Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Bioengineered bacterial vesicles as biological nano-heaters for optoacoustic imaging


Advances in genetic engineering have enabled the use of bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) to deliver vaccines, drugs and immunotherapy agents, as a strategy to circumvent biocompatibility and large-scale production issues associated with synthetic nanomaterials. We investigate bioengineered OMVs for contrast enhancement in optoacoustic (photoacoustic) imaging. We produce OMVs encapsulating biopolymer-melanin (OMVMel) using a bacterial strain expressing a tyrosinase transgene. Our results show that upon near-infrared light irradiation, OMVMel generates strong optoacoustic signals appropriate for imaging applications. In addition, we show that OMVMel builds up intense heat from the absorbed laser energy and mediates photothermal effects both in vitro and in vivo. Using multispectral optoacoustic tomography, we noninvasively monitor the spatio-temporal, tumour-associated OMVMel distribution in vivo. This work points to the use of bioengineered vesicles as potent alternatives to synthetic particles more commonly employed for optoacoustic imaging, with the potential to enable both image enhancement and photothermal applications.


A broad range of synthetic nanoparticles made up of inorganic and organic materials such as quantum dots, Au, Ag, Cu and polymeric particles have been reported for diagnostic and therapeutic functionality1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. Despite the appreciable success of synthetic nanomaterials for efficient disease diagnosis and therapy in preclinical trials, only a few synthetic agents have entered clinical trials. Factors that limit clinical dissemination of most synthetic nanomaterials include challenges involving low biocompatibility, material-associated toxicity, poor clearance and high cost of pilot scale production9,10. To overcome the technical limitations associated with synthetic nanomaterials, researchers in the last decade have shown keen interest in the development of cell-derived, nano-sized vesicles as carrier systems11. Moreover, bioengineering and bioprocessing tools have provided scalable and robust platforms for manufacturing such cells and vesicles to meet clinical and commercial needs.

Cell membrane-derived nano-vesicles have been explored with prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, including mammalian cell-derived exosomes12, erythrocyte-derived camouflaged particles13, yeast vacuoles14, bacterially derived minicells15 and outer membrane vesicles (OMVs)16,17. Exosome-based systems show low stability and yield and require expensive purification and production methods. Erythrocyte-derived particles exhibit excellent biocompatibility because they are taken from the target organism, but their lack of a nucleus means that they cannot be genetically engineered to carry biologically derived cargo. Yeast vacuoles show good ability to penetrate tissues and are easy to scale up, but their long-term stability, immunogenicity and toxicity remain to be clarified. Bacterial OMVs show several advantages as nanocarriers since they attain a rigid membrane, which imparts stability and reduces leakage in systemic circulation. Moreover, OMVs are safe because they are acellular and can be used in vivo in very small quantities. Importantly, OMVs can be customised to carry desired payloads and can easily be produced in large quantities using fermentation and purification procedures previously optimised on a pilot scale. This is particularly beneficial when considering that bacteria can easily be modified genetically to produce desired agents useful in vaccination, bio-sensing, bio-imaging, therapy or targeted delivery; and these agents can be localised specifically in membrane-derived vesicles16,17,18,19,20.

In this work we consider OMVs a platform for optoacoustic applications, which can be employed for contrast-enhancement and therapeutic applications. Multi-spectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that illuminates tissue at many near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths and performs spectral detection of endogenous chromophores based on the absorption spectrum. The method has been shown capable to detect melanin, oxygenated and deoxygenated haemoglobin and lipids or externally administered photo-absorbing synthetic probes, within depths of several millimetres to centimetres21,22,23,24. A major challenge for implementing MSOT in basic research and clinical procedures is identifying moieties that enable contrast enhancement for improving detection of particular pathophysiological conditions. Melanin is found naturally in many living organisms and it absorbs strongly in the visible and NIR window25. Optimised as a natural absorber of light, melanin is therefore well suited for enhancing the contrast for optoacoustic imaging26,27. In addition, melanin has high photothermal conversion efficiency and is consequently highly suitable for photothermal therapy, i.e., treatment whereby light illumination of tissue that selectively contains melanin induces local heating that kills tumour cells28. The ability of melanin to serve both as a contrast enhancement and a therapeutic agent makes it appropriate for theranostics, i.e., the combination of diagnostics and therapeutics in a single agent. In that respect, melanin could not only provide contrast and improve the detection abilities for optoacoustic imaging, but also enable local therapy which can be monitored by optoacoustic imaging29. Harnessing the contrast enhancement and theranostic potential of melanin, however, requires overcoming its low solubility, which necessitates treatment with alkaline solvents and conjugation with hydrophilic polymers27,28. Such processing steps are costly and make scale up challenging. Therefore, developing a biological approach to package melanin inside cell membrane-derived nanocarriers would be of great benefit for diagnosis and therapy.

We hypothesise that we can package naturally occurring melanin into bacterial OMVs to create a biocompatible nanomaterial (OMVMel) for efficiently delivering the photoabsorber to target tissues for optoacoustic imaging and theranostic applications. In order to avoid systemic side effects due to bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS), we use an Escherichia coli strain previously modified to be less endotoxic through inactivation of the msbB gene (to give OMVΔmsbB)16, and we further engineer it to overexpress tyrosinase, which produces melanin that is passively incorporated into the cytosol and membrane of OMVΔmsbB (to give OMVMel). We test the ability of MSOT to detect OMVMel in phantoms and in vivo, and the vesicles generate strong MSOT signals in both cases. Systemically administered OMVs passively target and accumulate in tumour tissue via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. We examine the ability of OMVMel to produce local heating in vitro after irradiation with a pulsed NIR light source, and we confirm that this local heating retards tumour growth in vivo (photothermal treatment). Furthermore, we show that a single dose of OMVMel inhibits tumour growth while triggering only mild, short-term systemic inflammation. These results establish OMVMel as a promising agent for optoacoustic imaging and potentially theranostics, even suggesting that OMVs may be able to inhibit tumour growth through synergy of photothermal effects and cytokine-mediated antitumour responses17. In future, it may be possible to replace the melanin with other naturally derived theranostic cargos to generate a flexible platform for imaging-based theranostic applications against cancer and other diseases.


