Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Sox17 is required for endothelial regeneration following inflammation-induced vascular injury


Repair of the endothelial cell barrier after inflammatory injury is essential for tissue fluid homeostasis and normalizing leukocyte transmigration. However, the mechanisms of endothelial regeneration remain poorly understood. Here we show that the endothelial and hematopoietic developmental transcription factor Sox17 promotes endothelial regeneration in the endotoxemia model of endothelial injury. Genetic lineage tracing studies demonstrate that the native endothelium itself serves as the primary source of endothelial cells repopulating the vessel wall following injury. We identify Sox17 as a key regulator of endothelial cell regeneration using endothelial-specific deletion and overexpression of Sox17. Endotoxemia upregulates Hypoxia inducible factor 1α, which in turn transcriptionally activates Sox17 expression. We observe that Sox17 increases endothelial cell proliferation via upregulation of Cyclin E1. Furthermore, endothelial-specific upregulation of Sox17 in vivo enhances lung endothelial regeneration. We conclude that endotoxemia adaptively activates Sox17 expression to mediate Cyclin E1-dependent endothelial cell regeneration and restore vascular homeostasis.


Transport of solutes, plasma proteins and liquid and trafficking immune cells across the intact endothelial barrier is essential for tissue homeostasis1,2. Injury or death of endothelial cells (ECs) results in breakdown of the EC barrier, tissue edema, and the unfettered influx of inflammatory cells1,3. Endothelial regeneration is therefore an essential adaptive response4,5. In inflammatory diseases such as acute lung injury (ALI), which is characterized by  severe endothelial injury6,7, the inflammatory injury often exceeds the regenerative capacity of the endothelium. Thus, regeneration of the endothelium using stem or progenitor cells has emerged as a potential strategy for restoring tissue homeostasis8,9,10. However, the prospect of EC regeneration through transplantation of exogenous regenerative cells remains challenging due to the limited engraftment11,12 and intimal retention13 of the regenerative cells. An alternative approach is to activate intrinsic EC regeneration mechanisms. But little is known about the signaling mechanisms or cells responsible for endothelial regeneration following severe inflammatory injury14,15,16.

Activation of developmental pathways may be key to activating endothelial regeneration, as shown in the liver and thymus where re-activation of the developmental transcription factors Id1, Foxn1, and Notch promote regeneration17,18,19. Sox17, a member of the Sry-related high mobility group domain family F (SoxF) transcription factors20, is a key developmental regulator of endothelial and hematopoietic lineages21,22,23. Sox17 expression in mouse embryonic and adult arterial ECs is also an important mechanism of arterial integrity24,25. In addition, Sox17 induces angiogenesis in tumors26 and participates in the conversion of fibroblasts to reparative ECs27.

In the present study, using a mouse endotoxemia model of inflammatory endothelial injury, we demonstrate that endothelial Sox17 expression plays an obligatory role in normalizing the endothelium. Restoration of endothelial integrity is mediated by activation of Hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), upregulation of its target Sox17, and subsequent downstream expression of Cyclin E1 which mediates endothelial regeneration.


Lineage tracing analysis of EC regeneration in vivo

To address mechanisms of EC regeneration, we first carried out EC lineage tracing analysis to assess the kinetics of the EC injury and repair response. For these studies, we crossbred dual-fluorescent color mTmG reporter mice28 with EC-specific Scl-CreERT2 mice to generate an EC specific genetic lineage tracing mouse model. In these Scl-CreERT2 mice, the tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase is driven by a 5′ endothelial enhancer of the stem cell leukemia (Scl) locus that is restricted to the endothelium. This is in contrast to the wild-type Scl locus that is also expressed in hematopoietic cells29. The mTmG double-fluorescent reporter mice express membrane-targeted tdTOMATO (mT) prior to Cre-mediated excision and membrane-targeted enhanced GFP (mG) after excision in ECs (Fig. 1a). This transgenic mouse model showed ~80% labeling efficiency and ~95% EC specificity (Supplementary Fig. 1A). Using 2-photon imaging of lungs in live mice, we observed that a sublethal concentration of the bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS) i.p. (12 mg/kg), which induces severe inflammatory injury, produced acute and severe loss of EGFP+ (EGFP positive) ECs; this was followed by a period of gradual recovery over several days (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Videos 1 and 2). Quantification showed decreased surface area of EGFP+ ECs at day 1 post-LPS and then recovery over 4 days (Fig. 1c). We also quantified the percentage of ECs derived from resident ECs (EGFP+ ECs) using flow cytometry. Freshly isolated lung ECs from mice were immunostained with the EC marker CD31 and the leukocyte marker CD45 was used to exclude CD45+ leukocytes, because they can also co-express CD31 (Supplementary Fig. 1B). The EC population (defined as CD31 positive, CD45 negative (CD31+CD45) cells) decreased markedly as a percentage of total cell lung population at day 1 post-LPS but then fully recovered by day 7 (Fig. 1d). EGFP+ ECs, reflecting the native endothelium, showed the same decrease in the EC population and subsequent regeneration (Fig. 1e). By day 7, the EGFP+ cell percentage reached the pre-injury levels and remained stable thereafter. These results defined both the time course of loss of ECs in the endotoxemia model of EC injury and recovery as well as the central role of the native endothelium in endothelial regeneration.

Fig. 1

Lineage tracing analysis of lung EC injury induced by endotoxemia and kinetics of regeneration. a We carried out studies to establish a model of endotoxemia (LPS) induced EC injury in lungs followed by progressive recovery of endothelium. Studies were made in mTmG double fluorescent lineage tracing mice using endothelial-enhanced Scl-CreERT2. After tamoxifen induction, Cre recombinase in ECs translocates to the nucleus and induces EGFP expression. b 2 photon imaging and 3D surface reconstruction of lungs from mTmG-Scl mice at baseline and days post-LPS-induced vascular injury (LPS is given i.p. at a dose of sub-lethal 12 mg/kg i.p.). Red indicates non-ECs and green indicates ECs. Scale bar = 20 μm. n = 3. Same lung sample in 3D structure movie were shown in Videos S1 and S2 for baseline and post-injury day 1. c Quantification of the surface area of EGFP+ (EGFP positive) cells relative to total surface areas (EGFP+ TdTomato). EGFP+ cell surface area, reflecting EC population, is 50% of total lung cell population at baseline. The EC population significantly decreases at post-LPS day 1 and progressively recovers by day 4. n = 3. d Flow cytometry analysis of ECs shown as percent of CD31+CD45 (CD31 positive, CD45 negative) cells. n = 4. In the non-leukocyte fraction (exclusion of CD45+ cells), CD31+ ECs, were significantly reduced within first the 24 h post-LPS-induced injury and then gradually recovered within 7 days. e Flow cytometry analysis of EGFP+ cells percentage among whole lung population. n = 5. Similar to d, EGFP+ cells also showed a marked loss of ECs induced by LPS within the first 24 h and then a full restored population by day 7 post-LPS. *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 versus day 0. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA

Endotoxin upregulates Sox17 expression in vivo

To investigate the mechanisms of EC regeneration, we performed qPCR analysis of gene expression in sorted CD31+ ECs obtained from mTmG-Scl mice at 6 hrs, 1 day and 2 days post-LPS challenge (12 mg/kg LPS i.p.) with PBS-injected mice serving as controls. The heat map of mRNA expression depicting key genes involved in endothelial development and growth revealed that Vegfr2, Sox17, and Ccne1 were significantly upregulated at post-LPS day 2 compared to baseline (Fig. 2a). Importantly, Sox17 expression increased as early as 6 h following injury whereas Vegfr2 and Ccne1 expression was increased at later time points. Because Sox17 is known to regulate vascular development30, we focused on its possible role in EC regeneration. Immunoblotting of freshly isolated murine lung ECs showed that SOX17 protein expression increased 5-fold post-LPS in ECs as compared to controls (Fig. 2b, c). We also determined expression of the transcription factor ER71 linked to angiogenesis and regeneration31 as a potential mechanism of EC regeneration, and found its protein expression did not increase following LPS (Supplementary Fig. 2). To determine next whether Sox17 contributed to regeneration through EC proliferation, we determined the kinetics of Cyclin E1 gene and protein expression known to regulate cell cycle activity32. We observed that Ccne1 was upregulated at Day 2 post-LPS (Fig. 2a). Furthermore, immunoblotting of human lung microvascular endothelial cells (HLMVECs) showed markedly increased Cyclin E1 protein expression in the cells over-expressing Sox17 as compared to control cells (Fig. 2d, e). We also identified several putative Sox17 binding sites in the CCNE1 promoter using the Sox17 binding sequence33 from the JASPAR database (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Fig. 3). Chromatin immunoprecipitation (Ch-IP) was carried out in HLMVECs overexpressing with Sox17. qPCR of the 4 Sox17 identified binding sites showed that Sox17 bound only to sites 3 and 4 on CCNE1 promoter (Fig. 2g). Using luciferase promoter activity reporter assay, we observed that Sox17 binding site 3 in the CCNE1 promoter increased luciferase activity by 5-fold in contrast to other binding sites (Fig. 2h). Thus, Sox17 binding site 3 in the CCNE1 promoter appears to be critical for Sox17-mediated transactivation of CCNE1. Together these results show that LPS-induced EC injury increases Sox17 expression and Sox17 induces EC proliferation via upregulating Cyclin E1.

