstrating that n-type polymer field-effect transistors (FETs) are catching up their p-type counterparts12. Band-like transport in organic materials is now well established in the case of small molecules, both for single crystals14,15,16,17 and more recently for thin films18,19. Likely because of the intrinsically higher degree of disorder in polymer semiconductors, very few cases of inverted temperature activated transport have been demonstrated for p-type polymer devices20,21,22,23, and only a single one for n-type devices24. The observation of such inverted temperature activation has been so far assigned either to a specific chemical structure24, to processing conditions20, or to the degree of backbone alignment21,22,23. It is indeed of utmost importance to clarify the conditions necessary to observe the transition from thermal activation towards temperature independent and band-like transport in polymer FETs.

Here we report the systematic investigation of structure-function relationships of a solution-processable polymer comprising alternating dithienyldiketopyrrolopyrrole (ThDPPTh) and tetrafluorobenzene (F4) units, referred to as PThDPPThF425. PThDPPThF4 used herein is synthesized by direct arylation polycondensation using a simple four-step protocol, and is free of homocoupling defects26. We demonstrate that the combination of uniaxial alignment and thermal annealing within the temperature range where partial melting of crystals occurs, gives access to efficient temperature-independent electron transport above 280 K, at the boundary between temperature-activated and band-like regimes. The transport properties between these two regimes can be controlled by distinct thermal annealing protocols below, in close proximity to, and above the melting temperature (Tm) of the material. Annealing at a temperature at which the smaller crystals melt, but the larger ones are maintained, allows for crystal thickening while preserving uniaxial chain alignment. Thus, a gate bias-independent electron mobility of 3 cm2/Vs is achieved. Using detailed thermal, morphological, opto-electronic, and theoretical methods, we are able to assign the origin of the improved transport properties to the synergy of improved order within the crystalline domains, increased interconnectivity of such domains, and a significantly reduced contribution of the disordered regions. Our findings offer practical processing guidelines for microstructure engineering in high mobility polymer thin films beyond thermally limited charge transport.

Results

Thermal characterization of PThDPPThF4 thin films

Thermal annealing is a widely employed strategy to enhance the transport properties of semiconducting polymer thin films via rearrangement of microstructure. Finding the optimal annealing temperature is usually either empirical or based on the phase behavior deduced from differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) performed on bulk samples. However, it is well-known that the phase behavior of bulk polymer materials often differs from that of thin films27, which are typically employed in FETs. Furthermore, in the spin casting process the polymer rapidly solidifies, giving rise to a kinetically trapped, non-equilibrium microstructure. Hence, the direct correlation between the phase behavior, including the thermal transitions, of spin coated thin films and standard DSC data is not always accurate. In order to assess the thermal behavior and the effect of thermal annealing on PThDPPThF4 (Fig. 1a, number-average molecular weight Mn = 14 kg mol−1; dispersity, Ɖ = 3.7, size-exclusion chromatography in Supplementary Fig. 1, cyclic voltammetry in Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3, extracted LUMO values in Supplementary Table 1) thin films processed under the conditions employed in FET devices, we conducted fast scanning calorimetry (FSC) instead of standard DSC bulk experiments. This allows a reliable evaluation of the first heating curves and avoids further structural reorganization during heating owing to fast heating rates28,29. For a complete discussion of DSC vs. FSC see the Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5 and Supplementary Note 1. The FSC traces of the 1st and the 2nd heating and the 1st cooling scans of a spin cast, ~40 nm thin PThDPPThF4 film at a scan rate of 2000 °C s−1 are shown in Fig. 1b. We associate the main endothermic peaks in heating scans with melting of the crystalline regions of PThDPPThF4. The melting temperatures (Tm) for the as-cast (1st heating scan) and the melt-crystallized (2nd heating scan) samples amount to 283 and 285 °C, respectively. Likewise, the main exothermic peak at 261 °C in the cooling trace corresponds to crystallization of PThDPPThF4. Because the 1st heating trace in Fig. 1b reflects the microstructure developed during spin coating, it can be used as a guide to judiciously select thin film annealing temperatures. Accordingly, the annealing temperatures T1, T2, and T3 were selected as temperatures well-below, within and above the melting endotherm, respectively. At T3, PThDPPThF4 is in a liquid state where molecular order is lost, and the final microstructure of the film at room temperature depends on the cooling kinetics. Conversely, PThDPPThF4 films are semicrystalline when annealed at T1 and T2 and thus the impact of annealing at those temperatures can be evaluated by calorimetry. To do so, we designed thermal protocols shown in Fig. 1c. T1 = 210 °C and a T2 = 287 °C were selected according to the data presented in Fig. 1b. Classical isothermal crystallization experiments in which films are quenched from the melt to a pre-selected crystallization temperature were not considered so as not to erase backbone alignment. The black traces in Fig. 1d correspond to the calorimetric signal recorded when heating an as-spun film up to the annealing temperature (stage I, Fig. 1c). The red and the blue traces correspond to the heating scans recorded immediately after the isothermal 5 min periods at T1 and T2, respectively (stage III). We find that annealing at T1 has no impact on the melting behavior, as expected. On the contrary, annealing at T2 provokes a marked shift of the melting endotherm towards higher temperatures with Tm increasing by ~30 K with respect to Tm of the pristine film and the film annealed at T1. This increase in Tm is rationalized in terms of thickening of the crystalline lamellae during annealing at T2, in agreement with the Gibbs-Thomson theory30. Accordingly, in PThDPPThF4 films annealed at a temperature within the melting temperature range, the thinner crystalline lamellae melt, while the thicker lamellae remain solid and evolve towards thermodynamic equilibrium, which corresponds to fully chain extended crystals31. Therefore, during annealing at T2, the thickness of the solid lamellae significantly increases, which results in the observed, notable increase of Tm. This behavior is common to all PThDPPThF4 samples analyzed, independently on chain length and molecular characteristics, as demonstrated in the Supplementary Information for samples of Mn = 11, 14 and 30 kg mol−1 (Supplementary Fig. 6 and Supplemenatry Note 2). Further confirmation comes from measurements performed at lower scanning rates, using standard DSC and polarized optical microscopy and spectroscopy (see Supplementary Figs. 5, 79 and Supplementary Note 3)29,32.

Fig. 1
figure1

Fast scanning calorimetry data. a Molecular structure of PThDPPThF4. R = 2-octyldodecyl. b Fast scanning calorimetry (FSC) 1st heating, 2nd heating and cooling traces for a spin-cast thin film of PThDPPThF4 with Mn = 14 kg mol−1. The three temperatures T1, T2, and T3 are below, within and above the melting endotherm, respectively and used throughout this study. c Temperature program of isothermal annealing: stage I is the heating ramp from 30 °C to the annealing temperature (Tann) at a rate of 2000 °C s−1, stage II is a 5 min annealing period at Tann, and stage III corresponds to a scan from Tann to 450 °C at 2000 °C s−1. d Heating traces using the isothermal annealing protocol shown in c with T1 = 210 °C and T2 = 287 °C. The black lines correspond to the calorimetric signal recorded as heating as spun samples up to the annealing temperatures, i.e. segment I in c. The red and the blue lines correspond to the heating scans recorded immediately after the 5-min-annealing steps at T1 and T2, respectively, i.e. segment III in c

Optical characterization of aligned films

A strong enhancement of charge mobility in polymer semiconductors can be obtained with uniaxial backbone alignment, inducing transport anisotropy and favoring improved transport properties along the alignment direction33. To exploit such behavior, we have realized uniaxially aligned films using either off-center spin coating (Fig. 2a), or wired-bar coating, according to a methodology based on the exploitation of marginal solvents and directional flow during deposition34,35. These two techniques produce similarly aligned and microstructured films.

