Polymers that feature p-block elements other than carbon in the main chain are interesting materials due to their potential uses as elastomers, etch resists in lithography, polyelectrolytes, ceramic precursors and in optoelectronics1,2,3,4. Earlier syntheses of inorganic polymers were achieved by the use of polycondensation and ring-opening methods1,2,5. Access to stable yet reactive, polymerisable, multiply bonded p-block monomers required for addition polymerisation remains a major challenge in the synthesis of inorganic polymers6,7,8. More recently, metal-catalysed coupling routes have been developed for accessing a broad range of inorganic macromolecules and materials2,9,10,11,12,13,14. In this context catalytic dehydrocoupling between main-group substrates has been shown to be a versatile method for the general formation of E–E′ bonds, which can be also used to access polymers via catalytic dehydropolymerisation15,16,17,18,19,20.

Polyphosphinoboranes attracted initial interest in the 1950s as a result of their potential as flame-retardant materials with high thermal stability21,22,23. However, attempts to dehydrocouple phosphine-borane adducts under thermal conditions yielded either low molecular weight or poorly soluble materials, which lacked convincing structural characterisation by modern standards2,24,25. Since 1999 a rhodium-catalysed dehydrocoupling approach to prepare soluble, high-molecular-weight (P-monosubstituted)polyphosphinoboranes has been available26,27,28. Examples of iron and iridium-catalysed dehydrocouplings have also been reported as routes to high-molecular-weight poly(arylphosphinoboranes) (Fig. 1a)29,30. Notably, these transition metal-catalysed protocols all require forcing conditions (≥100 °C, ≥20 h) and their scope is currently limited to the dehydrocoupling of primary arylphosphine-boranes, RPH2·BH3 (R = aryl). More recently, from our collaboration with Scheer and co-workers31,32, a metal-free synthesis of polyphosphinoboranes through the thermolysis of amine-stabilised phosphinoboranes, RR′PBH2·NMe3, was reported to proceed under milder conditions 22–40 °C. This route successfully produced high-molecular-weight poly-tert-butylphosphinoborane, [tBuHPBH2]n, presumably via the monomeric phosphinoborane [tBuHPBH2]. However, the precursors are challenging to prepare and attempts to access the P-disubstituted poly(diphenylphosphinoborane), [Ph2PBH2]n, by the thermolysis of Ph2PBH2·NMe3, yielded only very-low-molecular-weight oligomers [Ph2PBH2]x (x ≤ 6) (Fig. 1b). The development of convenient and efficient dehydrocoupling of secondary phosphine-borane adducts to give the corresponding polymers therefore remains an open challenge. Herein, we demonstrate the successful use of the carbene centres of cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbenes (CAACs) to mediate this process.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Synthesis of polyphosphinoboranes. a, b Current methods of synthesis and c proposed CAAC-mediated dehydrogenation

CAACs are analogues of N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) with one of the electronegative amino substituents replaced by a strong σ-donating alkyl group, which simultaneously increases the nucleophilicity and electrophilicity at the divalent carbene carbon centre33,34,35,36. The resulting small HOMO–LUMO gap of CAACs has allowed E–H (E = H, N, Si, B, P, C, O) bond activation by formal oxidative addition to the carbene carbon centre for a variety of small molecules under mild conditions, with this process giving products featuring a H–C(sp3)–E moiety37,38,39,40,41,42. However, the strength of the resulting C(sp3)–H and C(sp3)–E σ−bonds disfavours further reactivity of the H–C(sp3)–E products, limiting the ability of CAACs to mimic transition metal centres in synthetic utility.

We envisioned that a CAAC-mediated dehydrogenation of primary and secondary phosphine-boranes, species that contain both protic P–H and hydridic B–H bonds, may be possible (Fig. 1c). Dehydrogenation of phosphine-boranes using this strategy leads to reactive phosphinoborane monomers, which, given appropriate substituents at the phosphorus and boron centres, gives soluble oligomeric and polymeric material.


Reactivity of carbenes with phosphine-boranes

The synthesis of monomeric aminoborane-NHC adducts (NHC-BH2NHR) has been reported both through the use of an NHC for ambient temperature dehydrogenation of amine-boranes (RNH2·BH3; R = H, Me)43 and NHC-induced depolymerisation of poly(N-methylaminoborane)44. More recently, analogous species featuring the use of NHCs to stabilise phosphinoborane monomers have been isolated using NHC-induced thermal depolymerisation of polyphosphinoboranes45. Consequently, prior to investigating the reactivity of phosphine-boranes with CAACs, we explored the dehydrogenation potential of NHCs.

