Abstract
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) regulates vasculogenesis by using its tyrosine kinase receptors. However, little is known about whether Sec14-like phosphatidylinositol transfer proteins (PTP) are involved in this process. Here, we show that zebrafish sec14l3, one of the family members, specifically participates in artery and vein formation via regulating angioblasts and subsequent venous progenitors’ migration during vasculogenesis. Vascular defects caused by sec14l3 depletion are partially rescued by restoration of VEGFR2 signaling at the receptor or downstream effector level. Biochemical analyses show that Sec14l3/SEC14L2 physically bind to VEGFR2 and prevent it from dephosphorylation specifically at the Y1175 site by peri-membrane tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B, therefore potentiating VEGFR2 signaling activation. Meanwhile, Sec14l3 and SEC14L2 interact with RAB5A/4A and facilitate the formation of their GTP-bound states, which might be critical for VEGFR2 endocytic trafficking. Thus, we conclude that Sec14l3 controls vasculogenesis in zebrafish via the regulation of VEGFR2 activation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The vertebrate vasculature, as a tree-like tubular and highly dynamic plexus, extends into almost all tissues for a constant supply of nutrients and oxygens, or transport of metabolic wastes1,2. The formation of a functional vascular system is essential for embryonic development, and its structural abnormalities always lead to pathological diseases3,4. This systematic and hierarchical vascular system is achieved by two distinct mechanisms, vasculogenesis (de novo assembly of vessels) and angiogenesis (modification and expansion of pre-existing vessels). In zebrafish, angioblasts derived from the lateral plate mesoderm eventually give rise to the first embryonic artery (dorsal aorta, DA) and vein (posterior cardinal vein, PCV) during vasculogenesis, and then these vascular systems are rapidly expanded and remodeled during angiogenesis to consummate vessel networks, including the formation of intersegmental veins (ISV) by endothelial cell sprouting2,5,6,7.
So far, a variety of signaling molecules and transcription factors have been implicated in the formation of the vertebrate vasculature via regulating endothelial cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and position2,4,8. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling is considered as the most critical and pivotal one during embryonic vasculogenesis as well as angiogenesis9,10. After secretion, VEGF ligands bind in an overlapping pattern to three receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), known as VEGFR1/Flt-1, VEGFR2/Flk-1/KDR, and VEGFR3/Flt-4 on the plasma membrane, followed by receptor dimerization and autophosphorylation at particular tyrosine sites. Then, the phosphorylated receptors recruit interacting proteins and further trigger the activation of downstream cascades via PLCγ/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways11. Among these VEGFRs, VEGFR2 is considered as the major mediator of proangiogenic signaling in almost all aspects of vascular-endothelial-cell biology8. Of particular interest, in endothelial cells, VEGFR2 displays distinct distributions in subcellular pools, including cell surface, endocytic storage compartments, lipid rafts as well as cell-cell junctions12,13,14. As a result, VEGFR2 signaling could be monitored on the plasma membrane or within endosomes. However, what determines the activation of a specific pool is poorly understood8.
To achieve specific signal outputs with coordinated duration and amplitude, VEGFR2 signaling is strictly regulated at numerous levels, such as the receptor expression level, the availability, and affinities for binding its different ligands, the presence of co-receptors and repressor (tyrosine phosphatases), and so on15,16,17. More importantly, the intracellular trafficking and endocytic kinetics of VEGFR2 also regulate the signal outputs significantly18,19,20. Upon ligand binding, VEGFR2 is internalized mainly in a clathrin-dependent manner with the help of motor proteins and trafficked to RAB5-positive and EEA1-positive early endosomes. Unless VEGFR2 is dephosphorylated by the peri-membrane resident PTP1B at the Y1175 site21, these VEGFR2-containing vesicles can either be targeted for degradation via the RAB7-pathway to attenuate the signaling or recycled back to the plasma membrane via the fast (RAB4-dependent) or slow (RAB11-dependent) route for further potentiation19. Although NRP1-synectin-myoVI and ephrinB2-DAB2-PAR3 complex have been demonstrated to promote endosome movements into cell22,23, many events involved in VEGFR2 internalization and trafficking are still unclear. Full understanding of the endocytic VEGFR2 trafficking will further advance our understanding of the VEGF signaling and the consequential biological functions.
Sec14l3 proteins belong to phosphatidylinositol transfer proteins (PITPs), which were first described as transporters to potentiate phosphatidylinositol (PI) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) exchange between membranes in vitro24. Because of the involvement of PI molecules in endocytic membrane trafficking, PITPs are also proposed to play a vital role in vesicle budding from the trans Golgi network (TGN) as well as in priming of exocytosis25,26,27. Although it is reported that there is a crosstalk between PITPs with Wnt/Ca2+ and EGF signaling28,29,30, whether PITPs integrate lipid metabolism with intracellular VEGF signaling has not been studied.
In this paper, we demonstrate that Sec14l3 regulates VEGF signaling at its receptor level and participates in vascular development of zebrafish embryos. Using morpholino knockdown in combination with CRISPR/Cas9 knockout system, we find that sec14l3 deficiency results in narrowed DA and PCV lumens. Mechanistically, Sec14l3 promotes RAB5A/4A activation to accelerate VEGFR2 internalization and recycling, thus preventing VEGFR2 from exposure to the phosphatase activity of PTP1B, which ultimately enhances the downstream VEGF signaling. It will be meaningful to interpret PITPs function in regulating VEGFR2 trafficking as well as in understanding VEGF signaling during vertebrate vasculature development.
Results
Sec14l3/SEC14L2 are enriched in the endothelial cells
Vascular system formation is important for the normal development of vertebrate embryos, as well as for the survival of adults4. In order to identify critical genes required for zebrafish vasculature development, we isolated GFP-positive cell populations, by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), from Tg(fli1a:EGFP)y1 embryos7 at 24 hpf, when the DA has separated from the PCV5,6. RNA sequencing of the isolated cells showed that genes in vascular, hematopoietic and pharyngeal arch cells were highly expressed as reported previously (Supplementary data 1)7. Of our interest is the PITP gene sec14l3. Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) results showed that sec14l3 was spatially expressed in vasculature at 24 hpf (Fig. 1a). Transverse sectioning post WISH indicated that sec14l3 is expressed in both arterial and venous endothelial progenitor cells at 19 hpf, and thereafter it is restricted to the PCV compartment at 25 hpf (Fig. 1a). The expression of sec14l3 in endothelial cells is almost eliminated in etsrp/etv2 mutants lacking trunk vasculature (Fig. 1b)31, which confirms its vascular expression. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis indicated that sec14l3 expression level in GFP+ cells from Tg(fli1a:EGFP)y1 embryos at 24 hpf is enriched by about 5 folds, which is comparable to that of kdrl/vegfr2, a specific vascular marker gene (Fig. 1c).
To know whether the enrichment of sec14l3 in endothelial cells is conserved in mammals, we analyzed human SEC14L2/SEC14L3 expression in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). RT-PCR results showed that SEC14L2 transcripts exist while SEC14L3 does not (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Importantly, immunostaining data demonstrated that SEC14L2 protein locates throughout the cells, and presents as vesicles in the cytosol. Given the fact that intracellular VEGFR2 mainly distributes to endosomes and Golgi12,32, we co-stained our protein with VEGFR2 and it showed that about 28% of SEC14L2 is co-localized with VEGFR2 in the endocytic pool in HUVECs (Fig. 1d). Taken together, these data suggest a possible implication of zebrafish sec14l3/human SEC14L2 in vascular development.
Sec14l3/SEC14L2 are required for vascular formation
To investigate whether Sec14l3 is required for vasculature development during zebrafish embryogenesis, two antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (MO), sec14l3-tMO2 and sec14l3-sMO, were designed to knock down sec14l3 expression in vivo. sec14l3-tMO2 targets the 5′ untranslated region of sec14l3 mRNA to block its translation, while sec14l3-sMO targets the 2nd exon-intron junction to interrupt normal splicing of the primary transcript. Their effectiveness was confirmed by previous report30 and RT-PCR analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Compared to control embryos injected with standard MO (std-MO), 5 ng sec14l3-tMO2 injection showed no obvious difference in morphology, with normal convergent and extension movements at gastrulation stages (Supplementary Fig. 1c). When analyzing vascular development, we found that knockdown of sec14l3 in Tg(kdrl:GFP)s843Tg embryos resulted in arterial-venous segregation and luminal expansion defects with compromised ISVs formation (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 2a). However, when sec14l3-tMO2 was injected in a p53 mutant background, ISVs sprouting defect was largely restored at 48 hpf (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 2b), which presumably relieves the general off-target effect of morpholinos33. Therefore, we conclude that sec14l3 specifically regulates DA and PCV formation during vasculogenesis.
To figure out sec14l3 functions in a maternal- or zygotic-dependent manner, we turned to use the splicing blocker sec14l3-sMO. Consistent with sec14l3-tMO2, sec14l3-sMO injection similarly inhibited the arterial-venous segregation at 23 hpf and luminal expansion at 25 hpf (Fig. 2b, c), suggesting that the vascular defects mainly arise from the loss of zygotic sec14l3. More importantly, the DA and PCV defects in sec14l3 morphants were restored by sec14l3 mRNA overexpression (Fig. 2b, c), indicative of specific effects.
To substantiate the knockdown effect, we also generated a sec14l3 mutant based on clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 technology, using a guide RNA targeting the 5th exon of sec14l3 gene in Tg(kdrl:GFP)s843Tg transgenic line (Supplementary Fig. 3a). The isolated mutant allele contains a 10-bp deletion near the target site, causing a premature stop codon and presumably a truncated protein only owning CRAL-TRIO domain (Supplementary Fig. 3a). Although there is no obvious difference between mutant and wild-type embryos in morphology (Supplementary Fig. 3b), sec14l3 transcripts are almost abolished in homozygous mutants (Supplementary Fig. 3c). Compared with wild-type and heterozygous, homozygous embryos exhibit arterial-venous segregation and luminal expansion defects with nearly normal ISVs formation, distinct from impaired ISV length in sec14l3 morphants (Fig. 2d, e, and Supplementary Fig. 4). This is partially due to a non-specific effect of tMOs, as after injection of sec14l3-tMO2 in homozygotes, it could not cause further DA and PCV defects, but with further reduction of ISV length (Supplementary Fig. 4). Therefore, we conclude that sec14l3 is required for zebrafish DA and PCV formation.
Since it is reported that two distinct mechanisms could account for the DA and PCV formation in zebrafish34,35, we wonder what happens in our mutants. Using fli and etsrp as probes, the WISH result showed that in sec14l3 deficient embryos, the specification of angioblast is not affected at 8-somite stages (Supplementary Fig. 5), while its migration is significantly reduced at 14–16 somite stages, which could be rescued by the injection of sec14l3 mRNA (Fig. 2f). Meanwhile, with high-resolution imaging in Tg(kdrl:GFP)s843Tg embryos, we found that the sprouting of venous progenitors from the vascular cord is also decreased from 21 to 23 hpf in sec14l3 deficient embryos (Fig. 2g and Supplementary Fig. 6). Therefore, we’d like to conclude that sec14l3 play important roles in zebrafish DA and PCV blood vessels formation via regulating angioblast migration.
Since SEC14L2 is expressed in HUVECs (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig.1a), we assessed its function by in vitro wound closure assay in HUVECs. Compared with NC-shRNA infected control, the wound gap in SEC14L2 shRNA cells was closed much slower (Fig. 2h), suggesting a requirement of SEC14L2 for endothelial cell migration. The in vitro tube formation assay in HUVECs36 revealed that knockdown of SEC14L2 obviously inhibited the formation of capillary-like tubes (Fig. 2i), indicating a facilitating effect of SEC14L2 on the tube formation of endothelial cells. Therefore, SEC14L2 may mainly promote mammalian endothelial cell migration to maintain vasculature formation.
Sec14l3/SEC14L2 promote VEGF-induced VEGFR2 activation
VEGFR2 signaling plays vital roles during zebrafish vasculature, which could be motivated both by VEGF ligands and blood flow-induced fluid shear stress (FSS)10,37. Given that SEC14L2 co-localizes with VEGFR2 in HUVECs (Fig. 1d), we hypothesized that SEC14L2 regulates VEGFR2 signaling. Since Sec14l3 exerts its function on angioblast migration during vasculogenesis before the onset of blood flow in vivo (Fig. 2f, g and Supplementary Fig. 6), we focused on the VEGF- but not FSS-induced VEGFR2 signaling transduction in vitro, and further investigated SEC14L2 knockdown effect in HUVECs on the downstream effectors of VEGF signaling to mimic the endogenous regulation. As shown in Fig. 3a, the addition of VEGFa led to a rapid upregulation of p-ERK-1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) and p-AKT (Ser473) in NC-shRNA transfected control cells. Strikingly, both of these responses to VEGFa stimulation were markedly reduced in SEC14L2 shRNA transfected cells (Fig. 3a–c). Additionally, in human umbilical arterial endothelial cells (HUAECs) with SEC14L2 knockdown, the p-AKT level was also inhibited significantly, whereas the p-ERK level was not changed a lot (Supplementary Fig. 7). In line with the compromised VEGF signaling in HUVECs, depletion of sec14l3 also caused a reduction of p-Erk and p-Akt in zebrafish embryos (Fig. 3d, e). These results indicate that Sec14l3/SEC14L2 positively regulate VEGF signaling pathway.
Next, we tried to rescue the vasculogenic defects (i.e., narrow DA and PCV) in sec14l3 morphants by injecting ca-MEK and/or ca-AKT mRNAs encoding the constitutively active (ca) forms of human MEK and AKT respectively38,39. To our surprise, 50 pg ca-MEK mRNA injection alone only restored the DA formation in sec14l3 morphants, while 50 pg ca-AKT mRNA only rescued PCV. When the two mRNA species were co-injected, both DA and PCV of morphants were largely restored (Fig. 3f, g). These data provide strong evidence that sec14l3 acts through VEGF signaling to regulate vascular formation.
SEC14L2 promotes VEGFR2 phosphorylation at Y1175 site
Upon VEGFa stimulation, VEGFR2 molecules on the plasma membrane undergo dimerization and phosphorylation at several key tyrosine residues including the Y1054/1059 and Y1175 sites, which are essential for VEGF signaling to activate its downstream PLCγ/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways40. The finding that SEC14L2 knockdown reduces ERK and AKT activation (Fig. 3a–e, and Supplementary Fig. 7) prompted us to examine phosphorylation levels of VEGFR2 at both Y1054/1059 and Y1175 sites. Results showed that SEC14L2 knockdown had no significant effect on VEGFR2 Y1054/1059 phosphorylation (Fig. 4a, b). In contrast, Y1175 phosphorylation level showed a pronounced reduction in SEC14L2 shRNA cells (Fig. 4a, c), which is consistent with the reduction of activated ERK and AKT by SEC14L2 knockdown (Fig. 3a–c). To confirm functional conservation between zebrafish Sec14l3 and human SEC14L2 in VEGF signal transduction, a Flag-tagged full-length form of zebrafish Sec14l3 was transfected into SEC14L2 knockdown stable HEK293T cells with VEGFR2 overexpression. As a result, sec14l3 overexpression not only restored but even enhanced VEGFR2-Y1175 phosphorylation following VEGFa stimulation (Fig. 4d, e). To test whether this regulation is specific, cytoplasmic regions of three different VEGF receptors, VEGFR1-cyto, VEGFR2-cyto, and VEGFR3-cyto, were overexpressed with Sec14l3 for co-IP experiments respectively in HEK293T cells. Results showed that only VEGFR2-cyto could strongly interact with Sec14l3 (Fig. 5a), indicating that Sec14l3 somehow specifically regulates VEGFR2, but not VEGFR1 or VEGFR3 signaling. Taken together, these data indicate that zebrafish Sec14l3 is the counterpart of human SEC14L2 and both of them enhance VEGF signaling via regulating VEGFR2-Y1175 phosphorylation specifically.
Previous studies have demonstrated that decreased phosphorylation of VEGFR2-Y1175 may be caused by prolonged exposure of the activated VEGFR2 to some tyrosine phosphatases beneath or on the plasma membrane. PTP1B has been reported and identified as such a specific phosphatase21,22,41,42. To prove this notion, we compared the interaction between PTP1B and VEGFR2-cyto with or without SEC14L2 in HEK293T cells. The co-IP result showed that SEC14L2/Sec14l3 could indeed prevent VEGFR2 from interacting with PTP1B (Fig. 5b). Then, we wondered whether knockdown of PTP1B could reverse the effect of SEC14L2 depletion on VEGFR2-Y1175 phosphorylation. Strikingly, co-knockdown of PTP1B and SEC14L2 in HEK293T cells resulted in much higher phosphorylation levels of VEGFR2-Y1175 compared to SEC14L2 knockdown alone (Fig. 5c, d).
Consistent with these in vitro results, overexpression of VEGFR2-cyto mRNA or co-knockdown of ptp1b in sec14l3 morphants led to a relatively normal lumen size of DA and PCV at 25 and 30 hpf (Fig. 5e–h), while overexpression of VEGFR2-cyto mRNA or knockdown of ptp1b alone had no obvious effect on the DA and PCV formation (Supplementary Figs. 8, 9). Taken together, these in vitro and in vivo observations imply that SEC14L2/Sec14l3 may somehow protect VEGFR2-Y1175 phosphorylation from its specific phosphatase PTP1B and then stimulate VEGF signaling.
VEGFR2 trafficking is suppressed after SEC14L2 depletion
Based on the above results, in particular, the vesicle-like co-localization of SEC14L2 and VEGFR2 in HUVECs (Fig. 1d), we hypothesize that Sec14l3/SEC14L2 may contribute to intracellular trafficking of VEGFR2. To address this issue, we performed surface biotinylation assay to detect internalization and recycling of overexpressed VEGFR2 in HEK293T cells (Supplementary Fig. 10). We found that, before induction of internalization, the biotin-labeled VEGFR2 protein level on the cell surface in SEC14L2 shRNA transfected HEK293T cells was comparable to that in control cells (Fig. 6a, the first lane and fifth lane); following induction of internalization, intracellular biotin-labeled VEGFR2 proteins gradually increased in the control cells, but this increase was much slower in SEC14L2 shRNA cells (Fig. 6a). Thus, SEC14L2 is a potential regulator of VEGFR2 trafficking.
Next, the transport of VEGFR2-containing endosomes in HUVECs was examined by immunostaining assay. Before induction of internalization, endogenous VEGFR2 proteins on the cell surface were labeled similarly in control and SEC14L2 shRNA transfected cells (Fig. 6b, the first panel). After internalization induction at 37 °C for 10 min, the VEGFR2-containing endosomes in SEC14L2 knockdown HUVECs were significantly decreased compared to the control cells (Fig. 6b, c). Additionally, co-localization analysis between internalized VEGFR2 and the early endosomal marker EEA1 showed that SEC14L2 shRNA cells contained far fewer VEGFR2/EEA1 double positive endosomes than control cells (Fig. 6b, c), suggesting a requirement of SEC14L2 for VEGFR2 internalization into early endosomes.
It has been reported that in resting endothelial cells, VEGFR2 displays both the cell surface distribution and internal vesicular pool storage, which can be redistributed to the cell periphery upon VEGF stimulation12. To investigate whether SEC14L2 participates in this process, we performed surface biotinylation assay over a 35-min time course (20 min internalization at 22 °C followed by 15 min recycling at 37 °C). In NC-shRNA control cells, about 40% of internalized VEGFR2 could be recycled back to the plasma membrane and this recycling rate was enhanced to approximately 80% in the present of VEGFa stimulation (Fig. 6d), which is similar to the previous report12,22. However, knocking down SEC14L2 drastically decreased the VEGFR2 recycling rate to about 8 and 20%, respectively, with or without VEGFa stimulation (Fig. 6d). Therefore, we conclude that SEC14L2 may promote VEGFR2 intracellular mobilization at least in two ways, internalization from and recycling back to the cell surface.
Furthermore, we tried to figure out the final destination of VEGFR2 after knocking down SEC14L2 in HUVECs. Western blotting results showed that the total VEGFR2 protein level is not significantly affected when SEC14L2 is depleted, exclusive of its possible role in VEGFR2 degradation (Supplementary Fig. 11). When co-staining VEGFR2 with late endosome markers, RAB7 or CD63, we found that SEC14L2 knockdown led to more VEGFR2 accumulation in these compartments (Fig. 6e, f). Taken these results together, we would like to prospect that more VEGFR2 is stored in late endosomes but not delivered to the lysosome for degradation in SEC14L2 deficient cells, which is consistent with previous reports12.
Sec14l3/SEC14L2 physically interact with VEGFR2 and RABs
We next set out to investigate how Sec14l3/SEC14L2 mediate VEGFR2 trafficking. Given that Sec14l3 interacts with VEGFR2-cyto specifically (Fig. 5a) and SEC14L2 co-localizes with VEGFR2 endogenously in vesicular compartments (Fig. 1d), we first demonstrated that endogenous SEC14L2 indeed interacts with endogenous VEGFR2 and this interaction could be strengthened upon VEGFa stimulation (Fig. 7a), indicating that SEC14L2 prefers binding to activated VEGFR2. To further prove this point, wild-type form (WT-VEGFR2) or kinase mutation form (KM-VEGFR2) of VEGFR2 was co-transfected with Flag-tagged zebrafish Sec14l3 in HEK293T cells for Co-IP experiments43. We found that Sec14l3 associates with WT-VEGFR2 much stronger than KM-VEGFR2 (Fig. 7b, c). Taking these data together, we conclude that Sec14l3 favors associating with activated VEGFR2. Additionally, domain mapping results revealed that the Sec14 domain of Sec14l3 was essential for its interaction with VEGFR2 (Fig. 7d, e).
As a member of the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) family, VEGFR2 is regulated by various Rab proteins at the intracellular trafficking level, which renders vesicle transport to particular destination somehow through recruiting their corresponding effectors44. Considering that Sec14l3/SEC14L2 act during VEGFR2 trafficking, we wondered whether Sec14l3 could associate with RAB family proteins. Four members of RAB proteins, representing distinct endocytosis routes45,46,47, were selected for co-IP experiments in HEK293T cells. Results revealed that only RAB4A and RAB5A could strongly interact with Sec14l3 (Fig. 7f), which coincides with the function of Sec14l3 in VEGFR2 internalization and recycling (Fig. 6). Furthermore, these interactions were confirmed by endogenous co-IP data in HUVECs (Fig. 7g, h). Domain mapping analyses disclosed that the N-terminal CRAL-TRIO domain and the C-terminal GOLD2 domain of Sec14l3 were required for interaction with RAB4A (Fig. 7d, i). Therefore, Sec14l3 may promote VEGFR2 endocytosis and recycling through its interaction with RAB5A and RAB4A.
Sec14l3/SEC14L2 are required for RAB5A/4A activation
Like other GTPases, the RAB5A/4A cycle between an active (GTP-bound) and an inactive (GDP-bound) state, which is of critical importance to modulate vesicle trafficking processes48,49. We wonder whether Sec14l3/SEC14L2 are required for the activity of RAB5A/4A to regulate VEGFR2 trafficking. To this end, we first compared the association of Sec14l3 with RAB5A/4A-GDP and RAB5A/4A-GTP. Transfection and in vitro binding assays revealed that Sec14l3 preferred binding to the GDP-bound state of RAB5A/4A (Fig. 8a, b). To further investigate the function of Sec14l3/SEC14L2 in RAB5A/4A regulation, we performed immunoprecipitation assay using a specific anti-RAB5A/4A-GTP antibody or pull-down assay using purified GST-R5BD, which specifically binds to RAB5A-GTP50. Compared to the NC-shRNA control, knocking down SEC14L2 caused more than 50% reduction of the RAB5A-GTP and RAB4A-GTP amount (Fig. 8c, d), which is consistent with the compromised VEGFR2 internalization and recycling processes (Fig. 6). Taken together, these results suggest that Sec14l3/SEC14L2 facilitate the formation of RAB5A/4A in their GTP-bound active states, and then probably accelerate the movement of VEGFR2 vesicles to early endosomes and recycling endosomes to enhance VEGF signaling (Fig. 8e).
Discussion
Given the critical roles of endocytosis in VEGFR2 signaling, numerous relevant factors that have effects on receptor trafficking along endosomes have been identified, and most of them were demonstrated to participate in VEGFR2 internalization or degradation16,22,23,41,51,52,53,54. However, few factors were found to regulate a relatively complete VEGFR2 intracellular trafficking process, such as receptors internalization from and recycling back to the plasma membrane for enhancing signaling output. Here, we propose that the lipid binding proteins Sec14l3/SEC14L2 concurrently provoke VEGFR2 uptake from the plasma membrane and return from the endosomal pool to maximize signaling strength upon ligand stimulation. Mechanistically, Sec14l3/SEC14L2 conjugate activated VEGFR2 into RAB5-positive sorting endosomes and RAB4-positive fast recycling endosomes through their interaction to protect VEGFR2 from dephosphorylation by the peri-membrane tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B (Fig. 8e). Therefore, Sec14l3/SEC14L2 deficiency disturbs VEGFR2 internalization and recycling, leading to a prolonged exposure to PTP1B and subsequent compromises of PLCγ/ERK and PI3K/AKT activation, which consequently results in defective vasculature morphogenesis in zebrafish embryos in vivo and vascular tubulogenesis in vitro. The effective induction of VEGF signaling through overexpression of cytoplasmic region of VEGFR2 mRNA or suppression of ptp1b expression or overexpression of constitutively active MEK/AKT partially restored the narrowed DA and PCV lumens in zebrafish sec14l3 morphants. This study provides insight into the regulation of VEGFR2 endocytosis in vertebrate vascular system formation.
It was apparent that sec14l3 inactivation specifically affected vasculogenesis, whereas the angiogenic process appeared to be nearly intact, although both processes heavily rely on VEGF signaling. The pattern of how sec14l3 is spatiotemporally expressed may provide an explanation for this. Before the onset of the major axial vessels at 19 hpf, sec14l3 is expressed in both arterial and venous progenitors. And thereafter, it is gradually restricted into the PCV compartment, not DA or ISVs. This particular time window is corresponding to vasculogenesis, but not angiogenesis context during vascular morphogenesis. We did notice a reduced p-Erk level in DA of sec14l3 deficient embryos yet with the robust signal in selected endothelial cells, which might be enough for the tip cell selection and subsequent ISVs formation. This notion is compatible with ISV defects in kdrl and plcγ1 mutant embryos, which are caused by a loss of pErk-positive sprouting ISV endothelial cells in dorsal aorta55.
Inhibition between PI3K/AKT and PLCγ/ERK signaling has been well documented38,56. Within the arterial-fated angioblast, VEGFR2 signaling induces PLCγ/ERK kinase cascade and subsequently stimulates expression of several genes in the Notch pathway to ensure the arterial cell fate. It has been reported that overexpression of constitutively active MEK or treatment with agonists of PLCγ/ERK signaling can rescue the DA formation in zebrafish embryos lacking vegfa55,57,58,59,60. On the other hand, in the venous-fated angioblast, PI3K/AKT signaling is activated to antagonize ERK activity, and overexpression of constitutively active Akt promotes the venous cell fate38. Therefore, it seems coincident with previous reports that overexpression of ca-MEK or ca-AKT could rescue the DA or PCV formation respectively in sec14l3 mutant embryos bearing a relatively low level of VEGF signaling. Since both PLCγ/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways are downstream branches of the VEGF receptor, how they are preferentially activated in different endothelial progenitor cells or at different developmental stages remain intriguing questions. Furthermore, how Sec14l3 exactly regulates these processes also need to be investigated in the future.
Upon VEGF ligands stimulation, VEGFR2 is engaged in dimerization to induce phosphorylation of several tyrosine residues in its cytoplasmic domain. Meanwhile, various phosphatases have been reported to remove tyrosine phosphorylation at distinct sites21,61,62,63. Given that PTP1B specifically dephosphorylates VEGFR2 at the Y1175 site, we merely examined the rescue effect of PTP1B depletion following Sec14l3/SEC14L2 knockdown. However, we cannot exclude the possible involvements of other phosphatases, especially those transmembrane receptor-type PTPs, such as DEP1/CD148, VE-PTP and so on62,63. Knocking down these phosphatases respectively in Sec14l3/SEC14L2 deficient embryos may provide more information.
Besides VEGF ligands, PECAM-1 mediated fluid shear stress signaling could also recruit VEGFR2 and then phosphorylate it at Y1175 site along with VE-Cadherin, thus regulating vascular remodeling, vascular homeostasis, cardiac development and atherogenesis37. In this study, we didn’t focus on this branch, largely due to our in vivo observations that sec14l3 specifically exists and functions during zebrafish vasculogenesis before the onset of blood flow. Additionally, different from mammalian vascular development, it has been reported that changes in shear stress appear to be relatively unimportant in the initial stages of zebrafish angiogenesis because blood vessels can be successfully formed in the absence of heartbeat and blood flow until 14 days postfertilization64. Even so, we still cannot exclude that Sec14l3 could participate in regulating fluid shear stress-induced VEGFR2 activation during later stages of zebrafish angiogenesis. It will be interesting to explore this possibility in the future.
Previous studies have shown that VEGFR2 endocytosis proceeds in a clathrin-dependent internalization, followed by the cascade of RAB recruitments to deliver VEGFR2 to the plasma membrane for recycling, into late endosome for storage, or into lysosome for degradation65. In this work, we demonstrate that Sec14l3 could directly interact with RAB5A/4A and promote their GTP-bound states formation, and probably orchestrate VEGFR2 internalization and recycling back to the plasma membrane. After performing in vitro GEF assay based on mant-GTPγS fluorescence, we proposed that Sec14l3 could not act as a GEF to accelerate the GTP loading activity of RAB5 directly (Supplementary Fig. 12). Actually, whether Sec14l3 could regulate the GTP hydrolysis activity of RAB5A/4A also need to be determined by MESG-based single-turnover assay. In addition, whether the intrinsic GTPase activity of Sec14l3 is required for the activation of RAB5A/4A also awaits further investigation. Based on our data here, we would like to propose the following potential mechanisms of SEC14L2/Sec14l3 acting on RAB5A/4A activation. (1) Sec14l3 might serve as an adaptor to recruit a GEF protein for RAB5A/4A. Although we have not detected any interaction between Sec14l3 and several well-known GEF proteins of RAB5, such as Rabex5 and RABGEF1, we still cannot exclude this possibility, since there might be other unidentified GEFs for RAB5A/4A that could participate in this process. (2) Sec14l3 belongs to atypical class III PITPs, which are implicated in the traffic of phosphoinositides (PIs) between different membrane compartments24. Different PI species display distinct subcellular distributions where they play intriguing functions. For example, PI(3)P, PI(4)P, and PI(3,5)P2 are found predominantly within early, recycling and late endosomes, respectively66, which are essential for appropriate endosomal trafficking events. Drosophila PI 3-phosphatase MTMR13 promotes PI(3)P turnover at endosomes to activate Rab5 family member Rab21, PI(3)P levels in early endosome may drive RAB5-RAB7 conversion and so on67,68. Therefore, it deserves further exploration of whether Sec14l3 could also motivate specific phosphoinositides transportation along vesicles to regulate endosome dynamics, either in morphology or in effector recruitment.
Methods
Zebrafish strains and embryos manipulation
Tuebingen strain of zebrafish (Danio rerio) was used. Unless otherwise stated, Tg(kdrl:GFP)s843Tg and Tg(fli1a:EGFP)y1 transgenic lines were used for easy observation of vasculature development. Ethical approval is acquired from Tsinghua University Animal Care and Use Committee for the fish maintenance and manipulations, according to the institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocol (AP#13-MAM1). Embryos were raised and staged according to Kimmel et al.69. For injection, 1-cell stage embryos were harvested and injected with mRNAs or MOs in yolk for even distribution using the typical MPPI-2 quantitative injection equipment (Applied Scientific Instrumentation Co.). In this study, sec14l3, ca-AKT, and ca-MEK mRNA were synthesized using the mMESSAGE mMACHINE Kit (Ambion AM1344) and purified using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Morpholinos were ordered from Gene Tools, LLC. and prepared in stocks. sec14l3-tMO2, sec14l3-sMO, ptp1b-tMO, ptp1b-sMO and std-MO were synthesized by Gene Tools, LLC. The sequences of the used morpholinos are as follows: sec14l3-tMO2: 5′-ATGTCGCCACGAGTGCAGCAGAAAT-3′; sec14l3-sMO: 5′-ATGTTTCTCACCTCTCAGCCATCTG-3′; ptp1b-tMO: 5′-CGATTTCCCGAAACTCGGCTTCCAT-3′; ptp1b-sMO: 5′-GAAGCAGAATCAGTCTTTACCTGGT-3′ and std-MO: 5′-CCTCTTACCTCAGTTACAATTTATA-3′. Every single embryo was injected with 1 nl mRNA or MO solutions at indicated doses and raised to 19–30 hpf for observation. Embryos were harvested randomly for each experiment. For living imaging of vasculature development, chorion was removed from embryos by Pronase K (Sigma, 10 mg ml−1) and embryos were embedded in low melting agarose (Amresco 0815). Images were acquired using a Nikon A1RMPSi lasers scanning confocal microscope and processed by NIS-Element software for the measurement of diameters of vessels.
Whole-mount in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence
Embryos at indicated stages were harvested and fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde for at least 12 h. After dehydration in methanol gradients, embryos could be stored at −20 degrees for future use. For WISH, at the 1st day, embryos were subjected for rehydration in 0.1% PBST buffer, pre-hybridization in HYB− buffer and hybridization with the indicated probes overnight at 65degrees; At the 2nd day, embryos were washed by 50% formamide/ 2x SSCT, 2x SSCT, 0.2x SSCT buffer sequentially. After blocking, embryos were incubated with Digoxigenin-AP antibody (11093274910, Roche, 1:3000) overnight at 4 degrees; At the 3rd day, after several rounds of washing by MABT buffer and staining buffer, embryos were transferred into 48-well plate and the substrate BM-Purple (11442074001, Roche) was added for probe visualization. Digoxigenin-UTP−labeled sec14l3 antisense RNA probe was transcribed from a linearized plasmid in vitro. Stained whole embryos were photographed directly or sectioned in the transverse direction first (Leica CM1900) and then imaged by the Ds-Ri1 CCD camera under a Nikon SMZ1500 stereoscope. For immunofluorescence, mouse anti-GFP (sc-9996, Santa Cruz, 1:100), rabbit anti-p-Erk (Thr202/Tyr204) (#9101, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:100), rabbit anti-p-Akt (Ser473) (#4060, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:100) antibodies were used and embryos were imaged under Nikon A1RMPSi lasers scanning confocal microscope.
Cell culture and transfection
Plasmids used for cell transfection and their primers for construction are listed in Supplementary Table 1. HEK293T cells (Cell Resource Center, Peking Union Medical College) were cultured in DMEM (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FBS (Hyclone, Logan, UT) and 50 mg ml−1 penicillin/streptomycin (PS) (Invitrogen). HUVECs (ScienCell #8000) and HUAECs cells (ScienCell #8010) were cultured in endothelial cell medium (ScienCell #1001). Cell lines were checked for free of mycoplasma contamination by PCR and culture. Its species origin was confirmed with PCR. The identity of the cell line was authenticated with STR profiling (FBI, CODIS). The results for HEK293T cells can be viewed on the website (http://cellresource.cn). Transfections were performed using the polyethylenimine method for HEK293T cells. For endothelial cells, lentivirus infection method was used for knockdown experiments.
In vitro tube formation and wound closure assay
For in vitro tube formation assay, NC-shRNA or SEC14L2-shRNA infected HUVEC cells were plated on 12-well plate (2 × 105 cells per well) covered by Matrigel (BD 356230) and cultured for assessment of tube formation following seeding. The tube number was counted. For wound closure assay, HUVEC cells were seeded in 6-well plate and grown to confluent state. Then, a ‘scratch’ was created using the P200 pipet tip and the closure of the wound was monitored after 24 or 48 h to reflect the migration of endothelial cells.
Internalization and recycling assay
To quantify internalization of VEGFR2, biotin based biochemical quantification and anti-VEGFR2 antibody-based immunofluorescence were adopted. The biotin based assay was performed essentially as described12. Generally, biotin in the culture medium can bind to proteins including VEGFR2 on the cell surface at 4 °C, but the biotin-labeled proteins would not be internalized at this temperature. After free biotin molecules are washed away and incubation temperature shifts to 37 °C, the biotin-labeled proteins on the cell surface start to move into the cytoplasm through internalization. The intracellular/internalized biotin-labeled proteins can be pulled down using streptavidin beads after removal of those retained on the cell surface with iodoacetamide treatment and specific protein associated with biotin can be detected using a specific antibody at different time points of internalization (Supplementary Fig. 10). Briefly, transfected cells were washed twice using cold PBS (pH 8.0) and surface proteins were covalently labeled using a membrane-impermeant biotinylation reagent NHS-SS-biotin (Pierce, Rockford, IL) at 4 °C for 30 min. After labeling, un-reacted biotin was washed away by chilled PBS and labeled cells were immediately incubated at 37 °C to allow internalization for 5 min or 10 min. After internalization, culture media was discarded and washed sequentially by 10% FBS twice, 1% BSA once and 20 mM iodoacetamide (IAA) once for 10 min to remove biotin-labeled proteins remaining on the plasma membrane. Then, cells were lysed for streptavidin beads pull-down assay. For VEGFR2 immunofluorescence assay, HUVECs infected with shRNA were cultured for 72 h and then washed twice by cold PBS, which was followed by incubation with the Alexa647-conjugated anti-VEGFR2 antibody (#359909 Biolegend, 1:200) for 30 min at 4 °C. After removing extra antibody, cells were placed in an incubator at 37 °C for internalization. At indicated time points, cells were washed with acid PBS (pH 2.5) for three times to remove un-internalized anti-VEGFR2 antibody on the cell surface. After wash, cells were fixed by 4% PF and subjected for immunofluorescence. Antibodies used here including SEC14L2 (TA503723, ORIGENE, 1:100), EEA1 (#3288, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:100), VEGFR2 (#2479, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:200) and CD63 (#CBL553, Millipore, 1:100).
To measure the recycling of VEGF2, transfected cells were washed and labeled at 4°C with biotin for 30 min. The labeled cells were incubated with pre-warmed culture medium for 20 min at 22°C to allow cell surface proteins to internalize into RAB4-positive vesicles. The biotin-labeled proteins retained on the cell surface were removed by sequential washes with 10% FBS twice, 1% BSA once and 20 mM iodoacetamide (IAA) once, each for 10 min at 4 °C. Then cells were incubated at 37 °C to allow recycling in the absence or presence of 100 ng ml−1 VEGFa for 15 min. After recycling, cells were placed on ice and subjected to wash with 10% FBS twice, 1% BSA once and 20 mM iodoacetamide (IAA) once, each for 10 min, to remove labeled proteins that are returned to the plasma membrane. Finally, cells were lysed by TNE buffer for streptavidin beads pull-down assay and samples were boiled with 2x loading buffer and prepared for western blotting.
Co-immunoprecipitation and GST pull-down
Co-IP was carried out according to the previous paper70. Briefly, cells were lysed using TNE buffer (150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1% TritonX-100, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4]) mixed with protease inhibitors. The cell lysate was centrifuged at 120000 × g to remove cell debris to acquire supernatant for subsequent SDS-PAGE or IP assay. For the co-IP assay, the following antibodies were used: anti-VEGFR2 (#2479, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:200), anti-RAB4 (ab109009, Abcam, 1:100), anti-RAB5 (ab18211, Abcam, 1:100), anti-Flag (F1804, Sigma, 1:1000 for western blot). For immunoblotting analysis, anti-p-VEGFR2-Y1175 (#2478, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:2000 for western blot), anti-p-VEGFR2-Y1054/1059 (ab5473, Abcam, 1:1000 for western blot), anti-GFP (sc-9996, Santa Cruz, 1:1000 for western blot), anti-SEC14L2 (TA503723, ORIGENE, 1:1000 for western blot) and anti-PTP1B (610139, BD Bioscience, 1:1000 for western blot). For GST pull-down assay, GST-Sec14l3 and GST-RAB5A/4A recombinant proteins were expressed in E. coli. After 16 h induction by 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-Thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG, Takara 9030) at 16 °C, bacterial culture was centrifuged at 5000 × g and washed by 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) twice and then sonicated in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) solution supplemented with 1 mM PMSF. Next, the supernatant was incubated with glutathione-Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare), washed by 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) with 500 mM NaCl sequentially. After wash, about 1 ml PreScission Protease (GE Healthcare) was added into GST-RAB5A/4 A beads to cut the GST tag and the resulting RAB5A/4 A protein was eluted using 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) solution. For GTPγS/GDP- RAB5A/4 A pull-down assay, RAB5A/4 A protein was incubated in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, and 1 mM GTPγS/GDP (freshly made), for 90 min at room temperature to load GTPγS/GDP. Then GTPγS incubated GST-Sec14l3 beads were added into the solution for another 2 h incubation at 4 °C. Beads were finally washed and harvested for 2x loading buffer boiling and the samples were used for SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining.
Statistical analysis
Results were analyzed with GraphPad Prism 5.0 and are presented as mean ± SEM/SD as indicated, and comparisons were performed between two groups using a two-tailed Student’s t-test or ANOVA test when comparing more than two conditions. For all analyses, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 were considered statistically significant; ns indicated statistical non-significance with p > 0.05. Each experiment was carried out at least three times independently. The sample size is pre-estimated to ensure statistical analysis and no sample was optionally excluded from analysis. No blinding was done in the analyses and quantifications.
Data availability
The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. RNA-Seq raw data have been deposited in the GEO database under accession code: GSE126617 and other raw images are available at figshare.com for: Fig. 1d, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7729319, Fig. 2b, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7729325, Fig. 2g, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7729331, Fig. 3d, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7729334, Fig. 3e, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7729337, Fig. 5e, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7729340.
The source data underlying Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and Supplementary Fig. 4 are provided as a Source Data file.
References
Reichman-Fried, M. & Raz, E. Blood, blebs and lumen expansion. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 366–367 (2016).
Herbert, S. P. & Stainier, D. Y. Molecular control of endothelial cell behaviour during blood vessel morphogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 551–564 (2011).
Carmeliet, P. Angiogenesis in health and disease. Nat. Med. 9, 653–660 (2003).
Ramasamy, S. K., Kusumbe, A. P. & Adams, R. H. Regulation of tissue morphogenesis by endothelial cell-derived signals. Trends Cell Biol. 25, 148–157 (2015).
Gore, A. V., Monzo, K., Cha, Y. R., Pan, W. & Weinstein, B. M. Vascular development in the zebrafish. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2, a006684 (2012).
Ellertsdottir, E. et al. Vascular morphogenesis in the zebrafish embryo. Dev. Biol. 341, 56–65 (2010).
Lawson, N. D. & Weinstein, B. M. In vivo imaging of embryonic vascular development using transgenic zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 248, 307–318 (2002).
Simons, M., Gordon, E. & Claesson-Welsh, L. Mechanisms and regulation of endothelial VEGF receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 611–625 (2016).
Roy, H., Bhardwaj, S. & Yla-Herttuala, S. Biology of vascular endothelial growth factors. FEBS Lett. 580, 2879–2887 (2006).
Tammela, T., Enholm, B., Alitalo, K. & Paavonen, K. The biology of vascular endothelial growth factors. Cardiovasc. Res. 65, 550–563 (2005).
Lohela, M., Bry, M., Tammela, T. & Alitalo, K. VEGFs and receptors involved in angiogenesis versus lymphangiogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 154–165 (2009).
Gampel, A. et al. VEGF regulates the mobilization of VEGFR2/KDR from an intracellular endothelial storage compartment. Blood 108, 2624–2631 (2006).
Hudson, N. et al. Differential apicobasal VEGF signaling at vascular blood-neural barriers. Dev. Cell 30, 541–552 (2014).
Saharinen, P. et al. Angiopoietins assemble distinct Tie2 signalling complexes in endothelial cell-cell and cell-matrix contacts. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 527–537 (2008).
Fantin, A. et al. NRP1 acts cell autonomously in endothelium to promote tip cell function during sprouting angiogenesis. Blood 121, 2352–2362 (2013).
Koch, S. et al. NRP1 presented in trans to the endothelium arrests VEGFR2 endocytosis, preventing angiogenic signaling and tumor initiation. Dev. Cell 28, 633–646 (2014).
Gelfand, M. V. et al. Neuropilin-1 functions as a VEGFR2 co-receptor to guide developmental angiogenesis independent of ligand binding. Elife 3, e03720 (2014).
Di Fiore, P. P. & De Camilli, P. Endocytosis and signaling. an inseparable partnership. Cell 106, 1–4 (2001).
Horowitz, A. & Seerapu, H. R. Regulation of VEGF signaling by membrane traffic. Cell. Signal. 24, 1810–1820 (2012).
Sorkin, A. & von Zastrow, M. Endocytosis and signalling: intertwining molecular networks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 609–622 (2009).
Nakamura, Y. et al. Role of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B in vascular endothelial growth factor signaling and cell-cell adhesions in endothelial cells. Circ. Res. 102, 1182–1191 (2008).
Lanahan, A. et al. The neuropilin 1 cytoplasmic domain is required for VEGF-A-dependent arteriogenesis. Dev. Cell 25, 156–168 (2013).
Nakayama, M. et al. Spatial regulation of VEGF receptor endocytosis in angiogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 249–260 (2013).
Wiedemann, C. & Cockcroft, S. The Role of phosphatidylinositol transfer proteins (PITPs) in intracellular signalling. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 9, 324–328 (1998).
Cockcroft, S. The diverse functions of phosphatidylinositol transfer proteins. Curr Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 362, 185–208 (2012).
Mousley, C. J., Davison, J. M. & Bankaitis, V. A. Sec14 like PITPs couple lipid metabolism with phosphoinositide synthesis to regulate Golgi functionality. Subcell. Biochem. 59, 271–287 (2012).
Kempna, P. et al. Cloning of novel human SEC14p-like proteins: ligand binding and functional properties. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 34, 1458–1472 (2003).
Kauffmann-Zeh, A. et al. Requirement for phosphatidylinositol transfer protein in epidermal growth factor signaling. Science 268, 1188–1190 (1995).
Xie, Y. et al. Phosphatidylinositol transfer protein-alpha in netrin-1-induced PLC signalling and neurite outgrowth. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 1124–1132 (2005).
Gong, B. et al. The Sec14-like phosphatidylinositol transfer proteins Sec14l3/SEC14L2 act as GTPase proteins to mediate Wnt/Ca2+ signaling. Elife 6, e26362 (2017).
Sumanas, S. & Lin, S. Ets1-related protein is a key regulator of vasculogenesis in zebrafish. PLoS Biol. 4, e10 (2006).
Manickam, V. et al. Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 trafficking and angiogenesis by Golgi localized t-SNARE syntaxin 6. Blood 117, 1425–1435 (2011).
Robu, M. E. et al. p53 activation by knockdown technologies. PLoS Genet. 3, e78 (2007).
Herbert, S. P. et al. Arterial-venous segregation by selective cell sprouting: an alternative mode of blood vessel formation. Science 326, 294–298 (2009).
Kohli, V., Schumacher, J. A., Desai, S. P., Rehn, K. & Sumanas, S. Arterial and venous progenitors of the major axial vessels originate at distinct locations. Dev. Cell 25, 196–206 (2013).
DeCicco-Skinner, K. L. et al. Endothelial cell tube formation assay for the in vitro study of angiogenesis. J. Vis. Exp. 91, e51312 (2014).
Tzima, E. et al. A mechanosensory complex that mediates the endothelial cell response to fluid shear stress. Nature 437, 426–431 (2005).
Hong, C. C., Peterson, Q. P., Hong, J. Y. & Peterson, R. T. Artery/vein specification is governed by opposing phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase and MAP kinase/ERK signaling. Curr. Biol. 16, 1366–1372 (2006).
Robinson, M. J., Stippec, S. A., Goldsmith, E., White, M. A. & Cobb, M. H. A constitutively active and nuclear form of the MAP kinase ERK2 is sufficient for neurite outgrowth and cell transformation. Curr. Biol. 8, 1141–1150 (1998).
Olsson, A. K., Dimberg, A., Kreuger, J. & Claesson-Welsh, L. VEGF receptor signalling - in control of vascular function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 359–371 (2006).
Lanahan, A. A. et al. VEGF receptor 2 endocytic trafficking regulates arterial morphogenesis. Dev. Cell 18, 713–724 (2010).
Julien, S. G. et al. Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B deficiency or inhibition delays ErbB2-induced mammary tumorigenesis and protects from lung metastasis. Nat. Genet. 39, 338–346 (2007).
Zhang, R. et al. Etk/Bmx transactivates vascular endothelial growth factor 2 and recruits phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase to mediate the tumor necrosis factor-induced angiogenic pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 51267–51276 (2003).
Zerial, M. & McBride, H. Rab proteins as membrane organizers. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 107–117 (2001).
Galvez, T., Gilleron, J., Zerial, M. & O’Sullivan, G. A. SnapShot: mammalian rab proteins in endocytic trafficking. Cell 151, 234–234 e232 (2012).
Scita, G. & Di Fiore, P. P. The endocytic matrix. Nature 463, 464–473 (2010).
Stenmark, H. Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 513–525 (2009).
Barr, F. & Lambright, D. G. Rab GEFs and GAPs. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 22, 461–470 (2010).
Barr, F. A. Review series: rab GTPases and membrane identity: causal or inconsequential? J. Cell Biol. 202, 191–199 (2013).
Dou, Z. et al. Class IA PI3K p110beta subunit promotes autophagy through Rab5 small GTPase in response to growth factor limitation. Mol. Cell 50, 29–42 (2013).
Ballmer-Hofer, K., Andersson, A. E., Ratcliffe, L. E. & Berger, P. Neuropilin-1 promotes VEGFR-2 trafficking through Rab11 vesicles thereby specifying signal output. Blood 118, 816–826 (2011).
Gaengel, K. & Betsholtz, C. Endocytosis regulates VEGF signalling during angiogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 233–235 (2013).
Lampugnani, M. G., Orsenigo, F., Gagliani, M. C., Tacchetti, C. & Dejana, E. Vascular endothelial cadherin controls VEGFR-2 internalization and signaling from intracellular compartments. J. Cell Biol. 174, 593–604 (2006).
Sawamiphak, S. et al. Ephrin-B2 regulates VEGFR2 function in developmental and tumour angiogenesis. Nature 465, 487–491 (2010).
Shin, M. et al. Vegfa signals through ERK to promote angiogenesis, but not artery differentiation. Development 143, 3796–3805 (2016).
Rossant, J. Vascular development and patterning: making the right choices. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13, 408–412 (2003).
Kim, S. H. et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor signaling regulates the segregation of artery and vein via ERK activity during vascular development. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 430, 1212–1216 (2013).
Deng, Y. et al. Endothelial RAF1/ERK activation regulates arterial morphogenesis. Blood 121, 3988–3996 S3981-3989 (2013).
Corson, L. B., Yamanaka, Y., Lai, K. M. & Rossant, J. Spatial and temporal patterns of ERK signaling during mouse embryogenesis. Development 130, 4527–4537 (2003).
Zhang, C. et al. Inhibition of endothelial ERK signalling by Smad1/5 is essential for haematopoietic stem cell emergence. Nat. Commun. 5, 3431 (2014).
Bourdeau, A., Dube, N. & Tremblay, M. L. Cytoplasmic protein tyrosine phosphatases, regulation and function: the roles of PTP1B and TC-PTP. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 17, 203–209 (2005).
Mellberg, S. et al. Transcriptional profiling reveals a critical role for tyrosine phosphatase VE-PTP in regulation of VEGFR2 activity and endothelial cell morphogenesis. FASEB J. 23, 1490–1502 (2009).
Grazia Lampugnani, M. et al. Contact inhibition of VEGF-induced proliferation requires vascular endothelial cadherin, beta-catenin, and the phosphatase DEP-1/CD148. J. Cell Biol. 161, 793–804 (2003).
Pelster, B. & Burggren, W. W. Disruption of hemoglobin oxygen transport does not impact oxygen-dependent physiological processes in developing embryos of zebra fish (Danio rerio). Circ. Res. 79, 358–362 (1996).
McMahon, H. T. & Boucrot, E. Molecular mechanism and physiological functions of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 517–533 (2011).
De Matteis, M. A. & Godi, A. PI-loting membrane traffic. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 487–492 (2004).
Rink, J., Ghigo, E., Kalaidzidis, Y. & Zerial, M. Rab conversion as a mechanism of progression from early to late endosomes. Cell 122, 735–749 (2005).
Jean, S., Cox, S., Schmidt, E. J., Robinson, F. L. & Kiger, A. Sbf/MTMR13 coordinates PI(3)P and Rab21 regulation in endocytic control of cellular remodeling. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 2723–2740 (2012).
Kimmel, C. B., Ballard, W. W., Kimmel, S. R., Ullmann, B. & Schilling, T. F. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 203, 253–310 (1995).
Zhang, Y. et al. Rock2 controls TGFbeta signaling and inhibits mesoderm induction in zebrafish embryos. J. Cell Sci. 122, 2197–2207 (2009).
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. Nathan D. Lawson (University of Massachusetts Medical School) and Bo Zhang (Peking University) for providing transgenic fishes and Wang Min (Yale University) for providing WT-VEGFR2 and KM-VEGFR2 plasmids. We also appreciate the helpful discussion and technical assistance from members of the Meng Laboratory. This work was financially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#31522035, #91754112, #31801130 and #31371460), Major Science Programs of China (#2012CB945100).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.G. performed most experiments, collected and organized data. Z.H.L. helped to culture cells for partial biochemical analysis. W.H.X., G.Y.L., and S.H.D. participated in a part of the work, including whole-mount in situ hybridization, constructs cloning and so on. A.M.M. and S.J.J. proposed and managed the project, and B.G., A.M.M., and S.J.J. designed the study and prepared the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks Shamshad Cockcroft and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gong, B., Li, Z., Xiao, W. et al. Sec14l3 potentiates VEGFR2 signaling to regulate zebrafish vasculogenesis. Nat Commun 10, 1606 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09604-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09604-0
This article is cited by
-
Propofol improves survival in a murine model of sepsis via inhibiting Rab5a-mediated intracellular trafficking of TLR4
Journal of Translational Medicine (2024)
-
A Golgi-derived vesicle potentiates PtdIns4P to PtdIns3P conversion for endosome fission
Nature Cell Biology (2021)
-
SRGN, a new identified shear-stress-responsive gene in endothelial cells
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.