## Introduction

For superconductors, the central issue is what drives the otherwise repulsive electrons into bound pairs, which collectively condense below the superconducting transition temperature Tc. In conventional superconductors, it is known that the elementary excitations of lattice, phonons, couple with electrons, and act as attractive force that pairs the electrons, resulting in an isotropic s-wave superconducting pairing symmetry1. The reason behind this is that the electron–phonon interaction is often nearly momentum independent. There are some cases where phonons may play some role in the unconventional superconductivity, for example, in YBa2Cu3O7−x, but how the electron-phonon coupling is related to the presumable d-wave pairing is not clear at the moment2,3,4,5. Therefore, one natural approach to have a non-s-wave superconducting pairing, d- or p-wave for instance, is to resort to other interactions such as magnetic couplings6,7. Another possible route is to seek for strongly momentum dependent electron-phonon coupling8,9,10,11, but extensive research in three-dimensional materials with weak spin-orbit coupling (SOC) has not been quite successful so far.

Recently, the debate on the possibility of realizing topological-insulator-derived topological superconductivity where the electron–electron correlation is weak and the electron-phonon interaction dominates the superconducting pairing, has made this fundamental question more outstanding12,13. In this regard, a promising topological superconductor candidate Sr0.1Bi2Se3 with quasi-two-dimensional structure and strong SOC has come to our attention. Sr0.1Bi2Se3 is a member of the MxBi2Se3 (M=Cu, Sr, Nb) family, which become superconducting by doping the topological insulator Bi2Se314,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38. Bi2Se3 crystallises in a layered hexagonal structure with the space group $$R\bar 3m$$ (Fig. 1a). Superconductivity in this family was initially discovered in CuxBi2Se3 by intercalating Cu into the gaps between the Se layers of Bi2Se316,17, and subsequently in SrxBi2Se3 and NbxBi2Se3, with the latter two having larger superconducting volume fractions21,22,23. Experimental studies from nuclear magnetic resonance26, specific heat27,28, penetration depth29, transport30,31, and magnetic torque32, all indicate that the superconducting order parameter breaks the in-plane three-fold crystalline rotation symmetry, and exhibits a two-fold nematic pattern consistent with that of a p-wave pairing.

A number of theoretical works have also proposed the exotic p-wave superconductivity in this family18,33,34,35,36,37,38. Based on a short-range electron density–density interaction in a two-orbital model, Fu and Berg proposed a spin-triplet pairing with odd parity in Cu-doped Bi2Se318. The presence of strong SOC and hexagonal warping in Bi2Se3 had been suggested to play an important role in rendering the unconventional superconducting behaviours33,34. By performing symmetry analyses, Yang et al. also pointed out the possibility of realizing a p-wave superconductivity in CuxBi2Se335. For such a system with p electrons where electronic correlations are weak, it is most likely that the electron-phonon interaction will be the main driving force for the superconductivity. Theoretically, it is indeed proposed that such an non-s-wave superconducting pairing in CuxBi2Se3 is driven by the electron–phonon interaction, which is usually expected to result in a conventional s-wave superconductivity36,37. In particular, based on first-principles calculations, a singular electron–phonon interaction at long wavelength had been suggested in CuxBi2Se336. This unusual electron–phonon interaction was shown to make different pairing channels have similar strength, and the A2u symmetric pz pairing should win if the effect of the Coulomb pseudopotential μ* was taken into account36. Similarly, Brydon et al. also proposed an odd-parity superconductivity in the same material by considering the combined effect of the electron–phonon interaction and μ*37. Based on an effective model for Bi2Se3, the on-site repulsive interaction had been carefully studied, and the results showed that the Coulomb interaction generated repulsive interaction in both the s-wave and A2u paring channels, but not in the Eu (px or py pairing) channel, making the latter win over the former two38. Therefore, examining the electron-phonon interaction experimentally is the key to the understanding of the superconducting pairing mechanism in the MxBi2Se3 (M=Cu, Sr, Nb) superconductor family.