Fig. 2

Activation of Sox17 at onset of EC regeneration and Sox17-mediated Cyclin E1 expression. a qPCR analysis of gene expression in sorted CD31+ cells from mTmG-Scl mice before and after injury (12 mg/kg i.p.). Sox17, Vegfr2, and Ccne1 increased significantly at day 2 post-LPS compared to baseline. n = 3. Color scale: the fold change increases from red to white to green color. b Western blot analysis in fresh isolated ECs from wild-type mice and quantification c showed a 5-fold increase in Sox17 protein expression within 1 day following injury compared to baseline and followed by recovery within 3 days post-LPS. n = 3. d, e Western blot analysis of cultured HLMVECs in which Sox17 was overexpressed showed 2.5x fold increase in Cyclin E1 protein expression relative to control cells. n = 3. OE, overexpression. f Representation of the CCNE1 promoter region with Sox17 binding sites (circled numbers) and their sequences. g HLMVECs were retrovirally transduced with Sox17 or control plasmid for 3 days, and Ch-IP assay followed by qPCR was performed to amplify Sox17 binding sites in the CCNE1 promoter. n = 3. h 293T cells were transfected with a Sox17 overexpression plasmid containing CCNE1 luciferase reporter constructs. Luciferase values were normalized to Renilla luciferase control reporter values. A schematic representation of corresponding deletion constructs is presented in the right panel. n = 3 and duplicates per sample. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA for (c) and two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-tests for (e, g, h)

EC-specific Sox17 deletion prevents EC regeneration

We next deleted Sox17 in ECs by crossing Sox17fl/fl mice (Jackson Laboratory) with the tamoxifen-inducible endothelial-specific endo-Scl-Cre-ERT2 mice29. Tamoxifen (80mg/kg) was given daily for five consecutive days and experiments were carried out after four weeks when EC-expressed SOX17 was deleted (Fig. 3a). Immunoblotting confirmed the deletion in Sox17EC−/− mice compared to Sox17fl/fl mice (Fig. 3b, c). We observed that 12 mg/kg LPS induced 40–50% lethality in wild-type mice. Since Sox17 regulates endothelial proliferation, we surmised that the LPS dosage of 12 mg/kg in Sox17EC−/− mice would induce even greater mortality, and therefore lowered LPS to sublethal dose of 8 mg/kg in order to compare responses in Sox17fl/fl vs. Sox17EC−/− mice. We found that LPS increased lung vascular permeability at day 1 post-LPS with no significant difference between Sox17EC−/− and Sox17fl/fl mice (Fig. 3d); thus, Sox17 did not affect severity of the initial LPS-induced endothelial injury. However, measurements of lung vascular leak during the recovery phase showed the critical role for endothelial Sox17 in mediating EC regeneration following the inflammatory injury. Sox17EC−/− mice exhibited persistently increased endothelial permeability (Fig. 3d), indicative of delayed EC regeneration response. To confirm this finding, we also generated a second EC-specific Sox17 deletion mouse model using Cre driven by Cdh5 promoter. These mice were generated by breeding Cdh5-CreERT2 mice34 with Sox17fl/fl mice. We observed in these mice the same changes seen in endo-Scl-CreERT2 mice (Fig. 3e). All Sox17fl/fl mice survived the sublethal LPS dosage (8 mg/kg i.p.) while 60% of the Sox17EC−/− mice died (Fig. 3f). FACS analysis of freshly isolated lung ECs showed that Sox17EC−/− and Sox17fl/fl mice both had severe loss of EC at day 1 post-LPS. By day 5, however, the EC population was restored to baseline in Sox17fl/fl mice but EC regeneration was severely defective in Sox17EC−/− mice (Fig. 3g). This finding paralleled the significantly higher mortality seen in EC-specific Sox17 deleted mice. Next to assess EC proliferation, the nucleotide analog 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) was injected (i.p.) 14 h before sacrifice. Immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy showed significantly increased BrdU+ ECs in Sox17fl/fl mice at day 3 post-LPS when compared to Sox17EC−/− mice (Fig. 3h and Supplementary Fig. 4).

Fig. 3

EC specific deletion of Sox17 (Sox17EC−/−) in mice prevents endothelial regeneration. a Schematic diagram of Sox17fl/fl mice crossed with Scl-CreERT2 to delete Sox17 in ECs. After tamoxifen feeding for five days and rest for another four weeks, mice are challenged with LPS (sub-lethal 8 mg/kg, i.p.) for analysis. b Western blot analysis of Sox17 protein expression in isolated ECs obtained from flushed lungs of Sox17EC−/− and control mice. n = 4. c Quantification of b shows 80% deletion of Sox17 in ECs of Sox17EC−/− mice compared to control mice. n = 4. d Time course of lung transvascular permeability following LPS challenge in Sox17EC−/− and Sox17fl/fl mice. n = 4. While control mouse lungs showed increased endothelial permeability at day 1 post-LPS and then recovered to baseline by day 5, Sox17EC−/− mice showed prolonged endothelial barrier leakiness post-LPS. e Time course of changes in lung transvascular permeability following LPS challenge was also carried out in Sox17fl/fl mice crossed with Cdh5-CreERT2 mice. n = 4. Similar as in d, these Sox17EC−/− mice also showed persistent leakiness post-LPS while control mice fully recovered. f Survival curve of LPS challenge in Sox17EC−/− and control mice. n = 8 per group. At this sub-lethal dose, all control mice survived whereas half of Sox17EC−/− mice died on day 2 post-LPS with increased mortality on day 3. By day 5, the death rate for control mice is 0 while for Sox17EC−/− mice is 60%. g Flow cytometry analysis of CD31+CD45 ECs among whole lung population in mice following injury. n = 4. In contrast to control mice in which CD31+CD45 EC population gradually recovered with day 3 post-LPS after initial loss of ECs, Sox17EC−/− mice showed significantly delayed restoration of ECs post-LPS period. h Quantification of BrdU+ nuclei in each field of 425 μm2 area in flushed lung cryo-sections from mice following injury. n = 4 mice per group and 6 replicates per sample. Slides are co-stained with CD31-AF488, BrdU-APC, and DAPI. At day 3 post-LPS, the control group showed a significantly higher number of BrdU+ECs compared to baseline. However, Sox17EC−/− mice showed markedly reduced level of BrdU+ECs, indicating reduced EC proliferation. i To assess whether expression of Sox17 in ECs can restore lung endothelial integrity, studies were performed in Sox17EC−/− mice to overexpress Sox17 protein. We used a mixture of 50 μg plasmid (mouse Cdh5 promoter—Flag —Sox17) encapsulated in liposomes, which were injected i.v. 3 h after LPS challenge. j At day 3 post-LPS, liposome vector-treated Sox17EC−/− mice showed marked EC barrier leakiness as assessed by lung transvascular permeability of albumin whereas the Sox17-rescued mice showed markedly reduced endothelial permeability. n = 4. OE, overexpression. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Analysis was performed using two-tailed Student’s t-test for (c, j), two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-tests for (d, e, g, h) and Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test for (f)

We next determined whether re-expression of Sox17 in ECs of Sox17EC−/− mice is sufficient to restore lung endothelial integrity. These studies were conducted in Sox17EC−/− mice in which the Sox17 protein was expressed in lung ECs via i.v. liposomal delivery35,36,37. The Flag–Sox17 plasmid was driven by EC-specific mouse Cdh5 promoter to maximize its expression in ECs; and the effectiveness of the approach was determined (Supplementary Fig. 7), demonstrating marked augmentation of Sox17 expression in ECs isolated from the lungs during the days following i.v. delivery of liposomal Sox17 with an EC-specific promoter but no such augmentation of Sox17 expression was found in the non-EC fraction. Liposomes encapsulating Flag–Sox17 cDNA were injected i.v. 3 h after LPS challenge in mice (Fig. 3i). We observed that increased Sox17 expression in Sox17EC−/− mice significantly accelerated endothelial barrier restoration compared to control vector delivery (Fig. 3j).

We next addressed mechanisms of upstream regulation of Sox17 expression in ECs. A key feature of endotoxin-induced inflammatory lung injury is widespread influx of activated neutrophils which intensely consume oxygen and the induce relative tissue hypoxia38,39. We thus assessed neutrophil infiltration in lungs by measuring myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity and observed 6-fold increase in MPO activity within 6 h post-LPS challenge and which continued to increase up 24 h (Fig. 4a). We assessed whether the hypoxia-responsive transcription factor HIF-1α40,41 was concomitantly increased, and observed its protein upregulation in the timeframe of neutrophil infiltration (Fig. 4b, c).

Fig. 4

soHIF-1α signaling induces Sox17 expression. a MPO activity of flushed lung sample from mice challenged with LPS (12 mg/kg i.p.) for 6 and 24 h. n = 3. b Western blot analysis of wild-type mice lung before and after LPS-induced injury (12 mg/kg i.p.) and its quantification c showed that HIF-1α protein expression increased within 6 h post-LPS and remained increased until day 2. n = 3. d Western blot analysis in freshly isolated ECs from Hif1afl/fl mice and quantification e showed significantly increased Sox17 protein expression after injury when compared to baseline levels. n = 3. f Western blot analysis in freshly isolated ECs from Hif1aEC−/− mice and quantification g showed no significant difference in Sox17 protein expression before and after injury. n = 3. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA for (b, c, e, g)

To study the relationship between HIF-1α and Sox17 in vivo, we deleted HIF-1α in an EC-specific manner by crossing Hif1afl/fl mice with Tie2-CreERT2 mice. At baseline EC-specific HIF-1α deletion in mice did not affect SOX17 expression (Supplementary Fig. 8). Immunoblotting showed that while SOX17 expression significantly increased in ECs post-LPS in Hif1afl/fl mice (Fig. 4d, e), SOX17 expression did not change either before or after LPS in Hif1aEC−/− mice (Fig. 4f, g); thus, EC specific deletion of HIF-1α prevented the increase in endothelial Sox17 expression following LPS induced EC injury.

HIF-1α signaling in ECs activates Sox17 transcription and expression

To examine the role of HIF-activation in regulating Sox17 expression, we designed specific guide RNAs to delete either HIF-1α (Hif1aKO) or HIF-2α (Hif2aKO) in HLMVECs using CRISPR/Cas942. Dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG), a prolyl-4-hydroxylase inhibitor43,44, was added to HLMVECs to stabilize both HIFs. We observed that HIF-1α, HIF-2α, and SOX17 protein expression was significantly increased after DMOG treatment as compared to control (Fig. 5a, b). Importantly, CRISPR/Cas9 mediated deletion of HIF-1α prevented the increase of SOX17 induced by DMOG whereas HIF-2α deletion did not (Fig. 5a, b), indicating the essential role of HIF-1α in mediating Sox17 expression.

Fig. 5

HIF-1α activates transcription of Sox17. a Western blot analysis in control HLMVECs and HLMVECs for which CRISPR/Cas9 was used to delete HIFs. ECs were treated with the HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor DMOG to induce HIF expression. DMOG (1 mM) increased HIF-1α and HIF-2α protein expression in control ECs but not in ECs lacking HIF-1α or HIF-2α. Induction of HIF expression was coupled to Sox17 upregulation. n = 3. b Quantification of a showed that protein expression of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in ECs was significantly increased by DMOG treatment. Sox17 showed a 2.5-fold increase in Sox17 expression control DMSO treated ECs. The increase in Sox17 was significantly reduced in HIF-1α-deleted ECs but preserved in HIF-2α-deleted ECs, indicating the importance of HIF-1α in mediating Sox17 expression. n = 3. c Representation of the SOX17 promoter region with 3 HREs indicated by circled numbers, and their respective sequences are displayed. d HLMVECs were exposed to normoxia or 1% O2 (hypoxia) for 8 h. Ch-IP assay followed by qPCR was performed to amplify the HRE regions in the SOX17 promoter. Studies were performed in ECs exposed to either normoxia or hypoxia. n = 3. e 293T cells were transfected with a HIF-1α overexpression plasmid containing SOX17 luciferase reporter constructs. Luciferase values were normalized to Renilla luciferase control reporter values. A schematic representation of corresponding deletion constructs is presented in the right panel. n = 3 and duplicates per sample. Results show that hypoxia activation of SOX17 HRE3 was required for Sox17 expression. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-tests for (b, d, e)

On analyzing the promoter region of SOX17 for hypoxia response elements (HREs), we found 3 sites (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Fig. 5A), one of which is conserved across multiple species (HRE1, −294 ~ −285) (Supplementary Fig. 5B). Chromatin immunoprecipitation (Ch-IP) was carried out to determine binding of HIF-1α to SOX17 promoter using HLMVECs collected after 8 h of hypoxia (1% O2) with 21% O2 as the normoxic control. qPCR of amplified HRE regions showed that HIF-1α bound to HREs in the SOX17 promoter (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig. 5C). We observed using a luciferase promoter activity reporter assay that only HRE3 significantly increased luciferase activity  upon co-expression with a degradation-resistant HIF-1α construct (Fig. 5e).

Sox17 expression regenerates ECs and enhances survival in mice

To ensure that i.v. plasmid delivery using cationic liposomes induced expression in lung ECs35,36,37, we cloned a 2.5 kb Cdh5 promoter region from mouse genomic DNA and used it to guide Flag-tagged Sox17 gene expression in a pCDNA3.0 vector because VE-cadherin is an endothelial-specific protein and its promoter thus specifically regulates endothelial-specific gene expression. Injection of the plasmid-liposome mixture i.v. in mice 3 h after LPS challenge induced expression as shown by Flag-tag and co-staining for the endothelial protein CD31 from day 3 onwards (Fig. 6a, b). Immunoblotting of lung ECs (Fig. 6c, d) showed significant increases in Flag and Cyclin E1 expression within 3 days of Sox17 overexpression as compared to vector control mice (Supplementary Fig. 9). Immunostaining of CD31 and BrdU (Supplementary Fig. 6E) showed significantly greater double positive lung ECs in mice overexpressing Sox 17 as compared to controls. EC proliferation increased 3-fold at day 3 post-LPS in mice overexpressing Sox17, which was coupled to restored lung endothelial barrier function, whereas barrier remained leaky in mice receiving control vector (Fig. 6f). Upregulation of Sox17 in lung ECs also significantly improved survival in mice as compared to controls (Fig. 6g).

Fig. 6

Overexpression of Sox17 in ECs induces EC proliferation and regeneration. Mixture of 50 μg plasmid with 100 μl liposomes was injected i.v. 3 h after LPS challenge (12 mg/dose i.p.) in wild-type mice. This plasmid has a Flag-tag added to the N-terminus of Sox17 protein coding region and expression is under the regulation of a mouse Cdh5 promoter. a Confocal microscopy of flag staining with CD31 and DAPI co-staining for nuclei in lung cryo-sections from mice receiving a control vector or a Sox17-construct to over-express Sox17. Scale bar = 50 μm (original panel) and 20 μm (enlarged panel). n = 6. OE, overexpression. b Co-localization coefficient for the fraction of Flag in CD31+ cells assesses the transgene expression in the endothelium. The Pearson correlation coefficient is significantly increased in Sox17-overexpressing mice compared to control mice. n = 6. c Western blot analysis and its quantification d showed a significant increase in the flag and Cyclin E1 expression in the pulmonary endothelial cells of mice with 3 days of Sox17 overexpression compared to vector mice. n = 3. e Quantification of BrdU+ nuclei in each field of 425 μm2 area in lung cryo-sections from vector-overexpressing and Sox17-overexpressing mice. n = 5 per group and 6 technical replicates per sample. Slides are co-stained with CD31-AF594, BrdU-AF488, and DAPI. Both groups show increased BrdU+ ECs at day 3 post-LPS as compared to baseline and the response was significantly greater in mice in which ECs overexpressed Sox 17. f Lung transvascular albumin permeability pre-LPS and post-LPS challenge in mice overexpressing endothelial Sox17 and control mice. n = 5. Mice overexpressing Sox17 in ECs showed significantly reduced vascular leakiness post-LPS when compared to control mice. g Survival curve of LPS challenge in control mice and mice over-expressing Sox17 in the endothelium. n = 11 per group. At this lethal dose of LPS (20 mg/kg), the death rate for control mice is 60% while for Sox17-overexpressed mice is 10%. h Model. LPS induces tissue hypoxia due to local oxygen depletion by infiltrating activated neutrophils, thereby stabilizing HIF-1α resulting in upregulation Sox17 expression and Sox17 mediated expression of Cyclin E1. This activates cell cycle re-entry and EC proliferation, and restoration of endothelial integrity. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-tests for (df) and Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test for (g)


We demonstrate using endothelial lineage tracing analysis in mice that endothelial cells which survive endotoxin-induced EC injury are themselves the primary source of ECs re-populating the vessel wall and restoring EC barrier integrity. Furthermore, we established the central role of HIF-1α signaling in activating the developmental transcription factor Sox17 in ECs, which induced EC proliferation through expression of Cyclin E1. These findings show the central role of the HIF-1α-Sox17-Cyclin E1 signaling axis in mediating EC regeneration following LPS-induced EC injury (Fig. 6h).