Upon addition of one equivalent of IDipp to a solution of PhPH2·BH3 in tetrahydrofuran (THF), a homogeneous solution was formed after 10 min, and analysis of the reaction mixture by 31P and 11B nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy showed complete conversion to a new species (δP = −84.2ppm (br), δB = −33.4ppm (dq) in THF) (Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3). The similarity of these spectral features to those observed for Li[PhPHBH3] (δP = −93.8ppm (d), δB = −34.6ppm (dq) in THF)46, an analogous compound with a different cation, is consistent with deprotonation of PhPH2·BH3 by IDipp to yield the salt [IDippH][PhHPBH3] (1a) (Fig. 2a). The formation of this salt was further confirmed by an independent synthesis via a metathesis reaction in THF between [IDippH]Cl and Li[PhHPBH3]. This showed 11B and 31P NMR spectral features that matched those assigned to 1a along with precipitation of LiCl (Fig. 2b). The 13C NMR spectrum of 1a showed no 1JCP couplings involving the iminium carbon atom, which, together with the downfield chemical shift in the 1H NMR spectrum of the imidazolium proton (δH = 10.0ppm) (Supplementary Fig. 1), supports an ionic formulation for this species in solution. When Ph2PH·BH3 was reacted with IDipp, the analogous salt [IDippH][Ph2PBH3] (1b) was formed (Supplementary Figs. 46) and subsequently characterised using X-ray crystallography (Supplementary Fig. 7 and Supplementary Table 6).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Reactivity of IDipp and CAACMe with phosphine-boranes. a Synthesis of 1a and 1b by deprotonation of the phosphine-borane using IDipp; b synthesis of 1a and 1b using salt metathesis route; c synthesis of 3a through oxidative addition of PhPH2·BH3; d synthesis of 3a through stepwise reaction of PhPH2, then BH3·THF; and e synthesis of 3a through salt metathesis route

Next, we attempted the analogous reaction with a CAAC as the smaller HOMO–LUMO separation of CAACs renders them potentially better candidates for E–H bond activations. The P–H activation of PhPH2·BH3 by one equivalent of CAACMe (Fig. 2c) occurred readily at 22 °C in THF to give 3a, which exists as two diastereomers (3a′ and 3a″). The identity of 3a was initially established based on a distinctive doublet of quartet of doublets coupling pattern observed in the 1H NMR spectrum for the P–H protons (Supplementary Figs. 810). This assignment was further corroborated by an independent synthesis via a stepwise procedure involving oxidative addition of PhPH2 to the carbene centre in CAACMe to yield 2a (as a mixture of diastereomers each with indistinguishable enantiomers by NMR), followed by the addition of BH3·THF to give 3a (Fig. 2d). The two diastereomers of 3a were also formed immediately upon combining Li[PhHPBH3] and [CAACMeH]Cl through elimination of LiCl (Fig. 2e). In contrast to the results obtained in the reaction of [IDippH]Cl and Li[PhPHBH3] above (Fig. 2b), the lower steric hindrance and greater π-acidity36 of the cation [CAACMeH]+ leads to the formation of a molecular species with a distinct P–C bond, rather than the corresponding iminium salt [CAACMeH][PhPHBH3]. The molecular formulation of 3a is supported by the observation of both 1JCP (1JCP = 41.0 Hz (3a′), 1JCP = 38.3 Hz (3a″)) and 2JHP (2JHP = 4.2 Hz (3a′), 2JHP = 5.8 Hz (3a″)) coupling constants in the 13C and 1H NMR spectra.

Attempts to crystallographically characterise 3a were unsuccessful as solutions in THF (0.10 M) spontaneously decomposed to a mixture of poly(phenylphosphinoborane) [PhHPBH2]n and (CAACMe)H2 as shown by 1H, 11B and 31P NMR spectroscopy. Although only sensitive to low molar mass fractions47, electrospray ionisation-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) confirmed the formation of [PhHPBH2]n (up to n = 22) by identifying repeat units of ∆(m/z) = 122.05 (molecular weight of [PhHPBH2] = 122.05 g mol−1). Isolation of pure [PhHPBH2]n was achieved through precipitation of the reaction mixture into cold (−40 °C) hexanes to remove the hydrogenated carbene, (CAACMe)H2 (Supplementary Figs. 25 and 26), which was also characterised by X-ray crystallography (Supplementary Fig. 27 and Supplementary Table 6). In the present case, the eliminated phosphinoborane monomer [PhHPBH2] polymerises, presumably due to the small size of the substituents at P and B.

The influence of temperature, solvent and concentration upon the molar mass of the poly(phenylphosphinoborane) obtained was systematically investigated with a view of optimising the polymerisation conditions (Table 1; Supplementary Table 1; and Supplementary Figs. 1821, 23 and 24). In each case, ESI-MS and gel permeation chromatography (GPC) analyses were carried out (Supplementary Figs. 1117, 22 and 23). ESI-MS clearly confirmed the presence of the [PhHPBH2] monomeric repeat unit in each case and allowed us to detect the presence of either BH3 or PPhH2 end groups (Supplementary Fig. 22). However, due to only the low molar mass fraction being detected by the method, it is not possible to draw links between the reaction conditions and the degree of polymerisation using these data47. In contrast, GPC analysis permitted optimisation of the polymerisation conditions as this technique reveals the complete molar mass distribution (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1). Increasing the temperature (run 1 vs. 3, and 5 vs. 6) reduced the reaction time, but has no significant effect on the molar mass of the polymer obtained. Using a non-polar solvent (toluene) rather than THF (runs 3 vs. 5) also had no significant effect on the polymer molar mass. It was found that at higher concentrations (run 2 vs. 3 vs. 4), a larger quantity of polymeric relative to oligomeric material was formed (Supplementary Fig. 17). This observation is consistent with head-to-tail polymerisation of transiently generated phenylphosphinoborane, [PhHPBH2]. The reaction was also attempted under solvent-free, melt conditions at 110 °C (run 7), and, although high molar mass material was formed, the molar mass was no greater than that obtained using a concentrated solution at 60 °C. Due to concerns about the homogeneity of the reaction as a result of poor mixing, subsequent studies were performed in concentrated solutions rather than in the melt phase.

Table 1 Influence of temperature, solvent and concentration on the formation of poly(phenylphosphinoborane), [PhHPBH2]n, in a closed system

Mechanistic studies

A series of experimental and density functional theory (DFT) studies have been undertaken to probe the mechanism of the dehydrogenation of PhPH2·BH3 with CAACMe. Several mechanisms for the generation of monomeric [PhHPBH2] were considered and subsequently discounted, based on experimental and computational evidence (for a full discussion see ‘Proposed and subsequently discounted mechanisms for phosphine-borane dehydrogenation mediated by CAACMe’ in the Supplementary Information; Supplementary Figs. 32 and 33; and Supplementary Tables 3 and 5), before the final mechanism shown below was proposed and supported (Fig. 3). Attempts to trap the released monomer with either cyclohexene48 or 1,3-cyclohexadiene49 proved unsuccessful.

Fig. 3
figure 3

DFT study. Simplified schematic reaction profile calculated for the reaction of PhPH2·BH3 (A) with N-phenyl CAAC (B) at the PBE0/6-31 + G(d,p)/IEFPCM(THF) level of theory; Gibbs free energies for the second diastereomer are given in round brackets (for a comprehensive depiction of the reaction profile see Supplementary Fig. 31)

Kinetic studies were conducted to assess the proposed mechanisms (Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. 28). A plot of ln[3a] vs. reaction time showed equivalent half-lives of 1.5 h (Supplementary Fig. 29) for several initial concentrations between 0.3 and 0.7 M at 50 °C, indicating a first-order process in 3a. Monitoring the reaction at several temperatures between 22 and 60 °C allowed the enthalpy and entropy of activation to be calculated as 21.5 kcal mol−1 and −9.5 cal K−1 mol−1, respectively, consistent with a substantial energy barrier involving a relatively ordered transition state (Supplementary Fig. 30).

DFT calculations were carried out at the PBE0/6-31 + G(d,p)/IEFPCM(THF) level of theory50,51,52 with an N-phenyl model system for the CAACMe (B) to further elucidate the dehydrogenation mechanism (Fig. 3). An initial deprotonation of the P–H bond of PhPH2·BH3 (A) with B to give a [CAAC(H)]+ and [PhPH(BH3)] ion pair (Cpair) was the most favoured first reaction step with a low Gibbs free energy of activation of 4.9 kcal mol−1 (see ‘DFT calculations’ in the Supplementary Information). Subsequent nucleophilic attack at the iminium carbon of the [CAAC(H)]+ cation by the phosphorus centre of the [PhPH(BH3)] anion leads via TS4 to the SP,S (F) diastereomer of the P–H activation product, or via TS4′, to the other RP,S (F′) diastereomer. The calculation of the activation barrier for this step was hampered by the inherently flat progression of the potential energy hypersurface between TS4 or TS4′ and Cpair, which suggests, in agreement with the experimentally found rapid formation of 3a, that this step occurs with a very small activation barrier. F and F′ are kinetic products of the reaction. Significantly, this step is reversible via P–C dissociation, for which a maximum activation barrier of 18.7 kcal mol−1 was calculated from F to TS4. This opens up a second reaction pathway from Cpair leading to (CAAC)H2 (G) and [PhHPBH2] (H) via B–H hydride abstraction from the [PhPH(BH3)] anion by the π-acidic (CAAC-H)+ cation with a low activation barrier of 5.3 kcal mol−1 (via TS5). Thus, the formation of [PhHPBH2]n from 3a can be rationalised by the formation of transient [CAAC(H)]+ and [PhPH(BH3)] ions via consecutive P–C bond scission and B–H hydride abstraction leading to (CAACMe)H2 and [PhHPBH2], the latter undergoing head-to-tail polymerisation to thermodynamically favoured [PhHPBH2]n (Supplementary Fig. 31). For a discussion of the proposed polymerisation mechanism, see ‘Supplementary discussion of the polymerisation mechanism from phosphinoborane monomers’ in the Supplementary Information. The fact that the reaction between PhPH2·BH3 and IDipp stops at the [IDipp(H)]+ and [PhPH(BH3)] ions (Fig. 2a) can be traced back to the greater π-acidity of the [CAAC(H)]+ compared to the analogous [NHC(H)]+ cation, as suggested by the high exergonicity of the isodesmic reaction [CAAC(H)]+ + (NHC)H2 → [NHC(H)]+ + (CAAC)H2G0 = −66.8 kcal mol−1; N-phenyl model systems) (Supplementary Table 4).

According to the calculations, the dissociation of the P–H activation products F or F′ via the transition states TS4 or TS4′ requires the highest activation energy in the overall mechanism, which is in agreement with the first-order rate law found for 3a by the kinetic measurements. In addition, the calculated enthalpy of activation for this step (ΔH0 = 20.2 (TS4), 19.2 (TS4′) kcal mol−1) is in good agreement with the substantial experimentally derived enthalpy of activation for the overall reaction (ΔH0 = 21.5 kcal mol−1). The higher Gibbs free energy of activation required for the dissociation of the SP,S diastereomer FG0 = 18.7 kcal mol−1) compared to the RP,S diastereomer F′G0 = 16.6 kcal mol−1) accounts for the experimentally observed faster conversion of one diastereomer during the reaction. Moreover, the observed enhanced reaction rates in THF (see Supplementary Table 2) can be rationalised by the better stabilisation of the [CAAC(H)]+ and [PhPH(BH3)] ions in THF than in toluene, which is further corroborated by the calculations (Supplementary Fig. 31).

Substrate scope

Given the success with PhPH2·BH3, the scope of the CAACMe-mediated dehydropolymerisation was extended with the aim of targeting hitherto inaccessible high molar mass P-disubstituted polyphosphinoboranes. CAACMe(H)Ph2PBH3 (3b) was synthesised from Ph2PH·BH3 and CAACMe in THF (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Figs. 34 and 35). Formation of 3b was also detected immediately upon combining Li[Ph2PBH3] and [CAACMeH]Cl, and also through the stepwise addition of Ph2PH followed by BH3·THF to a solution of CAACMe.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Reactions of Ph2PH·BH3 and rac-Ph(Et)PH·BH3 with CAACMe and CAACCy. a CAACMe-mediated dehydrocoupling of Ph2PH·BH3; b CAACCy-mediated dehydrocoupling of Ph2PH·BH3; c CAACMe-mediated dehydrocoupling of rac-Ph(Et)PH·BH3; d CAACCy-mediated dehydrocoupling of rac-Ph(Et)PH·BH3; and e thermal ellipsoid plot of 3c. H atoms other than those bound to C9 and B1 have been omitted for clarity. Ellipsoids are shown at the 30% probability level

Heating a concentrated solution of 3b (2.5 M, 60 °C, 1 h, THF or toluene) effected complete conversion to (CAACMe)H2, the linear dimer Ph2PHBH2PPh2BH3, cyclic oligomers [Ph2PBH2]x (x = 3, 4), and the polymer [Ph2PBH2]n as observed by 1H and 31P NMR (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 40a)53. Removal of (CAACMe)H2 and cyclic oligomers was achieved by precipitation into hexanes, but attempts to separate Ph2PHBH2PPh2BH3 and [Ph2PBH2]n proved unsuccessful (for details see ‘Dehydropolymerisation of Ph2PH·BH3’ in the Supplementary Information). ESI-MS analysis of the product after precipitation nevertheless confirmed the presence of the repeat unit ∆(m/z) = 198.08 (molecular weight of [Ph2PBH2] = 198.08 g mol−1, maximum value of n = 10) (Supplementary Fig. 36). However, GPC analysis showed only a very small amount of high molar mass material. Interestingly, when toluene, rather than THF, is used as the solvent, a much smaller quantity of linear dimer is formed (Supplementary Figs. 37 and 40b). Under these conditions, GPC analysis on the precipitated material showed a majority of low molar mass material (Mn = ca. 1,300; polydispersity index (PDI)  = 1.31) and a small amount (ca. 10%) of high molar mass material (Mn = 54,300; PDI = 1.12) (Supplementary Fig. 38).

With the aim of increasing the yield and amount of high molar mass material, we investigated the use of the more reactive CAACCy, exemplified by its ability to activate dihydrogen under mild conditions37. The initially formed P–H activation compound is consumed within 1 h at 22 °C (Fig. 4b). However, GPC analysis again showed only a small amount (ca. 12%) of high molar mass material (Mn = 59,600; PDI = 1.08) with the majority being low molar mass material (Mn = ca. 1100; PDI = 1.28) (Supplementary Figs. 39, 40c and 4145).

In an attempt to further extend the scope of the dehydropolymerisation to other P-disubstituted phosphine-boranes the reactivity of rac-Ph(Et)PH·BH3 with CAACMe and CAACCy was investigated. CAACMe(H)PhEtPBH3 (3c) was formed through direct reaction of CAACMe with rac-PhEtPH·BH3 (Supplementary Figs. 4650). Unlike with the mono- and di-phenyl derivatives, 3c is stable at 22 °C, which allowed the structure to be confirmed by X-ray diffraction (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Table 6). Upon heating isolated 3c to 100 °C, the targeted dehydropolymerisation occurred to give [PhEtPBH2]n and (CAACMe)H2 (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 51). Pure [PhEtPBH2]n was obtained in 23% yield as a fine white powder following precipitation. ESI-MS analysis of the precipitated sample confirmed the presence of the repeat unit of [PhEtPBH2]n (∆(m/z) = 150.08, molar mass of [PhEtPBH2] = 150.08 g mol−1) and n = 33 (Supplementary Fig. 52); however, there was no convincing high molar mass material observed using GPC. In the analogous reaction using CAACCy, the yield was also low (19%); however, a GPC peak corresponding to high molar mass material (Mn = 62,600, PDI = 1.19, n = ca. 400) was observed (Supplementary Figs. 5358). Again this was only a small amount (ca. 18 %) compared to the low molar mass fraction (Mn = ca. 1900; PDI = 1.47, n = ca. 13). Upon closer analysis of the ESI-MS spectra for each synthesis of [Ph2PBH2]n and [PhEtBH2]n, the end group of the major distribution was detected as being either CAACMe or CAACCy (Supplementary Figs. 36, 37, 44, 52 and 56). These results suggest that trace amounts of CAACs may react with the polymer chain at some point during the polymerisation (for further discussion see ‘Supplementary discussion of the polymerisation mechanism from phosphinoborane monomers’ in the Supplementary Information).

When the reactivity of CAACMe with bulkier P-disubstituted phosphine-borane substrates (R = R′ = tBu or R = R′ = Mes) was explored, an enlightening divergence in reactivity was noted. For full conversion of these substrates, two equivalents of CAACMe are required. In situ 1H NMR reveals that an equimolar mixture of (CAACMe)H2 and the new species 4a/4b are formed (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Figs. 5968).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Synthesis and structure of cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbene-phosphinoborane adducts 4a and 4b. a Synthesis of 4a and 4b; b thermal ellipsoid plot of 4a; and c thermal ellipsoid plot of 4b. For both 4a and 4b ellipsoids are shown at the 30% probability level, and H atoms other than those at the B1 centre have been omitted for clarity

The structures of 4a and 4b were confirmed by X-ray crystallography revealing that in both compounds the CAACMe C-donor was bound to the boron of the phosphinoborane moiety (Fig. 5b, c and Supplementary Table 7). Interestingly, species 4a and 4b are analogous to the previously mentioned NHC–phosphinoborane adducts that have been recently reported45.

The reactivity with the bulky, P-disubstituted phosphine-boranes contrasts with that observed with PhPH2·BH3, Ph2PH·BH3 and PhEtPH·BH3 as an initial P–H oxidative-addition product analogous to compounds 3a–c is not observed. The monomeric phosphinoborane generated upon dehydrogenation does not undergo head-to-tail polymerisation, instead it is trapped by a second equivalent of carbene. The absence of an observable P–H activation compound can be explained by the greater steric bulk around the phosphorus centre. The trapping, however, provides further evidence for the release of monomeric phosphinoboranes in the proposed polymerisation mechanism. It is noteworthy that when Ph2PH·BH3 is reacted with two equivalents of CAACMe clean conversion to the species analogous to 4a and 4b is not observed; however, peaks for the short-chain oligomers CAAC(BH2PPh2)x (x = 1–4) have been identified using ESI-MS (Supplementary Fig. 69).


In summary, we have shown that cyclic alkyl(amino)carbenes can be used as stoichiometric reagents to effect P–H/B–H dehydrogenative coupling of primary and secondary phosphine-boranes. These results illustrate the complementarity between organic and transition metal ambiphiles in the context of the main-group redox transformations, and hint at a potentially broad utility for CAACs in accessing new inorganic polymers and materials. The carbene centre in CAACMe inserts into the P–H bond of phosphine-boranes, RR′PH·BH3 (R = Ph; R′ = H, Ph, or Et), to give derivatives of CAACMe(H)PRR′BH3 (3a–c) which undergo thermolysis to give the hydrogenated carbene (CAACMe)H2 and polymers [RR′PBH2]n. Most remarkable is that in the case of Ph2PH·BH3 with CAACCy the dehydropolymerisation proceeds within 1 h at 22 °C. In contrast, with respect to the reactivity of sterically encumbered P-disubstituted phosphine-boranes (R = R′ = tBu or Mes) with CAACMe, it is noteworthy that polymers are not generated post H2 transfer. Instead, the transient phosphinoboranes were trapped by a second equivalent of carbene to yield CAACMe–phosphinoborane adducts, 4a and 4b. The novel dehydropolymerisation using CAACs has been used to prepare samples of P-disubstituted polyphosphinoboranes, [Ph2PBH2]n and [PhEtPBH2]n, which cannot be accessed via previous transition metal-catalysed or stoichiometric routes, and contain high molar mass fractions. The development of catalytic rather than stoichiometric reactions involving main-group species is a rapidly developing field54,55. The reactions of phosphine-boranes with species that undergo E–H bond activation, for example, stannylenes56 and frustrated Lewis pairs that reversibly bind H257,58, are under current investigation. Future studies will target the generation of a well-defined propagating site, which should allow access to predominantly linear polymers, molar mass control and potentially block copolymers. A more atom-economic catalytic synthesis would also allow a more facile scale-up and thereby the properties of the new materials to be investigated in detail.


Detailed procedure for polymerisation of PhPH2 ·BH3 using CAACMe (run 4)

PhPH2·BH3 (156 mg, 1.26 mmol) and CAACMe (360 mg, 1.26 mmol) were dissolved in THF (1 mL) in a J. Young Schlenk tube, sealed and the reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 3 h. The reaction mixture was added dropwise into 20 mL of rapidly stirred cold hexanes at −40 °C, yielding a precipitate, and the supernatant was decanted. The precipitation was repeated twice more prior to drying in vacuo to leave a white powder of the [PhHPBH2]n polymer product. Yield (precipitated material) = 42 mg (27%). GPC (2 mg mL−1): Mn = 83,800 Da; PDI = 1.17. Full experimental details for all polymerisations can be found in the Supplementary Methods.