OMV isolation, purification, and characterisation

Figure 1 illustrates our approach to produce OMVMel. We started with a strain of E. coli K12 (derived from W3110) carrying an inactivated msbB gene, which leads to underacetylated and therefore much less endotoxic lipid A, an integral component of LPS16,30,31. We further engineered the bacteria to express Rhizobium etli tyrosinase32, which is the rate-limiting enzyme in melanin biosynthesis. The idea was that melanin would be produced and would accumulate in the cytosol and periplasmic space, then it would be packaged into membrane and cytosol of OMVs that would be shed into the culture medium. OMVs were purified from bacteria carrying the tyrosinase gene (OMVMel), from the parental bacteria with an inactivated msbB gene (OMVΔmsbB), and from wild-type bacteria (OMVWT) through multiple centrifugation steps. Figure 2a shows that the buffer containing isolated OMVMel appeared black, whereas OMVWT appeared light brown. Figure 2b, c shows OMV characterisation in terms of size and morphology. As evident from hydrodynamic size and transmission electron microscope analysis, most vesicles were in the range of 20–100 nm and had a uniform circular, bilayer morphology. Their sub-micron size makes the OMVs suitable for in vivo optoacoustic imaging of tumours. The colour difference between wild-type and melanin-containing vesicles was evident in transmission electron micrographs. OMVWT was monitored after negative staining, whereas OMVMel was visible without staining.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of OMVMel generation. A schematic representation of OMVMel purified after vesiculation from the parental bacteria. OMV, outer membrane vesicle

Fig. 2
figure 2

Outer membrane vesicle (OMV) purification and characterisation. a Purified form of OMVWT and OMVMel, isolated from parental bacteria by ultrafiltration and ultracentrifugation. b Dynamic light-scattering analysis of OMVs confirmed a particle size distribution in the range of 20 to 100 nm. c Transmission electron micrograph showing the nano-sized (<100 nm), bilayered, circular morphology of OMVWT and OMVMel. Scale bars, 100 nm. d Mean optoacoustic intensity (coloured line) as a function of wavelength for OMVWT and OMVMel

We tested whether the concentrated melanin inside OMVMel could give a strong MSOT signal. Figure 2d shows that phantoms of OMVMel gave ~7-fold stronger optoacoustic signal than phantoms of OMVWT after illumination at 750 nm. The absorption spectrum of OMVMel resembled that of pure melanin33, consistent with the idea that OMVMel contains encapsulated melanin. These results suggest that OMVMel can be used as an MSOT imaging probe, such as for basic studies of tumour biology, diagnostic studies and longitudinal monitoring of treatment response.

Photothermal heating efficiency and cytotoxicity of OMVMel

Melanin shows promise not only for disease research and diagnosis, but also for treatment. Irradiating the biopolymer can trigger local heating that kills diseased tissue through photothermal ablation or photothermal therapy28,34. We therefore asked whether the melanin packaged within OMVMel shows potential to act as a nanoheater for photothermal therapy. Figure 3a shows that irradiating a suspension of OMVMel led to much greater heating than irradiating OMVWT or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and that the rate of temperature increase was dependent on the concentration of melanin-carrying vesicles. Figure 3b shows that OMVMel solutions increased by >10 °C from room temperature after only 2 min of laser irradiation, and that this heating effect persisted. This performance is promising, given preclinical studies showing that heating cancer cells to 42–50 °C for more than 5 min can be lethal35,36,37. Figure 3c shows that the experimentally determined absorption coefficient of OMVMel was 0.75 cm−1 (absorbance of 0.31 OD) at 750 nm. This is an order of magnitude greater than the absorption coefficient of tissue (approximately 0.1 cm−1)33, suggesting that photothermal effects can be induced selectively where OMVMel deposits and not in neighbouring tissue. Figure 3d shows that OMVMel exhibits photothermal conversion efficiency of 18.65% with a quantity of OMVMel equivalent to approximately 150 µg of OMVWT (see Methods); this efficiency depends on melanin’s concentration and molar absorptivity1,2,38,39. To test the potential for photothermal therapy in living cells, we exposed 4T1 breast cancer cultures to OMVMel, then irradiated the treated cells for several minutes with a tuneable nanosecond-pulsed laser operating from 730 nm to 830 nm. The total laser operating time was 6 min, which included both wavelength tuning and irradiation time. Figure 3e shows that the number of apoptotic cells, which appeared red because of their ability to bind ethidium homodimer-1, was much greater in cultures treated with OMVMel than in cultures untreated or treated with OMVWT.

Fig. 3
figure 3

In vitro photothermal therapy using OMVMel. a Temperature curves of OMVMel, OMVWT and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) during exposure to 750 nm light (650 mW cm−2) over a period of 10 min. OMV, outer membrane vesicle. b Plot of temperature change (ΔT) over a period of 10 min as a function of OMVMel concentration. c Absorbance spectra of OMVMel (~150 µg) solution obtained using a spectrometer. d Plot of time as a function of −ln(θ) for the raw data and a linear fit during cooling after 10 min of irradiation as described for a. e Fluorescence images of 4T1 cells treated with PBS, OMVWT or OMVMel, then irradiated with a laser as described in the Methods. Viable cells were stained green with calcein-acetoxymethyl (AM), while dead cells were stained red with ethidium homodimer-1 (EthD-1). Scale bars, 20 µm

