Lineage-specific RUNX2 super-enhancer activates MYC and promotes the development of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm

Kubota, Sho; Tokunaga, Kenji; Umezu, Tomohiro; Yokomizo-Nakano, Takako; Sun, Yuqi; Oshima, Motohiko; Tan, Kar Tong; Yang, Henry; Kanai, Akinori; Iwanaga, Eisaku; Asou, Norio; Maeda, Takahiro; Nakagata, Naomi; Iwama, Atsushi; Ohyashiki, Kazuma; Osato, Motomi; Sashida, Goro

doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09710-z

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 10 April 2019

Lineage-specific RUNX2 super-enhancer activates MYC and promotes the development of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm

Sho Kubota ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6119-1259¹^na1,
Kenji Tokunaga²^na1,
Tomohiro Umezu ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0123-8921³,
Takako Yokomizo-Nakano¹,
Yuqi Sun¹,
Motohiko Oshima^4,5,
Kar Tong Tan⁶,
Henry Yang⁶,
Akinori Kanai⁷,
Eisaku Iwanaga²,
Norio Asou⁸,
Takahiro Maeda⁹,
Naomi Nakagata¹⁰,
Atsushi Iwama^4,5,
Kazuma Ohyashiki³,
Motomi Osato^6,11,12 &
…
Goro Sashida ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2318-5987¹

Nature Communications volume 10, Article number: 1653 (2019) Cite this article

6318 Accesses
33 Citations
2 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

An Author Correction to this article was published on 28 August 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is an aggressive subtype of acute leukemia, the cell of origin of which is considered to be precursors of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). Since translocation (6;8)(p21;q24) is a recurrent anomaly for BPDCN, we demonstrate that a pDC-specific super-enhancer of RUNX2 is associated with the MYC promoter due to t(6;8). RUNX2 ensures the expression of pDC-signature genes in leukemic cells, but also confers survival and proliferative properties in BPDCN cells. Furthermore, the pDC-specific RUNX2 super-enhancer is hijacked to activate MYC in addition to RUNX2 expression, thereby promoting the proliferation of BPDCN. We also demonstrate that the transduction of MYC and RUNX2 is sufficient to initiate the transformation of BPDCN in mice lacking Tet2 and Tp53, providing a model that accurately recapitulates the aggressive human disease and gives an insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of BPDCN.

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells develop from Ly6D+ lymphoid progenitors distinct from the myeloid lineage

Article 18 June 2019

Regine J. Dress, Charles-Antoine Dutertre, … Florent Ginhoux

Myeloid lineage enhancers drive oncogene synergy in CEBPA/CSF3R mutant acute myeloid leukemia

Article Open access 29 November 2019

Theodore P. Braun, Mariam Okhovat, … Julia E. Maxson

T-ALL can evolve to oncogene independence

Article 22 January 2021

Hesham Abdulla, Anh Vo, … Matthew P. McCormack

Introduction

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare and aggressive hematological malignancy, characteristic of skin lesions followed by hematopoietic organ dissemination, and is highly resistant to conventional chemotherapies, resulting in a poor outcome^1,2. BPDCN was previously classified as blastic NK-cell lymphoma or CD4+CD56+hematodermic neoplasm because of the expression of the NK cell marker, CD56; however, subsequent phenotypic (e.g. BDCA-2, IL3-Ra/CD123) and molecular studies identified plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) as a normal cellular counterpart of BPDCN³. Recent genetic studies identified the activation of the RAS signaling pathway, inactivation of tumor suppressor genes (e.g. TP53 and CDKN2A), and loss-of-function mutations in epigenetic modifiers (e.g. TET2)⁴, which are commonly mutated in myeloid malignancies⁵, whereas chromosomal translocation (6;8)(p21;q24) was exclusively observed in patients with BPDCN^6,7,8.

RUNX2, located on chromosome 6p21, is strongly expressed in pDCs and is also required for the differentiation and migration of pDCs through its regulation of the expression of pDC-signature genes^9,10. CD34+stem/progenitor cells in BPDCN patients have been shown to have significantly higher expression levels of RUNX2 than acute myeloid leukemia (AML)¹¹. BPDCN cells were recently reported to harbor super-enhancers of RUNX2 as well as TCF4, which are known to be critical for the development of pDCs¹². The TCF4 transcription factor maintains pDC identity by positively regulating the expression of transcription factors, including RUNX2, which, in turn, regulate TCF4 during the differentiation of pDCs^9,13.

Super-enhancers are large clusters of enhancers that are densely occupied by transcription factors and mediators, such as BRD4, which drive the transcriptional activation of critical genes that define cell identity through their regulation of differentiation¹⁴. BRD4 is a member of the bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) subfamily, which binds to acetylated histones and facilitates transcriptional activation in normal as well as malignant cells^15,16. BRD4 inhibitors, such as JQ1 and iBET, preferentially inhibit the function of super-enhancers, leading to the selective repression of potent oncogenes in various tumors^17,18,19. The inhibition of BRD4 was shown to significantly abrogate the proliferative capacity of BPDCN, at least in part, due to the suppression of TCF4 transcription^12,20. Thus, these lineage-survival transcription factors appear to utilize the activation of super-enhancers from precursors of and/or mature pDCs and confer transformation properties in BPDCN.

The function of MYC, located on chromosome 8q24, is critical for the development of various tumors^21,22, and the expression of MYC is activated by a gene amplification and the disrupted regulation of tissue-specific enhancers of MYC (e.g. colon cancer, T-ALL)^23,24,25. Translocation-induced enhancer hijacking has been shown to activate the expression of oncogenes including MYC (e.g. IgH-MYC in lymphoma, TCR-LMO2 in T-ALL)^15,26. Previous studies reported that t(6;8)(p21;q24) involved adjacent regions to MYC and RUNX2 in the cells of BPDCN patients;^7,8,27 however, the biological function of t(6;8) currently remains unclear. Based on these findings, we successfully demonstrated that t(6;8) juxtaposed the MYC and pDC-specific RUNX2 super-enhancer in BPDCN cells. The deletion of the mutant-allele super-enhancer of RUNX2 significantly reduced the expression of MYC and impaired the proliferative capacity of BPDCN cells, indicating that the pDC-specific RUNX2 super-enhancer activates the transcription of MYC. In addition, we investigated how MYC and RUNX2 promote the transformation of BPDCN in mice lacking Tet2 and Tp53.

We herein demonstrate that the pDC-specific RUNX2 super-enhancer is hijacked to activate expression of MYC via t(6;8) in BPDCN cells, and unveil the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of BPDCN, which originates from a precursor of pDCs by utilizing a mouse model.

Results

Enhanced expression of MYC in BPDCN cells harboring t(6;8)

Since the super-enhancer of RUNX2 has been detected in BPDCN cells harboring t(6;8), which involves a region adjacent to MYC^12,27, we initially examined the expression levels of RUNX2 and MYC in leukemic cells harboring t(6;8) in patients and the cell line, CAL-1, which has a loss-of-function mutation in TET2 (Supplementary Fig. 1)⁶. The expression levels of RUNX2 were significantly higher in BPDCN cells than in AML cells and U2OS and Saos2 osteosarcoma cells as Saos2 has higher expression level of RUNX2 than normal counterpart cells and promotes the cell growth²⁸, while the expression levels of RUNX2 were lower in BPDCN cells than in mature pDCs isolated from healthy donors (Fig. 1a). We found that BPDCN cells had markedly higher MYC expression levels among these malignant cells, whereas normal pDCs only negligibly expressed MYC (Fig. 1b). Furthermore, CAL-1 cells strongly expressed the MYC and RUNX2 proteins (Fig. 1c). Notably, a recent study reported that 22 out of 118 BPDCN patients harbored t(6;8) and enhanced expression of MYC, compared to BPDCN cells without t(6;8)⁸. Therefore, the expression of MYC are increased in BPDCN cells harboring t(6;8).