Fig. 2
figure2

Uniaxial alignment and optical anisotropy. a Schematic of the off-center spin coating deposition method; b polarized UV-Vis spectra of films aligned using off-center spin coating and subsequently annealed at T1, T2, and T3. The grey filled Gaussians result from the fitting of the spectrum of the film annealed at T1

Figure 2b shows UV-Vis spectra of aligned films after annealing at T1, T2, and T3. All spectra feature a low-energy (namely, charge transfer or CT band) and a high-energy (not shown) band. While significant spectral changes between films annealed at T1 and T2 cannot be observed, a strong hypsochromic shift occurs after melt-annealing at T3. Spectra of films annealed at T1 and T2 show three contributions, two bands at low energy (≈1.60 and ≈1.77 eV) assigned to 0–0 and 0–1 transitions within PThDPPThF4 aggregates, and a shoulder peaking at ≈1.88 eV, which is assigned to disordered polymer chains26. Following this assignment, we can observe that the content of crystalline regions is similar for films annealed at T1 and T2. Upon melt annealing at T3 and successive cooling, the thermal history of the film is erased. As a consequence, the band at 1.88 eV dominates the spectrum owing to an increased molecularly disordered structure.

Measurements of the dichroic ratio (DR) reveals optical anisotropy after annealing at T1 and T2 of DR ≈ 2 for both cases, implying preferential alignment of polymer chains along the radial direction induced during off-center spin coating. It is important to emphasize that uniaxial alignment is maintained upon annealing at T2, which is a consequence of the thicker crystals acting as nuclei that dictate chain and crystal orientation. In contrast, melting at T3 followed by cooling to room temperature entirely erases any preferred backbone alignment.

Microstructural characterization of aligned films

Two-dimensional grazing incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS) was employed to gain information on how these annealing processes modify morphology and coherence lengths. d-spacings and coherence lengths from GIWAXS patterns are summarized in Supplementary Table 2 (for GIWAXS patterns see Supplementary Figs. 1013 and Supplementary Note 4). The sample annealed at T1 shows a semicrystalline morphology with pronounced edge-on orientation of chains (as evaluated through Herman’s S-parameter, S = 0.49, Supplementary Fig. 12 and Supplementary Table 2). The main chain-side chain separation (100 reflection) and π-stacking distance (010 reflection) are 2.04 nm and 0.37 nm, respectively. Upon annealing at T2, both the main chain-side chain separation distance and the π-stacking distances increase to 2.11 and 0.38 nm, respectively. A population of face-on crystallites appears, which shifts the S-value to S = 0.32. The coherence lengths in both stacking directions improve considerably compared to films annealed at T1: from 13.7 nm to 16.45 nm for the (100) and from 5.37 nm to 7.28 nm for the (010) reflection. This is a clear indication of an increased crystal dimension upon annealing at T2, in agreement with FSC data. Melt-annealing at T3 results in a major loss of crystalline scattering features, in agreement with optical characterization (Fig. 2). In the sample annealed at T3, mainly diffuse scattering and weak (100) and (010) reflections are observed. The π-stacking distance of a minor residual crystalline fraction is still seen but increases to ~0.44 nm at a reduced coherence length of 1.36 nm. Thus, T3 annealed films are weakly crystalline and characterized by much smaller and more disordered crystallites.

Near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy measurements on aligned films support the view of a strong in-plane alignment of polymer chains at the surface of films annealed at T1 and T2 (Supplementary Figs. 14 and 15 and Supplementary Note 5). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis of films annealed at T1 and T2 (Fig. 3a–d) shows in-plane π-stacking of mostly edge-on oriented crystallites, and sharper π-stacking upon T2 annealing, indicating increased crystalline order, in agreement with GIWAXS analysis. The samples annealed at T1 show some reflections along the chain direction at 2.7 and 2.3 Å, suggesting periodic ordering of the monomeric units. In the sample annealed at T2, reflections along the chain direction disappear. Both TEM and also atomic force microscopy (AFM) indicate a fibrillary (i.e. fibrils grown parallel to chain axes) to lamellar (i.e. lamellae grown parallel to π-stacking direction) morphological transition from T1 to T2 annealed films (Fig. 3a, c, e, f), with long periods of 28–29 nm (Fig. 3b, d).

Fig. 3
figure3

Microscopic characterization. TEM analysis and electron diffraction of T1 (a, b) and T2 (c, d) annealed films; eg AFM topography images of oriented films annealed at T1 (Rr.m.s. = 1.2 nm), T2 (Rr.m.s. = 0.62 nm), and T3 (Rr.m.s. = 0.54 nm). Scale bar for AFM images: 500 nm. Elongated fibrils can be observed on the surface of films annealed at T1 (e), clearly aligned along the radial direction of spin. Upon annealing at T2 (f), fibrils transform into crystalline lamellae of ~30 nm thickness, which apparently are oriented perpendicular to the radial direction of the spin (i.e. chains being aligned radially to the spin), in agreement with TEM analysis. Backbone direction, however, does not change upon annealing at T2. After solidification from T3 (g), the top surface is composed of small domains that lack any evidence of an ordered structure

Local packing from solid-state NMR

To gain detailed information about temperature-dependent polymer chain conformation and local molecular packing of PThDPPThF4, we performed solid-state 1H and 19F magic-angle spinning (MAS) NMR experiments on samples annealed at different temperatures. These experiments rely on the reintroduction of the homonuclear 1H-1H and 19F-19F dipolar coupling via 2D double-quantum single-quantum (DQ-SQ) NMR correlation experiments36, providing molecular information about spatial proximities and chain conformations37,38. In addition, 2D 1H-13C heteronuclear correlation (HETCOR) spectroscopy experiments were performed. Like the 1H and 19F MAS NMR techniques, these experiments utilize the heteronuclear direct dipolar coupling to transfer magnetization directly through space from 1H to 13C, thereby offering the potential to establish through-space interchain correlations.

On the basis of the observations from 2D 1H-1H DQ-SQ and 19F-19F DQ-SQ NMR correlation spectra (Supplementary Figs. 1624, Supplementary Notes 68), it can be concluded that the disordered phase of the samples is characterized by non-planar Th-F4-Th conformations and less ordered aliphatic side chains. Conversely, a strongly planarized molecular conformation is observed within the ordered domains of the samples annealed at T1 and T2.

Annealing at T1 leads to a single stacking configuration for PThDPPThF4 in its ordered domains, with one prevalent polymer conformation as schematically illustrated in Fig. 4a. This conformation includes an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the DPP and neighboring Th group, as well as a co-planar ‘anti’ conformation of the thiophene groups surrounding the F4 units. Combining 1H-1H DQ-SQ and 19F-19F DQ-SQ correlation data with insights from 1H-13C HETCOR data (Supplementary Fig. 24), we propose a packing model for the polymer in the ordered domain, with the DPP units of one chain being placed above/below the F4 units of neighboring polymer chains. While this arrangement places an electron-deficient DPP unit above another electron-deficient F4 unit, it maximizes the distance between the sterically demanding aliphatic side chains, suggesting that the formation of this packing mode is at least partially driven by a reduction in steric hindrance. Taken together, this leads to the packing model I shown in Fig. 5b, corresponding to a shifted packing of the PThDPPThF4 main chains, where the DPP units are sandwiched in between F4 units from above and below.