In vivo optoacoustic imaging of OMVMel

As a first step towards validating the ability of OMVMel to accumulate in tumours in vivo, we injected mice carrying subcutaneous 4T1 mouse mammary gland tumours with PBS, OMVWT or OMVMel via the tail vein. Figure 4a shows time-dependent accumulation of OMVMel in tumour tissue using optoacoustic imaging. At 3 h after injection, unmixed melanin signal was much higher in animals treated with OMVMel than in other animals. This strong optoacoustic signal was evident even at 24 h after injection, suggesting persistence in the circulation and, potentially, accumulation in tumours. Next, we defined regions of interest within tumours and quantified levels of melanin present. Figure 4b clearly indicates accumulation of OMVMel in tumours via the EPR effect. Melanin signal was higher at 3 h than at 24 h after injection, indicating that some particles may undergo systemic clearance via the tumour vasculature. Given the overlap in absorption spectra between melanin and deoxyhaemoglobin, we wanted to confirm the presence of melanin based on spectral analysis. The spectral signature of deoxyhaemoglobin and melanin show lower absorption with increasing wavelength and are not orthogonal to each other. Thus, identification of melanin in tumours is a major challenge, in large part because tumours tends to be hypoxic relative to normal tissue, and hence deoxyhaemoglobin concentration is relatively high. Figure 4c, d compares the absorption spectra in the regions of interest in tumours from animals treated with PBS or OMVMel. As wavelength increased from 800 to 900 nm, optoacoustic signal decreased sharply (indicated with a black line) in the OMVMel group but remained constant in the PBS group. These results are consistent with the idea that the spectra obtained from OMVMel-treated tumours are a combination of deoxyhaemoglobin and melanin spectra, whereas the spectra from PBS-treated controls reflect primarily deoxyhaemoglobin, for which the optoacoustic signal has been shown to remain constant between 800 and 900 nm33. In addition, the biodistribution of OMVMel in a mouse was monitored during 120 min after intravenous injection (we did not examine non-tumour biodistribution over longer periods because we had to ensure that the animal did not move between measurements, and ethical considerations limited how long we could maintain the animal anaesthetised inside the MSOT set-up). During this 2 h period, the MSOT signal gradually increased in the tumour, tumour-adjacent region just below the skin as well as in liver and kidney (Supplementary Figure 1a). This provides further evidence that melanin is the primary source of contrast in our MSOT set-up, and it suggests that OMVMel circulates and distributes in various organs. At the same time, the melanin signal in tumours rose consistently even from early time points (Supplementary Figure 1b) and our experiments at 3 and 24 h (Fig. 4a) showed appreciable signal in tumours. This persistent signal in the tumour suggests passive targeting ability of OMVMel, likely due to nanometre size that ensures penetration through the leaky blood vessels and due to EPR effects in the tumour region.

Fig. 4
figure 4

In vivo multi-spectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) imaging. a 4T1 tumour-bearing mice were given a single injection of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (n = 3) or 150 µg of OMVWT (n = 4) or OMVMel (n = 4) via the tail vein. Tumour-specific accumulation over time was monitored using a commercially available preclinical MSOT system. Scale bar, 4 mm. OMV, outer membrane vesicle. b Melanin concentration in the tumour was measured over time. A single mean value was calculated over the tumour region. Mean values and error bars were expressed as mean ± SD, inter-group differences were assessed for significance using the paired t-test compared to control and differences were considered significant if ***p < 0.001. c, d Optoacoustic spectra from the tumour region of animals treated with c PBS or d OMVMel

In vivo photothermal therapy

To assess the potential of OMVMel for cancer treatment, we conducted photothermal experiments on nude mice bearing 4T1 tumours. Animals were randomly allocated to receive PBS intravenously or to receive OMVWT or OMVMel intravenously or intratumourally. At 3 h after administration, animals were exposed (or not) to a continuous wave laser (1.5 W cm−2, 800 nm) for 6 min. Tumour growth rate and animal body weight were recorded at fixed intervals. As can be seen in Fig. 5a, the tumour surface temperature in the laser-exposed area in animals treated intratumourally with OMVMel reached as high as 56 °C, compared to 47 °C in animals treated intravenously with OMVMel and 39 °C with PBS. This likely reflects much more efficient delivery of OMVMel to tumours when they are injected directly. The much greater heating observed with intratumoural administration of OMVMel was associated with superior therapeutic effect: in animals treated intratumourally and exposed to the laser, most tumour tissue appeared necrotic and the tumour mass nearly disappeared; in animals treated intravenously, tumour growth was reduced by approximately 43% as shown in Fig. 5b. No antitumour effects were observed in animals treated with PBS or in animals treated with OMVs in the absence of laser exposure. Throughout these phototherapy experiments, animals in all groups appeared normal and showed stable body weight (Fig. 5c), with no overt signs of toxicity. Our results suggest that OMVMel can be used for in vivo optoacoustic imaging and phototherapy.

Fig. 5
figure 5

In vivo photothermal therapy. a Infrared (IR) thermal images of 4T1 tumour-bearing mice before and after laser irradiation (1.5 W cm−2, 800 nm, 6 min). Before irradiation, animals were injected with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) intravenously or with OMVMel or OMVWT intravenously (i.v.) or intratumourally (i.t.). b Tumour growth curves. Representative images of dissected tumours are also shown, except for OMVMel (i.t.) + L, which had nearly disappeared. Mean values and error bars are presented as mean ± SD, inter-group differences were assessed for significance using the paired t-test compared to control (***p < 0.001 vs. PBS with laser treatment; n= 4). c Body weight of all animals was recorded during each treatment, with all animals appearing healthy throughout the study based on eating and behaviour. OMV, outer membrane vesicle; L, laser irradiation

In vivo safety and immune responses

To confirm the in vivo safety of OMVs for photothermal therapy, we investigated whether single-dose systemic injection of PBS or OMVs (OMVWT, OMVΔmsbB or OMVMel) would stimulate the immune system in C57BL/6 mice. The dose of OMVs was 75 µg, similar to the photothermal therapy experiment. Then, levels of the cytokines tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) in serum were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Cytokine levels were evaluated at 2 and 24 h in order to monitor early and delayed immune responses16. All three types of OMVs increased serum levels of the three cytokines at 2 h, with OMVWT triggering the greatest increases (Supplementary Figure 2a). In all cases, cytokine levels decreased close to baseline by 24 h. In addition, histology of heart, liver, spleen and kidney at 24 h after injection did not indicate significant organ damage under these treatment conditions (Supplementary Figure 2b). No animal mortality occurred in any of the groups. These results suggest that the underacylated LPS on OMVΔmsbB and OMVMel induce milder systemic inflammation than the intact LPS on OMVWT, and that the modified OMVs are well tolerated upon systemic administration.


Here we describe melanin-containing OMVs as a biocompatible contrast agent that may allow longitudinal imaging of tumours in vivo using optoacoustics, which offers several advantages over fluorescence methods for cancer monitoring. Fluorescence imaging does not offer good spatial resolution deeper than 0.5 mm because tissue strongly scatters light40,41,42,43. Optoacoustics, in contrast, generates optical images by recording the acoustic waves, which tissue does not strongly scatter21,44. In addition to offering images of higher resolution from deeper-lying tissue, optoacoustics is better suited than fluorescence for theranostics. Fluorescent agents cannot optimally emit fluorescence and heat target tissue locally, because the two processes of fluorescence and nonradioactive decay compete with each other. In the case of optoacoustics, contrast agents can be optimised for photothermal conversion efficiency, such that they simultaneously give strong acoustic signal while also converting light energy to heat.