In order to identify the breakpoint of t(6;8)(p21;q24), we performed fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) utilizing three distinct probes against either the 5′ region of MYC (8q24), 1.7-Mb 3′ downstream region of MYC (8q24), which contains blood cell-specific MYC enhancers in normal cells and AML cells^24,29,30, or a coding region of the RUNX2 gene (6p21) in a patient and CAL-1 cells (Fig. 1d). We found an associated signal between RUNX2 and the 3′ enhancer region of MYC on derivative chromosome 6 (der(6)), and a single signal of the 5′ region of MYC on der(8) in BPDCN cells (Fig. 1e, and Supplementary Fig. 2). Consistent with the finding of a fusion point between the downstream region of MYC and upstream region of RUNX2 in other patients (Fig. 1d)^7,8, we performed whole-genome sequencing of CAL-1 cells, and identified a fusion point of chromosome translocation between chromosome 8:128,817,726 (hg19) in 69 kilobases (kb) downstream of MYC and chromosome 6: 44,657,458 (hg19) (Fig. 1d), which was 58 kb centromeric to a long and clustered enhancer of RUNX2 (791 kb upstream of RUNX2) defined by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) sequencing using anti-H3K27ac or anti-BRD4 antibodies (Fig. 1f)¹². We analyzed the H3K27ac peak rank order for super-enhancers using the ROSE algorithm^15,16, and confirmed super-enhancers of RUNX2 and TCF4 in CAL-1 cells (Supplementary Fig. 3), as previously reported¹², while we found small and scattered peaks of H3K27ac and BRD4 in blood cell-specific MYC enhancers also known as BENC (blood enhancer cluster; Supplementary Fig. 4). Murine pDCs contained a long and clustered enhancer of Runx2 (543 kb upstream of Runx2) equivalent to that in humans, whereas multipotent progenitors (MPPs), common dendritic cell progenitors (CDPs), and conventional dendritic cells (DCs) did not (Supplementary Fig. 5)³¹, suggesting that BPDCN cells utilize the super enhancer of RUNX2 (seRUNX2 -791kb), which is activated in normal pDCs. In order to clarify whether the super-enhancer of RUNX2 was physically associated with the MYC promoter on der(8), we performed a chromatin configuration capture (3 C) analysis and a target sequencing to detect the expected chromosomes 6 and 8 regions using CAL-1 cells and Jurkat T-ALL cells lacking t(6;8) (Fig. 1g and Supplementary Fig. 6). The results revealed that the super-enhancer of RUNX2 was significantly associated with the promoter of MYC and the promoter of RUNX2 in CAL-1 cells, but not in Jurkat cells showing undetectable RUNX2 protein level (see below). These results indicate that BPDCN cells enhanced the expression of MYC following a juxtaposition of MYC and the pDC-specific seRUNX2 (-791kb) due to the translocation.

MYC and RUNX2 collaborate to promote the tumor cell growth

Based on the enhanced expression of MYC in BPDCN cells harboring t(6;8), we examined whether MYC and/or RUNX2 promoted the cell growth of BPDCN in vitro. We knocked down the expression of MYC using two distinct MYC-directed shRNA vectors in CAL-1 cells and found that both MYC-directed shRNA-transduced cells had significantly lower expression levels of MYC mRNA and protein than control vector-transduced cells (Fig. 2a, b). Given the potent oncogenic functions of MYC in various tumors, colony formation capacities were significantly weaker in MYC knocked down (KD) cells than in control vector-transduced cells (Fig. 2c). Thus, MYC functioned as an oncogene and enhanced the clonogenic capacity of BPDCN cells.

We also transduced two distinct RUNX2-directed shRNA vectors into CAL-1 cells, and confirmed that the mRNA and protein expression levels of RUNX2 were significantly lower in RUNX2-directed shRNA-transduced cells than in control vector-transduced cells (Fig. 2d, e). The number of RUNX2-directed shRNA-transduced cells was significantly lower than that of control vector-transduced cells in an in vitro liquid culture, and colony formation capacities were weaker in the former than in the latter (Fig. 2f, g). Consistent with the impaired cell growth capacities of RUNX2 KD cells, RUNX2 KD cells showed significantly lower BrdU incorporation than did the control cells (Fig. 2h). Furthermore, RUNX2 KD cells had significantly more Annexin V-positive cells than control vector-transduced cells (Fig. 2i), indicating that RUNX2 enhanced proliferative capacities, but also suppressed inappropriate apoptosis in BPDCN cells. In addition, when we knocked down the expression of both MYC and RUNX2 in CAL-1 cells, MYC and RUNX2-double KD cells showing significantly weaker clonogenic capacity than either single KD cells (Fig. 2j). Therefore, MYC and RUNX2 collaborate to promote the cell growth capacity of BPDCN in vitro.

RUNX2 functions as a lineage-survival factor in BPDCN

Since RUNX2 is required for the differentiation of pDCs⁹, in order to clarify the mechanisms by which RUNX2 promotes the cell growth of BPDCN, we analyzed the gene expression profiles of two distinct RUNX2 KD CAL-1 cells and control CAL-1 cells using a microarray analysis. These two RUNX2 KD cells showed significant overlapping of genes that were either up- or down-regulated in comparison with the control cells (Fig. 3a). Up-regulated and down-regulated genes were listed in Supplementary Data 1. A gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed that RUNX2 KD cells showed the negatively enriched expression of pDC signature genes, which was defined by genes expressed in pDCs (HLA-DR⁺CD123⁺CD11c⁻) compared with myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs) (HLA-DR⁺CD123⁻CD11c⁺) in humans (Fig. 3b)³². Quantitative RT-PCR confirmed that RUNX2 KD cells had significantly lower expression levels of pDC-signature genes, such as TCF4, TLR7, TLR9, and IL-3RA, than control cells (Fig. 3c), indicating that RUNX2 maintained pDC-signature gene expression in BPDCN cells. Furthermore, RUNX2 KD cells had significantly decreased expression levels of the BPDCN-characteristic surface markers, the CD56 and CD123 proteins (Fig. 3d), which was accompanied by impaired proliferation and enhanced apoptosis upon the knockdown of RUNX2 (Fig. 2h, i). Our results also demonstrated that RUNX2 KD cells had significantly decreased expression levels of canonical MYC target genes (Fig. 3e) accompanied with the decreased levels of MYC mRNA expression (Fig. 3f), indicating that RUNX2 facilitated the activation of MYC targets in this context. We found that ectopic expression of MYC partially rescued the reduced colony formation capacity in RUNX2 KD CAL-1 cells (Supplementary Fig. 7); which is consistent with the findings that RUNX2 required MYC to promote the survival of cancer cells^28,33. These results indicate that RUNX2 ensures the expression of pDC-signature genes, but also confers survival and proliferative properties in leukemic cells, in part, due to the activated function of MYC.