Here, using inelastic neutron scattering (INS), we measure the phonons on a superconducting single crystal of Sr0.1Bi2Se3, isostructural to CuxBi2Se3 but with a larger superconducting volume fraction21,22. We show that the phonon linewidths of the acoustic mode measured along the [001] direction increase significantly when approaching the Brillouin zone centre. This observation reflects the singular electron-phonon pairing interaction which diverges at small momenta (qs), and may be responsible for the exotic p-wave superconducting pairing symmetry discussed extensively18,26,27,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38.

## Results

### Phonon dispersions

The Sr0.1Bi2Se3 single crystals with a $$T_{\mathrm{c}} = 3.2\,{\mathrm{K}}$$ used in this work have been well characterised as described in the Supplementary Fig. 1 and in ref. 39. We have carried out INS measurements on the single crystal using an experimental scheme sketched in Fig. 1b. We focus on two accessibly strongest Bragg peaks (0, 0, −15) and (1, 0, −5) and map out the phonons at low energies around these peaks. At (0, 0, −15), as the wave vector Q is parallel to the [001] direction, phonons propagating along [001] and [100] directions are purely longitudinal and transverse modes, respectively. On the other hand, at (1, 0 −5), along both [001] and [100] directions, there is a mix of the longitudinal and transverse phonon modes, as these directions are in between the longitudinal and transverse directions, as illustrated in Fig. 1b.

In Fig. 2, we show the phonon dispersions around (0, 0, −15) and (1, 0, −5) for Sr0.1Bi2Se3 measured at $$T = 17\,{\mathrm{K}}$$. These low-energy branches correspond to the motions of the heavier Bi atoms36. Around (0, 0, −15), we observe one dispersing transverse acoustic (TA) mode up to ~5 meV along the [100] direction (Fig. 2a); along the [001] direction, a softer longitudinal acoustic (LA) mode is observed with a band top of ~3 meV (Fig. 2b). Around (1, 0, −5), we find one TA and one LA mode along the [100] direction (Fig. 2c); along the [001] direction, besides the softer TA and LA modes, we also observe an almost dispersionless transverse optic (TO) mode (Fig. 2d). The TO mode at $$q = 0.4\,{\mathrm{rlu}}$$ has an energy of ~4.85 meV, which is very close to the zone centre optic mode at 4.82 meV obtained from Raman scattering40. Overall, these data are in reasonable agreement with previous numerical results36,40,41,42, with phonons somewhat softer than those calculated in ref. 36.

We have also examined the phonons at $$T = 0.8\,{\mathrm{K}}$$, below the Tc of 3.2 K, but do not observe any essential changes on the phonon spectra across the Tc. Therefore, in the rest of the paper, we will discuss our results obtained at $$T = 17\,{\mathrm{K}}$$. We note that for some superconductors with a higher Tc, there have been some reports showing changes for certain phonon modes matching twice of the superconducting gap 2Δ(T) across Tc43,44,45,46, likely due to the participation in the electron-phonon coupling for these modes47.

### Linewidth broadenings near the zone centre

We perform energy cuts at a series of qs on the phonon dispersions shown in Fig. 2, and the results of the cuts are plotted in Fig. 3. From the cuts, we see that the phonon linewidth at different qs along the [100] direction for the two TA modes around (q, 0, −15) and (1 + q, 0, −5), shown in Fig. 3a, c, respectively, do not show noticeable changes. Similarly, as shown in Fig. 3d, around (1, 0, −5), along the [001] direction, the linewidth of the LA and TO modes has no q dependence. On the other hand, for the LA and TA phonons along the [001] direction, shown in Fig. 3b, d, respectively, we do clearly see that they become much broader when approaching the zone centre. For instance, in Fig. 3b, the phonon is sharp and almost resolution limited at large qs such as at q = 1.0–1.3 rlu. When q = 0.5 rlu, the phonon becomes very broad. As can be clearly seen from Fig. 3d, the TA mode becomes significantly broader for $$q \ \lesssim \ 1.0\,{\mathrm{rlu}}$$, well before the energy of the LA mode getting too close to be resolved from the TA mode. In other words, the linewidth increase observed in Fig. 3d is not due to the merge of the TA and LA modes.

To better characterise the phonon linewidth, we have fitted the energy scans in Fig. 3 using Lorentzian functions convoluted with the instrumental resolution, and plotted the fitted width as a function of q in Fig. 4. The results show that along the [100] direction, the linewidth remains almost constant for the TA modes around (0, 0, −15) and (1, 0, −5) (Fig. 4a); by contrast, as shown in Fig. 4b, along the [001] direction, the width increases from 0.15 meV at $$q = 1.3\,{\mathrm{rlu}}$$ to 1.0 meV at q = 0.5 rlu. For comparison purpose, we have performed similar measurements on the phonons of the undoped compound Bi2Se3, and the obtained phonon dispersions are shown in Supplementary Fig. 2. In Fig. 4, we also plot the phonon linewidth as a function of q for Bi2Se3. The results are very similar to those of Sr0.1Bi2Se3, where the low-energy phonons only become broader along the [001] direction at small qs. However, compared to Sr0.1Bi2Se3, the linewidth increase is much reduced, indicating that Sr doping can enhance the broadening effect at small qs. The evolution of the phonon linewidth has actually been predicted in an isostructural compound CuxBi2Se3 in ref. 36, where it is shown that the acoustic phonons remain well defined at large qs along the [001] direction or in the whole q range along other directions. In other words, according to the calculations36, the acoustic phonons will only show broadenings at small qs along the [001] direction, which is exactly what we show in Fig. 4.

## Discussions

By far, we have demonstrated that the acoustic phonons become broad only along the [001] direction at small qs, consistent with the theoretical calculations36. What is the origin of such singular phonons and what is the consequence? Since Bi2Se3 has both time-reversal and spatial-inversion symmetry, every energy band is at least double degenerate. With the strong SOC, the phonon displacement along the [001] direction at small qs which breaks the spatial-inversion symmetry efficiently lifts the double degeneracy, resulting in a large and singular electron-phonon coupling matrix element along this direction near the zone centre. Furthermore, because of an open-cylinder-like electron pocket along the $${\mathrm{\Gamma }}$$-Z direction centering at the $${\mathrm{\Gamma }}$$ point48, it is shown that there is a Fermi surface nesting along this direction, and the nesting function has the largest value as $$q \to 0$$36. The combining effect of the large and singular electron-phonon interaction as well as the strong Fermi surface nesting gives rise to the large linewidth for the phonons along the [001] direction at small qs. The contribution of each phonon mode to the electron-phonon coupling constant is proportional to the phonon linewidth divided by the square of the phonon energy. Therefore, the broad acoustic phonons at small qs observed here should dominate the electron-phonon coupling. As shown in Fig. 4b, the linewidth increase is larger for Sr0.1Bi2Se3 than that for the Bi2Se3 sample. In this sense, the Sr doping not only brings in the electrons16,39, but also enhances the electron-phonon coupling, both of which drive the superconductivity in Sr0.1Bi2Se3.

Based on a symmetry analysis, one can expect that this highly unusual electron-phonon interaction results in a remarkable proximity of all pairing channels. The strengths of the s- and p-wave pairing interaction are indeed shown to be comparable in this case36. Naively one may expect that the Coulomb interaction μ* only suppresses the s-wave pairing and a moderate μ* should result in an A2u (pz) symmetric pairing36. However, a realistic calculation reveals that the Coulomb interaction in Bi2Se3 generates repulsive interaction in both the s-wave and A2u pairing channels but not in the Eu (px or py) channel38. Considering that the strength of the Eu pairing is comparable to that of the s-wave pairing from first-principles linear response calculations, one can thus expect a two-fold nematic Eu pairing which breaks the in-plane three-fold crystalline rotation symmetry in this system36,38. Alternatively, Fu and Berg suggest that the Eu pairing states can also be realized as a consequence of the inter-orbital pairing, and the broadening of the [001] phonons observed here may assist such inter-orbital pairing18.

As we show in Supplementary Fig. 3, for the superconducting sample Sr0.1Bi2Se3 we study here, both the resistance and upper critical field exhibit a clear two-fold pattern, consistent with previous experimental reports on the nematic p-wave superconductivity in the MxBi2Se3 (M=Cu, Sr, Nb) superconductor family26,27,29,30,31,32. Our work thus provides concrete evidence that an odd-parity p-wave pairing compatible with that of the topological superconductivity can be induced by strongly anisotropic electron-phonon interaction. Very recently, thousands of topological materials based on weakly-correlated systems have been proposed theoretically49,50,51. Since we show here that topological superconductivity can exist in such systems, the search for topological superconductors should be much more promising.

## Methods

### Single-crystal growth and characterisations

High-quality single crystals of Bi2Se3 and Sr0.1Bi2Se3 were grown using the horizontal Bridgman method. The stoichiometric raw materials (99.99% Sr, 99.99% Bi and 99.99% Se powders) of nominal composition were mixed well and sealed in an ampoule in vacuum. The ampoule was then placed in a tube furnace with a temperature gradient, heated up to 850 °C, stayed for 2 days, and cooled from 850 to 610 °C at 1 °C per hour for the melt to crystallise. The resistance and magnetization were measured in a physical property measurement system (PPMS-9T, Quantum Design). The PPMS was equipped with a sample rotator used to measure the angular dependence of the electrical properties.

### INS experiments

INS measurements were performed on the cold triple-axis spectrometer (TAS) PANDA located at FRM-II, Germany, and cold-neutron time-of-flight (TOF) disk-chopper spectrometer AMATERAS located at J-PARC, Tokai, Ibaraki, Japan. On the TAS, we used a fixed final energy Ef mode. For the experiment on PANDA, one single crystal of Sr0.1Bi2Se3 with a mass of 1.1 g was mounted in the (H, 0, L) scattering plane. The sample mosaic was about 5 degrees (FWHM, full width at half maximum) scanned around the Brag peak (1, 0, −5). Double-focusing mode was used for both the monochromator and analyser. The collimation is 80′-80′-sample-80′-80′. With these configurations, the energy resolutions were about 0.09 meV for Ef = 5.1 meV and 0.05 meV for Ef = 3.5 meV. To reduce higher-order neutrons, one Be filter was placed after the sample. A closed-cycle refrigerator (CCR) equipped with a 3He insert was used to reach the base temperature of 0.8 K. In the TAS experiments, we measured the phonon dispersion along the direction that matched the resolution ellipse to improve the resolution. On the TOF spectrometer AMATERAS, a multiple- Ei (incident energy) mode with main $$E_{\mathrm{i}} = 10.5\,{\mathrm{meV}}$$ and resolution ΔE = 0.33 meV at E = 0 meV was used. For Sr0.1Bi2Se3, the 1.1-g sample measured on PANDA was used on AMATERAS. We also measured a Bi2Se3 sample with a larger mass of 1.6 g for comparison. Both samples were mounted with c axis along the beam direction and a axis in the horizontal plane. The rotation axis was perpendicular to a-c plane, and the step was 0.5 degree around the Bragg peaks (0, 0, −15) and (1, 0, −5). A 4He CCR with a temperature range of 5–300 K was used on AMATERAS. The wave vector Q is expressed as (H, K, L) reciprocal lattice unit (rlu) of $$\left( {a^ \ast ,b^ \ast ,c^ \ast } \right) = \left( {4\pi /\sqrt 3 a,4\pi /\sqrt 3 b,2\pi /c} \right)$$, with $$a = b = 4.14\,{\mathrm{{\AA}}}$$ and $$c = 28.6\,{\mathrm{{\AA}}}$$ for both Bi2Se3 and Sr0.1Bi2Se3.