Multiple mechanisms of EC regeneration have been proposed, including circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs)45, bone marrow c-kit+ cells46, and resident fibroblasts that convert to ECs47; however, the mechanisms of pulmonary EC regeneration in inflammatory lung injury have remained unclear48,49. Here, using mTmG-endo-Scl-CreERT2 mice in which native ECs are permanently labeled with EGFP and non-ECs are labeled with TdTomato, we carried out a lineage tracing study29,50 following inflammatory EC injury induced by the bacterial endotoxin LPS. We observed that EC injury resulted in severe EC loss, consistent with histological observations that lung EC is the predominant cell injured by LPS51. We tested various concentrations of LPS, and empirically arrived at 12 mg/kg LPS which induced maximal loss of ECs without causing lethality yet enabled quantitative assessment regeneration. EC population decreased sharply at day 1 post-LPS and progressively recovered within 7 days as evident by both EC lineage tracing in vivo and FACS analysis of ECs isolated from lungs. The loss of ECs seen reflected severe EC injury and denudation of lung endothelium characteristic of endotoxin-induced ALI6. EC loss was accompanied by increased lung vascular permeability to albumin within the first day, which returned to basal levels paralleling the restoration of EC coverage in the pulmonary vascular bed within 7 days post-LPS. To address the mechanism of EC recovery, we focused on the lung ECs and identified Sox17 as a key regulator of recovery. However, it remains unclear whether Sox17 also mediates EC regeneration in other vascular beds. A recent analysis of transcriptomic and signaling heterogeneity of ECs derived from distinct vascular beds52 suggests that gene regulatory networks and regenerative pathways can differ in distinct vascular beds.

The mTmG reporter mice used in the present study employed the endothelial-specific Cre reporter—endo-Scl-CreERT2 driven by a 5′ endothelial enhancer of stem cell leukemia (Scl) locus29. Scl expressed in hematopoietic cells is driven by the Scl 3′ enhancer whereas the 5′ enhancer modification used in the present study ensured EC specificity. This was confirmed by FACS analysis which showed that 95% of EGFP+ cells were indeed ECs. To confirm these findings, we also used another Cre model—the Cdh5 CreERT2 genetic mouse34. Both of these models of EC-specific Sox17 deletion demonstrated the requisite role of Sox17 in mediating regeneration of ECs.

We found increased lung vascular permeability at day 1 post-LPS; however, there was no difference in the severity of the permeability response between Sox17EC−/− and control Sox17fl/fl mice. Lung vascular permeability measured in subsequent days during the recovery phase identified a critical role for EC Sox17 in regeneration of the endothelium. Importantly, Sox17EC−/− mice exhibited persistent loss of endothelial barrier integrity indicative of failed EC regeneration program. This study thus demonstrated the requisite role of Sox17 in mediating EC regeneration.

As a member of the Sry-related high mobility group domain family F (SoxF) transcription factors20, Sox17 regulates endothelial and hematopoietic development during embryogenesis21,23,24. Its role in the adult has been studied in tumor development26, intracranial aneurysm formation25, and trans-differentiation of fibroblasts to ECs27. In the present study, we identified the central role of endogenous Sox17 in mediating EC regeneration following LPS induced injury by upregulating  Cyclin E1. These results mirror findings in quiescent adult hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) showing that Sox17 over-expression gave rise to fetal-like HSCs with high self-renewal capacity53.

Sox7 and Sox18 are other members of the SoxF family that may play a complementary roles in vascular development54,55,56. During embryogenesis, Sox18 induces lymphatic endothelial cell commitment54,56. Sox7 and Sox18 also regulate venous-arterial vascular differentiation57 while Sox17 is expressed in arterial vessels and regulates their development24. Since expression of Sox7 and Sox18, unlike Sox17, did not increase during screening of transcription factors in regenerating ECs, their role in EC regeneration may not be primary. A recent study demonstrated upregulation of Sox7 and downregulation of Sox17 during vessel growth of high-grade glioma58 and Sox17 deletion in tumor vessels increased Sox7 expression58. Sox18 also appears to be involved in melanoma vascularization59. The opposite pattern of expression of Sox7 and Sox17 and the involvement of Sox18 in tumor vascularization suggests that SoxF family members may have different functions in ECs dependent on the niche, insult, or type of vascular beds.

ER71 (also known as ETV2) is an EC-specific developmental transcription factor regulating neovascularization in hind-limb ischemia in mice31. We did not detect any change in ER71 expression following LPS. It is possible that the mode of injury itself determines activation of the transcriptional regenerative program in ECs. As we showed, Sox17 is essential for regulating EC regeneration following endotoxin-induced EC injury whereas ER71 may be important in other forms of EC injury such as ischemia31.

The finding that transmigration and activation of neutrophils rapidly depletes tissue oxygen, and stabilizes HIF in surrounding cells60 prompted us to investigate tissue hypoxia and downstream HIF signaling pathways as a factor mediating EC regeneration. We observed in Hif1aEC−/− mice that Sox17 expression in ECs required HIF-1α, and further we identified HIF-1α as the upstream transcriptional mechanism of Sox17 expression. HIF-1α is known to regulate EC proliferation by activation of VEGFR2 in tumor angiogenesis61 and Sox17 also regulates tumor angiogenesis through upregulating VEGFR2 expression26. We focused on Cyclin E1 as a downstream target of Sox17 responsible for EC proliferation and thus restoring EC coverage in the severe EC injury induced by LPS. Cyclin E1 plays an essential role in cell cycle regulation by inactivating APCcdh1 and transitioning cells into the proliferative phase32. We demonstrated that Sox17 induced EC proliferation through increasing the expression of Cyclin E1. We also identified Sox17 binding sites in the CCNE1 promoter responsible for Cyclin E1 expression. Thus, LPS induced EC injury induced Sox17 expression and Sox17 in turn induced EC proliferation through the expression of Cyclin E1.

The concept that upregulation of HIF-1α expression or activity can used therapeutically to regenerate ECs is problematic. HIF-1α activation has multiple collateral effects because it regulates processes as diverse as tumor growth, angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and metabolism20,61,62,63. Based on our findings, a more tenable downstream target to enhance EC regeneration may be Sox17. We demonstrated that liposomal delivery of Sox17 in lung ECs augmented endothelial regeneration, accelerated endothelial barrier restoration, and reduced mortality. Thus, enhancing proliferation of ECs through upregulation of Sox17 may be useful strategy for restoring endothelial integrity and normalizing perfusion.

We relied on the use of i.v. injected liposomes containing Sox17 cDNA to upregulate the expression of Sox17 in ECs36,37,64 of Sox17EC−/− mice. The shortcoming of this approach is that Sox17 expression may not be confined to ECs. To obviate this concern, we cloned Sox17 cDNA under the control of the EC specific Cdh5 promoter34. Also previous studies have shown liposome formulation used leads to transgene overexpression in the lung endothelium and increased protein expression within 2–3 days of the plasmid injection36,37 (Supplementary Fig. 7). Additionally, our data also indicates that using the Cdh5 promoter significantly increased transgene expression in the lung compared to all other organs (Supplementary Fig. 13), likely due to the high fraction of endothelial cells in the lungs. Functional assessment of Sox17 overexpression showed that lung EC expression of Sox17 promoted regeneration of ECs and restored endothelial permeability consistent with the time course of expression of Sox17 in ECs.

During liposome preparation, steps are typically employed to downsize the vesicles formed using either sonication or extrusion. These steps determine the polydispersity index (PDI), a measure of size distribution of the liposomes. PDI values can range from 0 for particles of uniform size to 1 where there is a broad size distribution. While nanoparticles synthesized from polymeric building blocks usually have PDI < 0.2 µm65, liposomes are typically more heterogeneous; e.g., cholesterol liposomes prepared using a single extrusion step have PDI of 0.4 µm66 whereas DDAB containing liposomes have PDI values between 0.13 and 0.48 µm depending on the exact liposome formulation67. An even wider range of PDI values can be found in the literature68,69,70. Thus, the method used to prepare liposomes influences the PDI value66. We observed that simply changing the syringe filter size from 0.45 to 0.22 µm resulted in a narrower size distribution and lowered PDI value from 0.3–0.4 µm to 0.2 µm (Supplementary Fig. 12). For clinical applications a low PDI is preferable as it suggests a more uniform product. While the PDI value of the liposomes in the present studies was sufficient to induce expression of Sox17 and effectively regenerate lung vessels, a limitation of our study is that we do not know the optimal liposome size for most efficient cDNA delivery to the pulmonary endothelium.

We showed that expression of Sox17 in ECs is directly regulated by HIF-1α activation. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that endotoxemia can activate multiple inflammatory pathways and release paracrine growth factors and cytokines, which may also contribute to the expression of Sox17. Wnt signaling is known to upregulate Sox17 expression24,71 and activation of the inflammatory transcription factor NF-κB triggers Wnt signaling72,73,74; thus, it is possible that such an inflammatory pathway can induce Sox17 expression parallel to the HIF-1α signaling pathway mediating Sox17 expression we have described.

In conclusion, the present study showed that induction of Sox17 expression through the activation of HIF-1α in ECs plays an essential role in regenerating ECs following endotoxin-induced EC injury. Sox17 functions by transcribing Cyclin E1 and activates proliferation of ECs, to re-anneal the injured endothelium. The HIF-1α-Sox17-Cyclin E1 signaling pathway functions as a critical mechanism of EC regeneration and may serve as a therapeutic approach for promoting the regeneration of the endothelium.


Generation of mutant mice

All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with NIH guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the IACUC of the University of Illinois. C57BL/6 mice (Strain #027) were purchased from Charles River Laboratory. ROSAmT/mG mice (Jackson Lab, Stock #007576) were crossed with endothelial Scl-CreERT2 mice29 (provided by Dr. Joachim Göthert). Mice were gauge fed with Tamoxifen (Sigma #T5648; 20 mg/ml in corn oil) for consecutive five days and then rested for four weeks to induce EC-specific membrane EGFP expression. Afterward, mice were challenged with sub-lethal LPS (Sigma #L2630) i.p. 12 mg/kg and then sacrificed at different time points for tissue harvest. Sox17fl/fl mice (Jackson Lab, Stock #027712) were crossed with endothelial Scl-CreERT2 mice and Cdh5-CreERT2 (provided by Dr. Ralf Adams) mice34, respectively. Mice were gauge fed with Tamoxifen (20 mg/ml in corn oil) for consecutive five days and then rested for four weeks to induce EC-specific Sox17 protein deletion. Afterward, Sox17EC−/− and control (Sox17fl/fl Cre negative mice with tamoxifen) mice were challenged with sub-lethal LPS 8 mg/kg i.p. and then sacrificed at different time points for tissue harvest. Hif1afl/fl mice (Jackson Lab, Stock #007561) were crossed with Tie2-CreERT2 mice75 (Jackson Lab, Stock #2450312). Mice were gauge fed with Tamoxifen (20 mg/ml in corn oil) for consecutive five days and then rested for four weeks to induce EC-specific HIF-1α protein deletion. Afterwards, Hif1aEC−/− and control (Hif1afl/fl Cre negative mice with tamoxifen) mice were challenged with sub-lethal LPS 12 mg/kg i.p. and then sacrificed at different time points for tissue harvest. All experiments were performed with 8–12-week-old animals using age-matched and sex-matched groups. All animals were on a C57BL/6 background. The mice were maintained in a pathogen-free environment in University of Illinois at Chicago Animal Care Facility (Biological Resource Center). Mice were randomly assigned to treatment arms with approximately equivalent numbers in each group. No blinding was done for animal experiments. The present studies addressed mechanisms of lung endothelial repair in a model of ALI/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) which are typically complications of severe systemic infections (e.g., endotoxemia). Endotoxemia was induced by systemic LPS (i.p.) which is routinely used in experimental lung injury models. This model also mirrors lung injury seen with polymicrobial sepsis76.

2-photon microscopy

The tissue live imaging experiment followed a previously described protocol77. Generally, the mice were sacrificed, and the lung was flushed with Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Sigma #P3813). Then 1 ml 37 °C 2% low-melting-temperature agarose was slowly instilled through the trachea into the lung. Once the lungs were fully inflated, we let the lungs cool by pouring 4 °C PBS over the lung and removed the lungs from the mice. We sectioned the largest lobe of the lung into 300-μm slices and placed the slices on plastic coverslips in the imaging chamber. Images were taken with a Prairie Technologies Ultima In Vivo Multiphoton Microscopy System (Bruker) and analyzed by Imaris software (Bitplane).

Mouse cell isolation

Flushed mouse lungs were  minced and digested with 5 ml Type 1 collagenase I (2 mg/ml in PBS) at 37 °C water bath for 1 h. Mixtures were titrated with #18 needles and then pipetted through a 40 μm disposable cell strainer. After centrifuging at 300 × g for 5 min and washing with PBS, the isolated cells were treated with red blood cell lysis buffer (eBioscience) for 5 min on ice to lyse red blood cells.

Flow cytometry

After isolation, remaining cells were incubated with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (1:50, BD Pharmingen #553142) to block endogenous Fc for 10 min on ice. After this, cells were stained with antibodies including CD45-EF450 (1:2000, eBioscience #48–0451–82) and CD31-APC (1:100, eBioscience #17–0311–82) for 45 min at 4 °C. After washing, the cells were resuspended in 500 μl buffer and analyzed on an LSRFortessa (BD Pharmingen) cell analyzer. Obtained data were analyzed by Summit software (Beckman Coulter).

Mouse EC pull down assay

After isolation, cells were incubated with 5 µg CD31 antibody (10 µl antibody in 1 ml buffer, BD #553370) at 4 °C for 20 min with gentle tilting and rotation. After washing, cells were then incubated with pre-washed Dynabeads (25 µl beads in 1 ml buffer, Invitrogen #11035) at 4 °C for 25 min with gentle tilting and rotation. ECs were harvested by magnetic separation.

RNA isolation and qPCR

RNA was extracted from the harvested cells using TRIzol™ Reagent (ThermoFisher #15596026) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Then RNA was quantified by Nanodrop 1000 (ThermoFisher) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (ThermoFisher #4368814). FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (ThermoFisher #4913850001) was used for relative quantification of cDNA on the ViiA 7 Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher) (Primer information included in Supplementary Table 2).

qPCR heatmap

The qPCR relative fold change values for a set of genes were plotted using the heatmap.2 function in the R “gplots” package. Upregulation of genes is shown in red, white, and green, respectively. Red corresponds to minimal increase while green corresponds to dramatic increase relative to the untreated control.


Harvested cells or tissues were lysed in RIPA buffer (Sigma #R0278) with protease (Sigma #P8340) and phosphatase inhibitor (Sigma #P5726 and #P0044). Protein concentration was measured using DC™ Protein Assay Kit II (Bio-Rad #5000112) in Epoch Microplate Spectrophotometer (BioTek). Immunoblotting was performed with Sox17 (1:250, Origene #AM32707PU-N for mouse Sox17; 1:200, R&D #AF1924 for human Sox17), HIF-1α (1:200, Cayman Chemical #10006421), HIF-2α (1:500, Novus Biologicals #NB100–122), Flag M2 (1:1000, Sigma #F1804), Cyclin E1 (1:500, R&D #AF6810) primary antibody using Bio-Rad Protein Electrophoresis and Blotting system. Sample loading was confirmed by GAPDH expression (1:5000, Proteintech #60004). Western blot pictures were taken using ImageQuant LAS 4000 (GE Healthcare). Uncropped versions of all Western blots are available as a Source Data file.

Cell culture

HLMVECs (Lonza #CC-2527) were maintained in culture in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C in complete Clonetics EGM-2MV BulletKit medium (Lonza #CC-3202) and 15% fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biologicals). Cells were thawed at passage 3 and transduced at the same passage. For hypoxic signaling activation studies, HLMVECs were treated with the HIF1α activator DMOG (Calbiochem #400091). 293T cells (ATCC #CRL-3216; Clontech #632180) were maintained in culture in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C in DMEM medium (Gibco #11995–065) with 10% fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biologicals).

CRISPR/Cas9 studies

Guide RNA targeting human HIF-1α and HIF-2α gene for Cas9-mediated CRISPR disruption were identified using online design software at The two targeting sequences for HIF-1α were: 5′-TTCTTTACTTCGCCGAGATC-3′ and 5′-CCTCACACGCAAATAGCTGA-3′. The two targeting sequences for HIF-2α were: 5′-GCTGATTGCCAGTCGCATGA-3′ and 5′-CAAGGCCTCCATCATGCGAC-3. The transduction of lentiviral sgRNA and adenoviral Cas9 followed a previous protocol42. Generally, DNA oligos were synthesized by IDT and the overlapping PCR products were cloned into pLX-single sgRNA lentiviral vector (a gift from Eric Lander and David Sabatini78 and obtained through Addgene as plasmid #50662). Lentivirus was prepared by co-transfection of lentiviral plasmids with psPAX2 (produced by Didier Trono and obtained through Addgene as plasmid #12260) and pMD2.G (produced by Didier Trono and obtained through Addgene as plasmid #12259) packaging plasmids into 90% confluent human 293T cells using Lipofectamine 2000 as per manufacturer’s protocol. Lentiviral supernatant was collected at 48 and 72 h post-transfection, concentrated by Lenti-X concentrator (Clontech #631232) as per manufacturer’s protocol, and used to transduce HLMVECs at a Multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 (measured by Global UltraRapid Lentiviral Titer Kit, System Biosciences #LV961A-1) in the presence of 8 μg/ml polybrene (Sigma #TR-1003). At 8 h later, the EGFP-tagged Cas9 adenovirus (Ad-GFP-Cas9, Vector Biolabs #1901) was also added at a MOI of 10 to transduce HLMVECs. After 2–3 days when HLMVECs reached confluency, the cells were trypsinized and split 1:3 and received a second batch of sgRNA lentivirus and EGFP-Cas9 adenovirus. Two to three days later, the cells were ready for experimental studies.

BrdU assay of EC proliferation

Mice were injected i.p. with BrdU (Sigma #B5002) 150 mg/kg 14 h before sacrifice. After the mice being sacrificed, mice lung was flushed with PBS, infused with 70% OCT intratracheally and then excised in the cassette and put on dry ice. After storage at  −80 °C for at least 48 h, mouse lungs were sectioned into 5 µm frozen sections.

Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy

The frozen sections were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma #P6148) and permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 (Fisher Scientific #BP151–100). After a wash with PBS/Tween-20 (Fisher Scientific #BP337–100), slides were treated with 3 M hydrochloric acid (Fisher Scientific #A144S-500) for 10 min to open the nucleus structure if needed. Slides were blocked with 10% donkey serum (Sigma #D9663) in 2% BSA (Sigma) in PBS/Tw-20 for 1 h at room temperature. Afterwards, slides were probed with primary antibodies (CD31 1:25, BD #550274; BrdU-APC 1:50, BD; Alexa Fluor 488 Mouse anti-BrdU 1:10, BD #558599; Flag M2 1:500, Sigma #F1804) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The next day, slides were washed and incubated with the fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibody (AF488 donkey anti-rat 1:300, Invitrogen #A-21208; AF594 donkey anti-mouse 1:300, Invitrogen #A-21203; AF594 donkey anti-rat 1:300, Invitrogen #A-21209). Images were taken with a confocal microscope LSM880 (Zeiss) and analyzed by Zen software (Zeiss).

Sox17 binding sites in CCNE1 promoter

We identified human CCNE1 promoter region using the UCSC genome browser. For the prediction of human Sox17 binding sites in the promoter of CCNE1, we searched for the presence of ATTGT motifs in the JASPAR database. The binding sites were found to be at −1090 ~ −1082 bp, −1335 ~ −1327 bp, −2022 ~ −2014 bp, and −2092 ~ −2084 bp upstream of the CCNE1 ATG start site.

Identification of HREs in Sox17 promoter

We performed a sequence alignment of the human SOX17 promoter region using ClustalW2. For the prediction of human HIF-1α binding sites in the promoter of SOX17, we searched for the presence of RCGTG motifs. In addition, we only considered RCGTG motifs that were conserved in, at least, four species, including the mouse. The HREs were found to be at −294 ~ −285 bp, −318 ~ −311 bp, and −338 ~ −330 bp upstream of the SOX17 ATG start site.

Chromatin-immunoprecipitation assay

The Ch-IP protocol is based on the protocol of Bryan Dynlacht and Richard Young laboratories. For the Sox17—CCNE1 experiment, HLMVECs transduced with pMXs-ms-Sox17 (a gift from S. Yamanaka79, Addgene plasmid #50781) were crosslinked by using 1% formaldehyde (Fisher Scientific #F79–1), washed three times with cold PBS, and resuspended in cell lysis buffer. The nuclei portion was resuspended in nuclear lysis buffer and sonicated to break down the genomic DNA using S220 Focused-ultrasonicator (Covaris). After centrifugation, the supernatant was immunoprecipitated with 5 μg anti-Sox17 (R&D #AF1924) or an equal amount of goat IgG (Santa Cruz #sc-2028). The DNA obtained from the IP was amplified by qPCR with primers specifically recognizing different binding sites in CCNE1 promoters (Primer information included in Supplementary Table 2). For the HIF-1α-SOX17 experiment, HLMVECs cultured in normoxic or 1% O2 hypoxic conditions were processed as above and then immunoprecipitated with 5 μg anti-HIF1α (Santa Cruz #sc-10790) or an equal amount of rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz #sc-2027). The DNA obtained from the IP was amplified by qPCR with primers specifically recognizing different HRE sites in SOX17 promoters (Primer information included in Supplementary Table 2).

Myeloperoxidase activity

Mice lungs were flushed with PBS and homogenized in RIPA buffer (Sigma #R0278). 50 μg extracted sample was mixed with 1 ml of 50 mM phosphate buffer (Sigma #S3264 and #S3139) containing 0.167 mg/ml of o-Dianisidine dihydrochloride (Sigma #D3252) and 0.0005% H2O2 (Sigma #216763). The reaction proceeded for 3–5 min at room temperature, and then was stopped by adding 3 M Hydrochloric acid (Sigma #H1758). Absorption was determined by OD460 using UV/vis spectrophotometer (Beckman #DU530) and normalized by protein concentration measured using DC™ Protein Assay Kit II (Bio-Rad #5000112) in Epoch Microplate Spectrophotometer (BioTek).

Evans blue-albumin tracer measurement of pulmonary transvascular permeability

Evans blue–albumin (EBA) (40 mg/ml BSA with 1% Evans blue dye Sigma #E2129) was injected into the right jugular vein of the mice (anesthetized by ketamine-xylazine mix approved from pharmacy) at a dose of 8 µl per mouse body weight gram and allowed to circulate in the blood vessels for 45 min. Intravascular Evans blue was washed by PBS perfusion from the right ventricle for 2 min. Mouse lungs were excised, homogenized in 1 ml PBS, and extracted in 2 ml Formamide (Fisher Chemical #F84–1) overnight at 60 °C. Evans blue content was determined by OD620 using UV/vis spectrophotometer (Beckman #DU530) of the formamide extract and normalized by body weight. The body weights of mice for the Evans blue experiments are provided in Supplementary Table 1.

Plasmid constructs

The 2.5 kb Cdh5 promoter was cloned from mouse genomic DNA and then inserted into the pCDNA 3.0 vector. The original CMV promoter was destroyed. Then the mouse Sox17 protein coding region was amplified from pMXs-ms-Sox17 plasmid and inserted into the pCDNA-Cdh5 vector. A flag tag (GACTACAAAGACGATGACGACAAG) was added to the N-terminus of the Sox17 coding region. For the liposome-gene complex biodistribution experiment, the EGFP protein coding region was amplified from a pWPXL plasmid (a gift from Didier Trono, Addgene plasmid #12257) and inserted into the pCDNA-Cdh5 vector. Full-length human SOX17 and CCNE1 promoter plasmids (GenoCopeia #HPRM50295-PG04 and #CS-HPRM38973-PG04–01) and the truncation mutants (PCR amplified) were subcloned into a pGL3-basic vector (Promega #E1751). The HIF-1α constitutively active mutant HA-HIF1alpha P402A/P564A-pBabe-puro was a gift from William Kaelin (Addgene plasmid #19005)80. Control pRL-TK plasmid was purchased from Promega (#2241).