RUNX2 activates the function of enhancers in BPDCN

Since the super-enhancer of RUNX2 appeared to promote the development of BPDCN by activating the expression of MYC and RUNX2, we examined whether the BRD4 inhibitor JQ1 abrogated the proliferation of CAL-1 cells in vitro. As expected, JQ1-treated CAL-1 cells had significantly lower expression levels of MYC and RUNX2 mRNA than DMSO-treated CAL-1 cells (Fig. 4a). We also confirmed that JQ1 markedly reduced the expression levels of the RUNX2 and MYC proteins in CAL-1 cells, while Jurkat T-ALL cells showed a mild change in MYC protein levels after the JQ1 treatment (Fig. 4b). Consistent with the reduced expression levels of these oncogenes, our results revealed that CAL-1 cells showed higher sensitivity to JQ1 in a dose-dependent manner, whereas Jurkat cells were resistant to this treatment (Fig. 4c). In addition, the colony formation capacities of CAL-1 cells were abolished by the treatment with JQ1 (Fig. 4d). The JQ1 treatment modestly decreased level of H3K27ac expression in CAL-1 cells (Fig. 4e), and H3K27ac ChIP sequencing revealed that H3K27ac modification levels were reduced at the region of RUNX2 super-enhancer after the JQ1 treatment (Fig. 4f). Thus, the inhibition of BRD4 significantly impaired the growth of BPDCN cells following the reduced expression of MYC and RUNX2.

In order to clarify if RUNX2 and MYC were responsible for the formation of BPDCN due to activating the function of enhancers, we examined whether the ectopic expression of RUNX2 and/or MYC rescued impaired cell growth after the JQ1 treatment. We confirmed the successful transduction of RUNX2 and/or MYC in CAL-1 cells (Fig. 4g). We found that neither RUNX2 alone, MYC alone, nor RUNX2 plus MYC overexpression promoted significant changes in growth capacities without the JQ1 treatment (Fig. 4h). While the ectopic expression of MYC alone caused slight increases in the growth of CAL-1 cells after the JQ1 treatment, RUNX2 alone and RUNX2 plus MYC overexpression significantly sustained the numbers of CAL-1 cells after the JQ1 treatment (Fig. 4h), indicating that RUNX2 plays a pivotal role in transcriptional networks for survival upon the insult of BRD4 inhibition. Indeed, RUNX2 ChIP sequencing revealed that RUNX2 were significantly enriched in the RUNX2 super-enhancer region showing at least 5 peaks (Fig. 4f), and RUNX2-binding sites were markedly overlapped with super-enhancers rather than conventional enhancers (Supplementary Fig. 8). In addition, a motif enrichment analysis on DNA sequences of H3K27ac ChIP sequencing revealed that super-enhancers enriched the binding sequence of RUNX2 significantly more than conventional enhancers in CAL-1 cells (Supplementary Fig. 9). Thus, RUNX2 and MYC promote the proliferation of BPDCN, at least in part, due to the RUNX2-dependent direct activation of super-enhancers, which is reversed by the inhibition of BRD4.

RUNX2 super-enhancer is hijacked to activate MYC expression

In order to clarify whether the RUNX2 super-enhancer directly activated the expression of MYC in a cis manner, we attempted to genetically delete the mutant-allele super-enhancer of RUNX2 on der(8) (seRUNX2der8), but not that on chromosome 6 (seRUNX2 (−791kb)), in BPDCN cells using a CRISPR-Cas9 system (Figs. 1d and 5a). We generated sgRNA-CRISPR-Cas9 vectors targeted for the distal region of the RUNX2 super-enhancer on chromosome 6 (sgRNA #1) and two distinct downstream regions of the MYC gene on chromosome 8 (sgRNA #2 and sgRNA #3; Fig. 5a), infected vectors into CAL-1 cells, and then selected single cell clones. We successfully established four distinct clones of CAL-1 cells from two sgRNA vectors (#1 plus #2, and #1 plus #3), and confirmed a deletion of seRUNX2der8 by amplification with genomic PCR utilizing primers beyond the fusion point between chromosomes 6 and 8 (Fig. 5b). The Sanger sequences of PCR products revealed the expected 104 kb or 111 kb deletion including the seRUNX2der8 in these clones (Fig. 5c). After establishing single cell clones, we examined the expression levels of MYC using quantitative PCR, and found that the expression levels of MYC were significantly lower in seRUNX2der8-deleted clones than in control-vector transduced cells (Fig. 5d). All seRUNX2-mut-deleted clones showed markedly impaired colony formation capacities from those in control CAL-1 cells (Fig. 5e). We noted that these clones showed between 20 to 60% reductions in RUNX2 expression levels (Fig. 5f), suggesting that MYC positively regulates the expression of RUNX2 in a direct and/or an indirect manner. While the reduced expression of MYC and RUNX2 may further inhibit colony formation capacities of these clones, the mutant-allele super-enhancer of RUNX2 directly activates the expression of MYC to promote the formation of BPDCN.

Transduction of MYC promotes the in vitro colony formation

Since MYC and RUNX2 promote the formation of BPDCN due to the RUNX2 super-enhancer in vitro, we examined whether the over-expression of MYC and RUNX2 was sufficient for the initiation of BPDCN in the absence of Tet2 and Tp53, because loss-of-function mutations in TET2 and TP53 are the most frequently detected in patients with BPDCN regardless the presence of t(6;8)⁴. In order to achieve this, we generated Tet2^wt/wt;Tp53^wt/wt;Cre-ERT2 and Tet2^flox/flox;Tp53^flox/flox;Cre-ERT2 compound mice and deleted Tet2 and Tp53 via an injection of tamoxifen at 8 weeks old, hereafter referred to as wild-type (WT) and Tet2^Δ/Δp53^Δ/Δ double knockout (DKO) mice, respectively. We purified Lineage^-Sca-1⁺c-Kit⁺ (LSK) hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells from WT and DKO mice 1 month after the tamoxifen injection and infected them with the MYC-IRES-NGFR and/or RUNX2-IRES-GFP retrovirus vectors (Fig. 6a). When we induced the differentiation of LSK cells into CD11b⁻CD11c⁺B220⁺ pDCs under liquid culture conditions with the Flt3-ligand and TPO (Fig. 6b)¹⁰. MYC plus RUNX2-expressing DKO cells produced more pDCs than the other cells following an additional treatment with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which induced the terminal differentiation of pDCs (Fig. 6c). Furthermore, we found that MYC-expressing DKO cells and MYC plus RUNX2-expressing DKO cells showed higher numbers and larger colonies cultured with the Flt3-ligand and TPO (Fig. 6d, e). MYC plus RUNX2-expressing DKO cells subsequently gained serial re-plating capacities, whereas the other cells had severely diminished colonies (Fig. 6f). Thus, the overexpression of MYC and RUNX2 promoted the production of pDCs and the MYC overexpression was critical for the colony forming properties of DKO cells under this in vitro pDC differentiation setting.

MYC and RUNX2 initiates the transformation of BPDCN in vivo

We next examined the in vivo BPDCN-initiating capacity of MYC plus RUNX2 expressing DKO cells. After a 9-day culture promoting the differentiation of pDCs, we transplanted empty vector-transduced WT (WT), MYC- and RUNX2-transduced WT (MYC+RUNX2-WT), empty vector-transduced DKO (DKO), and MYC- and RUNX2-transduced DKO (MYC+RUNX2-DKO) CD45.2⁺ cells into lethally irradiated recipient mice together with wild-type competitor CD45.1⁺ bone marrow cells (Fig. 6a).

While WT, MYC+RUNX2-WT, and DKO mice did not show significant changes in blood counts in peripheral blood (PB) (Fig. 7a) due to the negligible populating capacities of CD45.2⁺ cells 3 weeks post-transplantation (Fig. 7b), MYC+RUNX2-DKO moribund mice showed robust leukocytosis, anemia, and thrombocytopenia (Fig. 7a) following the emergence and expansion of CD45.2⁺ cells (Fig. 7b). All MYC+RUNX2-DKO mice died 1 month post-transplantation (Fig. 7c), whereas there were no lethal hematological malignancies in MYC+RUNX2-WT or DKO mice 6 months post-transplantation. At the time of killing, MYC + RUNX2-DKO moribund mice had significantly lower bone marrow cell counts and larger spleens than the other genotype mice (Fig. 7d, e). A detailed analysis of moribund mice revealed the expansion of immature leukemic blasts with a high nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio, dispersed chromatin, and microvacuoles in the PB and BM (Fig. 7f). A FACS analysis showed that these leukemic blasts were CD11b⁻CD11c^mid/+B220⁺Bst2⁺ (Fig. 7g), which was consistent with the murine pDCs immunophenotype, and also massively infiltrated the spleen and liver tissues (Fig. 7h), whereas the leukemic cells expressed neither myeloperoxidase nor lysozyme; markers of myeloid cells (Supplementary Fig. 10). MYC+RUNX2-DKO leukemic cells were transplantable in secondary recipient mice with the same CD11b⁻CD11c^mid/+B220⁺Bst2⁺ immunophenotype, and recipient mice died earlier at 2 weeks post-transplantation (the median survival, 23 days; Fig. 7c) due to severe anemia and thrombocytopenia (Supplementary Fig. 11). These results indicate that the overexpression of MYC and RUNX2 initiates the transformation of BPDCN in mice lacking Tet2 and p53.

BPDCN activates oncogenes but impedes pDC-signature genes

In order to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of MYC+RUNX2-DKO BPDCN, we performed an RNA sequencing analysis of CD11c^mid/+B220⁺Bst2⁺ leukemic cells isolated from distinct primary- and secondary-recipient mice in addition to those in LSK Flt3⁺ lymphoid primed MPPs (LMPPs), macrophage-dendritic cell progenitors (MDPs), granulocyte–monocyte progenitors (GMPs), and pDCs isolated from WT mice. RNA sequencing from MYC+RUNX2-DKO leukemic cells revealed 1445 up-regulated genes and 1526 down-regulated genes from WT pDCs (Fig. 8a and Supplementary Data 2). In order to determine whether the gene expression profile of MYC+RUNX2-DKO leukemic cells reflected that in human BPDCN cells, we utilized published data sets comparing CAL-1 cells and normal pDCs in humans (Supplementary Data 2)³⁴, and found that up-regulated and down-regulated genes both significantly overlapped between these comparisons in patients and mice (Fig. 8a), confirming the relevance of this mouse model for human BPDCN.

A principal component analysis showed that primary and secondary BPDCN cells clustered together, and these BPDCN cells were located closer to WT LMPPs and MDPs but apart from GMPs (Fig. 8b). In addition, a hierarchical clustering analysis using differentially expressed genes between BPDCN cells and pDCs located BPDCN cells closer to WT LMPPs and MDPs than GMPs (Fig. 8c), supporting a distinct origin of BPDCN from the leukemic GMPs of AML³⁵. Given the transduction of MYC in DKO leukemia cells, GSEA showed the positive enrichment of canonical MYC target genes in BPDCN cells from that in WT MDPs or WT pDCs (Fig. 8d and Supplementary Table 1), and a gene ontology analysis revealed significant enrichments in ribosome and translation-related pathways, which may be activated by MYC. Since human BPDCN cells showed lower expression levels of pDCs-signature genes than mature pDCs (e.g. TCF4, TLR7, and TLR9; Supplementary Fig. 12), BPDCN cells showed the significant down-regulation of pDCs-signature genes expressed in WT pDCs, but the positive enrichment of these genes from those in LMPPs, MDPs, and GMPs (Fig. 8e and Supplementary Table 1). Unsupervised GSEA showed that interferon α and inflammatory responses were significantly and negatively enriched in BPDCN cells, which compromised the immunological function activated in mature pDCs (Fig. 8f and Supplementary Table 1). Quantitative RT-PCR confirmed that that the expression levels of pDC-signature genes, such as Tcf4, Tlr7, and Tlr9, were slightly increased in MYC+RUNX2-DKO leukemic cells and markedly increased in pDCs (Fig. 8g), indicating that BPDCN blocked terminal differentiation into pDCs by inhibiting the expression of pDC-signature genes to lower levels in mature pDCs. To examine the in vivo BPDCN-initiating capacity of precursor cells, we transplanted MDPs and pDCs purified from cultured MYC+RUNX2-DKO cells into lethally-irradiated recipient mice (Supplementary Fig. 13). While the pDCs did not repopulate in mice, the MDPs expanded in mice and developed lethal BPDCN with the same phenotype of CD11b⁻CD11c^mid/+B220⁺Bst2⁺ following leukocytosis and thrombocytopenia (Supplementary Fig. 14). All MYC+RUNX2-DKO MDPs-transplanted mice died 70 days post-transplantation (median survival: 42 days versus undetermined in MYC+RUNX2-DKO pDCs mice) (Supplementary Fig. 15). Thus, MDPs were at least one of the cells of origin of BPDCN in this context.

The pDC-specific RUNX2 super-enhancer appears to play an important role in the differentiation and function of normal pDCs via increasing the transcription of RUNX2, but in the leukemic cells harboring t(6;8), the RUNX2 super-enhancer on the derivative 8 is hijacked to robustly activate the transcription of MYC, while the BENC enhancer does not appear to activate that of MYC (Fig. 8h). In addition, RUNX2 transcription factor binds to and helps the seRUNX2der8 activate the expression of MYC in BPDCN cells (Fig. 8h). Therefore, the expression of MYC and RUNX2 functions to confer survival and proliferative effects on leukemic precursors such as MDPs that initiated BPDCN in vivo, but also impedes terminal differentiation into pDCs to promote the development of BPDCN.

Discussion

BPDCN is a rare and aggressive hematological malignancy, and shows a poor clinical outcome due to inappropriate chemotherapies because its pathogenesis has not yet been elucidated in detail. Since t(6;8)(p21;q24) is specific to BPDCN, using functional genomic assays combined with a mouse model, we elucidated the molecular mechanisms responsible for the initiation and progression of BPDCN, which are driven by the MYC oncogene and pDC-lineage transcription factor RUNX2.

It has been recently reported that translocation (6;8)(p21;q24) was found in 22 out of 118 BPDCN patients and t(6;8)-positive BPDCN cells showed significantly increased expression of MYC compared to t(6;8)-negative BPDCN cells⁸. While translocation-induced enhancer hijacking has been reported in several tumors (e.g. IgH-MYC in lymphoma)³⁶, the mechanisms by which a translocation-induced enhancer activates a target oncogene and leads to transformation remain unclear. In the present study, we demonstrated that t(6;8) caused the mutant-allele super-enhancer of RUNX2 (seRUNX2der8) to activate the expression of MYC and promote the formation of BPDCN. While BPDCN cells did not show the Notch-dependent MYC enhancer observed in T-ALL³⁷, we found that CAL-1 BPDCN cells showed a H3K27ac peak of 1.7-Mb downstream enhancer of MYC equivalent to BENC module A enhancer, which was recently shown to mildly activate the expression of Myc in murine normal stem and progenitor cells²⁹, but also known as the Brd4-mediated enhancers of Myc in murine AML cells³⁰. However, CAL-1 cells showed scattered BRD4 bindings in the BENC enhancers and did not change levels of BRD4 post the JQ1 treatment. Although the BENC enhancer may be able to increase the transcription of MYC on the WT allele and that of RUNX2 on the mutant allele in BPDCN cells, we demonstrated that the specific deletion of the seRUNX2der8 significantly attenuated the transcription of MYC and resulted in the abolished cell growth capacities in vitro. Therefore, the RUNX2 super-enhances appear to dominantly activate the transcription of both MYC and RUNX2 in BPDCN cells (Fig. 8h).

Super-enhancers are critical for development and tissue homeostasis because they tightly regulate the expression of lineage-specific transcription factors in somatic stem cells, and the disruption of super enhancer regulation appears to contribute to malignant transformation¹⁴. The emergence and activation of the super-enhancer of RUNX2 (−791 kb) appears to occur during the differentiation of pDCs with the subsequent induction of RUNX2 expression, which is critical for the maturation and migratory function of pDCs^9,10. Although BPDCN showed lower expression levels of RUNX2 than pDCs, BPDCN cells had significantly higher expression levels of RUNX2 than other subtypes of AML cells, and the knockdown of RUNX2 significantly abrogated proliferative capacity following the attenuation of pDC-signature gene expression in BPDCN cells. In addition, the knockdown of RUNX2 reduced the expression of the BPDCN-specific markers, CD56 and CD123, and inhibited the expression of canonical MYC target genes, indicating that RUNX2 executes the malignant transcriptional program in collaboration with MYC in BPDCN. TCF4, a master regulator of pDC differentiation, which is known to mutually regulate RUNX2, was recently identified as a critical transcription factor for the survival of BPDCN cells by RNAi screening¹². We found that the knockdown of RUNX2 reduced the expression of TCF4 in BPDCN cells and this was accompanied by enhanced apoptosis. Thus, RUNX2-dependent transcriptional programs for the differentiation of pDCs were maintained in order to provide the survival properties of malignant cells, at least in part, due to the regulation of TCF4, but were also reprogramed to favor the propagation of BPDCN.

Since BPDCN cells have a higher sensitivity to the inhibition of BRD4, which has been shown to depend on TCF4¹², we also demonstrated that RUNX2 is one of the crucial targets in the setting of BRD4 inhibition in BPDCN cells. The inhibition of BRD4 significantly reduced the expression of RUNX2 and MYC in BPDCN cells, and the ectopic expression of RUNX2 alone, but not MYC alone, significantly restored impaired cell growth by the inhibition of BRD4, suggesting that MYC requires BRD4 and other factors to activate the enhancers and promote the cell growth, consistent with previous findings that ectopic expression of MYC did not restore JQ1-mediated impairments in cell growth in BPDCN and prostate cancer cells^12,38. We also found that the RUNX2-binding DNA motif was dominantly enriched in super-enhancers rather than in conventional enhancers in CAL-1 cells. Furthermore, RUNX2 itself bound to the region of the seRUNX2der8, and the knockdown of RUNX2 significantly reduced H3K27ac modification levels at the super-enhancer with subsequent reductions in MYC, suggesting a pioneering role for RUNX2 in the activation of super-enhancers during the transformation of BPDCN. Thus, RUNX2 plays a dominant role in controlling transcription networks in BPDCN, which provide the lineage-dependent survival signal and enhance the transformation capability driven by the expression of MYC.

MYC and RUNX transcription factor families both have the ability to activate the expression of p19^ARF, which stabilizes the p53 protein, and MYC is known to induce apoptosis in p53-dependent and independent manners. One decade ago, RUNX2 and MYC were shown to collaborate in order to generate T-cell lymphoma in a CD2 promoter-dependent manner in mice because RUNX2 suppressed MYC-dependent apoptosis in lymphoma cells in vivo³³. Consistent with this finding, we demonstrated that the knockdown of RUNX2 enhanced the levels of apoptosis in CAL-1 BPDCN cells harboring wild-type TP53, and the double knockdown of RUNX2 and MYC markedly reduced the clonogenic capacity of CAL-1 cells. In addition, the transduction of RUNX2 and MYC transformed p53 null/Tet2 null cells, but not wild-type cells into BPDCN in vivo. These results imply that RUNX2 exerts a survival effect by suppressing MYC/p53-dependent apoptosis and, in turn, collaborates with MYC in this specific type of leukemia.

Since loss-of-function mutations in TET2 and TP53 are frequently detected in BPDCN patients, we revealed that the over-expression of MYC and RUNX2 initiated the transformation of BPDCN-like disease lacking Tet2 and p53 in mice. Although we did not detect the expression of CD4, CD56 or CD123 in murine tumors, which are commonly detected in BPDCN patients, these leukemic cells showed the murine pDC phenotype of CD11b⁻CD11c^mid/+B220⁺Bst2⁺, accompanied by disseminative and transplantable capacities in secondary recipient mice. Interestingly, we observed that two out of 10 BPDCN mice showed focal invasions of leukemic cells on the skin and subcutaneous tissues. Since BPDCN-like tumor cells placed transcription profiles closer to LMPPs and MDPs than to pDCs and GMPs, we found that MYC- and RUNX2-expressing p53 null/Tet2 null MDPs repopulated in mice and developed lethal BPDCN disease, indicating leukemic MPDs being one of the cells of origin of BPDCN, which is also supported by a finding that MYC- and RUNX2-expressing p53 null/Tet2 null LSK cells and GMP cells occasionally developed AML in a non-pDC-differentiation setting. Therefore, this mouse model accurately recapitulates the phenotype of aggressive BPDCN and gives an insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of BPDCN.

A result of the present study is that translocation juxtaposes the pDCs-specific RUNX2 super-enhancer with MYC, resulting in the development of BPDCN, and our mouse model recapitulates aggressive BPDCN lacking p53 and Tet2 in mice. We also demonstrated how MYC and RUNX2 collaborate for the initiation and progression of BPDCN by activating the function of super-enhancers that may be reversed through the inhibition of BRD4, as previously suggested^12,20. These results support a rationale for combined applications of a BRD4 inhibitor with agents targeting MYC and/or RUNX2-dependent pDC-signature genes in patients (e.g. BCL2)³⁹.

Methods

Cells

CAL-1, HEL, MOLM-13, MONO-MAC-1, and Jurkat cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) with penicillin/streptomycin in a humidified incubator. U2OS and Saos2 cell lines were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS. The CAL-1 cell line was established from a patient with BPDCN as previously described⁶, and it is available from the author upon reasonable request. The CAL-1 was neither authenticated nor tested for mycoplasma contamination. The Jurkat was obtained from RIKEN (Japan), the other cell lines were obtained from ATCC.

BPDCN patient samples

All samples were obtained at Kumamoto University and Tokyo Medical University after written consent was obtained from patients. Patient anonymity was ensured, and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Committees at Kumamoto University (Kumamoto, Japan) and Tokyo Medical University (Tokyo, Japan).

Virus vectors and infections

MYC was constructed from cDNA encoding human MYC, and subcloned into the retrovirus vector pGCDNsam IRES-NGFR. RUNX2 was constructed from cDNA encoding human RUNX2 and subcloned into the retrovirus vector pGCDNsam IRES-EGFP. shRNA directed against either MYC or RUNX2 was expressed using the lentivirus vectors, pCS-H1-shRNA-EF-1-EGFP and pCS-H1-shRNA-EF-1-mRFP⁴⁰. Target sequences were designated as follows: shRUNX2 #1; 5′-AAGGTTCAACGATCTGATTTG-3′, shRUNX2 #2; 5′-ACAAGGACAGAGTCAGATT-3′^41,42, shMYC #1; 5′-CGATTCCTTCTAACAGAAATG-3′, shMYC #2; 5′-GATGAGGAAGAAATCGATG-3′¹². To produce the recombinant virus, virus vectors was transfected together with packaging vectors into 293T cells. Hematopoietic cells were then spinoculated with virus supernatant in 10 μg/ml protamine sulfate for 30 min, and infected cells were further incubated⁴³.

Mice

All mice were in the C57BL/6 background. Tp53 conditional KO (p53^flox/flox) mice were previously generated⁴⁴. Tet2 conditional knockout (Tet2^flox/flox) mice were previously generated⁴⁵. These mice were crossed with Rosa26:Cre-ERT2 mice (Taconic) for conditional deletion. C57BL/6 mice congenic for the Ly5 locus (CD45.1) were purchased from Sankyo-Lab Service. All experiments using these mice were performed in accordance with our institutional guidelines for the use of laboratory animals and approved by the Review Board for Animal Experiments of Kumamoto University (Kumamoto, Japan). All mice experiments were performed without randomization and blinding.

pDCs differentiation and transplantation assays

Purified murine hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (Lineage⁻Sca-1⁺c⁻Kit⁺) were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol, 20 ng/ml human TPO, and 100 ng/ml Flt3-ligand for 9 days¹⁰. On day 3 of the in vitro culture, 3000 purified GFP⁺NGFR⁺ virus vector-infected MDP cells (Lineage^-CD11c^-c-Kit⁺CD115⁺CD135⁺) were injected into lethally irradiated CD45.1⁺ mice (8–12 weeks old) together with 2×10⁵ CD45.1⁺ bone marrow cells. On day 9 of the in vitro culture, 6000 purified GFP⁺NGFR⁺ virus vector-infected cells were injected into lethally irradiated CD45.1⁺ mice together with 2×10⁵ radioprotective CD45.1⁺ bone marrow cells. Colony formation assays were performed using Methocult M3234 (Stem Cell Technologies) supplemented with 20 ng/ml human TPO and 100 ng/ml Flt3-ligand with 1000 purified GFP⁺NGFR⁺c-Kit⁺ cells. In replating assays, colonies were counted on day 14 and 3×10⁴ pooled cells were plated into the same medium. Terminal pDC differentiation was induced by the administration of 1 ng/ml LPS for one day on day 9 of the culture with TPO and Flt3-ligand. In transplantation assays, 3000 purified GFP⁺NGFR⁺ virus vector-infected pDC cells (CD11b⁻CD11c⁺B220⁺) were injected into lethally irradiated CD45.1⁺ mice together with 2×10⁵ CD45.1⁺ bone marrow cells, and blood was analyzed using a Celtac-α (NIHON KODEN). Mice were excluded from the analysis if blood cells were not recovered 2 weeks post transplantation due to injection failure.

Flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry antibodies

Flow cytometry and cell sorting were performed by utilizing the following anti-human antibodies (clone and catalog numbers): CD271 (ME20.4, 345108), CD45 (HI30, 25-0459), CD4 (OKT4, 50-0048), CD56 (MY31, 60-0564), CD123 (6H6, 306011), and TCL1 (1-21, 330506), as well as the following anti-murine antibodies (clone and catalog numbers): CD45.2 (104, 109820), CD45.1 (A20, 110730), Gr1 (RB6-8C5, 108404), CD11b/Mac1 (M1/70, 101208), CD11c (N418, 117304), NK1.1 (PK136, 108704), Ter119 (116204), CD127/IL-7Rα (A7R34, 121104), Bst2 (927, 127010), B220 (RA3-6B2, 103212), CD3e (145-2C11, 100320), CD4 (L3T4, 100526), CD8α (53-6.7, 100714), CD56 (809220, FAB7820A), CD117/c-Kit (2B8, 105812), Sca1 (D7, 108114), CD34 (MEC14.7, 11-0341-85), CD123 (5B11, 106005), CD135 (A2F10, 135306), CD115 (AFS98, 135510), and FcγRII-III (93, 101308). These antibodies were purchased from BioLegend, eBioscience, R&D systems or TONBO biosciences. The lineage mixture solution contained biotin-conjugated anti-Gr1, B220, CD4, CD8α, Ter119, and IL-7Rα antibodies. Apoptotic cells were stained with an anti-Annexin V–APC antibody (BD 550474) and propidium iodide. In order to evaluate cell cycle progression, cells were cultured with BrdU, fixed and permeabilized according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and then detected using the anti-BrdU-APC antibody (BD). All flow cytometric analyses and cell sorting were performed on FACSAriaII or FACSCantoII (BD 557892). Formalin fixed paraffin embedded bone marrow cells were stained with anti-MPO antibody (DAKO A0398) or anti-Lysozyme antibody (DAKO L1828).

Chromatin IP sequencing

CAL-1 cells were fixed by 0.5% paraformaldehyde at 37 °C for 2 min and then lysed. Cells were sonicated at 50% amplitude for 10 s 15 times. Samples were incubated with anti-RUNX2 antibody- (MBL; 8G5) or anti-H3K27Ac antibody-conjugated (Active motif; MABI 0309) Sheep anti-Rabbit IgG Dynabeads at 4 °C overnight. Input and immunoprecipitates were incubated at 65 °C for 4 h for reverse cross-linking, and DNA was purified using the MinElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). ChIP-seq libraries were generated using the ThruPLEX DNA-seq kit (Rubicon Genomics). Bowtie2 (version 2.2.6;default parameters) was used to map the reads to the reference genome (UCSC/hg19). HOMER (version 4.9) was used for de novo motif discovery in the peaks of super enhancers and enhancers. ChIP-sequencing data were deposited in the DDBJ database under the accession number DRA006440 and DRA007469.

Next-generation sequencing

Next-generation sequencing was performed on CAL-1 cells using the Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform with a 150-bp paired-end read protocol according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA-seq paired reads were aligned towards the UCSC hg19 reference genome using BWA-MEM. Gene fusions was detected by utilization of both soft clipping mapping and fragment information derived based on pair-end reads. Estimation of breakpoints for a gene fusion was performed after pileup of soft clipped reads for both sides. Genome sequencing data were deposited in the DDBJ database under the accession number DRA006440.

RNA sequencing

Total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Plus Micro kit (Qiagen), and cDNA was synthesized using the SMARTer Pico PCR cDNA Synthesis kit (Clontech). ds-cDNA was fragmented and cDNA libraries were generated using the KAPA HyperPlus Library Preparation kit (KAPA Biosystems) and FastGene Adaptor kit (Fastgene). Sequencing was performed using NextSeq500 (Illumina) with a single-read sequencing length of 60 bp, and the CLC genomic Workbench was used to analyze and visualize sequencing data. RNA sequencing data have been deposited in the DDBJ database under the accession number DRA006565.

Microarray

Twenty nanograms of total RNA was mixed with spike-in controls using the Agilent One Color Spike Mix Kit (Agilent), amplified, and labeled with Cyanine 3 using the Low Input Quick Amp Labeling Kit (Agilent) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A microarray analysis using the SurePrint G3 Human GE 8 × 60 K Microarray (Agilent) was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Microarray raw data were deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus under the accession number GSE110140.

Chromosome conformation capture (3C)-quantitative PCR

Cells were fixed by 1% formaldehyde at 25 °C for 10 min. Nuclei samples were digested with EcoRI at 37 °C 16 h and then ligated using T4 DNA ligase (NEB)⁴⁶. Quantitative PCR primers were designed to detect the closest EcoRI target sites of the promoters and enhancers of RUNX2 and MYC (Supplementary Table 2).

CRISPR

In order to delete the RUNX2 super enhancer from the translocated allele using the CRISPR-Cas9 system, the target sequence of gRNA was designed using sgRNA Designer⁴⁷ and CRISPR direct (Supplementary Table 2)⁴⁸. Designed gRNAs were subcloned into the lentiCRISPRv2 vector⁴⁹, and transfected into 293T cells together with packaging plasmids. CAL-1 cells were infected using a sgRNA lentivirus and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 1 μg/ml puromycin in order to select sgRNA-vector-transduced clones. Uncropped gel images are available in Supplementary Fig. 16.

FISH

CAL-1 cells were treated with 0.05 µg/ml colcemid solution for 3 h and 75 mM KCl for 60 minutes, and were then fixed in 3:1 methanol:acetic acid solution. MYC and the enhancer region of MYC were detected using Vysis LSI-MYC dual color probes (Abbott Laboratories). The RUNX2 probe was generated by the bacterial artificial chromosome clone RP11-1019C24 (Empire Genomics) and labeled with DY-415-dUTP: aqua dye (Enzo Life Sciences). Probe-hybridized slides were washed, and cells were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and then analyzed using the BZ8000 System (Keyence).

Quantitative RT-PCR and western blotting

Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini kit and then reverse-transcribed by the ThermoScript RT-PCR system (Invitrogen) with an oligo-dT primer. Quantitative-RT-PCR was performed with LightCycler 480 (Roche) and SYBR Premix ExTaq (Takara). Expression levels were normalized to ACTB/β-actin expression. Primers for PCR are listed in Supplementary Table 2. The following antibodies were used for Western blotting: RUNX2 (MBL 8G5; 1:200 dilution), Actin (Santa Cruz C4; 1:1000 dilution), MYC (Santa Cruz 9E10; 1:100 dilution), H3 (Abcam ab1791; 1:500 dilution), and H3K27ac (Active motif MABI 0309; 1:1000 dilution). Uncropped immunoblot images are available in Supplementary Fig. 16.

Statistical analysis

All statistical tests were performed using Graph Pad Prism version 7 (GraphPad Software). The significance of differences was measured by an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney non-parametric test. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size for animal studies.

Reporting Summary

Further information on experimental design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

All data are available within the article and Supplementary Information files. Sequencing data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in DDBJ or GEO under the accession numbers below. Whole-genome sequencing; DRA006440. Microarray; GSE110140. ChIP-sequencing; DRA006440 and DRA007469. RNA-sequencing; DRA006565

Change history

28 August 2019
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

References

Pagano, L., Valentini, C. G., Grammatico, S. & Pulsoni, A. Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: diagnostic criteria and therapeutical approaches. Br. J. Haematol. 174, 188–202 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pagano, L. et al. Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm with leukemic presentation: an italian multicenter study. Haematologica 98, 239–246 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Chaperot, L. et al. Identification of a leukemic counterpat of the plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Blood 97, 3210–3217 (2001).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Jardin, F. et al. TET2 and TP53 mutations are frequently observed in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm. Br. J. Haematol. 153, 413–416 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Shih, A. H., Abdel-Wahab, O., Patel, J. P. & Levine, R. L. The role of mutations in epigenetic regulators in myeloid malignancies. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 599–612 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Maeda, T. et al. A novel plasmacytoid dendritic cell line, CAL-1, established from a patient with blastic natural killer cell lymphoma. Int. J. Hematol. 81, 148–154 (2005).
Article Google Scholar
Nakamura, Y. et al. Identification of SUPT3H as a novel 8q24/MYC partner in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm with t(6;8)(p21;q24) translocation. Blood Cancer J. 5, e301 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sakamoto, K. et al. Recurrent 8q24 rearrangement in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: association with immunoblastoid cytomorphology, MYC expression, and drug response. Leukemia 1–14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-018-0154-5
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sawai, C. M. et al. Transcription factor Runx2 controls the development and migration of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 210, 2151–2159 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Chopin, M. et al. RUNX2 mediates plasmacytoid dendritic cell egress from the bone marrow and controls viral immunity. Cell Rep. 15, 866–878 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Dijkman, R. et al. Gene-expression profiling and array-based CGH classify CD4+CD56+hematodermic neoplasm and cutaneous myelomonocytic leukemia as distinct disease entities. Blood 109, 1720–1727 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ceribelli, M. et al. A druggable TCF4- and BRD4-dependent transcriptional network sustains malignancy in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm. Cancer Cell 30, 764–778 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nagasawa, M., Schmidlin, H., Hazekamp, M. G., Schotte, R. & Blom, B. Development of human plasmacytoid dendritic cells depends on the combined action of the basic helix-loop-helix factor E2-2 and the Ets factor Spi-B. Eur. J. Immunol. 38, 2389–2400 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hnisz, D. et al. Super-enhancers in the control of cell identity and disease. Cell 155, 934–947 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lovén, J. et al. Selective inhibition of tumor oncogenes by disruption of super-enhancers. Cell 153, 320–334 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Whyte, W. A. et al. Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell 153, 307–319 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Filippakopoulos, P. et al. Selective inhibition of BET bromodomains. Nature 468, 1067–1073 (2010).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Delmore, J. E. et al. BET bromodomain inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to target c-Myc. Cell 146, 904–917 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zuber, J. et al. RNAi screen identifies Brd4 as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature 478, 524–528 (2011).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Emadali, A. et al. Haploinsufficiency for NR3C1, the gene encoding the glucocorticoid receptor, in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasms. Blood 127, 3040–3054 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Dang, C. V. MYC on the path to cancer. Cell 149, 22–35 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kress, T. R., Sabò, A. & Amati, B. MYC: connecting selective transcriptional control to global RNA production. Nat. Rev. Cancer 15, 593–607 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Dave, K. et al. Mice deficient of Myc super-enhancer region reveal differential control mechanism between normal and pathological growth. eLife 6, 1–25 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
Herranz, D. et al. A NOTCH1-driven MYC enhancer promotes T cell development, transformation and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat. Med. 20, 1130–1137 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sur, I. & Taipale, J. The role of enhancers in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 483–493 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hnisz, D. et al. Activation of proto-oncogenes by disruption of chromosome neighborhoods. Science 351, 1454–1458 (2016).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Fu, Y. et al. Narrowing down the common deleted region of 5qto 6.0 Mb in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cellneoplasms. Cancer Genet. 206, 293–298 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Shin, M. H. et al. A RUNX2-mediated epigenetic regulation of the survival of p53 defective cancer cells. PLoS Genet. 12, 1–25 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Bahr, C. et al. A Myc enhancer cluster regulates normal and leukaemic haematopoietic stem cell hierarchies. Nature 553, 515–520 (2018).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Shi, J. et al. Role of SWI/SNF in acute leukemia maintenance and enhancer-mediated Myc regulation. Genes Dev. 27, 2648–2662 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Allhoff, M., Sereá, K., Pires, J. F., Zenke, M. & Costa, I. G. Differential peak calling of ChIP-seq signals with replicates with THOR. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e153 (2016).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nakaya, H. I. et al. Systems biology of vaccination for seasonal influenza in humans. Nat. Immunol. 12, 786–795 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Blyth, K. et al. Runx2 and MYC collaborate in lymphoma development by suppressing apoptotic and growth arrest pathways in vivo. Cancer Res. 66, 2195–2201 (2006).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sapienza, M. R. et al. Molecular profiling of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm reveals a unique pattern and suggests selective sensitivity to NF-kB pathway inhibition. Leukemia 28, 1606–1616 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Krivtsov, A. V. et al. Transformation from committed progenitor to leukaemia stem cell initiated by MLL-AF9. Nature 442, 818–822 (2006).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Walker, B. A. et al. Translocations at 8q24 juxtapose MYC with genes that harbor superenhancers resulting in overexpression and poor prognosis in myeloma patients. Blood Cancer J. 4, e191–e197 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ntziachristos, P. et al. Genetic inactivation of the polycomb repressive complex 2 in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat. Med. 18, 298–301 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Asangani, I. A. et al. Therapeutic targeting of BET bromodomain proteins in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature 510, 278–282 (2014).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Montero, J. et al. Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm is dependent on BCL2 and sensitive to venetoclax. Cancer Discov. 7, 156–164 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Katayama, K. et al. RNA interfering approach for clarifying the PPARgamma pathway using lentiviral vector expressing short hairpin RNA. FEBS Lett. 560, 178–182 (2004).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pratap, J. et al. Runx2 transcriptional activation of Indian Hedgehog and a downstream bone metastatic pathway in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 68, 7795–7802 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Boregowda, R. K. et al. RUNX2 is overexpressed in melanoma cells and mediates their migration and invasion. Cancer Lett. 348, 61–70 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sashida, G. et al. Ezh2 loss promotes development of myelodysplastic syndrome but attenuates its predisposition to leukaemic transformation. Nat. Commun. 5, 4177 (2014).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Jonkers, J. et al. Synergistic tumor suppressor activity of BRCA2 and p53 in a conditional mouse model for breast cancer. Nat. Genet. 29, 418–425 (2001).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Moran-Crusio, K. et al. Tet2 loss leads to increased hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and myeloid transformation. Cancer Cell 20, 11–24 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hagege, H. et al. Quantitative analysis of chromosome conformation capture assays (3c-qpcr). Nat. Protoc. 2, 1722–1733 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Doench, J. G. et al. Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 184–191 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Naito, Y., Hino, K., Bono, H. & Ui-Tei, K. CRISPRdirect: software for designing CRISPR/Cas guide RNA with reduced off-target sites. Bioinformatics 31, 1120–1123 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sanjana, N. E., Shalem, O. & Zhang, F. Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening. Nat. Methods 11, 783–784 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the members of the Sashida and Osato Laboratories for their discussions during the preparation of this manuscript and Ms. Mihoko Iimori, Ms. Noriko Yamamoto, Dr. Hirotaka Matsui, Mr. Shinji Kudoh, and Dr. Takaaki Ito for their technical help. This work was supported in part by a grant from the Takeda Science Foundation (S.K.), the Uehara Memorial Foundation (G.S.), Japanese Society of Hematology (M.O., G.S.), Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (16KT0113, 18H02842, 15H04312, 16H06276, 18KT0026, and 18K16090) and Strategic Research Foundation for Private Universities (S1511011) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan, and NCIS Centre Grant Seed Funding Program, Singapore Ministry of Education’s AcRF Tier 3 grant (MOE2014-T3-1-006).

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Sho Kubota, Kenji Tokunaga.

Authors and Affiliations

Laboratory of Transcriptional Regulation in Leukemogenesis, International Research Center for Medical Sciences (IRCMS), Kumamoto University, 2-2-1 Honjo, Chuo Ward, Kumamoto, 860-0811, Japan
Sho Kubota, Takako Yokomizo-Nakano, Yuqi Sun & Goro Sashida
Department of Hematology, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo Ward, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
Kenji Tokunaga & Eisaku Iwanaga
Department of Hematology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishi-Shinjuku, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
Tomohiro Umezu & Kazuma Ohyashiki
Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo Ward, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
Motohiko Oshima & Atsushi Iwama
Division of Stem Cell and Molecular Medicine, Center for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato, Tokyo, 108-8639, Japan
Motohiko Oshima & Atsushi Iwama
Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 119077, Singapore
Kar Tong Tan, Henry Yang & Motomi Osato
Department of Molecular Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, 739-0046, Japan
Akinori Kanai
Department of Hematology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan
Norio Asou
Department of General Medicine, Nagasaki University, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan
Takahiro Maeda
Division of Reproductive Engineering, Center for Animal Resources and Development (CARD), Kumamoto University, 2-2-1 Honjo, Chuo Ward, Kumamoto, 860-0811, Japan
Naomi Nakagata
Laboratory of Runx Biology, International Research Center for Medical Sciences (IRCMS), Kumamoto University, 2-2-1 Honjo, Chuo Ward, Kumamoto, 860-0811, Japan
Motomi Osato
Center for Metabolic Regulation of Healthy Aging (CMHA), Kumamoto University, Chuo Ward, Kumamoto, 860-0811, Japan
Motomi Osato

Authors

Sho Kubota
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Kenji Tokunaga
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tomohiro Umezu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Takako Yokomizo-Nakano
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yuqi Sun
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Motohiko Oshima
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Kar Tong Tan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Henry Yang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Akinori Kanai
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Eisaku Iwanaga
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Norio Asou
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Takahiro Maeda
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Naomi Nakagata
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Atsushi Iwama
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Kazuma Ohyashiki
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Motomi Osato
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Goro Sashida
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.K. performed experiments, analyzed results, and wrote the manuscript; K.T. performed experiments and provided reagents; T.U., T.YN. and Y.S. performed experiments; M.O., K.T.T., H.Y., A.K. and E.I. analyzed results; N.A., T.M. and N.N. provided reagents; A.I. analyzed results; K.O. provided reagents; M.O. designed the research and analyzed results; G.S. designed the research, performed experiments, analyzed results, and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Motomi Osato or Goro Sashida.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kubota, S., Tokunaga, K., Umezu, T. et al. Lineage-specific RUNX2 super-enhancer activates MYC and promotes the development of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm. Nat Commun 10, 1653 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09710-z

Download citation

Received: 17 April 2018
Accepted: 26 March 2019
Published: 10 April 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09710-z

This article is cited by

Super-enhancer-associated TMEM44-AS1 aggravated glioma progression by forming a positive feedback loop with Myc
- Erbao Bian
- Xueran Chen
- Jun Li
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2021)
EphA2 super-enhancer promotes tumor progression by recruiting FOSL2 and TCF7L2 to activate the target gene EphA2
- Shuang Cui
- Qiong Wu
- Hongjuan He
Cell Death & Disease (2021)
Hsa_circ_0068307 mediates bladder cancer stem cell-like properties via miR-147/c-Myc axis regulation
- Qi Chen
- Qiuping Yin
- Chen Yang
Cancer Cell International (2020)
Oncogenic seRNA functional activation: a novel mechanism of tumorigenesis
- Yuan Tan
- Yuejin Li
- Faqing Tang
Molecular Cancer (2020)
MicroRNA-221-3p is related to survival and promotes tumour progression in pancreatic cancer: a comprehensive study on functions and clinicopathological value
- Xuejiao Wu
- Jia Huang
- Weiyan Yao
Cancer Cell International (2020)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Subjects

Abstract

Similar content being viewed by others

Introduction

Results

Enhanced expression of MYC in BPDCN cells harboring t(6;8)

MYC and RUNX2 collaborate to promote the tumor cell growth

RUNX2 functions as a lineage-survival factor in BPDCN

RUNX2 activates the function of enhancers in BPDCN

RUNX2 super-enhancer is hijacked to activate MYC expression

Transduction of MYC promotes the in vitro colony formation

MYC and RUNX2 initiates the transformation of BPDCN in vivo

BPDCN activates oncogenes but impedes pDC-signature genes

Discussion

Methods

Cells

BPDCN patient samples

Virus vectors and infections

Mice

pDCs differentiation and transplantation assays

Flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry antibodies

Chromatin IP sequencing

Next-generation sequencing

RNA sequencing

Microarray

Chromosome conformation capture (3C)-quantitative PCR

CRISPR

FISH

Quantitative RT-PCR and western blotting

Statistical analysis

Reporting Summary

Data availability

Change history

28 August 2019

References

Acknowledgements

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

Corresponding authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Additional information

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Share this article

This article is cited by

Comments

Search

Quick links