Fig. 4
figure4

Solid-state NMR data. Results from 19F-19F solid-state NMR. a Conformation of the polymer backbone inside the ordered domains after annealing at T1. b schematic representation for the interpretation of the 19F-19F DQ-SQ correlation spectra shown in ce: while only one broad pair of cross-correlations is observed after annealing at T1, three new cross-correlation pairs with significantly narrower lines are observed after annealing at T2. Annealing at T3 leads to mostly non-planar conformations around the F4 monomer

Fig. 5
figure5

Molecular packing. Schematic representation of local packing from solid-state NMR. a The predominant conformation in the ordered domains is characterized by an intra-molecular hydrogen bond and the ‘anti’ configuration of the thiophene monomers next to the F4 unit; b packing model I for the ordered domains after annealing at T1, which upon annealing at T2 transforms into packing models II c and III d. The three models are connected via a slipping motion involving the both neighboring chains moving in either the same or opposite directions e

Going to the higher annealing temperature T2, no significant changes in conformation in the ordered domains are observed from both 1H and 19F NMR spectra. However, 1H-1H DQ-SQ correlation data indicates an increase in the order of the aliphatic side chains (Supplementary Fig. 18), while 19F-19F DQ-SQ correlation data shows the occurrence of three distinct cross-correlation peaks, with different chemical shifts compared to the correlations observed for T1 (Fig. 4c–e). Since any conformational change around the F4 unit should result in either the occurrence of one or two auto-correlations (Fig. 4b), the emergence of three distinct cross-correlation peaks clearly indicates the formation of at least two new packing modes, henceforth referred to as packing mode II and III (Fig. 5c, d). The structure of these two packing modes can be deduced by combining the results of 1H and 19F MAS NMR with further 1H-13C experiments, establishing a picture where packing modes II and III emerge from mode I via a slip of the polymer chains along their long axes, placing the DPP and F4 units now above neighboring Th units. This places the electron-deficient groups above and below electron-rich Th units, likely resulting in a lower overall energy. Sliding of the polymer backbones is possibly facilitated by an increase in order of the aliphatic chains, resulting in less steric demand in the long-axis direction of the polymer backbone and, as evident from GIWAXS, in an increased main chain-side chain separation distance with respect to T1.

Since for every DPP and F4 unit two Th units are present in the polymer chain, the slip can occur in two directions (Fig. 5e) leading to the formation of either packing mode II or III. Interestingly, packing mode II retains point reflection symmetry in the F4 unit, resulting in two of the 19F sites at the F4 unit being equivalent, while this symmetry is no longer present in mode III, where all four 19F sites at the F4 unit are inequivalent.

Heating above the melting temperature at T3 breaks a large fraction of the co-planar ‘anti’ conformations of the F4 group with respect to the neighboring Th units, increasing dihedral angles and leading to a packing structure of PThDPPThF4 dominated by random intra-chain conformations.

FETs characterization at room temperature

We fabricated bottom-contact, top-gate FETs using uniaxially aligned PThDPPThF4 thin films and a ≈550 nm thick PMMA dielectric layer. For uniaxial alignment, we employed alternatively off-center spin coating, as for optical and structural characterization samples, and wired-bar coating, a fast, large-area and scalable directional printing process35.

To avoid extrinsic phenomena such as contact resistance and current-induced self-heating (Joule effect) leading to a questionable extraction of intrinsic transport parameters7,39,40,41, FETs with a large channel length (from 80 to 100 µm) were mainly employed for mobility extraction.

The transport properties were investigated both with backbone alignment orientation parallel (Fig. 6a, para source & drain configuration) and perpendicular (Fig. 6a, perp source & drain configuration) to the charge transport direction (as defined by the orientation of electrical contacts). In Fig. 6b, representative transfer curves of FETs with 80 µm channel length are shown (output curves are reported in Supplementary Figs. 25 and 26). All devices exhibit typical ambipolar V-shaped curves with a clear prevalence for n-type current modulation and a weak p-type current appearing below 10 V. Gate leakage current is always much lower than drain-source current in all the explored voltage range (Supplementary Figs. 25a and 26a). Backbone alignment results in charge transport anisotropy with improved transport properties along the direction of polymer backbones (para, Fig. 6b). In films annealed at T1, a 2.6 × higher source to drain current (IDS) is recorded with respect to perp configuration at the maximum VGS employed in saturation regime. In films annealed at T2, the IDS,para/IDS,perp ratio increases to ≈5, owing to an improvement of transport only in the parallel direction. In films processed at T3, transport anisotropy is no longer present, in agreement with the loss of uniaxial alignment, and a general drop of current is observed.

Fig. 6
figure6

Electrical data of FETs. FET characterization of PThDPPThF4. a Sketch of source and drain pattern configuration parallel (para) and perdendicular (perp), allowing to probe transport parallel and perpendicular to the chain direction, respectively; b transfer curves (W = 1000 µm L = 80 µm), deposited using off-center spin coating, annealed at T1, T2 and T3 and probed parallel and perpendicular to chain direction; c saturation mobility values (µsat) vs. VGS plot of films annealed at T1, T2 probed parallel to chain direction; d IDS vs. VGS and IDS1/2 vs. VGS transfer curves measured at VDS = 5 V, VDS = 30 V, and VDS = 60 V, for devices annealed at T2 and including an injection interlayer. Current values are recorded parallel to the alignment direction. It is worth noting that μeff of ≈1.5 cm2/Vs is obtained already in the linear regime (VDS = 5 V), as a result of a high reliability factor of ≈77%. Such a high r value indicates FET behavior not far from ideality. In the present case the reliability factor is mostly limited by the non-zero threshold voltage. As a confirmation, at the onset of the saturation regime (VDS = 30 V), an r up to ~82% is extracted, due to a reduced threshold voltage of VTh = 14 V. Moreover, a notable µeff value of ≈4 cm2/Vs is obtained at VDS = 60 V (r = 65%, µsat = 6.1 cm2/Vs). FET parameters of curves in d: W= 1000 µm; L= 100 µm; Ci = 5.7 nF/cm2

Apparent saturation mobility values were first extracted from the local slopes of IDS1/2 vs. VGS for the saturation regime and of IDS vs. VGS for the linear regime, according to the gradual channel approximation equations42. Focusing on the transport properties parallel to backbone alignment (Fig. 6c), for films annealed at T1, gate voltage-dependent mobility values are extracted within the entire investigated range, i.e. up to VGS = 80 V. At the maximum applied VGS the maximum apparent mobility extracted is ≈1.7 cm2/Vs. Such marked voltage dependence of mobility in a long channel polymer transistor where contact effects should be mitigated can be associated to charge density transport dependence in a broad density of states (DOS) and/or trap filling43,44.

More interestingly, upon annealing at T2, the apparent mobility value parallel to backbone alignment (µpara) rapidly saturates to a constant value at relatively low VGS > 30 V, i.e. just 10 V above the threshold voltage VTh (Fig. 6c), denoting more ideal transport characteristics. Moreover, the electron mobility is found to exceed 1 cm2/Vs for VGS values very close to VTh (i.e. at the early onset of the device). To further reduce VTh, we implemented an injection layer into the device (see details in Supplementary Fig. 27, and transfer curves in Fig. 6d), leading to a reduction of VTh by ~5 V with no variation of mobility values. This is indicative of a contact resistance-dominated turn-on voltage which may be further engineered and improved.

As a more reliable parameter and to take into account device non-idealities, we extracted the effective mobility μeff as the product between the apparent mobility and the measurement reliability factor r, as recently defined by Choi et al. (Supplementary Figs. 28 and 29 and Supplementary Table 3)45. Notable µeff values of ≈1.5 cm2/Vs in the linear regime of ≈4 cm2/Vs in saturation regime are obtained. It is worth highlighting that the high reliability values for films annealed at T2 (r up to ~82%, see Fig. 6d) compare well to those obtained with polymeric p-type counterparts and, remarkably, with small molecule thin films and single crystal based devices, leading to impressively high effective mobilities46,47,48,49. When films are subjected to a temperature above melting (T3), the mobility drastically decreases to 10−2 cm2/Vs and a strong VGS dependence of the mobility is observed. Such electrical behavior is in agreement with increased microstructural/conformational disorder and consequently strong DOS broadening as suggested by the above optical and microstructural characterization.

Temperature-dependent characterization of FETs

It has been predicted that for charge mobility values exceeding 1 cm2/Vs, the transport regime must clearly deviate from a thermally activated mechanism, typically observed in most polymer semiconductors6. In order to get insight into the transport mechanism that is operative in aligned films of PThDPPThF4, we performed electrical characterization at variable temperature (Fig. 7). For annealing at T2, the µperp vs. 1/T plot can be well described by an Arrhenius dependence over the entire temperature range, with an activation energy Ea of ≈100 meV at any VGS employed for mobility extraction (Supplementary Fig. 30). Differently, at sufficiently high VGS, µpara is constant down to 280 K. This observation is reproducible in different devices and with different dielectrics (Supplementary Fig. 31) and reveals a temperature range in which transport is not thermally activated, suggesting a transition to a band-like regime. For temperatures below 280 K, thermally activated transport is instead observed with Ea = 61 meV. Within the thermally activated low temperature range, a reduced Ea is found (from 61 meV to 31 meV) when a low-κ dielectric layer like Cytop (κ= 2.1) is employed instead of PMMA (κ = 3.6), indicating a dielectric-induced dipolar disorder effect on the DOS, dominating low temperature operation (all activation energy values reported in Supplementary Table 4)50,51. Overall, according to a mobility edge model, a scenario is suggested where shallow traps dominate below a threshold temperature of 280 K, above which thermal fluctuations enable charge releasing to extended mobile states44. Data on films annealed at T1 and T3 are also displayed in Fig. 7. For both temperatures, purely thermally activated transport is found over the entire temperature range investigated, with extracted activation energies of ≈140 and ≈100 meV for T3 and T1, respectively.

Fig. 7
figure7

Mobility as a function of temperature. Comparison of µpara/µmax vs. 1/T from the FETs of this work in the direction parallel to backbone alignment

Charge modulation spectroscopy (CMS) and microscopy (CMM) was employed to investigate charge induced optical signatures (i.e. polaronic relaxations) in FETs devices (more details in Supplementary Fig. 32 and Supplementary Note 9). Downstream interpretation of the CMS spectra allows to confidently associate ΔT/T < 0 signals (a narrow one peaking around 1.55 eV and a much broader band with peaks at 0.9 and 1 eV) to polaronic optical transitions and ΔT/T > 0 (between 1.55 and 2 eV) to the bleaching of ground-state absorption (Fig. 8a, b). Negligible electro-absorption effects are present, as detailed in the Supplementary Note 10 and Supplementary Figs. 33 and 34, where an accurate investigation aimed at evaluating the presence of a Stark effect due to electric field modulation within the semiconductor is reported. While the positive peaks at 1.6 and 1.75 eV clearly correspond to the 0–0 and 0–1 vibronic transition bands of UV-vis spectra and thus are related to crystalline regions, the shoulder at 1.9 eV corresponds to the optical response of the non-aggregated phase within the solid films. Interestingly, the 0–0 and 0–1 bands prevail also in films processed at T3, where the bulk optical density is instead totally dominated by the high energy transitions of the amorphous-like phase (green dashed line in Fig. 8c). Thus, even in highly disordered films, charges preferentially select the smaller energy gaps of the residual ordered phase. Nevertheless, it may also indicate some segregation of the residual crystalline phase on the top surface of the film, as also suggested by NEXAFS analysis.

Fig. 8
figure8

Charge modulation micro-spectroscopy. Normalized CMS spectra of PThDPPThF4 in the high energy range (from 1.7 to 2.15 eV) (a) and low-energy range (from 0.5 to 1.55 eV) (b); c CMS spectra of PThDPPThF4 annealed at T1, T2 and T3, driven at VGS = 20 V; normalized optical density spectra (dashed lines) are also reported; 20 × 20 µm2 polarized CMM maps with the indication of the polymers backbone orientation (d, e) and the relative degree of orientational order (f, g) of PThDPPThF4 films annealed at T1 (d, f), and T2 (e, g)

The relative intensities of polaronic bands at 1.55 and ~1.0 eV strongly depend on the annealing temperature and thus on the microstructure. Films annealed at T3, which show the highest structural and conformational disorder and display the strongest thermal activation of transport, exhibit the highest charge absorption around 1.0 eV, comparable to the 1.55 eV absorption. Annealing at T2, where the highest order and the best transport properties are found, leads to the lowest absorption around 1.0 eV, with a strong prevalence of the band at 1.55 eV. The spectral signatures of films annealed at T1 are in between the two previous cases, consistently with mild thermal activation of transport.

The bleaching at 1.9–2.0 eV increases going from efficient transport (T2) to inefficient transport (T3). Indeed, with increasing disorder of the film, the disordered phase is necessarily more involved, leading to larger energy barriers for transport.

By combining CMS with a confocal microscope using a polarized probe and fixing the energy at the bleaching main peak (1.6 eV), it is possible to map the orientation of ground-state transition dipole moments within the channel of FET devices (Fig. 8d–g and Supplementary Fig. 35) and extract the degree of orientational order (DO)52. A marked increase in DO is measured in the case of T2 annealed films (DO = 0.98 at T2 vs. DO = 0.89 at T1), in agreement with the relative improvement of transport properties and with a picture of stronger interconnectivity of the ordered phase in the chain alignment direction upon annealing within the melting endotherm.

DFT calculations for oligomers and aggregates

The torsional conformation subspace of single chain PThDPPThF4 was investigated at the DFT level (Supplementary Figs. 3638 and Supplementary Note 11). Two most stable oligomers that are almost degenerate in energy and characterized by syn- and anti- conformations of the Th-F4-Th units were found. In both, the sulphur atom is on the same side as the lactam-N of the DPP unit. These findings support the structural analysis by solid-state NMR, which provides evidence for the anti- conformation. The latter was therefore adopted to optimize physical (van der Waals) dimers (i.e. aggregates) to calculate the most stable packing structure and inter-molecular interactions. Two dimers were investigated (Supplementary Fig. 38), called H- and J-dimers due to their co-facial or slide packing structure, respectively. In the J-dimer, the DPP unit of one chain interacts with the Th ring of another chain at an intermolecular distance of 3.439 Å. In the H-dimer, the DPP unit of one chain interacts with the DPP of another one at a distance of 3.410 Å. Again in agreement with NMR observations, J-dimer stacking is predicted to be more stable by 5 kcal/mol than the cofacial, H-dimer one.

Aiming at understanding the properties of charged states, we computed the structure and the optical properties of the most stable charged single oligomers and dimers by means of DFT and TD-DFT calculations in the unrestricted scheme (UDFT and TD-UDFT, see Supplementary Figs. 3941). From structural relaxations and polaron spin density analysis, the polaron localizes over three repeat units on the single chain, regardless the oligomer conformation53,54,55. By considering the most stable charged dimers, H- and J-dimer result in different spin delocalization. In the H-dimer, the spin is localized on a single chain featuring a prevalent intra-molecular character, whereas in the J-dimer the polaron spin density is inter-molecularly delocalized, as reported in Fig. 9a. Computed polaron optical transitions at the TD-DFT level are reported in Fig. 9b for the single chain oligomer, H- and J- dimers. Care should be taken regarding band assignments, because TD-DFT calculations of charged conjugated species can drastically underestimate the energy of the electronic transitions (although this effect should be alleviated by using range-separated functionals)56. Moreover, the band intensity can also be miscomputed, especially for high energy and/or diffuse (Rydberg character) excited states57,58,59. However, the low-energy transition range can be confidently assigned to and compared with the experimental CMS transitions60. Both the single oligomer and dimers show low-energy polaron transitions in the 0.6–0.9 eV region. For the oligomer we computed one intense band at 0.82 eV, mainly related to transitions involving the (highest) SOMOα and the (lowest) SUMOα (i.e., singly occupied/unoccupied molecular orbital). The H-dimer features the same polaron transition, however with a reduced oscillator strength than the oligomer. For the J-dimer, the transition is red-shifted with respect the two previous cases, at 0.79 eV, with a lower oscillator strength as compared to the single oligomer case.