Luciferase reporter assay

293T cells were seeded in 24-well cell culture plates and transfected with the indicated plasmids using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen #11668). One day after transfection, cells were lysed, and luciferase activity was measured using the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega #E1910) on a GloMax luminometer (Promaga #SA3030). Relative luciferase units were determined by dividing the luciferase activity of the Firefly target pGL3 reporters by that of the pRL-TK Renilla luciferase control reporter.

Liposome gene delivery in lung ECs

Dimethyldioctadecylammonium bromide (Sigma #D2779) was dissolved in Chloroform (Fisher Chemical #C606SK-1) in a 1:1 molar ratio with Cholesterol (Millipore #228111). Chloroform was evaporated in a Rotavapor (Buchi #R-300) at 37 °C, 100 rpm for 20 min. Afterwards, the dried lipid film was resuspended in 5% dextrose (Fisher Scientific #D16–500) in water and then sonicated in Branson 2510 Ultrasonic Cleaner (Sigma #Z244910) for 20 min, followed by 0.45 μm filtration. The mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (Piramal Critical Care) and retro-orbitally i.v. injected with the liposome-DNA complex at a dose of 50 μg DNA/100 μg liposome per mouse. Size (hydrodynamic diameter) was 234.3 ± 8.3 nm for liposome only and 240.1 ± 3.4 for liposome-DNA complex (as shown in Supplementary Fig. 10). Polydispersity Index was 0.400 ± 0.027 for liposome-Vector complex and 0.414 ± 0.009 for liposome-Sox17 complex (as shown in Supplementary Fig. 12). The surface charge (Zeta Potential) was 39.8 ± 0.2 mV for liposome only and 34.8 ± 0.2 mV for liposome-DNA complex (as shown in Supplementary Fig. 11). n = 6. Supplementary Fig. 13 shows the organ biodistribution of the transgene expression delivered by liposomes, where lung is the organ with highest plasmid gene expression. n = 4. All these parameters were measured by dynamic light scattering (Zetasizer Nano ZS, Malvern). Serum was first ultracentrifuged for 2 h at 140,000 × g (Optima TLX Ultracentrifuge, Beckman Coulter) to remove extracellular vesicles that might interfere with size measurements. We used liposomes (DDAB/cholesterol) with a high charge ratio of + 4.5 (+fatty acid/-DNA). The DNA complex was cloned with Flag-tagged Sox17 coding region following the EC-specific mouse Cdh5 promoter to ensure EC transgene expression.


Immunoblot bands were analyzed for optical density using ImageJ (NIH) software. Quantification of replicate experiments is presented as the mean ± SEM. The student t-test, one-way and two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-tests were used to determine statistical significance, with a P value threshold of less than 0.05. Significance levels are indicated in the figures as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001. Based on our experience, we expect changes in the gene/protein expression and function measurements to be detected with 3 mice per group, so the effect size was determined as n = 3 or n > 3. The variance between the groups that are being statistically compared was similar.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The authors declare that all relevant data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files or from the authors upon reasonable request. Please contact Asrar B. Malik ( for any inquiries.


  1. 1.

    Rajendran, P. et al. The vascular endothelium and human diseases. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 9, 1057–1069 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Komarova, Y. & Malik, A. B. Regulation of endothelial permeability via paracellular and transcellular transport pathways. Annu Rev. Physiol. 72, 463–493 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Deanfield, J. E., Halcox, J. P. & Rabelink, T. J. Endothelial function and dysfunction: testing and clinical relevance. Circulation 115, 1285–1295 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Vanhoutte, P. M. Regeneration of the endothelium in vascular injury. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 24, 299–303 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Zhao, Y. Y. et al. Endothelial cell-restricted disruption of FoxM1 impairs endothelial repair following LPS-induced vascular injury. J. Clin. Invest 116, 2333–2343 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Thompson, B. T., Chambers, R. C. & Liu, K. D. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 562–572 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Matthay, M. A., Ware, L. B. & Zimmerman, G. A. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 2731–2740 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Matthay, M. A. et al. Therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells for severe acute lung injury. Chest 138, 965–972 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gu, M. et al. Microfluidic single-cell analysis shows that porcine induced pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelial cells improve myocardial function by paracrine activation. Circ. Res. 111, 882–893 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lee, J. W., Fang, X., Gupta, N., Serikov, V. & Matthay, M. A. Allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of E. coli endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in the ex vivo perfused human lung. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16357–16362 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Curley, G. F. & McAuley, D. F. Stem cells for respiratory failure. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 21, 42–49 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gotts, J. E. & Matthay, M. A. Mesenchymal stem cells and acute lung injury. Crit. Care Clin. 27, 719–733 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Curley, G. F. et al. Effects of intratracheal mesenchymal stromal cell therapy during recovery and resolution after ventilator-induced lung injury. Anesthesiology 118, 924–932 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Case, J. et al. Human CD34+AC133+VEGFR-2+cells are not endothelial progenitor cells but distinct, primitive hematopoietic progenitors. Exp. Hematol. 35, 1109–1118 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Timmermans, F. et al. Endothelial outgrowth cells are not derived from CD133+cells or CD45+hematopoietic precursors. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 27, 1572–1579 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhang, M., Malik, A. B. & Rehman, J. Endothelial progenitor cells and vascular repair. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 21, 224–228 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ding, B. S. et al. Divergent angiocrine signals from vascular niche balance liver regeneration and fibrosis. Nature 505, 97–102 (2014).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yanger, K. et al. Robust cellular reprogramming occurs spontaneously during liver regeneration. Genes Dev. 27, 719–724 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bredenkamp, N., Nowell, C. S. & Blackburn, C. C. Regeneration of the aged thymus by a single transcription factor. Development 141, 1627–1637 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Park, C., Kim, T. M. & Malik, A. B. Transcriptional regulation of endothelial cell and vascular development. Circ. Res. 112, 1380–1400 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kim, I., Saunders, T. L. & Morrison, S. J. Sox17 dependence distinguishes the transcriptional regulation of fetal from adult hematopoietic stem cells. Cell 130, 470–483 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Clarke, R. L. et al. The expression of Sox17 identifies and regulates haemogenic endothelium. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 502–510 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lee, S. H. et al. Notch pathway targets proangiogenic regulator Sox17 to restrict angiogenesis. Circ. Res. 115, 215–226 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Corada, M. et al. Sox17 is indispensable for acquisition and maintenance of arterial identity. Nat. Commun. 4, 2609 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lee, S. et al. Deficiency of endothelium-specific transcription factor Sox17 induces intracranial aneurysm. Circulation 131, 995–1005 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Yang, H. et al. Sox17 promotes tumor angiogenesis and destabilizes tumor vessels in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 418–431 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zhang, L. et al. SOX17 regulates conversion of human fibroblasts into endothelial cells and erythroblasts via de-differentiation into CD34+ progenitor cells. Circulation 135, 2502–2523 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Muzumdar, M. D., Tasic, B., Miyamichi, K., Li, L. & Luo, L. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis 45, 593–605 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gothert, J. R. et al. Genetically tagging endothelial cells in vivo: bone marrow-derived cells do not contribute to tumor endothelium. Blood 104, 1769–1777 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lilly, A. J., Lacaud, G. & Kouskoff, V. SOXF transcription factors in cardiovascular development. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 63, 50–57 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Park, C. et al. Injury-mediated vascular regeneration requires endothelial ER71/ETV2. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 36, 86–96 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Cappell, S. D., Chung, M., Jaimovich, A., Spencer, S. L. & Meyer, T. Irreversible APC(Cdh1) inactivation underlies the point of no return for cell-cycle entry. Cell 166, 167–180 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Niakan, K. K. et al. Sox17 promotes differentiation in mouse embryonic stem cells by directly regulating extraembryonic gene expression and indirectly antagonizing self-renewal. Genes Dev. 24, 312–326 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sorensen, I., Adams, R. H. & Gossler, A. DLL1-mediated Notch activation regulates endothelial identity in mouse fetal arteries. Blood 113, 5680–5688 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Broman, M. T. et al. Cdc42 regulates adherens junction stability and endothelial permeability by inducing alpha-catenin interaction with the vascular endothelial cadherin complex. Circ. Res. 98, 73–80 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhou, M. Y. et al. In vivo expression of neutrophil inhibitory factor via gene transfer prevents lipopolysaccharide-induced lung neutrophil infiltration and injury by a beta2 integrin-dependent mechanism. J. Clin. Invest. 101, 2427–2437 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Miyawaki-Shimizu, K. et al. siRNA-induced caveolin-1 knockdown in mice increases lung vascular permeability via the junctional pathway. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 290, L405–L413 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Grommes, J. & Soehnlein, O. Contribution of neutrophils to acute lung injury. Mol. Med. 17, 293–307 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bhattacharya, J. & Matthay, M. A. Regulation and repair of the alveolar-capillary barrier in acute lung injury. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 75, 593–615 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ghosh, G. et al. Hypoxia-induced microRNA-424 expression in human endothelial cells regulates HIF-alpha isoforms and promotes angiogenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 4141–4154 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Manalo, D. J. et al. Transcriptional regulation of vascular endothelial cell responses to hypoxia by HIF-1. Blood 105, 659–669 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Gong, H. et al. Method for dual viral vector mediated CRISPR-Cas9 gene disruption in primary human endothelial cells. Sci. Rep. 7, 42127 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Cummins, E. P. et al. The hydroxylase inhibitor dimethyloxalylglycine is protective in a murine model of colitis. Gastroenterology 134, 156–165 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Cummins, E. P. et al. Prolyl hydroxylase-1 negatively regulates IkappaB kinase-beta, giving insight into hypoxia-induced NFkappaB activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 18154–18159 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Yoder, M. C. Human endothelial progenitor cells. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2, a006692 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Liu, Q. et al. c-kit(+) cells adopt vascular endothelial but not epithelial cell fates during lung maintenance and repair. Nat. Med. 21, 866–868 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ubil, E. et al. Mesenchymal-endothelial transition contributes to cardiac neovascularization. Nature 514, 585–590 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ohle, S. J., Anandaiah, A., Fabian, A. J., Fine, A. & Kotton, D. N. Maintenance and repair of the lung endothelium does not involve contributions from marrow-derived endothelial precursor cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 47, 11–19 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    He, L. et al. Preexisting endothelial cells mediate cardiac neovascularization after injury. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 2968–2981 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kretzschmar, K. & Watt, F. M. Lineage tracing. Cell 148, 33–45 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Crapo, J. D., Barry, B. E., Gehr, P., Bachofen, M. & Weibel, E. R. Cell number and cell characteristics of the normal human lung. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 126, 332–337 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Jambusaria, A. et al. A computational approach to identify cellular heterogeneity and tissue-specific gene regulatory networks. BMC Bioinform. 19, 217 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    He, S., Kim, I., Lim, M. S. & Morrison, S. J. Sox17 expression confers self-renewal potential and fetal stem cell characteristics upon adult hematopoietic progenitors. Genes Dev. 25, 1613–1627 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Duong, T. et al. VEGFD regulates blood vascular development by modulating SOX18 activity. Blood 123, 1102–1112 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Hosking, B. et al. Sox7 and Sox17 are strain-specific modifiers of the lymphangiogenic defects caused by Sox18 dysfunction in mice. Development 136, 2385–2391 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Francois, M. et al. Sox18 induces development of the lymphatic vasculature in mice. Nature 456, 643–647 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Cermenati, S. et al. Sox18 and Sox7 play redundant roles in vascular development. Blood 111, 2657–2666 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kim, I. K. et al. Sox7 promotes high-grade glioma by increasing VEGFR2-mediated vascular abnormality. J. Exp. Med. 215, 963–983 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Young, N. et al. Effect of disrupted SOX18 transcription factor function on tumor growth, vascularization, and endothelial development. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 98, 1060–1067 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Campbell, E. L. et al. Transmigrating neutrophils shape the mucosal microenvironment through localized oxygen depletion to influence resolution of inflammation. Immunity 40, 66–77 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Carmeliet, P. & Jain, R. K. Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature 473, 298–307 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Fraisl, P., Mazzone, M., Schmidt, T. & Carmeliet, P. Regulation of angiogenesis by oxygen and metabolism. Dev. Cell 16, 167–179 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Nauta, T. D., van Hinsbergh, V. W. & Koolwijk, P. Hypoxic signaling during tissue repair and regenerative medicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15, 19791–19815 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Thurston, G. et al. Cationic liposomes target angiogenic endothelial cells in tumors and chronic inflammation in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 101, 1401–1413 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Hickey, J. W., Santos, J. L., Williford, J. M. & Mao, H. Q. Control of polymeric nanoparticle size to improve therapeutic delivery. J. Control Release 219, 536–547 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Ribeiro, L. N. M., Couto, V. M., Fraceto, L. F. & de Paula, E. Use of nanoparticle concentration as a tool to understand the structural properties of colloids. Sci. Rep. 8, 982 (2018).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Johnsen, K. B. et al. Modulating the antibody density changes the uptake and transport at the blood-brain barrier of both transferrin receptor-targeted gold nanoparticles and liposomal cargo. J. Control Release 295, 237–249 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Roces, C. B., Kastner, E., Stone, P., Lowry, D. & Perrie, Y. Rapid Quantification and validation of lipid concentrations within liposomes. Pharmaceutics (2016).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Hadian, Z., Sahari, M. A., Moghimi, H. R. & Barzegar, M. Formulation, characterization and optimization of liposomes containing eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids; a methodology approach. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 13, 393–404 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Roy, B. et al. Influence of lipid composition, pH, and temperature on physicochemical properties of liposomes with curcumin as model drug. J. Oleo Sci. 65, 399–411 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Engert, S. et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signalling regulates Sox17 expression and is essential for organizer and endoderm formation in the mouse. Development 140, 3128–3138 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Reciprocal requirements for EDA/EDAR/NF-kappaB and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathways in hair follicle induction. Dev. Cell 17, 49–61 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Li, D. et al. Myeloid cell RelA/p65 promotes lung cancer proliferation through Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in murine and human tumor cells. Oncogene 33, 1239–1248 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Ma, B. & Hottiger, M. O. Crosstalk between Wnt/beta-Catenin and NF-kappaB signaling pathway during inflammation. Front. Immunol. 7, 378 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Forde, A., Constien, R., Grone, H. J., Hammerling, G. & Arnold, B. Temporal Cre-mediated recombination exclusively in endothelial cells using Tie2 regulatory elements. Genesis 33, 191–197 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Cheng, K. T. et al. Caspase-11-mediated endothelial pyroptosis underlies endotoxemia-induced lung injury. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 4124–4135 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Thornton, E. E., Krummel, M. F. & Looney, M. R. Live imaging of the lung. Curr. Protoc. Cytom. (2012).

  78. 78.

    Wang, T., Wei, J. J., Sabatini, D. M. & Lander, E. S. Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Science 343, 80–84 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Nakagawa, M. et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 101–106 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Yan, Q., Bartz, S., Mao, M., Li, L. & Kaelin, W. G. Jr. The hypoxia-inducible factor 2alpha N-terminal and C-terminal transactivation domains cooperate to promote renal tumorigenesis in vivo. Mol. Cell Biol. 27, 2092–2102 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


The studies were supported by NIH grants R01-HL45638 (to A.B.M.), P01-HL60678 (to A.B.M. and J.R.), T32-HL007829 (to A.B.M.), R01-HL118068 (to J.R. and A.B.M.), R01-CA211095 (to E.V.B.), R01-HL90152 (to J.R. and A.B.M.) and AHA CDA grant 18CDA34110068 (to L.Z.). The Cdh5-CreERT2 mice were provided by Dr. Ralf Adams and the Scl-CreERT2 mice were provided by Dr. Joachim Göthert.

Author information




A.B.M., L.Z. and J.R. conceived the study. M.L., L.Z., A.B.M. and J.R. designed the experiments. M.L., L.Z. and G.M. performed the experiments and wrote the original draft. A.J. performed computational analyses. S.X. cloned the mouse Cdh5 promoter and assisted in the in vivo studies. P.T.T. helped perform the 2-photon imaging and image analysis. E.V.B. helped design the Ch-IP experiments. M.L, L.Z., J.R. and A.B.M. analyzed the data. A.B.M. and J.R. revised and edited the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jalees Rehman or Asrar B. Malik.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, M., Zhang, L., Marsboom, G. et al. Sox17 is required for endothelial regeneration following inflammation-induced vascular injury. Nat Commun 10, 2126 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links