We showed with transmission electron microscopy that naturally produced OMVs was able to effectively package melanin expressed from a transgene. Melanin was presumably encapsulated into OMVs together with various cytosolic-, periplasmic- or membrane-bound components during vesicle generation and secretion, though the exact mechanism for melanin packaging is not known45,46. Importantly, the generated OMVMel particles remained sub-micrometre in size, with intact circular morphology, which indeed is similar to previously reported bioengineered OMVs under study for cancer-specific drug delivery16. OMVMel show good dispersion properties and small particle size, allowing them to remain in circulation for an extended time, which facilitates passive accumulation in the tumour tissue by the EPR effect. We performed these experiments in a bacterial strain with a mutated form of the msbB gene. The resulting under-acylation of lipid A substantially reduces the endotoxic activity of lipopolysaccharide, leading to weaker Toll-like receptor-dependent host immune reactions and increased in vivo safety16,17,30,47. The same strain has previously been used to develop OMVs for in vivo drug delivery applications16. Using less endotoxic bacterial strains is attractive for facilitating translational research on bacterially derived particles16,17. Furthermore, the produced melanin was non-toxic to the bacterial cells. The entire process of melanin encapsulation is a natural event, so it does not require any sophisticated synthesis skills, and OMVMel can easily be scaled up cost-effectively using well-established large-volume bacterial culture and purification techniques.

The absorption coefficient of OMVMel was found to be several-fold higher than that of tissue. As a result, OMVMel is expected to show strong optoacoustic signal. It appears that the proteolipid envelope of OMVs does not influence the absorption properties of encapsulated melanin biopolymers. In addition to NIR absorption, OMVMel show suitable properties for deep-tissue optoacoustic imaging and photothermal therapy. It offers a photothermal conversion efficiency of 18.6%, and it allows local heating in a time- and melanin-dependent manner. Within 2 min of NIR laser irradiation, the temperature of OMVMel suspensions increased beyond 45 °C, which is sufficient to kill cancer cells in vivo35,36,37,48. Since body temperature is around 37 °C, these results suggest that OMVMel that has accumulated into tumours can easily be heated above 45 °C upon NIR irradiation. When we irradiated OMVMel-treated 4T1 cancer cells in culture, massive cytotoxic effects were observed that were consistent with good photothermal conversion efficiency. Next, we demonstrated the efficacy of photothermal therapy in vivo. Maximal temperature on the tumour surface reached 56 and 47 °C after intratumoural or intravenous injection of OMVMel, compared to 39 °C in PBS-treated controls. Regardless of whether OMVMel was delivered intratumourally or intravenously, it triggered obvious necrosis after laser exposure, and the tumour was nearly completely destroyed in animals treated intratumourally. These findings demonstrate the potential of OMVMel as an effective nanoheater for diagnostic imaging and thermal therapy. Our in vivo photothermal therapy experiments were performed with continuous wave laser illumination. Our group previously demonstrated that photodynamic therapy can be performed with pulsed laser illumination29, and hence it should be possible to heat tumours with a nanosecond-pulsed laser illumination of MSOT as long as sufficient power can be delivered. In this case, MSOT could be used for image-guided therapy. Optoacoustic measurements can be used to estimate temperature distribution during photothermal therapy49, and hence an ideal theranostic system may combine phototherapy based on OMVMel with continuous monitoring of local temperature and OMVMel distribution using MSOT.

Due to its natural origin, OMVMel is a biocompatible and biodegradable agent that can be produced on a large scale in a cost-effective manner16,50,51,52. Here we explored its potential as a biologically derived theranostic agent. Our work has shown non-invasive monitoring of OMVMel using MSOT, and we demonstrated light-based heating with OMVMel in vitro and in tumour-bearing athymic nude mice. We used nude mice because their lack of pigmentation and skin hair facilitate optoacoustic analysis. However, this prevented us from determining whether OMVMel can stimulate immune responses against tumours. OMVs have been shown to induce the production of antitumour cytokines, including IFN-γ, in tumours of immunocompetent mice17. Repeated administration of OMVs can induce sustained production of IFN-γ in tumour tissue as well as long-term immune memory17. Further detailed work is needed to examine whether, as suggested for other OMVs17, our OMVMel can synergistically attack tumours by locally heating the tissue and triggering a long-term immune response to prevent cancer recurrence; indeed, hyperthermia can increase blood flow and immune cell infiltration.

OMVs carry several proteins and LPS on membrane surface, which might trigger systemic toxicity16,17,18,19,20. In order to address safety issues of OMVs, we carried out a separate study using immunocompetent mice. OMVWT induced substantially stronger Toll-like receptor responses than OMVΔmsbB and OMVMel based on serum cytokine assays (Supplementary Figure 2a), reflecting that the latter two OMV types were prepared from a low-endotoxicity E. coli that is generally well tolerated. The OMV platform appears less likely to induce chronic systemic toxicity or other side effects, based on reports of bioengineered OMVs that were repeatedly injected into a mouse cancer model16,17. An important question is what happens to OMVMel or melanin, which can function as a self-antigen. Studies with other OMVs suggest that they are degraded in late endosomes or lysosomes16,50,51, and that intracellular melanin is broken down by NADPH-dependent oxidoreductase53. The melanin in intact OMVMel may remain hidden from the immune system because it is embedded within the bacterial membrane. Future work should verify and extend our findings by checking for systemic toxicity or toxic effects in major organs upon repeated administration of modified OMVs in small and large animals. Also, potential synergies between photothermal therapy mediated by melanin and immune responses triggered by the OMVs themselves should be explored. Long-term stability of OMVMel upon standing should be evaluated, since this is important for clinical applications.

The efficacy of OMVMel as a specific anti-cancer therapy depends on its ability to target tumours, and here we demonstrate such an ability in vivo. Optoacoustic signal due to OMVMel was evident in tumours soon after intravenous injection, and this signal increased during 120 min, suggesting tumour accumulation via the EPR effect. At the same time, appreciable melanin signal from OMVMel was observed in a tumour-adjacent region just below the skin as well as in liver and kidney. This suggests that OMVMel can persist in other organs, and the implications of this for safety should be explored further. It may not necessarily have toxic effects, since photothermal therapy usually involves shining activating light only on the tumour. The present work focused on imaging biodistribution of OMVMel using MSOT. Future work should examine the fate of intact OMVMel and the released melanin in vivo in greater detail.