Fig. 9
figure9

Spin density distribution. a Computed UDFT (ω-UB97X-D/6-311 G*) spin density for the charged (−1) species of the single chain and H- and J- dimers (both alpha and beta spin densities are highlighted in grey, isosurface values 0.0003 a.u.). b Computed TD-UDFT optical polaron transitions for single chain (red), H- (green) and J-dimer (cyano)

The computed band at 0.8 eV can be assigned to the CMS band observed in the NIR region around 1.0 eV. For T3 processed films, optical behavior is associated with the characteristics of a single chain, therefore the intensity of the 1.0 eV polaron band is higher than that of the more crystalline films. For the case of T1 or T2 annealed films, namely those with an extended degree of order and/or crystallinity, the intensity of the NIR band around 1.0 eV is partially quenched by inter-molecular interactions and spin delocalization, as computed for aggregates (i.e., J-dimer).

The assignment of the CMS band at 1.55 eV is however not straightforward. TD-DFT calculations on charged dimers predict a polaron transition at 1.0–1.1 eV and at 1.18 eV for the single oligomer. These bands, most probably underestimated in energy, are tentatively assigned to the observed band at 1.55 eV. For such computed transitions, the oscillator strength is higher for the dimers than for the oligomer. This observation correlates with the observed behavior for the CMS band at 1.55 eV, which shows a higher intensity for T2 and T1 with respect to T3 annealed films.

Therefore, DFT calculations predict a J-dimer featuring an inter-molecular polaron spin delocalization, with the low-energy optical transition at 0.8 eV showing a lower oscillator strength than the one computed for the single chain. The higher energy polaron optical transition is calculated at 1.0 eV, featuring a higher oscillator strength than the oligomer case. These observations suggest that the CMS bands are probing polaron species, which, for T1 and T2 annealed films, are inter-molecularly delocalized, recalling similar observations for polycrystalline small-molecule films based on TIPS-pentacene61.

Discussion

For a low-molecular weight, high performance electron transporting copolymer, synthesized free of homocoupling defects by a simple direct arylation polycondensation protocol, we have identified key parameters required to induce a transition from thermally activated to temperature independent and charge density independent, single crystal-like electron transport. We have shown that combined uniaxial alignment and rationally selected thermal annealing procedures of films of PThDPPThF4 strongly enhance FET properties, culminating in a thermally independent transport regime in the proximity of 300 K, i.e. close to room temperature. Fast scanning calorimetry probes thermal transitions in thin films and allows the selection of three characteristic annealing temperatures: T1 below, T2 within and T3 above the melting temperature Tm. Upon uniaxial alignment through solution processing and mild annealing (T1), films with a relatively high crystalline content, with planar molecular conformation, and a well-defined supramolecularly oriented organization are obtained. Annealing within the melting temperature range and near Tm (T2) results in oriented crystalline lamellae of increased thickness. Melting and subsequent solidification from T3 erases thermal history and chain orientation, and results in a more amorphous film with fewer, smaller crystals with larger average π-stacking owing to increased conformational disorder. A sketch of the structural modification upon the different annealing conditions is proposed in Fig. 10.

Fig. 10
figure10

Structure-transport property relationship. a Proposed sketch for the changes in the functional morphology, i.e. the morphology of the molecules involved in charge transport, of PThDPPThF4 films upon annealing at T1, T2, and T3; thicker lines represent crystalline polymer segments; brighter areas evidence superior electron coupling. b Proposed energetic diagram describing transport within films annealed at T1, T2, and T3. According to the mobility edge model, the energy barrier for charge transport is defined as the difference between the mobility edge and the energy of localized states. The DOS tail variation induced by the applied thermal annealing allows for a modulation of transport barriers: thermal annealing at T2 leads to energy barriers inferior to kBT, i.e., around room temperature, thermal fluctuations enable charge releasing from shallow traps to extended mobile states

CMS measurements indicate that charged states characterized by strongly different energetic relaxation are involved in electron transport. More relaxed states, linked to higher transport barriers, are associated with the non-aggregated, disordered domains, while less relaxed states, linked to lower transport barriers, are associated with the more ordered, crystalline domains. The relative contribution of molecularly ordered and disordered regions to transport is manipulated using different thermal treatments, resulting in different degrees of energetic disorder within FETs and thus in a strong modulation of the thermal barriers to electron transport. A transport improvement with lamellar thickening, obtained upon annealing at T2, is generally expected in semicrystalline polymers62, but it has been rarely demonstrated63,64, especially in solution processed films and FET architectures. Owing to the retention of backbone orientation upon annealing at T2, energetic barriers for charge transfer are strongly reduced exclusively in the direction of chain alignment, where effective interconnectivity of ordered regions can be more easily gained, leading to temperature-independent electron transport near to 300 K. In contrast, in the direction perpendicular to the backbone, thermal charge transport barriers are independent whether the material is annealed at T1 or T2, which is not surprising as in the π-stacking direction coherence length is much smaller in any case. Combining thermal, structural, optical and electrical characterization with computational investigation, a picture can be drawn, in which PThDPPThF4 crystalline domains are energetically highly ordered and allow for superior electron coupling, up to inter-molecular charge delocalization, in virtue of chains co-planarity and, as suggested by ab-initio calculations, J-type aggregation. Moreover, efficient transport through interconnected crystalline domains via chain extended molecules is needed to realize the observed improvement in FET charge transport, as it allows to bypass the high-energy disordered phases present in the film. Insufficient interconnection of crystalline domains limits instead transport in films annealed at T1, and even more drastically in disordered films processed at T3.

These results rationalize the link between complex, semicrystalline polymer thin film microstructure and more efficient charge transport beyond thermally activated regimes. As such, they can pave the way for a new generation of high performance polymer-based electronics, suitable for a wider range of applications, such as ultra-high resolution displays and wireless communications, currently not accessible because of limited carrier mobilities.

Methods

Synthesis

PThDPPThF4 was synthesized using direct arylation polycondensation involving four steps as described previously. A detailed characterization including molecular weight, main chain defects and end groups is reported elsewhere26. The PThDPPThF4 batch used here has SEC molecular weights Mn/Mw = 14.1/52.2 kg/mol, is free of homocoupling defects and exhibits mostly hydrogen-termini at either side. Absolute number average degree of polymerization DPn,NMR and number average molecular weight Mn,NMR are obtained from the analysis of end groups in 1H NMR spectra, and were estimated to be 8 and 8.2 kg/mol, respectively.

Fast scanning calorimentry

The thermal behavior of PThDPPThF4 thin films were studied by fast scanning calorimentry (FSC) (FSC, Flash DSC 1, Mettler Toledo). The samples were prepared by spin coating PThDPPThF4 solutions (5 mg/mL in toluene) at 1000 rpm directly onto the chip sensor used for FSC experiments. Two types of experiments were conducted: (i) the calorimetric signals of the spin coated thin films between 30 and 450 °C were probed at 2000 °C/s by analyzing the first heating, the second heating and the cooling scans; (ii) annealing experiments were performed following the thermal protocol depicted in Fig. 1c in the manuscript: i.e., the freshly spin coated samples were taken to the suitable annealing temperatures at 2000 °C/s (stage I) and kept at that temperature for 5 min (stage II). Then, the thermal signal was recorded during a subsequent heating scan at 2000 °C/s from the annealing temperatures up to 450 °C (stage III).

Film topography and thickness

The surface topography of the films was measured with an Agilent 5500 Atomic Force Microscope operated in the Acoustic Mode. The thicknesses of the polymer films were measured with a KLA Tencor Alpha-Step Surface Profiler. PThDPPThF4 films for topography and thickness analysis where prepared either through off-center spin coating (30 s, 1000 rpm) or through wired-bar coating on silicon p-doped substrates. Uniaxially aligned films have been subjected to thermal annealing at different temperatures (in the 120–350 °C range) for 30 min.

TEM sample preparation and characterization

The polymer films were first coated with an amorphous carbon film of a few nm thickness under high vacuum (Edwards Auto 306 evaporator). Then, the carbon-coated films were lifted from the substrate using an aqueous solution of HF (5% in weight) and recovered on TEM copper grids. The samples were analyzed with a FEI CM12 microscope (120 kV) equipped with a Megaview III camera under low dose conditions in bright field and diffraction modes.

FET fabrication and electrical characterization

Thoroughly cleaned 1737F glass was used as substrate for all the devices. FETs were fabricated using a top-gate, bottom-contact architecture. Bottom Au contacts were prepared by a lift-off photolithographic process with a 1.5 nm thick Cr adhesion layer. The thickness of the Au contacts was 15 nm. Patterned substrates were cleaned in an ultrasonic bath in isopropyl alcohol for 2–3 min before deposition of the semiconductor. PThDPPThF4 thin films (30–50 nm) were deposited either through off-center spin coating (30 s, 1000 rpm) or through wired-bar coating. Films have been subjected to thermal annealing at different temperatures (in the 120–350 °C range) for 30 min. As the dielectric layer, we have employed either the perfluorinated polymer CYTOP CTL-809 M dielectric (Asahi Glass, spun at 6000 rpm for 90 s), or PMMA (spun at 2000 rpm for 90 seconds); in both cases dielectric film thickness was 550 nm. As the gate electrode, thermally evaporated 40 nm thick Al layer or 4.5 nm thick Au transparent layer were employed for standard FETs and CMS/CMM measurements, respectively. A charge injection interlayer was introduced in some devices, by spin-coating a 0.5 g/l P(NDI2ODT2) solution in toluene on top of the source and drain electrodes (1000 rpm, 30 sec) resulting in 2.5 nm ultra-thin films. The interlayer was annealed at 310 °C for 1 h in order to make it insoluble during the successive deposition of PThDPPThF4 from toluene. The electrical characteristics of transistors were measured in a nitrogen glovebox on a Wentworth Laboratories probe station with an Agilent B1500A semiconductor device analyzer. Saturation and linear charge carrier mobility values were extracted by the transfer characteristic curves according to the gradual channel approximation, following the expressions IDS = μsat × Cdie × W/2 L × (VGS − VTh)2 and IDS = μlin × Cdie × W/L × [(VGSVTh) × VDSVDS2/2], where IDS is the drain current, μsat and μlin are the saturation and linear mobility, respectively, Cdie is the specific dielectric capacitance, W and L are the width and the length of the channel, respectively, VGS is the gate voltage, VDS is the drain voltage, and VTh is the threshold voltage. Accordingly, μsat (μlin) was obtained from the slope of IDS0.5 (IDS) versus VGS, calculated every three points around each VGS value. The effective mobility µeff was obtained by multiplying μ (alternatively μsat and μlin) by the measurement reliability factor r: µeff=r×μ. r was determined according to the definition and equation reported in the work by Choi et al.45.

UV-Vis absorption

The optical absorption measurements were performed using a spectrophotometer Perkin Elmer Lambda 1050. PThDPPThF4 films for UV-Vis where prepared either through off-center spin coating (30 s, 1000 rpm) or through wired-bar coating on glass. Uniaxially aligned films have been subjected to thermal annealing at different temperature (in the 120–350 °C range) for 30 min.

GIWAXS measurements

GIWAXS measurements were performed on the SAXS/WAXS Beamline at the Australian Synchrotron65. In all, 11 or 18 keV highly collimated photons were aligned parallel to the sample by using a photodiode, with scattering patterns collected on a Dectris Pilatus 1 M detector. Angular steps of 0.01° were taken near the critical angle, which was determined as the angle of maximum scattered intensity. Each 2D scatter pattern was a result of a total of 3 s of exposure. Three 1-s exposures were taken at different detector positions to fill in the gaps between modules in the detector, and combined in software. Correction of data onto momentum transfer axes and sector profiles, was done using a modified version of NIKA. Peak fitting was done using least squares multipeak fitting within Igor Pro. By identifying the scattering peaks, and fitting them with a log cubic empirical background function, we can monitor the crystallinity in the three major unit cell directions. Peak area is proportional to the number of molecular planes which participate in crystalline stacking and so the relative crystallinity within the thin film, while the peak width is an indication of the coherence length of that crystallinity and represents the size and quality of those crystals, and finally the location of the peak gives the d-spacing or the distance from one unit cell to the next along that direction.

PThDPPThF4 films for GIWAXS where prepared either through off-center spin coating (30 s, 1000 rpm) or through wired-bar coating on silicon p-doped substrates. Uniaxially aligned films have been subjected to thermal annealing at different temperature (in the 120–350°C range) for 30 min.

NEXAFS measurements

NEXAFS measurements were performed on the Soft X-ray Beamline at the Australian Synchrotron66. Partial electron yield (PEY) was used to collect the data, with the PEY signal measured with a channeltron detector with a retarding voltage of ~200 V. Dark levels were measured and subtracted from the data, and double normalization was done using a gold mesh corrected by a photodiode. Peak fitting and tilt angle calculations were done using the Quick AS NEXAFS Tool67.

All tilt angles are calculated from a peak fit of structure at lower energies than 286 eV, which is in the π* manifold, corresponding to transition dipole moments normal to the face of a conjugated core, along the direction of the carbon π orbitals. Thus a tilt angle of 90° indicates that every TDM is perfectly in-plane, and so all the conjugated faces are oriented perfectly edge-on to the substrate, while a tilt angle of 0° indicates perfectly face-on orientation. Because of the uniaxial alignment of spin coated films, an unaligned film will have an average tilt angle of ~54.7°. It is also impossible to determine through only a tilt angle measurement the distribution of local tilt angles within the film, but only the ensemble tilt angle. Thus any fixed dihedral angle between backbone components will result in an average tilt angle between the tilt angles of each component. As opposed to GIWAXS, NEXAFS is sensitive to all molecules, regardless of them being in a crystalline or amorphous region. PThDPPThF4 films for NEXAFS were prepared either through off-center spin coating (30 s, 1000 rpm) or through wired-bar coating on silicon p-doped substrates. Uniaxially aligned films have been subjected to thermal annealing at different temperature (in the 120–350 °C range) for 30 min.

Charge modulation spectroscopy

The CMS spectra were collected in working FETs, measuring the normalized transmittance variation (ΔT/T) induced by the gate voltage modulation. We performed the measurements keeping the source and drain electrode at 0 V, while the modulated voltage (f= 983 Hz) was applied at the gate electrode. The offset voltage and amplitude of modulation varied depending on the sample. Details on these values are found in figure captions. The light of a tungsten lamp was monochromated and subsequently focused on the device. The transmitted portion of the light was then collected and revealed through a silicon photodiode. The electrical signal is amplified through a trans-impedance amplifier (Femto DHPCA-100) and then revealed through a DSP Lock-in amplifier (Standford Instrument SR830). All the measurements were performed in vacuum atmosphere (~10−5–10−6 mbar).

Polarized charge modulation microscopy

The p-CMM data were collected with a homemade confocal microscope operating in transmission mode. The light source consisted of a supercontinuum laser (NKT Photonics, SuperK Extreme) monochromated by an acousto-optic modulator (NKT Photonics, SuperK Select) in the 500–1000 nm region with line widths between 2 and 5 nm. Laser polarization was controlled with a half-wave plate and a linear polarizer. The light was then focused on the sample with a 0.7 N.A. objective (S Plan Fluor60, Nikon) and collected by a second 0.75 N.A. objective (CFI Plan Apochromat VC 20, Nikon). The collected light was focused to the entrance of a multimodal glass fiber with a 50 μm core, acting as a confocal aperture. Detection was operated through a silicon photodetector (FDS100, Thorlabs). The signal was amplified by a transimpedance amplifier (DHPCA-100, Femto) and supplied both to a DAQ (to record the transmission signal, T) and to a lock-in amplifier (SR830 DSP, Stanford Research Systems) to retrieve the differential transmission data, ΔT. The system was run with an homemade Labview software. The OD values were obtained from T as described in ref. 52, while the CMS data were calculated as ΔT/T. The sample was kept in an inert atmosphere by fluxing nitrogen in a homemade chamber. The gate voltage of the transistor was sinusoidally modulated at 989 Hz between 20 and 60 V with a waveform generator (Keithley 3390) amplified by a high-voltage amplifier (Falco Systems WMA-300), while the source and drain contacts were kept at short-circuit. Signal maps were collected by raster scanning the sample at 250 ms per pixel, with a lock-in integration time of 100 ms. All data were processed with Matlab software.

Solid-state NMR

All 1H and 19F solid-state NMR experiments were performed on a Bruker DSX 500 spectrometer operating at a magnetic field of 11.74 T, corresponding to Larmor frequencies of 500.2 MHz (1H) and 470.6 MHz (19F). All samples were packed into 2.5 mm o. d. ZrO2 rotors with Vespel drive and bottom caps. The 1H and 19F Magic Angle Spinning (MAS) NMR experiments employed a commercial Bruker 2.5 mm MAS triple resonance probe and a Bruker 2.5 mm MAS double resonance probe with low fluorine background, respectively, using MAS frequencies of either 25.0 or 29.762 kHz. The 1H and 19F chemical shift and corresponding radio-frequency fields were calibrated using adamantane and PTFE (−122 ppm). A π/2 pulse length of 2.5 µs (1H) and 3 µs (19F) was used for excitation, corresponding to RF field strengths of 100 and 83.3 kHz, respectively. The magic angle was calibrated using KBr.

The Back-to-Back (BaBa) DQ excitation and reconversion scheme was used in combination with a XY-8 phase cycle68 for both the 2D 1H-1H and 19F-19F DQ-SQ correlation NMR experiments. Both the 2D 1H-1H and 19F-19F DQ-SQ experiments employed four rotor periods of DQ excitation and reconversion and the indirect dimension was incremented in a rotor-synchronized fashion; phase discrimination was achieved via the STATES-TPPM scheme69 and 64 t1-increments were acquired in the indirect dimension. A short z-filter delay of one rotor period was applied prior to acquisition. Acquisition, processing, and data analysis were performed using the Bruker Topspin software package. All 2D DQ-SQ-correlation spectra were apodized with a shifted Gaussian window function (GB = 0.25; LB = -100 Hz (1H) and −500 Hz (19F)) to improve resolution in both dimensions.

Computational methods

DFT calculations of neutral and charged (−1) species were performed using the range-separated functional ω-B97X with D2 Grimme dispersion corrections (ω-B97X-D) and the 6-311 G* basis set. TDDFT calculations were performed at the same level of theory considering at least 30 excited states for each species. The unrestricted U-DFT formalism was adopted for the charged states. We investigated the oligomer lengths n = 1, 2 and 4. Molecular dimers were made starting from the oligomer n = 2. All structures (i.e., oligomers and dimers) were optimized and the evaluation of the vibrational frequencies (i.e. Hessian analysis) were performed to assure the stable equilibrium conformation. All Cartesian coordinates of the optimized structures are available under request to the co-author D.F. All calculations were performed with Gaussian09/D.01 code70.

Data availability

The authors declare that the main data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. Extra data are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

References

  1. 1.

    Caironi, M., Noh, Y. Y. (eds). Large Area and Flexible Electronics. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2015.

  2. 2.

    Guo, X. et al. Current status and opportunities of organic thin-film transistor technologies. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 64, 1906–1921 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sirringhaus, H. Materials and applications for solution-processed organic field-effect transistors. P. IEEE 97, 1570–1579 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chang, J. S., Facchetti, A. F. & Reuss, R. A circuits and systems perspective of organic/printed electronics: review, challenges, and contemporary and emerging design approaches. IEEE J. Em. Sel. Top. C. 7, 7–26 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kaltenbrunner, M. et al. An ultra-lightweight design for imperceptible plastic electronics. Nature 499, 458–463 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Troisi, A. The speed limit for sequential charge hopping in molecular materials. Org. Electron. 12, 1988–1991 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sirringhaus, H. 25th anniversary article: organic field-effect transistors: the path beyond amorphous silicon. Adv. Mater. 26, 1319–1335 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Berggren, M. et al. Browsing the real world using organic electronics, Si‐chips, and a human touch. Adv. Mater. 28, 1911–1916 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Baeg, K.-J., Caironi, M. & Noh, Y.-Y. Toward printed integrated circuits based on unipolar or ambipolar polymer semiconductors. Adv. Mater. 25, 4210–4244 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wong, W. S., Salleo, A. Flexible electronics: materials and applications, Vol. 11. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2009.

  11. 11.

    Liu, Y., Pharr, M. & Salvatore, G. A. Lab-on-skin: a review of flexible and stretchable electronics for wearable health monitoring. ACS Nano 11, 9614–9635 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Shi, L. et al. Design and effective synthesis methods for high-performance polymer semiconductors in organic field-effect transistors. Mater. Chem. Front. 1, 2423–2456 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Paterson, A. F. et al. Recent progress in high-mobility organic transistors: a reality check. Adv. Mater. 30, 1801079 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Minder, N. A. et al. Band‐like electron transport in organic transistors and implication of the molecular structure for performance optimization. Adv. Mater. 24, 503–508 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kim, B. J. et al. Electrical transport through single nanowires of dialkyl perylene diimide. J. Phys. Chem. C. 117, 10743–10749 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Minder, N. A. et al. Tailoring the molecular structure to suppress extrinsic disorder in organic transistors. Adv. Mater. 26, 1254–1260 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Krupskaya, Y. et al. Band‐like electron transport with record‐high mobility in the TCNQ family. Adv. Mater. 27, 2453–2458 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Xu, X. et al. Electron mobility exceeding 10 cm2 V−1 s−1 and band‐like charge transport in solution‐processed n‐channel organic thin‐film transistors. Adv. Mater. 28, 5276–5283 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mei, Y. et al. Crossover from band-like to thermally activated charge transport in organic transistors due to strain-induced traps. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E6739–E6748 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lee, J. et al. Thin films of highly planar semiconductor polymers exhibiting band-like transport at room temperature. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 7990–7993 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Schott, S. et al. Charge‐transport anisotropy in a uniaxially aligned diketopyrrolopyrrole‐based copolymer. Adv. Mater. 27, 7356–7364 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yamashita, Y. et al. Transition between band and hopping transport in polymer field‐effect transistors. Adv. Mater. 26, 8169–8173 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yamashita, Y. et al. Mobility exceeding 10 cm2/(V· s) in donor–acceptor polymer transistors with band-like charge transport. Chem. Mater. 28, 420–424 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Senanayak, S. P. et al. Room-temperature bandlike transport and Hall effect in a high-mobility ambipolar polymer. Phys. Rev. B 91, 115302 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Park, J. H. et al. A fluorinated phenylene unit as a building block for high‐performance n‐type semiconducting polymer. Adv. Mater. 25, 2583–2588 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Broll, S. et al. Defect analysis of high electron mobility diketopyrrolopyrrole copolymers made by direct arylation polycondensation. Macromolecules 48, 7481–7488 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Martín, J. et al. On the effect of confinement on the structure and properties of small-molecular organic semiconductors. Adv. Electron. Mater. 4, 1700308 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Martín, J., Stingelin, N. & Cangialosi, D. Direct calorimetric observation of the rigid amorphous fraction in a semiconducting polymer. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 990–995 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Schawe, J. E. K. Influence of processing conditions on polymer crystallization measured by fast scanning DSC. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 116, 1165–1173 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Gibbs, J. W. Collected Works. (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, 1948).

  31. 31.

    Strobl, G. The Physics of Polymers: conceps for understanding their structures and behaviour. (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2007).

  32. 32.

    Martin, J. et al. Temperature-dependence of persistence length affects phenomenological descriptions of aligning interactions in nematic semiconducting polymers. Chem. Mater. 30, 748–761 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Khim, D. et al. Uniaxial alignment of conjugated polymer films for high-performance organic field-effect transistors. Adv. Mater. 30, 1705463 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Luzio, A. et al. Control of charge transport in a semiconducting copolymer by solvent-induced long-range order. Sci. Rep. 3, 3425 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bucella, S. G. et al. Macroscopic and high-throughput printing of aligned nanostructured polymer semiconductors for MHz large-area electronics. Nat. Commun. 6, 8394 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Rouger, L. et al. Ultrafast acquisition of 1 H-1 H dipolar correlation experiments in spinning elastomers. J. Magn. Reson. 277, 30–35 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Do, K. et al. Impact of Fluorine Substituents On π‐Conjugated Polymer Main‐chain Conformations, Packing, And Electronic Couplings. Adv. Mater. 28, 8197–8205 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hansen, M. R., Graf, R. & Spiess, H. W. Interplay of structure and dynamics in functional macromolecular and supramolecular systems as revealed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 116, 1272–1308 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Liu, C. et al. Device physics of contact issues for the overestimation and underestimation of carrier mobility in field-effect transistors. Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 034020 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Förster, A. et al. Influence of electric fields on the electron transport in donor–acceptor polymers. J. Phys. Chem. C. 121, 3714–3723 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Nikiforov, G. O. et al. Current‐induced joule heating and electrical field effects in low temperature measurements on tips pentacene thin film transistors. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2, 1600163 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Sze, S. M., Ng, K. K. Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 3rd edn. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2006).

  43. 43.

    Toman, P. et al. Modelling of the charge carrier mobility in disordered linear polymer materials. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 7760–7771 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Klauk, H. Organic electronics II: more materials and applications, vol. 2. (John Wiley & Sons, Weinheim, Germany, 2012).

  45. 45.

    Choi, H. H. et al. Critical assessment of charge mobility extraction in FETs. Nat. Mater. 17, 2–7 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Zhenjie, N. et al. Quinoline-flanked diketopyrrolopyrrole copolymers breaking through electron mobility over 6 cm2 V−1 s−1 in flexible thin film devices. Adv. Mater. 30, 1704843 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Yamashita, Y. et al. Mobility exceeding 10 cm2/(V·s) in donor–acceptor polymer transistors with band-like charge transport. Chem. Mater. 28, 420–424 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Tseng, H. R. et al. High mobility field effect transistors based on macroscopically oriented regioregular copolymers. Nano Lett. 12, 6353–6357 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Gao, Y. et al. High mobility ambipolar diketopyrrolopyrrole-based conjugated polymer synthesized via direct arylation polycondensation. Adv. Mater. 27, 6753–6759 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Caironi, M. et al. Very low degree of energetic disorder as the origin of high mobility in an n-channel polymer semiconductor. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 3371 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Luzio, A. et al. Hybrid nanodielectrics for low-voltage organic electronics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 1790–1798 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Martino, N. et al. Mapping orientational order of charge-probed domains in a semiconducting polymer. ACS Nano 8, 5968–5978 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Francis, C. et al. Raman spectroscopy and microscopy of electrochemically and chemically doped high-mobility semiconducting polymers. J. Mater. Chem. C. 5, 6176–6184 (2017).

    MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kahmann, S. et al. Polarons in narrow band gap polymers probed over the entire infrared range: a joint experimental and theoretical investigation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 4438–4444 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Steyrleuthner, R. et al. Impact of morphology on polaron delocalization in a semicrystalline conjugated polymer. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 3627–3639 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Fazzi, D., Caironi, M. & Castiglioni, C. Quantum chemical insights in the prediction of charge transport parameters for a naphthalenetetracarboxidiimide based copolymer with enhanced electron mobility. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 47 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Zheng, Z. et al. Effect of solid-state polarization on charge-transfer excitations and transport levels at organic interfaces from a screened range-separated hybrid functional. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 3277–3283 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Dreuw, A. & Head-Gordon, M. Failure of time-dependent density functional theory for long-range charge-transfer excited states: the zincbacteriochlorin−bacteriochlorin and bacteriochlorophyll−spheroidene complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 4007–4016 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Baer, R., Livshits, E. & Salzner, U. Tuned range-separated hybrids in density functional theory. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 61, 85–109 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    D’Innocenzo, V. et al. Nature of charge carriers in a high electron mobility naphthalenediimide based semiconducting copolymer. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 5584–5593 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Eggeman, A. S. et al. Measurement of molecular motion in organic semiconductors by thermal diffuse electron scattering. Nat. Mater. 12, 1045–1049 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Koch, F. P. V. et al. The impact of molecular weight on microstructure and charge transport in semicrystalline polymer semiconductors–poly (3-hexylthiophene), a model study. Prog. Polym. Sci. 38, 1978–1989 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Müller, C. et al. Enhanced charge-carrier mobility in high-pressure-crystallized poly (3-hexylthiophene). Macromolecules 44, 1221-–11225 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Baklar, M. A. et al. Solid‐state processing of organic semiconductors. Adv. Mater. 22, 3942–3947 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Kirby, N. M. et al. A low-background-intensity focusing small-angle X-ray scattering undulator beamline. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 46, 1670–1680 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Cowie, B. C. C., Tadich, A. & Thomsen, L. The current performance of the wide range (90–2500 eV) soft X‐ray beamline at the australian synchrotron. AIP Conf. Proc. 1234, 307–310 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Gann, E. et al. Quick AS NEXAFS Tool (QANT): a program for NEXAFS loading and analysis developed at the Australian Synchrotron. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 23, 374–380 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Brown, S. P. et al. An investigation of the hydrogen-bonding structure in bilirubin by 1H double-quantum magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 4275–4285 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Marion, D. et al. Rapid recording of 2D NMR spectra without phase cycling. Application to the study of hydrogen exchange in proteins. J. Magn. Reson. 85, 393–399 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Gaussian 09, et al. Gaussian 09, Revision A.1. (Wallingford, Gaussian, Inc.; 2009).

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.C. thanks D. Natali for insightful discussions. M.S. and F.N. thank M. Hagios and A. Warmbold for SEC and bulk DSC measurements, respectively. This work was financially supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme “HEROIC”, grant agreement 638059. M.S. acknowledges funding from the DFG (SO 1213/8-1). N.S. acknowledges the financial support of the US National Science Foundation through the DMREF program (DMR-1729737). D.F. acknowledges the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) for a Principal Investigator grant (FA 1502/1-1). Part of this work was carried out on the SAXS/WAXS and Soft X-ray Beamlines at the Australian Synchrotron, part of ANSTO and at Polifab, the micro- and nano-technology center of the Politecnico di Milano.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.L., M.S. and M.C. conceived and coordinated the work. A.L. deposited the films, fabricated the field-effect devices, and took care of the whole electrical characterization. A.L. performed CMS and CMM experiments. Electrical, CMS, and CMM data were analysed by A.L. and M.C. F.N. and M.S. contributed the polymers under study. E.G. and C.R.M. performed X-Ray measurements and analysed structural data. J.M. and N.S. took care of thermal and POM characterizations, and analysed the resulting data. D.F. performed DFT calculations. P.S. and M.R.H. performed the solid-state NMR study. M.B. performed TEM measurements and contributed to the analysis of the structural data. A.L., J.M., D.F., P.S., C.R.M., M.R.H., M.S. and M.C. co-wrote the paper. All authors contributed to the editing of the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Michael Sommer or Mario Caironi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information: Nature Communications thanks Yunqi Liu and other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luzio, A., Nübling, F., Martin, J. et al. Microstructural control suppresses thermal activation of electron transport at room temperature in polymer transistors. Nat Commun 10, 3365 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11125-9

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.