Abstract
Nonlinear susceptibilities are key to ultrafast lightwave driven optoelectronics, allowing petahertz scaling manipulation of the signal. Recent experiments retrieved a 3rd order nonlinear susceptibility by comparing the nonlinear response induced by a strong laser field to a linear response induced by the otherwise identical weak field. The highly nonlinear nature of high harmonic generation (HHG) has the potential to extract even higher order nonlinear susceptibility terms. However, up till now, such characterization has been elusive due to a lack of direct correspondence between high harmonics and nonlinear susceptibilities. Here, we demonstrate a regime where such correspondence can be clearly made, extracting nonlinear susceptibilities (7th, 9th, and 11th) from sapphire of the same order as the measured high harmonics. The extracted high order susceptibilities show angularresolved periodicities arising from variation in the band structure with crystal orientation. Our results open a door to multichannel signal processing, controlled by laser polarization.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The development of strong ultrafast optical fields opened a possibility to induce and observe the nonlinear dynamics of electrons without damaging the material^{1,2}. High harmonic generation (HHG) in solids is a nonlinear frequency conversion phenomenon, whose mechanism is still a subject of intense investigation^{3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13}. The process was first observed in atomic gas^{14}, where it is welldescribed by the threestep recollision model^{15,16,17}. However, in solids, in addition to the abovementioned recollision scenario (described within nonperturbative interband HHG framework), intraband transitions^{4,5} and WannierStark localization^{11} have been found to make important contributions, depending on the material and laser parameters.
Prior experimental extraction of nonlinear susceptibility in attosecond experiments relied on other, nonHHG, mechanisms, such as comparing the linear to the nonlinear polarization response using attosecond streak camera^{18}. This allowed the extraction of the third order Kerr nonlinearity, showing the potential of petahertz scaling manipulation by relying on the change of the effective refractive index in optoelectronics^{18,19}. However, extracting higher order nonlinear susceptibilities using this method requires broader spectral coverage.
In the following, we show how to use HHG in suitable regimes to cleanly extract much higher order susceptibilities and therefore achieve unprecedented characterization of nonlinear electronic response directly based on experimental measurements. Figure 1 illustrates different possible mechanisms of HHG in solids, which may be due to either interband transitions (resulting from multiphoton absorption or tunneling) or intraband transitions. Both interband and intraband HHG have been previously observed in solids^{3,4,5,6,7,8}, with recollision being directly analogous to HHG in atomic gas^{20}, while intraband oscillations being unique to solids and determined by the shape of the conduction band^{21}. Here, we demonstrate high harmonics produced by the multiphoton interband transitions. Furthermore, we show that the existence of multiphoton scaling and interband polarization leading to high harmonics creates the necessary and sufficient conditions for measuring high order nonlinear susceptibilities, which are inaccessible by other means.
Results
High harmonic generation in sapphire experiment
The multiphoton regime is characterized by the relatively high value of the Keldysh parameter,
where ω, F, Δ are the laser frequency, maximum field strength, and bandgap, respectively, e > 0 is the absolute value of the electron charge, and m is the reduced mass of an electron and a hole (m^{−1} = m_{e}^{−1} ^{+} m_{h}^{−1}). The _{h}igh bandgap of sapphire (8.8 eV), combined with relatively high frequency and low peak field strength leads to a high value of the Keldysh parameter corresponding to γ ∼ 2.6 (depending on the exact intensity), which is consistent with the multiphoton regime. In this regime, the measured harmonics follow perturbative scaling, given by I_{HHG} ∝ I^{N}, where I_{HHG} is the intensity of the measured harmonics and N is their order. This perturbative scaling is observed for all crystal orientations, as Fig. 2c shows. The flattening out of the curve at higher intensities observed in Fig. 2c is consistent with the transition from the multiphoton to tunneling regime. The remaining deviation observed for the 7^{th} harmonic is due to quantum path interference, explained in some detail in ref. ^{22}. This quantum path interference also influences the 9^{th} and 11^{th} order harmonic yields, but the effect is less pronounced, since the distortion of the generated harmonics is different for each N order and depends on intensity^{22}. The powerlaw scaling with intensity of the laser is wellknown for multiphoton processes, unambiguously confirming that the experiment takes place in the multiphoton regime.
Figure 2a depicts the measured spectra by rotating the laser polarization about the Cplane. The electric field induced inside the sapphire specimen reaches to 0.7 V·Å^{−1}. The harmonic yield has a sixfold symmetry (periodicity of 60 degrees), which is same as the periodicity of crystal orientation in Cplane sapphire. The 7th, 11th, and 13th order harmonics have the maximum yield in the ΓK direction, and only the 9th order peak has the maximum value in the ΓM direction. These differences reflect varying high order nonlinear susceptibilities for different crystal orientations. Figure 2b shows the high harmonic yield of Aplane sapphire as a function of crystal orientation, which varies from ΓA to ΓM directions. The measured harmonics have maximum yields in the ΓM direction and local maximum yields in the ΓA direction, showing a twofold symmetry.
The ordinary and extraordinary refractive indices of sapphire are known to be 1.7601 and 1.7522, respectively, for 800 nm in wavelength. The birefringence effects become important for Aplane thick sapphire when the polarization direction is located between GM (ordinary) and GA (extraordinary) directions. However, for Cplane sapphire, the light propagates along the optic axis, where the refractive index is rotationally invariant, allowing one to neglect the birefringence effects. Additionally, the residual polarization status was compensated with the combination of wave plates.
The sapphire crystal is a dense periodic bulk solid and high harmonic generation mainly takes place along the micro scale focused depth of the pump laser. However, sapphire can act as both an HHG emitter and a strong EUV absorber, so that the observed HHG is produced within a few tens of nanometers. The small volume involved implies that phase matching here is less critical than in a gas target.
Dominant mechanism underlying high harmonic emission
HHG in solids is commonly interpreted as being due to either inter or intraband contributions^{3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10}. In panels (a) and (c) of Fig. 3 the calculated inter and intraband contributions to the high harmonic yield are depicted for the laser polarization pointing along the ΓK direction. As the comparison of panels (a) and (c) in Fig. 3 reveals, interband harmonics dominate over intraband above the bandgap. The implementation included a total of 5 bands (see the Supplementary Table 2 of SI for details), which were chosen based on the dominant transition dipoles. The band structure calculations were performed using WIEN2k program package^{23}, with the bandgap taken to be 8.8 eV, in agreement with known values.
The most compelling evidence against the intraband mechanism, independent of fine details of any computational approaches, comes from comparing the experimentally measured high harmonic yield along the ΓA direction against wellknown qualitative expectations for intraband harmonics^{3,4,21}. In particular, as Fig. 3b shows, the measured harmonic intensity is comparable in all three crystal directions. On the other hand, intraband currents would contribute much higher frequency components along the ΓA direction, relative to the ΓK and ΓM directions (see Fig. 3b). Physically, this is due to the kvector being significantly shorter along the direction perpendicular to the hexagonal face of the lattice (see Fig. 2 for crystal structure and Fig. 2d for band structure of sapphire).
The presence of higher frequency components along ΓA (relative to other directions) becomes clear if one expands the conduction band as a sum \(E_i\left( k \right) = \mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{n = 0}^6 {{\it{\epsilon }}_{n,i}} {\it{cos}}\left( {nka_i} \right)\) with fitting constants ϵ_{n} and lattice constants a_{i}^{21,24}. The cosine sum takes account of intraband HHG emission, which is due to nonparabolic nature of the dispersion curve in the conduction band^{3,21}. Since the dispersion curve along the ΓA direction is composed of much higher frequency components, intraband harmonics along the ΓA direction have a significantly higher cutoff than along other directions, as is indeed shown in Fig. 3b. The absence of this in the measured yield (where all directions have the same cutoffs around the 13^{th} harmonic) indicates that intraband oscillations are not the dominant mechanism producing high harmonics in this experiment. In contrast, the interband model predicts all crystal directions to have similar cutoffs, in agreement with experimental observations (see Fig. 3d).
Extracting highorder nonlinear susceptibilities
Having established that the measured harmonics are due to interband transitions in the multiphoton regime, we can now compute highorder nonlinear susceptibilities. The formula for polarization along the laser direction, neglecting tensorial and noninstantaneous effects, is given by:
with ϵ_{0} denoting the vacuum permittivity and χ^{(N)} the susceptibility of order N and where we assumed that the polarization density is constant over the focal volume V_{focal}. Here, we use the expansion
The above electric field is valid within the dipole approximation, which assumes the spatial variation of the laser field is small relative to the spatial excursion of the electron. This is indeed the case here, where the excursion of the electron is on the order of nanometers (note that in the sapphire crystal, the conventional unit cell has the size of ~1 nm), compared to the 800 nanometer laser wavelength.
The harmonic yield due to interband transitions is given by the Fourier transform of the polarization^{13}
where the Nth harmonic is given by the Nth Fourier component. Since the experimentally measured harmonics satisfy powerlaw scaling (see Fig. 2c), given by
the Nth order yield is calculated plugging in
into eq. 3 obtaining
Consequently, χ^{(N)} is contained in the prefactor A_{N} (see eq. 5) and thus, taking care of all the further constants and prefactors (see the Supplementary Note 2 of SI for details) the experimentally determined A_{N} value can be used to obtain nonlinear susceptibilities χ^{(N)} directly from experimental measurements. Note that the above scheme for calculating nonlinear susceptibilities requires both interband mechanism for high harmonics (to satisfy eq. 4) and powerlaw scaling (characteristic of multiphoton transitions) that satisfies eq. 5. Therefore, it could not be applied to many prior experiments, where HHG was due to either intraband, or tunneling interband transitions.
Discussion
In Fig. 4, the nonlinear susceptibilities extracted using experimentally measured yields for the 7th, 9th, and 11th order harmonics in the Cplane are shown as a function of crystal orientation. The shape of the harmonics is affected by the broad bandwidth of the 12 fs driving pulse, which in turn, leads to “effective” susceptibilities that reflect the mixing of the whole bandwidth. The fact that the values are approximately the same for 0 and 60 degrees is due to the 6fold symmetry of the crystal along the Cplane. The absolute values of the nonlinear susceptibilities are found to be on the order of 10^{−67} for the 7th harmonic, 10^{−87} for the 9th harmonic and 10^{−107} for the 11th harmonic, leading to a constant ratio between consecutive order susceptibilities, \(\chi ^{\left( N \right)}/\chi ^{\left( {N + 2} \right)}\), on the order of 10^{−20}. Both the absolute and relative values are in line with the approximate ballpark values found in the literature, where the Nth order nonlinear susceptibility of solids is estimated to be on the order of (5∙10^{11} V·m^{1})^{N+1} ^{25}. Note that measured susceptibilities decline less rapidly with harmonic order than this generic ballpark estimate, suggesting nonlinear contributions may play a greater role in sapphire than some other materials.
In conclusion, we investigated nonlinear electronic response in wide bandgap material by measuring angulardependent high harmonic emission. Having established that the high harmonics are due to interband transitions in the multiphoton regime, we were able to extract orientationdependent highorder nonlinear susceptibilities of the material. This greatly expands on prior findings, which extracted the 3rd order Kerr susceptibility induced by strong optical fields^{18}. Higher order nonlinearities are believed to be crucial to signal manipulation in optoelectronics by affecting the electron response time and refractive index^{25,26}. The susceptibilities obtained in our study have a periodicity that depends on crystal orientation, suggesting a possibility of multichannel signal processing at PHz frequencies by controlling the electron response time and refractive index using laser polarization.
Methods
In our experiment, a laser source emitting 12fs, infrared laser pulses (800 nm central wavelength) at a 75 MHz repetition rate is used. The ultrashort pulses are focused on an effective spot size of ~2 μm, with peak intensities up to 12 TW/cm^{2}. The incident pulse power is varied using waveplates in combination with polarizers. The polarization direction of the incident pulses is fixed to be linear. The samples are mounted on a 3D translational stage equipped with an extra rotation axis to vary the crystallographic angle with respect to the incident linear polarization. The samples are made of single crystal sapphire wafers with a thickness of 430 μm, being cut along the C and Aplane. Figure 2 shows the 7th to 13th order harmonics over a range of rotational angles with increasing laser field strength. As a photomultiplier was used which responds to EUV radiation with wavelength range of 45–135 nm, which corresponds to harmonic orders from 7 to 17, the harmonic spectrum from order 1 to 5, which corresponds to below bandgap harmonics, is not depicted. Figure 2 shows the measured high harmonic yield depends on the crystallographic orientation, which was analyzed by rotating the specimen about the polarization direction of the incident laser field. There are three distinct directions, for which the laser is polarized along the ΓK, ΓM or ΓA direction, and which we will focus on in part of the theoretical analysis due to the easy accessibility of the band structure in these directions.
Data availability
The data that support the finding of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Schiffrin, A. et al. Opticalfieldinduced current in dielectrics. Nature 493, 70–74 (2013).
Schlaepfer, F. et al. Attosecond opticalfieldenhanced carrier injection into the GaAs conduction band. Nat. Phys. 14, 560–564 (2018).
Ghimire, S. et al. Observation of highorder harmonic generation in a bulk crystal. Nat. Phys. 7, 138–141 (2011).
Luu, T. T. et al. Extreme ultraviolet highharmonic spectroscopy of solids. Nature 521, 498–502 (2015).
Garg, M. et al. Multipetahertz electronic metrology. Nature 538, 359–363 (2016).
Vampa, G. et al. Linking high harmonics from gases and solids. Nature 522, 462–464 (2015).
You, Y. S., Reis, D. A. & Ghimire, S. Anisotropic highharmonic generation in bulk crystals. Nat. Phys. 13, 345–349 (2017).
Wang, Z. et al. The roles of photocarrier doping and driving wavelength in high harmonic generation from a semiconductor. Nat. Commun. 8, 1686 (2017).
Schubert, O. et al. Subcycle control of terahertz highharmonic generation by dynamical Bloch oscillations. Nat. Photonics 8, 119–123 (2014).
Ndabashimiye, G. et al. Solidstate harmonics beyond the atomic limit. Nature 534, 520–523 (2016).
Higuchi, T., Stockman, M. I. & Hommelhoff, P. Strongfield perspective on highharmonic radiation from bulk solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 213901 (2014).
Hohenleutner, M. et al. Realtime observation of interfering crystal electrons in highharmonic generation. Nature 523, 572–575 (2015).
Osika, E. N. et al. Wannierbloch approach to localization in highharmonics generation in solids. Phys. Rev. X 7, 021017 (2017).
Ferray, M. et al. Multipleharmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases. J. Phys. B 21, 3 (1999).
Lewenstein, M., Balcou, P., Ivanov, M. Y., L’Huillie, A. & Corkum, P. B. Theory of highharmonic generation by lowfrequency laser fields. Phys. Rev. A 49, 2117–2132 (1994).
Corkum, P. B. Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994–1997 (1993).
Schafer, K. J., Yang, B., Dimauro, L. F. & Kulander, K. C. Above threshold ionization beyond the high harmonic cutoff. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1599–1602 (1993).
Sommer, A. et al. Attosecond nonlinear polarization and light–matter energy transfer in solids. Nature 534, 86–90 (2016).
Krüger, M. & Dudovich, N. Nonlinear optics: resolving the attosecond beat. Nat. Photonics 10, 626–627 (2016).
Vampa, G. et al. Theoretical analysis of highharmonic generation in solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 73901 (2014).
Ghimire, S. et al. Strongfield and attosecond physics in solids. J. Phys. B Mol. Opt. Phys. 47, 204030 (2014).
Kim, Y. W. et al. Spectral interference in high harmonic generation from solids. ACS Photonics 6, 851–857 (2019).
Blaha, P., Schwarz, K., Madsen, G., Kvasnicka, D. & Luitz, J. WIEN2K: An Augmented Plane Wave + Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties (Technische Universität Wien, Vienna, 2001).
Vampa, G., McDonald, C. R., Orlando, G., Corkum, P. B. & Brabec, T. Semiclassical analysis of high harmonic generation in bulk crystals. Phys. Rev. B 91, 64302 (2015).
Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear optics 3nd edn (Academic Press, London, 2008).
Krausz, F. & Stockman, M. I. Attosecond metrology: from electron capture to future signal processing. Nat. Photonics 8, 205–213 (2014).
Acknowledgements
A.S.L. acknowledges the Max Planck Center for Attosecond Science (MPCAS). A.C. performed part of the work under the auspices of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, which is operated by LANS, LLC, for the NNSA for the US DOE under contract No. DEAC5206NA25396. M.C. acknowledges the project Advanced research using high intensity laser produced photons and particles (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16/_019/0000789) from European Regional Development Fund (ADONIS). This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of the Republic of Korea (NRF2012R1A3A1050386), ICT, Future Planning (NRF2017M3D1A1039287), and Basic Research Lab Program (NRF2018R1A4A1025623).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The project was planned and overseen by S.K., S.W.K., and A.S.L. High harmonic generation experiments were performed by S.H., H.K., and Y.W.K. Data were analyzed by S.H, Y.W.K., M.C., and M. L. Simulations were performed by L.O., T. O., B. D., and A.C. All authors contributed to the discussion and preparation of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information: Nature Communication would like to thank Tran Trung Luu and other anonymous reviewers for thier contributions to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Han, S., Ortmann, L., Kim, H. et al. Extraction of higherorder nonlinear electronic response in solids using high harmonic generation. Nat Commun 10, 3272 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s4146701911096x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s4146701911096x
This article is cited by

Enhancing the efficiency of highorder harmonics with twocolor noncollinear wave mixing in silica
Nature Communications (2024)

Highorder harmonic generation from a thin film crystal perturbed by a quasistatic terahertz field
Nature Communications (2023)

High harmonic generation in condensed matter
Nature Photonics (2022)

Optimal Extraction Method of Feature Points in Key Frame Image of Mobile Network Animation
Mobile Networks and Applications (2022)

Highharmonic generation in Weyl semimetal βWP2 crystals
Nature Communications (2021)