Contrast enhancement in optoacoustic imaging originally relied on metal particles, in particular gold nanoparticles54,55. Although such particles can be produced with desired physical dimensions (size and shape) in a highly controlled way, they present several disadvantages for human use. They are difficult to reproduce on large scale and are vulnerable to photobleaching, which gives rise to variable optoacoustic response, and they can persist for long periods in tissue, increasing the risk of toxic effects54,55. We and others have shown that the use of dye-based nanoparticles absorbing in the NIR, such as quenched hexacene dye nanoparticles (referred as QH2 particles), can be a potent alternative to NIR metal nanoparticles for strong optoacoustic signal generation56. Importantly, QH2 particles can quench unwanted fluorescence and offer greater photostability in the NIR region than metal compounds. We also developed polymethine dyes such as DY-635 and DY-780 conjugated to polymeric scaffolds, and we showed that they could be used for organ-selective elimination, optoacoustic imaging and drug delivery; in fact, DY-780 proved to be suitable for MSOT imaging57. The work herein takes the next step in generating bioengineered optoacoustic probes with the potential to seamlessly translate into clinical and commercial successes. Importantly, advances in biosynthesis and bioprocessing have provided scalable and robust platforms for manufacturing of such bioengineered theranostics to meet clinical needs.

MSOT operates in the NIR spectral region, where penetration of tissue to depths of several centimetres becomes possible because of low light attenuation, and laser exposure of the sample remains within the ANSI (American National Standards Institute) biosafety limits58. High molecular detection specificity is achieved by resolving (unmixing) multiple spectral signatures in tissues22. Clinical translation of MSOT is limited due to the lack of imaging probes that are biocompatible and scalable. Bioengineered OMVs or similar cell membrane-derived particles exhibit improved theranostic efficacy as well as reduced toxicity16,17,19. Preclinical success of such biological nanoparticles for diagnostic or therapeutic applications can have paradigm-shifting effects on clinical or commercial translation of biological agents.

Here we acquired MSOT data with a transducer array having 256 channels covering a 270° field of view (in a two-dimensional plane). Light was delivered using a fibre bundle with six outputs, but high photothermal efficiency requires delivering light at a specific location of the body with a single output fibre. This can be achieved using handheld systems with single-point illumination or line illumination, but such systems feature limited detection angles, i.e., 145° in a two-dimensional set-up, and 90° in a three-dimensional set-up. As a result, quantification is challenging. Accurate quantification methods are being designed based on sparse recovery59, which may enable real-time three-dimensional theranostic applications of OMVMel.

We report a bacterial membrane-derived nanoparticle system for optoacoustic imaging. The entirely biological design of this system may effectively avoid the long-term toxicity issues associated with many synthetic agents that deposit in various tissues and exhibit poor clearance. The ability to produce OMVMel from bacteria means that the vesicles can be loaded with diverse genetically encoded agents suitable for optoacoustic imaging and image-guided therapy60. Potentially useful cargo proteins include fluorescent proteins, several optoacoustic-suitable chromoproteins and phytochromes61,62, anti-cancer toxins63 and peptides (e.g., aptides)64 or proteins (e.g., affibodies)14,16,65 that target specific tissues and therefore provide stronger therapeutic efficacy with weaker side effects. We anticipate that the OMVs presented in this work will be a starting point for future theranostic studies focused on simultaneous optoacoustic imaging and cancer therapeutics.


Plasmid construction, bacterial strain and growth

The melA gene of Rhizobium etli encoding tyrosinase (kindly provided by Professor Guillermo Gosset, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico)32 was cloned into pGEX-4T-1 (GE Healthcare, Freiburg, Germany). The construct pGEX-4T-1-melA was transformed into msbB mutant W3110-K12 E. coli (kindly provided by Professor Sangyong Jon, KAIST, South Korea)16. Bacteria were cultured in 1.5-L flasks at 30 °C and 180 rpm for 5 days. Tyrosinase production was induced at OD 0.6 using isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at a final concentration of 0.5 mM. To support melanin production the media were supplemented with 94.5 mg CuSO4 as well as 1 g l-tyrosine. OMVMel were produced in msbB mutant W3110-K12 E. coli transformed with pGEX-4T-1-melA plasmid. OMVWT were produced from untransformed msbB mutant W3110-K12 E. coli.

OMV purification and characterisation

Based on our previous work16, OMVs were produced as follows. E. coli were cultured as described above. Next, bacterial cells were removed by centrifugation at 7500 × g for 45 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant was filtered by passing through a 0.45-µm membrane filter (Nalgene, Thermo Scientific), and concentrated to 100 mL using 100-K ultrafiltration membrane. The concentrate was further precipitated using ammonium sulphate (at final concentration, 400 g L−1) at 4 °C overnight. Crude OMVs were obtained by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 45 min, the resulting pellet was resuspended in 1 mL PBS and was layered over a sucrose gradient (1 mL each of 2.5, 1.6 and 0.6 M sucrose) and separated from free melanin by ultracentrifugation at 150,000 × g for 3–5 h at 4 °C. The collected OMV fractions were washed with PBS with centrifugation at 150,000 × g for 1–2 h at 4 °C, resuspended in 1 mL PBS containing 15% glycerol, filtered through 0.45-µm cellulose acetate filters and stored at −20 °C until use. In the case of OMVWT, total protein concentration was estimated using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay (Thermo Scientific), and this was defined to be the OMVWT concentration. Since black colour prevents protein estimation with the BCA assay, we had to develop an alternative procedure to determine OMVMel concentration. Concentrations of OMVMel solutions were estimated based on the size of the pellet relative to the pellet obtained from OMVWT solutions (by ultracentrifugation) of known concentration. We verified the accuracy of this approach by comparing intensities of major protein bands obtained after fractionating OMVWT and OMVMel on sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. OMV samples were characterised with respect to size and morphology using an electrophoretic light-scattering apparatus (Malvern Zetasizer) and transmission electron microscope (Zeiss Libra 120 Plus, Carl Zeiss NTS GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany).

Cell culture and in vivo tumour experiments

4T1 mammary gland carcinoma (CRL-2539, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) was cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum and antibiotics. Cells were incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Animal procedures were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Handling Office of Helmholtz Zentrum München and by the Government of Upper Bavaria. Sample sizes were chosen based on guidance from the literature. Investigators were not blinded to the identity of groups. Female athymic Fox-N-1 nude mice 6 weeks old (Envigo, Germany) were implanted subcutaneously with 4T1 murine breast cancer cells (0.8 × 106 cells per animal). Tumour volume, calculated as (width)2 × (length)× 1/ 2, and relative tumour volume, calculated as V/V0 (where V0 was the tumour volume when the treatment was initiated), was monitored at regular intervals and was expressed as group mean ± standard deviation (SD). Tumour growth inhibition (TGI) was determined on the final day as % TGI: \(100\% \times \left( {T_{\mathrm {vol}}^{\mathrm {PBS}} - T_{\mathrm {vol}}^{\mathrm {OMV}}} \right) \times (T_{\mathrm {vol}}^{\mathrm {PBS}})^ {-1}\), where Tvol is final tumour volume − initial tumour volume.

MSOT set-up and data acquisition

Phantom and mice data were acquired using a commercially available MSOT scanner (MSOT256-TF, iThera Medical GmbH, Munich, Germany)66. Nanosecond-pulsed light was generated from a tuneable optical parametric oscillator (OPO) laser and delivered to the sample through a ring-type fibre bundle. The wavelength used for imaging was from 680 to 900 nm with a step size of 10 nm and 10 averages. Light is absorbed by the sample and generates an acoustic signal that propagates through the sample and is detected outside the sample. In our experiments, acoustic signals were detected as time-series pressure readouts at 2030 discrete time points at 40 Mega samples per second using a cylindrically focused, 256-element transducer. The transducer array had a central frequency of 5 MHz (−6 dB was approximately 90%) with a radius of curvature of 40 mm and an angular coverage of 270°.

Acoustic data were measured using a transducer array with 256 elements and 270° coverage at multiple laser wavelengths. The acquired acoustic data were filtered using a Chebyshev filter with cut-off frequencies of 0.1–7 MHz. Optoacoustic images were reconstructed using a Tikhonov regularisation-based scheme using filtered optoacoustic data; the regularisation parameter was chosen automatically using L-curve methods67. The Tikhonov method was implemented using the least-squares QR method to reconstruct an image at each wavelength59. These spectral optoacoustic images were used to unmix melanin chromophores through a linear unmixing method that assumed that fluence did not influence unmixing. Melanin quantification was then performed on the unmixed melanin image from the tumour region by plotting mean intensity from a defined region of interest (corresponding to a similar tissue area in all animals) over time. Differences in mean melanin levels were considered significant if p < 0.01. Advanced unmixing methods are being developed to quantify biomolecules68, but these methods have been extensively validated only for oxy- and deoxyhaemoglobin. Efforts are underway to extend these methods to other biomolecules such as melanin and lipids.

MSOT imaging of phantoms

A cylindrical agar phantom69 was prepared with two cylindrical holes, one for OMVWT and another for OMVMel. The cylindrical phantom contained 1.3% (w/w) agar (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to provide solidity and 6% (v/v) intralipid emulsion (20%, Sigma-Aldrich) for light diffusion to enable uniform illumination of the holes. The added intralipid gives a reduced scattering coefficient of 10 cm−1, mimicking scattering in tissue33. The two cylindrical holes were 3 mm in diameter. MSOT data were acquired as described above to allow transversal plane imaging at a single position, located approximately in the middle of the phantom.

Measurement of photothermal activity

Photothermal activity was measured by placing PBS or OMVWT (150 μg mL−1) or OMVMel solution (75, 150 or 300 μg mL−1 equivalent concentration) in a quartz cuvette, and then exposing solutions to an NIR light source at 750 nm (Tunable Optical Parametric Oscillator Laser, InnoLas Laser, Krailling, Germany) while monitoring temperature changes with a digital thermometer for up to 10 min. Concentration-response experiments were performed at a fixed laser power (650 mW cm−2) and compared with PBS as a control.

Cytotoxicity study

Fluorescence-based live/dead cell assays were carried out using the molecular probes calcein-acetoxymethyl (AM) and ethidium homodimer-1 (Invitrogen). Briefly, cells were seeded into 96-well plates and incubated with or without OMVWT or OMVMel for 6 h. After the media were replaced with fresh media, cells were exposed to nanosecond-pulsed laser treatment (730–830 nm, 650 mW cm−2) for 6 min and then stained with calcein-AM and ethidium homodimer-1 following the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were examined under a fluorescence microscope to determine numbers of live and dead cells (Thermo Scientific).

MSOT imaging of mice and estimation of melanin

Animal procedures were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Handling Office of Helmholtz Zentrum München and by the Government of Upper Bavaria. To examine in vivo cancer targeting, mice bearing 4T1 tumours (~150 mm3) were given a single injection of either PBS, OMVWT (~150 µg) or an equivalent amount of OMVMel via the tail vein (n = 4 for OMV treatment and n = 3 for PBS treatment). An additional mouse was scanned to monitor distribution of OMVMel in tumour, liver and kidney from 0 to 120 min after intravenous injection of OMVMel (mouse was killed immediately after imaging). Mice were anaesthetised with 1.8% isoflurane in oxygen, which was delivered throughout MSOT data acquisition. Ultrasound gel was applied to the mice before acquisition to enable coupling between the tissue and water medium. Tissue homing and retention were monitored at 3 h and 24 h post injection with MSOT. In a separate experiment, OMVMel (~75 µg) was injected via the tail vein, and then the tumour and nearby region (just below the skin) were monitored with MSOT continuously for 120 min without moving the mouse (mouse was killed immediately after imaging). Melanin intensities are averages calculated from 6 adjacent slices from the tumour centre. Sample sizes for animal studies were chosen based on institutional recommendations with guidance from the literature. Investigators were not blinded to animal group allocations.

In vivo photothermal therapy

Tumour volume and body weight were recorded at regular intervals. Once the tumour volume reached approximately 100 mm3, mice were divided into eight groups (n = 4 mice/group). The groups were treated with PBS intravenously, with or without laser treatment; with OMVWT or OMVMel (each ~75 µg) intravenously, with or without laser treatment; and with OMVWT or OMVMel intratumourally, with laser treatment. At 3 h after injection, tumours were irradiated with a continuous wave laser (1.5 W cm−2, 800 nm) for 6 min. Temperature at tumour sites was recorded immediately before and after laser irradiation using an IR thermal camera (FLIR i60). Investigators were not blinded to the identity of groups.

In vivo safety and immune responses

The safety and immune responses to OMVs were assessed in female C57BL/6 mice 6 weeks old. Animals were divided into four groups (n = 5 mice/group): (1) vehicle control (PBS), (2) OMVWT, (3) OMVΔmsbB and (4) OMVMel. OMVs were administered intravenously, then blood was collected via cardiac puncture (under surgical anaesthesia) at 2 and 24 h. Levels of the TNF-α, IL-6 and IFN-γ in serum were quantified at 450 nm using commercial ELISA kits (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Vital organs including heart, liver, spleen and kidney were extracted, fixed and frozen in OCT embedding gel. Tissue blocks were sectioned to 10 µm, and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Images were obtained by light microscopy (Carl Zeiss). Investigators were not blinded to the identity of the groups.


Sample sizes were chosen based on guidance from the literature. Animals of the same gender, age and genetic background were randomised for grouping. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 18.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Inter-group differences were assessed for significance using the paired t-test. Results were expressed as mean ± SD, and differences were considered significant if p < 0.01.

Data availability

All data presented in the paper are available from the authors upon reasonable request.


  1. Shanmugam, V., Selvakumar, S. & Yeh, C. S. Near-infrared light-responsive nanomaterials in cancer therapeutics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 6254–6287 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xie, J., Lee, S. & Chen, X. Nanoparticle-based theranostic agents. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 62, 1064–1079 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Michalet, X. et al. Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics. Science 307, 538–544 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nam, J. et al. Chemo-photothermal therapy combination elicits anti-tumor immunity against advanced metastatic cancer. Nat. Commun. 9, 1074 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mukherjee, S. et al. Potential theranostics application of bio-synthesized silver nanoparticles (4-in-1 system). Theranostics 4, 316–335 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tian, Q. et al. Hydrophilic flower-like CuS superstructures as an efficient 980 nm laser-driven photothermal agent for ablation of cancer cells. Adv. Mater. 23, 3542–3547 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zha, Z. B., Yue, X. L., Ren, Q. S. & Dai, Z. F. Uniform polypyrrole nanoparticles with high photothermal conversion efficiency for photothermal ablation of cancer cells. Adv. Mater. 25, 777–782 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Miao, W. et al. Photo-decomposable organic nanoparticles for combined tumor optical imaging and multiple phototherapies. Theranostics 6, 2367–2379 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Peer, D. et al. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 751–760 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Desai, N. Challenges in development of nanoparticle-based therapeutics. AAPS J. 14, 282–295 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoo, J. W., Irvine, D. J., Discher, D. E. & Mitragotri, S. Bio-inspired, bioengineered and biomimetic drug delivery carriers. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 10, 521–535 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alvarez-Erviti, L. et al. Delivery of siRNA to the mouse brain by systemic injection of targeted exosomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 341–345 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu, C. M. J. Erythrocyte membrane-camouflaged polymeric nanoparticles as a biomimetic delivery platform. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10980–10985 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gujrati, V. et al. Bioengineered yeast-derived vacuoles with enhanced tissue-penetrating ability for targeted cancer therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 710–715 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. MacDiarmid, J. A. et al. Bacterially derived 400 nm particles for encapsulation and cancer cell targeting of chemotherapeutics. Cancer Cell 11, 431–445 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gujrati, V. et al. Bioengineered bacterial outer membrane vesicles as cell-specific drug-delivery vehicles for cancer therapy. ACS Nano 8, 1525–1537 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, O. Y. et al. Bacterial outer membrane vesicles suppress tumor by interferon-gamma-mediated antitumor response. Nat. Commun. 8, 626 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gerritzen, M. J. H., Martens, D. E., Wijffels, R. H., van der Pol, L. & Stork, M. Bioengineering bacterial outer membrane vesicles as vaccine platform. Biotechnol. Adv. 35, 565–574 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, Q., Rozovsky, S. & Chen, W. Engineering multi-functional bacterial outer membrane vesicles as modular nanodevices for biosensing and bioimaging. Chem. Commun. (Camb.). 53, 7569–7572 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Acevedo, R. et al. Bacterial outer membrane vesicles and vaccine applications. Front. Immunol. 5, 121 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ntziachristos, V. & Razansky, D. Molecular imaging by means of multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT). Chem. Rev. 110, 2783–2794 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ntziachristos, V. Going deeper than microscopy: the optical imaging frontier in biology. Nat. Methods 7, 603–614 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tomaszewski, M. R. et al. Oxygen enhanced optoacoustic tomography (OE-OT) reveals vascular dynamics in murine models of prostate cancer. Theranostics 7, 2900–2913 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McNally, L. R. et al. Current and emerging clinical applications of multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) in oncology. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 3432–3439 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Simon, J. D. Spectroscopic and dynamic studies of the epidermal chromophores trans-urocanic acid and eumelanin. ACC Chem. Res. 33, 307–313 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stritzker, J. et al. Vaccinia virus-mediated melanin production allows MR and optoacoustic deep tissue imaging and laser-induced thermotherapy of cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3316–3320 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fan, Q. et al. Transferring biomarker into molecular probe: melanin nanoparticle as a naturally active platform for multimodality imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 15185–15194 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu, Y. et al. Dopamine-melanin colloidal nanospheres: an efficient near-infrared photothermal therapeutic agent for in vivo cancer therapy. Adv. Mater. 25, 1353–1359 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Neuschmelting, V. et al. WST11 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy effect monitoring by multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) in mice. Theranostics 8, 723–734 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim, S. H. et al. Structural modifications of outer membrane vesicles to reine them as vaccine delivery vehicles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1788, 2150–2159 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Somerville, J. E. Jr., Cassiano, L. & Darveau, R. P. Escherichia coli msbB gene as a virulence factor and a therapeutic target. Infect. Immun. 67, 6583–6590 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Cabrera-Valladares, N. et al. Expression of the melA gene from Rhizobium etli CFN42 in Escherichia coli and characterization of the encoded tyrosinase. Enzym. Microb. Tech. 38, 772–779 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jacques, S. L. Optical properties of biological tissues: a review (vol 58, pg R37, 2013). Phys. Med. Biol. 58, 5007–5008 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim, M. et al. Thermohydrogel containing melanin for photothermal cancer therapy. Macromol. Biosci. 17, 1–6 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hildebrandt, B. et al. The cellular and molecular basis of hyperthermia. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 43, 33–56 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Falk, M. H. & Issels, R. D. Hyperthermia in oncology. Int. J. Hyperth. 17, 1–18 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dewey, W. C. Arrhenius relationships from the molecule and cell to the clinic. Int. J. Hyperth. 25, 3–20 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rai, P. et al. Development and applications of photo-triggered theranostic agents. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 62, 1094–1124 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zou, L. et al. Current approaches of photothermal therapy in treating cancer metastasis with nanotherapeutics. Theranostics 6, 762–772 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Acedo, P., Stockert, J. C., Canete, M. & Villanueva, A. Two combined photosensitizers: a goal for more effective photodynamic therapy of cancer. Cell Death Dis. 5, e1122 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ma, X. P. et al. Assessment of asthmatic inflammation using hybrid fluorescence molecular tomography-x-ray computed tomography. J. Biomed. Opt. 21, 15009 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ma, X. et al. Integrin-targeted hybrid fluorescence molecular tomography/X-ray computed tomography for imaging tumor progression and early response in non-small cell lung cancer. Neoplasia 19, 8–16 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Glinzer, A. et al. Targeting elastase for molecular imaging of early atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 37, 525–533 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, L. V. & Hu, S. Photoacoustic tomography: in vivo imaging from organelles to organs. Science 335, 1458–1462 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bonnington, K. E. & Kuehn, M. J. Protein selection and export via outer membrane vesicles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1843, 1612–1619 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jan, A. T. Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) of Gram-negative bacteria: a perspective update. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1053 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hajjar, A. M., Ernst, R. K., Tsai, J. H., Wilson, C. B. & Miller, S. I. Human Toll-like receptor 4 recognizes host-specific LPS modifications. Nat. Immunol. 3, 354–359 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Dewey, W. C. Arrhenius relationships from the molecule and cell to the clinic. Int. J. Hyperth. 10, 457–483 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Landa, F. J. O., Dean-Ben, X. L., Sroka, R. & Razansky, D. Volumetric optoacoustic temperature mapping in photothermal therapy. Sci. Rep. 7, 9695 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Amano, A., Takeuchi, H. & Furuta, N. Outer membrane vesicles function as offensive weapons in host-parasite interactions. Microbes Infect. 12, 791–798 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Furuta, N. et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles enter human epithelial cells via an endocytic pathway and are sorted to lysosomal compartments. Infect. Immun. 77, 4187–4196 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ninh, C., Cramer, M. & Bettinger, C. J. Photoresponsive hydrogel networks using melanin nanoparticle photothermal sensitizers. Biomater. Sci. 2, 766–774 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Borovansky, J. & Elleder, M. Melanosome degradation: fact or fiction. Pigment Cell Res. 16, 280–286 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Gujrati, V., Mishra, A. & Ntziachristos, V. Molecular imaging probes for multi-spectral optoacoustic tomography. Chem. Commun. (Camb.). 53, 4653–4672 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Nie, L. & Chen, X. Structural and functional photoacoustic molecular tomography aided by emerging contrast agents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 7132–7170 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Nunes, A. et al. Quenched hexacene optoacoustic nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. B 6, 44–55 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Press, A. T. et al. Cell type-specific delivery of short interfering RNAs by dye-functionalised theranostic nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 5, 5565 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. LIA. American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers. ANSI Z136.1 (Laser Institute of America, Orlando, Florida, 2014).

  59. Han, Y. et al. Three-dimensional optoacoustic reconstruction using fast sparse representation. Opt. Lett. 42, 979–982 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Liu, C. et al. Advances in imaging techniques and genetically encoded probes for photoacoustic imaging. Theranostics 6, 2414–2430 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Li, Y. et al. Engineering dark chromoprotein reporters for photoacoustic microscopy and FRET imaging. Sci. Rep. 6, 22129 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Mark, J. et al. Photoacoustic imaging of fluorophores using pump-probe excitation. Biomed. Opt. Express 6, 2522–2535 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Patyar, S. et al. Bacteria in cancer therapy: a novel experimental strategy. J. Biomed. Sci. 17, 21 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Kim, S. et al. Bio-inspired design and potential biomedical applications of a novel class of high-affinity peptides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 51, 1890–1894 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Orlova, A. et al. Tumor imaging using a picomolar affinity HER2 binding affibody molecule. Cancer Res. 66, 4339–4348 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Razansky, D., Buehler, A. & Ntziachristos, V. Volumetric real-time multispectral optoacoustic tomography of biomarkers. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1121–1129 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Shaw, C. B., Prakash, J., Pramanik, M. & Yalavarthy, P. K. Least squares QR-based decomposition provides an efficient way of computing optimal regularization parameter in photoacoustic tomography. J. Biomed. Opt. 18, 80501 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Tzoumas, S. et al. Eigenspectra optoacoustic tomography achieves quantitative blood oxygenation imaging deep in tissues. Nat. Commun. 7, 12121 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Beziere, N. et al. Dynamic imaging of PEGylated indocyanine green (ICG) liposomes within the tumor microenvironment using multi-spectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT). Biomaterials 37, 415–424 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 694968 (PREMSOT). The research leading to these results was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Germany (Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Prize 2013, NT 3/10–1) as well as by the DFG as part of the CRC 1123 (Z1). J.P. acknowledges support from the Alexander von Humboldt Postdoctoral Fellowship Program. We wish to thank Professor Guillermo Gosset (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México) for providing the plasmid encoding R. etli tyrosinase, Professor Sangyong Jon (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, South Korea) for providing msbB mutant W3110-K12 E. coli, Andreas Schroeppel and Dr. Otmar Schmid (Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich, Institute of Lung Biology and Disease, Helmholtz Zentrum München) for helping us perform particle size measurements in their laboratory, Dr. Juan Antonio Aguilar-Pimentel (German Mouse Clinic/Institute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München) for providing the IR thermal camera, and Kanuj Mishra, Nian Liu, Dr. Doris Bengel, Ruth Hillermann, Sarah Glasl and Pia Anzenhofer for assisting with experimental procedures. We also wish to thank Dr. A. Chapin Rodríguez for helpful suggestions on the manuscript.

Author information




V.G. conceived the OMVMel system and designed the study. V.G. and J.P. performed the experiments, J.P. processed the MSOT data and helped analyse the data. J.M.-N. assisted with in vivo experiments and MSOT data analysis. A.S. subcloned the melA gene and assisted with bacterial culture. U.K. assisted with in vivo experiments and animal maintenance. G.M. and V.G. performed transmission electron microscopy, which M.A. and A.W. supervised. V.N. provided significant intellectual input, helped interpret the results and supervised the research. All authors contributed to writing the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasilis Ntziachristos.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

V.N. is a shareholder in iThera Medical GmbH, Munich, Germany. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks Peter van der Ley and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gujrati, V., Prakash, J., Malekzadeh-Najafabadi, J. et al. Bioengineered bacterial vesicles as biological nano-heaters for optoacoustic imaging. Nat Commun 10, 1114 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing