Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Dynamic emission Stokes shift and liquid-like dielectric solvation of band edge carriers in lead-halide perovskites

Abstract

Lead-halide perovskites have emerged as promising materials for photovoltaic and optoelectronic applications. Their significantly anharmonic lattice motion, in contrast to conventional harmonic semiconductors, presents a conceptual challenge in understanding the genesis of their exceptional optoelectronic properties. Here we report a strongly temperature dependent luminescence Stokes shift in the electronic spectra of both hybrid and inorganic lead-bromide perovskite single crystals. This behavior stands in stark contrast to that exhibited by more conventional crystalline semiconductors. We correlate the electronic spectra with the anti-Stokes and Stokes Raman vibrational spectra. Dielectric solvation theories, originally developed for excited molecules dissolved in polar liquids, reproduce our experimental observations. Our approach, which invokes a classical Debye-like relaxation process, captures the dielectric response originating from the incipient anharmonicity of the LO phonon at about 20 meV (160 cm−1) in the lead-bromide framework. We reconcile this liquid-like model incorporating thermally-activated dielectric solvation with more standard solid-state theories of the emission Stokes shift in crystalline semiconductors.

Introduction

Solution processed lead-halide perovskites (LHPs) are highly promising materials for photovoltaic and optoelectronic applications1. Despite their inexpensive and facile synthesis, the lead-halide perovskites exhibit long carrier lifetimes and diffusion lengths, as well as low electron-hole recombination rates2. In search of the basic cause of these remarkable properties, several models and perspectives have been discussed, including Rashba splitting3,4, ferroelectricity5,6,7, and polaron formation8,9,10. The large polaron model provides a conceptual starting point in understanding the electron-phonon interaction in polar solids8. In LHPs, a polaron theory must take into account the strongly anharmonic atomic displacements that are observed at room temperature11,12,13,14. While marked anharmonicity occurs in some oxide perovskites and other dielectrics15, it is unusual in the crystalline semiconductors that are typically employed in optoelectronic device applications. Indeed, semiconductor lattice dynamics and polarons are typically modeled as harmonic with small perturbative anharmonic corrections16,17. Recently the significance of the strongly anharmonic lattice dynamics has begun to be recognized and considered in LHPs18,19.

In this work we explore the consequence of strong lattice anharmonicity on carrier recombination luminescence. We examine the difference between the absorption and luminescence resonance energies (namely, the emission Stokes shift) as a function of temperature (T). We do so for two typical halide perovskites single crystals: hybrid CH3NH3PbBr3 (MAPbBr3) and all-inorganic CsPbBr3. The emission Stokes shift stems from the fact that, to a good approximation, absorption instantaneously excites an exciton resonance before any possible excited state lattice relaxation can occur, while emission probes the inter-band electronic transition after lattice relaxation. We observe that in contrast to conventional IV, III-V, and II-VI semiconductors, the emission Stokes shift in lead-halide perovskites significantly increases with T. Using classical dielectric solvation theories, originally developed for describing the Stokes shift of molecules in polar liquids, we reproduce the experimental observation. The efficacy of dielectric solvation theory highlights the role of lattice anharmonicity in carrier-lattice interactions in lead-halide perovskites. Yet we nevertheless show that this result is consistent with the ability of an effective harmonic model to describe the emission Stokes shift.

Results

Evolution of lead-halide perovskite optical responses

Figure 1 shows the optical absorption and photoluminescence of single lead bromide perovskite crystals. The absorption coefficient α is calculated from the observed reflectance spectra using a Kramers–Kronig constrained variational analysis. (Supplementary Notes 12 and Supplementary Figures 12). Our absorption and emission data agree with that of Tilchin et al.20 who made a careful study of MAPbBr3 below about 200 K. As previously reported, extrinsic photoluminescence side bands due to shallow traps are observed at low temperatures in MAPbBr320,21. The side bands decrease in magnitude at higher T as thermal de-trapping occurs. Furthermore, near 150 K in MAPbBr3, an abrupt negative jump in the resonance energy occurs as the orthorhombic to tetragonal phase transition is crossed (gray arrow in Fig. 1b). Overall, the spectral features of MAPbBr3 and CsPbBr3 and their temperature evolution are remarkably similar.

Fig. 1
figure1

Absorption and photoluminescence from 4 K to 300 K. a CsPbBr3, b MAPbBr3. Blue lines show absorption coefficient. Red lines show photoluminescence. Absorption coefficient and photoluminescence spectra at each temperature are scaled and offset vertically for display clarity. Gray arrow indicates the orthorhombic-tetragonal phase transition in MAPbBr3

Figure 2a, b show the evolution of the peak energy in optical absorption (blue) and photoluminescence (red) for CsPbBr3 and MAPbBr3, respectively. These results further emphasize the similar behavior of the hybrid and all-inorganic crystals. The resonance energy of the absorption in both materials shifts to the blue as T increases. This blue shift behavior, related to a positive dEg/dT, is opposite to that of common semiconductors such as GaAs22. However, it is commonly observed in the long-studied lead-based semiconductors23,24.

Fig. 2
figure2

Evolution of spectral features of CsPbBr3 and MAPbBr3 with temperature. Absorption and emission resonance energies of CsPbBr3 (a) and MAPbBr3 (b). Absorption and emission linewidths of CsPbBr3 (c) and MAPbBr3 (d). For both materials, blue dots denote the absorption coefficient, α, and red dots denote luminescence energies. Green and gray curves show the linewidth evolution predicted by Eq. (1), in which Eph = 20 meV, and γ0 = 5 meV. For CsPbBr3, A = 32 for absorption and A = 42 for luminescence. For MAPbBr3, A = 47 for both absorption and luminescence

The resonance energy of the photoluminescence (Fig. 2a, b in blue) follows the absorption excitonic resonance up to 50–60 K. At higher temperatures the photoluminescence energy diverges from that of the absorption and becomes almost independent of T, while the absorption excitonic resonance continues to shift blue as it did at lower T. Heuristically, it appears as if the emission no longer follows the band gap physics seen in the instantaneous absorption. We note that the temperature at which the emission behavior breaks from the absorption does not coincide with any known structural phase transition and is well below the tetragonal-orthorhombic phase transition where the organic counter-ions such as in MAPbBr3 are known to freeze out25.

Figure 2c, d show the evolution of the resonance linewidths in optical absorption (blue) and photoluminescence (red) of CsPbBr3 and MAPbBr3, respectively. Both absorption and emission resonance linewidths broaden at higher T. Wright et al.26 showed that emission broadening in MAPbBr3 can be fit by Eq. (1) at higher T. The first term in Eq. (1), γ0, captures temperature-independent broadening factors, such as static inhomogeneities and the intrinsic zero-temperature width, while the second term describes broadening from interaction with a thermal population of modes of energy Eph where A is a constant prefactor26. The solid curves in Fig. 2c, d show that a phonon energy of about 20 meV reproduces the observed linewidth evolution for both compounds. This observation is in reasonable agreement with that of Wright et al. who observed an activation phonon energy of 15.3 meV (123 cm−1). We assign this energy scale to framework LO phonons as did Wright et al.

$$\gamma = \gamma _0 + \frac{A}{{\exp \left( {\frac{{E_{ph}}}{{kT}}} \right) - 1}}$$
(1)

Both perovskite compounds exhibit similar distributions of framework vibrational modes11,12,13,27. The highest energy optical phonon branch of the lead-bromide lattice occurs at about 20 meV (160 cm−1)28,29. These modes involve predominantly halide octahedral motion12,27. Thus we observe the somewhat expected fact that linewidth broadening shows activated behavior due to carrier coupling to LO phonons.

Dynamic emission Stokes shifts and dielectric solvation

Figure 3a shows the evolution of the emission Stokes shift with temperature for CsPbBr3 (green dots) and MAPbBr3 (blue dots). Below about 50 K the emission Stokes shift is weakly dependent on temperature, and decreases as T increases. This type of Stokes-shifted luminescence is typically produced by potential fluctuations, such as compositional disorder, defect sites, and surface states, which allow relaxation and localization into trap sites before radiative recombination30. The influence of such extrinsic fluctuations in the emission Stokes shift decreases at higher temperature as detrapping occurs.

Fig. 3
figure3

Temperature dependent emission Stokes shift and dielectric response. a Emission Stokes shift of CsPbBr3 (green squares) and MAPbBr3 (blue dots). The two emission Stokes shifts are similar despite their differences in resonance energy and phase sequence. Black dotted line shows the naive prediction from the Fan Eq. (6) with constant ε0. The red curve shows the prediction the point charge dielectric solvation model Eq. (2). The magenta curve shows the prediction the point dipole dielectric solvation model Eq. (3). The black curve shows the revised prediction from the Fan model using the same ε0(T) as in the dielectric solvation models. b Temperature dependence dielectric response ε0(T) deduced from spectroscopic data. The insert shows harmonic, Lennard-Jones, and double well schematic potentials. All three curves share the same energy and curvature near the potential minima

From 60 K to 300 K, the emission Stokes shift strongly increases with T. This finding is both surprising and significant. Generally speaking, an intrinsic emission Stokes shift results from lattice relaxation around an optically excited state. For example, in a Frank–Condon picture, the optically excited state prepared by vertical electronic transition subsequently relaxes to lower vibrational states of the excited potential curve, dissipating the excess energy (the Frank–Condon energy, EFC) into phonons. For the simplest model of ground and excited state potential energy curves of displaced harmonic oscillators, the Frank–Condon energy is EFC = Sħω, where S is the Huang-Rhys factor and ħω is the phonon energy31. S itself is a geometrical factor with no temperature dependence. In this simple harmonic model the excitonic absorption and emission linewidths will broaden as T increases, but the emission Stokes shift is independent of T. This model, often applied to localized states, clearly does not describe our data.

We now seek to understand the anomalous temperature dependence of the emission Stokes shift. Some temperature dependence should come from the T dependence of the static dielectric constant ε0. Surprisingly, our observed emission Stokes shift is similar to that measured during solvent relaxation around luminescing molecules in polar liquids32,33. When a solute molecule is optically excited in a polar solvent, the solvent molecules will rearrange in response to the altered electrostatic configuration of the solute. At low temperatures the solvent is nearly frozen and a small Stokes shift occurs while at higher temperatures, reorientation is facile. The low frequency (static) dielectric constant of a polar liquid thus shows a large increase from low to high temperature. In typical organic dipolar solvents, a dielectric continuum model captures the non-equilibrium solvation around the excited molecule, as described in the Ooshika-Lippert-Mataga (OLM) relation34,35. More general descriptions of this dielectric solvation process exist36, which provide closed-form analytical expressions for the emission Stokes shift \({\mathrm{\Delta }}\tilde E(s)\) in the Laplace domain. Here we utilize such models to describe the long time emission Stokes shift via |∆E(∞) − ∆E(0)|. (Details of the implementation are presented in Supplementary Notes 3-5, Supplementary Figures 38).

The dielectric relaxation around a single point charge is expressed in Eq. (2), where s=, a is the radius of a bounding cavity around the solute molecule, and ε(s) is the dielectric response of the solvent. In this context, the constant a should be no smaller than the excitonic radius. The nature of the luminescing band edge species has been a topic of ongoing discussion20,37. We apply this dielectric solvation framework also to dipolar excitonic species. The dielectric solvation of a single point dipole is expressed in Eq. (3), where p is the dipole moment of the excitonic species and v is the solvation volume, s and ε(s) are the same as in Eq. (2). The dielectric solvation models for free carriers and excitons capture the experimental observations equally well. (Details are presented in Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Figures 6-7).

$${\mathrm{\Delta }}\tilde E\left( s \right) = \frac{1}{s}\left( {\frac{{48}}{\pi }} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}}\frac{1}{a}\left( {1 - \frac{1}{{\varepsilon (s)}}} \right)$$
(2)
$${\mathrm{\Delta }}\tilde E\left( s \right) = \frac{1}{s}\left( {\frac{{8\pi p^2}}{{3v}}} \right)\frac{{\varepsilon \left( s \right) - 1}}{{2\varepsilon \left( s \right) + 1}}$$
(3)
$$\varepsilon \left( s \right) = \varepsilon _\infty + \frac{{\varepsilon _0 - \varepsilon _\infty }}{{1 + s\tau _D}}$$
(4)

A simple description of temperature dependent dielectric response is the Debye dipole relaxation model, expressed in the complex form in Eq. (4). The importance of the difference of the high and low frequency dielectric constants in determining emission Stokes shift is apparent in both the classical Debye model and the solid state Fan model to be discussed below. In Eq. (5) we model the temperature dependence factor in the Debye relaxation, as described in detail in Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Figures 67. Figure 3b shows the low frequency limit dielectric function ε0 obtained by fitting the Eq. (2) and (3) solvation model to the T dependent emission Stokes shift. For both compounds we find that the parameters A = 6.5, Ea = 20 meV, and a = 10 nm reproduce the data in Fig. 3a. The extracted value for Ea agrees well with the Eph that was extracted from the linewidth analysis presented in Fig. 2 following Eq.(1).

$$\varepsilon _0 - \varepsilon _\infty = \frac{A}{{\exp \left( {\frac{{E_a}}{{kT}}} \right) - 1}}$$
(5)

In the dynamics of liquid state processes, it is well-known that the non-equilibrium response of even highly anharmonic systems may be modeled by an effective harmonic model as long as the pertinent fluctuations are Gaussian or if the environment responds in a linear fashion38,39,40. A classical exemplar of this fact is the success of the Marcus theory of electron transfer in polar solvents such as water41,42. Indeed, recent simulations demonstrate that even though the perovskite lattice is highly anharmonic, the relevant nuclear fluctuations are statistically nearly Gaussian. Given these facts, we postulate that an effective harmonic phononic model of the Stokes shift may be constructed, using the strongly temperature-dependent dielectric function as input43.

From polaron theory, Fan derived Eq. (6) for the emission Stokes shift (from the band edge) of recombining free carriers coupled to harmonic LO phonons44,45. Here ELO is the LO phonon energy, and the other symbols have their usual meaning. This model does not consider excitons. This framework works well for GaAs46, CdSe47, CdTe48,49, and other semiconductors at room temperature. In these compounds the emission Stokes shift is just a few meV. Furthermore in such standard cases the static dielectric constant is typically only about 10% larger than the optical dielectric constant50. In contrast, the predicted emission Stokes shift (also in Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Figures 67) for our compounds is large and close to the 60 meV shift we observe; this shift is about three times ELO.

$${\mathrm{\Delta E}} = \left( {\frac{1}{{\varepsilon _\infty }} - \frac{1}{{\varepsilon _0}}} \right)\left( {\sqrt {\frac{{m_e}}{{m_0}}} + \sqrt {\frac{{m_h}}{{m_0}}} } \right)\sqrt {\left| {E_{Ryd}} \right|E_{LO}}$$
(6)

It is useful at this stage to compare the classical dielectric solvation model with the polaron of Eq. (6). In Fig. 3a, the black dashed line shows the naive prediction of Eq. (6) with no temperature dependence. (Parameter values are presented in Supplementary Notes 56, Supplementary Figure 8) The magenta curve shows the prediction of a modified Eq. (6), valid at all temperatures, using the low frequency dielectric response in Eq. (5) (Fig. 3b). No adjustment is made to the electron/hole mass or the Rydberg energy, nor is any further fitting of dielectric function performed. Both the T dependence and the absolute magnitude of the emission Stokes shift are captured within this model. From this we learn that the strong T dependence of the emission Stokes shift is rooted in a thermally activated large change of the low frequency dielectric constant.

This dielectric response is far stronger than in the more conventional semiconductors. Thus the coupling between the moving carrier and lattice is large in these lead-halide perovskites. These perovskites show a T dependent dielectric response that behaves roughly as ε0(T) ~ A×n(T) where A ~ 6 and n is the Bose–Einstein population. In conventional semiconductors the dielectric response is ε0(T) ~ A×T where A ~ 10−4 50. This difference is not due to different LO phonon frequencies or populations. For example the ELO of CdTe (21 meV) is very similar to that of CsPbBr3 and MAPbBr3 (~20 meV). A low ELO and the resulting larger phonon population at higher T does not explain the stronger coupling in lead-halide perovskites.

Polarons form when lattice relaxation around carriers becomes significant51,52. Large polarons help to explain the stabilization and protection of carriers in lead halide perovskites8,9,10. Scattering by LO phonons is thought to limit the mobility of polarons13,53,54. The dielectric response factor (1/ε1/ε0) in Eq. (5) also appears in the Frohlich polaron coupling constant. Our findings suggest that in lead-halide perovskites, the carrier-lattice coupling strength, namely the effective Frohlich coupling constant, is T dependent.

Turning to the structural basis of the dielectric solvation, a large dielectric response emerges from large amplitude, anharmonic nuclear displacements with weak restoring forces. To generate significant dielectric polarization such large displacements are needed. On an anharmonic potential, the dwell time at large nuclear displacement, far away from the low temperature structure, can be dominant. In a heuristic sense this can be visualized by comparing the quadratic, Lennard-Jones, and double-well potential curves shown in the inset of Fig. 3b. These curves have the same harmonic curvature near their potential minima, yet very different displacements and restoring forces at higher potential energies.

Anusca et al. recently described a micellion model in which the rotating MA dipoles organize around a free charge carrier to screen its electric field. In their model, this micellion combines with the standard Frohlich polaron to form a hyperpolaron, which fully accounts for charge carrier screening. While this micellion concept is reminiscent of the solvation-type carrier stabilization we observe, we propose this stabilization has a different structural basis. It is well-known that the MA ions in LHPs are frozen within the orthorhombic phase. The onset of emission Stokes shift take-off occurs at ~60 K, well below the phase transition temperatures. The evolution of emission Stokes shift does not track the structural dynamics of MA rotation, and is almost identical between CsPbBr3 and MAPbBr3. Nevertheless the MA ion, while neither critical nor necessary, may have a secondary role in solvation. The specific nature of the A site cation does have a clear influence on the abruptness of phase transitions, the microwave and radio frequency range dielectric response, and hot carrier relaxation10,55,56,57.

The analysis of both the electronic spectral width and the emission Stokes shift point to significant coupling with the lead-halide framework modes at the top of the phonon dispersion curves (120–160 cm−1). Figure 4a, d present the temperature dependent Raman scattering spectra of CsPbBr3 and MAPbBr3, respectively. Previously we reported their Raman spectra above 80 K11,27. The new measurements reported here extend the T range down to 5 K, well below all structural phase transitions. We observe that the Raman modes broaden and shift as they are thermally populated. This thermal population is directly observed in anti-Stokes Raman scattering in Fig. 4b, d. The mode just below 140 cm−1 becomes thermally populated near 50–60 K, matching the onset of luminescence Stokes shift rise and linewidth broadening discussed above. Also as discussed above, theoretically the perovskite framework LO mode energies fall just below 150 cm−1 at the Brillouin zone center Γ point.

Fig. 4
figure4

Temperature dependent Raman scattering of CsPbBr3 and MAPbBr3. a CsPbBr3. b Anti-Stokes and c Stokes Raman scattering of the CsPbBr3 framework mode just below 150 cm−1. d MAPbBr3. e Anti-Stokes and f Stokes Raman scattering of the MAPbBr3 framework modes just below 150 cm−1. Insets in b and e show the corresponding spectral datasets as color plots

Incipient phonon anharmonicity

The Stokes Raman scattering provides further information about phonon lifetime broadening and the incipient anharmonicity, namely latent nuclear motions that sample an anharmonic potential region as T increases. Figure 4c, f show that the vibrational modes near 140 cm−1 are already significantly broadened near 50 K. In contrast, at the same temperature, the modes at lower frequencies remain sharper, as shown in Fig. 4a, d. In a Lorentz oscillator model, the Raman mode becomes broad and asymmetric when the damping term is approximately the same magnitude as the resonance energy. (Details are presented in Supplementary Note 7 and Supplementary Figures 910) Such modes are essentially overdamped oscillators; their quantized motion is not firmly established. The broadening of these modes, at the onset temperature of the emission Stokes shift rise, indicates the significance of the incipient lattice anharmonicity. Indeed, local polar lattice fluctuations emerging from large amplitude anharmonic nuclear motions have been reported recently11,14. Even at liquid nitrogen temperatures, nuclear motion samples the non-harmonic regions of the potential surface leading to lifetime broadening11. Broadening and strong anharmonicity have also been observed in the far IR spectra of MAPbBr3 at room temperature13. Large amplitude lead-halide octahedral lattice modes responding to photo-generated charge carriers have also been reported on the picosecond to sub-picosecond time scale9,58,59.

At low T LHP lattice motions are mostly harmonic and the emission Stokes shift is small. At higher T the anharmonic portion of the potential surface is explored and the emission Stokes shift is large. In more conventional semiconductors, anharmonicity is treated as a perturbative correction to the harmonic approximation, and Raman spectra remain sharp at higher T17. In our compounds anharmonicity is well beyond the perturbative regime. The dielectric solvation theory, which we use does not assume a quantized harmonic picture for nuclear motions. Yet note that these equations only consider the “external solvent” polarization in the solid outside the cavity of the luminescing exciton. The question of “inner polarization” inside the exciton certainly merits further investigation.

In summary, we report that luminescing band edge carriers in CsPbBr3 and MAPbBr3 are stabilized by dielectric response from thermally-activated anharmonic perovskite framework modes. This results in a strongly temperature-dependent emission Stokes shift, whose onset is far below the structural phase transitions. The effective carrier-lattice coupling strength increases at higher temperatures. This behavior is anomalous compared with more conventional crystalline semiconductors. A thermally-activated Debye liquid dielectric solvation model provides insight into this process, and can be used to predict the temperature dependence, as can an effective polaron model for coupling to LO phonons. Vibrational Raman spectra and prior theoretical modeling indicate the dielectric solvation is provided by the halide group modes near 20 meV. A similar dielectric response is observed in both CsPbBr3 and MAPbBr3. Thus a large dielectric response from strongly anharmonic lattice dynamics is intrinsic to the lead halide perovskite family. Coupling to the orientational dynamics of MA ion is not the dominant effect in carrier recombination luminescence.

Methods

Single crystal synthesis

High quality, mm-sized single crystals of MAPbBr3 and CsPbBr3 were synthesized11,27. Briefly, CH3NH2 (40% w/w Alfa Aesar) and HBr (48% Acros) were mixed to prepare CH3NH3Br. PbBr2 (98% Sigma-Aldrich) and CH3NH3Br were then dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide at 1:1 ratio to form 1 M solution. Single crystals of MA were grown by diffusion of isopropyl alcohol vapor into the solution. Single crystals of Cs were grown by diffusion of n-propyl alcohol vapor into a 30 mM solution of 1:1 lead bromide (98%, Sigma-Aldrich) and cesium bromide (99% metal basis, Alfa Aesar) in N,N- dimethylformamide.

Low temperature optical measurements

Single crystals were mounted onto the cold finger of an optical cryostat. The sample chamber was pumped down to the order of 10−5 torr, before cooling down with liquid Helium.

Optical reflectance spectroscopy

A quartz-tungsten-halogen lamp was used as the white light source. The white light passed through a 100-micron pinhole and was collimated. The white light beam was then sent into an inverted microscope, and imaged onto the back aperture of a ×40 long working distance objective with NA = 0.6. The objective focused the beam onto samples at normal incidence. The reflected light was collected by the same objective and imaged onto the entrance slit of a spectrograph. A 150 grooves/mm grating dispersed the reflected light on a thermoelectrically cooled CCD detector. For each measurement, reflectance of fused silica was collected under the same conditions, which was used as a reference60.

Photoluminescence spectroscopy

Photoluminescence was excited with the 458 nm line of an Ar ion laser. The excitation laser was focused on samples using a ×40 objective with NA = 0.6. Photoluminescence was collected by the same objective, imaged onto the spectrograph entrance slit, and dispersed by a 150 grooves/mm grating on the CCD detector. Typical excitation power was about 0.2 W/cm2 at low temperatures (T < 200 K), and about 1 W/cm2 at higher temperatures (T > 200 K).

Low-frequency Raman spectroscopy

The 633 nm line of a Helium-Neon laser was used as the Raman excitation. Spurious light in the laser beam was rejected by a 90/10 volume holographic grating (VHG) beam splitter. The beam was coupled into a home-built inverted microscope, and focused on samples with a ×40 objective with NA = 0.6. The Raman scattered light was collected by the same objective. Rayleigh scattered light was rejected first by the 90/10 VHG beam splitter, and then by two VHG notch filters. Each notch filter has OD > 4 rejection, and a spectral cutoff full width half maximum about 7 cm−1 around the 633 nm laser line. After passing through the VHG filters, the Raman signal was spatially filtered, imaged onto the entrance slit of a spectrograph, dispersed by a 1800 grooves/mm grating onto a liquid nitrogen cooled Si CCD detector. Spectral collection covered anti-Stokes and Stokes region from −200 to 200 cm−1. The anti-Stokes to Stokes ratio was used to calculate sample spot temperature as expected from the Bose–Einstein distribution. The cryostat temperature control and readout were found to be accurate within ±1 K. Data analysis was done using the Python programming language. Both reflectance and photoluminescence data was fit with the lmfit package61.

Code availability

Custom computer codes used in this work are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. 1.

    Stranks, S. D. & Snaith, H. J. Metal-halide perovskites for photovoltaic and light-emitting devices. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 391 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Brenner, T. M., Egger, D. A., Kronik, L., Hodes, G. & Cahen, D. Hybrid organic—inorganic perovskites: low-cost semiconductors with intriguing charge-transport properties. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 15007 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zheng, F., Tan, L. Z., Liu, S. & Rappe, A. M. Rashba spin–orbit coupling enhanced carrier lifetime in CH3NH3PbI3. Nano Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01854 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Isarov, M. et al. Rashba effect in a single colloidal CsPbBr3 perovskite nanocrystal detected by magneto-optical measurements. Nano. Lett. 17, 5020–5026 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rakita, Y. et al. Tetragonal CH3NH3PbI3 is ferroelectric. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E5504–E5512 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rakita, Y. et al. CH3NH3PbBr3 is not pyroelectric, excluding ferroelectric-enhanced photovoltaic performance. APL Mater. 4, 51101 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Frost, J. M., Butler, K. T. & Walsh, A. Molecular ferroelectric contributions to anomalous hysteresis in hybrid perovskite solar cells. APL Mater. 2, 81506 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zhu, X.-Y. & Podzorov, V. Charge carriers in hybrid organic–inorganic lead halide perovskites might be protected as large polarons. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 4758–4761 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Miyata, K. et al. Large polarons in lead halide perovskites. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701217 (2017).

  10. 10.

    Anusca, I. et al. Dielectric response: answer to many questions in the methylammonium lead halide solar cell absorbers. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1700600 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yaffe, O. et al. Local polar fluctuations in lead halide perovskite crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 136001 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Leguy, A. M. A. et al. Dynamic disorder, phonon lifetimes, and the assignment of modes to the vibrational spectra of methylammonium lead halide perovskites. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 27051–27066 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sendner, M. et al. Optical phonons in methylammonium lead halide perovskites and implications for charge transport. Mater. Horiz. 3, 613–620 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Guo, P. et al. Polar fluctuations in metal halide perovskites uncovered by acoustic phonon anomalies. ACS Energy Lett. 2463–2469. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00790 (2017).

  15. 15.

    Scott, J. F. Soft-mode spectroscopy: experimental studies of structural phase transitions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 83–128 (1974).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ashcroft, N. W. & Mermin, N. D. Solid State Physics. (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976).

  17. 17.

    Cowley, R. A. Anharmonic crystals. Rep. Prog. Phys. 31, 123 (1968).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Miyata, K. & Zhu, X.-Y. Ferroelectric large polarons. Nat. Mater. 17, 379–381 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Katan, C., Mohite, A. D. & Even, J. Entropy in halide perovskites. Nat. Mater. 17, 377–379 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tilchin, J. et al. Hydrogen-like Wannier–Mott excitons in single crystal of methylammonium lead bromide perovskite. ACS Nano 10, 6363–6371 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lozhkina, O. A. et al. Low inhomogeneous broadening of excitonic resonance in MAPbBr 3 single crystals. J. Phy. Chem. Lett. 302–305. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02979 (2018).

  22. 22.

    Klingshirn, C. F. Semiconductor Optics. 178, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012).

  23. 23.

    Tauber, R. N., Machonis, A. A. & Cadoff, I. B. Thermal and optical energy gaps in PbTe. J. Appl. Phys. 37, 4855–4860 (1966).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gibbs, Z. M. et al. Temperature dependent band gap in PbX (X = S, Se, Te). Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 262109 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Baikie, T. et al. A combined single crystal neutron/X-ray diffraction and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance study of the hybrid perovskites CH3NH3PbX3 (X = I, Br and Cl). J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 9298–9307 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wright, A. D. et al. Electron–phonon coupling in hybrid lead halide perovskites. Nat. Commun. 7, 11755 (2016).

  27. 27.

    Guo, Y. et al. Interplay between organic cations and inorganic framework and incommensurability in hybrid lead-halide perovskite CH3NH3PbBr3. Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 42401 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Huang, L. & Lambrecht, W. R. L. Lattice dynamics in perovskite halides CsSnX3 with X = I, Br, Cl. Phys. Rev. B 90, 195201 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    da Silva, E. L., Skelton, J. M., Parker, S. C. & Walsh, A. Phase stability and transformations in the halide perovskite CsSnI3. Phys. Rev. B 91, 144107 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Yang, F., Wilkinson, M., Austin, E. J. & O’Donnell, K. P. Origin of the Stokes shift: A geometrical model of exciton spectra in 2D semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 323–326 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    de Jong, M., Seijo, L., Meijerink, A. & Rabouw, F. T. Resolving the ambiguity in the relation between Stokes shift and Huang-Rhys parameter. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 16959–16969 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Arzhantsev, S., Jin, H., Baker, G. A. & Maroncelli, M. Measurements of the complete solvation response in ionic liquids. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 4978–4989 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kashyap, H. K. & Biswas, R. Stokes shift dynamics in ionic liquids: temperature dependence. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 16811–16823 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Mataga, N., Kaifu, Y. & Koizumi, M. The solvent effect on fluorescence spectrum, change of solute-solvent interaction during the lifetime of excited solute molecule. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 28, 690–691 (1955).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bagchi, B., Oxtoby, D. W. & Fleming, G. R. Theory of the time development of the stokes shift in polar media. Chem. Phys. 86, 257–267 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Song, X., Chandler, D. & Marcus, R. A. Gaussian field model of dielectric solvation dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 11954–11959 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Davies, C. L. et al. Bimolecular recombination in methylammonium lead triiodide perovskite is an inverse absorption process. Nat. Commun. 9, 293 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Bader, J. S., Kuharski, R. A. & Chandler, D. Role of nuclear tunneling in aqueous ferrous–ferric electron transfer. J. Chem. Phys. 93, 230–236 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bader, J. S. & Chandler, D. Computer simulation of photochemically induced electron transfer. Chem. Phys. Lett. 157, 501–504 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hwang, J. K. & Warshel, A. Microscopic examination of free-energy relationships for electron transfer in polar solvents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 715–720 (1987).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Marcus, R. A. Electron transfer reactions in chemistry. Theory Exp. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 599–610 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kuharski, R. A. et al. Molecular model for aqueous ferrous–ferric electron transfer. J. Chem. Phys. 89, 3248–3257 (1988).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Mayers, M. Z., Tan, L. Z., Egger, D. A., Rappe, A. M. & Reichman, D. R. How lattice and charge fluctuations control carrier dynamics in halide perovskites. Nano. Lett. 18, 8041–8046 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ullrich, B., Singh, A. K., Barik, P., Xi, H. & Bhowmick, M. Inherent photoluminescence Stokes shift in GaAs. Opt. Lett. 40, 2580–2583 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Fan, H.Y. Photon-Electron Interaction, Crystals Without Fields. In: Genzel L. (eds.) Light and Matter Ia/Licht und Materie Ia. Encyclopedia of Physics/Handbuch der Physik, Vol. 5/25/2/2a. pp. 157–233 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1967).

  46. 46.

    Sasaki, C. et al. Temperature dependence of Stokes shift in InxGa1−xN epitaxial layers. J. Appl. Phys. 93, 1642–1646 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Liptay, T. J., Marshall, L. F., Rao, P. S., Ram, R. J. & Bawendi, M. G. Anomalous Stokes shift in CdSe nanocrystals. Phys. Rev. B 76, 155314 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Morikawa, K. & Yamaka, E. Temperature dependence of the electroluminescence in CdTe diodes. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 7, 243 (1968).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Watanabe, T., Takahashi, K., Shimura, K. & Kim, D. Influence of carrier localization at the core/shell interface on the temperature dependence of the Stokes shift and the photoluminescence decay time in CdTe/CdS type-II quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 96, 35305 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Strzalkowski, I., Joshi, S. & Crowell, C. R. Dielectric constant and its temperature dependence for GaAs, CdTe, and ZnSe. Appl. Phys. Lett. 28, 350–352 (1976).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Mott, N. F. & Stoneham, A. M. The lifetime of electrons, holes and excitons before self-trapping. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 10, 3391 (1977).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Stoneham, A. M. et al. Trapping, self-trapping and the polaron family. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 255208 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Frost, J. M. Calculating polaron mobility in halide perovskites. Phys. Rev. B 96, 195202 (2017).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Zhang, M., Zhang, X., Huang, L.-Y., Lin, H.-Q. & Lu, G. Charge transport in hybrid halide perovskites. Phys. Rev. B 96, 195203 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Poglitsch, A. & Weber, D. Dynamic disorder in methylammoniumtrihalogenoplumbates (II) observed by millimeter‐wave spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 87, 6373 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Onoda-Yamamuro, N., Matsuo, T. & Suga, H. Dielectric study of CH3NH3PbX3 (X = Cl, Br, I). J. Phys. Chem. Solids 53, 935–939 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Zhu, H. et al. Screening in crystalline liquids protects energetic carriers in hybrid perovskites. Science 353, 1409–1413 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Wu, X. et al. Light-induced picosecond rotational disordering of the inorganic sublattice in hybrid perovskites. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602388 (2017).

  59. 59.

    Batignani, G. et al. Probing femtosecond lattice displacement upon photo-carrier generation in lead halide perovskite. Nat. Commun. 9, 1971 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Malitson, I. H. Interspecimen comparison of the refractive index of fused silica. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 1205–1209 (1965).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Newville, M., Stensitzki, T., Allen, D. B. & Ingargiola, A. LMFIT: non-linear least-square minimization and curve-fitting for python. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11813 (2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Y.G. and L.E.B. acknowledge financial support from the Keck Foundation. O.Y. acknowledges funding by the FP7 People program under the project Marie Curie Grant No. IOF-622653. D.R.R acknowledges support from the NSF (NSF-CHE 1464802). Funding for this research was provided by the Center for Precision Assembly of Superstratic and Superatomic Solids, an NSF MRSEC (Award Number DMR-1420634). L.E.B. thanks Vasili Perebinos for informative and insightful discussion.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.G., O.Y. and L.E.B. conceived the project. T.D.H. synthesized the samples under the supervision of J.S.O. Y.G. and O.Y. carried out optical measurements and data analysis. Y.G. and D.R.R. carried out theoretical analysis and modeling. Y.G., O.Y., D.R.R. and L.E.B. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed and contributed to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis E. Brus.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Y., Yaffe, O., Hull, T.D. et al. Dynamic emission Stokes shift and liquid-like dielectric solvation of band edge carriers in lead-halide perovskites. Nat Commun 10, 1175 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09057-5

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing